Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
unidentified
|
Pray for our enemies. | |
Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
unidentified
|
The people have had a belly full of it. | |
I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
It's going to happen. | ||
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room, here's your host Stephen K. Babb. | |
Welcome back, folks. | ||
Hanwell here at the helm, filling in for Steve Bannon. | ||
We're going to talk to Nathalie Dominguez now, home title lock. | ||
Nathalie, am I right when I suggest the figure that 90 percent of people's wealth is basically tied up in the property their own and that criminals are increasingly targeting this source of wealth for nefarious purposes? | ||
Yep, that didn't work. We're going to get Natalie back up. | ||
Let's go to Colonel Harvey. | ||
In the break, Colonel Harvey, you were telling me about, I think, 40 or so million illegals, did you say, in the United States right now, and the impact that this will have, that it might have on the election, which of course is an issue, it goes without saying, is an issue of national security. | ||
Yeah, well, Ben, there's 40 million non-citizens living in the United States. | ||
A good number of those are, in fact, here legally. | ||
And we've had 11 million come in illegally just in the last three and a half years. | ||
And there's been an executive effort led by the Biden administration to make sure that whenever they interface with the U.S. | ||
government, they get registration documents and get encouraged to register. | ||
There's no systemic process, and it would be very easy to systemically, organizationally check to make sure someone was, in fact, a citizen. | ||
But the Democrat Party fights it from the local level to the national level. | ||
Now, with 40 million people, if only 5% of them, 5% of the 22 million adults Voted, that would be 1.1 million people voting. | ||
More than enough to turn the election. | ||
But there's another factor here. | ||
The apportionment of congressional seats is based upon the population in areas. | ||
And Democrats benefit by where those citizens, those non-citizens are living. | ||
And that increases their numbers in the House of Representatives and increases electoral votes for blue states, where most illegals prefer to live. | ||
Thank you, Colonel Harvey. | ||
This is obviously an issue which ought to be terrifying for every member of the war room posse following this right now. | ||
We heard this from Mark Mitchell in the last segment about some reports. | ||
Sixty two percent of respondents fear cheating in the November presidential election. | ||
That is a headline figure. | ||
We're going to be repeating that, I think, every day now between now and And November the 5th itself. | ||
And I would ask, I would just gently, gently nudge the Trump campaign to come up with something more substantial than too big to rig, which as far as I'm concerned is literally meaningless. | ||
We're still getting Natalie to be reconnected. | ||
In the meantime, let's go to Monica Crowley. | ||
Monica, good morning to you. | ||
Hi, good morning, Ben. | ||
Great to be with you. | ||
Thanks, Monica. | ||
Listen, I was looking at your tweet earlier and it absolutely astonishes me that the backbiting and briefings against Kamala Harris have already started in day two or three of her honeymoon period. | ||
What really shocked me, Monica, is who's behind this? | ||
Who is doing the briefings against her? | ||
And that's Barack Obama himself. | ||
What does this tell you about, I think, the state of the democratic leadership? | ||
And are we confident, can we be sure, that it will be Kamala to actually win the crown at the Democratic Convention in Chicago? | ||
Well, to answer your last question first, Ben, I think what we know, the system is capable of doing anything. | ||
So it is possible that the ultimate nominee will not be Kamala Harris, but it looks increasingly likely that, in fact, it will, because time is running very short. | ||
And if they were to pull her, they have a whole range of issues, political, logistical, et cetera, to switching her out for another candidate. | ||
And I think at this point they run the risk of really looking like the chaos party, which they already do anyway, but I think it would be ramped up and put on steroids. | ||
If somehow she were to collapse in the next three weeks, and then they scrambled to replace her with yet another candidate. | ||
So it looks at this point like Kamala Harris is the fait accompli, that she will in fact be the Democrat nominee. | ||
But again, anything is possible. | ||
As we have seen over the last nine years, since the advent of Donald Trump on the political scene, anything is possible. | ||
Previously unthinkable things. | ||
Have certainly happened, so it's not beyond the pale. | ||
But it does look now like the train has left the station on Kamala. | ||
What you were referring to is a tweet I sent out last night, which is based on a New York Post report from yesterday that is still up on their website about President Obama. | ||
Now, Barack Obama, of course, is the major figure in the Democrat Party. | ||
He leads the party for all intents and purposes. | ||
And many people suspect that he and the Obama machine have been running the country over the last three and a half years, because it certainly has not been Joe Biden. | ||
So this has been Obama 3.0. | ||
So for a long time, Obama has controlled the party processes, the candidates, and how the party proceeds. | ||
And he still does. | ||
In this very moment, I mean, his hand is still on the till. | ||
So what I found very fascinating here, Ben, just to complete the circle, is that the reporting yesterday was that Obama was absolutely furious that the process has gone out from under his control and that he was very angry because he had a different candidate in mind. | ||
Now, a lot of us, including me, have been talking about Michelle Obama as a potential candidate. | ||
But this story suggested that President Obama wanted Arizona Senator Mark Kelly to be the Democrat nominee, and that he and Pelosi went to Biden, put the screws to Biden, essentially threatened him with the 25th Amendment. | ||
Unless he stepped down, quote unquote, voluntarily, but that Obama still thought that he had control over the process. | ||
And what looks like in this article, they refer to a source saying that Obama hasn't endorsed her quite yet because he doesn't think she can navigate what's coming at her, and he doesn't think that she can win. | ||
Now, that could be Obama leaking on Kamala, leaking against her. | ||
Or it could be somebody briefing against Obama. | ||
So there is a lot of intrigue going on here. | ||
But I don't think we've heard the last from President 44. | ||
I think he is extremely angry that perhaps he got boxed out. | ||
And I do want to have a word of warning here for the entire War Room audience. | ||
It's great fun to sort of poke fun at Kamala and laugh at her cackling and her moronic statements. | ||
But if, in fact, she and Biden join forces, Ben, to box out Barack Obama out of this process, do not underestimate her. | ||
She's very politically clever. | ||
She's a lot more politically savvy than most people know. | ||
And if in fact they boxed out the Obamas from this process, she is a force to be reckoned with, and President Trump and his campaign ought to be very aware and prepared for that. | ||
That's a very wise council, Monica. | ||
If you heard what was in the previous segment, when Mark Mitchell from Rasmussen Reports said in his latest poll, he said he found that 62% of Americans fear that there will be cheating coming up in the next presidential election. | ||
unidentified
|
Do you have a response to that figure? | |
Yeah, I mean, I think the American people are increasingly awake. | ||
I think they're aware of what happened in 2020, that that election was in fact rigged, that Joe Biden, this corrupt, senile corpse that they kept in a basement in 2020, And leveraged COVID to the nth degree to get him elected, basically installed. | ||
I think more and more people have an understanding of that now. | ||
And they have an understanding of what the deep state or the system is capable of doing. | ||
So they're more aware now of fraud, of election rigging, of the kind of ballot harvesting operations that they did in 2020 that they're prepared to do again this time. | ||
They don't have the larger context of COVID, but they did leverage COVID in 2020 and 2022 in that election as well for the early voting and the mass mail-in balloting and the ballot harvesting. | ||
They normalized that over the last two years. | ||
And those things, in most places, are still in place. | ||
So I know the Trump campaign is really on top of that, but I think more and more of the American people now are on top of that, seeing that these elections are not really in the hands of the people. | ||
They're in the hands of those who control the system. | ||
They're angry about it, and they're demanding accountability and honest, free, and fair elections this time around. | ||
When you were talking about the New York Post article before, and the suggestion is that the Obamas, or Barack Obama himself, was really pushing Mark Kelly, Senator of Arizona. | ||
His name's also in the running, isn't he, to be Kamala's Veep candidate. | ||
Could it be someone in his camp pushing this article, this attribution to Obama to boost his own share price? | ||
Well, anything is possible. | ||
Politics is politics. | ||
The article does say that the source was a Biden family source. | ||
So perhaps it's somebody in the Biden crew who wants to brief against Obama. | ||
Remember that Joe Biden is really, really angry that his so-called friend and mentor and former boss, Barack Obama, did not really back him up, was pushing him out of office. | ||
Barack Obama was leading the charge to push his vice president out of the presidency, again, along with Nancy Pelosi. | ||
So Joe Biden feels extremely stabbed in the back. | ||
So it's possible that Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi joined forces to box out Barack Obama And get Kamala Harris in there, and Kamala Harris was in on this as well. | ||
This is really the first time, Ben, in about, I don't know, 15 years, that Barack Obama doesn't have a full grasp and is not leading the charge on his own party and the party selection for president, and that has got to have him infuriated. | ||
Monica, I know Colonel Harvey wants to come in here and respond to what you were just Yeah, I think Monica, great points, loved hearing that perspective and very insightful. | ||
We were talking about the elections and the challenges and the rigging. | ||
One of the things that's fascinating to me is how the Democrat uh... led states are fighting cleaning up the voting rolls and uh... we're having to file suits to get them to take hundreds of thousands of dead people off of the rolls that still get these mail-in ballots and people mail them back in but in two cases maryland and in michigan where they have majorities and governors they have made it illegal | ||
For citizens and the Republicans to investigate, to question voting rolls and voting irregularities. | ||
And these rules are being initiated in the case of Maryland, not by the elected officials, but by the administrative state of Maryland, the election board, saying it's illegal to investigate. | ||
Yeah, you know, we are really dealing with it and thank God that we've had a change in leadership at the Republican National Committee earlier this year because they are really on top of this as well. | ||
Time is short, but when you have this kind of administrative fiat going in these critical swing states, Colonel Harvey, as you just point out, very difficult to push back because they're running out the clock and it will make challenges to any kind of ballot questions, exceedingly difficult for | ||
us to do. | ||
They know what they're doing. | ||
Look, last time around, Mark Zuckerberg put half a billion dollars into the swing states | ||
to do exactly this kind of thing, get out the vote, try to block challenges. | ||
Zuckerberg said he's not doing it again this time. | ||
I hope that is the case. | ||
But the systems and all of the democratic systems in all of these states have taken | ||
unidentified
|
it upon themselves to try to block this kind of stuff. | |
Just finishing off now with Monica Crowley. | ||
Monica, do you have any closing insights regarding President Biden's address to the nation last night? | ||
Well, you know, it's clear that, well, a couple of things. | ||
First of all, if the assassination attempt against President Trump had succeeded, and God forbid President Trump were no longer with us today, they would still be running Joe Biden. | ||
They'd be running this corpse for re-election out of the White House No question about that. | ||
The other element here of truth is that Joe Biden is not running because he is incapable. | ||
He cannot serve another four years, that much is clear. | ||
But neither of those things were stated in his, what sounded like a farewell address. | ||
This was not just an address to the nation explaining why I am not running for president again. | ||
It sounded like a profound goodbye speech. | ||
So you didn't get the truth. | ||
You got a spin that he was just passing the torch to the next generation. | ||
And I understand why they did this spin. | ||
But that is not the truth of what you got last night. | ||
And he certainly did not want to go. | ||
New York Post was reporting a couple of days ago that Pelosi and Obama both went in, threatened him with the 25th Amendment, said we can do this the easy way or we can do it the hard way. | ||
The government gangsters were out in force. | ||
They forced his hand. | ||
And that's what you saw last night. | ||
You saw sort of the mop-up operation last night. | ||
Since it does look like Kamala Harris will be the fait accompli of the nominee, I don't want this audience to underestimate her one bit. | ||
We talked a lot about Obama being furious. | ||
That he's lost sort of his sense of control over this process. | ||
He will get it back if he doesn't already have it back. | ||
He will ultimately endorse her and he and Michelle will be on the campaign trail around the country for her. | ||
That will be very powerful. | ||
They will help raise ever more money. | ||
So guys, I don't want you to lift your foot off the brake for one second. | ||
Do not underestimate her. | ||
We've got to run President Trump and all of our America First candidates down the line. | ||
We've got to run like they're all 20 points behind. | ||
We know what the deep state is capable of doing here. | ||
We know about rigged elections and we cannot take anything for granted. | ||
That's very much great insights, and I'm sure that Warren Posse will be taking note of your concerns. | ||
Where do people go, obviously, on social media to stay up to date with your insights? | ||
For example, this incredible tweet last night mentioning the Obama revelations. | ||
Yes, thank you so much, Ben. | ||
Please check out the Monica Crowley Podcast, now streaming on Rumble. | ||
I'm very proud to be part of the Rumble family. | ||
You can find it there at the Monica Crowley Podcast and all other podcast platforms as well. | ||
This week's shows, Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday, today's show, I do a whole historical arc of the system, the Deep State, so you have to know the history Of how we got to this moment. | ||
I break it all apart from JFK to Richard Nixon to Ronald Reagan through Donald Trump through today and what we're seeing today. | ||
So very important shows on the Monica Crowley podcast this week. | ||
Also on social media, Ben. | ||
Twitter, I'm at Monica Crowley. | ||
Also on true social, I'm at Monica Crowley. | ||
And Instagram, at Monica Crowley underscore. | ||
Monica, fantastic, amazing job. | ||
Thanks very much. | ||
Catch up with you soon on The War Room. | ||
God bless. | ||
Thank you, Ben. | ||
Thank you, Colonel. | ||
Thanks, Monica. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Well, we've got Rabbi Wolicki, who's coming on in a moment, who's beginning to break down with Colonel Harvey, the speech from Prime Minister Netanyahu. | ||
First, I think we've got Natalie back up now. | ||
Natalie Dominguez, the linecaps before. | ||
Natalie, let's try this again. | ||
Good morning to you. | ||
unidentified
|
Good morning, Ben. | |
Can you hear me? | ||
I'm here. | ||
Tell me what people can do. | ||
Obviously, with the emerging threats against people's property, where they think 90% of the wealth that they have, what can they do to protect this in the current economic environment? | ||
Yeah, absolutely. | ||
unidentified
|
So you were talking about, you know, criminals attacking our 90% of net worth. | |
For normal people, like I'm assuming you and me, you know, we're not career politicians that have all this equity built up from, you know, not their jobs. | ||
But today I want to talk about a criminal from Detroit, Michigan, that got found out a couple of months ago after stealing 30 homes in and around the city. | ||
And you'll never believe what she did for a living. | ||
She was the Director of Home Ownership Programs for a nonprofit called the United Community Housing Coalition. | ||
This nonprofit helps low-income residents stay in their homes with eviction defense and legal services, programs for avoiding foreclosure, and housing placement. | ||
So I'd call it ironic, but I feel like that's a disservice to the people that lost their home. | ||
So basically, this woman conspired with a few other people, allegedly co-workers, to target these low-income and elderly individuals who were in the program by stopping pending foreclosures via the nonprofit using fake documents. | ||
And then she would use fictitious title transfer documents to transfer the homes out of their name and into random fictitious entities. | ||
And then she'd market and sell the house, get paid via wire transfer that went into a bank account that was under her realty company's name. | ||
And then she would transfer the proceeds into her personal bank account. | ||
So after all that, even the craziest detail I heard from this whole situation was that she's currently living in one of the houses that she stole. | ||
And you know, We hear these big, crazy stories about people that tried to steal Graceland and Matt Cox, who stole a bunch of identities and ended up on the Secret Service's Most Wanted list. | ||
But those are just the big ones we hear about on the news, and it makes these crimes feel so big, like, oh, it's never gonna happen to me. | ||
I don't know if you guys feel that way at all, but for me, the most common crimes, the ones that are the scariest, happen by the people we know and trust in positions of power with knowledge and background of the process. | ||
you know, caretakers, family members, and non-profit directors who are supposed to help people | ||
not lose their home. People that are supposed to be helping us, protecting us, are sadly the | ||
most likely to take advantage, at least from what I've seen. | ||
And that, presumably, Natalie, is why the home title lock is there, and it gives you a far | ||
greater sense of security over your property so people like this can't come in and steal it from under | ||
unidentified
|
your nose without you even knowing about it. Exactly. | |
So bad people are everywhere. | ||
I mean, especially in this day and age, all the different ways we're being attacked. | ||
I literally got something in the mail the other day. | ||
It's like, oh, you're, what was it, Ticketmaster, you know, data breach, and just all your information's out there. | ||
We have all these scams constantly coming at us, and having home tidal lock monitoring your property for anything like this is just one of the ways you can lock into your peace of mind and have one less thing to worry about. | ||
It makes me feel a lot safer, you know, especially my grandparents. | ||
They live across the country. | ||
first thing my dad did was, you know, get stuff for their house because he's not there | ||
to watch it for them. | ||
And they're elderly and they get taken advantage of the most. | ||
They have caretakers coming in and out. | ||
And it's just a very scary world that we live in, you know. | ||
So what do people do? | ||
They've heard this, they might go onto the internet and find out more about what happened with this NGO and how this woman was able to steal 30 homes. | ||
People want to come to you and ask for a consultation or find out more about how they can protect their own asset, their own primary asset. | ||
What do they do? | ||
Where do they go? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, absolutely. | |
So they can go to our website, hometitlelock.com. | ||
They can give us a call, the number's on the website. | ||
They can ask us any questions that they want. | ||
They'll be directed to the right person. | ||
But Posse members today can actually use the promo code WAROOM to get a free title scan and history report. | ||
So if you're wondering, if you haven't, I mean, I never just walk into my county and say, hey, can I look at my title? | ||
If you want to look and make sure that your title is, you know, still in your name, there's no random liens, no random mortgages you have to worry about. | ||
You can get your first 30 days of protection for free. | ||
Cancel at any time. | ||
Get your history report. | ||
HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
PromoCode War Room. | ||
Give us a call. | ||
We can answer questions. | ||
Articles on the website will help you in any way that we possibly can. | ||
Again, HomeTitleLock.com. | ||
PromoCode War Room. | ||
Natalie Dominguez, thanks very much for coming on the show. | ||
We'll catch up with you again soon. | ||
unidentified
|
Awesome. | |
Thanks, Ben. | ||
Have a great one. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Okay, so now back with Colonel Harvey and Colonel The question I have, and then I'm going to hand over to Colonel Harvey to handle this segment, to dig down it, but I do have one question for you, Rabbi. | ||
Nancy Pelosi said that Netanyahu's speech yesterday was by far the worst by a foreign leader. | ||
What's going on in the U.S. | ||
Congress right now? | ||
Can you sort of expound a little bit? | ||
Well, Ben, it's hard for me. | ||
First of all, it's an honor to be on with you and an honor to be on with Colonel Harvey. | ||
Thank you. | ||
And of course, we all miss Steve dearly. | ||
Look, I can't speak for what Nancy Pelosi had in mind when she said it was the worst speech ever. | ||
I could think of a long list of speeches that were probably far worse. | ||
She was probably just upset that he praised Donald Trump at the end of the speech and actually criticized the Biden administration, even though he did it quite subtly. | ||
Ben, in this speech, Prime Minister Netanyahu said a number of very important things, and I just want to drill down on a couple of them if I can. | ||
The first is that he combated the two key false narratives about Israel's war with Hamas that the Biden administration has been using as cudgels to hurt Israel's chances of victory, to tie Israel's hands and to play along with the demonizing of Israel that's been going on in the media and in the various, you know, the UN and the ICC, these various Really bloated NGOs. | ||
That's really what they are. | ||
They purport to be international governments. | ||
And those two false narratives, the two key false narratives, the two pillars of lies, as I call them, of this war are number one, that this canard that there's not enough humanitarian aid going into Gaza. | ||
They've been touting it nonstop. | ||
They even built that ridiculous pier that failed in order to solve this nonexistent problem. | ||
Let's make it very clear. | ||
Israel has nothing to gain by withholding humanitarian aid. | ||
There's a tremendous amount of humanitarian aid going in because they're just allowing it all to go in. | ||
And the UN's own numbers, despite their own hopes for a different result of their studies, show that there's no famine whatsoever in the Gaza Strip. | ||
Soldiers that I've spoken to who have come out of the Gaza Strip recently report that there's pallets and pallets of food all over the place that are just lying untouched. | ||
So there's no humanitarian aid issue there except that it's enriching Hamas. | ||
That was lie number one that he debunked very well. | ||
The second lie that he debunked is the one about civilian casualties. | ||
That supposedly there's excessive civilian casualties when experts in urban warfare, as he quoted yesterday, have said quite clearly That Israel's done more than any other army to prevent them. | ||
Rabbi, will you hold on for just two minutes? | ||
unidentified
|
We'll be back after the break. | |
Welcome back, folks. | ||
We're going to straight now to Colonel Harvey, who's got some questions. | ||
Going to open up with Rabbi Wolleke. | ||
Hey, good morning, Rabbi. | ||
I appreciate you being here. | ||
You were beginning to talk about civilian casualties as one of the key things that, you know, the Prime Minister addressed to disabuse the Biden administration and others about their false narrative. | ||
Could you expand on that? | ||
Sure. | ||
So one of the key lies that's been told about Israel, like I said, there's really two key lies that have been used to demonize Israel throughout this war. | ||
One is that there's not enough humanitarian aid going in. | ||
The numbers show just the opposite. | ||
And the second is that the civilian casualties have been excessive. | ||
Now, Any civilian casualty is a tragedy, but in the history of urban warfare, and I'm no expert, I'm just citing the studies, and I've been following this very closely, and Prime Minister Netanyahu cited John Spencer, who's the head of urban warfare studies at West Point, who has said repeatedly, he's written a number of articles, you can find John Spencer's articles in Newsweek, I believe, | ||
Where he's written about the fact that Israel has done more than any army in known history to prevent civilian casualties in an urban warfare context. | ||
Whatever civilian casualties there are, are the direct result of Hamas, Hamas' strategy, and Prime Minister Netanyahu spoke about this, their strategy, and they say this. | ||
This is not just demonizing Hamas more than they're already demons. | ||
Hamas says this outright, that part of their strategy is to put civilians in harm's way. | ||
It's also the most complex urban warfare situation ever because of this tunnel network that snakes | ||
through pretty much every inch of the Gaza Strip. | ||
And the urban combat is, again, very complex. | ||
That said, even if we accept Hamas's own numbers, which we have to assume are inflated, and shame on everyone, including people in our media ecosystem on the right, who just blindly cite numbers that Hamas puts out, For the number of casualties, but even if we take Hamas's casualties at face value, Hamas never counts the Hamas fighters who were killed by Israel, the actual terrorists. | ||
They never count them in the casualty number. | ||
According to them, no one's been killed. | ||
If you subtract from the casualty number of Hamas the total number of Hamas fighters who've been killed, then you end up with about a one-to-one combatant to civilian casualty ratio, which is absurdly low in the history of urban combat. | ||
And there's reasons for this. | ||
Israel's taking great precautions. | ||
Also, the way that they're killing most of the terrorists, and this is something that a lot of people don't realize. | ||
I've spoken to people on the ground, soldiers and commanders on the ground. | ||
The majority of the terrorists that they kill, they don't kill by just blowing something up or bombing. | ||
They kill them with very precise targeted drone strikes, even at close range. | ||
Most of them are not even killed by soldiers holding guns. | ||
They're killed by these very precise drone strikes, which makes it a lot easier to not kill civilians. | ||
So that's a very important lie that's been told about Israel. | ||
Yeah, I think those are excellent points that the Prime Minister made. | ||
I'm glad you recapped them. | ||
There are some other things that were brought up in what I thought was a very strong speech. | ||
And he was very careful not to, you know, appear partisan. | ||
Although there were Lots of Hamas Democrats who did not participate in the joint session in Congress and rallied with the Hamas Democrats who were desecrating monuments and assaulting Capitol Police officers outside. | ||
But that said, he did address the way forward very, very, very well, even though the big elephant in the room is you really don't have a partner. | ||
But he did talk about Oh, that's a very important point. | ||
partnering with a Palestinian entity and a construct for bringing Gaza back. | ||
Could you talk about that? | ||
Oh, that's a very important point. | ||
When he talked about the way forward, and this is really, I think, the most important | ||
point that could get lost in the shuffle. | ||
He spoke about the need to destroy, to completely destroy Hamas's military and governing capabilities | ||
in Gaza. | ||
And he said that that's what total victory means. | ||
And he mentioned the word victory more than 10 times in the speech. | ||
And after he said that we have to destroy Hamas, he then went on to say, and I'm quoting, that his vision for the day after is a demilitarized and deradicalized Gaza. | ||
And then he said as follows, those twin words, demilitarization and deradicalization, those two concepts were applied to Germany and Japan after World War II that led to decades of peace, prosperity and security. | ||
Now, here's the key point, and I'm really interested to hear what you have to say, Colonel Harvey, considering your expertise and background. | ||
But although Netanyahu said that after we achieve victory, we then need to have a demilitarized and de-radicalized Gaza Strip, but he didn't really connect the dots in the causative sense. | ||
And what I mean by that is that the way that you get to a de-radicalized population is through unequivocal victory. | ||
Unfortunately, since World War II, the Western world has kind of lost its appetite for actual victory. | ||
Every conflict, from the Korean War down to Afghanistan, Every conflict seems to just be a long protracted thing that doesn't end in victory, or whenever there's a conflict anywhere in the world, everyone's just looking to de-escalate and find a ceasefire, leaving all the parties intact. | ||
And what's lost in that is that there is a moral and ethical value, and historical value, To actual victory, the way that Japan, Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany, which were both very radicalized, genocidal societies, the way they became almost overnight, rather benign, peaceful countries is because there was unequivocal defeat. | ||
There was an actual victory by one side and defeat of the other. | ||
When that happens, People who adhere to a radical genocidal ideology realize that their ideology was actually defeated, and that's where you can actually have real change going forward. | ||
This issue, you know, when people say, well, you've already degraded Hamas's capabilities so much, why is it so important to go all the way to the end to victory? | ||
The reason is that until they take a knee or are clearly defeated, There's no chance for a de-radicalization process of that population. | ||
I think this is a key point that is lost on a lot of people because, unfortunately, like I said, the Western world has kind of forgotten the purpose of actual victory. | ||
Well, I think that's absolutely correct. | ||
And those who study war, who understand war and war outcomes and how to bring change would accept that. | ||
And unfortunately, you know, the United States has developed an expertise in managing conflict to unacceptable outcomes. | ||
And so we have Secretary of State Tony Blinken immediately asking for Israel not to respond after October 7 | ||
and to be proportional. | ||
And you cannot change the dynamic. | ||
You'll just set yourself up for unending conflict unless you do something like psychologically defeat | ||
the enemy so that they accept that they've lost and they need to take a different path. | ||
So on that path, one pathway, one of the things that is going to be very challenging | ||
is addressing what is going to need to be generational change in attitudes | ||
amongst the Gaza population. | ||
And they're looking at bringing in Arab partners and others to participate in some construct after you get to that | ||
point of defeating Hamas. | ||
Qatar was not discussed at all during the speech. | ||
I noticed that. | ||
Would you address that? | ||
Yeah, and in fact we had a watch party in the Knesset yesterday for people who wanted to show up to that, along with one member of Knesset who was on our team, it should be said. | ||
And that came up, the fact that Qatar wasn't addressed. | ||
I believe that the reason that Qatar wasn't mentioned, and especially was not mentioned, I noticed it most When Netanyahu spoke about how Iran is funding the protests. | ||
Now, Iran might be throwing some money at protests. | ||
They throw most of their money at their military proxies. | ||
It's Qatar who's been funding all of the radicalized activity on the college campuses in America and these protests and he didn't call them out. | ||
I believe, because Netanyahu is a great critic of Qatar, I believe that he didn't call out Qatar for two possible reasons. | ||
One, Is that currently Qatar is managing the other side of the negotiating table in the hostage negotiations and Netanyahu might have felt that it wouldn't be prudent in terms of those negotiations wherever they might go to call out Qatar at this time. | ||
Another possibility is that he wanted to keep things simple. | ||
He had a great focus on Iran as the enemy of America and it's a heavier lift unfortunately to convince Americans that Qatar is an enemy even though you and I both know that they are. | ||
There's also the issue that you're raising here about what, in terms of the way forward, we need to have an actual partner. | ||
And there's no real leadership on the other side that is willing to work with us. | ||
One very important, one of the most important things about this speech was something that Netanyahu did not say. | ||
And that is that he did not He did not pay any lip service to the possibility of what's called a two-state solution or a Palestinian state. | ||
And that's very important. | ||
And that actually was pushback, even though it wasn't stated as pushback. | ||
He was polite about it, but it was pushback against Blinken and Biden and this whole administration, who they mentioned the two-state solution every chance they get. | ||
So that was very, very important. | ||
And as we see from last, you know, just last week, the Chinese brokered a unity deal between all the Palestinian factions, Hamas, together with the Palestinian Authority and others. | ||
And what that shows that unity deal, although China was obviously making a power play, that unity deal between all the Palestinian factions saying that they're all one and they're all going to work together. | ||
Now, they make deals like that all the time. | ||
They don't usually last very long. | ||
But the fact that they put out this messaging that they're all together. | ||
It gives a lie. | ||
It shows that the king has no clothes. | ||
And when Blinken and Biden say that the Palestinian Authority are the moderate Palestinians and they're a peace partner and they're someone we can work with and that they could govern, the fact that they just signed a unity deal with Hamas shows that that's, you know, that just went up in smoke. | ||
So this, you know, it's true. | ||
The path forward is going to be difficult and that's why it's so important. | ||
Unequivocal victory is the only chance we have to really have peaceful relations He also made another point, Rabbi, which was that Israel is in the front line defending United States as well as Western interests against Iran, against Russia and China, who are all seeking the weakening of the United States alliance structure and going after Israel so that they can gain traction in the Middle East. | ||
And if they all claim they need to defeat Israel, So that they can then weaken America and then go after American interests. | ||
Do you want to touch on that? | ||
Oh, absolutely. | ||
Israel's war is a war for Western civilization. | ||
It's simply a kinetic front in the same war that's being waged culturally all around the world. | ||
And here's where I have a bit of criticism for American conservatives, and I count myself among them. | ||
I am American. | ||
I live in Israel, but I spend a lot of time in the U.S., and I speak to Americans, and this audience is largely American. | ||
If you look around the world, The pro-Israel governments and leaders around the world today are Victor Orban, Geert Wilders, Javier Mele, Yair Bolsonaro, Georgia Maloney, all of the populist nationalist leaders around the world who are fighting for Western civilization against an encroaching jihadist Islam that is taking over the West, recognize that Israel is fighting their war. | ||
Israel is fighting the same war. | ||
And it's time for American conservatives to also wake up to this and recognize that it's very clear what side we need to be on. | ||
Israel is fighting a battle for Judeo-Christian Western civilization. | ||
If the Bible is true, and the Jewish people are the same Jewish people from the times of the Bible, which is a verifiable historical fact, then we are back in our homeland. | ||
But if history begins when the Marxist leftists decide that it does, a couple decades ago, and they can make up all sorts of false narratives about a phony Palestinian nation and a phony Palestinian history, if that is acceptable, then Western civilization is losing the battle. | ||
And we have to recognize that that's really what this war is about. | ||
Every American should be behind Israel 100%. | ||
Hey Ben, do you want to close this out? | ||
Yeah, thanks, Colonel Harvey. | ||
Look, quickly, can you both quickly recite your socials before we go to the break? | ||
Where can people go to stay up with your information? | ||
All right, I'm at RabbiPW on Twitter, or X and Getter as well. | ||
Please give me a follow there. | ||
And you can watch my show here on Real America's Voice every Sunday at 3 p.m. | ||
It's called Eyes on Israel, or my weekly podcast, the Shoulder to Shoulder podcast for longer form discussions. | ||
Colonel Rickey, thank you. | ||
Thank you, Rabbi. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back. | |
So, we had a lot of positive feedback. | ||
We had Ellen Fantini, managing editor of the European Conservative, and we had a lot of positive feedback on the socials. | ||
I was following on Getter. | ||
Ellen, good morning to you. | ||
I declare an interest. | ||
I am a contributing editor to the European Conservative. | ||
But it is a go-to source. | ||
I go to it every morning, especially on the international stuff, especially on the European stuff. | ||
It is a go-to source. | ||
I strongly recommend it. | ||
EuropeanConservative.com. | ||
We'll give those details out again towards the end of the show. | ||
Ellen, you've got a story here. | ||
You published a story I think this morning. | ||
to do with the blatantly illegal practices of the European Parliament. | ||
This is supposed to be the bastion of liberal progressive values in continental Europe. | ||
We're recovering blow by blow the European elections, the great successes of basically | ||
the two nationalist streams now, probably three arguably, following the election. | ||
You have the pro-Atlanticist nationalists represented by the ECR group headed by Maloney. | ||
You have the Patriots for Europe, which are sort of more Atlanticist sceptic nationalists headed up by Viktor Orban's group. | ||
And then you have this new group, which I didn't think they were going to get the numbers. | ||
They did, which is basically the AFD, the Alternative for Deutschland contingent. | ||
All three of them managed to get, I think, 23 or minimum of 23 members across seven member | ||
states. | ||
So it was a great result for the right, for the nationalists, for the populists, the non-establishment | ||
A great result in the European Parliament. | ||
And yet, lo and behold, what are the great paladins of democracy and diversity doing in Brussels? | ||
Ellen Fantini. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, as I told you last week, Eurocrat Ursula von der Leyen was reelected as the European Commission president after she sold herself to the highest bidder, promising to gang up on the patriots, sovereigntists and anyone else right of center in the parliament. | |
And remember, of course, she was reelected president without winning one single European's vote. | ||
And as I mentioned, she committed to this concept of the Cordon Sanitaire against the National Conservative Sovereigntists forces in the Parliament. | ||
Remember, Cordon Sanitaire is meant to create a barrier to stop the spread of infectious | ||
diseases. | ||
So, she and her colleagues are treating their democratically elected colleagues as if they | ||
have the plague. | ||
So, this week, on Tuesday, the European Parliament decided the leadership of its various parliamentary | ||
committees, chairs and vice-chairs. | ||
And normally, the vote would be a simple confirmation of candidates, as the posts are automatically allocated proportionally based on the relative sizes of the groups. | ||
Remember, the Patriots are the third largest group in the Parliament. | ||
So normally it's a simple walkthrough and they only have to worry about keeping a gender balance, which of course the parliament itself imposes a rule. | ||
So this time, the mainstream center-left coalition, along with the radical leftists, outrageously stripped every single candidate of the Patriots from their allocated leadership positions, even at the expense of violating its own internal rules for these gender quotas. | ||
And they did this just to prevent the Patriots from taking one single seat. | ||
So what did they do? | ||
The leftists joined forces to cheat the system and simply voted down every Patriot candidate and then split up the allocated chairmanships and vice chairmanships between themselves, all the time acting as if violating every convention laid down in the treaties was perfectly legitimate because, of course, it was done against conservatives. | ||
As one Patriots MEP said, this is a rejection of 18 million voters and a betrayal of democracy. | ||
So, that's where we are. | ||
Look, the European Conservative is in touch with all the leading members of the European Parliament in Brussels that are part of our faction here, the populists. | ||
Will you come back on tomorrow and give an explanation, if you will, a description, to our largely American audience to show just how illegal and unconstitutional the left is when they have power? | ||
And they're not even supposed to be in power right now. | ||
They're supposed to be the centre-right. | ||
The European People's Party. | ||
Would you come back tomorrow? | ||
I'd be happy to. | ||
In the meantime, your socials, please. | ||
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
We're at Eurocon on Getter, we're at Eurocon Official on X, and I'm at Fantina Vienna. | ||
OK, and that's the EuropeanConservative.com. | ||
Ellen Fantini, thank you very much indeed for coming on the show today. | ||
We'll catch up again with you tomorrow. | ||
unidentified
|
OK, my pleasure. | |
God bless. | ||
Mike Lindell, good morning to you. | ||
Mike, earlier on in the show we had Mark Mitchell from Rasmussen Reports who said his latest poll produced 62% of respondents said that they feared, this is a cross party, this is bipartisan, said that they feared cheating would take place in 2024. | ||
How does that strike you? | ||
Because you've been like the number one go-to guy on this. | ||
Right. | ||
Well, I'm 100% that they're going to try and do that. | ||
But we've got a great plan, everybody. | ||
You've got to get involved. | ||
Go to LyndellPlan.com. | ||
One of the parts of the plan is, which everybody needs to know, request your mail-in ballot. | ||
Get it, secure it, get it off them dirty voter rolls. | ||
And when you go in to vote, if they tell you you already voted, You say, no, I haven't. | ||
And you pull it out. | ||
We explain it all on LyndalePlan.com. | ||
This is very important because don't think they're not going to try it again, all the things they did. | ||
And so everything, get involved, really go to LyndalePlan.com. | ||
And that's your go-to place, everybody. | ||
Thanks, Mike. | ||
And what's going on over at MyPillow right now? | ||
What offers do you have to deposit this morning? | ||
Well, we got great offer. | ||
I'm going to be speaking in Minnesota, by the way, everybody, at the rally this weekend. | ||
So I'm able to go do these things because you are supporting my employees and my pillow. | ||
We're giving you a special that no one else in the country has today. | ||
I decided this morning to put the Giza Dream Shades This is our, the sheets, we all started it all. | ||
The best sheets in history. | ||
It's our real president's favorite product. | ||
Giza Dream Sheets, $59.98 for the queen. | ||
They're regularly $139.98, $69.98 for the king. | ||
The lowest prices in the history of the Giza Dream Sheets. | ||
These are the best sheets ever. | ||
I developed them about six years ago and used promo code WARROOM There's a 60-day money-back guarantee. | ||
You will love these sheets. | ||
800-873-1062. | ||
Call my operators. | ||
They're standing by. | ||
Or you go to the website. | ||
All the other specials that other people get are there, plus the War Room exclusives, everybody. | ||
Michael, the fact that 62% of the American people now believe 2024 might be stolen, I think Largely due to a lot of the work that you've done, you've moved the needle on the national conversation on this and I pay tribute to you. | ||
Catch up with you tomorrow, Mike. | ||
Thanks very much. | ||
God bless. | ||
Warming posse, we'll be back at 5pm with Nathalie Winters. | ||
Standby at noon with Charlie Kirk and have a beautiful rest of the day. |