And what you find is that the first story relating Alex Jones to Sandy Hook was literally one week after the election in 2016. One week after the election in 2016, and you have GQ publishing Sandy Hook Truther Alex Jones says he got a nice thank you call from the president elect. So, never once in the four years following the massacres, Alex Jones and Sandy Hook included in a single headline together. And it's only one week after the election that GQ decides an attack vector on Donald Trump will be to go after Alex Jones in association with Sandy Hook.

I'm not going to say who, but the family member said, Only 2% of what you hear in the media is true. Now, sit with that for a second. Only 2% of what you hear in the media is true.

So, Skelton put out the Guardian to their credit. London Guardian is the only one that covered it.

The London Guardian ran an article that I almost shot my crew once. None of it's true.

These people are out of their minds. This is why people like Brandon Weickert that was on last hour. You've got to listen to us because the talking heads on TV have no clue what they're talking about.

And of course, CNN calls it a gun issue. Is that the one where they called it a gun person? Then that was in BC, right? It might have been this one. Yeah, yeah, I think that was the one. Yeah, that is the one. They called it a gun person, 2-3.

I mean, you look at the mainstream media coverage of this, the New York Times coverage of it, which we talked about in a previous episode of the show. They wrote an article about Epstein's ties to Silicon Valley. Other people who had far less extensive of a relationship with Epstein got paragraphs in that story. Reed Hoffman was only mentioned in one sentence along with three other people. So he does seem to be getting a pass from, you know, Michael, if you want to characterize this as a feeding frenzy or moral panic or hysteria or what have you. Whatever it is, he seems to be getting a pass from the media.

So there was very little known about Epstein other than the prosecution, what he was found guilty of, because the media wasn't doing the stories.

Well, here's the article they published two days ago. What everyone assumes about every MC. They said, yeah, he was a leader, but there was no real elite. There's nothing to see there. Now, that's not as bad as stuff they wrote a few years ago in 2022, the great fake child sex trafficking epidemic.

It's what Murdoch determines is most important story, which is a missing grandmother.

And none of it's in the corporate media. Instead, it's all Trump's guilty, Trump's involved with no evidence.

I mean, Epstein is a leftist, but the so-called independent media spends most of its time now. Oh, look, Steve Bannon, you know, talk to him about politics and supporting Republican candidates. That's what Bannon does to everybody. Texts and calls me all the time for years. And look, Steve Bannon did an interview with him. And if you watch the interview, he grills him and calls him the devil and stuff. I mean, that's what Steve Bannon does is interviews. So, oh, God, the Republicans, their fingerprints are all over. Steve Bannon interviewed him. And, oh, Trump, you know, was a socialite and knew him because they lived in the two same cities. We're both rich. This isn't a defense of Trump. It's that most of the time is being spent either defending Trump or attacking Trump or saying he's involved or he's not when hiding in plain view is the most sensationally evil stuff ever that touches thousands of top corporate people and governmental leaders and the Labor Party and the other globalists in Europe.

Every time I criticize something Trump's doing, the corporate media runs headlines. Jones turns against Trump. Jones done with Trump.

It took about a week to get the corporate media to be forced to show the footage from in front of Ms. Good ramming Mr. Ross in Minnesota.

I've checked nobody, not ABC, not CNN, not CBS. They will not show the different camera footage from in front of her hitting him with the car and him flying up over the hood and almost dying.

The national media doesn't want to cover this because the leaders in question are Democrats, of course.

And all the talking heads, Jimmy Kimmel, CNN, the Washington Post, they're all saying this officer murdered her in cold blood, and they're showing deceptive still shots. I mean, this is criminal activity, saying that the vehicle never touched him, even though it hits him. He goes up over the side of the hood and back.

And the Washington Post today publishes this and just says, look, he never got touched by the vehicle.

The media doesn't track all the stuff Kennedy's done.

Well, my issue is, is that it's sucking all the oxygen out and the left is celebrating it.

95% of what I cover and do is really just analyzing things that are admitted and then trying to get the public to actually realize that stuff's real and they can go look it up for themselves.

Fox News, I got a clip here, had the former head of the Office of National Intelligence on, and they were just recapping the coup against America. And then my question out of all this is, why has this not happened?

Meanwhile, you can go to Tony Podesta, 2007, giant magazine that the Washington Post puts out once a year about art. He's on the cover, Dangerous Art. And it's all children, graphic paintings. Children in dungeons chained up, bleeding from their orifices. Like, here's the kids we just raped. I mean, this is the mild stuff right here.