June 22, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
48:58
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Do you want your life protected only up to a certain age? | |
| Do you want your life protected in one state but not in another? | ||
| When we deal with abortion, we're talking about a fundamental right that our founders mentioned in the Declaration of Independence. | ||
| There is no room for fudging, for compromise, or for diluting on this issue. | ||
| And especially in our party platform, we have to resist any and every effort to weaken the pro-life position. | ||
| Amen! | ||
| And thirdly, my friends, we have to deal with the abortion issue as a matter of honesty. | ||
| The Democrat Party wants to bring abortion front and center in this election. | ||
| You know what I say in response? | ||
| Be my guest. | ||
| But when you bring abortion forward, talk about abortion, not about some other kind of flowery language that you are afraid, okay, and they will never do this. | ||
| When we ask them, describe to us what an abortion is. | ||
| Show the American people what an abortion looks like. | ||
| They're cowards! | ||
| When we bring abortion forward, you know what? | ||
| We speak about abortion! | ||
| And brothers and sisters, that's how we have to deal with this issue. | ||
| Lookitabortion.org is a site that we're challenging folks who think they have an opinion on this. | ||
| Right there is Faith and Family. | ||
| President Trump will speak there tonight, 7 o'clock. | ||
| Real America's Voice will be in Philadelphia. | ||
| We have Jack Posobiec up there. | ||
| Also some special guests. | ||
| I think Brian Glenn's gonna be there. | ||
| That's gonna be at Temple University. | ||
| Also, or near Temple University. | ||
| Also later tonight, I think it's 7 o'clock, Real America's Voice. | ||
| We'll be streaming all that on Getter and my Rumble, our Rumble, Worms Rumble. | ||
| That's Father Frank Pavone. | ||
| You've got Dr. Ben Carson. | ||
| Some of the majors. | ||
| That's a panel. | ||
| They've had speeches all day. | ||
| Carrie Lake spoke there. | ||
| But the reason I wanted to come in right for that clip There's going to be a platform fight at the RNC, and the platform fight is going to be about this issue, and you heard Father Prevone right there throwing down. | ||
| This is Ralph Reed's group, big right-to-life group, and they're not about to back off one inch. | ||
| He said they want a robust platform in the Republican At the Republican National Convention. | ||
| And I'm just giving you a heads up, folks. | ||
| It's going to be a fight. | ||
| So we'll spend more time on that next week, even with everything going on. | ||
| Jeff Clark, I want to go back. | ||
| Of all the administrative states, and there are many important ones, the Mac Daddy is The Chevron deference. | ||
| This is something that people have worked on for years to get to the court to get with the right case. | ||
| How important? | ||
| Because Dr. Kevin Robbins is here. | ||
| You got an executive branch way to deconstruct the administrative state. | ||
| You have a legislative way because quite frankly, as you know, one of the central problems is we have laws that are passed. | ||
| Bills that are passed that are 500 pages long or 900 pages long, but that's nothing. | ||
| The real grit of it is the federal regulations underneath it. | ||
| That's where the administrative state grows like a weed. | ||
| And then you've got the courts and the judicial system. | ||
| And right now, It's stunning how quickly, just in a couple of years, and this is because President Trump came in in 2016. | ||
| This is what happens when you win. | ||
| How important is the Chevron deference case, the Mac Daddy, to really begin, I think, the most fundamental part of the deconstruction of the administrative state, sir? | ||
| Steve, it's super important, right? | ||
| It is the key generalized precedent that will be set by the court this term. | ||
| Let me just make a quick statement about the abortion issue you came in with as the cold open for this segment, which is we also are expecting a big, big abortion decision from the Supreme Court that hasn't come out yet. | ||
| Again, revealing what a giant term this is. | ||
| It's a case Uh, called, uh, Moyle and in Moyle, uh, the, uh, Idaho legislature passed, you know, restrictions on abortions, uh, you know, except, you know, to protect the, the, uh, the, the health of the mother, et cetera. | ||
| And instead of trying to challenge that constitutionally, cause they lost that in the Dobbs case, they're now challenging it as, uh, being preempted by the Medicare statute saying that it's a necessary medical treatment. | ||
| So we're expecting that abortion decision. | ||
| So that's also huge. | ||
| But back to the two Chevron cases, Relentless and Loper Bright. | ||
| I mean, these cases are so central, Steve. | ||
| And, you know, it's really the main thing they're trying to protect in many ways is all of the environmental regulation because it hinges on Chevron. | ||
| And so during my confirmation hearing in 2017, It was such a hot potato that the Democrats were like grilling me over, are you going to continue to uphold Chevron? | ||
| And the Republicans were doing, you know, the flip side of that, like, are you going to get rid of Chevron? | ||
| And what I explained to them, and you just alluded to Steve, is that this has always been in the hands of the Supreme Court and Congress. | ||
| Congress could overrule the Chevron doctrine like that. | ||
| I think we're going to get the Supreme Court, you know, having to step up because Congress hasn't done that. | ||
| They're the two bodies that can overrule that. | ||
| If you're in the executive branch, you're stuck with whatever the Supreme Court has told you about Chevron unless and until Congress or the Supreme Court changes it. | ||
| And I think we're on the verge of the Supreme Court very drastically changing that doctrine, which is the undergirding, you know, the steel undergirding of the administrative state and the fourth branch of government that Kevin Roberts talked about. | ||
| Let's go to, we've got Missouri, you got the Missouri about Big Tech, your thoughts on that? | ||
| And I also want to talk about the two I think are obviously huge immunity, but I think Fisher may be one of the most important and fundamental ever done in American judicial and legal history. | ||
| Let's go to Missouri first on the Big Tech. | ||
| So we got two big tech cases, actually, Steve. | ||
| One called Murthy, which is about social media working with the government to censor in the wake of the COVID so-called crisis, right? | ||
| That those who were questioning the treatments, the idea of how serious a public health problem it is, the vaccines, et cetera, they all had to be censored. | ||
| And then we also have restrictions on You know, social media in the wake of the January 6th incident that were imposed by Florida and Texas. | ||
| So the first case, the COVID case, is Murthy and the case about the Florida and Texas laws is Moody. | ||
| So there's another two huge First Amendment blockbuster set of cases that we're still waiting for, Steve. | ||
| And, you know, sadly, the Supreme Court seemed, you know, maybe a majority of them seemed skeptical. | ||
| of the idea that you could try to stop the government from engaging in, or big tech on their own initiative, | ||
| engaging in these kinds of censorship episodes. | ||
| You know, the ones who seem to have a different approach, not surprisingly, Justices Thomas and Alito, | ||
| which is why they hate them and why they're trying to drive them from the court. | ||
| Talk to me about, I wanna go Fisher first and then immunity. | ||
| I believe Fisher because of the inextricably linked nature of how this went down with the federal bench, federal justices, and the Department of Justice. | ||
| And maybe I'm reading too much into it, but talk to us about Fisher for a moment. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| So Fisher, Steve, is about 18 USC, 1512 C2. | ||
| Which has this language that they glommed onto in the Biden administration to try to throw people in jail and throw away the key after January 6th of obstruction of an official proceeding. | ||
| And if you just focused on that myopically, you could make an argument that people who caused a delay in the certification timeline On January 6 for the presidential candidates, you know, the way they see it on the left is, you know, to confirm Joe Biden's victory. | ||
| And, you know, but the problem is it's part of a larger statute. | ||
| It was adopted with a particular context. | ||
| And that context was to seal off a loophole that became apparent during the Enron debacle. | ||
| And I think that it's, you know, about documents, it's about testimony, traditional obstruction of justice situations, not situations of someone exercising their First Amendment rights and going up to the Capitol to raise a sign or, you know, shake their fist in the air and complain about the the election problems in 2020. | ||
| So I think the statute's been wildly misinterpreted and just bent to this purpose of throwing the book at January Sixers. | ||
| And I think, you know, from the Oral argument, although it can be hazardous to make predictions based on oral argument. | ||
| It looks like the Supreme Court's pretty skeptical of applying 1512 C2 in that way. | ||
| And so we're talking about the consequences of that. | ||
| You know, a number of people could be freed or have their sentences reduced, or they could just be let out of jail because they've already served enough time for their other charges. | ||
| And it knocks out half of Jack Smith's D.C. | ||
| indictment against President Trump. | ||
| So it's huge. | ||
| Well, it's huge. | ||
| Also, it's not simply that. | ||
| It's about after that. | ||
| Like, who's held account? | ||
| How did this happen? | ||
| Who's accountable for this? | ||
| There's a very dark underbelly here to this Fisher situation. | ||
| There's a very dark, and we'll have to wait how the Supreme Court rules on it, but I'm telling you, this one is going to lead to some dark places about how this actually happened. | ||
| How it got misinterpreted. | ||
| What was the meetings? | ||
| How did this take place? | ||
| What was the reasoning inside of Merrick Garland's Justice Department? | ||
| Jack Smith, the media, and actually the justices themselves is one of the things, as you know, out of Watergate. | ||
| We never really got to the... Watergate is really about Judge Sirica and the justices and the bench, the judges, actually working, not according to American custom and tradition, with House committees and with DOJ. | ||
| This is what never really got... We never vetted this, never lanced a bull on that on Watergate, and that's why we're in this situation we're in, and we're going to get a second bite of the apple. | ||
| Folks, this one's going to be big. | ||
| Very big. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| You agree with that, Jeff? | ||
| I do. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| And look, you know, you mentioned Judge Sirica and even the judges back then in the 70s, you know, during the Nixon era on the D.C. | ||
| Circuit, the Appellate Court. | ||
| Jeff Shepard, who was in the Nixon White House Counsel's Office, has convincingly shown in scholarship since than that they were engaged in ex parte contacts. | ||
| They were working with the Democrats essentially to pillory and drive Richard Nixon from office. | ||
| We're seeing the same kind of democratic playbook down in Atlanta where we have this other judge, | ||
| Glanville, who has the Young Thug case. | ||
| He's having ex parte contacts with the prosecutors and he's threatening witnesses. | ||
| And there's a defense lawyer who finds out about that. | ||
| And instead of the judge saying, you know, hey, I guess I was caught having improper ex parte contacts. | ||
| He demands to know how the lawyer found out about it, which isn't the issue. | ||
| Then he holds him in contempt and orders him to jail like every weekend for the next like five months. | ||
| And the Georgia Supreme Court had to put a freeze on that while they take a look at it. | ||
| I think they're going to reverse that lickety split. | ||
| So it's just the way Democrats proceed, right? | ||
| Like you cannot have, what is an ex parte contact? | ||
| It's a situation where the judge is talking to only one side outside the hearing and ability to advocate of the other side. | ||
| It's a violation of basic due process and it's totally un-American. | ||
| Can you talk about the immunity too? | ||
| Because this is the one MSME is saying, I realize it's huge, I happen to think Fisher Is 10 times more important because it gets back to Watergate and it gets back to the way they roll. | ||
| It gets back to the way the apparatus operates. | ||
| But I know MSNBC on immunity, your thoughts on immunity, sir. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And look, Steve, all this stuff is going to come out in terms of, you asked the question of, of the, the Garland justice department and how they came to these theories. | ||
| Those documents are going to get released unless they're destroyed. | ||
| Uh, but then they have bigger problems when that's discovered as well. | ||
| So look, the immunity case is huge because what it ties to is the election of 2024, right? | ||
| If they can get this trial that Jack Smith is trying to gin up against President Trump going again, and they can get it, you know, right in the key period of the fall before the election is held, which is what they're aiming for, then, you know, that's huge. | ||
| That could tip the election against President Trump. | ||
| And so President Trump, I do believe, has I think the Supreme Court is going to set the parameters of that in the Trump case. | ||
| And I think that, you know, the arguments that the left has against this, people like Larry Tribe having meltdowns about that, you know, we have situations where the courts have created immunity doctrines before. | ||
| They've created a civil immunity doctrine for the president in a Nixon case. | ||
| So this would just be extending that to the criminal context. | ||
| We have situations where judges cannot be brought up on charges because they have judicial immunity. | ||
| Prosecutors have prosecutorial immunity. | ||
| All of these things are creatures of case law. | ||
| And all that I ever see on MSNBC is the lame talking point of there's no specific presidential immunity provision in the Constitution. | ||
| Well, welcome to the world of immunity doctrine. | ||
| The courts have created immunity doctrines before in order to make the constitutional system work. | ||
| And that's what we're talking about here. | ||
| And I think we're going to see them create some form and define it, a span of immunity for President Trump, and then they're going to remand. | ||
| And hopefully they're going to keep a tight leash on Judge Chutkan, because I think if she doesn't have that tight leash, she's going to rush ahead to try to get this trial to dirty up President Trump so that the election can be interfered in and they can block Trump from returning to office. | ||
| Okay, I'm going to hold you for a short part of the next segment because I've got to get into these two gag orders. | ||
| Jack Smith again last night late in Florida. | ||
| Of course, the one in New York with Alvin Bragg. | ||
| They're trying to set the predicate for a multi-year prison sentence for President Trump on July 11th. | ||
| Patriot Mobile. | ||
| Glenn Story and the team. | ||
| Glenn Story's actually here. | ||
| He's here for the faith and family. | ||
| That's because Patriot Mobile is a Christian-based company with Christian values. | ||
| PatriotMobile.com slash Bandit for your discount. | ||
| Go check it out today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bandit. | |
| Okay, two things. | ||
| Jack Smith's on the ropes down there in Miami, and he's filing another gag order, and a lot of it's with War Room. | ||
| That, oh, President Trump, there was no assassination, they didn't set up to try to harm him, they didn't try to do anything, although they had, you know, they came with an operating order, fully armed, they had a combat medic, they had a triage plan, they had a trauma center set up 18 miles away. | ||
| It's all nonsense. | ||
| They were looking for trouble, and they were looking to instigate trouble. | ||
| Jeff, but Jack Smith is on his back foot. | ||
| He got ripped apart yesterday by Judge Cannon, although she went after Trump's guys too, but she ripped him apart. | ||
| And she's going to put him on trial in July, I think now, with the scope of his investigation. | ||
| She wants to get to the bottom of like who's running this and how to come about. | ||
| She's having a hearing I think next week and yesterday she was all about is Merrick Garland, | ||
| what is his day to day on this and Jack Smith, these guys did everything to spin out of that. | ||
| First I'll talk about Smith, where he stands, the gag order and then I want to talk about | ||
| Alvin Bragg. | ||
| Sure, Steve. | ||
| So, look, they're talking out of both sides of their mouths. | ||
| If you watch any of the so-called mainstream media, they say that, oh, Jack Smith, he's independent, right? | ||
| He's independent of President Biden and he's independent of Merrick Garland, you know, in large measure, right? | ||
| And so they do that in order to prevent and block off the argument that Biden is the one who's really ginning up these prosecutions against President Trump and those adjacent to President Trump, right? | ||
| But well, if that's true, though, then they have a big problem, which is being explored in these amicus briefs that have been filed and, you know, motioned by President Trump as well down in Florida, that then it's unconstitutional, right? | ||
| You have Jack Smith. | ||
| He's got the powers of all U.S. | ||
| attorneys. | ||
| He's like Shazam. | ||
| fused into one, but he is not Senate confirmed. | ||
| So if he is operating outside the chain of command in the executive branch, up to Merrick | ||
| Garland and up to the president, then they have a big constitutional problem. | ||
| So then to try to fend that off, they're like, well, he's actually subject to Merrick Garland's | ||
| supervision. | ||
| So then Judge Cannon's like, all right, well, let's explore that. | ||
| How much is he being supervised? | ||
| And then they try to clam up and basically say, well, you can't know about that because that's all privileged, right? | ||
| So it's a convenient way to try to do whatever they can do to make a point that they want to make, right? | ||
| They want to avoid the political consequences of the fact that he's really not independent. | ||
| And even if he were independent, then he's unconstitutional because he's not Senate confirmed. | ||
| So they're casting about saying to themselves, what can we do about this? | ||
| They decided on this strategy. | ||
| Last night, it seems, of let's file another gag order against President Trump. | ||
| And they try to paint themselves as virtuous. | ||
| Like, we've, you know, exercised a lot of restraint here. | ||
| We haven't filed prior gag orders down here in Florida. | ||
| You know, they were just doing that up with Judge Chutkan in D.C. | ||
| But, you know, so they're asking for one now and they're saying that, you know, agents and other DOJ personnel are at risk because of what President Trump's saying. | ||
| So let me say something about that quickly. | ||
| Look, yes, there are Standard operating procedures that the FBI follows. | ||
| But if you're going to do the first ever raid and execution of a warrant on a surprise basis against a former president of the United States, first time that's ever happened in history, do you use the standard playbook, Steve? | ||
| Or do you say, look, we're going to have a special process here. | ||
| We're going to treat the former president with respect. | ||
| And we're going to make sure we don't have any inadvertent incidents between the FBI on the one hand and the Secret Service on the other. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And of course, that's exactly the way they dealt with Joe Biden when they went to supposedly do investigation of his documents issue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| So President Trump never gets the benefit of that equal treatment. | ||
| And the fact that they, you know, they purported to pull off their off the shelf standard operating procedure. | ||
| Is suspicious, I think, for the reasons you've laid out. | ||
| And President Trump should be able to criticize that under the First Amendment, especially during an election season. | ||
| Quickly, Alvin Bragg, the last 48 hours on MSNBC is how the death threats of Tish James, death threats to Alvin Bragg is just terrible. | ||
| President Trump and his awful followers. | ||
| This is all laying a predicate, is it not, sir, for a multi-year prison sentence to be handed out by Judge Mershon on 11 July? | ||
| Yes, Steve, a couple days ago, I was at a conference and I was sitting next to, you know, a learned lawyer who's in the criminal defense bar. | ||
| And that lawyer was speculating that, you know, he doesn't think that that President Trump's going to get a prison term. | ||
| I told him I wasn't so sanguine about that, given everything else that's happened with Judge Mershawn up there and giving Alvin Bragg and Matthew Colangelo their wicked way against President Trump. | ||
| And look, we had a gag order development up there. | ||
| He's being shut down from talking about that ridiculous case, which now even Andrew Cuomo recognizes as a ridiculous case that wouldn't have been brought against Trump if he weren't a presidential candidate on the Republican side. | ||
| And the New York Court of Appeals, that's their highest court. | ||
| They don't call it the Supreme Court. | ||
| They call it the Court of Appeals. | ||
| They ruled that no substantial question was presented by the gag order. | ||
| And I just think that's facially laughable. | ||
| Of course, it's a substantial question. | ||
| If the president of the United States is being muzzled and gagged during a presidential election season about a ridiculous records related misdemeanor case that they've, you know, plussed up into a felony using three theories that President Trump had no notice of. | ||
| And it's like, pick a theory, pick your adventure path, like just security, the leftist folks have admitted. | ||
| Jeff, my call is prison sentence deferred to start on 6th November, the day after the election, and he will not be remanded. | ||
| He'll be under court supervision, and Merchant will get to pick and choose where President Trump ...can campaign. | ||
| These illegal barbarians have not come this far and shredded the Constitution and shredded New York law to stop now. | ||
| They're only going to get stopped when they get stopped. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Jeff Clark, amazing analysis on everything. | ||
| Your range is incredible. | ||
| This is what we need from a future Attorney General. | ||
| Where do people go to find out more about CRA, Jeff Clark, all of it? | ||
| Sure, so I'm at Jeff Clark U.S. | ||
| on Getter and X Twitter, and at Real Jeff Clark on Truth Social, and we are at the Center for Renewing America, AmericaRenewing.com. | ||
| Jeff Clark, thank you so much. | ||
| Appreciate you. | ||
| Do we have cash? | ||
| We've got Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Ben, pre-revolutionary. | ||
| I want to go to France and I also want to go to the Uniparties come together. | ||
| Richie Sunak will be the first, as you mentioned, the first member of the first Prime Minister in the history of England to be turfed out of his own House of Commons. | ||
| Walk me through. | ||
| Let's go to pre-revolutionary France right now. | ||
| I actually say it's revolutionary France. | ||
| What's happening? | ||
| The youth are driving it and then the United Kingdom. | ||
| Well, Steve, look what I've picked up. | ||
| This is from the FT, the Financial Times, the most sedate newspaper in the world. | ||
| Starts his article in this way. | ||
| This is Tony Barbak in the Foreign Affairs Editor. | ||
| He says, in June 2014, the Paris newsmagazine Le Commented that France finds itself now in a pre-revolutionary situation where everything is becoming possible. | ||
| Close quotes. | ||
| Ten years later, the FT says, after President Emmanuel Macron's gamble in calling snap legislative elections, is Le Pen's prediction finally coming true? | ||
| This is funny because when we spoke before the show today, Steve, this is exactly the possibility that we're now confronted with. | ||
| You said it yourself. | ||
| The French are basically in a revolutionary frame of mind. | ||
| And France, just like the United States, in fact, identically in this sense, you are both two cultures, two societies, made in the imprint of your respective revolutions 230, 250 years ago, and is very much in the forefront of the political establishment's mind. | ||
| But in both cases, in America and in France, And here's the point, the gamble that Macron, this is really why he failed, and why his whole political class, you know how they pride themselves on being out of touch, they pride themselves on being against | ||
| about trying to control the democratic impulse, which they see is leading potentially to the | ||
| overthrow of the system. | ||
| They have an arc system that that special school where they go to all the top civil | ||
| servants in France go to this school and they learn. | ||
| It's like a military school in the sense that it brainwashes you and gives you a specific | ||
| ideology, a specific contempt for the people, which, by the way, open brackets is exactly | ||
| what they tried to implement explicitly when they started constructing the European Union. | ||
| So here's the gamble, right? | ||
| The political establishment is so distanced from the people, it believes it's own BS. | ||
| It's high on its own supply. | ||
| And it actually thinks that Marine Le Pen is some exemplar of the far right, when of course she's not. | ||
| She's a standard, basically, I would suggest in the French mold, socialist protectionist. | ||
| The one thing that she is, is vehemently anti-immigration into her country. | ||
| And that is the single issue which puts her against the rest of the French political establishment. | ||
| That establishment is so out of touch, Steve, it believed that when confronted with a straight up or down vote on a snap general election, the country would panic, faced with the far right, and it would say, OK, OK, we'll go back into the globalist Embrace. | ||
| That is how far removed the French political establishment is. | ||
| And we're now starting to see this. | ||
| You put out on Ghetto. | ||
| We didn't get to discuss it on the show yesterday. | ||
| There's now a poll. | ||
| That came out yesterday. | ||
| That puts Macron at the lowest point now, tied to the lowest point he was, that he achieved both in the height of the Yellow Jacket protests and then in the farmers protests in April of last year. | ||
| He's now level pegging. | ||
| He fell six points from one day to the next. | ||
| He's now level pegging, the lowest level that he's ever been as president. | ||
| And the reason is, is that, right, there is a revolution sweeping across The European Union. | ||
| But it's not a crypto-fascist revolution. | ||
| It is a revolution of people, ordinary voters, traditionally from both sides of the political spectrum, that are disgusted with the autism of their political establishment and are absolutely determined, as Kevin Roberts was saying earlier in the American context, determined and focused on taking their country back. | ||
| And that is what we're seeing in France right now. | ||
| Ben, hang on for one second here. | ||
| Stick with us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Kash Patel, Ben Harnawal, next. | |
| Hello, I'm Steve Stern, CEO of FlagShirt.com, a third-generation, veteran-owned small business. | ||
| I believe that the American way of life is for all of us. | ||
| I'm asking you today to visit FlagShirt.com. | ||
| Help keep the American dream alive. | ||
| Be a flag waver. | ||
| Carry a nation's heritage. | ||
| Use coupon code ACTION10 for 10% off site wide and buy a flag shirt today. | ||
| Action, action, action. | ||
| Thanks. | ||
| Welcome back. | ||
| I had to get Kash Patel up and break. | ||
| Kash has been filming Complete Government Gangsters. | ||
| I'm going to play the trailer here towards the end of the show. | ||
| That film's coming out in the month of July. | ||
| It's going to be a blockbuster. | ||
| You're going to love it. | ||
| This audience is going to absolutely love it. | ||
| But Kash, you're driving. | ||
| Now, I had to get you up. | ||
| I've got two tweets about you about my beatdown of Paul Ryan the other day about talking about character And, you know, Trump's lax character. | ||
| You brought two brutal tweets up about Paul Ryan's character related to the Steele dossier that has not gotten anywhere near the exposure it is. | ||
| Tell me what you got, brother. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey Steve, great to be with you. | |
| Thanks. | ||
| Remember in 2016, let's rewind the tape, it was Russia collusion, Russia collusion, Russia collusion, and then Speaker Paul Ryan enlisted me and Devin Nunes to investigate the Russia collusion. | ||
| Nobody knew what the Steele dossier was in 2016. | ||
| They had already gone to the federal court and unlawfully surveilled Donald Trump with it. | ||
| But what we didn't find out until after we completed our investigation in 2018 was that | ||
| the speaker, Paul Ryan, who charged us with investigating Russiagate, was the first guy | ||
| to ever get a copy of the Steele dossier in 2016. | ||
| He never told us. | ||
| He still never admitted it. | ||
| It finally was admitted in a British court where Christopher Steele was being sued. | ||
| Just think about it, Steve. | ||
| We could have asked, where did you get it? | ||
| Who did you get it from? | ||
| How was it paid for? | ||
| All of these secrets could have come out under this man's very investigation, but he rigged | ||
| it from the beginning. | ||
| So I'm done listening to lectures about the new conservative brand that is Paul Ryan and anytime he wants to debate me, I'm all in. | ||
| He charged us with an investigation that he rigged because he didn't want Donald Trump to succeed. | ||
| He kneecapped him from the beginning. | ||
| That guy's talking about not going to the RNC. | ||
| No one wants him there. | ||
| He's so arrogant, he doesn't understand the simple fact that we put out... Hold on, hold on. | ||
| Cash, Cash, and I'll have you back on next week when we get you on Skype. | ||
| Are you telling me and telling this audience in a British court filing that Steele filed under penalty of perjury, he identified that... | ||
| Paul Ryan actually had the Steele dossier before he charged you guys at House Intel to look into this, and he never informed Devin Nunes, the chairman of that? | ||
| That's impossible to believe. | ||
| Are you sure about this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
100% accurate, the Steele dossier was handed to Paul Ryan's chief of staff in 2016. | |
| They put out a mealy-mouthed retweet to it, response to it, which basically said, oh, we didn't get it from Christopher Steele directly. | ||
| They admitted it in court that they had a copy the entire time, and they didn't tell us in 2016, they didn't tell us in 2017, they didn't tell us in 2018. | ||
| The quintessential piece of evidence which was exposed, because I went to DOJ and got the FISA. | ||
| Which the Steele dossier was an entire part of, and Paul Ryan was the one that fought us tooth and nail on, remember, on declassifying it. | ||
| Now we know why. | ||
| He had it for sure. | ||
| He is a total coward. | ||
| This is a blockbuster. | ||
| We're going to drill down on this. | ||
| This is, I'm telling you, the rats and the serpents around President Trump are unbelievable. | ||
| Cash, I need people to go to, not just your website, I need to go to your Twitter feed today, over the weekend, drill down. | ||
| I know you're going to be putting up a lot more information. | ||
| Where do they go? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Truth Social, you know I'm not a part of the scam that is censorship. | |
| I'm only on Truth Social. | ||
| We're going to put out the documents from the British court pleading itself. | ||
| You don't got to take my word for it as a Russiagate lead investigator. | ||
| Just go see it and read it for yourself and show the community. | ||
| Every time Paul Ryan's out there on Fox News and everywhere else talking about His righteous sanctimony. | ||
| Remember, this is a guy that cost Republicans the House majority. | ||
| Maybe we would have hung on to it if Paul Ryan told us he had the Steele dossier from Jump, who we got it to, how much he was paid for having it, and why he never told us the truth. | ||
| Maybe we should have been interrogating Paul Ryan under oath. | ||
| Oh, we are. | ||
| Paul Ryan, your turn in the barrel's coming, bro. | ||
| Thank you very much, Kash Patel. | ||
| We'll dive down on this deeper Monday or Tuesday. | ||
| Kash Patel, On the Road, Government Gangsters. | ||
| We'll play that trailer. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Steve Stearns with us. | ||
| Steve, let's focus today. | ||
| You've got so much going on to save the country, but I've got to focus on folks in the run-up to July 4th because we're running out of days that people can order and get all their great products. | ||
| At Flagshirt Company. | ||
| Where do they go? | ||
| Tell me what you got and where do people go to order now? | ||
| So go to www.theflagshirt.com. | ||
| We have people standing by. | ||
| Everything will get out Monday. | ||
| You know, you only have a little bit of time. | ||
| Last year, a lot of people waited to the last minute to get their stuff. | ||
| So this year, we've got a big thing going on. | ||
| Patriotism. | ||
| We got to show all the Democrats that we mean business. | ||
| And we also have a huge Zoom meeting on election integrity. | ||
| This is the biggest one we're ever going to have. | ||
| We have 10 speakers. | ||
| Heather Honey, Christine Bousman, Peter Berneger, Captain Seth Kessel, going to talk about the 30 different counties that mean business. | ||
| Jim Womack, Dr. John Richards, Linda Senkiewicz is going to give you 500 names of people that voted twice. | ||
| Ken Cuccinelli, who we never had on before, will be on there, and many, many other people. | ||
| Raj Dhirajami works with me on this, so it's very important. | ||
| So go and get your flag shirt. | ||
| You know what I'm doing. | ||
| We have tons of stuff. | ||
| Email me at estern1054gmail.com if you want any information. | ||
| Go to precinctstrategy.com. | ||
| We need to get people together. | ||
| Be a poll watcher or poll worker. | ||
| Go to Protect the Vote. | ||
| We're giving you so much information, but you've got to email me. | ||
| If you're a chairman, One more time, you got people standing by. | ||
| I want everybody to get their flag shirt and get their stuff before 4th of July. | ||
| We're going to have a massive show of force on this. | ||
| Wednesday at 1220 East, I'm sorry, 320 Eastern Time. Action, action, action. Go do it. | ||
| One more time, one more time. You got people standing by. I want everybody to get their | ||
| flag shirt and get their stuff before 4th of July. We're going to have a massive show | ||
| of force on this. One more time, where do they go to talk to operators right now? | ||
| Theflagshirt.com. | ||
| Get your loafers, hats, swimsuits, leggings. | ||
| All new stuff just came in yesterday, and we're here to serve you. | ||
| I will be working. | ||
| You know, I don't leave the warehouse. | ||
| I'm working here. | ||
| I'm always sleeping here because so many people are emailing me, calling me for information. | ||
| estern1054gmail.com. | ||
| I want to see some action here for the weekend. | ||
| I'm working all day tomorrow. | ||
| My wife's getting upset with me because I'm just not spending time with her, but we got to save this country. | ||
| Steve Stern, brother, I want everybody to flood the zone at The Flagshire Company. | ||
| We're going to be on that call also, listening and participating. | ||
| You're a great patriot and a great hero. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Steve Stern, The Flagshire Company, 83 years old, super ambitious. | ||
| Okay, we got Bob Good, we're trying to track down. | ||
| Let me go back to Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Also, POSO is going to call in. | ||
| POSO is heading to Philadelphia. | ||
| On Real America's Voice, President Trump at a rally in Philadelphia, President Trump at Faith and Family later. | ||
| That'll be amazing. | ||
| I think, Glenn, starting the team over at the Lincoln Memorial, where they're doing speeches over there, there's so much going on. | ||
| We're juggling so many balls. | ||
| Ben, I've got you a couple of free minutes here. | ||
| They're coming together. | ||
| Starting this morning in the United Kingdom, the whole thing is for Tories and Labour to come together, MI5 and MI6, and destroy Nigel Farage about his feelings towards Ukraine and to Russia. | ||
| Your thoughts, sir? | ||
| So Steve, he came out and said that Moscow's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine was, and I quote, a consequence of EU and NATO expansion. | ||
| So they are coming together. | ||
| What we've seen is the Uni Party unifying. | ||
| This is Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak coming together to condemn these outrageous remarks, which of course any member of the warring party will say, yeah, sure, it's obvious now. | ||
| But in communist Britain, you can't tell the truth anymore. | ||
| And so they've come together to say that basically this is Pro-Putin propaganda, suggesting that the country won't be safe in his hands. | ||
| Hey Ben, hang on for one second. | ||
| I've got Bob Goode and I've got to take him because he's out at an outdoor thing. | ||
| You put a pin in that, we're going to come right back to it. | ||
| Congressman Bob Goode. | ||
| Congressman, tell us where you are, I think over the Lincoln Memorial, and tell us what you're doing. | ||
| Then I want to get an update on Virginia 5. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey Steve, I'm actually on I-95, hands-free traveling between events, but I'll just tell you, the more we peel back the onion, The worst it stinks. | |
| Most specifically, since we last spoke, Lynchburg City, our largest locality in the district, which we won, but we didn't win it as strongly as we anticipated based on our polling, our door knocking, our phone banking, and our result tracking on Election Day. | ||
| We have just found out that they have not secured in Lynchburg The ballots, they allowed ballots to continue to be dropped off two days after the election. | ||
| They were not secure. | ||
| There's no accountability to how those ballots were protected, how many ballots were allowed to be dropped off, such that we learned of this yesterday, and our opponent's allies put out a preemptive message yesterday before we went public with it, claiming that there's nefarious activity afoot. | ||
| The Olinsky tactics, blame your opponent for that which you do. | ||
| Thankfully, though, we have evidence and documentation to show who was at fault here, and we are pursuing that with all vigor. | ||
| So the initial canvassing will go through at least Monday. | ||
| We are absolutely going to pursue a recount and a contest of this election. | ||
| There's many irregularities, many reasons for suspicion. | ||
| We continue to believe that if every legal and legitimate vote is counted and only that that reflects the intent of the | ||
| voters who legitimately participate in the election, we will prevail. | ||
| So we are continuing to pursue it, give it everything we've got. | ||
| But again, the more that we find, the more that we look into, the more concern that arises. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| See, this has November implications. | ||
| Where's the Yunkin administration? | ||
| What happened to their establishment Republican Party? | ||
| I'm going to use a phrase here that's going to reverberate. | ||
| We've got to stop the steal. | ||
| This cannot be stolen. | ||
| We have to have a free and fair election with only certifiable chain of custody votes by American citizens, Congressman Good. | ||
| How is your campaign going to fight, I guess, the Yunkin administration, the GOP establishment, the McCarthy Apparatus, what the hell's going on down there in the Commonwealth? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I will say my opponent and the McCarthy allies who are funding and supporting his campaign will do anything to try to win an election. | |
| Those who act like Democrats also run and campaign like Democrats and use Democrat-type tactics. | ||
| We know that to be true. | ||
| And this is on top of the things that I just raised. | ||
| Many other concerns and suspicions and irregularities and things that just don't look and smell right that we're pursuing. | ||
| So we will be pursuing a hand count recount. | ||
| We'll also be pursuing a contesting of the election in terms of trying to get investigated and adjudicated. | ||
| The things that call some of these results into legitimate calls to question the results as to whether or not they might have altered the election, certainly. | ||
| And this should not be certified until these concerns are obviously Investigate it and adjudicate it accordingly. | ||
| So we're pursuing it with legal counsel and we will be filing some things next week. | ||
| Congressman Good, where do people go to keep up on this moment to moment? | ||
| Your social media and also the website, people are all over this. | ||
| This has national and global implications, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It absolutely does. | |
| Go to bobgoodforcongress.com. | ||
| They can sign up for our communication there, so we'll keep them in the loop. | ||
| It can also support what will be an expensive It's an expensive recount and election contest there, but we're going to need some help financially also. | ||
| Congressman Good, thank you very much. | ||
| Honored to have you on here. | ||
| Continue on your rounds. | ||
| Stop the steal in Virginia 5. | ||
| This has implications in November. | ||
| My question is, what in the hell is going on down there? | ||
| We have to. | ||
| President Trump can win the Commonwealth of Virginia. | ||
| I was, you know, in 16, I told him, I said, I don't think this is going to happen. | ||
| Let's spend more time in other places. | ||
| This one's real. | ||
| I know the Commonwealth, and I'm telling you, President Trump can win it, but the only way to win it is to make sure that it is absolutely bulletproof as far as any ability to steal it. | ||
| Because they get some bad hombres wandering around my Commonwealth, and hey, they'll steal it from Donald Trump in a second. | ||
| This has national and global implications. | ||
| And also for the security of the House. | ||
| HomeTitleLock, don't let happen to you what happened to Graceland. | ||
| HomeTitleLock.com slash ban it. | ||
| And don't let anyone get into your castle. | ||
| you What do you think of the way that the intelligence community handled the so-called Russia dossier? | ||
| And overall, how do you think of the way they've handled Donald Trump? | ||
| Okay, Mike Lindell joins us. | ||
| Mike Lindell, the FBI. | ||
| Government gangster has been all over you for a while. | ||
| Tell me about your experience with the FBI, sir, taking your phone and trying to shut | ||
| down your business. | ||
| Well, you know, as everybody remembers, I was in a hearty restaurant coming back from | ||
| a hunt and shrimp. | ||
| We got surrounded and they didn't identify themselves, and if it would have been at night, Steve, I would have bashed through them and went to find a real, you know, sheriff or something, and it would have been a high-speed, dangerous chase. | ||
| I got out and I said, hey, who are you and what do you want? | ||
| He said, FBI. | ||
| I made them all show me their badges, and I, at that point, wanted to get arrested. | ||
| I got arrested. | ||
| I want to get arrested. | ||
| I want to go tell what's going on. | ||
| If I haven't done anything wrong, what are you doing? | ||
| They wanted to arrest me, took my phone, said I couldn't call a lawyer. | ||
| And as you know, I sued the government and the FBI. | ||
| This went on for a year and a half, went before the judges in Minnesota, the Supreme Court, | ||
| East Circuit. | ||
| They shoved it back down, so then we took it to the Supreme Court and they wouldn't | ||
| So, it's just weaponization. | ||
| They still have my phone. | ||
| And it's the, you know, everything, taking a phone, everyone's going, well, it's a phone, you can get another one. | ||
| Well, nowadays, everything I do is on that phone. | ||
| There's stuff on there that wasn't downloaded in the cloud. | ||
| And it's disgusting. | ||
| I'd never done anything wrong back then, so they wouldn't give me an answer. | ||
| They still won't give me an answer. | ||
| What do you got the phone for, you know? | ||
| It's just a weaponization of... I remember telling the FBI guys, I said, yeah, some of them were from Colorado. | ||
| I said, you know, you guys are bashing people's doors and innocent people and pulling their daughters down the stairs by their hoodies. | ||
| And then one guy goes, well, she didn't open her door fast enough. | ||
| He knew who I was talking about. | ||
| I said, it was 38 seconds. | ||
| So what are we all supposed to do in the morning? | ||
| FBI, quick, hurry, get to the door, open the door. | ||
| It's disgusting. | ||
| See, the FBI came into Missouri yesterday, three different counties, Osage County, and without telling the sheriffs there, this is going to be a big thing. | ||
| This is what they're doing. | ||
| They're weaponizing the FBI against the citizens. | ||
| It's the new American Gestapo. | ||
| The FBI better knock it off. | ||
| Mike, real quickly, we're pressed. | ||
| The specialties you give us, walk us through the specialties. | ||
| Where do people go? | ||
| Yeah, and everybody, this is the last weekend we're doing the special exclusive for the War Room Posse. | ||
| These were the sheets you see on TV, the ones we got with the long staple cotton. | ||
| As you see there, we have regular price, sale price, and then the posse price. | ||
| We're going to run it through the weekend. | ||
| We have allotted so many for the War Room Posse. | ||
| You guys, the queen size for $39.99, regular $99.98, king size only $39.98. | ||
| regular 99.98, king size only 39.98. | ||
| So go to the war room square and get used to promo code war room. | ||
| I'm leaving out the movies. | ||
| You guys get $80 of movies absolutely free for ordering anything off the website. | ||
| That's exclusive for the War Room Posse. | ||
| But all the specials you see there, the new one for the War Room Posse 2 is the six-pack dish towel sets. | ||
| And instead of four, you get six for $25. | ||
| for $25. So those specials, my pillow dog specials only for the war in posse. | ||
| MyPillow.com, PromoCode War Room. | ||
| MyStore.com, PromoCode War Room. | ||
| You get 80 bucks worth of free movies with any order. | ||
| 800-873-1062. | ||
| Mike Lindell, I know you're in Oregon. | ||
| You travel around the country. | ||
| We'll have you back on Monday. | ||
| I know you're going to be up on social media on Frank's speech all weekend. | ||
| Brother, thank you so much. | ||
| The Mike Lindell. | ||
| A recipient of government gangsters. | ||
| That movie's gonna come out in July. | ||
| Massive premiere. | ||
| You're all gonna be invited. | ||
| Jack Posobiec heading up to Philadelphia. | ||
| Jack, we've got a minute or so. | ||
| Why are you going to Philadelphia today to support the president? | ||
| Look, Steve, what can I say? | ||
| I've got the entire car full of not only the whole Pozo clan, but the whole trunk is full of my Unhumans books, and I'm returning to the scene of the crime. | ||
| Temple University, 1776 North Broad Street. | ||
| That is where I cut my teeth in politics 20 years ago with the Temple College Republicans, where I became chairman. | ||
| We were up there. | ||
| That's where we learned to take on liberals. | ||
| Head-to-head, don't sit around. | ||
| We put the teachers under investigation back then for being a bunch of communists. | ||
| We called in the state officials, the state government, and now President Trump is going back up there to see the crime-ridden, blood-soaked streets of North Philadelphia. | ||
| And I've been telling everybody, stay away from Temple. | ||
| Don't go back to Temple. | ||
| Trump says, I'm holding a rally there. | ||
| So I said, you know what? | ||
| If you're going, I'm going, and all the POJOs are going with him. | ||
| Pozo, right now, where do people go on your social media? | ||
| We want to follow this all day. | ||
| Pozo's going to be up at 1 o'clock, I think, at Philadelphia. | ||
| Brian Glenn's going to be there. | ||
| Jack Pasova. | ||
| This is going to be massive. | ||
| We're going to stream it. | ||
| Everybody's got to watch. | ||
| Where do they go on your social media, Pozo? | ||
| Look, you've got to find me, of course, on X, on Getter, Truth Social, but we already know BLM is planning to be out there. | ||
| The Palestinians are planning to be out there. | ||
| They've already called for a counter-protest. | ||
| They've already called for riots. | ||
| They're massing up already, as it is. | ||
| I even got some reports of agitators that were set up in Delaware County in one of the parks. | ||
| I love it. | ||
| One o'clock, Real America's Voice. | ||
| Jack Posobiec, we're going to watch it live on Real America's Voice. | ||
| We're also going to put it on all our platforms. | ||
| Brother, be safe. | ||
| Let your wife throw punches. | ||
| She's the tough one. | ||
| coming back. | ||
| Ben Harnwell from Rome. | ||
| You got 45 seconds, brother. | ||
| Hit me. | ||
| So, okay, making my point between the connection between Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron, Nigel Farage, there's something, there's a parallel between all of them, right? | ||
| And it's this. | ||
| The more they are attacked, The stronger they become. | ||
| That's my point in 45 seconds. | ||
| That is the defining characteristic of the populist in the present age. | ||
| The more they are attacked by the corrupt uniparty establishment, the stronger they become in the eyes of the people. | ||
| It's what you see, the attack against Nigel Farage. | ||
| It is rebounding, but it will rebound. | ||
| It will definitely rebound against them in the run up to this July the 4th general election. | ||
| Thanks. | ||
| Ben, where do people get you this weekend? | ||
| Give it to me. | ||
| At Harnwell. | ||
| At Harnwell. | ||
| All weekend. | ||
| He's got the greatest engagement ever. | ||
| Stick around on Real America's Voice. | ||
| Trump's up at 1 and then back at 7. | ||
| Grace Chung and Captain Bannon up all day. | ||
| I'll be dipping in and out. | ||
| We'll be back. | ||
| By the way, grass-fed beef livers. | ||
| SacredHumanHealth.com. | ||
| Go check it out today. | ||
| We'll be back live 10 a.m. |
Export Selection