Dec. 15, 2020 - Bannon's War Room
48:48
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | |
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Okay, welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| We've got so much we've got to get to today. | ||
| We've just got to grind through this. | ||
| It is the 15th of December, the year of our Lord, 2020. | ||
| We've got Brian Kennedy's been nice enough to hold over. | ||
| Brian, first off, do you have the resources? | ||
| Is the team stretched too thin to really get it done? | ||
| Mark Fincham's talking about having results by Sunday. | ||
| God Blessing. | ||
| Do you have the resources right now to be able to put a full team and to field a full team into Maricopa County, which, as Maggie so informs me, is 200 times the size of Antrim? | ||
| Well, we have a great team of forensic experts, including Colonel Phil Walton and others who have been testifying with Mayor Giuliani. | ||
| These guys are fabulous. But as Maggie said, this is 200 times bigger. It would be good if we had the resources of the federal government behind this. This is properly something the FBI should be investigating as well. | ||
| And as we've discussed on this show before, they've been AWOL on this. | ||
| That's unfortunate. | ||
| There should be other assets brought in, in order to really do the kind of thorough job you need to, or at least to do it quickly enough. | ||
| I'm hoping the team that we have, it's actually getting bigger. | ||
| They're currently assembling more people right now. | ||
| You need trusted people. | ||
| The last time I looked, this guy named Barr is taking early retirement to spend more quality time with his family over the Christmas holidays and ever after. | ||
| Are you guys lighting up the boards over the Justice Department? | ||
| Not that I'm a big fan of the FBI to get involved here, because not that they would slow walk anything. | ||
| But, is anybody in active contact with people that are, like, now you've got the Judiciary Committee in Arizona, senior guys, many of these people did not want to get involved at all. | ||
| They went out of their way to make sure they weren't involved in that first In the first hearing, it was because Brian Kennedy and the guys really worked through how it was going to be presented. | ||
| In the first hour, people were saying, it's kind of a snoozefest. | ||
| I go, no, they're setting the predicate. | ||
| They got Waldron, they got these serious people up there doing, laying down a foundation of a serious inquiry, and that is what turned people's heads. | ||
| So, Brian. | ||
| Are you engaged right now in trying to get, I know you're trying to build resources internally to the team and people that want to give to the campaign or whatever, however you ever do that, you feel free to do that to support Brian Kennedy and their work, but are you guys actively engaged in talking to law enforcement about getting involved here? | ||
| Yeah, no, the campaign obviously has money and most of us are doing this as volunteers actually. | ||
| But it really is people. | ||
| And I do know that we're going to bring more people on. | ||
| We do want law enforcement engaged if they're so interested. | ||
| But look, I think we're going to get this done. | ||
| So let there be no confusion. | ||
| We're going to get this done because I think most of the problems of the Dominion system are right there to be found. | ||
| If we can look at the software, if we can analyze the system, we can see where the problems exist. | ||
| And so, thankfully, because of what we did earlier in Arizona, and it was Mayor Giuliani and his efforts in there, those were great. | ||
| It was your efforts on War Room and lighting up the audience and lighting up the American people. | ||
| The combination of that with Phil Waldron and other experts, Bobby Pinton and others, these guys really, they presented the facts and the facts tell the story. | ||
| And I think we're going to go from what we did in Antrim to Arizona. | ||
| We're going to show what actually happened. | ||
| And that's going to shine a light on this election fraud. | ||
| And once that happens, the American people are going to change their minds. | ||
| I mean, I think they already believe it was stolen, but this whole idea of the electoral college and, and the idea that Joe Biden is the president elect, they're going to think that's simply wrong. | ||
| And then they're going to turn and they're going to ask for the political branches of our government to sort this out and get it right. | ||
| But let's spend over the next few days getting the facts. | ||
| We're going to do that in Arizona, and we're going to present them to a candid world in the most sober way possible. | ||
| They can look at the numbers and decide for themselves. | ||
| I think once they do, they're going to see something is wrong with Dominion voting systems. | ||
| Last thing, Brian, because you are very, I call you Steady Eddie, very stable, no hair on fire. | ||
| In Nevada, do you anticipate that you're going to get full access when the subpoenas issued and supposedly the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors are cooperating? | ||
| Mark Fincham said they were in the room when this thing was hammered out. | ||
| Because you had this situation in Nevada, because you were kind of in the campaign, you were both the Arizona and Nevada guy, working both of them. | ||
| You had a situation in Nevada that you did get, I think a judge issued a court order that you guys were supposed to have full access to the system in Nevada. | ||
| And I remember you went up there and you hammered for I think five days when they tried to play every trick in the book. | ||
| Did you ever get access that you needed in Nevada? | ||
| And do you think they're going to play the same games in Arizona? | ||
| Or do you feel that you guys are equipped to basically blow through that and seize these machines? | ||
| Well, I think in Nevada, you have a very partisan, you had a Democrat governor with the Democrat legislature and Democrat county officials and statewide officials. | ||
| And anytime they wanted to resist, they could resist. | ||
| And there was someone up the chain of command. | ||
| That would help them resist, even though there was a court order. | ||
| So Nevada, a Democrat state, even though I think it was overwhelmingly for President Trump, it was simply a very hard, you know, hill to climb. | ||
| Arizona, much different case, even though the Arizona governor's not being cooperative. | ||
| The Arizona legislature is filled with these heroes who are willing to fight. | ||
| They do have subpoena power. | ||
| They are willing to enforce it. | ||
| And let's just be frank here, anybody who really wants to see what happened should have an interest in just examining it. | ||
| This doesn't have to be partisan at this level, right? | ||
| We're examining a voting system. | ||
| When you hear the guys yesterday testifying, the actual guy, Jared, from Arizona, who was running the system, this is probably an honest guy. | ||
| No one's saying he was dishonest. | ||
| What is problematic is the Dominion voting system, the people who were involved with that from Dominion, and how the whole thing was conducted by them. | ||
| And that's the thing that many people don't have, or have a hard time getting their arms around. | ||
| No, I think, look, there's not one deplorable that says on a predetermined outcome. | ||
| What they want is to make, is to have this adjudicated. | ||
| We want Democrats to jump in. | ||
| First of all, we want Democrats to help unify the country by helping, let's get to the facts, but I have no problem at these committee hearings having Democrats rip into these witnesses, rip into the affidavits. | ||
| We have an advocacy system. | ||
| That's how, you know, thesis, antithesis, synthesis. | ||
| I got it. | ||
| This is what we're doing. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| But we've had to force our way through here, and it's because of people like you. | ||
| You've been just a tremendous in this. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Brian, we got to go. | ||
| Give your social media coordinates, because my phone's blown up. | ||
| People want to be able to follow you throughout the day. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| At Parler, it's at Brian Kennedy, and on Twitter, it's BrianTKennedy1. | ||
| Thanks for all you do, Steve. | ||
| We wouldn't be where we were if you hadn't been a driving force here, so thank you for that. | ||
| Well, look, all I've got to do is turn the switch on with my production team and let you guys roll. | ||
| This has 100% been people in the field, and because we've had so many great guests that really get down to details, and by the way, the guests have not been 100% accurate on everything. | ||
| It's human. | ||
| This is the fog of war, right? | ||
| This is what happens when you're in this type of information war. | ||
| Right? | ||
| It's not all 100% correct all the time, but at least we're putting it out there. | ||
| And you can see in the driving force that it has been correct 99% of the time. | ||
| And that's why you're seeing results. | ||
| Guys who are not engaged in this aren't putting out subpoenas for their health. | ||
| They're putting out subpoenas, number one, because they understand it's the right thing to do. | ||
| It has to be done. | ||
| Number two, the political calculation is, hey, these deplorables are angry, and they're angry for a good reason. | ||
| And you're not going to... This is the beauty of it. | ||
| This is what I think the show's done. | ||
| You're not going to be able to pat people on the head every morning and say, oh yeah, let me show you the 30-second spot about how we've got to save America and America be America down in Georgia. | ||
| That's all crap. | ||
| The American people, what the Republican Party has done for too long, has dismissed the intelligence of the deplorables. | ||
| Now, I come from a family of deplorables. | ||
| My grandfather went to the third grade in school. | ||
| My dad was only a high school graduate. | ||
| They're the two smartest guys I ever met. | ||
| Right? | ||
| I understand that working class people, that well-read working class people that have experience in the world are very smart. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And it's time we start, that's the one thing I'm proud about the show and everything I've ever done in Information Breitbart or whatever, is to raise the bar, make sure that the bar is high. | ||
| That you have to reach. | ||
| And the audience loves it. | ||
| And the audience will respond to it. | ||
| And this audience is changing the course of history. | ||
| If you don't think it's changing the course of history, ask Bill Barr, who didn't want to take early retirement. | ||
| No, he did not resign. | ||
| He was fired. | ||
| He was given the opportunity. | ||
| Hey, write a nice letter, and I'll say something nice on Twitter. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| But you're gone. | ||
| And you're gone because you failed in your duties. | ||
| You failed in your responsibilities. | ||
| Not to me. | ||
| Not to the President. | ||
| Not to the deplorables, right? | ||
| Not to war room pandemic. | ||
| You failed to represent the American people. | ||
| You failed to represent this Republic. | ||
| You failed to defend the Constitution. | ||
| Bill Barr, that's what you will always be known for. | ||
| And every other coward out there that wants to take the easy route out and not the hard route of the narrow gate. | ||
| Remember, the road to perdition is quite wide and easy. | ||
| It's the narrow gate. | ||
| The narrow gate. | ||
| The tough path. | ||
| Producer, get on that. | ||
| I get reverberation. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Brian Kennedy, thank you so much for being with us. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Yes, Maggie? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I just wanted to sort of clarify for people, because this word errors is getting thrown a lot when discussing the Dominion software and systems, and I just want to remind everyone that the Epoch Times released that report yesterday, and this is a quote from the report. | |
| We conclude that the Dominion voting system is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. | ||
| So these aren't random errors that just occurred because somebody made a mistake. | ||
| That is also a report from a Trump affiliated group. | ||
| That's not, and this is my point, that's a report that's out there. | ||
| It's now because of that report and other things they're issuing a subpoena in Maricopa County. | ||
| Is that is that holy writ? | ||
| No, it is not. | ||
| That's a report from a group that works with the Trump campaign. | ||
| I got that. | ||
| That's why it's to get into the it should be it should be debated. | ||
| It should be analyzed. | ||
| The Democrats should come back. | ||
| I got no problem with that. | ||
| We're in a search for truth. | ||
| The opposition's into the will to power. | ||
| It's very different. | ||
| We're in a search for truth. | ||
| There's not one deplorable I have met. | ||
| There's not one deplorable that's on the show that at the end of the day, when all legal votes are counted, if Joe Biden's got more legal votes and win this, then Joe Biden's the president. | ||
| OK, we've got no legal votes, not all votes. | ||
| This report is a quite controversial report. | ||
| I don't agree with everything in that report. | ||
| I particularly don't agree with all the calculations in that report. | ||
| Directionally, I agree with that report, and directionally, I agree with the calculations. | ||
| I may have my own difference of opinion about how some of the calculations were done. | ||
| I think the Democrats got to jump in here. | ||
| But that's where the power of the subpoena, because now you're going to get a broader, not just Antrim, what you said is 24,000 votes or 16,000 votes, we're going to have a bigger, we're going to have a bigger data pool, right? | ||
| That is Maricopa County. | ||
| And they're heading out there. | ||
| And here's what the, here's what the, here's what the, Most important aspect is, is that we know that the more we drill down, the more there is to find out. | ||
| And the more there is to find out, the more the American people want more information. | ||
| Well, I didn't know that. | ||
| Nobody said that. | ||
| I didn't see that on CNN. | ||
| I didn't see it on MSNBC. | ||
| I didn't read that in the New York Times. | ||
| That's interesting. | ||
| Is that a fact? | ||
| Then you get into it. | ||
| This thing in Antrim, I believe they should push. | ||
| We're going to have Mark Serrano on here in a second. | ||
| In fact, we're going to come with him into the next thing. | ||
| Mark Serrano from the Amistad Project has been the communications strategic partner for Phil Klein, and that team is doing such an amazing job. | ||
| He's going to get to the answers to some of these things. | ||
| But that was the power of the report. | ||
| The power of that report laid down a marker, and that marker has not been refuted yet by Democrats. | ||
| Or even election officials, they come out and say, oh, it's terrible, it's based upon this, the calculations are wrong, it's all this supposition. | ||
| Okay, fine, but that's all verbiage. | ||
| That's all rhetoric. | ||
| Give me the level of detail that they gave you. | ||
| When you say that, be specific about why you don't agree with it. | ||
| Okay, we'll take a short commercial break. | ||
| We'll return. | ||
| Mark Serrano from Proactive Communications, communications partner for Phil Kline and that tremendous team at the Thomas More Society's Amistad Project. | ||
| And then at the bottom of the hour, Darren Beatty from the hottest site Revolver.News. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Populous Press is hot. | ||
| Citizens Free Press is hot. | ||
| Revolver's hot. | ||
| The New. | ||
| All the anti-drudges. | ||
| He's going to be up with an amazing analysis they did. | ||
| Be back in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The John Fredericks Radio Network on Real America's Voice, Dischannel 219. | ||
| It is in Comcast 113 out in the Midwest. | ||
| Fabulous job. | ||
| They're the streaming service of the Trump Revolution. | ||
| I want to thank all the guys in Denver who do a great job co-producing this show. | ||
| And remember, when I scream, it's just a term of endearment. | ||
| Also, GNews, GTV throughout the world. | ||
| We're on Rumble, everywhere, every platform. | ||
| While we're up, sometimes we're down because they don't like what we're saying, but hey, It is what it is. | ||
| Okay, I want to bring in now Mark Serrano on a hot Tuesday morning here with news breaking all over about Stop the Steal, whether it's Georgia, Arizona. | ||
| Mark, I want to go to number one, Michigan yesterday. | ||
| Particularly the problem we had, you know, we were counting up all the what are called dueling slates, I think the term of art is, or competing slates. | ||
| From Nevada to Arizona to Georgia, just to make sure that the President had all options open in January when this goes to Congress. | ||
| But in Michigan they had a particular problem. | ||
| Can you walk us through what happened yesterday in Michigan? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So in Michigan yesterday, Steve, Governor Whitmer announced that the State Capitol building would be locked down. | |
| So think about this. | ||
| Tradition holds that their Senate has a ceremony Sending this slate of electors on to Washington, D.C. | ||
| on the 14th of December. | ||
| So as that day began, the governor issued a dictum that basically said the Capitol is locked down. | ||
| There is an announcement that talked about COVID. | ||
| And then it seems as if she was claiming right wing threats of violence. | ||
| So think about the implications of this, Steve. | ||
| The governor shuts it down. | ||
| The Senate president, Republican and the Republican House speaker go along with it so that only certain electors were allowed in. There were people left on the curb blocked by state police at the door who are supposed to be in that room. | ||
| There were legislators, duly elected legislators of the people that were not allowed in the people's building yesterday. | ||
| This is like a police state that took place in Michigan yesterday with the governor who's been proven to go with excessive police powers due to coronavirus. | ||
| You've got the Attorney General who is subtly threatened that frivolous suits related to election integrity will result in action against the attorneys filing it. | ||
| This is a classic police powers that are taking place that attorneys who are doing their constitutional duties as officers of the court representing interests who have interest before the court are being subtly threatened from the Attorney General of the state. | ||
| The governor shuts down the state capitol building. | ||
| You have legislators and electors at the door asking to be let in. | ||
| Represented by Ian Northen, an attorney who works with Amistad Project, who represents select legislators in litigation in the state. | ||
| And the state police said, you're not allowed in. | ||
| They tried to get their slate of electors delivered to the Senate president, a Republican, Shirky. | ||
| Would not let them in the People's Building yesterday, Steve. | ||
| This is outrageous that they were not allowed in to speak their piece about this election. | ||
| Let's talk about Shirky. | ||
| I think the President's had a couple of conversations with him. | ||
| The problem we have here It's not a problem of Democrats. | ||
| The problem we have here is weak-willed and cowardly Republicans, and that's from whether it's Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, not true because there they stood tall, or Michigan. | ||
| Shirky himself is a problem, right? | ||
| This guy's basically taking, he wants, he has no interest In getting to the bottom of this. | ||
| I mean, he hasn't even been supportive, I don't think, of the report that came out of Antrim County. | ||
| So where do we stand, actually, in Michigan today? | ||
| You've had this explosive report. | ||
| And I'm not saying this report's wholly writ. | ||
| I agree with it, I think, directionally. | ||
| I think there's some observations even I make about it. | ||
| But it is time now to get into it, and Democrats, if they want to dismiss it, you can't dismiss it just out of hand and say it's just right-wing partisan rhetoric. | ||
| You've got to get into it. | ||
| So where do we actually stand today with this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| Well, look, Judge Elsenheimer required information to be sent to him. | ||
| On Saturday, he asked for information. | ||
| By 830 a.m. | ||
| Sunday morning, Elsenheimer wanted the information, wanted the report, wanted to be able to act on it by Monday morning. | ||
| I'm not, you know, I don't know how to do an audit of data on a voting machine, okay? | ||
| So I don't have that expertise. | ||
| Guess what? | ||
| I don't have to. | ||
| I could take a look at that report and say, okay, this is enough to justify further investigation. | ||
| This is enough to justify taking a pause. | ||
| The only date that matters, as you know, in the Constitution is January 20th. | ||
| We have five weeks! | ||
| We have five weeks. | ||
| That report out of Antrim County raises a lot of very serious questions about the validity of data that came out of Dominion's voting systems in all these states. | ||
| That's all we're saying, is this requires further investigation. | ||
| Shirky is a guy who had that information first thing yesterday morning, provided to him enough to be able to say, time out. | ||
| Let's wait a second because this is too important to the voters of Michigan to get this right. | ||
| And that's what they're shutting down. | ||
| Steve, you are exactly right. | ||
| Let me tell you something. | ||
| I started my career in Republican presidential campaigns under Bush 41. | ||
| All right? | ||
| I grew up in that establishment culture. | ||
| Until 2013, 14, 15, I realized this party was no better than the Democrat Party. | ||
| And we needed a change, which is why I showed up in Trump Tower in the spring of 2015 to say, sign me up. | ||
| Let's make this change. | ||
| But now what we're seeing, Steve, is you've got political operatives, even those who worked inside the Trump campaign, Who are now saying, ah, it's time to give it up. | ||
| Time to move on because there's not really enough for us to build a case in all these states. | ||
| Can you imagine if our patriots from the Revolutionary War had said, you know what, they really got us over a barrel, it's time to move on? | ||
| These are cowards from the Republican Party that are just worried about their next paycheck and they're not standing by Donald Trump in a way that he stood by us for the past four years in unprecedented ways. | ||
| So, along those lines, let's continue that. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| People think, you know, you're a communications strategist, you're the communications partner for, I think, the biggest hammers out there, outside the Rudy team, which is Phil Kline in the Amistad Project and the Thomas More Society. | ||
| What's your recommendation? | ||
| What's the arc of the story in Michigan? | ||
| Let's stay in Michigan. | ||
| How do you guys drive this and what's the next step? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you've got individual legislators, and God bless them because they're willing to step up and they're willing to make a difference, they're willing to join litigation, and they're appealing to us because they've seen the evidence and the credible evidence. | |
| So, we've got more litigation coming, we've got more reports coming, Steve, that show the dark money influence in these elections, and, you know, we show credible evidence about- Hold on, hold on. | ||
| You're saying about the dark money. | ||
| I want to be very specific. | ||
| You guys are coming out with more detail on the Zuckerberg 500, 400 or 500 million dollars that quote-unquote winning in partnership. | ||
| And all of a sudden you had left-wing groups like Rock the Vote that were hardwired into the voter registration system. | ||
| Is this the kind of thing you're going to have more exposure on? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, we've got more coming, Steve. | |
| We've got more to show about how this intertwined and was done strategically months and months ago. | ||
| to lay the groundwork for what we believe has been election fraud on a massive scale. | ||
| And keep in mind, it didn't have to happen nationwide. | ||
| It had to happen in Atlanta and Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, et cetera. | ||
| And so, in Michigan, guys like Shirky are blocking the door. | ||
| They've got the state police at the door, they're blocking the door for the people to be in, and to fulfill their constitutional duties. | ||
| We've got those in each state. | ||
| You know, the Secretary of State in Georgia, it's the same situation. | ||
| But, thank goodness, in every single state, most notably in places like Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, we've got true patriots who are pushing this thing through, Steve. | ||
| And with our data and information for a litigation, we've got evidence, we've got affidavits, we've got declarations, we've got hard proof and evidence in our litigation. | ||
| That will demonstrate there is cause to investigate further and this electoral process must come to a halt. | ||
| Guys like Shirky are blocking the way. | ||
| Okay, I want to shift. | ||
| We've got a couple minutes left. | ||
| I want to shift to Wisconsin. | ||
| I know you guys have been very focused on that. | ||
| We actually had wins yesterday. | ||
| Number one, in the overall case, the liberal judges didn't want to touch it because they claimed latches, which is, hey, you should have come. | ||
| They don't want to talk about the merits. | ||
| They said you should have come six months ago. | ||
| But the minority judges just jumped all over the evidence and said, hey, this was stealing. | ||
| This was fraudulent. | ||
| But the case that you won, He just went back on the ICs, the long-term care people, and said the $221,000, yes, this was a problem, it shouldn't have been done, but you've got to go individually prove it. | ||
| Where do you think we stand in Wisconsin as you see it this morning? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, so the indefinitely confined voters, obviously those traditionally are about 50,000 in Wisconsin. | |
| This year we saw there were 250,000. | ||
| Our evidence was able to demonstrate that many of those voters were not indefinitely confined. | ||
| And so the court obviously made a decision that says you can't throw all those votes out. | ||
| There are ways for that to be retooled. | ||
| Again, there's plenty of time for the courts to consider evidence and new evidence and remedies on these things. | ||
| And so I think what we do is we hunker down, we go back in with this evidence and demonstrate what we've got in a state like Wisconsin where we've got tremendous champions from the legislature. | ||
| Ultimately, we want the legislature to step up and to use their constitutional powers to speak out about these things specifically. | ||
| So, we're encouraged in Wisconsin that we've got openings there and opportunities there. | ||
| We are coming forth with new litigation, I think, that will make the difference there. | ||
| And it's stay tuned. | ||
| I mean, Wisconsin is clearly a case where the confine, the indefinitely confined made a big difference. | ||
| And the margin there was so narrow. | ||
| We're talking about 12,000 votes in Wisconsin that we are very confident we can demonstrate that 150,000 votes were potentially fraudulently cast in Wisconsin. | ||
| Stay on the sidelines. | ||
| to stay with it. Look, these Republicans who want to bail out at every ruling that seems to go against our way, that's because they have a foregone conclusion that they want to go with and they support Joe Biden. And if you're not fully behind Donald Trump and if you, you know, whimper at every new ruling, you're not in this for the real fight. You're not tough enough for this fight. Stay on the sidelines. We've got more coming and we're going to just toughen up. | ||
| Give me your Twitter handle. | ||
| How do people get access to you during the day? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Twitter, at Mark V. Serrano, S-E-R-R-A-N-O, on Parler and CloudHub, at Serrano, S-E-R-R-A-N-O. | |
| You've got to follow Serrano. | ||
| You've got to follow Phil Kline. | ||
| You've got to follow the Amistad Project. | ||
| You've got to follow Thomas Moore. | ||
| We're going to return in a moment with Revolver News. | ||
| Darren Beatty. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Take it down. | ||
| Okay, we have a clip from Michigan from yesterday about trying to show the police state. | ||
| Good try. | ||
| We tried. | ||
| We're always trying here. | ||
| We're trying to push the envelope. | ||
| When we get that right, let me know. | ||
| Producer Cameron. | ||
| Cameron, you having fun? | ||
| You having enough fun yet? | ||
| We're having a good time? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, good. | |
| Okay, good. | ||
| I like that. | ||
| He likes a challenge. | ||
| Young man likes a challenge. | ||
| That's what we like to do here. | ||
| I want to now turn to, and Maggie, if you've got anything, jump in here. | ||
| Darren, we're going to go to Darren Bailey, Revolver News. | ||
| Remember, in the implosion of Drudge, you've got the implosion of Fox, you've got the implosion of Drudge, you know, you've got the implosion of a lot of things going around, a lot of former institutions on the right. | ||
| Part of that's because what used to be considered conservative Maybe now, because of this nationalistic populist movement, they don't look so conservative anymore. | ||
| As I keep saying, you've got to think in new ways. | ||
| The one new way you've got to think about, it's not liberal and progressive and conservative and Republican and Democrat and everything like that. | ||
| It is globalist versus nationalist. | ||
| That is what the global political structure is, and it's populist versus elitist. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| It's the Parti of Davos. | ||
| Versus populist nationalist governments and movements throughout the world, right? | ||
| And also for the left, that's not an anti-semitic trope, okay? | ||
| By far, one of the most nationalistic countries in the world, and the reason I love them, is Israel, right? | ||
| They are nationalists, right? | ||
| They believe in Israel, and that is a tremendous, tremendous, tremendous, I think, Benefit. | ||
| You know, India, you're seeing it. | ||
| Japan, you're seeing it. | ||
| The United States, you're seeing it. | ||
| Australia, you're seeing it. | ||
| This conflict between globalist and between populist nationalist movements and governments. | ||
| I want to bring it, and that's why you're seeing these sites come up, whether it's populist press, whether it is the stack over at Citizens Free Press, whether it's Whitefinger, and clearly one of the leaders is the one that combines both high and low. | ||
| Super intellectual thinking and thought leadership with good old tabloid. | ||
| Right, good old, fun to, you know, kind of keep, but everything signal, not noise. | ||
| And one of the folks associated with that is a Darren Beatty. | ||
| Darren, you've, one of the things that you've, I think, separated yourself out from other sites is you've either Contracted with people, or partnered with people, you've had some of the most serious analytical work done. | ||
| National Pulse, Rahim Ghassan and the guys over there did a great job also, but you guys have done a number of these kind of analysis and studies that come back and just show you that, you know, for the opposition media that are so evidence-based, science-based, data-based, they just want to run away from this. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And get on top of this. | ||
| So walk through, number one, the driving force, the revolver.news, what is your take on this entire situation of where we are right now in this moment? | ||
| And we were going to play the Michigan Police State yesterday. | ||
| And what is this new analysis that you've had up as the lead all day yesterday? | ||
| Well, thank you very much for having me again. | ||
| And yes, there is a new piece out. | ||
| We ran it yesterday. | ||
| So it's still fresh, and it's really blowing up a new statistical analysis that I'm very proud to run. | ||
| As you said, like, I'm very proud that revolver.news has had access to a truly World class team of statistical experts who in their day jobs are, you know, in academia, in the financial industry and in places Uh, where they use their professional expertise, um, in relation to statistics, uh, in their, in their ordinary work. | ||
| Now, unfortunately, as of yet, they can't quite, um, come out and take credit for it, but maybe that will happen at some time. | ||
| But the way that these pieces are presented is they're quite open and really subject to public scrutiny. | ||
| Anyone with a kind of statistical knowledge is free to review and critique these pieces. | ||
| And as I've said, repeatedly, for every single stats piece that we have out, crickets, we don't get compelling criticism at all. | ||
| Ross Douthat in the New York Times tried it, but I would say unsuccessfully. | ||
| And this latest piece is actually one of the most interesting approaches that I've seen to studying the irregularities of the 2020 election from a statistical point of view. | ||
| So I encourage everyone you can go follow along, go to revolver.news. | ||
| The link is red and it's in the pinned tweets so you can go through it in as much detail as you could possibly want. | ||
| But I'm just going to run down the basics here of what what the approach and the methodology was. | ||
| So basically this piece comes up with A rough statistical model to predict how states should look, how states should have performed in two vote share comparison between Trump and Biden. | ||
| And it does this using two basic variables. | ||
| The first variable is looking county by county. | ||
| This is county specific on how each county voted in the past five presidential elections. | ||
| And this is You know, very reasonable and the idea being that, you know, counties will pass performance is not completely, but it is to a substantial degree predictive of how the county behaves. | ||
| And, you know, this allows for changes within counties. | ||
| And so how each county voted in the past five presidential elections. | ||
| There's an additional variable that we layer on top of that. | ||
| And that variable looks at nationwide demographic voting trends in 2020, through a number of key demographic metrics that are typically used in voting analysis. | ||
| And that is a demographic of non-college educated whites, college educated whites, blacks, and Hispanics. | ||
| So the idea is this we get an idea of what each county should look like given historical patterns, but also we allow for the possibility. | ||
| Look, sometimes counties change, and we wanted to account for that. | ||
| And we use as a predictor of what they should change. | ||
| The aggregate nationwide change across those demographic variables that I described. | ||
| And so combining these two elements, we come up with a model. | ||
| And then the question is, how predictably accurate? | ||
| How accurate is this model in terms of fitting the data of the actual 2020 election? | ||
| And what we found is something quite curious. | ||
| We found that this model actually fits the data of pretty much every county in the United States. | ||
| It fits All battleground states except precisely for those states in which there's a contested issue and likely voter fraud. | ||
| And this is very suspicious because just by chance, like if if the model wasn't predicted, didn't fit the data at all. | ||
| Then you just have noise. | ||
| But it's very weird to have this model, whose methodology is open and very intuitive, accurately fit the data for every county, including contested counties, but not including battleground counties, but not the contested states. | ||
| So it predicted majority wins and actually quite big wins in Arizona and Georgia. | ||
| And it predicted wins in Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. | ||
| And it did not predict a win in Michigan, but it predicted it to be much closer than it actually was. | ||
| And so what this means is people who say that there wasn't fraud, they have to come up with an explanation as to why weird things are happening exclusively in these contested states where there is extreme circumstantial evidence of fraud occurring. | ||
| That's that's a very strange thing to happen. | ||
| And all of these statistical pieces that we've put out are different ways to approach one basic fact pattern. | ||
| And that is some very weird things were going on in Biden's favor only in the states where he absolutely needed it to happen. | ||
| And under the most suspicious circumstances possible, literally in the dead of night, vote counting. | ||
| And this is another way of telling that story using numbers. | ||
| This thing's very powerful. | ||
| And when people say, hey, why do you keep going over this? | ||
| Remember, wash, rinse, repeat. | ||
| You have to have a framing device in narrative. | ||
| And you have to set a predicate in that framing device. | ||
| This is what this analysis is about. | ||
| People should understand something. | ||
| I know some very sophisticated hedge fund people throughout the world, globally, that make a living off of this type of understanding algorithms and understanding directional trading patterns, and not just the finances of companies, but these are guys that also are just heavy quants Right. | ||
| These are gearheads who literally don't care what the company does, don't care what that they are. | ||
| They are driven statistically about about trading of stocks, bonds, all of that. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Currencies. | ||
| I have not met one, and many of these people, in fact, most of them are not fans of Trump, and most of them didn't vote for Trump. | ||
| A lot of them didn't vote at all, but these are not Trump partisans. | ||
| This is not the war room posse. | ||
| This is not at the Donald dot win, okay? | ||
| This is people that are just into making money. | ||
| I have not talked to one of these brilliant people that do not say, obviously, the math shows you that the fix was in on this. | ||
| It's laughable. | ||
| And this is Darren Bay. | ||
| He's come up with another set of analysis that drives his point. | ||
| So Darren, you're not just one of the smartest guys out there from a rhetoric point of view and a narrative point of view, but also analytical and math. | ||
| You also understand the grubby world of politics. | ||
| Why is it that the Republican establishment, having seen what's going on here, understanding that their base is never going to back down on this, why are they so adamant? | ||
| They're actually more adamant than the Democrats that just move on, there's nothing to see here. | ||
| Well, that's actually a very good question. | ||
| I think it's an open question as to whether the establishment truly understands that the base is not going to back down. | ||
| And I think that's an open question. | ||
| We'll see. | ||
| How much the base is willing to take. | ||
| But the modus operandi of the Republican establishment, at least until Trump came along, and I think it's important for everyone to remember, Trump ran against the Republican establishment just as much as he ran against Hillary Clinton. | ||
| And they never forgave him for it. | ||
| And in fact, they thwarted him at every possible opportunity. | ||
| They thwarted his agenda during four years he's been in office. | ||
| On literally everything except for judges and tax cuts. | ||
| So this tension is not new and the Republican establishment would love for him to be gone. | ||
| Mitch McConnell would love for Trump to be out of the picture. | ||
| And then McConnell has all the juice in terms of negotiating with Biden. | ||
| It's great for him. | ||
| It's great for the establishment. | ||
| They're going to go on to business as usual with people like, you know, Kevin McCarthy and so forth. | ||
| And just pretending like Trump never happened, which is, of course, not going to work. | ||
| But the real question is, you know, they're used to treating their base like crap. | ||
| And, you know, I have to say in somewhat for good reason, because the base is very tolerant and they tend to forget quickly. | ||
| So I think the challenge here is on the base. | ||
| Now, people are talking about, oh, just accept it. | ||
| Just roll over. | ||
| The important thing now is that we keep the Senate and we can just forget about Trump. | ||
| And I have nothing wrong against keeping the Senate in principle, but this idea of just forgetting about Trump, forgetting about the base, and just focusing on keeping the Senate for typical establishment Republican reasons, that's simply not going to cut it. | ||
| And I think you could even argue, as I have, that the base needs to demonstrate leverage. | ||
| They need to demonstrate that if you screw with them, if you turn your back on them, they have the power and capacity to punish you. | ||
| They need to do that if they want to exert any influence on the political system. | ||
| And I think it's crucial that they not back down and send a strong signal to the Republican establishment that we're not going back to the pre-Trump days. | ||
| Darren, it's powerful. | ||
| We've got the revolver story up on the screen. | ||
| Darren, you've got about 15 seconds. | ||
| How do people get access to a revolver and how do they get access to you during the day? | ||
| Great. | ||
| Well, as always, check out revolver.news. | ||
| Make it, bookmark it. | ||
| It's not only the new Drudge, it's really, I think, a growing hub for cutting-edge investigative analysis on all sorts of things, political. | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| I'm on Twitter at at Darren J. Beattie. | ||
| And check out Parler, Beattie, Darren J. War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| OK, we're going to bring our wingman in here, Raheem Kassamba. | ||
| I want to show you, people in the audience all the time, and this came from Liz Yor and her fantastic group out in Chicago, are always creating memes. | ||
| I want to make sure we put up one of the memes they created last night. | ||
| It's going to be up on the screen here momentarily, and we'll describe it to the radio audience and to the podcast audience. | ||
| I want to bring in Rahim. | ||
| Rahim, we're going to put the meme up and I'll talk about it since we're a little slow on the trigger here, Cameron. | ||
| Can we get it up? | ||
| Let's shift it over. | ||
| There we go. | ||
| Okay, that meme is up there. | ||
| It's basically about sheriffs. | ||
| We've got someone from High Noon, some other films, Maggie is represented. | ||
| Maggie's either Annie Oakley, Calamity Jane, or Tart, or Miss Kitty, or Miss Kitty, right? | ||
| It's a good look. | ||
| I think I'm from the high noon. | ||
| Rahim looks dangerous. | ||
| Rahim is dangerous. | ||
| That's why we're bringing Rahim Kassam right now. | ||
| By the way, we want to thank everybody who does these memes. | ||
| We'll start putting more of them up. | ||
| We love them. | ||
| We push them out. | ||
| We find it very heartening and it's great fun. | ||
| And it's got a lot of truth to it, a lot of this stuff. | ||
| Rahim, Darren Beatty's on, and he's saying, hey, we're at a deflection point, this is a moment of truth, and it's a moment of truth to the Trump base, because the establishment just thinks they're going to pat you on the head and we're going to move on from this, and that you're going to lose interest in it over time, and that's why Mitch McConnell's coming out and welcoming Joe Biden, that's why Mitt Romney's going out of his way and Ben Sasse to dump on people. | ||
| What's the assessment of national pulse in all of this? | ||
| I just want to point out that I'm also the best dressed in that meme, which I very much appreciate to whomever made that. | ||
| They got that accurate. | ||
| Hold it, hold it. | ||
| If you're gonna go there, I'm also saying I think you're the only guy in chaps. | ||
| I think you're in chaps. | ||
| Just making an observation. | ||
| Just making an observation. | ||
| Look, I tend to agree with Darren. | ||
| Remember, I said this a couple of weeks ago on the show as well, that I was the guy who, after David Cameron went into coalition with Nick Clegg in 2010 in the United Kingdom, I gave them a couple of months, the coalition government, and saw whether or not the Conservative Party was indeed willing to sell out every single thing. | ||
| I was watching for the sops, watching for the little scraps of red meat that they throw us every so often. | ||
| And I noted it, you know, I took out my number two pencil, as you would say, and noted down every time there was a SOP versus every time there was a real, real problematic giveaway to the liberal left in the United Kingdom. | ||
| And guess what? | ||
| David Cameron, who is now fully within the purview of the Chinese Communist Party, was giving away far more than he was getting. | ||
| And that's what's happening over here now with the Republican Party, too. | ||
| I'll be very unpopular for saying such things, but Darren's right, and I would go even further, which is to say that actually, you know, you guys went on the show yesterday, yesterday afternoon, I was listening, and you say, hey, you know, it's great that Loeffler and Perdue kind of, you know, finally found their way to this whole thing, but then as soon as people start going, oh yeah, good, we're going to vote for them, everything's going to be good again, | ||
| Then you get another turn against you, a turning of the back and actually it goes further, it goes to attack you. | ||
| You look at now where Fox News is positioned. | ||
| You look at where the Spectator magazine is now positioned. | ||
| Andrew Neil coming out today in the Daily Mail attacking Brexit. | ||
| You know, for the last four years these guys have pretended to be on our side. | ||
| No, guess what they were doing? | ||
| They were riding on our coattails. | ||
| They were taking a free ride with the path that we had forged for them. | ||
| Building up their subscribership, building up their print subscriptions, building up their names, their platforms, and now they're willing to abandon us and stab us in the back and the side and the front all at the same time. | ||
| So I will say this and I will go further. | ||
| You know, look, what the average American does with their vote on January the 5th when the Georgians go to vote is completely up to them. | ||
| I'm not going to go into trying to dictate to people how they should vote or whether they should vote at all. | ||
| But you have to look for alternatives in the long run because there is nothing to say that Mitch McConnell's Republican Party will even try to continue representing your interests in the near, the medium or the long term. | ||
| I want to just hold there. | ||
| By the way, we have an amazing video from Maggie, but I want to give it full time, so we're going to play it at 5 o'clock. | ||
| I want to tease everybody. | ||
| At 5 o'clock, we're going to open the show with this incredible video from the parade and from the rally on Saturday, because I think it shows you the diversity of this movement, the energy of this movement, and the power of this movement. | ||
| So Maggie Vanderburgh's new video will be the highlight and kickoff of the 5 p.m. | ||
| show tonight to talk about the rally. | ||
| Along that lines, Rahim and Maggie, do you sense that this is different, that this is where you're seeing that people right now, and Rahim I'll start with you, then Maggie, we've got about two and a half minutes left, that people see that this is actually bigger than President Trump. | ||
| They're 100% back of President Trump, but it is symbolic that we get to the bottom of the steel and we make sure only legal votes count because of the Constitution, because of the Republic. | ||
| Rahim, you and then Maggie. | ||
| Look, I just, you know, I'll sort of take the question another way. | ||
| I love the work that people are doing, putting the, you know, the Stop the Steal rallies, everybody that's been, you know, Kremer's coming on this show and Ali and the whole team putting all these rallies together. | ||
| But actually, really what it needs is another Tea Party moment. | ||
| And it's a Tea Party moment that can't go away anytime soon. | ||
| Which is to say that the rally shouldn't be every other Saturday or every once a Saturday a month. | ||
| It should be every day outside the U.S. | ||
| Capitol. | ||
| It should be every day. | ||
| There should be hundreds and hundreds of people camped out there demanding justice for this past election. | ||
| So I think it's more than just putting a few things together now. | ||
| This is existential for the party, for the Republic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Exactly, and I also think when we see this video later tonight, it's going to be, it's amazing how many Chinese were out there, and how much they appreciate this show, because these people know what communism is like, they know what socialism is like, and they understand and respect the importance of American elections, and they know what that means, you know, to be able to vote in America, and we need to ensure that we can trust in our election process. | |
| So Rahim, what's on National Pulse at three o'clock? | ||
| We actually have a longer form interview with Steve Cortes today. | ||
| He's got a great op-ed out on the National Pulse website about where we go in the medium and long term. | ||
| We've got a lot of people looking at the short term. | ||
| We've also got to be focused on what's over the hill and Steve Cortes will join us. | ||
| That piece of Cortez is so powerful in his new analysis of the economy, global economy and deflation, so powerful. | ||
| Cortez is going to be in the morning show tomorrow. | ||
| Watch him. | ||
| There's long for an interview. | ||
| Steve Cortez is one of the smartest guys out there. | ||
| We're going to lead off tonight with Maggie's amazing little film. | ||
| It talks about the breadth and the power of this movement. | ||
| Remember, all the power rests with you. | ||
| Okay, until 5 o'clock today, there's going to be a lot of breaking news at 5 o'clock. | ||
| Make sure you come back to the War Room. |
Export Selection