Right now, and for the last couple of years, there's been an intense drive for countries all over the world to adopt the IHRA definition of antisemitism. The definition of antisemitism from the International Holocaust Remembrance Association conflates criticism. Of Israel and anti Zionism with anti Semitism. So that's it. Once you have that, the cycle is set up and it perpetuates on its own volition because Israel acts insane, commits genocides, commits massacres, bombs apartment buildings full of innocent civilians, and that outrages people. So people speak out about that. People get angry about that. Now, that very reasonable and legitimate criticism of the brutal actions of a nation state is then transmuted through this. Definition into anti Semitism. And so the worse Israel acts, the more people complain about it, the more people complain about Israel, the more you can say anti Semitism is rising, the more you can say anti Semitism is rising, the more money you can collect, the more you can put fear in the hearts of Jewish people and fear in the hearts of non Jewish people and convince them to hand over more power, convince them to hand over more censorship because of the shocking rise in anti Semitism that came about entirely because you redefined the word to mean criticism of a state that is acting as belligerent. And objectionable as humanly possible. And the result of all of this is that all around the world, anti Semitism laws are being passed on the basis of the IHRA and in connection with all of the other surveillance and censorship campaigns going on, like digital ID, mandatory ID to get on the internet, you know, under eight, protecting people who are under 18, despite the fact that Europe isn't even really having children.