They call him names, cite bizarre statements, and harp about his Russia collusion.
But why focus on sticks and stones, sudden firings, criminal investigations, and bizarre statements that have world leaders scratching their heads, when there's some real scores to settle?
Why does the media ignore Trump's criminal actions in Syria?
Well, that's good for Israel, and the Jewish-owned mainstream media has no beef about that.
There's about as much conflict of interest in the media as there is in Congress these days.
And what about the rider in Trump's tax plan that pushes through oil drilling in the Arctic?
Where is the outrage?
Hastily wrecking vast expanses in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be a huge cause for alarm.
These are genuine gripes against Trump, not his hair, and certainly not his alleged Russia collusion.
How about Trump's flip-flop on gun control?
Don't worry about bump stock.
We're getting rid of it. I mean, you don't have to complicate the bill by adding another two paragraphs.
We're getting rid of it. I'll do that myself.
With a little help from Dianne Feinstein, whose mission creep will strip the goys of all their guns.
Trump once blasted opponents of gun rights, like Feinstein, who used scary-sounding words like assault rifles and military-style weapons.
But lately, Trump tweeted, quote, We will ban all devices that turn legal weapons into illegal machine guns, unquote.
Looks like Trump's now using scary-sounding words himself.
Yet the only thing scarier is when Trump and Feinstein, who is the antithesis of Trump, actually agree, especially when it comes to disarming Americans.
So Senator Murphy and I and 46 Senate colleagues on a bipartisan basis have what we think is a start.
It's not the end-all be-all.
There's other things that people want to add to it.
You talked about the bump stock issue that Senator Feinstein I know cares passionately about.
And I'm going to write that out.
Because we can do that with an executive order.
America first or Feinstein first?
Banning bump stocks is only a first start, too.
Bump fire can actually be achieved without even using a bump stock.
So, what would Trump be banning?
Too many bullets?
Will he install a timer on every trigger, limiting how quickly a gun can be fired?
Criminals would love that one.
Will Trump ban the physics of a gun?
We'll have to ban all guns for that, and that's exactly what Feinstein and Tribe want.
The downshot is that banning bump stock sets a broad and dangerous precedent that could be used to eradicate the Second Amendment completely.
Mission creep is the bullet in Trump and Feinstein's anti-gun push.
The media only pretends to hate Trump.
Why else do they sweep real grievances under the rug?