Art Bell revisits the bizarre 1970 Oregon State Highway Division’s dynamite disposal of an 8-ton, 45-foot whale carcass in Florence, creating a mushroom cloud and raining blubber on bystanders—including Walt Amenhoffer’s crushed car. Meanwhile, investigative journalist Chris Ruddy presents forensic evidence declaring Vince Foster’s torn suicide note a forgery, citing procedural flaws like single-sample comparisons and media suppression, with experts like Oxford’s Reginald Alton backing claims of potential obstruction or murder tied to Clinton-era Whitewater. Bell warns of systemic impunity if such evidence is ignored, urging listeners to demand accountability from the AP and media amid partisan dismissals and historical parallels to Watergate. [Automatically generated summary]
From the high desert and the great American Southwest, I bid you all a sparkling good morning from the high desert and welcome you to another edition of Coast to Coast AM Live Talk Radio because this radio station cares enough to have live talk radio on instead of recycled, regurgitated, relentless repeats.
That's right, we're live, and boy, do we have a plan this morning?
Got a couple of things I'm going to do here.
There was and is, every now and then, a game I play called Troop or Trash.
In it, people will call up and tell incredible stories.
Many times lying, frankly, they're a little teeth off.
Then it's up to the panel to decide if or not the story is true.
Well, it was about, I don't know, maybe a year ago, and somebody called me and told me this story about a pretty fantastic story about a whale watching up on a beach in Oregon and Oregonians not being the brightest bunch up there turned the,
with the theory that whales like Rhodes being big, you know, big whale, big road, government there decided that they would turn the project over to the highway department to dispose of, and it was, oh, it's a gigantic whale.
Well, I as much as told the person that they spoke with forked tongue because I just frankly didn't believe the story of what happened to this whale.
And see, the highway department, my wife wants to know, maybe we can find out.
But after giving the project, we speculate that they probably got together a bunch of the highway guys in a bar somewhere and said, well, what the hell are we going to do here?
And one of them said, well, look, why don't we blow the thing up?
I mean, just absolutely blow it up.
And we're going to find out if that part of the story could be true.
Anyway, subsequently, they did blow the whale up.
And it was like the WKRP Turkey Story Times, Tim.
All I can tell you is a lot lies ahead.
One of the larger, or largest, I guess, now larger, pieces of whale blubber blown to smithereens came down right on top of the car of a guy named Walt Amenhoffer.
And as much of this story is myth and legend as anything else for a lot of people out there right now, we are going to bring it to real true life, and I've done this in two ways.
One, I've got Walt Amenhoffer on the line.
Walt says there's a lot of the story that hasn't been told yet.
That never really got out.
So we're going to lay it out in excruciating detail for you shortly with Walt.
And then the second thing I did is somebody once was kind enough to send me a high, pretty good video from Channel 2, KATU Television in Portland.
And I've wished and wished and wished there would be a way that I could bring you this.
You know, obviously I can't give you the video, but Channel 2 can and plans to.
And I'll tell you about that.
What they have done is given me permission to run the Channel 2 Portland report that ran oh so long ago called A Whale of a Tale.
And by the way, Channel 2 plans, here, I'll give them a plug, plans A Whale of a Tale as part of a great anniversary celebration to air, so you people in Portland, whatever you do, do not miss it, Wednesday, November 1st in their newscasts at 5 and 6.30 and 11 p.m.
With the series airing Thursday and Friday, November 2nd and 3rd at 5, 6.30 and 11.
And the people up at Channel 2 were great and they sent me permission to air the narrative part of the KATU story.
So you're going to also hear that this hour.
Next hour, I may have some very serious blockbuster news for you.
Well, I will, either way.
We may or may not have Chris Ruddy on with a real bombshell for you.
unidentified
moment a whale of a tale waltz almond hopper is going to tell us about the Coast to Coast AM sure sounds great in the middle of the night.
But you know, you don't have to be nocturnal to enjoy this amazing show.
The Coast Insider is your key to a normal life.
For 15 cents a day, you can wake up refreshed knowing that last night's show is waiting for you with podcasting.
Listen on your way to work and again on the way home.
Or listen to one of over a thousand archived shows from the past three years.
As a member, you'll have access to our monthly live chat sessions with George Nouri and special guests.
The Coast Insiders Club is a must-have feature for all Coast to Coast AM listeners.
Visit CoastToCoastAM.com to sign up today.
You'll sleep like a baby, knowing you'll never miss your favorite guests and topics ever again.
Remember, a one-year subscription comes out to only 15 cents a day.
Sign up today at CoastToCoastAM.com.
Get a new view of the world with Coast2Coast AM.
First of all, I want to just thank you for bringing everyone out here to Corny Coffee Just phenomenal knowledge.
I don't know of anyone else that I've ever listened to at radio that just fills my brain and stimulates me.
But you know, I was listening to the show and I thought to myself, do you think, George, the common citizen such as you or I, really has any hope towards the future of any privacy or anything else?
I think we do.
I think eventually so many people will see the light, see what you see, see what I see, that eventually they're going to say enough is enough.
And I think that we do have a future and we're going to win in the long run.
It's going to be bumpy along the way.
It's not going to be easy, but we will get there.
That's my take.
And you know what?
As long as I can continue on the earwaves and tell people this, I shall.
You're listening to Art Bell, Somewhere in Time.
Tonight featuring Coast to Coast AM from October 25, 1995.
The End Now, up to the state of Oregon where Walt Ammenhoffer, and I hope I've got that name right, continues to reside.
You've been not an easy guy to find, and I've got to thank one of my listeners, maybe a friend of yours, who heard the talk about it on the show and supplied me finally with your number.
I saw people standing next to it, and they were dwarfed.
I mean, this was big.
unidentified
So we were able to, fortunately, get down.
They were kind of keeping people back, but Vern Atkinson, the air pollution guy, knew Wilbrook quite well, and we were able to go right down there to actually where the whale was.
And the smell, you couldn't believe the smell of this thing.
I don't know how long this thing was dead, but it came ashore, and it was just awful.
So we kind of stood around there and chatted around there, and they had people there from the highway department, and we were all kind of talking together.
And, you know, I said, well, what are you going to do?
And this fellow that's from the highway department, he says, well, he said, I'm going to blow it up.
And I thought, well, you know, okay, not a problem.
So we did there a while longer, and all of a sudden, this caterpillar tractor come rumbling down across the stand with a huge bucket on the front of it.
And in this bucket, with 20 cases of 60% powder.
So I see that, and I said, boy, this is going to be big trouble.
So I said to this guy, he says, what the hell are you going to do with 20 cases of dynamite?
He says, I'm going to blow it out to sea.
And I thought, yeah, you're going to blow it out to sea.
And I says, where do you ever come up with this formula?
And he says, he talked to somebody, and they said, rule of thumb, case of dynamite per ton of whale.
He says, I'm going to dig on the inboard side of the whale and put the case of dynamic and I'm going to blow him out to sea.
Well, powder doesn't work that way.
And I got into quite a well, you might say almost an argument about it.
He says, you're crazy.
You're going to kill somebody.
I said, you know, if you want to obliterate the, if you want to blow up a big rock with dynamite, you put a few sticks of dynamite on the top and put some sand on top and you'll crack it.
You never go underneath.
Especially with sand, because sand is so dense that all power you have is going to go straight up.
Anyhow, Vern Atkinson and Wilbur said to me, come on, John Harvey.
He says, it's really none of your business anyhow.
And I said, yeah.
And he says, and the guy from the highway department, he says, anyhow, he says, I'm going to have everybody on top of them dunes up there.
Well, you know, I understand, actually, before they began running, right after the explosion, everybody for at least a few moments rejoiced and clapped and yelled.
This, all those many years ago, was the actual KATU, Channel 2 News report.
The whale of a tale, the exploding whale story that many people have thought, and in fact, I recall now the panel thought was absolutely a whale of a tale, but a total lie.
Well, guess what?
It wasn't a total lie.
And here's Channel 2's report from way back then.
unidentified
It had to be said, the Oregon State Highway Division not only had a whale of a problem on its hands, it had a stinking whale of a problem.
What to do with one 45-foot, 8-ton whale dead on arrival on the beach near Florence.
It had been so long since a whale had washed up in Lane County, nobody could remember how to get rid of one.
In selecting its battle plan, the highway division decided the carcass couldn't be buried because it might soon be uncovered.
It couldn't be cut up and then buried because nobody wanted to cut it up, and it couldn't be burned.
So dynamite it was, some 20 cases or a half ton of it.
The hope was that the long-dead Pacific gray whale would be almost disintegrated by the blast and that any small pieces still around after the explosion would be taken care of by seagulls and other scavengers.
Indeed, the seagulls had been standing nearby all day.
As everything was being made ready, we asked George Thornton, the highway engineer in charge of the project, for his final observation.
Well, I'm confident that it'll work.
The only thing is we're not sure just exactly how much explosives it'll take to disintegrate this thing so the scavengers, seagulls, and crabs and whatnot can clean it up.
Is there any chance it might be more than a one-day job?
If there's any large chunks left, and we may have to do some other cleanup, possibly set another charge.
The dynamite was buried primarily on the leeward side of the big mammal, so as most of the remains would be blown toward the sea.
About 75 bystanders, most of them residents who had first found the whale to be an object of curiosity before they tired of its smell, were moved back a quarter of a mile away.
The sand dunes there were covered with spectators and landlubber newsmen, shortly to become land blubber newsmen, where the blast blasted blubber beyond all believable bounds.
All right Fred, you can take your hands out of your head.
Here comes the faces of my head.
Thank you.
Our cameras stopped rolling immediately after the blast.
The humor of the entire situation suddenly gave way to a run for survival as huge chunks of whale blubber fell everywhere.
Pieces of meat passed high over our heads while others were falling at our feet.
The dunes were rapidly evacuated as spectators escaped both the falling debris and the overwhelming smell.
A parked car over a quarter of a mile from the blast site was the target of one large chunk.
The passenger compartment literally smashed.
Fortunately, no human was hit as badly as the car.
However, everyone on the scene was covered with small particles of dead whale.
As for the success of the effort, well, the seagulls who were supposed to clean things up were nowhere in sight, either scared away by the explosion or kept away by the smell.
That didn't really matter.
The remaining chunks were of such a size that no respectable seagull would attempt to tackle anyway.
As darkness began to set in, the highway crews were back on the beach burying the remains, including a large piece of the carcass, which never left the blast site.
It might be concluded that should a whale ever wash ashore in Lane County again, those in charge will not only remember what to do, they'll certainly remember what not to do.
Walt, I just want to give them one more little plug here, and then it's back to you.
Look, this report has only at one other time in all its 25-year history been released to anybody to run, and that was to, I think, KGO in San Francisco that did a piece on it.
And so I feel very honored that KATU allowed us to run it.
They're very nice people up there in Portland.
And once again, you can see it for yourself, the video that goes with the report.
If you're in Portland, it'll be Wednesday, November 1st in their newscast at 5 p.m. and 6.30 and then 11 as well, with the series airing Thursday and Friday, November 2nd and 3rd at 5, 6.30 and 11.
So don't miss it.
And thanks to Doug Brazil, the news director, and everybody else at KATU, it was a rare opportunity, and I'm glad we could provide it for you.
Well, Walt, there it was.
Sound familiar?
unidentified
You know, one thing that's always puzzled me about this, it's a known fact that if you get underneath the bureaucrats and get them all upset about something, you usually get an IRS audit.
What I never could understand is I was the only one who protested what this guy was doing.
How the hell he ever directed that piece of wheel to the top of my car, but he did it.
I think what they were really afraid of, this thing had really made the newspapers in the APY service, and I had people from Germany send me the newspapers and relatives I have over there.
And I think what they were afraid of is probably all these people could have sued them, at least for new clothes.
When we got home, we had to rent a car to go home in.
And it was cold, and we had to have all the windows down all the way home.
In other words, whales don't would you say that Walt that whales don't really well I blew up part of it blew up but there was so much of it left I think better than half of it was still intact then whales don't blow up easily first-time caller line you're on the air with Walt Amenhopper hi John from Milwaukee yes turn your radio off sir turn your radio off it's off okay
You know, when you told it, Walt, and thank you, caller, it kind of reminded me, I like Roadrunner cartoons.
And I used to watch cartoons where things would go up and you kind of pictured it as going way up and then sort of stopping and suspending for a moment.
Is there actually, Walt, any way to calculate how much dynamite it would have taken to, as they wished to do, obliviate or turn into little tiny particles.
unidentified
I think what they should have done if they were going to use explosives, you know, was put some, maybe a case or two in single sticks on top of the whale and put sand on top of it.
So you would kind of blow it apart in place more or less, and you'd still have to bury the pieces.
Yeah, but and but this guy thought he was gonna, by putting the dynamite on the inboard side, he figured he was gonna blow the whole thing out in the ocean.
In fact, if I remember that time, there was a pretty good-sized tug in Florn.
And if they had just got a big net or something and put it around it and put some dynamite in it and drag it out a couple of miles and then touched it off.
Well, you know, I was thinking of some same but different stories waiting on the line, and I recall seeing some pictures of a friend brought that a friend brought back from Newfoundland one time.
I don't know how long or far into the winter season you were in, but they had a sperm whale wash up in their town that was fresh dead, and the city made an activity out of utilizing every bit of the whale, as the old whalers did.
The blubber, the bones, all for practical purposes.
Well, I think this is just hazarding a guess, but Walt, from what you've told me of the condition of the whale, it's not something you'd carve up and take home for the dinner table.
unidentified
Yeah, it was pretty rank.
I don't know how long the thing has been dead, but it was kind of gooey, you know.
But that's what this program does, as you will learn as time goes on.
There is an investigative reporter that, because of the rate of our affiliate acquisition, a lot of you may not know.
He is a mainstream, mainline reporter, investigative reporter for the Pittsburgh Tribune Review.
He has been doggedly hanging on the Vince Foster story when others have fallen away through pack laziness or maybe just being too comfortable or, we don't know, a lot of reasons.
You know, the press is scared from the story.
You may recall 60 Minutes a few weeks ago, did a couple weeks ago, three maybe, did a big story on Chris Ruddy, which I consider to be a flat-out hatch job, in which a lot of Chris Ruddy's interview was left on the cutting room floor.
We talked to Chris Ruddy shortly after that.
Chris Ruddy has shocking blockbuster news for you this morning about the Foster investigation.
This is, if you thought the Watergate burglary was something significant, I don't think that that even compares to this.
Today, in Washington, there was a press conference held by Strategic Investment Financial Newsletter.
Prestigious newsletter, James Dale Davidson, who heads the National Taxpayers Union, hosted it.
They brought in three forensic handwriting experts, two from the United States, one formerly with the New York City Police Department, another with the Massachusetts Attorney General's Criminal Unit in Boston, and a third one,
eminent scholar from Oxford University, 30-year lecturer on handwriting and forgery detection, had ruled on the C.S. Lewis Diaries, the noted English author, several years ago.
He's been a consultant to British.
The bottom line is he is a preeminent world-recognized expert on handwriting.
And I should underscore that by telling the audience, I spoke with this man earlier today on the telephone.
unidentified
Yeah, well, anyone that speaks to him knows that he knows his business.
And he has been called into disputes.
We're talking here about, let's say you find an ancient manuscript and you say, well, Shakespeare wrote this.
If he really did write it, it's worth a million dollars.
So usually they call in the Mike Tyson of handwriting experts, and that is Reginald Ernest Alton, Mr. Alton from Oxford University.
Mr. Alton came in just for the press conference, and they announced the results of their review of a torn note that was found in Vince Foster's briefcase almost a week after he died, pieced together, 28 pieces.
And they concluded, all three of them, that the note was a forgery.
Vince, I'm going to ask you to do something because in light of this news, I would say the content of the letter, and I remember the content of the letter, the content of the letter was, in my opinion, very, very suspicious.
Well, I'll tell you what I said about it at the time, that it could have come straight out of the White House press office.
Mr. Alton said, you know, he said, anytime you have a note that suddenly appears when there needs to be such a document, and that it seemingly benefits someone, it's just immediate cause for concern.
And of course, here you have so many disjointed statements that all the experts believed that these statements had been taken from other documents that he had maybe had written in other contexts and had been put together.
A good forger will always try to imitate known writings of the person they're trying to forge.
And yet that sounded like kind of a summary note, nevertheless.
I mean, summarizing everything to this point with something in mind without having said suicide, it did sound kind of final, a summation of the failure or however you want to look at it.
unidentified
At the press conference, there were a number of reporters, a number of television networks.
I don't think it ran on any of the television networks.
But this is now a panel of three international forensic experts, and they are saying, apparently, now you tell me, without qualification, it's a forgery.
How do they come to that conclusion?
unidentified
Okay, well, before they even get to the issue of forgery, they're also saying that the FBI and the Park Police totally mishandled it, that nowhere in forensic examination do you ever compare a note like this, or any note, to one document to make the certification, which is exactly what the Park Police and the FBI did.
So the big question mark is why did they suspend the normal procedure?
And I quote in my article, which you have, the FBI Crime Lab Assistant Director and the former head of the question document unit at the Bureau saying, you know, you wanted a minimum of 10 documents.
Well, sticking with the note for a second, the declaration that it is a forgery is a blockbuster.
I mean, if that's a forgery, then the whole damn thing comes apart.
unidentified
Well, there's a couple of reasons why.
First of all, there was a great cause for suspicion, because the note is found in a briefcase that was searched, that the police said that they were suspicious of the fact that that briefcase was searched twice and was empty when Nussbaum looked at it.
Second, it benefited people at the White House and took the onus off of proving this suicide.
Third, it was torn.
And apparently the expert said anytime you have a document, question document, that is torn, mutilated, crumpled, something spilled on it, it is oftentimes an effort to make the comparison difficult.
So already you have a prima facie case, as the English expert said, of suspicion.
Then you look at the note.
And first of all, the note, if you look at the note, which we have a photocopy of, and we had a huge blow-up of it, and compare it, you can see that it is not a match, that the way the stroke structures are done, the flow, the slant of the letters is not the same.
So then from a clear handwriting expertise point of view, which is a good science, it's a forgery.
unidentified
Well, it is a forgery.
And the other thing is what they were able to show in large blow-ups was that certain letters, like when you write a letter, let's say the letter B, you might only write that letter, lowercase B, with one stroke.
You start at the top, you go down to the bottom, you round it out, and then the last stroke is going over to the next letter, the end of the stroke.
But a forger will not do it that way.
He'll write the line down, he'll stop the stroke, he might take the bow of the letter B and start from the top and bring it around.
And you can see this on a large blow-up, and that's what they were able to show, that the letter B, for example, was done in three-stroke structures, strokes, unlike Foster, who had a very continuous, easy style of writing, which you see in all, we had a dozen documents that we compared it to from three different sources.
You know, this is starting to get very dangerous for some people, Chris, at this point.
Like you, like me, like anybody who's got anything to do with saying what we're saying right now.
But this has got to lead.
It's got to lead to the next step.
And so you're asking a couple of things, aren't you?
You want, based on this report, you want more coverage.
You want...
If you were in charge of the investigation, if you were the person pursuing this story right now, other than as a journalist, you know, in official charge, and you realize you had a forgery on your hands, where do you go?
unidentified
Well, if I was Ken Starr, I realized I had a forgery, I would realize immediately that there's a strong likelihood, as it was said at the conference today, that this is a murder.
You have a much stronger case that it was a murder, but If it was just a simple suicide, they wouldn't have gone to this length to cover it up.
With all of the other inconsistencies that Chris has listed for us in the past, this goes to me way beyond an inconsistency.
This is not quite, but, well, maybe it is, kind of a smoking gun.
Sorry, but in a case of this magnitude, where you're talking about the president's counsel, a man who would have information, definitely have information, if such existed,
that would damage that president or the first lady, and when you've now got a suicide note that the world's experts say is forged, you've got a very serious story.
I hope you were all listening very closely this morning.
unidentified
I hope you're all listening very closely.
The new version of the Coast to Coast AM app is here, now available for Android as well as iPhone.
For Coast Insiders, it offers the ability to download the most recent shows so you can listen to them at your leisure.
The new app also has listen live and streaming features, plus recaps, contacts, and upcoming show info.
Coast Insiders with Android System 4.0 and above or iPhone, check out our new app at the Google Play or iTunes stores or link from the Coast website.
You're listening to Art Bell, Somewhere in Time.
Tonight featuring Coast to Coast AM from October 25th, 1995.
In other words, you want the Associated Press should have covered this story, and I think that the American people have a right to know what happened at that press conference today and what those experts said.
Now, the Associated Press, what they did was, as I said, they threw it in an article at the very end and a couple of paragraphs, not like Reuters or the other.
Why is it that the people in London, which have nothing to do with this country directly, have gotten the full story on this document?
They have a half page in the Times of London devoted to this story.
Do you feel that if the Associated Press picked it up properly, that's a word we'll use, prominently, that then the larger networks would have no choice but to follow on?
unidentified
Well, I think that it would have been more likely that the networks would have followed with the story.
There's a herd instinct.
The Associated Press is one of the lead news items, but it's really not their job to determine what the American people should or shouldn't know.
They should be reporting news.
It's not just that there were three experts here that came in and gave their opinion.
One of the world's preeminent handwriting experts came into this country.
Actually, in a moment, once again, Chris Ruddy, investigative journalist, with breaking news.
I consider this to be big, breaking news.
he works for the pittsburgh tribune review and he has doggedly stayed with this story and we'll get back to him in just a moment Looking for the truth, you'll find it on Coast2Coast AM.
unidentified
Nobody wants terrorism, obviously.
But I don't know who to believe anymore.
Because, you know, if something happens, you would think, oh my gosh, this is real terrorism.
But then on the other hand, you say, this is just their way of saying we need to implement more of these controls.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
The problem is you have to look at everything as if it's a conspiracy because nowadays, you just don't know.
Now, we take you back to the past on Art Bell Somewhere in Time.
I mean, this is, to me, as you said earlier, this makes Watergate pale by comparison.
There, you're talking about a third-rate burglary for some nefarious political purpose.
Here, you might be talking about, at the least, obstruction of justice, in that a body was moved and a story was manufactured, or murder.
unidentified
Right, whatever it is, it doesn't, it isn't, even if justice was subverted, if the FBI didn't use their proper procedures in investigating this, the Park Police used an examiner to certify the document that never was certified as a handwriting expert.
So obviously, no one really cared to properly investigate this.
Mr. Scalise, one of the experts, formerly with the New York City Police Department, was on the House Committee for Assassination, and he was the one that detected or found the palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald on the rifle butt.
He is an expert in latent fingerprints.
A note was torn for the audience of the reporters today, into 28 pieces, and it was shown how many fingers had to come in contact with different pieces of paper.
Mr. Stille said in his statement that this is consistent.
The fact that they had no fingerprints or no latent impressions on these papers is consistent with the person who tore it having worn gloves.
Well, the AP today promised a number of people that called in the media world here in Washington and elsewhere that they were going to do a dispatch.
May have been, you know, a short story, but it would be a story.
And when people were calling up, they said, yeah, we did it.
We're doing it.
Well, we did it.
Well, we find out what did it meant was two paragraphs, three paragraphs at the end of a very long article on Whitewater and Senate hearings, which is a typical way of burying a story.
Here they're talking about all these things going on with subpoenas, and they're saying, by the way, three experts are saying that the note is a forgery, which is like, you know, sort of saying, you know, writing on the news after the day the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, you know, talking about what happened between the Yankees and the White Sox and saying, and by the way, at the end of that story, you know, there was a bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
And, you know, it's just patently ridiculous how it was framed.
I rarely, if ever, do this kind of thing, Chris, but damn it all, this is a really big story.
And if it takes pressure so that by tomorrow morning, you know, the guy is telling his boss, who will tell his boss, hey, boss, we're starting to get a lot of pressure on this forgery story.
Maybe we better sit down and have a powwow about this.
unidentified
Well, I think after they get 10,000 phone calls and that all they're doing is answering up phones for the next week, that somebody's going to say, hey, wait a minute, the American people are not fooled and are, you know, this is, you know, it's something reminiscent of Behind the Iron Curtain before the Berlin Wall fell.
I am not a fan of Bill Clinton's, particularly his administration.
I don't like the way he operates.
But I'm also not one of his dire enemies.
I'm not a Rush Limbaugh.
And I really, really do want the audience to understand that I'm not just out to get a president, but my God, the truth ought to be out on this if this is a cover-up or a big obstruction of justice, whether or not it goes to that level.
I just don't see how they can ignore this.
unidentified
Well, let's get something straight.
Truth is not Republican or Democrat.
One of the reasons why I think we're not having progress, as much progress as we should in getting to the bottom of the Foster case.
Number two, one of the main supporters of my work is James Dale Davidson, head of strategic investment, chairman of the National Taxpayers Union.
He is a former friend of Bill Clinton, gave the maximum amount allowable campaign contribution in 92, went to Renaissance weekends with the Clintons, to Arkansas Balls when he was inaugurated governor.
And he thinks that the evidence here is just shocking and overwhelming.
I didn't come into this saying, boy, I want to get Bill Clinton.
I'm looking at the evidence.
Where does the evidence take me?
It doesn't say Bill Clinton murdered Vince Foster or Hillary Clinton.
It says that something smells here.
That Vince Foster, if he's a friend of the president's or if he's just a local worker at the local deli, he deserves to have the same police investigation.
You know, you've got to wonder, if you'd had this report and the news conference had already occurred when 60 minutes came to you, whether they would have even included this in the report.
unidentified
They probably wouldn't have.
And, you know, the funny thing is a number of people say, well, Mrs. Foster has identified the note.
Well, as the experts pointed out, the English expert was telling a number of funny stories where people believed, the family members believed they had actual documents when they really had forgeries of loved ones and things like this.
That a family doesn't have a particularly trained eye, and if a forger is a good forger, they can fool anyone.
And so you have, in effect, done exactly the same thing.
You brought in the really big guns, and their report was conclusive, Chris?
unidentified
Absolutely.
They concluded forgery.
They didn't say, well, it could have been, it might have been.
They said it was actually a pretty crude forgery.
Mr. Alton, the English expert, is quoted as saying something to the effect that the forger was a fairly good forger, but could forge a check but he wasn't a real pro.
Yes, they have high-powered scanners and also pen machines that can mimic more than that.
And in fact, they believe that some of the words and sentences were so similar in stroke structure within the document itself that there's the possibility that in fact whole sentences were lifted from other documents.
Chris, how would you describe this moment in the continuing investigation?
Is this a linchpin?
Is this a crucial, critical moment where either, damn it, this story is going to be pursued or the princes of darkness that cover this kind of thing up are going to win?
unidentified
Well, the problem here is this.
No matter how, you know, Ambrose Evans Pritchard is the great reporter from the British Telegraph.
And he has said, you know, if we had a video of someone murdering Vince Foster, they still wouldn't believe it.
Ambrose just published a story this Sunday, it wasn't carried on the AP, I wonder why, about a witness that was in Fort Marcy on the night Foster died.
He came in, he was the first one to spot Foster's car, and he told the FBI and the Park Police that there was a Hispanic man sitting next to Foster's car, watching it, menacing him with very menacing looks, followed him as he urinated in the park, and this witness left immediately.
The Park Police never went and visited him to interview him.
They spelled his name wrong in the police report.
When the FBI visited with him, the FBI said, well, who was this man that gave you menacing looks, this Mexican-American man?
And the FBI interview statement states very clearly that the witness was unable to identify or would be unable to identify in a lineup or a composite sketch who this man was.
Well, there it is in the London Telegraph this Sunday, a composite sketch of the man he saw in the park.
And the FBI, out and out, lied in their report.
Now, this would maybe be a mistake if it happened once, but when we have so many instances in this case, you know, there were two witnesses later in the park that saw two men in and around Foster's car.
They said it on the record.
One guy was standing with long blonde hair in front of Foster's Honda with the hood up just before the body was found.
All right, look, Chris, you're pushing this one to the edge, and you're beginning to now tamper.
You know, in other words, if the worst case scenario is true, which seems now more likely than ever to me based on the forgery thing, then you're tampering with forces that have already gone an awful long way here and have an awful lot at stake.
And even though you're a big-time reporter, I'm not convinced that you're safe.
unidentified
Well, you know, there's risks involved in anything you do.
I've taken those risks and will continue to take those risks because this is a very important story.
And, you know, the chips will have to fall where they may.
If they fall on me, I'll just take that when it comes.
Well, and look what, you know, here Mike Wallace did this piece, and I think I said this to you on the last time, you know.
My brother called me up afterwards.
He said, Chris, I've known you your whole life.
You've always been an honest person.
You've never wanted a lot of money.
You never wanted the big job on Wall Street type person.
And I just watched this, and it makes you sound like you're A, a liar, and B, you're a charlatan trying to make money.
I took a pay cut to continue doing this story.
So what do you say?
I mean, how do you argue against that?
Mike Wallace knew that, and he knew that I never reported that Foster was left-handed first.
That was the Boston Globe.
But I was going to be held responsible for every error that any newspaper had ever done in this case.
It only indicates to people out there that do look into it that I'm on the right track.
It only indicates to me I'm on the right track.
When they have to make such a schmear, when Mike Wallace, who's almost 80 years old now, the dean of American television journalism, has to bring down a 30-year-old reporter, that's how old I am, and try to destroy his reputation, that shows that I'm having an impact.
Well, if we look at it from the other direction, the implication is, and I'm not making the charge, but the implication is that the administration has control of very large segments of the media.
And I'm not making that charge, but you could almost begin to believe that could be so because of the Associated Press underreporting, because of 60 minutes going after you as they did, and because the news now is so shocking that it has to be out there.
I think not.
So what does that say?
I mean, if you look at what it says, it says a large portion of the media is in bed with the government.
unidentified
Well, or the key media.
I don't know if everyone, but the key media, the leaders.
60 Minutes is a lead program.
You know, Don Hewitt has gone on the record.
He's the producer of 60 Minutes saying that he helped get Clinton elected after the Jennifer Flowers thing.
That he edited that tape in such a way that he remade, recast Bill Clinton as the candidate.
You know, ABC News has a very close association with this administration.
A former Clinton campaign advisor was the head of the news for a while.
Rick Kaplan.
You know, so you see these connections.
The Clintons are not good at governing, but they're very good at dealing with the media, handling the media.
We've had two hours of interviews, both very different.
One very funny and one not funny at all.
The first was with Walt Amenhopper, the poor fellow who had his car crushed by a giant Hunko well blubber.
I may play that piece from Channel 2 for the later audience.
Once again, in fact, I said I will.
And the second hour, very serious indeed, a very tired Chris Ruddy, investigative reporter for the Pittsburgh Tribune Review, laying out what occurred with regard to an incredible bombshell piece of information just breaking today.
Some of the world's foremost forensic handwriting experts have declared the Vince Foster suicide note to be a forgery.
So you may well have comments on that.
All right, so that gives you kind of a background of the last couple of hours.
Also, Rand, in the news, a horrible accident, unimaginable.
I cannot figure it out.
How could it be?
I'm sure you saw the terrible pictures.
A train plowed into a school bus at an intersection.
It had all the safety features there.
You know, the ringing bells, flashing lights, the warning arms.
You know, those arms that come down when the train is going to come.
And apparently, there was an intersection, as there would be there.
And here was the bus.
About the last third or maybe almost half of the bus was on the tracks.
Well, the bells start ringing.
The lights start flashing while the bus is sitting there.
And the arm comes down on top of the bus.
One witness said there was a car in front of the bus.
Others are not sure.
Kids.
It was just unbelievable.
And, you know, the students, I am told, panicked, tried to run toward the front of the bus to get some way to safety.
They saw the train coming.
The driver must have been aware the train was coming, but nothing helped.
In an instant, there was terror and death.
Five children were killed, two dozen injured, many of them critically.
Kids were thrown through windows.
One witness said there was blood everywhere.
Bus never moved.
The driver of the bus, a 54-year-old woman, was described, understandably, as being hysterical.
It's just unimaginable that she would not have put the...
You know, even if there had been a car in front of her, which some say there may have been, she would not have hit the gas, if necessary, pushing that car and her bus into the intersection, rather than collide with a train that was doing 50 miles an hour...
and have zero chance of stopping why didn't that bus move only she can answer it i guess uh.
But just an absolutely an unbelievable tragedy.
In Dallas, a very interesting federal court decision, a federal court jury in Texas, in Dallas, awarded an abortion doctor and his wife $8 million in a suit against a group of several anti-abortion groups.
Dr. Norman Tompkins was his name.
Finally left town, but sued the groups.
And he won.
And his wife won.
The activists, undaunted, basically are saying, well then, so what?
They take all we have, so what?
That's how important this is.
So I wonder how you feel about that.
Do you think this will put a dent in those who would go and harass doctors that do abortions?
Will it slow them down?
I don't think so.
How do you feel about that?
California state officials today said that Rossborough's new party, third party, has now in fact met the early and stiff requirements to qualify to be on the ballot.
So here it comes.
There's going to be a third party.
Dash, dash, dash, CBS now says Colin Powell is consulting with potential campaign backer Ronald Lauder, a cosmetics king with very deep pockets, the kind of money it would take to run Powell in a race.
So I guess I'm a pragmatist.
You know me.
I can read the handwriting on the wall and I know that Pat Buchanan has been winning a lot of straw polls and that kind of thing.
But I'm telling you now, it will come down to Clinton, Dole, and I think Powell.
Powell is going to run.
Powell is, for all we don't know about him, we know a little bit about him now.
He is pro-choice.
We know that.
What else do we know about Powell?
He's a strong leader.
We know that.
He's brilliant.
I think we agree on that.
He talks about some gun control or sensible gun control laws.
I would have to hear that defined before I would be able to make a judgment there.
But in a number of areas, he looks to be a fiscal conservative and a social middle-of-the-roader.
More a Republican than a Democrat, but it's getting hard to tell these days, you know.
So if we get a Clinton-Dole-Powell race, I guess it might begin to be appropriate, because I think that's what it's going to be, to ask you which way you would be inclined to go.
So, which way would you be inclined to go?
I really think that's the way it's going to go.
Congress getting ready for a historic vote on the budget, the attempt by the year 2002 on the part of the Republicans to balance the budget, and it's going to be a big fight.
$245 billion in tax cuts for you and me and everybody, and huge cuts to go along with it or allow for it.
President Clinton vows he'll veto it, too radical, too extreme.
He uses those words a lot lately.
Bob Dole says it's the most important piece of legislation before Congress in all of his years, and that's a lot of years in Congress.
Senator Kennedy says, it is taking from the needy to give to the greedy.
Senator Kennedy says, of course, Senator Kennedy would say that.
Interesting Reuters news story.
We're talking about Reuters versus AP.
And there is an interesting Reuters news story that somebody sent me on internet regarding former President Jimmy Carter.
Another story that basically got buried, but I want you to hear it.
He said yesterday that, listen to this, the federal and state anti-poverty programs of the last 30 years have proven to be a quote now, abject and almost unanimous, end quote, failure.
As if taking a page out of a Republican Party hymn book on socioeconomic issues, the 71-year-old elder statesman gave his endorsement to urban development programs that work in cooperation with private industry.
He said, quote, I would say of the great society programs of the Johnson years, all of the federal programs that have concentrated on low-income areas, what I tried to do, what's been done by other leaders coming after me, in general, the failures have been abject and almost unanimous.
Now that is one strong statement from Jimmy Carter and one big turnaround, and boy, I'll tell you what, it sure is another, yet another very underreported story.
unidentified
alright in a moment open lines You're listening to Art Bell, Somewhere in Time.
Tonight featuring Coast to Coast AM from October 25th, 1995.
Music All right, I've got a lot more material here, but I've already given you enough to sink a ship.
You know, this, you know, it's funny that when Clinton sent these troops to invade Haiti, which we never should have gotten into, instead of letting this guy fight his own war, letting him free his own country, he sat in this country in a mansion in Washington,
D.C., John Bertrand Aristide, I'm talking about, sat in a mansion in D.C. collecting political refugee checks in the United States while the U.S. Army put him back in power and did his fighting for him, this cowardly little squirt.
Now, isn't it funny how four Americans who have been killed in Haiti since this operation commenced?
Three of them were supposed to be suicides, don't you know?
At this point, with that kind of information, either one of two things is true.
Either we are an America faced with undeniable, strong evidence that should be pursued, we are an America that will pursue the truth, or we have become an America that will no longer pursue the truth, no longer gives a damn.
There's sometimes, even on radio, and you wish you could use a stronger word, but you know, you shouldn't and can't.
Or even if you can't at this time of the morning, you shouldn't.
I don't know which America we are, but I do know a bombshell piece of news when I hear it, and what Chris Ruddy just put on the air, is bombshell.
Yeah and what happens is it just keeps ringing and ringing and ringing and then an operator comes on the air and says the party you have dialed is not answering.
And so I checked the number and I called it again and it did the same thing.
Now before I gave it out at whatever time it was in the break I called it and I taught I made sure it was the right number.
unidentified
I said is this the main Associated Washington DC Associated Press office and they said yes it is well I think they've realized something's cooking because it took me about 20 phone calls before I got through the first time and I don't know how many the second time so they've probably rigged the phones up so people might want to give it a rest for a little while and then try back a little later.
If this supposed suicide note or note, either way you look at it, you want to call it a suicide note or not, if it's a forgery and the best say it is, then the whole thing is going to come apart.
unidentified
Oh, I would have to agree with you.
In fact, I would say this is probably the only Clinton, no, I wouldn't even call it an anti-Clinton story.
And, you know, for the sake of our country, I tell you, the people and the government are moving away from each other about as fast as the militias and the government are moving toward each other.
And if we don't start telling the truth and pursuing the truth as a nation, that's it, baby.
unidentified
Yeah, we've got to come out and say, you know, the press as well is going to have to say, well, hey, we might not like it, but this is how it is.
Well, in other words, his money is where his mouth is.
And you can take that for what it's worth.
Thank you, my friend.
We've got to take a break.
unidentified
have a good one take care serious days in america you're listening to art bell somewhere in time tonight featuring coast to coast a.m. from october 25th 1995 premier
Networks presents Art Bell, Somewhere in Time.
Tonight featuring Coast to Coast AM from October 25, 1995.
Well, a lot of facts is coming in, a lot of them on the Ruddy matter.
And this is just typical, I suppose.
Mr. Bell, Mr. Ruddy's only chance of surviving is to slowly release information, which may involve other officials and so on and so on.
and people are killed for a lot less, he says.
you had better watch your back as Well given the reported scenario.
Be well and take care.
Thank you.
Milton, Seattle.
Typical well, yeah, you know, I've thought about it.
And so what?
It's not exactly a cavalier attitude.
I mean, I have thought about it, believe me.
If what seems to be true is true, then obviously powers that would do what they are alleged to have done or now seemingly have done, because where does a forgery lead you to one of two very destructive paths for somebody?
Very powerful.
And there's been a lot of pressure and there's been a lot of manipulation.
And I'm no fool.
I know what could happen.
But if I don't do it, then who is going to?
If Chris Ruddy doesn't do it, then who is going to?
If the Associated Press doesn't do it as they should, then who is going to?
If 60 Minutes doesn't do it as they should, then who is going to?
He should.
And there are far less noble things to die for, if that is what it comes to, than exposing the truth or chasing the truth.
You know, it's interesting the way the press is covering this thing with the Vince Foster deal.
When I was in the service during the breaking of the Watergate story, I was overseas in Germany and I was reading European newspapers to get more information than I was getting out of the magazines that I was subscribing to.
There are similarities in the way the Washington Post had to doggedly pursue, under criticism, the story.
Now, that is what is happening here.
Now, how long has the press been in this condition?
I don't know.
Is it laziness?
unidentified
I don't know.
Back in those days, I think nobody wanted to report on what Kennedy was doing because the spirit of the times in those days was that we leave the president alone, the dirty things about the president alone, going all the way back to not quite true.
I used to have to give an update to my friends back in the States about what was going on with the Watergate investigation because I got it out of the London paper and I got it out of the English printed German newspaper.
I guess maybe, according to a lot of the reports I'm getting, the Associated Press may have switched off their phones or they may be so overloaded that, you know, who knows?
I hope it's true.
unidentified
Yeah, this whole thing just stinks pretty badly.
It has for the whole time.
Had quite an air to it.
There's too many unanswered things.
Who bumped into, for instance, there's just, I guess it's the age of unanswered questions like, who was it that bumped on the back of Cato's wall?
That'll always be the unanswered question.
And who was it that laid Vince Foster out with no blood?
You know, it's almost tiresome, sir, and nobody wants to see another presidency falter and fail, you know, as Nixon did.
Nobody wants that for America.
Nobody in their right mind could want that.
And I know this is going to be seen as Art Bell or Chris Ruddy or both, you know, going after Clinton with an agenda, but damn it, that is not what this is about.
unidentified
No, it's not about that at all.
I understand it's not about that at all, but as unpleasant and as distasteful as it is, if it is something that needs to be dealt with, it is something that needs to be dealt with.
Well, Americans have got to sit down and have a conversation, I think, after something like this with themselves and say, are we still Americans really?
Are we still the country we once were?
Do we still pursue the truth or do we not care anymore?
And I guess we'll find out by finding out how many people call up the Associated Press Act, Area Code 202769400, and demand they give this attention, the attention it deserves.
You've got forensic experts, world-class, stating unequivocally that this is a forgery.
The note was a forgery.
Now your mind does not have to do a lot of work to see where it would lead from there.
And it's not a good place.
I said it a minute ago, nobody in their right mind wants to see another presidency fail.
And I'm not even saying that would occur.
But you could imagine it would be close or there.
It's a horrible trauma.
I lived through Watergate.
I remember it.
I was politically aware during Watergate.
It was awful.
It was, actually, it was the breaking of the virginity of the American people.
Our innocence was lost.
A piece at a terrible, wrenching piece at a time, as that whole thing began to unravel.
It was the beginning of the end of the way America was.
Nobody wants to see that happen again.
But the alternative is absolutely horrendous.
The alternative is an America where it may be possible for the government to manipulate the media, where it may be possible for the government to commit crimes, or persons within the government to actually commit crimes, and with their power and influence, get away with it.
007 time.
So Americans really have to make a decision themselves.
Now, look, Charlie, damn it, Charlie, stop for a minute.
Just play like you're an intellectual for a second and talk to me about ignoring for political purposes, which you are obviously prepared to do, the report of a group of international forensic experts in handwriting who declare this note of forgery.
Are you telling me, Charlie?
No, let me tell you something, buddy.
Are you saying this should not be followed up on?
unidentified
I'm telling you, you guys can follow up on it as much as you want if that makes you happy.
But you can find experts, as many experts as you want.
I can go out right now.
If I had enough money on me, I could go out right now and find 20 experts that say these guys are out of their mind.
If you were, you'd know that people can pay for, you can either pay for experts, but experts are either bought or people will come out and they'll say things just to get attention for themselves.
By the way, since obviously you and I are going nowhere but against the wall on this one, let me ask you that question.
Given the probability of a Dole Clinton-Powell race, how would you vote?
unidentified
Well, I've told you before, I'd have a very difficult, I couldn't vote against Bill Clinton, but I would have a very, very difficult time opposing Colin Powell, you know, simply because of his race.
Let me please investigate that story before I air it.
Because that is a very, very, very serious charge, and I'm not doubting your word.
But should you be wrong about something like that, there would be very serious legal repercussions.
So let me find out about that.
But even if true, it is certainly an isolated incident, not significant compared to what Chris Ruddy seems to have come up with here.
You know, Charlie's reaction, of course, I guess, you know, I guess it's going to be typical of the liberals.
And I guess there is going to be no way, no escape from the accusation that I am, and Chris Ruddy is, simply going after this president.
And maybe it is that the midget liberal mind, the myopic mind of the average liberal like Charlie, cannot react in any other way, even to serious, not mid-level,
but high-level forensic expertise that absolutely demands an explanation, demands an explanation, and they can talk it away by saying that it's conservative nutball rhetoric.
And there was, it's interesting you should mention that, because, of course, I'm assuming you heard the facts I read last night about the piece that broke off, which, by the way, is not in the shape of a cross or anything like it right now.
There is a spiral that has been noted by recent Hubble photographs, a very strange spiral shape to the debris.
There is a piece that is broken off that is not 30% of the comet.
Is nobody worried?
It is a piece that simply is reflecting probably because of the amount of material burning off.
You know, you take the dirty snowball, if that's what it is, and you break off a piece, and you've got fresh snow.
And so then that begins to get bright.
The question, the good question is, why is it bright at all right now?
In other words, it's out beyond the orbit of Jupiter, and whether you're talking about the nucleus of the comet itself or a piece that breaks off, there should not be enough energy from the sun to be melting and scattering debris as we are now seeing.
That part of it does not make sense.
And again, we will question Richard Hoagland about that when he's here Friday night, Saturday morning.
I don't want you to miss that program.
Friday night, Saturday morning.
He's got a lot to say.
Not so much about the comet.
But we will again ask about that because there must be energy to create the burn-off that creates the reflected light that we see.
And where is that energy coming from?
East of the Rockies, you're on the air.
Hello.
unidentified
Good morning, Art.
This is Tim Colm from Pekin.
The lady who just called not too long ago about the guy who produced or directed Powder.
Yeah.
That's a true story.
I've got a copy of the story right here by an Associated Press writer.
Uh-huh.
It's in a newspaper, and it shows the young man picketing in front of the theater who had the...
Diane confirms that for me, listening to KBZ down there.
Thank you.
Thought it might be the L.A. Times.
Just, you know, it said Times staff writer, and you can't tell unless you've got to the top of the page.
Now on to Farrakhan.
This is an ISCNI item, but it's been elsewhere.
And it quotes the Washington Post on September 17th as saying that Minister Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Million Man March in Washington, D.C., told a stunned crowd at a Washington Baptist church that the march was inspired by an extraterrestrial vision he had 10 years ago.
A UFO, he said, swept him off to a spaceship where the late Elijah Muhammad told him that President Ronald Reagan was plotting a war and Huron was then beamed back to Earth.
He said, quote, I really don't care if you think I'm a nut, end quote, he told the church without elaborating on how his vision was connected to the march.
Wow.
Well, maybe I've been pursuing Louis Hurricane as a guest in the wrong way, and maybe he would respond to an invitation to Dreamland.
What do you think?
Art, the Vince Foster situation, and I think this is good advice for everybody.
He says, if the truth shall set us free, then a lie, whether blatant or a sin of omission, shall keep us bound, prisoners of those who would have us in darkness and ignorance so they can continue to control.
The Vince Foster scandal could very well be the tip of an iceberg when further investigated could reveal to the American people that our government is built on a mountain of lies.
When given the truth, history has demonstrated that people will rise up even in the face of the greatest adversity and danger to preserve the human spirit.
Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal, female or male, young or old, we deserve to be told the truth.
Most sincerely is your program appreciated by this one signed Isadora.
There is a name for you in San Diego.
Well, Isadora, that is exactly the way I feel about it.
I am not afraid of the truth.
I'm just not afraid of it, and I'm not afraid of where it leads.
And you may or may not have noticed this about me yet, but I do not respond to individual items presented to me ideologically.
Don't.
I respond to them, I hope, directly and pragmatically, and examine each one for its worth.
I don't, in other words, I don't, I do have, I am basically a fairly moderate conservative.
But I'm not a reactionary.
I look at each thing as it comes along, and I'm not afraid of the truth.
I'm just not.
And if it ever gets to the point where I am, then I need to walk away from this job, and I'm not going to do that until it gets, and hopefully it never does.
I mean, if I had to come on here and, in effect, serve my masters, you know, whoever they might be, I couldn't do it.
Leave it at that.
You know, I'll just leave it at that.
I couldn't do it and wouldn't do it.
What this job is all about, at least not for me.
Okay?
East of the Rockies, you're on the air.
Hi.
unidentified
You are.
This whack job you had on, I saw him on 60 Minutes.
Well, bear in mind, Doc, that the FBI is presently about to be examined by an international panel because of allegations regarding evidence that it may have slanted, allegedly, or even tampered with, Doc.
unidentified
In other words, the United States is losing its sovereignty.
I'm going to give you the same opportunity that I gave Charlie.
And that is an opportunity to say, honestly, Doc, can you say that the world's foremost forensic handwriting expert and two others just a notch below him coming out and saying, absolutely, this is a forgery, does not deserve headlines and investigation?
unidentified
Well, I'm all for looking into it, but I'll tell you this.
Handwriting analogy is not a perfect science.
And if you line up 10 experts, you might get 5 and 5, 6 and 4, 7 and 3.
The FBI is protecting Clinton because they've looked at this handwriting, this foster letter, and they say it's legitimate.
So, I mean, like I say, until if the FBI comes out or some other American intelligence agency comes out and says this is forgery, then I would say Clinton is finished.
But otherwise, until then, it's just, you know, gossip.
When you start pulling things out of the middle of somebody's sentence in the edit room, don't you think there's a few ethical problems with that, Doc?
unidentified
Hey, Mike Wallace has more credibility than anybody.
Mike Wallace has been doing this since the beginning of 60 Minutes.
But I'm also not in the place where you are saying it's a load.
I mean, how can you say that?
unidentified
I believe that there's a Creator of some kind, but I don't believe that what's written in the Bible is what's true.
And I would base that on if God, way back when, when God delivered the Bible or the words that we were supposed to live by upon us, why would he only deliver it to one people to be able to give it throughout humanity?
If God came down, George Burns-like or otherwise, tomorrow, or let's say even a God that was more impressive than George Burns, really looked God-like, all right?
Went on the air with Dan Rather and gave his message to the world tomorrow night.
And the American people were polled after Dan Rather's interview with God.
What do you figure the poll would turn out?
You know, was it God?
Wasn't it God?
Is it real?
Is it not real?
Probably about 50-50, something like that.
unidentified
Well, according to everything I've read about the Bible, and according to what you've given us as far as information about the different things from Richard Hoagland and such things like that,
I just find it very, very difficult to believe that if God were delivering a message, whether it be to Dan Rather or whoever it may be, that he wouldn't deliver it unto all the people.
Because even Catholics or Christians say that you need to be saved, Correct.
Well, what I'm getting to is that these people that call in all the time about, you know, how can you prove that, you know, there's a God that exists and so forth.
Well, if you take a book that was written, you know, approximately 2,000 years ago, like the Bible, you can understand why everybody under the sun would actually question anything as written in there with typographical errors or whatever.
Those of you who join at this hour, anything is possible tonight, anything at all.
Who knows?
but then again that's kind of the way i like it The new version of the Coast to Coast AM app is here, now available for Android as well as iPhone.
unidentified
For Coast Insiders, it offers the ability to download the most recent shows so you can listen to them at your leisure.
The new app also has listen live and streaming features, plus recaps, contacts, and upcoming show info.
Coast Insiders with Android System 4.0 and above, or iPhone, check out our new app at the Google Play or iTunes stores, or link from the Coast website.
Looking for the truth?
You'll find it on Coast2Coast AM.
Nobody wants terrorism, obviously.
But I don't know who to believe anymore because, you know, if something happens, you would think, oh my gosh, this is real terrorism.
But then on the other hand, you say, this is just their way of saying we need to implement more of these controls.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
The problem is you have to look at everything as if it's a conspiracy because nowadays, you just don't know.
You're listening to Art Bell, Somewhere in Time.
Tonight featuring Coast to Coast AM from October 25th, 1995.
And, you know, people, this thing has happened one time before.
You know, if the Bible is correct in the flood, you can see the people laughing at old Noah, preaching that there's going to be a flood for 120 years.
And then if they can explain away animals walking in the boat, and by the way, people that think that every animal had to get on a boat, listen, we know that animals descend down and that they break off and so forth.
You don't need every single animal on a boat to get with the animals we have today.
But we're having the same thing over again as history repeats itself because usually the people aren't listening the first time it happens.
And it frightens me, and I'm concerned, and to answer one question he had on tonight with several people, if I were to vote today, I would vote for Colin Powell.
And because I don't know how he's going to react to the international scene as far as I know he'd be good in the war situation, but I don't know how he's going to look, time fortunately is on our side, and I think he is going to get into the race, and then he is going to have to answer the questions.
Just one of the most remarkable television events in all of TV history.
And I got their permission yesterday.
I called their, went through the hierarchy at Channel 2 in Portland, and they were very nice to me.
ABC affiliate, I might add, up there.
But first, I want to read you and show you how good a sense of humor my sponsor has.
Now, you watch them tomorrow night, they'll be off all of a sudden.
Dexter has a good sense of humor, though.
You remember we were talking last night about the mouse?
Actually, that is a true story, you know, the human ear on the back of the mouse.
First, I got this facts, Art, regarding the ear on the mouse story.
I concur, your first reaction to the story is this is an abomination.
To me, the abomination lies in the idea that I don't feel that these little lives are ours to appropriate, and that these kinds of experiments represent a terrible form of cross-species enslavement.
To make things worse, in this case, it is a matter of convenience and not necessity.
For if we can grow ears and perhaps livers, etc., on other animals, then surely this procedure could be perfected for people.
So that was one reaction to it.
This was another.
Subject absolutely fresh.
We all know the secret to making money is timing.
Well, Art Bell and Dexter Yard have teamed up to form an exciting new venture, absolutely fresh fingers.
We are a finger farm in western Nevada.
All we grow are fingers.
With Dexter's vast experience in farming and shipping fresh products and Art's vast stable of rabbits, you can now have fresh fingers delivered next day by FedEx to the surgeon of your choice.
No other finger can compare with the freshness selection price or dexterity of ours.
They're grown on the backs of rabbits which are fed 100% organic grains and veggies.
The rabbits, with finger or fingers attached, will arrive in a large rectangular box.
All your surgeon has to do is clip off the finger and sew it onto your hand and you're on your way home to a finger-licking good dinner of roast rabbit.
Or you can keep the rabbit as a pet for yourself and or your kids.
Our absolutely fresh fingers are not only good for amputees, they also make excellent gifts for birthdays, Christmas anniversaries, etc.
Imagine the look on your mother's face when she opens the box and out hops a rabbit with a big thumbs up on its back.
She'll know you really care.
They're also great for sporting events.
There's nothing like an absolutely fresh work, one finger to show support for your favorite team.
And if you're mad at your boss or your spouse, you can send them one of our extra large middle.
Well, you get the idea.
So many uses, and Dexter will even include a card with a handwritten message for you.
You don't find that anymore.
All this for $139.95.
That's right, $139.95.
No other finger farm can make this kind of deal.
That's because we cut off the middleman.
In fact, if you ever find a better deal on Fresh Fingers, let us know and we'll advertise their product instead.
But we know you won't.
So call 1-800 Fingers today and your absolutely fresh fingers will be there tomorrow.
That's 1-800 Fingers.
You'll be glad you did, I guarantee you.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, shows that I have people out there who listen to every single word that I utter.
It scares me now.
Earlier in the show, we did something in the first hour the later audience might not have been able to hear.
It's almost mythology, but it is true.
It is a whale of a tale.
A whale showed up on a beach in Oregon.
I interviewed earlier the man in the first hour of the show that we'll repeat, the man whose car got crushed by this incredible piece of whale flubber that came down at probably terminal velocity after the explosion and crushed his car.
Now, to set it up, for whatever reason, the people in Oregon up there, the highway department, decided that a whale is in many respects like a road in the sense that it is big.
So they turned the job of the disposition of this smelly whale over to the Oregon Highway Department.
I don't know how they came up with the idea of blowing up the whale as opposed to doing whatever else, but they did.
My wife and I were talking, and I thought, you know, the guy's probably got to went to a bar somewhere and kicked it around.
Well, anyway, the coverage of this story was done by KATU-TV, Channel 2 in Portland, ABC.
They are going to, I'm promoing, cross-promoing for them.
They're going to broadcast the video from the audio that you're about to hear called A Whale of the Dale, Wednesday, November 1st in their newscasts at 5, 6.30 p.m., and 11 p.m.
With the series airing Thursday and Friday, November 2 and 3, at 5, 6.30, and 11.
Thank you, Kay, to you.
Here is the story that ran, albeit 25 years ago, ladies and gentlemen.
25 years ago in Portland, Oregon.
Thank you, Channel 2, for permission to rebroadcast this.
So those of you that are about to hear this will know it is not a myth.
It is the truth.
Here is that report.
unidentified
It had to be said, the Oregon State Highway Division not only had a whale of a problem on its hands, it had a stinking whale of a problem.
What to do with one 45-foot, 8-ton whale dead on arrival on the beach near Florence.
It had been so long since a whale had washed up in Lane County, nobody could remember how to get rid of one.
In selecting its battle plan, the highway division decided the carcass couldn't be buried because it might soon be uncovered.
It couldn't be cut up and then buried because nobody wanted to cut it up, and it couldn't be burned.
So dynamite it was, some 20 cases or a half ton of it.
The hope was that the long-dead Pacific gray whale would be almost disintegrated by the blast and that any small pieces still around after the explosion would be taken care of by seagulls and other scavengers.
Indeed, the seagulls had been standing nearby all day.
As everything was being made ready, we asked George Thornton, the highway engineer in charge of the project, for his final observation.
Well, I'm confident that it'll work.
The only thing is we're not sure just exactly how much explosives it'll take to disintegrate this thing so the scavengers, seagulls, and crabs and whatnot can clean it up.
Is there any chance it might be more than a one-day job?
If there's any large chunks left, and we may have to do some other cleanup, possibly set another charge.
The dynamite was buried primarily on the leeward side of the big mammal, so as most of the remains would be blown toward the sea.
About 75 bystanders, most of them residents who had first found the whale to be an object of curiosity before they tired of its smell, were moved back a quarter of a mile away.
The sand dunes there were covered with spectators and landlubber newsmen, shortly to become land blubber newsmen, for the blast blasted blubber beyond all believable bounds.
Now on the screen, you'd be seeing a countdown like for a shuttle launch, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
unidentified
you get the idea uh...
All right, Fred.
You can take your hands out of your head.
Here comes the pictures of my...
Yeah.
Thank you.
Our cameras stopped rolling immediately after the blast.
The humor of the entire situation suddenly gave way to a run for survival as huge chunks of whale blubber fell everywhere.
Pieces of meat passed high over our heads while others were falling at our feet.
The dunes were rapidly evacuated as spectators escaped both the falling debris and the overwhelming smell.
A parked car over a quarter of a mile from the blast site was the target of one large chunk.
The passenger compartment literally smashed.
Fortunately, no human was hit as badly as the car.
However, everyone on the scene was covered with small particles of dead whale.
As for the success of the effort, well, the seagulls who were supposed to clean things up were nowhere in sight, either scared away by the explosion or kept away by the smell.
That didn't really matter.
The remaining chunks were of such a size that no respectable seagull would attempt to tackle anyway.
As darkness began to set in, the highway crews were back on the beach burying the remains, including a large piece of the carcass which never left the blast site.
It might be concluded that should a whale ever wash ashore in Lane County again, those in charge will not only remember what to do, they'll certainly remember what not to do.
We had Walt Amenhover on early in the show, and he said he described the one particular gigantic piece of blubber in a way I'll never forget, the one that flattened his car, and he's the one who bitched that it was not a good idea, and they wouldn't listen to him.
Anyway, he said he was standing there, and he watched this giant piece of flubber go way up into the sky until it got small, and then it just sort of hung there suspended way up in the sky, and then he watched it slowly begin to descend like right out of a Roadrunner cartoon.