Megyn Kelly LAMBASTED! But Was She RIGHT? Kristi Noem OUT! Auto-Pen Probe SHUT DOWN & MORE!
Megyn Kelly’s expose on Israel’s $900K "Project Esther" influencer campaign—funded by Netanyahu’s office via Havas Germany—ignites debate over foreign-funded U.S. media manipulation, despite skepticism about her $7K-per-post claim. Meanwhile, Kristi Noem’s ouster as Homeland Security chief over an affair and Mark Wayne Mullen’s appointment spark speculation about Trump’s inner circle, while a DOJ auto-pen probe shutdown raises concerns about selective presidential scrutiny. A Marine veteran’s broken arm during an Israel-Iran protest and the SAVE Act’s controversial transgender surgery ban highlight escalating culture-war clashes, all framed against a backdrop of algorithmic censorship and viral political spectacle. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, in late breaking news of the day, Christy Noam is out.
And I have a sneaking suspicion it had to do a little bit with something that occurred yesterday during some oversight committee hearings.
Behold.
Trump knows that this guy is shady.
Corey has a decades-long record of physical batteries, sexual harassment, illegal lobbying for a Venezuelan oil company, and bringing a loaded gun into a federal building.
Despite being fired or removed from virtually every position he has ever held due to misconduct, he now wields unchecked, unconfirmed, undisclosed power over your department.
This person has no experience running anything close to Department of Homeland Security or even advising someone in your position.
He is unqualified, which again has left my constituents and I wondering why he is your top official.
So, Secretary Noam, at any time during your tenure as director of Department of Homeland Security, have you had sexual relations with Corey Lomandowski?
Mr. Chairman, I am shocked that we're going down and peddling tabloid garbage in this committee today.
Reclaiming, one thing that I would tell you is that he is a special government employee who works for the White House.
There are thousands of them in the federal government.
So reclaiming his advisory question.
It is okay for you to have a question.
But it is also a real question.
I have long said this, people.
If you don't want to be offended by tabloid garbage questions, don't engage in tabloid garbage lifestyle.
Keep your schmekel in your pants.
Don't dip that schmekel or pen in company ink.
Don't engage in arguably immoral, I'll say not even arguably immoral, objectively immoral, but arguably corrupt behavior.
And you don't give scoundrels the talking points that they need to humiliate you publicly.
And you should be able to answer that what we do at the Department of Homeland Security every single day.
Every single day is to protect yourself.
If someone is asked to make decisions, you or any federal official is sleeping with their subordinate.
That should be the easiest.
You should be wanting to answer that question.
Because it is not about your sense that you have brought it up.
It is about.
Oh, it's offensive.
And nobody cares about your feelings.
Answer The Offensive Question00:02:24
That knife cuts both ways.
When liberals say, I'm offended, that's an offensive.
Answer the offensive question.
Holy hell.
You're doing that kind of garbage.
It's about reclaiming my time so that I can hear myself.
Well, all right.
Look, people, she's out.
That's the news of the day.
And incidentally, for what it's worth, again, Christy Noam, not somebody that I started off with any negative impression about, even when she came public with her puppy killing, and I am the biggest dog lover in the world.
In fact, I just posted a picture of my new dog, which I let out of the office because I don't think he was going to remain in the office.
Look at that, look at that boy.
Her story when she killed her dog by shooting it.
And I was like, okay, first of all, I appreciate people in the country don't always take a dog to the vet so they can euthanize it with Barbadolls or whatever the hell they do.
And even when we were kids we had an English mastiff and the farmer from whom we got that dog told us how, when his father the father of our English mastiff got too old 200 and some odd plus pound dog you don't you know, carry that thing around he called the dog over to a pre-dug hole and shot the dog and rolled him in.
I say, you don't brag about shooting a puppy, certainly not one that you had to shoot because of poor behavior, instead of looking for every other option to adopt that dog out.
Even then I was almost defending Christy Gnome.
Then her poor performance coming out of Minnesota, some arguably laughable idiocy going on on a professional level.
And Robert Barnes during our sunday night VIVA and Barnes LAW FOR THE People sensitized me to some of the gossip.
And it's not gossip when it's actually happening, it's just people acting like bloody fools.
The affair with Corey Lewandowski we talked about it.
You want to have an affair?
Fine.
You want to hire the person that you're having an affair with and you want to do things on the job or put mattresses where they shouldn't be on a professional level, expect that to catch up with you.
And now yes, I appreciate we're going to the Daily Beast, a left-wing rag, but facts are facts regardless of who says them.
Icebarbie finally cornered on alleged affair with top aide Corey Lewandowski, whom i've also defended in the past, but not when he doesn't deserve a defense.
Double Entente Affair Revelations00:04:30
DHS former.
This is from yesterday.
My goodness, what a difference a day makes.
Department OF Homeland Security secretary Christy Noome was backed into a corner.
There's a double entente there, which i'm certain they did in fact mean over her widely reported alleged affair With her top advisor, Corey Lewandowski.
Noam 54 lashed out after she was grilled by members of Congress on Wednesday over the rumored affair.
The worst kept secret in Washington, D.C., as it is described.
The socialist liberal left is: you go off and attack conservative women, Noam fired off.
You say that we're either stupid or we're slough.
Maybe don't have an affair and prove all of your detractors right.
But that's, you know, an affair and immoral personal behavior is one thing.
An immoral and personal, you know, stuff that leaks into the professional realm is another.
And also sucking at your job is another.
And she's out.
But the hilarious thing was we've been talking about this for a while.
Robert Barnes, Viva Fry, Viva and Barnes, Law for the People, taking some flack for saying, you know, Pam Bondi has got to go.
Not because she's a woman, although the humor behind this is they don't have to go because they were women, but it's arguable whether they were possibly hired because they are women and not just women, but women who are not hard to look at on a superficial basis.
Trump has a tendency.
You know, he's very happy.
He's got some very competent women who also happen to be not hard to look at.
Caroline Levitt is the best press secretary in the history of these United States of America.
I say cynically, what's her face?
Jen Pasaki was also a good press secretary because at least when she lied through her lizard tongue, go look back at videos and you'll see what I'm talking about, the lizard tongue licking her lips all the time.
At least when she lied, it was more believable than when the most incompetent press secretary in the history of these United States of America, Karen Jean-Pierre, lied.
She was laughably stupid when she lied.
Nobody could take it seriously.
Nobody could believe a word she said.
Saki was at least effective.
Caroline Levitt is good.
She's good.
You appreciate when she is spinning things, as he put it in quotes, because that's her job.
She's direct.
She's remorseless when it comes to dealing with bullshit.
So it's not because they're women that, you know, Trump has made a mistake.
But it was funny.
I was listening to Rachel, what's her name again?
Rachel Wilson as I was jogging the other day.
And Rachel Wilson has just come out with a new book.
I forget what the name of it is, something to do with a form of feminism.
And as I'm jogging, I hear this clip and then I have to screenshot to remember the timeframe.
Like even Trump, Trump frustrates me on this because he wants, he's like, we got to have more programs to get all the moms back to work.
And I'm like, why?
Why do you want to do that?
Why do you want to push all the moms back to work?
That's a terrible idea.
Why do you think he's saying that?
He's a liberal and he's a feminist.
He loves hiring women.
It's probably his biggest Achilles heel if he would stop hiring women and get rid of a lot of his problems.
But he loves hiring women and he's very pro-working woman.
He, like his first wife, one of the things he loved about her was she was very like successful in business.
We can pause it.
She goes into the policy reasons for which it's not necessarily a good idea to compel, incentivize, entice, or lure women to come back to the workforce because it has a devastating effect on population growth.
Just the funny thing is, yeah, he'd have a lot fewer problems if he wouldn't have hired certain women.
And I dare say, you know, Christy Noam is out.
Pam Bondi is going to be the next one out of the administration.
Someone who, again, I did not have a negative impression at the early stages, although maybe I should have, because if I had known that she was counsel for Pfizer during the COVID era, I certainly would have started off with a negative impression of Pamela Bondi.
But the news of the day, she's out.
And it's about time.
Who has replaced her?
For goodness sake, let me just get that article because I now forget the name of the individual who is replacing Christy Noam.
Christy Noam, it's an amazing thing also.
You put in Christy Noam, and the next words that come up in Google search are Corey Lewandowski and or affair.
Now, who replaces her?
Let's just get this and we can move on to the next story of the day, which is fun.
Trump fires Noam as frustrations build among White House officials, GOP lawmakers.
President Donald Trump said on Thursday on social media he was firing a what is her name?
Homeland Security Secretary, Christy Noam.
Trump thanked Noam for her service, has had numerous and spectacular results, yada, yada, yada.
Trump Fires Noam00:14:47
He said Mullen would replace her.
Trump loves, is this Mullen right here?
So no, this is Senator Mark Wayne.
Mark Wayne Mullen speaks to members of the media near the Senate chamber floor.
I was wondering why he wouldn't replace her with, well, look at those baseball cards.
I wonder why he wouldn't replace her with Tom Homan, who's doing a bang-up job.
I'm not sure maybe there's some procedural reasons why not.
She's out.
We've been saying it for a while now.
Took some flack for saying it.
And I get called names on the internet, which I don't give a sweet bugger all about anymore.
I say, call me whatever name you want.
Hold on one second.
I do got to show it.
I got to show it because every now and again when it happens, it's not an I told you so.
It's just an I called it.
Someone says, no, that's not the right one.
Ah, yes.
In response, I'm not trying to put the person on blast and probably going to enjoy the free publicity for their Twitter handle.
I remember being called the black pillar and a panic in when Barnes Law and I said it needed to be done, predicted it would happen.
Funny how that works.
To which someone says, it's because you guys started acting like the six-letter F-word.
And I say, call me whatever you want.
Just make sure to follow it up with, you were right.
Trash can Kobe.
Holy merciful goodness.
Good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
I've got to keep my phone on because I got a FedEx package and apparently I need to sign off for this one.
So until the missus gets back, I have to be on call.
And I want to just say something right off the bat.
I got a DM from someone who said, you have Megan Kelly come on on your show.
I'm like, no, why would you have thought that?
And he said, your thumbnail could have been misleading.
I hope that thumbnail wasn't misleading because if I could have had, if I was going to have Megan Kelly on, I would have also, by the same rationale, been having Benjamin Netanyahu on.
I wonder if Netanyahu would ever come on my channel for an interview.
I would love to have it because I would ask every question that I've been asking for the last couple of years.
But no, Megan Kelly's not coming on.
I'm just talking about Megan Kelly getting dumped on.
It's an amazing thing.
And you see, like, everybody tends to think, like, what is it?
That reason directs action or something like that.
No, this is motivated reasoning by a lot of people out there.
And I think it's by design.
People have decided Megan Kelly is an enemy right now.
Through her failure to renounce her relationship with Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, she's now public enemy number one.
She gets no grace.
She gets no positive interpretation for anything.
And she is to be demonized at all costs.
Let's just get right into it.
Well, first of all, good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
Daily time slot on Rumble, three o'clock.
Viva and Barnes, Law for the People.
At six o'clock every Sunday, F. Charton says, I'm on X. I'm going to pay a lot of influencers 10 cents to claim Trump is replacing Bondi with Barnes.
Who is with me?
Do it.
Don't do it for the 10 cents.
Hope Springs Eternal.
Make your own reality.
That is F. Charton from our above-average Viva and Barnes Law for the People.
Tell me what I'm talking about.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
So we are live on Crumble Daily, three o'clock.
I post the clips to Commitube afterwards.
You want to know what algorithmic censorship looks like?
You go look at what happens on Comitube.
I posted the story, and I appreciate, you know, I'm supposed to say grape instead of rape and, you know, SA instead of sexual assault.
And I don't because I'm fed up with that bullshit already.
I put up the story of Aaron Spencer, the Arkansas man who just won the primary to become sheriff of Lincoln.
I'm told it's called Loanoke, Arkansas.
He's a man who killed a 67-year-old pedophile.
I use all of these words in the video, so you know, bing, bing, bing, now the whole channel, whatever.
Killed a 67-year-old pedophile who had sexually assaulted his daughter, had materials of his daughter on the pedophile's phone.
The pedophile, after being bonded out of jail for 5,000 bucks, comes.
And I think it was now the third or fourth interaction with the daughter, despite the court order.
One o'clock in the morning, takes the father's daughter in his car and flees.
This man goes and intercepts, ends up killing the pedophile who kidnapped his 13-year-old daughter.
And I want to put this story on algorithmic blast because these charges should be dropped.
This man, Aaron Spencer, just won the primary, should be the next sheriff of Loanoke, Arkansas.
It's like it doesn't exist on Commitube.
That said, every other mainstream media outlet, which covers this story in a little bit different angle, my goodness, they don't just get monetized.
I should have mentioned it got demonetized.
They don't just get monetized.
They get good ads on that video.
It's an amazing way that you can control the flow of information, you know, much like they did during the 2020 election.
Did we just get raided?
If we just got raided by Jeremy, who I was watching before today's show, because when Chris, it's an amazing thing.
Jeremy and I, you know, he's right before.
He goes live, I think, at 2 o'clock.
And when you go live in the afternoon, unless something happens in the news, you're sort of either left forced to cover stuff that everyone's been covering from the morning.
But every now and again, when the morning peeps have gone and then news breaks, we got a monopoly on the news.
Christy Noam, out.
And next, it should be Pamela S. Bondi.
I don't even know what her middle name is.
What's Pamela Bond?
What's Pam Bondi's middle name?
Anyway, all that to say, Jeremy, thank you for the raid, the quartering.
Check them out.
We had a funny exchange the other day because he challenged Dave Smith to a debate.
And then Dave Smith replied, who are you?
And what do you want to debate?
And then Jeremy reposted that and said, I've already lost guys.
And then I replied to that.
I said, who are you?
And what did you lose?
Very funny.
All right.
Megan Kelly.
Let me start that again.
Once they have decided you are the enemy, they will go out and demonize you at all costs.
You get no grace.
You get no favorable interpretation.
You get no benefit of the doubt.
And right now, Megan Kelly, because of her failure, her refusal to renounce her friendship and publicly denounce Candace Owens, public enemy number one, because she refuses to denounce Tucker Carlson, public enemy number one, because she's, I'd say, pretty critical of Israel.
Public enemy number one.
When it comes to Candace Owens, I'm not really jumping on the bandwagon either because I think if everybody, you know, you want to generate interest and you want to promote what I think is fundamentally immoral behavior of attacking a widow.
I mean, I appreciate now you can go and say, well, she's the CEO of Turning Points and so subject to fair scrutiny.
That's fine.
Fair scrutiny is fair scrutiny.
Fair scrutiny is not going up and digging up Instagram posts from 13 freaking years ago to suggest the most nefarious things on earth.
That's not fair game.
That's cheap exploitation.
I believe that's what it is.
I believe it's unfair and it's not something I'll have any hand in.
Does it require blocking?
Does it require a campaign to demonize the people who you think are doing something wrong?
No, because all you do is give them publicity by doing that.
The Streisand effect is real.
Well, Megan Kelly came out with a video and I say, she posts this.
And I'm not trying to put the guy on blast.
Brand, he follows me.
I have a sincere question to the individual because she has Glenn Greenwald on and this clip is going viral.
Everyone now self-righteously has to take a hot, steaming, proverbial digital dump on Megan Kelly because she spouted something, or I should say she repeated something, which people say spouting because it's inaccurate.
It's a lie.
Just spouting lies.
And I'm like, am I crazy in thinking that there's an element of truth in this?
Here's the clip.
And then we're going to get into this because this sent me down a rabbit hole.
I didn't get all the way down the rabbit hole.
And if I've made a mistake, I want the internet to correct me and I will correct myself.
I want to understand things, and people on the internet don't seem to understand that.
When you want to have a discussion about something that you're not entirely certain about, and if you get facts wrong, get facts wrong.
And so that the aggregate knowledge of the internet can correct you and people can understand.
This is the clip.
Heavily by the pro-Israel crowd and the Israel first crowd and then the bots.
There are many, many bots on X that are part of an operation.
And then there are many, many live humans on X who actually get $7,000 a tweet.
People have come out and admitted it from the Israelis to troll anybody who deviates from the party line.
And so I want the audience to understand that this is happening and it's an effort by a foreign country to silence the views of Americans about American foreign policy heavily.
So that's the claim.
And again, I'm not putting this man on blast.
I sincerely want to know what he thinks is objectionable about it because it sent me down the rabbit hole.
I can't believe Megan Kelly actually said this.
She claimed Israel is paying Americans $7,000 to post pro-Israel content on social media.
That's the kind of conspiracy theory you usually hear from anonymous internet trolls, not a high-profile political commentator.
She can't seriously believe that right now, I'm going to give Bren the benefit of the doubt because the internet is a vast, endless place, and it's impossible to know everything about everything at all times.
And so the argument here seems to be that this rumor went around the internet, let's say like November earlier, late in 2025, earlier in this year, that certain people were getting paid $7,000 a post.
It became a trope.
Did you get your $7,000 for that pro-Israel trope?
Okay, fine.
So that's the clip.
And I'll give everybody the link so that you can, you know, keep track of this yourself.
I wanted to know what the issue was here because in my recollection, there was some element of truth to it, but I also wanted to know what's the disinformation part of this.
And so that brought me to say, all right, what's the scandal?
What's the scoop?
Where did the rumor or the lie in as much as they're in one get started?
So I replied to Bren.
I say, this is where I believe disinformation is sprinkled into information so that it creates sufficient confusion and can be used to discredit people who are essentially right.
Bear in mind, like there are ways they did this to Alex Jones.
You know, you get someone to repeat something false and then you get to discredit everything that that person has ever said, done, and stood for in their lives.
That's one way of doing it.
The other way of fighting an information war or a disinformation war is to sprinkle in elements of disinformation so that you then throw out the baby with the bathwater by saying, oh, we're watching $7,000 a post, you idiot.
All wrong when it was something.
I mean, the idea that it's offensive or a conspiracy theory to suggest there are paid campaigns and bots and trolls on the internet, to deny that makes you an idiot.
So I said, my understanding is that the $7,000 per post might have been a misunderstanding, misreading of the document, but pay a post and using paid influencers to push messaging is definitely a thing.
This is the document.
Okay, perhaps Megan Kelly is wrong on the amount per post, but unless I'm misunderstanding the filing, she is essentially right.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
The document is a document that was filed with, as you can see up here, received by NSD.
I forget what that acronym stands for.
FARA, Foreign Agent Registration.
What is NSD?
Get the NSD part of the acronym.
Sorry.
NSD FARA acronym.
The NSD.
Come on.
Why is it not telling me what the NSD stands for?
NSD acronym.
Come on.
NSD Foreign Agent Registration Act is a law.
Oh, yeah.
National Security Division.
Sorry, National Security Division.
This is the document.
They filed this.
And as you see up here, it's from Bridges Partners LLC.
I guess foreign on behalf of HAVAS Media Network.
LAP.
We're looking up on the top here.
Campaign Esther Project.
We're going to come back to that.
47239.
You got a bunch of names here.
And then the order.
And what you have here is influencer campaign USD, United States dollars, miscellaneous costs.
Note, initial payments for production and influencers concept development with each influencer begin matching with Israeli content partners and writing initial post.
Then you get miscellaneous costs for $140,000.
Bring it up here just in case we can't see this.
Development phase payments for influencers and production.
Five to six influencers begin creating content, begin onboarding additional influencers, post, post volume, approximately 25 to 30.
Booked.
Influencer USD.
Payment for influencers for production, three to four.
We can do the rest of $200,000.
New Israel Connections created post volume 25 to 30.
Another quarter of a million.
Payment for influencers and production, three to four.
More influencers activated.
Further expansion.
Okay, fine.
That's the document.
Go up here.
Bridges Partners LLC and Havis.
Remember these names.
What is Bridges Partners LLC?
And I apologize if this is like repetitive for people out there, but it wasn't repetitive for me.
Now, here, what is Bridges?
We're going to get there in a second.
This is from Public Citizen, and it looks like an activist organization.
So take it with a grain of salt, but let's see what we can reconcile from an activist organization that might be up to whatever and what facts as we currently know them.
FARA complaint alleges U.S.-based social media influencers are acting as agents of Israeli government.
This is Mr. Eisenberg.
Dear Mr. Eisenberg, please accept this letter as a formal complaint regarding apparent violations of FARA, specifically section yada, yada, yada, by influencers who appear to be operating as unregistered agents of the government of Israel.
Who's Bridge Partners?
This is accurate.
This might be an activist organization, public citizen.
They might be a bunch of scoundrels.
You know, I don't know that they are, but they might be as much of scoundrels as much as Media Matters for America, as much as the ACLU or the ADL.
But facts are facts, again, regardless of who they come from.
Bridge Partners, a Delaware-based LLC, is compensating these individuals as part of a $900,000 contract on behalf of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs to create content, as described in Bridge Partners Exhibit AB.
According to the contract filed under FARA on September 26, 2025, and reviewed by the Quincy Institute and Public Citizen, Bridges Partners LLC is carrying out this work as a subcontractor for Havis Media Group Germany on behalf of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The influencer campaign, nicknamed Esther Project, remember that because it's going to come up again in a second when it comes to the Heritage Foundation, nicknamed Esther Project on the FARA filing covers this time period.
And so they're going to allege that anybody who does this without disclosing it, the influencers, are unregistered foreign agents.
Influencer Esther Project00:14:14
Here's the link to that.
Now, where does it get confusing?
Because we got this filing.
This is the filing in its original form from which I cited before, received by NSD Farah Registration, September 26th.
Do you see what you got here?
Bridges Partners LLC.
Just so you can see this, this is still up there.
e-file.farah.gov docs.
And I'll give everybody the link so you can grab it yourselves.
Thus far, all the facts check out.
Bridges, representing Havis Germany, acting on behalf of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Israel, has something of an influencer campaign.
Okay.
Where does it get a little confusing?
There is another Project Esther.
This one's coming from National Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism.
Project Esther, a national strategy to combat anti-Semitism, National Task Force.
Project Esther, a national strategy to combat anti-Semitism.
This, from what I understand, comes out of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank in the U.S. Happens to be named Project Esther as well.
The Torah in the book of Esther, Megila Esther, tells us that in the mid-fourth century BC, a thriving Jewish community in ancient Persia risked extermination.
Haman, Persian king.
I guess that's how they pronounce Achash Verush.
Prime Minister Viziv, Angryby, Morda the June.
Okay.
Now let's just go in here in this document.
We want to go to influences, influencer.
And this is now down on page 27.
Authorities.
As American citizens are authorities derived from the Republic's founding documents, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights.
Beyond that are federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, etc.
We have several laws at our disposal that may help us exploit resources.
First and foremost, Project Esther will require money to fund the operations needed to counter the HASN.
Hold up a little bit to see what HSN is again here.
Hamas support network.
Okay, now let's go back to influencers.
That money may originate from coalitions, large donors, other high-net worth individuals, and grassroots fundraising.
Similarly, we will need centers of influence, which themselves may be high-net worth individuals or key influencers.
Much of the information required, especially with respect to building out the HSN, that's a Hamas support network for analysis, is publicly available or purchasable.
Information that is not so readily accessible can likely be accessed through Freedom of Okay.
So now you have two things, and it gets a little confusing: the Heritage Foundation, Project Esther.
Heritage Foundation, Project Esther.
And let's bring this up so we can see it in real time, so that you can see it as I do this.
Project Esther from the Heritage Foundation: a national strategy to combat anti-Semitism.
And let's see if the word influencer comes up in here.
Where is it?
Way down.
So, what do you got going on here?
By the way, not for nothing.
Some people are going to say, well, the Project Esther, which consists of paying influencers, is different than the Project Esther of the Heritage Foundation, because the Heritage Foundation came out and said there's no connection between the two.
Now, let's just bring up this article, which is where I think the $7,000 per post came up, which is stupid math based on the aggregate and whatever.
Again, the disinformation sprinkled in to create confusion might be the quantum that allows people to disregard the fact that, unless I am mistaken, there is black and white documented evidence.
Whether or not you think five or six influencers is nothing, it's happening.
And then who knows how many more come on board?
Who knows how broad the reach of those five or six influencers are?
This is not accurate stuff here.
I'm going to read it regardless.
Responsible statecraft.
Israel is paying influencers $7,000 per post.
Netanyahu referred this week to a community pushing out preferred messaging in U.S. media, and boy, are they making a princely sum.
This goes into the document, which was misread and then misstated, but thus far doesn't seem to be wrong in not even in essence, wrong in fact.
Link to that.
And so dumping, dumping on Megan Kelly for citing the trope number $7,000, which might be the lingering effect of a misinterpretation from the get-go, despite the fact that everything else seems to be materially accurate.
Now, yes, I'm quoting from the Jerusalem Post.
From what I understand, it's as left-leaning a rag in Israel as CNN is in America.
And they hate Netanyahu as much as CNN MS now hates Trump in America.
All right.
Be that as it may, facts don't change when you've done the 360 full circle cross-verification.
The filing reveals that a firm called Bridges LLC has been hired to manage an influencer network under the code name, the project code name, Esther Project.
And we're told that it's a pure coincidence.
The Heritage Project in America calls it Esther Project, Heritage Foundation, sorry, has nothing to do with Bridges LLC and Havas Germany representing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs out of Israel.
Newly filed records with the Department of Justice show that Israelis government has quietly launched a two-track influence operation in the United States, blending big-budget political advertising with grassroots-style influencer campaigns.
The filings reveal that a firm called Bridges LLC has been hired to manage an influencer network under a project named Esther Project.
It's unclear if there is any link to Project Esther, a plan to combat anti-Semitism published by the Heritage Foundation.
They've denied it.
Heritage Foundation has denied the connection, and maybe it just has its roots in an aptly named passage from the Bible, story from the Bible, the historical story.
In its disclosure, required under the FARA Act, Bridges said it has worked in its work was intended to, quote, assist with promoting cultural interchange between the United States and Israel, and specified that the engagement runs through a German division of the global PR firm Havas.
Attached documents show the firm owned by Israeli consultants Uli Steinberg and Yair Levy was formed in June 2025 in Delaware and soon after received nearly $200,000 to recruit, coordinate U.S.
I don't know if anybody's who specifically has been paid, but to have all of this and then dare to say that Megan Kelly is out in left field and should be discredited as a journalist, as a commentator, as an analyst, whatever you want to call her.
The contracts allow for up to $900,000 in payments over several months include detailed pricing.
Okay, we saw that.
The filing also maps out the phase rollout: three to six influencers on board at a time, and each expected to post roughly 25 to 30 pieces of content per month across Instagram, TikTok, and other platforms.
Later, phases anticipated further expansion, including, quote, matching the Israeli content partners, end quote, and developing partnership with U.S.-based marketing agencies.
Documents also list payments.
There is evidence that the work is already underway.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with a group of influencers on Friday in New York City.
When one asked him how to win back declining support for Israel, he said, We have to fight back.
How do we fight back?
Our influencers.
I think you should also talk to them if you have a chance to that community.
They are very important.
Some people might say he's just talking about influencers, people who have influence, not necessarily anybody who's a paid member of this particular project, Esther.
Others might say that's exactly who he's talking about.
Netanyahu, who added, we have the right.
We have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we engage, and the most important ones are on social media.
Bridges' filings, unreported until now, add new information about Israeli's sweeping current diplomacy push in what Israel officials have taken to calling an eighth front in the country's current war.
Do we need to keep going on this?
I don't think we do.
I'll give you that.
I archive the link so that we don't lose it to the internet.
And someone in the chat is going to tell me where I got it wrong, what I got wrong, and if I am a derelict for suggesting that Megan Kelly got it essentially right.
We don't know the scope and breadth of it, but we certainly know of the existence of it.
And to suggest that it's anti-Semitic conspiracy theory to state this, I mean, I presume that every government out there has influencers on their payroll.
Some disclose it, some don't.
I'm not exactly sure what the laws are across various jurisdictions about disclosing a paid post.
They all do it.
Why wouldn't Israel do it?
Every government, every entity.
And the idea to say, well, it's crazy.
Oh, it's not $7,000.
Okay, you got her.
You got her.
It's not $7,000 per post.
But unless I've misunderstood anything, it's entirely accurate.
There's a question as to whether or not that Project Esther from Bridges LLC for and on behalf of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Israel through a German company called Havas has anything to do with the Project Esther through the Heritage Foundation out of America.
I don't know.
I'll take the Heritage Foundation at their word that there's no connection.
Don't get there and tell me that it doesn't exist when I'm reading it with my own two eyes.
And that's that.
Now, what I do want to do is go to the chat and see if I've got something wrong.
See if I need to fact-check and correct in real time.
We've got an amazing community at vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
And I shared this with them before the show as I'm doing my homework.
Haven't been able to visit that post to see what the to see what the news is, but I'll go to the chat.
First of all, I'm going to go to Rumble and see what's going on in the chat there.
See if anybody has any Heritage Foundation for Alex $200.
It's called Limited Hangout.
CIA Tactics, look it up.
We know what Limited Hangout is.
They give you little bits of information.
Uncommon Sense 2020 says, Is there anything wrong with educated people?
Is there anything wrong with educating people to the truths that I presume that means so many ignore or ignorant of?
Take the time to take the truth.
I would love to get paid for exposing people.
The only issue, well, first of all, the issue is, whether or not it's the issue is, legally speaking, is it a far a violation?
If an influencer is taking money from a foreign organization or a foreign entity to lobby for that foreign country without being registered, is that a far a violation?
Ethically, I don't know where it stands right now in terms of not disclosing that something is a paid post.
And, you know, everyone's going to rationalize it to themselves.
I believe it anyhow, so why not make some coin doing it?
If ever I post on Twitter and it contains a sponsored post, you will see it.
I mean, typically it's obvious because it's a sponsor of the show, Rumble Wallet, for example, not the sponsor of today's show, but download it anyhow.
The idea to take money and not disclose it when you're promoting an idea seems dirty.
And then the question is: if you're doing it foreign on behalf of a foreign government, whatever foreign government that is, because I have zero doubt Iran is doing it.
I have zero doubt Qatar is doing it.
I have zero doubt Saudi Arabia does it.
I have zero doubt Israel does it.
And they would have to be stupid not to do it.
You're not going to fight the digital warfare on the digital battlefield.
And you have to be stupid not to do it.
So then the only question is: are there influencers who are taking the money and not disclosing it?
How much money is it?
How much influence do they actually have?
And what in the name of sweet holy hell is so offensive about stating that?
So let me see what they say here.
We got Ginger Ninja says, Y'all, get your Populism Fixes Everything shirt at vivafry.com.
Oh, that's true, Abe.
But Ginger, we have that shirt.
Populism Fixes Everything.
Viva Fry, and we have a merch site.
I'll show that in a second.
Then we've got, and if I did miss anything, if I'm out in left field, like I don't know who has publicly confirmed they took the money.
I know some people suggested they did.
I think it might be more of a joke than not.
But I mean, if I got it wrong, if I'm missing a key fact that would, you know, change this entire analysis, I want to know.
Patriot Politics Research says, Hi, Viva, worked for Havas in Chicago.
It's an ad marketing company.
Havas.
Sava.
It's what's a, I wouldn't have ass.
It's like, it sounds like half-ass.
Not a name I would have picked.
Dominant one in anticipation of King of Bill Tong says, King of Biltong, you need to add a disclaimer on Bill Tong's USA that says, do not sit on Anton's firm and juicy meat.
Anton's meat is only intended for oral pleasure.
That is talking about Bill Tong, which is the next one.
Premium Bill Tong from Bill Tong USA.
High protein, keto-friendly, no additives, U.S. source beef, authentic South African flavor.
Get some now at www.billtong.com.
Use code Viva for 10% off.
Go check it out.
It's amazing.
And here, if you want to get some merch, go to VivaFrive.
Everybody needs a shirt.
Freedom over life.
Freedom finds a way.
I am not my brother's gatekeeper.
Learn or repeat.
Freedom to Fa, Freedom to Faux.
And it gets more.
What do we got here?
Oh, this is my personal one.
My personal favorite is: thank you for your attention to this matter.
And this one, which may or may not translate well in shirt format, be a force multiplier.
I think we got it on a mug as well.
It was the greatest compliment I've ever gotten, which was be a force multiplier.
It's a military term.
One entity that has exponential impact, almost like, I won't say I was going to say an influencer.
Mar-a-lago Memes00:13:53
So there's that.
All right.
And I'm going to go into our tip questions over on vivabarnslaw.locals.com and see if they have led me astray or led me.
So we got Joe Maskey, who says, oh, my flipping G, L O L. What is this?
Okay, all right, all right.
Okay, I'll bring that up in a second.
I don't know if it's going to be pro or critical of Trump.
We got F. Chartrand, who says U.S. representatives are legit off their rockers and no one seems to see it.
Look, I think.
Okay.
F. Chartrand says, I'm on X. I'm going to pay a lot of influences 10 cents to claim Trump is replacing Bondi.
Chris Kraft 2 says, For the Manny was right again, Jar.
Yeah, Manny's doing good.
What did I do with Manny?
I get that cone off his neck.
He really wants the cone off, but I need to go one or two more days to make sure that he doesn't go nod his ball sack.
Now, hold on.
Let me watch this with.
it's only 12 seconds so just bear with alright it's kind of critical Don't this is criticism that people have leveled.
Oh, 6.7,000.
Oh, it's from Dem Oversight.
Well, you know, it's going to be critical in here.
Hold on, let me just make sure the volume's in here.
You're right now not in a very good position.
You're gambling for millions of people.
You're gambling with World War III.
You're gambling with World War III.
You're right now not in a very good position.
Yeah, I give that a five on 10.
That was when he was talking to Zelensky, and the joke is that he's talking to himself.
Five on 10.
You know, not even, not even a, not even a 10 on 10 for effort.
But I'm going to tell you one thing.
I was going to start the show with this because it had me legit laughing my butt off.
The question is: I don't know if these are jokes that are AI generated themselves, but the video is quite clearly AI generated because it's babies doing stand-up.
We'll play the whole thing, and there's swear words.
So, earmuffs for those who are sensitive.
Listen, the first one just had me on the floor.
Metaphorically speaking, I'm already sufficiently close to the floor that I need not go any lower to get up.
This meeting is weird as hell, bro.
I mean, my food comes out of my mom.
What is that all about?
Like, is she supposed to be my parent or my fucking friend?
That's that's a good joke.
There's gonna be like so somebody.
I don't know if AI can write that joke, but now you understand it because you can generate well.
I guess you could have always done it through animation.
That's funny.
Well, okay, let's just go a couple more.
Let's just go.
She was my mom or effing fridge.
Mom said I have to start potty training.
I'm like, Excuse me?
You want me to go to another room and sit on a cold seat instead of shitting comfortably in bed?
Are you fucking serious?
Too much story on this one.
Someone asked me what I want to be when I grow up.
I'm like, never mind what I'm going to be.
I still haven't figured out what I am right now.
Mom keeps wrapping me in blankets, so I'm thinking I'm some kind of burrito, maybe.
Mom says I have to eat my vegetables if I want to get big.
I'm like, oh, yeah, mom.
I have to eat my vegetables to get back to show.
Cause I know for a fact, your ass didn't get that big, ain't no motherfuckin' bad.
Oh, my, here you go.
You can all have you can go watch that.
Okay.
I can't segue into the next.
I got to find something that's not as bad before going into the next segment of the show.
What do I have in the back here?
I gotta, I got that.
I got that.
I did that already.
Oh, yeah.
Let's go into something that's not funny.
Not quite as unfunny as the next story, which we're going to get into.
Which hold on, hold on, hold on.
Hold up.
Wait a minute.
Sup, mate?
Right.
I need to get a link to the meme.
I need to get a link to the meme.
Link to meme zero arrests.
I just want to get the image because I want.
I think we're going to have to update this thing now.
Let me see if it's.
Is it going to give it to me?
Grock seems to have been up and down lately.
Ah, cripe.
Hold on one second.
Zero arrests.
Let's see if I can.
Did I just do?
That's O arrests.
Zero arrests.
I want to see the meme.
I want to see that stupid picture that everybody.
Come on.
I can't find the flipping meme.
The image.
Oh, let's just go deep state.
Is that going to do it?
Deep state.
I need just to have a certain library.
Oh, come on.
If anybody finds the image, I know it'll be in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
That meme went around.
You know, number of arrests, and it's zero for all of them.
It seems outrageous that I can't actually quickly find the meme.
This is getting frustrating.
This is getting frustrating.
And I've given up.
Okay, I'll get it in a second.
The meme was zero deep state arrests, zero Russia gate hoax arrests, zero auto pen abuse arrest, and to criticize Pamela S. Bondi for seemingly doing nothing as Attorney General of the DOJ.
And I asked the question and I never got anything remotely close to a sensible answer.
What has been Pamela Bondi's major victories as Attorney General?
I mean, some civil rights division stuff, some.
Don't tell me that arresting the idiots out of Minnesota who stormed the church is going to be a victory.
That's not a victory.
I mean, that's just like doing business.
And so the meme was going around and our viva barneslaw.locals.com community got the image here.
Number of arrests, Russia collusion hoax, zero.
It's correct.
January 6 entrapment law fair, zero.
Mar-a-lago raid, I still don't believe there is anybody that can really be arrested for that in the first place, but set that aside.
Zero.
Biden Autopen, zero.
2020 election, zero.
We've got that thing going on in Georgia, so maybe something comes of that.
Epstein pedophile arrests, zero.
COVID, zero.
Benghazi, zero.
Doge findings, zero.
Ukraine impeachment hoax, zero.
They're going to have to make an updated one now, which is going to have to have a red line right through the auto pen because they've dropped the investigation.
I mean, it's so amazing.
And then I, and then I, you know, I criticize.
It's like, when's someone going to fire?
Well, they can't bring charges if there's no statute violations.
I'm not the one who brought the investigation.
And someone tries to lecture me.
Viva, don't you see that if they were to do that anyhow, then they would use it against Trump?
That was my argument at the time before they launched the investigation.
Don't lecture me on what I've been warning about from the get-go.
I'm not the one who launched the investigation.
I did say if you go and start attacking the use of the auto pen for executive actions, they'll use it against Trump.
There's a material distinction.
Trump knows what the F is going on.
But that being said, it is the step to the next level where they kick out the ladder and that's the new normal.
I said that from the beginning.
Robert Barnes said that from the beginning.
Be careful what you wish for and be careful using a power that will be abused by your adversaries.
That being said, I'm not the one who launched the investigation.
I'm not the one who said, well, this is a big scandal.
We're going to make a big deal of it.
We're going to launch a probe only to then say, quietly shutting it down.
So you're not only going to have a zero permanently staying now for the auto pen, you're just going to have to scratch it off the list.
It's going to go from observing how many people have not been arrested of the list to one item on the list being scratched off after another.
CBS News reporting it.
And then yesterday, I got to take shit.
Some of their CBS News now you're citing CBS News.
Yeah, it's kind of hard to cite Fox News when they don't report on the story.
There might be a reason why right-leaning-ish Fox News has not reported on this yet.
Maybe it's all a big lie.
Maybe it's disinformation and it will come to be that the probe is still ongoing.
CBS News is reporting the probe into auto pen use by Biden and AIDS closed by DC U.S. Attorney's Office.
Sources say.
Maybe it turns out to be false.
And that's why Fox News hasn't reported on it.
But it's kind of hard to use Fox News or a right-leaning outlet when they haven't reported on it.
Federal prosecutors and U.S. Attorney Janine Pirro's office are dropping a criminal probe into whether former President Joe Biden and his aides unlawfully used an auto pen to issue pardons.
A person briefed on the matter told CBS News.
This might turn out to be incorrect.
I don't trust random sources.
I don't trust anonymous sources.
And I don't trust CBS News.
It's been reported elsewhere.
Incidentally, I just had to observe that Fox News hasn't reported on it.
Two sources confirmed the existence of the probe with one telling CBS News that the matter has since been closed because prosecutors were never able to find a legal hook to be able to pursue the matter further.
CBS News has not determined precisely when the case was closed.
Last June, President Trump ordered an investigation into whether the Biden administration used an auto pen machine to sign key presidential documents like pardons months after Trump had claimed his predecessors' pardons were illegitimate.
Trump told Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House counsel in a memo to probe what he claimed was a quote conspiracy end quote to quote abuse the power of presidential signatures through the use of an auto pen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline.
You know, I do agree that you don't want to necessarily, you don't want to go in there and start invalidating Biden's pardons because they'll find a way to do it to Trump, even if it's not based on an auto pen.
They'll say he's close enough to the 25th.
They'll say it was a corrupt pardon.
And therefore, even if Trump did issue it himself, well, now there's a door, a crack opened to invalidate it.
I didn't think it was a good idea at the time, but I'm not the one who launched the probe.
I'm not the one who investigated it, who came out and said, this is a big ass scandal, only to then quietly brush it off.
So no, you will not be getting any arrests on the AutoPen.
Whether or not you could have gone after the staffers or people who were using the auto pen without Biden's authorization, it's interesting.
Don't go after invalidating it, but if there was unauthorized use, okay, fine.
So the pardons will stand because you don't want to open that window, but you'll go after people within the administration who are not the executive commander-in-chief, Joe Biden, to prosecute them.
Nope.
No fraud, no conspiracy, no nothing.
The order cited a number of executive actions by Biden.
Did I miss a paragraph here?
Mr. Trump told Attorney General Pam Bonte and White House counsel in a memo it was a conspiracy, abuse of the power.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, okay, fine.
The order cited a number of executive actions by Biden, including pardons, judicial appointments.
He argued there are serious doubts as to the decision-making process and even the degree of Biden's awareness of these actions taken in his name.
It suggested that if Biden's advisors, quote, secretly use the mechanical signature pen, end quote, it would, quote, have implications for the legality and the validity of actions.
Well, how about you just can go after some of the staffers if they unlawfully fraudulently used it and then maybe implement some form of legislation.
I don't know what you'd need to prohibit anybody but the president with specific authorization to say, yes, you can use the auto pen for this specific, specific act.
But that's it.
The closed auto pen probe represents one of several failed attempts in recent months by Pierrot's office to pursue cases against Mr. Trump's political enemies.
Recently, a grand jury also refused to indict six Democrat lawmakers over charges they violated the law by urging military service members to reject unlawful orders.
I appreciate there's activist judges in there that'll make it impossible.
Impeach activist judges.
Haven't seen much of that either.
Judge Boseberg, that corrupt SOB, still sits on a bench in his black robe.
Oh, we can't do anything because of activist judges.
Impeach the activist judges.
Well, we can't do that because we don't do something except make excuses for why you can't do anything one after the other.
Piro's office has also sought to subpoena records from the Federal Reserve over its renovations and comments that Chairman Jerome Powell made about those renovations and testimony before Congress.
Federal Reserve is quietly seeking to quash those subpoenas in a closed-door legal fight that remains under seal due to grand jury secrecy.
New York Times first reported on the closure of the auto pen review.
CBS News has asked for comment from the Justice Department.
We cannot comment on ongoing investigations, said Pierrot on X.
And I'll show that to you for my homework.
We cannot comment on ongoing investigations.
Well, is it over?
This is from Michael Schmidt.
Exclusive in breaking.
Despite pressure from Trump, DOJ tried but failed to build a criminal case against Biden and his aides for the use of the auto pen.
This is the latest example of the DOJ failing to follow through on Trump's desire to use criminal justice system to indict and jail his rivals.
You know, exactly like they did to him.
We cannot comment on ongoing investigations.
Hold on a second.
I do want to see, actually, What that looks like in the comments section in terms of whether or not the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs you can't comment because there's no case.
Well, that's a stupid response because if there was no case, then she could comment.
Period.
Very obvious to every single person with a basic understanding of the law and the constitution.
Veteran's Arm Broken Protestibly00:10:28
Grok said this was a parody account.
It's not.
There is no ongoing investigation.
You guys lost again.
Thanks for the clarification.
Now, can you comment on the 1500 January 6th violent criminals Trump Pardon?
Oh, there you go.
I thought they were going to say, can you comment on the FBI agents and prosecutors who persecuted 1500 January 6th protesters?
Oh, that's right.
No, one of them is still working at the DOJ.
Jocelyn Ballantyne.
Don't forget.
So that one's done.
And now, before we get into the last-ish story here, do I know?
Is this not refreshed?
Oh, no.
So that's it.
Okay.
There's a video going viral.
I'm not going to play it because it actually turns my stomach.
I watch a lot of UFC, and there's really nothing worse than watching someone break their arm when Noguera got his arm snapped by Frank Muir, when Anderson Silva cracked his shin in half on Chris Wideman, and then when Chris Wideman cracked his shin in half, I forget against whom.
When Conor McGregor snapped his ankle.
These things, they make me almost physically ill.
I still watch UFC a lot.
And it actually causes like a, I don't know if it's a medical condition, like a throbbing in the upper part of my legs that I can feel it.
I can feel it like when I visualize things like the story of one of my friends who had a friend who had a father that had a temper and he was holding a knife and in an argument, he slammed it into a cutting board and his hand slid down the handle and he severed his four fingers nearly clean off.
And I'm getting goosebumps.
It makes me it physically hurts.
So I don't know what that is, but it's been like that my whole life.
Watching people get their arms snapped, it's nauseating.
There was a video, and I'll try to stop it.
You can't really see it unless you know what you're looking for.
And there were a number of views going around.
And the underlying story is that there was a protester who got his arm broken as he was protesting.
You know, this war in Iran, he came out and said, no, we don't want to die for an Israeli war.
And whether you agree or disagree with that sentiment, this was all very bad.
Let me see.
I just want to make sure I get the right video.
So this was the first video that went viral, at least the one that I saw.
And you don't even see it happen.
And I just, everyone, fair warning.
It's like a not a compound fraction.
It's a clean break.
And his arm gets stuck.
That wasn't his arm.
That was a cardboard door.
I'm going to skip it.
This is a senator who was a former Navy SEAL.
They're trying to wrestle this guy out.
He can't get out because his arm is jammed here on the door.
Now, I don't want to, I don't want to.
So, okay, stop.
So, that's what happens.
And then, afterwards, his arm is stuck, and then they start saying, You broke this guy's arm.
Is it gonna let me do this?
I don't, I don't want to, I don't want to watch it from that point, so it's not letting me skip ahead.
There was some activists in the past saying, Senator Halley, whoever the guy was, you just broke a veteran's arm.
At first, I thought the veteran held onto the door and/or deliberately wedged his arm in between a door and the wall.
A second view came around that showed it's like just a whole slew of unfortunate events that led to it because there's two doors that are that are swinging, and somehow the second door, as we can play this, and you can hear the substance of his protest.
I'll pause it before so nobody sees the arm break because it's not, won't make you feel good.
Israel is the reason for this war.
America does not want to fight this war for Israel.
Let's go.
Come on, let's go.
I think, personally, I think all of this is entirely unnecessary, but I'm sure people will call me a pussy Canadian.
The funny thing is, when they went over the top on Owen Schroer, and when they went over the top on other conservative protesters, and you say that's unnecessary, people are like, They cheer you on, and all of a sudden, because tribalism is what it is, you say, I think this is unnecessary.
A, it could be done a little bit slower, it doesn't have to escalate zero to 100.
The guy was doing nothing more than speaking words, which I appreciate might offend people.
This is how it escalates, and it escalates into an accident happening because people, you know, just didn't see what was happening in real time.
This is not what it sounds in sons and daughters, the war for Israel.
Your inability to name that shows your adventures as leaders.
He's resisting.
Yeah, I appreciate that.
And, you know, maybe it's always easy to say there were other ways that would have been less confrontational.
This is wrong now.
And nobody wants to fight for Israel.
Okay, now, so this is where I'm not going to play it.
The door, there seems to be two panel doors here.
And as you'll see, one opens up and then closes back as he wraps his arm around the door to stop himself, thus wedging his arm.
You could slow it down a little bit.
There's no imminent harm to anybody.
Imminent risk.
Commandant, please stand up as a Marine.
Okay, so now that door slides.
He holds onto this door.
And then the door where my cursor is is going to close and wedge his forearm between the two doors right there.
And now he can't get out, and they're trying to force him through, and he physically can't get his arm out, and it proceeds to snap.
And that's it.
Okay, I'm not playing it anymore.
And that was not his arm cracking.
That was the door.
But then his forearm snaps.
And Marine breaks arm.
We'll get the.
And I appreciate people are going to say it's lunatic behavior.
It's unhinged.
This is what happens with leftist indoctrination.
And you might be right.
And then the only question is, how do you respond to it in a way that doesn't end up like this?
This is not going to, you know, I don't think, who is the senator that tackled them?
Lunatic behavior.
Marine vet protesting Iran war appears to snap bone.
Oh, no, he doesn't appear to.
He snapped that bone.
Tense moment during Senate Armed Services Subcommittee.
Now, other people are going to say, also, you don't get political when you're in uniform and so reprimand the individual.
Of course, this was just consequences that nobody really could have foreseen because it's just an awful sequence of events that got his arm pinned against that door.
Footage of the confrontation during which the veteran appeared to suffer a broken arm has fueled heated backlash and debate online with critics accusing the senator of escalating the situation and supporters arguing that the helped officer, that he helped, oh, and supporters arguing he helped officers regain control of the room.
Senator Tim Sheehy tackles Marine veteran.
Officers attempted to escort Marine Corps veteran and political candidate Brian McGinnis from the room on Wednesday after he interrupted an armed services subcommittee meeting.
The confrontation escalated when McGinnis, who was running for the Senate as the Green Party candidate, resisted removal.
Footage suggested that the struggle left him with a very badly broken arm.
That's my analysis.
Before the incident, McGinnis posted a video on X explaining why he planned to protest inside the Capitol hearing room.
Hey guys, let me see if I can bring this one up.
Here, let's bring this one up.
You know, here we go.
Let's do this.
Hey, guys, I'm here in DC trying to speak out against the Senate and ask them why they're going to send our men and women into harm's way when our elected officials said that it would be no war or war.
Anybody who feels disillusioned and betrayed by our government, you're not alone.
Join us in demanding accountability for this betrayal.
Free Palestine, free America.
Let's go.
So quite clearly an activist, and that's within his God-given rights as an American citizen.
And I'll get to the Rumble rant in a second, but what says, hey guys, okay, so we got this and we got this.
Okay, we got this.
Hours later, a video shared by CBS News showed the Capitol Police officers attempting to remove him after he showed nobody wants to fight for Israel.
And we saw this.
During the scuffle, he hooked his arm around the doors, and then they broke it.
Oh, yeah.
Injury claims and online reactions follow.
Afterward, another clip showed McGinnis being escorted away while supporters said his arm was broken.
Capitol Police Officer later confirmed he received treatment for an injury, but did not specify its nature.
I will be flabbergasted if it's not a clean break in his forum.
In a statement, the Capitol Hill said that it responds to protests.
Okay, then that's it.
So then Sheehi, who's the man who's taken a lot of flack from some to, you know, who are accusing him of being an unnecessary hero under the circumstances, escalating.
We've seen it.
I do want to know what people think, but I want to get to this from Force name changed.
There are well-reasoned rules prohibiting him from protesting while in uniform.
I cannot fit them all into a super chat.
The Marine knows them.
No, no, I appreciate the rules.
And absolutely well-reasoned.
If you want to hold your personal opinions, you do them not in the uniform representing the policy and the government.
Just a terrible, terrible sequence of events.
And we'll see what happens to this man in terms of his political run.
F. Charton says, what I missed.
Wait, I missed this.
The transgender carve-out post from the Trump is part of the Save Act.
What the F is going on?
The SAVE Act.
All voters must show ID identification.
No transgender mutilation surgery for children without the express written approval of the parents.
I have to see if that's real.
Parents don't get to approve mutilation of their children.
Come Watch the Movie Tonight00:03:34
I'm going to have to look that up right now.
We're going to do that in the after party, right after we decide who is going to be the beneficiary of the raid.
And I think it's going to be redacted in a second.
But before we do that, let's just go to the chat and have a little fun before we send on over the crowd.
If you don't want to go over to redacted, I'm sure there are other people you can come watch, but come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
In fact, I'll give everybody that link right now.
And you can come do that link, bada bing, bada boom.
And as we raid, so by the way, if you want to support the channel, you all know how to do it.
You can come to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
You don't even have to sign up for 10 bucks a month, 100 bucks a year.
You could just become a member.
And if you want to support, what is it called?
Punctually with coins, that's an option.
If you want to support with tipping, you can go to that little tip button.
It's hidden under the he says, I'm not saying he deserved it.
He should be allowed to protest.
He's not allowed to do it in uniform.
Well, the punishment would have been different, and they could have punished him regardless.
If you want to tip using crypto, go here, tip another crypto.
You can tip with Bitcoin.
Scan that QR code if you want to support the work that we do on Rumble, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Now, by the way, tonight, Viva and Lord Buckley, go to the movies.
We are reviewing what's the name.
I hope it's tonight.
I don't see the link up yet.
We're reviewing.
Come on, Viva, get your stuff together.
It's Bonnie and Clive.
I just watched it.
The original Bonnie and Clyde with what's her face?
Faye Dunaway, Warren Beattie.
It was great.
Here's a link to Viva and Lord Buckley.
Subscribe.
Come on over there Thursday at 7 o'clock.
It's only on comment Friday.
We're going to get the Rumble thing set up.
I'm not handling that.
But tonight we're watching tonight.
We are watching that movie that I just said.
Bonnie and Clyde.
I still got to piece together the historical inaccuracies of it because apparently there's quite a few.
Great movie.
And we're going to break it down and contextualize it historically, cinematically, if you want to get away from politics for an hour or so.
Now let us go raid, redacted, and you can all decide if you want to come on over to viva barnslaw.locals.com.
Forward slash raid, bada bing, bada boom.
Confirm it.
And now we go here and we say viva raid booyah.
Hope you enjoyed the show.
If you didn't, be sure to come back tomorrow and not enjoy it again.
If you did, come back tomorrow and enjoy it again.
Three o'clock.
Tomorrow's Friday.
Big USC fight coming up this weekend.
I got to get my picks in for that.
And that's that.
Let me see here.
I've got everything.
Okay, go.
And I will see locals right now.
Am I forgetting something?
I feel like I'm forgetting something.
Check my text messages.
I've had three raids so far.
Jacob Castro, thank you.
Leak Project, thank you.
And The Quartering, thank you.
And that is coming from NeuroDivergent, the moderator, who has been very helpful to me here.
I've got a text here that I don't know who it's from.