José "Pepe" Mujica, the former Tupamaro guerrilla leader who survived torture and 14 years in prison, became Uruguay's president by campaigning on anti-consumerist principles while donating 90% of his salary. Critics accuse him of betraying revolutionary ideals by working within a gridlocked Congress rather than overthrowing capitalism, yet Mujica defends his pragmatism as necessary to fund social programs like free education and marijuana legalization. Contrasting his consensus-driven style with predecessor Tabaré Vázquez's authoritarian efficiency, Mujica prioritizes immediate material benefits over utopian visions, offering a complex case study on whether incremental change or violent revolution better serves fragmented leftist movements. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Raw Conversations on Recovery00:02:06
This is an iHeart podcast.
Guaranteed human.
Real talent is defined by what people can do, not where they learn to do it.
So by stopping at the education section of a resume, you might throw away the perfect tire.
Skills first hiring helps you see talent others miss, like more than 70 million stars, skilled through alternative routes.
Let their story unfold and gain a competitive advantage because hiring managers who start with skills are 60% more likely to find a successful hire.
Hire skills first.
Learn why at tearthepaperceiling.org.
Brought to you by Opportunity at Work and the Ad Council.
Today's Financial Literacy Month.
We are talking about the one investment most people ignore: building a business around the life you actually want.
It was just us making happen whatever he said was going to happen and then it happened.
On those amigos, entrepreneurs like Amira Kassam and Joe Hoff get real about money, taking risks, and while your dream might be the smartest move.
At the end of my life, what am I really going to care about?
And the conclusion I came to is what I did to make the world a better place in whatever way.
Listen to those amigos on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
I'm Kristen Davis, host of the podcast, Are You a Charlotte?
In 1998, my life was forever changed when I took on the role of Charlotte York on a new show called Sex in the City.
Now I get to sit down with some of my favorite people and relive all of the incredible moments this show brought us on and off the screen.
Listen to Are You a Charlotte on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
On the Ceno Show podcast, each episode invites you into a raw, unfiltered conversation about recovery, resilience, and redemption.
On a recent episode, I sit down with actor, cultural icon Danny Trail talk about addiction, transformation, and the power of second chances.
The entire season two is now available to bench, featuring powerful conversations with guests like Tiffany Addish, Johnny Knoxville, and more.
I'm an alcoholic.
And without this probe, I'm going to die.
Listen to Ceno's show on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
Dictatorship and Political Imprisonment00:14:58
Hoodabadoo Badoo.
Badoo Ba-doo-ba-doo.
Yep.
That's how we start the episode.
Great.
That's going to name the podcast.
Just who to Badoo Ba-Doo?
Well, we can't start with ho-ho-ho because Santa Claus was murdered at the beginning of the first episode.
He was.
He was murdered by Paul Schaefer, who just zoomed in to shoot him in a river with a bunch of kids watching.
Ah, Paul Schaefer.
The audience can't see, but I'm shaking my head disapprovingly.
At you?
At Paul Schaefer?
I don't know.
But not the Paul Schaefer who had a Nazi cult in Chile, the Paul Schaefer who worked on, who was Letterman's band leader for years.
Yeah.
That's the one.
He shot Santa Claus too in a lake.
So, Margaret, Killjoy, how are you?
I'm good.
You good?
How are you liking the two Pomaros?
You know, I'm like, I keep, I'm really excited to see how it plays out.
Yeah, yeah, they're endearing.
Yeah.
Yeah.
But then even like the fact that one of them ends up president, that's like both interesting in so many complicated ways that I like, I want to see the steps that took them there.
Yes, because this does not happen often.
Sometimes guerrilla insurgents win their insurgency and then become the president or whatever.
Sometimes guys who are like labor organizers or like leftist politicians get imprisoned by a dictatorship and then later become the president.
Rarely is a guy robbing banks with a handgun and then gets democratically elected president of the country, like after spending years in a dictatorship's prison cells.
That is not a common story.
You don't run into that all the time.
How much did he change?
I don't know.
You know, because that's what we're getting into.
It's exciting.
Yeah.
I'm excited.
So by 1975, the military had successfully rolled over and destroyed the Tupamaro.
1972, when the dictatorship comes into place, is when they start like going hardcore, cracking down.
And by 75, everybody's dead are in prison, mostly in prison.
And one of the people who was thrown in prison was our friend and future president, Jose Mujica.
He was actually captured several times.
He was arrested.
He was like imprisoned like four separate times.
He broke out of prison at least once.
But like the thing he finally gets caught for is he's like drinking in a bar after robbing a bank or something.
And a cop who's there in plain clothes recognizes him and gets a bunch of other cops and they have a huge shootout in a bar and he gets shot six times and survives.
So again, when I say this guy was like hardcore, like you can't, you can't be much more committed than getting shot six times in a gunfight with the police.
Yeah, as a revolutionary.
To bring him down, you know, no, you should sell out.
You certainly can't.
Yeah.
I got shot with a rubber bullet once.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Same.
But this is a little bit more hardcore than that.
And he is one of the last two Pomaros who gets captured and locked up.
And by the time he gets locked up, he's fairly high in the organization, right?
And again, he's kind of because in part because he's one of the last ones to get to get captured.
And so he's put in prison for well over a decade.
And I'm going to quote from a write-up in The Guardian to describe what his time in the dictatorship's prison is like.
The poet, novelist, and playwright Mauricio Rosenkoff spent 11 years in a tiny cell next to Muzhika.
For many years, Rosenkov told me the hostages could only communicate by tapping Morse code on their cell walls.
Allowed to use the toilet just once a day, they urinated into their water bottles, allowing the sediment to settle and drinking the rest because water was also scarce.
It was even worse for Muzhika, whose bullet wounds had seriously damaged his guts.
Solitary confinement drove them half mad.
Pepe became, and that's Jose's nickname, became convinced that a bugging device was hidden in the ceiling.
Its imaginary static deafened him.
He would put stones in his mouth to stop himself from screaming, Rosenkoff, now 81, told me.
Muzhika fought to obtain the one item he needed most, a potty.
Hostages were allowed occasional family visits, so Donna Lucy brought him one, but the guards refused to give it to him.
One day, when his jailers held a party, Mujica began to scream for it.
The commandant, embarrassed in front of his guests, relented.
Mujika clung to his sole possession, a symbol of victory over his jailers, each time they were moved to a new army camp.
He refused to scrub it clean, Rosenkoff recalled.
We all have ticks left from that time.
When Pepe came out, he came out with all that baggage.
So he is.
And some people, some sources kind of frame him getting the toilet as like this victory, him being able to get the one thing he could, the one like way to exert his autonomy, was to force them to give him his own toilet.
Some people frame it as him like losing his mind a little bit and just becoming obsessed with the idea of having a toilet.
Both are probably true.
They don't need to, those don't need to be in conflict with each other.
There's no way I think you would have to go a little crazy in specific ways to survive 14 years, which is what he spends in a prison like this, where you're tortured and beaten and starved regularly.
You don't survive that by not changing at all.
You know, like that is.
Yeah, he does what he has to.
He survives.
He's imprisoned for 14 years.
If you're wondering how he stayed sane during that time, in his own words, we have an interview conducted by someone from the site Upside Down World with Mujika that sheds some light on how he claims he kept himself sane.
Quote, I would come up with ideas for tools.
I mentally invented farm implements.
That would be for this or that.
I calculated them, manufactured them mentally, and so kept myself entertained.
I walked several miles a day, more than I do today, for sure.
And then the journalists ask in the hole because he's in like this basically a dank hole.
And he said, oh, yes, three steps one way, three steps the other, three steps one way, three steps to the other until my legs hurt.
Like that's how he avoids losing his mind in this prison.
It was the early 1980s when cracks finally started to form around the dictatorship.
Some of the credit for this goes to the men and women on the legal left, the same people who'd formed the Frinte Amplio.
They continued to organize and agitate.
And in 1984, people took to the streets en masse protesting the dictatorship.
And it was such a significant number of people that the dictatorship backs down, basically, realizes like we either are going to start killing people en masse in the street or we're not going to have a dictatorship anymore.
And if we kill people en masse in the street, I'm not sure we'll win.
And so I'm not going to gamble, I think is kind of what happens, right?
And the liberal, the kind of the dictatorship's end is negotiated in large part by the leader of kind of the liberal party, Julio Sanguinetti, who helps to negotiate an end to the dictatorship.
And he gets elected president next in a peaceful election.
And one of his first decisions is to push for an amnesty that frees imprisoned leftist radicals like Mujica, while also providing amnesty to the military leaders who'd run the dictatorship.
So Sanguinetti is like, we're going to release all the two Pomaros.
We're also not going to imprison the military.
Because I think the attitude is, number one, you have to leave them.
We're trying to get them to back down without mass bloodshed in the streets.
You have to leave them an exit plan.
And I also think it's his ad the attitude is like, well, if we just imprison another group of people, then maybe we'll have a cycle where a new regime comes in, it imprisons the old regime.
And like, that doesn't like, I don't know how much of it is like trying to give the military an out and how much of it is trying to stop a cycle of reprisals, but that's what they decide to do.
It's better than most, you know, actually getting the political prisoners free.
It's better than most movements.
Better than most like movements.
And it's, it's, I mean, obviously it's controversial not prosecuting the military.
And actually, they do start to prosecute and currently are to some extent some people who like the some of the worst people.
But initially, it's just like, yeah, let's amnesty kind of for everybody involved in that whole thing.
Let's try to put it behind us.
Now, Sanguinetti, who's kind of the first post-dictatorship president, is also one of the people who blames the two Pomaros for the coming of the dictatorship, one of the Uruguayans who does.
His claim for this, like one of the things he says in an interview I found is that like the bullets that Mujica and the other two Pomaros fired were shots against democracy because they led to the dictatorship.
And he, as Jose gets out of prison and gets into politics, he does not like Mujica.
I found some quotes from him in a Guardian article.
And I think at least some of his issue with the two Pomaros is that he's not a leftist, for one thing.
He's kind of like more maybe center left, you could say, but he's not like, I don't think he's a far leftist.
And I think some of his frustration comes from the fact that when the dictatorship ends and politics starts up again, the Frinte Amplio comes back and it starts siphoning votes away from the liberal Colorado party, Sanguinetti's party.
I'm not going to spend a lot of time like digging into Uruguayan electoral politics because I don't understand them well.
Again, I cite two scholarly papers you can read that go into a lot of detail about Uruguayan electoral politics.
I would recommend reading that if you want to know it better.
But it is interesting to me that to kind of look into which groups of people had issues with the fact that Jose Mujica, when he gets into politics, was a former two Pomaro and which people didn't.
Because like Sanguinetti, this guy who, to his credit, helps end the dictatorship, dislikes Mujica and the two Pomaros and blames them for the coming of the dictatorship.
You know who doesn't blame them and who in fact votes for Mujica when he wins the presidency?
Is it the products and services that support this show?
No, it's not time for that.
You remember how I read that story last episode about like that guy who as a kid with his like wheelchair-bound sister, Jose, like robbed the family and threatened to murder his dad?
Yeah, he votes for him for president later.
He's like, yeah, we'll talk about that a little more.
But he's like, yeah, I think he's probably a good candidate.
I'm not angry at him.
Which is...
Gave me my typewriter back.
That says something about how polite a robber you are if like later someone votes for you to be president.
And imagine that being your backstory.
Like in the United States, being like, yeah, you know, when I was six, Joe Biden robbed my house at gunpoint and threatened to kill my stepdad.
No, and said Biden does all these other crimes that are far grosser.
Way grosser.
Yeah, I mean, Mujica was at least front and center in whatever he was doing, you know?
So we talked earlier about how the tupamaros are characterized by how flexible they are, how good they are at pivoting from different things and not really staying locked into things that one tendency or another would require of them, kind of ideologically.
And they do this again.
They get out of prison, or at least, you know, because some of them are just like underground hiding, but like they're able to be public again and they form a political party and join the fronte amplio again.
And so, yeah, the old tupamaros start getting into electoral politics.
And the tupamaro who was like at the forefront of pushing for the party to get into electoral politics is Jose Mujica.
Right.
And I'm going to quote from the New Republic here.
As the group readjusted to freedom, most of its members wanted to avoid returning to guerrilla warfare, though what course to pursue instead was unclear.
Right-wingers still maintained control over much of the government.
Mujica argued for an entry into traditional party politics and staged public forums known as materas, confabs held in village squares over calabash gourds full of strong mate tea.
He'd retained his childhood egalitarian passions, but prison had made him more philosophical and deepened his rough-hewn physical allure.
He rapidly developed a following among poorer workers and in the mid-90s entered parliament.
Then in 2005, he received an appointment as agriculture minister.
It was in that post that Mujica won national acclaim, speaking in almost biblical terms about how government policies affected the common man.
For post-dictatorship Uruguay, his language was healing, a triumphant return to the country's traditional values of humility and shared responsibility.
Mujica's biggest fight as agriculture minister was to ensure poor Uruguayans' access to asado, the traditional dish of beef rib grilled over an open fire.
Unable to afford the meat, the lower classes often ate less expensive cuts off the neck.
Neck is unacceptable, Mujica told a reporter.
When some butchers began selling more affordable asado, people lovingly nicknamed it asado del pepe.
A 2007 poll showed that he'd become far and away the country's most liked government official, and he decided to run for president.
And like that is such a heartwarming, just being like, wait, poor people, like this is our traditional dish that I grew up eating, and you're telling me people are like eating, using shit meat for it now.
That is unfucking acceptable.
Like poor people deserve to eat well too, and I'm going to fight for that shit.
Obviously, people loved him.
Yeah.
Where's the catch?
Well, we'll talk about that.
It's not perfect.
Like, it's not perfect.
And we are going to, I think, like, primarily today, we'll be talking about the catch and the degree to which he, I mean, what is sold out or whatever you want to talk about it?
Like, we're, yeah, well, I'm excited.
I'm excited to have a conversation about that with you.
Yeah.
So he ran for president in 2009, and he immediately made a massive impact on Uruguay's urban poor, just because of the way he presented himself, not even in terms of policy yet, because the policy part is more debatable.
But he has this big impact, in fact, part because he dresses.
He's not in a suit.
He's not dressing like a politician.
He's not dressing like a, he refuses to wear a tie.
He is often seen at public events in sandals, and like he would wear dirty jumpers.
Like at first, They had to like kind of fight with him to get him to wear at least like, okay, you can wear like just a shirt, but a clean one, right?
Like and he's like dragging his potty around with him.
He's got his body with him.
He met poor people where they lived, and he was particularly famous for asking meaningful questions about their lives.
Not like, do you support this policy?
But like asking like very pointed material questions about what they had access to and how they were doing.
He also ranted in his public speeches against consumerist capitalism, which he said wasted human strength on, quote, frivolities that have little to do with human happiness.
Jose was elected president in 2009, and on paper, his term is a left liberal wet dream.
Under his presidency, Uruguay legalized gay marriage, marijuana, and abortion, which is pretty good for four years, right?
Yeah.
Yeah.
And it's not like a like a great, I guess you could say it's not like the ideal abortion policy.
It's legalizing, I think, up to 12 weeks, but like from a point of this is a Catholic country and you can't do it.
That's like a huge, that's a big, that's a, that's a thing.
Like that's worth celebrating.
And also just like being down with gay rights when you're talking about a 60s revolutionary.
Mujika's Rights and Liberties00:03:51
We will talk about that.
Not guaranteed.
Not a guarantee.
Now, these are the cliff notes of Jose's presidency.
And so you can see what like the Guardian says it's the most radical president in the world.
Now, when you get into the weeds a little bit, it is less radical.
Well, in some ways, less radical seeing.
It's certainly in some ways like it's more complicated.
But I also think it's a lot more interesting if you look at like his motivations for things.
Let's take gay marriage, right?
His support of gay rights.
Because a decent critical piece on Mujike, and I've read a number, will note rightly that he should not be credited with bringing gay marriage to Uruguay because activists have been working for decades to get to that point, you know?
Which is always the case when gay marriage gets legalized, right?
That's the case with Obama, too.
Like, I don't give him credit for it other than the fact that he was the guy who decided not to fight it anymore.
Right.
You know, I think Mujika gets a little more credit than I would give Obama for this, maybe, telling the press, quote, they fit about his like gay rights, marriage rights.
They, those rights, fit our sense of freedom and human rights, but they don't solve the basic problem, which is the difference of class.
And that's what you'll see.
He's like, I'm happy to legalize gay rights.
I don't think this solves the problem, which is primarily a class problem.
He'll say a lot like, look, the issue, like, it's important for people to have rights.
I believe in people having freedom.
But also, if you look at it, rich people were always free to be gay.
This is something he says in like interviews and number.
Rich people have always been able to be gay and pretty much live life the way they wanted.
It's if you're if you're a gay woman, a poor woman, you know, an indigenous gay person, like if you're not part of the upper class, that's when it becomes a problem.
And so he sees gay rights as primarily part of the class struggle, is the thing that he always emphasizes in his interviews.
So it's interesting because he's not doing full class reductionism.
No.
There's actually tiny issues in.
He's actually doing better than a huge chunk of the state's radical left at the moment.
And it's interesting because when it comes to Jose's personal views, one Uruguayan sex health activist called him a bit Cro-Magnon.
And he refers to, when he refers to gay people, he calls them sexually ambivalent, which, you know, he was born in 1935, right?
Like, yeah.
You could call me sexually ambivalent.
It's not offensive.
It's just kind of weird.
And it's clear he's just like, I don't really get this, but like, my default is that people should have more freedom.
So yeah, let's do it.
You know, like, I think that's kind of his attitude.
He's like, I don't understand this at all, but like, it's a question of rights and people should always have more rights.
Which is fine.
And it is worth noting that the, so before Mujika gets elected, the broad front elects another president.
The first president the broad front elects is a guy named Vasquez, who is a very left-wing dude in a lot of ways.
And we'll talk about him a bit more, but he's also very Catholic.
And again, like liberation theology and stuff.
So he had, despite being the lefty president right before Mujika, he vetoed a law to get legalize gay marriage during his term.
And so again, an abortion too, probably.
I don't know as much about that, but I don't know if the fight to legalize abortion was at enough of a point during his presidency where he could.
I'm not really sure.
But I think you should say, don't give this guy all the credit.
There's a lot of activists, but also the last guy who was on the left vetoed this.
So it's not no credit that Mujika gets, especially I always give credit to like an old dude who clearly doesn't understand anything about it other than that people are being restricted from a thing.
And it's like, well, that's bad.
Like, there's a degree to which I just inherently respect a man who's willing to say, I'm old, I don't understand things anymore, but my default is always give people more freedom.
So that's where I land on this.
That's a really good way to approach aging and not understanding issues is just trying to be like, all right, well, what about like, where, what is, yeah, I think that's admirable.
Um, you know what else is admirable, Margaret?
No, I have no idea.
Drug Policy Nuances00:14:21
The products and services that support this podcast.
Um, very admirable.
Admiration will be available from everybody.
Yeah, for $9.95 on a recent episode of the podcast, Money and Wealth, with John O'Brien.
I sit down with Tiffany the Bajanista Alicia to talk about what it really takes to take control of your money.
What would that look like in our families if everyone was able to pass on wealth to the people when they're no longer here?
We break down budgeting, financial discipline, and how to build real wealth, starting with the mindset shifts too many of us were never ever taught.
Financial education is not always about like, I'm gonna get rich.
That's great.
It's about creating an atmosphere for you to be able to take care of yourself and leave a strong financial legacy for your family.
If you've ever felt you didn't get the memo on money, this conversation is for you to hear more.
Listen to Money and Wealth with John O'Brien from the Black Effect Network on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
I went and sat on the little ottoman in front of him and I said, Hi, Dad.
And just when I said that, my mom comes out of the kitchen and she says, I have some cookies and milk.
This is badass convict me.
Just finished five years.
I'm going to have cookies and milk.
Yeah, mom.
On the Ceno Show podcast, each episode invites you into a raw, unfiltered conversations about recovery, resilience, and redemption.
On a recent episode, I sit down with actor, cultural icon Danny Trail talking about addiction, transformation, and the power of second chances.
The entire season two is now available to binge, featuring powerful conversations with guests like Tiffany Addish, Johnny Knoxville, and more.
I'm an alcoholic.
Open your free iHeart radio app, search the Ceno Show, and listen now.
I feel like it was a little bit unbelievable until I really start making money.
It's Financial Literacy Month, and the podcast Eating Wall Broke is bringing real conversations about money, growth, and building your future.
This month, hear from top streamer Zoe Spencer and venture capitalist Lakeisha Landrum Pierre as they share their journeys from starting out to leveling up.
If I'm outside with my parents and they're seeing all these people come up to me for pictures, it's like, what?
Today, now, obviously, it's like 100%.
They believe everything.
But at first, it was just like, you got to go get a real job.
There's an economic component to communities thriving.
If there's not enough money and entrepreneurship happening in communities, they fail.
And what I mean by fail is they don't have money to pay for food.
They cannot feed their kids.
They do not have homes.
Communities don't work unless there's money flowing through them.
Listen to Eating Wallbrook from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
When you listen to podcasts about AI and tech and the future of humanity, the hosts always act like they know what they're talking about and they are experts at everything.
Here at the Nick Dick and Pole show, we're not afraid to make mistakes.
What Koogler did that I think was so unique?
He's the writer director.
Who do you think he is?
I don't know.
You meet the like the president?
You think English the president?
You think Canada has a president?
You think China has a president?
Blah, blah, blah.
Proves that.
God, I love that thing.
I use it all the time.
I wrap it in a blanket and sing to it.
It's like the old Polish saying, not my monkeys, not my circus.
Yep.
It's a good one.
I like that saying.
It is an actual Polish saying.
It is an actual Polish saying.
It's a better version of play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Yes.
Which, by the way, wasn't Taylor Swift who said that for the first time.
I actually, I thought it was.
I got that wrong.
Listen to the Nick Dick and Poll Show on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Ah, we're back.
So when it comes to how Mujika talks about legalizing gay marriage, how he talks about like how he deals with like when people like, especially like foreign journalists, credit him with this is really interesting.
And I want to read a quote from him on that subject and some other things from that Guardian article.
Quote, all we are doing is recognizing something as old as humanity, Mujika said.
The best thing is that people can live as they want to live.
And that's his like attitude to like, why did you, which is, I think, very admirable.
He sees those twice punished by poverty and intolerance as the real victims.
Those who are sexually ambivalent have a real problem if they are poor.
If they are rich, they are tolerated.
That sounds crude, but it's the truth as I see it, he said.
And the women most discriminated against are those in poverty.
Mashismo hits hardest at the lowest levels.
Poor girls are not well treated by our society.
There are women who end up abandoned with lots of children.
For me, that is one of the most important battles for fairness.
Yeah.
And during his presidential campaign, he was caught complaining about, quote, intellectual women who think they are downtrodding, but who talk about their companera or cleaning lady when she is really the servant.
Which I love that he makes that distinction.
Where he's like, there's a lot of rich women complaining about like how they're not treated equally who also have a lady who's basically their slave.
Like, I don't think that's cool.
Yeah.
He's, he's, it's hard to argue with the things he says, at least.
You know, probably tips well, you know?
Yeah.
He goes out to a restaurant.
Probably tips well.
We are, yeah, we're actually getting to that in a little bit.
Yeah.
So the fact that Pepe is a quasi-anarchist militant president who legalized pot might lead you to expect that like he's does a lot of pot.
He's never smoked marijuana.
And I will believe that from a guy who legalized it.
Like a lot of times it's like, okay, well, you're probably just...
He's like, no, he's fine with it being legal.
He just doesn't want to do it.
He's heavily addicted to tobacco and he drinks a lot, but I don't think he's ever smoked pot.
He says he hasn't.
But he's not like pro-weed culture.
He just thinks prohibition has been a failure.
And there's also a big element of like why he's legalizing pot is to take money away from drug cartels because there's a major, it's essentially like a cocaine derivative problem in Uruguayan slums that his government was fighting.
And so he is not anti-the drug war entirely.
And this is, I think, one of the areas in which I would disagree with him because his attitude is, I think, we should legalize the drugs that are not harmful in his view to deny cartels money and we should fight them selling what is basically crack.
Which like, I'm not pro-crack.
It's pretty nasty stuff, but I don't think prohibition works there either.
Again, he's not a perfect man.
But this is, I think, his attitude towards it.
And I'm also not an expert on Uruguay's crack cocaine problems, so I'm not going to pontificate there either.
And his attitude in general towards drug use seems to be that, at least from a user perspective, people, one of the quotes he gave is, we want to take users out of hiding and create a situation where we can say, you are overdoing it.
You have to deal with that.
So it's a very like Scandinavian attitude towards how drugs should be treated.
Which of like the ways Western countries deal with drug use is the most reasonable that kind of states tend to embrace.
So whatever.
You can think about that the way you do.
But it's nuanced.
It's not just like, he's not just pro-drugs.
He does support some kinds of drug war.
I think the place where Jose Miujica is most impressive is in the ways in which he actually does live, because it's one thing to say all this stuff.
He really does live in concert with his values.
For example, he speaks all the time about the plight of poor women.
And as president, he made like 200 grand a year as president and he donated 90% of his salary to single mothers.
And he's not getting into this as a rich guy.
He's not like a millionaire becoming the president.
He took enough to like live in the house that he'd occupied most of his life and gave all of the rest to like single moms, which is dope.
And he has like some land and a bunch of old people live on it and don't pay rent.
He's a pretty like he's everything about his life is very much in concert with the things that he's saying.
I want to not like him.
And you're making it hard.
It's hard not to, even the people who are very critical of him like him personally.
It's very hard not to like him personally.
Despite being tortured in prison, he seems to generally support the amnesty for the military, which I find really interesting.
His attitude is that, because a lot of people are very critical of this, and I'm not saying it's the right or the wrong policy.
Obviously, people who like had friends murdered or tortured by the military will have issues with the amnesty.
I think I would.
Jose's attitude as someone who was hurt as much as anybody by the military was that the men who harmed him were not doing it themselves.
They were tools of a system, and that system was his actual enemy.
There also seems to be beyond his ideological justifications, I think, a dimension of emotional pragmatism to this attitude.
As he told The Economist in an interview, I do not hate.
Do you know what a luxury it is to not hate?
And so I think there's an element of like, this is the only way I can continue as a, I have to not hate them.
Yeah.
Like, I have to not hate them because otherwise it would destroy me.
And it's, it's, I'm, now that I'm out of prison, I have the luxury of not hating.
It's the thing that I enjoy most about freedom is I don't have to hate anymore is, I think, kind of what he's saying, which is pretty profound, actually, I think.
It also, I mean, it's funny because then it's like, well, it's the anti-carceral thing.
It's like you, you, the only defense for prison is to stop people from doing things.
Yeah.
And these people are no longer part of a system that is capable of doing these things.
So they are no longer capable of committing the harm that they did commit.
So in some ways, I don't see what would myself speaking as the president of Uruguay.
Yeah.
You know, that makes sense to me.
Yeah, it totally makes sense.
I could also understand other people being fucking mad.
I don't think I would be as good a person as him in his situation if I'd been locked up and tortured for 14 years.
I would want to be as good a person as he is.
Yes, sir.
But yeah.
There's some Catholic in there after all.
And it's interesting because there's a number of like, there's one interview I found with him where he talks about how not all the guards were terrible.
A number of them would like smuggle in food for us or like gifts for us or like things to like make us more comfortable.
So as much as the torture was a part of like, I blame like most of the crimes on the system, but I recognized that the people in it were also humans and like I wouldn't want to just like paint them all with one brush.
He's very nuanced when he talks about this stuff in a way that is impressive for someone who suffered so much under that regime.
You really get a sense of how different he is from like a normal politician.
When you read articles by journalists who actually meet with him, this passage from The Guardian is emblematic of the whole.
Mujika emerged from his tiny house dressed in a fawn fleece and gray trousers with sandals over socked feet.
The fleece is an improvement which can be credited to his 2009 campaign team who weaned him off tattered jumpers.
Age has made his features both more pinched around the eyes and fleshier around the edges.
His thick shock of graying hair was neatly brushed, another habit he acquired while running for president.
Manuela, a three-legged mutt, hopped gamely along.
The one-story house lies half hidden by greenery, its corrugated metal roof resting on pillars around a narrow cement walkway full of dusty crates and jars.
Winter rain highlighted the patchy plasterwork.
Mind the mud, the president warned by way of greeting.
The narrow, elongated front room contains a cheap office chair and desk, bookshelves, a small table with two uncomfortable wood-backed chairs, a roaring log stove, and an ancient, immaculately restored Pujo bicycle.
I've had that bicycle for 60 years, he said proudly, recalling his days as an amateur racer.
My God.
Mujika could live in the presidential palace, a hundred-year-old mansion in the old money Prado district, but he would rather be here.
We think of it as a way of fighting for our personal freedom, he said.
If you complicate your life too much in the material sense, a big part of your time goes to tending that.
That's why we still live today as we did 40 years ago, in the same neighborhood, with the same people and the same things.
You don't stop being a common man just because you are president.
I think he might be incorrect about that in terms of the ability to exert power.
He's too nice, but yeah, yeah.
But I appreciate the like.
Yeah.
Well, and one of the criticisms, we're getting to like the critiques of him by the left, but one is that he's bad at using power.
He's too much of, and that's part like he makes a lot of compromises with the neoliberals and with like the conservatives, especially in economic stuff, because he's not very authoritarian.
Like he's not good at that.
Like that's one of the really trenchant criticisms of his time as president, is he's like actually bad at forcing his way into things.
He's too much of like a little too much of an anarchist.
When foreign journalists interview Pepe about his past as a freedom fighter, he refuses to apologize for the violence that he took part in.
Mujika even expresses scorn for what he calls beatific pacifism and added, the only things I regret are those I could have done, but didn't.
Which is like, incredible.
It's a flex.
I wish I'd robbed more banks.
I wish I'd robbed another couple of banks.
It's not too late.
It's not too late, I'm saying.
No one's going to stop you at this point.
In part one, I told you the story of two kids Mujika held up at gunpoint while he was threatening to murder their dad.
And again, the young kid he held up, Manis, told The Guardian that he voted for Mujika, saying, I might be expected to feel bitter about him, but he's the only one who practices what he preaches.
Yeah.
Just like, yeah, he robbed me at gunpoint and tried to kill my stepdad, but he's an honest man.
I mean, it is.
It's honest to just actually exert that power as compared to like hiding behind this or that institution.
Critique of Unfulfilled Promises00:09:07
Yeah.
He never had goons do shit for him.
He was out there.
Now, given that Jose Mujika has not, in fact, destroyed the state or the system he railed against as a young man, you will not be surprised to hear that his largest detractors and the most trenchant criticism against him comes from the left.
And the leftists who critique him have a lot of very fair points.
I found a new Republic article by a journalist who traveled to Uruguay and talked with left-wing organizers, political leaders, journalists, and came up with a very critical article.
His was kind of in response to The Guardian saying the most radical presidency.
This New Republic journalist is like, well, let's go see how radical it really is.
And the radicals in Uruguay say not at all.
They all kind of seem to agree that he's a very nice man.
Nobody seems to believe that he's like lying and like hiding his life as a rich person, but that that didn't make him an effective president.
They point out that most of the things that he was elected to do did not happen.
He pushed for a massive educational expansion that would include a flood of new technical universities for poor kids.
But actually making that happen meant ramming laws through the still very splintered and gridlocked Congress.
And Mujica, as a political outsider and is not good at being authoritarian, was unable to do that.
He did succeed in getting laptops for like Uruguayan school children, which is like one of the big things his administration would brag about.
But test scores, I think, mostly still continued declining during this period.
The issues that the Uruguayan public school system had had, he didn't fix the problem, even though that was like the main thing he harped on in his campaign.
And I'm going to quote from the New Republic here.
The story was the same on other policy fronts.
Mujica wanted Uruguay's public railway utility to operate under private sector rules to boost efficiency.
Nothing happened.
He tried to pass a new tax on the big landowners to help the poor, but failed to ensure that the legislation would be constitutional.
The Uruguayan Supreme Court struck it down.
If he had taken the opportunity to consult more specialists in law, he wouldn't have failed, said Garcia, the political scientist.
But Mujika isn't too worried about the legal aspects of things.
One morning over coffee, I spoke to a former Mujika staffer named Conrado Ramos, a budget wonk who looks like a sad Hugh Grant.
He had been in charge of an effort to reform the Uruguayan public sector.
Mujica said he would make it a priority, Ramos recalled, but that was part of the problem.
Mujica's pan-enthusiasm placed everything and consequently nothing at the top of his agenda.
From time to time, Pepe would wheel unannounced into Ramos' office and get excited, unfurling beautiful language about the big changes needed.
But he doesn't know how to plan.
Mujika appointed as Ramos' boss, the disinterested son of a former tupamaro, and appeared to forget the issue.
After several fruitless years, Ramos quit in frustration, embarrassing the administration.
And again, it's like, I think it's a mix of he's probably a little ADHD and maybe a little too much of an anarchist to be good at making things work in a system.
Well, it's like it's in its way, it's this almost brilliant critique of state and state power because finally everyone's like, well, if you had the right person in charge, and like you finally have the right person.
It doesn't get righter.
As presidents go, it doesn't get righter.
And he can't do anything.
I mean, he could do things like that.
He does things by not being, but by not being the right person anymore would be the ways that he would.
So it's like this kind of interesting, this is what you all claim we need to do is get the zero bicycle riding guy.
Anyway.
Yeah.
It's the, it's the, like everybody loves, like, I think one of the things that endears a lot of people to Bernie Sanders, you see a picture of him in his house, and he's got like the chair with crap stacked on it, which you never see a politician have.
And it's like, oh, he's a human being.
He's at least a person.
And maybe if a person was president, things would be better.
And some things are.
I think the left, and especially this new Republic article, goes too hard against him.
For one thing, it's interesting.
I've talked a lot about what the kind of liberal and centrist sources leave out when they're reporting on this.
The New Republic, as they're critiquing him, and we're going to read more critiques, doesn't note that unemployment dropped by half under him.
And maybe that's, maybe they're being fair that, like, well, that was, there was, it was an economic boom.
You know, he doesn't get credit for like everything.
There's every time there's good stuff that happens, it's like, well, but he shouldn't get credit for that or this.
But it's like, well, I think you're going a little far here.
But still, they have other trenchant critiques that I'm going to continue to read.
So the progressives and leftists interviewed by the new republic have two main arguments.
Mujika accomplished few of his actual policy goals.
And while he both lived very consistently to his values and he said wonderful things about anti-consumerism, the horrors of capitalism, he didn't stop them and he didn't try to stop them in particular.
The article quotes a journalist Mauricio Rebuffetti.
I agree with absolutely everything Mujica has to say about materialism, he told me.
I believe inequality and consumerism are damaging to society.
It was exciting and fascinating to me then that this man became our president, but he has done nothing.
He later added, he's always saying he's a fighter.
He's a fighter.
So his failure is something that's very hard to understand and hard to forgive.
And they critique him by pointing out like how much, how many more designers stores there are in Montevideo, how much the fact that inequality has grown, the fact that people are increasingly obsessed with like Western like consumerist things, electronics and all this stuff.
I'm like, he didn't stop that.
And it's like, yeah, he didn't.
How could he have?
Because it is like, yes, it is fair to say it's frustrating that this guy maybe didn't destroy the system when he talked about how the system clearly didn't need to keep existing.
But also like, what was he supposed to do?
And this is, I think, one of the things, if you're going to be really fair, you have to note, he was elected president at age 74 after 14 years in prison and getting shot six times.
And I kind of think part of his attitude is like, yeah, there's a bunch of shit, fucked up shit that I'm not going to be able to fix or do anything about.
And I will talk about it as if it's bad and then I will engage with the system because I am too old to be a guerrilla and I'm going to try to help people.
And you can feel about that the way you want.
You know, it's a compromise for sure.
And it's a compromise made by a man who did uncompromising things for a very long time.
Yeah, and I'm like, like I said, not in a good place to lay any judgment on decisions that this man makes.
I think we can analyze it while saying, like, I would be willing to bet that virtually no one could go through what he did and not have his outcome be the best case scenario.
Yeah.
Like that, that's kind of where I land on this.
And for where it, what it's worth, Mujika addresses the fact that like, yeah, he didn't destroy CAT, he didn't stop consumerism.
He talks about that a lot.
He talks about the, he, like, very openly in interviews will address kind of the inconsistencies with his beliefs and what he's doing as president.
And I'm going to quote from that Guardian article again.
Quote, the man who, inspired by Guevara, once blew up factories owned by foreigners now offers them tax breaks.
I need capitalism to work because I have to levy taxes to attend to the serious problems we have.
Trying to overcome it all too abruptly condemns the people you are fighting to suffering so that instead of more bread, you have less bread.
And he's like, he talks about like, you know, because he's like, he's been in a bunch of photos with Hugo Chavez and stuff.
And he's like, but also Venezuela's system doesn't work very well.
And I don't think the U.S. system works very well either.
I'm just trying to like, I'm not, I was not elected to overthrow the government and destroy the system as it exists and build a new one.
And I'm too old and tired to do it.
So I'm just trying to help people have more bread because I feel like that's all I can do.
Not all the tupamaros have accompanied Mujika on his journey to soft pragmatic socialism.
They left their ideals in their prison cells.
The former hostage George Zabalza proclaimed recently.
Some old campaneros won't understand, Mujica said.
They don't see our battle against people's everyday problems, that life is not a utopia.
And that's interesting.
So there are former tupamaros who are like, you fucking, you sold out, you know?
Like, we were supposed to overthrow the state and you became part of it.
And you are willingly working with the capitalists, working with the conservatives.
And like, that was never the plan.
And Mujica's response is, and that is a fair criticism.
That is what happened, right?
You can morally land wherever you want on that.
That is objectively what happened.
And Mujika's, I guess, moral defense is like, yeah, that's true.
And I get why you're angry, but I think I can help people.
And we're not living in a utopian situation.
So I'm going to, I'm going to plow the shit, you know?
I think that's kind of his attitude.
And again, there's a number of ways to feel about that.
I'm not going to tell you how to feel about that.
I don't know how I entirely feel.
Like, it's a complicated issue, but he's not, he's not denying the inconsistencies.
He's not pretending that he's the same.
He is acknowledging, like, yeah, I kind of sold out because I thought I could do these good things.
And I, I do, you have to respect that to some extent, I think.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, it's, it's a, I can see it.
It's like, it's one of those things where it's like, I, I don't, I don't imagine that's like what I would hope for someone, right?
The Catholic Leftist Paradox00:10:19
Yeah.
Um, but I, I can see it, and it's a lot more interesting to me than the people who sell out by, I don't know, just entirely abandoning their values.
Yeah, like the Kristen Cinema, where you're like in black block at the WTO protests in 2008 and then voting for austerity with Joe Manchin.
Yeah.
Yeah.
He doesn't, he doesn't do that.
Um, it's a perfect.
And you know who else doesn't vote with Joe Manchin?
Oh, oh, gosh.
Some of the products and services that I was going to say, can you really verify that?
Some of the products and services supporting our podcast do not vote alongside Joe Manchin.
And that's about as good as you're going to get, guys.
Look, come on.
Lex's not a utopian.
He's just a real person.
I thought Joe Manchin was like Joe the Plumber.
Yeah.
Joe who lives in a mansion.
It took me a few years.
Joe Manchin.
That was very funny.
It is funny that like one of the men repeatedly holding back any attempts to address inequality in the United States is you could you could call him Joe Manchin.
That is kind of funny.
I didn't think about that.
All right.
On a recent episode of the podcast Money and Wealth with John O'Brien, I sit down with Tiffany the Budgeta Alicia to talk about what it really takes to take control of your money.
What would that look like in our families if everyone was able to pass on wealth to the people when they're no longer here?
We break down budgeting, financial discipline, and how to build real wealth, starting with the mindset shifts too many of us were never ever taught.
Financial education is not always about like, I'm going to get rich.
That's great.
It's about creating an atmosphere for you to be able to take care of yourself and leave a strong financial legacy for your family.
If you've ever felt you didn't get the memo on money, this conversation is for you to hear more.
Listen to Money and Wealth with John O'Brien from the Black Effect Network on the IHART Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
I went and sat on the little ottoman in front of him.
Hi, Dad.
And just when I said that, my mom comes out of the kitchen and she says, I have some cookies and milk.
There's this badass convict.
Right.
Just finished five years.
I'm going to have cookies and milk come on.
On the Ceno Show podcast, each episode invites you into a raw, unfiltered conversations about recovery, resilience, and redemption.
On a recent episode, I sit down with actor cultural icon Danny Trail to talk about addiction, transformation, and the power of second chances.
The entire season two is now available to binge, featuring powerful conversations with guests like Tiffany Addish, Johnny Knoxville, and more.
I'm an alcoholic.
I'm a guy.
Open your free iHeartRadio app, search the CITO show.
And listen now.
I feel like it was a little bit unbelievable until I really start making money.
It's Financial Literacy Month, and the podcast Eating Wall Broke is bringing real conversations about money, growth, and building your future.
This month, hear from top streamer Zoe Spencer and venture capitalist Lakeisha Landrum Pierre as they share their journeys from starting out to leveling up.
If I'm outside with my parents and they see all these people come up to me for a pitch, it's like, what?
Today now, obviously, it's like 100%.
They believe everything.
But at first, it was just like, you got to go get a real job.
There's an economic component to communities thriving.
If there's not enough money and entrepreneurship happening in communities, they fail.
And what I mean by fail is they don't have money to pay for food.
They cannot feed their kids.
They do not have homes.
Communities don't work unless there's money flowing through them.
Listen to Eating Wild Broke from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
When you listen to podcasts about AI and tech and the future of humanity, the hosts always act like they know what they're talking about and they are experts at everything.
Here at the Nick Dick and Pole show, we're not afraid to make mistakes.
What Koogler did that I think was so unique, he's the writer director.
Who do you think he is?
I don't know.
You meet the like the president?
You think it goes a president?
You think Canada has a president?
You think China has a president?
Lozla cruzette.
God, I love that thing.
I use it all the time.
I wrap it in a blanket and sing to it.
It's like the old Polish saying, not my monkeys, not my circus.
Yep.
It was a good one.
I like that saying.
It is an actual Polish saying, it is an actual Polish saying.
A better version of play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Yes.
Which, by the way, wasn't Taylor Swift who said that for the first time.
I actually, I thought it was.
I got that wrong.
Listen to the Nick Dick and Paul Show on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Oh, we're back.
So continuing, because we have actually a bit more kind of grinding through the different sides of how to look at this man to get through, because I think he's fascinating.
And I think what he represents is fascinating.
And I think it's incredibly important for leftists, especially leftists who like dream of some sort of revolution, to engage with the Tupa Morrows and Mujika and the journey that they went on.
I think that's there's tremendous, it's tremendously important to at least try to understand it and come to your own conclusions about it because it's not a common situation and I think very worth studying as a result of that.
I'm going to quote, read another quote from a little bit later in that same article.
Globalization's glaring failure, Mujika said, is a lack of political oversight.
It is bad because it is only governed by the market.
It has no politics or government.
National governments are only worried about their next elections, but there are a series of global problems that no one deals with.
That does not mean capitalism has won outright.
I don't think it's inevitable that the world should live in capitalism, he told me.
That is the same as not believing in man, and man is an animal with many defects, but also with many startling capabilities.
He's an interesting guy.
Yeah.
That New Republic article critical of Mujika saves its most trenchant criticism of the man for a passage in which it lays out the achievements of his predecessor, Vasquez, who also followed Mujika.
So you can't do one term after the other as president.
Vasquez is the president before Mujika and the president after.
I'm going to read a quote about him.
And I think the new Republic, I don't know.
Catholic leftist.
Yeah, the Catholic leftist.
I don't know generally.
I'm not super up on the New Republic.
I think they're a little bit more state socialist kind of authority driven than I am.
That's my impression.
Yeah, but I'm not trying to.
Yeah.
You get that in this quote because they are critiquing him for the things that we've laid out.
You can read that.
It's a good article.
You should read it.
I don't agree with everything in it, but it's a good article.
And they contrast his failure to overcome a lot of gridlock with this guy, Vasquez.
Quote, in fact, there is a politician in Uruguay who accomplished some of the same kinds of goals people hoped Mujica could tackle.
His name is Tabarre Vasquez, an oncologist.
He preceded Mujica as president and will succeed him again come March.
In 2005, he inaugurated the first left-wing government since the country's dictatorship and took great strides towards restoring the Uruguayan social safety net, rebooting Bazé's national health care system, expanding welfare, and making Uruguay the first nation in the world to fully implement the one laptop per child program.
He managed these successes thanks to a political persona as authoritarian and charmless as Mujika's were gayly anarchic and alluring.
With a rough of silver hair, basset hound eyes, and a smile just on the wrong side of lascivious, Vasquez exudes the unsettling aura of a Mr. Rogers impersonator who performs in porn.
He rarely consults others on political decisions and projects arrogance in his certitude.
Faced with the same constraints all modern presidents face with their power, he just goes around them.
When Vasquez decided to ban smoking in public buildings, something that was really important for him as an oncologist, Rebufferi, the journalist said, he didn't involve Congress at first.
Instead, he used Uruguay's version of an executive order.
The unilateral move prompted a flurry of outrage about personal liberties, and the Uruguayan legislature could have subsequently overturned it.
But ultimately, the policy established a new status quo that its opponents decided they didn't want to waste time and political capital to fight.
So again, it's, you know, I think there's that's that's again, not you can think about that whatever you want.
I think it's probably factually a broadly accurate statement, and I get why, I get why that is a criticism.
And it's probably worth saying that like, yes, an authoritarian as president will get more done than a guy who's kind of more egalitarian and consensus driven, you know?
Obviously.
And there's good things about that and bad things about that in part because like I, you know, maybe this guy Vasquez, the executive order use and stuff that sets a precedent that can be bad when the conservatives get back into power.
And they got back into power in 2020.
So like, you know, it's never, none of this is simple, you know?
It's also worth noting that like this article doesn't note that Vasquez vetoed a gay marriage bill and that that was something that happened because Pepe was in power.
Because he's an authoritarian.
And also he believes that he should be able to do what he wants.
Yeah.
And like, you know, it's like, I don't want my government to dom me, you know?
But it's all, I think maybe if you want to engage with it even a little more nuanced, and again, this is just something that maybe this is partially the case that like if you're trying to change society, maybe it helps to have people who are broadly politically aligned and have an authoritarian and then a guy who's not authoritarian and kind of like so that you're not trending too hard in that direction and you can then like Pepe is better at building social consensus.
Ratcheting Systems and Authoritarianism00:03:37
I don't know.
Maybe that's accurate.
Maybe that's not.
It strikes me there's a benefit from Vasquez going to Pepe afterwards, like certainly within the matter of gay rights and some other issues.
It's a different ratcheting system.
Yeah.
In the U.S., we have a rightward ratcheting system where the Republicans push things to the right and the Democrats don't do shit.
And then I could I could see.
Yeah, I don't know.
I don't think anyone does know, but I think that's something to maybe consider.
It doesn't seem to be worse than the way things have been going in the United States.
No.
Like, if I'm comparing it to my government, this sounds all right, you know, by comparison.
This, this, like, method of things is like, well, that, that's okay, you know?
Right.
I wouldn't, I would have probably, I would definitely have more critiques were I living in Montevideo.
Um, but that's always the case.
Uh, yeah.
Um, and I will note that, like, in fairness to the author of that new Republic piece, in addition to being coming down very much on the sort of critical of Pepe, Vasquez was a better president.
He also does some work in this article that I don't think a lesser journalist would have done in his position.
Um, because he actually went and spent a lot of time in like cripplingly poor neighborhoods in Uruguay after talking to these like leftists.
And again, the guys that we've been quoting from so far, these journalists and these, like, I think they're mostly like middle class kind of and upper like leftist sort of thought leaders.
And he also spends time among the very poor.
And what they tell this guy is very different from what kind of the activists he talked to told him.
Quote, Of course, he understands us better, Almiron said, blinking perplexedly, as if my question itself, whether Mujica had been good for the poor, was not even worth asking.
She'd received me in a dark but startlingly pretty ante-room in the shack she'd built, its floorboards mere planks over the slum's oft-liquid earth.
Eagerly, she showed me paintings she'd done on the shack's walls, stylized fairy images reminiscent of Tinkerbell, and the new wardrobe and table in her bedroom.
The wardrobe she'd recently been given through a work-for-housing program sponsored by Mujika's government, the table she'd subsequently made on her own.
She gave Mujika credit for both interventions.
Living in elective poverty himself, he appreciates the importance of something seemingly as simple as a clean place to keep one's clothes.
Once, Mujika had come to visit the neighborhood and seen Almiron's shack.
He'd asked her a question that had stuck with her ever since, affecting how she thought of herself and her five boys and girls.
Does every child of yours have a mattress of his own?
Almoron had never considered this.
She works at a slaughterhouse and has barely enough to get by.
But, she explained, Mujika thinks every kid has the right to privacy with his own fantasies.
She had started saving for those beds.
The policymakers and opinion setters I'd spoken to had been so spittingly certain that Mujika's presidency had failed Uruguay's poor.
And four teachers I spoke with who work with them directly believe the opposite.
I spent a couple of days touring lower-income schools and neighborhoods, and the view of Mujica I encountered was as different as the view of a city from the street level versus looking down from atop a skyscraper.
Everyone, without exception, believed Mujica had improved their lives.
Seeing a man who looked like them and lived like them, who even invited them to barbecues at his commune, occupying the land's highest office, had made them feel human again.
By noticing them, by speaking to them rather than about them, Mujika had reincarnated them.
We are a poor people, Almiron told me with a note of defiance, but we are people at the end of the day.
Yeah, fuck yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Guantanamo Lessons Learned00:08:13
So I'm pretty pro this guy.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No, I, I, I mean, it's interesting because, yeah, if most of the critiques coming from the left are, oh, you're not good enough at wielding institutional power.
And his whole thing is seems to be a little bit like, that's not the thing he's trying to accomplish is wielding institutional power.
That's it's fucking interesting.
It's very interesting.
And I really recommend some of the studies and articles that I've attached to this.
Like, he's a fascinating person.
And like what his journey says about everything about like radical politics is, I think, really important to understand.
And I also should note, he took a bunch of people from Guantanamo Bay and like welcomed them into Uruguay so that they wouldn't have to be in Guantanamo anymore because they were people who like didn't have a state that was willing to take them.
And then he went on a long rant about U.S. torture and how like these people have like you destroyed these people for nothing.
And like this is fucked up.
And wasn't just like talking about how bad Guantanamo was, but was like, yeah, of course my country will take some of these people.
Bring them here.
I killed Dan the Strangler.
Of course I did.
Yeah, I killed Dan the Strangler.
Of course I'm going to take prisoners from Guantanamo.
Do you know me?
Again, that's the thing like.
Again, I hope nothing we've come across in talking about the criticism of him is dismissive of those criticisms.
I don't agree with all of them.
And I think the thing that is most admirable about him is that, number one, he never pretends to be perfect or entirely ideologically consistent.
And neither were the two Pomaros, you know?
But he's like, he is pretty ideologically consistent.
Like he's not just going to talk about the plight of single mothers.
He's going to give them all of his money.
He's not just going to talk about how Guantanamo is bad.
He's going to make his country take people from Guantanamo and rehome them.
He's pretty good at that kind of shit.
Yeah, he follows his ethical guidelines instead of ideological guidelines.
And that's kind of interesting to me.
Yeah.
And I've read some quotes about the Tupamaros now, because especially in 2020, like a more conservative government was elected.
There's a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen to the education system.
I'm not getting into that as much as I just got up to speed on the broad strokes of Uruguayan political history.
I don't want to pretend to be any kind of an expert.
But I've read some quotes about the Tupamaros where it's like, yes, they're in politics now.
They also still have guns.
And they're like, they're flexible.
They're ready to go back.
If they have to, they'll go back and like do the thing that they were doing.
Like, you know, they, they're not, they, they, they're never like, we're 100% for electoralism.
Just like when they were terrorists, they're never, they weren't 100% for terrorism.
Like they're real good at kind of flowing and making ethical exceptions and stuff, which I think makes them very interesting to me.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No, that's.
Yeah, I had no idea what to expect with any of this.
So this is.
Yeah.
I think it's broadly, again, Uruguay still has plenty of problems.
This is an ongoing story.
But I think the sweep, why this is a Christmas non-bastards episode, is the sweep of this history is a pretty, inspiring may not be exactly the right word, but like hopeful.
Yeah.
Because it's actually slow work to change society.
And people think it's slow work, like seize power and then excuse the fact that you've taken power.
Well, of course, it takes forever.
We have to hold on to power.
But instead, the like slow work of like just trying to be good in all of the situations that you've put yourself into and realizing that what it means to be good by your own standards might change depending on sometimes it means there's, you know, sometimes it means robbing people.
Yeah, sometimes it may mean assassinating a CIA torturer.
Sometimes it may mean giving documents you stole to a prosecutor who you trust agrees with you on that single issue at least.
You know, like that's what they did.
Yeah.
And it's, it's, uh, it's complicated.
Again, like you should feel about this however you feel about this, but maybe think about it because it's, it's, there's some stuff in here that's worth thinking about.
Like, yeah.
I think for the left trying to find its way at this present point in time where things are very scattered and fragmented in ugly, sharp ways.
And there's a lot of ideological infighting at a time when we're all kind of staring extermination in the face.
These are probably some people to look at and be like, well, maybe we should learn some stuff from them, right?
Not that you should ever just say whole hog, these guys were perfect and we'll do exactly what they did.
But like, let's let's maybe learn some lessons here because I think there are some lessons here, right?
Yeah, well, one of the lessons is no one ever knows whether or not violent revolution is going to make things better or worse.
It seems including including both mass huge uprisings and like targeted assassinations.
It's a total crap.
It's a complete fucking roll of the dice.
And anyone who pretends otherwise is probably dangerously unhinged.
Yeah, right.
Yeah.
Like anyone who pretends this will obviously happen if we do this is a lunatic and you should be scared of them.
You know?
But yeah, I don't know.
Cool dude.
I think Hussein Miuki, as an individual person, he's like my favorite of our people since probably Wallenberg because he's just, he's very authentic.
He's very caring to all of the people around him.
And I think that's good.
He's authentic.
I think he's a nice man.
Yeah.
And my God, do I love the idea of a president who bicycles to work wearing socks and sandals?
And it's like, and I want to be around authentic people more than I even specifically want to be around people who agree with everything that I'm saying or do, because then you can actually model your decisions based on, well, I expect this person to be morally consistent to their own values.
Not to my values, but to their values.
Yeah.
You know, like, yeah.
No, that's fuck yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right.
Well, that's uh, that's behind the bastards.
Um, have a Merry Christmas.
Have a happy new year.
Um, have a dancing tet.
I don't, I don't know enough about tet, but have a good one of that too.
If if uh you're in Vietnam, you know, have have a good whatever holiday is your next holiday that you're looking forward to.
Enjoy it.
Um, yep.
Oh, wait.
Shit.
I forgot to ask you to plug your pluggables, Margaret.
You got any pluggables to plug?
Yeah.
Um, you can find me on the internet.
I'm on Twitter at Magpie Killjoy.
I'm on Instagram at Margaret Killjoy.
And I have a new book.
It's actually an old book re-released called A Country of Ghosts that just came out that answers the question of, well, it presents one of the many, many different answers to the question of what could a society without authority look like and how could it function.
And but more than that, it's actually just a story about going to go fight people and fun plot things and an adventure.
Excellent.
Yeah.
And it is great.
And also a good companion to this piece.
Because this is, I mean, this actually happened, but it is kind of one way of imagining what happens when anarchists get some of their way.
Little bits of it, pieces of it.
I don't know.
Doorbell just rang.
Oh, okay.
Well, you go do that and everybody else go home.
You're drunk.
Hi.
I actually drop better when I'm high.
It heightens my senses, calms me down.
If anything, I'm more careful.
Honestly, it just helps me focus.
That's probably what the driver who killed a four-year-old told himself.
Driving Change Through Focus00:02:14
And now he's in prison.
You see, no matter what you tell yourself, if you feel different, you drive different.
So if you're high, just don't drive.
Brought to you by Nitza and the Ad Council.
Today's Financial Literacy Month.
We are talking about the one investment most people ignore: building a business around the life you actually want.
It was just us making happen whatever he said was going to happen and then it happened.
On those amigos, entrepreneurs like Amira Kasam and Joe Hoff get real about money, taking risk, and while you're dreaming, might be the smartest move.
At the end of my life, what am I really going to care about?
And the conclusion I came to is what I did to make the world a better place in whatever way.
Listen to those amigos on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
Now, everybody over here?
Oh, it's one of my other favorite places.
The Twilight Gazebo.
Sunset Gardens.
Twilight Gazebo.
What's next?
Dead Man's Grove?
Mom, could you please try to be a little bit positive about this?
From Kenya Barris, the visionary creator of Blackish, comes Big Age, an Audible original about finding your way in life's next chapter.
This audio comedy series follows a retired couple's reluctant relocation to Sunset Gardens, a flirting senior community that is anything but relaxing.
Starring comedy legends Jennifer Lewis, Cedric the Entertainer, and Nici Nash Betz.
Through its blend of outrageous comedy, Key Party Anyone, and Touching Revelations, Big Age explores what it means to grow older without growing old at heart.
Go to audible.com slash Big Age series to start listening today.
I'm Kristen Davis, host of the podcast, Are You a Charlotte?
In 1998, my life was forever changed when I took on the role of Charlotte York on a new show called Sex in the City.
Now I get to sit down with some of my favorite people and relive all of the incredible moments this show brought us on and off the screen.
Listen to Are You a Charlotte on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.