June 21, 2024 - Bannon's War Room
47:59
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is what you're fighting for. | ||
| I mean, every day you're out there. | ||
| What they're doing is blowing people off. | ||
| If you continue to look the other way and shut up, then the oppressors, the authoritarians, get total control and total power. | ||
| Because this is just like in Arizona. | ||
| This is just like in Georgia. | ||
| It's another element that backs them into a corner and shows their lies and misrepresentations. | ||
| This is why this audience is going to have to get engaged. | ||
| As we've told you, this is the fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| War Room Battleground. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, in a cramped day for news, there's so, so much more to get through. | ||
| Thursday, 20 June, year of Erlo 2024. | ||
| We had Raheem and Ben Burquam in England today, in the United Kingdom, tracking Nigel Farage. | ||
| They're now over there permanently until the 4 July election. | ||
| Also, they're going to be going, I think, to France for the 27th, the first round. | ||
| So, a lot of coverage. | ||
| We also have our head of international Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Ben, first, I didn't get a chance to really go through the polls with Rahim. | ||
| There's a lot going on. | ||
| Put in perspective, you've actually worked in the European Parliament. | ||
| You're very familiar with Parliament, with Westminster. | ||
| Give us a perspective of what's going on right now in this entire situation in the United Kingdom. | ||
| Steve, there's an unprecedented meltdown taking place right now. | ||
| And a level of panic. | ||
| It's beyond panic. | ||
| It's beyond resignation. | ||
| The statistics coming back via the stethologists and professional pollsters are just literally, it's an overused journalistic word, they are unprecedented. | ||
| As in never before in history has any party been tracking so poorly. | ||
| Let me go to one. | ||
| There were two polls out today. | ||
| Let me go to the Savanta poll first. | ||
| They're slightly different in terms of their percentage outcomes. | ||
| And as the Daily Telegraph itself said, very small differences in input right now can produce wildly different outputs in terms of seats. | ||
| So you need to vary in the percentage to get an outward massive variation. | ||
| But let's go to the Savanta poll first. | ||
| That puts Reform on 13%, the Tories on 23%, Labour on 44%. | ||
| Now, in terms of seats, projected seats, this is absolutely astonishing. | ||
| The Savanta poll gives no seats to Reform, but it gives 53 seats to the Tories and 516 Hold it, but hang on. | ||
| Put in perspective, is that the worst blowout in the history of the United Kingdom? | ||
| Yes, yes, yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now to put that into perspective, Steve. | |
| Put in perspective, is that the worst blowout in the history of the United Kingdom? | ||
| Yes, yes, yes. | ||
| To put this into perspective, and I'm going to go on to the YouGov poll as well, tie these | ||
| two polls together. | ||
| To put this into perspective, we all remember the landslide victory that Tony Blair had | ||
| in 1997, right? | ||
| And on the back of which he governed, or the Labour Party governed, he was followed by Gordon Brown, his Chancellor, for 13 years. | ||
| And that's when David Cameron came in. | ||
| To put this into perspective, Steve, 382 This majority, this notional potential majority for Keir Starmer, that would be double what Tony Blair's had in 19... And that was a landslide victory. | ||
| How big is this? | ||
| How big is this? | ||
| Well, to put this into perspective, it's a third, basically. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's a third of the seats that the Tories had back in 1997, continuing that comparison. | ||
| They were returned at that election with 165 seats. | ||
| So this is projecting 53. | ||
| And in terms of seats, again, compared to the last election, which Boris Johnson won, it would only come out with 15% of the seats it had when Boris Johnson was leader. | ||
| It's Canadian. | ||
| This is what the... | ||
| It's Canadian. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a Canadian style wipeout. | |
| This is for the American audience. | ||
| I know most of our Americans follow Europe closely because they understand the interlinked | ||
| nature of a lot of this. | ||
| This is a reject, not of a party, not of individual members of Parliament. | ||
| This is a rejection of a philosophy of government, right? | ||
| If you're supposed to be conservative, you should believe about your sovereignty, your territorial integrity, basic things that come with being a conservative. | ||
| The Tories are as bad or maybe even slightly worse than the rhinos here in the United States. | ||
| These establishment parties that have control that end up just being controlled opposition to the deep state or to the global governance of the capital markets and international business and international financiers. | ||
| This is what happens to them because we don't stand for anything. | ||
| People, this is a rejection, a rejection of a philosophy, is it not, sir? | ||
| It is certainly a rejection of our philosophy. | ||
| And let me go further. | ||
| It's a rejection, it's a revenge of the betrayal That the British people, but specifically Conservative voters, have been inflicted on for decades by the Tory party. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
| It's a rejection and revenge of a betrayal. | ||
| Here's what one cabinet minister has said to the Times. | ||
| This is a party. | ||
| Fields like voters have been saving up for this moment for a long time and they are determined | ||
| to give us a big kicking. | ||
| Two down right, Steve. | ||
| Two down right. | ||
| This is a party, let's not forget how autistic the Tory party has become. | ||
| And it's peopled, it's parliamentary party with parliamentarians that I personally don't | ||
| think are competent even to stand as a local councillor. | ||
| Would you call that a local borough councillor? | ||
| I forget what the term is in American, right? | ||
| The Tory party's parliamentary representation is massively overplaced in terms of the actual competence of the people who've been returned to parliament. | ||
| And they are. | ||
| If you want to imagine, you know, most people, I think, Americans will be familiar with the old science fiction classic Doctor Who. | ||
| These guys are Daleks. | ||
| They are autistic Daleks. | ||
| And it's no wonder, it's no wonder that the British people are saving up this big kicking that this cabinet minister has mentioned. | ||
| Why would they not be? | ||
| The Tory party, as it is the present, the parliamentary party as it is presently constituted, Steve, Got this majority on the back of Boris Johnson. | ||
| Now, we're not going to Boris Johnson on this point, but the point is they put someone in as leader who had a certain charisma, certain following in the country. | ||
| And then they got rid of him and they put in a succession of autistic Daleks, each one more autistic and more Dalek like. | ||
| than the other one. | ||
| And you end up with Rishi Sunak, who's a man who has negative charisma. | ||
| You might even be notionally disposed to the Tory party. | ||
| You hear him speak and you say, get lost. | ||
| I'm not interested. | ||
| That's how bad he is. | ||
| How bad is he? | ||
| Let's go back to this poll, Steve. | ||
| Let's go back to this poll when I say unprecedented. | ||
| He is, according to this Savanta poll, going to be the first prime minister in British history to lose his seat. | ||
| At the next general election, according to this Savanta poll, which will put the incoming Tory parliamentary party on 53 seats. | ||
| That has never happened before. | ||
| And it is absolutely, for everything that you just said, it is a rejection of a philosophy, but it's a rejection of a betrayal. | ||
| You know, when this cabinet minister says that the British public have been saving this, | ||
| that this is kicking up, let's not forget after the British people spoke very clearly in terms | ||
| of Brexit and produced this epoch-defining referendum result, the Tory party put in | ||
| Theresa May, who was a Remainer, right? | ||
| It's difficult to express the absolute contempt for the people a political party, a governing political party must have in order to pull that manoeuvre. | ||
| And yet that's exactly what the Conservative Party did. | ||
| The British people spoke and they put in somebody who tried and succeeded to some extent to sabotage a successful Brexit from the first moment onwards. | ||
| And this has been the British political establishments priority since 2015 to scupper, to sabotage Brexit, to do everything in their power to stop it from working. | ||
| And it is no wonder, it is no wonder that the British people are telling the pollsters, coming up to pollsters with figures like these. | ||
| As I say, first time in history that a Prime Minister, a British Prime Minister, will lose their seat at a general election. | ||
| Never happened before. | ||
| Done the forest fire have to burn through till you get the rejuvenation? | ||
| Is that what Nigel Farage, is that why Nigel's jumped? | ||
| When he said I must stay out of this, he's jumped in now to lead reform or reform. | ||
| And many polls are leading two times what the Tories are just because of their pulling their own party together. | ||
| Probably could get very few seats won, maybe a half a dozen. | ||
| And Nigel himself may be in Parliament. | ||
| But is that the play here? | ||
| Is the rejuvenation of the Conservatives come through a more populist nationalist take on things that Nigel Farage represents since he's the father of Brexit? | ||
| Talking about Nigel, let's go quickly pivot to the YouGov poll, because I do want to get these statistics in here. | ||
| This one puts the reform on 15% right now, tracking on 15%. | ||
| But that will give the reform five Members of Parliament. | ||
| And there's a poll in the seat where he's standing, Clacton. | ||
| Which says that he's easily going to win his seat there. | ||
| The other poll, the one I just mentioned, the Savanta one, doesn't have him winning. | ||
| This one does. | ||
| And that's what I mean when I say just a couple of percentage difference will produce a radically different outcome. | ||
| So look, to come back to your... So all I want to say is I want the Warren posse to understand in their heads from this segment on the show that there's all to play for right now. | ||
| There's absolutely all to play for. | ||
| To come back precisely to your question that you asked, Well, it's looking as if what will be left in the Tory party, if I said it's basically a gaggle of autistic Daleks, if you can take out of the present Tory parliamentary party the most autistic representatives of that gaggle and keep them in there, that looks as if what is going to happen. | ||
| We'll need to see, Steve, what the British people decide to do on how they vote on the 4th of July and see who is returned to Parliament to see what kind of spring back the Tory party might be capable of doing. | ||
| I think it's easy, the Daily Mail, I sent this through to Denver, I don't know if they had the time to prepare, to put it up, but this article yesterday, I think you discussed it in the Daily Mail, said that there's a path for Nigel Farage to be Prime Minister at the next election. | ||
| I want to take, thanks Denver, thanks so much, I'd like to diverge slightly from the analysis of that article and I'll tell you why. | ||
| I think that Nigel, I think there is a path, a coherent reasonable, sensible speculation to say that Nigel Farage can become the leader of the opposition after the next election. | ||
| And I'll tell you why I say to be Prime Minister is a little bit more iffy, Steve, because how incompetent must this future Labour Party government How incompetent can it be to whittle down this super majority, this 350 or so seat majority, over 500 seats itself? | ||
| How bad are they going to have to be to whittle that down for the Tories to form another government? | ||
| To put that into perspective, the Tories have now come to the end of 14 years, and they've been god-awful. | ||
| They've been so bad, and yet they've staggered on for 14 years. | ||
| There is no indication that Keir Starmer is as autistic as Rishi Sunak. | ||
| There's no reason at all. | ||
| There's no reason to suggest you can disagree with his policy priorities, but you know, The Labour Party is an heir to a socialist party, so we're going to have disagreements there. | ||
| But there's no indication whatsoever that he's going to be as autistic as Rishi Sunak. | ||
| That means to say, the majority, if there's anything like these polls coming out, this is a government that could last easily 20 years. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Easily. | |
| Right? | ||
| To whittle that one down. | ||
| So when I say to come back to the point, so Nigel Farage can be leader of the opposition. | ||
| He can form a deal if the trade party is willing, if it wants to claw back a realistic presence in the domestic political life. | ||
| But it's a 20 year, it's going to be 20 years long. | ||
| He can either merge with it or take it over. | ||
| That'll be figured out. | ||
| I'm not so sure it's going to be a 20-year slog, because you're going to hit an economic and financial crisis fairly quickly, and we'll see what happens with that. | ||
| But that's for another day. | ||
| I've got to get to Ukraine tomorrow with you, but please give me a couple of minutes, because I'm jammed here for time. | ||
| Give me a couple of minutes on... There is a... | ||
| Concomitant meltdown in France about the rise of the rise of Marine Le Pen and Front National. | ||
| I mean, what they're doing is absolutely, in fact, right here, the Financial Times the other day, French bosses build ties with Le Pen has left triggers alarm. | ||
| And this is about the capital markets over there are in complete panic. | ||
| The industrialists are in complete panic of the rise of the populist nationalist right in France. | ||
| Give me a couple of minutes on that. | ||
| Well, I saw a similar article to the headline that you just mentioned. | ||
| Suggesting actually that it's more Macron that's having the problems in Brussels with regards to his budget. | ||
| Brussels is about to launch a manoeuvre, a very rarely used manoeuvre, both on Italy and on France. | ||
| Somewhat unfair to Georgia and Maloney. | ||
| Hang on, scrap that, wheel that back. | ||
| It's not unfair, this is deliberate. | ||
| This is the European Union fighting back and visiting on these new governments like Maloney and Le Pen. | ||
| The punishment of all the irresponsible spending, that's gone back decades. | ||
| That's a ploy of the European Union. | ||
| However, as I think you were saying, Le Pen is doing very well to calm French business, and it looks as if they're looking to her. | ||
| Of course, she's a protectionist. | ||
| Why wouldn't they be looking with a certain degree of optimism towards some of the things that she's saying? | ||
| So I think that's the situation in France. | ||
| The other things when you mentioned Ukraine to look out for is the fact that the Ukrainians have started to talk about a second peace summit, which I think, let's see who signs on for this, because I think the first one actually, rather than showing how much international support they have, actually I think it was starting to show how How posturing, how performative that support actually is at this stage. | ||
| Let's see who signs on to the second peace summit. | ||
| The other thing to watch out for is the is the is the fact that Mark Rutte, the outgoing Dutch. | ||
| Prime minister, it has now all but got the I think it's actually been confirmed because because his opposition, his rival, his leading rival, that the president of Romania has dropped out. | ||
| He'll now be the secretary general. | ||
| NATO and of course this is a typical thing amongst our sociopathic overlords, lose one election and then pick up a nice seat | ||
| in an unelected situation there. He'll take over the beginning of November | ||
| and I would suggest here that there's been an absolute desperate | ||
| dynamic here in order for the Romanians not to rock the boat because they want to | ||
| get this guy in before the presidential election in November. | ||
| No, it's a disgrace. | ||
| It's an irrelevant military. | ||
| They don't pay their bills. | ||
| Now he's going to hit on NATO. | ||
| It just shows you what a complete joke NATO is. | ||
| We've got to bounce. | ||
| Amazing. | ||
| This UK thing. | ||
| The UK election. | ||
| The French election. | ||
| Just absolutely incredible. | ||
| Like Brexit set the predicate for President Trump's victory in 2016, we see another one coming. | ||
| Ben Harnwell. | ||
| Social media. | ||
| Where do they go? | ||
| Thanks, Steve. | ||
| Getter. | ||
| My social... I love that platform. | ||
| I like the platform. | ||
| I like how it works. | ||
| Um, I like, I like it. | ||
| I prefer it to Twitter because you can actually put in up to 777 characters in a post, which I do use, um, rather than just superficial soundbites over on X Twitter. | ||
| Um, and I read every single comment that's ever posted on my feed, have done since the beginning. | ||
| What I like about Getter is the community there. | ||
| Absolutely fantastic, um, platform. | ||
| I strongly recommend it. | ||
| There I am just tapping my surname, Hanwell. | ||
| And I do have some pretty good posts at the top of my feed right now. | ||
| Thanks, Steve. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| Your engagement is amazing. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Let's turn back to the United States, and really not just the United States, but the interlocking connections between capital markets in China, our rivals, and quite frankly, the corruption here. | ||
| Nobody's done a better job than Brian Costello. | ||
| Brian, get us up to date on Sequoia Capital. | ||
| You're putting up stuff on Twitter every day, it's making my head blow up. | ||
| Sequoia Capital, the FBI, the DOJ, Moritz, McCarthy, all of it, sir. | ||
| Yeah, let's rewind, Steve. | ||
| So it was a year ago when we started to cover with you that the Department of Justice, the National Security Council, went in and enforced Sequoia Capital, who's America's top investment firm. | ||
| And just to give people perspective, these guys have funded something like 30, 40 percent of the NASDAQ companies like Nvidia, Airbnb, YouTube, Google. | ||
| So it's a fairly significant player. | ||
| So they were forced to separate from their China arm. | ||
| A year ago, they were employing a direct advisor to the Politburo, a guy named Neil Shen. | ||
| So what we're seeing now is the cleanup, right? | ||
| We're seeing them coming out saying you have to watch out for Chinese spies in your portfolio. | ||
| We're seeing press related to Shen funding things like military robotic dogs. | ||
| And, you know, the real story in this is we had this, right? | ||
| You know, Colonel Harvey, who's been on your show, who was at House Intelligence Committee with Nunes, we knew this, right? | ||
| We brought it into the government. | ||
| We brought it into the Department of Justice, into Lisa Monaco's division. | ||
| We brought it into the House Intelligence Committee. | ||
| And because of the political donations flowing to people like Kevin McCarthy, Flowing to all the Democrats under Nancy Pelosi through not only Sequoia, but it's portfolio companies and also it's investors who are making oodles of monies in China. | ||
| This thing got buried. | ||
| So I'll tell you right now, like these, you know, military robotic dogs that the Financial Times reported on, these things are funded with American pension money by Neil Shen and folks like Speaker McCarthy, Turner, Lisa Monaco, the administrative state, could have stopped this. | ||
| This could have been stopped, right? | ||
| And it's still going on, Steve. | ||
| You know, Shen's now, you know, supposedly some Singapore resident. | ||
| They're putting him front and center at American award shows, positioning him as, you know, some national hero and not somebody who's been working for the Chinese government to subvert our economy and also create companies that work directly with the PLA. | ||
| Um, why can this thing, since House Intel had it, and Colonel Derek Harvey had it, and letters actually got sent, in your experience, you went, you've gone with all information, and the information was not only not refuted, people, FBI agents told you there's something here. | ||
| Why, not just the FBI, but why a DOJ? | ||
| Why have they suppressed an investigation? | ||
| Is it because Sequoia Capital is just so dialed in and gives so much money to both sides? | ||
| And they've corrupted Kevin McCarthy by giving him tip money. | ||
| And now, quite frankly, you've seen their senior partners went to the President Trump, you know, when the, when Silicon Valley went, came as supplicants to Trump. | ||
| Two weeks ago, you had, I think, Leon and the other guy, you had two of the senior partners that went as supplicants bearing gifts of writing checks. | ||
| Is that how it got suppressed, is that they went to the Democrats, they went to Lisa Monaco and Merrick Garland's corrupt DOJ? | ||
| They've got Turner. | ||
| Who's a captured asset by these guys that he wouldn't he would get rid of Derek Harvey and not consider the investigation. | ||
| They're now trying to get into the Trump movement and the Trump campaign by giving big big donations. | ||
| Is that how the game is played? | ||
| Yeah, it's both. | ||
| I call it the Sequoia model, Steve, right? | ||
| They had a Leone giving on the Republican side. | ||
| They had Moritz giving on the Democratic side. | ||
| And he flows a lot of money into, you know, the Democratic NGO apparatus. | ||
| He lives a couple houses away from Nancy Pelosi, you know, up in San Francisco, the city they've destroyed. | ||
| And so what you had is you have You know, for DOJ, it was kind of untenable, really focusing on the seven title 18 violations we laid out. | ||
| It was like, hey, this is a huge political donor, right? | ||
| Not only directly, the CEOs of their portfolio companies like FTX and Citadel were giving to both sides. | ||
| And you also have the limited investors in their funds who have all this money wired into China. | ||
| Uh, and, and, you know, these guys are funding, you know, with all the profits they're funding Sequoia and Yale where these political, uh, folks like Jake Sullivan, I mean, Sullivan was paid. | ||
| Sullivan was paid to go speak at the Yale center, Beijing by Shen. | ||
| And here you have the national security council when they know the DOJs, if they didn't know the DOJ was possessing crimes, Lisa Monaco and the DOJ weren't doing their job. | ||
| Cause we have entire organizations like the committee on foreign Uh, CFIUS, the Committee on Foreign Investment, that, uh, get these groups collaborating, looking at this type of stuff. | ||
| So yeah, it's, you know, it's, Merrick Garland's full of shit, right? | ||
| There's huge political bias in the Department of Justice. | ||
| They protected political donors. | ||
| And I sat in an FBI interview in the Washington field office, same Washington field office, spending all its resources. | ||
| ...putting in January 6th, and the FBI agents told me they believed these were all crimes. | ||
| And they needed to go up to the Department of Justice. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Which, by the way, Steve... People... Hang on one second, hang on one second. | |
| Go ahead. | ||
| What you just said, this is why they're melting down on MSNBC and CNN every night. | ||
| This is why McCabe's... You know what your crimes are. | ||
| You know the protection racket you've run for these capitalists, these venture capitalists, hedge fund guys that are doing business with our enemies in China. | ||
| And you protect it's a protection racket. | ||
| The receipts are all going to be there. | ||
| This is why Merrick Garland. | ||
| They're going to be dozens and dozens and dozens of massive investigations of current DOJ personnel just is. | ||
| We're going to get to the bottom of who's who's a collaborator with our enemies. | ||
| Who's been looking the way and what's the protection racket? | ||
| Why have some people why have some companies been protected that are in business and in business on military technology? | ||
| With the Chinese Communist Party, with America, with your pension fund money. | ||
| You know how you come in here, the audience? | ||
| It's your pension fund money that's being used. | ||
| It's not theirs. | ||
| It's yours. | ||
| They're using your money to fund our adversaries. | ||
| They're taking the profits and funneling back to political parties that didn't give money to fund the Praetorian Guard and the Deep State and the selection process. | ||
| This is why Matt Boal, we started the day with Matt Boal talking about, we started with Matt Boal talking about the 18th of November when they came out and laid out, you know, Merrick Garland gets Jack Smith, Fonny Willis' Wade is up in the White House for eight hours, right? | ||
| They start all this ball rolling. | ||
| They've got Matthew Colangelo the same day leaves. | ||
| It's a protection racket and that protection racket is going to come under vast scrutiny and you're going to have guys like Brian Costello. | ||
| I'm a huge believer. | ||
| I hope that Brian Costello joins the new Trump administration, but if not, he'll be an outside advisor to it and everything that he's gone through and his Twitter feed will actually be a platform for investigations. | ||
| That's why they fear this. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| McCabe comes on and he's talking about, they're talking about going to foreign countries. | ||
| They understand what their crimes are. | ||
| These are very smart, cunning people. | ||
| This is my whole point. | ||
| They're never coming back. | ||
| Once they lose and we get these investigation going, they're never, ever, ever, ever, ever coming back to power. | ||
| Ever. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Brian Costello and we got Naomi Wolf on Fauci next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All this nonsense, all this spin, they can't handle the truth. | |
| It even gets worse about Sequoia, doesn't it? | ||
| Brian, go ahead and take it. | ||
| Yes, Steve. | ||
| As you talked about, Leone and some of the other partners at Sequoia are trying to get close to Trump now. | ||
| No doubt McCarthy's bringing his donor in that circle. | ||
| The question I would have is, Sequoia employs their two top guys on the Washington side. | ||
| And just so people know, venture capital firms don't employ Washington people. | ||
| Like, they're only employing Washington people because of how much money they have in China to run cover. | ||
| So they have two employees, Don Vieira as their chief legal officer. | ||
| Don Vieira was Lisa Monaco's chief of staff for a period of time on the National Security Division. | ||
| He was the chief counsel for the House Intelligence Committee, and his wife did Obama's $65 million book deal, right? | ||
| So here's Sequoia getting close to Trump. | ||
| But there are two top Washington guys are Obama guys. | ||
| So why is that? | ||
| Right? | ||
| So the second guy they have, who runs our public policy is a guy named Michael Ortiz. | ||
| Ortiz worked in Obama's Senate office. | ||
| He then got put in a job working for Kerry under the Department of State. | ||
| So here's guys saying, you know, hey, policy is terrible, everything else. | ||
| But there are two guys still work working the Washington corridors of both Obama guys, because they need to run cover for the intelligence community, for the Department of Justice and all these groups that they did before. | ||
| And they have access to a lot, right? | ||
| They have access to a lot of powerful AI companies, companies like ByteDance, TikTok, companies that can influence elections. | ||
| And so you see the Obama... | ||
| I want to get you back on with Harvey, because there's been a shake-up, and the apparatus is in freak-out. | ||
| Turner's been so hapless from a conservative and really from a MAGA national security point of view. | ||
| They put in Brigadier General Perry and Rear Admiral Jackson, and there were two guys. | ||
| One's a Brigadier General, 30-year veteran reserve, and you got Admiral Jackson, who was at the White House with President Trump, and they're freaking out, saying, oh, these guys don't really have credentials. | ||
| Hello? | ||
| Turner was, I think he was the mayor of Dayton. | ||
| That was his thing, mayor of Dayton. | ||
| They want these people they can totally capture. | ||
| Bryant, your Twitter feed is enormous. | ||
| Eventually it's going to get you arrested by the FBI, I know. | ||
| Where do people go to follow this? | ||
| Because this story is the biggest financial scandal, I believe, one of the biggest financial scandals in the history of this nation. | ||
| And the biggest financial scandal, of all the ones we've had, the biggest financial scandal that's directly tied To the financing of the military capability of the biggest existential threat we've ever had in the military. | ||
| So remember, when we have a carrier battle group at the bottom of the Straits of Taiwan, and you have 10,000 dead young American male and female sailors in the 7th Fleet, you can tie that directly back. | ||
| You'll be able to tie the blood. | ||
| The blood will be on the hands of Sequoia Capital and the politicians. | ||
| that took their orders and people like Lisa Monaco and Merrick Garland and others in the FBI and DOJ | ||
| that not just looked the other way but were a protection racket for them. | ||
| Brian, where do they go for your Twitter? | ||
| Yeah, and Steve, it dovetails to both the, you know, the axis we're dealing with with Russia, | ||
| Iran and China, but it also deals with all the economic stuff. | ||
| You've been doing such a good job covering with Scott Besson and Brad, right? | ||
| Like, because we need to win. | ||
| We need to build these next companies. | ||
| And if they're not playing by the same rules, it's there. | ||
| But Twitter's BP Costello on X, so people can follow me there. | ||
| Amazing. | ||
| Just Mo and Grace, let's put that up. | ||
| Make sure everybody in the posse gets it. | ||
| It's got to be part of your media diet every day. | ||
| Brian Costello in his investigative analysis. | ||
| Thank you, brother. | ||
| Yeah, and if they come after me, Steve, hopefully I'll ask them if we can, uh, we can room together. | ||
| So, all right. | ||
| Hopefully by the time they come after you, I'll be long out, but you never know. | ||
| If not, I'm, you know, always looking for, you know, as long as you take the top bunk, I'm good. | ||
| I want to bring in Naomi and here's how I want to do this. | ||
| There's two clips we're going to play. | ||
| I played them yesterday, but I gotta have Naomi applying this. | ||
| The first is Rachel Maddow from 2021 and then the second one's more update. | ||
| Let's play those and we'll have Naomi come in and make some observations on the Dr. Fauci of it all. | ||
| It means that instead of the virus being able to hop from person to person to person to person, spreading and spreading, sickening some of them but not all of them, and the ones that it doesn't sicken don't know they have it and then they give it to even more people because they didn't recognize. | ||
| Instead of the virus being able to hop from person to person to person, Potentially mutating and becoming more virulent and drug-resistant along the way. | ||
| Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. | ||
| A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. | ||
| The virus does not infect them. | ||
| The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. | ||
| It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. | ||
| That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this. | ||
| I think if you fast forward now about denying the science of a vaccine and denying that vaccines are safe and effective when you have billions of people who've been vaccinated and the data showing the life-saving elements of a vaccine, that is tantamount to denialism. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And when people don't get vaccinated, Because of whatever ideological reason they have for not getting vaccinated, those are lives lost that are avoidable deaths. | ||
| And there's been some modeling studies to show that there have been a substantial number of people that would have been alive had they gotten vaccinated that didn't get vaccinated merely because ideologically they didn't think you should get vaccinated. | ||
| They believed people who said vaccines don't work and vaccines are dangerous. | ||
| And many of those people are dead now, and that's really unfortunate. | ||
| No matter what their political slant is, that pains me to see people having died because of a decision based on a political reason. | ||
| Natalie will join us tomorrow. | ||
| We're going to go and spend another hour on this, or hopefully as much time we can carve out. | ||
| At least 30 minutes. | ||
| It's so important. | ||
| Naomi Wolf joins us. | ||
| Naomi, this infuriates me so much. | ||
| Please take over here, and we've got the new book out, and you've kind of dedicated a big part of your life over the last couple of years of doing this. | ||
| It makes my blood boil, these two clips. | ||
| Your observations, ma'am. | ||
| They're really hard to watch, aren't they, Steve? | ||
| It's like watching A crime scene. | ||
| I mean, two crime scenes. | ||
| It's like looking at security camera footage of a horrible, murderous event that was inflicted on the people of the United States and the people of the world. | ||
| But at the time, it just seemed like... At the time, many people didn't know how big these lies were and how baseless were these claims. | ||
| So, I just want to remind everyone that A, The first clip talked about transmission, right? | ||
| Rachel Maddow creating this kind of Dr. Seuss description of how, of virology, right? | ||
| Like the, you know, this virus hops, right? | ||
| That's the word she used from person to person to person. | ||
| And it, People transmit it without knowing that they have it, and then the vaccine stops it in its tracks from hopping, right? | ||
| I mean, like, literally a Dr. Seuss book. | ||
| And, of course, now we know that Pfizer admitted in European hearings that they didn't even look to see if it stopped transmission. | ||
| They didn't even check to see if it stopped transmission. | ||
| And there's no evidence at all That it stops transmission, right? | ||
| So, but this is very important. | ||
| It's more than just something that was wrong, like the masking and the distancing turned out to be wrong. | ||
| This is much more important than that because what the transmission claim or legend really this mythology did was it turned individual rights inside out. | ||
| It turned our whole framework of individual rights inside out and replaced them with a Marxist matrix because It didn't matter if you personally didn't want to take this injection. | ||
| You were, through this transmission theory, which was not based on truth, you were suddenly responsible for the health and well-being of everyone around you, right? | ||
| You were kind of typhoid Mary without even realizing it. | ||
| And you were killing people and killing grandma and, you know, murdering children and All while you were going about your business, having made a personal decision for yourself, right? | ||
| So we really have to understand that that scenario turned our rights-based, individualistic, constitution-based system into a matrix of public health, which is really a matrix of communism. | ||
| The state has to regulate the commons. | ||
| The state has to regulate everything that happens between people, right? | ||
| You don't get to make any individual choices anymore because you're not an individual, you're a comrade. | ||
| And the state has to keep everyone safe as opposed to keeping everyone free. | ||
| Um, so that's what that did. | ||
| And then the shocking and tragic thing about the second clip is that, of course, their Dr. Fauci is claiming that people who didn't take the vaccine, uh, did so only because they're, you know, once again, this kind of liberal elite, um, instinct of you all are such idiots, right? | ||
| You know, the MAGA crowd can't think straight. | ||
| They never took science. | ||
| They can't do math. | ||
| Um, and so you're not deciding not to take the vaccine because you've read a lot of independent voices and looked at, you know, other research and decided that it's risky because it's actually an experimental injection and the trials aren't done till 2023. | ||
| Uh, but no, you're taking, you're not taking it for ideological reasons and then you're going to die. | ||
| Well, we know, um, and Jayanthi Kunadasan, one of our, uh, volunteers, Dr. Jayanthi Kunadasan, an anesthesiologist in Australia is for the second time, Presenting to the Australian Parliament about her findings. | ||
| We know the only way Pfizer got to claim that you're more likely to die without the vaccine than with it was by hiding the bodies of eight dead vaccinated people illegally. | ||
| And if they had accurately reported the eight dead vaccinated people, the math would have tipped in The balance that we now see it's tipping in multiple studies which is you're more likely to die if you've had the injection. | ||
| So these giant lies, they were lying these giant lies at a time when All of the internal documentation that Dr. Fauci certainly had. | ||
| I don't know what, you know, Rachel Maddow had or didn't have, but she shouldn't have made the claims that she did. | ||
| No, no, but I want to go to this. | ||
| She's the most prominent spokesman. | ||
| She's the railhead of the intelligentsia of the progressive left. | ||
| That was so definitive. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| When she said that, When she said that, the people at Pfizer knew that that was wrong, given the evidence you've seen, correct? | ||
| That was in 2021. | ||
| They knew at that time, when she said that, that that was wrong, correct? | ||
| Absolutely no question that that's correct. | ||
| Yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But what's your take? | |
| Did folks that were supposed to oversee these trials and supposed to oversee it for the government, for basically the people, were there people in either CDC, FDA, whatever, that also knew what she was saying was wrong? | ||
| And not slightly wrong, I mean dead wrong, as later they said we didn't even test her. | ||
| Were there people in CDC or FDA that knew she wasn't kind of wrong? | ||
| What she was telling, those are all Those are not mistakes, are they, ma'am? | ||
| Aren't they just bald-faced lies? | ||
| I mean, it's kind of worse. | ||
| So first of all, to answer your question, everyone knew that what she was saying was wrong. | ||
| Everyone internally who had the science knew that that was wrong. | ||
| It was a lie. | ||
| It was a talking point. | ||
| It was a political talking point. | ||
| It had nothing to do with the science, which was completely in the other direction, right? | ||
| I mean, there's literally nothing we've seen in the Pfizer documents about transmission. | ||
| And then Pfizer actually confirmed that they didn't look at transmission. | ||
| And what we've seen about the FDA is, and these, these these pharma companies is they don't look for what they don't wish to find. | ||
| So there, Everyone, everyone, Dr. Walensky, the head of the FDA, Dr. Collins, Dr. Fauci, probably President Biden, all knew, the staff knew, that Rachel Maddow was lying and that there was absolutely no basis for her making that statement. | ||
| But they also knew that the only way you could get to What they wanted to get to was to create this fairy tale, this mythology, that you could be walking around killing people without having any symptoms whatsoever and that that's why you have to take this injection, whether you feel well, whether you feel ill, whether you're healthy, whether you're immunocompromised, because that changes you magically into a non-transmitting | ||
| Transmitter. | ||
| Complete fantasy. | ||
| But what they wanted to get to, Steve, is what's in the Daily Mail today, which is they wanted this injection to be rolled out because they also knew that it sterilized people and dropped birth rates and killed babies in utero. | ||
| And there is a dramatic story in the Daily Mail that Europe cannot replace its population because of the drastic drop in Live births by Europeans and that by 2100, 32% of the population will be over 65 because babies are not being born by, you know, two Europeans. | ||
| And that as a result concludes the Lancet, which is a medical journal and not a public policy journal. | ||
| Immigration has to be embraced because otherwise these countries are going to collapse because babies aren't being born. | ||
| That's what they wanted to get to. | ||
| That's the strategy. | ||
| And it's happening in the United States as well. | ||
| We're having collapses of healthy births. | ||
| It's happening in Canada. | ||
| It's happening in Australia. | ||
| That was the goal and they knew it. | ||
| So this is a much more nefarious, you know, plan, scheme, outcome than just these two horrific demonic liars Lying with abandon and somehow thinking they would never, ever, ever be able to be faced with the truth. | ||
| I don't know how they were so sure that they thought the truth would never come out, but they knew they were lying. | ||
| You know, it's even worse than that, Steve. | ||
| In 2021, Dr. Fauci was covering up myocarditis in minors. | ||
| They knew how dangerous these injections were. | ||
| Okay, the reason they thought so at the time, this is what I found for you, I've only got a couple minutes, I'm going to figure out a schedule to do this and get you back on. | ||
| This is so important, it must be done. | ||
| Remember at the time, Rachel Maddow and these people and the people around him, the Pfizer documents were sealed for 75 years. | ||
| It was the great heroes down in Texas that went to court and had a federal judge say, this is redonkulous. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Of course we're going to, the public paid for this. | ||
| And that led to your team, Amy Kelly, your great leadership, 3,500 volunteers from the War Room Posse, and we got a new book that's coming out, the Pfizer Papers. | ||
| None of that, they thought the crime scene wouldn't have the evidence for two, three, four generations. | ||
| Everybody forgotten about it. | ||
| That's why they thought it. | ||
| And a brave federal judge and the group down in Texas that sued him and won is the only reason we have this today, ma'am. | ||
| You're absolutely right. | ||
| I mean, why do I feel we're in biblical times? | ||
| You know, biblical history. | ||
| It's absolutely providential. | ||
| A handful of people like Aaron Seery, you know, made, cracked open this deep vault of secrets. | ||
| And now the secrets are flowing and changing outcomes. | ||
| And by the way, this book, the Pfizer papers is number one new release on Amazon in immunology. | ||
| The truth, you know, is starting to come out and there's no... I can see that these evildoers would have assumed in 2021, oh, you know, it's buttoned down. | ||
| No one's going to tell. | ||
| Pfizer's not going to release these documents. | ||
| Moderna's not going to release their own documents. | ||
| We can get away with this. | ||
| But I do think the creator had other plans. | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| Let's talk about the book, because I've got to bounce, but I've got to get you back. | ||
| This is so important. | ||
| And I love the color. | ||
| It's like a throwback to the 70s or 80s. | ||
| That's how books, real books used to be published. | ||
| That cover just grabs me. | ||
| I think I'm looking at the greening of America or something. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| Tell me about the book. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, it's, you know, again, thanks to the War Room and thanks to Steve Bannon and of course the amazing Amy Kelly and these volunteers. | ||
| By the way, we saw the amazing Amy Kelly physically here in New York yesterday. | ||
| And this, I love the cover too. | ||
| It actually reminds me of the Pentagon Papers, you know, like one of those expose books back when there was real journalism, but it's a really historic publication. | ||
| It's the second tranche of the reports that you provoked, essentially, by challenging me to do it on air. | ||
| Oh, you guys are going to produce a lot of reports about this, right, Naomi? | ||
| And I'm like, I guess so, Steve. | ||
| But now we're up to 104 reports. | ||
| And this is the second volume. | ||
| And this has some of the biggest bombshells of all. | ||
| These are some of the biggest stories, journalistically, of the 21st century. | ||
| I don't think I'm overstating. | ||
| For instance, this includes how Pfizer hid the bodies to get to the right number. | ||
| It includes a lot on the reproductive damage, stories that we broke, damage to moms, damage to babies. | ||
| It's, you know, the biodistribution study. | ||
| I mean, the things that are so important for the world to have learned in order for humanity to survive are all collected here. | ||
| And I wrote an introduction. | ||
| You'll be writing at some point a foreword, as I understand it. | ||
| And it explains, you know, between us, it explains what the significance of this incredible document, set of documents. | ||
| And the beautiful thing about a book, Steve, is that you can hand it to people like loved ones who insist on not looking at the truth. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| The receipts. | ||
| We got to bounce. | ||
| Where do people go for your great group, your social media, all of it, ma'am? | ||
| Yeah, well, the most important thing the War Room Posse can do right now is order the Pfizer papers and also go to Amazon, if you like, and order the paperback of the bodies of others, which tells the story of this whole time, really, and of the evildoers and the names of who did it. | ||
| Those are the two things you can do and come to Daily Cloud. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Let's do it. | ||
| Let's do it today. | ||
| We'll do it right now. | ||
| Thank you, ma'am. | ||
| I appreciate it. | ||
| We're going to have you back on to break this down, the Fauci book tour. | ||
| What a disaster. | ||
| Lou Dobbs is next. | ||
| Birchgold.com slash Bannon. | ||
| You think it's turbulent? | ||
| You ain't seen nothing yet. | ||
| Just heard the report about the birds in Europe. | ||
| You need a hedge against times of turbulence, a financial hedge. | ||
| Birchgold.com. | ||
| The end of the dollar empire. | ||
| It's all free, but you get to talk to Philip Patrick and the team. | ||
| Do it today. | ||
| Birchgold.com. | ||
| Start spending. | ||
| Lou Dobbs next. |
Export Selection