You want, game theoretically, the ideal strategy is perfect amorality because it can behave morally when that's advantageous and it can behave immorally when that's advantageous. That is inherently the best. I'm not saying it's good. It's not defensible. But I'm saying just game theoretically, that is going to be the most effective strategy is one that can be moral and amoral or it can behave in whatever way is ideal for the individual circumstance.