Ivan Rakeland and Viva Fry dissect the legal fallout surrounding Dr. Anthony Fauci, focusing on whistleblower Dr. Morenz's indictment for destroying emails regarding Wuhan lab gain-of-function research. They debate prosecuting Fauci despite President Biden's alleged autopen pardon, while highlighting a May 13th hearing before Senator Rand Paul. The discussion covers Cole Allen's not guilty plea against Judge Jeanine Pirro, Rakeland's defamation lawsuit against Dr. Terry Adiram over unlawful military vaccine mandates, and critiques a Los Angeles County Federation of Labor ad targeting Spencer Pratt, suggesting the Streisand effect may ultimately benefit the Republican candidate. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Fauci, Kushner, and Pence Fallout00:15:02
All right, Ivan, hold on.
I'm gonna.
What song is that?
You like that song?
I don't know.
I might have liked it when I was fourteen.
My taste has gotten very fine over the last three decades.
It's Blink 182 or nothing.
Ivan, well, I'm going to put on.
Well, while we're watching the rest of this, because we can actually just imagine the music, this is about Fauci.
You were supposed to come on last week.
Actually, let's just take this idea.
Not you, not you.
This.
Ivan, how goes the battle?
For everybody who's meeting you for the first time, first of all, everybody, welcome.
Viva Fry.
It's the three o'clock Rumble show, and Ivan Rakeland is coming back on.
He was supposed to be on last week, but.
We had a miscommunication when I put my phone on, do not disturb, and then went live.
Ivan, how goes the battle?
Who are you for those who don't know?
The battle continues, it never stops while I'm alive.
Who am I?
I'm just a patriot trying to get the autocorrect in our country going.
And apparently, we have to escalate in order to be able to do that.
Well, okay, let's.
We're going to get into Brian Cole.
You've been following Brian, no, not Brian Cole.
You've been following Cole Allen.
Brian Cole, you were supposed to be at, or you were trying to be at the hearing for Cole Allen today.
That's the would be assassin.
At the White House Correspondence Dinner, but you've also been following Fauci for the longest of times.
And the recent news that broke was Dr. Morenz, one of Fauci's, how do I want to say it, enablers, co conspirators, was indicted for destroying emails, attempting to bypass FOIA, a number of charges under the indictment.
You've been following this for the longest of times.
You were famously sitting behind Fauci during those congressional hearings.
I guess on the one hand, flesh out the incestuous and very close relationship between Morenz and Fauci, and then what can be done to potentially indict, prosecute Fauci given his pardon.
No, I think you hit that in terms of Morenz.
He was a senior advisor for Anthony Fauci at the NAIAD, National Institute for Autoimmune Infectious Diseases, something like that.
Infectious Diseases, yeah.
And for those who, he was caught.
We were talking about it at the time, actually, because when people were making FOIA requests, they were coming up against stone walls.
And it turns out, in addition to deleting stuff, they were finding ways to bypass people's ability to FOIA documents that were relevant for establishing that the coronavirus was the result of gain of function research at a Wuhan lab in China.
Yeah, but Anthony Fauci didn't want us to basically take the prevailing, I wouldn't say prevailing, but the initial declassified version of that lab, the theory of the origins of COVID.
There was one Intel community entity that had a moderate level of confidence that it was a lab leak.
And there were four elements, I believe, that came to the conclusion that it was zoonotic.
The zoonotic theory was the prevailing one, but it was a low level of confidence.
So it was kind of a toss up, right?
Early on, at least that's what was disclosed.
And I guess we're trying to, we're finding out with the releases from Bobby Kennedy, not Bobby Kennedy, but Senator Rand Paul and Ron Johnson, what they're looking at.
Rand Paul is focused on the origins, Ron Johnson is focused on the negative.
Impacts of the alleged quote unquote vaccines, the so called vaccines.
But to get back to your original question of Morenz, he's only one individual that was found to cover up the information related to whatever it may be that he was covering up in order for it to not be disclosed.
And I think some of that is going to be identified, would be my guess, on Wednesday, just in less than two days, during the hearing that is scheduled at 10 a.m. before the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, chaired by Rand Paul, where there is a Quite a substantial whistleblower that's coming forward.
And Senator Rand Paul has been not only hyping up that Anthony Fauci needs to be prosecuted by today for his testimony five, was it five, six years ago, maybe five years ago before him.
But I think that, I mean, there's a lot to unpack here when you talk about pardon and this and that.
Let's just start off with the first thing of supposedly today's the deadline to go after Fauci, but it's only to go after Fauci for one thing.
There's a lot of things that we're going to be able to go after Falchion.
But the one thing that Senator Rand Paul is referring to is the false testimony of 18 USC 1001 violation from five years ago, where he testified.
And so, yeah, technically on that one, the statute of limitations is going to run.
But I think Senator Rand Paul is using this as a method to showcase, without directly going after President Trump, without directly going after Jared Kushner.
Without directly going after Mike Pence, right, who ran the COVID task force, all three of which were bosses, if you will, of Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burks, and the rest of the COVID White House task force.
It's essentially Rand Paul indirectly saying, hey, we all can see America that this DOJ is not going to go after Anthony Fauci.
The next question is, why is that?
And I kind of laid it out indirectly right there.
It's because Jared Kushner was the shadow governor of the White House coronavirus task force.
So, if you go after Anthony Fauci, that means he's going to take down with him Jared Kushner, Mike Pence, and on up, is my assessment.
Let me bring up one thing here just so that people will be aware.
We talked about the pardon thing, too.
Well, yeah, for sure.
But just so people may or may not be aware, this is from last week, but upcoming Rand Paul says whistleblower will testify next week.
That was last week.
So, this upcoming week about the COVID 19 cover up.
And let's see, next week, be holding a hearing with a whistleblower who will testify publicly about the COVID cover up.
Mark your calendars Wednesday, May 13th.
10 a.m., the truth is coming.
Two questions.
One obvious you're going to be there, I presume, or is it open to the public?
Of course.
Okay.
I have to be there.
Now, second question.
This is something like I'll see if I can find the tweet when Trump was running in 2024 and he continued to celebrate the success of the vaccine, even to jeers and boos at events.
And I was like, you know, at some point, you're just going to have to say Fauci lied.
They falsified the results or concealed the bad results from us, and we didn't know.
And therefore, we can now turn around and faced with the new information, go after Fauci.
In order for Fauci to be able to take down Kushner with him, it would necessarily involve, as a factual timeline, that Kushner was aware either of the gain of function research at Wuhan being funded by a third party NGO via Fauci.
It would imply that Kushner was aware of some of the incriminating information.
I would imagine they weren't.
And so, why wouldn't they?
Not necessarily.
So, yeah, I agree with you.
I have not seen any evidence that Jared Kushner would have been aware of the gain of function component to it.
It.
What I am lying or the lying about it.
Right.
So I'll grant that.
Obviously, I haven't seen any evidence of it.
If there is any evidence, I'd be happy to see it.
But I have no beef with anybody.
I just want the truth out.
So as it comes to the delivery of the remdesivir, the protocols, the ventilators, the issuance of the face masks, the toilet face toilets, the subsequently, I think the PCR tests, right?
The White House Coronavirus Task Force, while Jared Kushner and Mike Pence were on it, those were the products that were being distributed to PPE, right?
And so then it begs the question at what point in time did Jared Kushner, if at all, Mike Pence and Deborah Burks and Anthony Fauci realize that those of us that were raising the alarm that, hey, guess what?
These are products that are emergency use authorized products.
You cannot, one, mandate them.
And number two, there's some evidence and increasing since then over the last six years.
That the ventilators were actually killing people.
The remdesivir protocol was killing people.
It was not safe and effective.
So, then at what point did Fauci know?
And then, if they're working together on the White House coronavirus task force from March and then later May, when Pence took over in 2020, at what point in time did any and all of those know that what they were distributing out to the states was actually destructive, right?
And then you have the question of how much risk of litigation do these three have, whether it's civil or whether it's criminal based on their mens rea.
And now, this is the issue.
And this is not because I'm a Trump sycophant or a Trump administration sycophant whatsoever, although people still say it.
I wouldn't, I would be in.
You'd need to see evidence before you think anything ill of Kushner in terms of this process.
Mike Pence, he's the politician.
Relying on the experts.
What we do know, as a matter of fact, is not that Mike Pence and Jared Kushner knew that the six feet was just arbitrarily decided, that Fauci knew that there was.
But I argue that those two provided top cover for the Anthony Faucis so that at a minimum, Jared Kushner, his associates could make money hand over fist on the contract determinations for all these emergency use authorized products.
That evidence exists that Jared Kushner was the shadow governor of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, used private emails.
Along with his buddies, in order to dole out the masks and other products.
So, how much did Jared Kushner benefit financially from that?
I haven't seen any evidence of that, but I suspect that if we were to look into his communications and everything, the evidence would probably show up that he would have financial gain from it.
I would have gone the other way and said that they were using Fauci not as plausible deniability, but as the cover, like, okay, I'm just doing what the expert is telling me, and I would be.
I would be flabbergasted if they knew that Fauci behind closed doors was admitting to or acknowledged involved in gain of function research.
If he knew that the masks did nothing, even though he was saying then, you know, to use them, if he was saying that infection provided no immunity, and I actually believed it, but that if they knew he changed his tone, you know, as the months and months continue.
Two points I want to make, Viva, real quick.
So that I haven't addressed yet is number one.
The time for President Trump and Jared and Mike Pence to say, you know what, I was lied to by Anthony Fauci.
I think that ship has sailed because there's enough of us that maybe a couple years back that would have been the case.
But with all the disclosures by Senator Ron Johnson, by Senator Rand Paul, the subcommittee hearings, the committee hearings, Marjorie Taylor Greene had field hearings on the subject matter.
Thomas Massey discussed it early on when he called for it.
He was the first one to really sound the alarm when everybody wanted to sign the CARES package, the COVID relief package, where they wanted to, by proxy vote, Vote to allocate trillions of dollars, but he wanted an in person vote.
So, year after year after year, the warning signs were there.
The Declaration of Military Accountability, 231 members that signed the declaration on January 1st, 2024, laying out the harms of the so called vaccines and how it pushed soldiers out, how it harmed individuals.
So, how many years are you going to give them a pass, right?
Yeah.
I'm not giving them a pass anymore.
Now, you could say that, oh, you know what?
After this hearing on Wednesday, now the American public realizes that, yes, it was a lab incident and a lab leak, and all the policies subsequent to that were garbage, to include those that were approved by Mike Pence, Jared Kushner, and Donald Trump, right?
So, based on my conversations with senators and those that talk to the president, he's already been briefed on all of this, and he has decided to go ahead and ignore all of this.
The harms, like all of this related to the whole COVID con.
So now it begs the question why is Fauci not being prosecuted and the pardons?
I suspect that the Republicans want those pardons, they're going to advocate that the auto pen pardon from Biden is legitimate.
The Republicans that were complicit in, at a minimum, the cover up, because guess what?
They signed, oops, let me turn that off.
They signed off, not signed off, but they also received the jabs.
And so, at a minimum, if you're a Republican, which is 98 out of the 100 in the Senate, because the only two that I'm tracking that didn't take the jab, Senator Rand Paul and Senator Ron Johnson, the rest of them really don't want to go into it.
And so, it's easier for them to allow for the auto pen to pardon Anthony Fauci so that everyone can move on from that and not litigate that.
But the problem for all of them is folks like me, folks like Rand Paul, folks like Thomas Massey.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, the pure bloods out there, right, that are not going to let this one go.
And I can speak for myself.
Because this administration is not going to hold anyone to account for COVID accountability, this administration must be deemed an accessory after the fact as well in the next America First administration and hold everyone to account in the involvement of the conspiracy to eventually through the policies.
Injure millions, slaughter tens to hundreds of thousands at a minimum, according to CDC's data.
And so the ship has sailed for me.
So now we have to hold everyone to account that was involved in the policies and then their subsequent cover up.
I think I made that point clear enough.
Oh, no, there's no question.
I mean, I won't play the clip from Megyn Kelly.
Oh, and last thing.
Accountability for the Cover Up00:12:27
Yeah.
The only way that you litigate this pardon, whether it's legit or not, is you go ahead and arrest Fauci.
Yeah.
And then you have him.
Raise the defense that I was pardoned.
It is, I mean, that is the obvious answer.
The statute of limitations I'm less concerned about because when it comes to the cover up, it was obviously not just an ongoing conspiracy.
I think it's still ongoing to today.
What is this?
Right?
No, there's no question about that.
But I won't play the entire Megyn Kelly clip, but this was when she had Trump on.
And she says Trump is not proud of the vaccines and doesn't want to talk about the speed of production, which many considered a success.
I won't play the entire clip, but I want to play my assessment of it, which was it was a great answer.
Great question, five on 10 for the answer.
The better answer would have been Operation War Speed was only intended to design a vaccine for the most vulnerable.
While pursuing available therapeutic options, subsequent one size fits all vaccine mandates was never the original objective.
And continuing to push the one size fits all endless boosters is not something I would have done.
This is speaking in the answer for Trump.
Also, now that it has been revealed that the trials were bogus and prejudicial information withheld, I will order investigations into the trials, the data, and any information that may have been concealed from me and my administration.
If any such shenanigans took place, there will be accountability.
The only problem with that answer is it's now close to two years old.
No, I'm sorry.
What is it?
It's close to three years old now.
So he argued that.
In my opinion, because he's vaccinated, he's boosted.
JD Vance is vaccinated.
Marco Rubio is vaccinated, right?
So, in essence, all of them have to look in the mirror and say, you know what?
Oh, yeah, I was duped.
Do you think their egos are going to allow them to say, I was duped for six years?
But I would have imagined, and again, I'm trying not to doom pill or black pill myself.
I would have imagined that after it comes out, Dr. Morenz, put him in doctor, he should lose that title.
Morenz. Was caught concealing, destroying documents to hide the fact that they were lying about essential elements.
After that comes out, they would then say, Let's look at all of it right now.
And maybe I was duped, and maybe Trump shouldn't have gotten that booster at Christmas last year.
Maybe they were duped and look into it.
October 10th is when he got it.
September, October, it was after.
But who's counting?
I know that people are attributing differences in behavior to certain specific dates.
That's one of them.
I don't necessarily agree.
September 10th is one of them.
When the power vacuum in the White House went over to Miriam Adelson, and October 10th is about the same time when he started endorsing Albert Berla and Bob, what's his name, Bill Gates, and Mom, what's it called?
What's that guy's name?
Not Cuomo.
Cuomo in New York City.
The other date that some people pick up on is February of 2025, when he was gifted a golden pager.
That was another date that some people attribute.
Doesn't matter.
Set all that aside.
I would have imagined one and the other six times that he was visited by the offer of that gift.
Once it came out that Morenz actively destroyed evidence, concealed evidence, because they knew that they were lying about the origins, that was the moment where you could say, All right, let's look at it.
Let's look at Pfizer.
Let's look at everyone who profited off of this, who concealed information from me.
And it says, No, he forgot that Pfizer tried to screw him by not disclosing the so called successful vaccine until after.
Yeah, but Pfizer.
Donated so much too, right?
Well, and then Albert Bula just won some sort of international prize of freedom.
But so I look, I donate to both sides of the aisle, right?
And the disinformation platforms, whether it's MSLSD or faux news, right?
Criminal news network.
So, I mean, Donald Trump could argue that no, Pfizer actually benefited me.
They donated quite a bit and we won.
Let me see.
I want to see how much they donated in 20 years.
Similar to how he, you know, lauds and fawns over Miriam Adelson's $250.
Million dollars.
Her quarter of a billion is.
I'm not sure what Pfizer donated recently.
I'll double check that.
There's zero question that people felt a distinct betrayal when they saw Bourle in the White House, Zuckerberg in the White House.
And it was totally.
And I'm trying not to betrayal after betrayal.
Yeah.
And you see, when I look at you now, I see despair, and I'm trying not to get there yet.
So I want to hold out hope that there will be opportunity.
It's just a.
Well, you see an opportunity, but it's going to be with different players at this point in time because.
Yeah.
New alliances are strategically forming for 2026 and 2028.
And then the question is going to be, you know, can JD Vance pull back up and invigorate the populist movement?
But so Fauci, he got a pardon.
As far as I'm concerned, I got two questions for that.
Hold on, let's see it.
Hold on, let me see.
Let me take myself out, see if it's too bright.
Yeah, I'll send it to you.
Okay, and I can bring it up.
What I was going to say is crap.
What was I just about to say?
It was about the new alliances.
JD Vance.
Remember, JD Vance is vaccinated.
So from my perspective, he's disqualified from serving in my government.
You have to be a pure blood in order to serve in Ivan Rakeland's government.
Well, I'm going to double check if JD is, in fact, Jimmy J.
He is.
He said it on Joe Rogan's show.
How many did he do?
Two and then done, or did he do any boosters?
I don't know for sure, but all indications is that he did the initial set and that was it.
The question is this now.
When Fauci got the pardon, I don't understand why states can't go after Fauci.
I think they can.
International.
Chris Kobach in Kansas, Ken Pax in Texas, and who's the AG in Louisiana?
I always forget the name.
That would be another strong candidate based on indicators that I've seen in the past.
But again, I mean, what's going to happen?
President Trump's going to call and say, Hey, you're going to hurt my friends.
You're going to hurt my friends.
And what did he do to Marjorie Taylor Greene?
Hey, releasing the Epstein files is going to hurt my friends.
So he's going to give a call.
It's going to hurt my friends and son in law.
So please don't do it.
I'm not trying to put Shake 67 on blast here.
Just like, Hey, David, what's the saying?
Keep your friends closer and your enemies closer.
And I appreciate people have that theory, but it only works.
If at some point you go after your enemies, like right at some point, if you keep your enemies so close they can't be prosecuted, they're no longer enemies and they no longer regard you as an enemy.
I'm not saying that's what's happening, but it's like you say, indict Fauci and let him raise the arguments that he's been pardoned and let him raise and then let them.
I mean, let's be realistic, Viva.
Jimmy, Homie Comey is still out there freely treasoning.
You know, I mean, he didn't even show up to the hearing he was supposed to show up to.
Uh, actually, today he requested the judge, you know what, I'm not, I don't want to show up.
Let's postpone this.
He wasn't even arrested.
Okay.
So the guy that Todd Blanch says, oh, he threatened the president with 8647, which he did.
But in his infinite wisdom, Mr. Todd Blanch says, oh, he can go ahead and freely treason with John Brennan for the next three years.
Why?
Because, well, I don't know.
Good old Todd Blanch is the product of the Southern District of New York and worked for James Comey when he was the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
This is all incestuous.
We're not going to get any accountability, in my opinion, at this point.
Again, I thought we were going to be able to get there with this administration, but now we have to plan for, in spite of this administration and those that are at the DOJ, whether it's Todd Blanch, whether it's downstream from that, Judge Jeanine Pirro, right?
Still allowing Jocelyn Ballantyne to continue to flourish in these cases of Brian Cole Jr.
I mean, you've talked about it many a times on your show.
So, we now have to plan for transitioning from an America second admin to an America first admin to then be able to go scorched earth against the current America second members that are complicit and the America fifth and sixth crowd that were part of the previous illegitimate administration.
You have no idea who the whistleblower is, or do you know the whistleblower that's coming to testify on Wednesday?
Next question.
Okay.
Is it going to be anything that's going to change anything?
I guess is the bigger question.
We now know Morenz and everyone involved.
Fauci was involved in it.
They lied.
They covered up.
They concealed.
We know that Pfizer did as well.
Brooke Jackson's Key Tam lawsuit, this DOJ has not yet revived after having quashed.
Okay.
So here's what I can, like, my assessment based on me reading what's been going on in the.
Public, you know, out there available for everybody to see and running it through some AI platforms.
Bobby Kennedy and HHS has provided Senator Ron Johnson 11 million pages of documents.
Now that we have AI, that's an easy endeavor to sift through 11 million pages of documents, right?
That wasn't the case before.
So that coupled with Senator Ron Johnson being on literally every single platform to include faux news discussing.
The adverse events and deaths as a result of the COVID products, including the jabs, and Senator Rand Paul concurrently, just in a nonstop and cadence barrage, talking about Fauci, talking about this hearing coming up.
I suspect that what is going to be delivered by this is the first time I've seen both senators actually in parallel.
It's almost like it's synchronized, whereas before they were just operating separately.
It's almost as though they're.
Really beating the drum in an escalatory fashion so that Wednesday is going to be a pretty significant event.
And I'm going to go back to what I said earlier.
Bobby Kennedy cannot go too aggressive because he will be fired by Susie Wiles and potentially Donald Trump for exposing those that I just talked about, right?
So he has to kind of play along in a way that is not really exposing Donald Trump's friends, right?
Or relatives.
And so, the best constitutional path to that is to leverage the Senate, Rand Paul, Ron Johnson, to subpoena and request documents be coming in from HHS, CDC, right?
And then the subordinate agencies, FDA, CDC, et cetera.
So, with these disclosures, I think we're going to see, and I guess the relationship that those two senators have, especially Rand Paul, with the intelligence community.
Because let's face it, the only person that I'm seeing releasing and disclosing stuff that we want, that we voted for, is Tulsi Gabbard.
So I don't know if this is the case, but I'm guessing that Rand Paul finally has something of significant consequence to disclose on Wednesday that will showcase and probably tie the knot of Fauci funding the lab incident.
The lab incident being covered up by Fauci through his interactions with those in the intel community to doctor the analysis and then tie that into those from the former FBI that then censored anybody talking about the lab leak theory.
Remember when everyone was banned from talking about it?
Absolutely.
I think that there's going to be some.
Substantive connectivity between Fauci funded lab incident theory, censorship, and every name involved in that.
That creates a new line of criminal liability, from my perspective, and civil liability.
Lindsey Graham on Pardons00:14:34
Well, actually, now that you say this out loud, the pardon cannot be prospective.
So the pardon can only be from the date of the issuance, and they gave Fauci 10 years prior.
So if there has been any criminal activity or RICO conspiracy, whatever you want to call it, cover up since.
That was part of the ongoing cover up.
The pardon issued on January 5, 2020, what was it, 2025?
Would not, is it 2025?
Yeah.
Would not cover any ongoing.
It's not a pardon.
I wouldn't call it that.
The auto pen scribbles.
Well, I mean, nothing.
Not to say, not to push back on that.
I understand what you're saying is that you're going to have Republicans saying, we don't want to invalidate these pardons on the basis of the auto pen because then it will give every subsequent president.
Or, the administration has the ability to annul or declare void any pardons if they don't, you know, if they say, well, it wasn't done with an auto pen, but it wasn't, you know, he wasn't all there mentally.
So, the real reason is because they don't want to be drugged through the mud of being.
Most Republicans were promoting the vaccines.
Well, no, that's why I think you agree.
They're complicit.
Yeah, no, I would just say, like, I won't change my opinion on the warning of invalidating the auto pen pardons unless you can demonstrably prove that it was, in fact, not even anywhere near Biden's.
Understanding or knowledge that it was happening yet.
I could create a factual pattern where I could say, there's emails saying, let's do it.
He doesn't know, F him.
We got control of the pen.
Then you invalidate them.
In general, I would be more on the side of erring on the side of caution, not annulling prior pardons because you know the next administration is going to do that.
But set that aside, even the pardon, if valid, won't cover anything that was done.
To President Trump's credit, when it comes to pardons and executive orders, that's on video.
He signs it right there at the Resolute desk.
For sure.
Every single part.
And there's a video.
Yeah, but they'll just make an argument that you can invalidate.
No, the argument might be well, it wasn't invalid in form.
It'll be invalid cognitively because he wasn't, you know, he was compromised or whatever.
But set that aside for one second.
Because of the Vax, right?
Because of the Vax.
I'm not one who thinks it.
You know, Barnes has taken shit for saying, and, you know, Jones for questioning his mental acuity.
I don't, you know, he still looks fine.
I wouldn't call him anywhere near the 25th, but I can understand people are entitled to their opinion.
Yeah, I mean, is he slowing down a little bit?
He's still, he's 80 years old and he's dealing with all the stress.
On Earth, I mean, it's still doing better.
And you know, I see him live, and whether or not he's showing signs of aging, he is, but he's not there in my view, but whatever.
Um, there are two I would agree with you, even though I love no, but my dad is 83.
He, he, he, I don't think he could be president of the states, but he, you know, he shows signs of aging, but he's still damn sharp.
Um, this is the question because there's two elements to this gain of function research, the knowledge thereof, the cover up thereof, the systematic demonizing and discrediting of scientists who were raising this at a time where it could have saved.
I mean, the idea that people might have concealed the actual origins and that it was the result of gain of function human intervention, to know that would have.
Fauci authorized gain of function.
Yeah.
And now the question is going to be this, however.
That's going to be one element of it.
Then there's going to be the whole element of the rushing of the trials and the suppression of the alternative methods of treating this.
So there's going to be two.
There's a strong.
Leave me a couple minutes to talk about that and an update on my lawsuit.
This is going to be the issue then.
Fauci, whatever statute of limitations and people think, I think it's ongoing and I don't think this is one of the cases where there's a hard date.
You don't think there's going to be any meaningful action taken against Fauci.
I would posit this to you, Ivan.
If everybody knows, and most of us do believe that RFK Jr. is trying to get to the bottom of it in a politically savvy way that does not get him yeeted, like who was in charge of antitrust?
I forget her name now.
She was just fired, and Mike Davis and everybody was taking the victory lap.
Gail Slater.
Yeah, good Gail.
If RFK is trying to survive and thrive, and you would presume Trump knows it, then you would say he's letting RFK Jr. do what he needs to do, and they're sort of working together.
I would be shocked if Trump knows it, Adelson knows it, and they can't find a reason to get rid of RFK Jr.
If they needed to, they would.
So do you think that that might be their mole in the hole who's actually going to blow this thing open with the help of, of, of, The polls, and at one point, you're going to see this administration say, We're going to prosecute Fauci and we're going to prosecute Bourley.
You just don't think that's going to happen ever.
No, I think the first response again, this is my guesstimate.
After this hearing comes out, there's going to be retaliation, whoever this whistleblower is, right?
They're going to try to discredit all the information that's being put out by the whistleblower.
And then politically, President Trump is going to continue to escalate and attack Senator Rand Paul, right?
Because it's exposing Donald Trump for the COVID policies.
Okay.
Let's just face it.
And so he's going to attack him on just generally, again, of what he's working on.
I don't think he's going to attack Bobby Kennedy for it because Bobby's just kind of being responsive constitutionally to the request for documents.
But I just think that's the political path in order to protect himself publicly from that.
But I don't know.
I mean, this week is pretty major.
You got this whistleblower on Wednesday.
And then the following Tuesday is whether or not Kentucky and the rest of the country wants one America First House member to remain in office.
Or is America going to allow Miriam Adelson and Paul Singer to purchase all 100% of the Republican seats in Congress?
Because right now, we really only have one Republican that is not in America Second.
Well, Thomas Massey.
In the markets is still at 70%.
And so the Massey election, the Massey primary is next Tuesday, a week from tomorrow.
Yep.
That's going to be a big one.
He's at 70%.
I'm looking at.
That's the most important race right now in the primaries.
Yeah, I'm looking at January.
I'm going to be running through September, I think, 10th.
For Delaware is the last state that runs their primaries.
But no, we have three big races.
Just a side note.
You got Thomas Massey.
Remember, pure blood called out COVID from the get go.
Called out the J6 pipe bomb stuff, went against the weaponization.
And basically, he's undefeated on every single issue.
And on all the issues that he's undefeated on, Donald Trump is winless, right?
And he's also winless against the deep state thus far that I've seen.
And so the second one is going to be Ken Paxton versus Cornyn the following week on May 26th in Texas for the Senate seat.
That's a big one to remove Senator Cornyn.
And then the last one that's going to be really important is to take out Mr. Senator Lindsey Graham.
That's another one I'm taking.
Second week of June, I think.
I got an acute interest in that one because I've got a bet, a gentleman's bet.
It's not even a gentleman's bet.
It's a bet.
I think it's $500 to a charity of our respective choices.
Oh, no, that was over Massey with, what's his face?
Will Chamberlain.
When it comes to Lindsey Graham, I'm going to go snip and clip a part where Sean Farage said, you know, let's go primary Lindsey Graham to let Trump know that nobody likes Lindsey Graham.
Then the only question is, why the hell?
Does Trump continue to endorse war horror that nobody likes?
According to Chris Lasavita, I don't think I told you this yet.
So, at the White House Correspondents Association, after the dinner, and well, there wasn't really a dinner, but I had dinner there at the venue early because I had to go to another event, the America First Correspondents Dinner, where I received the Deep State Disruptor Award.
And then, as I was at the second venue at the National Press Club, that's when the shooting happened.
But after my event, I went back to the hotel.
Where the White House Correspondents Association dinner was, and stumbled across Chris Lasavita, who was the campaign co chair.
He's also heading up the John Cornyn PAC to support him.
During our conversation, I asked him, Why are you trying to take out Massey?
And he says, Because the boss wants that to happen.
And I asked him, What about Senator Lindsey Graham?
He said, Oh, the boss wants to, he's a friend of the bosses.
And I said, Why don't you remind your boss that it was Lindsey Graham that, as chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Back eight years ago, he was the one that provided top cover to James Comey to launch the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.
Maybe he'll reconsider endorsing Lindsey Graham, but no, Lindsey Graham knows how to boost Donald Trump's ego sufficiently to stay in his good graces.
All right, so that's some fun insider stuff.
Insider baseball.
Oh, since I'm on a big show, let me say this too.
In our conversation, it was actually surprisingly cordial because we've actually never met up until that point.
But he's been in Virginia politics for decades.
I'm aware of him.
He's aware of me.
And he said, What are you doing?
And my response was, No, friendly.
I said, Hey, neither you nor Donald Trump has a monopoly on shit posting online.
I have growing market share.
And he chuckled.
I imagine that, and not imagine, I know you.
I know what my impression was of you before getting to know you.
Same thing as Kyle Seraphim.
And I imagine that anybody who thought you were their enemies when they meet you say, Okay, you're not as big, bad, mean, and scary.
You might be scary for political reasons, but you're not an asshole.
You're, you are, I can't.
Well, I say brash versus asshole.
It's a tip or tat, right?
If you're polite to me, I'm going to go ahead and be polite back.
So next week and vice versa, if you're disrespectful, I'm going to escalate to the most extreme that you're not very, most people aren't comfortable with.
Wednesday, we got the hearing.
I'm absolutely going to be paying attention to that.
You're going to be there.
It's going to be live broadcast, correct?
Again, let me tell you this.
I have to be there.
Okay.
Yes, it will be live.
Does everybody know that?
What?
That you have to be there?
I just told you.
Okay.
All right.
So it's going to be big.
I'm going to be watching that and I will definitely be streaming that.
Okay, now.
Oh, yes.
You're going to stream it?
Oh, yeah.
Well, I think I'm going to have to.
What time was it at?
I had it on the.
Right now, just to get some hype going on this.
I saw Yanya Kellick last Wednesday at the Black Tide Gala that General Flynn and the Gold Institute did.
And I think he's going to be there covering for Epoch Times.
Lindell TV.
I think Allison from Lindell TV is going to be there.
I think Gateway Punnett's covering it.
Some independents are going to be there.
And if anybody else that you know of in the DC area, I think quite a few people are showing up.
I'm obviously getting my network mobilized and activated to attend.
I think you're going to probably see some prominent individuals in the crowd in this particular fight that will be in attendance.
And so let's just pray that the whistleblower is not stopped from being able to testify.
I'm calling you immediately after this show, Ivan.
All right.
So that is what's coming up on Wednesday.
Now, Uh, that was what we were supposed to talk about last week.
Uh, before the uh silent mode phone made it so that uh, I didn't get you on for the Wednesday show, uh, you were supposed to attend the hearing for Cole Allen today, which was when he entered his plea.
Did you end up missing the hearing because they changed it, or what?
Yeah, so apparently I was looking at the court's calendar, uh, I checked it this morning and it said it was for 1 30.
But then as I was about to go live with Lindell TV or with Emerald Robinson at one o'clock, I Yeah, about 12 45.
Kara Castronova was reporting from the White House explaining that the gentleman just pled guilty.
So, obviously, that means he was already, you know, the hearing is already complete.
So, that's why I missed it.
And so, I guess I should double check.
No, but it doesn't.
The only thing that you missed that is of particular interest is not just that he pleaded guilty, but that they made a motion to disqualify.
Everybody, everybody, the whole government, because the whole government was at the end.
Let's sensitize people to the absurdity of this because I don't know who can prosecute this if it's not.
I'm glad you're raising this because I wanted to address this.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No, no, it's because I, I mean, I heard that he pleaded guilty, but then I hear this.
So the White House Correspondents Association dinner shooter, Alan Cole, pleads not guilty.
Judge scoffs at defense's power play.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I didn't get to the scoffing part.
Okay.
The man accused of trying to kill President Trump pleaded not guilty.
Yada, yada, yada.
Here, Cole Allen, shackled.
Pleaded not guilty.
Okay, we can skip that part here.
More charges are possible.
Fine.
Alan's defense wants Pirro and her office removed from the case, citing a conflict of interest stemming from the fact that Pirro was a victim of their client's alleged crime.
What I love is actually fascinating.
They're admitting he did it then.
Right, right, right.
Exactly.
They won't be able to judge me.
I tried to kill her.
They won't judge me fairly.
So I'll bring it out because that's about the gist of it.
To me, it seems like a preposterous.
They tried it.
It's basically what they tried to do in the Tyler Robinson assassination say that because one of the daughters of one of the department police officers was at the event, they're going to pursue a vengeful justice and not fair justice.
Let's parse that real quick.
Viva, let me just jump in here.
Don't you remember?
And doesn't the audience remember back in January 6th, 2021?
Who was part of the jury pool?
January 6th Prosecutors React00:05:04
Right?
Who was the prosecutor?
Execution team.
Didn't they live in DC?
And so they're also technically the victims of the January 6th Fed insurrection, excuse me, insurrection, they said.
It's similar to what occurred.
And I don't remember a January 6th or moving based on the argument of, oh, we're trying to move this out of the federal district into a more favorable venue, right?
Nothing, change of venue never took place.
So I'd say there's some similarities here.
And I hope that the venue doesn't change.
But then again, I don't know how this is going to play out with, you know, specifically Judge Nene was in attendance, right?
I think Todd Blanch was in attendance.
Can you imagine?
I mean, what you're basically doing.
Is rewarding criminals to say go after the bigger targets and then say they can't prosecute you.
Who's left to prosecute them?
I find it again, I don't want to go freely treasoning.
James Comey's freely treasoning.
John Brennan's freely treasoning.
Although maybe we'll have some change of heart on Wednesday.
When it comes to the coal, I mean, I look at it, there's been no adjudication on it.
It's not clear if the defense is asking for the entire DOJ, I mean, I'm not to be disqualified.
My prediction, for what it's worth, you know, based on today's reporting, it's going nowhere, much like it didn't go anywhere with Tyler Robinson.
It wouldn't change anything.
That being said, there were some judges who should have recused themselves in the January 6 cases, not because they were victims and therefore partial, but because they expressed their animosity quite clearly and quite openly, which made them unfair and unable to adjudicate.
But again, we're not talking about the judge here.
We're talking about the prosecutors.
Their job is to prosecute to some extent, you know, pursue justice and prosecute.
To some extent, yeah.
No, can I say, look, it's not the prosecutor's job to seek convictions.
They're supposed to seek justice.
But We're not talking about the judge.
Disqualify a judge that has showed animosity, personal bias, whatever.
But the prosecution's job is to prosecute based on the crime that they charged and that got approved in the indictment.
But yeah, no, so I say it's laughably stupid, but we haven't gotten a ruling on it yet, and we'll see what happens there.
Okay, that's Cole Allen.
Speaking of Allen, why don't we just bounce back to another Allen?
Brian Cole, I should say.
No, we're not bouncing back to another Allen.
We're bouncing back to another Cole.
Brian Cole, any meaningful news on what you've been following there?
Do you have any details?
I'm open to Insider Baseball.
Um, I would say monitor the following Twitter account, and I'm just gonna leave it at this.
And while you talk about Twitter, let me bring up what you sent me earlier.
I do not bring this up with approval, there we go, or admonishment.
Free Brian Cole.
We got Ivan Oakland says, Donald, who's Miriam's little biot?
Rubio, and who else?
To which, uh, then you got, um, you know, it's funny, someone's gonna say this is unfair, this is mean, whatever.
You know, when Trump says, Oh, it's unfair.
It's mean.
No, but I mean, like, it's also, it's like Trump effectively said as much when he says, You know, like, you give $250 million, you're going to get some access.
I mean, this is.
Yeah, you're going to own me.
What's the Twitter account?
Let me bring this one up.
Free Brian Cole.
Yeah, I was scrolling around and.
Dude, okay, not that I'm paying attention to numbers.
This is either a new or a very unknown account as of yet.
Yeah, so.
Free Brian Cole, just family standing together in support of their son.
Yeah, April.
Okay, let's go follow this.
So it looks like the family account.
This is interesting.
Okay, so family standing, this is where it would be nice to know if it's an official account.
Let's just go here.
Okay, based in the United States, that's already a good sign.
Family standing strong in support of their son, grandson, brother, and cousin.
I've confirmed this, Vivo.
Okay, so good.
Well, whatever that's worth, and I'll just leave it at that.
Okay.
Because I just don't want to, I don't think they want to identify who specifically is running it, but it is.
I confirmed this family.
Yep.
Okay.
Excellent.
So, the reason why I came across this is I was scrolling around and I saw the video.
If you scroll down to the first tweet, there's only been about four or five tweets published by this account.
I'll bring it back.
And there's a video.
And I saw the family being interviewed.
So I thought, wow, this might be something legit.
And that's why it caught my attention.
And I followed up and verified that one, right?
I think right there.
That's a long video.
I won't play that, but I want to see.
They're getting to the pings here.
Oh, they're retweeting Armitage.
Brian Cole Jr., no Nissan Santra seen in video.
Below is a map showing the locations where the United States Capitol Police cameras.
Everyone should follow Armatas as well.
If you want, like, I don't want to use the word autistic because people sort of make a joke of it, but this is like Rain Man level information and detail and analysis that you get.
It's a map showing the United States Capitol Police cameras and where the footage and images were canvassed.
Despite all this coverage, no Nissan Santra appears in the Vehicle of Interest file index.
Terry Adiram Memo Statement00:15:19
In fact, despite all these sites, the only evidence submitted to place coal in the area is an LPR and a cell tower data.
How can we imagine that Cole, who has been described as having the mind of a 16 year old, evade all this security?
We're going to see when that's.
Hey, can we do a last kind of update on my lawsuit?
Oh, yeah.
So one of them related to, oh, coincidentally, COVID.
For those who don't know, you are being sued by, give me her name again.
She's the former Terry Adiram.
What was Terry Adiram?
Dr. Terry Adiram was the former acting assistant secretary of defense for health affairs that wrote and that signed off on the memo on September 14th of 2021, implementing the COVID jab mandate, compelling folks to consume the only one that was available, which was the emergency use authorized product, the Pfizer BioNTech.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, you can't compel unless you have a presidential waiver in writing.
And so even if you Considered Joe Biden as legitimate, which I never do.
Let's just say hypothetically, he was.
He still didn't write a waiver in writing to compel military service members into consuming the emergency use authorized product.
And thusly, that memo that she signed, the implementation memo from September 14th of 2021, is unlawful.
And Pete Hegseth said so last year.
And also, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness said so in a memo, which is a rank above her former position.
And the Department of Homeland Security a couple months ago in a press release stated that the mandate was unconstitutional.
So let's take a look here.
We are in the middle of discovery, folks, through August of later this year.
And I don't know if I should disclose some of the folks that I want to call as witnesses.
Hold on.
So you got to tell people what you're being sued for.
So this is Terry.
Oh, yeah.
She issued this.
I'm being sued.
Go ahead.
Well, because she issued this, I don't know, whatever you want to call it.
A decree that everyone in the military should be subjected to the mandate of the COVID shot.
The HEGS has come out now and rescinded that, declared it unlawful.
When Terry Adiram was appointed to, I forget what position of the Trump administration, you came out and put on blast.
She later became the senior health professional at the Central Intelligence Agency.
And once you put that on blast, she was swiftly terminated before she even got to get started.
She said.
I had nothing to do with her firing.
Well, not just that.
When people want to talk about tortious interference, there has to be a tort to the interference.
Otherwise, that claim was dismissed against me.
So I think defamation, tortious interference.
There were a number of.
Intentional infliction of emotional distress.
I know the truth hurts, right?
They got $1.5 billion against Alex Jones for that.
So why not try to work on that precedent?
All but one of her claims got dismissed, or it was two claims against you that still survived, correct?
It went from four claims, four dismissed, and then she amended the complaint.
Two remained in her attempted amended complaint, and then the judge dismissed one.
And so we're down to just the defamation.
And the defamation is that she is the architect of the DOD's jab mandate that resulted in significant harms.
Well, guess what, folks?
Senator Ron Johnson just laid it out for us a couple weeks ago.
And guess what, folks?
And by the way, based on evidence from March of 2021, which predates my truthful statements that were made and predates.
The memo that she signed.
So she should have known that her mandate was going to be harmful and she should have known that it was going to be unlawful.
And guess what, folks?
Little Birdie may or may not have told me that neither the JAG nor the general counsel within certain parts of the Department of Defense, let's just say, never staffed the memo that she signed.
It never went through the proper staffing process.
As you're talking, I'm trying to pull up the exact civil and criminal litigation shall continue against her.
But in the meantime, I will continue to expose through discovery what she may or may not have.
And we're going to introduce different hearings from the legislative branch with all these documents showing the harms of the vaccines and that they were actually emergency use authorized experimental drugs.
I'm going to read them, Ivan.
So it was on a podcast with Ivan, with Roseanne Barr, correct?
Yes.
I don't need to get it.
I'm just going to read the summaries.
According to court filings, including Adiram's complaint and opposition brief, three specific statements on Barr's podcast that Reichlin made.
She, quote, signed the memo institutionalizing the illegal vax mandate on the Department of Defense, end quote.
She is, quote, this one I love, criminally liable and legal.
Real quick.
Would you consider illegal and unlawful to be interchangeable?
Well, in this, first of all, I mean, look, I may have been, I might be getting a little bit not softer, not.
Less stringent on what I think is considered defamation in the states.
Because when you say criminally liable and face, oh no, sorry, that's the next one.
Signed the institutionalizing the illegal vax mandate on the DOD, it's been declared unlawful.
So there I would say illegal and unlawful are the same.
And you're not accusing her of a crime that is defamatory per se or a crime that would defame one's reputation.
This is a statement of, I think, incontrovertible fact at this point.
But even if it weren't, it's not defamatory.
The next one, I'm saying glibly, you're getting close.
She is, quote, criminally liable and will face consequences for genocide and for mutilation.
I mean, that to me is, I say, you're saying she's criminally liable when, as a matter of fact, she hasn't been found criminally liable.
And one would say this is, in fact, just your statement of opinion.
But the full statement is a question.
True.
Well, first of all, also, will she face criminal, will she be criminally liable and face consequences for genocide and for mutilation?
What I love now, if we know that this is a, um, A gene altering therapy.
It's a question.
It's a question with an L. You know what you're saying, it's an accusation.
I'm saying, even if it's a statement, even you're saying, I believe you have been doing all your life.
Guess what?
Even if it were a statement, we just seen 38,000 deaths as a result of the vaccine, the so called vaccine mandate, according to CDC's own records.
And I have a witness that's going to testify to exactly how many of those 38,000 deaths are attributed to the military population.
So then, when you show more than several dozen, more than hundreds attributed to the military population, Does that meet the threshold of being able to state rhetorical hyperbole exactly how I just mentioned?
Not just that.
It is rhetorical hyperbole and clearly as indicated or understood as much andor predictions that you might be wrong about.
Like, for example, the third statement is she will, quote, be convicted of genocide and mass mutilation at the very least.
That's a prediction.
I think you're going to be wrong on it because I don't think she's going to face any of these charges because if she is.
Well, not this administration.
Well, that's what I was going to say.
Okay.
But in the next administration, the America First administration.
We can go ahead.
Remember, there's no statute of limitations on capital offenses.
I still think it's clearly a prediction and not, you're not calling her a convicted sex offender.
The only time that I'm wrong on that prediction is when I am deceased or the person that I mentioned that is the one responsible for this expires.
Hold on.
Can you be posthumously convicted of a crime?
Obviously.
Convicted of a never thought of this one before.
Can your estate be posthumously?
No, you generally cannot be convicted posthumously.
I thought certain like war crimes you could be, but hope springs a turtle.
Ivan, um, let me see if I got any more questions.
Do we anything else we wanted to get to that, um, that we didn't get to yet?
I, I love it.
No, this is key because, uh, uh, I'm not gonna hold off for now until we finalize this, but I've been going back and forth with my legal team and, uh, Some of these witnesses that we'll be calling and the documentations and information that they have, let's just say I may or may not have mentioned them already earlier in this episode.
No, dude, I love it.
May I ask the indiscreet question?
Wouldn't it be great to call Pete Hegseth and the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, Anthony Tata, and I don't know, Jay Bhattacharya, head of the CDC, and oh, I don't know, the head of the FDA, Marty McCarry, or Bobby Kennedy?
I would like for you to call.
Who is the former director of the?
It was at CDC.
No, remember, I have to defend myself from the defamation.
So I have to show that it's truthful, or at a minimum, there's enough evidence to showcase that my statements were made in good faith.
It's a dead case to me.
It's a preposterous case.
And one more thing I just remembered.
So on her memo, it says, If you have any questions about this memorandum that Terry Adiram signed, the point of contact for this is there's a Colonel.
Wait, wait, wait.
I got his name.
Dizzyk or something like that.
I have it listed.
So, anyway, I would love to see him deposed.
Just saying.
Because if he's under oath, I would imagine that a low kind of.
A mid level official, when asked certain questions like, Hey, did this memo go through the proper staffing?
Who was involved in the staffing?
Can you provide the actual data and evidence and routing process of who was involved in that?
Did anybody non concur or did they have any inhibitions on whether or not this memorandum was legal or not lawful?
And I would like to then depose those individuals that thought that it was an illegitimate memo.
And in fact, I have a piece of evidence.
Let's close with this one, Viva.
That we need to post.
We have one tweet from 2023 that actually showcases that there were individuals that tried to warn that the memo was unlawful early.
So they knew the risk of signing this bad boy.
I'm reading some more here.
It says also the other issues are your deep state target list of treason, war crimes, homicide, mutilation connected with a role.
What was the other one here?
Is the architect of the illegal DOD CCP19 jab genocide?
Mandate Terry Adiram burrowing in the CIA.
It's unbelievable that these MFers who are in the government, who are responsible for these decisions, which we know whether or not they knew that they were wrong at the time, we know that they were bad now, want to not just shrug off responsibility, but sue the people who want to hold them accountable for what they did, knowingly or unknowingly.
Reverse accountability.
Did you post something that I'm going to bring up?
Yeah, I just sent it to you real quick.
Show that real quick.
Hold on.
Hold on.
You can find it.
Via text message, Ivan Rakelin.
Here, let me do this.
Bring this one up.
Read the highlighted part on page two.
Okay, let's bring this up here.
And then, Ivan, there's a couple of comments for you that I think we're going to want to get to.
Actually, read both highlights.
We need to dissect those.
It's going to be.
Shoe on the memo.
Here we go.
Shoe, the memo, this memo doesn't get talked about in the memo.
Scroll down.
Yeah, no, I just wanted to get the context of this.
And then we got Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, 1200 Defense Pentagon.
Action memo for Terry Adiram.
From David Smith, can you have a more generic name than David Smith?
Subject mandatory vaccination bullet three the memorandum adds a statement that a service member, after medical counseling, declines administration of the emergency use authorization manufactured Pfizer BioNTech vaccine but will accept the BLA manufactured product.
BLA, uh, I forget, biologic license agreement that's the FDA approved one, Pfizer Comernity, that was never actually produced.
Okay, interesting.
Then we're going to go back here.
The Department of Defense health care providers should engage with their logistics chain.
To secure and administer the one that was actually approved, the BLA Pfizer BioNTech Community product prior to any punitive action being taken against the service member.
And I suspect the problem was the bait and switch that they didn't even have the one right.
So this individual wanted to add that statement in order to make the Terry Adiram signed memo lawful.
And guess what happened on page two there?
The memo states that the vaccines can be used interchangeably.
Who the ever decided?
What blows my mind up in Canada was that, yeah, go get the Moderna, get the Pfizer, mix and match.
It's like you know, you're at an open bar at a You know, on a cruise ship, you can have tequila and then gin and see how you feel in the morning.
The mental state of the vaccines can be used interchangeably.
However, this paragraph would suggest the Department of Defense considers them different and, as different, cannot carry out punitive action against the service member until they have the opportunity for the BLA manufactured vaccine.
This subverts our current DAF, Department of the Air Force vaccination mandate and may open up the Air Force for increased litigation from individuals who have been mandated since 24 August to be vaccinated.
If there is no difference that can otherwise be communicated, We recommend non concur with this paragraph as it subverts current policy.
We are all operating under the belief that the lot issue is a distinction without a difference from the health, safety, medical, legal perspective.
As the services have taken action, possibly include adverse action based on a belief that the distinction is one without a meaningful difference.
OSD retrenchments signifying that the distinction does matter would probably require significant remedial actions.
Air Force Vaccine Mandate Subverted00:04:21
And just to get clear on what this memo was again, this was the action memo.
So this is in response.
To Terry Adiram's memo saying, These are the changes that we should implement before you issue this memo, this directive?
Correct.
And that statement is a non concur, basically saying, This will subvert our current vaccination mandate and may open up the Air Force for increased litigation from individuals like Ivan Rakelin, who have been mandated since 24 August to be vaccinated, and 100,000 of my closest friends.
Ivan, I'm going to bring it up because it is for you.
Finboy Slick says, Ivan is one of my favorite guests.
Here's a meme for him.
Let's see what this is.
Ivan Rakelin.
I'm going to save that one and send it to you as well.
Let me see.
There were more here.
Let's see if we've got any questions.
Ivan, save.
Escape.
We got Bill Brown says either we take power back or we will never be free again.
No more asking nicely.
Our founding fathers warned us.
And then we got Rustang says the deep state, cripe almighty, the deep state needs a major disruptor, shit disturber extraordinaire.
Enter Ivan Rakelin.
No, this is just a question of whether or not you will be able to successfully achieve.
It's always a question of not the means justifying the ends, but rather whether or not the means are the best way to get to what you need to get.
Politeness doesn't work, but neither does violence.
So the perfect balance is somewhere in the middle.
And it's just a question of whether or not I'm.
By the way, we've got King of Biltong says turn up the flavor with Peri Peri Biltong, mild heat, big flavor, 50% protein to keep you going.
Try the full Peri Peri range at BiltongUSA.com.
Use code VIVA for 10% off.
And Biltong says apologies, rushing.
UPS is here for pickups.
Thank you.
Hands one pack says Ivan and all those who have turned on Trump have the same thing in common.
They all think Trump was supposed to do what they wanted.
If they don't get 100% of what they want, they will burn it all down.
What's an amazing thing?
Hands one pack, I know.
Here's the deal people like me, I support and defend the Constitution.
Donald Trump is a method and mechanism to improve our posture to be able to be closer aligned with our constitutional principles.
When he betrays me, that means he's betraying the Constitution.
And so I'm here to auto correct that.
So I want to make that clear.
But I'm also, by the way, for anybody else that are haters out there, keep in mind my ego is one trillion times larger than Donald Trump's.
So it's not my problem.
That's your guys' problem.
But I want to just highlight one thing because it's in the first sentence Ivan and all of those who have turned on Trump.
If at what point, after enough people, I won't, you know, turn on Trump is a turn of phrase.
At what point, if enough people say, uh, we're this is not, uh, not just we're not getting everything that we want, at what point when enough people who were the biggest, most vocal supporters to their own Detriment in the day, turn on Trump and put it in quotes.
Do you have to say maybe it's not Trump and maybe it's not all of them and maybe it's actually something that's going wrong with this administration?
Like at some point, you have to.
Yeah, and I think I laid it out.
No, it's like, it's like, yeah, everybody around me driving this morning is an asshole.
I think, no, if everybody driving around you is an asshole, you might be the one driving like an asshole.
It's the old expression.
Like, if before lunch you run into one driver who's a crappy driver, it's them.
If you run into six before lunch, it's you that's the crappy driver.
Hans One Pack says, Biden, and again, by the way, Donald Trump works for me, not the other way around.
Well, that was the other thing.
When you say, when they were telling you at that White House dinner, you know, the boss says X, you know, the glib response is, well, remind the boss who the boss is because he represents the people and not vice versa.
And it was the people through their coalition based on not promises.
It's like a campaign, no new taxes.
This was supposed to be transformational, not purely transitional.
And by the way, Biden has already confirmed he approved the pardons.
He confirmed it retrospectively or after the fact for sure.
That doesn't necessarily mean that he, in fact, confirmed it at the time.
Auto pen scribbles.
I mean, let's face it, Donald Trump's a good meme.
He's a good influencer, right?
But I would like for him to be a good president.
And by the way, also, you know, there is a conceivable fact pattern where even his ex post facto, yes, I authorized those Biden auto pads, you could find an email saying, we know that he doesn't know that this is going on, but these are our friends and let's do it.
Biden Confirms Retrospective Pardon00:04:37
Him saying after the fact, oh, can you retroactively approve a pardon that you didn't issue at the time?
I don't think so, especially when you're no longer president.
So there's that.
And Ginger Ninja, who's actually staying at my place right now, and I'm going to bring him on after the after show, says, I can tell this litigation has taken a toll on Ivan.
Just look at the poor sap.
He's pulled out all of his hair.
Ivan, when did you decide to shave?
Oh, you're on mute.
I started shaving at the age of 18.
Look, one thing is clear.
I might lose my hair, but my dad lost his hair at like 70.
That's so.
You had like a young receding hairline, probably.
I don't know.
Hey, we're getting off topic.
I gotta roll.
Okay, get out of your Ivan.
Thank you for everything.
Uh, where can people find you?
And I'll put all the links up.
Where can they find you?
Ivan Raklin, as long as Elon's there, allowing me and Rumble as well as Telegram.
Ivan Raklin, I V A N R A I K L I N. There's a couple of them.
You have another older one that's at Raklin.
Everyone should use the Ivan Raklin, just the full name, man.
Thank you for coming on again.
It was great.
Appreciate it, view.
Got to see the platform.
Bye.
All right, that was good.
Never thought we'd be discussing when he got a receding hairline.
But, um, Ginger Ninja, who many of you know as the man who made the Viva Barnes Law.locals.com new members bell, is uh, he's we're hanging.
We went to fishing earlier today, and I and uh, Ginger caught a fish.
And what else was I gonna say?
I had to ask, did you guys hear my dog?
Listen to this, listen to this, listen to this dog.
He was doing this during the stream, and I don't know.
That is one loud.
It was distract me.
I didn't know if it was audible through the thing.
Okay, let me see what makes sure we didn't miss anything here.
We're going to go have an after party and I'll maybe get Ginger to come in and come into the studio.
I think he's watching in the other room.
Also, making sure my kid doesn't get into trouble.
Boys will be boys.
Okay, hold on.
Let me bring it up here.
I noticed we just got another one and we're going to go raid.
I guess redacted.
Griffin says, Hi, Mr. Ivan Raithkin, thank you for applying a while ago about my health.
Fight, you got this or something similar.
Griffin.
Godspeed.
And we have another dog coming in.
What's up?
What's up?
Okay, let's go raid someone.
Let's go to the Viva Barnes Law.
Locals.com and Rumble After Party.
Go, rate.
We're going to raid Redacted.
They got Anna Kasparian on.
And let's see who gets mad at the raid.
Too bad.
We got to do it.
Go confirm raid.
Check them out.
Come on over to Viva Barnes Law.
Locals.com for the after party.
If you want to support the work that we do at Viva Barnes Law.
Locals.com.
10 bucks a month, 100 bucks for the full year.
Bestest community out there.
And you can be a non supporting member and just a member and support the work that we do.
Viva, let me just go ahead and let them know that I just got here.
Viva, raid, booyah.
And now we're going to go.
We're going to do one actually funny story in the after party.
And then I'll see if Ginger Ninja is going to pop in for a bit.
See how one mic, one mic, two guys.
Okay, let's get out of here like this.
And we're going to go to the after party.
How do I do it?
Oh, there's going to be no Rumble Premium.
It's just going to be because I'm using StreamYard today.
So I can't rumble out only to the Rumble Premium.
Well, you know what?
Everybody's just going to get to the after party, but I'm only focusing on locals because we're going to see what's going on in the chat over there.
Let's bring back up locals and see.
Refresh.
And yeah, I don't know what happened yesterday.
Still waiting for the glitch report.
But last time Ivan couldn't get in on.
Rumble Studio, and I don't know if it was the new canvas.
And yesterday, when we went to Rumble Premium after party and locals only, it ended the stream.
Barnes and I are sitting there talking for like 10 minutes, and he's like, or maybe five or seven minutes.
He looks in the chat and is like, Are we still live?
Because people are saying we're not live anymore.
And uh, didn't look like we were live.
Okay, what was I just about to do?
I was going to go here.
That's Bill Brown with his dog who looks high as well.
I'm joking, Bill Brown does not give his dog marijuana.
Viva says, Mighty Pay it.
Spencer Pratt Debates Recording Laws00:12:19
TMI, inappropriate task to guess about a receding hairline.
No, it's not.
Not among adults.
And plus, especially since Ginger had already made the joke, whatever, I gotta deflect and make it a humorous thing.
Trump failed his sworn duty to we, the actual people in the U.S., in 2020.
Take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
Article Section.
And then Article 6 The Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land.
Article 14 No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges. Or immunities of any citizen of the U.S., nor shall any state deprive any such person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny to any such person the equal protection of the laws.
Trump stood and allowed all of this.
I wouldn't be that hard.
I just say at some point, did I miss the deal with Spencer Pratt passion?
No, that's what we're getting to right now.
Let me bring this one out.
Every now and again, you see something that is so insanely idiotic, you say to yourself, this has to be parody.
You say to yourself, there's no way that anybody on earth lacks the insight, the self reflection.
I was going to say self respect, and it's pretty much the same thing the introspection to understand that they are voluntarily, willfully engaging in the greatest self own of all time, where you take yourself so seriously, you don't understand how stupid you look.
And I've been saying this of Democrats for a little while, leftist progressives, that you know that someone is becoming more and more lefty as they age, more and more progressive, more and more Democrat, because they lose their sense of humor.
Because they take themselves too seriously, which causes them to no longer be able to self assess their own stupidity, their own silliness.
They think everything they do is amazing.
They don't understand how other people are judging them.
And none of this is confession through projection, people.
I live with the crippling neuroses of constantly understanding exactly how other people are looking at me, judging me, the insults that they're thinking about me, the criticism that they have against me.
In some sense, I guess it keeps you humble.
It also keeps you.
Very much neurotic and insecure, which is good, I guess, for making sure you dot your I's and cross your T's.
I saw this video and then I posted out a joke response to it and, like, oh, no, no, hold on one second.
This video was a joke.
I got duped by an AI parody, but no, this was an actual campaign ad.
Unrig LA posted it, but it's an actual campaign ad.
The LA County Federation of Labor has a new committee lined up to go after Spencer Pratt and they are dropping an initial $221,000 on this video.
And an additional digital ad.
And when you watch this video, you're going to say, if I'm Spencer Pratt, I retweet this video and I say, I'm Spencer Pratt and I approve this message.
Republican Spencer Pratt is the last thing Los Angeles needs for mayor.
Pratt opposes using taxpayer money to build brand new houses for our unhoused neighbors, saying it's time for the homeless to get help or get out.
Pratt thinks LA needs thousands more police officers rather than more social workers, and Republican Spencer Pratt.
Thinks public employee unions should have less power, not more.
LA is on the right track and needs to stay the course.
Vote no on Republican Spencer Pratt.
It's so.
Republican Spencer Pratt is the last thing Los Angeles needs for mayor.
And again, I'm so neurotic about being duped by something that is actually parody in disguise.
If you were going to make what would be a parody ad by a leftist organization that lacks insight and introspection and doesn't understand when they are putting out a promotional video.
And not an attack ad, it wouldn't have been done any differently than that.
But they actually put that out.
God forbid somebody says, yeah, at some point, the homeless have to get on their own two feet or we stop supporting them.
At some point, LA is not on the right track, unless you mean the highway to hell, and they need to vote for Spencer Pratt.
Let me just, I want to, Spencer Pratt attack ad.
I want to, I'm so effing neurotic about all of this that at least if I get duped, it's only because I don't have, you know, an immediate source.
You do as much crowdsourcing and public, what's the word I'm looking for?
When you tap into public source material, this is from Fox News, May 10, yesterday.
Union funded anti Spencer ad sparks backlash as critics say it could help him.
So, I said it's got to be fake.
By all accounts, it's not fake.
It's just by idiots who lack such self introspection.
They don't understand what is actually pissing off people on the street.
Not the homeless meth zombie crack addicts, 100 and some odd thousand plus in Skid Row that now occupies 50 city blocks.
No, LA's on the right track.
Political advertisement opposing Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt.
Where are we here?
I just lost the page.
It's drawing attention online as critics argue the messaging could ultimately benefit the former reality TV star instead of hurt his campaign.
The ad which circulated on X recently.
Attack Spencer Pratt over homelessness, policing.
Oh, yeah, no, no.
After what we see now going on in New York, after what we see, the violence and criminality running rampant in big cities, you need less police, not more.
You need transit ambassadors in New York while machete wielding homeless crazy people are slashing people and burning them alive.
The ad at Circuit Alex Republicans.
Okay, we got all this here.
Los Angeles Ethics Commission filings show that the ad was funded by an independent expenditure committee called LA Unions Opposed to Spencer Pratt for Mayor 2026.
Which is sponsored by the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, the AFL CIO.
The group reported spending $221,000 on digital advertising and opposing Spencer Pratt in the Form 496.
So, like, I would have thought, and I still think maybe, maybe, that this committee, the Los Angeles opposed to Spencer Pratt, is in fact a mole sabotage attempt to sneak in, put this ad out, and then humiliate everyone involved.
It could be a double fakey false flag.
We don't know, but for the time being, looks legit.
Dog scratching his ears.
The report.
Okay.
The tone deaf framing of the ad quickly sparked reaction online, with some users suggesting the criticism could resonate with voters frustrated by conditions.
Yeah, you know, violence, no less police, homelessness, more money.
This attack ad could well elect Pratt, says Ted Cruz.
Some users on X also mocked the ad's messaging.
One user wrote, This is supposed to be an attack ad.
LOL.
Another wrote, Wow.
Even Unrig LA is running ads supporting Spencer Pratt.
This is such an incredible ad supporting.
I think Unrig LA is the one that's exposing LA's problems.
I don't think they're the ones republishing that ad with approval.
Fox News digital re show to Spencer Pratt's campaign.
Labor for comment.
The ad comes as Pratt's mayoral bid has gained attention following his performance in a recent debate, which he drew notice for his blunt criticisms of city leadership and policy priorities, including the handling of homelessness.
If you've listened to Pratt talk, you have no question about.
The fact that he's got better policy, the fact that he is the best candidate out there.
And you know, by the way, it's an amazing thing also that CBS News recently did an interview with him.
And I said, oh my goodness, when CBS News does an article with you, even if it's going to be a hit piece, that means that you've reached a certain level of popularity.
And even if it's going to be a hit piece, it's going to be amplification of the candidates.
Like, if these idiots don't understand the Streisand effect, but if CBS News really wanted to hurt Spencer Pratt, they would just ignore him.
But even by interviewing him, even if the purpose is to put out a cheap five minute hit piece, simply by virtue of CBS News covering Pratt, even if it is to provide a hit piece, is going to be amplification of his existence to people who may not have otherwise known.
And by and large, something tells me the idiots who still watch CBS News probably did not know about Spencer Pratt.
Until they heard about him.
So they wouldn't have voted for him anyhow.
But now that they do know about him, thanks to CBS News, they might say, hey, I like your ideas.
I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter, or better yet, make you the mayor of LA.
But after they did that interview with Spencer Pratt, in which they spent an hour with him and then put out a five minute hit piece, which Spencer Pratt suggests they ran by the PR team for Karen Bass, and I think it's sort of tongue in cheek, they did put out a five minute hit piece running old clips on him of the hills, or that show, whatever the hell reality show was on.
And this is what Spencer had to say about it.
After CBS embarrassed Karen Bass by fact checking her debate lies about the Palisades fire, they clearly got the call.
CBS Film with me on my burnt out lot for over an hour talking about crime, housing, affordability, things that voters care about.
And they turned it over to Karen Bass's PR team to edit it into a comical five minute hit piece with clips from the hills.
They can't beat my ideas.
They can't beat me in the debates.
So they got to try to turn my campaign into a sideshow.
People are done with these skeezy political tricks.
And I'm done with CBS.
They should release the full unedited interview.
The voters deserve to hear from their next mayor.
I see.
I just hoped that Spencer recorded his end of the interview with CBS.
And I think he's allowed to in California.
It's a one party consent state.
Although, if one party, even in an all party consent state, is recording, I think, not legal advice, I'm fairly certain that is tacit consent for everybody to record, which is why when you call up these organizations in all party consent states, they say, for your information, this is being recorded, which is basically your authorization to record as well.
Is this not the cutest dog you've ever seen?
Hmm.
All right.
Well, that's Manny.
Holy.
Hey, Ginger.
Let's see if Ginger Ninja is going to come in.
So that's Spencer Pratt.
Oh, gosh.
He's losing a little bit of hair.
Let me see what's going on over here.
What's going on here?
Okay, see, now I got to bring this one up to see if this is, in fact, it wouldn't hurt.
Yeah, grab that.
We'll switch.
Well, then you might want to sit on the ground, Ginger.
So hold on.
Hans One Pack says, You know, when you voted for Trump, you were not getting accountability on COVID.
Ooh, that's a bad argument.
That would be the moment in which I would say that's a bad argument that you might not want to make, even if you believe it.
But I don't think people who voted for Trump did not think they were going to get accountability on COVID.
This is about right.
So, all right, we're going to get out of here.
Everybody, we're going to go to locals.
And we're gonna go.
Let me just see what's going on in the chat over in locals.
So, this is Ginger Ninja, everybody.
Luke, tell them who you are.
Hello, I go by Ginger Ninja online because you know, a gamer tag in I don't know what 2000.
Um, yeah, just down here in Florida hanging out with Viva Ginger.
But first of all, my kid, who was it that said Ginger is literally two of you?
Ginger's six foot six.
Um, okay, we've done an interview on locals, but Ginger, it's been a while, it's been a long time.
Tell everybody, tell everybody who you are, and um.
Ginger Ninja Live Stream Chaos00:03:22
What's going on?
What do you want the world to know?
So, yeah, I'm just an Air Force vet that's a carpenter, and I mostly like making people mad, shitposting online.
And there we go.
Hold on.
Oh, yeah.
Everybody else already got pictures.
For those who don't know, so Ginger and I, we went fishing.
This is our locals' community.
And I see Viva is standing on his chair right now.
Dude, it is wild.
Ginger gets into we got a Bronco and his knees are touching the dad.
He can't open the glove compartment while we're driving.
Let's see what's going on here.
So, yeah, kind of an ape.
Look at this.
Look.
That was us earlier.
Yeah, my hand is about as long as your arm.
So, Air Force vet.
Yeah.
And what do you do now?
Where can people find you on the internet?
Oh, I've got a Rumble channel.
Subscribe to my Rumble channel.
I haven't posted a video in about nine months, but the last one I posted was kind of an in depth video Ginger Ninja 1776 on Rumble.
It's a gun range video, kind of an instructional video on how to take your high powered rifle from.
100 yards to a thousand yards.
So, yeah, I'm a precision shooter recreationally, not competitively yet.
We're looking at that one there.
Is that the rifle that we shot when we went up to the range?
It's one of them.
Yeah, that's the 300 WinMag.
That's the second one you hit at a thousand with.
Well, you got to upload.
See, look at this.
You got to upload it.
I know.
The Casey Neistat.
I have a couple ideas.
I'm going to do some more videos.
I'm going to do some ballistics gel videos with some of my reloading stuff.
You know, so I like to reload ammo that takes a while, but it's good.
Well, we're gonna, we're not going to a gun range here.
I'm just gonna give everyone the link.
Put a five shot group in 0.27 minutes of angle at a thousand yards the last time I was there, and uh, I was like, that's pretty good, we'll end on that.
Do you know how big that is?
Uh, 0.27 minutes at a thousand yards, 0.27 minutes of angle, yeah, 0.27 minutes.
Is.
I have no idea what that.
So a minute is is approximately an inch at a hundred yards.
So 0.2, it's two less than three inches.
So that would be one of the situations where if someone, if someone, were on a range and they wanted to mess with your grouping, they would fire a bullet.
Oh yeah, maybe just a channel, I think.
Uh, seven yards and a thousand.
I would just be impressed if uh, if he did that with a, we would mess with the group we love.
Passion Moyer.
I am Spencer Pratt.
That's a.
That's some bastardized version of a modern.
Uh, hi, I'm Spartacus.
Oh, yes, Spartacus.
But hold on a second, what's this here?
I'm Spencer Pratt, I'm not, I'm Viva.
Okay, oh, that's a big ass beard on Viva.
And then we got Griffin says, I understood Viva with Pasha there.
Yeah, that's if I could grow my beard out and just not cave and shave it one day.
You do shave it.
I understand that this sounds silly to think about, but I still don't know why the man is that impersonated Michael T. Flynn on July 21, 2008, and that followed Mr. Larry Page to Angerdine, Australia, a day after the world.
Spencer Pratt and Viva's Beard00:02:12
Dude, I don't even know anything about this.
I still believe that the SARS vaccine that was administered to me on the train gave me huge chest pains and a fever the whole way home.
I've talked about it once.
Well, it's interesting.
I forgot that in 2008, they had this sort of scare and they were forcing people to take a jab.
I forgot they made a SARS vaccine.
Well, and I remember when I was discussing with my wife, it was like, no, you took that thing back in 2008, 2009.
I don't remember for the life of me, but I wasn't even.
It's like you don't remember that which you weren't paying attention to.
And I've also been instructed by the chat to change the tone.
Of this, and so I'm gonna attempt to do this.
What button here to make lower volume, uh, lower pitch?
Uh, yeah, lower pitch, but does it less?
You know, it bothers some dogs out there, I think.
I'm sure it does.
Let's go here, and then we're gonna do this, and then we're gonna, what are we gonna do?
I'm gonna get on it, I promise.
Oh, yeah.
Well, I don't know how you're gonna do it.
I have no tools anywhere here.
It's okay.
Uh, are we still in this to see?
No, we're not here.
It dude, well, the one thing that's I'm glad I was, I brought your, I brought that same shirt.
I'm glad I wasn't wearing it.
Well, you see, you'd be unrecognizable.
There's no difference.
Well, what's amazing is that now I can see my color, the color between us, because this is.
Put your arm here like this.
Yeah.
This is floor to arm.
And that is, look at this, elbow to elbow.
Okay.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Okay.
That's amazing.
Yeah.
The human physiology.
Like this, this is my dark skin.
This is like, oh my God, it's blinding.
Put your sunglasses on.
Add to stage.
Let's see what we've got going on the chat.
More cowbell.
We need more cowbell.
We had a dentist.
Not even like put some tape on the inside.
Okay, let's go here.
Ooh, what is this?
Oh, that's awesome.
He's got a break action pellet gun and he's killing.
That is a giant.
Hold on.
I got to get to the original post on this.
Is it a rat?
This is hyphen.
I'm doing a bit for the hantavirus.
Oh, that's nice.
That's that's an arrow.
Is that a domestic rat?
That's it.
Yeah, it's a break action pellet gun.
Holy cats.
That's funny.
That is a giant mouse.
How does it look like somebody bathed it?
Like it's awfully clean.
Well, we'll say it looks like you get some good meat off that.
Um, yeah, Ginger's Ginger's visiting Florida and then drove across to say hi.
Driving Notifications Crazy00:01:14
Yeah.
Uh, lower pit.
Okay.
All right.
Well, I think we're going to go.
Uh, we got to either go back and do some fishing or here we go.
Uh, or we're gonna do like uh Laverne and Shirley, yeah.
While I got the big audience here, if you go if you have any interest in firearms, that's you know, go go uh, go to my Rumble channel and uh, throw in a comment of the video, it still sends me notifications, uh, like something that you would like to see a video on.
Um, because I'd really rather do it, even if it's just you know, one person asks, I'd love to do videos on stuff that people are interested in.
I would love everyone to go and just like drive him crazy now with comments so that he turns off notifications.
I remember the early days of YouTube, it's like, yeah, notifications are good.
Then you get too many, and then you don't want to see some of the notifications.
But don't go driving crazy dislikes on your streams nowadays.
Yeah, well, I think people are calming down a little bit, but yeah, or they've left, or no, no, they haven't left.
Here, let me see what we got.
Uh, it was like five, yeah, that's not bad.
Okay, this is what it looks like.
All right, people, Ginger and I are gonna go frolic in the Florida rain, something along those lines.