Nov. 19, 2025 - Bannon's War Room
48:43
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is Texas redistricting. | ||
| This is very much going to be about 2026. | ||
| We might have Epstein be about 2026, but this is well. | ||
| The state of Texas tried to redraw the maps, add five more seats, and now a federal judge has said, no, you can't. | ||
| Three of them, actually. | ||
| So in redistricting cases, oftentimes the law requires that they are heard initially by a three-judge panel, and that's what happened here. | ||
| And they are saying that the redistricting effort that Texas undertook here was done in a way that wasn't just partisan. | ||
| It was overtly racial in its gerrymandering such that the plaintiffs who sued and there were multiple groups of them are entitled to a preliminary injunction that blocks the use of those maps for the 2026 election and requires Texas to go back to their 2021 maps. | ||
| They're saying that having a legislatively drawn map is preferable to courts drawing the map and getting involved in that themselves. | ||
| They recognize time is of the essence. | ||
| And usually when you have an election right around the corner, a Supreme Court case called Purcell sort of begs that court sort of back off and not get involved. | ||
| And they say, here, the evidence of the partisan and racial gender remandering was so obvious and flagrant that despite that Supreme Court case cautioning courts not to get involved, they had to override it. | ||
| That's interesting. | ||
| So I think it's December 7th or December 8th that lawmakers have to file for their candidacy, which means there's only a few weeks for this court to bring it up to, or for Texas to appeal this to the Supreme Court. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| The Supreme Court would need to weigh in before then. | ||
| What is the likelihood of that happening? | ||
| I think the likelihood of it happening is high. | ||
| At least the court may determine and say that they're not going to take it in which case the court's decision, the lower court's decision today, would stay in place. | ||
| But I think it's more likely that they'll use it as an opportunity to say whether or not all of these redistricting attempts that are happening at DOJ's invitation expressly all over the country should happen now or not. | ||
| It's not typical for mid-decade redistricting to happen, and there's a reason why. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on this people. | ||
| Here's how I got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
| Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| It's Tuesday, 18 November, Year of the Lord, 2025. | ||
| Okay, here's what we're going to do today. | ||
| I've got Rabbi Peasock Walicki, good buddy of mine, is going to co-host today. | ||
| Got a lot to talk about. | ||
| Brian Harrison is going to join us in a moment. | ||
| Big news coming out of Texas on the Muslim Brotherhood and Care, but Signal Not Noise redistricting, which we have to win redistricting or midterm is going to be very tough. | ||
| We're going to get to all that. | ||
| I'm here for the first half hour with the rabbi and Brian Harrison at 6 o'clock. | ||
| I got to step out for a meeting, but at 6 o'clock, we're going to have While Israel Slept, Yaakov Katz is with me. | ||
| I'm back here with an entire hour to go through October 7th. | ||
| Remember, we had him on a couple weeks ago. | ||
| People were very bad. | ||
| This book is fantastic, so we'll get to all of it. | ||
| Brian Harrison, first, before we get to the Muslim Brotherhood and Care, we got kind of a bombshell today down in Texas. | ||
| I'm not so sure this is not an unforced era, but where are we? | ||
| This is vital, brother, because right now the Democrats are climbing over the ramparts on this redistricting fight and establishment Republicans in Kansas, Nebraska, Indiana were all suddenly getting cold feet. | ||
| Where are we? | ||
| What happened today? | ||
| It's a huge deal, and I got to remind folks the stakes. | ||
| I mean, we're talking about the future of the United States Congress and what happens in the midterms. | ||
| Do the radical leftist Marxist progressives of AOC take over and effectively thwart the final two years of the Trump administration? | ||
| I mean, the stakes could not be higher. | ||
| And we had an absolute legal bombshell. | ||
| What happened to catch folks up is that state of Texas redistricted earlier this year to add five new Republican seats. | ||
| Quite frankly, something we should have done before now, but we finally got it done this year. | ||
| And what a three-judge panel, three federal judge panel decided to basically slap down our new maps and force us to have elections in the March primary and November general elections next year based on the maps that were drawn in 2021, which gave a five-seat advantage to the Democrats as opposed to the five new seats for Republicans in the current map. | ||
| We had three judges here, the two judges that ruled against the state of Texas. | ||
| One was appointed by Barack Obama, so no surprise. | ||
| But also one of the judges, and what's very interesting, was actually appointed by President Trump himself. | ||
| The state of Texas was thrilled to see our attorney general announce that he will most definitely be appealing this, and it looks like it will go straight to the Supreme Court. | ||
| So a massive, massive legal breaking news here regarding redistricting. | ||
| And I disagree with these judges. | ||
| I think they were wrong. | ||
| They're basically claiming that we drew this down here in Texas on the basis, so forth, they called it racial gerrymandering. | ||
| I have no reason whatsoever to think that's correct, but this is a very serious issue, and we should be treating it very seriously down here in the state of Texas. | ||
| So I talked to the Attorney General. | ||
| You guys are going to go to the Supreme Court, Corey. | ||
| This will be settled at the Supreme Court, I take it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Yeah, that's right. | ||
| Because it was a panel and not an individual judge, we don't have to go through the Fifth Circuit or another court. | ||
| So this will go straight to the Supreme Court if the Supreme Court takes it. | ||
| So I am hopeful that the Supreme Court will, number one, agree to hear the case, and then number two, rule against the three-judge panel here in Texas and allow our elections to proceed as we have been planning for the last several months. | ||
| But I want to be really clear on this point because we should never take anything for granted. | ||
| We should always be leaning forward as you talk about a maximalist strategy here. | ||
| We should be preparing contingency plans right now, right this second, in the event that the Supreme Court does not overrule these three judges and strike and slaps down our maps. | ||
| The governor of the state of Texas needs to be making contingency plans right now to not only bring us back, but if we're not allowed to go on the current maps, we should redraw maps. | ||
| We should do it the second Supreme Court if they rule against us. | ||
| And don't just add five seats. | ||
| Let's add six seats. | ||
| Let's add seven seats. | ||
| Let's add eight seats if we have to do this again. | ||
| I hope it doesn't come to that, but we should be preparing right now. | ||
| Let me, the Trump, when you say Trump judge, this was a judge that was pushed by Ted Cruz. | ||
| Was it not, sir? | ||
| If memory serves me correctly. | ||
| That memory, I would have to be fact-checked on that, but I believe that is correct. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think we're talking about Judge Brown here. | |
| How does a Trump judge rule against this, sir? | ||
| You know, I don't know. | ||
| It's a very long opinion. | ||
| So I want to be very clear. | ||
| I have not had a chance to go through the entire opinion, but he is hanging his hat on a lot of statements and a lot of other rhetoric that was made down here by senior Republican officials in the Texas government. | ||
| I want to still be clear. | ||
| I believe that the judges are wrong. | ||
| I don't know why he ruled this way. | ||
| And to be very clear, again, at the risk of putting too fine a point on it, I need the posse to understand how big of a deal this could be. | ||
| This is not just a Texas story. | ||
| This is a story that will impact the entire United States of America and potentially Be the deciding factor as to whether President Trump gets four full years to pursue his affirmative agenda to make America great again, or is stymied with impeachment and nonstop oversight, hearing from the radical leftists who are hell-bent on destroying this country. | ||
| And as far as me speaking for myself down here as a constitutional officer in the state of Texas, I want the Texas government, the Republicans or so-called Republicans that lead the state of Texas to take nothing for granted. | ||
| And we should be fighting absolutely as hard for the future of our state, the future of our country, and for the future of Western civilization as the radical leftist Democrats, many of whom want to see the leftist agenda realized through their positions, in many cases from the federal bench. | ||
| Abbott never wanted to do this in the first place. | ||
| We had to go baynet to the back to him on this show with you, the people at Patriot Mobile. | ||
| If it was not for Glenn Sturry and the team of his political operation, we would have never gotten the five. | ||
| They were always half-hearted. | ||
| And I got to tell you, Democrats, look in the Commonwealth of Virginia, Commonwealth of Virginia, Spamberg and those guys are going to push the primaries back to August and go 10 to 1. | ||
| They're going to take four seats from the Republican in a state that votes about 44, 45%, 46% Republican. | ||
| These Democrats play smashmouth. | ||
| Okay, we got time. | ||
| Hopefully tomorrow, maybe Ken Paxon is going to join us. | ||
| I got to shift. | ||
| Governor Abbott, wow, he dropped a bomb today on care in the Muslim Brotherhood. | ||
| Let me get this right. | ||
| This proclamation, they can't own property in the state of Texas. | ||
| They can't purchase property in the state of Texas. | ||
| Yeah, that's what it looks like based on the declaration, which is a victory for conservatives. | ||
| But let me be really clear, too. | ||
| This is a victory that people have been calling for, not just grassroots patriots in Texas, but across the country for a long time now. | ||
| I mean, quite frankly, it's a huge win. | ||
| And I want to say thank you to the posse because for all of this year, up until today's announcement, the governor has been putting out statements basically declaring victory against the violent people who are adherents to Sharia, claiming falsely that we had banned Sharia law in Texas. | ||
| We never did that. | ||
| He claimed that we got rid of this Muslim epic city. | ||
| That's absolutely false. | ||
| It's proceeding faster than ever. | ||
| So this is a huge victory for people, but it's credit to the conservative patriots across the country because if it weren't for your pressure, I can promise you, Governor Abbott wouldn't have issued this declaration today. | ||
| So while on one hand, great. | ||
| Celebrate it. | ||
| Thank you, Governor. | ||
| It was the right thing to do. | ||
| Break, break. | ||
| We must maintain vigilance. | ||
| Because as I put out when he tweeted this out earlier today, this is good. | ||
| The words are correct. | ||
| Governor Abbott really did do this, and the words are right. | ||
| But words without action are meaningless. | ||
| And we've seen this, unfortunately, the history with Governor Abbott, for example, when it took years for him to declare his invasion authority on the border during the Biden border crisis, but we didn't see action to accompany it. | ||
| So we need to see action. | ||
| Stop giving vehicle registrations to illegal aliens, many of whom may well be affiliated with terror organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood. | ||
| So good job, posse, forcing a big victory out of the governor today, but let's make sure it's accompanied by force, by action, and not just more empty rhetoric. | ||
| It's just a start, too. | ||
| Just because the Muslim Brotherhood and Care, we're not going to sit there and use all kinds of holding companies. | ||
| We'll get to the bottom of it. | ||
| Brian Harrison, social media, I know you got to bounce. | ||
| Thanks for taking time away to join us. | ||
| No, great to be with you. | ||
| Yeah, at Brian E. Harrison on Twitter, at Brian E. Harrison, at Brian E. Harrison. | ||
| Just thanks again. | ||
| A lot of breaking news and appreciate, Steve, what you're doing to open the eyes of patriots across Texas and the country on this. | ||
| These are big breaking stories and a lot more to come. | ||
| I'll check with you after that. | ||
| I'll check with you after I read the opinion. | ||
| I want to get you and Paxon on. | ||
| I talked to Paxton a little while ago, both you guys on. | ||
| This story couldn't be bigger. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| You spent a lot of time in Texas. | ||
| I've actually done events. | ||
| In fact, there's a photo here in our favorite paper, Haratz, of us. | ||
| I'll show you in a second down in Texas. | ||
| I went down for Texas for five days here about a month ago, and I went down to do the shortest. | ||
| What I did is took meetings with so many people and got kind of my sea legs on this issue of this Islamic invasion of Texas. | ||
| It's amazing that Abbott's decision is hitting the news today because the contrast between how controversial this is. | ||
| Oh my gosh, he's declaring care and the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist organizations. | ||
| Hello, you got the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia in Washington today in the mobile. | ||
| No, but here's the thing. | ||
| He's declared them already. | ||
| The Muslim Brotherhood is declared a terrorist organization by the Saudis. | ||
| And care. | ||
| And care. | ||
| So here you have the Saudis who hold the Muslim Brotherhood to be terrorists and the Egyptians and the Jordanians and the Emiratis. | ||
| Most of the sane countries in the Middle East know that the Muslim Brotherhood are bad news. | ||
| And when you, and you've mentioned this many times, that in the first term, you tried to get the Muslim Brotherhood declared a terrorist organization. | ||
| You couldn't do anything. | ||
| And you couldn't get anyone on it. | ||
| So it's amazing the timing of it. | ||
| In Texas, though, you agree, because you spend a lot of time down there. | ||
| People should be worried. | ||
| There's been 48 mosques opened in Dallas, in the Dallas area, in the last 24 months, to a month. | ||
| Look, this is all over the world, Islam is ascendant. | ||
| And there's no game plan. | ||
| There's no game plan to push back on it. | ||
| And it's a real problem. | ||
| I mean, this is, I'm worried for America. | ||
| I'm worried, you know, you see what's happening in Europe. | ||
| It's coming here. | ||
| It's coming. | ||
| It's come here. | ||
| This is why I keep saying New York City, we have to defend Texas because they've got New York City. | ||
| They have a Ugandan Marxist jihadist. | ||
| And for President Trump, come off the plane. | ||
| His staff that's telling him about Mamdani, because I'm trying to denaturalize the guy because he's not really an American citizen. | ||
| And to have people brief President Trump and he comes off, he says, hey, he's reaching out to us, think of a meeting. | ||
| He's given interviews a day, and he's up in President Trump's guerrilla. | ||
| I put him up on Getter. | ||
| This guy has said nothing nice about President Trump, nothing good about any kind of cooperation. | ||
| The day he was talking smack about President Trump. | ||
| And if President Trump is going to enforce, I think, some ICE issues in New York City. | ||
| And he's blowing back on Trump. | ||
| This punk has got to be treated like a punk. | ||
| He's the most dangerous politician in this country. | ||
| Full stop. | ||
| There's no seconds. | ||
| Yeah, and people don't understand the difference between different types of Muslims either. | ||
| He's a 12 or Shiite. | ||
| And that's a particular sect of Islam, which is the same ideology as the mullahs in Tehran. | ||
| Most of the Middle East aren't 12 or Shiites. | ||
| They are the most extreme, most anti-West. | ||
| And that is the branch of Islam that Mamdani is a part of. | ||
| And that's what he adheres to. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| By the way, I might add, because I got my guy here today. | ||
| 33% of all of Jewish voters voted for him. | ||
| 67% of Jewish voters under Saudi Arabia. | ||
| It doesn't surprise me at all. | ||
| We could talk about it afterwards. | ||
| No, I really want to get into you because your guy is going through the receipts on the UN resolution and the difference between the 20-point plan. | ||
| I want to get down to where we actually stand on this because I'm seeing, well, you see what happened today with the Saudis. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| Back in the war room. | ||
| Rabbi Walecki is here as my co-host for the first half hour. | ||
| Back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
America's hot. | |
| Because Voice family. | ||
| Are you on Getter yet? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| What are you waiting for? | ||
| It's free. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's uncensored. | |
| And it's where all the biggest voices in conservative media are speaking out. | ||
| Download the Getter app right now. | ||
| It's totally free. | ||
| It's where I put up exclusively all of my content 24 hours a day. | ||
| You want to know what Steve Bannon's thinking? | ||
| Go to get her. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's right. | |
| You can follow all of your favorites. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Steve Bannon, Charlie Cook, Jack the Soviet, and so many more. | |
| Download the Getter app now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sign up for free and be part of the new thing. | |
| By the way, so welcome back. | ||
| The engine room, because we have different engine rooms around the country, asked a question. | ||
| They thought the 12vers were 85% of Shia, not a minority, but they're actually 85%. | ||
| No, of Shia, but the Shia are a minority. | ||
| Yes, right. | ||
| But he's saying of Islam, meaning they're a sect of Islam. | ||
| They're the majority of Shiite. | ||
| Correct. | ||
| Is it the Twelvers the Imam? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're waiting for the Imam to come back. | |
| I'm not a big expert. | ||
| You've got to have Robert Spencer on here or someone to talk about that. | ||
| But the point being that when you look at different branches of Islam and who's more moderate and who's more possibly amenable to living peacefully with the West, the Twelvers are on the extreme end of destroy the West. | ||
| This is Ayatollah Khomeini, Khamenei, the regime in Tehran now. | ||
| That's who Mamdani looks to as his spiritual lodestar. | ||
| It's like a traditional Catholic looking at the Pope, or I don't know what you think of the Pope now. | ||
| I'm saying like that for him, the Ayatollah is the spiritual leader of the movement that he's in. | ||
| And his mother takes, his mother's been financed by Qatar, correct? | ||
| Is my understanding. | ||
| Her filmmaker, she's been financed by that. | ||
| Very dangerous guy. | ||
| Why did he have such wide Jewish support? | ||
| Because this guy's not, he's not shy about what he believes. | ||
| Look, the vast majority of Jews in America, and this isn't true of Jews in Israel, but it's the vast majority of Jews in America identify with the progressive left far more than they identify with Judaism. | ||
| They don't practice their Judaism. | ||
| They're not attending synagogue. | ||
| They're not studying the Torah. | ||
| The vast majority of Jews, this is a sad fact, but it plays out in all the electoral politics. | ||
| The vast majority of Jews in America want nothing to do with folks like me. | ||
| They want nothing to do with their own tradition. | ||
| And their religion is progressive left. | ||
| So they're totally sexy. | ||
| That's what they are. | ||
| They love Mamdani. | ||
| I want to go through this deal because for people that have supported Israel for years and have not been a two-state people, like I'm always no two-state. | ||
| We have de facto a two-state solution coming out of the UN resolution, whatever this is. | ||
| You're the one person that's gone through the details of this, the 20-point plan versus what's in the UN Security Council resolution. | ||
| One of the issues, because I keep hearing guys like you saying, hey, Hamas is not disarmed. | ||
| Their arms not taken away. | ||
| Until that's done, that's a condition precedent, everything else. | ||
| But this deal moving on, they're over at the White House today. | ||
| The Saudis are getting the military deal. | ||
| They're getting the economic deal. | ||
| They're coming here to invest. | ||
| And they're saying, hey, we're going to think about the Abraham Accord. | ||
| So it was not a condition precedent. | ||
| What is your problem right now with this deal, particularly coming out of the UN Security Council, which I noticed when I read the thing, I didn't see Israel having a big role in it. | ||
| You had Muslim nations, Arab nations, Turkey with the United States. | ||
| So is it out of the room, out of the deal? | ||
| And how bad is this deal, particularly when we look at the details? | ||
| Well, right now, if you look at the headlines in Israel, you look at statements coming out of the prime minister, the foreign minister, and other cabinet ministers, they're all crying about the UN Security Council resolution for the wrong reason. | ||
| What's the reason they're crying about it? | ||
| Let me just back up and explain, because I don't know if everyone in the posse knows everything in the 20-point plan. | ||
| Let's just go through it. | ||
| I'll walk through this pretty quickly. | ||
| In the 20-point plan, as you said, a condition for moving forward is the disarming of Hamas. | ||
| Phase one of the plan was just that Israel would withdraw to an internal perimeter to facilitate the hostage release of prisoners in Gaza, an internal perimeter in Gaza. | ||
| Israel still controls 53% of the Gaza Strip. | ||
| Hamas is in the other 47%. | ||
| And that would facilitate the first stage of the deal, which meant that aid would start going back into Hamas, the war would end, and all the hostages and the bodies of deceased hostages would be released. | ||
| Prisoners would be released from Israeli prisons. | ||
| It's the first stage of the deal. | ||
| And that's all that Hamas agreed to. | ||
| And they're very adamant that that's all they agreed to. | ||
| President Trump keeps saying that Hamas agreed to disarm. | ||
| Hamas is adamant that they did not agree to disarm. | ||
| They say it every day. | ||
| They said it yesterday again. | ||
| They did not agree to disarm. | ||
| Now, what does that mean? | ||
| Does that mean that I don't think Trump is lying? | ||
| I think the Qataris and the Turks probably told Trump, don't worry, they'll disarm because they want to save Hamas. | ||
| That's their goal in this. | ||
| But Hamas says they never agreed to disarm. | ||
| And the big problem with the 20-point plan is that throughout the rest of the plan, a predicate for everything else that follows, all the investment and everything that happens later on with a new type of government in Gaza is all predicated on Hamas disarming and being removed from power. | ||
| But it never says in the 20-point plan whose job it is to disarm Hamas. | ||
| So in the weeks after. | ||
| That's kind of a big question. | ||
| So this all leads up to the Security Council resolution. | ||
| But in the weeks after the 20-point plan was first announced, you had all this confusion. | ||
| Maria Bartaromo is interviewing President Trump, and she asks him who's going to disarm Hamas. | ||
| And he goes, oh, maybe we'll do it. | ||
| Maybe Israel will do it. | ||
| And then Secretary of State Rubio is in Israel and they ask him about Israel disarming Hamas. | ||
| He says, no, Israel can't do it because that would mean a resumption of the war. | ||
| And Jared Kushner is asked by Leslie Stahl in 60 Minutes who's going to disarm Hamas. | ||
| And he says, oh, that's going to be done by the International Stabilization Force. | ||
| The Turks. | ||
| Now, the International Stabilization Force, and this is the key I'm about to read from the Security Council resolution. | ||
| You'll see the problem. | ||
| The International Stabilization Force is introduced in Trump's 20-point plan way down the list. | ||
| I think it's around 0.15 or 16. | ||
| Meaning, after Hamas is demilitarized and the Gaza Strip is no longer a danger to Israel and Israel is withdrawn, then we can bring in this new security force, this new police force under the guidance of the Egyptians and the Jordanians called the International Stabilization Force, which will become the new security apparatus for Gaza. | ||
| So when Jared Kushner says to Leslie Stahl, oh, the International Stabilization Force is going to disarm Hamas, a couple days later, King Abdullah of Jordan tells the BBC, No, we're not. | ||
| The International Stabilization. | ||
| So no one has a plan to disarm Hamas, right? | ||
| No one has a plan. | ||
| Well, along comes, and it's very clear, by the way, in the Trump 20-point plan, that the disarming of Hamas is not the job of the International Stabilization Force. | ||
| Now, everyone is reporting on this UN Security Council resolution as though it's just a cut and paste of the 20-point Trump Plan. | ||
| And in fact, the 20-point plan was appended to it. | ||
| But I read through the Security Council resolution. | ||
| I had a hard time finding it. | ||
| Most of the news coverage of this resolution didn't include the text. | ||
| It didn't link to it. | ||
| I had to dig it up, but I found it. | ||
| Which you know is always an issue. | ||
| And that's always that's the more the harder it was to find, the more I knew there'd be a buried lead in there. | ||
| So I dug up the text of the Security Council resolution. | ||
| And in Article 7 of this 11 points, and it's by far the longest piece, it's the main course here. | ||
| I'll just read one piece of it. | ||
| It's about the International Stabilization Force. | ||
| And here's what it says: The ISF, the International Stabilization Force, shall work with Israel and Egypt without prejudice to their existing agreements, along with the newly trained and vetted Palestinian police force, that's the ISF, to help secure border areas, so far so good, | ||
| stabilize the security environment in Gaza, so far so good, by ensuring Ensuring the process of demilitarizing the Gaza Strip, including the destruction and prevention of rebuilding the military, terror, and offensive infrastructure, as well as the permanent decommissioning of weapons from non-state armed groups. | ||
| In other words, suddenly, in this UN Security Council resolution, it's the job of the International Stabilization Force to disarm Hamas. | ||
| Now, the chances that Jordanian, Egyptian, or some other Arab country or Muslim country, Indonesia, Uzbekistan, or Kazakhstan, whoever has said that they're going to give troops to this international stabilization force, the chances of them going in and taking weapons away from Hamas are zero. | ||
| Which means now Israel is in a worse position that we were in before the Security Council resolution. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Well, before the Security Council resolution, if Israel got fed up with the fact that we're not progressing to phase two of the 20-point plan, they would say, okay, if no one else is going to disarm Hamas, we're just going to go back in and disarm them. | ||
| And Trump had already indicated that that might be the way Hamas gets disarmed. | ||
| But now, Israel can't do that because before the Security Council resolution, they would just kind of need permission from Trump or a green light from him. | ||
| You came to America. | ||
| Now, if Israel decides to go back in there, you're in violation of a binding Security Council resolution, which means Israel's hands are tied, and they would need all these other actors to agree. | ||
| So why is the Netanyahu government, why are people, the Jerusalem Post, the Times of Israel, nobody's talking about this. | ||
| Why, and particularly Netanyahu, is Ron Dermer being gone that big a deal? | ||
| Why is Netanyahu's government not banging on the tables about this? | ||
| Well, they're all focused on the Palestinian state issue. | ||
| Oh, there's a pathway to Palestinian state. | ||
| Look, there's definitely a path. | ||
| Not even a pathway. | ||
| It's a thing. | ||
| Steve, the number of resolutions that have been passed in the United Nations calling for a Palestinian state, an Israeli withdrawal from territories over the decades, those things are meaningless. | ||
| And also in the deal, when it talks about a Palestinian state, it just cuts and pastes from the Trump 20-point plan, which says that at some point, at some point far in the future, when the Gaza Strip is no longer a threat, we'll talk about a Palestinian state. | ||
| We've got a bounce. | ||
| But what needs to be done here? | ||
| What then needs to be done? | ||
| needs to be done here is israel has to actually become an independent state and you know i i you gave me the idea first Loomer came on the other day. | ||
| Can we have you back on later this week? | ||
| I mean, you've got to get your sovereignty. | ||
| We need to get our sovereignty. | ||
| You and I talked about this months ago. | ||
| Months and months ago. | ||
| Israel needs to be able to make its own decisions. | ||
| The leverage that the United States has in Israel's strategic decision-making is bad for Israel. | ||
| You need to be a sovereign. | ||
| Steve, I do. | ||
| You agree with you. | ||
| You were right on that. | ||
| I don't agree that we're a protectorate. | ||
| I think there's a gray area here that we can agree on. | ||
| But you're saying total sovereignty. | ||
| Look, Israel only gets 10% of our military budget from the United States aid. | ||
| It's 0.7% of our GDB. | ||
| This is a solvable problem. | ||
| Israel needs to be sovereign and needs to be independent and needs to be able to actually do what we need to do for our sovereignty. | ||
| I'm going to talk to you about my Christian state, the three-state solution, since you got two. | ||
| Rabbi, where do people go? | ||
| You're brilliant. | ||
| Where do people go to get your? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Main place to go is the Israel 365 YouTube channel. | ||
| You can also go to my ex account at RabbiPW. | ||
| And I'm the only person in the world named Pesach Waliki. | ||
| I'm easy to find. | ||
| Just search my name. | ||
| And there it is. | ||
| Steve Bannon. | ||
| In the weekend paper in Israel. | ||
| One of my better talks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There you go. | |
| Got Harat's hates hierarchy. | ||
| The way they discredit me is by saying that I'm friends with Steve Bannon. | ||
| There you go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Joe Allen's going to take over for 30 minutes. | ||
| I'm back at 6 o'clock on While Israel Slept. | ||
| Stick around. | ||
| in the world. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Good evening. | ||
| I am Joe Allen sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Two big news items tonight from the world of artificial intelligence. | ||
| First, Google has released their Gemini 3 model, the latest AI model that has blown past all of its competitors on the most crucial evaluations. | ||
| So Humanities Last Exam, created by the Center for AI Safety, is a series of extremely difficult questions that evaluators run AIs through to get a sense of how quote unquote smart they are. | ||
| For Gemini 3's Deep Think, it scored 41%. | ||
| Compare that to GPT-5 Pro, which is at 30%, or Claude at 13%. | ||
| We see that despite all the crazy hallucinations and all of the malfunctions that AIs constantly enact, you have an enormous increase in artificial, quote-unquote, intelligence. | ||
| The other evaluation, which is in some sense more important, the ARC AGI test. | ||
| The ARC AGI test is a type of problem-solving or puzzle-solving evaluation, which tests whether or not a model is able to work through a problem that it would have never seen before, a sort of spatial reasoning. | ||
| Gemini's Deep Think scored 45%, blowing past GBT-5, which was at a mere 17%. | ||
| What this means is, number one, the technology is, without a doubt, advancing at a rapid clip. | ||
| And number two, it is not going away. | ||
| This is going to be a huge boon for those who are making tons of money off of it. | ||
| And this is going to be a huge problem for those of us who would like to see it just disappear, not happening. | ||
| The second item, which is much more urgent and much more immediate, is that the 10-year moratorium, which so many people across the aisle fought to put down, is now reportedly being snuck back into the National Defense Authorization Act. | ||
| This means that for all of our efforts, it's possible that Republicans led by Ted Cruz will ban any state from enacting regulation on artificial intelligence. | ||
| We have about four days to put this thing back in the ground. | ||
| Here to talk about it is Tim Estes, founder of AngelQ. | ||
| Tim, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
| Joe, great to be on. | ||
| Thank you very much for having me. | ||
| So, Tim, we have the Leading the Future Super PAC, which is reportedly at around $200 million to primary or defeat any candidate that wants to regulate AI. | ||
| We have David Sachs, Mark Andreessen, Peter Thiel, all these guys pushing against any kind of regulation that's meaningful. | ||
| What does it mean that we have these House Republicans pushing for a new moratorium in the NDAA? | ||
| Well, first of all, it's a great sign that this could never happen on an up and down vote because the goal here is to take a must-pass bill that normally gets massive support and in the back rooms, sneak in language that benefits a handful of companies that supposedly is going to give us an advantage against China with the same companies that it's giving advantage to having been the ones that put the R ⁇ D in China to enable them to copy us. | ||
| So right now, it's a crucial moment because the president has just come out and stated that there doesn't need to be state-by-state regulations. | ||
| There needs to be a federal standard. | ||
| And if that's what we are really debating, that would be a great debate. | ||
| If we could have a national standard on areas like child safety, a national standard on areas like veracity and loyalty of the AIs versus deceit and abuse, if we had a standard on copyright that wasn't being trampled on, these would all be things that would be great to have a national standard on, but none of that's going to be in this. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| What we're really talking about is AI hands. | ||
| A note on that, Tim. | ||
| I mean, we have COSA, the Kids Online Safety Act. | ||
| We have the risk assessment bill that has been introduced. | ||
| We have all of these different federal bills, but they're all floundering, correct? | ||
| That's right. | ||
| They get blocked at the last minute by procedural things. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Certain people in leadership or chairman positions, they stand up and don't let them proceed. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Because if they actually had COSA on the floor of the House, you would get 350 votes, just like we got well over 90. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So what's really terrible is we have gotten close to creating reasonable, thoughtful protections to protect families. | ||
| And speaking, you know, as a fellow conservative in this, even though I think the issues we're talking about, they're 90% issues. | ||
| These are not Republican Democrat issues. | ||
| This is about, are you pro-human or pro-company? | ||
| And the pro-human side of this could have made amazing strides under this majority, but that has not been the priority. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And I think we're at a point now where we really have to decide how we think the voters are going to react when 90% of them want to prioritize protecting children over industry growth. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So there is a huge gap between the electoral politics being pushed from the venture capitalists in the White House with the realities what's going to happen next fall. | ||
| And so I believe that the majority is about to commit electoral suicide if they go down this road. | ||
| So who is behind this? | ||
| We know that Steve Scalise told Punch Bowl News that they were pushing this. | ||
| This was reported yesterday. | ||
| We know that Ted Cruz has been arrogantly claiming that the preemption is not going away. | ||
| We know that many around Trump are pushing this. | ||
| But where should the audience be focusing their attention, both the people who are behind it, but also the people who can block this, who can veto the new alleged moratorium in the NDAA? | ||
| Well, I think that there's a lot of House members on the Republican side which need to realize that this is not going to be a big win for the country. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The big win for the country is getting the applications of artificial intelligence, which actually promote industry to be well-funded, to be supported, to turn into mature, trustworthy technologies. | ||
| This isn't about that. | ||
| The laws are being passed in these states are age verification for pornography and addictive social media use and other areas. | ||
| That's the stuff that's going to get interfered with here. | ||
| And so the other areas, I mean, I think that we could go back and forth about how states should be influencing certain models. | ||
| But the bottom line is the conservative pro-family side is not here like trying to run interference for Colorado and California. | ||
| We are saying you have missed the vote on protecting our kids. | ||
| And Republicans are supposed to be against child sacrifice. | ||
| And whenever you want to find evil in this world, look where they're sacrificing the children. | ||
| And so I think here is one where completely reasonable standards could have been proposed and then it would have been naturally preempted. | ||
| COSA, you mentioned, preempted most state laws are not. | ||
| The war room posse has no problem. | ||
| The war room posse has no problem whatsoever holding the Republican feet to the fire. | ||
| So that's not an issue over here in our neck of the woods. | ||
| You know, when we were talking earlier, you were telling me that there were certain key politicians that we need to hit up. | ||
| Who should the war room posse be calling? | ||
| Whose offices do they need to call? | ||
| We have the Bill Blaster app. | ||
| There'll be notifications going out tonight. | ||
| Who needs to hear this and who needs to be speaking up as this goes forward over the next four days? | ||
| Well, I mean, this is a bill coming out of House Armed Services and the Senate Armed Services Committee. | ||
| So Republican members on those committees probably just need to say, this is not the vehicle for this. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| This is a unifying bill that's negotiated for a year, or at least for nine months to get to this point. | ||
| That's why it normally has overwhelming support. | ||
| You don't take something this divisive, this electric and this problematic and stick it in in the back room in the last minute. | ||
| Because what's going to happen is this, when those data centers need to get built out and the electricity rates shoot up, that's going to be on ads that run against you in the fall. | ||
| And it will resonate. | ||
| It will sting. | ||
| And this effort will be seen as the big tech giveaway. | ||
| So I'm just saying straight up that you can choose to either go along with an industry that is going to fund whoever wins and switch sides like they did this recently with Trump. | ||
| They were on the other side before. | ||
| They will switch sides to what side serves them. | ||
| The people who have been involved in this movement, they're the ones that need to stand up and say, you know what? | ||
| Ms. Reza, we agree with you. | ||
| Let's make a big discussion on a federal standard as soon as possible so we can then preempt wacky states. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| But that's not what's happening. | ||
| This is a vacuum that's being created on protection so that the companies can monetize on the backs of our children, on the backs of our creators and copyrighted works. | ||
| All these things are happening to enable a very small few to control more power. | ||
| And there's no guarantee they're going to be loyal to any agenda. | ||
| So I think that the president is being Fauci on this issue from inside the White House, as I might say so. | ||
| And I think that needs to get, before it comes too late, needs to get dealt with. | ||
| So having said that straight up, the Republicans need to be reached out to or the Republican members on the House Armed Services Committee and then other key members in swing districts to say, let's not get on the wrong side of a 90% issue. | ||
| That would be Mike Rogers of Alabama, chair of the Armed Forces Committee. | ||
| Yes, correct? | ||
| Yep, that would be the chair. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| And Rob Whitman of Virginia, vice chair and chair of the subcommittee on tactical air and land forces. | ||
| Scott Desjarlay of my own Tennessee, chair of the Subcommittee on Strategic Forces. | ||
| Trent Kelly of Mississippi, chair of the Subcommittee on Sea Power and Projection Forces. | ||
| Don Bacon of Nebraska, chair of the Subcommittee on Cyber Information Technologies and Innovation, and Jack Bergman of Mississippi, sorry, or I'm sorry, of Michigan, chair of the Subcommittee on Readiness. | ||
| So, War Room Posse, take out your number two purn. | ||
| If you are in Virginia, Rob Whitman, if you are in my own Tennessee, Scott Desjarlais, if you are in Mississippi, Trent Kelly, if you are in Nebraska, Don Bacon, and if you are in Michigan, Jack Bergman, we put the moratorium in the ground before we can definitely do it again. | ||
| If you would, Tim, where can people find you and where can people keep up with this as it unfolds over the next four days? | ||
| Well, I mean, so I'm on Twitter at TW Estis, I'm on LinkedIn and SSAI, and you'll find a lot of people. | ||
| I would say, you know, follow the Institute for Family Studies that's been out there leading on the polling that I've been alluding to that show like dead to rights the wrong side of this issue is giving amnesty to industry. | ||
| And I think that look at what Heritage has put out, look at what various other conservative organizations, Ethics and Public Policy Center, the long-standing traditional national security and pro-family right are not on board with this and never have been. | ||
| But there's not a voice for them at this table, which is why, you know, we're here. | ||
| We're here saying, you know, we're the ones that are going to turn out and keep a majority. | ||
| And this is being done for issues and ideas that are totally against the interest of most Americans. | ||
| So I think we're at a really critical moment here. | ||
| And I want to say very directly that like we are here to see this presidency be successful and not end up in two years of crisis and negotiations and crisis and investigations starting in 2027. | ||
| Amen, brother. | ||
| I really, really appreciate you coming on. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| Totally. | ||
| All right, War Room Posse, get the Bill Blaster out. | ||
| Grace Chong is ready to guide you through at Bill Blaster app on X. | ||
| And you can check my social media momentarily at J-O-E-B-O-T-X Y-Z for all the resources to hold these guys' feet to the fire. | ||
| Right back after the break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's take down the CCP. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Welcome back, War Room Posse. | ||
| Any of you guys who are in the Dallas area, I invite you to come down to the Angelica Film Center in downtown or downtown-ish, Dallas, Texas, Sunday, November the 23rd, 5 p.m. I'll be speaking about AI, the tool that becomes a god. | ||
| You can hold my feet to the fire in the QA. | ||
| And of course, I'll have books for sale. | ||
| And there'll be a number of interesting characters there for you to talk to. | ||
| And it'll be great to get along and get around people of like mind. | ||
| So that is in Dallas, Texas, Sunday, November 23rd, 5 p.m., Angelica Film Center. | ||
| You can get tickets. | ||
| You can find a link at the top of my social media at J-O-E-B-O-T XYZ. | ||
| My website, joebot.xyz. | ||
| And this is done in partnership with the Ministry of Truth. | ||
| And you can find tickets directly there, Ministry of TruthFilmfest.com. | ||
| Tickets are cheap. | ||
| Two for one until tomorrow. | ||
| Come down, hoot and holler. | ||
| Don't throw any tomatoes until I'm done. | ||
| And I will see you afterwards. | ||
| Once more for the attempt at a new version of the AI moratorium, which would ban states from regulating artificial intelligence, | ||
| ban states from being able to determine their own future in a transhuman age, we urge you to go to Bill Blaster at Bill Blaster app on X or the website up on Grace Chong's X, which I do not have on the top of my head. | ||
| But whatever you do, put pressure on your congressman to reject, to veto any injection of a new moratorium, be it one year, be it 10 years, be it 10 seconds. | ||
| Look to Mike Rogers of Alabama, Rob Whitman of Virginia, Scott Desjarlais of my own Tennessee, Trent Kelly of Mississippi, Don Bacon of Nebraska, and Jack Bergman of Michigan. | ||
| And while you're at it, go to birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| That's birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| As we move into an era in which digitized currency is tracking and tracing everything you do and can be shut off with a flip of a switch when your social credit score plummets for being a normal human being, you're going to want something. | ||
| A garden, weaponry, food supplies, but definitely you're going to want gold. | ||
| Go to birchgold.com slash Bannon or text Bannon to 989-898. | ||
| That's Bannon to 989-898. | ||
| And if you are sick of being tracked and traced via your phone, and I know I am, I'm basically going to have to get this thing implanted in my forehead in order to keep up with everything going on. | ||
| And if I do that, I'll probably want some privacy protections in place. | ||
| Maybe I will get a Patriot mobile phone. | ||
| Go to patriotmobile.com slash Bannon. | ||
| They do not provide surgeries to implant in your forehead. | ||
| You have to pay for that on your own. | ||
| But if you want an untrackable, untraceable phone, go to patriotmobile.com slash Bannon or call 972Patriot for one free month of service. | ||
| Now, you might think that with all this coffee, I would be full of energy, that I would be ready to go for the rest of the night with no signs of fatigue, but it's not happening. | ||
| I'm getting real tired, real sleepy. | ||
| I'm probably going to need a nap. | ||
| I'm probably going to have to lay my head onto my pillow. | ||
| Here to talk about the upcoming Black Friday deals. | ||
| Michael and Dell, please, sir, where do I get this pillow? | ||
| Where do I lay my weary head? | ||
| Well, everybody, I missed y'all this morning, but I wanted to get on here and tell you we're having the early Black Friday specials with free shipping on anything you order. | ||
| This is a war room exclusive for the country. | ||
| You guys have had my back. | ||
| You've had my employees back. | ||
| So the first thing we're going to tell you about the my slippers are here, the blankets will go first. | ||
| This is the early Black Friday special over five different kinds of blankets, duvets. | ||
| I'll give an example. | ||
| The pillow shams that are normally $69.98, $1,288. | ||
| I mean, so check this out. | ||
| We have down conference, all this, the early Black Friday special. | ||
| And then the other one we have, the big one we just added today, is the My Pillow Slippers. | ||
| They're normally $149. | ||
| We had them on sale for $59.98. | ||
| For the War Room special, for the early Black Friday special, $39.98.98 a pair. | ||
| So you guys, and once they're gone, they're gone. | ||
| They might be gone before Black Friday. | ||
| So you guys would get them all. | ||
| And you guys get this with free shipping, no matter how big or small your order is. | ||
| If you go to mypillow.com forward slash war room, there we have all the Black Friday specials. | ||
| We put the pillows on sale with the Black Friday $14.98 for the standard MyPillow. | ||
| Then you see the slippers, the blankets. | ||
| And don't forget, we got those five Bible story pillows where you get five gifts in one for $29.98. | ||
| That's what, $6 a gift. | ||
| So you have five Christmas gifts there. | ||
| You guys check out all those specials with promo code Warroom. | ||
| The early Black Friday specials are called 800-873-1062. | ||
| That's 800-873-1062. | ||
| Those are their moms and dads working from home. | ||
| They love taking you guys to call promo code Warroom the most sought-after promo code in history. | ||
| Thank you very much, Mike Lindell. | ||
| We really appreciate it. | ||
| And I look forward to laying my head down on one of those cushy My Pillows. | ||
| As soon as you send me a free one, which you still haven't, but I'm sure it'll be in the mail. | ||
| War and Posse, we appreciate your attention and we appreciate your efforts. | ||
| If it wasn't for you, we would have no rights for states to enact AI laws. | ||
| They're coming up from the Florida Citizens Alliance. | ||
| They are coming up through the Freedom Principal Missouri Fellows, and they're coming up all over the country. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because nobody wants big tech shoving their strange alien minds into their brains. | ||
| One way to get rid of it, say no. | ||
| Second way to get rid of it, pass laws that eliminate the problem to begin with. | ||
| So go to billblaster.com or at billblaster app. | ||
| Let your representatives know that you don't want another moratorium. | ||
| Again, we appreciate you. |
Export Selection