Sept. 1, 2023 - Bannon's War Room
48:55
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the primal scream of a dying regime. | ||
| Pray for our enemies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we're going medieval on these people. | |
| I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. | ||
| The people have had a belly full of it. | ||
| I know you don't like hearing that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. | |
| It's going to happen. | ||
| And where do people like that go to share the big lie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
MAGA Media. | |
| I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? | |
| If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| It is 1 September, gotta get used to saying that, year of our Lord, 2023. | ||
| It's Natalie Winters, obviously. | ||
| I sit here before you as the co-host of War Room, but you know I used to be, and still sort of am, an investigative reporter. | ||
| And the story that Jim has brought to our attention, the whistleblower, really watching people who are supposed to be preserving and protecting the integrity of our elections, mocking them, turning them into something that I think third world countries really would envy. | ||
| Really, I think, brings me back to when I was doing a lot of my early reporting on the origins of COVID, and it sort of left me with the question of, where is the Republican Party? | ||
| Where is the Republican, you know, where are the Republican officials actually doing anything? | ||
| Starting the investigations, the inquiries, and then, of course, you come to the realization that a lot of the Republican Party is controlled opposition. | ||
| But I was 19 when I started doing my investigations, and I was like, Is there anyone else who's going to pick up the slack, at least from the elected official side of things? | ||
| There never really was, and that's where the Chinese Communist Party has gotten away with COVID-19. | ||
| But Jim, I think the most pressing question and the obvious follow-up to everything that you just told us is, Has anyone with any power in the Republican Party, any congressmen, senators, reached out to you to try to back up and actually get accountability from the stories, from the evidence that you're surfacing? | ||
| Or has it been kind of radio wave silence? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, as you know, mostly silence. | |
| We did send our reporting to a member of the Oversight Committee just this week. | ||
| So we hope that they look at this. | ||
| I also would like to add, Natalie, that there's 16 individuals, mostly senior citizens, some are in their 80s, who were alternative delegates for President Trump in 2021, January 6th. | ||
| And they were arrested by Dana Nessel because Dana Nessel said there's no fraud, there's no evidence of it. | ||
| Well, there actually was an investigation that was turned over to the FBI at the time she knew this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And now it's a much bigger scandal than she would like to admit. | |
| I'm sure this puts a damper on her day because, once again, she's caught in not telling the truth to the people of Michigan. | ||
| And so there's also going to be a telethon for these people next week that we're going to broadcast. | ||
| I get repundant. | ||
| I think Steve may join us for that. | ||
| Yeah, nothing from the GOP, of course. | ||
| It's not surprising. | ||
| I've been doing this for about 20 years and it's about the same response that we typically get when we break a huge story. | ||
| But this is very important. | ||
| We're not going to stop. | ||
| We're going to continue. | ||
| We have some other bombshells to release that we're holding in our back pocket right now. | ||
| Well, Jim, I think when the Republican Party ignores you, the fact-checkers come after you and they try to demonetize you. | ||
| That is the kind of three musketeer signs that you're doing the right thing and that you are indeed on the right side of history. | ||
| I'd also throw in there when the Chinese Communist Party is weaponizing their largest ever bot campaign against you. | ||
| Like we just saw reported, at least against Steve in War Room. | ||
| I think that means, like I said, we're on the right side of history, and that is a good place to be. | ||
| Jim, if people want to read the story and stay up to date with everything you're working on, where can they go to find it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Natalie. | |
| Yes, bgatewaypundit.com is our website. | ||
| We're on all the socials, so TruthGetter, Telegram, TwitterX, and so you can find us there. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Now, Denver, if we want to roll a quick clip before we get to Mike Davis, who I hear was sort of offended that I had replaced him last time I hosted the show with Garrett Venturi. | ||
| Mike wants to make the key point that Garrett is not a lawyer. | ||
| Mike is. | ||
| It's a very lawyer thing to say. | ||
| But speaking of lawyers and being scared about the law and pending impeachments, let's see MSNBC in complete tailspin over what is going to happen to Joe Biden. | ||
| On the impeachment inquiry and just a laughable take will be nice by Kareem Jean-Pierre about Joe Biden and China. | ||
| Let's hit it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But this is some of the new reporting that we have, as 1A told us, in the simplest of terms. | |
| This is not an evidence-based effort. | ||
| It is an election-focused effort by Republicans, Willie. | ||
| So Peter's right, Jen, that for a while, the White House, Biden White House, really steered clear of the term war room. | ||
| They did. | ||
| They said in the early But I'll say this, no president has put the United States, and you've heard us say this many times, in a stronger position to out-compete China than President Biden. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I talked to, they're almost sort of resigned to the idea that at least there'll be an impeachment inquiry unclear if we'll get all the way towards a full fledged impeachment. | |
| But I'll say this, no president has put the United States and you've heard us say this many times in a stronger position to outcompete China than President Biden and managing, and I think she has said this too in her interviews, managing that intense competition requires intense diplomacy. | ||
| Joe Biden is the strongest president, president against China. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| They must think we're really dumb because that must be the worst political take I've ever heard. | ||
| And I watch a lot of mainstream media. | ||
| I mean, like I said in the early hour, it is so oppressively in your face, the lies that they will tell you, of course, aided and abetted by the fact checkers. | ||
| But that MSNBC segment right there, by the way, You can use the term war room. | ||
| I think our war room's a little bit better, maybe at least when Steve's hosting. | ||
| But it shows you they're in full-blown panic mode because they know the impeachment inquiry is coming. | ||
| And it's not an evidence-free impeachment. | ||
| It's probably the best, if not most well-sourced impeachment inquiry that we will ever have. | ||
| Not because Republicans are good at investigating, but because Joe Biden is just so damn corrupt. | ||
| But Mike Davis, I think we have you. | ||
| Your thoughts on sort of where we are progressing when it comes to the impeachment of Joe Biden? | ||
| And I'm sure we will get into a myriad of other topics. | ||
| Well, I think the Biden White House knows it's coming because MS I guess NBC is reporting that the Biden White House has two dozen lawyers and political operatives now in a war room preparing for impeachment. | ||
| And if they have nothing to hide, why do they have two dozen lawyers and other operatives preparing for impeachment? | ||
| It's obvious that President Biden is compromised by tens of millions of dollars in foreign bribes and other corruption from Ukraine, from China, from Romania, and other hot spots, and this has deadly consequences when President Obama put Vice President Biden in charge of Ukraine. | ||
| Biden went on the take as the Vice President. | ||
| He took a $10 million foreign bribe from Burisma and changed U.S. | ||
| policy. | ||
| He threatened to cut off a billion dollars in U.S. | ||
| aid to Ukraine if the Ukrainian president didn't fire The Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma and the Bidens and oh, guess what? | ||
| The shakedown was recorded on 17 audio tapes, 15 with Hunter and two with then Vice President Joe Biden. | ||
| And these audio tapes were with the Burisma executive who was almost certainly a Russian asset. | ||
| So Putin knows about this shakedown. | ||
| Maybe that's why Putin realized that Biden was corrupt and compromised and took Crimea back then. | ||
| And then we had four years of peace in Ukraine and prosperity in Ukraine under Trump. | ||
| And then the second Biden's back as the president of the United States, Putin smells his corruption and weakness again. | ||
| and tries to take the rest of Ukraine. | ||
| We may see the same thing in China, where China knows that the Bidens were on the Chinese payroll, and who knows, we could see a war in Taiwan. | ||
| Two trouble spots in the world right now, Russia with Ukraine, China with Taiwan. | ||
| It is a direct result of Joe Biden being corrupt, taking bribes and other corruption, and these adversaries are enemies smelling our president's weakness. | ||
| He is compromised, and House Republicans have no excuse anymore. | ||
| They need to move forward with an impeachment inquiry immediately. | ||
| This is foreign bribery. | ||
| This is in the Constitution. | ||
| This is what impeachment is for. | ||
| It's glaringly evident that the indictments are lawfare meant to distract away from, you know, the Biden family corruption scandal, right? | ||
| Accused your enemy of what you're guilty of. | ||
| But I also think Republicans, the MAGA base, really needs to wrap their head around the fact that these potential mask mandates, these impending lockdowns, are another form of lawfare, I think, more so to deflect, if not really, I think, propel the Democratic election fraud machine, the election rigging, both through legal And illegal means, of course, the, you know, Zuckerberg type groups. | ||
| So I'd love to hear from your perspective, both, I know you're a lawyer and Garrett's not, on the law side of things, but also just how we need to see our, you know, Republican members on the Hill actually fight back against the potential lockdowns. | ||
| But in your opinion, do you think that they're going to spin these lockdowns, the mandates, whatever they want to, I know the new term for them, they're very good at branding is safety protocols. | ||
| But do you think that they're going to spin that as sort of another iteration or derivation of democratic lawfare to try to beat Trump at the ballot box because they know they can't do it through legal means? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it's obvious that they're going to bring back, they're going to try to bring back these COVID lockdowns because Republican politicians and judges rolled over and played dead for three years of COVID, right? | ||
| It wasn't until we had courageous young judges like Katherine Meyelton in Florida who said the CDC has no power to mandate masks on planes and trains. | ||
| If Congress wants to give CDC that power, pass legislation. | ||
| And frankly, I don't even think Congress has the power. | ||
| to pass legislation to mask people because that's not in the Constitution. But at a minimum, there has to be a legislative enactment in order for a bureaucrat, an unelected bureaucrat at the CDC to tell Americans we have to wear these science-free masks on planes and trains indefinitely, right? This is fear. And what I think is happening is, is the Biden regime understands that Bidenomics was just an utter failure. | ||
| It caused tremendous inflation. | ||
| Interest rates are too high. | ||
| Gas prices are too high. | ||
| Frankly, I think it's by design. | ||
| But they need someone else to blame. | ||
| They need something else to blame. | ||
| And I think what they're trying to do is implement these COVID lockdowns again so they can blame COVID for the Biden economy instead of Biden's policies. | ||
| Mike Davis. | ||
| Now, I guess I'm biased. | ||
| I like to have you on the show because you actually subscribe to me on Twitter. | ||
| It's a great subscription. | ||
| No, I'm kidding. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's just golf videos. | |
| Natalie G. Winters. | ||
| I think I get like 1% of whatever. | ||
| Natalie G. Winters at Natalie G. Winters. | ||
| I think I get like 1% of whatever. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Maybe Garrett was able to finagle 2%, but I get 1%. | |
| 10% for the big guy. | ||
| 10% for the big guy. | ||
| Don't sell yourself short. | ||
| Mike Davis, if people want to follow you... I know. | ||
| I wonder how I got the job. | ||
| No, I'm kidding. | ||
| If people want to follow you and stay up to date with everything you're working on, where can they find you? | ||
| It's at article, or excuse me, article3project.org, article3project.org, you can donate there, at article3project, at article3project, at getter twitter, or x, or whatever the hell it's called, and then my personal is m-r-d-d-m-i-a, m-r-d-d-m-i-a. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie, and thank you for having the junior varsity Garrett on the other day. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I like this cold war that's brewing. | ||
| I guess it's a hot war that's brewing between you guys. | ||
| Have a good one, Mike. | ||
| Thanks. | ||
| And I think we have Congressman Tim Burchett on the line with us, maybe? | ||
| I do, I see him. | ||
| Now, Congressman, before we get into the latest with what the Oversight Committee is doing on the emails, the hidden redacted stuff from NARA, your thoughts on what we were talking about previously, if you heard how they were potentially going to use the lockdowns, the mask mandates, as sort of a new iteration of lawfare to influence the 2024 Well, thank you so much for having me on. | ||
| Before we get started, I would inform you that there's a boy in my office. | ||
| His name is Pruitt Asher. | ||
| are going to do to make sure that we don't even have to say we will not comply because there will be no lockdowns or mandates to have to not comply with? | ||
| Well, thank you so much for having me on. Before we get started, I would inform you that there's a boy in my office. His name's Pruitt Asher. He's a big old tall strapping Texas boy, and he thinks you're the most wonderful thing in the world, and he would like to take you to dinner. So we'll talk offline. He makes okay money. He's got most of his natural teeth, and I said he's from Texas. | ||
| He's as conservative constitutionally as you and I are, so we'll leave it at that. | ||
| You know, I was on Christian radio this morning. | ||
| Oddly enough in Knoxville here, and I was talking about that very same subject and just how we rolled over our houses of worship. | ||
| You know, the Hasidic Jews in the north and the evangelicals in the south just rolled over. | ||
| We let them close our places of worship. | ||
| They closed our schools and they closed our places of business except for the big box stores, which to me was just crazy. | ||
| They said all of a sudden these international conglomerates have the ability. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If I hear music, do we need to... | |
| Yes, Congressman, will you hang with us through the break? | ||
| I assume you will. | ||
| We got you. | ||
| Yes, we got to talk about lockdowns, but we also have to talk about, believe it or not, the Biden regime is still acting like the Chinese Communist Party, hiding emails, hiding basically all the evidence of their corruption. | ||
| But I guess that's what regimes do. | ||
| We'll be right back after this break with Congressman Burchett. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is your host, Stephen K. Babb. | |
| We always like to say, accuse your enemy of what you're guilty of. | ||
| That's, of course, the guiding axiom, the guiding strategy of today's Democratic Party. | ||
| And there's probably no better example of that than, of course, the lawfare that they're perpetrating against Donald J. Trump, all of the indictments, the conspiracy to overturn the results of the election. | ||
| Well, I've said it before, and I will stand by it, that COVID-19, the pandemic, public health, That really was the true conspiracy to overturn the election results, to deny the will of the American people. | ||
| If you want to talk about how we had probably the most busted election in the United States history, look no further than what they did with universal mass mail-in voting, all by design, I'm sure. | ||
| Now, Congressman, I know we had to go to break. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| If it were up to me, I would have blown through the break, but I don't think I think that's above my pay grade. | ||
| Only Steve gets to make those decisions. | ||
| But if you want to pick up where you left off on where the crusade against these potential looming next wave of mandates stands, I'm sure the audience would appreciate that because they probably need their cortisol levels to go down just a little bit. | ||
| Or maybe you'll spike them. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Now, you know, I said I was on Christian Radio here in Knoxville and we were talking, that was one of the issues that they were concerned about, was it, are we going to roll over again? | ||
| And I thought it was very interesting because I've often stated that that's where our biggest problem has been. | ||
| been when 20 million or 30 million, whatever it is, so-called evangelical Christians decided to stay home on election day. | ||
| And I said that those things have consequences at the federal level, yeah, but at the state and local level, really, just immediately almost. | ||
| And so I think people are aware of it now. | ||
| I think we'd have the support in Congress. | ||
| I don't think Congress has the right to mandate masks. | ||
| I used to get ticked off on the airplanes when they'd say, it's a federal law that you wear your mask. | ||
| Well, hell no, it wasn't a federal law. | ||
| It was a rule passed down by a bunch of bureaucrats, and we didn't have the guts to stand up to it. | ||
| You know, the Republicans, we brought Fauci in. | ||
| To one of the conference meetings and I was like, who is this guy? | ||
| I couldn't see him. | ||
| I was in the back and he's short little guy and they were giving him a standing ovation and all this stuff. | ||
| And I, I just, I'm not big on standing ovations and I couldn't figure out who he was and why he was there. | ||
| And then, um, you know, I think it was pretty much revealed. | ||
| I don't know if the Chinese thought it would be a good idea to, Maybe they thought it would change America's course, but I don't think they were in collusion with the left when they did it, but I do think they seized upon that moment, let no good calamity go unused, and that's what they did. | ||
| I think they know now what America, just like the Chinese balloon that was allowed to fly over our country, it wasn't so much the information No, in fact, I do not want to do this. | ||
| I'm not going to lose my business. | ||
| the, you know, even the war pimps at the Pentagon see it. | ||
| And they know what our response will be. | ||
| It'll be next to nothing. | ||
| We will roll over once again if we're not careful. | ||
| If we do not tell our elected officials, in fact, no, in fact, I do not want to do this. | ||
| I'm not going to lose my business. | ||
| I'm not going to close my house of worship. | ||
| I'm not going to make my kids be sequestered in a room where the only influence they have on them is some left-wing nut job on pumping information into their little, little, very malleable heads. | ||
| And I think we need to stand up to it, 100%. | ||
| a standing ovation for Fauci. That's one of the most sickening things that I've ever heard. I guess maybe almost as sickening as what the Biden regime is doing to continue to stone Wallhouse Oversight's investigations into the corrupt business deals, not just of Hunter Biden, but really of the Biden family writ large. Now, I'm under the impression that either yesterday or today was the final day that the archives had to comply with your request to produce records on the weird, super shady pseudonym | ||
| containing emails involving Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. | ||
| Where do we stand on that front? | ||
| Well, another instance where we'd better be checking. | ||
| If we know of three or four of his pseudonyms that he used on these emails, I wonder about the rest of them. | ||
| And I wonder if we're ever going to Really do what we're constitutionally allowed to do, and we're supposed to be the funding mechanism. | ||
| And if Congress—if Republicans in Congress will get some guts and say, hey, these departments, like the folks that we're talking about, will not come forth with these records as they're compelled to do—again, unelected bureaucrats Telling the elected body what to do. | ||
| I think the Holman rule needs to come into play and we need to start cutting their money. | ||
|
unidentified
|
100%. | |
| It's just a dereliction of duty. | ||
| It's a thumbing their nose at the constitution of people in this country. | ||
| Again, Republican leadership better get some guts or we're going to start looking elsewhere for new leadership. | ||
| Retweet on that. | ||
| Now I know there's another I think inquiry also with the archives going particularly from Rep Comer and Byron Donalds looking into how Hunter Biden was using Air Force Two flying around with Joe Biden at taxpayer expense to help Yeah. | ||
| ink all of his business deals with the Chinese Communist Party. So is that part of the records request that we were just talking about or specifically looking downrange on that one? | ||
| What do you expect to see unfold there? I think that's two separate things, but you got to realize and I was on CNN the other night and I told the lady, I said, no, you're CNN man. | ||
| Nobody believes you. | ||
| I said, and she said, you know, she wasn't left or right or whatever. | ||
| I said, ma'am, your fingers are crossed underneath the table. | ||
| But because I think what's happened is, Is that we, again, let another bureaucracy do something that they're not allowed to do. | ||
| So, on these records, I think what we should tie in, and we should show to the American public, and we don't need a major production like the January 6th, and we don't need CBS to come in and produce it for us or have walkout music. | ||
| If they do, I want mine to be Simple Man by Leonard Skinner, but that's beside the point. | ||
| I would hope that we would show, which I've seen, I've pretty much drawn this conclusion, and it's pretty easy to do, that you saw Hunter, a corporate entity overseas, was in trouble doing something shady. | ||
| They hired Hunter, or they gave him a ton of money. | ||
| They then put it into 21 different LLCs. | ||
| But then, oddly enough, after maybe phone calls between The board and the vice president, Joe Biden, at the time, they would have meetings with Biden. | ||
| In one instance, one of the Chinese fellas, they wrote a recommendation letter for her daughter, his daughter, or somebody to get into some college. | ||
| I don't know if she did or she didn't, but anyway. | ||
| And then you saw some of the problems go away. | ||
| I think that's the thing that we ought to show. | ||
| That shows the direct tie-in. | ||
| But I still think, I wish Chairman Comer or somebody, maybe Jordan or somebody, would figure out how we get the records from the IRS that show whether they paid taxes or not. | ||
| All this stuff, the Justice Department is crooked as a dog's leg. | ||
| They're not going to do anything. | ||
| But I think we should put the pressure on the IRS and show the American public. | ||
| Because you and I, if we sell $600 worth of stuff on eBay by law, get a letter from the freaking IRS. | ||
| Now, you've got $20 million. | ||
| I've heard it could be even $40 million. | ||
| It doesn't matter to me if it's $10 that they're allowed not to pay taxes on. | ||
| Why isn't the IRS going after him? | ||
| That's what they got Capone on. | ||
| He killed people. | ||
| He ran whiskey. | ||
| He did whatever. | ||
| Prostitutes, everything. | ||
| But what they got him on was tax evasion. | ||
| And that's what we ought to be looking at here. | ||
| Because if the Bidens have not paid taxes on this money, Which is why they put it in to 21 different LLCs. | ||
| I think that's where we get them. | ||
| Now obviously, any congressman who uses the term war pimp, which is great, never stop being you, congressman. | ||
| You are brutally honest, and wonderfully so. | ||
| So I'd love to get your thoughts on Kevin McCarthy, I think a week ago, was on Fox saying, we can't shut down the government, we need a CR through March, otherwise we can't continue with our impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden. | ||
| Your take on that interesting, to say the least, spin? | ||
| I think we need one week. | ||
| Let's present the case to the American public. | ||
| Let's vote on it the next week. | ||
| There's enough out there. | ||
| Everybody wants to get their spot on Fox News, and everybody's got to talk. | ||
| Everybody's got to get their two cents in, and I get it. | ||
| But this has gone on too long. | ||
| We're going down the tubes. | ||
| We're $32 trillion in debt. | ||
| In less than 10 years, the largest single item Interest, interest on the dadgum loan. | ||
| And so, you know, it's shiny over there. | ||
| Let's, you know, everybody's talking about the impeachment. | ||
| Let's get on with it because we know, we know they're not going to get 60 votes in the Senate. | ||
| You know, it's not going to pass. | ||
| Let's get on with it. | ||
| Let's do our thing. | ||
| Let's hang the impeachment on him. | ||
| But let's, let's, let's, let's roll. | ||
| Let's get on and let's, let's, let's bring the IRS in and say, why are they not paying taxes on this stuff? | ||
| Leadership, I know what they're doing. | ||
| They're dragging their feet because we have some Republicans who won't vote for it. | ||
| Well, so be it. | ||
| Let them look at the information I've seen and let them make an educated decision. | ||
| And that's all they got to do. | ||
| And then if they don't do it, they can suffer the consequences at the ballot box because we've seen it before and we'll see it again. | ||
| The American public's tired of this garbage. | ||
| Let's get on with it. | ||
| They don't understand why we're delaying, and frankly, I don't either. | ||
| We've got enough information. | ||
| Are they going to wait? | ||
| It's every two weeks. | ||
| It's a cycle. | ||
| Every two weeks, they roll something else out. | ||
| We've got IRS whistleblowers. | ||
| We've got the records of 21 different LLCs, the Chinese, Burisma. | ||
| You just go down the list and let's go. | ||
| I'm ready. | ||
| And, you know, we're going to end up losing market. | ||
| I mean, honestly, the truth is, if they don't hurry up and go, the American public is going to lose their interest in this thing. | ||
| I'm like the American public. | ||
| I want my pieces in 30 minutes or less. | ||
| And that's about my dadgum attention span. | ||
| Congressman, the audience loves you. | ||
| Where can they find you and stay up to date with everything you're doing? | ||
| I got a, you know, the regular Twitter thing. | ||
| I guess it's Congressman Tim Burchett. | ||
| I'm not really sure. | ||
| But the cool one, where I railed that one, at Tim Burchett, it shows it right there. | ||
| That little grave right there is my daddy's and my mama. | ||
| She's buried there too. | ||
| And the Jewish folks have come by and put rocks on their grave, which is kind of cool. | ||
| Daddy fought in the Pacific. | ||
| Mama lost the brother fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's a must, a must follow. | |
| Congressman, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Don't forget about that boy in my office, Pruitt Asher. | ||
| He is not. We'll be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. | |
| Babb. | ||
| Welcome back to the war room. | ||
| Now, I don't know about you, but the concept of Representative Rosendale, Biggs, and Crane touring Montana talking about why we need full-spectrum American energy dominance, that sounds pretty good to me. | ||
| I think that's what they call a dream team. | ||
| I guess maybe it's a nightmare for the Biden regime. | ||
| But the congressman has been out in Montana, I believe, talking to constituents, talking to, I'm sure, the War Room posse about everything. | ||
| American energy. He joins us now. I'd love to get sort of the scoop from you on everything you saw, everything you talked about, but really what the sentiment is on the ground of the American people, not just about, of course, the ridiculously high gas prices, but I think the fact that the Biden regime is really trying to weaponize the sector of energy, um, as sort of a way to implement what I think is a very radical climate change, green new deal inspired, uh, energy agenda. | ||
|
unidentified
|
your thoughts, the boots on the ground perspective. You are spot on. | |
| Talk about a road trip. | ||
| I mean, I was, I was considering additional security because to have the conservative movement, the heart of the conservative movement in one vehicle with me, that was fragile cargo for sure. | ||
| We traveled around Montana. | ||
| There's very few places in the country, if any place in the country that you could hit a palladium platinum mine. | ||
| A hydroelectric facility, a coal mine, and what we call a mind-to-mouth operation where the coal was going directly from the mine into an electric power plant and then back around to a oil refinery within two days' time. | ||
| All within my district. | ||
| So what we're trying to do is get more information out there that the members can share with other members so that folks can understand | ||
| That while it's a great concept to go out there and try to develop some wind energy and solar energy, in order to make sure that we have the backbone of the power grid that is necessary for our economy, for our national security, for the power grid itself, then we are still utilizing 80% of that is provided by oil, gas, and coal facilities. | ||
| And I just wanted to make sure that the members can see that. | ||
| Natalie, the other part that they got to see is the reclamation efforts so that they can see that no one in the world does this safer, cleaner, more environmentally sound, or with higher labor standards than what we do right here. | ||
| And so these folks that are out there trying to impose ESG standards on American businesses and on American people, And these folks that are talking about being on the front lines of climate change and working with Gavin Newsom to make sure that we address it, they are compromising. | ||
| First of all, they're not being honest. | ||
| They're having a lot of money, taxpayers' dollars, funneled to them through the Green New Deal programs, and they are compromising our economy. | ||
| They're driving inflation up, they're driving energy costs up for those that can least afford it, and they're compromising our national security. | ||
| You know, I think one of the issues, really, the connective tissue, it really is two sides of the same coin. | ||
| I think part of the reason the Biden regime is so compromised when it comes to American energy is because a lot of the business deals that Hunter Biden was pursuing dovetailed with that sector over in China, and Sinopec has been seeing some amazing gains underneath the Biden regime. | ||
| I'm sure no coincidence there, despite the fact that Hunter Biden was inking billion-dollar deals with them. | ||
| But I'm curious, when you talk to people What are the issues that are most pressing for the people that you talk to? | ||
| Is it the impeachment inquiries? | ||
| Is it the energy? | ||
| Is it the gas prices? | ||
| I'm envious. I've been stuck in Washington, D.C., though I know you guys are going to have to be forced to return soon when recess is over. What are the issues that are most pressing for the people that you talk to? Is it the impeachment inquiries? | ||
| Is it the energy? Is it the gas prices? | ||
| What do you think is sort of the most prevailing issue that people want to see you guys address in Congress? I think that the folks that I've talked to across the state of Montana, they're very concerned that they hear a lot of noise out of Washington, D.C., but they don't don't see much action. | ||
| And whether we're talking about the oversight hearings and leading to some impeachment or oversight hearings that lead to the charges and prosecution of what most people can look at and see as common crimes. | ||
| And nothing is being done about it. | ||
| And then the other part of it they see is that when we start having discussions about how we are going to fund government going forward, they are incredibly upset that we continue to see the business as usual. | ||
| When we hear conversations about a continuing resolution, which typically leads to another omnibus, when we were assured in January of this year That the 118th Congress was finally going to restore Congress and we were going to deliver the 12 appropriation bills and fund the United States government the way that it is supposed to be in a transparent and clear manner. | ||
| And right now, they are not seeing that. | ||
| And to bring a continuing resolution forward, Natalie, basically says we're going to continue what's already in place. | ||
| What is in place right now? | ||
| is Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden's budget. | ||
| Why would any of us vote for spending at levels that we voted against for the last two years or policies that we voted against for the last two years? | ||
| That's what a continuing resolution is. | ||
| We will extend the Pelosi-Biden budget. | ||
| And I, for one, will not vote for it. | ||
| You know, you got McCarthy up there on Fox, really insulting, I think, the intelligence of the American people and the MAGA movement, saying that we can't shut down the government because we won't be able to continue our investigations into Joe Biden. | ||
| You know what, Kevin McCarthy, Mr. Speaker? | ||
| We've had enough evidence to impeach Joe Biden since the day he announced his campaign, probably since the day he became vice president of this country. | ||
| And they've been slow walking and slow rolling the release, just like Congressman Burchett was saying, of all of the information. | ||
| That we've been talking about here in the war room and across all the alternative media outlets really for years. | ||
| Like I said, probably since Joe Biden was vice president, since Hunter Biden was traveling at your taxpayer expense to China to ink those deals. | ||
| Now, of course, you're talking about the continuing resolution. | ||
| You guys are going to be back in session, if I'm not mistaken, in about a week. | ||
| I'm sorry to take you back from Montana. | ||
| I would much rather be out there than be back here in the swamp, although I guess it's not as humid. | ||
| But walk us through sort of the battle plan, looking downrange, what you think is going to unfold in September. | ||
| I guess we're looking all the way out through March when it comes to the battle over the CR. | ||
| So first, let me say that the way I perceive this right now is that Kevin McCarthy is trying to create this distraction of now we're going to proceed with this impeachment unless you guys won't go along with the CR. | ||
| This is very convenient timing. | ||
| I personally look at this at the exact same way that President Trump's indictments have come down, at the exact same time that Representative Comer has been able to expose the Biden crime family and all of their problems. | ||
| Every time that he brings up bank records, every time that he brings up additional payments that have come from China or Russia or Ukraine or Kazakhstan. | ||
| Somehow the Department of Justice is able to conjure up yet another indictment against President Trump. | ||
| I mean, what is going to be next? | ||
| Are they going to indict him for cutting the tags off of his mattresses? | ||
| Oh, my Lance, you know, tragedies around the world. | ||
| And when I see that now, finally, Speaker McCarthy is starting to have discussions about bringing forward the impeachment inquiry on President Biden, That is very convenient. | ||
| What the American people want us to do, what the people across the state of Montana want, they want to see those 12 appropriation bills. | ||
| They want us to finally, after several years of funding the government through continuing resolutions and funding the government with pork-laden, 4,000-page I'm the bosses with 7000 individual earmarks that are special privileges for certain members. | ||
| They don't want to see that. | ||
| They want to see the appropriation bills. | ||
| And again, I am not going to vote to extend Nancy Pelosi's policies and Joe Biden's spending levels. | ||
| We are going to demand a group of us are going to demand that we do deliver the appropriation bills. | ||
| Well, talking about Pelosi's policies, I'm sure the Warren posse is very well aware that COVID-19 and the lockdowns and the mask mandates are back in the news cycle. | ||
| And I think, as we know from the 2020 election, that those alleged lockdowns and mandates really have been used as another form of lawfare to influence election results, just like the indictments are meant to be Democratic lawfare. | ||
| To hurt Donald Trump in the polls, though, unfortunately for them, not quite working. | ||
| I'm just curious, on the front of standing against what is a potential new wave of COVID tyranny, I've always said I don't like the phrase, do not comply, because it implies that there is lockdowns, that there are mandates that we have to forcibly choose to not comply with. | ||
| What do you think Congress is going to be doing when you guys are back in session to make sure that we don't have another wave Don't consent. | ||
| I agree. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not comply. | |
| Don't consent. | ||
| This government was formed by the consent of the governed. | ||
| Don't consent. | ||
| And I can tell you that there's a lot of states, Montana being one of them, that have already passed additional legislation after that disaster of 2020 where they falsely closed down and unjustly and unconstitutionally closed down churches and businesses and took control over people's lives. | ||
| We will not consent. | ||
| And I've right now started gathering up the list of provisions that have been entered into the Montana statute to make sure that we can Impose some of that at the federal level. | ||
| We cannot pass these emergency declarations. | ||
| Emergency declarations do not undo the Constitution. | ||
| And we just, you can't consent. | ||
| And I think the most, I would say, abysmal form of consent coming from Republicans on the Hill is the fact that, not you, but your unfortunate colleagues gave Joe Biden basically a blank check with federal spending. | ||
| And I'm sure that's going to run very nicely with all of the dark ideas that they have when they want to roll out COVID-19 spending. | ||
| They basically have carte blanche and a blank check to institute all those lockdowns and mandates because Republicans versus Democrats gave it to them. | ||
| Yeah, and Natalie, the very spending that you're talking about is what we were trying to claw back during the budget, during the debt ceiling debates that we had earlier in the year. | ||
| There was still COVID money that was still floating around and was available for us to claw back. | ||
| The 87,000 IRS agents that Biden wanted to fund, we had all of those provisions built into the original And unfortunately, we saw where that went. | ||
| It went in the waste can. | ||
| It didn't just go up to the Senate. | ||
| It went up to the Senate and then was ignored because Kevin McCarthy went to Joe Biden beyond, outside of what we had agreed to and put his own debt ceiling deal together and was able to get enough Democrats, more Democrats to support that. | ||
| Then even Republicans did when that debt ceiling was passed and approved. | ||
| And now it has been moved out till January 25, which has removed a lot of leverage that we have in the House of Representatives to try and push back on this out of control spending and this regulatory state that the Biden administration has been trying to create. | ||
| Congressman, if people want to stay up to date with you, everything you're working on, the really cool trips and travels that you're going on with your awesome colleagues, where can they find you? | ||
| At RepRosendale. | ||
| All platforms. | ||
| I make it simple. | ||
| At RepRosendale. | ||
| Follow us and check it out on XNOW. | ||
| You'll be able to see how you fracture the coal in order to extract it from the ground. | ||
| We don't just blow things up in Washington, D.C. | ||
| We have to blow some things up in Montana, too. | ||
| That sounds exciting. | ||
| I think I'm going to go watch that during the break and I think the War Room Posse should too. | ||
| Thank you, sir, for joining us. | ||
| You have a good Labor Day. | ||
| Thank you, Natalie. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| We got Joe Allen in studio with his wonderful new book. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banff. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| I always say I used to get to do the MyPillow Reads, but now I get to do maybe even cooler companies. | ||
| Jace Medical, if you want to make sure that the drugs that you're taking, I guess we have the book right here. | ||
| China Rx. | ||
| Rosemary Gibson, I think she used to always come on War Room and talk about how we had outsourced not just, I mean, everything, but also the pharmaceutical supply chains to China. | ||
| Pfizer's design, I'm sure. | ||
| If you want to make sure that you are not beholden to the Chinese Communist Party as much as you can be, I don't know about you, Joe, that's a personal goal of mine. | ||
| I don't want to be beholden to anyone, let alone the CCP. | ||
| Make sure you go to JaceMedical.com to get pharmaceutical stuff that isn't produced by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| I think that's a pretty good spin for my first read for JaceMedical.com. | ||
| JaceMedical.com, you gotta go there. | ||
| But now, My favorite thing to do in the war room is to plug books. | ||
| Dark. | ||
| That's not sarcastic. | ||
| Dark. | ||
| Eon. | ||
| Aeon? | ||
| Eon. | ||
| Aeon. | ||
| Potato. | ||
| Potato. | ||
| Okay, we'll go with that. | ||
| So... | ||
| I want to talk to you about a new story that I saw. | ||
| I'm getting ready after the show to go travel for my Labor Day celebrations. | ||
| I'm sure many of you are too, and I hope you guys aren't going to New York because I saw a very concerning story that says that NYPD, under the direction of Eric Adams, is going to start using AI-fueled or powered drones to monitor people's Labor Day backyard parties. | ||
| Yes, this has been a trend in New York. | ||
| You've got not only the drones to monitor what people are doing, but also they've rolled out DigiDog. | ||
| They tried it before, they're trying it again. | ||
| It's very much a knockoff of the Boston Dynamics SpotDog that everyone's so impressed with. | ||
| And this move is kind of testing the water. | ||
| How much will people take? | ||
| You'll recall back during the pandemic, you had authorities deploying drones to watch people to make sure they were socially distanced. | ||
| And of course, drones have been used to monitor people now. | ||
| It really began over 10 years ago, police armies regularly monitoring people by way of drones, and now even citizens spying on each other. | ||
| So, this is a technological trend. | ||
| If you're on the sweet end of the lollipop stick, fine, I guess, right? | ||
| Everybody wants to have power, and technology is power. | ||
| If you've got the fuzzy end of the lollipop stick, well, you're being observed by strange spy mosquitoes with AI to pretty much monitor what you're doing and make sure that you don't get out of line. | ||
| Well, I want to link this to, frankly, in that paradigm, a very concerning story, because the Air Force, I think, just asked for $6 billion to build a fleet of AI-controlled drones. | ||
| So I want to link that to what we were just talking about. | ||
| But what do you think the significance is, sort of the signal, not noise, that we now see from the federal government, and in some cases state, local government, just a full-blown unapologetic endorsement Of these drone technologies and like you were getting into, the potential for misuse is so grave. | ||
| Absolutely, and one of the things that I mentioned yesterday, when you have an autonomous weapon system, you don't have the problem of human conscience. | ||
| You don't have the problem of a human hesitating before killing another human. | ||
| It's just programmed to do so. | ||
| This has been a desire for a long time. | ||
| Obviously, drones have been deployed, such as the Predator drone, for well over two decades. | ||
| Actually, a little bit less. | ||
| During the war in Afghanistan, you saw the first rollout of drones used regularly under Obama. | ||
| It really ramped up. | ||
| But the technology has expanded so much at this point. | ||
| Many see it as the future of warfare. | ||
| That includes China. | ||
| China has many programs to create intelligentized weapons, whether they be airborne drones, you know, marine drones, land-based drones. | ||
| All of these are being developed. | ||
| They're being used right now in the Ukraine-Russia war. | ||
| And as the CEO of Palantir, Alex Karp, has openly said, the Ukraine war represents a sort of testing ground for the strategies that work in warfare using AI, using robotics. | ||
| And this is anticipated to be pretty much the next front and perhaps the dominant trend. | ||
| That's unknown. | ||
| What is known, though, is that our federal government is undoubtedly pouring Billions into these projects overall. | ||
| We just heard from the U.S. | ||
| Defense Secretary, the Deputy U.S. | ||
| Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks, that many, multiple thousands of drones are going to be acquired and perhaps deployed in the course of the next 18 to 24 months. | ||
| You also have the Air Force, the Navy, they have their own compartmentalized drone programs, You know, war bot programs. | ||
| And then, you know, on top of all of this, you have police forces who are testing the water using similar technologies on civilian populations to keep people in line. | ||
| It doesn't take a paranoid imagination to foresee a day in which these powers are used regularly, that they are abused regularly. | ||
| And I think that those nations that uphold civil rights Over, you know, police enforcement and those nations which, you know, uphold ethics and warfare above lethal autonomous weapons coming in in swarms and killing people without a human in the loop. | ||
| That will really make, it will be in many ways, a kind of dividing line between who is and isn't part of what could be the most nightmarish future that any human being could imagine. | ||
| I feel like every time I have you on, I ask you about the most, like, absurd out there stories that are true. | ||
| It's just because of the times we're living in, but we got about two minutes. | ||
| You can see the clock better than I can, but the stuff in here is not just is the book dense and long, but it's so, not beyond my pay grade, but it's so, it's so, there's so much gravity, right, to it because it is the replacement theory and not in the way the mainstream media uses it in sort of our own way. | ||
| So got about like 30-ish seconds. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just give us a simple elevator pitch for what the book is actually about. | |
| Why you should get it. | ||
| The book is about technology. | ||
| It's about radical technology. | ||
| It's about the future of those radical technologies. | ||
| And I think that people of your generation are going to be the ones who are going to get the most out of it. | ||
| To the extent young people recognize that we are on the verge, in fact we're at the beginning of a radical transformation of what it means to be human. | ||
| It's up to you to make the proper decisions going forward. | ||
| It won't be up to me so much, and it won't be up to the older generation so much. | ||
| All we can do is confer knowledge and wisdom. | ||
| It's up to you. | ||
| So that is my elevator pitch. | ||
| Choose wisely, Natalie. | ||
| Choose wisely. | ||
| And also, buy the book. | ||
| Buy two. | ||
| I always thought when Obama said he was going to put America through a radical transformation, he was talking about another agenda, which we've heard a lot about in recent days, but maybe he was really just kind of pre-gaming the release of Dark Eons. | ||
| It's layer after layer after layer. | ||
| I don't think any one thing takes precedence over the other, but I do think that technology will probably have the most dramatic impact in the long term. | ||
| Transhumanism and the war against humanity. | ||
| Light words to send you off into your Labor Day weekend. | ||
| War Room Posse, thank you so much for letting me host the show. | ||
| I hope you guys learned a lot and I hope you have a safe, blessed, wonderful Labor Day. | ||
| No AI drones spying on you allowed. | ||
| Let's hope you're not in New York. | ||
| Have a good one. |
Export Selection