Physicist James McCanney challenges NASA’s "dirty snowball" comet model, citing missions like Deep Impact (2005) and Stardust that found no water on comet nuclei, instead proposing an electrically charged plasma theory. He links ancient civilizations—Mayan/Aztec/Inca legends of Quetzalcoatl and Hopi elders’ warnings—to catastrophic gravitational tidal waves from comets, suggesting Mars lost its atmosphere via similar interactions. McCanney warns Yellowstone’s bulging caldera could trigger a supervolcanic eruption, dismissing NASA’s reckless "comet bump" plan to alter Earth’s orbit. Callers speculate on pole shifts, extraterrestrial tech intercepting asteroids, and oil’s cometary origins, while McCanney ties myths to Velikovsky’s Worlds in Collision (1950), hinting at suppressed solar system truths. [Automatically generated summary]
I asked you to watch it, so I would presume a good probably, I don't know, a healthy bunch of you got to see 60 Minutes, right?
And James Hansen?
The scientist who can't talk, talked, sort of.
It was called Rewriting the Science.
It was all about the White House, rewriting the science.
And oh my God, did they ever rewrite the science?
Talk about redaction.
I'm sorry, I know I shouldn't laugh, but it's you got to laugh or you'll cry.
He is a very calm, very non-alarmist, best in his field.
He said you may, as somebody else said, you may find somebody as good, but you're not going to find anybody better than James Hansen.
He's it.
James Hansen is it.
Top of NASA, top of the climate modeling.
And the 60-minute story, I thought, laid it out superbly, elegantly, without political tilt, in my opinion.
They just laid it out.
They showed you what the White House had changed.
And if you're not angry as hell, then you weren't watching.
It was an elegant story, to be sure.
You know, so this is a many, many, many years, going on a decades project for me, trying to sound the alarm bells on this.
And so I was very thankful to see the hard-hitting piece 60 Minutes did tonight.
Hey, were you watching Matt Lauer?
I wonder if Matt Lauer was watching.
Somebody do me a favor and send a VCR tape or a DVD over to Matt Lauer, will you?
Tell him courtesy of Art Bell.
I had a whole lot of email on the subject.
This is just one I thought it'd be worth reading.
It's from a gal named Honey.
There's a good name for you, Honey, huh?
Who writes art, the idiots are ruining our earth, and just where do they think we're all going to go when the earth decides it's not enough?
I cannot say how brave, I just can't talk about how brave this man is for stepping forward, but we need to keep this in the public eye, or once again, the government will shove it back down under the rug.
I truly believe they don't care, since, you see, in ten years, most of these old men will be dead.
But see, I have three granddaughters, so it upsets me greatly.
Why are we allowing these men, these men, who not only are waging war on other men, but ruining our very lives by waging war with the environment?
As women, we should all be standing up and demanding change.
We need a woman to run and win before there's nothing left to save.
And here I am still staring at the story from yesterday called Climate Change, Irreversible as Arctic Sea Ice Fails to Reform.
They're talking about tipping points.
And by the way, again, I'm going to be gone for a couple of weeks or so.
And I'm going to do a little earth tipping myself, a little change of scenery, and we'll be right back.
For the next, at the bottom of the hour, I'm going to do something a little outrageous.
I'm going to play the Rendlesham audio.
Now, it's about 17 minutes long, so I'm not going to do it right now.
Right now, I'd like people to call up and comment on the 60 Minutes piece.
If you saw it and you're not ticked off, I don't know.
So, I mean, if you want to dial in real quick, I'm going to take some calls on the 60 Minutes piece.
But then at the bottom of the hour, in 1980, we talked about it last night on the program, the Rendlesham affair.
And it's one thing to talk about it.
Let me tell you something.
It's something else to hear it.
And this was a military unit that went out to investigate a UFO.
Actually, a smaller UFO, perhaps a remote-controlled craft of some sort, but definitely not of this Earth.
And the audio at the very beginning is a little difficult to understand, but then it gets real good.
And you, oh man, at the end of the thing, they actually begin to see these objects, and it's pretty wild to hear.
And I'm really surprised that nobody's ever played it for you, so I'm going to do that.
I mean, we're talking about a military unit here.
There's no question as I listen to it and as you listen to it, it'll be obvious that Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt and this military unit are encountering UFO evidence of a landing, and then they're encountering UFOs.
And it's on tape.
it's recorded.
So, yeah, I'm going to play it.
What the hell?
You know, in fact, about a lot of things.
Again, I'm a libertarian, but I have deep, deep, abiding concerns, worries about what's going on with our climate.
And I am now too old and been in this game too long to give a damn and not say what I believe.
And what I believe is that we're headed for an unmitigated disaster if we don't start doing something about it.
This is not Republican.
It's not Democrat.
It's not even libertarian.
It's just science.
And we don't get off our butts and do something pretty quick.
We're just going to be...
It'll be our children.
Wildcard line, you're on air.
Hello.
unidentified
Yeah, hi, Art.
Do you suppose it would be mechanically advantageous from the point of view of future Mars colonists to conjoin Mars's motion?
But there was a time when our top scientists, I mean, the top scientists, whatever you think of him, in climate, he's number one.
And to have him muzzled, to have his words changed to the degree that it's changing the meaning that he's trying to get across to the world and to America, well, that's just not American.
unidentified
But I did read the CBS newsprint that you had on the webpage.
Are you concerned that you just might not be getting the truth and that the planning that we should be doing because of what they say is happening, not might be happening, but is happening, that we ought to be doing something about it?
unidentified
Well, of course.
I think that the recent past shows us that we have to take preparations of our own.
For all the people that might not think that you're being partisan with the politics involving this, I'd like to say one need only to listen to past shows where you were critical of the Clinton administration and took him to task.
And I watched the show tonight, as you recommended, and I thought that it was surprising that it was a lawyer, like you said before, that was doing the editing of the NASA scientists' report.
But I didn't find it surprising that he's now working for ExxonMobil, and that's all I had.
And I have been watching the climate for years because my children, they're really old now, but they laugh at me and they say, Mom, you and the weather.
Well, I've been watching and talking about it for 20 years to them, and you are so right on, but I don't know what we can do.
They're still going to be around in 40 years, we hope.
Anyway, another thing about the current administration, and I don't like to call our sitting president or any president names because that doesn't get you anywhere.
On this issue, it is extremely important to go back to stories that were out initially around February 9th on this George Deutsch, the man Deutsch, who is a NASA official, and the other official, Dina Costa, who was the press secretary, when they were finally talking about James Hansen and how many other scientists have been mothballed at this point after I see stories on this issue from February.
I've seen them from March 19th and going back to March 19th.
And Linda Maltenhow, who I've spoken to on innumerable times about these issues.
Yes.
And it just keeps welling and welling and welling into a planetary catastrophe.
And that's why people should really tune in and figure out what the ominous parallels are with government and censorship and the amount of what's turning this country into something other than this free republic we call America.
I remember when I started doing a talk show long ago, and people used to make the kind of statements that you just made, and I would go, oh, come on, it may be a lot of things, but it's still America.
Now, you know, now, I don't know, maybe that sentiment fits.
And, man, that's one sad thing to contemplate, that, you know, it's not America, not the America we knew.
This will chill you, I promise.
Hold on.
Get close to the radio.
Turn the volume up a little bit, because coming up, I don't think you've ever, ever heard this.
The End If
you didn't go back and listen to the archives, about Bentwaters.
Now, listen to me carefully.
What you're about to hear is Rendlesham.
Now, this is a military unit that responded, and they're out in the forest in Rendlesham, and it's obviously a military unit.
Now, after we talked about it on the show last night, I said, my God, there's a tape of this.
And he said, yes, oh, yes.
And so, as I say, I take my own show seriously.
I went on the web immediately after the program and listened.
I went, oh, my God.
It's like the audience has got to hear this.
Now, the first part of it is going to be difficult to hear.
But then it will begin to sort of clear up, and you'll get used to listening to it after a moment.
What I'd like you to do is kind of curl around your radio and listen very carefully, because, again, you're going to hear a military unit responding to a UFO landing report, finding some physical evidence.
And then, oh, my God, at the end, they're going to actually see them themselves.
You're also going to hear them taking a Geiger counter reading.
So, I mean, this is dramatic stuff.
It's about 17 minutes.
Here it is.
26 years ago.
Here's what happened.
unidentified
150 feet or more from the initial, I should say, suspected impact point.
Okay, we're now approaching the area within about 25, 30 feet.
What kind of readings we get?
Hey, just five foot.
300 clicks.
Any impressions?
There's one.
Are they all bigger than they are?
Well, there's one more well.
The security control.
We're still getting clicks.
Click.
Can we read that on the scale?
Yes, sir.
We're now on the 510 scale.
And we're reading about the 4th day coming.
Okay, we're still covering it.
It's safe here.
We have a light on 4th day.
That's right.
Security.
Can you hear those?
It's still minor readings.
Second.
We can.
Pod orientation.
First.
Security.
Security.
This one's good.
Let's go to the third one over here.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Time to do it.
Yes, now I'm getting some residual.
I can read now.
The meter is definitely giving a little pulse.
Yes.
Okay.
I'm getting some.
That's what I was going to say.
Let's go to the center of the area next and see what kind of reading we get out there.
Let's see.
Yeah.
You're reading the clicks.
I can't hear the clicks.
Yes, sir.
Got them up the center, Bruce?
Yes.
Okay, let's go to the center.
Yes.
That's the best deflection needle I've seen yet.
Okay, can you give me an estimation where I'm on the point?
0.5 scale we're getting at uh approximately 0125 hours we're getting right at uh a half of a little rate at this point I don't see it go any higher yeah
Okay, we'll go out toward the number one indentation.
We first got the strongest reading.
And similar to what we got in the center.
About in a pot.
This might be in a center.
Looks like an area here, possibly.
Could be a blast.
It's in the center of the bottom.
Here you gotta take your small fingers by the front.
Here's to the Up to what, seven?
What?
Just jumped out the way.
here seven tenths right here in the center we find a small blast what looks like a blasted or scrumped up area here get very positive radians see is that near the center yes it is this is what we would assume would be the dead center thinking about more as you go along to seven tenths or seven seven units it's called on the 0.5 scale okay
Okay, why don't we do this?
Why don't we make a sweep?
I've got the gloves on now.
Let's make a sweep out around the whole area, about 10 foot out and make a perimeter run around it.
Starting right back here at the corner.
Back at the same first corner where we came in.
Let's go right back here.
Don't let the pin them on you count the clicks.
Okay, let's put the light on it and sweep around it.
Let's try it.
the gravity on someone it looks like an abrasion on it okay we'll push that light back let's go right back in it we've got the interest right over here.
It looks like an abrasion point into the center to the standing area.
It may be old though.
There's some sat marks or something on it.
Let's go on back around.
Alright.
So it gives an extension on there.
Yeah, this is an awkward thing to use, isn't it?
Let's see how it's carried on my ears.
Are we getting any further?
I'm going to shut the recorder off before we find something.
Picking up?
What are we up to?
We're up to two or three units.
Deflection, you're getting in close to one point.
Picking up something.
Picking up.
Okay, it's still not going above three or four units.
Picking up more of more bridgewood.
Yes, you're staying steady up around two to three to four units now.
Yeah.
Each one of these trees that face into the blast, what we assume is a landing site, all have an abrasion facing in the same direction towards the center.
Let's go around the circle here.
Turn it back down here.
Pick it up in the collection.
You're right about the abrasion.
I've never seen a tree that's ever seen a point, but damage reactor.
We've got a sample bottle.
We'll just ask for the soil and put the panel.
Yeah, here, a sicker substrate.
Okay, well, let's identify that as point number one.
That stayed there.
So you all know where it is, but we have to sketch it.
You got that setting, Neville?
Yes, sir.
Okay.
Close this to the wood bridge base.
Be point one.
Be point one.
Let's go clockwise from there.
Point two.
Point two.
So this tree is between point two and a half.
Two other personnel with quantity.
You'll find them on the key location.
Don't want them out there right now.
Okay, the sample, you're going to mark this sample number one.
Yes.
Have them cut it off and include some of that sap and all, is between indentation two and three on a pine tree about five feet away, about three and a half feet off the ground.
There's a round abrasion on the tree about three and a half, four inches in diameter.
It looks like it might be old, but strange is a crystalline pine sap that's come out that fast.
You see there's other trees here that are damaged in a similar fashion.
Why don't you take a picture of that and remember your picture and you ought to be writing this down?
What's going to be on the tape?
Got a tape measure with you.
This is the picture.
Your first picture will be of the first tree.
The one between Mark 2 and 3.
Meantime, I'm going to look at a couple of these trees over here.
Are you going to be rings on the tree you're taking samples from on the side facing the suspected landing site?
Four clicks max.
Up to four.
Interesting.
That's right where you're taking the sample now.
Four.
That's the strongest point on the tree?
Yes, sir.
If you come to the back, there's no clicks whatsoever.
No clicks at all on the back.
It's all on the back.
Maybe one.
Interesting.
The annotations look like something twisted as it got, you know, as it sat down on them.
Looks like someone took something and sat it down and twisted it from side to side.
Very strange.
We're looking at the same tree we took the sample off with this, what do you call it, star scope?
Uh-huh.
Starscrew.
Getting a definite heat reflection off the tree of about three or four feet off the ground.
Yes, where the spot is.
Same place on the spot as we're getting a heat spot on the tree directly behind us.
I picked up the same thing and one off to your right.
Three trees in the area immediately adjacent to the site within ten feet of the suspected landing site.
We're picking up heat reflection off the trees.
What's that again?
Shy the light out again, Bob.
Try the light and you'll notice the white.
Hey.
You're right.
Is there a white streak on the tree?
Can we turn off this tree over here now?
Just a second.
Watch your director of the tree.
I can see it.
Baby, give me a little sideline so I climb the tree.
Okay.
I lost the tree.
Okay, stop, stop.
Light on.
Hey, this is Erie.
This is strange.
Erie, somebody want to look at the spots in the ground?
Whoops, watch it off.
We'll walk all over.
Okay, let's step back and not walk all over them.
Come back here, somebody put a beam on them.
We got to be back 10 or 15 feet.
See it?
Okay, lights off.
He took this long to dock.
What do you think about the spot?
I see it first spot.
Okay, that's what we call spot number three.
Let's go to the back corner and get spot number one.
Spot number one.
You're spot number one right here.
Spot number one, right here.
Even some light?
There it is, right there.
Are you focused?
Focused.
Okay.
You can clear out spot number one through the starlight scope.
Slight increase in light at spot number one.
Let's go look at spot number two.
Spot number two is right over here.
Right here.
See it?
Okay, get focused on it.
Tell me when.
Okay.
Lights on.
Let's see what we get on it.
Slight increase.
Just a slight increase?
Try to center.
Center spot.
It'll be in the center.
It's slightly off center.
It's right there.
Okay.
I'm going to get your reading on it right there.
Okay.
Tell me when you're ready.
Ready.
Okay, lights on.
This is the center spot we're looking at now, almost the center.
Slight increase there.
This is slightly off-center toward the 1-2 side.
It's some type of abrasion or something in it around where the pine needles are all pushed back on.
We get a high radioactive or high act reading, about deflection of 2-3, maybe 4, depending on the point of it.
So there's a positive after effect?
Yes, there is definitely.
That's on the center spot.
There is an after effect.
What does that mean?
Means when the lights are turned off, once we are focused in and allow time for the eyes to adjust, we are getting an indication of a heat source coming out of that center spot, which will show up on the side.
Heat is some form of energy.
It's hardly heat at this stage of the game.
Looking directly overhead, one can see an opening in the trees, plus some freshly broken pine branches on the ground underneath.
Looks like some of them came off about 15 to 20 feet up.
Some small branches about an inch or less in diameter.
Zero 148, we're hearing very strange sounds out of the farmers' barnyard animals.
Very, very active, making an awful lot of noise.
You're looking at figmentation.
You just saw a light.
Where?
Right in this position here, straight ahead, in between the tree.
There it is again.
Watch.
Ready to head off my flashlight there now.
There it is.
Hey, I see it too.
What is it?
We don't know, sir.
So you have to try to get somewhere.
Yeah, it's a strange, small red light.
You'll see maybe a quarter to half mile, maybe further out.
I'm going to switch off.
The light is gone now.
It was approximately 120 degrees throughout the site.
Is it back again?
Yes, sir.
Oh, it does flashlight set.
Let's move out to the edge of the clearing so I can get a better look at it.
See if you can get the star scope on it.
All right, still there, and all the barn or animals have gotten quiet now.
Yeah, we're heading about 110 to 120 degrees from the site on through to the clearing now.
Still getting reading on the meter.
About two clicks.
Here we go, three to four clicks, getting stronger.
Now it's now coming up.
Hold up.
There we go.
About approximately four foot off the ground.
Coming setup of 110 degrees.
I just turned the meter off.
Got to say that again.
About four feet off the ground, about 110 degrees, getting a reading of about four clicks.
Yes, sir.
See it bounced.
Bounced down.
I think it's something other than the ground.
I think it's something that's something valuable.
We have the first night bird we've seen.
We're about 150 or 200 yards from the site.
Everything else is just deathly calm.
There is no doubt about it.
There's some type of strange flashing red light ahead.
There's yellow.
I saw a yellow tinge in it, too.
Weird.
It appears to be maybe moving a little bit this way.
Yes, it's right on half stat.
Yellow.
It's coming this way.
It is definitely coming this way.
Pieces of it are shining off.
There is no doubt about it.
This is weird.
To the left.
Yeah, definitely.
Two lights.
One light to the front, one light to the left.
Keep the flashlights off.
There's something very, very strange.
Keep that fit on.
See if it gets any longer.
Okay.
Let's get some rotation that just sits on a better reading, too.
It's on the bay area.
The bay field has been removed.
Okay.
This is a fall.
Let's see it again.
It just moved to the right.
Yeah.
Strange.
That's quite close to the edge of the woods up there.
Can you wanna do it out, Lates?
Let's do it carefully.
Come on.
Okay, we're looking at the thing.
We're probably about 200 to 300 yards away.
It looks like an eye winking at you.
It's going over from side to side.
And when you put the styroscope on it, it sort of has a hollow sair, right?
Dark Sair.
Yeah, like a pupil of an eye looking at you, winking.
And the flash is so bright to the styroscope that it almost burns your eye.
We pass the farmer's house and across into the next field.
Now we have multiple sightings of up to five lights with a similar shape and all, but they seem to be steady now rather than a pulsating or glow with a red flash.
Just cross the creek.
And we're getting what kind of readings now.
Getting three good clicks on the meter and we're seeing strange lights in the sky.
244, we're at the far side of the farmer's second farmer's field and made sighting again about 110 degrees.
This looks like it's clear out to the coast.
It's right on the horizon.
Moves about a bit and flashes from time to time.
Still steady arrowed in color.
Also, after negative readings in the settler field, we're picking up slight readings, four or five clicks now on the meter.
305, we see strange stroke-like flashes through the rubber sporadic, but there's definitely something, some kind of phenomena.
305, at about 10 degrees horizon, directly north, we've got two strange objects, half moon shape, dancing about with colored lights on them.
But guess to be about 5 to 10 miles out, maybe less.
The half moons are now turning the full circles.
So there was an elliptic eclipse or something there for a minute or two.
Doing a 3-15 now, we've got an object about 10 degrees directly south.
So, if you want to deny it, then probably you ought to be like an editor at the White House or something.
Incredible.
Coming up, Professor James McCanney, M.S., is a physicist who has now spent decades promoting his theoretical work showing that the solar system is ever-changing and is electrically active.
These theories have been confirmed with space probe data and prove that there are definite Earth effects resulting from our sun's electrical activity.
He has openly opposed NASA's view that outer space is electrically neutral.
McCanney was a faculty member of the Physics and Mathematics Departments of Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
He has researched theoretical celestial mechanics and plasma physics for the layman that would be studies of planetary motion and electrified gases in outer space and has presented his theories at Los Alamos National Labs and the American Geophysical Union.
That would certainly seem to qualify him, wouldn't it?
Well, I've been talking about this, and of course, in the general science, space science sense, for a long time, that NASA has been controlling its scientists.
And tonight we'll probably talk about cometary topics.
The same issue is going on where if you don't march the party line, you don't talk, it's very controlled.
Well, they found it in the tail, so they keep saying, well, it's got to be coming from the nucleus.
And what I keep saying is, no, it's being pulled into the nucleus, and these small comets are too warm to maintain it, so that water just gets funneled back out into the comet tail region in the form of neutrals.
And that's a term, a cometary science term, for a neutral atom or molecule that is then flowing back out in the solar wind.
So it's kind of a cycling process.
But when they crashed into Temple 1 this past July 4th, a couple things.
The entire surface, well, out of the exploded area of the crater, they found chemicals and organic chemicals and other types of dust and other materials, but no water.
And they were expecting that the water must be just right under the surface.
They advertised this ahead of time as a big July 4th.
You might even see it with your own eyes kind of deal.
I guess they figured they were going to crash into the snowball and split it into 50 million pieces, and there was going to be this incredible sky show that people on Earth could see.
And in fact, the most powerful telescopes could see a brightening, but then again, they saw brightenings the day before also when nothing was going on.
And we're all with our jaws on the ground when NASA said, well, we're not going to release the spectrometer data, which is the most important data because that tells you the composition, the temperature.
Well, they, of course, had to wait for the proper way to release the data.
And this is somewhat like Hansen and his greenhouse data.
But ultimately, when it was released, the comet nucleus was too hot to support water.
And they actually had to make that statement that the temperature of the nucleus in outer space was so hot that water in any form could not exist on that nucleus.
And then the spectrometer data, which actually got to view the whole nucleus over the course of the passage, was able to identify, It examined the entire surface.
Only 25 one-thousandths of 1% of the nucleus, that's a small amount, had any trace of water at all.
And so, just to give perspective, of the 45 square miles of surface area of this comet nucleus of Temple 1, only about six football fields in size had any trace of water at all.
And that was just a trace which was mixed in with some surface dust, and it was not belching out and forming the tail.
Well, this past month, much to my surprise, I was walking by a TV monitor, and the History Channel was airing a TV show, a special just made, called Comets, Prophets of Doom, where all the NASA entourage of comet scientists were on telling how this explained the dirty snowball comet model.
And I thought, now I hadn't heard that term for about two years in the media.
They were talking about these icy bodies and on and on, but they never used that term.
And all of a sudden, out of the woodwork came that special.
Then the Thursday morning after, the BBC released an article on this stardust result called Comets Are Born of Fire and Ice.
And that got wide coverage.
And it came from the LA Times.
It was reprinted in all the national newspapers explaining these icy objects from the distant solar system also have some hot stuff in them.
Well, they said it's a mystery, and they decided that there is something called the X-Wind, which they didn't believe in before, that somehow this X-Wind, I'm not sure why they didn't call it the Z-Wind or the Y-Wind, but supposedly they...
But they claimed that possibly early in the formation of the solar system, that these particles were formed near our Sun or possibly another one, and then catapulted out to where they formed with the comets.
And so now we have a formed over here, flew over there, and it kind of rings of what they criticized Velikovsky for, for that stuff that just kind of flew around the solar system with no physical means of support, visible means of support, so to speak.
And also with these, they've talked about Z winds and X winds and a thing called the T Tauri wind, which they believed was a high gaseous wind coming off the protostar early in the formation of the solar system.
Why is science, which should be a seeker of facts and a reviser when necessary, of data, you know, admitting that, well, okay, here's the truth, because science is the search for truth.
And what I find amazing also is in this Comets, Prophets of Doom two-hour special on the History Channel, all of these scientists have put their John Henry on this model.
And for posterity, this is after all the data's in.
And so, you know, in 100, 200 years, when the pendulum finally swings the other way and people figure out that the moon is not made out of green cheese, these people all have their face and name and, you know, all chatting about the dirty snowball comet model and how it's been confirmed.
And, you know, so I wouldn't want to be personally in that position for all of the notoriety and fame and free vacations that these scientists get.
Well, the sun, it turns out, puts out an excess of positive current, Primarily in the way of protons and ions, pushing out in the solar wind, and it forms a capacitor that is far beyond Pluto, with the positive side being out there and the negative, the relative negative sun in the center.
And so when an object comes in or is in an elliptical orbit, it's cutting down through the potential gradient of that electric field and discharges it.
Is there any validity then, in your opinion, you know, to the fact that comets are regarded as sort of prophets of doom and of change and of, you know, it's a very, very old, I mean, people would look and see comets and they'd go, oh, my God, something big is going to happen.
Is there a practical reason for that old, well, I don't want to say myth.
Well, in fact, it is a myth, and a lot of our mythology of the ancient Greeks comes down from the fact that the planets were fighting, and that's what Velikovsky is all about, that he wrote about what the ancients saw.
Okay, for example, I interviewed the Hopi, the Hopi elders, and they firmly believe that in the past comets have been portenders of change, and that, in fact, when they look into the future, James, they see comets coming and then monstrous earth changes occurring.
Do they have a basis in reality for believing this, James, is what I'm getting at again?
Once again, it comes down from all the nations of the world.
In fact, just looking at the fact that we have this segmented population of races, we would call them, of people from all over the world who obviously many were in communication at one time with other parts of the world, and there were vast worldwide civilizations at one time.
The whole evolution of man, the story that they came out of the cradle of civilization and somehow walked around the Bering Strait and then came down and populated the South American continent is it just can't be true.
There are cities they're unearthing right now in Peru along the coastline that they believe housed about 40 million people, some of the cities.
And they're simply gone.
There's no trace of a bone, very few potsherds, but very advanced.
What they do find is very exquisite artwork, but simply gone.
I've always wanted to know how a civilization, for example, ours right now, could in, I don't know, less than a million years, certainly, just disappear and not leave really a trace.
I mean, just nothing.
I mean, you've got to explain that because you're saying it happened.
And what happened was a vast ocean wave, which they also talk about, that Quetzalcoatl took the ocean up on his back and brought it over the land, which are the vast tidal waves generated by the large gravitational wave when one of these objects comes by.
And, you know, there have been events in the past where Earth has been hit by things, but in most of the cases, these objects come by and they do a great deal of damage without hitting directly.
I call it action at a distance.
We have the mountain building, the terrors in the planetary surface.
The ancients are very clear that Mars at one time was a blue planet, was a water planet, and it was relieved of its atmosphere and oceans by one of the large comets.
And they could see it, and that's one of the reasons they talk about the snake image, because as that extension, that plasma extension came off, the comet coming by reached out and grabbed Mars, it looked like a snake because the auroras around the planet looked like the snake's mouth as the serpent had the planet in its grasp, and they could see it go from a blue planet to the red planet we see today.
Well, these things happen very quickly because the exchange, the encounter lasts, the direct encounter lasts probably less than a month as these things move in proximity in outer space.
And it turns out that we did have two encounters with that same comet, according to the legends, the Quetzal-Coaddle, or Venus comet, what Velikovsky calls the Venus comet.
And we were bigger.
Our gravitational, our surface gravity of Earth is larger than that of Venus.
And oddly enough, the surface gravity of Venus is greater than that of Mars.
So in the tug of war over Mars's atmosphere, Venus won, and in the tug of war over atmospheres when Venus came by Earth, Earth won.
And we had a large pollution event.
They talk about the rain of Naphtha, the black blood that came from the sky, some of it burning as the brimstone and hail of brimstone and fire came in.
This is in all of the old texts, in the legends and the Hopi elders.
They all talk about this.
They talk about the severe winds.
And so, like in my weather book, I have a chapter on biblical weather.
And I've learned a lot just from studying what the ancients went through and understanding that our weather is driven by electrical currents of electrical activity in the solar system and not by just the warmth of the sun from solar light.
So if somebody says, well, is it going to happen soon, unless you see one of these coming, then there's no way to predict if it'll be this week or in 100 years or there really isn't.
Yeah, but the point is we can maybe have some differences on theoretical about this or that or what may cause it, but we're in a very dynamic changing solar system.
The electrical nature, that's what I keep harping on, is the meteorologists don't have a handle on the electrical component of this weather system.
and so here's my question james if there was a dark planet out there by that i mean Honestly, can you tell me about when you think our astronomers, amateur or pro, would detect the fact that, oh my God, look, something planetary in size is headed toward us, but it's dark.
If you went up to the surface of the moon, it would be extremely black.
So it's a good example of something that is a good absorber of light yet looks very bright.
The problem with these objects, when they come in the outer solar system, when they would be very faint and maybe just The best telescopes would start to pick them up.
First of all, you have to be looking in the right direction.
But second of all, immediately they start to discharge the solar capacitor and they become enshrouded in a cloud of dust and gas.
And that blocks the sunlight from reaching them.
And NASA has actually built a telescope.
I understand the funding has been canceled now.
But it was to look for large diffuse clouds of gases and dust at the far reaches of the solar system, which would encapsulate one of these objects.
And so in the background, I believe they are very much in agreement with what I've been talking about, because they're actually building the equipment to go out and look for these.
But I'm talking about Hailbop is big, but I'm talking about something humongous.
Planetary size.
Let's stick with Planet X for a second.
If there were one headed that was going to make a close pass, enough to do Earth-changing, devastating type events to us, I'm just asking how quickly we would find it.
Now, when the Quetzalcoatl Venus comet was captured by Jupiter, according to the legends and what we can put together, it was captured by Jupiter, and that's when they first noticed that Venus was born of Jupiter, the old mythology of where Venus came from.
And it was probably 600 years before it migrated in and circularized and spiraled in, so to speak, to where it came in through Mars and then towards Earth.
So, in other words, the human race could find out that here comes this thing that's going to pass very close to Earth, probably causing an extinction of life on Earth.
My next question is, something of that size, planetary size, James, what would be the chances of our diverting it?
And see, this is why I think they keep promoting this iceball charade, is so that when something appears up there in the form of a comet, they'll just go, oh, that's one of those little iceball things.
So in other words, do you think they would conclude, James, that the result of such an inevitable absolute announcement would, I don't know, it would cause such disruption as to not be actually worth telling the people.
So an extinction-level event would be kept secret as long as until it happened.
If you're like at the World Trade Towers, some guy was standing in the middle of the down, right in the lobby downstairs, and he was blown out the doors two blocks away and got up and was uninjured.
There was this special on the Discovery Channel not very long ago.
I'm a real devotee of the Discovery Channel.
And they showed what would happen if something the size of the rock that killed the dinosaurs, supposedly, were to hit Earth's atmosphere.
And what actually happens, James, is that the atmosphere boils.
The oceans actually boil completely out of their beds.
And that water is taken up into the atmosphere.
And then fire spreads around the Earth, igniting sort of the atmosphere, and the temperature on the surface of the Earth approaches that of the sun, or something like that.
It was a recent documentary, and it would erase all life down to the microbial level.
In fact, down into the Earth quite a long way, and there would only be a sort of a small area between the heat in the center of the Earth and the heat that had been coming from the surface where microbial life could survive to one day emerge and repopulate Earth with life.
Well, we've seen mass extinctions many times on this planet.
And we have, for example, salt beds from ancient oceans that are miles underground.
So clearly, something has happened to this rock here many times in the past.
We find the dinosaur beds out in Montana, Wyoming, that area, and other parts of the planet that used to be lush tropical fern forests and now are just the driest, most barren place on the planet.
So clearly there have been some changes.
And something hitting Earth is one option, but I don't think it's the only one or probably the most frequent one.
I think these large objects coming through the solar system, the other thing they can do by igniting or discharging the solar capacitors, there's a lot of energy stored there, electrical energy.
And we've seen comets come by the Sun before where they snap an electrical discharge off to the Sun and boom, out comes a big flare.
So comets can discharge the surface fusion in the Sun and cause other conditions so they don't even have to come near Earth to cause some very severe conditions on Earth and the other planets.
So there's a whole myriad of things that could happen to the solar system.
Okay, so if you were in charge, instead of being who you are, if you were in some high government position and you actually had to make a decision about whether to tell the people that something like an ELE is coming or to keep your mouth shut, what would you do?
And one of them is to, actually a number of them are to deal with this where you have small population centers all over the planet which are locally prepared.
It's not like FEMA can come out of Washington and help everybody in the country if something major happens.
But this would have to be handled at a local level.
Get off the planet, and there are certain people who would go for this.
And a colony would probably be, I talk about launching tubes, large carbon fiber tubes with a rocket.
I talked about the water rockets that the Russians used back in the late 80s, early 90s.
They were a nuclear-powered water rocket.
And they were a steam rocket, basically.
But they could get these things into orbit.
But launch the tubes, strap them together, build a city, much like the 2001 Space Odyssey rotating tire-like or wheel-like city, and then spin these off away from Earth and have them around the solar system.
Also, they would need electromagnetic shielding because the comets, when they come through, are going to be zapping everything in sight electrically.
So you would need shunts and bypass circuitry so these electric currents would not damage the...
Well, if we started today, or unfortunately, if we would have started 30 years ago on a program to really live in space instead of sending onesie-twosies up there.
Yeah, you got a point.
And I've always said that our space program has been a way for corporations to make money, not to go into space.
And I think that's very close to accurate.
But we have to change this whole concept of going into space.
And I kind of liken it to the surfboard industry, where these guys go out there and get on a surfboard and learn how to ride the waves.
And nobody taught them.
There was no surfboard school.
They just went and did it.
And that's the way I see outer space also.
And you kind of see this in the entrepreneurial spirit with Branson and the little bit of it.
You know, the Catholic Church, Rome, actually, from Rome, they've got this observatory down in Arizona that they blew right through all kinds of environmental obstacles just magically.
I guess they can do that from Rome.
And they got this observatory built.
And I always wondered what the hell they were, you know, what the heck they were looking for.
And you remember a guy named Malachi Martin who said that one of his statements was the Vatican wanted to know if Hale-Bop was wormwood.
And I know personally some of the astronomers who were hired to staff that facility because they came from the University of Minnesota and they were comet scientists.
A comet telescope is very different from any other brand of telescope.
And so you're not trying to get down to one little pinpoint.
You're trying to get this vast area of the sky, and plus you have spectral analysis points in many areas of your photographic array of the C C D. So you have the equipment is totally, totally, totally different than anything else.
And there's probably, we've seen comets come through the solar system that are pretty amazing.
What was it, 1886 had the Great Comet.
They called it.
It was seen over Europe, et cetera.
The ancients talk about these.
When you see one of these big comets raging from one end of the sky to the other in the daylight sky, everybody's going to know that that ain't no little snowball.
Well, we think, I guess we've been observing the sky truly scientifically for a relatively short amount of time, actually.
But we think we have all these things identified.
But see, space lives in millions and billions and trillions of years while we've only been observing for a little while.
So I guess what I'm saying is we don't have all of these comets categorized.
And what are the chances that one that we haven't heard about before suddenly appears and starts to grow larger and larger, basically headed in our direction?
Well, the object Sedna is in an orbit which brings it the closest distance is three times the distance to Pluto, and then it goes out to something like 87 times the distance to Pluto.
And what's the probability that when we found Sedna, that's the only one out there, you know, or that's the biggest one, or it's the smallest one.
If you look at the statistics of, I call it the size distribution of objects, we have grain-sized stuff in the solar system and asteroids and moons and planets.
Well, supposedly NASA has discovered some of these.
And it was actually Frank Drake took this information, the Drake equation, which deals with the statistical probability of life in the universe, and they updated that equation a number of years ago based on that fact, that they were finding these rogue planets.
Well, interestingly enough, about two weeks ago, I believe it was in Nature, the journal, geologist from the USGS wrote finally an article saying that, gee, the mound had risen.
And of course, they had begun measuring this in 1996, I believe.
There was a woman out there, and she was just monitoring the lake, and it was rising.
And almost like the Hansen event, they kind of muffled this for some time.
They did.
And finally, they posted an article just rather casually saying that, yeah, it's risen and they're looking at it, and they don't know anything about it, and other than there it is.
But the reality is that the lake at Yellowstone has been poisoned up until, oh, a few years ago, there were fish in it, and they're all dead, and the bison who would roam around the lake, it's a dead lake now.
I was driving through eastern Nebraska one time, and I picked up a brochure, and it's this dinosaur bed that they discovered of ash, where the dinosaurs are simply buried in ash.
And there's no volcanoes in eastern Nebraska.
So it took them a long time to figure out what volcano was responsible for this ash bed that buried these dinosaurs.
And it turns out that it was one of the sister volcanoes of the big one that's at Yellowstone.
This one was actually, I believe, in Wyoming, probably 500 miles away.
And it just showed, first of all, the pyroclastic blast that comes off of these probably killed the dinosaurs in that area first.
And then as they laid down, the ash fell on top of them and basically encapsulated them, dried them out so they were perfectly preserved up to today, millions, hundreds, you know, what, 50 million years later.
But the big caldera in Yellowstone has gone off in the past.
Okay, what the average person, I guess, wants to know is, I mean, I remember when the volcano in the northwest went bulge and Very little warning, and then kaboom, off she went.
How much do we know about the caldera there at Yellowstone?
And like I'm monitoring one right now in the Popo Catepitol, which is outside of Mexico City.
And it could just go wham someday.
Typically, though, they'll go in rhythms and they'll start almost like a birthing process where they start in a rhythm and then it gets the patterns get shorter and all of a sudden then you start getting the rumbling under the volcano and then it goes.
See, and I'm just wondering, there must be somebody who has measurements who can tell us, look, it has this much stress right now, and if it gets that much, it's going to blow up.
There's the shield volcanoes, which just ooze, like the Hawaiian Pacific volcanoes.
Good point.
But this one, according to the USGS own numbers, is overdue by about a few hundred thousand years to go off.
But there are two major things that cause volcanoes to blow.
One is sulfur, high sulfur content.
We know that the Yellowstone Basin has a very high sulfur content.
The other thing that makes them go off the top is water.
And that's one of the mega projects that I've defined that the Earth really needs.
We have to drain the water out of the basin in the caldera at Yellowstone.
Because if you took that amount of water and turned it into steam, if that were to drain down into a fissure, we know that when that bulge is occurring, it's not due to lava, it's due to gases.
So if that were to break and the lake would fall down into that chasm and hit the magma and blow, and you turn, you know what steam will do, it would be one of the largest volcanoes the Earth has ever seen in any kind of geological history.
Well, it wouldn't last long because the steam and the just how fast that would turn to steam and blow the material all over the place, it would just be a huge mess.
So we can't do anything about the sulfur content.
That's locked in the ground.
But what we can do is drain that water out of there.
And there's a natural path out the southeast arm of the lake.
That we have to move that water out of there to prevent the case of it falling down into a breach in like this one of these air bubbles, which we know are under that region.
And can we allow government agencies to be in control of these when they have political agendas to not scare the people or to say things that are politically correct?
A volcano going off in the western U.S. isn't exactly a politically correct statement.
Well, I mean, for example, last night on 60 Minutes, they pointed out that one of the Democrat administrations tried to pressure Hansen into saying that it was actually worse than it was at that time, and he wouldn't do that either.
I just thought I'd throw that in for balance.
So agendas, yes, they seem to carry the day, don't they?
And the global warming issue, I've always tried to insert a few things in there.
One is that they are measuring temperature rise, which is not the equivalent of heat content rise.
I use the example of if you take two boxes, same size, you fill them full of gaseous material, but you, say, put more water vapor in one, you can have a lower temperature in the box without the water vapor, but more heat content.
If you have the lower temperature in the box with water content, you can actually have more heat content in that box, even though it's at a lower temperature.
So, temperature is not an indicator of heat content, and the greenhouse global warming scientists are using them interchangeably, and it's a totally scientifically incorrect comparison.
It's too difficult for them to measure true heat content, because that would require knowing the atmospheric components like water, which holds a lot of heat.
Back to water for a second, because I'm not done with this Yellowstone thing.
I guess I want to understand if the lake fell into the broken bulge, I really do want to know what would occur in the surrounding states and to what distance this would occur.
It's hard to estimate, but we've seen very small lakes like this.
For example, Mount St. Helens, let's take a good example of a volcano that blew due to both water and sulfur.
There was probably a chasm underground that when that rumbling was going on, the breaks and the fissures were occurring, and water, probably from a freshwater underground reservoir, dumped down into the chasm.
And that's what took the top of Mount St. Helens off.
And you saw it took the top third of that mountain off in a matter of seconds and blew it 60 miles in the sky.
But the thing about Yellowstone is you've got written down here that it would be the perhaps biggest volcanic eruption the Earth has seen in 50 million years.
Now, that 50 million years, that seems like a really big explosion.
So around the surrounding states, the answer to your question is it would cover, it would blow material into that 50-state or that probably 10-state region completely surrounding the Yellowstone caldera.
Now, a lot of scientists believe that, well, I guess we know, don't we, that volcanoes actually lower the temperature on Earth because they obscure the sun to a certain degree, right?
Now, do you think that global warming could conceivably get bad enough that somebody would come up with the idea of blowing Yellowstone to cool it off?
They were going to move the Earth further away from the Sun, temporarily, to deal with global warming.
And then at the end of that time, they were going to move it back.
And the way they were going to move it was to take something like a giant, I don't know, maybe a comet, some planetary something that's headed in our direction but not close enough, and then insert it in exactly the right passage of Earth to just bump us out of the current orbit by a little bit.
And then the idea was to get another rock and put us back into orbit after we had cooled off.
The one I saw, they were going to cast material up in outer space, I think, fine aluminum particles or something, and it would block the sun and then cause cooling.
Yeah, I'd start to play with those kind of things and the side effects and the unknown, you know, like anything when you change nature, five other things that you didn't expect happen.
If this is really a danger and they're doing specials on Discovery Channel and such about it, and you're telling me they were giving us the data indicating it was bulging and then the data stopped, that's very troubling, James.
And there again, it's just like the Hansen incident or the issue with the dirty snowball comet model.
Science is not science, and it is so controlled and distorted today that you could hardly recognize it as science.
Somewhere above, however, I talk about the different tiers of science.
Much of what we see today is, I call tier two science.
There are groups of scientists, you don't know their names or you never hear from them, they don't publish, but they have real data and real information, and it does go somewhere.
And I always have a little special for the coast-to-coast audience for people who like to use mail order.
And tonight, the book we're talking about is Principia Meteorologia, The Physics of Sun-Earth Weather.
And that's kind of a long title, but it's written for the general public so you understand how our solar system weather works and how it affects us on Earth.
And that book typically retails for $35, but tonight for the audience, that'd be $25, and that includes shipping and handling.
Just that when things come in through either the web page or unfortunately, I have had to step out of the process of that just so that I could direct my attention to other, my research, etc.
The drill bit for tunnel drilling, and they put a big rotary machine behind this, and they just tunnel through the ground, so they make long tunnels, and this one was an extra large one.
unidentified
Okay, I understand that.
And that reminded me of a movie I saw called Armageddon where a comet was coming, and they had this idea of sending these guys out to drill big holes in the meteor and then put some nukes in there and blow it up.
And I was just wondering, is that even possible?
Like if they had a big enough spaceship to get that bit out there?
Well, the the problem with drilling in outer space is that there's nothing to grab on to.
When we drill on Earth, you have gravity and you can drill, but the drilling in outer space has posed a problem because there's no relatively zero gravity on these objects.
It changes the orbit of the object and without any explosions or whatever.
And you better make sure you know this is going to hit Earth, and then you spirit it away and it misses Earth because you've changed its orbit due to the tail drag.
But the physical thing you do is attach a tether to it and let it reel out away from the sun.
You know, that's the kind of thing I always thought, like on Star Trek, instead of having a commander that made all the decisions, sometimes the guy, you know, that maybe is closer to the action or whatever would have the best idea.
So we have to, that's great to have input like this because...
When one of these objects comes floating through, if it's sufficiently large to cause trouble, it would also be sufficiently large to, through some associated side effects, pick up a few rocks from the asteroid belt and also add to the shotgun effect, would it not?
And that's part of the comet phenomenon is what we call the meteor stream associated with comets.
And the ancients talk about this, the hail of brimstone and fire, the brimstone was the meteor streams that came in along with the oil from the comet's hail, the hydrocarbons.
So absolutely, it's going to be picking these up, and there's an actual physical process by which comets cause the metallic structure in, like, small rocks and pebbles to be attracted.
It's called the induced electric dipole force.
But absolutely.
And how big an object they would pick up depends on how big the comet is.
But absolutely.
unidentified
So this side effect could be in itself rather horrendous.
They don't know where they came from over in the Mideast, that are, they call them rock fields.
And they're literally entire vast regions of the desert that are just covered in rocks, and they have no idea where these come from.
But the speculation is they come from outer space.
There's a series of elliptical lakes.
They're small lakes down in South Carolina and the same thing.
It appears that a big barrage of objects from outer space came in and dug these out, But there again, all we see now is the result.
So obviously these things have happened in the past.
And now that Schubacher Levy 9, the 21 pieces, hit Jupiter, scientists have become acutely aware of these objects coming and having multiple pieces coming in at one time.
And NASA's one of their major two programs, they have two programs that are coverall programs within NASA.
One is called Living with a Star.
And that program, the other one is called Sun-Earth Connection, but the Living with the Star program is to learn how to deal with space radiation.
And one of their, they have hundreds of scientists right now trying to figure out how to safely maneuver through the near-Earth radiation belts, which are the Van Allen belts.
So that is a huge ongoing issue, and a lot of people are working on it.
But to answer your question, I can't personally say yes or no to that.
unidentified
Wow.
The other quick question I wanted to know is would that radiation belt perhaps help protect us if something came at us?
When NASA went to the moon, the moon, the Apollo program in the late 60s, early 70s, the only radiation they were aware of at the time were alpha and beta particles, which are actual particles that might hit somebody in their detectors, their badges that they wore.
Actually, that NASA symbol on their chest was also a radiation detector.
They had no X-ray detection of any kind at the time.
And there's an example of when they first had the shuttle, they brought it up to about a 500-mile orbit, and the astronauts' eyes began to glow, or their eyelids, or I mean their eyebrows began to fluoresce, etc.
Dr. McCanney, you said earlier comets can cause surface fusion on the sun.
So through the solar capacitor function in Comet Tempel 1's impact, could it have been an electrical short cause, thus the sun displaying an increase in solar flare activity and or a measurable change in the heliosphere that could be responsible for our strange weather happenings on the continental U.S. with hurricanes and tornadoes?
Oh, I was on the night with Richard July 4th when we were waiting for that data to come in, and we agreed on the air that there is something very hokey going on with the data.
But absolutely, there's something missing there completely.
But the photographs and the video, the series of clips, they made it into an actual video, makes it clear that this is not a snowball.
A lot of other things happen there.
The spectrometer data we were talking about earlier clearly shows this is a hot, dry rock with no water.
it's not producing anything that would form a comet tail uh...
sublimating water of any kind there's no Nothing of the sort was found.
And the first time I've had my radio shit off to Art Bell is now because you requested me to.
And James, what I was hoping to ask was, there's rumors that are saying that NASA has been going to the Hopi Indians, asking them what the heck is going on with the weather changes.
We may only have 100 years of data, and not all of that is the greatest.
That's a good point.
So where it's going and where it's been, but there again, I don't see a lot of good current data on that myself.
In fact, I've looked around for that, and it's one of those topics that there are probably some astronomers that have real good data, but I haven't personally seen it myself.
And one thing that I would have to ask James is when these large cometary bodies come by Earth, you know, he was saying that they don't necessarily hit, and I believe that entirely.
The probability is that they don't hit.
But when they do come by, is that one of the factors that changes the polarity in the Earth?
We have the magnetic, what we call the magnetic North Pole, which is somewhat loosely coupled with the Earth.
But the crust and mantle of the Earth ride over a viscous layer, which has actually been measured.
It's not hypothetical.
And then beneath that is the core.
And this surface can slide over the lower layers.
And that actually happens a lot of times during major earthquakes and plate shifting, etc.
But the bottom line is you have a large object coming by.
It sets up a gravitational wave, which then can shift this whole surface kind of shell over the core.
And then it redistributes.
During this process, the core continues to spin at the same rate and direction that it was spinning before.
And all of this then kind of locks back together after the event.
And it's very clear that our old North Pole used to be somewhere in the state of Ontario.
That's why the magnetic North Pole is trying to migrate up to where the real North Pole is right now.
So this really takes, Earth takes a very good jar, jarring.
And so to answer your question, both the magnetic pole and the celestial pole, which is the rotational pole, can change dramatically during one of these events.
A friend of mine from Turkey is a head of a group over there, and they have actual footage taken by an airline pilot of an object coming in, kind of like you would see almost in the Deep Impact movie.
And all of a sudden, a laser beam comes out of nowhere and zaps this thing.
There are three installations on Earth that we know of.
There's one in Russia, there's one in Turkey, and I'm not sure where the other one is, but that have been identified as what are believed to be ancient Earth-protecting automated sites, which can basically zap objects as they come in.
Is it possible as a consideration to think of a nuclear weapon, possibly using ion propulsion for speed and distance, as a consideration of trying to protect the Earth from an incoming comet?
West of the Rockies, you're on the air with James McKenney.
Good morning.
unidentified
Art and James, I'd like to ask about the abandoned supercollider project in Texas, whether that could be used as an underground safety site for NASA employees.
Art, thank you so much for being one of the elite broadcasters who are brave enough to not screen your calls.
You're welcome.
Mr. James, what I'd like to ask is, should somebody at some point choose to cool off our planet by simply rotating our orbit just a minute little bit, how will that affect the moon and what will that do to our tides?
They're due to the gravitational influence of the moon and the sun to a lesser degree.
But anytime you start changing these things, you don't know of all of the side effects.
One of the projects I had in my mega projects list was to take, when we have this increased runoff from Antarctica and Greenland, say for example, to take that water and move it to desert areas.
And so we'd have to develop ocean liners or maybe big plastic vessels you would pull behind ocean liners.
It turns out that in 19, I believe 91, Asia sent an entourage of ships into the Great Lakes and took 152 million gallons of Lake Superior lake water over to Asia, and they finally got it stopped.
Wildcard Line, you're on the air with James McKenney.
Hello.
unidentified
Hi.
Hi.
This is Perry from Sedalia, Missouri.
And I've heard you reference a lot of times the legends and myths and old texts and stuff.
And I'm kind of interested in Zacharias Sitchin.
And I just never heard of this.
It intrigued me whenever you mentioned about Venus taking the atmosphere from Mars.
I'd never heard that Venus did it and got trapped.
And it also makes me think of Major Ed Dame, something that he remote viewed one time, was something to the effect of something, some object bouncing off the atmosphere of Mars and stripping away its mind.
West of the Rockies, you're on the air with James McKenney.
Good morning.
unidentified
Hi.
Besides wanting to say that I think George had a caller of a truck driver who had a truck driver friend who had delivered something to Texas, went into a tunnel and drove for miles and miles underground before he deposited his unknown load.
And the primary reason I called may not be the most important, which I hope I have a chance to say less.
Okay, I don't know whether this is a cuckoo idea, but...
Yeah, okay.
What about the idea that the bird flu is a way to thin out the population for the known coming disaster so that the people who are going to go into the bunkers will have less trouble getting in there?
When we pass through these comet tails, it might take up to a month where we actually are passing through.
The ancients talk about the hail of brimstone and naphtha, the burning naphtha coming in from outer space, and that occurred at the time of the great flood, which also came in from the water came from outside the planet.
But to answer your question, the hydrocarbons form relatively quickly in outer space, and this is a whole branch of chemistry.
The water in the comet tail forms when hydrogen and oxygen molecules form the water molecule in outer space.
And this is a whole branch of chemistry forming these, for example, hydrocarbon chains up to crude oil.
In the chemistry of oil in general, you just have hydrocarbon chains.
So methane and propane and all of these different things we break out of oil are smaller hydrocarbon chains.
But the big ones, the crude oil, the black oil, is built up in outer space.