Art Bell dissects the Bosnia conflict, exposing NATO’s divided stance in 1995 London meetings and threats against Serbs over Garanja. He critiques California’s affirmative action reversal, ties Waco hearings to Iran-Contra-like cover-ups, and questions OJ Simpson’s defense strategy. Callers debate UFO footage authenticity—90% of faxes support its credibility—and link seismic oddities to potential geological shifts. Bell insists women’s bathroom delays stem from social behavior, not physical tasks, while dismissing race-based crime explanations as statistical facts. The episode blends conspiracy theories, political skepticism, and fringe observations, painting a picture of systemic distrust in institutions. [Automatically generated summary]
The heating of the Caribbean to the North Pole into South America.
On coverage.
And that's the extent of about how much I try to think about it.
All right, there's it's Friday night, Saturday morning, so anything goes.
You guys name it, we'll do it.
I do have a few thoughts on a few things.
Bosnia, of course, remains in the top of the news, and they had the big meeting in London yesterday.
And so tonight, yet we have another threat from NATO.
Earlier in the day, NATO met in Europe.
Actually, NATO and the Russians, and they were there.
When the meeting ended, President Clinton trotted out and said the NATO partners had reached agreement.
And then right behind him came the Russian representative who said, wrong, they had not agreed.
Now, I guess the president meant everybody but Russia, you see, agreed.
Now, the Russians more or less on the side of the Serbs, so they're not agreeing to heavy airstrikes against the Serbs.
NATO's threat is the latest.
This is NATO threat number 94.
Actually, I don't know if that's true, but you know, there's been a lot of them.
Leave the last safe haven, Garashta, alone, or else.
The or else would appear to be a bombing campaign.
The U.S. wants, despite Russian objectives, and to be fair, the French and the British also are going along with us.
The Bosnian Muslims say, not enough.
And can you blame them?
We've promised more or less protection for them, named the safe havens, and now we are down to one, count it one safe haven.
They're not even going to call Sarajevo a safe haven.
The Serbs are openly defying, of course, the latest threat, saying, well, look, we can open two fronts if we need to, one against the continuing one, actually, against the Muslims, and the international community will not be a problem.
So we can open two fronts.
At any rate, the meeting in London arguably was not a success.
Americans had wanted complete agreement.
They didn't get it.
The intensity of the airstrikes and the scope, in other words, they're going to be limited to Garanja not to include Sarajevo.
So the threat now is, don't you take this last safe area?
Yes, we know you've taken all the others, but don't you take this one.
Bob Dole's comment on the meeting was, quote, it seems the London meeting was a disappointment.
Another dazzling display of ducking the problem, end quote.
Oh, my.
Administration officials say this is different than previous warnings, but they do admit that it's going to be lights out for the UN if this fails.
Now, you'd think a statement like that would really encourage the Serbs.
In other words, we're going to make one last try at protecting a safe area.
But if it fails, that's it.
Boy, the UN's out.
Now, where does that serve up the motivation to the Serbs?
Anyway, what do you think the UN will do?
Will they indeed strike?
Will the strikes be effective?
Will the Serbs shake and rattle when they get this warning?
When the little UN messenger probably in a little blue UN helmet runs in with this latest threat, actually, the threat, frankly, is more from NATO than it is.
As a matter of fact, a lot of the UN is being cut out now.
NATO is not happy with the UN, and can you blame them?
Who is?
Anyway, they're trying to get UN personnel the hell out of the way.
So if the bombing does begin, if, I said, they won't be able to take blue-helmeted people and chain them to targets.
So that is the present sad state of affairs.
I thought that the Dateline, I think it was the Dateline NBC program earlier tonight had a story worthy of our discussion.
There was a crime in California, a terrible crime.
Well, a couple little black kids, well, one a kid, one an adult, teen, came in and they were intent on robbing the guy.
Well, they ended up beating him to death, took a pipe, and just beat this guy to death.
The bad guys, kids, whatever, one adult, got life in jail, no possibility of parole.
The other one, a juvenile, got the max sentence, basically to be held in juvenile custody until he's 21 years of age.
The surviving widow is in desperate financial straits.
She is going to probably lose the house and has already lost her husband.
And they showed a court scene where she said, you know, here was my husband, showed a big portrait picture of him and said, here he is now, and threw a box of ashes.
This was, you know, at the sentencing, and threw a box of ashes down on the table.
Anyway, the widow is now suing the parents of both families, of the juvenile and of the adult, in prison for life.
She will receive some help from California's victim fund, but she's going beyond that, and she's suing the parents of both families.
They say, not fair.
We didn't do it.
It was our child.
It's going to ruin us.
We'll lose our house.
We'll lose everything we've got.
She got a $250,000 judgment from one of the kids.
Now, that was touching.
unidentified
He went on and said, well, I'll probably have to work my whole life to pay this off.
The families, both in this case, both say they'll be ruined.
And as a matter of fact, to add to the whole mix, there is now a bill on the California governor's desk, which I'll bet he signs, that would even remove the requirement to sue.
In other words, if your cute little progeny goes out and does something awful, you, as a parent, could be paying for it the rest of your natural life.
You could lose what you have.
And I wonder how people feel about that.
Maybe a little inducement to more parental responsibility or unfair.
What do you think?
It was a little shocking.
I mean, on the one hand, parents are in a way responsible for what their children do, but by the time they get to be teens, you're not always in control.
I mean, should they be able to sue you and virtually take everything you've got for what your child does?
That's what's going on.
And that's the law.
It's about to be signed there in California.
And it doesn't matter whether it is or not.
There can be civil suits, and indeed she is suing civilly.
Affirmative action still in the news.
That thing between the governor and Jesse yesterday really stirred it up.
UC Board of Regents, of course, voting late last night to end all affirmative action.
What will the loss of race and gender preference mean?
Well, about half of this year's class was chosen because of gender or race.
Jesse Jackson, in kind of a funk about the whole thing, said, why America's educational system has been hijacked.
So do you think the UC Board of Regents did the right thing?
I do.
Affirmative action either is or isn't.
The president, of course, the other day saying that we shouldn't end it, we should mend it.
Now that's silliness.
Because you either have affirmative action or you don't.
And affirmative action to me means, has to mean, preferences, racism, quotas, some yardstick by which to measure whether you are affirmatively acting.
Right?
There must be a yardstick to determine if there is action going on.
That's why they call it affirmative action.
So that's still a big firestorm going on.
Very little news coming out of the Waco trial.
All I can give you tonight is that yesterday, Lloyd Benson, the former Treasury Secretary, you'll recall, during the Waco days, had to go in front of the committee and admit very poor coordination.
In fact, imagine this.
Lloyd Benson said he wasn't even told of the initial attack on the compound until hours after it was well underway.
The Secretary of the Treasury, the boss of the ATF, wasn't told the raid was even underway until several hours after it was gone.
Do you believe that?
I'm not so sure I believe that.
Any more than I really believed that George Bush had very, quote, minimal information on Iran-Contra.
Come on.
Sure he did.
He was an old CIA guy.
He knew what was going on.
And an old Lloyd Benson, he must have known about the attack on Waco, too.
but he went in front of the committee yesterday and say he didn't even know about it.
Not me, not until just hours after it was underway.
Poor communication.
Some rather startling new allegations on the Good Old Boys Picnic, the ATF annual get-together.
you I've got a little information on the Waco hearings, days one and days two, with regard to the amount of coverage given to the Waco hearings by the various networks, and I thought you might be interested.
ABC had two stories, average length, four minutes and 45 seconds in total.
CBS had two stories, four minutes, 30 seconds.
NBC had two stories, three minutes, 40 seconds.
And PBS had four stories, 15 minutes and 30 seconds.
The New York Times devoted five stories.
The Washington Post, five, USA Today, five.
The top issues so far with regard to the press, this is what will get you.
In the Waco hearings, the NRA role in the hearings has had 10 stories.
Ten stories.
Political motives have had six stories.
ATF drug nexus, three stories.
Government non-disclosure, two stories.
And ATF military assistance, two stories.
So what I told you about the coverage, the national coverage of the Waco hearings is exactly true.
It is weighted in favor of the ATF and the government by a long shot.
I just gave you the figures and you cannot ignore them.
Next couple of stories, I guess, several stories in a way about women.
Women at work.
Labor department stats.
This is pretty interesting.
The number of families where both work, you know, the man and the woman, is up 12.5% from 74 to 94.
An additional 17 million women in the workplace now totaling 58 million American women working.
A new study says, get this, 55% of working women make half or more of their families' total income.
Still, they don't make as much.
And they took the field, for example, of psychology.
A man psychologist can expect to make, on average, about $31,000.
A woman psychologist, $22,000.
Women now make 76 cents to every dollar men make.
And the question is, why?
And I'm sure that you out there, many of you have the answers.
I've got coverage of Susan Smith and a lot more here.
I've got a lot of information on OJ.
I really have too much news.
But this is related to women, so I thought I would toss it in as well.
The late ABC show did a piece on women in bathrooms, and it's all extremely sad.
Apparently, women don't have, or one of their biggest complaints, period, is that they do not have bathrooms.
There are not bathrooms for women, or enough bathrooms for women.
So I wonder what you make out of that.
Not enough bathrooms for women.
They showed long, long lines for women.
And women were complaining bitterly that going to events, you know, movies and stage shows and wherever it is that women go, there are not enough women.
Moreover, it takes them more time in the bathroom.
Now, all of this may seem silly, but some women are getting so incensed and in a hurry that they're marching into men's rooms, which they say are empty or nearly empty.
And it's a real horror.
I mean, I would be horrified to be the one guy in a men's room and have a troop of ladies or a lady or a troop of ladies come marching in, demanding to be able to use the facility alongside myself.
That would bother me.
So I wonder if it would bother you.
Anyway, that's a little more news on women, and women out there May wish to confirm it and say, yes, it is true art, or it's a bunch of baloney and they were just doing a kind of a story that looks interesting.
I have a feeling, kind of a sneaky suspicion, that it's probably true.
Susan Smith.
New details.
The final hours, the final days before she killed her children.
First, apparently, we found out, she was trying to drive off a bridge with her children.
In other words, she was going to commit suicide with her children.
But one of her children began to cry, so she kept going.
Went on to the lake, where she first released the parking brake, was going to drown herself, then pulled it back again, what they say, then released it again, then jumped out of the car.
They say they're trying to argue the motive was suicide.
They said Susan was dispensing sex to her husband, ex, her stepfather, her boss, and her boss's son.
That she thought of suicide every day.
And of course, the only question left for Susan is whether she lives or dies.
That's really frankly about it, whether she lives or dies.
It's very racist to mention that they were African-American community members.
How do you know that the old white man didn't make them do it?
Maybe he said racist things and tried to shoot them or something.
Well, actually, sir, the words were the kids came into the gun shop to rob the white guy.
It says you shouldn't talk about race when you talk about crime.
That's Howard in Oakland, where there's a lot of crime.
A lot of it black, too.
See, Howard, that's why I mention it.
Because it's true.
It's not true to mention, not racist to mention that they were black.
I saw them on TV, so I saw they were black.
And it's not racist.
It's just simply true.
The black community is well aware of it.
And white kids, when they commit crimes, are mentioned also as white, many, if not most times.
Art, we live in Eclair, Wisconsin, 30 miles east of the Twin Cities.
We're watching an hour-long, at least I think, weather special being broadcast on WCCO-TV that is reporting unprecedented tornado and thunderstorm activity in Twin Cities in our area.
Started around 5.30 this evening, and the storms just continue to redevelop.
They have interviewed pilots who have never seen anything like this before this far north.
The storms are slow moving and just constantly redevelop.
We'll be tuning you in at about 1 a.m. at which time the storms are predicted to be in our area.
B.S., we used to listen to you on KEX Portland, moved west central Wisconsin, picked you up a while on WOAI, yeah, all the way from San Antonio, then WTMJ in Milwaukee, and wonderfully now from KSTP in Minneapolis, St. Paul.
Well, let me tell you something.
Our network took some hits earlier tonight up in the Oregon area.
They have vicious storms Going on hail, lightning.
The weather continues to be a very, very big story.
And something's going on with the weather.
I don't care.
I'm saying it.
I'm not shying away from it.
Something's going on.
Like with the geologic activity, which, by the way, I also want to mention, it's been very quiet, nervously quiet up in Northern California for too long now.
And that's all I'll say about that.
The weather, though, something's wrong with the weather.
Really wrong.
So I agree with the factser from Wisconsin.
And they had it so bad up at the network, we uplink on what's called KU-band.
Actually, we downlink on C-band, uplink on KU-band.
KU-band is very high frequency, and it is affected when you have a density of rain.
They had marble-size raindrops, I'm told, to the degree the network could not get its signal up to satellite.
It simply could not get through the density of the raindrops.
Something's going on with the weather.
So, I've got more, but I will hold it.
Are you ready?
East of the Rockies, you're first up this morning on the air.
And as long as that baby is born on U.S. soil, and my understanding is that at L.A. County Hospital, about 65% of all live births are to illegal aliens.
65%.
They then are automatically American citizens, entitled to everything a citizen can get.
Moreover, when they get to be 21, they can bring mom and dad and sisters, brothers, grandfathers into the U.S. Documents?
No problem.
$150, and you can be documented six ways from Sunday, matter of fact.
We'll serve it up once, and I'll wait once, but not twice.
When you get on the air, turn your radio off.
I know it makes me seem like a cruel, ruthless dictator, but I guess I am.
That's the way it's going to be.
Turn your radio off.
And so if I say turn the radio off, and you say, okay, and I wait, and then the radio is still on again, and you have to turn it down twice, I mean, you must have a very unusual radio.
That volume must just jump right back up by itself.
Actually, I think that he gobbled people of both races, my recollection.
Both races.
First time caller line.
You're on the air.
Hello.
unidentified
Hi, my name is Pat, and I'm from San Diego.
Hi, Pat.
Hi.
I'm a huge fan of the show.
I've been listening for a long time.
And something you said tonight when I was driving home from my friend's house reminded me of something.
I grew up in Alaska and lived through a lot of the earthquakes, the major one that hit up there.
And ever since I went through that experience, I was real young when it happened.
But I mean, it would be really strange.
Like I'd sense like an earthquake or a, you know, something happening and then it would happen.
And it's really funny, a couple, something you said about, you know, Northern California being really quiet and, you know, what you were saying about that.
You know, with your feeling about earthquakes, I suppose it is incumbent on me to ask you, what made you go to California?
unidentified
That's a fair question.
Well, actually, I lived in Anchorage for 12 years after that major one hit, and then, you know, I went into the military, you know, after that.
And I ended up in Southern California because I was sent here by the military, but I decided to stay in San Diego because I fell in love with my husband.
And, you know, I decided to blow up the fear of the earthquake.
But I, at the same time, knew that that was, you know, part of the package deal.
Well, San Diego is perhaps not as much at risk as north of the area.
unidentified
Yeah, I agree with you, but I was just thinking how, I don't know, I've just been listening to the show for the last year, and I just identified with, I've heard other callers call in and mention that, you know, something's going to be happening.
And I had a real strong sense that I don't think necessarily San Diego per se, but it's been a long time since those, well, since 1989, that really bad one hit Northern Cal.
O.J. Simpson's attorneys now say they expect to wrap up their case in about a week and a half.
Now, this comes from court transcripts released Friday in the former Football Stars double murder trial.
It was from a sidebar conference.
And I guess I'm telling you, he said, Johnny Cochran, I'm going to finish in a week and a half.
Now, he told the judge that.
Now, here's the thing you're going to want to watch for.
According to Los Angeles television station, KCAL, Simpsons lawyers have hired a woman defense attorney to play the part of prosecutor Marsha Clark and to put the defendant through a mock cross-examination.
They have hired somebody in Marcia Clark's image.
I wonder if they could really get the same driving temperament of Marcia Clark to put O.J. Simpson through the paces the way they think Marcia Clark will do it.
You know, you can almost imagine the ad that must have gone in the newspaper for that one needed one mock prosecutor.
Qualifications.
Well, you know, I've got to be fair here.
Sharp, very intellectual, bitchy, whiny, effective, aggravating, professional.
She is all of those.
And you'd have to put an ad in like that anyway.
So they did it.
How OJ did is an open question.
Now, somebody here said that Michael, I think it is from Orange, says the cross-examination rehearsal with a skillfully trained female attorney went so badly that OJ, they have decided, will not take the stand.
He said that he was receiving a little bit of friction from the UFO community for the fact that he wasn't being very altruistic with his tape, that he had exon screens in line for him.
And I find that kind of incredulous because anybody I've ever seen in the UFO community, any self-proclaimed authority, always has an 800 number with something for sale for $29.95.
I mean, if you're selling something, it's a big bill.
No, I thought Santilli's motivations were straightforward and maybe a little more straightforward than a lot of the people in the UFO community, as you say, who are hawking this or that.
Of course, everybody who comes on a radio show just about has written a book.
We'll be right back to you after the news is the top of the hour.
unidentified
You're listening to Art Bell, Somewhere in Time, on Premier Radio Networks.
Tonight, an encore presentation of Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
Be-bye.
Coast to Coast AM from July
21st, 1995.
Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
Tonight, tonight we're gonna make it happen Tonight we'll put all of the things aside Give in this time and show me something Premier Radio Networks presents Art Bell somewhere in Time.
Tonight's program originally aired July 21st, 1995.
From the high desert, good morning, everybody, and welcome back.
I've got a number of comments for you, but we've got a caller on hold right now.
Wanted to hold through the news, commenting on the Santilli interview we had the other morning.
Actually, we did it twice.
I think we did it late in one program and then early in the next so you all could hear it.
Hello there.
unidentified
Good evening, Mark.
Yes.
Yes, there's something else along the same lines I'd like to mention.
Although I've not had the benefit of seeing the five stills of Mr. Santilli's film, I think that the technological abilities today to create really convincing and stupendous forgeries with computer graphics and what have you is going to be incredible.
And I guess until I see it live on CNN, ABC, NBC, and the Fox channel, just like I saw the OJ Chase, I'm still going to have my reservations.
I would say, and I'm being honest with you, 90% of the faxes that I've received from people that have seen these photographs of the alleged alien abduction believe that it's real.
And I'm going to stick my neck out, too, and it's been chopped off before, so who cares?
I tend to think it's real myself.
I guess that's why I've been paying so much attention to this.
I think it's real.
I think these are real photographs.
Now, or the photographs are authentically taken from the 16mm film, which I think is real.
If I were a betting person, I would bet the larger bit of the money on it being real.
Not saying I might not hedge it to some degree, and I've got my neck out a little here.
I tell you, it looks real to me.
It's the damnedest set of photographs I've ever seen in my life.
And by the way, I said this yesterday, but I'm pretty proud of myself.
I've done a lot of work on these.
And I have sharpened them.
I've done a lot of enhancement Work.
Not changing the nature of the photographs, but getting more detail out of them than was originally in them.
I've done a lot of work.
And so we've got a wonderful set of five photographs that we have been given nearly exclusive permission by Race Antille to publish.
They're going into the newsletter.
The newsletter is going to be going out and will hit your house fully two or three weeks before the national release.
So we've got some pretty hot stuff here.
Art, I can't believe it.
Racist cops on dope.
He's referring to the story that the ATF racist picnic, allegations now of rape, rape, and drug use.
Anyway, he says, Art, I can't believe it.
Racist cops on dope.
In America, I've had my suspicions, but now it's on TV, so it must be true.
I think I'll go shoot myself.
Signed, Stu.
And this from Kathy, Dear Art, women have long been viewed as objects to be used by society.
Yes, women take advantage of women too, of course.
They not only are expected to be satisfied for less pay, but they often don't fight for the inequity.
It's not only how men see us, it's how we see ourselves and therefore pass the pattern on to our children.
It's important to realize also that the income women bring in is often not necessary for basic survival of the family, but goes to support the excessive lifestyle that our current standard of living idealizes.
How else would we be able to afford the luxuries we enjoy that are hedonistic by comparison with much of the rest of the world, and even with ourselves 20 years ago?
Kathy, of course, has a very, very good point.
And we've been talking about the weather, and I've got a good facts on it that argues with what the last caller from Minnesota said.
She said, ah, the weather's no different.
Yes, it is, and I'll read you this facts in a moment.
Yeah, well, I'm glad you're humored by all of this.
I'm not.
I think that if a woman came traipsing into the men's room while I was there, I would scream.
unidentified
Well, anyway, when you were talking about, and this, I remember about two or three years ago, and it was an inner-city minority activist, and he was talking about the problems with gun control.
He was shouting about how we have to make the manufacturer of firearms accountable, how we have to make the manufacture of ammunition accountable.
And I was thinking what the finale to his tirade should be, we ought to make the makers of these children accountable.
Well, what I mean by that is that these people are parents of these kids who are doing this killing and this violence.
And there should be responsibility and accountability on the children.
And the story is, to briefly repeat, these two young thugs, black, walked into a gun store with robbery in their little heads.
They ended up doing something they didn't have to do.
They took a pipe and beat the guy to death.
The widow is one of the kids, punks, was given life in prison because he was over the juvenile age.
The other was a juvenile, be held until he's 21.
But that's not the story in America anymore because that's commonplace.
Punks beat somebody to death, that's commonplace.
What is not commonplace is that the surviving widow of this man has decided to sue the families of the children for everything they've got.
And she's doing it.
And there is a bill that would allow it to be done in California on the governor's desk right now, even going beyond allowing a civil suit, almost mandating that it occur.
Go after the parents.
And I wonder how you all feel about that.
A little bit scary on the one hand.
You can argue, well then, yes, the parents ought to be responsible.
It is their prodigy.
They created this child.
They shaped and molded this child.
Or you might argue, despite the best efforts of some parents, the children will go out and commit crimes.
And therefore, the parents ought not be responsible for the sins of their offspring.
Dear Art, meteoral, I have never been able to say this word.
Meteoral, you know, weather stats don't lie.
Meteorological.
That's how it should be said.
I have been working on a presentation which I'll be putting blah, blah, blah, blah, on somebody else's show.
Well, who cares?
As I've mentioned to you before, a book called The Survival of Civilization warned that as this interglacial cycle closed, it would be heralded by over 300 years' time of increased wind speeds,
increased tornado activity, downbursts, severe cold, intense heat, hail, torrential rains, and flooding.
He's tried to call me, he says, many times, but without success.
So, you know, I had a caller or a Faxer from Wisconsin who said, basically, Art, we live in Eclair, Wisconsin, 70 miles east of the Twin Cities.
We're watching an hour-long weather special being broadcast on WCCO-TV, reporting unprecedented tornado and thunderstorm activity in the Twin Cities area.
Again around 5.30 this evening, and the storms just continue to redevelop.
They have interviewed pilots on the air who say they've never seen anything like it before this far north.
And on and on and on.
And apparently they're in the middle of them right now.
And it is my observation the weather is changing.
Or we're just having a very bad year, but I think arguably it is changing.
It is becoming more severe.
The weather, along with everything else, is going through a bit of a quickening.
unidentified
The weather, along with everything else, is going through a bit of a quickening.
What really boggles my mind about these guys is how they decide who is a threat and who's not.
They claim that weapons in the hands of people like Randy Weaver and David Koresh is somehow a huge threat.
Yet gangs in this country seem to have the run of the streets.
Koresh and Weaver hadn't done anything yet to anybody.
They simply wanted to be left alone.
Yet gangs kill people every day, innocent people.
Where is the ATF on this issue?
Why aren't they beating down the doors of crack houses and confiscating illegal weapons held there?
Weapons which kill children, police, and anybody who happens to get in their way?
And as far as the 14-year-old girl's testimony about being molested, though her testimony sounds genuine, isn't it convenient that David Koresh is not alive to defend himself?
These hearings are a joke.
Nothing will come of them, and as soon as they're over, it will be business as usual.
And this, dear art, you haven't touched on something you need to mention about women's bathrooms.
I don't believe there is extra time spent in front of the mirrors.
This is from Vince in Boulevard.
Well, you're naive, Vince, but he does want to make a good point.
Did you ever notice women seem to go into the bathroom in pairs?
It's true.
This is especially noticeable at any athletic event, not stadium events, but little athletic events like girls' softball and so forth.
Girls go to the bathroom in pairs.
Why?
To gab.
Women gab, gab, gab.
Vince in Boulevard.
Yeah, I think Vince makes a good point, but I think there's still extra mirror time.
I mean, the original factor talked about a time and motion study.
And, you know, that I really believe that in any time-motion study, ugly a thought as it might be, I think women just waste a lot of time and motion.
And as Vince points out, they do go in pairs.
It's like they can't go by themselves.
They've got to have support, go with somebody they know.
I never have figured that one out either.
But it's just one of the many mysteries about women.
Maybe some woman would like to call and explain, or even try to explain, why women use the restroom in pairs.
Why it's important for one, in fact, they'll ask each other, you ready to go?
I guess I would translate that to mean you figure he's guilty.
unidentified
Yes, I really, I really do.
But I want to get your opinion on a couple things.
First of all, did you hear that Governor Pete Wilson said that the other day he was going to introduce a law that would only require 10 out of 12 guilty verdicts to put someone in jail?
Now, I'll tell you, I do, I really do agree with Governor Wilson.
But that doesn't make me want to jump on the governor's bandwagon because I really do view the man as the bandwagon kind of guy.
As a matter of fact, I am not excited about the next election, which now is 480-some odd days away.
And of course, it's well underway.
I've got the figures here on how much campaign money has been raised by the various candidates.
And I just, I don't know why.
I'm not very excited about anybody just yet.
And I've interviewed several of them.
I will interview several more of them.
I would love to interview President Clinton, actually.
I wonder if I could do that.
He probably wouldn't come on the show, huh?
I guess he doesn't like to put himself, or maybe he would, in a position where he gets some hard questions.
I mean, really hard questions.
Because I could ask him.
I've got a lot of questions I could ask at this point.
You know, maybe I ought to try.
I haven't even tried.
I haven't even really thought about it till now.
Mentally, I can sort of, I get this picture of some Serb general probably back from the front lines attacking one of the safe areas.
And this little blue-helmeted messenger running up with NATO's latest warning.
And the general yawning, pulling the big old cigar out of his mouth, receiving the latest warning, and putting it on this big pile entitled NATO Warnings.
That may be, that's, I guess, a little cynical, isn't it?
Cynical.
But I bet it's close to the truth.
So once again, we've warned you attack Garajda, and we're coming from the air big time.
Do you believe us?
unidentified
You're listening to Arkbell somewhere in time.
Tonight featuring a replay of Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
We'll see you next time.
You're listening to Art Bell, Somewhere in Time, on Premier Radio Networks.
Tonight's an oncore presentation of Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
The rumored stories about women who are weary and miserable from standing in long restroom lines at restaurants and events are all true.
The phenomenon has been occurring for five or six years.
We have lots of time at that location to complain about this obvious inequity.
Last weekend, I desperately braved the stronger sex, invaded their designated territory, and stood guard, enabling a few of us to use public facilities and get back to the event that we all had paid for.
We are not created equal in this regard, as any time and motion study would reveal.
Frankly, I believe too many men think that we have a bathroom fixation and that this is something to tease us about.
Well, we aren't laughing anymore, so if any architects are out there listening, please change this or prepare for more invasions from women with a purpose.
And this, dear art, the 2020 program tonight regarding the San Diego gun store owner that was beaten to death during a robbery appeared to me to have been done by a white and a black.
You know, they may be absolutely right.
This is even better.
Now, is it racist to say it's a white guy and a black guy?
Remember the black guy said he could have stopped the beating, but didn't.
Remember?
Yes, of course he did.
And I didn't see the other.
I'm not even sure they showed him.
So on the other hand, though, I have a newspaper article here.
It does show the other guy's white.
So now it's not racist, thank God.
Can we now just discuss the issue here, which is, I don't care what color they are.
They beat a guy to death with a pipe.
And the issue is, should the families be financially responsible to the widow for what their offspring did?
Whatever color they are.
Who cares?
I mean, really, who cares?
The issue is the crime and compensation and the rest of her life and the fact she's never going to get her husband back, never.
And I listen to a lot of whining from this kid, the one black kid, who said, oh, I'm going to have to pay back $250,000.
I'll be working the rest of my life to do this.
Well, so what?
So what?
You know he's never going to do it anyway.
And then there are the families, and they have some assets, and there is the question, should those assets be in effect confiscated?
Dear Art, I spent a year in Japan as an exchange student with a Japanese family in Wakiyama.
We had several earthquakes over the course of the year, and the family dog, Wanta, always seemed to know it was coming.
She acted a certain way, and we could always tell that it was coming.
The past couple months you were, oh boy, you were very complexed and actually perplexed over Operation Black Hole and the fact that you had very, very, oh, how do I describe it?
And there are some things I guess since June is over, I guess we wait until December on whether Japan, Indian Ocean, going with the series of earthquakes which your guest on Dreamland had talked about.
The cycle ending or at least coming by the end of the year, he predicts, yes.
unidentified
Yes, so I'm interested to see that now that June is over to look towards December.
And one last question.
You had said something, no, or I had heard something by this.
This was from a militia group in Montana, which was talking about weather modification and had even alluded to the fact that the UN had they had actually had some conferences in the mid-70s to this fact and that they have the actual patents.
I wanted to ask if you had inquired or talked with somebody who's good with anatomy to look at those things and see if they could shed any credibility on what those look like.
I have a report from a pathologist, a written report from a pathologist who, in England, who is sort of a stodgy, very mean linish kind of pathologist, who doesn't go, you know, he kind of sticks his neck out a little bit and seems to imply, Although there's no way to know for sure, clearly what he saw does not appear to be human.
unidentified
But anatomically plausible as a variation on the human form.
In other words, he was able to see the moving pictures that we have not yet seen where they actually exposed the brain and so forth and so on.
he saw uh...
good close-ups though somewhat blurry of the internal organs and so he was able to comment as a pathologist and he rather thought them I understand a number of television stations are beginning to pick it up now.
And Congressman Schiff is getting involved and doesn't discount this film.
This is getting to be a really big story.
unidentified
Yes, it certainly seems that way.
Can we expect any further sets of these photographs to be internet?
After that gentleman fact, that Serbian gentleman facted you, I was thinking and I remembered yesterday.
I remembered some prophecy that I had read about a month ago, and it was from actually a Serbian shepherd at the turn of the century.
And it's quite, I guess, quite well known in Serbia.
Each household has one.
He predicted they would ultimately lose, but it would take a while.
And he also predicted World War III being largely an air war, and that after whoever survived it would be a period of peace where, how did he put it, people would no longer remember their birthday, that people would live that long.
And that kind of rang a bell with what some of the other people had said.
And also I kind of, just for humanity's sake, I want to know if there's an old Christian proverb that you can't spit in God's eye too often.
So I just want to know if anybody in the cosmos noticed that courageous people of Satya and if it mattered to anyone.
And on another topic I wanted to plug Dr. Goldberg.
I don't know if you remember having him on, but I ordered some of his tapes that I was interested in and people may not be interested in the subject, but one of them happened to be blank, the one I was interested in.
And I called him the next day and left a message.
And he was really sweet.
He called me right back and he sent me a replacement and even sent me something extra.
So just in these days of people not doing anything for anyone, right, I just thought it would be a good idea.
Affirmative action is when you give a preference to somebody because of sex or color, or you get, as in a hiring preference, or you hire them in order to meet a quota.
Keyword, action.
In other words, you do something as an employer or as a school or as an institution which favors somebody because of their sex or their race.
unidentified
Well, why I was asking this is the DMV is raising their weight fees and stuff, and it's all done on affirmative action.
And the only thing I could figure for affirmative action is somebody says they're going to do something and they just do it.
Well, I suppose the very broadest sense of the phrase might include anybody who takes an action, which is, in their estimation, affirmative.
But in the more narrow sense that we talk about affirmative action, sir, it is a preference or a quota or an action because of somebody's sex or color.
unidentified
Okay?
Mm-hmm.
Well, that's what I thought, but I thought I'd ask somebody else to see what they said on it.
I mean, find out what's going on in your community.
If you have the guts for it.
Now, if you have never listened to the police, for example, and you begin listening to the police, it's really going to freak you out.
I'm not kidding.
You have no idea what's going on around you.
And frankly, scanners are not good for everybody because maybe there are some things that you don't need to know, that you shouldn't know, that will just, as I said, it'll freak you out to know the crime going on around you.
You'll be suddenly aware and uneasy.
So it is a mixed bag.
But for those who like reality, it's really a trip.
And I too love scanners.
But it'd be really rude for me to be listening to a scanner, as well as illegal, while I'm on the air.
I wanted to comment on a caller earlier had mentioned that law in California allowing verdicts by 10 jurors.
Yes.
And, well, my understanding is it's already been killed in committee, but he had asked if it passed, could it be applied to OJ in a retrial?
And my understanding on that is that anything along that line would be considered ex post facto, so he would still have to be tried according to the laws as they stand at the time the crime is committed.
Dear Art, the cheap and simple solution to the bathroom problem, remove all of the mirrors.
J.K. in Oregon.
Well, that's not a bad.
I'll tell you what we could do.
You could sure make a study, couldn't you?
You could have two ladies' rooms, and in one of them, you could remove all of the mirrors.
And in the other, you could leave them in.
And then you could see over a period of time, just like with the little highway counters, how fast they go in and how fast they come out.
Maybe we could prove something there.
I am suspicious, and I think that our friend of the facts here a little while ago had it right, of women who go in pairs to the bathroom.
Does any woman, any woman out there, wish to try to explain that to all the men out here?
Probably not.
From Bryn Marie in San Francisco, same subject, bathrooms.
I don't suppose you've thought of this, or maybe you have, but it's not as easy for women to perform, number one, as it is for a man.
We have a lot of clothing to undo generally if we're out for an evening function.
There's panteos involved and so forth.
Yeah, I know all that.
The reason it takes longer for a woman to perform the same bodily function as a man is we have to get undressed.
Believe me, primping has nothing to do with it.
Honest.
I've had the occasion to be in bathrooms labeled for either or neither gender, and men primp too.
Oh, yeah, hardly.
Bryn, if I could get away with unzipping one zipper to answer nature's call, I certainly would, signed Bryn.
Well, look, I am allowing, and I do understand, that women have clothing that men don't that must be removed.
Fine.
Having said that, and even allowing for that, I'd be willing to wager you money that a time and motion study, as suggested by an earlier faxer, would clearly show that women primp more, gab more.
I mean, if not, then I want someone to call and explain to me why they go in pairs.
Men don't do that, I guarantee you.
Men don't do that.
You never turn around, hey, Joe.
You ready to go?
Well, yeah.
Well, not yet.
No, let's wait a while.
Well, I can't.
Well, okay, then we'll go.
Never, I guarantee.
There's never a conversation like that between men, never.
Why is there among women?
East of the Rockies, you're on the air.
unidentified
Hi, Art.
Hello.
Yes.
Have you ever heard of stories about aliens from outlaws from the West, like William Bonney, aka Billy the Kid?
Yes, the Teflon president, why, that's just referring to an artful man.
Finally, a phrase that she had at least heard.
So then Bill is no doubt particularly artful, isn't he?
Slick Willie.
Slick Willie.
It's just a way of paying the man a compliment, saying how adept he is at the world of political intrigue and dodging and the ability to answer any question put to him with no sort of answer at all.
And I just thought maybe you might be interested in maybe either having this person on your show, or maybe you might even be interested in picking up the copy of the book yourself and reading it yourself.
Well, that's because we're beginning to take over.
We own the night.
It's a slogan.
Thank you very much for the call.
Truscal, Maine.
You see, it's true, you know, a lot of people who are hearing this program are doing so nearly for the First time because we're spreading now in the East so quickly.
It's really almost frightening.
It's 192 affiliates, I think, right now.
We're going to be celebrating 200 very quickly.
And we have become the preeminent all-night show in America, simply, truthfully, and pleasantly.
I like it, but I don't think about it.
I've been doing this show for 10 years.
It used to be called originally when it was on KWN, that was the seed pod station, the alma mater, however you want to put it.
It used to be called West Coast AM.
Then it syndicated.
then the syndication took off and now First time caller, you're on the air.
I don't have the audio clips from the 6 o'clock news, but bear with me.
I think this will ring a bell.
Remember shortly after Oklahoma, the president said at a nationwide broadcast that no American has the right to criticize any federal law enforcement official.
Remember anything like that?
The media didn't play it up as big as they should, but he was basically telling us we didn't have any right to free speech or to criticize our government.
I recall something, I don't know if that was the exact context.
unidentified
It was very, very, very close to what I just described.
And of course now he is on the television the last several days haranguing against the good old boys in this FBI weekend scandal kind of thing, criticizing the federal, well, whoever they were, criticizing the federal officials.
Well, actually, I thought the criticism was rather muted because he said that anybody behaving that way should go find another job.
I mean, that was the biggest sort of downside to that sort of behavior that he seemed to talk about.
I mean, go find another job.
Anybody else, throw him in jail for 10 years.
unidentified
He knows about abherent behavior and how, you know, if you get away with it as governor, you ought to be able to get away with it as president, and so you go find another job.
Other concern I have is that I'm convinced that there's a lot of rotten fish regarding Vince Foster and Whitewater and everything else.
But my concern is if we find that and get rid of Clinton per chance, then the Democrats might come up with somebody respectable to run.
And I'm not sure the Republicans have anybody.
I mean, I'm very Republican, but I'm not impressed with the Republican field.
And I'm concerned about what's going to happen in 96.
I could just tell by the hum, which is why you should buy the trope so you don't have that rotten hum.
And then if a neighbor is on, why, of course, you've got other problems because then there'll be what's called a carrier interference, and it really sounds awful to the degree that you can't even hear who you're talking to sometimes.
Well, aren't you proud, Doc, that you were able to take what should be an investigation to get to the truth about a serious matter why 80 people died, including a lot of children, Doc, and divert attention from the truth.
Yeah, it's really something to be proud of, Doc.
I hope you're really proud of that, and you obviously are.
Because you don't care about the truth.
All you care is about politics.
You really are a wonker's wonk, and you belong in the White House.
You know, I want to make a comment to you about your book.
You're writing your book, but before I get to that real quick, there was a guy about a week ago, and he called you, and would you agree that people's voices are very similar to fingerprints, almost maybe not as detailed, but yet they are?
And it's very obvious, I think, myself, too, as far as what I hear, people's differences in their voices.
A guy called and he asked you, he was confused about a fellow who called the week before, and you threw out the name Charlie, but that wasn't the caller's real name who had called.
He made a comment that this guy sounded like the cartoonist who wrote you up in that cartoon.
Can you imagine one day, you know, your hairline starts receding and you see a little something there, you know?
A little number.
And you pull a quarter of a number, you know.
And you pull a little more of your hair back.
And there it is.
Three-sixths on your receding forehead.
Well, actually, your scalp.
But you don't learn until you get, say, into your mid-40s or early 50s where your hairline is.
My hair has not receded, by the way.
I've got more hair.
God, my hair grows so fast.
But I mean, a lot of men have receding hairlines.
And all of a sudden, it recedes to the point where you begin to see the number.
Ooh, wouldn't that be something?
East of the Rockies, you're on the air.
unidentified
Hi, Art.
First of all, that young man that called sounds very encouraging.
And I'd like to see the young people like that in Washington, you know, after they did some heavy reading on, like, the CFR and the, you know, trilateralists and that.
I know what it was, but it made fun of the name of my town, and I didn't take it well.
unidentified
I think he was trying to compliment you, but anyway, maybe not.
I don't know.
Anyway, Art, did you have a guest who's knowledgeable about ELF ways of electromagnetic weather control who can explain to us how weather can be controlled?
You want a big collision of a high-pressure and low-pressure system in tornadoes?
You know, I got it down to such a fine degree that I can actually predict where the tornado box they're going to be drawing the next day is going to be.
Now, that really is an important question, because I think it adds to it.
Now, you can't tell me that two girls who don't know each other and feel like gabbing don't use the opportunity to go to the bathroom as a place to gab.
So if you're looking for an honest-to-god difference between men and women and bathroom time, you know, I mean, it's getting serious and women are breaking into men's bathrooms and stuff like that.
Just calling to let you know that about two years ago I uploaded some new Roswell pictures to you, and included in those pictures are two extreme close-ups of the face.
And if you listen to the interview with Ray Santini, excuse me, Santilli, we have permission only to publish the five, and so that's exactly what we're going to do.
I mean, so what if they both get up and go together?
Who cares?
Why would that affect the lives of the men who are going to sit there and watch the event anyway?
There's no, there's a deeper, buried sociological reason that women are refusing to talk about, else one would have called up by now and told the truth, and they haven't.
I get one woman who claims to be a rebel from Montana.
But all my life, and I never thought about it until the guy faxed me, all my life, I've noticed it's a truth.
Women do that, but I just never, it never occurred to me before, except now they've got this big thing where women are complaining there's not enough bathrooms for women.
And so they're going into men's rooms.
And so there's some very serious reason, sir, thank you, why they go together.
Sociological reason.
I don't know what it could be.
But I know that it is part of the problem.
And the sooner they realize that, the sooner they'll have to stop breaking into men's rooms because they don't have enough time.
That's what I think.
Well, I'm going to take the time now to pre-read a couple of these facts so that I don't lose my career instantly, my, my, my language, people language.
I know you get upset about these issues, but come on now.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
You're listening to Art Bell Somewhere in Time on Premier Radio Networks.
Tonight, an encore presentation of Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
Goodbye.
Coast to Coast AM from July
Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
21st, 1995.
Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
Freebie Radio Networks presents Art Bell somewhere in Time.
The night's program originally aired July 21st, 1995.
Why, when you thought that both kids in the pipe beating were black, you felt it was relevant to mention their race.
When you found out the truth that one of the beaters was in fact a white boy, then you changed your racist tune to say that race wasn't important.
I dare you to read this over the air.
Unsigned, of course.
Normally, it has become my practice not to read things that people dare me to read over the air.
But I read this because this guy's all wet.
You missed the whole point or you didn't hear it.
The point wasn't what color the kids were who did the beating.
The point was, and the controversy was, and the time I spent unwinding it was, whether the kids, the kids of any race, it didn't matter, whether the victim ought to be able to sue the parents of those children, black, white, or purple.
That was the story.
As a matter of fact, the only one they didn't show the white kid, they showed only the black kid, the one who said, well, I could have stopped it if I'd wanted to, but I didn't.
That's the only one they showed.
And I had it in another fact that they were both black.
It doesn't matter.
If they'd both been white, it wouldn't matter.
Criminals are criminals or criminals.
That's what, I guess, the truth is.
And there is a fact, and there is a statistic that clearly shows there is more black crime per capita than white.
But that's a totally different argument.
And that's also not racist.
It's just a fact.
Again, though, in this particular story, the controversy was with regard to whether or not the survivor of the victim of the kids ought to be able to sue the parents of the kids.
And in California, they're prepping to be able to allow that as a matter-of-fact automatic thing.
There aren't a terrifying thought.
The Republicans may not solidify behind any one candidate.
Or if they do, perhaps Perot or Powells will step in as an independent, splitting the conservative vote.
Clinton awakens one day with a conscience and withdraws from the campaign.
Jesse Jackson is then elected.
Clinton is no longer the worst president in U.S. history.
I have nightmares about this one, Jeff in Livermore.
And then finally, this.
Dear, on this restroom situation, the lack of knowledge and understanding from you men is really making me angry.
Primp time in front of the mirror and gab time with a girlfriend are not the reasons that it takes so long to get one woman in and out of a bathroom stall.
Please take into consideration the following movements undertaken by any woman in a public facility.
1.
Open door to stall.
2.
Lock door to stall.
3.
Find a place to put handbag.
4.
Line the seat with paper.
5.
Undo belts, buttons, zippers, etc.
6.
The obvious.
7.
Redo belts, buttons, zippers, etc.
8.
Unlock door and wash hands.
Now, if women, she says, would not redress themselves inside the stall, it would definitely help.
Lynn, listening in North Hollywood.
I don't buy it all, Lynn.
List or not, I don't buy it all.
There is a reason women go together.
It's a sociological reason, and I don't believe that they don't gap.
I don't believe they don't talk.
I know damn well they go to the restroom to talk about the guys.
Right?
So are they talking stall to stall?
Probably not.
When do they do their talking?
They get out and they look in the mirror and they primp and they talk about what's going on and the guys and stuff like that.
And they talk and talk and talk.
And that's that's so, in other words, a lot of this complaint about not enough bathroom time is the woman's fault, isn't it?
They just don't want to face up to it, but it's the truth.
And I'll tell you this, there's damn little conversation that goes on between men.
You women don't know.
Those of you who haven't yet broken into a men's room wouldn't know.
Men don't use it as a social gathering place.
You go in there, you get your business done, and you leave.
It's not a place where you talk about events or friends or have casual little conversations or do this or that.
Yes, granted, no handbag.
Maybe that takes an extra second or two.
But basically, the problem is much deeper, and it has to do with talking.
The networks, all of them, excepting perhaps PBS, it's done a fairly credible job, have been serving the interests of our government in the Waco hearings and the Whitewater hearings.
The reporting on it is so obviously biased.
And in fact, the numbers back that up.
I've got a report here.
But you don't need a report to know.
I mean, you watch the evening news, take your pick, and I don't see how you can help but come to the same conclusion.
Doc Democrat actually summed it up, I thought, very artfully.
When he said, wasn't that a great PR move Democrats did to get that 14-year-old girl in there?
Last week, there were a number of people who castigated me for driving a Geo Metro.
I drive a little Geo Metro, and I like my Geo.
I've had it for years, and I've had great luck with it.
And they said, gee, what an image buster.
We thought you'd be driving at least a Cadillac.
Wrong.
So comes this message across the internet from George.
For several years, I've been watching the Continual increase in our foreign trade deficit.
What got my attention was the fuel shortage imposed by the Arab oil producers.
Though fuel is now very cheap in the U.S., the supply is not secure.
We are making it less secure by purchasing huge quantities of automobiles that, in actual practice, get less than 18 miles per gallon.
The politicians that I've spoken with about this all want to continue with high-volume imports of petroleum, and they're apparently scared to death of gasoline taxes.
This does not make sense in view of the very healthy subsidies benefiting private autos and trucks.
Realizing that little will be done by our leaders to change this situation, I too purchased a Geometro that regularly gets 60 miles per gallon, easily breaks all speed limits, and is a far better automobile than most others.
I heard you mention over KOH Reno that you owned one of these, and my estimate of your intelligence and powers of perception increased another notch.
The three-cylinder engine in the Metro is elegantly designed, very durable, even at high speeds.
You did not mention this factor.
Several years ago, I bought a predecessor of it.
The Sprint, which now has 100,000 miles on it, still doesn't use oil, has all of its original power.
Could find no indication in the instructions that there was any need to service the car except for changing the oil, filling the gas tank, and replacing Warren Tires.
So that is all I've got to say.
The Metro is the least trouble to own of any car I know of.
Signed, GWH.
I agree.
And I don't care what people think of me.
Even having achieved some degree of success now, I feel no burning need to take my, by the way, paid-for GeoMetro, paid-for, I said, and just sort of turn it away and put some gas-guzzling, large, heavy metallic machine out there that I won't drive anyway.
Yeah, but still, it doesn't matter because if the primping and mirroring part has to be a part of it, then when they are there gabbing, they are backing everything up, so to speak.
And the ones in the stalls can't very well come out to the mirrors and gab until the gabbers move on.
unidentified
That actually doesn't stop the stall line at all.
If you think of it just numerically, say three minutes.
You've got four stalls.
You can only put 88 women through there in the course of an hour.
Now, how many men can use a men's room in the course of an hour?
Well, the answer is many more because they don't sit there and gab.
Now, I appreciate your call, but I don't buy what you're saying.
If part of the experience for the woman is getting in front of the mirror, having a little talk, trimping a little bit, then it backs up the whole system because you've got the one in the stalls that we've got to make it into mirrors.
They can't very well come out of the stalls until the mirrors are clear, right?
So the line stays backed up.
No, sir, I'm not buying it.
It's a very different sociological effect or custom men and women.
And as far as I know, there's about as many women's rooms as there are men's rooms.
It's not like there's some great shortage of women's rooms across the country.
In almost any place I've ever been, you name it, restaurant, event, place, whatever.
If you've got a men's room, you've got a ladies' room.
Only in very tiny places will they have one common for both.
You know, where you go in, you lock the door.
Then the next person uses it.
Otherwise, there is no great shortage of women's rooms.
Two side issues on this law they're trying to pass where you can sue somebody for what their kids did?
Yes.
I could see where there's going to be a lot of kids that are not going to have any legal parents because the parents are probably going to go to court and get that waived.
Maybe that would prevent a lot of terrible things from occurring.
I mean, if a child is unmanageable and is destined or likely to do something awful, and they're not in control of that child, then maybe they ought not be in custody of that child.
unidentified
That's true.
But there's also another thing I could say.
I could see where insurance might have a niche in here.
Or you can pre-plan and get insurance for this type of action.
But this new custom, that's why we're talking about this, because there is this threat now, not even so subtle, that women are going to begin actually invading men's rooms in order to get what, God knows what, probably an increase in facilities, whatever it is they're after.
They're going to invade men's rooms.
Now that's not just unsettling.
That's just uncivilized.
And I don't know what I'd do if I saw some woman come bursting into a men's room.
In modern America, it is said it is now more likely, at one time, if you were going to be murdered, the great likelihood was that the murderer would be somebody that you know.
It would be a passion murderer.
It would be somebody in your family, one of your so-called friends, somebody you know.
In modern America, not only is your likelihood of being murdered greater, but there is a much greater likelihood that it will be somebody you don't know, a complete stranger, for possibly no apparent reason at all, other than you were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and somebody who just didn't give a damn about life took your life.
That is the more likely of the eventualities in modern America.
So there is a lot of that kind of thing going on.
Absolutely random shootings.
And it's Saturday morning, so here's Maria from the high desert to you.
unidentified
You're listening to Arkbell somewhere in time, tonight featuring a replay of Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
Shadow painting a baby, baby.
With a romance in my head, heaven holding a handful of all to a sad kick up a little girl.
Come on, catch the tips on bed.
He walks down the way.
Oh, my God, till the evening end, till the evening end.
The End
You're listening to Art Bell Somewhere in Time on Premier Radio Networks.
Tonight's an oncore presentation of Coast to Coast AM from July 21st, 1995.
And that is the only thing that allowed the involvement of the military.
And why isn't that a big issue?
Well, you know, so, you know, these hearings are being orchestrated with the cooperation of the media, totally away from headed toward the truth, which is really sad.
And I thought, you know, Doc Democrat did it up really well this morning.
And so I believe that in some sort of like when you're at a movie theater or something, you've got to stand, and so that instead of inconveniencing the men twice, they do it all at once.
unidentified
Correct.
I think it's some sort of politeness thing that has just been handed down through the generation.
But I just always assumed, like in my mother's day, when women would get up during dinner, that all the men would stand so that they wouldn't have to keep on getting up and down and up and down.
Thank you very much for the attempt and the call, but I don't think it has yet successfully been, although that was a good stab at trying to explain it.
And that somehow then it became genetically, from that point, ingrained in women.
Dear Art, I'm about to say something totally different about your Roswell pictures that I've been studying for about two weeks now.
These pictures do not have the fake look of a Hollywood backdrop, and they have an air of authenticity about them.
Yes.
You may have given your pictures the wrong name.
I think you should have called them Los Alamos.
I might be a total paranoid or cynic.
You be the judge.
With the recent disclosures about the secret radiation experiments on unsuspecting and innocent citizens of the U.S., I believe we might be witnessing a small child who's been fed plutonium or some other toxic nuclear material.
This was just acknowledged by the government a couple of weeks ago.
And is in a government-run laboratory being studied for the purpose of effects of radiation on the human body.
The body looks as if in the advanced stages of some type of muscular deformation possibly caused by radiation poisoning.
After watching the workings of government my whole life, I don't believe this is so far-fetched.
Ivan in Lincoln, Nebraska.
Ivan, the only argument that I would have with that would be that the six fingers and six toes, while not impossible, are almost impossible.
And that even given radiation, it would make you sick or give you cancer, but the radiation given to an existing being would not grow additional digits nearly as I know.
A lot of times ladies go to the restroom in twos because if they've never been there before, they don't know if there's doors on the stalls or if the lock on the door is broke.
And women are a lot more modest than men, and they don't like for other ladies to open the door and walk in on them.
God knows this has got to be solved shortly or the program's going to end and we'll never know.
Why?
unidentified
All right, I'll make it quick.
The reason for it is I've gone with some friends of mine to a lesbian bar, and what it is is that the women go in Paris for the single fact that they're afraid of someone.
Like, it's a numbers group thing.
You know what I mean?
they're like in numbers it's a lot safer so they're worried about being approached when they go in if the women's I'm serious.
If the women's rooms are that crowded, as crowded as they're saying, so crowded they've got to break into men's rooms, then there's a big crowd in there, and they don't have to worry about being alone.
unidentified
Well, that's somewhat true.
We're worried about being approached on the way to the bathroom.
I've been in a bar and it was a gay bar and I didn't know that.
And I'm serious.
Friends of mine, me and my roommate and I, which is a guy, we went to the bathroom together for the single fact of being afraid of being approached by, you know, a gay person, being male, of course.
I just got carried away, and I wanted to make a few more points, and I just started freaking out, you know, because Charlie exudes that kind of response of people.
And either I connected the connector to the coaxial improperly, or I find that the internal antenna, the width antenna, is actually doing a better job.