But making people reliant on that social safety net and then having generation after generation reliant on that social safety net, you stifle all growth and development and make people dependent.

My argument would be a system functions really well when people are immunized from real bad luck, right? Things that they – it's not the consequence of their bad decision-making. It's actually, you know, you happen to get a tumor because of a genetic vulnerability or an encounter with some chemical that you had no ability to know was there.

But that as soon as you start immunizing people from the downstream effects of their own bad decisions where they had better decisions that were available to them, you just get the evolution of civilization into a quagmire.

Yeah, and you take away protections for people, and they will get to a point where the only thing they can rely on is charity. I mean, we see it already with GoFundMes for healthcare stuff and all that shit. You see the beginnings of pauper states beginning.