Episode 5113: The Beginning Of The End Of Western Civilization; Aluminum Adjuvants, Autoimmunity, and Autism Spectrum Disorders
Stay ahead of the censors - Join us warroom.org/join
Aired On: 2/2/2026
Watch:
On X: @Bannons_WarRoom (https://x.com/Bannons_WarRoom)
On the Web: https://www.warroom.org
On Gettr: @WarRoom
On Podcast: Apple, iHeart Radio, Google
On TV: PlutoTV Channel 240, Dish Channel 219, Roku, Apple TV, FireTV or on https://AmericasVoice.news. #news #politics #realnews
Times reports that the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, met with federal agents the day after the FBI raid on a Georgia election center.
According to three people with knowledge of the meeting, at one point, Gabbard pulled out her cell phone and called President Trump, which is totally not normal.
She put the president on speakerphone, and then he proceeded to ask the FBI agents questions before praising them for their work on the investigation in Fulton County.
Because the FBI is supposed to be independent from the White House, Katie.
And it would be one thing if the president was calling some FBI agents who had just participated in a dangerous operation to grab a fugitive overseas.
This is an investigation that goes directly to Donald Trump's political agenda and to the conspiracy theories that he's been spinning about the 2020 election.
And we don't know the extent to which we don't know the evidence that they have that allowed a federal magistrate judge to approve that search warrant.
But we do know that Donald Trump is trying to suggest that this evidence bolsters some of the wackadoodle conspiracy theories that he's been spinning for a long time about Italian satellites and voting machines that flip votes in Georgia and all kinds of things that have been totally debunked.
And I can tell you, look, I haven't confirmed this to the satisfaction of MS Now, but I caught wind of this story and I have no reason to doubt any of the details that have been reported.
And my understanding is the agents were very, very disturbed and concerned by the whole appearance and the whole way that this played out, because to have Donald Trump with an interest in the outcome of this investigation, getting on the phone and talking to them, it's just not how things are done.
What he talked about after the 2020 election when he lost but refused to admit it, right?
Mike Flynn, we talked about him just a minute ago, came to the Oval Office along with Sidney Powell and a couple others, and they urged him to use the military to seize the voting machines.
Okay, he didn't do that at the time.
But just the other day, when he talked to my colleagues from the New York Times, he actually expressed some regret that he didn't.
He said he should have used the military to seize voting machines in 2020.
So the election, the lesson that he's taken from that election is not to keep your hands off an election, but in fact, to do more to try to control it.
And he's talking about taking over 15 states.
He's not talking about taking over states that gave him the vote.
He's talking about taking over blue states so that they can't give votes to Democrats running against him or his chosen successor.
And I think that's going to send a real alarm signal through a lot of Democratic precincts right now.
You have some brandy reporting about Ed Martin, the Justice Department lawyer, who's been the leading advocate for a lot of the investigations that Donald Trump wants into his political adversaries.
Ed Martin, a polarizing figure, even by the standards of the second Trump administration, remember, Stop the Steel co-founder, defended January 6th defendants, and has been a leading advocate for these investigations that target Donald Trump's political adversaries.
He, as we understand it, we've been told by three people, he's been sidelined from his role as heading the so-called weaponization working group, in part over his feud, long-standing feud with Todd Blanche, the Deputy Attorney General, who is said to just loathe, absolutely despise Ed Martin.
And so Ed Martin remains the pardon attorney.
That's another one of his jobs.
And the Justice Department spokesperson told us in a statement, hey, Ed has been appointed pardon attorney and he's been doing a great job at that.
He did not address what we understand to be the sidelining of Ed Martin from, I think, the role he cares more about, which is the weaponization working group role.
But that's our understanding.
He is not exercising that role right now.
He's at a different office, not at Maine Justice, working on pardons, which in and of itself is a very controversial part of the Trump administration.
But in terms of his efforts to go after people like James Comey and Letitia James, he's not involved in that anymore as we understand it.
unidentified
Go after the ones who are killing the people.
Put this regime on notice.
We're never going to let up.
Strangle their economy.
It will fall.
The people will take over.
And over time, we will have a friend in Iran, not an enemy.
Welcome to the Welcome to the Afternoon, late afternoon, early evening edition of the War Room.
We will have War Room Texas right after this hour as we talk at Warroom Texas about what happened over the weekend on this election in Senate District 9 as we get ready for this run-up to the three March primary.
I want to talk about Tulsi Gabbard, Ed Martin, Laura Loomer.
Let's start with Tulsi Gabbard.
I asked Kurt Mills to join us.
Kurt, today, President Trump's announced, Witkoff's announced, I think he's flying over to the Middle East to do a wellness check on Netanyahu.
But there's a beginning of talks.
I think it may take place in Turkey.
Erdogan may have some role here as a mediator, but it looks like we're on talks, although we've got assets in place in theater, including a carrier strike group, I guess, in the North Arabian Sea, or the Lincoln strike group has been kind of in and out, but we have enough assets there.
And of course, this all gets back to the intelligence, what the president's being told.
But it looks like the president is taking the route of continued economic warfare.
He announced a deal for China to buy oil from Venezuela.
He had cut their oil off first, but he mentioned that they wouldn't be buying it from the Ayatollah, the Mulas anymore.
He's got a deal with Modi.
Dr. Thayer is going to join us momentarily.
He says he's got a trade deal today.
Part of it's to get the Russian, not buying Russian oil.
Walk me through, first off, where do you stay in this Iran situation?
Tulsi Gabrier has been such a big part of DNI of really giving us a balance of intelligence.
And of course, Mark Levin, which I think is fine.
Mark Levin, I think, took the first 18 minutes of his show last night to make the case for why you go Kinetic right now for regime change in Iran.
Yeah, it looks as if it's a real 11th hour night fight on the Iran file.
End of last week, end of January, it seemed as if it was all systems go for a imminent strike by the United States on the Iranians.
Over the weekend, the situation changed.
The Iranians came back to the table, I would say, on two tracks.
One, the Russian track, which I think in some ways might be the more important one.
And then secondly, what is also known as the Istanbul track.
And there was discussions in both capitals about how to avoid a war.
And it appears as we're heading into Friday that number one, the entire region's getting involved, including Turkey, including Saudi Arabia, including others, including Qatar.
And additionally, Trump is not only sending Wickoff, but he's also sending Jared Kushner, his son-in-law.
So it seems as if it's all of the heavies to get a last-minute negotiation.
Per multiple reports, the Iranians have offered to move more nuclear material out of the country, which would seemingly be a concession that the U.S. strikes last June did not get all the nuclear material.
And then it's very possible that they might agree to further abrogate their program beyond levels that they had even conceded.
So it is very possible that Trump is able to get a deal that is better than JCPOA, better than the Obama-Iran deal, by a country mile, frankly, while avoiding a second war.
There's a lot going on, though, as you allude to.
This Gabbard story comes across the wire in Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal this morning, Monday on the 2nd.
And it is curious the timing.
Apparently, there was a whistleblower complaint about her last spring.
This was as Gabbard sort of fell out of the president's good graces and Gabbard testified to Congress that the Iranian nuclear program was not a major threat to the United States, which of course it is not as it currently stands.
And it is a question of whether or not there's an effort to further sideline Gabbard again, because Gabbard's in this unusual position, right?
She has not been fired.
She has one of the big four national security jobs, along with Sec State, NSA, and Secretary of War.
And Gabbard, apparently, is overseeing Trump's efforts to investigate the results of the election in 2020 in Georgia.
So why a disclosure now?
Why a journal report on this now?
It is curious.
And then additionally, the complaint itself, and finally, the complaint itself was lobbied during the run-up to the 12-day war in June.
I have no special information, but it's very possible the complaint was meant to sideline a relative restrainer within Trump's ranks.
I'm not sure she ever fell out of President Trump's favor.
What I think really happened is that some of the advisors around President Trump, she fell out of their favor because I believe she was speaking truth.
As I said on the show many times, the intelligence the president worked off of in July, it was not the urgency.
And we know this now because it's been released by the Times of Injured.
The war cabinet meetings said it was a couple of years before they had anything.
As you know, this deal that President Trump could get now is much better than any deal possible.
So Gabbard's always been, to me, a truth teller.
Tulsi just gives the facts as they are and doesn't politicize it.
There are certain people around the president, particularly in the intel world, that will politicize this.
And my fact check on that is President Trump would never have her overseeing, because there is a major national security and intelligence part of this 2020 election that has to be looked into.
And he believes she's a safe pair of hands to do it.
But you could tell today, the same people that were upset with her before have got the neocons of the Wall Street Journal going.
The Wall Street Journal basically publishes essentially hearsay from some whistleblower who's already been discredited.
And I think you got to go down.
The DNI spokesman came out and she was terrific.
She says, hey, talk about buried leads.
I think it's in the 12th of the 13th paragraph of the story.
You find out that it's already been dismissed as some sort of crank.
Of course, the Daily Mail and other publications that normally take big stories like this from the Wall Street Journal, they just blow it up.
And all of a sudden, Tulsi Gabbard's, you know, she's being investigated for serious national security.
And the quotes were so breathless.
You know, FBI people have never seen something like this.
This will shock the nation, all of that.
That is the same type of theatrics they tried to use to silence her the first time.
When let me repeat, she was 100% correct, Kurt Mills.
No, I mean, this is something I'm sort of loath to do.
This is basically media reporting, but it's important.
The Wall Street Journal, of course, is owned by Rupert Murdoch.
It's owned by News Corp, which oversees Fox News and both in the journal, which is obviously competing for the president's attention right now.
I think it's important to bifurcate it out.
Generally speaking, the Wall Street Journal hard reporting does great work, very important stuff.
I think it is basically believable.
The editorial board is a comic relief baby boomer sort of laugh factory at this point that is basically appealing to the politics of one man, Mr. Murdoch.
However, occasionally, in times of acute national security situations, and I think specifically, I can think about right after October 7th, it does seem as if some of the opinion vapors bleed into the reporting, the hard reporting at the journal.
There was an example in late 2023 with the journal, and I believe they've never retracted or apologized for this report, had a very loosely verified report about how the Ayatollah, about how the Iranians directed October 7th.
No evidence has ever come to light on that fact.
The Iranians, by most reporting, were, yes, Eliot Hamas, but were basically in the dark.
There wasn't severe channels, which makes sense.
This is a Shia Persian power as opposed to a Sunni or Sunni radical Islamic power.
They were tacit allies at best.
Finally, I think, again, I'm sure there was a whistleblower complaint.
I'm sure it needs to be investigated further.
But the timing on this, the timing of the complaint in mid-spring in 2025, for it to resurface as Hawks and neocons are pushing for a new war with Iran again in early February is conspicuous.
Okay, Kurt Mills is with, by the way, take your phone out.
Text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N-989898, get the ultimate guide for investing in gold and precious metals in the age of Trump.
Markets have been quite turbulent, as I don't need to tell you over the last couple of days.
I'm trying to get Philip Patrick on here tomorrow to discuss this all, but make sure you go there now and you can make contact with Philip Patrick and his team.
Talk about why gold has been a hedge against times of financial turbulence for 5,000 years of man's recorded history.
Make sure you understand the process.
Birchgold.com promo code Bannon, you go and get the end of the dollar empire.
Chinese Communist Party, as we talked about this morning, she's come out and said, hey, I think I want the Chinese currency to be a competing reserve currency to the U.S. dollar.
That means that is economic and financial war.
No longer unrestricted warfare.
That's just up in your grill.
So make sure you check it out.
Find out what it all means.
The end of the dollar empire.
We started five years ago because we knew this day was coming, folks.
Go check it out.
Talk to Philip Petron and the team.
Kurt Mills, I want to give time because I've never said Mark should not have a platform.
I'm not what Mark shouldn't have a platform.
Mark shouldn't.
I think it's great.
Mark makes, in his minds, very cogent arguments, I think.
I think they're pure madness.
And that's why I want more people to listen to him.
He did an 18-minute, I think, open on Fox last night where he systematic, because he's a constant, you know, he's a lawyer, he walked through his case, you know, beat by beat of why we should go kinetic now and not just why we should do it, that we have to do it.
This is a perfect time.
We'll never see this time again.
And we have to go Kinetic.
We have to use American military force to decapitate the regime, the Iranian regime.
And then we have to, I guess, back whatever group comes together to try to put it back together again.
My argument is that use economic sanctions.
I think we ought to block the oil.
But the Iranian people put these guys in charge.
And I understand there's a lot of bloodshed in the streets, but hey, guess what?
You're trying to overthrow a government that you put in, and you were looking for an Islamic Republic.
When you look at Islamic republics, they're kind of totalitarian.
So you got what you paid for, and now you deal with it.
Mark Levin takes a very different path.
And you actually retweeted where I try to be magnanimous and say, Mark, you should watch it because he makes the best case why we shouldn't go kinetic.
You actually say, I think you called it what, moronic?
What did you say?
You were very snippy, Kurt Mills, for such a nice guy.
Even if they're North Korean, we're not moving on the North Koreans.
President Trump wants meetings with the North Koreans.
He wants to talk about it and put pressure on the Chinese because the North Koreans are a vassal state, just like you put pressure on Turkey and Russia and other people around there to bring them to the table to negotiate.
We're not in bombing.
I haven't seen us bombing, you know, bombing North Korea, sir.
I mean, like, that's what autocracies have learned around the world, that the only guarantee, the only safeguard of their regimes are to get nuclear weapons.
I don't think the Iranians are actually there.
I think the Iranians have shown that they will do a deal with this president, that they will basically abandon any serious lunge towards nuclear weapons.
They have been fighting this zero enrichment thing.
But the level of enrichment that you need to get a nuclear weapon is not the level of enrichment that they're agreeing to go below.
They're talking about 3% enrichment.
That's not 100% enrichment.
That's not a nuclear weapon.
And I don't think we want to set the precedent that basically the U.S. is just a totally dishonest broker, because then you will see other countries launch for the bomb.
You will see if the Iranians, if their regime can survive, they will launch for a crude weapon.
And so ironically, the number one thing that makes the world proliferate is the kind of extreme hawk neocon stuff that we've been pursuing or that Levin would prefer us to pursue.
Because if the Iranians go down, the Turks are going to go for the bomb, the Saudis are going to go for a bomb, the Japanese are going to go for a bomb, the Koreans will go for a bomb.
And I think if our goal is to have less nuclear weapons in the world, that's a dangerous line.
Some argue, like Mearsheimer, that that actually might make the world safer.
I'm not sure I'm quite there, especially because we have the discreet goal of no nuclear weapon for the Iranians.
And I think that can be easily achieved.
And as I've indicated elsewhere, this is actually the one thing that will get Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize.
He thinks it's a deal potentially with Ukraine or on Gaza.
Both are too controversial.
These are European liberals, right?
If he does a deal with the Russians on Ukraine, they'll never forgive him for it.
But if he actually flouts the will of Netanyahu, if he flouts the will of people like Mark Levin, if he does a better deal, a more impressive deal with the Iranians than Barack Obama did, that is the one thing that actually will get him the Nobel Peace Prize.
These are not the guy can pull off a Ukraine peace deal with no American security guarantee, a Gaza deal that's rebuilding.
They're already putting big money in there with no American security guarantee, and he forces by military, potential military might, the assets we have in theater, a deal, a meaningful deal with the Iranians.
Forget the nuclear priest pies.
He'll go down in history as the greatest man of peace in world history.
It just, I mean, he's solved the unsolvable.
And so let's give President Trump a chance.
Let's give him some runway.
Let's go back to Tulsi Gabbard.
This is why I said she didn't fall out of favor with the president.
She fell out of favor with that kind of Praetorian guard that sometimes is in the national security aspect during the June and July timeframe.
And they try to run her out of there, you know, every other day.
The President Trump thinks very highly of her.
He has to because she's overseeing.
Cash is doing the criminal part.
She's looking at the overall stealing of the 2020 election.
And the mainstream media is absolutely incorrect.
We have to get to the bottom of that because if you don't have that, you don't have a country.
And Tulsi is doing a job.
And you see right now they're trying to get her.
Oh, my God.
She's doing conference calls with Trump, conference calls to the FBI.
They are coming at Tulsi Gabbard every way possible.
And that's why MAGA has to have her back, Kurt Mills.
Look, I mean, people forget in August of 2024, you know, this was Brad Summer.
This was the ascendants of Kamala Harris.
There was an expectation that the Trump Vance ticket could lose.
And the endorsement of RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard was a crucial lifeline in getting Trump to win.
And I think if MAGA is going to be an enduring political movement, if it's going to have an afterlife long after Trump's in office, you need to keep people in the coalition like the Kennedys, like the Gabbards.
And Gabbard's a representative of a lot of Americans, independent-minded Americans, ex-Democrats, who came to vote for Donald Trump.
And not surprisingly, she has foreign policies that were critical of previous Republican administrations, like the Bush administration.
There's a lot of people, unfortunately, again, within Trump's cabinet who just want to return.
People like Marko Ruby, I would submit, who just want to return to the hits.
They just want to return to Pompeoism or Mike Penceism or establishment republicanism.
There's not the demographics for it, first of all.
But second of all, it's demonstrably failed.
Iraq didn't work.
The global financial crisis didn't work.
People are justifiably angry about the Bush Republican legacy.
And so that Trump and his allies need to cook up something new and keeping people like Gabbard in the fold, I think, is absolutely crucial.
Afghanistan didn't work and don't, you know, Osama bin Laden hit the World Trade Center on Bush's watch and they couldn't get him in before their watch was over.
They were too busy in Iraq doing first Fallujah, second Fallujah, that had to fall to, that had to fall to Obama.
Kurt Mills, where do people go and get you?
This one's a hot one, particularly the Iran situation.
Tulsi Gabbard, they're all over her.
Where do people go to get you on social media and all the great content you're putting up?
Look at the Afghan papers that have been declassified.
But anyways, it's the American Conservative magazine founded in 2002 by Patrick J. Buchanan and others against the Iraq war, conservatives and friends against the Iraq War.
It is at www.theamericanconservative.com.
And my own work is at Kurt Mills, at C-U-R-T, M-I-L-L-S on X. I'm the executive director of our fine little magazine.
Tuesday, January 27th, 2026, was the day that it was murdered.
You had on that day both the Spanish announcement of the 500,000 individuals who are going to get work permits, which you have to multiply by six or seven times because of family unification, which is always permitted.
And then the EU reached with Modi an agreement on mobility also on January 27th, which is going to allow Indians to come into the European Union to skilled workers, purportedly students and others, by the millions.
So Western civilization lasted for about 3,000 years, but the European Union did its utmost to murder it a week ago.
That comes six days after President Trump at Davos on January 21st, right, touted the advantages of Western civilization and the need to sustain Western civilization as the NSS, the national security strategy, identified civilization.
This goes back to the state Senate election in Texas.
The left knows we're at war.
The right, the war imposse does, but we've got to enlighten and awaken everybody on the right that we're at war right now.
And this is going to win one of two ways.
We either keep this civilization and bequeath it to future generations, or we're going to lose it, and we can lose it.
Dr. Thayer, thank you.
That brings up two people, Ed Martin.
And look, I don't know what's going.
Ed Martin is a great warrior.
He was head of, supposed to be, when he left the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, when Judge Janine came in, which he got confirmed.
Ed went over to Maine Justice to head up the weaponization of government, of which he was handpicked by this guy named, let me remember.
I get him.
Oh, yeah, Donald J. Trump, who happens to be President of the United States, who could not think more highly of Ed back from the time of in 15 and 16 when Phyllis Schlafly endorsed President Trump.
And Ed Martin has been a warrior since then.
He's one of the toughest ombres I've ever met.
And now there's a Washington Post story that says today that Ed Martin is out of Maine Justice.
He's off of not even not heading the weaponization, but he's not even on the weaponization working group.
I don't know how that happened.
And he's now doing pardons full time.
And there's this discussion.
He may go over to the White House in a senior position.
I'd rather have him in Maine Justice on weaponization.
I think it's good for the country.
This guy's a total warrior.
If not, please, we got to keep him in the White House in a senior position.
Ed Martin, the reason they're after the people like Ed Martin is because Ed Martin is a fighter.
Tulsi Gabbard's a fighter.
They single out and target the people that are the biggest fighters.
And so we're going to delve into this more, but it just broke today.
We heard there were some rumblings over there.
But Ed Martin is supposedly, according to the media, he's out of Maine Justice.
He's off the weaponization, not simply heading it, it's off any work in the weaponization of government committee.
And he's now doing pardons, which is fantastic, but he's got a lot more capacity than that.
And we've got Ed's back, and we're going to figure out or find out exactly what's going on.
If he goes over to the White House in a senior position, that's fantastic.
So why are we in Texas for a month in the run-up to this primary?
Well, because on the ballot in March, and we're going to talk about this next, basically some people that have lived under Sharia law, as Westerners didn't comply with it, but saw society's crater when it was brought in.
We're going to do that the next hour in War Room, Texas, to talk about what's going on in Texas.
Now, there's this proposition on the ballot to prohibit Sharia law in the state of Texas.
And they want to have overwhelming on Prop 10 on 3 March so it gets on the permanent ballot.
But also, the governor, Abbott, and you know, Abbott oftentimes has not been quick on the trigger of this.
We actually got clips in the next hour of Abbott, and now John Cornyn's jumping in.
Abbott declared the Muslim Brotherhood in CARES terrorist organizations.
He was followed shortly thereafter by Governor Ron DeSantis, who declared care a terrorist, a Muslim brotherhood and care terrorist organizations.
And look, you know, there's a lot of times, particularly when we went after President Trump ran against him, Ron DeSantis is not my cup of tea.
But Ron DeSantis, as a governor, is very methodical when he does things.
He's not a guy that hot-foots it around.
He really thinks things through.
You can see that during the pandemic.
And so for Ron DeSantis and Abbott to do it, two governors have designated terrorist organizations, guess what?
They're found in the UAE and Saudi.
They're terrorist organizations.
President Trump's already designated three.
I think it's Jordan, right?
Egypt and Syria branches of the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.
I think they're still reviewing Qatar and Turkey.
Laura Loomer sued CARE years ago for conspiring with the previous management before Elon took over of banning her from Twitter.
There's a Breitbart article came out years later that said that the Wall, I think from the Wall Street Journal, said they had documents that that had actually happened.
Yet when she sued, they lost in federal court.
Of course, these federal court guys are always defending the bad guys.
They made Laura pay the legal fees, right?
I think it was $125,000 of care.
And since they've been designated a terrorist organization, she did the logical thing.
She went back to court and said, hey, oh, by the way, since they're a terrorist organization, maybe I don't have to pay the rest of the money.
And the magistrate judge, Reinhardt, remember him?
The one that signed off on, signed off on the raid of Mar-a-Lago.
You know what a scumbag that guy is.
He hates President Trump.
He's another Trumper.
He basically said, no, you have to pay.
Here's what I don't understand.
And I would request from the governor's office in Florida, Ron DeSantis, because I know DeSantis is a serious guy.
If you designated the Muslim Brotherhood and CARE as terrorist organizations, someone should look into the situation with Laura Loomer.
Laura Loomer was a warrior out there at the beginning before Abbott, years before Abbott, and years before DeSantis came on the scene as governor to put this up.
I remember I fought at Breitbart and in the administration to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and their cohort, CARE, as terrorist organizations.
Now, we didn't get very far in 2017.
We were busy taking down ISIS, trying to get accommodations in the Middle East so they would go after terrorist financing, which Qatar essentially at that time refused to do.
But it was evident in talking to people in the Gulf region, there was no doubt that the Muslim Brotherhood and CARE were terrorist organizations when you talk to these senior level people.
So I don't understand why a federal magistrate judge, and then here's the worst news: CARE's online mocking her.
They're doxing her.
They're putting up the documents about her checkbook and her banking account, I guess, her address.
It just seems to me that the state of Florida or someone in President Trump's administration ought to take a hard look at this because clearly Laura's been fighting this fight for a long time before other people came on board.
And they're targeting her because they understand she's a hammer when it comes to this stuff.
And you're going to see it get very ugly down here in Texas.
You just are.
As this whole movement to ban Sharia law, to prohibit Sharia law in the great state of Texas.
And it's something that's long passed due.
It should have never even gotten traction here.
It has gotten traction.
As you're going to see in the next hour, it's spreading like wildfire and it has to be stopped.
You have to prohibit Sharia law.
This is not about religion.
This is about a control mechanism that is just antithetical to the constitutional republic we live in.
Why Bobby Kennedy Linked Autism to Vaccines00:07:10
This is a review paper where we have connected definitively the aluminum adjuvant used in most vaccines on the infant childhood schedule and autism spectrum disorder.
We've looked at this, Steve, from a standpoint of epidemiology.
We've looked at it from biochemistry and cell physiology.
We've looked at neuropathology.
We've looked at genetics.
And we've even gone through a legal exercise, what's called the Bradford-Hill criteria, which is used in court to establish causation between an environmental stressor and a medical condition.
We've gone through all nine of those criteria.
And when we go through that, we have shown that aluminum adjuvants are intimately tied to the etiology of autism.
And the thing that is so insidious about this is that aluminum adjuvants are ubiquitous in vaccines.
They are used in almost every vaccine that children get between the ages of birth, if they opt into the hepatitis B shot until they're about two years of age.
And so they're getting whopping amounts of aluminum directly injected into their body.
They simply didn't do it because they didn't want to do it.
They did not want to know the answers regarding autism, the autism epidemic.
And, you know, there was so much industry capture within the CDC, within the National Institutes of Health, with Fast Track and the FDA program that it behooved them not to find that link.
So Dr. Hooker, here's what you got to help me understand the audience.
You know, like the Department of War, old Department of Defense, you know, we got into Vietnam, other things, the Iraq war, people protest sometimes.
There are a million people when we try to put nuclear weapons, purging missiles into Europe to try to defend Europe, millions of people in Central Park.
The financial crisis, the Tea Party was created, millions of people coming to Washington, D.C. on the financial crisis, what caused it, but the bailouts for the wealthy.
So other parts of the government, people have been very vocal about not agreeing.
One thing you never saw that was kind of CDC or, you know, and there was considered sacrosanct that they were dealing with the straight and these professionals, because you see them in the white coats.
They're at these conferences.
They're putting out official reports.
So you're telling us by tying together all these studies that are out there, things that have been evident to people in your movement for a while.
And we see Bobby Kennedy, they're trying to destroy him.
But we need to actually start to identify who, when you say, hey, they knew it, they just didn't do it.
We got to go to phase two on this.
If we don't hold individuals accountable, and I want to hold Fauci accountable for different things, but somehow Bobby and the team have got to pivot and say, these people cause tremendous damage to people and families and children, but they also destroyed the credibility of this institution, which is going to take decades to rebuild, sir.
You know, the authors of the cover-up regarding vaccines and autism started in the 1990s, in the late 1990s.
There were individuals like Roger Bernier, Dr. Julie Gerberting, Dr. Colleen Boyle, Frank DeStefano, Thomas Verstratten, Phil Rhodes, so many others that conspired to look the other direction regarding autism and vaccines and conspired to commit data fraud over and over and over again.
They've set autism research behind probably 30 years because of this.
Because if we would have known and we would have admitted what I've known for since my son was diagnosed in 1999, then we could have advanced this research.
We could have saved a lot of children.
They chose not to do it.
So it's really on them.
Not only do we need to clean up this mess in terms of recompense for the individuals who have been affected, but these people, you know, jail time is too good for them.
That's something that before Secretary Kennedy even announced his run for presidency, he's been working on that for years.
I mean, there are many, many co-conspirators in the Institute of Medicine, in the pharmaceutical industry, in the CDC, in the National Institutes of Health.
And it's time to name names.
We have everything written down.
We've worked actually on several legal complaints on it.
That information needs to be published.
It needs to be made public.
I'm not aware of what Secretary Kennedy's plans are to do that, but I know that information exists and it's got to come out.
And a hat tip to Bobby Kennedy, the entire team, the Make America Healthy team, the entire team over at Healthy Human Services doing a spectacular job.
This is one of the reasons we have All Family Pharmacy as a sponsor.
Just don't break the grip of big pharma.
Break the grip of the distribution network that really limits your options.
Okay.
AllfamilyPharmacy.com, promo code Bannon10.
You get 10% off.
They have doctors standing by that can work through what your issues are and give you appropriate prescriptions that you need to get the medicines that you need.
Allfamilypharmacy.com, it was set up to break the grip and give you medical freedom, to break the grip on big pharma and the distribution network that forces you to make choices that may not be the best choices for you or your family.
Allfamilypharmacy.com, promo code Bannon 10, you get 10% off.
Go check it out.
Ask a million questions.
These folks are terrific.
Mike Lindell, I'm so proud of you of what you've accomplished as a politician.
As starting off, you're a guy we spent a lot of time in the trenches with, fought a lot of fights.
What you're doing up in Minnesota is amazing because you're a relentless truth teller and it's just incredible.
And I know we're going to get developments on that story as Amy Klobertshire has now jumped in the race because they're totally scared to death that Mike Lindell is going to win the governorship and then get his hands on all the records.
And then his jail time is prison time for all of them.
But right now, as much as we love that, we want you to continue talking about this deal.