Blood Money episode 69 - Family Law is a Genocide Machine
|
Time
Text
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a commentary on this. I'm going to be talking about the game, and then I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game. So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
So, I'm going to be doing a little bit of a review of the game.
1969.
Family law is a genocide machine.
Alright, welcome to the latest episode of Blood Money.
Alright, welcome to the latest episode of Blood Money.
For this episode of Blood Money, we're gonna do something a little bit different.
We like doing things a little differently once in a while here on Blood Money.
So for those that don't know, the Blood Money podcast was started off the heels of a documentary series called America Happens, hence the name of our platform, americahappens.com.
So during this episode of Blood Money, we're gonna show you five different pieces that have been produced by America Happens.
It's essentially five different episodes or segments, I guess you could call it.
And the theme of this episode is called Family Law is a Genocide Machine.
For those that have been following what we're doing on Blood Money in America Happens, the family law industry is definitely one of the themes that we touch upon all the time because, frankly, it is so destructive.
It is one of the reasons why the family structures in the United States and the West have been falling apart.
This is a problem not only in the United States, but in countries like Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, Where, frankly, you have this completely lawless family law industry, doesn't believe in due process, a place where false accusations are held up as if they're real, and it really is a completely destructive mechanism that exists within our society.
For those that wonder why America and the West are falling apart, I think this episode is going to enlighten you.
I think it's going to give you some clues to why that's happening.
This is not going to be a pleasant episode of Blood Money.
These five segments that we have, at least a few of them, are pretty hardcore, but they're also enlightening.
They will open your eyes to the issues that exist in our country and what's happening with our country.
Why are countries falling apart?
and one of the core issues is that you know whether you like it or not this is a fact there is a war against men and fathers right and what i know about this topic is the first step of any genocide i've known this since i was a kid because i come from armenian and greek ancestry both Both cultures, both societies, both races suffered through genocide because they were Christian, right?
And the first thing that the people that were committing genocide, in this case, the Ottoman Empire, the Ottoman Turks, the first thing that they did on April 24, 1915 is they rounded up all the men.
They rounded up all the men and they killed all the men because unlike the movies if you want to destroy a country if you want to destroy a culture you destroy the men first because once the men are gone you could pretty much bowl over the rest of the population and like I said it's not like the movies you know there's a lot of tough chicks out there great but like the reality is when these kind of things like genocide happen when these kind of things like invasion happen you need the men And so the Ottoman Turks,
the first thing they did is they rounded up all the Armenian men and, you know, put them out to death.
And then it was basically easy to murder one and a half million Christian Armenians in the Ottoman Empire.
And not to mention probably another million Greeks who were also Christians.
So yeah. Now, in this episode, there are individuals you're going to see, like names you're going to see, like El-Avi-Dawi.
El-Avi-Dawi from the United Kingdom, who was in jail for eight years.
Eight years because he violated the gag order and spoke out about corruption in family law, especially corruption in his case, where for no legitimate reason, there's a dad that hasn't had any issues in terms of being a danger to his children.
So without any legitimate reason, his kids were held away from him.
And the point that I like to make here is that these are acts of terrorism.
These are crimes against humanity, right?
And that's not an emotional statement.
That's actually, if you go to the ICC, International Criminal Courts, Kidnapping is a crime against humanity.
Keeping somebody away, you know, from their kids, kidnapping, alienation, crime against humanity, terrorism.
This is the legal definition, right?
These are the legal definitions, right?
You will see the name of Cash Jackson, who was kept away from his children for years, when he was not a harm to his children.
So he wanted to see his kids, and he went to court, and the judge...
That was up there was the brother of his political opponent.
Cash Jackson was running for office and the brother of his political opponent was the judge.
And the judge could have recused himself.
He could have done that because it is a conflict of interest.
He has to recuse himself in that kind of a situation.
But rather than recusing himself, what he really did is he made Cash Jackson's life hell.
And for years, Cash Jackson basically was a victim of crimes against humanity, terrorism, not being able to see his own children, right?
If this was Al-Qaeda that was kidnapping your kids, if this was, you know, like some kind of a group kidnapping your kids, you would say these are crimes against humanity and terrorism, right?
But that's not, you know, what the court called it.
And in fact, they inflicted crimes against humanity and terrorism against Cash Jackson.
And after a while, Cash Jackson basically threatened the lives of the judges in a recording.
And for that, he was taken into custody where he didn't see due process.
And while he was in custody for a prolonged period of time, not seeing due process, his best friend died of pancreatic cancer, Ted Bush, also somebody that was alienated from his kids.
And one would wonder, you know, why are all these parents dying of cancer, alienated parents like Ted Bush dying of cancer?
Question the stress that one deals with in those kind of situations.
Literally, terror and crimes against humanity inflicted upon one's life, their children taken away for no reason.
And I'm sure that does a number on your health.
And I've seen Cash Jackson in the last three years One and a half of which he has spent in prison, most of which he saw no due process.
I've seen this man age 25 years in the last three years, right?
His mother also passed away.
So while he's in prison, his mother and best friend passed away.
They didn't allow him to see his mother and his best friend on their deathbeds, right?
And after all of this, he was offered a plea deal.
He was offered a plea deal to basically do two years in prison after which he would be released.
He's already done one and a half years, so he took the plea deal after his mom died.
Because frankly, you know, they did their best to break Cash.
And I don't know if they did, but they definitely took a big chunk out of him, inflicted terror and crimes against humanity against Cash Jackson.
So, you're going to see a lot of other people like this, you know, that have been going through the tortures, the terrorism, the crimes against humanity of being involved with these corrupt courts, corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers that profess to do things in the better interest of the child, but what they're doing is really better interest of their pockets, better interest of their pockets.
The family law world for those that are following is filled with kidnapping, acts of terror, crimes against humanity, destroying people's lives, suicides.
I mean, I've heard up to 40 suicides a week happen because of alienated parents that aren't able to see their children.
Even one is too much.
Even one is too much, but this happens all the time.
So the five pieces within this piece, everything's timestamped.
So you'll actually see the timestamp saying when each piece is supposed to end.
Just in case you've seen some of these pieces before, you could fast forward to the next piece.
So the first episode that you're about to see in this five This piece sequence is called, it's from the America Happens documentary series, episode number seven, called Family Law is a Genocide Machine, which this episode of Blood Money is also called.
This is a 13-minute piece.
This was filmed in the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom.
But identical things are happening in the United States, Canada, and Australia.
It's pretty much the exact same thing.
You could change these accents to an American accent and it's pretty much the same garbage happening over here in terms of what these repugnant family courts are doing to parents.
The second piece is Blood Money Episode 1, the first episode, which reveals how British Intelligence Services, MI5, basically are targeting parents and threatening them with essentially terrorism charges, which is very convenient, by the way, because when you charge somebody with terrorism, they don't have due process, right?
And so, you know, these things like the Patriot Act and the equivalent of India We thought they're going to be used for real terrorists that are trying to blow up stuff.
No, they're being used on parents to silence them from talking about family law corruption.
Because as you'll hear in this episode, these MI5 agents say that JJ, the individual that we interviewed about what happened to him, was a national threat because he was speaking out about family law corruption.
Because, you know, God forbid that people realize that their own government is kidnapping and trafficking children for money, kidnapping them from good parents, literally stealing children.
God forbid that they see him.
Yes, it is a national threat because people find out this is happening, they might actually do something and stop this corrupt, evil, repugnant abuse of the law.
The third piece, and this won't call this an episode because it's a short video, but it basically exposes how there are government incentives for judges and lawyers to be corrupt, to actually kidnap children and commit crimes against humanity, acts of terrorism against Isn't that nice? So this gentleman in this very short video, I think it's two or three minutes long, explains how that works, how there's actually government incentives to destroy families and children.
The fourth piece, which is an episode, is a 30-minute documentary, also produced by AmericaHappens.com, called The Godfather of Family Law, about family law attorney Marsha Willick of Nevada.
And this piece exposes how corrupt judges and family law attorneys work together, essentially to commit crimes within the court, and they cover up their nonsense, right?
And why would they do that?
The fifth episode you're about to see is a poem by Cash Jackson, read during his confinement in Illinois, where he's been in jail for the last year and a half.
This piece is 13 minutes long and really exposes the heart of the disaster that is family law and the corruption, the terrorism, the crime against humanity that they inflict upon people and what this does to people.
Basically a suicide machine.
That's why this is called Family Law is a Genocide Machine.
This is Van Miller and this is America Happens.
I really felt that the family court was a place that should be open to the press.
Yeah. Because it was sort of the dumping ground for morons and political hacks.
Stars aren't the people you see on the TV screen.
Stars are the people fighting against all odds against tyranny and oppression.
Billy O'Connor was raised on the rough streets of working class London.
He is a construction worker by trade who is taking on the most corrupt and repugnant institution in the Western world, the family law industry, which has become a genocide machine, where children are stolen and trafficked and sold, with heartbroken parents who've had their children stolen, committing suicide at an alarming rate, with an entire industry of corruptible social workers and criminal corporate family court judges operating in complete secrecy, without a jury in the secret court.
I tell people, I tell my son-in-law, I actually see another parent who's lost their life to night before, because they can't take what you've done to them.
Ritchie Rooney, by all reports, was a great mother that looked after her son with much love and care. But then social workers entered her life.
She took the child away from her and so began a two-year battle for her to win her child back from the family courts.
After two years of fighting, she was notified that her son would be put up for forced adoption and soon after, unable to deal with the unbearable pain, she took her own life.
It happens on a daily basis.
There are people that have their children taken from them for no valid reason.
From lies. Because there's a large pot of money.
Each child that is taken, there's a revenue of 30,000 pounds.
It's a 60 billion dollar a year industry.
Built upon child abuse, trauma, death, destruction and the genocide of families and children.
You are robbing children from their parents, their right to know their family.
That is what you are doing.
Every name on this dress is of a child that's been taken by social services for excuses like potential emotional future harm.
This idiotic law was created by none other than Tony Blair himself, for somebody who 86% of the UK public disapproves of.
So if you suffer domestic violence, they will use your previous domestic violence against you, saying potential future emotional harm, just as much as going to the local card reader and asking them what your future is.
What are the forms of corruption?
I read the report about myself.
Let's just say it didn't look like me and I looked a lot of sleep under it.
It's not just lies, it's the way they twist things.
If you've been in care, they will say potential future emotional harm.
So what is so wrong with our care system that you come out of care and they re-victimize us and our children?
I suffer from PTSD and the way they twist the dag is unreal.
Because I was in care, because I had a crappy child, you're going, you're going to be a crap parent, you're a crap parent.
Why do you suffer from PTSD? See, my brother died when I was a youngster.
I was 13 years old.
They will go to those children now.
Well, you were removed, so you had trauma, so you can't parent.
And it's a forever feeding cycle.
Don't use your trauma as a weakness to work their way into your family life.
I first learned about Billy Connor from videos of him as an activist, setting up his speakers in the most busy and affluent areas in London, England, to report the crimes against humanity happening in these family courts.
Can I get some people's attention, please?
Because I would like to raise some serious Every month, Billy O'Connor and a community of parents who've had their children stolen gather and they make a march from one side of central London to the other to the central family courthouse, intentionally walking through neighborhoods where the wealthy shop, with the speaker blaring the message about how highly criminal and corrupt the entire family law industry has become.
Save our children!
Open up the country courts!
Save our children!
Stop forced adoption!
Social services are now run by corporate business and they are stealing our children for billions of pounds a year.
On the adoption for a social worker, £2,000 or £4,000.
We researched the payment schemes for social workers and found that there has been leaks that show adoption targets being set for social workers, as well as market premium retention bonuses, welcome bonuses, multiple financial benefits, and a troubled families program,
where up to £4,000 is paid to identify and turn around troubled families, meaning ill-intentioned social workers have the financial incentive To fraudulently dub a family trouble using false allegations and fraudulent evidence in order to seek financial gain.
They took my grandchildren.
They lied. They used a pedophile social worker who was running a pedophile ring for 50 years.
And I'm thinking, oh man, all these parents can't be lying.
There's got to be some truth in what people are saying.
One minute they were there and the next minute they were gone.
And every one of them was saying, well, they've been manipulating it.
It's just it. To put them in a stronger position.
Thank you. Just in the last decade, tens of thousands of parents have committed suicide because of what the family law industry has done to their lives.
Charlotte Louise was targeted by social service workers with her child being taken away from her.
She fought through the family courts to be back in her child's life, and a day after she lost her battle in court, she took her own life by hanging herself.
This picture of her was drawn just a week before her suicide.
They know exactly what they're doing.
They don't take the children that are...
Just in the last decade, thousands of children have been murdered because of family law corruption.
Star Hobson, this lovely 16-month-old toddler, was the daughter of Jordan Hobson and Frankie Smith.
Through systematic corruption within social services and Bradford City Council, The star was cruelly taken from those who loved her, her father Jordan, and her grandfather Andrew Smith, as well as many other concerned family members, and she was put in the hands of her negligent mother Frankie Smith.
Frankie Smith began having a same-sex relationship with Savannah Brockhill, a 28-year-old bouncer and boxer.
Savannah Brockhill began abusing the child, Literally using this child as a punching bag.
And despite over at least five reports to social services in Bradford City Council, made by her great-grandfather and the babysitter Holly Jones, who had evidence in the form of videos and pictures that showed serious bruises on the body of the toddler, all these reports were ignored by Bradford City Council, as the mother Frankie Smith and her bouncer girlfriend claimed that the reports were made due to malicious discrimination against their same-sex relationship.
Bradford City Council, under the guidance of Mark Douglas, spent a measly one hour interviewing Frankie Smith and Savannah Brockhill about this abuse before dropping the case.
The child star Hobson during this meeting was so dazed that she ran into the couch, yet the social workers completely ignored the signs of abuse.
Rather than protect the child, social service workers accused the family of being malicious in making these reports of child abuse.
On the last day of this toddler's life, Star Hobson was beat so badly by Savannah Brockhill that a main artery ruptured in her body and she bled to death, while her mother Frankie Smith stood by and did nothing.
As the verdict was read, Savannah Brockhill smiled, and reports have been made that since then she has bragged about burying three more babies.
The grandfather of Star Hobson, Andrew Smith, took his own life after sending a card to his daughter's prison cell which read, You look after yourself, and I'll look after the baby.
They take children from families that have done nothing wrong.
You're supposed to protect children, but what you're actually doing is you're taking them away.
They're being killed within your care.
Children that are being brought up by families with good upbringing, those children are more desirable than the children that are wayward.
How many have died within your care?
Elsie Scully Hicks was taken from her biological family.
The biological grandmother of the toddlers had revealed that she fought hard to keep the little girl, and that there were many other loving members in the family that could have taken care of the child, including the grandparents, brothers, sisters, aunts, and uncles.
Rather, the social worker forced this unnecessary adoption to Craig Scully Hicks, and for eight months that Elsie lived with the couple, his husband Matthew Scully Hicks beat the child regularly.
Elsie needed medical treatment on numerous occasions while in the care of Matthew Scully Hicks.
In November 2015, the child was seen by a general practitioner as she could not bear weight on her leg.
An x-ray found that she had a fractured leg.
In December 2015, she suffered a large bruise on her forehead.
In May 2015, she was described as vomiting after falling through stair gates.
Despite the list of injuries, Scully Hicks' explanation that these were just accidents were accepted by health professionals who lacked professional curiosity.
Thirteen separate reports or more were made and eight different agencies were involved in these reports of abuse.
The social workers felt that Matthew Scully Hicks, the child's abuser, was well-educated and articulate.
Hence, they closed all investigations.
Elsie Scully-Hicks was murdered in May 2016 when she was only 18 months old.
No social workers have been disciplined or sacked over the mistakes because it was quote-unquote not appropriate.
And I couldn't believe what I'm finding out after looking in and digging in so deep.
They use us as the small people to build up their empire.
And all this is owned by hetero-bankers, people who have nothing to do with children.
It's all about the money.
I'm just in some protest that will actually have 12 of your peers sit there.
You've got nothing to hide.
You turn around and stand.
I have 12 of my peers saying, we have got to be going on to my family.
There's two children that have been murdered by family members in the last few weeks.
The Home Secretary has stood up in Parliament and made this the excuse for taking more children.
Arthur Hughes loved superheroes, watching soccer, and he loved reading.
He had an incredible smile and was loved by those who knew him.
But his stepmother and father tortured him, beat him, starved him, and deprived this beautiful boy of water while lacing the food with salt to make it uneatable.
His grandmother had raised concerns on many occasions about the multiple deep bruises on the child's back.
So had the school that Arthur went to.
However, social workers did nothing to stop the abuse to Arthur, despite being notified on at least four separate occasions about this abuse.
Social workers allowed Arthur to be systematically removed from the lives of those who loved and cared for him most, especially his grandmother, who had not seen the child for over a year by the time the child was murdered by his stepmother.
The following is some very disturbing audio of Arthur just hours before he was tortured to the point of murder by his stepmother.
Someone's gonna feed me!
Someone's gonna feed me!
Scum! Scum!
Scum! Scum! Scum on you!
Scum on you!
Sadly, there are many such stories across the Western world.
thousands of children murdered because of the negligence of social workers.
They are using these children for their agenda and are taking the children.
They're all corrupt.
They have been around everything, the generations, the type of people.
They are ready to learn the concerns of the world.
Tell me more. Tell your family about it.
It's all about the money.
How much longer is this fight going to go, Billy?
To the day I die. To the changes of the day I die.
My last breath. I met JJ just as he was about to have his three children taken away from him permanently to be forcefully adopted against their will.
JJ told me that he was a victim of domestic violence and he had made the mortal mistake of revealing to social services and his doctors that he was suffering from depression and PTSD as a result of this abuse.
Rather than helping him, social services set their sights on his three children.
And before JJ knew it, his children were taken from him and put up for forceful adoption.
I tried to get in touch with JJ after his children were taken and I couldn't find him for months.
Finally having found him in January 2022, he brought me up to speed on all that had happened since his children were stolen from him.
As you know we've been talking for a minute and most recently I sought you on Facebook and I couldn't find you, I couldn't find your page, I couldn't find your picture and knowing how down you were last time because your kids were stolen from you, I was actually worried that you had committed suicide.
I'm very happy that You didn't and we got in touch.
Tell me what's happened since we last spoke.
I was raided in the end of November by a special team of police who forced my door late at night, fully armed, 12 police officers sealed off the street, smashed into my home and threw me on the floor with guns pointing to me and my head. I was told to get on my knees. I complied with that and they handcuffed me and said I was arrested under the Terrorism Act. I was then rushed to
a South Wales police station, a high category police station where I was locked up for 48 hours and then I was then interviewed by military intelligence MI5 by two young military officers who said they were from MI5 and I said why am I here?
And they said that we believe that you are inciting terrorism.
I said, that's not actually correct.
I'm not inciting anything. Please expand on this.
And whilst I was being held without any legal counsel because I was being held in the Terrorism Act and I wasn't allowed any solicitor that was told that they could hold me indefinitely under the terrorism law without any sort of legal resignation, they bullied me.
So they went on to say about these groups that are constantly saying storming Parliament and ungrown concerns about my groups that I was heading up, political groups in relation to parents coming forward to go into Parliament to expose these people who are stealing our children and asked about a lot of the members on these Facebooks such as Billy O'Connor That are inciting
protests and they felt that was a real risk to the UK government that there might be some kind of terrorism act against Parliament or the Prime Minister or any MP. And I had grown concerns about parents speaking out about us, about children being taken.
So I said, well, am I being charged with anything?
They said, yes, you may be charged with inciting terrorism.
I said, how can you say I'm inciting terrorism?
I have freedom of speech.
They said, there's no such a freedom of speech when it comes to people storming Parliament.
And we were real concerned that an act of terrorism will happen.
And we believe because of these groups, support groups, Groups that your so-called calling support groups are gathering thousands of parents who are at risk that something may happen.
So you're inciting and as a result we're investigating you.
I said, well, you can investigate all you want.
So they asked me in relation to these groups that I'm a moderator on or admin.
They interviewed me for 24 hours without any food or sleep.
They were ruthless to me, without medication.
In the meantime, whilst I was being interviewed, I was constantly embarrassed.
I was put down. They said, would you come?
Look, we can make things easier.
You can come and, you know, work for us and, you know, be a confidential informant.
I said, it's not going to fucking happen.
It's not going to fucking happen.
I said, the day that I had been informant for this government or MI5, you can fuck yourselves.
I was quite aggressive.
And they said, you're an aggressive person.
I said, well, you've, you know, you dragged me out of bed at 2 o'clock, 2am in the morning, and you're saying to me, you've been an aggressive person.
Well, you've fucking, you've stolen my children because I've got PTSD. I've been traumatised.
And you've sold my children.
They said that, we're not interested in that.
All we're interested in is the insight of terrorism with these groups, support groups, and You're heading up these groups with Billy O'Connor.
As a result, you're on our radar.
I said, I'm there to support any parent.
I've not acted on nothing.
I've not incited anyone to go and block any shit.
I've not incited anyone to hurt anybody.
All I've said is, with Billy O'Connor, let's protest.
Let's get the word out there.
Let's speak. Let's speak out.
Let's get people to talk about these things.
And bring it to the public's attention.
That's all I've done. And they went on to say, well, what you're doing is you're aggravating people to do unlawful things, i.e.
terrorism. I said, how can you say that?
I said, I've not asked anyone to do anything.
They said, but you're exposing names and addresses of social workers.
I said, no, I haven't.
I said, I've named social workers, yes, because they're coming on our groups.
Spying on our groups.
They said, well, you know, that could cause terrorism.
You're putting people's lives at risk, these social workers.
I said, how do you expect that I'm putting people's lives at risk?
If social services and social workers come on these groups, pretending to be parents, they shouldn't be on there.
My right is to expose a social worker on the group so we can kick them out and expose them.
You know, we don't want moles inside those groups.
They went on to say to me, well, they don't need to be males.
We can see the groups. We have access to everything.
We can see every member.
I said, well, I know you're spying bastards anyway.
So why would I incite something on a media platform that everyone can see to have myself arrested?
Because I'm here.
I'm what?
I'm bullshit. Because I spoke out about my children being stolen because I had PTSD. You sold my fucking children and now you arrested me under the terrorism.
What the fuck is all that about?
After a lengthy conversation with them, I obviously went down.
Mark, as you know, for a couple of months over this, and as you realise, I wouldn't get any messages from yourself or from the people who are usually supporting me through this.
Well, people have got to understand that the problem being is the government are really scared and they're trying to bully people now under this terrorism act.
Now, first it was contempt that I was told if I speak out about my children, I'll be held in contempt.
If I name my children, I'll be put in contempt.
As you know, I've shown you a couple of people who are in jail now for speaking out about their children being forced to flee adopted.
But no, that's not enough.
Now they're raiding my house with military intelligence and threatening the terrorism act.
The two young officers who interviewed me from MI5 have clearly said, there is no freedom of speech in this country.
I was like, what the fuck?
I said, that's my right.
No one will stop me from speaking out.
They said, I do intend to carry on with these groups.
I said, yes. They said, we'll be watching you.
And we're watching Billy O'Connor.
They named other people on the group as well.
People need to be aware that they're being watched and monitored closely because We are upsetting the status quo in respect of Parliament running scared, the Prime Minister's running scared, that we're exposing the UK government as trafficking children.
Because down to all this, this is what it is.
There's big money behind forced adoptions.
It's trafficking money.
They're using that as a way of peer low fees as £32,320 or whatever they call it, just rounded off to £32,000 per child the local authorities are getting.
That is selling a child for money.
If you did that in this country, okay, it's trafficking children.
You would be jailed. So the government are trafficking children.
It's not right. I remember you were telling me a little bit about the history of this sort of thing.
Slavery was perfectly acceptable by the US and UK governments and worldwide to have black people as slaves.
That was so fucking wrong!
But in the eyes of Parliament in London and in the US, it was perfectly legal to have slaves, which is fucking disgusting.
Now it's frowned on and people think it's disgusting.
Then in the early 70s, the 60s, 70s and 80s in the UK, unmarried women, their children were removed from them and forced adopted.
That was perfectly legal for Parliament to do that in the UK. They were taking millions of children Away from unmarried mothers in the UK and thought that was susceptible.
Now they're apologising for it.
They're saying, oh, it was wrong.
Now they're forcefully removing children from good people like myself who've suffered with PTSD, but the children have never seen my depression because I did it well.
But if you've got any slight depression or if you're a victim of domestic violence or anything like that, or you reach out for help, We're
removed because they were unmarried. Now it's affecting us.
It's gonna incite, obviously it's gonna incite people to do dumb shit. I'm not the one to blame here.
I'm the one who's just exposed the truth for what it is.
My local authority, okay, they don't just have that PLO fee, let's say £22,000 for each child, but they own their own fucking adoption agencies.
So they're getting more fees for the adoption agencies.
I reckon that the three children sold by the UK government in this country, for my three children, they've earned a region of £120,000 for three of my children.
Now, that's coming from the Treasury.
The Treasury funding abductions of children by being kidnapped under a crazy law that was brought in by the debunkers, Tony Blair, under potential future emotional harm.
Well, how can you potentially say a child's And potentially a target of future emotional harm.
Well, you can't prove that or disprove that, but that doesn't give a right to have a child removed in this country from a family-loving parent, you know?
They're separating siblings, you know?
They're causing families to break down.
There's parents committing suicide.
You know, I'm on the edge, believe me.
Right. I actually went away and I sat in my camper van and I took a lethal dose of tablets and I fell asleep.
I woke up two days ago.
I don't want to really admit this, but, you know, I did take another dose of sleeping tablets and unfortunately it came out of it.
I say unfortunately because every day is painful for me.
To mourn children that are living.
I feel my children are mourning a loss of the children that are living.
And it's all come on top of me being raided by armed police and MI5 and then in the morning losing my children.
I've not just been threatened with contempt of court about speaking out about my children and that's contempt with eight years imprisonment without trial, without any jury, without any lawyers.
A family court judge or a high court judge can turn around and say you're in contempt court for naming and speaking out about your children being adopted, eight years imprisonment, there you go, end of story.
How right is that? Because then I'm dealing with a contempt court order if I speak out about my children being forced to be removed by the UK government that's sold.
Now I'm being threatened by military intelligence.
It all come on top of me and it ended up with me taking a load of sleeping tablets.
I woke up two days later.
I had to go dark for a while because it was a very traumatic time being held under terrorism as a parent who's been through, who's a victim of this government, this Nazi government, who have taken children.
What they're doing is discriminating against people with depression.
Low-income families are being targeted because they can't feed their children and are taken away because of struggling on the bed line because of this government's minimum wage crap.
You've got people who are depressed.
You go to the doctor. As soon as you say you're depressed, they alert the local authority.
Every local authority in their made-up is a multiple agency support hub.
It's an office where it's full of midwives, GPs, Police officers, social workers and legal teams.
They've got access to your medical records.
They had access to my medical records without my consent.
They knew I was depressed.
They took my children away.
I went through a rough time where, you know, as you know, I was in a domestic-violent relationship, but I was free from that.
As soon as I spoke out about that to get help, my children were removed.
It's a scary place to live in this world, especially in the UK. There's a A lady, a black lady who I'm really friends with, called Ingrid, she watched at me a few days ago, screaming, breaking down.
She came from Africa to obtain a degree in this country and to go on to do psychology and social services mocked her and said she did a psychology degree just as a joke and a mockery.
No one comes from Africa with their children to do a degree and then to have their children She's a beautiful woman.
She broke down and I felt empty when I found...
It was like she was crying over the death of a child.
She's had her children removed.
She was telling me after she calmed down a couple of days after that another friend of hers who came from Africa to do a PhD, she was literally in the country less than two weeks and she had her children removed after trying to do a PhD.
We need to wake up.
We need to see that the government are bullying parents now with contempt of orders and raiding people's houses.
We're not out there to stab people.
We're not out there to blow shit up.
We just want to protest.
We just want to hear... We just want the British people to hear the truth because you're hiding it and it's threatening us with contempt of court.
Now you're threatening to...
You've held me under the terrorism act because I am supporting parents that are going through it because you don't like it.
You don't like it because more and more people are getting to know about this.
More and more people are waking up to what's going on.
The illegal acts of what you're doing.
They said, oh, well, we're not doing any illegal acts.
you know, we're just here just to make sure that there's no one towards activity of terrorism towards the government. I said, well, they said they went on to say, like to say to me, what was your view if someone, say a parent, went out and they bombed Parliament or something like that? I said, well, you know, I wouldn't have done it, but I'd understand it. And they said, well, don't you understand that?
What you're doing then is you're inciting.
No, I'm not inciting nothing.
It's an opinion. Everybody's entitled to opinions.
My opinion is you stole my fucking children, and if it means about us protesting our parliament peacefully, I will fucking do it.
If it's about standing out of the local authorities, councils, with banners, I will do it.
Also, Latif, I don't know if you know him at all.
I was questioned over him big time.
They're really threatened by him.
Who is that?
They said he's a Muslim.
I'm not aware of his beliefs and that.
But they were concerned that, I said he's a good, wholesome man.
He has true, genuine beliefs.
You stole his children, but you know he's a Muslim.
I said, so what, I didn't know he was a Muslim.
No.
But even he is, he's a very peaceful man.
They said, do you think he has intentions of, because of his Muslim background, his extremism, would he be capable of creating Do
you know what is the most loving...
Gentleman you could ever think of, and he's a big player in relation to protesting and bringing a light to these issues of the UK government and what they're doing.
Everything we're doing is above board to expose what's going on in relation to the corruption in the UK, okay?
It's obviously a concern now to me that now I'm on an MI5 watchlist because telling people what's going on.
What it is, we are now embarrassing the UK government.
We're embarrassing them that much that the more and more the British people know, because there's a complete media blackout on forced adoptions, as you're fully aware in the UK.
And the media blackout on forced adoptions can obviously be used as contempt.
The journalists won't write about any particular... they can obviously write that it's happening in the UK, but it's very far between. You don't hear about it.
Journalists are warned, should they speak about any particular cases, they'd be held in contempt.
So, there's a media blackout in relation to forced adoptions.
We're embarrassing the government because more and more good-standing people get to hear about it, and it's brought the attention of military intelligence now.
So, what I would say to people is, exposing a social worker that is on a group of, a support group for parents, if you're prepared to expose yourself, If they want to be stupid and put themselves at risk
by exposing themselves, these are angry parents.
But again, I'm an angry parent, but I wouldn't go out and damage government property and certainly not incite terrorism in any form of way.
My only objective is to expose the UK government and corrupt courts.
What they're doing is illegal.
People who are special on low incomes or on legal aid, family solicitors, they know they can't win cases.
They're taking on cases and they're in with the government.
Family solicitors in this country, they're not representing you.
They're representing the government.
They're getting legal aid.
They're getting government funding.
So you're getting a public To represent you in a family court.
Who's being paid by the UK government?
So unless you've got funds and private funds of your own to have your own legal team that are on partial, then you've got no way of winning cases.
So let's get this straight now.
People who are on legal aid, if you think your lawyer is acting for your best interest, Think again.
Your own lawyer will say it's best for you to just admit that legal threshold because then it gives them extra rights, the other side, to take your children away from you.
So I've come across a lot of cases where people have had legal aid funding.
I funded my own legal team, but I've come across so many people who have had lawyers under legal aid, solicitors, representing themselves in court, have used excuses.
And they're all funded, and they're all, they all ask you, I'll just admit legal threshold.
They are there to help the government take your children away.
They don't become solicitors to fight for your children.
They're corrupt, in fact.
They just want the, they just want the funding.
They just want the business from Legal Aid, which is a UK government-funded fee.
So please be aware that this event is all corrupt.
The lawyers are corrupt. The social workers don't come social workers to keep families together.
It's to take children away.
You don't become a social worker today to work with families.
They don't work with families.
They don't work with victims of depression and keeping families together.
They don't work with men and women who have gone through domestic violence or soldiers or anyone else who's going through PTSD or whatever else.
They only become social workers to take children away from loving homes and getting forcibly adopted and to get large amounts of money for their local authority.
This is what it's all about.
Circuit judges, family circuit judges, high court judges, if you look at statistics, right, 99.6% of cases ahead who are heard in family courts all go for the local authority.
So you've got less than 0.4% chance of getting your children back.
That in itself is a scary thought.
They said, you know, would I be a confidential informer for protection?
So what do I need protection for?
Well, you know, you know, things can happen to you and, you know, we can make sure that those things that you're protected.
I said, why are you threatening me?
No, we're not threatening you, but if you're ever in a stick It's a tricky situation you can't get out of.
You know, you've got us on your side and we can make it evaporate.
So can you bring my children back to me?
They said, well, that's a tricky situation.
We can look into it, but especially the other two, maybe not the youngest two, but the other one's not adopted yet.
I said, you think I'm going to fill out my child to be a confidential informer?
You're fucking, you're wrong.
They're offering me incitement, rewards, such as one of my children back if I become a confidential informer.
And I would not do it. I'm sorry.
I would feel that I'm betraying my fellow people, and I couldn't do that.
You're not using my children's partnerships for me to become a confidential informer.
And I'll be totally open with you.
I was arrested in my household in January because I was distressed.
My friends took my life last January because of what happened to my children and what they did to me.
The judge emailed me late at night saying that my children...
He emailed me at 9pm in January saying that my children...
Before even seeing the court hearing the next day saying my children be removed for forced So obviously I was in my household and I said I was going to kill myself.
So there was a standoff with the local barbers trying to kick my door in.
I said, you fucking come in here, right?
Believe me, you're not going to come out.
I'm not going to battle the fuck out of you.
They said, just come out. Let's just talk this out.
On the phone to me, they said, look, I don't want to cause any harm to any person, but if you come into my home, I'm going to protect myself and my home.
They said, look, we just want to do a welfare check on you to make sure you're okay.
We know you're upset. We're scared in case you're going to commit suicide.
Why do they even care?
Like, why are they even caring when they're giving you all the incentive?
They were just using that as harassment.
It was harassment. They were harassing me at my own address, doing welfare checks on me so they can just build up a bigger, stronger case.
It ended up with them kicking the fucking door and coming in, in my property, and arresting me For a public order offence and a private dwelling.
It's unheard of. It's fucking unheard of.
I was never in public.
I was not on a public road.
I was in my household. Never once did I come out of my home.
Once I come out of my home, if I started shouting out a window or I come outside my property and started yelling abuse, then it's a public order offence because they can now then arrest you.
I was in my private dwelling.
Went to court. Pleaded not guilty.
Didn't even get a jury. Didn't get any jury at all.
And I was then charged with a public order.
Wow.
Wow. Wow.
Wow. Because they said to me, as a confidential, me being a confidential informer, they could revoke my probation supervision period.
Yeah, that I'm on probation for.
And by the way, I've got £600 going for it as well.
That's something that I should never have been charged with in the first place with.
I thought, if anything, they should have took me to a psychiatric hospital to obtain help, which they didn't do.
They just locked me up, charged me with a public order for offence on a private dwelling, which is unheard of.
When I told my solicitor, They said, I can't charge you with that.
My solicitor argued. They said, how can my client be charged with a public order when he was on a private dwelling?
The judge said, well, we are.
And I find him guilty.
I thought, what the fuck? My solicitor was like, you can appeal this.
But it was a Crown Court judge sitting on a magistrate.
How is that strange? There's magistrates not sitting there.
We're getting Crown Court judges sitting on magistrates, convicting people.
That's a breach of the Criminal Justice Act.
Why is a Crown Court judge sitting on a magistrate's bench?
They shouldn't be doing it.
So it's found guilty for a public order offence on a private dwelling, which is unlawful.
Fast forward in November now.
I don't think it was all premeditated by him.
I really do.
Because things don't add up.
The email at 9pm saying that my children would be forcibly adopted back in January 2021 from a judge.
And then you're me sparking off.
And then it just happens.
How did they know I was depressed?
They come to do a welfare check on me.
They said they got a core concern for my well-being.
I didn't contact anyone that evening.
Things don't add up.
And them saying that they can wipe my criminal record, possibly get my oldest child back if I come back.
They were giving me incentives to become a confidential informant.
I wouldn't say that.
I believe that I'm not the only one.
Things don't add up. The hell is being pulled over every five minutes.
Oh, we're just doing a welfare check.
My registration numbers were flagged up.
Every time I was going anywhere, I was getting pulled over.
Jay! We just want to check if you're okay.
I said, what the fuck? It was harassment.
It was constant harassment.
It's a way to wind me down so I break.
It just blew my head in that they could use children as bargaining chips.
The MI5 were using military intelligence, they were using my child to get my child back to me.
How can you use children as a reward, incentive to be a confidential informer for military intelligence?
I truly believe that they are running scared.
The French High Commission have condemned the UK of forced adoptions.
The French High Commission were disgusted over it.
Russia are a big backer of a breach of human rights.
And you know, if Russia says something seriously wrong, then And I always think to people, you know, especially asylum seekers, why the fuck would you want to come to the UK? There's people like me who wish to have asylum in Russia.
Now that just tells you a lot.
So in 2012, I used to work for a company called In 2012, family court cuts in terms of legal aid cuts were coming in.
Now, we were categorically told most family court professionals rely for about 75% of their income on legal aid.
And because legal aid cuts are coming in, they are no longer credit worthy.
Unless they can prove over 50% private practice, Pre-legal aid cuts, the only thing you can lend to them now is professional indemnity insurance.
Now, the issue with that is, directly after legal aid cuts, there was a loophole to still get the legal aid, which was to make a domestic violence allegation.
It's known as a DV gateway application.
And out of nowhere, the number of domestic violence accusations for Family Court went through the roof.
There was an investigation by something called LASPO. And they found that in one solicitor's firm alone in Birmingham, there was an increase in 725% of accusations of domestic violence.
Now we all know that about 50% of all accusations of domestic violence centre around the family court process.
Now think about this.
The solicitors who had usually been highly reliant on legal aid and funding from organisations like Investec, how are they going to pay for their Mercedes?
How are they going to pay for their houses, the mortgage payments, everything?
Well, the answer was, and still is, that they encourage mothers to make accusations.
So it's not always mothers making false allegations.
A lot of the time, it's the so-called family court professionals that their number one priority is supposed to be the best interests of the children.
The investigations by LASPO Let me be clear about that.
What that means is most solicitors firms in the UK cannot be trusted to safeguard the best interest of the children.
They will happily throw them under the bus so that they can keep going to the opera or on those lovely holidays they go on.
This is yet another reason why relationships in the UK They're pretty much dead as they are right across the Western world.
These people don't give a shit about anyone but themselves.
And so, to anyone watching this from this industry, listen in.
We are coming.
I'm doing so, but I asked Mr.
Squee to sit down and shut up.
No, I don't know.
This is really completely unprofessional.
Stop! The Secret Marshall Willick Tapes is a glimpse into the corrupt world of family law with never-before-seen court footage that was meant to have been destroyed years ago due to the controversial nature of what this footage contained and how it portrayed the godfather of family law Marshall Willick.
When I found out my ex-husband had hired attorney Abrams, I borrowed $5,000 on my car and I paid attorney Willer $5,000 to represent me to find out he and Abrams were lovers.
And after taking my money and telling her everything I told him, I'm telling her how to fight it.
He said he couldn't have me get a good friends with Abrams Rock.
I lost everything I owned.
I had a $40 million a year business.
My ex-husband got out because something's going on in that courtroom between certain attorneys and certain judges.
Eric, could you explain what happened in the video here where Judge Ritchie seems to be critical of the conflict of interest or bias between Marshall Willock and the prior judge before this came to Judge Ritchie's courtroom?
Let me ask you this, okay?
Because this record stinks. When did you start representing a relative of the judge?
You filed your notice of appearance on February 6, 2014?
I'm sorry, I don't have that date.
I'm just saying, I mean, is this order even viable?
From my understanding, Judge Ochoa actually hired him, hired Marshall Willick to do some work for him directly, and neither one of them said anything to us or our council at the time this thing took place for Well over two and a half months,
at which time he was also billing my ex for work and doing multiple briefs against me for failing to comply to an order that Judge Ochoa had made.
So they're operating in a period of time with a conflict of interest right there, and eventually what happens is that Judge Ochoa recuses himself.
Exactly. Yeah, Marshall Willock never once said anything about the fact that he'd been hired by Ochoa to do any work, ever.
So when Judge Ritchie over here makes these comments, I mean, he makes pretty harsh comments saying that this case stings, and I think he talks about an orator and questions whether it's even binding under those circumstances.
That's what Judge Ritchie is referring to?
Yes.
Let me ask you this, okay?
Because this record stinks.
When did you start representing relative of the judge?
I'm sorry, I don't have that data.
I'm just saying, I mean, is this order even viable?
So, one of Willick's attorneys in his office is a sexual predator.
Bye.
Yes. Tell me a little bit about that.
Oh, Richard Crean. As far as I know, they've been partners for the longest time.
Richard Crean is a Tier 2 registered sex offender.
It's on the registry.
And he's a family law lawyer.
Yeah. What did he do?
What was his crime? I believe it was Henderson PD that did a sting back in 2014, around there, I want to say.
And it was an online thing where they're trying to catch sexual predators online talking to kids.
And I guess he, Richard Crane, believed he was talking to an underage minor.
It was actually Henderson Petey that he was talking to and he got arrested.
He got busted. Trying to pick up on an underage minor trying to have sex with him.
He got arrested, he got charged, and he lost his law license for a couple years.
However, even though he lost his law license, Willock was still allowing him to work in the Willock Law Group and still billing everything Richard Crane did.
I mean, if you got pictures of kids' investigations, you know, naked pictures or whatever, this guy's seen all that.
He's a registered sex offender.
My research shows that despite being removed from the profession, Rick Crane was still appearing in bills sent by Marshall Willock to his clients.
I heard that Marshall Willock helped get Richard Crane reinstated as an actual licensed attorney here in Nevada.
Wow. Which by law I didn't think was allowed.
I mean, how is that even possible that Marshall Willick has this much power within the courts to be able to do these sort of things that normally would be impossible and or unlawful?
It had to take a lot of money.
You know, they say money talks bullshit walks.
It's the most unqualified, the most dangerous people are actually running the shit show.
And what I mean by that is like, look at Willett, who's sitting there in Reno, literally, masturbating in front of 14-year-old girls.
They're changing in the dressing room.
This is all covered up.
This is the head It's Willick!
Marshall Willick!
And to clarify, I didn't hear Reno.
I heard actually happened in Carson City.
Carson City, I'm sorry. Carson City.
That's what I heard.
That's what people are saying.
It's all over the legal circle in Vegas, but nobody does anything about it.
This gentleman right here, all the way to the left, is Toby Mathis.
He's the plaintiff who has called this court session for a variety of reasons.
Number one reason is that this person over here, Attorney Marshall Willick, has attempted to freeze all of the business accounts that he is associated with, which is, at best, completely unethical, and at worst, unlawful.
So, you're saying that Marshall Willick did some unlawful things during the court process?
Correct. He attempted to freeze ass.
He pretended like he had the court's authority to freeze bank accounts of a business that I own.
So, I'm a business owner.
I have a business that has hundreds of employees.
What happened in this case is Marshall Willock sent out notices to all bank accounts that he could get knowledge of that were associated with the business and attempted to freeze all those accounts.
So active bank accounts.
The person to the right of Toby Mathis is lawyer Joseph Scalia.
We'll get to him in just a moment.
The person to the right of Joseph Scalia is Larry Weinstein.
He's the business lawyer for Toby Mathis, and he's here to argue that what Marshall Willick had done in trying to freeze Toby Mathis' business-related bank accounts was due cause for censure, fines, and even disbarment.
Before we proceed to the merits, as a housekeeping matter, we should address the purported appearance of Mr.
Weinstein for a purported intervener.
We have not been served with even a motion for intervention of any kind of a loss of order granting any such intervention.
We don't believe Mr.
Weinstein's properly before the coordinating agency of any kind.
We believe the motion that filed is a fugitive document which should be sui sponte stricken Let me put this in perspective.
Let's say that you are a shareholder in a company.
Normally, you'd be looking at the value of the company.
What Marshall Willick attempted to do was freeze those accounts so that he could probably use it to extort additional funds out of the In this case, me.
That certainly looked to be the case.
Let's bring your company to its knees.
Let's stop you from being able to do payroll.
Let's stop you from being able to pay your bills.
And this has nothing to do with the family.
You're just going through a divorce and custody hearing.
We had just started the process.
I had filed for divorce.
So anything with an account number on it, he sent a freeze notice, which you cannot do unilaterally.
Your court could order it.
And before the court would order it, they would order a hearing so you could see whether it's even relevant or not.
But what he did is he just went ahead and said, freeze this account, pretended like he had a court order, brought it up.
The court actively protected him.
I can move this along here, if Your Honor allows me to.
Any stipulations? Let's start with that.
Well, I don't know if we have any formal stipulations, but the facts are the facts.
Your Honor has seen the drug results of Brenda.
She could have been, in theory, arrested on her way to take the test.
She's five to eight times the legal limit for a DUI. So what Joe's talking about there, Is that at the first hearing, they said that my wife was not doing drugs and I was a horrible person.
They accused me of all sorts of things.
We asked, I'll take any drug tests you want.
She takes any drug tests.
And the court said, that's a good idea.
She took a drug test and right after the hearing she was five times the legal limit.
So she was high there and they were saying that she wasn't doing anything.
She says that they knew that she was doing drugs and they said not to say anything and to deceive the court and they misled the court.
That being said, she at this point has hit bottom and she's gone to the Meadows and she's enrolled in the treatment program, which is in the benefit of all concerned.
So we're all happy about that.
So in the interim, I don't think there should be too much of a problem with granting Toby exclusive possession of the house.
Well, we can get into this.
The reason we didn't want to do it last time was because we had this issue of the cuss of the children.
Now that mom came up extremely dirty from her recreational drug use, as the defendants have contended, we realize now it's beyond mere recreational.
Like recreational hard drug use on its own is a play on words.
I mean that's a fraudulent representation because there is no such.
The reason we didn't seek exclusive possession last time because we did not have the proof of the myriad of allegations we've been making that her drug use was completely out of control, the defendant denied any drug use.
I know, I was here.
Right, so now that we have the drug use, drug results back, she is in Meadows in Arizona.
I don't see any reason why Toby shouldn't be granted exclusive possession.
Where are Ms. Bailey's children?
In the home of Toby. The main issue here,
of course, is the disgorging of the funds by counsel.
$23,000 from someone who is a drug act.
My attorney, if I remember right, was about $3,000 for that same period of time.
So these guys took 10 times the fee from somebody who was obviously not completely lucid.
So there's a question as to whether she had the capacity to enter into the contract.
In the decision behind Rafael Acosta vs.
Yoli DaCosta, the judge in the case recites how Mr.
Marshall Willock was trying to get paid in excess of $200,000 for what amounted to 20 hours of work across a two-year span.
The judge stated that this was not a reasonable sum that could be enforced.
Calling it outrageous and unreasonable and stating that the real amount should be only $9,209.
I'm not sure how a law firm can accept such a sum or someone with a drug problem of that magnitude has the capacity to even form the intent to create a contract.
Let's talk about their knowledge of the facts.
According to their pleadings, they denied, categorically, not only in this case, but the other case, that their client had a drug problem.
Judge Gail Nathan, as you heard, just said not to defend the Willock Law Group, and then she goes on to defend the Willock Law Group.
She recalls that there was a letter from a mental health professional and or drug counselor saying that Miss Bailey just used drugs recreationally.
It's not marijuana?
It's not marijuana, no. She was in rehab for hard drugs.
Hardcore drugs in the cocaine, meth, heroin variety of drugs?
Hard drugs. Hard drugs, wow.
So the idea of recreational hard drugs is just ridiculous to begin with?
Correct. Wow.
And so I think that any lawyer would have some reliance on a representation made by mental health workers.
I would suggest, Your Honor, that the lawyer also has a duty of diligence in speaking with the client to ferret out the truth.
I think certainly an experienced attorney like Mr.
Willig would not put his client, who's really at this point a drug addict, through a custody battle.
I think that part of our job as counselors and as attorneys, we would say to our client, no, that is not in your best interest right now.
We're just saying that you're misleading the court.
You knew that she, you know, you tried to underscore or understate or conceal issues.
She was like, they completely Lied to everybody.
She said right out the gate, here's my issue.
I'm suffering from this.
Suffering from drug addiction. Yes.
She said she made them aware of what was going on.
And then after she went through rehab, She still tried to get the monies back.
Mrs. Scalia, I understand your argument on fees.
Anything else? So we're getting back to the disgorgement of the fees, Your Honor.
I understand that it's like baseball.
No one can bat 100 all the time.
But I think the facts of this case and the law of this case is argued.
I've seen Better defenses raised by the Pro Bono Project, really, Your Honor.
And for them to come in here and argue $23,000 in fees under these facts and under this law goes beyond the realm of ridiculous.
Well into the world of absurd.
Those fees should be disgorged, or at the very least, charged back to the American Express account.
They should be paid on a quantum merit basis.
I'm not saying that they shouldn't earn something.
They should earn something. And I'm looking at it going, hey, wait a second.
You lied to the court.
There's no other way. You attempted to destroy something, somebody.
Maybe that's the ordinary course of business and family law.
That didn't seem proper.
I caught you. They did all of these motions, seizing all these accounts, which I would call that rookie mistake 101.
An overaggressive attorney right out of a lawsuit would start seizing bank accounts, which had nothing to do with the parties.
He turned up the heat on Willock, saying, like, this is definitely sanctionable activity.
Any judge that I'd worked with would not have been happy, would not have been pleased, right?
Would have definitely hit him, and more than likely, he would have been censured or disbarred.
They made a big mess of this.
I came in here personally to pick up the order to unfreeze the accounts.
I had to do it on my day, and I called Mr.
Willick, and I called the opposing counsel that day.
Mr. Willick was in the meeting, never called me back, never did anything at the spot that I was doing, because had the banks had those accounts freezed, Anderson Law Group could possibly maintain an action against the Willick Law Group downtown.
But I did it, even though I called them numerous occasions.
Now, you know, I didn't do it out of charity.
I did it for the well-being of my client, obviously, but it's something that they made this mess and now they wish to withdraw from this mess that they created.
I'm going to oppose their motion to withdraw.
They moved to withdraw.
And we were blocking them saying you shouldn't be allowed to withdraw.
You took a bunch of money and you made a mess.
You shouldn't be able to walk away from it.
They want to walk away from their client?
Yep. They want to walk away from their client while their client's in rehab.
Exactly. And basically leave her completely on her own.
She doesn't have an attorney now.
Correct. And they did. Well, they absolutely did.
I think that has had a drug problem, and until we're completely sure that she's completely rehabilitated, she has to have counsel.
And they've been paid!
And I would prefer that she have counsel and go forward so that way we don't have a problem later to say, oh, she wasn't represented.
You know, I oppose the emotional withdrawal and I think that some of the funds they've earned so far should be disgorged on the facts of this case as they are before your honor today.
I think that's what has to happen.
It's just food.
You want to stir it?
Stir.
Basically, as far as the pizza, there should be no discardment.
We've worked. We've earned the money.
She signed a contract and said that she would pay her bill of dollars.
That's what she's done. As far as what he's just said about the order, that went around our office.
I was out of town. Mr.
Willock was not available. Someone from his office contacted our secretary and said, the order's ready, we've picked it up.
We had no idea why. Your law clerk could not even contact us yet.
So whatever he's done on that side of it, there has been a breakdown in communication with our office and our client.
We cannot at this time continue to represent her, and unfortunately I can't divulge to the court what has been said, whatever.
As far as the issue with the bank accounts, Based on, I don't know if you've had the opportunity to read what we got filed for you yesterday, but there's documentation in the letter that was attached as an exhibit.
There's also the way that they have been throughout the marriage with the way he's handled the money and always taken it out of those accounts from the businesses.
That did have something. And then when he totally cut off all her access to any kind of funds, There is an issue with it and we have asked for that in our initial motion.
It didn't get hurt, it got continued.
We had no choice after he cut her off is when we went and worked that way.
Carrie's trying to make an argument that I got paid out of business accounts therefore you should be able to freeze said business accounts.
So if you get a paycheck from a business, if you get dividends from a business, whatever, they should be able to freeze that business?
Nonsensical. It's nonsensical.
There's no legal basis.
There's no legal basis and they know it.
I don't really have anything else to add.
Mr. Willock is going to add something about the fees, I believe.
Very briefly, Your Honor, and I don't wish to make a long record of it.
There is no difference to how we litigate our cases, whether we're representing client pro bono or on retainer.
The statement that there should be is loathsome.
I have been insulted in this courtroom.
I have been assaulted. I asked not to be interrupted.
Please advise Mr.
Willing to address the court and not counsel.
I'm not the judge here. You're the judge here.
He should address you, not me.
I am doing so, but I asked Mr.
Scully to sit down and shut up.
Your Honor, really, Mr.
Willing, this is really completely uncomfortable.
This is... Stop! He's having an outburst!
Please! Mr. Willock!
I mean, is it even proper to say things like stupid and, you know, we heard him bang on the table there and addressing...
You would not get... The judges I worked with, you would never get away with that.
Mm-hmm. You can't behave that way in a corner.
Yeah, yeah. So there was some familiarity there that allowed him to believe that he could do that.
That he could get away with that. Okay.
I want five minutes of uninterrupted time, then I will shut up and go away.
I am not in the mood today for histrionics.
I am not in the mood for personal attacks.
I am not in the mood to be insulted.
Mr. Willick states that he's not in the mood for histrionics when his behavior has been the only outlandish and contemptuous behavior in the court of law.
He should address you, not me.
But I asked Mr. Squee to sit down and shut up.
They're completely unprofessional. This is- STOP! He's having an outburst!
I asked not to be interrupted.
Please advise Mr.
Wilk to address the court and not counsel.
I'm not the judge here. You're the judge here.
He should address you! Now he's mad because I'm watching a child.
I'm watching somebody who makes it about them a narcissistic jerk.
We seized nothing.
A JPI was sent to bank accounts.
It's all perfectly legitimate.
Actually, Mr. Willick is lying here.
Trying to freeze bank accounts without a court order is not legitimate.
The attachment of a piece of one of my legal notes claiming that the court has the authority to enforce a JPI, which of course is true, is stupid.
And irrelevant to the issues currently before the court, as is the filing of a motion complaining about ATM withdrawals by a person on vacation and normally scheduled hair maintenance.
The drugs that she was getting, she was taking ATMs out of North Las Vegas, things like that, and then they tried to say it was for hair.
We understand that's more of a concern for some people than others.
So we were saying, look, she's hitting ATMs.
We need to keep her from getting drugs.
This is the only way I know how to do it.
And they're just trying to cover it up by saying, oh no, it was for this, it was for that.
No, she had credit cards for those other things.
She was getting cash so that she could get drugs.
To the issues currently before the court...
As is the filing of a motion complaining about ATM withdrawals by a person on vacation and normally scheduled hair maintenance.
We understand that's more of a concern for some people than others, but it's a perfectly legitimate expense.
There was no harm, no foul.
This motion should have never been filed.
It was taken care of at the last proceeding.
It is a transparent effort to waste money, consume the funds currently sitting in our retainer account because the guy sitting at the other table has all the money.
The only thing he's pissed off about is that she managed to get some of it before he managed to cut her off by using the credit cards.
There has never been a motion, certainly not an order, certainly not an opinion, in the state of Nevada where the moneyed spouse asked for disgorgement or God help us sergeant equalization from the non-moneyed unemployed spouse.
The whole premise of the motion is beyond stupid.
It should have never been filed.
The court could sua sponte issue sanctions for filing that pile of crap.
In the meantime, because of our communication difficulty with our own client, and because we are forced because of an internal matter relating to our office and our contract with our client to withdraw, we ask the court to permit the withdrawal.
If you want to space it up until after our client is released so that we can communicate with her and allow her time to get new counsel, that would be fine too.
In the meantime, the funds sitting in our retainer account, and I don't have I don't have an accounting, but I will be putting...
We're going to go off the record for a minute.
Counsel, can I see you?
It gets to a point where Marshall clearly looks like he's having an emotional breakdown, is the way it read to me, right?
But then the video cuts.
The judge stopped the video.
Why did the judge stop the video?
She's biased. I mean, she's basically trying to cover up for Marshall Willick at this point?
That's what it appeared. She cut off the video because he was losing it.
He was losing it. Yeah, he lost it.
He started going crazy. Pointed his finger, slapped the table a bunch, started crying.
I remember him losing his stuff and I remember them going back in chambers.
I remember him getting escorted out of the courtroom by the law enforcement and removing him and then denying every one of my motions.
Yo, Nathan. A alert came up saying that Gail Nathan was a possible relative or an associate of his.
Incidentally, the address of Gail Nathan today as a private family law attorney as she was voted off the bench as a judge appears to be the exact same address as the Willick law firm.
These two The judge ordered the return of all videos.
I'm kind of shocked that you have one.
If you have a copy of the recording, you have to return it to the court.
I was shocked that after the hearing, I get a call from my lawyer saying, you're not going to believe this, but the judge is ordering all copies of that.
That video be destroyed, you're never going to see a copy of the hearing.
This act of the judge ordering all copies of this video destroyed, of a court hearing.
Explain what that means.
It means that nobody will ever see a record of it.
It means she's destroying that the hearing ever took place.
These are public hearings.
It seems like it's covering something up.
Because I think the public would want to know that this guy...
is unhinged when you're taking him on and is willing to do things that were unethical, if not illegal.
I will say that Marshall Willick is the best at what he does, which is to make a lot of money, influence politicians, judges, and do anything to drag out and win a case, no matter if he has to break the rules, and no matter how many lives are ruined in the process.
I had never seen the type of behavior From Marshall Willock in a courtroom.
Period. And not only did they not do anything to him, but Judge Nathan seemed to go out of her way to make sure that this video never saw the light of day.
The hearing, in essence, is like it never happened.
You still lost. That part happened.
I guess I'm trying to understand why that's not a gross violation of due process.
As the party is sitting there, I can tell you it felt like a gross violation of due process.
I mean, you're given the loss, but at the same time, you don't have the evidence to show why you should be able to be entitled to an appeal and why that decision was wrong.
The system appears to...
Benefit those parties that are willing to bend the rules in their favor.
And the only reason somebody could do that over a long period of time is if they weren't afraid of the rules and nobody was willing to enforce the rules against them.
It would make sense, like why would you change if you're getting great results pending the rules?
I'm not sure.
I'm an adult.
I'm an adult coloring book right now.
I'm coloring a big hummingbird for my mother.
Oh, wow. Yeah. So I wrote this one...
Oh, man.
A couple months...
A few months ago, I wrote this one.
I call this one Vanishing Heroes.
And it's, of course, because of the inspiration that I have for how many friends of mine that I've lost to suicide.
You know, I've lost more than ten friends to suicide.
And several of those were...
During their military career or after their military career.
Anyways, I wrote this poem called Vanishing Heroes.
They say I'm a dangerous man, that my toxic masculinity is overflowing and I'm a middle-aged white domestic terrorist with a deadly plan.
But who are they to describe and treat me in such a way?
These child trafficking whores of the court selling kids for cash in the halls of justice.
There's got to be a better way.
One dad, two dad, three dad, four, this kid, that kid, more kids score.
Running up the financial tabulations while demoralizing families is the American situation.
Attorneys and judges raping and pillaging these fathers has these men contemplating To live or to die.
Because enduring this endless trauma is more painful than some sleeping pills and bourbon on their journey to the other side.
Some might call this court ordered suicide.
Now don't judge unless you be judged and if you think that it's funny just wait your turn.
One day you're standing on top of the world and then just like that they take your baby girl.
Pay your child support is all you're ever told, and if the years fly by without so much as a call, is it any wonder when your blood begins to run cold?
I hate to be the one to tell you, but American children are quite literally being sold.
No trial, no jury, just a criminal nightmare laden with a feminist fury.
You see, there is no desert on Earth more barren and desolate than that of an alienated parent whose soul is ravaged, but whose self-worth has been purged.
You know, I'm not a prophet with the gift of prophecy, but these cult-like courts are the living embodiment of a Christian heresy.
You see, the prohibition of a parent's national love for their offspring is a punishment so cruel and unusual that it beckons and calls for an uprising of righteous retribution in defense of our nation and her beloved Constitution.
Desperately, we need a political hurricane because the status quo cannot remain the same.
But if we burn their banks, they'll merely bring their tanks.
And if we were to raid their homes, they would simply launch their drones.
But if we don't challenge their ways, well, you guessed it, we'll forever remain their American slaves.
They censor my speech and they despise my profanity while I load their methods and their criminal insanity in their homes around the holidays and Christmas time as caviar and well-aged wines.
Endless gifts and diamond rings.
Christmas cards while the angels sing.
Lots of glee and lots of cheer.
They've even got gourmet cheese and import beer.
But my house is nothing quite like this.
As I stare at my chimney, I clench my fists.
There'll be no fat man with a bright red nose and blunt and plum-colored cheek, if I'm honest.
It's all I could do to survive the holiday weeks.
I can't walk through a Walmart or a Target store because everywhere I go I catch a glimpse of my son or daughter.
I don't think that I can bear much more.
Constantly men like me are misdiagnosed with post-traumatic stress and depressive disorder than given coping skills and prescription pills to use and order.
I won't have the savory flavors nor aromas from a golden turkey or a fresh baked ham.
I'm in survival mode, so I'll dine all alone on cheap American beer and Spam in a can.
There will be no stockings hung from my mantle with love and care.
And should I say?
Can I tell you?
Do I dare?
But I've got a rope in my hand.
Standing on the tips of my toes from the seat of a chair.
Oh, don't act so surprised and astonished.
It's not you who the cowardly judge degraded and admonished.
If you had given the best years of your life to an ungrateful nation and an abusive ex-wife who rationalized their cruelty and torture?
I assure you, you too would consider the unthinkable of taking your own life.
Because in America, kidnapping a child is perfectly lawful.
I see you're shaking your head.
You don't believe me?
Well, I find your deliberate ignorance to this really quite awful.
Don't pretend you didn't know or you didn't have a clue when they only found one of my shoes.
On that bridge above the engorged river below, you remember?
I had tried in vain to warn you, but your response was irrationally slow.
Did you actually expect a Prozac and psychiatrist to prevent what was bound to happen next as I climbed to the top of my home and flung myself from a rooftop and snapped my own neck?
The coroner said it was the impact from the lethal fall that caused my untimely demise and the blood on the wall.
What does he know?
He was the last on the scene.
He doesn't have a clue if he know what I mean.
When he discovered my last meal was pancakes and bacon, did it also tell him how long my heart had been so painfully breaking?
Or that this was my kids and I's favorite weekend treat?
How about after the police carefully outlined my body with their stick of colorful chalk?
Did their forensics tell them the last place I had so tearfully walked?
Did the soil sample from the bottom of my shoes lead them back to the place where my son and I had last shared?
A father and son's loving embrace as I hugged him and I wiped the tears from his gentle little face.
Did they put two and two together when it was discovered that my G-Shock watch was stuck on 2200 and not one second over?
Or that 22 is the number prescribed for how many veterans die each day by suicide?
You see, each day 22 find a way.
Even though you and I have both craved these men, they would not be swayed.
And you stood by while he cried.
And they kept his children away.
I feel so helpless with all you could say.
But he fought for your family and he defended your freedom!
At least, that's what they had told him.
Till he realized that these were real lies and then he no longer believed them.
I mean, when you felt so helpless, did you magically lose your God-given senses?
So much so, you had no feeling of touch to write or call a local legislator?
A congressman?
That makes no sense.
No sense at all.
I mean, was your vision so hard to mimic that you couldn't see?
His spirit was broken and his will to live was finally finished.
Could you not hear his pleas for assistance, or did you just merely turn up your music with a stubborn persistence?
I'm curious, would you now be able to politely describe how do you feel right here in your chest, on the inside, knowing you stood by and let an innocent man die?
What's it like? That taste in your mouth.
Knowing you deliberately blocked all of your good senses out.
I mean, every possible tool that God had so willingly gave you to save a human life from a premature grave, it was an elective abandonment.
Choosing instead to be an apathy slave.
Tonight I'm here to tell you that our nation's heroes are vanishing at an alarming rate and we all have a duty to respond, to act.
You can save a life before it's too late.
I beg you to please, please stop with the incessant and unending excuses.
You're giving a pass to the judicial and domestic abuses.
Ex-girlfriends and ex-wives who keep a child from their loving father are killing more than just their previous partner.
Our sons, brothers, nephews, uncles, and childhood best friends are each at risk of an untimely and violent end.
Our country will never survive this endless winter season of killing our protectors and providers.
Done under the blanket of freedom and without any good reason.
Consider this rebuke, my personal decree, a painful truth spoken through a poetic manifesto.
We need your help to shoulder this tremendous burden with American gusto.