So also, there was this Stanford Internet Observatory Cyber Policy Center. They did a review of Getter's operations in August 2021, and they found some kind of some fun stuff and then also some not fun stuff. Fun stuff, quote, Gitter markets itself as a non-biased social network where users are able to post content more freely than Twitter. In some ways, however, Gitter is more restrictive with content policy than the platform it contrasts itself with. For example, in the app, but not on the website, users were initially prevented from posting expletives, presented with an error message of, sorry, we don't allow abusive words. You fundamentally don't understand your audience, sir. Abuse is the point. Now, more troubling, less funny, this report also found, quote, very few, if any, mechanisms for detecting spam, violent content, pornography, and child exploitation imagery are present. Gitter instead appears to be relying on community reporting models, which has not proved successful.