Ed Dames, a former U.S. military remote viewer ("Dr. Doom"), details his structured psi well techniques to locate missing children—like Chandra Levy’s suffocated body near Arlington—and suspects within 1,000 meters, using puzzle-like data collection and electromagnetic field analysis. He dismisses claims of consistent visuals (e.g., license plates) due to left-brain interference and links climate shifts—such as a 250% rise in major hurricanes—to existential threats like HIV, comparing it to Soviet/U.S. bioweapons research. Dames also explores dolphin cognition, "shadow people" as UV electromagnetic anomalies, and biblical metaphors like the "false prophet," which he ties to TV’s mass manipulation. While remote viewing can’t predict the rapture or pinpoint free energy solutions in parallel universes, his work suggests hidden truths—from Earhart’s wreckage near Kuria Atoll to Titan’s sponge-like life forms—reveal deeper mysteries than mainstream science acknowledges. [Automatically generated summary]
From the high desert and the great American Southwest, I bid you all good evening, good morning, or good afternoon, wherever you may be across the great cosmos.
I'm Arbel, and this is Coast to Coast A.M. on a Friday night, Saturday morning end of the week, albeit somewhat short one for me.
Howdy, everybody.
Well, I've got a big announcement for you coming up shortly.
It's going to be a night of big announcements.
As a matter of fact, in the next hour, Ed Dames is going to be here.
He's going to be talking, among other things, about the Chandra Levy investigation and what he has found out.
With reference to last night's show and the Bigfoot caller, I have attempted, made several calls to Robert W. Morgan thus far without success.
Knowing that time was of the essence, I have turned it over to another investigator.
So it's not just sitting idly by.
There is a contact being made right now.
And I will let you know what occurs, whether it was a hoax, the real thing, was a 700-pound Bigfoot waiting somewhere at the bottom of a bomb shelter in Michigan or not.
We'll know soon.
On another quick type note thing for you here, the story about Cuba.
I can't give you any details.
All I could, as you know, this underwater city off the coast of Cuba was a big, big story for us just a little while ago.
Now, I'm here tonight to tell you that I have inside information and about the only extent of it that I can relate to you is that it has legs.
This story is real.
This comes from inside information.
I wish I could tell you more.
I'm sworn to some silence right now for reasons that you would understand if you could hear them.
But the story about Cuba is real.
There is, in fact, an underwater city that may be Atlantis off the coast of Cuba.
I repeat.
I have good, very reliable sources that tell me this story is absolutely real.
And you can hear the mouths snapping shut just all across the hemisphere about that story right now.
But I'm here to report to you tonight that it's real.
And when it breaks, it's going to break in the mainstream media in a really, really big way.
And that's all I can say.
But I wanted to say at least that much.
All right.
What's about to happen here is really, really, really important to me for a lot of personal reasons.
It's kind of an interesting milestone, to say the least.
But I'm going to read you a list tonight of new affiliates that join as of tonight or have joined in the last couple of days.
They are, prepare yourself, as follows.
I would like to welcome KFGO in Fargo, North Dakota.
They're 790 on the dial.
KFYR in Bismarck, North Dakota, 550 on the dial there.
Welcome to the network.
KMAN AM in Manhattan, Kansas, 1350 on the dial.
Welcome.
KMZCFM in Winfield, Texas, 94.3 on the FM dial.
Welcome.
KOKPAM in Perry, Oklahoma, 1020 on the dial.
Welcome to the network and this strange program.
KRLN in Cannon City, Colorado, 1400 on the dial.
Welcome.
KWFS AM in Wichita Falls, Texas, 1290 on the dial.
WHQOFM in Shahogan, Maine, they'd be 107.9 on the FM dial.
Welcome.
WOWO in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
The big one in Fort Wayne.
Make that 1190 on the dial.
Welcome.
WSICAM in Statesville, North Carolina, 1,400 on the dial in my birth state.
Welcome.
WSYBAM in Rutland, Vermont, 1380 on the dial.
Welcome.
WGNSAM in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 1450 on the dial in Murfreesboro.
Welcome.
Let's see.
WDXY AM in Sumter, South Carolina, 1240 on the dial.
Welcome to the program.
WDKDAM in Kings Cree, South Carolina, 1310 on the dial.
Welcome to the program.
WGAI AM in Elizabeth City, North Carolina.
Again, my birth state, 560 on the dial.
Welcome to the program.
WSPCAM in Auburn.
I'm never going to get this right.
Auburn-Marie, is it?
A-L-B-E-R-M-A-R-L-E.
Albermo, North Carolina.
My birth state, I don't know how to say it, 1010 on the dial.
Welcome.
WVFC AM in Cortez, Colorado, 740 On the dial.
Welcome to the network and the program.
WCMT AM in Martin, Tennessee, 1410 on the dial.
Welcome to the program.
WKCY AM in Harrisonburg, Virginia, 1300 on the dial.
Welcome.
WTNT AM in Tallahassee, Florida.
Make that FM.
It's got to be FM at 94.9, right?
It's got to be FM.
WSFC AM in Somerset, Kentucky, 790 on the dial.
Welcome.
And WGAU AM in Athens, Georgia, there, 1340 on the dial.
Welcome to Coast to Coast AM now at 500 official on-air affiliates.
We've done it.
This is kind of like the end of a fireworks display, you know, when you get the big final volley.
Well, that was the final volley to get to 500 folks.
And this time I've chosen not to have some big celebration when, you know, everybody comes forward from the network and the stars.
And, you know, everybody says congratulations and all of that.
Even though it's a gigantic mark, I thought I would just share it with you and announce it as we just have on the air.
It's a big deal to me.
And I guess it's because, well, first of all, for long-form shows, in other words, not the short reports like Paul Harvey, for example, but for long-form shows that are several hours at least in duration, three hours at least, we now, I think, would be the second largest show in America from an affiliate point of view, next only to Rush Limbaugh.
And I think we're chasing his numbers pretty hard right now.
But we are officially at 500, unofficially at 512 affiliates.
We don't count an official affiliate until we have contract in hand and they're actually on the air.
So, I don't know.
It's a big deal to me.
And last time I was on the air before I retired, I was nearing the 500 mark.
And since I've come back, we have now finally, after all these years, actually made 500 mark.
And I can remember when I was 12 years old mowing lawns to get my first ham gear, my amateur radio gear, so I could get on the air.
From about that moment, even earlier really, in through getting my commercial licenses, then hanging around radio stations until I probably was going to have rocks thrown at me.
I mean, I really used to hang around, and I soaked it all in.
I learned as much as I could.
I watched everyone, the engineers.
I'd bum around with the engineers trying to get information and knowledge.
And then I'd bum around with the on-the-air people trying to figure out what they were doing.
And through an engineering career and then an on-air career and all these years, I always only could imagine and dream what it would be like to be on just one big radio station, the one near me, WABC in New York, was what I grew up.
I cut my teeth on WABC in New York and followed them as I moved around in the Northeast from the Northeast, from Connecticut to New Jersey to Maryland.
It was always there.
WABC went where I went.
And so I dreamed.
I dreamed that someday, you know, I would achieve that, at that time, that monstrous, impossible goal of being on one large radio station of the caliber, say, of WABC, WLS, KFI in Los Angeles, you know, really big caliber.
And I thought that would be the culmination of a career to achieve that.
Well, here I am with 500 radio stations carrying the program.
It is astounding to me.
I don't think about it a lot.
I've kind of had my fingers crossed.
I've been knocking on wood and hoping that we would make this 500 mark.
And we have.
And so it's kind of a big night for me, in a way.
It's overachieving one's dream.
I never in a billion years dreamed that we could be on 500 radio stations, and here we are.
Absolutely amazing.
So I'd like to congratulate everybody concerned.
And there are so many people, obviously, that I could name and should name.
So many people at Premier.
So many people in Oregon.
Alan Corbeth, the fellow I worked for.
Alan has been at my side through all of this.
And it's quite a bit to have been through, as a matter of fact, but he's been there the whole time.
And it would not have happened without Alan Corbeth.
And, of course, our own affiliate department.
And everybody else that works up in Oregon.
And of course, in Los Angeles at Premier.
It's just, it's been, you know, you hear this all the time when people accept awards at the Emmys and so forth.
You know, I'll never be able to thank everybody and I never will be able to thank everybody.
And so it's hard to even begin.
Craig Kitchen, certainly, for bearing with me through some pretty difficult times.
We've had some wild times.
Both Will and Steve, who are in the affiliate department and came up with a lot of these affiliates.
And the whole support staff up there and everybody again at Premier, it's quite a big deal.
500 radio stations.
Now, what I'm going to have to do is work to dismiss the fact from my mind.
Because when I realize so many of you are out there, I get nervous.
I still get nervous.
And the only way I can really do the show is to forget about all that baloney.
And it's not really baloney, but I just have to dismiss it from my mind.
The number of people, the cities, and all the rest of it.
I get the heebie-jeebies when I begin thinking about it, and I do my best radio when I don't.
Nevertheless, I had to call your attention to this milestone, and it's a gigantic milestone.
It really is a monstrous milestone.
And so, thank you all, and all of you obviously out in the audience.
How can I forget you?
You got me here.
Thank you very, very much.
It's been a pleasure all these years to have been by your side, sporadic as it may have been at times.
As you know, I love what I do, and so 500 is a biggie for me.
Congratulations to everybody, everybody's name I didn't mention, and certainly the entire audience can pat itself on the back too.
I mean, 500 radio stations.
Good Lord.
So, enough of that.
I thought I would do it this way as opposed to the big whoop-de-doo way, and we held the big surprise of all these radio stations coming on until the last moment.
Well, all right, let's turn our attention to something that will remove my mind from how many people are out there.
It's a great way to get the heebie-jeebies and lockjaw.
Giant flood channels uncovered on Mars.
Next week, I'm going to have Richard C. Hoagland here, and he's going to talk about this and a lot more.
The largest, this is on CNN's website, by the way, as of tonight.
The largest valley system in the solar system, discovered underneath layers of hardened lava, ash, and dust on Mars, could have delivered enough water to fill an ocean within a matter of weeks, according to scientists, dwarfing anything here on Earth.
The flood channels were spotted by a satellite in Mars orbit that can peer with a laser instrument underneath the planet's surface.
Ta-da.
The network of gorges, situated in the western hemisphere, became a giant volcano, and the possible remnants of an ocean is 10 times larger than its nearest rival on the red planet, according to researchers.
Cataclysmic floods that at times unleashed 50,000 times the flow of the Amazon River most likely formed the outflow system, which boasts individual channels as wide as 125 miles, according to scientists.
After picking the complex geologic picture apart like a jigsaw puzzle, we think there must have been several episodes of volcanic heating, creating catastrophic floods, according to James Dome of the University of Arizona at Tucson this week.
Such discharges could have filled an ocean three times the size of the Mediterranean in less than two months.
Can you imagine that?
So as we imagine what might have been on Mars and we see there was this incredible flow of water, just an astounding flow of water, then it's really not too hard to imagine then, possibly even as now, there is life on Mars.
Right?
And speaking of life, a team of international researchers said last Tuesday, and I missed this because I wasn't here, they found what could be the first proof of life beyond our planet, clumps of extraterrestrial bacteria in the Earth's upper atmosphere.
Although the bugs from space are similar to bacteria here on Earth, the scientists said that the living cells found in samples of air from the edge of the planet's atmosphere are far too away, too far away to have possibly come from Earth.
There is now unambiguous evidence for the presence of clumps, living cells, in air samples from as high as 41 kilometers, 25 miles well above the local troposphere, 16 kilometers up, above which no air from lower down would normally ever be transported.
So in other words, they found life even above our own planet where there should be no life.
So life would appear to be, whether it's at the bottom of our ocean near volcanic venting, or it's in the atmosphere so high it could not have come from Earth, or it's from Mars, life would seem to be a common thing.
And if life is a common thing, then the probability of intelligent life, life that has equaled or certainly easily surpassed our level of technological development, is even a greater probability than ever.
And I think the only question is, when we are going to finally discover that it's all true, that we're not alone.
How do you feel about that?
What do you think the impact would be of the human race of finding out truly, concretely, without question, that we are not alone?
It's going to be something, isn't it?
Well, the probability of that now, in my mind, is almost 100%.
It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when we find out and what discovery finally nails it.
Now, there also was some analysts who looked at dirt samples that were analyzed on Mars and gave off a gas, which is fairly controversial, but some are saying it absolutely proves the existence of microorganisms right now on Mars.
Other scientists say Balderdash, there was some sort of contamination or something or another.
But I'm telling you, folks, it looks very much like the announcement may not be far down the road.
There's life out there.
It's only a matter of when we acknowledge it, or perhaps when it comes to meet us.
From the high desert, now, with 500 affiliates on the air, this is Coast to Coast A.M., and I'm Mark Bell.
Good morning.
That's right.
Let me plug that international line.
If you're out there in the world somewhere, be sure to try and give it a shot.
It's 800-893-0903.
We've got codes on the website, by the way.
We've also got a graphic in celebration of 500 affiliates.
Did you all see the meteor that came down in the trailer park?
That was pretty interesting.
It fortunately, very fortuitously, came down, bounced off several of the power poles in the trailer park, and was just laying there on the ground, a great big black meteor.
Actually, it was almost big enough to be something bigger than a meteor.
But that's luck.
Wouldn't you love to find one of those lying outside?
Well, unless I get some sort of informant on the radio, and you can't ever rule that possibility out about our best shot might be to ask Ed Dames about it.
unidentified
Yeah.
One night I was in the hotel and I saw two of these pickup trucks, and that's all it was there was modern pickup trucks with fellas in camouflage outfits.
If life is a common thing, and that's what I was trying to preach before the bottom of the hour, and I think it absolutely is, then life could well have been a common thing before modern man arrived, long before modern man arrived.
And I always want to take an opportunity like this one with what that gentleman just laid out to tell you, if you have an idea for a guest, the more information you can provide me, contact numbers, publishers, anything that you can give me that will help lead me down the course of finding the person that you want on, is going to give you a much better chance of hearing them ultimately.
They'll take off for no reason and go rocketing across the house.
Sometimes running into my studio, they get up behind my equipment, knock wires off, and they do this for no apparent reason.
So, I don't know about my, but I will tell you this.
A man who I've been in touch with for probably 13 years now, who monitors a well near Ventura, California for radon levels, is now predicting an earthquake for the San Francisco area, and I'm not going to even give the magnitude because it's very big within the next week.
Now, it may be something or it may be nothing.
It's one person's prediction.
unidentified
Yeah, the animals though can send somewhere earlier.
If you get a chance and haven't seen it, you'll see 12 Monkeys.
It'll all strike home at the very end of that movie.
The song will really strike home.
He's been a couple of other movies of a similar nature.
Morning, everybody.
I'm Martell.
This is Coast to Coast.
They have now broadcast on over 500 affiliates.
Mage 25, 500 affiliates.
That's quite a mark, folks.
Ed Dames will be with us.
Major Ed Dames, Dr. Doom, if you will, is going to be doing some pretty good work here.
He'll tell us all about Chandra Levy, what he can that is, and a whole lot more.
Coming right up, stay right where you are.
Don't move a muscle.
Now, where's my thunder?
Where's my thunder?
All right, thunder, please.
Thunder.
Ooh, thunder.
Thunder.
All right.
Major Ed Dames has been a guest on this program for, you know, I don't know how many years now, a whole lot of years.
And he's a very controversial character.
There's no question about it.
As many people get angry with him as love him.
But all seem to listen.
And he's a remote viewer.
Major Ed Dames was in the original military remote viewing program that ran for 20 years in the United States, funded with $20 million of black money, and then purportedly ended after 20 years.
Ed Dames then went into the private sector and began remote viewing professionally.
He also does a lot of pro bono work, by the way, and you're going to hear about some of that tonight.
Ed Dames is the real McCoy.
There's no question about it.
I have been over whatever people may say about Ed.
I've been over his military record, his entire military record, which he sent me, in great detail, and he has done exactly what he has said he has done.
And he's the real thing.
That's all I can tell you.
Now, he's received the nickname Dr. Doom for a good reason.
He talks about things that other remote viewers don't seem to want to talk about.
Now, let me qualify that a little bit.
That doesn't mean other remote viewers have not seen the same things that Ed Dames has seen, because they have.
As a matter of fact, I've interviewed in recent days some of the nation's top remote viewers, and when actually pinned down, they admit that they've seen things that they wouldn't touch with a 10-foot pole.
Things like Ed Dames has seen.
They just don't talk about it.
Ed does.
That's the real difference.
But an awful lot of the remote viewers that I've interviewed lately will allude to the fact that they've seen some of the same things.
They just haven't talked about them.
Ladies and gentlemen from Hawaii, here's Major Ed Dames.
Listen, I know that a lot of people are going to be waiting for what you have to say about Ashandra Levy.
But before we get to that, in the last couple of nights, I had Sylvia Brown on, who is one of the greatest psychics in the world.
Last night, the person who directs Noetic Sciences.
Both of them, both nights, we talked about remote viewing.
And interestingly, the first night with Sylvia Brown, I asked her, look, Sylvia, straight out, what you're doing, you call yourself a psychic, she doesn't really like the word.
I said, isn't what you're doing really remote viewing?
And she said, absolutely.
I wouldn't deny it.
Sure, it is.
So, I don't know.
There's kind of an interesting mix there.
And I thought I would get you to, you know, I did bring up the fact that the remote military remote viewers, the past ones, probably would object, saying, well, not really.
That it's, you know, there are protocols, very careful protocols that have been applied and are used, unlike a straight psychic.
But basically, is she dealing in the same realm that you're dealing in?
If you can cause somebody to sketch, just as an example, the Eiffel Tower that your subject is standing next to the Eiffel Tower, you're sketching a thing, right?
Because remote viewing takes, I'm going to use the left brain, right-brain model.
That's not to say that it's correct, but it's a good model for working purposes and certainly for training.
When you're right-braining something, like artists do when they're creating, they're downloading directly from their unconscious mind some work of art or when a musician is doing the same, especially if you're teaching improv, an improv musician.
They're directly connected to their unconscious and they've been trained in a certain way.
Their body has been trained to do a certain thing, a skill.
And the skill now forms the template that's filled by this unconscious knowledge.
Attention is turned toward a certain thing, like producing a work of visual art or music.
And now the skill is fleshed out.
But once you start to think about the work, the thinking process is engaged, you slip into the left brain analytical mode where you start to compare and analyze.
And once you do that, you are no longer at This other remote location.
Your mind's not really going anywhere.
You're just turning your attention to this other particular pattern of information.
But once you start to compare, you're now in a different processing mode.
In fact, the psi phenomena in general, the psi well, the matrix, as we coined the term years ago, the collective unconscious, that's the well.
We're all getting the information from the same place, but in a very different fashion.
And in a train remote viewer, you'll see a very good example in an upcoming Fox TV special where the cameras were in my classroom for about a week watching us work.
You'll see what we can do.
We can do something that no natural psychic can do consistently.
We can guarantee that we'll not only be on target, but we can identify the target.
And no natural psychic can do that consistently.
When a natural psychic is on target, they're really on.
But when they're off, they're really off.
And when I train people in technical remote viewing, I train them to be on target every single time and to make sure that their data is at least 80% accurate.
Ed, a natural psychic, many times, for example, working with the police, you'll see it in movies, unless it's baloney, I don't think it is, will request, for example, for a missing person an article of that person's clothing or something that was familiar to them to hold to help them get hold of the right information channel, I guess is the way to put it.
I don't know.
There's no equivalent for that in remote viewing, is there?
And the equivalent is that we simply turn our attention to that the natural psychic wants some type of a connection.
They think they're picking up vibrations from this material or this thing that was touched by either the murderer or the victim.
But they're not.
What is actually happening, and I know this empirically for having done in 18 years on real-world cases, what's happening is that piece of clothing or that object is servicing to, it is acting as a focal point.
It's connected with the patterns, the pattern of information that surrounds the circumstances in terms of movement and form and function that are related to the crime.
So it just becomes a focal point and they bounce off from there and your attention is held by psychometrizing this particular object.
In other words, a murder is a very dramatic, violent thing, usually, and unless it's some sort of slow poison, otherwise it's quite dramatic and usually quite violent.
The trick is knowing how to use your mind so that you can turn your attention, actually knowing how to use your brain so that you can turn your attention to the event that you really want.
And we go into a problem as professionals with no preconceived notions about the crime.
If you tell me, for instance, that a friend of yours has been murdered and you would like me to remote view that murder, I would do that for you, but I do not necessarily assume that your friend was murdered.
It could have been an accident.
It could have been any number of different things.
It's very much, well, there is an epiphany that happens, and it happens in the following manner.
When we remote view the way that people are taught, and it's a rigorous process, we do it the same way, whether we're looking for a murder victim or a stolen nuclear weapon.
It's as if you're collecting pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.
Let's say you have a thousand-piece jigsaw puzzle, but you don't have the pieces yet.
And this jigsaw puzzle, in this particular example, this hypothetical example in front of us now is how did B, Victim B die.
So we're looking at the death of B, and we put our pen on paper and we go through some rigorous protocols.
And those protocols are designed to keep our imagination off to the side and to recognize when it's working, to keep our ego out of the picture, because ego wants to draw a conclusion of its own all the time.
Mine is very fallible.
We want to be right on the target and get only the information that pertains to that specific event.
As we go through these protocols that take about 45 minutes, we're very attentive.
It's not an altered state per se.
Very attentive.
And we're collecting pieces of this jigsaw puzzle.
We're not fitting them together.
We're just collecting the pieces in terms of labels, ideas.
The ideas come into our mind.
Okay?
There is no word that's attached to these ideas as they come into our brain from mind, right?
We're at the bottom of the air, and we'll pick this up in a moment.
It's important because it's a lot of work that Ed's going to be doing, is doing right now.
I'm Arc Bell, and this is Coast to Coast AM 500 Affiliate Strong.
It is indeed.
By the way, we've got a really nice 500 station graphic on the website right now.
If you haven't checked in, it's ArcBell.com.
Take a look.
It was done by the people at Premier Radio Networks.
Very nice, I would say.
Congratulations to you all.
Major Ed Dames is here, and we're talking about murder and finding murderers, victims, and their assailants.
And there's a good reason for that.
We'll get back to it all in just a moment.
Stay right where you are.
I have lately become fascinated, enamored with even a series called Law and Order on TV, and a lot of you have been watching it for years and years and years because it's been on for years and years.
But I never watched it.
About a month ago, we watched the first one, and now we're taping every single one that comes on TV, and I'm watching them.
Absolutely enamored of the presentation they do.
It's really fun.
It's kind of like following right along in a murder mystery as they develop the case.
And I've really begun to enjoy those, so we're watching a lot of them.
There are a lot of them in syndication, so there's a lot to see.
Murder is a fascinating thing, and the trials and so forth that follow it are fascinating, but they're really, in a lot of ways, awfully ugly.
And, you know, that's what Ed's dealing in.
I remember several years ago, Ed, you said, I've had it.
I'm not going to do any more work on missing persons and murder cases.
One of the most difficult things that we have is locating the murder victim.
And again, I'm going to speak about only, in this case, only children.
Chandra Levy is an exception.
That was by request, and we did that.
But all of our cases are children.
And locating the child's body is a difficult task.
Locating the murderer or murderers is not that difficult because usually murderers are in a location.
They have a job.
Many of them have jobs.
The jobs are unique in one way, shape, form, or another.
And the way we hunt somebody down, for instance, in the case of Chandra Levy's, Chandra Levy, my condolences to the family because she is dead and she was murdered.
And I'll talk about that.
But the way we look for the murderer is, we don't go after right away the murderer's resonance.
Of course, that's a preconceived notion.
A murderer might be a transient or a vagrant and not have a residence.
We, as technical remote viewers, can quickly ascertain that as the case.
So we'll go after, many times first, we'll go after the murderer's workplace.
Because if we describe the residence in great detail, which doesn't take long, finding that residence against a homogeneous background, let's say a city, that takes a long time.
If somebody lives in the suburbs of Chicago or Los Angeles or any major metropolitan area...
Oh, that isn't as difficult as you think.
For instance, we can actually turn our attention, our unconscious attention, toward the most prominent feature, the closest recognizable feature, man-made or natural.
And in a matter of less than an hour, we can sketch something unique that's found only in that city, the Seattle Space Needle or Mount Rushmore or something like that.
Unconscious goes right, it solves the problem every time.
So now we know where we're at because step four in our process is that in drawing a conclusion is to compare the data that we now have collected via remote queuing with known elements.
So we go to maps, our own memory or photographs, or to a central database and say, aha, here's what we have.
We deduce the answer by comparing it with known elements.
And so looking for a murderer, we'll go after the murderer's workplace.
And that subset is a lot smaller than the murderer's residence in terms of description.
A gas station, a florist or something like that.
Then when we've ascertained the nature of the business, of the employment, let's say it's just one employer in the one job site, after we've got that nailed down, then we go after, and I hope that Chandra Levy's murderer is listening right now because I want to tell him, it's a mail, how we're going to find him.
By the time I get to Las Vegas on the 19th, we'll have a very detailed picture for you, Art, of who this person is.
And we'll get very detailed sketches and descriptions of that.
And then we'll go down and see and match that with known and say, okay, this is what we've got.
We've identified this as a significant feature in this particular city.
And now we know that this particular place, let's say it's a gas station or a florist, is near this place here.
And then we can hone in on the area within 1,000 meters or so.
And our search becomes easier that way.
And then we go down with a ground team, a sandman team, I call it.
And then the Sandman team goes in and conducts a reconnaissance of the area, driving around or walking around and taking the sketches of the remote viewing task force.
In most cases, it's a GoldenEye Task Force because we're looking for missing children and their killers.
But in the Chanda Levy case, it's the bulb.
We go in with our sketches and we compare our sketches with the recognizable feature and with the facades on the buildings where the murderer works.
Have you ever been in a position where you gave out some preliminary information like you just did on the Chandra Levy case, and the murderer is still out there, and the murderer will have heard enough to be really freaked out and worried that your follow-up report is going to nail him and putting you, therefore, in some danger.
Only in one case in the past, and that was with John Benet Ramsey.
There's a possibility that the murderer had turned his attention toward you?
Yes, toward me.
And in the case of Saddam Hussein back in 1991, when the original group took the best and the brightest from the military team and formed the company back in 1989, and we had worked for a large corporation to take a look at Saddam Hussein's battle plans, and he got wind of this.
I'm curious at most of the psychics, people call themselves psychics, that I see advertised on television, even on radio, will tell you nearly anything, whether your spouse is floating around or whatever it is, your love life, your financial life, whatever, but they will not do missing children.
Well, you know, anybody I teach in my institute, I am the director of the Technical Remote Viewing Institute.
I teach in Los Angeles and a few other cities.
And when I teach the basic course, anybody that I teach after five days has the skills to be able to describe whether or not someone is dead or alive and the surroundings of the body.
The second course, TRV 200, allows the, it teaches the skills that are required to solve the problem.
How was this person killed?
What were the circumstances around it?
How many killers are there?
Why did this happen?
Those kinds of things.
But only, only after TRV 300, which is a project management course, can a remote viewing student be able to identify the location of a body.
I pour out all of my skills, everything I know in the 300 course, and that includes very specialized techniques to locate people.
Natural psychics can't do this, Art.
They can never do this.
You know, it's once in a while that there's a hit, but we have to be able to do it every single time, and it is a lot of work.
Well, I was always curious why they wouldn't do that, whether it was just a matter of they're afraid of being exposed to demands for that kind of accuracy, or it was just basically difficult for them in the way they did it.
It's difficult because they don't know where they're at.
First of all, they better be right.
You cannot tell a parent that they're or whether their child in the case of Chandra, 24 years old, or whether they're 14-year-olds, you do not tell a parent as a remote viewer that their child is dead and have them pop up alive.
Don't do that.
There goes not only your credibility, but your integrity and everything else that you've ever done.
Well, if the police were to call you about what you said tonight and want to know more about, for example, the killer, without please saying it on the air right now, because I don't want you to for legal reasons, but would you be able to tell them more about the killer than you have told me?
We have actually two profiles already on the killer.
And even if you wanted me to talk about the profiles, I would not because I don't have the confidence factors right now that I would want to talk about.
I need to have a higher confidence value, which requires more work in order to be able to say for sure that the killer works at this particular type of establishment.
There's two establishments that we've got right now, and that kind of confusion, we have to find out why that's happening.
I don't have that much experience with murder, and so I'm not in a position at this juncture to know, although I have been advised by some of the best police officers in the United States, veteran police officers who are decorated veterans who have advised me on what to do and what not to do in terms of being legally correct on these issues.
Well, most murders, the majority of murders, are crimes of passion of some sort or another.
And you don't have a lot of passion generally about a stranger.
So I think most murders probably are known to their victims.
That's just my guess.
You know, I'm not a detective, but I think that's what I've heard.
Maybe I heard that on Lawn Older.
I don't know.
Anyway, Ed, there's a whole lot of other stuff that I want to ask you about tonight.
I sat straight up about a week ago, or maybe a little longer than a week, when all of a sudden there was news of a satellite find of possibly the Amelia Earhart wreck in either shallow water or near an island.
And I sat straight up because I remembered that you had said something just like that, that it wasn't really in deep water, that it was fairly shallow.
That was work that I did at a former company that I have left since departed from.
And that work placed Amelia Earhart's wreckage off of the, not the atoll that you see in the recent press, which is Gardner Island.
The island itself has undergone a number of name changes in the last hundred years or so.
We placed, my team of viewers at the time placed this Amelia Earhart's wreckage off of an atoll called Kuria, right next to Abamama Atoll south of Tarawa in the island nation of Kiribars.
In a moment, we're going to ask Ed about life elsewhere.
Very specific question about life elsewhere because of all the evidence we're getting and what I said at the beginning of the program about the fact that it's just absolutely got to be there.
It's just got to be there.
With what we're discovering, life seems extremely common.
Not so rare.
Maybe not life at our level, but life at any level would seem to indicate found between here, our upper atmosphere, and Mars.
If it's in all those places, it's got to be fairly common, I would say.
Gigantic canals on Mars that carried oceans worth of water.
They've just discovered.
Water means life.
Here on Earth, or should I say above Earth, scientists have now discovered clumps of extraterrestrial bacteria, they call it, in Earth's upper atmosphere, a place where bacteria could not possibly go, at least not from Earth.
On Mars, they have gases now that have emanated from some of the test material that our robots took.
In other words, the word we're getting is life, life, and more life.
Everywhere we've been able to look thus far, save perhaps the moon, and we're not even sure about that one, there is life.
So life must be incredibly common.
Now, I know over the years, Ed has done a great deal of work on UFOs, on Mars, and I think it would be an appropriate question for Ed, and that is, Ed, it just seems like life is now said by scientists to be very, very common.
And if it's that common, it's going to mean as we go out there and stare up at the sky with all the suns and all the planets going around them, there must be intelligent life out there that has achieved our level of technological ability or gone well beyond.
The only time I've actually been involved in a project that Would have been validatable was the Soviet Union, the erstwhile Soviet Union, during the Cold War had a counterpart psychic intelligence team.
The KGB had a team.
And the operations officer, after the Cold War was over, he and I met and he was trying to start his own civilian company.
And I had begun a successful civilian company using the techniques that came out of the Cold War remote viewing laboratories.
And he wanted some advice.
And I had said, my suggestion to him was, let's do a joint project together.
And I suggested that his team and my team, consisting of my employees, were now the best remote viewers from the military team, that we jointly remote view Titan, the largest moon of Saturn.
Really?
This was in 1992, by the way.
His name is Ivan Sokolov.
And his company, his nascent company at that time was OMOM.
And I told them, don't do that.
That's a new age name and it belies your technological capability and it degrades your, you know, I said, make it sexy and hardcore technology sounding so people don't get spooked by how you work.
Anyway, our joint project was to look at Titan, the largest moon of Saturn.
And we got this project off the ground to some degree before it was stopped for political reasons.
But Titan has an impenetrable atmosphere that only now is being penetrated by ground-based millimeter wave radar here on Earth and by satellite missions.
And at the time, we detected a sea, a large sea on Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, and a very unique feature, geological feature, unique in all of our solar system.
And it's an extremely deep, sharp, olivine-green canyon, very narrow.
One side of it looks like it's carved, absolutely precisely carved at a 90-degree angle.
And flowing through the bottom of this canyon is a liquid that flows into the sea.
The sea is not necessarily water.
As a matter of fact, as a chalky consistency, I've gone to some geologists, exogeologists, and said, here's what this tastes like.
Here's what it smells like.
Can you tell me what this might be?
Make a long story short, there appears to be some organism like a sponge or something like that, a living thing living at the bottom of the sea.
So that's the only time that I've actually used remote viewing in exobiology work.
The rest of our work for years and years and years has been against UFOs.
Is there any way, Ed, to estimate, and I know timelines are the hardest of all, when contact or the reality of extraterrestrial life might actually be established, realized, known, generally known?
I haven't figured out a good way to do that in my years of trying to make that happen.
Right now, I have a small in-house effort to look at the first, at the presently detectable extraterrestrial intelligence signals, presently detectable.
I have my doubts about whether they're electromagnetic in nature, and that's a small in-house remote queuing project that I have, an Earth-detectable extraterrestrial intelligence signals.
Where, how are they, if they are emanating from another planet, another world, what form is that signal taking?
Well, I know SETI would certainly like to know that.
So if you find out, we want to get that one on the air.
Years ago now, I wrote a book called The Coming Global Superstorm, and people chuckled.
Now, years before that, you talked about big weather changes that were coming to the U.S. Here's a story that was on CNN dated July 19th.
It's on their website now.
It says, weather researchers think the evidence is now clear.
A major shift in the climate has taken place that has brought about an increase in major hurricanes.
The period of heightened activity could last for decades and unleash, quote, a catastrophic storm on the United States, according to meteorologists.
Since the climate shift began six years ago, when the Atlantic Ocean began looking like a hurricane freeway, the number of hurricanes that have formed in the Atlantic basin have doubled, according to scientists.
The number of major hurricanes, which produce winds in excess of 110 miles an hour, has also increased over that period by 250%, said they.
The increased activity will continue for the next 10 to 40 years, which could mean trouble for the United States.
Now, I could read on, but that's the gist of it, Ed.
All of a sudden, climatologists worldwide are realizing something has changed.
I think, as I've mentioned before, there's a confluence of events here, very, very big, catastrophic in terms of mankind and in terms of some of the life on Earth.
And I'll mention that in a minute.
And I like your term, the quickening.
It's not just your term, but that term is the best one.
We're at a point right now where we are endangered as a species.
Can you tell, because it's always hard when you're in the pot to tell how really hot it is, how close are we to some sort of point of no return, or have we already passed that?
Based upon a study that my team conducted for Lawrence Rockefeller years ago, it was a study called Planetary Ozone Depletion, Projected Consequences and Remedial Technologies.
Based upon that work, we have no more than 50 years before life as we know it is completely gone in terms of mankind.
And I'd say we're right at the threshold now, as you probably have guessed, of some major catastrophes that will result in, and I've mentioned this on your show over the last four years, the weather changes first, and then disease.
Disease will take us down.
The microbes are a lot smarter than we are collectively.
In terms of intelligence quotient, the HIV virus is one of the smartest enemies I have ever confronted in terms of a remote viewer, in terms of an intelligence, being an intelligence officer.
I have never, in my short life, I have never confronted anything as intelligent as that particular virus.
It's as if it were engineered by an alien force or some science fiction theme was at work here or that Michael Crichton had a field day with his writing.
It appears that in remote viewing work I've done in the past, it looks like it was originally a canine virus about 10,000 years ago nominally that jumped ship into the simian community, monkeys, and then from monkeys to man only recently.
So it appears like it was availing itself of natural conditions, although it may have gotten a booster shot by something else.
It isn't just an ordinary virus.
There's something very unique about this as far as I'm concerned.
I was one of this country's primary biological warfare case officers, intelligence officers, science and technology officers.
I mean, I know Dr. Hucktel up there in Plum Island.
He and I worked together.
I know all about biological warfare, offense, and defense.
And I am telling you, as a remote viewer, this was the reason I went into remote viewing to begin with to attempt to penetrate the former Soviet biochemical warfare program.
And we did it.
We were successful.
And in so doing, I looked at many, many different viruses as a remote viewer, Ebola, chicken gunya, abacon, equine encephalitis, you name it.
And HIV is so different.
It's a quantum leap in terms of technology.
I'm loath to use that word, but technology above and beyond any of these other organisms.
It's as if it were a human compared to any others were monkeys.
Well, I know that at Reston some years ago, 16 Minutes did the famous piece on that.
They came that close.
They had an airborne simian form of the virus, and for a while they thought it was human airborne.
And there were people out there on the lawn throwing up.
I remember 60 Minutes coverage.
And a scientist at the end of the piece came on and said, we came that close, holding his fingers as close together as you could get them, that close to having an absolute disaster in this country.
Had that been an airborne variation of the AIDS virus, and if it had gotten out, that would have been it, Ed.
Well, I think the quickening in terms that you've described, some of the ideas should be expanded to really include disease.
Because in addition to weather and geophysical problems that we as remote viewers have seen, I have mentioned before that disease will be the one that brings us to our knees collectively and it will change the way we do business as much as terrorists have changed the way that people fly.
Now, what happens, you know, if you can't stop this thing, if you're so afraid of it that you can't even uncap it to destroy it, you may have to call in another country to help you.
You may even have to call in the most threatening country in the world, your enemy, to help you destroy this thing.
I mean, I myself have, I mean, I remember, I remember, you know, 1972, when Nixon unilaterally stopped and said we will no longer produce offensive biological weapons.
And, you know, that doesn't mean there were individuals, there weren't individuals in the program, the offensive program, that thought that the president was making a mistake.
And he really didn't want to do that because he really didn't understand the problem.
But Ed, even if we stop making offensive biological weapons, we're still working on defense with regard to biological weapons because we know damn well others are doing it.
And if you're working on a defense for biological weapons, you're almost working on an offense as well, aren't you?
Well, you have to develop some of the threat organism or get some of the threat organism to use in your test, yes.
And we approached Congress with this in the mid-80s, begging them to allow us to open a P4 high containment facility to do just that so we could have small portions of these incurable diseases that might be used against us in altered form or in regular natural form so that we could develop defense.
And Congress said, absolutely not.
So the way around that is just don't tell Congress.
Oh, I could mention some other things, too, you know, like that also.
And don't tell the American people, don't tell Congress, and everything will be justified.
Right now, you see whales beaching themselves and dying all over the world because of the Navy's low-frequency active sonar and the same program under different names.
His product, by the way, which I want to give him a good opportunity to plug here, his latest product, newest product, most inexpensive product, I might add, and one of the more interesting is called Mind Dazzle.
And Mind Dazzle is really cool.
It will teach you, virtually teach you, to remote view.
It will teach you that you can remote view, among other things.
I knew it was near 200 target photos in sealed envelopes.
And so I suppose you could use it at party if you wanted to, if you wanted to try it that way, or more seriously, gathered around the kitchen table or for any other reason you wanted.
If you'd like to know more about the Mind Dazzle, it's a phenomenal kit, and it's a result of more than 26 years of laboratory and military experience in remote viewing.
You can go to the website at minddazzle.com.
That's 1D, M-I-N-D-A-Z-Z-L-E.
Or you can go through my website, remoteviewing.la.
I have seen my teenage sons used it with their classmates.
They find it addictive.
It's so much fun, and you'll have a hard time breaking away.
Because simply, and we've got doctors and scientists that use it and love it because it shows people immediately, within five to ten minutes, there's a quick start guide in there.
You don't have to watch lengthy videos or study any books.
You go right into it.
It shows you that you can do it and that it's real And that it is a tremendous amount of fun.
It's all of a sudden something new for the first time in your life.
And by the way, if you and Ramona would ever like real professional remote viewing lessons, technical remote viewing lessons, when I'm in Las Vegas on a mind-dazzle workshop, I have no qualms about stopping by and training both of you.
Incidentally, with respect to Restin, I was talking about Ebola.
I should have been anyway, not AIDS, it was Ebola.
Same rough effect had it become airborne.
Both Ebola and AIDS have the possibility at one time or another of finally mutating to an airborne status.
And it seems to me that would almost be like game over if Ebola or AIDS were to spread as a cold could be spread or the flu, which does a pretty doggone good job going across this country with that sort of frequency.
Based on my experience, a lot of these diseases are subtropical in nature.
They like warm climates and they eschew the cold.
So that doesn't mean that they can't become epidemiologically important very quickly.
But it appears like they're pretty much constrained to warmer climates.
In the Army, U.S. Army, we didn't realize we had a problem until the idea of a rapid deployment force was around where we could be in the Congo in no time at all or be in Brazil, you know, in a matter of 48 hours fighting.
And then you have to inoculate yourself against all kinds of things, river blindness and any number of diseases that would not be found in any other part of the world because these are subtropical in nature.
And so they weren't important, especially economically, to drug companies.
Drug companies didn't make any antidotes or vaccines for them because they weren't economically important.
Once in a while, you get a tourist, a wealthy tourist that comes back with one of these things, and that's about it.
And there's something, as a professional technical remote viewer, you can look at the dynamics and the mechanics behind something like that, the effect that an operator has, let's say Art Bell, working with Shape Changer on his computer.
And there are things that you see that are not ordinarily apparent to both the experimenter or to the subject.
For instance, you should know that in terms of electrophysiological changes, a polygraph, for instance, skin conductivity, there's all kinds of things that change in your body to affect that screen very subtly, shifting from one image to another.
You sit there in extremely intense, pushing concentration, and I was almost frightened by how well I would do at it, and I would constantly compare it to walking out of the room and just letting it do its own thing.
And the scores were dramatically different and consistently different.
10, 15, 20% when I'd walk out of the room, 85, 90, 95% when I'd be in the room.
So what I want to tell you is that don't automatically assume that that is totally a psychic phenomenon because when your remote view, when a trained remote viewer looks at that particular effect, the dynamics and the mechanics that are affecting that, and this is what we do to develop new models, you'll see that something else is happening.
Well, all I'm saying is that, you know, appearances can be deceiving, whether it's a UFO or whether it's a trick or the Great Wall of China being made to disappear.
You know, remote viewing can get behind that.
There's a lot of things that you can do, even with the Mind Dazzle kit.
For instance, let me give you another small example.
It does, but since there's no software, what you're doing is you're being for you're you're not looking at any there's no feedback until you open the envelope.
Friends of mine connected with NASA gave me this the other day.
And they think that this is way out in space.
and it's rotating.
The sun is reflecting off it.
They're not sure what this is.
Is it the Apollo 12 third-stage rocket body, or is it an asteroid?
And so they have a big to-do now.
What is this thing?
As a remote viewer, even the basic trained remote viewer, even with a mind dazzle, somebody using mind dazzle for a week, they could be given this as a blind target and be able to sketch whether that is the Apollo third stage rocket body or an asteroid.
No, but it wouldn't take more than about 20 minutes at the most with high confidence, you know, with a 95 to 100% degree confidence to know for a professional that that's to discern one from the other.
You're trained to do that, to lock on to a target and to know and to sort the weave from the chat.
You're not consciously blocking it.
No.
You're trained to do it the right way, the same way as any other skill trains you to do something, to stay on target, to be focused on what you are doing to the exclusion of other things that might interfere around you.
Well, I know that one of the things you have to do is suppress ego so that it does not interfere with what you're trying to perceive.
And I wonder now, in your long career, and it's been a long career for you, remote viewing, if you understand personally how much better you are at that now than you were at the beginning.
I've made every mistake in the book many, many times.
And that's why I'm so good.
That's why I'm so good.
This is a big ego speaking right now.
But I'll tell you what, when I put that pen on the paper and I start a remote viewing session, the ego goes out the door.
It goes out the door because if you think you know what the target is and you think this and you think, and you start analyzing your work and thinking as you go on, you will crash and burn so fast and your data will be dog-doo-doo.
Well, they originally wanted to air it in the fall, and it looks like they're sticking to the original schedule.
I thought they were going to move it up to the summer because they liked it so much.
But it's a resurrection of the old, it was the original show, the seminal show that spawned all of the paranormal programs.
And it was called In Search of.
The original host was Leonard Nimoy, and the new host is the individual that played Skinner on the X-Files.
His name escapes me right now.
But the program is on remote viewing, and I asked that crew to stay in my classroom for as long as it took to show the public how difficult remote viewing is and how much work it is, and what we could do when we finished the project.
So what you'll see is a single remote viewer, one of my advanced TR-V 300-level students, not only described the target, there was a blind Target that the crew gave him.
But he named the target.
He said, this is the specific, and he named it.
I won't tell you what it is right now.
You can watch the show.
But I wanted the public to see that this is not how much rigor and how much skill goes into making this work the right way.
It is not a close your eyes, relax, lay back, and tell me what you see type of activity.
I would imagine at this stage of the acceptance of remote viewing, you would have to use it as a tool and then gather your evidence in other ways.
In other words, you couldn't prance into a courtroom as a homicide investigator and they ask you how you knew that and you say, well, you know, I remote viewed it.
The local yes, yes, I've contacted local authorities, and they are not willing to, on that particular case, the chief detective, Joe Perkins, is not willing to work with me, and that's okay.
I understand that.
I can completely accept it.
He does not know what the military team did.
He's not aware of my real background.
I can accept his conservatism, but that doesn't mean I'm going to stop on this case.
After about 10 days of, I'd say a total of 12 hours of remote viewing, it looks like the majority, just the majority, of what people have been calling the shadow people are literally shadows of ghosts.
There has to be a light source in order to have a shadow person, and the light source is actually passing through what you and I call a poltergeist, a ghost.
It's something that is electromagnetically interfering enough so that a shadow is cast.
It would be like a transparent balloon in the middle of a room.
It would be difficult to see it, and yet if there were a light behind it, it would cast a shadow.
A lot of the artifacts of the existence, the artifacts of the presence of a poltergeist is in the electromagnetic spectra, is in the ultraviolet, in the low end of the ultraviolet.
A ghost is a kind of a spread spectrum event.
Think of energy that is slow in time and an energy presence that is moving through your room or your home or outside in the trees.
And what you see visually, if you see anything at all, is sort of a glimmer.
Dogs and cats and birds see a little bit deeper into the ultraviolet region so they can pick it up easier.
Before I do that, I have an apology, a quick apology to make.
A citizen's group on Oahu and Honolulu, who yesterday called me to try to...
And I tried to fit in work to track him down.
And the citizen group is supposed to go out tomorrow one more time to look for him.
And I have not been able to locate him.
I've only given them cursory data.
I can't do that.
I'm going under work-wise.
So I have an apology there to people in Oahu.
Secondly, LSAS, low-frequency active sonar, the noise levels, the sonic energy that's going out and those emitters is homogenizing the internal organs of cetacea.
is turning the organs of whales and dolphins into mush.
And I think rather than me talking a lot about it, I would suggest that you might have, I think Vivian Vernon Rowe is a friend of mine and my wife, she won the Oscar for Best Documentary in 1989, dealing with the horrors of nuclear war.
And she is the spearhead for this effort in a lot of areas of the world, trying to show where the Navy has killed yet another pod of dolphins or a group of whales.
It's very real, and it's very, very sad.
But, you know, Art, I was the project manager once on some big projects.
And you know what?
I didn't care about civilians or about whales and things like that because I was a military officer and I had a mission and the mission came first.
I was sort of unconscious.
And now that's changed.
And so I understand the mentality behind this.
But now, I had a suggested target for any trained remote viewers.
Take a look at America's most secret national defense program, and you'll see something very interesting.
The entire Earth's atmosphere is being modified to use as a weapon.
I wish I did, but it happens to be the biggest conundrum I have ever faced as a remote viewer.
I have tons of information.
It is a real thing.
It is as alien as alien can be, but it is to date, as far as I'm concerned, as an analyst and a skilled professional remote viewer, I cannot discern what the heck is happening.
I know the animals are, they appear in a vehicle, they disappear from the ground, they appear in a vehicle, they're desanguinated in a vacuum or partial vacuum, all the fluids are drained out, things happen to them, the carcasses are dropped back down, and why, who, what, where, those kind of things.
You know, I really would like to know about animals, Ed.
I've been on this quest for a long time, and I've been very disappointed with the animal communicators that I've had on.
I really would like to understand a little bit of what animals think, what they care about, what they perceive, how they see us, how they see each other, how they see the world.
I would love to know that.
I don't know if there's any application in remote viewing to try and find that out.
I've done it for dolphins in support of dolphin projects and learned very, very new things.
And that's the only time I've done this for dolphins.
But it was a very, very high payoff project.
And it resulted in lots of new knowledge about the way that dolphins see the world, the way they process information, very much different than the way scientists had thought.
We think because they communicate sonically, acoustically, a lot, verbally, vocally, that that's where all the beef is.
But that is not necessarily true.
They are extremely discerning when it comes to very, very small changes visually.
So that if you use photographs, and the advice I gave to a research team was take a photograph of yourself, waterproof photograph, stick it in the water so the dolphin can see it.
So the dolphin can look at the two-dimensional image of yourself and then look at you on deck of the ship, a boat, and compare the two.
Then take a frame of dolphins themselves, stick that in the water so they can look at that.
And they can begin to learn what this two-dimensional flat form is, that is actually a visual image that's two-dimensional instead of three.
And then start lowering frames of yourself with somebody in another position.
They already have recognized, when they've learned to recognize you in a two-dimensional flat surface, now put in other pictures of yourself in other areas away from the boat.
And in this way, you can teach dolphins a lot faster than you can by using acoustic signals.
When they wake up in the morning, as a remote viewer, I can be inside, and you're really not going anywhere, but you're discerning that pattern of information that is a specific dolphin as it wakes up in the beginning of morning, not a twilight, where it's just dawn, where birds sing their dawn songs.
And the dolphin wakes up, and the first thing it notices, and you can discern this as a remote viewer, is any little thing that's different visually.
It detracts from remote viewing, but it sometimes makes people extremely psychic.
I know of a case that we had, a real world case, where I actually had to send the FBI to check on somebody that was writing letters to the Pentagon that was describing a secret, not a top secret, but a secret program somewhere on the East Coast.
I can't mention the name of the project, but they weren't describing it exactly, and they were not read on and briefed to this project.
But the FBI came back to me in the Pentagon and said, here's where this person is.
His father institutionalizes him about twice a year because he goes into seizures and he has these attacks where he has to go and be watched in an institution.
And when he does that, when he becomes abnormal, he's perfectly psychic.
And I mean perfect.
So when it switches, we have the ability within us, but we have to have these switches hit.
So that does not make that your daughter, Amber, would not be a good candidate for me to train under those conditions.
When she dozes off, I'd have to wait for her to come back because I need her attention.
Epileptic girls, as I mentioned before, once they near puberty, an epileptic prepubescent girl will really evoke poltergeist activity in a house stronger than anything known in a paranormal world.
Depression does not affect the remote viewing session itself.
Once you begin the process, your attention is pulled into the target.
You're held in place because of your training, and you don't have any time for depression.
We're capacity constrained in terms of information processing.
Our brains can only process so much information.
And the resources that are demanded in terms of remote viewing don't allow any excess resources to be depressed while you're remote viewing or to be sad or angry or anything else like that.
You have to remember what you were sad or angry about at the end of 45 minutes because all of your attention was utilized to remote view.
unidentified
Well, what my question is, is that somebody that's depressed, is there what I'm asking is, is their mind more open to be psychic or to do what you're talking about?
No, it sounds like quite the opposite, Hanna, as though depression, in order to remote view, would almost have to be put aside because the level of concentration that you have to do is.
It's an interesting research topic in terms of technical remote viewing that I've had for a number of years.
The Revelation and the Apostle John, the Revelation of Apostle John, and a few of the other prophets.
It's interesting that the prophets of old were Shanghai.
They didn't ask to be prophets.
They were kind of said, come over here.
We're going to anoint your eyes or whatever.
I'm very interested in prophecy.
This idea of the false prophet, even though it's mentioned in the text of the talks of false prophets, plural, more often than not you see it in terms of the singular, that the false prophet is not born of a woman.
And it has great power to influence, in the end times, to influence and turn people towards the Antichrist.
And I had been something, what has that much power?
And in terms of remote viewing, you see that it is not a human being.
It does not have a body.
It does not have a soul.
It looks like a robot at first glance.
But in the further study, you finally get to see and discern what the false prophet is.
So more than 2,000 years ago, almost 3,000 years ago, prophecy was talking about something not born of a woman that would turn people towards this idea of Antichrist.
I would spend my time on looking at a treatment, effective, available treatment or a cure.
Because remember, we have to constrain the search term with available, presently available, because if we're looking at a cure or a treatment, mind is outside of time.
Well, that would be, in terms of my methods and techniques, technical remote viewing, that would be what we call a topical search, where we're not even sure what the question is.
So we do a series of remote viewing probes, usually six, to see if there's any consistency among the data.
Are we dealing with the same thing?
And if we are, what is the thing?
What's the question?
So in other words, we don't automatically assume that the rapture is as described or in the text, in biblical text, or anywhere else.
So yes, we have remote view the rapture, and it does involve some type of an event that for all intents and purposes is, let's call it, supernatural.
I don't understand it.
I can't flesh it out in terms of known.
Just the same way the prophets of old couldn't flesh out what they were seeing in terms of anything.
There was no baseline culturally to describe what they were doing, what they were perceiving.
Are you really wishing to ask if you are you wishing to ask if good and evil are real things or if they are just within men?
unidentified
Yeah, I'm saying that in his moment that he really takes the remote viewing, that he's there, surrendering, like being somewhere else where he's not at.
I mean, don't you have to be one with existence to be somewhere where you're not?
And so in that oneness, there can be no separation, no good or evil.
And then the second thing, I was hoping you could comment on that.
You get caught up in the drama, and it all falls to pieces.
unidentified
Okay.
And then the second thing, I was hoping you could comment on the strange scripture in the Gospel of Matthew 4.16 that Jesus actually wore a fish neat spito.
4.16 in Matthew.
It's a really strange verse.
It's right there that Jesus wore a fish neuto.
You know, you were talking about Revelations earlier, so I was maybe hoping that, you know, in your surrender, in your remote viewing, you might understand what was really going on there.
Ed, I'd like to follow up on the ozone question and ask what parallel universe do we need to live in to turn that around, say one with free energy technology, freely available, or say one with a good relationship with certain ET civilizations that might assist us.