Major Ed Dames, a former U.S. military remote viewer, reveals GINGER, a 2002-disclosed geomagnetic engine replacing combustion tech, and its linked Inductance Transportation Vehicle (IT)—a silent, insect-like personal transit device. He confirms UFOs as interdimensional artifacts, not physical craft, with future-humans monitoring nuclear weapons and classified disruptions like Trident missile code erasures. Remote viewing also detected a fungal infection cured by colloidal silver and warned of a solar event causing 300 mph winds, planetary torque, and underground survival trends. Dames dismisses afterlife theories but insists his trained method—unlike natural psychics—exposes tangible truths, from career guidance to geophysical threats, underscoring its potential as a societal game-changer. [Automatically generated summary]
Invented the orgasm machine, or I think Rush called it the orgasmatron.
It's actually a very serious invention.
A lot of people will chuckle and laugh and think of all kinds of applications, but we'll tell you what it really is coming up in a moment.
Then in the next hour, Majorette Dames, the remote viewer Majorette Dames, is going to be here.
And so it'll be quite a night in all.
And I'll give you a little hint of what's coming up, by the way, in the next week or so as well as the show progresses.
Now, we've had a lot of earthquakes.
There has been, I guess you would call it a flurry of earthquakes around me, and I'm a little concerned about that.
And we'll talk about that a little as well.
All around me, if you get a chance, go to an earthquake map, not to mention one, of course, occurred in El Salvador.
Go to an earthquake map and look at California and Nevada and ask yourself, would I want to be art right now?
All right, just one more item, and then it's to Dr. T. Stewart Malloy.
And the item is, guess what?
More new affiliates, folks.
I'd like to welcome KWKC in Abilene, Texas, 1340 on the dial.
WONE in Dayton, Ohio, 980.
Hello, Dayton.
And WJNO in West Palm Beach, Florida.
They'd be 1290 on the dial.
So welcome to all of you as the network continues to grow like a weed.
All right.
Who is Dr. Malloy?
Dr. Malloy earned his B.S. in the chemistry honors program at Duke University and an MD degree from Bowman Gray School of Medicine at Wake Forest University.
With Bowman Gray, Dr. Malloy was given the Annie J. Covington Memorial Award in Cardiology.
Dr. Malloy completed his postgraduate work at George Washington University Medical Center, highlighted by an internship in internal medicine.
Fellows of heavyweight.
Residency in anesthesia, a fellowship in cardiovascular anesthesia, and membership on the cardiac transplant team.
Oh, my.
Prior to founding Piedmont Institute of Pain Management in 1995, Dr. Malloy was an anesthesiologist with Winston-Salem Anesthesia Associates.
Dr. Malloy has been with PAPC since March of 1997.
This would be somebody in true chronic all-the-time kind of pain.
unidentified
Correct.
Generally, what we do as a first step after we do a history and a physical exam and we try simpler things is to place just the electrodes through the needle.
And then we take the needle out and we have one end of the electrodes coming out of a hole in the skin.
And we use that in a temporary fashion for two or three days and let the patient go home.
And in their home environment, we have them turn the power on and off and they can change the pulse width and the frequency.
And we let them determine whether or not this is something that truly helps them.
Since you deal with pain, I have a completely unrelated question to ask you, and maybe a tough one.
You don't have to answer it.
I have a lot of friends who have passed away of cancer and other extremely painful things.
And there's a big controversy in America about medication.
In other words, when somebody truly is in a very great deal of pain, are doctors in America, in your opinion, under-medicating people who really need the help?
unidentified
Well, I need to draw a distinction between two circumstances.
One would be pain from a malignant origin, like a cancer, for example.
Right.
And then the second is pain from a non-malignant origin.
And we'll use back pain as an example from a herniated disc.
Sure.
The answer is that in general, in those circumstances, the patients are being undermedicated.
Is it not to a large degree because the DEA monitors what you doctors write?
unidentified
There certainly is a certain stigmatization of narcotics just in society as a whole.
I'd have to say that in 11 years of practice that I have not had the DEA question what I'm doing.
On the other hand, you know, you went through my resume and if they look me up and they see, well, he's got fairly extensive background in pain management.
Sure.
That's a little bit different from a family practitioner who may be called upon to treat a patient and may be doing it appropriately.
But because of the, again, we as a society attach to that kind of therapy, they may run afoul of the law.
In other words, for a certain kind of pain, you kind of generally know where to go?
unidentified
Yeah, we have a reasonably good idea where to start, but for this kind of procedure, the patient is actually awake.
And so what we'll do is put the electrode into the area where we think it needs to be, apply power to the electrodes, and then ask the patient where they feel it.
And so, for example, let's say we're trying to get your leg.
The first position might just get your buttock.
So we move the electrode, and we're watching it under an x-ray machine as we do this.
We move it a millimeter or so, and now, say, we're getting your buttock down to your knee.
Move it again, we get down from your buttock down to your ankle.
Move it again, now we're encompassing your whole leg.
But, you know, it's taken several steps to get there.
So in other words, once those electrodes are in, it would take a very small device to go home with the patient to produce the results.
unidentified
Well, the finished product or the permanent product is, and conceptually it's like a pacemaker in so much as you have a pulse generator and an electrode, except in this case the electrodes are near the spinal cord and not in the heart.
Well, then, a natural question, I guess, would be: if it's been used for decades, how is it that you suddenly stumbled into something that somebody probably should have found 10 years ago?
unidentified
Well, the effect, the stimulation effect, people have noted and commented on, although no one's done any serious work about it before.
I think if I made a unique, well, I did make a unique contribution, that was to realize that it could be a therapy for an entirely different class of disease, that of orgasmic dysfunction.
I mean, my patients have a lot of problems, to be sure, but that's not high on the list of things they tell me about.
And it's not, you know, up until now, it's probably not something that I would have asked about.
I would have relegated it to the, gee, what an interesting day at the office I had, course of things, except that I was having dinner with a colleague of mine who's a gynecologist.
And, you know, after I told him the story, he said, well, you know, if you've got a therapy for gastric dysfunction, that's an extremely common problem.
So it may, could it be true then that other doctors did stumble on the phenomena, but simply dismissed it as irrelevant to what they were trying to accomplish?
So in your case, then, tell the story of the lady that, I guess, the discovery was made with, or at least the one that went ahead to be what it is now.
unidentified
Well, it was pretty much what I told you as far as the serial stimulation.
You know, you get an effect, you move the electrode, you get an effect, and it changes.
When they moved, they moved to this particular area.
unidentified
Well, she came in saying that she was no longer getting her pain relief, and so we got a chest x-ray, and lo and behold, the electrodes had moved down about a vertebral body and a half, which, you know, given that we normally adjust these things in millimeters, Is a huge difference.
So Fox 8 News heard weekday afternoons at 5 o'clock on News Talk, 1230 WMFR.
Newsroom, a 20-year-old freshman's arrested for three murders, actually the murders of two fellow students over the past five months at Gallaudet University in Washington.
According to our investigation, the motive in both cases was robbery.
D.C. Police Chief Charles Ramsey says Joseph Messa Jr. is to be arraigned Wednesday.
The U.S. Navy confirms two civilians were on the nuclear sub at control positions when it surfaced and hit a Japanese fishing trawler near Honolulu.
Sources say these civilians were not controlling the sub and didn't cause the accident.
Investigators want to see if there's a tape from a periscope with video recording.
Also, there is sonar recording activity so that they may be able to piece together what the sonar was picking up at the time of the crash.
Reporter Kyoki Kerr in Honolulu.
The Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday starts investigating then-President Clinton's pardon of Mark Rich.
Plans are to have giant windmills generate electricity for Australian bases at the South Pole.
Australian Antarctic scientists say it could reduce greenhouse gases and save money.
Chuck Siebertson, ABC News.
One, this is CBS News.
I tried dozens of lotions for my dry, itchy, and sensitive skin, but they all fell short.
Then I discovered new sensitive skin gold bond lotion.
Gold Bond lotion is known to relieve dry, itchy skin.
And now there's a Gold Bond lotion for sensitive skin.
Triple action Gold Bond moisturizes, relieves itch, and prevents irritation with dimethicone plus aloe, vitamin E, and oatmeal in a fragrance-free formula.
Gold Bond really works.
New fragrance-free, sensitive skin gold bond lotion.
Gold Bond relief, as sensitive as you.
Commercials are more believable if you get to know real customers.
So on the line with me is Michael Weisbrod, a Geico Auto Insurance customer.
Michael, tell us about the real you.
Oh, I'm 5'11, 170 pounds.
My turn-ons are sunsets, honest people, walks on the beach, puppies, and low-cost car insurance.
It doesn't get any more real than that.
To join sensitive people like Michael, call 1-800-947-AUTO.
You could save 15% or more.
1-800-947-A-U-T-O.
GEICODICER.
It's a sensible alternative.
A Dutch computer hacker has Jim Shenevey, CBS News.
It's natural to keep a NetTooPhone direct calling card in your wallet.
Up to 25 hours of free phone calls, a free gift, incredibly low worldwide rates.
U.S. international calls as low as 3.9 cents a minute.
Up to 25 hours of free calls and 3.9 cents adds up the big savings.
Call 1-877-777-6910.
The NetTooPhone calling card guarantees your satisfaction with just 99 cents monthly for service.
No surprises, no hidden charges, as low as 3.9 cents a minute.
All right, so you had a second lady, and she had implanted electrodes for pain, and she was obviously getting a different effect, and came to see you, and you asked her, and she said it's not affecting the pain well anymore, but well, she wasn't improved from her pain, and she'd done well before we knew the electrodes had moved.
unidentified
We'd seen that on the x-rays, so that what I offered her was a re-operation to put the electrodes back.
And she was very cagey about undergoing that, and I'd say it took about 20 to 30 minutes before I finally grasped that, oh, there's some other kind of stimulation.
It is a fact in America, in the world, I suppose, is it not, that about 30% of women, over 30, about a third of all women, that's a lot of women, never experience orgasm.
unidentified
Is that right?
Those are the figures I'm familiar with.
I've heard higher figures, too.
Since all this started, all sorts of figures have been bandied about.
Because it's not something a lot of women would admit in any sort of survey, I suppose.
unidentified
Generally not.
A lot of people are reluctant to go to their physician and talk about this at all.
One of the interesting things about, I've done, I think this is interview number 49, but I've had a lot of opportunities to speak to large numbers of people and just say, look, this is a problem.
Do see your gynecologist.
You know, there are a lot simpler things that can be treated than involving a spinal cord stimulator.
Yes, I was going to ask, in what percentage of cases where a woman doesn't experience orgasm will a trip to the doctor and some sort of treatment short of what you do remedy the problem?
unidentified
I really don't know the outcomes of it, but the fact, at least in my mind, if people are at least getting the information and seeking medical help, then irrespective of where this device ends up, you know, I've had an opportunity to help people and on a large scale.
This device, then, when the electrodes are in the right place, will produce, even in a woman who has never had an orgasm, will in fact produce an orgasm one time or repeatedly?
unidentified
Again, we've not studied it systematically.
Both women that I've observed personally, to be honest with you, I don't even know what their orgasmic history is.
But talking to other practitioners in the field, it's clearly a real phenomenon.
It also seems dependent on the application of power to the electrode.
So that would imply that, yes, you could have a continuous orgasm.
The United Kingdom has seemed fascinated by this phenomenon.
I get a lot of questions from there.
And during one show in Australia, I was asked, well, could you use this while driving?
And my response was that the states were trying to get people to not use their cell phones in their car.
Could you imagine that this device would be implanted in an office, for example, or in a hospital setting, and then for this very purpose, and then somebody would go home and have an incredible ability they didn't have before?
unidentified
Well, I have to say that, you know, if it sounds like I haven't gathered a lot of facts or information, that's not entirely true.
And triggered mostly by the fact that, you know, the fact that the patent being granted was picked up in the news about two weeks ago and then by one magazine and then the pre-release came out about a week ago.
Can you imagine in your mind, in Production, what a device like this might cost to make and then to be installed?
unidentified
Well, the pain management devices that are designed to be used continuously cost about $15,000 just for the device itself.
The devices that I envision, battery power usage is much more efficient if you use it intermittently.
Batteries are not that great of continuous power.
And the significance of that is that for a device that would only be triggered intermittently, again, I'm not an engineer, but it's my belief that you could make it smaller and cheaper.
A pacemaker can be implanted, as you certainly will know.
Would you imagine a device of this sort could the current devices are fully implantable?
Oh, they are.
Oh, my.
This is really something you have on your hands then.
How do you proceed?
Is this something that will require FDA approval for purpose, or is it already approved, and could you just then change the purpose?
unidentified
Well, from a safety standpoint, the devices are approved for implantation in the human body.
And I really don't know where the FDA stands on this because you don't necessarily need to implant a device for something that the FDA has approved it for.
For example, I mentioned earlier using these devices to treat occipital headaches.
Sure.
That is not an FDA indication, and yet it is something that people can do.
So then you're probably going to be okay to go ahead with this.
unidentified
Well, you really run into two categories.
Category number one, in my mind, is somebody with documented orgasmic dysfunction.
They've been to their gynecologist.
All the treatable causes have been ruled out, and now you're moving forward to treat them in an effort to reduce, or I'm sorry, to return them or to bring them for the first time up to normal physiologic function.
That's what I think of when I think of medicine.
That's what we do.
There's another category of person who may or may not have a problem.
I mean, let's face it, my understanding is that not every man who takes Viagra has impotence.
No, but this is nevertheless, joke as we might about it, it is a big contribution to society.
I mean, a really big one when you think about the size of the problem.
unidentified
Well, and also think about relationships.
I mean, you know, we have a very high divorce rate.
I don't know to what extent sex is responsible or lack of satisfactory sex is responsible for everyone's divorce.
I mean, there are people who just make their peace with whatever their problems are and go on.
Oh, sure.
And but by the same token, you know, you can see where maybe a couple's been together for a couple years and things just aren't as interesting as they used to be, and they just kind of drift apart.
If somehow, I mean, Viagra has that whole let the dance begin or whatever their male dance.
Well, I understand that, but what I'm saying is that if you could reignite the flame so that both partners, you know, I think a lot of men are happy if they can satisfy their partners.
And obviously their partners are happy if they can be satisfied.
So if you can reignite that mutuality, you can strengthen a relationship.
And I don't, you know, I say this out of my mouth, that sounds grandiose, but, you know, is this potentially making our civilization stronger?
I will say that I've worked with that company for many years on the pain management side of it, and they make a top-notch product.
They have caring people.
I've been up to visit their facilities, and it's interesting.
All their workers understand that their product is going to go in one individual human.
I don't have enough nice things to say about them.
Since I've been on this media campaign, or Blitz, we've had two other manufacturers contact us, and we're talking to them, too, because I want to help people, certainly.
I took the time and trouble to take out a patent because this is an entrepreneurial activity for me.
One important question, I guess, I should ask before we finish, and that is, I think most Americans are familiar with some studies that were done with mice and rats, given an opportunity to push a little button to get cocaine, I think it was, and they would just keep pushing that button until they died.
I mean, they wouldn't eat.
They would just keep pushing it until they died.
How does that cross into the human pleasure centers?
unidentified
The studies I'm familiar with, they actually hardwired electrodes into the rat's brain.
But the outcome was exactly what you described.
Any device can be abused.
And, you know, one of the recent concerns, we talked about using opiates for chronic pain.
Well, I wanted to really know about this, and I thought perhaps you really wanted to know about this too, so perhaps now you do.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
Don't leave me this way I can't survive I can't save a lot Without your love Oh baby Don't leave me this way I'm gonna live in this world I'm gonna live in this world I'm gonna live in this world
This is Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell, formball Kingdom of Die.
This is.
Sometimes I'm so anxious to get on the air that I start this show rolling about a minute, actually a minute before it's supposed to roll.
Then I look up the clock and I go, oh my God, I'm early.
I guess better early than late, huh?
Listen, coming up in a moment is Major Ed Dames, probably one of the most controversial characters you're ever going to meet.
He was in the military remote viewing program, the military program that lasted for 20 years with tax fair dollars.
It was a big secret.
They had a Nightline show.
They blew the roof off the whole thing on remote viewing a few years ago.
I remember that show so well with Ted Coppel.
And ever since, we have been intrigued with and have been following remote viewing.
And I would say Ed Dames probably is the most controversial remote viewer of the whole original bunch.
In fact, they nicknamed him Dr. Doom for a very good reason.
And so whenever I have Ed on, I always issue a warning.
If this kind of programming makes you nervous, gives you the heebie-jeebies, scares you, or otherwise affects you negatively, then you should tune out because there's lots of, frankly, less entertaining things, but other things going on on the radio that you can listen to and not be scared and or offended.
So having given that warning coming up in a moment, the amazing Major Ed Dames.
I was coming back from the island of Okinawa, where I'd spent about 10 years, and I decided to stop on Maui like I hadn't had enough island punishment, you know.
So I spent six months there, and Maui was not all that developed then, and it was paradise.
However, after you'd been to the beaches the first 20 or 30 times, or 50 times, there wasn't a lot else.
It's a skill, and it takes, it's a skill like mathematics is a skill.
The ability is innate, but you have to learn the syntax and the grammar for how the unconscious segment of our mind communicates to conscious awareness effectively.
And that is a skill.
It was a discovery at first, which at $20 million or so of taxpayers' money and 20 years of research, but it is now a skill.
I teach, I'm back in the classroom art in Los Angeles and in Hong Kong now.
Well, the Chinese don't have the prescriptions against, as you know, against things that we would term phenomenological or parapsychological in nature, although I feel that remote feeling is just strictly science.
Well, I have friends who are plugged in at the governmental levels, and they've told me the changes that they've experienced.
My most poignant observation was this, that at the end of the day, when most Chinese business people close their doors, they close their doors and they go and open up another business, they're extremely prodigiously productive.
The information is in the same place that we as trained remote viewers get it.
We call it the matrix, you can call it the collective unconscious.
Those children, part of their neocortex, part of their creative thinking process has been shut down and they're shunting directly to this area that their personalities appear to be interested in in the collective unconscious and downloading information, whether it's musical, artistic, mathematical.
And that's what we do as remote viewers, except we are taught to have control nowhere at the point.
Yeah, but in the children you spoke of, the salons, there must be a physiological change that occurred to them or they were born with or a difference in pathways in the brain or whatever.
But that's the point I'm trying to make is that the information, they're having to go, they're having to turn their attention to a place in another dimension of mind where this information resides because it isn't in their memories.
We have to, as normal operating people, we have to learn how to bypass our thinking mechanism, our creative minds.
We have to learn how to get around that and maintain this constant contact with the target and keep our thinking and our creative imagination at bay.
The autistic savants, that part of their brain is not functioning like ours.
And they're shunting the creative, time-consuming thinking process.
And they're downloading information directly from this font of information that we call the matrix of the collective unconscious, a specific area of it.
So they're bypassing thinking, especially creative thinking.
As you know, if you look on my Institute's website, you'll see our Operation GoldenEye, and that deals with one specific case where we were approached by the chief investigator, a police officer, on a case to find a missing child.
Unfortunately, we were not fast enough, and now we're homing in on the child's killer.
This child, a 15-year-old girl, was abducted a year ago, Leah Freeman, in Coquille, Oregon.
And our job as remote viewers are now to find her killer.
And we have narrowed it down to the killer's workplace.
It took a lot of work, a lot of work to do that, a lot of specialized techniques that we teach our advanced students.
And now we're homing in on the individual, his workplace.
You know, here you are saying this, and I'm thinking, if I'm the killer out there listening to this program right now, and Ed Dames is saying he's got it down to where I work, I've got to perhaps think that I've got to go see Ed Dames.
Having been a military officer, those kinds of things are really not something we worry about as former soldiers or police officers.
It's not something that we worry about day to day.
It's a conceivable.
And now our focus is to find the evidence, because it is not good enough for us to be on the ground, as we will be, with the police officer and say, there's your man right there.
We need to be able to find the evidence, otherwise we don't have a case, and they can't prosecute, and this person will still be, this animal will still be out on the streets.
So our task is also to remote view location of evidence.
And in this case, we know where there is a piece of evidence, and I'm not going to talk about that.
But I will say we have pinpointed the individual's workplace.
And that was a trick because we had to hone in on his, when we went to look for the individual's workplace, unfortunately, this worker was a construction worker, and so was in a number of different workplaces at any given week.
And it took us a while to realize that we were making a mistake.
We should be looking for the employer.
When we honed in on the employer, we were able to see, oh, we have a construction company here.
And then we sketched the symbol for the construction company, and we were able to deduce which company that was in southern Oregon.
If I were to spend all of my time on a murder case, it would take me a minimum of six months to hone in on, let's say, a killer or a group of killers' locations, present location.
And then that's without even remote viewing the evidence.
Whereas with a team of four to six trained remote viewers, and you don't want more than that because then you have too much data to analyze.
With a team of four to six people, I could do the same amount of work in six weeks or less.
Well, when you have that many people and you're working independent of each other, and then you inject controls into the pl where these targets are run blind initially, where the remote viewing, part of the remote viewing team has no idea what the target is.
This is what they've been taught to do.
They're unconscious has been taught to do all the work.
Then you're running upwards of 100% on mutually corroborating data.
I asked you, I don't know, when we scheduled the program, everybody in the country who knows about this kind of thing is dying of curiosity about this thing they call it or ginger, which is advertised by some pretty high-profile people as not being a scam, not being a joke, something that will change society, something that entire communities will be built around.
There's been a lot of speculation that it's some sort of personal transportation device, but nobody knows and they're not going to tell.
My job, one of the hats I wore at the Office of Secretary of Defense levels in intelligence was to brief the presidential staff and the National Security Council and the heads of the DIA and CIA on exotic weapons and potential weapons of mass destruction that were the result of new technologies,
mostly in the Soviet Union, in some cases, Erstwatt Soviet Union, in some cases China.
So for instance, what might a new discovery of a particle beam weapon, what kind of a threat would that pose on a future battlefield?
What kind of a threat would genetic engineering in terms of biological warfare pose on a battlefield?
Those kinds of things were what I looked at and then made the decision myself whether or not to target these specific facilities, and programs using intelligence sources and methods.
my job was also to brief.
And when many of these unpleasant techniques of death and destruction were briefed at the White House, that's when I got that moniker, the Mai Namdegur.
Call our dell from west of the Rockies at 1-800-618-8255.
East of the Rockies, 1-800-825-5033.
First-time callers may reach out at 1-775-727-1222.
The wildcard line is open at 1-775-727-1295.
And to call out on the Soul Free International Line, call your AT ⁇ T operator and have them dial 800-893-0903.
This is Coaster Coast AM with Ark Bell from the Kingdom of Nine.
Good morning, everybody.
Let me give you an idea of what's coming up on future shows.
Tomorrow night is going to be open lines with the exception of the first 30 minutes.
Linda Molten Howe has a report, a scientific report, on our landing on an asteroid, the most incredible landing.
That'll be 10 to 10.30 or in the first half hour of the show for other time zones, followed by open lines.
And we're going to talk about entities tomorrow night.
I am now getting flooded with reports of people who work around MRI machines, MRI technicians, suddenly willing to come forward and talk about the fact that they see entities.
They've seen things disappear.
They've seen a lot of anomalous occurrence around MRI machines, which have gigantic electromagnetic fields.
So we're going to talk in general about entities tomorrow night, those who have dealt with them and have seen them.
That'll be in open lines, and that'll be all but the first 30 minutes of the program.
The following night, Thursday, is going to be consumed by, in the first hour, Richard C. Hoagland on the new pictures of Mars, the face, and more, actually more, followed by a man I had on toward the end of my last reign, David Anderson, Dr. David Anderson, who's president of Time Travel Research Center and Association.
And you know the way I feel about time travel.
He's actually doing experiments in time travel, so he'll be quite a fellow to talk to.
Then on Friday, we're going to speak with Dr. Melvin Morse, who has written a book about near-death experiences and actually may have some tapes for us on patients that he's been associated with.
He'll have a lot to say about that.
Next Monday, it'll be Don Ecker, who publishes UFO magazine, and he's got some new pictures of the moon that will rock you back, and I'm certainly looking forward to that.
Don Ecker, it's been a long time since I've talked to Don Ecker.
So we will do that.
And let me keep going here just to give you an idea.
Then the next night, on Tuesday, we will talk with Brendan Cook and Barbara McBeet from the, let me see, what are they?
The Ghost Investigators Society, the Ghost Investigators Society.
And they are going to have electronic voice tapes for us.
As a matter of fact, they're making up a special version of a CD with voices from beyond the grave that they actually have recorded.
We'll have about 20 or 30 tracks for you.
The night after that is Dr. Lorraine Day, and she'll be here talking about mad cow disease, and what she has written about mad cow disease scares the hell out of me.
She wrote me a fact saying the following, saying, Art, great to have you back.
Art, there's another big cover-up going on, and that's the mad cow epidemic.
Listen to this, and it's related forms in pig, sheep, chickens, and so forth, which, she says, will make AIDS seem like a day at the beach.
And she goes on, but it's pretty scary stuff.
Mad cow disease, Dr. Lorraine Day, well qualified to talk about it.
Then on Thursday, a kind of a different show, it should be very, very interesting for a lot of you out there.
I know a lot of your hams or sea beers or in some way have a license to operate something or another from the Federal Communications Commission.
Riley Hollingsworth, who is the enforcer at the FCC, at the Federal Communications Commission, has agreed to be a guest, and I'm going to be honored to have him here.
So that's what's coming up.
But in a moment, Major Ed Dames, the single most controversial remote viewer, I think, in the world, is going to tell us what it is.
Here's a little information for you.
Next week on Friday, I am now adding, I've had so many requests that next week, Friday, we will do Ghost to Ghost AM once again.
That's next week.
So that maps out the remainder of this week and next week for you.
Just one more item.
I know I'm holding Ed and holding you all up here, but Keith has returned to the website all of the UFO and alien Photographs that we have collected over the years.
They are back there as of tonight.
So, if you've never seen that collection, I think perhaps we have one of the best collections in the world of UFO photographs and alien photographs, and it's back up on the website as of right now, which is www.artbell.com also up there.
Some pictures, when I came back on the air, first night back on the air, Bob and Sue Crane went up to the network, get this, to take photographs of the technicians doing whatever they were doing and the staff up at Medford as the button was pushed and I came back on the air.
This guy takes a six-hour trip in his car to take a photograph of somebody throwing a switch.
Anyway, those photographs are up there, and it's more than just throwing a switch.
He got the whole staff, or a large portion of the staff, in photographs, as well as his own wife, Sue.
So those photographs are a whole bunch of new stuff on the website at www.artbellt.com right now.
Most importantly, this giant collection of UFO photographs and alien photographs that I think really, I guess with as many years as we have been doing it, has no real competitor.
I mean, there are websites, but we've, well, I'll tell you, we've got some good stuff.
My best guess, you know, I've actually got it written down here.
If I can find it, it's way back in my stuff.
But I think that it's a personal transportation.
All right, here it is.
I just found it.
Let me read you what I think it is.
It stands for Inductance Transportation Vehicle, a neat little mobile gadget that may eliminate the need for cars in the future.
However, if there are a large number of vehicles operating in the same area, it does require magnetic tracks to be installed to prevent the possibility of collisions of magnetic interference with other ITs.
The breakthrough technology that runs the IT is GINGER, the geomagnetic inductance neutralizing gasoline engine replacement.
This clean, quiet, inexpensive engine will be the real moneymaker whether the IT becomes popular or not.
It could be used extensively in defense, shipping, and many other industries.
So that's the best explanation I've seen for it, or the one I liked when I read it.
It doesn't look like a, in that regard, it does not look like a scooter.
It's fatter, much fatter.
And it has an ingenious number of parts, engineering parts.
It has torsion bars, things like springs, and again, it has this splinky-like motion as it moves along.
Very quiet.
Whirr, and a whirr falls off, a whirr picks up again, that kind of thing, like a flywheel, that just translating energy into the wheels, into the movement.
I think if you take a community that is very environmentally oriented, that they would plan to have tracks where these kinds of things would run on and provide as people movers.
As if these were, let's say, a hypothetical weapons, then our job as a military team would be to essentially take this thing apart and using remote viewing to disassemble it and reverse engineer it and take it apart and see how it works to see if the bad guys, I use the term loosely, had scooped us and developed a technology that really could be used against us in weapons form.
But that in peacetime is called industrial espionage and that is not what the Technical Remote Dealing Institute does.
And even before remote viewing came to the fore, military team members used altered states to collect intelligence.
And some of those altered state sessions were used to look at anomalies at military bases, anomalies associated with what we call UFOs.
Sure.
And after all that is said and done, it appears that not all of these objects or in certain cases they're not objects themselves.
They're artifacts of propulsion.
What we see with our visual range, and of course humans are bandwidth limited.
We can only process a certain amount of sensory input.
What we see is not the thing itself.
It's a projection like you would.
It would be the reflection of a searchlight on a layer of clouds.
We would see this big spot on clouds and think it's a thing, a vehicle, because that's the best that we could do.
After all these years, it looks like some of these solid objects, apparently solid, are moving in time.
Almost every validated remote viewing case that we have in our field work, I've led some field expeditions to hot spots in the American Southwest where we have first remote viewed locations and then gone there on the ground, the same way we would find a criminal.
These expeditions have led us to believe that we're dealing with something that's moving through our window in time.
I, at least speaking for myself, I have pushed the envelope of applied technical remote team about as far as it will go on any number of different things.
What do you name it?
Loch Nest monster, phenomenology, enigma.
Tangentially, the Loch Nest monster is a good example.
What I'm running into and what is of interest to me of late is the limitations of mind because that's where technical remote viewing operates in the mind.
So we have the one power pool, the game insight, and any information pattern.
It appears that it in and of itself is very limited, that there's much more than these patterns of information that we've been receiving that is not knowable because we as humans do not have the wherewithal, the hardware, and the software to process the information.
And some of these classes of enigma, including some classes of UFOs, appear to meet that criteria where something may be penetrating or intruding or extruding from another dimension.
And because we have never evolved within that dimension and have had no need to process information.
There's no point of reference, there's no baseline, there's no common denominator to speak of, and therefore these will always be enigmatic to human beings.
The best that we could do, in my mind, is to design a machine to penetrate these other dimensions and then come back and attempt to put that in terms that a human could possibly comprehend, whether it's a metaphor or a metaphor.
Well, in other words, you said create a machine that would penetrate this other dimension, gather information about this other dimension, and bring you back sort of a baseline of information from which you could begin to remote view so you'd understand what you're going after.
What I'm saying is that remote viewing is not good enough because it's a tool of the mind, and our mind is an adjunct of the way that mind is.
Mind is unitary.
The reason that we can remote view is because our brains are processing information that come from this mind field, which is a unitary field.
We call it the matrix of the collective unconscious.
But even though these other patterns of information about other dimensions may be part of this matrix, we do not have the wiring in our brains to comprehend what we're remote viewing.
Whatever an angel is, and there's been a lot of remote viewing history looking at this class of phenomena, of entities, it does appear to be a real intelligent entity, this thing that humans call angels.
Call Art Bell from West of the Rockies at 1-800-618-8255.
East of the Rockies at 1-800-825-5033.
First-time callers may reach Art at area code 775-727-1222 or call the Wildcard line at 775-727-1295.
To talk with Art on the Toll-Free International Line, call your AT ⁇ C operator and add them dial 800-893-0903.
This is Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell.
Can you imagine a world with no more secrets?
Can you imagine something you can do with your mind that can literally just about, maybe accepting other dimensions and angels, go find out about anything?
That's remote viewing.
That's what we're talking about.
And we've got the most controversial remote viewer in the world, Major Ed Dames.
We'll get right back to it.
All right.
Now, don't ask me why I like it so much, but the Loch Ness Monster, a ghost of a dinosaur.
That one really makes sense, doesn't it?
The Loch Ness Monster is a ghost of a dinosaur.
I'll not forget that soon.
All right, Ed, welcome back.
Thank you.
Just a second more on UFOs.
You say they move in time, and I've heard you say that before, and it makes all the sense to me because they seem to appear and disappear, and that's what they would do if they were moving in time.
But can you...
We're obviously being lied to.
The very least UFOs are, no matter what they are, is a threat to national security.
Obviously, a sensible position says most or even a good percentage of them are, you know, test aircraft, sighting the planets, all sorts of things that people see that they somehow attribute to something from somewhere else.
But would you say conclusively that some of them are from either another time or another place?
In other words, within them, do you sense entities that are not human?
In some cases, there are distinctly different humanoid-looking entities.
But in most cases, and most of the sightings at UFOs in the last, oh, I'd say, 15 years, at least in my experience, many of those particular sightings were a radar signature vehicle, or what we call a vehicle for lack of a better word, has been on and off the screen.
were human beings look very similar to you and I inside of those objects.
Because the majority of the sightings that the military team, when I was the operations officer and training officer for the military remote viewing team, I slipped a lot of these targets in as training targets.
Much to the dismay and the chagrin of them, except that the person that was running it, a very high-placed, very high-level civilian whose name I will not mention at this time, was keenly interested, keenly interested in those objects.
We were not being paid by the taxpayers of the United States to do this.
Now, I don't know how many times I've said that, and people would just refuse to believe it.
But when you're wearing a uniform and you're paid tax dollars to do a job, whether or not you're interested in something is your business, personal interest.
And you might be able to do this on off-duty time with the capability, especially if you're a remote viewer.
But you can't use, let's say, an F-111 to go take a look at your favorite fishing lakes in Canada.
Yeah, I've seen generals who call and shop and protest.
I'm a little aware of that.
But the fact is that there was not that much time that we could get away with this to look at it.
And when we did, we noticed that the majority of incidents where we were able to track a solid vehicle somewhere before it disappeared using remote viewing techniques and methods, these people inside,
I'll call them people, inside of these boxes in the sky were hovering above nuclear weapons, storage depots, nuclear submarines, nuclear reactors.
They were keeping track and seemed to have a tally of every single nuclear weapon on this planet.
I certainly would, but I want to just preface it with the fact that we all know, and we've heard the reports, it was on major media, that objects hovered above our silos and the Dakotas and elsewhere and turned off ICBMs.
They did that, Ed.
We know they did that.
So is that the intervention you were about to speak of?
Yes, there were incidents outside that we looked at.
I used the military remote fueling team to look at incidents outside of storage depots in Socora, New Mexico, and other places where in the old now superannuated weapons technologies, nuclear weapons warheads, where the targeting codes were zeroized by a glowing object where the physical security of a bunker, a storage bunker, was not violated.
But the weapon itself that was programmed to land on Minsk or Kiev or wherever the target might be, that map was gone.
The codes were not there, so that if you bolted that weapon onto a missile, it would go up and come straight back down because all the instructions of where to go were gone.
So yes, that would be a national defense security breach, I would say.
And do you think that extends now to the entire response of our government to the whole UFO question since it's not understood, since they can't do anything about it, they just don't talk about it?
There's lots of incidences recorded on satellite photography of these kinds of things and enigmatic glowing objects that do appear to have a shape, a symmetry.
But because the government can't explain them, and in most cases we can't report these, the intelligence community cannot because it would give away what the platforms we're looking at and of course the technologies that we use to capture this image or this electronic signal.
But more than that, any government or any scientific establishment even that pretends to be the leaders of the people or society is not going to say, I don't know.
That's one mantra you do not chant to the people, I don't know, as a leader of a country.
And so the answers to the new President of the United States, each time we have a new one, when he asks this question, is, we don't know what they are.
Usually it's an Air Force general saying that.
Because we don't.
But it goes beyond that.
And what the American public does not know, and this is the first time that they'll find out right now, tonight, is there some intervention that has occurred.
Very, very strange intervention.
And I'm going to get into the consequences to what this might mean after I talk about it.
The triad system in the 60s was a system of triad.
We could deliver nuclear weapons in force to a belligerent using B-52s, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, submarine-launched missiles, and land-based missiles.
Well, anyway, the Navy was very excited about their Trident missile program back in the 60s, and it worked really well when they tested it.
The Russians were extremely anxious about the Trident missile program because they could not, at that time, the Russians were not capable of achieving a balance of terror.
This Trident missile program was throwing the balance offside, putting Americans, getting Americans the upper hand.
Well, even as far back as the Cuban Missile Crisis, we're now led to understand that President Kennedy had information indicating the Russians were not prepared to enter a nuclear war.
They simply were not prepared.
And so he used that as the edge to the world.
It looked as though they backed down.
And of course, they did.
But he was only able to push that bluff because he had information indicating they couldn't do what they said they could do.
The reason is that there's a whole history there that may or may not ever come to light, but that particular scenario is a good one.
It's just as good as anything else, but there was a smaller incident that happened that really was upped the balance to threshold levels where Bobby Kennedy was actually implementing on this.
Bobby Kennedy was the one that convinced the Russians.
It wasn't a calling the Russians bluff, but the Russians really didn't think that John Kennedy was serious because there was no really direct communication between the two leaders.
Bobby Kennedy provided the middleman, was the middleman for that.
The Navy was very, well, flummocked because some of their missiles, some of their submarine-launched missile tests were failing again and again.
Missile was coming up out of, was working fine out of the submarine, but the tests weren't going well after that.
1,000 feet out of the tube, the missile punches, breaks the surface of the water, and then about 1,000 feet later, it has some real problems.
Every time.
Well, that's not all that was there out of the water, this tube, this missile.
There was a glowing object.
Many, many times for about upwards of a half a second, there was a glowing object that sometimes satellites would pick up during these missile tests, U.S. tests.
The Navy and others, the Department of Defense, you know, was at their wit's end trying to figure out what was going on and thought that maybe there might be something between this coincidental glowing thing and the failed test.
And so you're telling me there was intervention from the future, that they were humans from the future, intervening to slow up or stop our missile tests or plummets them to the point where they were suspended and the balance of power had an opportunity to regain balance.
What it is now looking at is, and I did not know this exists, a very secret insulation in the United States, and I wouldn't say where it is, but it's a very big ground-based directed energy weapon as part of this new ABM, the Sun of Star Wars, this anti-ballistic missile shield.
In other words, the tests are not going to work if this control system out there is watching this carefully because the Russians are very afraid of this.
I have a videotape of one of our shuttle flights in which it's obvious the cameraman directing the external cameras were looking at a spot on Earth at a certain time, expected to see something, zoomed in, waited, which they had not done before, and bigger than hell, Ed, this ball of what looks like plasma takes off from Earth about a zillion miles an hour.
It was obviously some kind of test that they were monitoring, and I have that on videotape.
That's the kind of weapon you're probably talking about.
And You're telling me that there's intervention going on again to slow this up or to stop it?
I'm telling you that the same control system, elements of which messed with the U.S. Triton program, is now seriously considering doing the same thing to this brand new installation that I remote viewed last week.
There is, I think Jacques Vallet was really the first person who, as a non-remote viewer, a non-professional remote viewer, was able to deduce that this was going on, that something like this was going on, that there is something that is steering human society, the trajectory of culture and societies, something in the background that occasionally intervenes when it has to.
Using remote viewers to sketch the humanoids inside of these glowing spheres.
They're not really glowing spheres.
That is just what images pick up in photography.
They're actually moving so fast, and they can do whatever they need to do so rapidly.
They're picked up.
In the old days, they were only picked up on two frames of photography.
I can't tell you how fast the camera went in those days, even now it's a classified.
But they were picked up on two frames.
But in remote viewing, you can stop time.
Take as much time as you want to sketch something and go inside of these particular vehicles and they were vehicles at the time and sketch the faces and the bodies of these people.
And they are not alien.
They are humans.
They're people.
They look a little bit different than us in some ways, but not much.
And when they take off again and they move and they land, they're landing in a place that's on Earth, but it's not just time.
Can you give me a little hint, or do you know anything about the nature of time itself in the sense that if these future humans were trying to maintain the balance of terror so that Earth would survive, if they failed in their mission and Earth did not survive, would that virtually mean they blink out?
I want to ask you about a prediction that you made.
And it was about, it was a dire prediction, indeed.
Something about cow's milk and mother's milk and babies dying.
You saw a lot of babies dying.
You saw a lot of things happening.
And I don't want to put any words in your mouth, but it crashed in on me today when I read Dr. Lorraine Dave's little preface to her coming on the program.
She said, along with a lot of other things, there's an epidemic, a pandemic which is going to occur that's going to make AIDS seem like a day at the beach.
And what she's talking about is mad cow disease.
Now, it's already horrendous in Europe, as we know.
From what I've heard, and Dr. Day may change my mind, but it's not here in the U.S. yet.
Maybe.
It occurred to me that the mad cow disease thing had certain parallels to what you were talking about with regard to the immune system and babies and milk, and all of that sort of rang a bell for me earlier today.
And I said, I wonder if there's any relationship between the two.
Well, I don't want to muddy the waters or make this any more complex than it should be by bringing in a bunch of biochemistry and biotechnological terms.
I'm going to make it really simple.
As early as 1984, in the military team, we were seeing and looking at remote viewing being used as sort of an over-the-horizon radar, advanced distant early warning of things coming.
Because it can be used for that, particularly for singularities, things that could never be predicted because there's nothing in a database to even point in that direction.
As early as 1984, the team members were describing, including myself, milk that babies were drinking and they were dying.
And since 1984, as a remote viewer, I've been looking at this particular phenomenon in the collective unconscious mind.
What is this?
And basically, it is a future event that was picked up as early as 1984 where worldwide, particularly in the lesser developed countries, many, many, many infants were dying in their mother's arms because they were drinking cow's milk.
Now, we didn't know what the cause was.
Actually, we still don't know.
We have not really looked at what the cause is in terms of a virus or whatever at the biogenic.
Mothers, don't give your children, at least mothers in the future, at some point in the future, and that point may be starting right now, do not feed your children cow's milk.
Feed them soy milk or mother's milk, but not cow's milk.
Because cow's milk in the future, as far as we're concerned, and I still stand by this, I'll put my institute's reputation on the line and my own reputation on the line, what's left of it, is this.
It is the most dire and the most important and most significant over-the-horizon prediction and forecast that I have ever had in my business.
That cow's milk is going to kill a lot of babies because there's something in the milk that is ostensibly killing, that's damaging the immune system, or that the immune system in these children cannot take.
Because milk is used as a source of nutrition for so many infants for a while.
We made this choice culturally in many cultures, you know, a long time ago.
And it's time to start really for these big companies that produce children's formula and for other companies, you know, dairy companies, to start owning up to the possibility that whether it's bovine,
spongiform, encephalopathy, or something else, Or prions, or whatever we got, that they may be responsible for children's death if they don't start investigating the quality of the milk.
Way before the millennium, whenever you consider the millennium to be, and there's a big argument about that, but I guess it's over now.
But you said that Y2K wasn't going to be much of anything.
It wasn't even a blip on the radar.
You were absolutely right about that.
But you also said that it wouldn't be a big thing because it would be overshadowed by a kill shot or a terrible eruption from the sun that would do just terrible damage on Earth.
And that sort of set the timeline as being, you know, at Y2K or prior to Y2K, but it hasn't happened yet.
Do you regard that now as a miss, or do you think that's still coming?
And people were calling in, and this was like three and a half years ago, three years ago, and saying, what can we do?
And I said, well, there are certain sanctuaries in North America that are important because they have lots of fresh water, they're isolated, and those kinds of things.
Yeah, you can go to some websites and you'll see that there was a circle.
And through the circle in this wheat field was a line.
There's a line.
And the line had two other curved arced lines coming from the central axis out towards the circumference of the circle.
And then there were some other curved lines outside of the circle that looked like rays passing through it.
To make a long story short, this particular crop circle in whitefish with these two arced lines, what it represents, if you remote view it, the mean, because this is a symbol, and you can remote, symbols really lend themselves to remote viewing.
But again, in terms of the timelines, you did seem to associate it with Y2K or that it was an event that overwhelmed Y2K, seemingly placing it at about the Y2K timeline.
Well, I have spoken to astronomers, Ed, who say that they have now begun to see cases of suns like ours, typically like Earth's sun, which appear to be very stable and then suddenly erupt for no discernible reason, wiping out planets nearby, that sort of thing, that they are observing this now.
They actually have seen it occur with suns just like ours.
Not everything, but it would take a lot down to the ground.
And I don't know where if the entire planet, I don't think the entire planet would be subjected to 300 mile-an-hour winds because that's not the way, you know, it would depend on the surface.
So we're talking about at least some regions having, under those circumstances, having extremely high winds.
So the magnetic field, there's a big push on the Earth's magnetic field and a torque.
So inside the Earth, the core rotates.
It takes a little while because the coefficient of friction between this loose core and the Earth's mantle is a degree that's not 100%.
So it's like an egg yolk.
If you spin an egg that's not hard-boiled, it takes a moment for the momentum to catch up with the shell, and then the shell starts spinning, like that.
So these two things, and yes, I've said there's going to be a war on the Korean Peninsula, I stand by that, but there's going to be a lot of war.
But these two things, this milk problem and this particular geophysical event, are very big things that can change infrastructures and make us rethink and rearrange our cultural, socioeconomic positions.
They have impact, big impact, global impact, right away.
The crop circle notwithstanding, there's one very, very interesting way that I know that we're getting closer to something, and it's this.
See if you can follow me now.
In my work, in technical remote viewing, we spend a lot of time looking at individuals.
Individuals are always interested in their own situation in terms of their own future, slightly so.
So eight years ago, five years ago, when I taught this to civilians, civilians who were interested in looking at their own, let's call it a trajectory in time, where they're moving, would describe certain situations in the future.
We could describe them for the individual or the student.
If it was one of my students running a problem without knowing that they were looking at themselves, it would describe a person under the following circumstances and describe these circumstances.
Here's a person living somewhere, doing something, working somewhere, married to someone, those kinds of things, right?
That's what we can do in remote viewing.
But about five years ago, something started to happen.
When we were running these types of projects for individuals, some individuals, when they went to describe the places where they would be living and what they would be doing, assuming that they would be alive and not die of old age or an accident, were describing themselves underground.
Regardless of whether or not the project was an attempt to discern where they would be living and what employment they would have, they were describing themselves underground.
And over the last five years, more and more and more people, no matter what we do to try to discern what the optimum pathway for a person would be in terms of livelihood, place to live, those kinds of things, more and more people were simply describing themselves underground as if the collective unconscious was saying, hey, don't worry about the stock market.
Don't worry about who you'll be with.
Don't worry about what you'll be doing.
You won't even be alive unless you do this.
And so that leads me to believe that whatever this is, this catastrophic event, that is a killer, it's getting closer.
Well, call our bells from west to the Rockies at 1-800-618-8255.
East to the Rockies at 1-800-825-5033.
First-time callers may reach out at 1-775-727-1222.
Both wildcard line is open at 1-775-727-1295.
And to reach out on the toll-free international line, call your AT ⁇ T operator and have them dial 800-893-0903.
This is Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell on the Premier Radio Network.
Well, I warned you it wasn't going to be an easy ride, didn't I?
And so a lot of you who get very angry at Ed Dames and don't like the negative, I don't want to say predictions, the negative vibes, the Californians, whatever it is, all of what you've just heard, attach a time period to it and say, that's it.
It didn't happen.
He's full of it.
And there's a lot of anger out there at Ed Dames for that.
I know, and he knows.
But if you're listening carefully tonight, he says it's all still ahead.
And we've got more ahead if you'll stay right where you are.
Actually, that's what we've got going on today.
Storms in California dumping immense amounts of rain in California and snow in the mountains.
Just really, really, really wicked storms going on out there.
Let's see.
Los Angeles downpours, flooded roads, snow, buried mountain passes.
Well, I still think, Ed, that was the biggest mistake.
I remember when you said you were going to do it.
And I swear, Ed, as well as I know you, and I've talked to you for, we've talked for, I don't know how many hours, a lot of hours over the years, I detected a definite, absolute change in you after you did that.
Others did too.
Now, I don't know if it was a good change or a bad change.
I really haven't thought that hard about it, but a change.
I can feel it more than I can hear it.
A change in you.
Some kind of change.
Something happened.
What made you decide to remote view Satan of all things?
I felt that there was something that was not attributable to our own culture, something behind the scenes that might be called to task for that.
That something else was at work here that I could not put my finger on.
And I did not know what it was until I removed view the cause of that.
And I realized there was some type of, I don't want to call it a force, I don't want to get esoteric and kneeling mouth about this, but there was an element that was almost supernatural that was affecting the assailants at Columbine.
And that's when I turned my attention to that element, which turned out to be associated with what we in the West and historically have called this entity, Satan, this idea of a Satan, the shadow.
Well, I think that most people would agree there's a good force and there's a bad force, a good and a bad, a positive and a negative.
You know, just like in every endeavor in life in the world, there's a good and a bad, a yin and a yang.
And so if you believe in God, a God, then you probably don't have all that much trouble believing in a negative force, a negative entity, what's called Satan, I guess.
You know, one of the reasons that I've not wanted a remote view, and I think you really do know them, I'm not sure that I would want to see or know the things that you know and see.
That's some pretty heavy weight on anybody's shoulder.
And it seems to me, Ed, that with a lot of what we've covered already tonight, it would so change your life that it would take over the direction of your life.
Well, MindFire is designed for children and for young adults and for adults who want to learn it, but predominantly with children in Mind, it's easy and it's fun and exciting.
They can show off their skills in no time at all.
It can pick out children who are very gifted immediately.
It could be your grandmother or it could be your child, but it picks out those people who have the gift within 30 minutes.
And people can be remote viewing 10 minutes out of the box.
But the targets are all in there, hundreds of targets, all concealed.
You do not know what the target is.
And you're taught that within three minutes to describe a target.
And the process bootstraps itself very, very quickly.
So my goal is to have this very sexy, thrilling thing in the hands of young people so they can learn this because they're going to need these tools.
Instead of looking at Satan or some target like that, with Mindfire, with teaching a child to begin to see the things that can be seen, is there good practical application for that child's life?
In other words, as you grow up, can you look and see whether a business deal or an association or a social coupling would be good or negative, will work out well or poorly?
In other words, can you use it for practical things in life?
Well, what the cause was, and why the PET scan didn't pick it up, was I first had to discern whether or not it was the woman's own, I knew that it was Living cells.
I did not know if it was the woman's own cells, cancer that had metastasized or something like that, but that still would not explain this solid, coagulated, glassy material.
What it was was that it was a fungus that was growing in her sinuses.
And it's not one of those fungus that you're just allergic to that causes you some distress and you sneeze and you get a rash, not that.
This fungus was ensconced in her sinuses.
And fungi, what are the cells, the actual body of the fungi is chitin, the same material that makes up our fingernails or a lobster shell.
And when the cells die, all of this chitinous material starts to coagulate and it has nowhere to go.
So it breaks up.
She's actually heard crunching noises in her head and forms these glass-like strands and these pebbles.
And it comes out wherever it can come out.
In this case, the closest point of exit was the egress, was the eye.
And the reason that these august clinics did not pick it up, because they did not run a test for fungi, there happens to be a metabolite that the body produces that's indicative.
It's a red flag that you have a fungal infection.
But they didn't run that test because the symptoms were so odd.
For example, if a child were to learn this early on, could they, as they came into adulthood and began a career, for example, decide if they were headed in the right direction, decide if a partnership or beginning of business was going to be a good idea or not?
I'll tell you, the answer to that question is the following.
The young person in that case would not really be looking at the future or turning its attention to a future.
The child would be, that the young person would be communicating with his or her own unconscious.
And the unconscious is really closer to our spiritual self, our essence.
It knows what we really want.
Our own thinking mind, our creative mind, that's overlaid by all this emotional body, it gets in the way and we screw ourselves up constantly.
By communicating with your own unconscious, with that portion of your mind, that can direct you and see true and let you know, hey, this person is not right for you.
This job is not what you really want to do.
This is not where you really want to live.
This is not the hobby you really want to learn because it's a waste of time.
That's what our unconscious can do to us.
Our unconscious tries to communicate that knowledge in dreams, but the overlay of all our emotional body and our neocortex messes it all up, scrambles it, and we get a wrong message.
Remote viewing has that direct knowledge, it's a direct line to our unconscious, the unconscious segment of our mind, and that person can then say, hey, I know this is right.
I may not think it's right because our thinking is so fallible, but it's the right thing for me to do because, you know, I've learned that in the past, when I use this remote viewing tool, I've learned to distinguish right from wrong.
But of course, as I just mentioned, as many, many researchers know, it is the message that unconscious tries to get up to percolate up through conscious awareness.
In all the years, in all the dreams that I've ever had in my whole life, and I do, I own cats.
I have three cats.
My wife and I have three cats.
I haven't told the audience this yet.
I've never had a dream about a cat.
Never in my life.
And several weeks ago, Ed, I woke up one morning just about in tears, and I told my wife that I dreamed that one of our cats was really sick.
Actually, I said one of our cats was dying, is what I said.
And she said, God, what an awful dream.
Ed, two days later, the cat that my wife and I have had since the night we got married in Las Vegas, Abby, fell rapidly, unaccountably, incredibly ill.
Except as remote viewers, as professional remote viewers, we get to direct our unconscious attention to any target.
Now, we're trained to do this in the blind, where, as trainees, as students, the way I teach in my institute, of course, and I am for many years, is the student starts out never knowing what the target is.
Their unconscious must do all the work.
But later on, as we become professionals, we can work what we call front-loaded targets.
But we must be very, very disciplined, extremely disciplined, to do that.
And that takes a while to learn.
In fact, that's not done until the second week of PRB 200, which is the second course in my institute.
Only the second half of that is a student allowed to work even touch a target where they know what the problem set is.
I mean, I relate this now, and people can either believe I'm telling the truth or not.
It doesn't matter.
It's not a useful thing because there is so much noise.
Dreams are just generally so much noise that when a real one comes along, how are you to know it's a real one?
Something of that magnitude only occurs every so many years or something like that.
So it's not a tool you can use because you have no way to recognize if this is the real thing or you just had a bad bit of undigested something and had a bad dream.
He's got something new coming out called Mind Fire, which he says will appear on his website in short order, next few days.
I've got a few questions for him, and we're going to get the lines open shortly.
Let you ask what you want.
But it's some pretty dire stuff, as always.
All right, I just spoke with Keith Rowland, who earlier today restored all of our UFO and alien photographs to the website.
Many of you have not seen them or seen them in a long time.
They're all back up there, and we have one of the more extensive collections, I think, in the world.
He has just now restored all of the ghost photographs, and we have had many, many over the years, and I want to take this opportunity to ask any of you with photographs of the paranormal, ghosts, aliens, UFOs, or any other aspect of the paranormal, to send me those photographs, and we'll get them up there and make them part of the collection and share them with everybody.
That's what the website is for.
So if you have such a photograph, please send it to me.
I'm Art Bell.
That's A-R-T-B-E-L-L at mindspring.com.
Art Bell at mindspring.com.
So there you have it.
All right.
Once again, Major Ed Dames.
Ed, I don't want to belabor this point, but Mike from Kansas City, Missouri writes to our Fast Last setup.
Ed, are you sure you're okay since you remote-viewed Satan?
Many of your friends at SciTech and elsewhere don't seem to think so.
But I mean, recalling now when you did remote view Satan, there was a moment, you said, when you were virtually in Satan's presence and when Satan, I don't know if the right word would be turned, but recognized your presence.
It appears unlike any other remote viewing target where you are just a passive observer, although we know that whenever you observe something, you become part of the history of that pattern of information.
Unlike those targets, it appears that this particular target was intelligent and was aware that you were observing it.
I'm talking specifically, again, about a mutation of Claviceps paporia, one of the 33 known species of fungi that infects grasses that is of African origin.
That specific fungi has now made it to as far as Texas, and phytopathologists are watching it there.
That particular species of fungi is the infectious agent that I'm talking about that appears to be something like an Andromeda string.
And if it is something that is unique of the coelacanth category zoology, then what we can do as remote viewers are look at this creature.
We can bait it.
We can set up.
We can actually describe what would be bait to this creature.
We could tell you what it likes to eat, what it actually does eat, what repels it, what attracts its repulsions, how it communicates, those kinds of things.
We can actually do that, and then we could actually direct where, investigators, where to place cameras, IR-triggered cameras, you know, hunters use these to monitor deer trails.
You place cameras that have infrared or proximity switches out on a trail somewhere to count how many deer pass by.
And you can set up a camera to look for one of these and to monitor unattended, an unintended camera in the forest to be able to capture more photographs of this.
And we would be able to direct those kinds of investigations.
As I mentioned before, a couple of years ago when we talked about this extensively on your show, what we detail is the following.
When a person dies, when we die, our consciousness, our active consciousness that's been driven by glucose and electrochemical reactions in the brain, it sort of dies back like when you pull the plug on a radio and all the capacitors and the inductors start to lose their charge.
Our consciousness loses charge in a similar way, and in an analogous way.
But sometimes, this consciousness, actually, in the form of almost like a plasma, attaches itself to another human being in almost a parasitic, electrical way.
And that kind of thing sometimes becomes what is channeled.
I'm not saying that all channeling is this, but many times that's what's channeled.
And there's a way for us to know, without being remote viewers, whether or not you're dealing, when you're dealing with somebody that's channeling, whether or not you're dealing with something like that.
And here's how to do it.
You look the person that's channeling right in the eyes, and you start to ask this entity questions about the present time.
And it will not be able to give you a straight answer because it does not know anything past the point where the person that was attached to this consciousness died.
And that's always in the past.
It can't tell you what's happening now.
I had experiences like this when I was trying to put together some very esoteric work for the Department of Defense.
We approached the best natural psychics in the United States and some of the best channelers.
And we were looking to see what, in terms of human potential, what we could get away with.
And I remember looking at, and I won't mention the person's name, but this woman who was channeling this very popular entity.
I'm looking her dead in the eye.
And this entity was telling me, this channeled entity was saying, oh, Mr. So-and-so.
I was using an alias in those names because those days I was on the cover.
And, you know, Mr. Enoch, it's so wonderful to see you today.
You know, the universe is shining on your presence all this.
And I'm looking this person dead in the eye and saying, I have a question.
Oh, please ask your question.
You know, the divine light will give you the answer.
I said, that's great.
Right now, in a wood just to the south of Pilva and Czechoslovakia, there's a Scud missile on a transporter electoral launcher.
I want to know whether it's being fueled or not.
Well, the universe is bright and shiny and all this.
I said, no, no, I need to know about that specific launcher right now.
The universe in a good time, that kind of stuff, that's how you know that you're dealing with one of these undissipated minds that didn't go away and will do anything to maintain its attachment to a living human form.
Here's another one that may be a miss on your part.
I don't know if you'll qualify it as that or maybe you'd want to explain it, but you were predicting near the millennium that there would be a bio, I think it was a biological bomb set off, virtually that.
It's like flatlanders trying to perceive, you know, a two-dimensional being trying to perceive a third dimension.
It's just a very difficult thing to do.
All that we know as remote viewers that we accurately know are whether something is in the future, the past, and the present.
We can always discern that.
That's why we qualify our searches with the qualifier of present time when we're looking for something.
Because if we don't do that, if, say, we're looking for an individual and we don't qualify it with present time, our minds can go to that individual at any time in the past.
All right, so you did say earlier, though, that you're beginning to refine something of a method for nailing down timelines, or at least you can begin to tell when one of these events is getting truly close.
We can do it, but it's a tremendous amount of work.
And the way we do it is we attach the event to something physical.
And the best thing physical is the position of the planets.
So we can use what's called an orory.
An orary is an old English word, and it was actually a physical wind-up apparatus that showed the relative positions of the heavenly bodies.
Sometimes you see it in movies and in museums.
Well, they have those that are on software programs, too.
If we do a lot of work and we sketch the positions of the planets, or at least several of the planets, one outer or inner planets in relationship to the Earth and the Sun, then we average that out over many, many different remote viewers, or a number of different remote viewers in a number of different sessions, we can get a good approximation of the time.
Then we check the software program to see when that particular alignment of the planets will be.
If I were to tell you something here, Ed, maybe you can Digest it and see if it makes sense to you.
But I have recently had guests who have told me that UFO appearances, paranormal events, appear to be connected to the position of Earth relative to the stars.
This was said to me the other night, and they're beginning to do some statistical work proving that these events occur when the Earth is facing in a certain direction with respect to the stars.
And that little bell went off, ding, ding, ding, ding.
And as a matter of fact, even ASETI is beginning to consider some work looking for optical stuff instead of the same sort of stuff they're looking for right now.
And that would be relative to the position of the stars.
Does any of that make sense?
I guess it does to you because it sounded just like what you just said applying it to remote viewing and timelines.
It appears to be something that deals with plasma and the Earth's magnetosphere and things like that, or perhaps even fields that we don't know of, or juxtapositions of energies that we don't know of.
But something opens up at different times and lets things in and out.
And here from Lance in Denver, Colorado, have you ever remote viewed a major physical event that we think took place millions of years ago, like the K-T Boundary meteorite event that supposedly zonked the dinosaurs?
Only one major event that was very fascinating in terms of a study.
In my institute, we have students that come in and during the some of the higher level courses, they bring their own projects with them.
One was a geologist who was very interested in why the woolly mammoths in Siberia were flash frozen in place with food still in their mouths.
And yes, we spent some time on that one a number of years ago.
And that was a result of a very unique and a rare volcanic explosion in what today is the Fairbanks, Alaska area, somewhere in Alaska.
It's the type of volcanic explosion that comes right, it's extremely powerful.
It is not, I forget what the name of it is in geological terms, but it blows straight up from the ground, and the force is so tremendous, it pushes the Earth's atmosphere right up into the stratosphere, where a tremendous amount of the superheated air now becomes super cool.
And when it comes back down, the Earth has rotated.
And here now, the Earth has rotated underneath all this, and it's coming down now in Siberia.
So the last thing these willy mammoths saw, and we can sketch this as remote viewers, it's amazing to have a sketch of the scene, is these woolly mammoths looking up, kind of thinking that there's something out there and not seeing anything.
That's the last thing they knew before this hit them.
That's what flash froze these woolly mammoths in place.
And this is just going to have you repeating something, but it was so cool, your answer to it, that I thought we'd repeat it.
Jose Escamilia has been on my program in years past.
He's talked about, shown video of these things that he calls rods, things that you might see out of the corner of your eye occasionally, but hardly ever.
They're caught on camera.
They appear to move like living things swimming in the atmosphere.
It's the only way you can really describe it.
I should have Jose on again to do it.
Again, explain to everybody what these are, these rods, so-called.
But you remote viewed them, and what did you come up with?
Okay, Mr. Dames, I was wanting to know if you could go into more detail about your encounter with Satan and if you experienced any telepathy or kind of mind, like talking voices going back and forth, if you spoke to him at all.
In my mind, the concepts that were in my mind at the time I was remote was that there was an entity that was aware of my presence, and there was a reaction, an emotional reaction in me, that was one of fear.
But there was an article last week about how there's a Ulysses spacecraft and, of course, Soho watching the sun.
And the title of the article was, The Sun is Struggling with Its Polarity Shift.
I'm paraphrasing right now.
So we don't know what can come of that because what they're seeing is that something's not quite what they're expecting.
And the second thing on the pathogen, Willie Striever has an article posted today.
It's out of New Zealand newspaper.
And it's about these four scientists who claim, and they went in front of this board.
I don't have the article in front of me.
But however, they went in front of this board and said that they contained this genetically engineered plant pathogen, mind you, that killed grasses, wheat.
And these guys testified and said that they saw it escape in the field, and what it was doing was just devouring.
And it really, as the article in its title states, that all of the grasses would have been gone.
All of the green, whatever, would have been gone.
You can just check it out.
I mean, it's a fascinating article.
And I thought there was a lot of synchronicity there with Ed being on the show.
Okay, my question.
Now, here it goes real quick.
This Mideast thing, I just can't let it go.
And I know I talked to you before about this, Ed, but the point is, to me, since 1993, when this whole Oswal peace process started, we always heard about the Palestinians and the Israelis.
Then it went to Israel proper.
And as the stories, the press stories kept coming, it kept focusing down to Jerusalem.
And then it kept almost like we were a microscope focusing in.
Then it came to the Temple Mount.
And there's a lot of articles that never get play in the American press that say there's a tremendous amount of digging underneath that Temple Mount.
My question to you is, have you remote viewed the Temple Mount?
What is under there?
And why is everybody so focused on this one specific geological point on this whole big great planet?
I'm glad to hear you say that, because I'm getting those sorts of reviews from everybody on The Key.
Thank you.
unidentified
I mean, it goes from the need to developing a radiant energetic body so that after death, our soul doesn't dissipate, but can create its own light, to talking about the coming global superstorm.
Yes.
Which apparently is going to destroy northern civilization, leading to an ice age, which Ed's been talking about.
So I'm wondering if we have to expand maybe our safe harbor parameters here.
I was wondering if Ed could possibly or has he remote viewed safe places in Central and South America.
And he wrote a sort of a cartoon book that is extremely famous in China, but subject to as much controversy as the Nostradamus quatrains are in the Western world, it's called the Toi Betu.
I speak fluent Chinese, I teach remote viewing in Chinese.
The Toi Betu, I used one of the pages, the most controversial pages, illustrations, and remote viewed it.
And that particular page was essentially a return of the ice age.
Well, at least one class that we know of is responsible for things in the sky, but they're not vehicles.
It's a projection.
It's like the opening of a window in the sky, and we see this opening moving around and call it a vehicle, but when in fact it's a very distant world, an intelligent race on a very large gas giant, a hot planet, it would be like Venus, only a much bigger planet.
And these things that I have described as upright newts.
You know what a newt is?
Looks like an upright newt about three and a half, four feet tall, has this very advanced technology, and it can actually open up a window and move the window around on our world and in our atmosphere and look around.
All right, let me remind your audience that the spring course schedule for the TRV Institute is posted on my website, and there's a link to my website that Keith Rowland has up.
But I am really surprised, considering his interest in religious topics and his exploration of those topics, that he's not issue a word of caution about something he's promoting, which is his Mind Fire program.
And the word of caution simply should be that there are two spiritual families on the earth, and that we cannot simply hand over our children's spiritual education, which I suppose Mindfire really is.
We cannot simply hand it over to any one person without thinking beforehand what the effects will be.
For anyone especially who's not been brought up in the Christian, Western, moralistic, exoteric traditions of the United States, for anyone who has not been brought up in that to hand their children, this teaching, I think, without further contemplation of the effects, is really dangerous.
And I can't believe Ed would promote this without mentioning that word of caution.
Take a look at what your children are doing now, and you'll see why Mindfire is going to be out there.
unidentified
I understand, Ed, but it is a remedial or a corrective effort on your part, and that is appreciated.
But what I'm trying to say is that what a corrective effort is for one class of people and one spiritual family may not be a proper means for another class.
It allows someone, adults and children, to know when their minds are right, correct, and when it's wrong.
And by doing that, it hones that skill so that in their everyday life, they can look at someone, someone on television or someone in front of them, and know when that person is telling the truth and when they're not.
unidentified
I appreciate that.
And that is a principle idea behind religious teaching.
You do want to improve your mind.
You want to improve your senses.
You want to improve your sense of what you're dealing with.
There's nothing like this that has been out on the streets.
And yes, it's a Pandora's box in one respect.
But all that it is doing is honing, it's using a very fun kit to hone a very important skill, an innate ability that we humans have allowed through atropy.
unidentified
Yes, I understand, but don't you think that this method has been referred to throughout various teachings in the world as something that's desirable and something we ought to be striving for?
And because you present it in one way, perhaps another people in another part of the world have attained the same state of mind through a different method.
Anyway, I'm not going to ask you about the devil thing because I've seen it, did it, done it.
I know how you feel.
Don't like to talk about it.
But the question I got for you is, actually, I need some advice.
I've been honing my skill lately.
I've been able to look into people, so on and so forth.
And like yourself, I ended up deciding to track.
My area I wanted to track was child molesters.
And I found a few, intervened a couple times through anonymous letters and so on.
And eventually the person was caught and so on and so forth.
But what's been happening lately within the past month is normally when I go to do some remote viewing, I'll sit there in meditation and then I'll go out and remote view.
But these images lately have been coming in, coming in, coming in.
I won't even be, like I'll be just standing at work, driving the car, shopping, all of a sudden, bang, in they come.
Otherwise, we would have used them to support military operations, but it didn't work because the psychic was not able to focus on a target and hold it.
And most importantly, the natural psychic did not know when their imagination was beginning to infiltrate and overlay the data.
Actually, New York City and another city in the United States.
These are the kind of things that really can't be talked about, even if we had the information.
If you go to my website and you look at where it says TRV Institute Special Studies on that particular webpage, you'll see the areas of expertise that remote viewing has proven itself to be very efficacious in.
And one of those is counterterrorism, if you read that.
unidentified
Okay, one more comment about something.
That was the Illuminati.
Ed Dames, do you believe it's possible that they have the eyeball of George Washington in a jar?
East of the Rockies, you're on the air with Major Ed Dames.
unidentified
Hi.
Hi, good morning.
Ed, I had a question for you, please.
I know that when you've remote viewed, you've seen a lot of people with the earth or people on the earth coming down with different plagues and things.
But I had a different kind of question about health.
It seems like a lot of people are having waves of dizziness and frontal headaches and even children, my children and other children that I know.
Have you seen this in remote viewing?
And is this due to different frequencies of the earth and the way the earth is revolving right now?
And if you have seen something like this, have you also seen any different healing modalities that could help people that are going through this?
And were I to study it, I would take, instead of taking the whole collective idea, I would take one specific example, let's say one child or one adult, one incident, and I would use that as a remote viewing target to find out what that melody was.
I wouldn't use a collective.
unidentified
Okay.
I just had that question because it seems like within the last four or five years, not only like in my family, but teachers and other people that you've talked to will say, you know, that they've had like waves of dizziness and things like that.
And the one thing I keep having remote viewing of is something about the Earth going into like a whole other stage where it's going to erupt from all over all the continents.
Like where there are cities, there's going to be rocks and mountains.