Don McAlvaney warns that communism persists in Russia’s 12 republics, China, and South Africa, with the KGB reorganized into a stronger force and nearly 45,000 warheads still active, while U.S. military presence in Europe dropped from 350,000 to 100,000 troops. He ties gun control laws (banning 180 firearms, ATF searches) and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child—backed by 50 U.S. senators—to a "New World Order" agenda, urging stockpiling food, gold, and self-sufficiency while distrusting media. McAlvaney predicts nuclear conflict within three to five years, citing North Korea’s aggression, Russia’s 12,000–15,000 missiles targeting the U.S., and China’s ICBM expansion, warning of "Red Dawn" scenarios and suitcase nukes in American ports. Preparedness Expo (Sept 9–11) and his free newsletters offer survival strategies amid perceived globalist threats. [Automatically generated summary]
From the high desert and the great American Southwest, I bid you good morning and welcome to another edition of Coast to Coast AM Live Talk Radio Throughout the Nighttime, actually the fastest growing, now largest all-night radio program in America.
Glad to be with you.
My name is Art Bell.
And this morning, this evening, depending on your time zone, we have a guest.
His name is Don McElvaney.
I shouldn't have to tell you what he does.
He publishes a newsletter, and he's a very informed individual.
I think you'll find it absolutely fascinating.
He is going to be at the Preparedness Expo in Seattle September 9th through the 11th, which, as you know, we are advertising.
And I suspect that had something to do with our ability to snag him for an interview.
Back in the 60s, I did some undercover work for a couple of intelligence agencies and penetrated some communist fronts.
And this was back when I was actually at the University of Texas.
I got out of the University of Texas, started doing lectures on communism and socialism wherever I could.
Went to Wall Street in 1967 and have been in the investment business, almost every aspect of the investment business since that time.
Started going down to South Africa because I was involved with South African gold stocks in the middle 70s and ultimately went down there about 35 times.
I made a lot of contacts there and in about 1976 started writing my intelligence newsletter, which is now called the McClavania Intelligence Advisor.
So I have a precious metals brokerage and consultation firm in Colorado.
Write my newsletter, but my first love is to try to wake up Americans as to the incredible decline that our country is in, the dangers our Constitution faces, the dangers to our freedoms, and so forth.
So I've been writing my newsletter for over 20 years now, and I guess it's pretty widely distributed around the world.
And talk about things that people, most people don't want to talk about.
I suppose our claim to fame is we love to move people out of their comfort zone and make them very, very uncomfortable.
Well, we continued to write about things that we had been writing about, the New World Order, economic problems in the country, and so forth.
But we've written quite a few letters trying to point out to people that communism is not dead, that the Cold War is not over, that peace has not arrived, that one-third of the world is still under the control of the communists in Red China.
Believe it or not, still in Russia, the 12 republics, part of Eastern Europe, now South Africa, Red China, etc., etc.
And so, you know, we've written a great deal about what I believe is one of the greatest strategic deceptions of all time, the idea that communism is dead.
It's not dead at all.
The KGB was never dismantled in Russia.
KGB has been reorganized three times in the last five years.
It's more powerful than it was 20 years ago.
Russia is run from behind the scenes by the old Communist Party USA or Communist Party of Russia or the Soviet Union.
The military was not dismantled.
They still have close to 45,000 warheads on 12 to 15,000 missiles, mostly pointed at the United States.
They still have 6,000 defense factories that were not shut down, that are still cranking out tanks, fighter planes, bombers, long-range bombers, ICBMs, submarines, etc., etc.
And when Zernovsky comes to power in the next 12 to 18 months, or a hardliner like Zhernovsky, perhaps a Ruskoi, I think people will all of a sudden say, oh my gosh, what happened?
Well, he's made a lot of statements, and people laugh at him and say, ha, yu, ha, ha, yuck, yuck, this, this big buffoon, this clown, et cetera, et cetera.
He's made statements like the Russians still own Alaska and we'll go back and take it back, and nobody takes him serious.
And he's written a book about how they will make the great move south into the Persian Gulf.
We have to understand that Brezhnev said in 1973, in his Brezhnev Doctrine, he said, we will take those two great treasure chests upon which the West depends, the strategic oil reserves in the Middle East, the strategic minerals in South Africa, and then we will dictate the terms of surrender to the United States and to the West.
Well, that would be World War III or something like that.
Yeah, but the difference could be if that happens, and I would say that that could happen in three to five to seven years.
I'm not predicting it's going to happen tomorrow.
But basically what they've done is they are in the process through Glasnost No. 6.
This is the sixth period of Glasnost Berestroika.
We had one in the 20s under Lenin, one in the 30s under Stalin, in the 40s again under Stalin, in the 50s under Khrushchev, in the 70s under Brezhnev.
Each time the communists promised that they would become good guys, clean up their act, get rid of their old communist ways, become capitalists, go to free elections, free markets, become just like us.
Oh, by the way, we need massive aid from you guys to do it.
And each time we poured in the aid, and each time they turn around and become the bad guys that they were before.
The sixth period of Glass Nos, which we're in right now, was to be the greatest and grandest of all.
The script for Glass Nos No. 6 was written in 1981 by Yuri Andropov, who was the 15-year head of the KGB.
He was called in by the Polo Bureau, and they said, give us the biggest and best Glass Nosp of all, and he did.
He came to power in 83, died in 84.
His protégé, Mikhail Gorbachev, who had come up through the ranks of the KGB, came to power in 85.
It fell to him to implant or install Glass Nosp No. 6.
It was to be the biggest of all.
Communism would be declared dead.
The Cold War would be declared over.
They would reduce the Iron Curtain to nothing, so it would seem.
They would get rid of the Berlin Wall.
They would allow the reunification of Germany.
In reality, they would put second and third echelon communists in control in most of the Eastern European countries, KGB-appointed people in all of the republics, which is the case today.
And they would continue to wield decisive influence, but from behind the scenes, while calling themselves non-communists.
Now, by the way, this script was written in 1981.
Anatoly Golitsyn, who was a major in the KGB, defected, came to the States, wrote all about this in a book called New Lies for Old, Anatoly Golitsyn, wrote it in 81, published it in 84.
He would have sworn the guy was a prophet of God because the things that he was predicting in 81 were happening in 88, 89, 90, almost precisely.
But he just was a KGB major and read their mail.
The flip side of this, what was America and the West supposed to give back in return?
We would begin to financially support Eastern Europe to the tune of $40 billion to $50 billion a year, which we're doing.
We would begin to dismantle our European presence.
They had to neutralize NATO.
They had to neutralize NATO, which is their Western flank.
And of course, with the signing of the INF Treaty by Ronald Reagan on December 8th, 1988, we pulled our Persian cruise missiles out of Europe.
We began and have now completely pulled them out.
We have begun to pull our tanks, close down our bases, pull our troops out, et cetera, et cetera.
Part of the script would be that we would massively financially aid Russia in the Soviet Union.
We have, in fact, though, Don, not given what we have promised, we've promised a lot of aid, but we haven't come through with a lot of it yet, have we?
Well, if you take collectively the aid from the West, not just America, but England, Germany, Western Europe, it's probably been in excess of $50 billion.
We are closing down our defense industry because after all, this new era of peace, and after all, all we'll need is the United Nations Army, which can kind of police up the world.
We don't have any major threats anymore, we say.
And this was all part of the script that America would disarm while they would continue to quietly rearm or continue to arm.
Part of the script was that America would discontinue support for the anti-communist resistance movements around the world, such as the Mahajadeen, such as UNIDA in Angola, such as the Contras down in Nicaragua and elsewhere around the world, and we did.
Part of the script was that America would pull out of the Philippines and South Korea.
We did pull out of the Philippines.
We pulled out of Sudic Bay and Clarkfield under Bush.
And we're getting ready to pull out of Korea, and then the Koreans begin to rattle the saber, et cetera, et cetera.
Just as Bill Clinton and George Bush are actors, there are powerful people behind the Bushes and the Clintons and the Yeltsins and the Gorbachevs who are pulling the strings.
In Russia, it would be people in the Polar Bureau, it would be the KGB and the Red Army itself, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
There are powerful people that run the show behind the scenes, particularly the Central Committee of the Communist Party in Russia.
They will bring in actors like Gorbachev, like Yeltsim, and it's like a giant soap opera.
The Russians are big on drama.
The Russians are big on chess.
They're the chess champions of the world.
And so they see this as one gigantic global chess game that takes place over a 20 or 30 year period.
They see it as one gigantic soap opera.
And if you can just imagine soap operas, they write people in the script.
They write people out of the script.
Yeltin was written into the script after Gorbachev had fulfilled his usefulness.
Gorbachev's purpose was to dismantle the old Soviet Union.
You know what they say in England, when the king is dead, the king is dead, long live the king.
Now, the old Soviet Empire was intentionally dismantled.
It wasn't working.
It was creaking.
It was totally disorganized.
So they wanted to reorganize and purge from top to bottom.
And so the idea was Gorbachev's task was to come in and dismantle.
It didn't fall apart spontaneously, dismantle the old Soviet Empire.
But a new Russian Federation, Communist Federation, is being put together in its place.
And it is being assembled as we speak.
And it'll become very obvious to people after one of the hardliners, probably Zhirinovsky, not necessarily, and I would say most likely Zhironovsky.
But when the hardliners come to power, people will begin to see the form and substance of this thing.
The new Russian Federation, remember, long live the new king.
The new Russian Federation will include Russia.
It may include Afghanistan.
It will probably include India.
It will include the new Axis that Russia is putting together right now in the Middle East, which will include Iraq, Iran, Syria, Ethiopia, Sudan, Radical Sudan, now is under radical Islamic government, Libya, Yemen.
The Marxist-Leninist Republic of South Africa, South Africa was handed by the world powers, was handed over to the communists on April 27th of this year.
And maybe we can come back and talk about that because that's probably the most critical loss to the West since the loss of China.
China will be part of the new federation.
Vietnam, North Korea, and so forth.
We're talking about a federation of 2.5 to 3 billion people.
Communists.
Communists.
We need to understand communism is dead, right?
But it still controls a third of the world's population, about a third of the world's land mass, and approximately 61 countries.
I would say that the Red Army still controls 90% plus, and maybe it may be 95%, nobody knows for sure, of the old nuclear weapons.
There's no doubt that some of them have probably gotten out.
But with respect to Iran, Iran is run by radical socialist Islamic government.
And they are moving into a very close alliance with Russia at this point as we speak.
Russia is helping them on a nuclear program.
They're building pipelines and railroads between the two countries and so forth.
And this has been going on for the last probably three or four years.
Likewise, Russia is trying to wield together an axis that will include radical Syria, Iraq, and Iran.
Now, you say, you'd never put Iraq and Iran together in an alliance.
That's exactly what you could do.
And, you know, believe it or not, after an eight-year war during the 80s between the two countries and the bitter enemies that they are and so forth, yes, you could put together an alliance, and that's what Russia is doing.
Now, Russia is setting the stage for an eventual move into the Middle East and occupation of the Persian Gulf oil fields by the latter part of the 1990s.
Once again, back away and look at the whole chessboard.
The whole chessboard includes now.
They're neutralizing Western Europe through this whole glass mass parastroika gambit, through moving U.S. out of NATO.
Germany is becoming neutral.
She's the anchor of NATO.
The Western flank is being neutralized.
Russia is neutralizing her Eastern flank with a non-aggression pact, long since negotiated, with Red China.
Russia is now in alliance with Red China.
Everyone said, way back in the Kissinger days, we'll play the China card.
You know, our enemy is our friend, and therefore we'll get in bed with China and get between China and Russia.
It didn't work out quite that way.
And indeed, Russia and China are in bed, and Russia is selling massive amount of arms to China right now, who will also be a major communist threat to us over the next few years.
But in essence, or in summary, they have neutralized their eastern and western flanks, and that will leave them.
Now, understand, America will be largely disarmed.
We are being disarmed.
The Clintonistas are rapidly dismantling our military that didn't start under the Clintonistas.
It started under George Bush and maybe even in the latter part of the Reagan administration.
We need to understand there's not as much difference between a George Bush and a Bill Clinton as people would suppose.
They both were socialists.
They both were liberals.
They both were members of the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome.
They're both globalists.
They, like Gorbachev and Yeltsin and whoever follows, take orders from people that are far above them.
And so this thing really began to accelerate under George Bush, who believed, of course, in his New World Order, which he talked about hundreds of times.
Clinton is simply continuing it.
But Clinton is a radical socialist, and everyone has sold Bill Clinton short.
Well, everybody looks at Whitewater and the Vince Foster murder, and I believe it was a murder, and all the shenanigans and all the things.
And they always count Bill Clinton out, and Bill Clinton is down for the count, and then miraculously Clinton comes jumping back up and scores another victory.
They've been telling us he was down and out ever since the primaries in 1992.
This guy is a real rebounder.
But in answer to your question, it's accelerating dramatically under Bill Clinton.
They are rapidly dismantling our defense industry.
They are closing down our production lines all over the country.
We are closing down our military bases.
We are closing down bases all over the world.
And so we are rapidly downsizing the U.S. military.
And that's part of it.
The downsizing the military, the closing of our defense industry, but then even equally ominous, we are moving what's going to be left of the military under the command of the United Nations.
Once again, here I am, and I want to tell you, everybody, back to Don McElvaney in just a moment, but I want to mention to you, I have a news I'm going to break on the O.J. Simpson case.
I got a letter from a Los Angeles Police Department detective working on the O.J. Simpson case, and he has leaked to me, and I'm going to read you that letter.
Yeah, just imagine if we suddenly were faced with a major buildup in Korea, which is a very real possibility still.
And just imagine if we got sucked in a major way into either the Middle East or Bosnia or whatever, we would be strained very thin indeed.
Our military is far smaller today than it was when we assembled Operation Desert Storm just about three years ago.
So they rapidly are disarming.
I think it's interesting to note little wars like Desert Storm, like Panama, like Grenada, and now certainly Haiti.
Why in the world would America want to go into Haiti?
I mean, what in the world are we doing?
Is there a more incredibly stupid thing in the world than us going in?
We're trying to put Aristide back in.
He is a dictator.
He's a Marxist-Leninist.
He was a great supporter of Che Guevara.
He is a supporter of Fidel Castro.
Why would we send our troops in to overthrow one military dictatorship to put in a communist dictatorship into that country?
What in the world are we trying to do?
When you read George Orwell's 1984, which is certainly being imposed on America today, a very comparable type situation, the Big Brother constantly had to have his little regional wars that he would send the people out and he would entertain the people with and keep them busy.
It was kind of like having a Super Bowl game three times a year.
Well, isn't a measure, Don, of anything we do like this, where is our national security interest?
They had the weakest case I ever heard when they were strangling Haiti economically, producing refugees, and it was weakly suggested that our national security interest was to stop the refugees.
Now we're going to go in anyway, and we don't even have the refugee problem anymore.
And I think, you know, it's partly to occupy the military.
You've got to give the military, what's left of the military, an excuse to exist.
It's partly to show the strength of the New World Order because before it's all over, this will be a United Nations operation.
And you've got to have these little periodic United Nations wars to build up the credibility of the UN and its so-called New World Army.
I think there are probably some hidden things that we don't see.
But the point is, do our listeners, do I want to have our sons and daughters give their blood and spill their blood on the shores of Haiti to install a Marxist dictatorship in a country that we have no business, we have no national security interests there.
It is a downtrodden, probably the poorest country in the world with AIDS and everything else.
If I were Sadrus and I looked at Clinton and I looked at what Clinton's done so far and I looked at Somalia and how he behaved when he got hurt in Somalia, I would dispense a bunch of people with automatic weapons throughout Port-au-Prince and up into the hills and I would start a war of attrition and terrorism against USGIs once they hit the island.
And I think it's going to be like Somalia where we find out there's a lot more resistance than we think and they're going to start drawing our blood.
And then eventually we'll move the United Nations in to try to operate the island and the country and so forth.
It's bizarre, but you can't separate these things from the whole concept of the New World Order.
An awful lot of things that you see them doing that don't seem to make sense make sense if you put them within the context of the New World Order, the buildup of the United Nations, the move of the U.S. military into the United Nations, and this whole strategy for world government over the next five, six, seven years that the establishment folks in America and Europe and elsewhere are pushing.
A lot of things that we look at and say, this just makes absolutely no sense.
I think what you have said is essentially true from about 1945 until maybe three or four years ago.
The genesis of the UN was it was basically put together by leftist globalists.
Alger Hiss was our representative.
He turned out to be a Soviet spy.
He was the Undersecretary of State.
So was Harry Dexter White, Undersecretary of Treasury.
They put together this thing out in 1945 in San Francisco.
Hiss was the Undersecretary General for the Formation Committee.
He sets up 66 agencies, staffs and with 500 of his own hand-picked people.
We find out a few years later he's been a Soviet spy the entire time.
The United Nations was geared to be a vehicle for world government.
They set up an agreement, a side agreement, that every commander of every military operation, the UN, would always be a Russian general officer.
And that's why the CHICOMs and North Koreans always knew what MacArthur was going to do in Korea before our troops did because it was being fed back through Russia.
And so this thing has stirred the pot, and it's been kind of a Trojan horse, but as you say, a very ineffectual Trojan horse on the East River.
I mean, you and I are in 100% agreement on that, except for one thing.
It's now changing.
We called it the Frankenstein monster, and it's about seven and a half foot tall, and it's green, and some people would call it ugly, but you and I look at it, and we have this pride of ownership and authorship and so forth.
But, you know, it just doesn't want to get up, and we keep plugging it in, and we just don't give it enough juice.
But we go back to the drawing boards and so forth, and one day we finally get it right, and we plug it in, and all of a sudden we energize this big, ugly green monster, and he gets up, and he steps on our foot and walks out the door.
Now, this is kind of the United Nations.
In the last three or four or five years, something has been changing, and as they have accelerated this move towards the New World Order, they are energizing the United Nations.
And the United Nations is not going to be, in fact, I think right now, is being injected with money, with prestige, et cetera, et cetera, that is not known before.
I agree with you up until about the last couple of years.
What I'm saying is there's a change that's taking place in the UN right now, and that the globalists who believe that the UN and it's what they call the New World Army, which is the United Nations Army, U.S. troops are being moved into it, Russian troops will be a part of it, etc., etc.
They're doing some new things right now, which is moving the UN back to center stage.
I talk about this in my newest newsletter, by the way, which maybe sometime we could tell people how to get a copy of.
It's called America at the Crossroads, Freedom or Slavery.
Okay, well, for one thing, I write the newsletter, the Mackelvania Intelligence Advisor monthly.
It covers monetary, economic, geopolitical developments, and it's written from a traditionalist, conservative, constitutionalist frame of reference, and it's pretty hardcore.
The newest newsletter is 28 pages, so I think I probably also have some kind of record for every month.
I probably write the longest newsletter in the country.
The new one, America at the Crossroads, Freedom or Slavery, It talks a lot about the re-energizing of the New World Order, the United Nations, moving U.S. military under the U.N. command, U.N. world population control, and what they're doing in that area, how the U.N. troops are now beginning to show up around the United States, their combat vehicles and so forth around the United States.
It's got a long section on the new national ID card and what they're doing to install that, and that could be a fait accompli within 12 to 18 months.
And then it goes into the crime control bill, the EEOC guidelines, which says you can't mention God in the workplace, the United Nations Convention on the Child.
If you don't like to think and you're not into the things we're talking about tonight, don't call.
But if these things are of any interest to you, then I would encourage you.
We'll give you a free newsletter.
Call us at 1-800-525-9556.
You might get through tonight.
I think there's some people at the phone.
You will definitely get through in the morning.
If you would like to subscribe to our newsletter, we'll give you a six-month subscription for the price of three if you see it called Infromarchs program.
You just want to get a free copy of the newsletter.
Yeah, I would say an awful lot of them are survivalist type people.
A guy named Ed McCabe will be speaking on AIDS and ozone therapy and alternate medicine.
Nancy Lord is an attorney who's just won some really good cases against the FDA.
Larry Pratt, who is, in my opinion, one of the great American heroes.
He's the head of Gun Owners of America, who almost single-handedly stopped the crime control bill while the NRA laid down, rolled over, played dead, and didn't even have any kind of grassroots lobbying.
But Gun Owners of America, with 125,000 members, launched hundreds of thousands of phone calls, faxes, and so forth against the House and Senate, stopped it in the House, and then they came back and still defeated us.
Anyway, Larry Pratt, the pit bulldog of the pro-gun movement, will be a speaker.
Jack McLamb, a highly decorated police officer from Arizona, will be one of the speakers.
Jack has a newsletter called A is a Bet, and Jack is trying to wake up police officers all over the country as to how they are being pulled in under the New World Order and under Clinton's National Police Force and are to be used by the federal government.
So he'll be speaking.
I'll be speaking about A to Z. I'll be speaking about the coming depression, what you do to get out of harm's way that way, the New World Order, the Russians, and so forth.
So there's a bunch of good speakers.
They're really good meetings, but they're for constitutionalist, traditionalist, patriotic type people who are thinkers, who are really concerned about the country.
Newt Gingrich, Bob Dole, failure of leadership there, six defectors from the Republican Party.
Other people, Don, in arguing, in framing the argument against the crime bill, I think almost themselves have committed a crime.
Instead of framing it as a Second Amendment issue, instead of framing it as a challenge to one of our basic rights in the Bill of Rights, they framed it, Rush Limbaugh did the same thing, as a question of pork.
You know, too much pork.
Everybody was afraid to even open their mouth.
Gingrich in interviews wouldn't even open his mouth about the assault rifle ban.
Adole didn't talk about it.
Limbaugh didn't talk about it.
Nobody talked about it.
They framed the issue as one of pork.
So when the thing went back for reconsideration and they cut out a few billion dollars of pork, all of a sudden the votes that were restrained because of that argument were suddenly released, and now we've got the damn crime bill.
They framed the issue the wrong way, in my opinion, Don.
And, you know, it's interesting to me that Rush Limbaugh, you mentioned Limbaugh, Limbaugh comes down on the wrong side of a lot of key issues, whether it's NAFTA, whether it's something like this.
And I wonder if it's because the establishment put the guy in business in the first place.
I probably shouldn't even say that.
But if you go back and look at the people that financed him and put him in business, Phil Donahue is not considered to be exactly a conservative, and he was his chief financial backer.
Anyway, that's another story.
Everybody missed the point, and they intentionally framed it that way.
Look, this is not a crime control bill.
This is a people control bill.
This is a bill to set up a police state.
This is a bill that, by the way, 95% of the people who voted for the bill never read it.
They did not read it.
And in fact, as Bill Richardson, the founder of Gun Owners of America and the very well-known conservative state senator down in California said, what makes you think they read the bills?
They don't read most of these bills.
95% of the people who vote for the health care bill will not have read it.
And that was true of the crime bill.
And indeed, I think one of the reasons that Clinton hasn't signed it yet is because they're adding lots of new stuff to it.
And even after they pass a bill, they could add new stuff to it.
If you haven't read it, you don't know what they throw in.
And this is a bill that's a formula for a police state.
This is what I have been writing in my newsletter for over the last couple of years now.
We are plunging towards a socialist police state in America.
And this bill is a quantum jump in that direction.
I believe, Arnt, that they wanted this bill more than they wanted health care.
And, of course, health care gives them a 19% quantum jump control over 19% of the U.S. economy.
And that's very important to them as far as socializing America.
But the Crime Control Bill, here's a few of the things it does.
It basically will make a major move to move local law enforcement under federal control.
Okay, very, very important.
It will make a major move towards setting up the National Police Force, which Bill Clinton and Al Gore promised in their campaign book and so forth on page 72.
I think it was called Up With People or something.
And they're putting together a national police force.
This will be a quantum jump in that direction.
37,000 new social workers will be put on the street.
If they find anything that they say you are helping to contribute to the delinquency of your child, maybe it's a homeschooling home and they don't like the fact that you're teaching something against the new world order of the UN.
As far as the gun control, yes, they banned 180 different firearms.
It was not 19.
It was 180 different firearms ought to be banned.
And even though it sounds like at this point that they will grandfather in people who now own those particular semi-automatic weapons, you see, the gun control, the political left knows before they can establish the New World Order, before they can move us into a socialist police state, a la Nazi Germany, a la Russia, under Lenin, China under, under Mao, you know, Cuba under Castro, they've got to disarm the American people.
And so this is just a major, you know, Brady 1 was the first step.
Brady 2 is now being introduced by Kennedy as we speak.
I mean, it's in the hopper now.
And this was another major step.
Now, the problem is, whether they will grandfather in the people so it's legal to keep owning these 180 different semi-automatics.
Let me inject this thought.
The political left are smart.
They know how to hang scary labels on things to scare people.
When they wanted to get small pistols that people in the inner city used to defend themselves from marauders, they called them Saturday night specials.
We're all scared of Saturday night specials.
It was a total propaganda ploy.
Then they came along with semi-automatic weapons, and they called them assault weapons.
Anybody who's been in the military knows an assault weapon is a fully automatic M16 or fully automatic weapon.
I think whether there has actually been a piece of legislation introduced or not, I can tell you that the political left is planning to push that concept.
And the ATF, those are the good folks that shot up Waco, Texas.
They began it, and the FBI finished it.
The ATF would then have the right to come into your home with a warrantless search three times a year, and search your home to make sure that you, in fact, are maintaining your arsenal correctly.
Yeah, we're moving towards a major confrontation, Art.
There are a lot of people across the country that I think for good reason are getting very angry as they see the Constitution just torn up and thrown away.
As they see seizures and forfeitures last year, the government seized property and assets from 250,000 Americans.
That's $5,000 a week.
Over a billion dollars worth of houses, cars, businesses, real estate, bank accounts, you name it.
As they see the Randy Weaver, Waco, Donald Scott type things where the government just runs roughshod over people and if you raise a finger in objection, they can shoot you or burn you or gas you or whatever.
There's a lot of anger that is growing across the land.
I am sensing it as well.
Of course, the government knows it as well.
And I think this is why they are moving so rapidly to implement the crime control bill.
And I do believe that Bill Clinton hasn't signed it because he's adding a lot of other measures to it.
And those will go through when the final copy comes out.
They are moving rapidly the black helicopters that are seen all over the country now.
And I'm sure you've probably had programs and have talked about it.
You and I have got probably a lot of the same pictures.
The fact that Russian troops are now to be brought onto U.S. soil to be trained.
It's actually been going on for a couple of years, but they've now publicly acknowledged that they're doing the same.
UN troops being trained in this country.
I think we are moving towards some sort of a crisis.
In my new newsletter that we mentioned in the last hour, America at the Crossroads, Freedom or Slavery, we talk about the fact that what they can't get done through the Congress, and you can get some things through the Congress because I do believe it's the greatest group of idiots ever assembled under one roof in the history of the world.
And so you get a lot of stuff through these idiots.
By the way, the Republicans are no better than the Democrats.
Everything Clinton gets, he ultimately gets with the help of the Republicans.
But what he can't get through the Congress, they'll just do with executive orders.
And they may use executive orders to put the national ID card through.
But if you examine the executive orders that have been floated over the last few years, you realize that the dictatorship is there.
They have given ironclad control over every aspect of the economy with the stroke of a pen.
I believe that some excuse for a state of national emergency could be launched in the next, I don't know.
Maybe this fall, sometime in the next 3, 6, 9, 12 months, it could be rioting.
Let's just take an example.
The L.A. riots were classy.
L.A. riots were not spontaneous.
There were circulars circulated two weeks in advance before anybody knew whether Rodney King's, the police in the Rodney King case were going to be acquitted or found guilty.
They were already preparing for the riots.
Either way, they were going to have the riots.
I think those riots were a test case.
And I strongly suspect that the government and the establishment were very much involved in those to test martial law, see how the people would react when the federal troops were called in, etc., etc.
Now, imagine that they rioted that way when Rodney King, in this Rodney King case, what happens if in the O.J. Simpson case, for example, what happens if he's found guilty?
And I don't want to comment on the details of the case.
There's overkill, and you probably know more about that than I do.
But let's say that he's found guilty and given life in prison or the death penalty, and you've got people stirring the blacks in various neighborhoods across the country that this is just a racist thing.
The whites have got him.
And let me tell you something.
There's about 55%.
56% of the blacks believe that, according to some polls.
Well, it could be riots from the O.J. Simpson case.
It could be something that's stirred up.
It could be a financial crisis.
But some excuse is used to trigger a state of national emergency.
We go to martial law.
Suddenly you begin to realize why these black helicopters and these detention centers and these foreign troops and U.N. vehicles and Russian vehicles and so forth were here.
And we suddenly find ourselves with a state of national emergency.
Now, we all know 2,500 ATF agents can't disarm 75 million Americans with 200 million firearms.
Give me a break.
I mean, that'll never happen.
They can harass dealers.
They can go out and shoot men, women, and children in Waco or do Randy Weaver type operations, but they can't go out and disarm the American people en masse.
The National Guard, really, even though they've been training for house-to-house searches for firearms, they can't really do it because they can't be counted on to come against the American people.
Local law enforcement can't, although they're moving rapidly.
John, we've got a lot of people emotional about both those things.
And these idiots are messing with both.
And I think that they are, there is an anger going across the land.
There is an incipient resistance to this that is growing.
There are the militias that are popping up around the country, and the Constitution says they're constitutional.
A friend of mine who's got a talk show down in Florida says that there's 50,000 people in the militias in Florida.
I've not confirmed that number.
But the government knows that there is this growing resistance and anger to what they're trying to do.
And so people are waking up across the hinterland.
And let me tell you, there is some good news out there.
Let's talk about the good news for just a minute.
When Hitler installed his dictatorship, and Lenin in Russia and Mao in China, Castro in Cuba and so forth, they had a lot going for them.
But one of the things that they didn't have going against them was they didn't have radio talk shows like yours.
I have major problems with Russell involved, but some of what he says is good.
But, you know, there's hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of radio talk shows around the country.
They're reaching tens of millions of Americans every single day, and they're telling them what they don't want to know.
There are major holes that have been punched in their information monopoly, and it's really hurting them bad.
And that's why they pushed the fairness doctrine last year, and they'll keep trying to push it to try to put guys like you off the radio.
Okay, that's a problem they've got.
They've got newsletters out there, which are like the letters of correspondence before the American Revolution, and there's hundreds of those.
And then there's tens of thousands of little private newsletters that are free that people are sending around the country.
So whether it's a national newsletter like mine or private ones, those are punching major holes in their information monopoly.
Then they've got the fax machine.
And high-tech is certainly a weapon the establishment will use to enslave us, but it's a double-edged sword.
When they do some kind of mendacity, these guys don't function well except in the dark.
They do their dastardly deeds in the darkness, and suddenly they try to do something, and people with fax machines back in Washington fax it out, and it goes out to a few hundred, a few thousand, ten thousand, a hundred thousand, fifty thousand, and before you know it, and then there's like when they drop the nuclear bomb, and there's this gigantic rush of wind in one direction, and the wind goes back in the other direction.
And all of a sudden, you've got hundreds of thousands of faxes going back to Washington.
And so they cannot do what they've done in the darkness.
We've got this information now, and think about computers, which are even faster than faxes and so forth.
So the so-called people who believe, I don't like the word conservative anymore.
I suspect that there is a tremendous run on PVC pipe and shovels going on in this country.
I would bet you that there's a lot more of that going on than you would ever guess.
I think that there's a lot of steps that people are taking and should be taking towards greater self-sufficiency.
Like what?
Well, let me say this.
I changed my mind.
I'm not going to send them one newsletter.
If they call in the 800 number, I'm going to send them two.
So another one that's very important, very important, and I don't know if you've seen it all, but I did it in July.
It's called Escaping the Socialist Juggernaut in America towards greater self-sufficiency.
I go into a lot of details about urban self-sufficiency.
If you've got to live in the city, what you do, number one, if you can live in the country, if you could live in a small rural town, you're going to be much better off in the coming convulsions.
If you think about the Russian Revolution, the people who lived way out in the hinterland and the countryside were the ones who had a much better chance of surviving.
So I talked about country living versus urban self-sufficiency, and there's some things you can do if you live in the city.
Homeschooling.
They're trying to destroy our kids' minds in the public schools.
They're trying to mold them for the new world order.
And homeschoolers who are not as well organized as the gun people, okay, and this is why I have great disdain for the leadership of the National Rifle Association.
with their 3 million members the same kind of grassroots campaign to stop the gun control that the homeschoolers did last spring and that Larry Pratt did with Gun Owners of America, and could have totally killed off the gun control thing.
They didn't do that.
Last spring, the homeschoolers, who are totally disorganized, heard that as part of HR6, the government was trying to shut down homeschooling in all private Christian schools in America, and they really did try it.
And a million irate communiques, faxes, phone calls poured into Washington, and they backed up very quickly.
They're going to try the same thing to the UN Convention on the Child.
And I have a major section in this August newsletter that I said I would send out, one of the two newsletters I'll send for people who call, dealing with the UN Convention on the Child.
It's less likely to be confiscated, more likely to remain legally tradable when you liquidate it.
There's no reporting requirements.
And when gold goes up, those coins tend to go up faster because they're a little scarcer.
I think you want to have upwards to 30% of your assets in precious metals, and you ought to be acquiring them right now.
I think you ought to have a cottage business.
Find a second source of income.
I wrote about this in my September 93 newsletter, which dealt completely with self-sufficiency.
I listed about 10 different books on how to set up a cottage business, different kinds of home-based businesses you could get.
That's very important.
I think you ought to have a year's supply of survival food, dehydrated food tucked away, and my company offers that.
I couldn't find anybody else that wanted to sell it, and everybody thinks I'm crazy, so I said, fine, we'll help people to get that as well as the metals.
I think you want to develop alternate sources of information.
Programs like yours, newsletters like mine.
Look, there's a lot of good hard-money, conservative, patriotic newsletters out there.
You ought to take three or four or five, not just mine.
Okay, one of the areas of self-sufficiency that ties in with what you were saying about Bob Crane and the facts is communications self-sufficiency.
I think everyone ought to have some kind of a shortwave radio receiver.
If we have a state of national emergency, God forbid if we ever had a red dawn scenario, and I think it's not as far-fetched as some people think, you need to have a way of knowing what's going on in the world, and traditional communications could be shut down.
They could be shut down by the government or in other ways.
Bob Crane has a great company, C. Crane Company.
You gave their number.
And I have already gotten a number of things.
I wrote about him and a lot of the different shortwave type receivers he's got in my July newsletter, which I'm going to send out to the people who call in.
You need to get some World Band type receiver radios.
These are not expensive.
You can get them for a few hundred bucks.
I'm frankly going to get my ham radio license and get the ability to communicate two-way around the world, and I'm working on that one right now.
I'm sitting in a room right now with a studio on one side, my full ham set on the other side, and the third side is a 486 computer, printer, the whole ball of wax, and I'm up to my neck in all of this kind of communication.
We're going to need to be able to talk to them all over the world.
I need to be able to talk to people five miles away, but I need to be able to talk to you, you know, 1,500 miles away, or to people halfway around the world in South Africa or Germany or friends of mine in NATO and so forth.
And so you need to have the equipment and the know-how to do so.
So I think communication self-sufficiency, very, very important.
Well, I have a whole section in here on urban self-sufficiency and what you need to do as far as being armed in the city, how women should always carry number 10 peppermace, what you need to do when you're in parking lots.
You know, I list about 25 or 30 different things, if you can't leave, that you need to do.
And as a matter of fact, 28 to be exact.
There's a great book I suggest, The Urban Survival Handbook by John Lofty Weissman, who's a former chief survival trainer for the British SAS Special Air Service.
And I give a lot of different advice for people if they have to live in the city.
It's not the best, but I understand some people just can't move out.
They can't afford to move out.
They can't even afford to move out 40, 50 miles, 65 miles like you and I have done.
So I've got some, I think, some constructive ideas there.
Boy, I'll tell you what, if you live in the city, and this goes on to another area of self-sufficiency, firearm self-sufficiency is essential.
Look at those poor idiots out in Los Angeles.
Forgive me if you were not one of those idiots, but who were so ill-prepared during the Los Angeles riots.
And so every family ought to have a minimum of a rifle, a shotgun, and a pistol.
Every woman ought to have a can of number 10 peppermace that she carries with her all the time.
By the way, here's a little clue.
If you don't want to carry number 10 peppermace, everybody ought to have a big, gigantic, family-sized can of Dow oven cleaner and just leave it in your front seat.
You spray somebody in the eyes with that, they'll probably never see again.
My friends in New York City, I mean, it's like the ones that are street smart, it's like they've got radar that's going 360 degrees, and they're looking all the time.
Living in the country, my kids climb mountains, they go camping, they do backpacking, they're rock climbing, they do kayaking, they do fishing, they do all this kinds of stuff.
But your lifestyle is going to be different.
And I would say that most listeners who say, oh, I'm tied to a job, I'm right in the middle of a big city, I can't move, they ought to get my September 93 newsletter on self-sufficiency where we deal with cottage and home-based businesses.
Because of the computer, because of the fax machine, it is so easy to do businesses in remote areas, even if you're pulling business from around the country.
And high-tech is working on our side as well as the other guys' side as far as making us independent and being able to decentralize.
Unless we have a tremendous awakening, and it happens very quickly, I think between now and the end of the decade, we will lose our freedom.
You know, we all took it, we all thought, oh my gosh, maybe we're turning this thing when we won the first vote in the crime bill here about three weeks ago.
And then they turned around and they troused us over the next week or two.
You look at the makeup of the Congress, you look at the makeup of the administration, you look at how the left owns the levers.
See, the political left in this country is a minority.
They probably are no more than 5% of the country, and the elitists who are pushing the New World Order are a very, very small minority, way less than 1%.
And that's in the judiciary, that's in the media, that's in the entertainment industry, that's in the educational system, that's in the mainline church religious denominations.
By the way, on the score, back very quickly to guns.
There is, at some point, maybe not now, Don, but when confiscation begins, to be sure, there is going to be a direct Second Amendment challenge.
The NRA is going to be forced to do it, or gun owners of America.
Somebody's going to go up to the high court and say, look, this is not constitutional, and there's going to be a test, and there's going to be a verdict.
I think whereas we've had a few rulings for our side on a number of issues in the Supreme Court over the last five or ten years, I think that is going to diminish.
The political left control the levers of power in this country, but they only have about 5, 6, 7, 10 percent of the population at most.
Now, on the other side, we've got 5 or 10 percent of the population, and I hope it's closer to 10, but it might be 5, who knows?
Who are constitutionalists, who are traditionalists, who are patriotics.
Now, unfortunately, in the middle are the 80 to 90 percent of the sheeple, the sheep, the people who don't think the masses, every civilization which is in decline has the great majority who don't think.
And so the balance of power either goes between our five or 10 percent or their five or ten percent.
The difference is they control all the levers of power right now, and we don't.
We do not control power in the United States, our side.
But we have made major inroads in the communications area, in the homeschooling area.
As George Washington said, the event is in the hand of God.
I don't know how it's going to turn out, but I do believe that if more Americans don't wake up, we could very well lose all of our freedom and be serfs in the New World Order before the end of the day.
And okay, that 5 or 10% on our side, the traditionalists, the conservatives, the Christians, there have been a lot of people woken up as a result of Waco.
Yes, they covered it up, just like they're doing Whitewater and the Vince Foster murder and all of the stuff the Mendacity, the Clint Easters are doing.
But I think they've gone so far on some things, and because of our information network that we've now got in this country, Waco did wake up a lot of people.
And I think in that respect, those people may not have totally died in vain.
They were murdered.
It was something on the level of what the Nazis would do.
And I write, by the way, I've read a number of newsletters in recent months about the parallels between the United States and Nazi Germany today.
But the great number of sheep, the 80 to 90 percent in the middle, the dumb ones, the ones that get all their information from television and think they know everything and know nothing, those people didn't wake up.
But there's more people on our side beginning to wake up.
Because they can, with all the mendacity that the thinking people in your audience and hopefully they'll read my newsletter know, we know that they can cover that up, that if they control the levers of power in the press.
True, or if he becomes too much of an embarrassment, and they say, look, we've got to pull the plug on this guy.
And so if the establishment decides to get rid of him, and you'll know you'll see him being massively attacked in the New York Times and the establishment media.
I don't think they can take down the Constitution totally between now and 96, but you give them 96 to the year 2000, and I do believe they can take down the Constitution, and then we are in deep trouble.
These are some of the most precious hours that I can recall spending in radio.
My guest is Don McElvaney.
And what a story it's been.
If you have not heard the first two hours, all I can do is implore you to order a tape of these two hours.
And we'll tell you how as the morning wears on.
But whatever you do, you've really got to get this information and act on it.
All right, brace yourself.
Don McIlvaney's about to come back, and he's not pulling any punches this morning with regard to the advice he's giving out with regard to what he feels is coming.
And as I said, if you have missed the previous two hours, you've got to get hold of a tape.
Back now to Don McIlvaney.
And very quickly, Don, just a couple of questions.
We've got to get to the phones.
We've got to get to the phones.
But a couple of questions.
One involves Cuba.
I can't figure out what we're doing with Cuba.
I just heard the news.
Thousands of rafters are setting sail.
We're being inundated.
And for years and years and years, we begged Castro, pleaded with him, let your people go.
Let there be open immigration, all the other things that you want from a small communist dictatorship like that.
Now, Castro has let his people go.
And the first thing Bill Clinton does is shut it all down, tell them they can't come to America.
I understand it's a strain, but it's also kind of a weird reverse upside-down policy.
Remember, when I was growing up, my mom used to fix potatoes and stuff in a pressure cooker.
And the pressure cooker had this little thing on the top, and it would rattle, and the steam would come off, and so forth.
As pressure builds in Cuba, they will occasionally let people out.
And some of them are dissidents, and some of them are going to be the bad dregs of society and so forth.
But they let pressure off of the system periodically for doing that.
So I think that that's part of the motive behind Muriel number one, and I think you could call this the Muriel Boatlift No. 2.
But I think there may be more to it this time.
Part of the agenda of the establishment has been to normalize relations with Cuba.
Now, it doesn't look on the surface like that's the direction it's going, but has been to normalize relations with Cuba so that we could drop this long embargo and start giving aid to Cuba, et cetera, et cetera.
And I think that that is one of the goals of the political left.
And you've had people on our side have certainly, I think, pushed for just the opposite, pushed to do anything impossible to overthrow Castro, which we should have done 25 years ago.
I think that out of this whole thing could come negotiations between the Clinton State Department and the Castro government.
And that before it's all over, I think that this thing could go the opposite direction, and you could see a relaxing of tensions between Cuba and America and indeed an opening up of relations between the two.
That is one of their goals.
I know that that is one of the goals of the Clinton administration.
Well, isn't it a little strange that we're going to go to New York and negotiate with Castro one subject only, supposedly, and that is getting Castro to, in effect, clamp down and stop what's going on.
From the militia of Montana, it says, within the free zone, to all Washington citizens, research and seizure.
We have received information from National Guard members that there was a briefing during the week of 22 August 94 in which members of the Washington National Guard who are stationed in the western side of the state are to be deployed to a town on the eastern side of the state for the purpose of house-to-house search and seizure within two weeks of the briefing date.
The special emphasis was also made for the unit to create a conflict with civilian militias that are now being formed.
The unit also consists of 30 to 40 percent UN troops.
Again, this information came from within the unit.
If and when we find out the exact location, we will notify you.
Also, these types of reports cannot be confirmed until it happens, which, of course, we do not want.
Yeah, I see a lot of faxes like that, and I think that some end up being accurate and good information, and some don't.
We do live in a period of wars and rumors of wars, and it's very, you know, basically I make note of those things.
I file them, I watch them, and then I see if they can be confirmed from other sources.
And indeed, you'll know in a few weeks if this is true.
Let me tell you why it's not off the wall, though, whether this particular communique is accurate.
Conceptually, it's not off the wall.
We know that they went in for warrantless searches in the public housing projects in Chicago earlier this year, and this one then bragged about it on MTV, and said, We do a lot more of that.
You guys have got to be willing to give up some of your freedoms to bring about stability, et cetera, et cetera, ad nauseum.
Okay.
Now, what I also know, and I get this from people who are high up in the government, who are friends, and by the way, there are some real good, patriotic, solid citizens who are in most of these government agencies.
I mean, they're not all bad guys, and we've got, there's some good, and they're appalled, and I know some of these people at what they see our government doing.
In any case, a friend of mine who is very high up in the Treasury Department pointed out to me that for the last three or four months, there's been an operation going on over in Puerto Rico, a test case, if you will, where they have been going into all kinds of public housing projects all over and doing house-to-house searches for guns, no warrants, et cetera, et cetera.
U.S. police have been involved from the mainland have been involved in this, and you've had U.S. police officials and federal officials and National Guard officials going down and watching the operation.
And so kind of a training exercise, if you will, has been going on for some months in that part of the country, or not the country, but in that territory of Puerto Rico.
Friends of mine in the police, but who have good contacts with naval intelligence, told me earlier in the summer that they were expecting to have these kinds of sweeps for firearms down in the Tucson area.
I'm not aware that that's happened yet, but I think you're going to start to see this in a lot of parts of the country.
They're going to do some test runs at it.
They're already doing test runs, Puerto Rico, Chicago, et cetera.
And so I don't know if this communique is accurate, but I will say that this sort of thing is on the drawing boards.
Surely the National Guard has been practicing for house-to-house searches for firearms and drugs for several years.
Ultimately, the National Guard and local police won't be enough if they start doing this all over.
They will have to use the U.S. military.
I'm sure you're aware of the questionnaire that was circulated to the Marines at 29 Palms, California, in which they asked the Marines if they would consider attacking their own people.
The question, the exact question was that there were a whole series of questions in this questionnaire.
I said, one of them was, they asked, I would swear to the following code, I'm a United Nations fighting person.
A 30-day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to local authorities.
At the end of this period, a number of citizens groups refused to turn over their firearms, considering the following statement.
I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government.
Okay, now that was the last question on this long questionnaire, which basically was trying to get the feel of how our soldiers would react to being under U.N. command, United Nations command.
Now, they've tried to deny this, and oh, this was just a guy who was working on a master's degree passed this out.
Yeah, but on the other hand, Navy SEALs all over the country, Larry Pratt, head of Gunners of America, has talked with a number of Navy SEALs, not all together, in different situations, especially in SEAL Team 6, who have talked about being asked the same question.
So I think we know that Between the National Guard and various areas of the U.S. military, they are preparing to use them in the coming gun confiscation.
Obviously, 2,500 ATF agents and even 10,000 FBI agents can't confiscate 200 million firearms from 75 million Americans.
So the military, whether it's U.S., U.N., National Guard, or some combination of all the above, has to be used.
So that communique you just got, whether we can confirm it, whether you are, you'll know.
Okay, that's a real personal thing, and I do believe that one of the things that you need to have in the whole upcoming scenario is we all need to listen to God and get his guidance and direction.
And, you know, for most people, I think staying here in America and supporting our Constitution, our traditional way of life is going to be the way to go.
I do know people, I will tell you this, there have been more people who have left the United States and have left with their money, their families, their businesses in the last 18 months than in the last 25 years put together.
People understand what's coming.
Not everybody's asleep.
Not everybody just fell off the turnip truck.
And so you have tens, if not hundreds of thousands.
I think 250,000 Americans either moved their families or businesses or their assets out of the United States in the last 12 months.
And that was actually an article, Flight from America, that I think was in Money magazine here a month or two ago.
And I will stay and do everything in my power to defend the Constitution, to defend our traditional way of life, to continue to try to wake up people and so forth.
And I think that there's more millions of people are going to stay.
So I'm not in the business of recommending that people leave.
The same way with health, if everyone is supposed to be guaranteed health benefits or whatever, that's just like all the doctors and the health providers are slaves or whatever.
Well, Don, they've I don't, you know, there is the possibility that our wonderful way of life, our entrepreneur way of life, can, in effect, be legislated or decreed out of business.
When I was growing up, there was a song and a movie called Three Little Words, Say I Love You.
Well, there's four little words that describe the whole agenda of the Clintonistas and this move towards a socialist police state to control the people, to control the people.
They want to control every aspect of our lives.
If they can control us medically, big quantum jump to controlling us.
Abortion was started by the globalist establishment.
A friend of mine who used to be in the United Nations and has left and is now a Christian was asked by the Rockefellers to help to start up the world abortion movement 25 years ago.
It is the planned parenthood was completely financed by the establishment group.
They've killed off 37 million babies in the last 20 years, and they're doing this on a global basis.
Euthanasia is part of the UN globalist population control, and that's coming in like a flood, and that will be expedited by the Clinton East to Socialized Medicine program.
The AIDS and the plagues that are coming up, and a lot of them I think are coming from laboratories, also part of the population control.
They're going to be able to use, they're going to be able to national ID card, will be part of the new national health care socialized medicine program, controlling and rationaling medical care so that they can choose who lives and who dies.
And old folks are going to be written off.
They're going to be written off.
Euthanasia will come like a flood with this.
And hey, if you're 70, 75 years old and you're listening to this program, remember, this new health care program could sign your death warrant.
Controlling 19% of quantum leap to control 19% of the economy of the United States.
It's pure, unadulterated socialism and people control.
Look, Gulliver traveled through the land of the willopushi.
Remember Gulliver's travels and he lays down in the grass to take a sleep and he wakes up and these little bitty critters, you know, they've been busy.
They're about the size of a mouse or smaller and they've been whining threat around him.
And just, you know, what's a thread or two or three or five or ten or even a hundred for a giant.
But when he wakes up, he's like he's mummified.
He can't move.
He's like he's in a straitjacket.
And that's what they're doing to us.
86,000 pages of regulations were passed last year.
Tens of thousands of regulations.
They filled 86,000 pages of the Federal Register to implement 2,500 new laws that were passed by the Congress.
I'm talking in 93.
Similar amount in 92, probably larger amount this year in 94.
And these laws, rules, and regulations carry criminal as well as civil penalties.
Based on those regulations, the last 12 months, 250,000 Americans have had their assets seized.
And so what we're seeing is we're like Gulliver.
They're just totally wrapping us up and mummifying us.
and when it's all over, guess what?
We're slaves.
We're like the folks who lived in Nazi Germany or in Russia.
The same God, the God of love of money, who is trying to rule each of our individual lives is also trying to rule America in the process of destroying us both.
That is why Christ came to this earth as Savior of each of us individuals.
Having created us in his own image as free moral agents, he forces his morality or his salvation upon none of us.
His kingdom on earth is made up entirely of volunteers.
Salvation is for whosoever will.
If we follow Christ and his teachings, he will save us, and if enough of us follow him, he will also save America.
Art, I think this guy needs to get a grip on reality.
I think that maybe he's just a little paranoid.
While it's true the government seems to be trying to gain control of every aspect of our lives, I think the American people are just a little smarter than he gives them credit for.
I think the American people in general are dumber than I give them credit for, 80 to 90 percent in the middle.
There are some thinking people over on the conservative, traditionalist side, and unfortunately there are some very thinking, smart people who come up with all the wrong conclusions over on the liberal side.
I'm used to being called a gloom and doomer.
That's okay.
I think that that's a label that's hung on me and a lot of conservatives and traditionalists who are trying to be watchmen and wake people up.
I think it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what the government is doing in every aspect of our life.
I mean, we had 250,000 seizures in the last 12 months of people's assets by the government.
There have been private studies done by major newspapers that have said that 90, 95% of those people had not violated any major law.
They just had stumbled over some government regulation.
I mean, if we can't see the controls that are coming via environmentalism, cash reporting laws, the moving of the U.S. military under the United Nations and so forth, I think there's a tremendous amount of information that's building up and evidence is building up that people are just not joining the dots.
And I think your caller, who I'm sure is very sincere, is not joining all the dots to see where this thing is going.
Read the writings of the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the establishment folks, and see what they say their plans are to slam dunk us into the New World Order.
Then you decide, well, Michael, you may be crazy, but this is what these guys are saying themselves.
I would encourage your caller, the caller who said that, to Get my newsletter, America at the Crossroads, Freedom or Slavery.
I mentioned it earlier, at least in one of the earlier hours, how they could get a copy of that and also the other newsletter on moving towards greater self-sufficiency.
Okay, if people want to get a copy of this letter or that particular caller, call it.
It's free.
I'll send you 28 pages.
1-800-525-9556.
If you'd like to subscribe, you can get a six-month subscription of the price of three.
Or if you just want to get a free copy of that newsletter and the one on self-sufficiency, call us at 1-800-525-9556.
You look at what the United Nations is doing and saying right now, and I analyze it in detail on the newsletter.
You look at these questionnaires that are being given out by the government on moving U.S. troops under the U.N. You look at the gun control express.
You look at the DEEOC regulations that say you can't even mention God in the workplace.
You study the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which could be ratified within the next 60 days.
And then you try to tell me that these things were not piling up.
And I analyzed these in detail, so I would encourage that caller to look and see.
And hey, you want to call me a gloom and doomer?
Fine.
It's like when somebody's on a railroad track and the train is coming towards them to warn them that they're in grave danger, to warn them that they're about to get massacred and that they better jump off of the track.
Aliaga, the gray wolves, right-wing extremist, lone assassin, what are you talking about?
And I had written it was a Polar Bureau.
Order came down from the Polar Bureau to take out the Pope, and that the KGB pulled this thing off.
A year later, Claire Sterling wrote about it in the Reader's Digest, and from that point forward, it's been common knowledge that the KGB tried to take him out.
We had darn good intelligence information out of French intelligence as to exactly what had happened.
We have a lot of good wires in Washington.
We monitor about 500 publications a month, as well as having some really good intelligence contacts around the world.
I suppose you could say they got blown away, except it didn't seem like that there was any major damage to the glasses.
He was, the first person who found him, found him laying in one position.
They came along a few minutes later, and his hands and everything had been moved.
Vince Foster was very, very close to Hillary.
I mean, it's strongly rumored back in Arkansas that there had been a liaison between them that had gone back for some 10 years.
But more importantly, probably, he was very, very tied in with the whole Whitewater thing, the cover-up, and so forth.
Now, whether this guy was about to have a nervous breakdown, whether he was about to blow the whistle, whether he knew too much or whatever, we probably will never know.
You look at the cover-up.
The cover-up is like the Waco cover-up when they bring in an independent arsonist from Houston, but he turns out that he was also a consultant for the ATF for 10 years, and his wife is married to the head of the ATF office in Houston that planned the Waco massacre.
You say, well, maybe that was a cover-up.
Well, we have here a top government official is found dead, and you have the Washington Park Police investigated.
Very, very strange goings on.
There's a lot of evidence that they're trying to suppress.
That's why they brought in, that's frankly why they brought in the new prosecutor because the old one had completely covered it up.
Whether the truth will ever come out, who killed him, who knows?
The massive amount of, when they go into his office and they start all of this cutting up, shredding of the papers and evidence and so forth immediately thereafter, they've scrambled so hard to cover it up that it, remember, it was the Watergate cover-up that nailed Nixon.
It wasn't Watergate per se, which was a relatively minor infraction of the Watergate cover-up.
Well, there's been the same kind of scramble to cover up this whitewater thing.
And I think there is growing evidence that the man was murdered by who?
Why are they ignoring the testimony of this late witness who saw the body, saw the hands in a different position, saw a lot, and they seem to be just ignoring it?
They could end this presidency if they had chosen to do so, and even they don't want to do so.
They're going to ignore that witness as much as they can.
It may be that this thing gets away from them.
I don't know.
I have friends in Washington that believe that between Whitewater, the Spence Foster murder, and all the bimbo eruptions, et cetera, et cetera, that he can't survive.
They have done a tremendously good job of exposing Whitewater and the Vince Foster situation and so forth with a series of articles, not unlike what The Washington Post did maybe on the Watergate thing 15, 20 years ago.
There's a string of over 30 bodies now in Arkansas where people got too close and understood the drug connections, understood about the women, understood the white water, et cetera, et cetera.
And you know, the incredible thing is, we don't read the foreign press in this country, but if you read the London Daily Telegraph and a lot of other European papers, they understand they're writing stuff that our press is totally covering up and spiking on Whitewater, on Vince Foster, on the women, all the different things.
And you knew it when David Rockefeller came out in the New York Times with an editorial in August of 92 saying, and now get this, would you believe this, quote unquote, the only man we can trust in the election is Bill Clinton.
There's no real difference between the Republicans and the Democrats.
They're Socialist Party A. They're Socialist Party B. They compete with one another to see who can tax the most, spend the most, control us the most.
The Liberal Eastern establishment owns and controls both parties, and so they will probably select whoever is the Republican candidate to run against Gore or Clinton in 1996.
But first, I wanted to say that recently I've come in contact with a lot of information like the Vampire Killer 2000 and the Police Against New World Order.
And I've been making copies of that thing and trying to get out to as many people as I can and to several police officers I've given it to.
And it seems like a lot of them just seems that it's too terrible to be true, and they don't really want to accept the whole fact and are happy in their own little world.
Yeah, and I think there's probably some good stuff in there I would agree with, and there's some other things in his writings that I would disagree with.
He's got a newsletter called Aid and a Bet, and he is trying to wake up policemen around the country as to how the New World Order and the establishment are trying to take over local police and get them to help enforce the New World Order.
There's another good police organization called Cops for Christ that's run by a friend of mine, and they also understand a lot about what's going on.
You can get the numbers for either one of those by calling us at our 800 number, and we'll dig it out for you and tell you how you can get a hold of those publications.
Yeah, I was wondering if Don was aware of all the seafood processing ships and lumber processing ships off our coast.
No, that's interesting.
Tell me about it.
Well, we have a lot of them.
They're taking raw logs from the northwest and shipping them out to these ships, and they're making processing them into furniture and then bringing them back into the country.
They're taking our jobs.
Yeah, I wouldn't doubt it.
And the food, foreign food processing ships, North Korea, Japan.
You've got to think internationally and don't worry about U.S. jobs because you don't mind if you guys lose jobs up there, but you're helping to employ North Koreans or Taiwanese or Chinese or whatever.
I mean, after all, we're raising the standard of living for the entire world.
And the fact that you folks are losing jobs down in the Pacific Northwest, well, you don't have to worry about those things because basically overall, everybody is going to be better off on average.
Just as we kept poking Saddam Hussein in the eye with a sharp stick because we wanted a war in Operation Desert Storm, George Bush said it was a stepping stone of the New World Order.
So we have been poking the North Koreans in the eye with a sharp stick.
I agree that they have nuclear weapons, but they're only one of 23 countries that are developing nuclear weapons.
Why aren't we worried about the Chinese con if we're so worried about North Korean nuclear weapons, why aren't we worried about the nuclear weapons program in Red China, which is infinitely larger, which is 100 times larger than that in North Korea?
I do think it's important to understand that the Islamics are getting, the radical Islamics are getting nuclear weapons, and it could come from them.
I also think that you've got to watch Russia.
Russia's got 45,000 warheads on 12,000 to 15,000 missiles, and most of them are pointing at the United States.
I believe in the Red Dawn scenario.
It's a military scenario.
Go out and get the movie and see the movie because it's based on a Defense Department war scenario.
I think we have great danger from the Soviets, from a surprise nuclear attack over the next three to five, seven years.
I'm probably the last guy in the world that believes that besides a few people over in NATO that I know around the world in the intelligence community.
I think you've got to watch the Russians and the fact that they've got nuclear submarines all over the world with nukes pointing at America.
I think you've got to watch a lot of the radical Islamics.
And yes, you've got to watch China, which is arming to the teeth and will be able to hit us with IV.
They can probably already hit us with ICBMs, but that capacity is growing.
So I can see three or four areas that you've got to watch.
Watch China, watch North Korea, watch Iran and some of the radical Islamic states.