Sept. 8, 2022 - The Benny Show - Benny Johnson
01:02:26
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| This is the Attorney General. | ||
| He's going to be in charge of it. | ||
| He's a great gentleman and a highly respected man. | ||
| So everything that they need is declassified. | ||
| And they'll be able to see how this hoax-- how the hoax or witch hunt started and why it started. | ||
| It was an attempted coup or an attempted takedown of the President of the United States. | ||
| It should never, ever happen to anybody else. | ||
| So it's very important now people have been asking me to declassify for a long period of time I've decided to do it and You're gonna learn a lot. | ||
| I hope it's gonna be nice, but perhaps it won't be What you you Today is Thursday, September 8th, 2022, and Trump told White House team he needed to protect Russiagate documents. | ||
| He ordered them declassified, and you heard it here first on this show on July 1st. | ||
| Fourth, cringe-fest at the White House as Obama returns, and the polls are collapsing for Democrats less than 60 days out from the midterm election. | ||
| Rich Barris joins the show to talk about them. | ||
| My name is Benny Johnson, and this is The Benny Show. | ||
| Our first story today, it is with great aplomb and with great joy that we bring to you this victory dance and this victory lap. | ||
| You won't find me on TikTok. | ||
| You won't find me dancing. | ||
| Trust me, ladies and gentlemen, I won't ever dance for this show. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| Maybe there can be some things that I would dance for. | ||
| Maybe if Ron DeSantis won the presidency, maybe if Donald Trump won the presidency in 2024, I would dance for this show. | ||
| Maybe I'll make that wager I'll put on my MAGA hat and I will do a dance live on camera. | ||
| Let's see. | ||
| Royce is cracking up saying, no, don't do that. | ||
| We'd lose all the viewers. | ||
| But here we go! | ||
| The reason why I am doing my happy dance, my touchdown dance, the reason why we are giddy on this show today is because the liberal media has proven us right. | ||
| Very rarely does the corporate leftist media, the likes of which... | ||
| Included Rolling Stone, NBC News, CBS News. | ||
| Very rarely do these people come through, watch our show, and then are forced to report on the fact that we not only were first to break a story, but that we were right. | ||
| Travel with me, dear viewer, into a time machine. | ||
| Get into my DeLorean. | ||
| I have the flux capacitor all loaded up. | ||
| We're going to head back to the 4th of July special. | ||
| The 4th of July special, right here with Kash Patel. | ||
| Kash Patel, who was put in charge of securing all of the Russiagate documents for Donald Trump. | ||
| Kash Patel, the reason why we know that Russiagate is a complete and total hoax and fabrication on the American people. | ||
| Kash Patel, the lead investigator for Devin Nunez in the House. | ||
| As they investigated Russiagate and as they exposed this enormous lie for the American people. | ||
| Kash Patel was here. | ||
| Now, pardon the decorations. | ||
| We bought balloons. | ||
| We had Bud Heavies, the Freedom Beers cans, right? | ||
| We were having a 4th of July festival here, 11 a.m. in the morning. | ||
| We just did a 4th of July live. | ||
| We took your questions, and we asked Kash Patel your questions. | ||
| And on this show, here, before the raid, you're talking a month, more than a month, before the raid of Donald Trump's home. | ||
| Cash Patel revealed to you exactly what they were planning on doing, raiding Donald Trump's house and why. | ||
| The bombshell has now been confirmed by the corporate media who found this clip and resurfaced this clip and have proven us right. | ||
| First off, here is the clip in question. | ||
| It says, now that Cash has authority, when will he release the declassified documents that were never released? | ||
| Yeah, I wish I had the authority. | ||
| So I've seen a lot of this on Truth Social. | ||
| And what happened was President Trump substituted me in to be his representative at the National Archives because we did this big declass at the end of the Trump administration. | ||
| And his cronies actually bureaucratically stopped the declassification process, if you believed it. | ||
| The commander in chief said declassified to this mountain of documents. | ||
| And he walked out and his cronies were like, well, we're not going to exactly do that. | ||
| So now we're in this fight and people think I can just walk down to the National Archives and like throw it in my, you know, my backpack and walk out. | ||
| I'm working on it. | ||
| And of course, the bureaucracy is getting in the way, but that's not going to stop us. | ||
| I will be going to the National Archives in the coming weeks. | ||
| I will be identifying those documents, and I will be demanding that they be released because they are already declassified. | ||
| The reason they're not released is because they show more corruption at the FBI and DOJ, just like we showed during our Russiagate investigation when Devin and I landed. | ||
| Devin and I have always said, the American public has only seen 60% of what we've been able to see. | ||
| So just imagine that. | ||
| 60% and you have the biggest criminal scandal in U.S. history. | ||
| Why won't they release the other 40%? | ||
| The same reason they didn't want to release the first 60%. | ||
| It shows corruption at the highest levels. | ||
| It shows politicization. | ||
| It shows political enemies using the intelligence system and law enforcement to prosecute a political vendetta, which should never be allowed. | ||
| So I am going to continue that work at the National Archives. | ||
| I apologize. | ||
| I can't get it declassified overnight, but I'm on it. | ||
| Let me... | ||
| Show you an article that was published overnight from the Rolling Stone. | ||
| The Rolling Stone writing that in his final days at the White House, Donald Trump told his top advisors, Kash Patel, that he needed to preserve certain Russia-related documents to keep his enemies from destroying them. | ||
| The documents related to federal investigation into the Russia election meddling and alleged collusion with Donald Trump's campaign that has been fully debunked. | ||
| At the end of his presidency, Trump and his team pushed to declassify these so-called Russiagate documents, believing they would expose a deep state plot against him. | ||
| According to a person with direct knowledge of the situation and another source briefed on the matter, Trump told several people working on the outside with the White House that he was concerned that Joe Biden's incoming administration would shred, bury, or destroy the evidence that Trump was wronged. | ||
| They go on to cite our show as the first time that a member of Trump's inner circle discussed heading to the National Archives with a backpack to get these documents and make them public. | ||
| These are the documents. | ||
| These are the reason that the raid on Donald Trump's home happened. | ||
| We have been covering this story non-stop for a month, okay? | ||
| The raid happened on August 8th. | ||
| We have been slowly but surely getting to the point where we are now 100% sure. | ||
| That this was a political raid executed by a political Gestapo in order to cover the asses of the deep state. | ||
| They knew Donald Trump declassified these documents. | ||
| That's what this is all about. | ||
| This is about the Russiagate documents and the sloppiness and the banality and the malevolence of the Obama administration in order to cover up their crimes. | ||
| This now confirmed by Rolling Stone and their reporting, along with other corporate leftist news media reporting. | ||
| They cite our show as the first time that a member of Trump's inner circle described this battle. | ||
| Kash Patel there saying, you only know 60% of what happened. | ||
| The other 40% they have hidden, Donald Trump declassified it, and this is what the battle is over. | ||
| Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe told CBS, Do you see what's happening? | ||
| This is it! | ||
| All you have to do is look back. | ||
| Now we are going to show you, from CNN of all places, the reason why you are seeing these selective leaks about nuclear capacity for various countries. | ||
| Now that's the news story out, right? | ||
| That Trump had nuclear capacity documents. | ||
| This is the story out now. | ||
| Go back to this CNN article from... | ||
| 2021, November 18th, Steele dossier, a reckoning, buried deep in the article. | ||
| You can find exactly why Donald Trump may have some type of classification of a foreign country's nuclear capability or defense capability. | ||
| The reason why is because this entire Steele dossier and the FISA warrants that were delivered FISA standing for Foreign Surveillance Warrant. | ||
| That's what FISA stands for. | ||
| It's because the Steele dossier was completely corroborated and made up, stitched together by a bunch of foreign actors, foreign adversaries to the United States of America. | ||
| It was a made-up document constructed by spooks and freaks from Moscow to London. | ||
| This was a foreign meddling document, and CNN says so here in their reporting. | ||
| Of all places, we wanted to cite for you, CNN, this article. | ||
| Steals sourcing disintegrates. | ||
| This is the section of the article I will read to you. | ||
| Drachenko indictment alleges that he lied to the FBI, and possibly still too, about the details that became central to the dossier. | ||
| Drachenko himself is a Russian national. | ||
| He was also attributed misinformation to Sergei Milan, who is a Belarusian-American businessman, another foreigner. | ||
| These are the sources, along with another Russian. | ||
| Her name is Olga Gratinka. | ||
| So here you have three foreigners, a Belarusian, a Russian, another Russian, Steele, who ran the MI6. | ||
| Operations table for Russian agents who worked out of Moscow, who was a big Hillary fan. | ||
| This entire operation was a foreign intelligence operation in order to slander and smear Trump paid for by Hillary Clinton. | ||
| With full knowledge from our CIA, our FBI, and the Obama administration. | ||
| This is it! | ||
| You heard it here first on the 4th of July. | ||
| I'm sorry, I'll calm down. | ||
| You heard it here first on the 4th of July. | ||
| Kash Patel told you exactly what they were after. | ||
| He told you that they were stonewalling. | ||
| And now you can see, laid directly before you, this is what they're after. | ||
| So when they leak about Trump having nuclear capability codes and so forth, what they're really leaking is the Steele dossier. | ||
| Right here. | ||
| Royce, scroll down in the article. | ||
| Some of Steele's sourcing disintegrates. | ||
| According to CNN, Steele used multiple Russian spies, a Belarusian businessman, shady, in order to stitch together his fake bundle, witch's kitchen hoax about Donald Trump. | ||
| These are the documents that Trump had. | ||
| They were paid for by Hillary Clinton. | ||
| They were approved by Barack Obama. | ||
| They were approved of by Joe Biden. | ||
| The reason that Donald Trump has some nuclear capacity or whatever they're leaking right now is because these agencies, the FBI, the CIA, working in consultation with Barack Obama and his White House, Joe Biden included, spread the information that was paid for by Hillary Clinton That was cobbled together through Russian spies. | ||
| Steele, Drachenko... | ||
| Sergei Milan. | ||
| Olga Gatinka. | ||
| Benny, you're going crazy. | ||
| No, I'm reading CNN! | ||
| And now I'm reading The Rolling Stone. | ||
| And the Rolling Stone is citing our show and citing Kash Patel's interview on this show on the 4th of July and they were showing you, we were showing you at that time exactly what was about to happen. | ||
| We were right. | ||
| I hate to be right in this scenario, but we were right. | ||
| So when you see the selective leaks, when you look at what's happening with Trump and the FBI as you watch the court orders and this battle continue, know this. | ||
| You know the truth. | ||
| And you heard it here on this show. | ||
| And we are thrilled to bring you the truth. | ||
| That is why we do what we do. | ||
| The same cabal of liars who have set this all up, Obama, all the way down to his archivist, David Fierro, through the intelligence agencies, discredited and disgraced, the John Brennans of the worlds and the James Comey of the worlds. | ||
| All of this was designed, and all of this is still being operational. | ||
| This is Russiagate 3.0. | ||
| This is the third time they impeached him for the second time. | ||
| They did the Mueller report for the first time. | ||
| This is 3.0. | ||
| They're now going after Trump for the exact same thing. | ||
| Planted fake evidence by them. | ||
| The same cabal is back at the White House desecrating those hollowed rooms in the hollowed ground yesterday in Barack Obama's portraiture unveiling at the White House. | ||
| It was a complete cringe fest. | ||
| These people are guilty of sin. | ||
| They know they have lost the will of the American people. | ||
| There was a little celebration at the White House. | ||
| It was horrifying because of its cringiness. | ||
| Starting with, but not limited to, Joe Biden's bringing back his ASMR whisper. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go. | |
| That's why you'll be considered one of the most consequential presidents in our history. | ||
| Along with one of the most consequential first ladies. | ||
| You know, Michelle. | ||
| He knows, we all know, he couldn't have done it without you. | ||
| *crowd cheers* Okay, Grandpa, calm down. | ||
| Again, he's got the Werther's original stuck in the back of his mouth. | ||
| The cringe continued as Jill Biden stood up in front of the entire country and roasted Joe. | ||
| These people have sick marriages. | ||
| They have sick personal lives. | ||
| They're unhappy people. | ||
| They're godless people. | ||
| Jill Biden was the babysitter. | ||
| That's why she's in this position. | ||
| She was Joe Biden's babysitter, babysitting Hunter Biden. | ||
| Did you know that? | ||
| Did you know that's how Jill and Joe got connected? | ||
| She was the babysitter, the homewrecker. | ||
| If you want to know why Hunter Biden turned out the way he did, man, and Ashley Biden and the entire sick lot of rotten apples, boy, you can look to Joe and you can look to Jill. | ||
| And if you wonder if they have a happy marriage, go ahead and watch a clip like this, where Jill Biden humiliates her husband in front of the entire nation while giving Kamala Harris a run for her money in the cackle fest. | ||
|
unidentified
|
go. | |
| Joe, honestly, everybody stood but Joe. | ||
| Joe. | ||
| Joe. | ||
| Thank you, Michelle, for a friendship I treasure. | ||
| How incredibly humiliating. | ||
| I mean, listen, man, this is just tantamount to elder abuse at this point. | ||
| You just got to call it what it is. | ||
| It's just a disgrace that Jill Biden does this actually quite regularly. | ||
| We covered this on the Newsmax show where Jill Biden insults her husband. | ||
| If you want to know what's happening with the dude, yo, dudes. | ||
| Watch the way your wives treat you, okay? | ||
| Your wives and girlfriends. | ||
| Because other men and other people pay attention. | ||
| Guys are typically, like, not the greatest with emotions. | ||
| If you want to really see the measure of a man, see the way his wife treats him. | ||
| If his wife treats him like garbage, if his wife treats him like he's an idiot, well, maybe he is. | ||
| The wives know, man. | ||
| Women have... | ||
| Sixth senses about this stuff. | ||
| And is Jill Biden malevolent towards Joe? | ||
| I mean, we actually think that Jill Biden just knows that Joe is decrepit and unable to care for himself, and he isn't with us. | ||
| Jill Biden knows Joe better than any other person on this earth. | ||
| That is undeniable. | ||
| And does she love him? | ||
| I don't know, man. | ||
| How else would you, like, why else would you stick with a guy who's so diseased and dandruffy and creepy? | ||
| Maybe she does. | ||
| I think that when Jill Biden is diminutive and mean to Joe Biden, it's because she's frustrated, and it's because Jill is actually screaming silently to the rest of us that Joe Biden isn't with us. | ||
| Now, Michelle Obama got up on stage, and she didn't scream silently at all. | ||
| Michelle Obama got up on stage and said, I really like the second gentleman. | ||
| Here's Michelle Obama talking about Doug Emelhoff, whatever, Kamala Harris's husband. | ||
| Go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you so much. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| And, of course, to Vice President Harris, and I love to say this, second gentleman. | ||
| Let's say it again. | ||
| Second gentleman, you're doing a great job. | ||
| Let's say it again. | ||
| It's virtue signaling, man. | ||
| I mean, all of this stuff. | ||
| Virtue signaling is people who don't have actual virtue signaling to you that they're virtuous. | ||
| Talking about a second gentleman. | ||
| Okay, great. | ||
| Maybe this is the first time in modern history that a white guy has been honored inside of the White House. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Inside of like a Joe Biden, new left, zeitgeist. | ||
| Wow, way to go, Doug Emelhoff, whatever, however you pronounce the name. | ||
| Dude, it's just virtue signaling. | ||
| There's not an actual focus on making lives better for the American people. | ||
| It's tokenism. | ||
| It's pure tokenism. | ||
| That's all it is. | ||
| And it's just about, like, breaking, just shattering. | ||
| The shattering of every conceivable glass ceiling. | ||
| It's not working. | ||
| It's not working with the American people. | ||
| Apparently there is a beef between Joe Biden and Barack Obama. | ||
| This has been, you know, this has been covered. | ||
| You can almost see Barack Obama in his comments yesterday cringing his teeth when he has to compliment Joe. | ||
| Barack Obama going, Whoa! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Joe! | |
| I hear slightly better than my tan suit. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go. | |
| You have guided us through some perilous times. | ||
| You've built on and gone beyond the work we all did together to expand healthcare, to fight climate change, to advance social justice, and to promote economic fairness. | ||
| Thanks to your decency and thanks to your strength. | ||
| Maybe most of all thanks to your faith in our democracy and the American people. | ||
| The country's better off than when you took office. | ||
| And we should all be deeply grateful for that. | ||
| So thank you so much. | ||
| All right, so exactly how? | ||
| Can you enumerate for us? | ||
| Tell us how. | ||
| How is it better? | ||
| Let us know. | ||
| Why don't you make a list? | ||
| How is the country better under Joe Biden? | ||
| I want a single thing. | ||
| Give me a single thing. | ||
| And like blue-haired lesbian librarians attacking Donald Trump and sending the FBI after Donald Trump, that doesn't make the country better. | ||
| Forgiving their student loans doesn't make the country better. | ||
| You're going to have to enumerate for me, Barack Obama, how the country is better. | ||
| And by the way, if you actually love Joe Biden so much, why do you treat him like absolute garbage when you're at the White House? | ||
| Remember last time that Barack Obama was at the White House and he just straight up B-T-F-O'd Joe Biden? | ||
| Watch. | ||
| The Washington Post reports there's bad blood between the two of them. | ||
| Barry may have been on his best behavior today, but we all remember the last time he visited Joe. | ||
| And he reminded him who's boss. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Vice President Biden. | ||
| Vice President. | ||
| That wasn't Joe. | ||
| That was all set up. | ||
| The Post reports that Joe and his team didn't like that. | ||
| They didn't think that was funny. | ||
| But this whole thing goes back a while. | ||
| When Joe used to grandstand in the Senate. | ||
| A young Senator Obama used to reportedly tell people Biden sure loved to ramble on and the guy can just talk and talk. | ||
| According to a new book called The Long Alliance, Barry also reportedly told an aide to, quote, shoot me now during one of Joe's floor speeches. | ||
| I think he speaks for all of us. | ||
| And believe it or not, Biden wasn't really a fan of Barack's either. | ||
| The book claims Biden used to, quote, roll his eyes behind Obama's back and just couldn't stand Obama's dry sense of humor. | ||
| And let's not forget this backhanded compliment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You got the first sort of mainstream African-American who was articulate and bright and clean and nice-looking guy. | |
| I mean, that's a storybook. | ||
| Got it. | ||
| Okay, so what's not a storybook is the relationship between Barack Obama and Joe Biden. | ||
| They hate each other. | ||
| That's become pretty clear. | ||
| We brought you that story last week that, according to a book that's about to be published, Barack Obama said, please shoot me. | ||
| When listening to Joe Biden give a speech, and again, as Jesse Waters says, he speaks for all of us. | ||
| Joe Biden there calling Barack Obama smart and good-looking and articulate, you know? | ||
| The kind of guy we've been waiting for. | ||
| Well, Joe Biden is none of those things, and recent polling shows that. | ||
| Majority of Americans say Joe Biden's anti-MAGA speech was designed to incite conflict. | ||
| This, according to the Postmillennial, polling has been abysmal. | ||
| The new polls are in. | ||
| The official polls are in. | ||
| These have been fake polls and Rick... | ||
| Rich Barris will be joining us in just a moment to talk about it. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, I'm getting ahead of myself. | ||
| Rich Barris from Big Data Poll will be joining us in just a moment to talk about this. | ||
| I'm sorry, I'm reading ahead here. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is the first official poll. | ||
| From after the speech, alright? | ||
| So they like to say that the speech, they like to give you the polls before these events happen. | ||
| So they poll stuff like the Mar-a-Lago raid and then they tell you these fake polls before they happen. | ||
| This is actually happening right now. | ||
| This poll was taken after the speech. | ||
| 35% of Americans said the speech is acceptable campaign messaging. | ||
| This is extremely, extremely dangerous. | ||
| The majority said that it was a dangerous escalation and designed to incite conflict. | ||
| The poll conducted by Trafalgar Group for the Convention of the States found that 56% of Americans, and likely general election voters, that Biden's speech was designed and designating MAGA Republicans as extremists represents a dangerous escalation. | ||
| Split by political party, Democrats were more likely to see the speech as acceptable, while Republicans and independents said that the speech was a dangerous escalation. | ||
| 70% of Democrats said that the speech was acceptable. | ||
| Acceptable campaign messaging. | ||
| That's really bad. | ||
| The vast majority of Republicans, 89%, said Biden's speech represents a dangerous escalation. | ||
| Uh, Along with independents, the majority of independents. | ||
| So you're losing independents on speeches like this. | ||
| You're even losing Hillary Clinton on speeches like this. | ||
| This is a catastrophic backfire for the Biden regime. | ||
| They were walking this back the day afterwards. | ||
| The day afterwards, Joe Biden was at the White House saying, Hey, yo, I didn't actually mean that. | ||
| The overnights on this were abysmal, were terrible. | ||
| And Rich Barrett is going to talk to us about it in just a moment. | ||
| But before we get to Rich... | ||
| Hillary Clinton was saying, maybe this was an overstep. | ||
| Yo, when Hillary Clinton, queen of deplorable, says that Joe Biden is making a mistake here, maybe he's making a mistake here. | ||
| Here's what Hillary Clinton had to say on The View yesterday. | ||
| You know, look, fascism is a very big word. | ||
| I know that. | ||
| But so is socialism, and the Republicans call every Democrat who wants people to have health care a socialist. | ||
| So I think we do need to be careful with our language, but I think... | ||
| The problem is if you go through the hallmarks of authoritarian regimes, you see too many characteristics, unfortunately, on our Republican side. | ||
| And my most fervent hope is that Republicans themselves will begin to reject all of that verbally, vocally in their voting. | ||
| Got it. | ||
| Okay, so you see too much authoritarianism, Hillary? | ||
| Really? | ||
| How about raiding of Donald Trump's home? | ||
| Is that authoritarian? | ||
| Using federal law enforcement to raid your political opponent. | ||
| Is it authoritarian to mandate vaccines and injections for people to work? | ||
| Is it authoritarian to censor speech? | ||
| Is it authoritarian to criminalize political parties? | ||
| Is it authoritarian to create hoaxes and pay for hoaxes that sabotage your political opponent, paid for by your campaign, and then shopped around to the DOJ and the FBI and the Is that authoritarian? | ||
| Is it authoritarian to impeach a president that did literally nothing? | ||
| It is truly 1984. | ||
| The final, last command of the party is do not believe your eyes and your ears. | ||
| These people are trying to corrupt and change and denigrate language. | ||
| They are trying to change definitions of words like recession and woman, authoritarianism and fascism to mean the opposite of what they are supposed to mean. | ||
| They are breaking the language and they are trying to break you. | ||
| But it seems as though they are the ones who will actually be shattered on this rock and the person who knows it best, the only pollster that we trust on planet Earth, Rich Barris joins us now. | ||
| you you Rich, thank you for being on the program. | ||
| We're a little bit late to getting to your insight here and we thank you for being patient with us as we talk through the bombshells of bombshells that this entire FBI raid was propagated in order to do political cover for the FBI, the DOJ, and the Russiagate scandal. | ||
| Now that we know that, definitively, let's look in at the polling. | ||
| So these are... | ||
| Polls that you have on your site, Big Data Poll, and you are saying that this is backfiring for Democrats. | ||
| Talk us through what is the data that we have seen so far from the post-Mar-a-Lago raid universe that we live in now politically. | ||
| Yeah, for CDM Media, for CDM Media, on CDM.press, people can go look at all the polls we did in Pennsylvania recently. | ||
| The timing was perfect. | ||
| And as always, thanks for having me on, of course. | ||
| But the timing was perfect. | ||
| You know, we went in there after he gave the speech and the student loan forgiveness, which I think is why, you know, we focused on education in these articles because it jumped right out at us. | ||
| I mean, Pennsylvania is about 60 percent non four year degree, about 40 percent with a four year in advance. | ||
| It was a great state to really look at this, especially if there's student loans. | ||
| But I'm not sure it was only student loans. | ||
| Definitely people. | ||
| I mean, basically, like, whoa, wait a minute. | ||
| It's a very close state in 2020. | ||
| Very close state in 2016 usually is. | ||
| That was the generic ballot. | ||
| If you looked at Joe Biden's negatives, and if 50% of the Keystone state strongly disapproved of him, he was only underwater about 43, 55, which is bad. | ||
| But the reason that I say only, it's because... | ||
| Only about 5% somewhat disapproved. | ||
| When I say they disapproved, I mean, it's hard to undo when you have those kinds of negatives, and it started to hurt that it's down ballot now, that generic ballot was looking... | ||
| Very nice for Republicans. | ||
| Mastriano was right on Shapiro's tail. | ||
| It was less than a point. | ||
| Even Osnell, who Fetterman was once at 47. After that, he fell below 44. He was about 43.8. | ||
| And Os ticked up about two points. | ||
| So, I mean, there's definitely a reaction here. | ||
| I mean, I don't know how anybody can argue there's not. | ||
| Again, when you look at education, it tells the tale, without a doubt. | ||
| In all of the years polling publicly, we have never had the state of Pennsylvania outside the sampling era at the presidential level. | ||
| It's always, you know, Hillary plus two or three, Biden plus two or three, Trump plus two or three. | ||
| It's never outside the sampling era. | ||
| This time we had Trump up by just under 7.6.6, which was, how does that happen? | ||
| It happens when voters in Allegheny are like, whoa! | ||
| You know, you're putting me in a... | ||
| This scares me a little bit. | ||
| And Donald Trump rises to the mid-40s in Allegheny County. | ||
| That's how that happens. | ||
| So anyone who, you know, disbelieves it, do so at your own peril. | ||
| What can I tell you? | ||
| I mean, plus seven for Donald Trump in a state like Pennsylvania is massive. | ||
| These are numbers that... | ||
| I suppose reflect the Wilkes-Barre imagery, right, of him filling a stadium to capacity, and then the line for the bathroom, the line for the men's restroom was larger than the Joe Biden event that happened 72 hours before. | ||
| Yeah, for Aaronson's team, that new Donald Trump Going to switch. | ||
| You know, northeastern Pennsylvania was going to swing some of these areas. | ||
| Lackawanna, Luzerne. | ||
| He was going to do much better in places like Monroe and Pike than traditional Republicans. | ||
| This time, again, people go through the crosstabs, look by region. | ||
| He's just killing Joe Biden. | ||
| That's where, you know, Scranton, Bidentown. | ||
| You know, the Northeast is just killing Joe Biden there, which was close in 2020. | ||
| We thought Donald Trump would do a little bit better there than he actually did in our polling, but still very close. | ||
| We were pretty much always within sampling areas in these states. | ||
| Always. | ||
| Not this time. | ||
| Benny, it's not close. | ||
| It's not close. | ||
| It started to remind me of like Ohio in 2016, where you see these people, you know they voted for Obama. | ||
| And just like we know now, they voted for Joe Biden. | ||
| We always ask people, who did you vote for? | ||
| And the sample was Biden plus 2.4. | ||
| Almost like right on the official, anyway, number. | ||
| I actually think it was a little bit more favorable to Joe Biden than it really was in reality. | ||
| But I'm walking a line here. | ||
| The bottom line is, those are people who said... | ||
| You know, I did vote for Joe Biden. | ||
| I'd either vote third party now, I'd vote for Donald Trump. | ||
| And that's why he's at 40. And Trump hasn't, not only has he not budged, he's gained some. | ||
| And you can look at that. | ||
| Did you vote for Biden? | ||
| Trump takes twice as many. | ||
| He loses less than 2% of the vote in 2020, which is statistically insignificant, Benny. | ||
| I mean, it's real. | ||
| People should understand that's real. | ||
| And I think it's part of the student loans. | ||
| And it's part of that speech, which spooked some people, a lot of people. | ||
| But the student loan thing's not going over well. | ||
| It's not. | ||
| So we're less than 60 days out. | ||
| Now you're seeing these sort of crises add up. | ||
| Student loan thing, you're saying, and we've been covering that, but we haven't seen any data on that. | ||
| We've been covering that. | ||
| I mean, it seems like such an insult to regular working Americans and people who paid off their student loans. | ||
| That's not going to go over well in a working-class state like Pennsylvania, Ohio. | ||
| I guess it's not going to go over anywhere. | ||
| I can't think of a place other than Midtown Manhattan and Upper East Side that would think that's a great idea. | ||
| What are the major factors, I suppose, that is leading to this switch? | ||
| And will we see, like, an October surprise? | ||
| Like, what's your prediction? | ||
| Will we see, like, this continued denigration? | ||
| We saw the Reuters article yesterday saying that Joe Biden is sinking again in polls. | ||
| Will we continue to see that trend? | ||
| Is Mar-a-Lago raid playing a part in this? | ||
| Obviously, the Hitlerian red speech and the student loan forgiveness, that isn't polling well. | ||
| What is your prediction for the next 20 days? | ||
| You know, I would expect them, you know, we think that was overreach, the speech, the raid. | ||
| I would expect something, Benny, because... | ||
| Trump is running ahead of these Republican statewide candidates, and he's typically running ahead of generic ballot Republicans. | ||
| He is in our national poll as well. | ||
| He's beating Biden by almost five, and Republicans, their lead on the generic ballot fell by about two. | ||
| And you have all of their favorite forecasters and pundits basically making the argument as if they care about Republicans. | ||
| They're giving them advice, right? | ||
| I remember Rush Limbaugh used to say... | ||
| Folks, they're not looking out for Republicans with their advice here. | ||
| Use your head. | ||
| They don't want Trump on the trail. | ||
| In 2018, we saw what happened. | ||
| He single-handedly saved the majority for the Republican Party in the U.S. Senate. | ||
| He did, Benny. | ||
| Let's be honest. | ||
| He ran around and he won those races in a year where the electorate was D plus 8, you know, nationally. | ||
| the House vote anyway, was D plus eight. | ||
| They don't want that repeat. | ||
| And now he is, he's announced it, he's doing it. | ||
| He started with Oz and Mastriano. | ||
| He's gonna be all over the place trying to gin up the Republican base, which is what he needs to do because the difference between him and Republicans where they're running a little bit behind is that when we talk to the working class or if you have some college and associate degree, when we talk to them, they are 100% behind Donald Trump. | ||
| When we ask them about a generic Republican, I don't really know. | ||
| I don't trust those guys to really do what they say. | ||
| Donald Trump, as a different Republican, is going to convince people to come out and vote to win some of these races that are winnable. | ||
| I would expect them to try to... | ||
| I think the race of Marlowe was an attempt to scare him off the campaign trail. | ||
| Do I think they're going to keep moving? | ||
| Yeah, but I'm looking at this from a political perspective. | ||
| They're trying to keep him away from the campaign trail. | ||
| They know that that is a turnout waiting to happen. | ||
| Look at Arizona. | ||
| Historic. | ||
| Look at Wyoming. | ||
| Historic. | ||
| After they raided Mar-a-Lago, what happened in Wisconsin? | ||
| In 2018, 53% of the two-party primary vote was Democratic. | ||
| This year, it was 53% Republican. | ||
| Republican turned out by 20%. | ||
| So they're not dumb. | ||
| They'll say one thing behind closed doors and then write their little op-eds and their cute little opinion pieces and call Nate Silver to, you know, hey, I didn't know. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, it is a hindrance to the GOP. | |
| So you can scare Mitch McConnell and the rest of them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And he'll say, OK, whatever you need me to do, just let me know. | |
| And that's how this goes. | ||
| You know, but the fact is they don't want him on the trip. | ||
| It's a no brainer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I would expect something stupid. | |
| I want to punch in on an issue that you hit on a lot on your Twitter and everyone has to go follow Rich's work. | ||
| It is truly the most important polling and the most important data out there and the most accurate. | ||
| And that's not me just being nice to you because I'm your friend. | ||
| Appreciate that. | ||
| That's proven. | ||
| Time and time again. | ||
| However, I do want to punch in on something in my final question to you because you are contrarian with the entire polling apparatus and everyone who does this from a corporate level on down to like a community college level. | ||
| Every person is saying something opposite of you. | ||
| You're saying that Donald Trump is the Republican Party, the core of the energy. | ||
| And that Donald Trump is the person who brings across the victory line many candidates. | ||
| And there are so many out there that are trying to say the opposite. | ||
| That he is a millstone around the neck and he's dragging the party down. | ||
| And without him, Republicans would be to the moon! | ||
| And you are saying the opposite. | ||
| I want you to, like, make that argument and then... | ||
| Make it, of course, in context of what you just said there, that they're trying to... | ||
| Why would they try and keep him from campaigning if he was such a hindrance? | ||
| They'd be like, go, Trump, go! | ||
| Get out there! | ||
| We want you out there! | ||
| Go on! | ||
| Exactly! | ||
| You know, this is nonsense, what we're hearing. | ||
| The truth is, since Trump came on the stage, you know, back in 2015, throughout 2016, it has always been true that Donald Trump... | ||
| He gave more to the Republican Party than he ever got. | ||
| His base was more than the traditional Republican Party. | ||
| So candidates from the traditional wing, they got the benefit of these new voters of Trump while they didn't always trade off some of their traditional voters. | ||
| Pat Toomey, Ron Johnson. | ||
| 2016, I just did this on Twitter before, neither one of them led into the RCP average or the polls. | ||
| Going into 2016, both of them were widely expected to lose. | ||
| Pat Toomey, who would lead by a point there throughout earlier in that cycle, eventually everybody heard it against him. | ||
| Franklin and Marshall had Toomey down by 12. Marquette in Wisconsin routinely published 10-point-plus leads for Russ Feingold, and then eventually they heard it at the end. | ||
| to a closer race, but never was Ron Johnson ahead. | ||
| What they did not see was what I'm trying to point out now, and they are hard states to poll, but they stink at it. | ||
| The fact is, they didn't see these voters coming. | ||
| In the end, what happened? | ||
| Ron Johnson won three and a half points. | ||
| It was the first race of the night to be called. | ||
| He drug Pat Toomey, who would have lost, across the finish line. | ||
| Anybody who ran from him, Joe Heck, Kelly Ayotte, they went down. | ||
| They did so, by the way, by bigger margins. | ||
| So then he might have lost that respective state. | ||
| So this is not really up for debate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're just wrong and I'm right here. | |
| The fact is Republicans couldn't pay people to turn out in the numbers they do for Donald Trump willingly and for free. | ||
| They couldn't pay them to do it. | ||
| They don't inspire. | ||
| Wait until you see this ridiculous plan they're going to release coming up. | ||
| It's going to look like 1994 all over again. | ||
| Same language. | ||
| They have lived in the past for far too long. | ||
| And honestly, it's not a good thing that one man is this much of a party. | ||
| But he is the backbone of the movement. | ||
| And until Republicans get on board, fully get on board, then I kind of liken them to teenagers who are approaching their 18th birthday. | ||
| And they think they can kind of like go out and live on their own. | ||
| But then they call daddy for rent money, right, because they can't get it done without him. | ||
| And that's what they need to do. | ||
| They've been doing this to Trump for years. | ||
| The man should be able to go relax at Mar-a-Lago and kind of put his feet up. | ||
| But he can't. | ||
| That's the truth because they will lose without him. | ||
| And the funny thing here is these same people then use his margins to compare to the congressional vote we've been seeing. | ||
| Minnesota won. | ||
| Perfect example. | ||
| Brad Finstad won that election and he won it by a margin. | ||
| He got the share of the vote that is the highest since 2014 for any Republican congressional candidate in that district. | ||
| And yet somehow it was an underperformance. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because Trump won it by almost 10. Well, right, because he's Donald Trump, but it was still a swing to the right for the Republican candidates. | ||
| Same thing for Mark Molinaro, who lost in New York 19. What happened there? | ||
| In both of these examples, Donald Trump was not present, so he didn't juice turnout. | ||
| They were missing about, you know, let's be realistic and say 50,000 working class voters. | ||
| The one town. | ||
| In Dutchess County that had a Republican primary, Molinaro won. | ||
| He still swung it by 11 points, but because he barely lost, it was a great result for Democrats because Trump did so much better. | ||
| It's nuts. | ||
| It's like apples to apples when it makes sense to them, then apples to oranges when it makes sense to them. | ||
| They're cherry picking. | ||
| They're not looking at the totality of the data here, and they're trying to... | ||
| You know, dog Trump's impact while at the same time using him as a benchmark. | ||
| It's extremely dishonest, Benny. | ||
| You know, it's like the statistical contortions they're doing, putting themselves in these presidents. | ||
| So your walkaway predictions for the next 60 days, what do we end up with in the House and the Senate? | ||
| You know, here's the thing. | ||
| I really, and I've been saying this for months, and I really do believe it. | ||
| I don't think McCarthy and McConnell want a big win. | ||
| I don't think McConnell wants MAGIT in the Senate, and I don't think McCarthy wants to get John Boehner, like the Tea Party movement did to him, right? | ||
| Where they come in and they actually expect them to keep their promises. | ||
| God forbid. | ||
| McCarthy's just counting votes. | ||
| He's not counting seats. | ||
| This is the problem with that, though. | ||
| Yeah, you can redirect funds and you can pretend like, you know, I'm not going to help Oz in Pennsylvania. | ||
| I'm going to leave Peter Thiel to deal with, you know, with Blake Masters out in Arizona. | ||
| But in election cycles where there are swings, Betty, it's almost like the American people can just about do whatever the hell they want and it doesn't matter what you have to say about it. | ||
| And in the end, I think that, you know, well, they break their, they have a ceiling of 247 as far as a majority in the House. | ||
| At this point, I don't think they're going to do that unless they get their act together, but they still are going to win the majority. | ||
| 25 seats is pretty easy at this point. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's easy. | |
| Even a two-point generic ballot lead that we found, that's a solid win for Republicans in the House nationally. | ||
| It's the way districts are. | ||
| And then in the Senate, I think, you know, despite spending how much against Walker, he's back up. | ||
| Right? | ||
| You have New Hampshire basically teetering by a thread. | ||
| You have Pat Murray who's in trouble. | ||
| And by the way, two-party primary vote share in Washington state is predictive. | ||
| She only got 52%. | ||
| We should have seen this coming. | ||
| But there's a narrative out there that's not jiving with reality. | ||
| And if it does swing, then you'll see things go that none of us would have thought. | ||
| Would happen. | ||
| That's the way midterms work. | ||
| That's the way, especially first-term incumbent midterms. | ||
| So I do think Republicans are favored in both right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Still. | |
| It's going to be a wild 59 days. | ||
| I want rich booked every single week! | ||
| I only trust this man. | ||
| I only trust this man. | ||
| We can do that. | ||
| Where can people find your work? | ||
| We're going to toss up your website on screen. | ||
| Yeah, Truth in Getter, at People's Pundit on Twitter, at peoples underscore pundit. | ||
| And, you know, we have inside the numbers. | ||
| As always, people can go check out on YouTube. | ||
| But the best place to follow me is peoplespundit.locals.com. | ||
| And if you go check out that website right there on the screen, you'll look at some of the trackers for our national polling. | ||
| That's for the Public Polling Project. | ||
| And if people want to contribute, of course, we'd be happy for that. | ||
| But share it far and wide. | ||
| Let's get a bigger base of support here. | ||
| The only project, the only, the one and only project solely funded by the public. | ||
| No media influence, no media money, just funded by the public. | ||
| So we can focus on doing the best we can. | ||
| Really proud of that work. | ||
| Really proud of it. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I think people would be shocked to know how much they use polling actually against the American people. | ||
| And they create fake polls in order to... | ||
| Rig elections, right? | ||
| In order to hurt the campaign. | ||
| They're not real, right? | ||
| I'll never forget Chris Eliza. | ||
| The day of the election, Donald Trump has approached 0% chance of winning. | ||
| He's publishing this from CNN. | ||
| I'll never forget it. | ||
| I want to get it framed in the new studio. | ||
| Donald Trump has approached 0% chance of winning. | ||
| This is Chris Eliza of, I think he was at CNN or Washington Post at the time. | ||
| Washington Post at the time. | ||
| Now he's at CNN. | ||
| That was the front page of the Washington Post. | ||
| Man, these people. | ||
| Such jackals. | ||
| Follow Rich Ferris! | ||
| Thank you for being on the program, man. | ||
| As always, Benny. | ||
| I'll see you soon, brother. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| you All right! | ||
| Seriously, it really is important for you to have the right information and good information and good polling. | ||
| Good polling will show you exactly where the country is. | ||
| And this next story is devastating for Joe Biden. | ||
| The great American squeeze. | ||
| 69 million households are now canceling vacations, driving less, cutting grocery bills, and as inflation hit home, pollsters reveal this from the Daily Mail. | ||
| The share of Americans who say inflation is causing them financial hardship has risen 49% in January, 56% with rising prices forcing 69 million. | ||
| Yo! | ||
| 69 million American households are sitting there feeling the pain of Joe Biden. | ||
| A worrying 12% of the survey's 1500 respondents said they are experiencing severe hardship. | ||
| This is what we call piercing the veil in politics. | ||
| Piercing the veil is this. | ||
| Most Americans want to sit On their Saturdays and Sundays and have their kids come running around and jump on them, watch the game, watch football, college football, the NFL, whatever. | ||
| We don't like the woke NFL, but what can you do? | ||
| Eat chicken wings, drink Bud Light, have their wives, you know, whatever, like shopping at Target. | ||
| This is what most Americans want to do. | ||
| That is the healthy and happy lifestyle of an American that is your birthright. | ||
| You have a right to live peacefully and happily in the way you want to live. | ||
| That is your birthright as an American. | ||
| Your forefathers fought for that right. | ||
| You work and break your back for that right. | ||
| And now Joe Biden is screwing with that. | ||
| This study finds That poorer households are more likely than others to be experiencing severe hardship. | ||
| That makes sense. | ||
| 26% of those with an annual household income of less than $48,000 say that prices are severely hurting them. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| Of course, Joe Biden would say that he is a president of the disparaged classes and the lower classes and the ones who are rising up in order to make a... | ||
| Political phalanx around this old, diseased white guy who's been in politics and has never bought a gallon of milk in the last 70 years. | ||
| No. | ||
| No! | ||
| No! | ||
| He's lying. | ||
| He's lying. | ||
| The Democrat Party has never been more pretentious, over-educated, whiter... | ||
| It is now the party of the elite, the Democrat Party, and the Republican Party is the party of the working class. | ||
| And we are very, very happy about that. | ||
| We work every single day to deliver the news to you. | ||
| People who don't want you to have the information that you need are the apparatchiks of Joe Biden, Dr. Fauci, and Karine Jean-Pierre, who will have to be delivering to a judge their emails. | ||
| Amazing, amazing article here from the New York Post. | ||
| Karine Jean-Pierre and Dr. Fauci are part of a massive lawsuit against big tech in the White House's coordination with big tech platforms in order to censor Americans and censor the information that you can receive. | ||
| This is an incredible article. | ||
| We are very excited about this, and we're going to be following it very, very closely. | ||
| U.S. District Judge Terry Dowrey's Tuesday order was the latest development in a lawsuit filed in May by Attorney General Eric Schmidt of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana that charged the executive branch acted in cahoots with social media giants to censor freedom of speech on a number of topics, including COVID-19 and penitentiary. | ||
| So what happened was the White House was working directly, we know this, by the way, from the documents that have been released, working directly with social media companies in order to demand censorship, in order to demand that various creators get kicked offline, in order to violate and be totally violative of the First Amendment. | ||
| So here now, once more, you have a White House that is working in order to destroy the American Constitution and your rights. | ||
| Evil, malevolent, vindictive, venal times we live in. | ||
| Corinne Jean-Pierre, of course, asked about this yesterday. | ||
| Didn't go well. | ||
| Watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So a federal judge talked about the social media lawsuits from Missouri and Louisiana. | |
| A federal judge ordered that you have 20 days to turn over emails communicating with social media companies over misinformation and disinformation. | ||
| What are those emails going to show? | ||
| So I can't comment. | ||
| You asked me this question last week. | ||
| I can't comment on any specifically ongoing litigation. | ||
| And so, again, I'd refer you to the Department of Justice. | ||
| A couple of things that I would say. | ||
| As a general matter on this, as we've said over and over again since the beginning of the administration in our battle against COVID-19, it has been critical for the American people to have access to factual, accurate, science-based information. | ||
| And ensuring that any media platforms have access to latest information on a once-in-a-generation pandemic is something that has been done since the earliest days of the pandemic. | ||
| Do you want to know how to do a great impression of Kareem Jean-Pierre? | ||
| Take a stack of papers and just look at them and read directly from them. | ||
| Read like exactly what is on the papers. | ||
| That is Kareem Jean-Pierre's every waking moment at the press dice. | ||
| Every waking moment is just... | ||
| And then they told me what to say. | ||
| And that is what we have to say. | ||
| Russia has shut down the Nordstrom pipeline. | ||
| That is how you do it. | ||
| That's your perfect Korean Jean-Pierre impression. | ||
| It's super simple. | ||
| That's all you do. | ||
| Never makes eye contact. | ||
| Really bothers us on this show. | ||
| Never makes eye contact. | ||
| We're making eye contact and we're making contact with you through Rumble. | ||
| We're very excited to be streaming this show every single day on Rumble. | ||
| Multiple times a day on Rumble. | ||
| We love our Rumble following. | ||
| It's skyrocketing, baby! | ||
| To the moon! | ||
| And we love this platform. | ||
| It's where free speech lives and we're very excited to say that Rumble set new record traffic for Gen Z users. | ||
| That's like very young people. | ||
| Growth surges as big tech censorship rages on. | ||
| Rumble platform has broken records in August, increasing monthly active users to 78 million. | ||
| Man, that is a huge amount of active users. | ||
| The platform reports that its 77% year-over-year growth, much of that growth, came from Gen Z users between the ages of 18 to 24. Yo, that's Royce! | ||
| That's Royce! | ||
| Show the sweet people! | ||
| Come on, the Royce cam. | ||
| We got the Rolls Royce cam. | ||
| Royce helps us do the show every single day. | ||
| This is Royce. | ||
| Royce, is your mic on? | ||
| You can't talk to the people? | ||
| Alright. | ||
| We're gonna get Royce lobbed up for stories like this. | ||
| I ain't a Gen Z-er! | ||
| I'm not some young spring chicken! | ||
| I was born in the 80s, baby. | ||
| Ronald Reagan was president when I was born. | ||
| Rolls-Royce, on the other hand, is 20 years old. | ||
| Yes, confirmed. | ||
| 20 years old, he is a Gen Z, he is a Zoomer, and he is in the age demographic of massive growth for Rumble users. | ||
| So if you're watching on Rumble right now, deuces, baby! | ||
| We love Rumble, and we are very proud to be a partner with them in broadcasting this show. | ||
| More to come! | ||
| More to come on that, hopefully very soon. | ||
| The growth is very strong in the U.S. and Canada, with a $63 million increase. | ||
| 103% year-over-year growth. | ||
| So Rumble just crushing it. | ||
| Chris Pavlovsky of Rumble said that when you look at the data, especially the 60 million monthly active users, MAUs, in U.S. and Canada, it's clear that Rumble's growth is one of the reasons that big tech platforms have stagnated. | ||
| And you have seen stagnation. | ||
| Although, I will say this. | ||
| God bless all of you. | ||
| We want the show to reach everyone. | ||
| We do this show every, you know, no like little login, subscribe to be a member thing on this program. | ||
| We broadcast this for free where the people are. | ||
| We love all of you, but we are very proud of our friends at Rumble. | ||
| Way to go. | ||
| Man, this enterprise is taking off and we need more free speech. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Except... | |
| For this kind of speech in our next CNN. | ||
| We need less CNN, okay? | ||
| We need less Don Lamont. | ||
| Don Lamont on air yesterday. | ||
| It is amazing how the iron law of wokeism means that all of us get canceled and everyone gets eaten by the alligator. | ||
| So it's best to just not be woke, right? | ||
| Why would you walk into the alligator pit? | ||
| Why would you swim with the alligators? | ||
| If you're guaranteed that you're going to be eaten, maybe you get eaten last, but it's a guarantee. | ||
| So it's best not to swim in that woke pool of filth, but Don Lamont was out there in the pool, splish, splashing around, and now Don Lamont is getting canceled at CNN. | ||
| We love it. | ||
| Don Lamont is branded a misogynist after asking stuttering Republican commentator. | ||
| I wouldn't actually call Essie Cup a Republican. | ||
| But she is a CNN commentator, 43, if she's suffering from mommy brain. | ||
| Whoa! | ||
| Essie Cup is a mother, and she was on CNN. | ||
| She was, you know, just catching her train of thought, right? | ||
| This happens when you're on TV. | ||
| You're sort of gathering thoughts. | ||
| It happens on this show all the time. | ||
| It happened on this show, literally, where I'm like reading ahead and I lose my place, okay? | ||
| It's just what happens when you're alive. | ||
| All you beautiful people, you get it, you forgive me when I do this. | ||
| This is a normal thing that happens on TV or when you're broadcasting. | ||
| This happened to Essie Cup, I believe this was earlier this week, where she just lost her train of thought. | ||
| And Don Lemon, woke Don Lemon, Women's right pussy hat wearing BLM Don Lemon said, Yo! | ||
| Are you suffering from mommy brain? | ||
| Essie Cup? | ||
| Woman and mother? | ||
| Dude. | ||
| Seriously? | ||
| The cancel bots are out for Don Lemon. | ||
| The iron law of wokeism, which is that we all get canceled, including the most woke among us, has come home to roost. | ||
| Check out the clip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Numbers don't add up. | |
| What do you mean? | ||
| Well, I mean, where Republicans are offering ideas, and they're not doing much of that anymore, the ideas are not popular among Republicans. | ||
| 13% of Republicans want a total ban on abortion. | ||
| 70% of Republicans... | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| But with restrictions, right? | ||
| Want restrictive abortion. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, I was going on a different issue, but you can go down. | |
| I mean, a majority of... | ||
| Did you lose your train of thought? | ||
| I do it all the time. | ||
| I did, but a majority of Republicans oppose book bans. | ||
| A majority of Republicans think that talking about race and learning about racism in school is a good thing. | ||
| Majorities of Republicans are not where today's MAGA Republicans are going and all the things that they keep talking about. | ||
| Which begs the question, what the hell are they thinking? | ||
| Is it fair to say this because I'm not a mommy, but is it mommy brain? | ||
| No, Don, I just forgot what I was going to say. | ||
| I forget what I'm talking about all the time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's COVID fog. | |
| You can call it COVID fog. | ||
| What the hell was that? | ||
| Hold on. | ||
| I mean, listen. | ||
| If I want to get a cast iron frying pan thrown across the kitchen into my face, what I would do is I would tell my wife, Who's gathering her thoughts that she has mommy brain and then laugh in her face. | ||
| Now, if I wanted to get sleep on the, not just on the couch, if I wanted to sleep like in the front yard curled up under a bush, I would do that on live TV, which is what Don Lemon did. | ||
| Goodness gracious. | ||
| What a jackass, this guy. | ||
| What a jackass. | ||
| And that's, by the way, what passes for Republican commentary on CNN. | ||
| In case you're wondering why CNN is cleaning house and firing everyone, John Harwood got fired last Friday. | ||
| We didn't cover that. | ||
| He's irrelevant. | ||
| But Don Lamont is up next to be fired. | ||
| Chris Cuomo. | ||
| Obviously, Brian Stelter was let go. | ||
| If you're wondering why they have to clean house, it's because, I mean, as a Republican, are you watching that? | ||
| Being like, this is how my views are being represented on CNN by S.E. Cupp? | ||
| By Max Boot? | ||
| Max Boot was on that panel? | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| Dude, you gotta change it. | ||
| You gotta change it. | ||
| And it's time for, we deserve, we have the right to be represented and to have our views represented. | ||
| That's why we do this show. | ||
| And that's why we have a simple ask for you. | ||
| Please, subscribe to our podcast. | ||
| Take your phone. | ||
| Go right here to this link. | ||
| Subscribe. | ||
| You got to do it because we deliver every single day for you the news that you will not hear on those ridiculous panels on CNN. | ||
| We do the research as we developed on this show. | ||
| We were telling you that this is where it's headed. | ||
| We were ahead of the schedule, okay? | ||
| We didn't need a time machine to do it. | ||
| We were there for you. | ||
| Can you be there for us? | ||
| Can you just subscribe to our podcast? | ||
| It's totally free. | ||
| Can you like our page on social media that you're watching this on? | ||
| Can you subscribe if you're watching on YouTube? | ||
| Rumble? | ||
| Can you like the page on Facebook if you're watching there? | ||
| It's a 100% free way that you can help support us. | ||
| It doesn't cost you a penny. | ||
| All right? | ||
| And we promise on the other end of this bargain, because it does take you clicking, right? | ||
| It does take you clicking. | ||
| You're going to see us in your feed. | ||
| We promise on the other end of the bargain that we will work like Dogs. | ||
| We will never stop. | ||
| We will be workhorses on this show to bring you truth and to bring you the news that you need. | ||
| We are in a dangerous time. | ||
| Steve Bannon had to show up in court today in New York. | ||
| Like, we are looking at dangerous times for truth tellers. | ||
| So we are putting ourselves out there. | ||
| Can you help support us? | ||
| Please subscribe to the podcast. | ||
| Please like the page. | ||
| And please, uh... | ||
| Help us share the good word. | ||
| That's why we're here. | ||
| We have the good word because we have our priorities straight. | ||
| God, family, country. | ||
| That's our priorities on this show. | ||
| We were born free men and women. | ||
| And we're going to stay that way. | ||
| We're going to stay that way as a community. | ||
| We're going to grow this community. | ||
| We have such exciting things to bring you in the future. | ||
| I can't announce them now! | ||
| But we have very exciting things to bring you in the future. | ||
| Some really incredible projects we've been working on. | ||
| This space is 100% funded by you. | ||
| We are not owned by a corporation or some giant media entity. | ||
| It's just us. | ||
| In right now! | ||
| Kind of like a garage, right? | ||
| We're at my house. | ||
| But new studios to come. | ||
| New advancement. | ||
| Huge interviews to come. | ||
| So many amazing things we're working on. | ||
| It's hard to keep it all inside, but we're going to right now. | ||
| We can keep a secret. | ||
| But not for long, baby. | ||
| It's going to be exciting. | ||
| God bless all of you. | ||
| Have an incredible rest of your day. | ||
| Please join us tonight. | ||
| Robert Davi is coming on the show. | ||
| He's going to be talking to us about My Son Hunter, his new movie. | ||
| Join us tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. | ||
| Robert Davi and then tomorrow morning Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch will be on this program talking about these huge bombshells from the Trump raid. | ||
| Amazing stuff. | ||
| We are so excited to bring you the truth. | ||
| It's what we do every single day here. | ||
| God bless all of you. | ||
| Have an incredible rest of your Thursday. |
Export Selection