Al Bielek claims his birth records as Edward Cameron (1916) were erased by the Navy, linking him to Nikola Tesla’s 1930s Project Invisibility—funded by FDR and later classified under Project Rainbow—using 500 kW Tesla coils to manipulate time phases. In 1943, he alleges the USS Eldridge vanished into a hyperspace bubble, killing four sailors; later, Montauk’s 1983 crash involved time-displaced Dr. John von Neumann and sabotage by a "monstrous entity." Bielick insists functional time travel tech exists, tied to quantized time theory, with aliens observing experiments. Skeptics dismiss claims, but he cites verified sources like CIA agents and suppressed Tesla innovations—including particle beams and anti-gravity systems—to argue governments control reality-warping science for political and economic manipulation. [Automatically generated summary]
And the one I had to leave the house where I was because the owner was making major changes to the house, and there was no longer going to be a bedroom for me, so I had to leave.
This is going to take a lot of preparation, I guess, in the way of getting started.
But you were involved in the Philadelphia experiment, and I guess people need to find out at the start of the program here a little bit about Al Bielick, who you are, who you were then, and how you got involved in all that.
My birth certificate says I was born on the 31st of March 1927, which of course for many years I accepted as the gospel truth until various events occurred starting in 1986 and then culminating in 1988 with my recollection of the fact that I was involved with the Philadelphia experiment.
And simultaneously, my name was not Al Belick, but Edward Cameron.
And that's a long story as to how that was changed.
I was originally and actually born in the 4th of August 1916 as Edward Cameron, son of Alexander Duncan Cameron Sr. and his then living wife whom he later left.
And he was a Navy man himself at that time.
He had been in the Navy since we assume sometime around 1910 because all of those records have disappeared and have not been able to find any of them either when he went in the Navy or he left, though we do know when he left the Navy, which was December 31st, 1989.
He had a medical condition and he was given a medical outage and a pension.
In any case, the father was a Navy man for many years.
We don't know too much about what he did in the Navy other than we have one picture of him taken in 1917 showing him in his first-class petty officer's uniform.
And beyond that, we have no records of anything of what he did in the Navy.
He turns up again in 1941 in the Coast Guard, but as a volunteer officer with World War II.
And that's part of the story of the Philadelphia Experiment.
I was born in 1916.
I have a half-brother named Duncan Cameron.
He was born in 1917, May, as I remember.
And I might add, all of the records for both of us in that period have disappeared, very nicely exhumed and erased by various government services who are specially appointed for those tasks.
Totally, as Edward Cameron, and as the original Duncan Cameron, also, the whole history of that is gone.
I've gone to the lengths of going to try to trace birth certificates under my original name.
I got no response even from the state of New York after nine months.
And the only one who knows anything at all about the earlier family history is a historian, a family, actually a town historian in Bay Shore, Long Island, who I finally was able to track down.
This is well over a year ago.
And he knew a great deal about the early family history.
But no place in that record does anything show up about Duncan Cameron or Edward Cameron having been born in 1916 and 1917.
Yet there's a virtually complete history of father.
He knew that he had been involved in the Navy.
In fact, he knew he would get out on December 31st, 1929, and the reasons.
And there's a lot of pictures of father during that period doing racing sloops on the Long Island regattas all through the period of the 30s.
That came to me as rather a shock when in January of 1988, one Saturday night, I was watching television very late at night and on HBO, and I was about to retire at 4 a.m. in the morning when I came on and said, the next feature of the evening will be the Philadelphia Experiment.
Well, I missed when the movie went around.
It stayed on the circuit for about two weeks, which isn't very long, in August of 1984.
And I did not know of the video.
I had a great interest in the subject because for years I'd been researching the subject of the Philadelphia Experiment.
It had a great fascination for me.
Even helped research the subject with Ivan T. Sanderson when he was still alive.
And I had to stay up to see it.
So I did.
And within the first 15 minutes, it hit me like an atom bomb, and I realized I was involved in that in some way.
And it took a while for it to filter down past the box, the metal box, which were installed.
Had been years ago.
And that's part of the long story.
In any case, at that point, I knew I was involved with it, and it took some time for it to filter down as to which of the two principal characters I was.
The better-looking one turned out to be my brother, Duncan, because I had a role model for him, and he was really well played by Michael Perret, and it was a fairly good look-alike for my brother.
Myself, the person that played that part, was not well played in terms of being a physical look-alike.
But nonetheless, the part portrayal was accurate.
I had a pregnant girlfriend at that time, whom I later married.
Where it deviated from the actual facts was after we returned, actually did not return, we went to Montauk, Long Island.
Now, in the movie, they showed it as being out in Wendover, Utah, at the old Wendover Air Force Base, where they arrived.
And the helicopter blew up.
It was a helicopter, but it didn't blow up.
And the fence was destroyed, and we walked through it and wandered off through the rest of the story of the Philadelphia experiment as portrayed in the movie.
That part is not factual.
But the fact was that we arrived there, stayed inside the fence, and were grabbed by MPs immediately, not three days or four days, a week later.
In any case, that part awakened my dormant memories.
And after a lot of further memory searching and memories coming up and a lot of further research, I've been able to put together most of the story.
Most of it is from memory.
Some of it is from contact with other people who remember me from that period.
And that includes both one former naval officer who's still alive, one of the few that is still alive.
I was about to ask, Al, when you die, who's going to be left, if anybody, if it were to occur today, who would tell the story as you're able to tell it?
The only one who would know any part of the story today would be one retired naval officer living in New York City and my brother, Duncan, the younger brother, who remembers a good part of the story of having been resurrected under hypnosis.
And he is not one, however, to go around the circuit doing lecturing.
He prefers to be somewhat retiring and makes little effort not doing any lectures.
He is not reluctant to tell a story if somebody asks, but I and a person by the name of Preston Nichols are the only ones that ever asked him.
And how I came to know of his involvement with it was the fact that Preston Nichols knew him, and somebody, one time, and this was back in 1988, the subject matter came up at the Philadelphia Experiment, Act, it was 89, January, February.
Yes, this was on the phone without meeting me face to face, based on my voice only.
So that was rather phenomenal in itself.
And I've since met other people who were technically involved with the experiment in one phase or another, who remember the whole thing.
They knew I was there.
They knew many aspects of it in terms of the technical expertise required to produce the equipment for the experiment and what was theoretically behind it.
Two of the people involved, one was on staff at the Institute of Advanced Study and since died.
And the other one, fairly recently last May, was a naval officer who knew all about it, but he died in a nursing home.
All right, Al, I'm going to ask you to hold on for a second, and we're going to start the story from the beginning here in just a moment.
So stand by, Al Bilick.
We are speaking with Al Belick, who sounds as though he may be the last of those to tell the story of the Philadelphia experiment, a story you're about to hear.
Well, it's a very long story, and let's begin really at the beginning of this, technically.
The Philadelphia experiment didn't begin with that name.
It began as a research project entitled Project Invisibility and was a private research project undertaken initially by Nicola Tesla, Dr. John Hutchinson, who was then dean of the University of Chicago, and a staff physicist, Dr. Emil Kurtenauer.
and this was in the year 1931.
And the long history of Tesla, of course, is a very long story to tell in itself.
But briefly, he had been involved, of course, in many years of research himself, and his history is available from other sources.
He had this idea, and these three came together in Chicago, the idea, how do you make an object invisible?
There'd been a lot of popular press representation of that idea at that time, making objects invisible.
But for whatever reason, these three men came together with the paper study, in essence.
How can you do it?
Well, they didn't achieve much of anything at that time.
And in 1934, the project, even though it had been funded at the beginning with some naval research money from the Office of Naval Engineering, as it was then called, changed its name to the Office of Naval Research in 1946.
Now, in 1933, one of the things that happened, of course, was Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected 32nd President of the United States.
And he already knew Tesla from 1917 because in the period of World War I, when we became involved, he was Under Secretary of the Navy, that is Roosevelt.
And he invited Tesla to Washington and asked him if he would do some work for the Navy Department, for the government, to advance the progress of the war.
And Tesla readily agreed.
So the two were friends from that period of 1917.
Roosevelt becomes president in 1933, invites Tesla to Washington, and exchange memenes and basically asks him, would you like to be director of the project you were working on?
And he says, that's fine with me.
So Roosevelt named him director of the project.
In 1934, it was transferred out of Chicago to the Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, which was rather newly formed.
It had been brought together and became active in 1933 with four initial staff members.
Those four initial members were Albert Einstein, Dr. John Van Neumann, Dr. Alexander Vabelin, Dr. Alexander, and Dr. Roswell Vablin.
They were the four original staff members.
Many more came later.
In those days, the Institute was the premier think tank of the world, and they did a lot of very, very original research.
The project was transferred there in 1934, and they continued working on it and built some hardware with their first initial test in 1936.
And the mathematics that supported it were very involved.
It involved earlier work that had been done by many people.
I won't go into the whole history of it, but one of the principals that set up the math was a Dr. David Hubert from Germany, who was famous for his multiple space, multiple reality mathematics.
And Dr. John Van Neumann, who himself was a premier mathematician, in many respects, I think he was ahead of Einstein, because he could build hardware.
Einstein didn't know a transistor or a tube from a screwdriver.
He was an excellent theoretician, but he knew nothing of practical matters in terms of designing equipment.
Neumann was hands-on, which was a rare thing for a mathematician.
He had a Ph.D. in math from 1926 in Europe and came to the U.S. in 1930, taught at Princeton for three years as an adjunct professor in the graduate school, and then was invited to join the staff in 1933 along with the other three I named.
Einstein, just as a curiosity, also left Germany in 1930, but he did not go directly to the Institute, and he went actually to Caltech and taught there for a number of years, three years, and was ambassador into California.
There's a long story how he got out of Germany.
He was smuggled out by friends.
The National Socialist Party did not want him to leave.
They considered him a national asset.
But after three years in the West Coast, he was invited to join the Institute in 1933, and he did.
And the Institute was renowned then for being a think tank.
It is no longer.
It is, well, we'll go into what it does now.
It's still there, it still exists.
But it is not doing the same kind of work.
It did many research projects at that time, privately funded.
Now, the invisibility study was supported by Navy grants and research money, but it was a private research project and was not classified at that time.
In 1936, they had their first hardware test.
It was partly successful, which enough indication that they were getting results to continue their research in that direction.
And they continued with this until 1940, when they had a fully successful test at the Brooklyn Navy Yard with a small tender.
They put the Critical equipment on board the deck of that ship, and they had other heavy equipment, which is on two other ships adjacent, one starboard, one port.
No one was on board the test vehicle, and they ran the equipment that was on board that ship on long cables because they didn't really know for sure what would happen.
Well, I can't tell you much about how far they got in the lab because I was not part of the project until 1940, actually January 1940, along with my brother, before the Brooklyn Navy Yard test.
Now, to give you a brief rundown of the technical aspects of this, one has to understand that, first of all, we are not living in a three-dimensional universe or even a four-dimensional, it's five-dimensional.
The man who first technically explored this possibility was a man by the name of P. D. Uspensky, a Russian mathematician, who wrote a book in 1931 entitled Tertium Organum, which in English is a new model of the universe.
And he described there the fact that we are in a five-dimensional universe structure.
The fourth dimension, of course, has been well defined as time, but it took Einstein with the unified field theory and others examining this to understand that the fifth dimension is also time, but it is the next up vector, if you will, the next higher order, called T2 in mathematical notation, which is the vector which controls T1 or the flow rate of time as we measure with a clock.
And T2 describes, speaking again mathematically, a helix, a corkscrew through time, if you will.
The forward motion is the rate which we measure as time in the T1 mode or the clock, if you will.
But by manipulating the corkscrew, the rate at which that second vector at right angles to the first one of time moves, you control the rate of flow of time.
Well, Al, I've got to stop you because I understand, I think I can understand the flow of time or what you're calling T1, or what we see go by on the clock every day.
That I can understand, laid out like a long carpet running endlessly into our future, that I understand.
The second T2 effect on T1, I don't yet understand.
Okay, well, let me give you another analogy, a model.
You've seen, I'm sure, these kids' toys, the long coiled spring where you hold one end and you can jog it at one end and you see this motion, this wave through the coil as it goes to the other end and bounces back.
Well, if you take this thing and close it in a loop like a doughnut, which is what Einstein said, we are living in a closed universe.
Everything is in a circle, including time, then you have a little bit of an idea of what we were dealing with.
It's like a sleazy, except what we were doing, or attempting to do, and eventually did succeed in doing, was to enter this thing at some point along the edge of what we call our reality and create an artificial field which would affect within that field only the flow rate of time by affecting T2,
you affect T1, and you can then affect the position where that object, in this case a ship, was on the edge of the coil of time, as we call it.
Now, what they were doing was by very complex fields affecting the time flow rate, and if you start to move the object around the edge, it starts to go out of our reality into the next one.
You have to also understand that there are multiple realities involved in our universe.
And they're all interrelated, but they're interrelated by being phase out of our reference, phased out in time by at least 90 degrees into another reality.
Al, would that be, again, staying with the analogy of the slinky then, would that be instead of traveling along the surface of the slinky and going around and around and around and around, it is as though you're jumping from one link to the other link directly without traveling the entire path.
Now you can again look at that in terms of another analogy, quantum physics, which in the modern analysis, using quanta, is not only a quanta of energy and quanta of matter, you're a quanta of time according to that theory.
And it is in a discrete little jump, as it were, which fits quite well the Sleazy model.
What we were attempting to do and did eventually do was to take an object, create a field around it, and move it in relation to the reality which we normally exist in, move it part way out.
And if you get far enough along that edge, the Sleazy, so to speak, What happens is the electromagnetic energy called light and also radio waves, particularly the higher frequencies that we use for radar, no longer are reflected by the object.
And if they pass straight through it or around it, you can do it either way, there is no energy reflected.
The object is invisible because it requires a return of some kind of energy so that you know that the object is there.
And that was what they did in 1940 at the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
They made the object invisible to eye, to a camera.
And also, at that time, it would have been invisible to radar, but radar was not of a major development yet in 1940, even though the Navy had been working on radar systems from 1938 and had some on board ship, experimental.
The basic theory which was developed at that time, partly in accordance with Einstein's unified field theory, which does exist and is alive and well, and is never in the status of being incomplete.
It was stated that way to the public and was completed about 1938 and given to the government, and we had access to it at the Institute.
All of that says, to make it simple, or try to make it simple, is that all of the elements of our universe, the energies which we normally consider, the electric field, the magnetic field, the gravitic field, if you will, which it is a field, are all interrelated in such a manner that you have a fourth element which is also locked into them, and that is time.
If you manipulate any three of those, you can affect the fourth.
In this case, the one we wanted to affect was time.
So if you know how to interact between the electric field, the magnetic field, and the gravitic field, you can affect time.
And that, of course, refers to a limited area in which you can affect those three fields.
In terms also of certain mathematical constants which relate to the Earth's constants.
And one of the main constants here on Earth, which is used to generate and to predict window frequencies for certain phenomena, is the mathematical function of pi over 2.
That is one of the keys.
One half pi, if you will.
Multiples thereof.
I won't go into that.
It's a long mathematical dissertation, but basically any frequency involved, which is pi over 2, is active in a special sense.
What they were doing was generating an electric field through means of a radio transmitter, which generates an enormous electric field from an antenna, depending on the power level.
And you had four coils on the deck of the ship, which were specially designed Tesla coils, designed by Tesla, a primary only, which was a conical shape.
It was narrower at the top and much broader at the base.
It was hollow copper tubing, water-cooled, about an inch and a half in diameter, and it was pumped from both, direct connected to the generators, which were below deck.
There were two major generators, 75 kVA each, and there were four outputs, two from each generator.
They had to be very carefully phased also to produce a rotating magnetic field.
Now, the two of those interacting together at a certain rate and ratio will affect the gravitic field, particularly if you have enough power, and that's one of the reasons they wanted enough power for this.
The mathematics of this are still buried and classified, and I do not at this point recall what the math was, because certain other things happened to me, which I will go into as I develop the story.
But that was basically the system that we were using.
It affected the gravitic field, and the three of them would produce essentially a rotating field which was looking, if you wanted to take a plane view of it, look down on it, look like a donut.
There was nothing else directly involved other than the fact, of course, the fields being generated had the lower half truncated by the seawater because seawater was the most excellent absorber of both RF energy and magnetic energy.
Magnetic fields do not propagate well through seawater.
They do, but they're attenuated rather rapidly.
In any case, that was the basic idea.
I'm not going to attempt to go into any mathematics on this.
I was born, as I said, in 4 August 1916, my brother in May of 1917.
Father was a Navy man, of course, and the family had a lot of money.
Earlier on, they had married into the Arnold Constable family.
Our Auntie Arnold, as we called her, originally at Cameron, had married into that family at a much earlier age.
And father was a result of one of those.
I can't go into the whole lineage.
And in the period prior to World War I, he, as a Navy man, had two live-in women, his first two wives, but they were common-law.
Why was born by one and Duncan by the other.
And when 1917 came along and we became involved in the war, the Navy tapped him on the shoulder and said, you're going to sea now.
And he abandoned those two wives.
So we were raised by Auntie Arnold in the big house in Long Island, which is at East Islet, or sorry, West Islet.
And finished our common school education, if you will.
Father encouraged us.
We saw him about once a year to get a good education.
And there was no lack of money, so we went to college.
I went initially to Princeton, took a bachelor's degree there, and was doing my master's.
I met Dr. John Van Neumann, who was on campus, and he took considerable interest in me and suggested that, well, if you're going to get a PhD, I'll encourage it most thoroughly, but I think you would do better to go to Harvard.
It's a better school and so forth.
So I went to Harvard for my doctoral work.
And Duncan, in the meantime, for whatever reason, went to the University of Edinburgh at Edinburgh, Scotland.
We both took our PhDs in the summer of 1939.
And, of course, father congratulated us.
He was long since out of the Navy.
And he arranged for us to enlist in the Navy and follow in Father's footsteps.
So in September 1939, we both enlisted in the Navy in Church Street, New York.
Went through a special 90-day training school for officers because we were given commissions of Lieutenant J.G. upon enlistment.
And this 90-day wonder school, there were all kinds of names that have been appended to these particular schools.
There were special schools for those to go to special assignments.
We didn't know where we were going to go or what was going to happen until after we completed the work there had been completed.
We were assigned to the Institute of Advanced Study in January 1940.
We only knew that we were taking on probably careers in the Navy.
And since we both had PhDs in physics, we assumed it would be some technical role, which was, of course, a correct assumption.
And little did we know of Father's involvement in the background.
We've done a lot of research on this since.
He hasn't died.
Died in 1981.
He was born in 1891.
He was 90 when he passed on.
Father, after he left the Navy in 1929, was in some manner, somehow, still involved with the military, with intelligence, with espionage, and many things.
We have yet to uncover the whole history, but we know that he was involved in smuggling Nazi Jewish scientists, Hicks-Nazi, or Jewish scientists, out from under the noses of the Germans in Germany from 1933 until 1942.
We've been able to determine that about nine were brought over through the auspices of the company store, if you will, and I don't mean a three-letter company, but Arnold Constable.
And through the company store, a long story in itself.
And they stayed in Long Island undercover.
When the war was over, they all went to work in special projects at Brookhaven National Laboratories, which is another story that comes after the Philadelphia Experiment.
Father was involved in a lot of things.
We have yet to track it all down.
But he was knowledgeable as to what was coming up, and he arranged for us to join the Navy, and apparently for us to become assigned to the Philadelphia Experiment.
We don't know that as a fact, but it appears that way.
We joined the Institute in 1940, and we were brash, young guys, thought we knew all about physics.
Then we find out when we go to the institute, where they're working on the cutting edge of projects which we've never heard of in school, and mathematics we've never heard of, von Neumann's special mathematics and other things, including unified field theory, we suddenly found out we didn't really know much of anything.
And we were brought up to speed.
And this was prior to the Brooklyn Navy Yard test.
We found out what they were doing and what they were attempting to do.
And Von Neumann himself instructed us.
We met, of course, occasionally, Tesla, who was working on other projects in his own labs and was there part-time at the Institute.
In any case, came the test in 1940 at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, fully successful.
The Navy classifies the project, calls it Project Rainbow.
We all had to get clearances.
And then we found ourselves shuttling between the Institute and the Broken, I'm sorry, the Philadelphia Navy Yard, where they set up offices in one of the buildings overlooking the harbor for all the classified projects, including this one.
He's all the way out in Atlanta, Georgia, but that doesn't make any difference.
Time and space, we just zip right through it.
It's the satellites to come to you, and he's got quite a story to tell.
It is the story of the Philadelphia experiment, an effort to get an entire ship to disappear, which they did.
And we're about to get that story in a second.
We've, up until this point, had a lot of technical details about how it was accomplished, how it was researched, who worked on it, and all the rest of that.
And incidentally, I just got a fax here, which just came through.
And if you have a fax, if you want to fax a question into Albelic, you can fax it in.
But here's what I got already.
Art, please mention how to get audio tapes of this program early.
Many of us can't listen to the whole thing at this time.
Thanks.
All right.
To get a copy of this program, you can call area code 503-664-7966.
Back now to Al Bielick, no doubt, with a cup of coffee in his hand.
As I said, we returned to the Institute in January of 1942 to find preparations well underway for the test for the battleship.
And they were nearly complete, but Tesla was having serious misgivings about the problems of the extreme power required to make a ship of 30,000 tons invisible as compared with a small tender, in which there would be personnel present.
He was very concerned about the possible damage or injury or even death of personnel from the very high-powered electromagnetic fields.
Now, as you would ask earlier, there is, at that time, there was no information in the literature about what the neurological effects of certain levels of RF from magnetic fields would be.
This was new territory.
And, of course, today we have a lot of that information as well as a long history of tests.
But it stems from the Philadelphia experiment as the beginning point.
Well, he was concerned.
He was very severely concerned.
And he went to the Navy and asked for extension of time to solve the problem.
He says, I'm sure I can solve it.
I need more time.
The Navy said, you have an assigned test date, March 42.
Do what you have to do, but you must meet that date.
He had a serious problem there, and he knew it.
And he decided the two options he had, to go ahead with the test or to cancel it, that he would sabotage the test deliberately by detuning the equipment so that when the switches were thrown on that fateful day, nothing happened other than a few pieces of equipment blew up, some tubes blew out in the transmitters, and that was all.
And of course, he bowed out at that point and saying, that test is a failure.
I have other things to do.
We have a very good man here, or you have a good man here who can take over this test, Dr. John Von Neumann.
Well, of course, there is argument to this day that he leave volunteer earlier than the Navy firearm regardless, he left.
And of course, as history shows, he didn't live much longer after that.
He died on January 7th, 1943, in his hotel room in New Yorker in New York City.
John von Neumann takes over, and of course, first thing he says to the Navy is, well, I have to study the problem and see what's wrong here.
And it didn't take him long to find out what happened, but he decided that he was going to take advantage of this opportunity to redesign the equipment.
Tesla's approach was analog, and Von Neumann was known as a man who liked pulsing equipment and the pulsed approach, so he decided to redesign the equipment for pulse modulation rather than a continuous analog form of modulation.
All right, I would think, and maybe you can help me out here, but I would think once you moved into the area of pulse, you would be able to achieve higher peak power levels, and that was the idea.
He, of course, abandoned the battleship, and the battleship was resumed, returned to service.
I don't recall now what happened to it, but it wasn't there after a certain day.
And we were all part of it at that point.
So Van Neumann, along about in June of 1942, decides he wants a ship which is designed from the ground up for this project.
So in July, he went to the shipbuilding, Federal Shipbuilding Yards at Newark, New Jersey, picks a number off the drawing board, DE-173, which later was known as the Elverage, and said, I want this, this, and this change.
Basically, what he wanted was of the four gun turrets, number two was to be left unfinished.
They said you never did any wooden turret for it for tests at sea, but they wanted that hole, as it were, left unfinished without the ammo racks below.
Part of the interior of the ship was to be gutted so they could drop the heavy equipment in through that hole and slide it on rails to the central point midships.
So the ship was built with those specifications.
It came down the ways in September of 1942, went into dry dock for outfitting the heavy equipment.
The heavy equipment included the two 75 kVA generators, which were designed for this project, along with a very large electric motor with two right-angle gear drives.
The electric motor was a 750-horse monster.
The entire equipment was run on its own separate power system from chips power.
They ran in a special diesel-electric generator about 8 megawatts output, which was a lot of output.
That's a big generator, but that's one of the reasons they had to have the interior of the hole gutted.
All that equipment was moved in in dry dock, and then about September of 42, of course, the ship was taken under its own power.
It was not totally gutted by any means, to the Philadelphia Navy Yard and put in a secure area in the rear.
There was a front section for ordinary shipping, and there was a rear section with access control by a drawbridge for classified projects.
So in December, the ship was sent there, and then in January on, the special electronics equipment was moved outboard.
It wasn't that large.
Also, during that summer, Van Norman decided, and the Navy concurred, they wanted a special crew for these tests, namely an all-volunteer crew.
So they went throughout the Navy, acquired, after a period of time, some 33 enlisted men, about seven officers who volunteered for this project and essentially signed their lives away, and went through a special training school in the Coast Guard Academy at Grove in Connecticut, if I remember correctly, for three months, from September to December of 1942.
And who was the schoolmaster, if you will?
We still have a picture of this crew.
The headmaster was none other than my father in his Coast Guard uniform.
He made no change in the generator system other than with the pulse technique.
He had to put special damper coils on the top of these conical magnetic field generators, if you will, on the deck of the ship, which stood a little over six feet high, by the way.
And he started to become concerned about the problems of power and related to the human mind and the neurological system.
So he decided to try to do something to compensate for this.
He added a third generator to the system after ordering it from Westinghouse.
Never worked properly.
It couldn't synchronize that with the other two.
And eventually, one day in May of 43, it went out of control.
And one of the other technicians assigned to us was zapped badly with an arc of engine, almost lightning, high voltage that came off of that generator because it was out of sync.
Wound up in the hospital in a coma for four months, eventually recovered and was given a medical discharge.
So it was back to square one.
He scrapped the third generator and decided to continue along with his normal approach.
Now in June, the ship had sea trials, which were very successful, because the intent was if all the tests were successful, the autoch would immediately go to sea.
And they had all kinds of backup systems already built.
In any case, the test date, after a lot of testing in the Navy Yard, of the various systems, subsystem testing really, I decided to go for the full board test in July of 43 in the harbor and outside of Philadelphia.
My guest is Al Bielich from the Philadelphia Experiment.
And just when we got to a critical moment on a discussion of the experiment, just as apparently he was saying, and then the battleship, we lost everything, picked it back up again, and now once again out to Atlanta, Georgia.
And I wonder if they got us.
I wonder if somebody was listening and said, we don't want that story out.
Click.
It sure felt that way.
And this is the way people begin to believe in conspiracies, don't you know?
On July 22nd, we had our first field test in the harbor.
The volunteer crew actually had only used a skeleton crew of about 15 enlisted men and some eight officers, two of whom were Duncan and myself, who were trained to run the equipment for the test.
The equipment was housed in a special, completely enclosed room on deck, which was part of the main structure of the ship.
So we were on station.
At about 900 hours, we were told to go ahead with the test by radio link, and there was a carrier with this observer ship with certain personnel on board, including Dr. Von Neumann.
So we fired up the equipment.
See, there were no computers in those days.
Everything had to be done by hand.
And we knew what the procedure was, so we fired up the equipment, and the ship became invisible to sight as well as to radar.
By 43, they had a very good radar, and they were concerned about radar invisibility.
Everything went very well.
After about 20 minutes, the commander who was in charge of the test, Captain Harrison, who is now deceased, ordered the test discontinued.
However, in the first test, the ship disappeared from sight as well as from radar, but it was surrounded with a mist, and it was a sort of greenish fog.
And why the color green, we don't really know, except that one of the byproducts of this test was in generation of large amounts of ozone gas.
Right.
The ship, however, was still there in the harbor, but what they found in the process of the observation was that the water line, which would show where the ship should be, was much larger than the ship, and there was an apparent hole in the bay, much larger than the ship itself, and they couldn't see the bottom of it through binoculars from the observing personnel on the carrier.
And Captain Harrison was very concerned about this.
He said that he knew the ship was gut in the interior and there wasn't everything there in the normal internal structure.
And he was afraid that the ship might be supported on air rather than on water and it would break in half.
He knew that, if that were the case.
So he ordered the ship's test discontinued, we turned off the power and returned under our normal power back to dock side.
At that point, we found out that those personnel who were on deck were very severely disoriented, nauseous, ill, and as they're saying, goes out of it, and definitely not well, showing the effects of exposure to very high-powered electromagnetic radiation.
It took two people to operate the equipment properly.
And we just continued the test on orders, went back to the Navy Yard.
They found out they had very sick personnel.
Then Neumann was quite concerned about this.
The Navy says, not to worry, we have another crew for you.
And Van Neumann then went to the Navy and says, I have to look at this and study this and try to solve this problem.
The Navy gave no response for a few days.
And Van Neumann asked for an extension in time, rather than a definite one.
The Navy finally came up with an answer and says, you will complete the test by the 12th of August 1943 or forget it.
It was a drop-dead test date.
Like do it by then or just forget the whole damn thing.
Well, nobody understood this, and I knew Hal Bowen fairly well at that point, and I went to him and I said, what is this all about?
And he says, well, that's the orders I received.
He says, where did they come from?
And what's this all about?
Well, he tracked it down, found out that it came from the Chief of Naval Operations himself, who was then Admiral King, and he was told that this is the way it is.
Now, Admiral King, as CNO, is not concerned other than the cursory way of engineering tests.
He is concerned with the operation of the war and the Navy's part in that and all theaters of operation.
He is not a man who is going to take detailed interest in an engineering test.
So we didn't understand this.
It took a long time to find out what was really involved.
In fact, it took many decades.
In any case, we had the 12th of August and dropped dead date, and the Navy says, oh, you don't have to worry about invisibility for the eye, optical invisibility.
All we are really concerned about is radar invisibility.
Well, I've had a slight decrease in the stringency of the requirements on the 12th of August.
It was not so much a matter of power as a matter of scientific approach and how much of a phase shift in terms of the time vector required.
What we did was shift phase around the coil, as I called it, of time to a slightly lesser degree of shift, which would still provide radar invisibility.
And what we did is you shift them to that point, and then you locked at that point.
On the 12th of August, we were about to proceed with the rest of the tests, and what Captain Harrison insisted upon was to have hydrostatic tests of the hull stress by means of special sensors installed on the hull, inside and outside.
The submarine was assigned to go under the ship and see what was going on.
And a secondary crew was put on board that ship for these tests.
At the last minute, something went wrong.
They decided to cancel the special hydrostatic test.
The secondary crew was pulled off, put on the sub, and the sub pulled out, and we were left there alone with Duncan and I standing by the rail, were very perturbed, wondering what the blazes is going on.
We knew something was wrong.
We had no idea what.
Then the orders came to proceed with the test in the normal manner.
So we did.
Well, from the standpoint of those outside on the observer ships, and for the second test, there were three observer ships.
There was a carrier, there was a Coast Guard cutter, and there was a commercial ship known as the SS Fury Seth, which figures very prominently in the book written by Hurlitz and Moore, Project Invisibility.
And they were concerned because in 1943, the German submarine fleet was sinking 50% of our shipping crossing the ocean to get to England.
And the merchant marine ships wanted the equipment immediately if it was successful.
So they were observing the test themselves.
Fired up the equipments as on command, and for the first 60 or 70 seconds, everything seemed to be normal.
The ship had radar invisibility, but you could still see it vaguely through a fog.
And then there was a bright flash of blue light, and the ship disappeared completely.
The water line disappeared, and there was no ship there.
Well, everybody panicked, particularly John Van Neumann.
And there was no radio contact, and there was no contact for some four hours when the ship finally returned to the harbor in the same location.
And they knew immediately something was wrong because the special radio antenna, which had been designed by T. Townsend Brown, as his contribution to the project, because he was involved with special Navy projects.
And I'm not going to go into his history on this.
But his antenna was broken, pieces missing, and there was superficial structural damage, and they could get no radio response, and they could see something was wrong on deck through binoculars.
So a special boarding party was sent out to board the ship, and they did, and they found four sailors in the process of dying.
Two were buried in the steel deck, and two were buried in the bulkheads, standing upright, but immersed, if you will, in the steel.
The fifth man had a hand buried in the steel, bulkhead.
He lived.
They cut his hand off and gave him an artificial hand later.
And one of those in the bulkhead upright happened to be a younger brother, Jim, who was six years younger than I, and he enlisted in the Navy after the war started, and he wound up in the volunteer crew, and he wound up throwing the straw for the second test.
And he was dying.
I put my arm around him, and Duncan looked at this and decided we'll have to backtrack a little bit.
He decided to jump overboard.
Ow.
This was not the first time.
Let's go back a little bit and tell what happened to Duncan and I. I gave the external observance of what happened.
Now, internally, we were in the control room, and for about 30 seconds, everything seemed to be normal.
But then we realized something was not right because the Banks of Electron tubes, there were some 3,000 6L6 tubes, not the miniatures, but the full-size bottles.
We fell and fell and fell like we were falling through a tunnel for what subjectively seemed like about a minute.
And then we found ourselves landing on dry ground at night in what was obviously a military base of some kind because it was a chain-linked fence of a military design directly to a rear.
Suddenly there was a bright light overhead, a searchlight beaming down as we found out later from the helicopter.
But in 43, who knew much about helicopters?
They were experimental at that point.
And suddenly out of nowhere comes a number of MPs.
They grab us and they take us to a building on this base.
We go inside and we go in an elevator.
We go down several levels and the door opens.
And we see a lot of military personnel running around.
And then an elderly civilian with white hair approaches us and says, gentlemen, I've been waiting for you.
I'm Dr. John von Neumann.
At which point we look at him and says, you're who?
And he says, I'm Dr. Jan von Neumann.
John von Neumann.
I said, it couldn't be.
We left him perhaps an hour ago.
He's a much younger man.
He says, yes, I know.
He says, I'm the same man you knew in 1943.
This is not 1943.
This is now the year 1983 here at Montauk, Long Island, part of the Phoenix Project, or as we call it now, the Montauk Project.
Well, we couldn't believe him.
We thought he was bonkers, of course.
But nevertheless, he gave us a book's tour of the underground, and we see computers, graphic displays, large-screen color TV, and things which did not exist in 1943.
So we stayed there about 12 hours, and after watching TV for several hours and seeing ads for Fly to Hawaii in our 747 jet, we sit there with a house of gape and look at shots of the freeway traffics and freeways and man on the moon and references and the Cold War.
We suddenly realized something was terribly wrong, or maybe the man is right.
We were there about 12 hours, and Von Neumann sprung it on us and told us what had happened.
He said, this project in 1983, the Phoenix project, has locked up through time with the experiment with the Elveridge in 43.
And I said, the ship disappeared and is in hyperspace.
We can't control that ship from here, but the generators have to be shut off.
He says, we have created a bubble in hyperspace which is growing, and we don't know how big it will grow or what will happen if it isn't stopped.
What do you think would have occurred, or what's the best guess, about what would have occurred, had you not been able to get back on board and smash that equipment?
Neumann's assumption at that time was that the hyperspace bubble would grow to the point where it said it could overwhelm the Earth itself.
And they were concerned theoretically, of course, whether it was a practicality or not.
And they said there's enough fuel in the generator supply to keep those equipment running for 30 days if they didn't break down first.
And it could theoretically engulf the Earth.
The Earth itself, theoretically, could disappear in a hyperspace bubble.
In any case, that was a theoretical concern, and they weren't about to sit around and wait for it to happen.
So we did smash the equipment.
The ship returned to the harbor.
Something jumped overboard.
I remained with the ship.
The four sailors died.
And, of course, the boarding party reported what had happened.
They sent another party on board ship to bring it back to the, out of the harbor, back to the rear part of the Navy yard because there was no other damage to the ship.
Well, the history of Literature on the subject goes back quite a ways, but in terms of actual books, there was one entitled Thin Air, published in 1978, which I believe is out of print, and told in a fictionalized form the story of the Philadelphia Experiment.
The one done in 1979 by Berlitz and Moore, entitled The Philadelphia Experiment, Project Invisibility, is well known and has been available as a paperback for many years.
It's still available.
But it does not really tell the detailed history of what exactly happened.
Mr. Moore, who did most of the research, was never able to find out very much, and he has done 180 cents and says he doesn't think it ever happened.
The other one was the one written by myself and Brad Steiger, entitled The Philadelphia Experiment and Other UFO Conspiracies.
It is available in many of the New Age bookstores, and if the listeners are not able to find it that way, they can contact me and ship it out.
So in late October, late at night, they decided they were set to put the ship on station, pull all the personnel off, and controlled the equipment by remote control through over 1,000 feet of cable.
And again, the ship disappeared, came back some 15 or 20 minutes later, and the equipment that's related to the invisibility test was a smoking ruin.
So at which point the Navy washed the hands of everything connected with these tests and says, re-equipped this ship for war duty.
And it was so re-equipped.
And from approximately January of 1944 on, it was in the normal operations of the war.
It was retired in 1946, put into mothballs.
1951, President Truman took the Eldridge and others out of Mothballs on an agreement with the Greek Navy, and it was transferred to the Greeks.
They renamed it the Leon.
And as we have found out with research and correspondence, the Leon is still in the Greek Navy to this day.
Insofar as I am concerned, I remained in the Navy as a career officer for a number of years.
But Neumann took me aside and says, I don't know whether to believe your story or not, and it's not very much of a problem, but I'm going to build a little time machine here, and I'm going to send you back in the future, and you're going to bring proof back to me of what has happened, that your story is true.
Now, unbeknownst to the Navy, because he worked at that time with the Institute, and the Navy was not directly funding the Institute and had no control over it.
And he sent me back to the project in the 80s, 82, 83, and more than once.
I brought back eventually proof of the fact that I had been there and that he had been there or was to be there in terms of 1943.
And eventually was satisfied.
And he then went on to other projects.
In October of 43, he became involved with the Los Alamos bomb project.
And in the summer of 1944, in July of 44, at his request and the Navy's very happy agreement, I was shipped with family because by that time I was married and had a baby son.
And I was up to Los Alamos and helped work on the project along with Von Neumann, who was actually not resident there, but a consultant and a visitor.
Remained at Los Alamos until July 4th, 1947, which time I was arrested, charged with espionage, which was absolutely ridiculous, but nonetheless, I was arrested.
I was removed from the family, whom I never saw again, either the baby son or my wife.
And this was an Ed Cameron, understand, not as Albillik.
And I was taken by train to Washington, D.C., expected a full court-martial.
There was none.
Charges were canceled.
They said, we have a new assignment for you.
We're sending you out to Port Hero, Long Island.
There is a Navy base out there.
And I said, okay.
I did not know at that point that Fort Hero, an Army base containing also a Navy base, was the exact location of the Montauk project, the Phoenix Project, as we called it, where in later years it became the main project, which in 1983 pulled us from the outage.
So I was sent out there in 1947, and I was there a few hours and was told to go to a certain circle, stand there surrounded by a large number of military personnel with drawn weapons that don't move.
I did, and suddenly I was not there.
I was back in the underground area of Montauk.
And a very cheerful von Neumann says, I don't like what they're going to do to you, but I have nothing to say about this.
I'm only a consultant here.
And they're going to strip you of your memories, and they're going to send you back into the past, and you're going to start life over as somebody else.
So they did, to make a long story short, strip me of all my memories.
And by means of age regression techniques, which the government has, they can physically regress the age of a person, anyone they so choose, to make them a much older person, much younger, like a 65-year-old person can be made equivalent to 25 physically without losing any of their memory or capabilities.
I mean, you sound lucid to me, Al, but there are people who will listen to this story and they will say, you were really a candidate for the Philadelphia Looney Bin.
I mean, I can't force anyone to believe The story.
I know certain aspects of it are very difficult to accept, but there are people who know of these aspects of the experiment, namely the age regression research that was done from 1947 approximately onward at a research institute in Miami, Florida, which Howard Hughes himself bought.
After several decades, they came up with some workable systems and finally were able to do a full age regression, taking a person back up to 40 years, 40 years off of their age physically, make them young again.
And they held us special people in the government.
They didn't want to leave service because they were much too valuable.
They were going to take me back, memory, shrink me down to a young kid at the age of about one after stripping me of all memories and then plugged me in another family.
And that's how I became a Belik.
I was transported backward through time because at Montauk they could send you any place they wanted.
You know, the old business about if you go back and disturb something, or if you go back and, for example, kill somebody who would later have borne you, you could literally extinguish yourself.
And they did, I understand, go back and extinguish the life of that gentleman before he married.
But nothing happened to the son in the present era.
It's present era speaking in the 70s.
And they went back to the physicists.
Okay, what's wrong?
And what they came up with, and it's a fairly good explanation, I believe, namely, with quantum physics, you have to look at time also as being quantized.
They said, all you did was disturb the time quanta in the area you visited.
You didn't disturb the time quanta in the period following.
Therefore, you didn't change anything except in the area where you visited.
Now, that is essentially true, so far as I understand it, but Montauk was a special case, and there is a special case involved here, and I'll have to go into that in a little bit, wherein if you disturb not one reality, but you make changes in all seven realities that you know exist, then you have a different story and a different case.
Montauk was capable of doing this.
Well, I was sent back to 1927.
My first memory, quite aside from the birth certificate, and how they arranged this, I don't know, but my first memory was in Christmas of 1927, sitting on mother's grand piano, a little tight, next to the Christmas tree, sitting on that piano, and the family and friends were around exchanging Christmas presents.
One of the strange things about it was, at an age of essentially one, I understood virtually all the conversation that was ongoing there around that piano with the various people.
There weren't blank outs in certain areas.
I understood the language long before I was willing to talk.
And as I grew up, I knew nothing of my past.
I had fleeting memories during my teen years of other things, and I had no idea what they were, and they would blank out.
When I went into the Navy a second time as Al Belick in 1945 during the World War II and came out in 1946, I was again in electronics, but only as a seaman, a petty officer ranked, not an officer.
I knew when I came back to late 46 into 47 that I didn't belong in that family, but that was just a gut feeling.
I had no other reason to believe that.
I went up through the years, went to school, became an engineer, consulting engineer, from 1958 to 1988, and retired in 1988.
During that period, I met a lot of people.
I had an extremely strong interest in the whole Philadelphia experiment, philosophy, ideas, the stories that were written and told about.
I didn't know why I was so fascinated by it until I saw that movie in 1988, January.
Now, one other thing happened, of course, during that period of time.
I met Ivan Sanderson.
He had a great interest in this subject.
He tried to get information out of the Navy.
In spite of the fact that he had been a former intelligence officer in the British intelligence service and had good connections with the Navy, they wouldn't tell him anything either.
He died in 1973.
And during this period, I became involved with a group called the United Stytronics Association.
And in 1983, at one of their meetings in Portland, Oregon, I met Preston Nichols.
In 1985, at the meeting at Dayton, Ohio, he brought with him his new lab assistant, because he not only worked full-time, he had his own private lab, Duncan Cameron.
And I didn't know him from Adam at that point.
But in the course of that meeting, in the four days we were there, I talked with him at great length in the cafeteria, and after about an hour of this discussion back and forth, I finally got this funny gut feeling I knew him from somewhere.
And I finally asked him, I says, hey, do you have a feeling you know me from somewhere?
He says, yeah.
Do you have any idea where you're from?
He says, I don't have the slightest idea.
But I know I know you from somewhere.
And I had the same feeling.
Well, before the convention broke up, Preston had invited me to visit him at his lab in Long Island at some time in the future.
And I did a month later in August, when my job as a consultant ended, that I was on.
And he took us out to Montauk after I was there, expecting to be a weekend, it was a two weeks.
Montauk, Long Island, to see this derelict base where we walked on, saw all this old electronic equipment lying around in the buildings and various places and an abandoned base.
Fences were down.
It was obviously a military installation.
We did not know, including Preston, that we had all been involved previously in this project which crashed on the night of 12 August, 1983.
Remember, the state 12 August.
Eventually, in 1986, with another visit back there, and Preston and Duncan with many visits, and in the meantime, visiting the site of the crime, so to speak, does tend to restimulate buried subconscious memories.
So in May of 86, I went back out there with a crew from Phoenix, who I talked about this project to make a major investigation of the possibility of monies being subverted by private industry into a special government project, and they wanted proof of it, and they went to Ramontauk.
Well, they didn't find what they wanted, but nevertheless, in the process of that visit, my memory started to come back one afternoon that I had been involved in this project, detailed memories, and they kept expanding from that point on.
But this was prior to the recall of the Philadelphia experiment involvement.
As I'll be elected, I was involved in this project very heavily for many years.
I don't know how many.
But there was leakage of information from a retired, or shall I say, resigned CIA agent to Preston that I was involved in 1953 to 83 because they kept me undercover for 30 years.
It is my understanding from reading both books on the Montauk Project that in order to get to a certain place in time, it took a psychic sitting in the Montauk chair, concentrating on the desired place in time.
How did Dr. Von Neumann target the Montauk Project and send you there with the early 40s technology, assuming that he wasn't already using the technology described in the Montauk books?
I can't answer that fully because I certainly was not a von Neumann myself, but he developed the time machine.
It was used, and whatever the means was, he did get me reconnected with Montauk.
Could be there was an automatic attraction.
I can only assume that.
I don't know the exact mechanics, but I did go back to Montauk more than once, and he was satisfied, and that project was discontinued, and he went on, of course, with the Los Alamos project, as well as other projects he was working on during the war years.
I do not know exactly why I wound up back there, but I did.
On the wildcard line, you're on the air with Al Belick.
Good morning.
Where are you calling from, please?
unidentified
This is Charlie, liberal in California.
Let me just say that you've had some very extreme guests: the guy who thought there were pyramids on Mars, and the guy who wanted to build an island and name it after make his own country up.
But this guy really takes the cake.
First of all, isn't it a fact that the reason that you've made up all these outlandish stories about people being brought back in age to age 12 and time travel, isn't it a fact that you've made up these stories simply to make fast money for yourself?
I can say this much, that there is no money really to be made in going on the air and doing these things or going around public lectures.
I'm living on retirement and not from the Navy.
It's from Social Security.
And the amount of additional monies I get is a pittance by comparison.
I'm not living high on the hog.
I'm living very low on the hog, if you will.
I'm making up the stories.
It's your opinion.
If you wish, that's your opinion.
But there are plenty of people around that know these facts, including technical people, people still working in certain laboratories I've talked with personally and verified many details of these facts, of the Philadelphia experiment and equipments that were built and what happened.
There are other people that are still working in the government, whom I know, I cannot name names, have verified all of these things, and there is no question whatever in the mind of those who have done enough research that this actually happened, both projects.
In fact, so far as the Montauk project is concerned, all they have to do is go out to the Montauk Long Island Point and you can see the abandoned base for yourself.
Invisibility in terms of techniques that are used now, because I did not mention the fact that in 1947 that project was resurrected at the request of the Navy, and John von Neumann eventually did solve the problems.
In 1953, that was not around for it, and I don't know what techniques he used.
Invisibility is a standard technique today called cloaking, available for the Navy fighter aircraft, the B-1 bomber, the B-2 bomber, Israeli aircraft, and others, and it involves techniques which are probably highly evolved from the original Philadelphia experiment and perhaps different.
The difference between invisibility is, basically, you are making an object invisible by cloaking it to any reflected energy.
In other words, if you have no energy, light or radar or whatever, reflected from an object, you can't see it.
It's still there, but you can't see it.
Time travel, the object moves out of your time frame.
Time travel has always fascinated me probably more than any other subject, and here's the question.
If I were to come to you, Al, and I were to say, look, I have nearly unlimited resources, certainly enough to be able to try and duplicate the project you've talked about.
I want to experiment with time travel.
Do you have enough technical knowledge to assist in building the equipment that it would take to do it again?
I would not be able to do that fully at this time, no, because much of that technical expertise that I knew well in the 40s as Ed Cameron has not all come back.
The basic theory, I understand.
The more precise mathematics, the more fine details, the finesse, if you will, of how to build that equipment is largely lost.
If we had somebody who could put together the technical aspect of it, and there was enough money to do it, and you had an opportunity to be part of it, would you run away from it or run to it?
In other words, would you become involved again or not?
Yes, I was not part of that directly, but I have read a considerable amount of material.
There's ongoing research today, and I know from reading some of the English source material that the people involved other than the director appointed by the President Truman at that time, who was Vannevar Bush.
His chief scientific advisor included people like Dr. John Van Neumann and a number of other people from Harvard and elsewhere who were a scientific team to evaluate what was there and what had come down.
It's quite well documented now, even though the government still wants to deny it, they cannot anymore completely because a lot of evidence has turned up.
A lot of people who were directly involved at that time were now speaking out in the last five years.
I became part of the Phoenix Project Montauk, if you want to call it that, sometime in the 60s or the 70s because it was part of an ongoing project which started in 1947 under the umbrella entitled Project Phoenix.
I became involved sometime in that period of the 60s and 70s and directly in the Montauk operation about 1975, so far as I can now estimate.
And I was there as Al Belick and was used as an engineer because I have been an electronic engineer for many years, even though retired.
My expertise was apparently used in some phases there, particularly power supply design.
Other people I know were involved, but that's not the question was asked.
Now, I went there in 1983 and the last day with Duncan as Edward Cameron and Duncan Cameron because of the Eldridge incident.
And at the time of the last two days, three days of the project before it crashed in August 12, 1983, I, as Al Belik, was removed from the project and told to go take a hike.
In other words, take a vacation.
They did not want me there when I arrived as Ed Cameron.
Now the project crashed that night.
That's a long story in itself.
It's covered in the Montauk project book by Preston Nichols.
The factors involved are not very involved, but the project was basically sabotaged and crashed.
I was no longer attached to it.
I am no longer attached to it.
The project has been revived since.
In fact, as we have found out in recent months, it never really died.
They just left it dead on the surface and let it appear to be dead, while they spent four years rebuilding and redesigning the project underground and added two more levels to the underground.
There were six levels originally.
There are now eight levels underground at Montauk Point, and the bottom two levels extend for miles.
They did resurrect the project and went back online in 1987 for apparently new usages and purposes.
We don't yet know the whole story.
And the power output was up fantastically from the levels which they were using in the 80s.
Presently, time travel has been used for looking into the future to see in terms of politics what's going to happen, in terms of economics, what may happen, but more specifically in terms of earth changes, which everyone who has looked at has been predicting.
And I don't mean psychics, but even geologists who are looking at it and realizing we're due for some very nasty earth changes.
They're all looking into the future to see what is going to happen and what does happen.
And anyway, I wanted to ask you, I heard Preston also.
And as I remember the story, it seemed like, I think I heard this from Preston now, that there was some kind of machine or computer at Montauk that they tried to secure the power to, but apparently the computer or machine wouldn't allow that to be done.
The whole system at Montauk on the last day there developed its own strange capability.
When they knew things were going awry, when this monstrosity that looked like a Sasquatch was tramping around the grounds in the last hours, picking up people and throwing them against concrete walls and trying to break into the radar tower itself, they knew they had to shut the whole system down.
First they went for the power switches.
They were frozen like on the Eldridge.
Then they went and cut cables underground with torches, two sets of power feed cables, and even though the lights went out, the transmitter kept running.
Stop you right there because I wanted to ask it the last time.
When the switches became frozen and when there were arcs going on that you described of incredible voltage, that implies that a source outside your source was feeding power almost wildly to this equipment, keeping it going.
There was a lot of technology, the very advanced technology, on how to construct a time tunnel, which means to be able to travel through space and time simultaneously was beyond our technology in terms of the theory.
That was provided by the aliens.
It was a joint operation known by those who were running the project.
And they provided part of the technology.
They knew we could build the equipment, but they knew we did not know the theory, and they gave it to us.
The reason they did it was because they had their own agenda, which was used on the Montauk project.
Just before we go back to our caller who's waiting, please give out the post office box an address to get in contact with you, Al, just in case we can't get hold of your book.
Also, please let me know why they've decided to keep you alive.
So I guess first things first, what is the address?
I was wondering, if you was to take the ship and go south of the equator, would the fields have to rotate clockwise in order to achieve the same effect?
Okay, they had to leave me alive, as well as Duncan.
They had to resurrect him, so to speak, for a simple reason.
We had gone through the entire time loop, and one of the gentlemen who worked on this project, Dr. Norman Levinson, who has four or five books out of mathematics, he was a professor of math at MIT, died in 76, if I remember correctly.
He showed in the classified work he did, which was the time equations and the time matrix, that when you rip a hole in space-time, which is what occurred when they locked up the two experiments from 43 to 83 on the 12th of August.
The 12th of August is significant.
I'll get into that in a minute.
But when you do that, you tear a hole in space-time in the fabric of space-time, you create a problem.
Those who are familiar with electrical theory and know about transmission of RF energy down a transmission line, you must terminate that line and its proper impedance at the end where you are attempting to ship power.
You rip a hole in there, abnormal rupture, as it is.
You no longer have a smooth flow of time because there is a flow.
You have a definite problem.
There's many problems were created by that lockup.
But one of the things that occurs is after 83, this equations show that it takes 20 years for the disturbances to damp down to the point where they don't have to worry about it.
In other words, in the year 2003, 12, August, it's essentially all over.
For some reason, reasons not known to either Duncan or myself, and I don't know who, if anyone knows the answers, Duncan and I act as human dampers on the time trail, so to speak, to maintain a damping coefficient of some type so that the whole thing doesn't go off and rupture again.
I don't know if it's released yet, but he's expanded it by about 100 pages.
It still sells for the same price at $20.
But if you want a very thorough and concise rundown of the conspiracy worldwide for a one-world government, a very repressive one-world government, and who is involved and how long this has been going on, he has more source information than anyone I've ever seen.
There are others who've talked about this and published on it, but I think he has more information in one book than anything I have ever seen anywhere.
I do recommend the book.
unidentified
Also, I was wondering what your views are on the works of Michael Lindemann and also Georgia Damsky.
He's been doing a lot of very good work in expose of the conspiracy.
He's sort of a latecomer to it, but nevertheless, when I say latecomer the last five years, he's done a great deal of homework, and he has had some excellent material released on this, and he's very heavily into it.
I met him personally many years ago in 1954 when I was first in California.
And he was a mysterious person.
He made many claims, including having been on flying saucers, flying saucer craft, and speaking with Venetians and all this sort of thing.
I don't know how much credence to give to some of his claims, but he wrote a series of books, and he did have what appeared to be a considerable amount of knowledge of what was going on.
He was one of the mysterious people from the past that I can't give a really concise answer on, other than to say he was at a stand on the foothills of Mount Palomar for many, many years and had a lot of audience and a lot of interest.
And I guess that's about the most I can say about him.
I've been at many UFO conventions, preparedness expos, UFO Expo West, Whole Life Expo, and a number of conventions across the country, including two in Canada.
Okay, I think that would fascinate some of the people in the science fiction genre to kind of open them up and make them think a little bit more than some of the stuff that's available to us today.
You know, some of what I've talked about probably is wilder than some of the science fiction you've talked about, and there are other people that have talked about, or I have written.
But one of the other things, and I know what you were talking about, why you're asking that question, the problem of space travel, as postulated by standard physics, says it's going to take years and years and centuries to get to some locations, but that's not entirely true.
Hyperspace travel, you're traveling at much faster than the speed of light.
And Einstein equations, nonetheless, you can do it.
And it has been done and is being done by aliens and also with some of the craft that our government has built in the more recent years.
The age regression problem is not really required.
And if you look at some of the equations and the contraction, Lorentz contraction equations and others, as you go at higher and iron speeds, the speed of travel affects the body to an extent so that you don't age as rapidly as you would if you were sitting on Earth.
unidentified
Yes.
Are you still affiliated with any branch of the government or?
Well, my question was, in the 40s, when you were in the Navy, as Al Bielick, wasn't Ed Cameron at the same time involved in the Philadelphia experiment?
Because I was separated in space as well as in the time period.
I actually did live parallel for 20 years from 1927 to 47.
One as Ed Cameron and the other as Al Balik, and I'm sure there was somebody in the government who made sure that the two didn't cross.
As I, as Al Balik, knew nothing about Edward Cameron until 1988.
And even though I was in the Navy during the same period, fourth of the same period, as Al Balik only 45 and 46, I was in electronics, I knew nothing of the other project that was ongoing until late 43.
Let's go back to the telephones and take questions as we can.
On the wild card line, you're on the air with Al Belick.
unidentified
Mr. Bills, get in.
Yeah, I am, to be honest and respectful, I am a skeptic.
I'm a reasonable skeptic.
I would like to know how it was possible, in your view, that 40s technology using electromagnetics could cause invisibility, given the structure of matter.
Well, if you understand any of the math that was done by David Hilbert, by John von Neumann, and of course Einstein, you would understand that we're living in the five-dimensional universe.
We have the three physical dimensions we're all familiar with.
The fourth dimension is time, but in terms of expressions of time mathematically, it's T1.
There is another vector at right angles to the main time vector, which is the one we measure with the clock and so forth, which actually controls it.
It's higher order.
It's a fifth dimension.
And by manipulating T2, the fifth dimension, you can control the fourth dimension within a limited area.
And of course, we're only concerned with a limited area, namely the special fields which were put around the ship or whatever object you're trying to make invisible.
The techniques that we're using then were somewhat crude.
They were very high power, and they got into a lot of problems because of it.
But basically, it was a time manipulation to produce invisibility.
If you produce a field wherein light or electromagnetic energy is not reflected, there's no return energy, you can't see it.
I heard you mentioned the conspirators' hierarchy, and, you know, I was wondering if you're aware that a number of his associates are doing prison time in Virginia now from 10 to 77 years.
They're under army control, but there's also a special group I've heard the initials of, which actually is administrative control of all the black helicopters, and they are a multinational force now.
If I could, I'd like to take Mr. Belick back to the roots of this technology and ask for a comment or an opinion about something that I have found out about Dr. Tesla and a question for Art after that.
From what I've been able to read about Dr. Nicoloi, I believe, Tesla, he had the uncanny ability of being able to have such powers of visualization that he didn't need blueprints.
He didn't need plans.
He could visualize in his mind all the inventions, and there was quite a few in varied fields in his mind, and it worked perfectly.
And he was able to, and in his early days with his early inventions, and he scooped the time with the light bulb in the USA.
And what I was wondering is could you comment on your thoughts and feelings if he had remained alive to develop his theory instead of going to Pulse and would they had converged or would they had been buried and we would have had maybe not the tyranny of the government behind this, but maybe some light behind some alternate theories.
Tesla, of course, got into trouble around right after the turn of the century when he proposed free energy at that time for the people from the masses without the massive generating systems and of course the whole power grid that developed well after that.
But the financial interest, J.P. Morgan and others, of course, were making huge sums of money off of generators and motors and the whole AC power system which he developed.
And they did not want to see a change like free power by putting an antenna in the air and another in the ground, as J.P. Morgan once stated, and you can't put a meter on it.
That was the basis of the philosophy.
If we can't meter it, how are we going to charge them for it?
So he became, over a period of time, deliberately thrust into the position of being a non-entity, the word almost in the dictionary, and the only credit they gave him was the invention of the Tesla coil.
He did improve free energy.
He did develop particle beam weapon systems, a death ray system in 3839.
Allegedly, I've not been able to prove it, an anti-gravity system.
Many advanced ideas.
He was well known, better known in Europe than here, but the scientific fraternity knew him here very well.
But he was a political non-entity, and he was an embarrassment, apparently, to certain other interests.
He could have prevented the problems we have with air pollution today from the excessive use of fossil fuels, and he wanted to do that.
Al, what I want to know is, if it's possible to physically age someone mentally and physically to age 29, and you say you still don't know people in the government that can do this or have knowledge of it, what I'm saying is put me in touch with them because I'm paralyzed from the chest down, and I imagine I'd be well again.
And so please, I'm not being sarcastic.
Sign me up.
Get me in touch with somebody that can do that because I'd sure and hell love to be 25 years old and able-bodied again.
Now, so far you continue to age, so I can only presume if you had the ability to get in touch with anybody who could do it, you would have done it already.
On our wildcard line, you're on the air with Al Bielick.
Good morning.
unidentified
Yes, all right.
I know you're trying to squeeze in as many calls as possible, and before you cut me off, could you please allow me to finish my question to Al Bielick?
Okay, so far as the Belick family was concerned, I don't know fully just how it was handled, but I think it was a case of an adoption place, a son that was born to them, actually, and was alleged to have died.
Four months before my legal mother died in a nursing home, she came up very blankly one day, staring at me, and said, quote, the baby's dead, isn't it, unquote, since I was the only child.
This means there was a memory in a legal mother's mind of another child who had died, which says I was an adopted replacement, and then everybody concerned was brainwashed and forgetting about it, except before she died, she started to remember.
That is probably the way it was done, is all I can say on that.
As Ed Cameron, I was almost 31.
I was born in 27, according to the birth certificate, which means I would be 67 at the end of this month.
But had I lived as Ed Cameron on through in a linear fashion, today I would be, as Ed Cameron, I would be at 77 going to 78.
And the two lifetimes in series says I would be some ways around 97 if you put them on end to end.
A question that concerns me about time travel, that is, as the Earth is going through space at basically hundreds of thousands of miles per hour, it's displacing its placement.
How do you account for the displacement, not just the time, but the displacement?
Sure, the Earth is traveling through space, and so is the solar system.
But this does not have a direct effect on time travel per se.
If you're only manipulating one of the dimensions, namely time, you do not affect the other three unless, of course, you develop a system where you can affect the other three simultaneously.
unidentified
Yeah, it seems like your position, you're left far behind.
If you're talking about many years away, you're very far behind in position.
Yes, Mr. Belak, please correct me if I'm confusing you with someone else, but did I hear you speak several months back about concerning two Mars expeditions that you had had something to do with?
Yes, that's true, and that was in the Montauk Project.
unidentified
Okay, could you please speak a little of that, especially as to what, if anything, was found and also the nature of the crafts that got people to Mars?
I did speak of that because the Mars colonies found entrances to what appeared to be an underground sealed.
Radio communication indicated that they couldn't get into it.
Montauk was contacted, and with proper coordinates, they sent a probe into the underground to find out what was there, and they found an extensive cavern system, which had at one time been inhabited.
So after they sent a camera, and it didn't disappear in rock, they sent several crews up, and they found a lot of artifacts in the underground.
And this indicated there had been an extensive civilization at one time on Mars, and was still intact underground.
The surface works have been largely eroded over 250,000 or so years.
I was on two of those trips, perhaps more than two as I remember now, but two unauthorized ones with Duncan and myself, and we had our wrists slapped after we got back from the second one, and we were pulled off that project.
How far that went afterwards, I don't know, but it wasn't a very extensive exploration.
No further back than the 1927 thing, as Al Bielick.
What else may have been accomplished at Montauk?
I still have not pulled all my memories on that, and there were many projects going on I had no connection with.
But we do know from data at Montauk that they were capable of going at least 100,000 years into the past, and it is said by those who worked on the project a million years into the future.
Perhaps they could go further.
We don't know.
They had a capability of going very far into the past or the future.
Now, there are some people whose psychics claim they could do it on command and on demand.
Possibly so, but nevertheless, in this very real physical sense, the aliens are now rather reticent to talk with too many humans.
There has been a great deal of problems with the U.S. government, and we have our own Star Wars defense systems in place in orbit, and they have let orders out that anyone who comes closer than 250 miles to the surface of the Earth, unless they are invited, will be shot out of the sky.
Psychotronics is basically a study of the science of the interaction of mind with matter, more specifically electronic devices, and how they can interact with the mind using devices or devices interacting on the mind.
And there is an organization, the United States Psychotronics Association, that has been in existence since 1975, specifically to study that aspect and people who have worked in that field for years.
Men like T.G. Hieronymus, now deceased, were one of the heavy mainstays.
And the work really goes back to an MD in San Francisco at the turn of the century who started out the whole business.
But it's well developed in the civilian sector, but the government also has their own programs going, well covered, very well established and very advanced.