Sept. 2, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:52
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
| Because we're going medieval on these people. | ||
| President Trump got a free shot at all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
| I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
| MAGA Media. | ||
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
| Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | ||
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved! | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I want to welcome you We're going into the Labor Day weekend. | ||
| I know a lot of you are on the move. | ||
| Let's remember what the Labor Day weekend is all about. | ||
| It's really celebrating the deplorables, the hard-working men and women of this country who build our bridges and roads and provide the sweat and labor | ||
| That has been so instrumental in making this this country so great, so I hope you have safe travels And if you're listening live as many of you do Hopefully we can provide you with some very entertaining and information as well I do have an incredible show for you As the preview I'm going to do | ||
| I don't know how many of you know this, but Steve's main studio, when he's not off around the world doing on location, is literally a touchdown pass away from the Supreme Court. | ||
| I could walk out the door here and even I, with my weak arm, could throw a football and hit the Supreme Court. | ||
| And one of the messages I'm going to give to you today Is my criminal case for which I will go on trial this coming week and there was a lot of action this week is headed right for that building and I'm going to tell you exactly why that's the case and why what you didn't read in the press this last week. We had actually a great victory | ||
| in my case and I will explain the details of that in a minute. So we're going to go over some of that. I've got an interesting Blair Witch Clip update related to that, that you'll get a kick out of. | ||
| But I'm also going to have Dr. Robert Malone on in the bottom half of the hour. | ||
| As you know, there's a new variant of the China virus going round and the Biden regime wants you to booster up. | ||
| And these are significant issues, and we want to prepare our posse for the narrative and propaganda that will be coming. | ||
| So let's start this off, Denver, with clip four. | ||
| And I'm going to lay out what transpired this week. | ||
| I went to the federal courthouse. | ||
| That's only about a quarter mile away from here. | ||
| Play that clip and I'll start to wax a little eloquent on this. | ||
| What this, I think, means is that we'll have a trial next week. | ||
| But these are questions that will certainly move up the chains, the appellate level. | ||
| And as I said at the beginning, this is probably going to the Supreme Court. | ||
| Because this is so important. | ||
| You can't have a Congress, a partisan Congress, That abuses the subpoena process for the purpose of punishing the party that's out of power or putting somebody in jail. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| In this case, clearly the J six committee was trying to build a criminal case against president Trump. | ||
| And it was no coincidence that on Monday, one courtroom away from where I was in Facing what could be an up to two-year prison term. | ||
| The president was facing a lot longer than that. | ||
| Okay, so the point here is the constitutional separation of powers is an issue. | ||
| You can't have Congress under the Democrats doing what they have been doing and expect to have efficient, effective Decision-making in the executive branch. | ||
| That's what these constitutional separation of powers are all about. | ||
| All right, so this is an interesting case. | ||
| I get a subpoena on February 9, 2022, after this J6 Wynch Hutton committee is set up with a bunch of rabid Democrats who tried to impeach Donald Trump twice and two rhino Republicans in Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger. | ||
| What they did was issue a subpoena that compelled me to testify and produce some documents. | ||
| Now, the separation of powers makes it clear constitutionally that the legislative branch cannot Intrude in that fashion on the executive branch. | ||
| In other words, Congress can't do that in the White House. | ||
| And the prevailing doctrine is twofold. | ||
| It's called executive privilege, which a president can and will invoke. | ||
| And there's also this related concept, which are sometimes regarded as synonymous, of what's called absolute testimonial immunity. | ||
| And the idea here is that the very same Department of Justice that's prosecuting me for an alleged crime has had a long-standing policy for more than 50 years that you can't compel people like me, alter egos of the President, to do what they are now prosecuting me for failing to do. | ||
| I mean, it's a fairly Interesting issue. | ||
| So, I'm going to explain the victory in a minute, but let's bring in now Clip 2, Denver. | ||
| At the very beginning of this process, I made the very clear statement repeatedly that there are very complex and important constitutional issues Related to the separation of powers between the legislative branch and the executive branch. | ||
| And the best proof of That statement is the hearing today in which it took Judge Maida over an hour, over an hour, to work through the very complex case law in history associated | ||
| With executive privilege and the related issue of absolute testimonial immunity, which I would note is the policy of the same department, the DOJ, which is prosecuting me. | ||
| In other words, for over 50 years, it's been the case where people like me, senior advisors to the president, alter egos to the president, cannot be compelled To testify. | ||
| That's absolute. | ||
| And so, the judge, I thought very thoughtfully, went through the case law today, and the message that you hear in the press should take away from that is he said repeatedly that based on the court rulings, so many of these questions are open questions. | ||
| Open questions. | ||
| So how am I As somebody who is clearly following the president's direction, how am I supposed to be able to sort through all of these legal issues when it took the judge in this case over an hour to do the very same thing? | ||
| Okay, so the central issue here The central question is, can the legislative branch, the Congress, compel a senior White House advisor like me, an alter ego of a president like President Trump, to testify Before Congress. | ||
| The DOJ, the Department of Justice itself, has memo after memo over 50 years that says that Congress cannot do that. | ||
| And if that doctrine had held in the DOJ, I would not be facing trial under any circumstances. | ||
| But with the Biden regime changing the rules, they basically weaponized the Justice Department. | ||
| They basically brought this issue up. | ||
| And this case is not about me. | ||
| It's about whether they, the legislative branch, can compel a senior White House advisor to testify. | ||
| Now, why is that important? | ||
| It's important Going back to the days of George Washington, and it's been recognized in dicta after dicta and Supreme Court rulings, that in order to have the best decision-making for the nation, presidents and their advisors must have confidentiality. | ||
| Period. | ||
| Full stop. | ||
| And that's What you get as a president when you invoke executive privilege, and that is what you get as a senior advisor presumptively by the DOJ's policy of absolute testimony immunity. | ||
| And this case is about that. | ||
| This case is about whether that will hold or whether the Biden regime, a partisan regime, a legislative branch in cahoots with a Democrat-controlled Justice Department, can start handing out subpoenas willy-nilly, intrude upon the executive branch, and then start putting people in prison if they fail to comply. | ||
| Now, here was a great victory. | ||
| I went into the pretrial conference and the judge had to rule on whether the privilege would apply and how would it apply. | ||
| And it was the first 40 minutes where, like, every single case and argument for exactly why people like me cannot be compelled. | ||
| And this was a great victory because for the very first time we had a ruling from a lower court affirmatively on this issue. | ||
| If a president invokes, and because of testimonial immunity, you can't, as a Congress, force them to testify. | ||
| And the press completely missed that. | ||
| They completely missed that. | ||
| I got into this whole situation because, let me just put it frankly, I'm willing to go to prison to settle this question, okay? | ||
| It's my duty to this country, my commander-in-chief and to the Constitution, to obey a president, in this case Donald Trump, when I am commanded To invoke executive privilege on his behalf. | ||
| And it's not, by law, my privilege to waive. | ||
| And so, what we got this week was a great half a loaf victory. | ||
| Now, the other part of the issue was the judge decided that, for some reason, Executive privilege hadn't been properly invoked. | ||
| And that's going to be the other portion of this case. | ||
| And this will go up to the appellate level. | ||
| It'll go up to the Supreme Court because of the significance of this issue. | ||
| And so this coming week, We'll pick jury. | ||
| We'll go to trial. | ||
| That's the way it's set out. | ||
| And we're going to decide this issue. | ||
| But let me be clear. | ||
| The judge's ruling, just as with Steve Bannon in his trial, effectively stripped me of every single defense. | ||
| And that's why this will go to an appeal. | ||
| But the judge also made it clear that all of the questions Involved in this case, what's called open questions. | ||
| This is a case of first impressions. | ||
| And those are the kinds of cases that the Supreme Court loves to take on because they are of such national importance. | ||
| Peter Navarro, we'll be right back. | ||
| You are in the war room, sitting in for Stephen K Bannon. | ||
| the day well the first thing is that uh... | ||
| my legal bills just went up by another half a million dollars so uh... anybody watching this right now defend peter dot com defend peter dot com uh... on the uh... | ||
| the website so it's a little my legal defense fund uh... | ||
| i've been able to raise uh... | ||
| today uh... | ||
| About $335,000. | ||
| This case, however, has already cost over half a million dollars in legal fees. | ||
| And by the time the trial finishes, I expect those legal fees to hit $750,000. | ||
| Yeah, defendpeter.com. | ||
| Oh, ah, hi. | ||
| I had the situational awareness to be able to go out and talk to the world via C-SPAN to help me there in my fundraising efforts, which I thought was a pretty useful thing to do, defendpeter.com. | ||
| But here's the economics of this. | ||
| Just this week in the Washington Times, I did a column about the cost of what we call lawfare. | ||
| Okay, what the, what the Department of Justice is doing to me, to Donald Trump, to Meadows, to Giuliani, to just poor, poor folk electors in places like Georgia who are like 80 years old and don't have the money. | ||
| What they're doing is they're imposing ungodly legal fees. | ||
| As a means of bullying, kowtowing, and getting us to bend to their knee. | ||
| And my legal bills, as I said in the clip, it's like, okay, so there's this great site, GiveSendGo, right? | ||
| They set up a legal defense fund on that. | ||
| I use the defendpeter.com because it's like a shortcut there. | ||
| And it's been really just humbling to me to see the outpouring of people who are just donating $5 and $10. | ||
| I mean, if you can raise like $300,000 and something like $360,000 now, if you do that in like $5 contributions, that warms your heart. | ||
| I'm telling you. | ||
| And I want to thank everybody who sent me money, as well as their prayers. | ||
| But this case is going to cost me, through trial, probably about $750,000. | ||
| And then the appeals process, all the way up to the Court of Appeals, and likely the Supreme Court, will be another million. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Now, don't weep for me, but scale that up, right? | ||
| There's about 20 people that the Justice Department's going after, that the Georgia Fannie Willis, Black Panther, Marxist ladies going after. | ||
| And every single one of us are going to have bills in the millions. | ||
| Mike Flynn, for General Flynn, I love the guy, he spent $7 million trying to keep himself out of the DOJ prison. | ||
| And this is lawfare, it's brass knuckled lawfare. | ||
| Trump's legal bills are going to cost at least over half a billion dollars, okay? | ||
| So that's what they're doing to us. | ||
| You should get mad and then you should get even at the ballot box. | ||
| So I'm going to fight this fight. | ||
| Look, men and women, young men and women usually, | ||
| have gone into uniform and and been willing to sacrifice their lives for this constitution in this country and the least i can do is to stand up for a constitutional principle which i believe is one of the most important principles for this nation to prosper if we don't get what | ||
| If we get what the Democrats want, it's going to be chaos. | ||
| Now, let me say one last thing on this, this executive privilege issue. | ||
| So, so as I said in the earlier segment, it was a great victory for the judge to rule that if a president invokes the privilege properly, that was the, that was, that was the catch word. | ||
| Senior White House advisors like me can't be compelled to testify. | ||
| That's news. | ||
| That's big law. | ||
| That's important. | ||
| It means that going forward, Congress is now checked. | ||
| They can't play that game. | ||
| And all I have to make sure of on the other end, folks like me and the President, is that the privilege is properly invoked. | ||
| I properly invoked a privilege. | ||
| The president properly invoked a privilege. | ||
| He seriously deliberated before he did so. | ||
| We met all of the checkmarks. | ||
| Every single one the judge put down. | ||
| I was on the stand. | ||
| Uh, for close to an hour, went through five phone calls with the president, a personal visit to Mar-a-Lago, endless emails, phone calls with people you know, like Liz Harrington, Susie Wiles, talking with the president. | ||
| I mean, the case, it was, it was, Denver, get ready for clip three here for a second. | ||
| It was overwhelming evidence that the privilege had been invoked and had been done properly. | ||
| But the judge didn't buy that. | ||
| Now play clip three, because this is the other kind of piece of evidence, which for me, this is like, I'm just, I'm just astonished at this particular | ||
| Allegation that that the privilege wasn't invoked but but take take a listen to this There is not a single White House advisor Who hasn't Asserted executive privilege. | ||
| It's not like I'm the only one who's done this you go back to You go back to 2019 | ||
| You had, in the Mueller Russia hoax case, you had McGahn, Dearborn, Porter, Conway, Donaldson invoking the privilege and immediately the president confirming that. | ||
| You go to After the J6 committee was established, you had Meadows, Scavino, Patel, and Bannon issue subpoenas and the president invoking the privilege. | ||
| And you had people repeatedly go before the J6 committee and assert the privilege, all without challenge. | ||
| And here I am, People are supposed to believe that the privilege hadn't been invoked. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I just, huh? | |
| That just doesn't follow. | ||
| I mean, here's the thing. | ||
| When I first got into the White House in 2017, one of the first things I learned was that folks like me do not go up on the Hill to testify. | ||
| I mean, the reason is that we are considered alter egos of the president. | ||
| And we are, we, you know, within the White House grounds as advisors, we're different from, say, cabinet secretaries, which have, have an obligation by law to go before Congress a certain amount of times. | ||
| And they, they don't, they don't have the same kind of absolute testimonial immunity that applies to folks Like me. | ||
| But then, like, fast forward. | ||
| I mean, this was like a clinic for me in learning about the invocation of executive privilege and testimony immunity. | ||
| I mean, Pelosi gets control of the House of Representatives in the 2018 midterm elections and states for the record publicly that she's going to use Democrat-controlled investigative committees to make our lives miserable and try to put us in prison. | ||
| I mean, she said she's coming right after us. | ||
| And she did! | ||
| And, sure enough, the subpoenas started to fly a few months later, and the first ones that flew We're related to the Mueller investigation, the Russia hoax. | ||
| And so, they'd send a subpoena to Don McGahn, or Rick Dearborn, or Rob Porter, and immediately, the President would invoke the privilege, and equally immediately, White House legal counsel Pat Cipollone, one of my favorite guys in there, would issue a letter that | ||
| Quoted the opinions of the Department of Justice, both old and the ones he might solicit, saying, hey, you can't do that. | ||
| They never got, they never got charged with contempt. | ||
| I am the first person in the history of this country, the first senior White House advisor ever And then, of course, along comes J6, right? | ||
| And Brother Bannon gets a subpoena. | ||
| Cash Patel gets a subpoena. | ||
| You know these guys from the war room. | ||
| Mark Meadows, you know him. | ||
| Dan Scavino. | ||
| What happens? | ||
| Invocation of privilege. | ||
| And none of those guys, save Bannon, got after. | ||
| Well, that's another story. | ||
| All right. | ||
| I'll be right back. | ||
| We're going to switch gears and talk to Dr. Malone shortly, but I got the Blair Witch Project for you coming up. | ||
| Don't miss this cold open clip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will fight till they're all gone. | |
| We rejoice when there's no more. | ||
| Let's take down the CCD. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bound. | ||
| You you you I appreciate it. | ||
| No, that's all right. | ||
| I appreciate it. | ||
| Look, this is great. | ||
| Put your flag up there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We appreciate what you're doing, sir. | |
| We appreciate the justice you're getting for this country. | ||
| This is kind of the important... | ||
| She's got a megaphone to disrupt. | ||
| But when it comes time for me to express my view to you, you've seen what she's done. | ||
| She's interrupted me while I was speaking. | ||
| know that's fine she's expressing her point of view she's got a megaphone to disrupt but when it comes time for me to express my view to you you've seen what she's done she's interrupted me while I was speaking and she won't even let an American show the American flag Oh, it's so beautiful. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh say can you see by the dawn's early light What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming Whose broad stripes and bright stars | |
| So this is the slings and arrows we gotta deal with these days. | ||
| So I'm given that presser, as they say in the trade, out after the trial, pre-trial conference. | ||
| And this woman comes, I mean, she was like within inches of me. | ||
| She's got this megaphone like a gun. | ||
| She starts screaming at me. | ||
| And I turn around. | ||
| And the left wing press doesn't mention any of what what follows where you can see in that clip that this is a T-shirt. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't believe that. | |
| I wish I'd noticed it at the time. | ||
| But when I did the editing on it, I go, wait a minute. | ||
| Her shirt literally says which. | ||
| And so this woke witch is like elbowing a patriot out of the way. | ||
| Nice woman supporter waving the American flag. | ||
| I mean, this is like this is how low things have come to. | ||
| In this country. | ||
| And something's gotta give. | ||
| So if you're outraged by any of that, you can see on my Twitter feed, my Getter feed, my true social feed, Real P. Navarro watched the whole thing. | ||
| Go to DefendPeter.com if you want to strike back against that kind of crap. | ||
| Alright, let's switch gears now. | ||
| I want to bring in one of my favorite people on the planet who has saved Hundreds of thousands of lives with his wisdom and perhaps more than that. | ||
| Dr. Robert Malone. | ||
| Hey, Doc. | ||
| How you doing, man? | ||
| Hi, Peter. | ||
| Thanks for the kind words. | ||
| No worries, man. | ||
| We're all in the same situation. | ||
| We're getting attacked all the time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So much appreciate your kindness. | |
| So, here's the thing. | ||
| I want to really help the posse today in this regard. | ||
| We've got yet another variant of the China virus, and we've got a fairly aggressive effort from Moderna, Pfizer, and the Biden regime to get you to take a booster. | ||
| Yeah, tell us, Doc, about the new variant, how it relates to the vaccines people have already gotten, and was there any reason at all? | ||
| Are they getting any better at this vaccine stuff, or is this just more of the same Fauci snake oil? | ||
| Okay, the answer is more of Fauci snake oil with a The cherry on top is the usual fear porn and propaganda. | ||
| So the variant that we're talking about right now is technically named BA2.86, and it's otherwise known as Parola, which relates in some way to Venus, the planet. | ||
| And just to make it simple for the... Posse has got lots of sophisticated folks in it, and I'm not in any way talking them down. | ||
| The simple line is that this virus, while it's different, and it has many mutations in the spike protein, many more than have been seen previously, there is no evidence that it is more pathogenic. | ||
| In other words, that it causes worse disease. | ||
| There is no evidence right now that it is more highly infectious. | ||
| In fact, the fact that it has such a dense collection of mutations in the spike protein may well make it less infectious. | ||
| It absolutely shows the signs of having been genetically selected, so evolved, to avoid the vaccine-induced immunity. | ||
| That's why all these mutations in spike appear, as you and I had discussed would be the case so long ago in our op-eds in the Washington Times and here on Mr. Bannon's broadcast. | ||
| So the punchline is there are actually very few of these so far. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And in terms of a day or two ago... Hey, hang on, let me just stop you there because you said something really important. | |
| In lay terms, I think what you just said is that the people who are more likely statistically to get infected with this virus are the people who got vaccinated. | ||
| Is that what I heard? | ||
| It's not what I said, but it's likely to be the case. | ||
| The truth is that we really don't have any verified cases as of a couple days ago of parola causing COVID. | ||
| We have verified cases of parola infections. | ||
| We have verified parola nucleic acid in sewage, but we don't have a swarm of clear clinical cases associated with this variant. | ||
| However, the fact that it has these clustered mutations in spike suggests that it's been selected by the vaccinated, and we already know that the vaccinated are actually at increased risk from the prior variants of hospitalization and death relative to those with natural immunities. | ||
| And we already know that those that are highly inoculated, I hesitate to say vaccinated with this product, have both a non-specific immunodeficit. | ||
| There was a paper just out from Australia pointing this out in the pediatric population that in Australia, children that have been vaccinated are more likely to get infected with other pathogens. | ||
| And we have There's evidence of some immunologic phenomena having to do with imprinting an original antigenic sin that makes it so that those that are highly inoculated are at higher risk for disease and unfortunately death. | ||
| Those are the facts. | ||
| And so I, you know, some of the posse may have been vaccinated as I was. | ||
| I was in the early round of vaccination when it was given by the National Guard. | ||
| Um, I took it for my own reasons. | ||
| I had to travel and I was suffering from long COVID and supposedly it might've helped. | ||
| Uh, and I believe that my colleagues had fixed the, uh, problems associated with the technology. | ||
| Um, all of those were false. | ||
| Uh, but I did take it. | ||
| I was vaccine damaged, but I certainly did not take any additional boosters. | ||
| And it's these people that have been multiply boosted sometimes seven or eight times. | ||
| that are at very high risk for disease and unfortunately death relative to age and a pre-existing condition matched people, if that made sense. | ||
| Yeah, let me see if I can, I'll be a lay guy here, see if I heard you right. | ||
| The first thing, when you talk about this genetic selection, I think what I heard you saying is that these vaccines, as we wrote about it back when in the Washington Times, these viruses mutate. | ||
| The viruses are like clever beasts, as Steven Atfield might say, and what they try to do is figure out a way to infect you. | ||
| So if you get vaccinated or inoculated, whatever you want to call it, whatever that hellish thing is they put in you, And that provides some kind of Maginot Line defense. | ||
| They'll figure out a way quickly to go around that through a mutation. | ||
| I think what I heard you saying was that this particular latest one... Using your metaphor of the Maginot Line, it's like the Germans had so many troops, in other words so many viruses, that were all slightly different tactics They could overwhelm the Maginot Line, and that is absolutely what viruses do. | ||
| And when you have something like a pre-existing immunity that's leaky, so this is a partial Maginot Line that isn't working very well, they'll get through and basically their offspring will all know how to get through that line again. | ||
| So that is absolutely what's happened, is that The leaky vaccines have selected for highly mutated spike proteins that avoid the types of antibodies that are generated by the vaccine products. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And on top of that, on top of that, what you're saying is there's increasing amounts of data that everything else being equal, people who've gotten vaccinated or immunolog, highly vaccinated, are suffering from broader immunodeficiency things, meaning that their body has been weakened to the point where they're more susceptible, not | ||
| Just to new COVID strains, but also to many other diseases. | ||
| Is that what you're saying? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| And there's a recent paper in Children published from Australia study. | ||
| And this data that you're referring to has been building from the UK, Canada, the United States, all over the world. | ||
| And it's very unfortunate, but true. | ||
| These patients are people that have accepted multiple boosters, not only have a broad, non-specific immunologic deficit, it's not huge, it's not AIDS, but they do have a weakened immune response, and they also have a very selective, focused immunologic deficit against this SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| So both things are happening, a specific weakness and a general weakness. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, and a general weakness. | |
| Doc, I'm a big fan of your work. | ||
| I think the best place to find much of what you do is at your Substack. | ||
| So why don't you let people know now what that Substack is and then maybe you can give me your social media as well. | ||
| So Substack is rwmalonemd.substack.com, and yesterday I published a very nice analysis from my colleague Byram Breidel in Canada, who is another molecular virologist and vaccinologist, titled The Parola Variant of SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| And if you want to dive into the details, you'll find that if you can just scan down on that list a little bit. | ||
| Yeah, today was the funnies, but if you were to scroll down, then you would see that there is that one right there, the parola variant of SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| And I recommend that folks that want more details read that very clear, easy reading article that has... | ||
| They're playing our song. | ||
| You know that music, right? | ||
| You know who that is? | ||
| That's Miles Guo. | ||
| Free Miles Guo. | ||
| Doc, always good to see you. | ||
| You have a safe and wonderful Labor Day weekend, my friend. | ||
| And we're trying to keep America safe here, but Biden sure makes it hard. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro in for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We'll be right back with The Big Fin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Vance. | |
| Okay, well the first thing is that my legal bills just went up by another half a million dollars. | ||
| So, anybody watching this right now, defendpeter.com, defendpeter.com. | ||
| On the website, it's my legal defense fund, I've been able to raise to date, $1.5 million in legal fees. | ||
| About $335,000. | ||
| This case, however, has already cost over half a million dollars in legal fees. | ||
| And by the time the trial finishes, I expect those legal fees to hit $750,000. | ||
| Hey, Peter Canovari for Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Yeah, that's the last thing I'll do to promote this legal defense fund. | ||
| It's DefendPeter.com. | ||
| Have some fun with it. | ||
| At least go to the site. | ||
| You can read about the case. | ||
| And if you go there during the live show here, you'll see that the total race It's about $380,000 so far. | ||
| This week has been really good, but it would be really nice if you out there in posse land could help a little bit. | ||
| I don't want people to do anything they can't afford. | ||
| Five, ten bucks is fine, but DefendPeter.com would be very helpful. | ||
| After selling you on that, I really want to sell you on something that is really, really interesting. | ||
| This is a hefty book by Brother Joe Allen called Dark Aeon. | ||
| I've got a confession to make, Joe. | ||
| What, Peter? | ||
| When Bannon started having you on, I was going, what's this about, right? | ||
| And then time passes, right? | ||
| And it's like I realized that Bannon does justify his reputation as the guy who sees even further into the future, which I pride myself on being able to do. | ||
| And he saw all of this stuff coming and basically brought you into the discussion. | ||
| You've been kind of the beacon on this whole Scary stuff and and this book is really an expression of that. | ||
| It's kind of cool It's Steve's Steve's imprints the war room imprint, but it's done by one of my my good buddies Tony Lyons at Skyhorse press Tony's absolutely fearless and he will publish books that Frankly the bad guys don't want you to read okay, so so Let me ask you this. | ||
| I mean, there's just a lot of things going on. | ||
| I'd like to get your view of, first of all, of artificial intelligence. | ||
| And how do you think that could play out in a good way, but more likely in a bad way? | ||
| Because, you know, I'm already, I'm starting to use it kind of in my research and writing this and the other thing. | ||
| And it scares the hell out of me. | ||
| You know, I'll ask it questions sometimes, and he comes back with the worst kind of dogma. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Yeah, who's programming the programmers, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So anyway, talk to me a little bit. | ||
| You know, Peter, it's always been strange coming on after you, or coming on after people who are looking at what's happening right now. | ||
| You know, you're looking at the economy, Where you're looking at the political situation, you're trying to decipher what's going to be our next move, given what's happening right now. | ||
| And it's always very nuts and bolts. | ||
| This is a very ethereal topic, because you're talking about the future. | ||
| He's pointing to the book, by the way. | ||
| It's an ethereal topic. | ||
| It's kind of out there, right? | ||
| See, I think the point I was trying to make when I first started listening to you, Well, that's what it sounded like. | ||
| This guy's like Spaceman. | ||
| He's out there. | ||
| You weren't the first. | ||
| But you're not. | ||
| That's the funny part. | ||
| You're like right in the middle of a vein of rapid technological change, which by the time Uh, your 14 year old kid goes to college even. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Um, it's going to be dramatic in how this world is changing. | ||
| So, so. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| It's sort of like looking at it. | ||
| Imagine you're living in the early 1900s and people are telling you about Marxism and you're noticing that, you know, the, the workers are getting a little amped up about it, you know, and it's not something that you're necessarily thinking about all the time until you get something like the Russian revolution. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And these sorts of changes, the cultural revolution in the U.S., you think about, for the most part, the post-war generation, the World War II generation, they were at the top of their game. | ||
| And then with all that excess, suddenly something shifted in the youth culture and everything changed among the youth culture. | ||
| And now the fruits of that are readily apparent. | ||
| The world is simply not the same place because of ideology and shifts in culture, but also because of technology. | ||
| The technology drove the revolution of the 60s, both in China and here. | ||
| And the technology in many ways drove the revolution, the original Russian revolution and the various Marxist revolutions across the world because you had suddenly massive industrial society. | ||
| What are you going to do with it? | ||
| Transhumanism is the next beacon forward. | ||
| We have all these technologies, artificial intelligence, automation and robotics, genetic engineering. | ||
| What are we going to do with them? | ||
| They have a very clear, articulate answer. | ||
| Transhumanists, futurists, the oligarchs coming out of Silicon Valley, or Musk, the outlier, the Chinese Communist Party, people who are at the cutting edge of these technologies have very clear plans as to what they're going to do with them. | ||
| Most of those plans involve advantages for them, and many of those plans involve controlling you, right? | ||
| And I think that as the next generation comes up, they are really going to have to be very wise, very discerning as to which of these technologies they adopt and how they use them if they do. | ||
| Is this simply an explanation of the dangers or is there an action plan here to fight back? | ||
| There's very much a description of the dangers, the landscape, both technologically and you might surprise you, religiously. | ||
| and the meaning of technology in an atheistic society. | ||
| But there is, you know, as asked, as requested by the War Room Posse, the last two chapters, the last chapter, the last two chapters and the appendix dedicated to you. | ||
| You asked for my answer for what to do, you got it. | ||
| Action! | ||
| Action, action. | ||
| How many times have you heard that from Admiral Stephen K. Bannett? | ||
| Joe, Dark Ian, go to Amazon right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Buy it. | |
| The audio book's coming out soon. | ||
| Peter K. Navarro, always an honor to sit in and be with you, the posse, in for Stephen K. Bannett. | ||
| So enjoy your Labor Day, but let's remember, it celebrates Labor Day, workers. |
Export Selection