This article, the local paper Whitewashing a Sensationalized Report of Pianca's speech, was then picked up by the Drudge Report, and immediately a right-wing attack commenced. But then, as people started to analyze the quotes provided to the Gazette Enterprise and compared them to a transcript of Pianca's speech, things didn't add up. The quotes were taken entirely out of context, and often from different parts of the speech. People who were there came forward and called MIMS assessment a, quote, dishonest mischaracterization and said, quote, Dr. Pianca in no way advocated billions of deaths from Ebola or said anything that would lead a reasonable person to think he was doing so. I've read the speech and I 100 percent concur with this. I find it very hard to believe that someone could reach the conclusions that MIMS did without doing so intentionally. Oh, good. Well, that's settled, and I assume that the right wing would never, ever use that as an attack. Oh, you're not giving me a smile on that. No, that doesn't sound good. I think if you look at the available information, it becomes pretty clear that Mims was likely offended by Pianca's tone and how he doesn't care for creationist and climate denial positions. In his speech, Pianca said, quote, The biggest enemy we face is anthropocentrism.