John Zajack, physicist and author of The Delicate Balance, debunks extraterrestrial claims about the Great Pyramid’s construction while highlighting its impossible precision—144,000 casing stones aligned to within five-thousandths of an inch, using a "sacred Israeli inch" matching Newton’s pi calculations. Its shafts encode biblical dates (2 BC, 33 AD) with geometric perfection, defying coincidence despite failed modern replications. Zajack links this to prophecy but stops short of proving divine origin, leaving its purpose—and whether human, alien, or something else—deliberately mysterious. [Automatically generated summary]
Welcome to Dreamland, a program dedicated to an examination of areas in the human experience not easily nor neatly put in a box.
Things seen at the edge of vision, awakening a part of the mind as yet not mapped, and yet things every bit as real as the air we breathe but don't see.
This is Dreamland.
It absolutely is.
Good evening, everybody.
Sunday evening, another Dreamland.
I'm Mark Bell.
And we'll have the usual lineup in that Linda Howe is here this evening.
She'll be with us in a moment from Philadelphia, which she calls home.
And then a bit of a different tack this morning.
John Zajak, who is a physicist and author of The Delicate Balance, will be here, and he's got a bit of a different theory on the Great Pyramids.
So we'll talk with him right after Linda Howe.
At any rate, I think you'll find it a fascinating adventure into areas, as the goal boarding said, where things are not so neatly or easily put into a box.
And now all the way to Philadelphia and Linda Howe.
And, you know, a couple of weeks I talked with Dr. Eugene Shoemaker, who was one of the co-discoverers of those strings of comet pieces that have been bombarding Jupiter for the last week.
And he described the potential impact that some of those gigantic pieces would have made on our planet if they had hit here, essentially being a major catastrophe.
And today in the paper in Philadelphia, they did a large headline asking, could it happen here?
Basically following up the same idea that Dr. Shoemaker and I were talking about, what would happen in terms of an asteroid impact.
And they reported something very surprising that I think is important for us all to keep in mind and consistent with the Dreamland theme that many things don't fit in any of the neat boxes that we think about.
This is a quote.
In 1989, a half-mile-wide asteroid flew through Earth's orbit.
The Earth had been at that exact point only six hours earlier.
This was reported in a journal to the House of Representatives in Washington, D.C. The quote from this House of Representatives report continues, had that asteroid in 1989 struck the Earth, it would have caused a disaster unprecedented in human history, unquote.
To think that we passed within six hours of an asteroid that was the same size as fragment A that impacted on Jupiter and caused the first big bruise on that enormous planet, and that we came that close without any of us really realizing at the time, I think is a sobering fact.
And in addition to the fact that what has just happened on Jupiter could happen in our lifetime or maybe in the next thousand years to this Earth with yet unknown consequences, as the violence has subsided on Jupiter, it has raised even more mysteries now with scientists who have some really interesting questions to solve.
And among those are what is all the black stuff at the impact sites?
It might be sulfur, but no one knows for certain.
How long will these big dark bruises stay on Jupiter's face now?
And the answer is maybe months, and that they will be visible for amateur telescope watchers.
So anyone listening who still wants to see these dark spots on Jupiter's face, they are visible through amateur telescopes right now.
Linda, one thing that a lot of people are asking, I'm asking in my own mind with regard to the dark spots, Richard Hoagland, incidentally, thinks they're carbon.
But whatever they are, Jupiter has a very violent atmosphere, and it's surprising that in effect they have not been quickly erased.
And in fact, I'm going to play an excerpt from an interview here from Dr. Andrew Ingersoll, who is professor of planetary science at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.
He is going to be summarizing all of the 70 some Jupiter studies for a major scientific review in Bethesda, Maryland in October.
And he talked to me yesterday about several of the surprises they have so far, and they expect more to come, including the dark stuff, which he personally thinks is sulfur, and the issue of a carboniferous chondrite made-up sort of comet hitting Jupiter, is beginning to have a big question mark at the tail of it because they have yet to find any presence of oxygen or water.
And as this interview begins, Dr. Ingersoll is discussing that very fact, which currently is one of the biggest puzzles so far at the end of this impact, because it might not have been a comet at all.
It may have been a broken up asteroid.
This is Dr. Andrew Ingersoll, planetary scientist from Caltech.
unidentified
So I think the big thing we've learned is that there's not a lot of oxygen either drifted up from Jupiter or else brought in with the comet.
Uh because in this hydrogen-rich environment, the oxygen you expect uh to be tied up with hydrogen the flow of water.
Comets are made out of ices and Jupiter is about to have water clouds deep down and uh that kind of result is already pretty firm and I think uh over the next few weeks we're gonna firm it up some more and discover that people may discover traces of uh oxygen.
But uh I think the lack of oxygen is so pronounced that we that we can say we already know that.
It's already a big mystery.
Uh now if your question is how long will it take us to figure out the mystery?
Well isn't the implication of the mystery that the comet itself may not have been an icy snowball but it must be made of something else completely different?
unidentified
That's that's certainly part of it.
It it the comet uh really couldn't have been a what we normally think of as a comet.
It might have been a rocky asteroid in fact.
Um the latest results uh suggest that uh uh it might be just that.
There the latest results uh show that there's metals uh in the comet that are now seen in Jupiter's atmosphere.
Magnesium and silica.
And uh you can get metals if you vaporize a rock and uh break the uh molecules of uh silicon dioxide and so on up into their constituent pieces.
Um the one implication is that um the uh comet wasn't a comet at all, but a rocky object like an asteroid.
The other implication is that the comet didn't go deep enough uh to dredge up uh water from Jupiter's interior.
Meaning that it may have been uh vaporized uh on the surface.
Well, yeah, um if you can speak of its surface, but uh or the upper atmosphere.
The upper atmosphere from the tops of the clouds that we normally see to the uh zone where the water is is about a hundred kilometers.
And it's quite possible that the comet burned up before it got down that far.
So right now, the sum is they haven't been able to see the water and the oxygen that they had expected, especially if this was an icy comet that was breaking up in the upper atmosphere of Jupiter.
This is truly one of the biggest mysteries so far from this impact.
Yes, and I'm going to continue to talk with Dr. Shoemaker, Dr. Ingersoll, some of the others, because each scientist around the country, I have a list of about 75 or 80 of them.
They're taking different aspects of these, of all of this data.
And I think periodically I will try to bring some brief updates.
I thought tonight it was definitely worth going into this in depth.
And next week, when I'm your full-time guest, I plan to give you some fascinating updates on what's been happening in the crop circles who've been in Canada, the United States, and England.
New mutilation cases with some very interesting anomalies and reports.
And if I have anything more to report next week concerning scientific discoveries on the Jupiter impact, I will certainly, we can talk about that too.
Yes, there was one that I know of that has two parts to it, and it's the only formation I know.
It's in the same field.
And I have a drawing of it, and the size is about 150 feet in diameter, and it is actually resonant with both a formation that was in England two or three years ago and with the current new one that's up in Ontario, Canada, which I'm getting videotape and photographs and have a drawing from.
And we're also getting analysis on the wheat from the one in Ontario.
So by next weekend, I probably will be able to report some of the preliminary data on that.
I could understand why one would think so, because even with today's technology, we cannot duplicate the Great Pyramid, even if we didn't have financial restraints and political problems and so forth.
We could not reconstruct the Great Pyramid today.
Apparently, science is wise enough to understand why the Great Pyramid is unique, but not so wise to be able to copy it.
My claim to fame is the ability to have a very diverse and wide background in view to be able to show commonality between seemingly unrelated fields of science, very often creating a whole new field of science in the process.
Just a keen sense of observation and the recognition that things similar or related indeed happened in other disciplines.
That has led me to some reasonable successes as vice president of research and development for some leading corporations, vice president of research and development for some leading corporations, such as Cutler Hammer, Eaton Corporation, General Signal Corporation, Electrotech, and some others.
And with patents in many diverse areas, from chemistry to electronics, mechanics to biometrics, etc.
So it's a wide field, but the field is because the greatest technological advancements typically happen when the astronomer is talking to the metallurgist or to the anthropologist.
And when those seemingly unrelated scientists sit down and have dinner together and start realizing there's a common thread through their problems to put them together, then we come up with theories that can be later substantiated for the extinction of the dinosaurs, for instance.
Actually, the evidence is overwhelming that that's exactly what took place.
I was not just throwing some loose terms around.
It actually came about that a very leading scientist, Nobel laureate actually, from University of Berkeley, Alvarez, has a son.
And Alvarez is in many areas of physics, very diverse by himself, now passed away.
But he was having Thanksgiving dinner with his son, who was an anthropologist.
And as they sat there, his son was saying that in different parts of the world, particularly in Italy, that he could find some very high levels of deposits of iridium and other such materials, and that that happened about the time of the extinction of the dinosaurs.
And his father says, wow, but do you understand that that's not popular on Earth?
He says, yeah, I know it's kind of rare, but what I say is a half-inch thick layer in Italy.
He says, well, that's only really found in asteroids.
And what you should do is check on other continents and see if it coincides, and if the layer is there as well, if it also took place at the time of the Great Extinction.
Which, by the way, extinctions have happened many times in Earth's history.
And sure enough, it turns out that this layer is global.
And knowing the thickness of the layer, they could measure what they would anticipate the size of the impact to be.
In other words, the size of the mass coming in from space.
And it turns out to be somewhere in the order of about three plus miles in diameter, which fixes very nicely with lots of things.
They also could go backwards and check the frequency of great extinctions, which happens, oh, every 35 million years or so, which leads to a theory that there is a black, dark companion to the sun, about a thousand times out further than Jupiter,
perhaps, that makes an elliptical path, and once every tens of millions of years comes in close enough to cause a gravitational tug, if you will, through what we would call our expanded solar system.
And let me mention what that is.
I mean, we know there's nine planets, but the solar system is actually considerably bigger than that.
It's as far out as our Earth has influence.
And there's a whole lot of space junk left over from the beginning of our solar system.
There's something called the Oort belt, if you will.
It's a cloud that's sitting out very much further out than Jupiter.
It cannot be seen from Earth directly.
And it contains something in the order of 100 billion pieces of rock junk left over from the beginning of time with space junk in the size of 1 to 10 miles in diameter.
There are a number of people, John, who think that not only have there been cycles of extinction, but that man has been here before, created civilization, and become extinct.
Well, we mentioned we're talking about a delicate balance here, and there's one underlying theme that I keep trying to present to folks is that just because something didn't happen yesterday, last week, or last year, or maybe even for the last thousand years, there's no reason to assume it couldn't happen tomorrow morning or next week.
The fact that we have gone through a very, very mild period in our climate and a fairly stable period in geological effects and earthquakes and so forth, doesn't mean that we can automatically anticipate that trend to continue.
In fact, in many cases, we can look at history and say there's no reason for it to continue.
History has never been this consistent and this temperate for a long period.
And with relation to that, we were talking about the Oort belt and the fact that there are 100 billion, that's with the B, pieces of space junk sitting out there in a very delicate balance.
We'll use that term a few times through this discussion, I think.
Where these pieces are as far out at the very edge of our solar system as possible, held in place by the extremely weak forces of the pull of gravity of the rest of the galaxies and the pull of gravity of our sun.
That is, you know, being out there a thousand times out further than Pluto, you've got to know that those forces are extremely weak.
Therefore, small forces could indeed cause a disruption in that balance and cause some of that space junk to fall in towards the sun.
And of course, the Earth is in the path of some of that debris heading in towards the sun.
The evidence for such is rather amazing.
We tend to be comfortable about things and say, well, yeah, in the early solar system, there was lots of impacts caused upon the planet, evidenced by just looking at the moon.
The man, the moon, and all those craters are indeed obviously impacts.
But the moon would have been struck by meteors considerably less frequently than the Earth itself because of Earth's greater gravitational pull.
And it turns out that we have on Earth today that we can measure and observe 28 impacts still in existence, of course eroded and corroded and covered over by growth and so forth.
But 28 major impacts.
Major impact is between 1 and 100 miles in diameter.
Now, when we talk about the average piece of space junk that's between, you know, something between 1 and 10, we pick the arbitrary number 5 miles in diameter.
A 5 mile diameter piece of space junk with an average velocity of just under 50,000 miles per hour crashing into planet Earth would indeed cause a meteor impact about 100 miles in diameter.
It would throw up so much dust and debris that we would immediately go into a new ice age.
Certainly sunlight would be blocked out and if animals and humans didn't die immediately from the shock, from the quake, from the inhalation of dust, one would certainly think that food growing would be extraordinarily difficult, if not impossible, for some length of time, probably years, but would throw us immediately into an ice age.
I'm just curious, John, if you were to do projections, as they do with nuclear warfare, and this were to occur based on current technology, how many people, if anybody, would survive?
Maybe, you know, handfuls of people would survive.
Let me give you, for instance, for instance, in the American arsenal, we talk about having 10,000 nuclear weapons, thermonuclear weapons.
The Russians claim to have 9,000 or 10,000, but our resources suggest perhaps 40,000.
However, the average size of the American arsenal is about half a megaton.
It's roughly a little bit bigger than that, approaching one megaton for the Russians.
If we added what's known of the American and Russian arsenals together, and even added in all the stuff we think the Russians are hiding, we're talking in the vicinity of 50,000 weapons, less than one megaton apiece.
That would be to say that if World War III broke out and every single weapon got used, went off, we're talking in the terms of 50,000 megatons.
If something the size of a five-mile diameter struck the Earth, we wouldn't be talking about 50,000 megatons.
And as we've just seen, the gravitational pull of Jupiter broke apart the comet that smacked into it.
We might see fragmentational companion parts as well.
It has been two thoughts come to mind in this regard.
It has been pretty much shown by, now that we've seen this comet break up, that if we look at the moon and other places, that many of the impact craters are in straight lines, which pretty much says that it's multiple impact.
Well, you know, one blast would be enough to do it.
But we might not have the luxury of only having half the Earth destroyed.
Certainly when you throw debris up into the atmosphere, you cause enough of a global problem from a standpoint of falling dust and blocking out of the sun to cause very, very many problems.
Not only from inhalation of the dust itself, which is, of course, even during volcanic eruptions, what has killed many people, but because of the sudden change in temperature.
You know, here on planet Earth, it's kind of interesting.
People have looked at the Farmers Almanac for years and said, gee, isn't it singing?
They have a whole bunch of things which kind of tend to make sense to come true.
And one of them is that a severe winter always has an early snowfall.
But that's not coincidence.
That's absolute fact.
And the reason why is, is when the first snow falls, the white area reflects 97% of the sunlight coming in, guaranteeing the temperatures directly after snowfall to be cooler than they would have been if there wasn't a snowfall, causing additional precipitation in the form of snow, causing additional sunlight to be reflected, therefore causing the winter to be more severe.
In fact, scientists have recently put together the reasons why we have colder winters, or somewhere one of the reasons for having some colder winters.
And it's got to do with whether or not the first snowfall takes place on the northern or the southern slopes of the Tibetan mountains.
You say, now wait a minute, that's for sure the other side of the globe.
What's going on?
Well, what happens is that with the first snowfall, just as we've mentioned, additional sunlight's reflected, causing a colder region.
Hot and cold cause high and low pressure areas.
And as the jet stream smacks into the Tibetan mountains, it needs to make a choice whether to go over the, you know, go up or around the north or down around the south.
However, when it moves around the Tibetan mountains, it sets up a pattern which tends, I used the word tends here carefully, which tends to encourage either northern or southern movement of the jet stream around the rest of the hemisphere.
Therefore, the first snowfall in Tibet can very much affect what we see in terms of our winter because our weather patterns are very much controlled by the jet stream.
In fact, when we look at the weather patterns we've had lately with droughts and so forth, we see that it's really because the jet streams are not where we typically want to find them.
Our droughts in California have been caused because the jet stream has been about 400 miles too far north.
It's been raining buckets up in Washington, Oregon.
But California has been having Mexican weather and has been very, very dry, causing the six-year drought and mandatory water rationing, cutback of agriculture and so forth in California.
The most productive area in the country, by the way, is for produce.
We produce more produce is produced in California.
And by produce, we're talking about fruits and vegetables, not particularly wheat, than any place else in the country.
But many of the orchards have been forced to literally have their trees die for lack of water and so forth because of our long drought.
We've also seen this in the southeast, where again, jet streams being too far north change the weather pattern significantly enough to cause thousands of chickens to die from the heat and as well as extreme failure in corn crops and so forth.
So our weather pattern is a very delicate system set up upon the difference in temperature between the poles and the equator.
With the rotation of the Earth, that difference of temperature which drives the heat engine sets up the jet stream, sets up our weather pattern.
And without that delicate balance being there, we don't recognize what we end up with.
And even small shifts has caused large changes.
Now, talking about this meteor impact thing, if I may, which, by the way, is discussed in great detail in the book, The Delicate Balance.
It is also, though, something that I've been talking about since this comet going into Jupiter has been recognized in all the science journals, which is about a year and a half ago.
It's kind of amazing that it didn't reach the public until now, as many of us have been giving lectures on it before this.
But what is exciting and interesting to me is how real this is.
In the beginning of your program, it was mentioned that the probability of any individual on Earth being killed by some catastrophic event or by even some natural causes such as snake bite and bear attack, earthquake, I think she mentioned earthquake, but certainly hurricane and lightning and so forth, was equal to a trip on an airplane.
It actually turns out that although air travel is the safest means of travel, it is more likely that anyone will be killed by an impact of a foreign visitor from deep space, namely an asteroid or a comet, than they will be by flying because most people, the average person, takes more than one trip in his lifetime.
That is very, very significant.
Now, she also mentioned that we had this major comet or asteroid fly by the Earth, crossing Earth's path six hours apart from where the Earth would have been.
And that happened on March 31st, 1989.
And indeed, it was close, but it did miss us by something in the order of a half a million miles.
It was found only six days after it passed by because no one was looking for it.
It also turns out that in 1989, we had two other closed encounters, and that's three in one year.
And each time it was because people would examine photographs of the night sky and see what was that, it wasn't there before, and then could make projections for its course and so forth.
But because they don't send out big long tails, we don't see them coming from a long distance, they're not being observed.
Well, three of them in one year was rather unsettling.
Whenever we mentioned that there was this delicate balance holding things in the Earth belt out there, and one of the things that happened significant, or maybe insignificant, I can't say, because science has never figured out what gravity is.
Oh, we've got names called the graviton, and we talk about gravity waves, but no one has a clue what it is.
We don't know how fast gravity travels.
We don't know what it will travel through.
We don't know if gravity waves can bend gravity waves.
We don't know anything about gravity except Sir Isaac Newton, who we'll talk about later.
I was sitting under an apple tree, so the story goes.
I got hit by the head by an apple.
I've maintained that if there were no apple trees, we wouldn't have the word gravity.
So, I mean, that's how in the dark we are about gravity.
However, if you would take any significance to the event that in 1986, all of the planets wind up in a perfectly straight line, an event which happens only once every hundred, I'm sorry, once every 286,000 years, you know that that's not a common event.
If gravity waves bend or are focused or add together, and we don't know that to be the case, could that have an effect or a tug on that Oort belt?
I don't know.
How long would it take for stuff falling out of the Oort belt to fall towards the inner planet?
I don't know.
How many pieces could fall at a time?
Well, if even one piece fell, probably hundreds, maybe thousands of pieces would fall.
There's no reason to think a piece would fall when there's a hundred billion of them out there in different positions, delicately balanced.
Here comes the kicker.
In 1989, yes, there were three, but in 1990, there were six.
That was exciting enough that the science departments of Yale and Harvard put together a team that came up with the first analysis that you were more likely to die if this trend does not go away, sent then Vice President Dan Quayle to Congress to ask for $125 million,
which was appropriated, to build a number of inexpensive, short-sighted telescopes to, quote-unquote, look for the killer asteroid.
Now, it was believed at the time that that study was started that there were 40 pieces of space junk, at least a half mile in diameter, that were known to cross the Earth's orbit.
And they were.
Except that in the first two years of study, they found 25,000 more.
So as we speak, and the number goes up every day, there are 25,000 pieces of space junk, half mile or larger in diameter, that cross the Earth's path.
Now, those may not be the most damaging ones because they are not coming from deep space.
They are remnant of different things, which we'll talk about later probably, but probably the asteroid belt or whatever that cross our path but have been fairly stable for obviously a long time.
The more concerning are those pieces that will fall out of the Oort belt that we don't have any clue about that may be of any size between 1 and 10 miles in diameter as just mentioned.
And that is much more concerning.
And in the scientist community, it is a real concern.
However, that does not stop science from thinking they have the possibility to do it.
There is a joint effort with the USSR at this time to build deep-space missiles carrying atomic warheads.
And although it's feasible, the realities of it are not.
And let me tell you why.
Number one is that there is no reason to believe that we will see the thing coming at us long enough advanced.
Now, with Schumacher, we saw this a year and a half in advance because it already made one closed pass by Jupiter.
And we saw that.
Jupiter's gravity then, you know, said, no, you can't keep going and pulled it back in.
And so we saw this happening.
And the only question for the last year and a half was picking the date.
Interestingly, science did not pick a set of dates so far apart.
They kept picking July 20th and 21st, which I thought was very conspicuous, coincided with the 25th landing of the first man on the moon.
But as you know, it came in here for almost just about a week, from last Saturday to either Thursday or Friday of this week.
So it was spread out further than we probably anticipated.
We couldn't tell for sure the size of each of the objects because of their distance and so forth.
But we were standing by ready and waiting because we had approximately a year and a half notice of the event because of its last close pass, which indeed caused it to break up into fragments.
The consideration here, though, is that if we saw three in 1989 and that we continue to see close encounters passing by us, in fact, the closest was 1993.
We had a piece of space junk approximately a mile in diameter, perhaps slightly less, come within half the space of the Earth to the moon.
I believe we're paying much more attention to the possibility.
I think that what has just happened at Jupiter is increasing public awareness and making the public more willing to fund projects that would allow us to see what's going on.
However, do remember this.
We didn't see the Jovian comet until it was close, making a close pass at the planet.
We only know now that it was going to take place because after we saw it go by and we had our eyes trained on it, if you will, we could project where it was going and what would happen a year and a half in advance.
Yes, this calls for a little bit of speculation, John.
Speculate for me.
If they determined that an object was coming, but that we could do nothing about it, in other words, explode things on it as we might, we couldn't change its path, would they tell us?
Not because Washington would make the decision, but rather because the scientific community and people looking for comets and asteroids, which by the way, almost all of them are found by amateurs.
All of the big telescopes have a very busy schedule, and they're all busy looking at new formations in the sky and distant galaxies and looking for planets around stars and so forth.
They're not looking close by, and they don't have time to just sit there looking for something they may not find.
And, you know, if it ever happened, if there was anybody around to serve up recriminations, they would be saying, well, then why didn't the London Observatory see it or something?
And there'd be people like you trying to explain they weren't looking for it.
However, that may not be the only cause for such things to occur.
So it's not the black body figuratively called Mimnus that would necessarily cause this.
But if anything's out there that far, barely held on to our sun's gravity, it too may have changed its path and so forth.
So we really don't know.
That's the whole mystery here, is that we have barely understood some of what's going on, understanding why it may fall out of balance.
If we had a real good handle on when things would fall out and then we'd be in deep straits, that would make things easier.
Right now we're just barely smart enough to understand that these conditions occur and they could fall out of balance quickly.
What we're talking about is whether or not mankind, with its infinite wisdom and technological abilities, would just simply send up our nukes and blast a thing out of the sky.
Well, it's kind of interesting that even just recently on CBS News, and I'm talking just three days ago, they were saying, yes, this is one of the few natural disasters that modern science can prevent.
Well, does that mean instead of hitting dead center in New York, we only hit Brooklyn with a 100-mile impact?
I mean, you see my point.
We'd have to be able to see it coming from great distances.
This thing's moving at close to 50,000 miles per hour.
Our fastest rockets travel at 18,000 miles per hour.
First of all, do we have the technology and radar to time things so perfectly that we can actually get this thing to explode 100 yards apart from this thing at speeds of 50 or 60 plus thousand miles per hour?
First of all, I don't know who built it, except to say humans probably supplied the horsepower.
Okay, that's item number one.
Item number two is that to understand what's really taking place here, more important than knowing who built it, who supplied the horsepower, is who supplied the design for it.
And the design is so phenomenal, so overwhelming, that I will make a prediction right here and right now that you have never gotten a response on your radio show as strong as the one you're going to get one hour after I start talking about the Great Pyramid.
It's happened everywhere we've ever gone because this is a very exciting and different approach.
I can't summarize it to you in fast terms because the Great Pyramid story has a beginning, a middle, and an end.
And you need to know why it's unique, then how science was able to establish its uniqueness, then what it did that nothing on Earth could do, and why, not only could science not build it, but science could not design it.
One of the tickers we're going to get to at the end of that comment is if every scientist in the world just on paper tried to design the Great Pyramid using all the supercomputers available in the world, for any other planet in the entire universe, it could not be done.
And we will do that, and it can find them, but it can't do it without going from beginning, middle, to end.
And if we have just a few minutes before the bottom of the hour, maybe we should close off on this connection thing with the asteroid.
And that is to say the following.
You know, one of the nice things about your program is it says, let's look at things, let's look at them intelligently, and let's look at all aspects.
But let's not put it in a box.
And that's really important.
And in the delicate balance, we again take this wide view and tie seemingly unrelated things together.
The economy, the ecology, scientific development, and so forth.
And one of the things that happens as we do this, as we look at meteor impacts, again, which is covered in detail in the book and so forth.
It's not something that just happened because of what's going on on Jupiter.
But as we're looking at those things, very often one says, gee, haven't I heard this someplace before?
And sometimes we have.
And here comes one of these things, going to sound really out in the left field.
But what we examine at the same time is prophecy.
And not prophecy from Gene Dickens, mind you, but rather from three.
I chose purposely to use only three from very different walks of life.
And those three are no less than George Washington, the founder of our Constitution in many respects, but certainly the father of our country.
Aguil Di Nascidanus, probably the most popular secular figure in terms of prophecy, a futurist, and a world-renowned physician who would have been famous on that court alone had he not also been able to foresee and foretell the future.
And just because why not, we look at John at Revelation as well, because as a good scientist, you can leave no rock unturned, and there are things there that seem rather significant.
Well, I only preface it as I do and give John third billing so someone wouldn't think that I am trying to be especially religious and or to prove the Bible.
Neither of those are the case.
But rather, to say, let's keep an open mind and let's make the examination.
And it's kind of interesting as we approach the close of the bottom here of the hour, so that we'll go on to the whole new subject of the Great Pyramid, is to say, if what we've just described is these three people being prophets, if they foretold their future, which was now our history, accurately, then maybe we should be paying attention to what they claim our future to be.
And indeed, Begeldian Academus speaks of, and he's misinterpreted very widely, but speaks of great devastation Happening on planet Earth because of climatic changes, great drought and pestilence, probably due to food shortage and so forth as well.
When the great comet makes its run, and that was from other quatrains shown to be in the latter part of the 20th century.
And so everyone says, ah, Halley's comet, Halley's comet.
Naturally, this is predicting worldwide drought and famine in 1986.
But that's not true, and it wasn't true for several reasons.
He was speaking of an unknown comet because it does things that Halley never could come close to doing, including drying up the lakes and rivers and so forth.
Not to say we don't have drought and famine presently, but not on the scale that Master Damas was talking about it being severe worldwide.
So Miguel de Napostris was talking about this great comet, when the great comet makes its run, that all of these universal effects of Earth start changing.
John in the book of Revelation also speaks of a time when a great mountain, a flaming mountain, is hurled onto the earth and that it destroys a great city.
It's called Babylon, but it's a representation of Babylon, a place of sin, if you will.
But where a great trade center is where he says that all the merchants at sea will wail and grind their teeth, saying, but what city could compare to this great city?
Which would cause, by the way, because of his impact, a worldwide earthquake that would leave, quote-unquote, no island left in the sea, no mountain left in its place.
It was connected to good weather and to a nicer lifestyle and to get away from some of the rudeness and toughness of New York area.
Because there may be no place on earth that's safe.
If we had time to talk about earthquakes later, we'd see that California may be the safest place in the entire country to withstand a major earthquake because there do, within the whole country, that California has earthquake standards and some provision set up and a mindset that will probably help to handle it.
And every mile underground, the telephone company has a 10-foot loop of wire to pick up, to allow for movement of ground and so forth without breaking down communications.
So the earthquake, the major earthquake we're looking for in California will not be a pleasant one, but any place else in the country would probably be considerably more devastating.
So the bottom line here is simply that prophecy is something which I keep threading through the things we're doing, and I think it's very significant because it shows that some of these things may not be out of left field, but been foretold for centuries.
And when we look at the Great Pyramid, we will find that the Great Pyramid is probably, and I say probably loosely, it's almost definitely the most incredible, prophetic message ever left on the planet.
Well, we'll have to discuss that, but, you know, again, it's not that I'm claiming it was not built by humans, but that's the horsepower.
The question is, who supplied the technology?
Who supplied the design?
Why was it so important to leave a prophetic message for the planet, which no one can really refute?
And it's very interesting how the message is left, but the message is not left in hieroglyphics.
It is not left in symbols or terms or words.
It is left in the universal language of numbers.
In fact, we know from computers that every computer on Earth speaks the same language, regardless of whether it's built by the Japanese or by the French or by the Americans.
And I'm just dumbfounded by that because the Great Pyramid is the oldest structure on Earth.
It is 4,614 years old.
And as I think of this, I ask him, well, you know, I can't understand Shakespeare, and he spoke, quote-unquote, English just 300-plus years ago, and I can't understand that very well.
If we want to put it on tape, what kind of tape should we put it on?
Should it be on VHS, super VHS, should it be Betamax?
Is it on quarter-inch tape, 3-8-inch tape, half-inch tape, 1-inch tape?
At what speed is the tape running?
Do you know that the average life expectancy of a piece of plastic tape, like seven years?
It is 50 years for a piece of metal tape.
How many lines to the inch are we talking about here?
Are we talking standard television broadcast, 330 lines?
Are we talking home broadcast, which is 220 lines?
And certainly it had to be left in stone, for that's the only thing that would last the period of time necessary to get the message to whom it was directed.
And also, probably what I'm not going to talk about, this discussion is not going to deal with things like sharpening razor blades and mummification of cats and finding your anniversary date and all that kind of silly stuff.
I'm going to look at some really basic fundamental parts of the Great Pyramid.
And what we should know about the Great Pyramid is it's the only remaining Great Seven Wonders of the World.
It is indeed the oldest structure on Earth and the largest structure on Earth.
Now there is one pyramid that some people will claim is older, but that pyramid was built in four stages.
The first stage was nothing more than a burial site, which does predate the pyramid.
But of any size, it nowhere comes close to the Great Pyramid in terms of its actual age.
Now, we mentioned that the Great Pyramid is the largest structure on Earth, and one would quickly point out that the Great Pyramid is 454 feet tall, and the Twin Towers alone, second tallest building on Earth, is 1,368 feet tall.
And you say, John, what are you talking about?
The biggest structure?
Well, let's just examine that for a moment.
The Twin Tower was built by 5,000 people.
It took them 11 years using modern equipment.
But if we realize that the Twin Tower's office building is indeed mostly space, okay, that is to say that there's roughly an acre of space per floor.
The pyramid, except for a couple of very tiny rooms, is solid stone.
So if we say, well, let's expand the 209-foot base of the twin tower to that of the pyramid being 761 feet, and of course in both directions.
And then if we had Godvilla come by and put his big foot on the puppy and squish it down to take the space out between the floors and the space out even in the floors itself, which is mostly girders and space again, then you'd find that next to the Great Pyramid, which is 454 feet tall, the twin towers would be four feet 10 inches high.
You could take all the masonry required to build a highway lane from San Francisco to New York, eight feet wide and six inches thick, and put it inside the Great Pyramid.
In fact, when we look at New York with all its tall skyscrapers, we're reminded that it's built on Manhattan Island because Manhattan is rock, and we needed a good base, if you will, to hold up the weight of those large structures.
But when you consider that even the Twin Towers is only four feet 10 inches tall next to the Great Pyramid, you gotta wonder what's under the Great Pyramid.
Well, the first coincidence, and I'm very willing to accept it as a coincidence, is that only a few places on Earth could hold the Great Pyramid.
And the Great Pyramid just happens to be built on a flat granite mountain, the height of which is the same height as the sand, so that the pyramid could be built on top of it at what we would call ground level, and that that would represent the foundation of the Great Pyramid.
An interesting coincidence while we're talking about the Great Pyramid and its height is that modern science using new techniques from satellites have been able to pretty accurately measure the heights of all the mountains and so forth.
And if we take the average land mass of Earth, and this is not insignificant to me, but if we take the average land height of the Earth, the Himalayas being high and Florida being low, we find that the average height of land on Earth is 554 feet tall.
Same height as the Great Pyramid.
Hmm.
But of course, coincidences do happen.
Here perhaps is one that's a bit harder to understand.
If we took a picture of the globe, when I say picture, I mean if we actually went to the globe, or took a split picture of the globe, one that does not distort land masses, and we decided to find the longest land parallel, that's to say, a line parallel to the equator,
that would go through the longest land line, we would find that that line would go through the southern tip of America, the northern tip of Africa and Asia, and right smack dab through the Great Pyramid.
Coincidentally, if we took the longest land meridian, we'd find it to go through Europe and Asia and Africa and Antarctica, and guess what?
Now, there's only one place on Earth that those lines can interconnect.
The majority of places that you'd think could be possible would end up being underwater.
But for some reason, way before Columbus sailed the ocean blue to prove that he knew where India was, which of course he was wrong, but long before anybody could have had a global map, the Great Pyramid ends up sitting right in the center of the longest land parallel and longest land meridian.
It also does so in such a fashion as to make all four quadrants exactly equal in mass.
Very peculiar.
How could anyone on planet Earth have distinguished this particular capability and just coincidentally, at the same time, be fortunate enough to find a solid granite mountain beneath it to hold its weight?
No, but it would certainly indicate that someone knew something about the Earth in detail that only modern science knows in terms of center of land mass, height of land mass, etc.
Sure.
At the same time, you know, we always hear about the Great Pyramid being a very precise instrument.
But you look at the thing, it looks like a pile of rock.
unidentified
I mean, it doesn't look so precise when you go up to it, does it?
These stones, these casing stones, were polished with a smoothness and a fineness equal or better to that of your reading glasses.
Think of polishing stones that well.
They were also held almost perfectly square with each other, and I'll tell you how they were, the precision of their placement in a moment.
But it actually created a mirror, a mirror that shone light down back upon the Earth itself, a pyramid of such brilliance that it could be seen from the mountains of Israel.
It's indeed the only structure that could be seen from the moon.
Now, I know astronauts have said the only thing they could see on Earth that they could recognize was the Great Wall of China.
But the Great Wall of China is like 30 feet wide.
Consider that with something hundreds of feet wide and square, also with a mirror surface, and you realize there's no comparison, except that on their flight path and cloud cover, what they saw is the Great Wall.
Well, indeed, that's true, but I think the Great Pyramid is probably still one of the few structures that can be seen from the map.
In any case, the stone under the casing stones were just filled stone.
Okay, and they were cut with the precision of the people of the time, with the tools of the people of the time.
And you might say, well, that's remarkable or it's nice, but it's not overwhelmingly spectacular.
Let me go further.
By the way, just so we don't lose track of those stones, when the Arabs found the means to topple these stones from the Great Pyramid, they ended up building many of the great mosques of the Middle East and several cities for Shahs and others.
Kind of interesting, and maybe we'll get to that later, but I doubt it.
But dealing with the stones that were stolen.
However, as they toppled these down, they would fracture and break some of them, and many of them along the way, 20 tons a piece.
But beneath the rubble, there were still some casing stones left.
And it's those casing stones, the very bottom row, that are pictured in the book and are shown.
And after 4,600 years, you can look at these and see their incredible flatness and straightness at 20 tons apiece.
In fact, without computer enhancement, you can't see the separation between the stones.
They have just five thousandths of an inch of space between them.
Five thousandths.
That's roughly about the thickness of a piece of tinfoil, I guess, between them.
But you're busily making a pretty good scientific presentation that we could not have done what you're saying we did.
Now, even though we may have had knowledge that, well, I'd be glad to pin you against the wall and try to get to the bottom of who you think it was who did it.
The U.S. Bureau of Standards will list the British inch as 25.399978 millimeters, and the American inch is equal to 25.400508 inches.
I'm sorry, millimeters.
It's not a lot, and it's accurate for the first three or four significant digits.
But, in fact, only to the third.
It's only accurate to the third.
In fact, it's only accurate for the first two digits.
The third digit's already off, but it's not off by a lot.
The point being is, is that even when you try to copy things precisely, as America did trying to copy the British inch, and we set up a standard for it, and the platinum bar held in temperature and humidity and so forth, there were slight errors to it.
And what I want to state is that what happened is that he who broke the code to the Great Pyramid, no less than the greatest scientist that ever lived, recognized that if he used an inch, but not the British inch and not the American inch, it was a slightly different inch, but almost as close to the British inch as the American inch is.
And that inch is the significance for breaking the code of the Great Pyramid.
And it's very important that we talk about that.
And it's also important to know that it's not John Zajak who came over with this code, and it's not Joe Schmidt Lab at 33rd and 3rd Avenue in Manhattan.
The greatest scientist that ever lived is, without real argument, Sir Isaac Newton.
At age 28, he was trying to prove his theory of gravity, but he had a problem.
Science couldn't accurately measure the size of the Earth for him to prove his theory of gravity.
And he needed to know more accurately the size, particularly because he was sure that there'd be a bulge about the equator due to the Earth's rotation.
And he had heard that all the history of the world, past, present, and future, was contained within the Great Pyramid.
And he went there to find the size of the Earth.
P.S., he did not find the size of the Earth.
It is there.
But he didn't have the means to make the measurements to find it.
However, he was so taken by what he found that he dedicated the bulk of the rest of his life to the study of Scripture, and indeed wrote a book about the interpretation of the prophecies in the Bible.
Published after his death, by the way.
In any case, what is it that Sir Isaac Newton found?
Well, if you and I took apart a Honda, I won't say a forward anymore because that might be more confusing, but if we took apart a Honda, we would notice something was pretty significant in terms of a universal commonality.
In other words, things turned out to be equal denominations if we picked a unit that we personally call the meter, or the millimeter, if you will, which is the division of the meter.
But if we said, hey, you know what, this is a, if we pick some unit, this becomes a 10 millimeter bolt and a 20 millimeter bolt, and this becomes a 50 millimeter wheel or 150 millimeter gear or whatever, but everything would work out if the millimeters.
Well, Sir Isaac Newton found that everything in the Great Pyramid broke out nicely in something called the sacred Jewish inch, which is just about as close to the British inch as the American inch is.
And when he did this, he started with some basic claims.
He started with the height of the pyramid and the periphery of the pyramid.
Well, either way, most people would say 10 out of 65 and a quarter, which would be 365.25.
I'd say that's pretty close, but not close enough.
Because, you see, it wasn't until George Washington's time that we even adopted the Gregorian calendar.
And the Gregorian calendar basically says, yep, you'll have a leap year every four years to make it come out, right, but not exactly.
So to make it come out exactly, we have a leap year every four years, except in years ending in double zero, except in years even divisible by 400, in which case we put it back in anyway.
Bottom line is, the exact length of the Earth year is 365.24 days, something that the average citizen is not quite aware of, something that we didn't adopt throughout the world until roughly George Washington's time, 200 years ago.
Yet 4,614 years ago, built into the Great Pyramid is this wonderful little thing called the exact length of the Earth day.
We've also heard that the Great Pyramid points perfectly to the north.
That is not true.
It is off by six minutes of arc.
Now, each degree knows 260 degrees in a circle.
You could break a circle down into 60 minutes, and it's off by six of those minutes.
Turns out that in the International Geophysical Year, modern science, in its infinite wisdom, decided to build a perfect monument to the Earth and decided to point it due north.
Oh, sorry, I said that the Great Pyramid was off by six minutes of arc.
That's not true.
It's off by three minutes of arc.
The best that science could do in building that monument was to make one six minutes of arc off, twice the error of the Great Pyramid.
But since the Great Pyramid was built, there has been a movement of the North Pole.
In moving that backwards, as best we possibly can, 4,600 years, we find that the Great Pyramid pointed to 0.001 minutes of arc when it was first built.
Well, what I'm going to tease you with is what's directly ahead.
So far, we've talked about whoever designed the Great Pyramid knew an awful lot about planet Earth and had technology greater than we presently possess today.
However, one could say, could that not have been built by a smart Martian?
Maybe perhaps.
But so far, all we've looked at is the evidence on the outside of the Great Pyramid.
Because as we come back, we're going to look at what takes place on the inside of the pyramid, which not only excludes humankind, but excludes those Martians and Venetians as well.
The outside shows that it understood planet Earth very well.
One item we did not get to mention May we didn't mention, but one significant item that we should keep track of is that the Great Pyramid has a slope on it, which is peculiar, but allows it not to cast a shadow at noon on the burrow equinox.
Something that will come up importantly later.
But when we get inside the pyramid, the whole message changes.
And what we'll do this now in Panavision for all your viewers, but basically the Great Pyramid is the only pyramid that didn't have hieroglyphics, did not have a burial chamber, does not have any treasure, does not have any body in it.
It basically has two shafts, a downward sloping path called a descending passage, an ascending passage which comes off of that going up at the same angle the other one is going down.
It breaks into something called the Grand Gallery where these passages that are only about three and a half feet tall suddenly jump up to 28 feet high.
Off of that grand gallery at the top is something called the King's Chamber.
And off the bottom is called the Queen's Chamber.
And the Queen's Chamber floor intersects the ascending passage and produces an angle.
And we'll get into that angle momentarily.
Now when Sir Isaac Newton went into this, very simple little stuff inside, the ascending, descending passage in the Grand Gallery, and the angle that we talked about.
When he got inside, though, he recognized that in the whole pyramid, there is only one set of scribe lines.
No hieroglyphics, no words.
In fact, the Greek pyramid was actually built 500 years before the invention of the spoked wheel and before the invention of higher hieroglyphics.
But the scribe lines coincide with what he called the year 2141 BC, a time that the original or earlier North Star shone down its very narrow passage.
The North Star does not yet shine down that passage.
If it's going to happen in the future, we probably won't get to talk about it.
In any case, from that point, he says, if I measure in what he called sacred Jewish inches, inches, and call each inch a year, something rather interesting happens.
If he goes forward from those scribe line up to the face of the Great Pyramid, he comes up to the year 2623 BC, the year that the Great Pyramid was completed.
If he goes down the passage, he comes to the point where the ascending and descending passage split.
And that happens in the year 1453 BC, which coincides with the exodus of the Israelis from Egypt.
As he continues going up the ascending passage, he comes to the year 33 AD, in which case this tiny little package explodes into this huge room with the 28-foot-high ceiling, coincidentally called the Grand Gallery or the Passage of Light Knowledge, on the year 33 AD.
Most interesting.
What he does then is looks closely at that triangle that we mentioned, the horizontal floor of the Queen's Chamber intersects the ascending passage right at the beginning of that chamber.
And again, if we consider this a triangle, the horizontal leg would be equal to the beginning of that great passage opening, if you will.
And that coincides not only with the year 33 AD, but the Greek pyramid, measured by laser and other techniques, is the most heavily measured structure on planet Earth, measured to the thousandths of an inch, comes out to not only a year, but they can actually pick the day.
And that comes up to the year 33 AD on April 3rd, coinciding with the crucifixion of one man of earth that we call Jesus Christ.
If we look further at that triangle, we will see that where the corner of the triangle comes together, it comes together on September 29th, 2 BC, Christ's birth.
You say, well, wait a minute, wait a minute, Christ was born in the year 1.
People think he was born in the year 0, but there was never a year 0, so it has to have been born the year 1.
But there's a two-year error in our calendar.
And in the past, we always used the same references going back, and we used the reigns of kings to determine how long ago things took place.
And one king in history ruled twice, second time under a different name, caused a two-year error in our calendar.
So indeed, we now know that Christ was probably born in the year 2 BC.
Some will argue 3 BC.
But basically, we know this error in our calendar.
It's about two years.
Two years places it into the BC 2.
So here we have this Christ triangle, as it's called.
The Christ triangle depicts three dates, depending upon which leg you measure.
Either Christ's birthday, his crucifixion, or the other leg comes up at October 14th, 29 AD, the date of his baptism.
Interestingly, if we take that Christ angle, keeping the angle very precise, and it is very precise, it's 26 degrees, 28 minutes, 9.63 seconds.
Trust me, nothing gets more accurate than those numbers.
You place that over an area on a map of the Middle East or where the Great Pyramid is, putting that triangle exactly as displayed here over the Great Pyramid itself, so that one of the corners of the Great Pyramid, we find that there is a horizontal line running parallel to the equator.
The other line goes right through Bethlehem.
And goes right through Bethlehem.
In fact, if standing on the Great Pyramid, one would see the sun rise, literally, on the longest day of the year, directly over Bethlehem.
So what we have is something that is mind-boggling.
What we have is a structure using science, modern science can understand but can't duplicate, that is putting together a prophetic message of the future, for it was built 4,614 years ago, talking about the greatest natural event or the greatest event to affect mankind on planet Earth, to be a person born in Bethlehem in the year 2 BC, the way our calendar counts.
For whoever built this could no longer be just a clever Martian understanding science, technology, and the Earth, but has to be someone who is able to either foresee the future thousands of years in advance or control the future so importantly far in advance that we can only call it supernatural.
If you combine that with the fact that this is obviously a message of a spiritual leader, you end up with an amazing paradox that it can't be a human and it really can't be quote-unquote intelligent life forms from another planet.
So, your conclusion, I think, is what my guess was, that somehow this information, this technology, was imparted by a supernatural force, which you probably would view to be from our Creator, John?
Now, if I ask you to design pi into that, you say, wait a minute, I can't do that unless it already happened because you can't change the periphery-height ratio if the periphery and the height are fixed.
Yet it comes out to pi.
Mutually exclusive.
All the greatest scientists in the world with an entire universe.
All right, if you can mathematically derive the biblical events that you talked about, can you derive any further prophecy or as yet unrevealed prophecy from the same numbers?
There is a date further up where the Grand Gallery ends.
And that's the year 1914, start of World War I, first global war.
Invention, if you will, of a culmination of modern technology from a medical standpoint, aviation standpoint.
Technology really started exploding in the beginning of the 20th century.
But no, after that, there are those who argue that the timeline changes to an inch prompt, et cetera, et cetera, making a closer cosmetic look at what's taking place, microscopic look.
I don't particularly follow it.
Most people making predictions of the future have kind of put the square peg in the route hole in my mind and usually been proven wrong if the date ever got to pass.
So no, I do not see directly what it's telling us about our future.
It is really, I think, showing some key points, but that the most significant point was that of the birth and crucifixion of a very significant figure in our history, which most would not argue was the most significant event to happen on planet Earth.
You could be Jewish or Muslim or whatever.
You have to be Christian to say, yeah.
Belief in Christianity probably affected more the world than anything else.
I didn't mention Edgar Casey only because I was not trying to look at all prophets, but rather three unique ones.
There may be some significance to things that Edgar Casey has done, some things looked important.
I could never put my finger on the precision of it and authenticity of most of it.
That's not to say it wasn't authentic, I just I could.
In terms of the upcoming alignment of the planets, we had the most significant one that I'm aware of in 1986 when they were all in a perfectly straight alignment.
Usually when we talk about alignments, we're talking within 70 degrees, either 90 or 20 or something.
But in 1986, they were perfectly in a straight line.
I don't expect anything more spectacular than happened in 86, and I'm not sure that anything happened in 86.
These things are very far apart and pretty small.
However, solar the force changes necessary oxidations out of the Orth Belt.
So if things were knocked out of the Orth Belt in 1986, the question is, how long does it take to fall in towards Pun before we see them?
And the answer is, I don't really know.
They may be moving at 48,000 miles per hour when they get close to the Earth, but they start out moving at, you know, 20 miles per hour.
Yeah, up here in the Listen, you know, your guest here revolves everything around Christ's birth.
He helps to acknowledge that a Buddha was born in 560 BC.
And Buddhism, the missionaries, the Buddhist missionaries, went over to Mesopotamia and the Tigris and the Euphrates, and they spread the seeds of the concept that there is a higher being.
Quick opinion do you have, John, on monuments of Mars, the structures on the moon, and what's your opinion of these mysteries surrounding the Bermuda Triangle?
First was, if we say that the Great Pyramid is the oldest structure on Earth, what about the Sphinx, which is at least twice over 10,000 years old?
And the answer to that is, yeah, it's way over 9,000 years old, in fact, because the Sphinx is made out of a natural up-upping of stone, sandstone, and was carved.
The Sphinx is carved, not built.
Therefore, it's as old as what it is, but it wasn't made by mankind either.
It's a natural formation that's carved.
And in regard to the Great Pyramid saying that the stones were not carved, but rather a cement that was molded, I've heard this argument because it grew up even more impressed, because not only was what we call cement not cemented by not left to it, but think of the tropos.
How would they have made the mold?
How would they?
How would you prevent shrinkage?
How would you prevent the warp adventures?
She pulled molded.
None of them, no two are alike.
Talk about precision.
More impressed if it could have been a cement that was molded and popped out of a mold, even more so than just the carving, which is spectacular by itself.
Listen, my knowledge of the subject is not real big, but I'm wondering if there's any closure to the pyramid of panning to the Ten Commandments or the possibility of the refining of the Ark of the Cuttle Pyramid that correlates.
The Ark Covenant dimensions are exactly easily divisible by the dimensions of the king's chamber.
In other words, because the multiple is the Ark of the Covenant Dimension is supplied by a continent.
Also, the only thing that I know of with regards to the tenements is that there are three granite looks that they could not carve through and had to carve around to get past the ascending passage, which is believed to have come from the same mouth because of the very unique red granite that the Ten Commandment tablets were carved in.
But you can't absolutely prove that, but it does test against minerals extremely well.
I thought that I seem to remember the story in National Geographic.
It was a story about the pyramid, and then there was a small section that reported the technology and how it was built.
But I wanted to also bring up something I've seen on the computer bulletin board.
It was a mathematical proof that Barney the dinosaur was actually Satan because by breaking down the letters and playing with numbers in a certain way, you came with the number 666.
So my complaint is that these mathematical games, when you only use the numbers to define what you want to come out, really don't mean anything.
That in essence, if you play long enough and look at events, you know, string them together, as you suggest is your specialty, or connecting events, you can set out and finally prove about anything.
If I wanted to find my birth date by finding the 77th tier two inches over from the top and some other stone two inches above some other place, I'm sure I could do that.
However, one must realize that if you want to contrive things, tell me how.
All we looked at is the height of the pyramid, its periphery, period.
There's nothing contrived about that.
When we got into the pyramid, all we measured was the length of the passages, period.
unidentified
And we used the same unit of measure from the outside to the inside.
I mean, when you talk about Barney and the number 666, well, 666 is D Humby.
Who said it was Ronald Reagan in his house address?
266 is not an exclusive number, and they tried it to get there.
The trick is going the other way.
If you look at something and only measure its height and its periphery and the passages, all in the same measurement, and all these things getting place, that's not being constructed.
Well, the first thing is that if they're graduate students trying hard to be published, you wonder what they're going to say.
But second of all, I can assure you that no one's ever solved the problems of the Great Pyramid.
They could build them and say, look, we built these stones and with plenty of people, we moved one ton of stone, we've had more people, we could pull more, and they could expect collisions.
However, the Japanese demonstrated that when you went up in scale, the things that supported this weight no longer worked.
Because a Japanese, funded by the Japanese government, attempted to build a scale model of the Great Pyramid.
I think it was like a one-quarter scale.
It lapsed under its own weight because things we didn't talk about.
The Great Pyramid has things like cornerstones that have special anchor mechanisms that we have only on modern bridges and so, like golden sockets and so forth, to allow it to last its time.
Other pyramids, even Egypt, poor copies of the pyramids have bulges on them because of its great weight.
They literally can stand.
The pyramid is unique, even to Egyptian pyramids, and there has never been anybody of any credible value ever making the claim that they could understand how it was done or if they could replicate it.
For everyone else's anation, that passage, I could look it up and quote it to you.
But basically, it says that an altar to the Lord will be built in center of Egypt at its border.
Which in the first place sounds like a prediction because I could be at the center and at the border, but there were always two Egypts, the Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt.
The different pharaohs wearing different colored hats.
And the borderline between Egypt goes right through the pyramid.
And of course, the Giza, the pyramid, the Greek pyramid is called the Pyramid of Giza, which also means the border, the border of the river, I suspect.
Actually, the word pyramid isn't even Egyptian.
It's Greek from the word Pyros and Midos, I guess, but basically means center of knowledge and wisdom.
On the toll-free line, you're on the air with John Zajak.
Hi, where are you calling from, please?
unidentified
Portland, Oregon.
Okay, go ahead.
Well, I had a question for your guest.
I wanted to know if he believed that Christ certainly would be the Son of God and Savior of the world and what his opinion on the Bible was and if his research at all affected his belief of it.
Though my book does not try to make case for it except to show similarity between science and theology, stating that they need not be diametrically opposed.
I do, in fact, Jesus Christ as the Son of God, and I think that there's a lot of things that can be proved scientifically within the Bible, though I am not trying to prove the Bible.
Rather, that when I do this scientific investigation as scientists, one says, but haven't I heard some of this before?
And just as the young colleague said, gee, does the Bible refer to the Great Pyramid?
Actually, what I was doing was research for myself.
I wanted to know if was the air safe to breathe?
Should I live in California?
Gonna fall off into the ocean?
Are the banks going to be there?
Is the financial system, you know, secure?
And I did this research as a research scientist for me.
Where do I start a family?
Where do I live?
Where do I place my investments?
What do I eat?
What do I breathe?
And as I did that, my colleagues would corner me for hours at a time wanting to know what I had found out.
It got to be so tiring that I did a video one day, quite by accident, while doing a commercial for Motorola, where they just said, John, tell the director what you told me about so-and-so.
And we did that, which later got shown in movies, inserted, or transcribed into the book.
Well, it could easily be another program, but they all foresaw the future.
George Washington and Miguel DeMastodamas saw World War III very vividly and clearly.
George Washington also saw the Revolutionary War and its outcome, the Civil War and its outcome, and the only other war besides those two which threatened America, which is World War III.
And in World War III, he talks about it being the whole world against the United States, where the cities are destroyed by fire before the invading army approaches the shore of America, which can only be what we now describe as atomic warfare.
Something that is unthinkable during George Washington's time and the technology which existed then.
Miguel de Massodamis saw pestilence, warfare, green plagues, the comic, actually, if you will, for our future and World War III.
He was very explicit about World War II, naming the countries involved, the leaders of those countries, how and when they would be taken over, the weapons to be used from submarines shooting torpedoes.
And in World War III, submarines, they could fire fish through the air.
We still call torpedoes fish to hit enemy cities.
And of course, John in the Book of Revelation speaks of a time of great and drought and pestilence, worldwide earthquake.
By the way, we have 6,000% more earthquakes today than we had just 40 years ago.
A great one about to happen momentarily in Japan that's going to devastate the whole Western banking system.
And of course, John in the Book of Revelation talks about the Battle of Armageddon.
And if that's not a good description of how World War III is culminated, then I don't know what is.
So they all had common health.
They all stated it in different words, but they overlap very, very clearly in their predictions for the future.
One of the interesting Bible verses your cast hasn't alluded to, at least what I've heard, is the one where a star called Wormwood apparently falls on all the fresh water, making all fresh water undouble and deadly.
And some prophecy-type creatures in the radio have equated that star to be some kind of mineral that is actually poisonous to the fresh water system.
And I'm curious, is your guest aware of any asteroid or comet that would potentially have some kind of a mineral or compound in it that could do that kind of damage to all fresh water?
No, but I'll tell you one thing real interesting about wormwood, and I guess it's written in Greek in the original, and Greek in wormwood comes out Chernobyl.
And so, why not come within it again?
Chernobyl is wormwood.
I can't think of a better way to do it through radiation, but I think it's mankind doing it to mankind that will accomplish that particular task.
I don't think that it is possible that there could be a combination of extraterrestrial or superior intelligence other than earthly and not necessarily the supreme being involved here.
Well, only if that extraterrestrial being had the desire to promote religion and at the same time had the ability to control events thousands of years in advance.
And then you'd be right.
Then my only question is: why is he promoting religion and why is he telling the whole world that these events will occur on these particular times, particularly the most significant one, is the birth and crucifixion of Jesus Christ?
unidentified
Well, my real question would be not regarding necessarily religion, but the truth.
I mean, that's not my religion, but religion can make beliefs, so many of them false.
Oh, but what I'm saying is that if this Martian, if you want, for want of a better term, not only understood the earth, but could also control future events on planet Earth with good precision, why is he doing it with such a religious figure?
Except to promote religion?
I'm not saying religion is competitive.
I'm not saying some religions are not equal to other religions.
I'm just saying, obviously, Jesus Christ is a religious figure.
Why I would message directed at a religious figure?
You know, neither do I. Do you believe that, you know, planet Earth is the only place that God created life?
No, and nothing that I said here to get, okay, well, if they did look life from other places, I mean, you say that we are not of this world, and he had sheep which were not of this flock, and I was interpreting that.
But all I'm saying is, even if he created life on other planets, or if life evolved anyway in other planets, my only concern here is that could some other life form, regardless of how technologically advanced, be able to predict and control the future so well?
And if so, why would it be centered around a spiritual figure?
Wild Godline, you're on the air with John Jay Jack.
unidentified
I. When we're talking about the asteroids and so forth, how big a piece would it take to hit the Earth with such force that it would sort of like pop it and let the hot stuff out from the inside?
I'm not sure how much the hot stuff would come out, but surely in sizes that we're talking about, somewhere between two and five miles in diameter, we would probably move the Earth off its course somewhat.
We would probably shake it off its axis.
We would probably create a wobble.
Aside from the earthquakes and the tidal waves, which would be over 300 feet high and circumvent the globe several times, by the way, 300-foot wave would probably climb 1,000-foot mountains without any difficulty.
Aside from all of that, you know, it would certainly cause eruptions worldwide and certainly a lot of hot stuff coming out from where the impact was.
But it would do other things too, like knock it off its axis, push it off its orbit slightly, create dust and debris.
It would be, well, at the very beginning of the program, we said something like, you know, a catastrophe.
Well, let me tell you, the world, recorded history, has not only never seen one like this, it can't possibly imagine all the ramification and destruction of what we call planet Earth and our society due to it.
Well, when people call, we can talk about it, but there are some audios on different aspects, including the Great Pyramid and some of these other subjects as well.