Nov. 26, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:45
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| In terms of what to watch for next, I think we need to be watching for something that they call autocratic breakthrough. | ||
| Autocratic breakthrough is when the party in power uses the power they do have in government to make sure they can never be dislodged from government. | ||
| I'll give you a concrete example. | ||
| You've already seen in the House of Representatives, now that Mike Johnson is back in as Republican House Speaker, they changed the rules in the House to make it much harder to remove him as Speaker. | ||
| So that's them digging in, planning to stay for the long run. | ||
| Now we're here. | ||
| You're not going to be able to get us out. | ||
| You've seen Trump, quote, joking, end quote, about expecting to stay in office for a third term once the second term is up. | ||
| And that's, of course, against the Constitution. | ||
| But he keeps repeatedly bringing it up that that's his expectation. | ||
| Trump advisor, his one-time campaign manager Steve Bannon, saying things in public about how they're going to be ruling for 50 years. | ||
| There won't be any way to dislodge them from power. | ||
| Autocratic breakthrough is when they use the powers they've achieved through winning elections to cement themselves in power so they can't be removed by future elections or by other democratic means. | ||
| So we are watching the efforts to consolidate power. | ||
| We are watching for signs of autocratic breakthrough, trying to entrench themselves in power so they can't be removed. | ||
| This is just the way these things go. | ||
| This is how strong men rule. | ||
| These are the things that they are trying. | ||
| Both the classified documents case and the election interference case being dismissed by special counsel Jack Smith after years of building that case. | ||
| What's your reaction to that news? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's sad. | |
| You know, haven't all of us gone from depressed to sad to angry and back again over the last several weeks? | ||
| This is kind of the whipped cream and cherry on top. | ||
| But as Vaughn said in your earlier segment, people voted here and they were fully aware of what Donald Trump had done and the serious allegations against him. | ||
| And the American people decided to Dismiss that, and with that comes the dismissal of this case. | ||
| I don't think anybody should be surprised. | ||
| Obviously, I don't think Jack Smith had much choice considering what the realities are on the ground. | ||
| I think number one, the justice system was not equipped to handle a defendant like Trump. | ||
| I mean, he just had extraordinary resources just by virtue of who he is. | ||
| He had a big legal team by the end. | ||
| He had multiple criminal defense attorneys. | ||
| He had appellate experts who argued before the Supreme Court. | ||
| He had entire teams. | ||
| This is not the way that the justice system is set up. | ||
| It's not set up to basically have entire large-scale teams who can We're good to go. | ||
| You know, that had information to give to the special counsel's office that by the time you ended up litigating all the executive privilege, you're already a year and a half into these investigations. | ||
| So I think there was a combination of factors, but I also think, you know, the way that the justice system is currently set up and structured in this country was just fundamentally not equipped to deal with someone like Donald Trump. | ||
| Claire, you've been through these Senate confirmations. | ||
| You've been through these hearings. | ||
| There's an assumption when a choice sits down in front of you, you may not like them, you may not want to vote for them, you may disagree with their views or their qualifications, but there's an assumption at least they've been through a basic FBI background check. | ||
| We've already seen what's happened to someone like Matt Gaetz, what's happened to someone like Pete Hegseth. | ||
| We'll see what his fate ends up being. | ||
| They're just doing their own background checks inside the transition team and putting people up on screens for Donald Trump to look at and then making choices based on that. | ||
| What are the implications of them just being thrown out there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, there's going to be a lot of Senate staffers that are going to be abandoning projects they've been working on and trying to do a much deeper dive into potential nominees that are coming before the Senate. | |
| But I think really what's going on here is, especially when he pulled Gates, is a recognition that there are some Republican senators that are not going to lay down on really outrageous nominees that have to be confirmed. | ||
| So what Trump is going to do is he's going to try to put in people that are really offensive into non-confirmable positions. | ||
| And as was just outlined, he's going to ignore the necessity for checking into their backgrounds. | ||
| And that's when journalists are going to have to kick in. | ||
| And you know, Willie, we have some amazing journalists at MSNBC and NBC that are out there every day trying to find the truth of what's going on. | ||
| There's a lot of networks that have good journalists that are working seriously to uncover the facts. | ||
| I would tell everybody to pay attention to journalism over the next four years. | ||
| Don't abandon it. | ||
| Don't decide, I'm going to turn everything off, but rather support those outlets where you see good investigative reporting going on. | ||
| And there's a number of not-for-profits out there that do great work. | ||
| ProPublica is a great example. | ||
| They've done some amazing investigative work. | ||
| The Guardian has done some good investigative work. | ||
| So, support those institutions that have people that are actually digging for the facts, because that's how the American people are going to know about some of these outrageous people that are going to populate the Trump administration. | ||
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot of all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big line? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| here's your host steven k band it's tuesday 26 november the year of our lord 2024 you're uh you're here this morning at the home of the autocratic breakthrough uh Aunt Claire McCaskill, Auntie Claire, in her total meltdown... | ||
| By the way, I want to play that clip of the meltdown, if my great staff can pull that. | ||
| I've got... | ||
| I noticed Aunt Claire said at the end she didn't... | ||
| She mentioned The Guardian, which we love. | ||
| She mentioned ProPublica. | ||
| It's not too shabby. | ||
| You know, she didn't mention Jim Van Der Hay's rant the other day. | ||
| Axio said that, you know, they're giving each other awards for journalism. | ||
| She failed to mention... | ||
| Breitbart, Citizens Free Press, The Gateway Pundit, Revolver, Darren Beattie's going to join us here shortly, Rahim Kassam's National Pulse, I can go on and on and on of all the great, amazing, amazing sites on, let's call it the right wing, in the ecosystem of media that drives the narrative today. | ||
| I'm honored to have Matt Boyle, National Political Editor for Breitbart, and I think the greatest reporter of his generation. | ||
| Matt, thanks for joining us. | ||
| I could play that cold open. | ||
| Folks, I hope your head's blown up because I could play that cold open multiple times today. | ||
| Brother, give me your thoughts and observations about what you just heard. | ||
| Yeah, well, first off, I heard that Rachel Maddow got a pay cut over there at MSNBC. I think she got a $5 million pay cut. | ||
| I hereby volunteer if MSNBC actually wants to fix the network. | ||
| I will do the job that Rachel Maddow has failed to do for her entire career. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, hold it. | |
| Hold it. | ||
| Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, Matt. | ||
| She made, I think, 30 million a year for one day a week. | ||
| She's only there one day a week now. | ||
| Now, she's the Brainsley operation. | ||
| That $5 million, I think, would be the payroll of Breitbart for a decade. | ||
| I mean, she's taking a $5 million cut down to $20 or $25 million for one night a week. | ||
| Come on, Rachel. | ||
| You're supposed to be a populist. | ||
| Your thoughts, brother? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Yeah, no, I'll do the job at half price. | ||
| Let's put it that way. | ||
| MSNBC, you hire me for $12.5 million, and I will do it. | ||
| And I'll do better than Rachel ever did. | ||
| No, like, these people are totally ridiculous. | ||
| And then Claire McCaskill there? | ||
| Claire McCaskill was one of the most corrupt U.S. senators in history. | ||
| I spent years investigating her here at Breitbart. | ||
| In fact, I... The deals that she and her husband had with nursing homes in Missouri were some of the most corrupt stuff. | ||
| The only reason she got away with and got re-elected in 2012 was the Republicans nominated Todd Akin, who made the biggest mistake in Political history when he was out there, you know, talking about abortion. | ||
| But the point is that, you know, and then it took six years of fleshing that story out for now Senator Hawley to defeat her in a landslide in 2018. You want to talk about journalism? | ||
| Let's talk about what we uncovered with her, right? | ||
| Like, I mean, you know, and by the way, you think that the businesses have ended with her and her husband in the nursing homes in Missouri? | ||
| No, like, of course, they're still doing it. | ||
| But now she's an MSNBC character. | ||
| These people are so high on their own supply. | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| The media is in a total crisis as an industry, and this could be fixed extremely easily, right? | ||
| We're not even saying they need to go out there and push conservatism or something or whatever. | ||
| All they have to do is tell the truth and be honest and open with their audiences. | ||
| And if they do that, and their reporting is accurate, then guess what? | ||
| They're going to fix themselves. | ||
| But hang on, hang on, hang on. | ||
| I don't know if they're fixable because they're so in the mind, but I want to go back to Rachel Maddow. | ||
| The reason she gets paid $25 million a year is she's the brains of the operation on the media side. | ||
| I want to go back to autocratic breakthrough. | ||
| So everybody take out your number two pencil. | ||
| We're going to have more nomenclature. | ||
| Autocratic breakthrough. | ||
| Now, she didn't complain. | ||
| She's not complaining about FDR and the 1932 realignment, which they locked in in 36, locked in more than 40, and they governed essentially for 50 until Reagan came, essentially. | ||
| Even Nixon didn't matter. | ||
| They reigned until Reagan and then Newt Gingrich in the 80s and 90s. | ||
| That was the realignment to the Democrat Party that really put the Republican Party of the Civil War and post-Civil War to bed. | ||
| Matt, we've worked on this project now together, I don't know, for 10 or 15 years about a populist nationalist movement that had African-American participation from the working class, that had Hispanic participation from the working class, that went beyond race and went beyond gender and ethnicity and religion and really focused on economics. | ||
| And the people that made this country and really drive this country get a fair share in it. | ||
| Why is she so... | ||
| And we believe, Matt, as you know, because we've worked on this, that we will govern for 50 years using democratic processes. | ||
| Why is the left so maniacally focused on that we're autocrats, we just want... | ||
| They put democracy on the ballot and we blow them out. | ||
| What don't they get about this? | ||
| And this is a massive political realignment, sir. | ||
| Well, I think the smart ones actually do see what we're doing, right? | ||
| So I think the Rachel Maddows of the world, they get it. | ||
| And they're scared because they know they're about to lose and be irrelevant forever, right? | ||
| And the fact is, is that we are succeeding in this fight, and it's because we're willing to challenge the Republicans, too. | ||
| They aren't willing to challenge the Democrats, okay? | ||
| Like, that's the point. | ||
| They can't challenge Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, And, you know, Valerie Jarrett and Rahm Emanuel and all these people. | ||
| If they wanted to have a real populist revolution on their side, they could. | ||
| But they're unwilling to do so. | ||
| And because they're unwilling to do so, they're ceding the ground to us. | ||
| You're saying because Federman and Roe Kahana and Sherrod Brown, people like that, are economic nationalists and populists, but they are actually a very small part and a very small voice in the Democratic Party? | ||
| Yeah, but they're not stepping up and challenging the authority of their party. | ||
| It's nonsense, right? | ||
| Like, so they say these things. | ||
| They say, oh, we stand for the workers. | ||
| But then when it comes to actually voting, right? | ||
| Like, look at Sherrod Brown's voting record. | ||
| You vote 100% of the time with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, right? | ||
| Look, Fetterman is the only interesting one, kind of, on the Democrat side, in that I think that, you know, I don't know if there's enough other people that would join him, but, like, Ro Khanna votes 100% of the time with Democrat leadership in their party, right? | ||
| So, at a certain point, I mean, look, we had really hard fights on the Republican side where we went up against John Boehner and Eric Cantor and Paul Ryan. | ||
| And Mitch McConnell. | ||
| I mean, look, we drove McConnell out, right? | ||
| Like, it took us 15 years to do it, but we did it, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Like, now he's not the leader. | |
| And he's still not totally out. | ||
| He's still got John Thune. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| Yeah, Matt Boyle's got breaking news over at Breitbart. | ||
| Darren Beattie's going to join us. | ||
| We're going to go to North Carolina. | ||
| Rachel Maddow nailed it last night. | ||
| How did President Trump win and we lost everywhere else? | ||
| What is going on in the Tar Heel State? | ||
| Absolutely essential to the MAGA movement. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Birch Gold. | ||
| Birchgold.com. | ||
| Go check it out and find out from Philip Patrick and the team why gold has been a hedge against times of financial turbulence for 5,000 years of man's recorded history. | ||
| Short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Band. | |
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| I make sure, Birch Gold, besides going to the website, you can, if you have your phone, text Bannon at 989898, and you can get everything you need to know about your 401k and your IRA if you want to roll them over tax-free, or I guess tax-deferred, maybe is a better term for that, but talk to Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
| We give you access to the best. | ||
| Make sure you take advantage of the access. | ||
| Steve Hayes and Jonah Goldberg with Andrew years ago, over a decade ago. | ||
| Bull remember this. | ||
| When Tucker Carlson ran Daily Caller and Steve Hayes was, I think Steve was at, had just gone to the Weekly Standard. | ||
| He was at Fox. | ||
| He was a buddy of Andrew's. | ||
| Tucker was a buddy of Andrew's, Jonah Goldberg. | ||
| Jonah Goldberg's mom was one of the founders of this. | ||
| She's the one that broke the story about Clinton and And the intern, everybody was kind of working together. | ||
| Now, in the Trump years, that's kind of split. | ||
| Steve and Jonah set up the dispatch, which is, I think, a fantastic site. | ||
| I go there a lot. | ||
| It's kind of the bastion of never-Trumpers, but you've got to understand it. | ||
| They wrote Michael Warren, Mike Warren over there, it's a terrific reporter, has written a story, an interview by me, about the war we've got. | ||
| With the establishment right now, about the rearguard action they're doing through John Thune to get rid of Gates and to fight Trump's appointments. | ||
| Matt, before I get to your story, Matt's got big breaking news out of the White House on Biden. | ||
| Some of the people are going to get a little... | ||
| Biden is sketchy, and Matt Bull goes into how sketchy they are. | ||
| But Matt, I want to bring back this following topic, is that... | ||
| What the Democrats haven't had, and they've deferred for years and years and years, is a civil war insight. | ||
| And this happens in political parties. | ||
| You're seeing over in England right now with the Reform Party and the Tories, and you've got to search for your way forward. | ||
| We've been at war with the establishment, Matt, for, I don't know, 12, 14 years. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Kind of from the Tea Party days. | ||
| We've had that civil war, and guess what? | ||
| Trump's populist nationalism has won. | ||
| Now, we haven't won everywhere because there's still a huge reactionary part of the donor class and the Republican establishment and the institutions and a lot of the media, Fox News. | ||
| The bastion of the neoliberal neocon kind of system that runs the country, that runs the American empire. | ||
| But we've given as good as we've gotten and that's why President Trump has been ascendant with his message. | ||
| I posit that the Democrats haven't had that message. | ||
| I mean, you know the Democrats very, very well. | ||
| You know a lot of guys over there. | ||
| They actually haven't had the bloodletting that you have to have in a political party. | ||
| They've kind of let the credential class in. | ||
| And this is why MSNBC has actually been a detriment to the Democratic Party and to what they're trying to accomplish. | ||
| Because they basically played patty cake with the credential class and promoted them. | ||
| And they forgot the populist roots. | ||
| Remember, my family, I started as a Democrat. | ||
| My family are a bunch of union Democrats. | ||
| You know, Kennedy Democrats. | ||
| So, Matt, what do they have to do to actually, and I think MSNBC is worse for them than Fox, as bad as Fox is for the Republicans, MSNBC is worse for the Democrats. | ||
| Matt Boyle, your thoughts? | ||
| Yeah, no, I agree 100%. | ||
| Steve, I'll tell you this. | ||
| I have a lot of Democrat friends. | ||
| I was just with a couple of them a couple weeks ago. | ||
| I will tell you, they want to meet you. | ||
| They specifically asked me this. | ||
| They want to meet you and learn how we did this, right, like on the Republican side, so that they can do it because they know that their future is very dark and it's not bright for them. | ||
| They might be able to get slim majorities here and there in the House or Senate in future elections, but they don't have a clear, visionary path forward. | ||
| And I'll tell you, I've met Democrat activists who would like to talk to you to figure out what happened on the Republican side so that maybe they can learn from it. | ||
| And maybe we'll set that up at some point, right? | ||
| Like, where we can go teach them how to do it. | ||
| By the way, I think it would be good for the country if they go through the same thing that we did. | ||
| And, you know, it'll take them a long time. | ||
| It'll take them a decade or so, at least. | ||
| But if they go through the same thing we did and then they actually get reformed and start representing the working class folks again and go back to their roots and the Republicans do the same, you know, keep going down the right path. | ||
| You know, yeah, there's still more work to do on the Republican side. | ||
| You know, imagine if we had a space race or an arms race between the two parties to see the best represent the American worker. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Like that would be the best interest of the working class folks in this country. | ||
| So, I mean, I think we should encourage it. | ||
| But again, when you have the establishment media and Democrats, you know, like MSNBC and CNN and whatnot, just protecting them. | ||
| They're never going to do it. | ||
| They're never going to change their ways. | ||
| They're never going to go through it. | ||
| I think we have, I would propose something else. | ||
| Because I think that the establishment figures are never going to be with us. | ||
| They're never going to be populist nationalists. | ||
| They are globalists. | ||
| They're elitist globalists. | ||
| I think we're going to lose part of that. | ||
| I think we have a higher probability. | ||
| And look, it's I'm 100% not agreeing, but you got Tulsi, you got Kennedy, you got other people coming up like that, and I realize everybody's not signing off on everybody's belief. | ||
| I'm not saying that, but you see a new 1932 coalition coming together. | ||
| I think we have a higher probability of getting Roe Kahana with his economic patriotism, which is really just Peter Navarro's economic nationalism, and Fetterman. | ||
| To align with us somehow, because their party's not, their leader's part, the credentialed part of their party is not going to give up power. | ||
| Just like, you know this, the donors of the Republican Party are not just going to sit there and say, oh, this is terrific. | ||
| Trump's guys, the unwashed masses that Trump has brought to the Republican Party for these victories. | ||
| Let's toss the keys to them. | ||
| They're not. | ||
| The John Thune, the Gates situation, and others coming through in this confirmation hearings, because Chris Christie said it the other night, and Chris Christie was very perceptive on this week that Jonathan Karl had on Sunday. | ||
| He says, hey, the Republican Sanders are going to get one. | ||
| They're going to get one. | ||
| They're going to... | ||
| Between Kennedy, Tulsi, and Hegseth, you're going to get one. | ||
| Focus on that, and you get Gates out, you'll get one more out. | ||
| And the Republican establishment should focus on that, and you see that happening right now. | ||
| So I think, tell your buddies, I'd love to meet with them, but I think we've got a higher probability of picking them off to our side. | ||
| Talk about this scoop that you've got in the Biden situation. | ||
| The guys in the White House, between the war in Ukraine... | ||
| The games they're playing at Treasury on the balance sheet and what they're doing on the southern border, they're fighting Trump every inch of the way to make sure when Trump relieves the watch at noon on the 20th of January, this thing is totally screwed up. | ||
| You've actually got even more reporting of the rats leaving the ship and what they're doing on the way out the door, sir. | ||
| Yes, so the gist here is that back during the Obama administration, we saw them fund the federal government to the tune of close to a billion dollars of loan guarantees and cash grants and so on and so forth. | ||
| A solar energy plant in Nevada, it's called Crescent Dunes, and this plant has had major issues. | ||
| It went offline for a year because of technological issues. | ||
| It went into bankruptcy, and then it reopened under new ownership and only produces a percentage of what the energy that it was supposed to produce. | ||
| The issue here is that a related firm That got screwed out of tens of millions of dollars, so they say, filed what's called a KETAM lawsuit. | ||
| A KETAM lawsuit is where a private entity sues other places to recoup losses that the taxpayers have. | ||
| Got on behalf of the federal government at no cost to the taxpayers. | ||
| And the Justice Department had greenlit this about halfway through the Biden administration. | ||
| And then all of a sudden on election night, they pulled the carpet out from under it. | ||
| And At 5.20 p.m. | ||
| Eastern Time on election night, a Justice Department lawyer emails the plaintiffs for this Ketam lawsuit saying that they were going to move to dismiss it, a complete shocking reversal, which amounts to an effort to cover up what is essentially a theft of hundreds of millions of dollars and Of taxpayer dollars in the cash grants that were granted back during the Obama administration. | ||
| So the Biden Justice Department on election night is doing this. | ||
| And I don't think they're so much concerned about this plan and what may come out about this one. | ||
| They're more concerned about the broader green energy agenda because just a couple months ago, the Biden Interior Department announced a massive expansion of In dozens of western states, millions of federal land acres of plans for future solar energy projects like this one. | ||
| So the green energy agenda is on display here. | ||
| And they were letting it go forward when they thought they were controlling government and it wouldn't lead to problems for them. | ||
| But they undercut the effort as soon as they see Trump coming in because they're afraid that their future projects are at risk. | ||
| Are they trying to bail out—is this like Obama and Gore and these guys? | ||
| Are they trying to bail out their venture capital buddies, or is this something they're trying to lay in policy and energy that Trump can't reverse? | ||
| What is it more? | ||
| It's similar to Solyndra in that there's an obsession from the radical left with this solar and wind energy and these so-called renewables for which the technology is just not there yet, right? | ||
| We know the technology doesn't exist. | ||
| To the point where it does with regard to fossil fuels. | ||
| And so what they're trying to do is they're aggressively pushing that agenda. | ||
| And frankly, they will do anything they can to throw as much money at that as they possibly can. | ||
| So yeah, they're making lots of money on it. | ||
| And there's lots of different people that are bilking the taxpayers basically out of it. | ||
| But at the same time, it's the obsession with the radical left synergy. | ||
| But the key thing here is that they literally are covering this up on election night. | ||
| So literally, as they find out Kamala Harris has lost the election, they knew at 5.20pm Eastern that they lost the election because they have the exit polls. | ||
| And the exit polls showed she was going to lose. | ||
| So they know she lost the election. | ||
| And then what's their first move? | ||
| Protect the green energy. | ||
| Because they know that they're going to have to ride out Trump in his second term. | ||
| Their hope is they get the White House back in 2028, and then they just start up the green energy nonsense right again, right after that. | ||
| Right or die. | ||
| Matt, where do people go to get your writings? | ||
| You have about 30 seconds. | ||
| Just go to Breitbart.com. | ||
| I'm also on X, Twitter at mboyl1, and on True Social at Real Matt Boyle. | ||
| Brother, we love you. | ||
| We're going to have you back on to do a reprise on Claire McCaskill. | ||
| We'll do Aunt Claire sometime maybe next week. | ||
| Just a reprise of your grave reporting of her corruption. | ||
| Matt Boyle, we love you, brother. | ||
| Have a great Thanksgiving. | ||
| Short break. | ||
| Darren Beatty's on deck. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The justice system was not equipped to handle a defendant like Trump. | |
| I mean, he just had extraordinary resources just by virtue of who he is. | ||
| He had a big legal team by the end. | ||
| He had multiple criminal defense attorneys. | ||
| He had appellate experts who argued before the Supreme Court. | ||
| He had entire teams. | ||
| This is not the way that the justice system is set up. | ||
| It's not set up to basically have entire large-scale teams who can Basically litigate their way through the courts. | ||
| And you've got to remember, you know, I hear a lot about, you know, Merrick Garland could have started earlier. | ||
| Like, maybe. | ||
| But then there is also the case that during the criminal investigations, you know, Trump repeatedly litigated every executive privilege fight he could. | ||
| Right there. | ||
| Hugo Lowell is one of the smartest reporters out there. | ||
| He's with The Guardian. | ||
| That is one of the most important statements that we've said. | ||
| The justice system, quote-unquote, is not set up for a defendant like Trump. | ||
| As Mike Cernovich says all the time, it's not about whether you're getting... | ||
| It's about when the state rolls on you, you're done. | ||
| This is why we have a thousand J6 folks in prison. | ||
| This is why Tina Peters is rotten in prison. | ||
| This is why they send... | ||
| They can crush you and they will crush you. | ||
| It's not about justice. | ||
| They weren't set up for Trump because Trump could fight back. | ||
| Trump had the resources and the savvy and Boris Epstein and others that could architect it and he was relentless. | ||
| You want an autocratic breakthrough? | ||
| Rachel Maddow, suck on this. | ||
| We're going to dismantle that quote-unquote justice system. | ||
| That's the justice system Stalin had in the 1930s. | ||
| That's the justice system that the Nazis put in place. | ||
| That is not a justice system for a free people. | ||
| You want an autocratic breakthrough? | ||
| We're going to burn down main justice and put these people in prison because they're criminals. | ||
| Hugo Lowe right there just told you, Beattie, This is the beating heart of this. | ||
| Unless we take this, not just defeating them and President Trump defeating them. | ||
| They must be professionally eradicated, sir. | ||
| Well, I completely agree. | ||
| And look, I've been on this show many times to maintain that in my view, and in the view of many others, for a lot of justification, Department of Justice is the key item. | ||
| The Department of Justice is the first, most important precondition to cleaning out the swamp entirely. | ||
| And it's something that, unlike our corrupted intelligence agencies, cuts closer to the core of our self-conception as Americans, because we think of ourselves as a nation governed by the rule of law. | ||
| And when that very concept is perverted, corrupted, weaponized the fashion that it has been through Biden, but really going back to Obama, that's when we start to think of ourselves again with sad justification as a banana republic. | ||
| And so... | ||
| I think a lot of these terminology like retribution, all of these kinds of things, that's very valid and there is a very valid sense of indignation. | ||
| But in a broader sense, what this is, it's not simply about retribution, what it is about setting the conditions to restore legitimacy within our institutions. | ||
| If we have people who think of their institutions rightly as corrupt and criminal, we cannot be a successful country into the end of the century. | ||
| If we want to look in the long term and set our country aright, part of that process is restoring legitimacy and faith in our institutions, including justice. | ||
| And in order to do that, you have to air out the crimes and you have to punish the criminals. | ||
| You and I are locked, welded at the hip on this, that there's going to be a lot of people, particularly the establishment, and this is the reason the country's in the shape it is, because the Republican establishment won plenty of elections, but wouldn't cut to the heart of the problem. | ||
| There are going to be a lot of people in President Trump's ears saying, hey, you won, let's just have a unity moment, let's have a group hug, let's sing kumbaya, let bygones be bygones. | ||
| That is exactly what we don't need to do. | ||
| Would you agree with that, Darren? | ||
| I would agree with that. | ||
| And again, it's one of these things. | ||
| It's not really a process of anger. | ||
| I mean, I think the general public is very angry and they're entirely right to be so. | ||
| But the mechanism, the purpose is not to assuage our emotional indignation. | ||
| The purpose is a necessary step toward restoring anger. | ||
| Faith and legitimacy and functionality into our institutions. | ||
| It's not, if it turns out we don't go after some of the most egregious criminals here, that's not a gesture of mercy. | ||
| That's not a gesture of being nice. | ||
| That in itself would be an offense against these institutions, because in order for them to be re-established as legitimate, there has to be at least some degree of accountability For the most egregious offenders. | ||
| Otherwise, everyone's going to think of these institutions as not only a joke, which they have become, but a corrupt, malicious, pernicious, poisonous joke of the sort that we typically see in the third world. | ||
| Let's play the, I want to play the Rachel Maddow. | ||
| I want to play the, for Darren, the autocratic breakthrough so Darren Beattie can chew on this. | ||
| Honestly, in terms of what to watch for next, I think we need to be watching for something that they call autocratic breakthrough. | ||
| Autocratic breakthrough is when the party in power uses the power they do have in government to make sure they can never be dislodged from government. | ||
| I'll give you a concrete example. | ||
| You've already seen in the House of Representatives, now that Mike Johnson is back in as Republican House Speaker, they changed the rules in the House to make it much harder to remove him as Speaker. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| So that's them digging in, planning to stay for the long run. | ||
| Now we're here. | ||
| You're not going to be able to get us out. | ||
| You've seen Trump, quote, joking, end quote, about expecting to stay in office for a third term once the second term is up. | ||
| And that's, of course, against the Constitution. | ||
| But he keeps repeatedly bringing it up that that's his expectation. | ||
| Trump advisor, his one-time campaign manager Steve Bannon, saying things in public about how they're going to be ruling for 50 years. | ||
| There won't be any way to dislodge them from power. | ||
| Autocratic breakthrough is when they use the powers they've achieved through winning elections to cement themselves in power so they can't be removed by future elections or by other democratic means. | ||
| So we are watching the efforts to consolidate power. | ||
| We are watching for signs of autocratic breakthrough, trying to entrench themselves in power so they can't be removed. | ||
| This is just the way these things go. | ||
| This is how strong men rule. | ||
| These are the things that they are trying. | ||
| They had a realignment in 1932 around FDR that they tried to lock in by packing the courts. | ||
| In the mid-1930s that was shut down, but they realigned with political power. | ||
| Darren, this is just what we're doing, this populist, nationalist, America First movement, is we're winning votes and winning elections. | ||
| That's the realignment. | ||
| Why does she go back to saying, look for an autocratic breakthrough, sir? | ||
| Well, a number of things on that. | ||
| First, just to get a sense of how utterly detached from reality, Mike Johnson is their example of autocratic breakthrough. | ||
| Mike Johnson, that's your autocrat, Rachel. | ||
| It's ludicrous. | ||
| It's just the dumbest thing I ever heard. | ||
| I didn't realize it would be that dumb before you played it for me. | ||
| But some other context there. | ||
| The term breakthrough itself, this is borrowed from the terminology of color revolutions from that whole world. | ||
| In fact, the preferred euphemism, at least as of like a year ago, for color revolution, because remember, we started talking about it, and one of their organizations did a very detailed mapping of the trajectory of the color revolution narrative, beginning with Revolver News and War Room and all the way into the broader media sphere and the broader national conversation. | ||
| Election Integrity Partnership did this. | ||
| It was one of the groups funded by All of these censorship organizations and NGO censorship groups. | ||
| They did a detailed study precisely of the evolution of this narrative, and it's been lectured upon in universities and such, which is kind of interesting. | ||
| But part of the vernacular jargon of this world is to refer to color revolutions as democratic breakthroughs. | ||
| And things going in the opposite direction is Democrat backsliding. | ||
| So this is an evolution of that terminology from that world and from that orientation. | ||
| Well... | ||
| Let's attach authoritarian breakthrough to, what, people wanting to win elections? | ||
| I mean, it's even more ridiculous because here we have the popular vote, and nobody really disputes that. | ||
| I mean, that's, I think, why the left is so fundamentally demoralized, is they can't hang it up. | ||
| Like, in 2016, they could say, oh, it was just a few people. | ||
| Oh, maybe, you know, the Russians paid a pittance for, you know, ads somewhere on Facebook that, compared to the, you know, the rest of the media were trivial. | ||
| But we can... | ||
| The victory was marginal enough that we can attribute it to some kind of outside nefarious force. | ||
| There's no excuse here. | ||
| Resounding victory in the popular vote, resounding victory in the electoral vote. | ||
| We got both houses. | ||
| And so what are they going to do with that? | ||
| I mean, this is a kind of cheap and poor excuse. | ||
| And they say, oh, the purpose of authoritarian breakthrough is to remain in government. | ||
| Well, If you do it through the electoral process, I don't see what the objection to that. | ||
| But there's another layer to this, which is that the Democrats and the left and, you know, whatever you want to call them, the globalists, the deep state, whatever, they do have permanent government and they have it by virtue of being entrenched within the bureaucracies. | ||
| So they have achieved We have every interest if we're smart enough and focused enough. | ||
| Focus is really important, by the way. | ||
| We can lose this whole thing if we don't have focus and we're just kind of dilly-dallying here and there. | ||
| You have to be very focused and precise, I think, to have any kind of like indefinite, sustainable, consolidated gains from this that don't just disappear into thin air after a year or two or even after the four years of the term. | ||
| But we have every interest, of course, in reforming the bureaucracies with our own people. | ||
| I mean, it's critical because you look at the Senate confirmation process. | ||
| If you don't have Senate confirmed, there's so much like the default is the bureaucracy. | ||
| And so we're seeing this blockage, whereas in the Democrat side, if they don't get a confirmation, the default from there, which, by the way, they usually get because the Republican senators are more inclined to vote for Merrick Garland than they are for somebody like Matt Gaetz, which tells you a lot about they usually get because the Republican senators are more inclined to | ||
| But in the rare occasion that the Republican Senate won't approve a Democrat, someone that the Democrat president wants, it'll just default into the bureaucracy and they get what they want anyway. | ||
| So there's just such a profound home court advantage in government to the Democrats having the bureaucracies themselves as one of their key client classes. | ||
| So you want to call that an authoritarian breakthrough? | ||
| That's just them playing the game, the long game. | ||
| They played it well, and we're playing catch-up. | ||
| But we absolutely should focus on that and address that in this narrow space of action that we have. | ||
| And it's a very narrow space. | ||
| Darren, revolvers at the cutting edge of this fight against the administrative and deep state. | ||
| Where do people go to get you social media? | ||
| Where do they go to the site? | ||
| Revolver.News. | ||
| We're on everything developing and also, more significantly, the main things that will remain significant for years to come. | ||
| The cutting-edge Revolver.News. | ||
| Revolver.News. | ||
| I'm on X at Darren J. Beattie. | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| Darren Beattie, Revolver is the tip of the tip of the spear. | ||
| Thank you so much for carving time out on this week to come on. | ||
| Really appreciate you. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| My pleasure. | ||
| The Autocratic Breakthrough, Rachel, take your number two pencil out and write this down. | ||
| We are going to take the Justice Department apart brick by brick. | ||
| It is a nest of vipers that has tried to destroy this republic. | ||
| Thank God in heaven it failed. | ||
| The providential return of President Trump, his moral courage to fight this. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to go to North Carolina and find out exactly what's going on in the Tar Heel State next in the war room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We rejoice when there's no more. | |
| Let's take down the CCB. This year, Trump won the presidential race, but Republicans lost almost everything else in the state. | ||
| Heading into this election, North Carolina Republicans held a supermajority in that state legislature. | ||
| But in this election, they lost that supermajority. | ||
| Democrats made enough inroads in that state legislature this year in this election that Republicans in North Carolina no longer have a supermajority that allows them to override the veto, for example, from the governor. | ||
| Republicans took this laws of dentistry bill. | ||
| They gutted it. | ||
| They took out all the dentist stuff. | ||
| They then decided they would call it their hurricane relief bill. | ||
| You remember all the horrible storms in western North Carolina right before the election. | ||
| They said it would be their hurricane relief bill. | ||
| But what the bill actually does is it changes the state government in North Carolina. | ||
| So all the state government positions that are about to be held by Democrats will have their power stripped away from them. | ||
| The governor of North Carolina, for example, will no longer be allowed to appoint judges as he sees fit. | ||
| Under this new bill, he will literally be required in certain circumstances to appoint judges that have been approved explicitly by the state Republican Party. | ||
| The state Republican Party has to approve the Democratic governor's judicial picks. | ||
| The Attorney General under this bill will not be allowed to oppose anything that is done by the Republicans in the state legislature, even if the Attorney General thinks it's against the laws of the state. | ||
| Power over the administration of elections in North Carolina would inexplicably, under this bill, it would inexplicably be moved wholesale into the office of the state auditor. | ||
| The state auditor being in charge of elections? | ||
| Why would Republicans change North Carolina state law so the state auditor is suddenly the person in charge of elections? | ||
| Oh! | ||
| Oh! | ||
| Because state auditor is the one race that Republicans won this year in North Carolina. | ||
| Okay, Michelle Morrow joins us. | ||
| We've had Michelle on before. | ||
| She ran a heroic race to be the education secretary and head of education in North Carolina. | ||
| Michelle, first off, people can't... | ||
| There's kind of some confusion here because North Carolina is such an important swing state. | ||
| President Trump won, and it was close, but it wasn't that close. | ||
| And we understand the governor candidate had some issues, and Mark's a good man, but there were some issues there. | ||
| The rest of you guys were, I mean, not just competitive. | ||
| You put forward a team on the rest of the down ticket. | ||
| That was amazing. | ||
| What's happening there? | ||
| Because people are saying, hey, with the vote counted, did the western part of the state count? | ||
| How did we lose everything except for Trump, essentially? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you know, it's a great question that you ask and thank you so much for having me on because this makes us question how President Trump could have won North Carolina with the largest margin of his three victories and we did not get the entire Council of State. | |
| I will say there is an issue with the establishment. | ||
| There's an issue within the party. | ||
| As I traveled the state of North Carolina, there is divisiveness. | ||
| And I'll just put this forward. | ||
| The person that I beat in my historic victory during the primary was a Republican. | ||
| And now she is on the transition team for Josh Stein, our Democratic governor. | ||
| So that tells you a little bit because during the primary there were over 30 Elected officials who were endorsing her and who were coming against me. | ||
| And so we do have an issue here and it is within the party and it's time for us to make this party in North Carolina and I think across the entire country. | ||
| It's time for us to be the gathering of patriots. | ||
| Rather than the grand old party. | ||
| It's time for us to get onto the track of what President Trump has won on. | ||
| And that is making America great again. | ||
| That is going back to constitutional issues. | ||
| That is focusing on education and a strong border and economic prosperity here in North Carolina and around this country. | ||
| And so I say this, I think this is, I'm excited. | ||
| Because I think this is a great day in America. | ||
| We have an incredible opportunity. | ||
| President Trump is about to take back the reins, and he is going to give power back to the people. | ||
| And it is up to us, the patriotic Americans, to fight for him and for this agenda. | ||
| And that's what I intend to do. | ||
| They dumped $8 million into a smear campaign against me. | ||
| And has that ever happened? | ||
| Have you ever heard of a Of a superintendent's race being in the national news, Anderson Cooper, Rachel Maddow, everyone else. | ||
| No, but it's because when you speak truth to power, when you uncover what their intentions are, and their intentions are to destroy our children and to lie to them and to indoctrinate them so that even the next four years of greatness and coming back to constitutional values, | ||
| that if we don't train up our children to know the truth about history, The truth about civics, the truth about biology, and the truth of our role as citizens in the greatest country in the history of the world, then we will not have that 50 years of prosperity that you spoke of. | ||
| But we can have it. | ||
| And I think that what the General Assembly has just done, we need to remember, Josh Stein Is a very dangerous person. | ||
| He has an agenda. | ||
| And as the Attorney General, he used our taxpayer money here in North Carolina to fight against a voter ID bill that the majority of North Carolina voters voted for back in 2012. We fought for 12 years to get voter ID after we wanted it to be a constitutional amendment. | ||
| That is who he is. | ||
| He has used our money to fight against the legislature. | ||
| So I think it is brilliant that the supermajority in North Carolina, before they leave for Christmas, they are taking back the reins of the judiciary. | ||
| And why would we not want our elections to be under the auditor? | ||
| Has anybody understand what the meaning of an audit is? | ||
| When we talk about auditing elections, don't we want to have election integrity in North Carolina and throughout the country? | ||
| It's brilliant because we've already seen Josh Stein and he has fought against election integrity. | ||
| So why would they sit back and allow him to be the one to name the people on the board of elections for the state of North Carolina? | ||
| They are being responsible. | ||
| They are being responsive to the people of North Carolina. | ||
| And we have we also what they did is which is amazing is they took away schools. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| I'm going to hold you through the break. | ||
| This is too important to rush through. | ||
| Michelle Morrow, they put $8 million in a superintendent education race. | ||
| Why? | ||
| They understand she's a rising star in MAGA. We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Johnny Kahn of Breitbart takes us out with American Heart. | ||
| Michelle talked about a gathering of patriots, not a grand old party. | ||
| Patriot Mobile is part of that gathering. | ||
| Glenn's story and the team. | ||
| Go to patriotmobile.com today. | ||
| See about their wireless service and your free hookup and connections. | ||
| Maybe even a free phone. | ||
| Go check it out. | ||
| PatriotMobile.com. | ||
| The best of the best. | ||
| Short commercial break. |
Export Selection