Hero Dad Who Shot Pedo WINS SHERIFF PRIMARY! Tim Walz: More Corrupt than Incompetent & MORE!
Aaron Spencer, a father who fatally shot pedophile Michael Fossler after he was released on $5K bond despite prior sexual assault charges, won his sheriff primary (54% vote) as voters rejected prosecutors’ gag orders and sealed records. Meanwhile, TikTok psychic Ashley Guillar lost a $10M defamation case after falsely accusing University of Idaho professor Rebecca Schofield of orchestrating student murders—her tarot-based claims collapsed under legal scrutiny. Minnesota’s Tim Walz faced bipartisan backlash over a $10B fraud scheme in state programs, with 82 Somali-American defendants linked to corruption, while Republicans accused Democrats of enabling fraud to retain voting blocs. The episode ties these cases to broader distrust in institutions, from DOJ inaction on "deep state" claims to political cover-ups, leaving accountability elusive despite public outrage. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, sometimes it feels like there's no good news on the horizon.
And then things happen that give you back-to-back good news feel-good stories.
The first of which is Dan Crenshaw lost his primary run yesterday.
We shall begin with the video of Alex Stein, the pimp on the blimp, confronting Dan Crenshaw.
Behold.
Daniel, just such a little loser.
Who's trying to grab my thing?
Look, you're too slow.
He's too slow.
Navy Seal.
It's funny, Dan, how you said you're tall.
Yeah, I'm small, but I'm so much taller than you, Dan.
I'm so much bigger than you.
You're just a little, you're a little sad little boy.
I mean I'm a little this is what yeah imagine me calling you up cuz you're not you're a globalist Oh, I got a job.
I work for the police.
I make a lot of money.
Yeah, I do.
Yeah, I do, Dan.
Yeah, I make a lot of money.
Yeah, I'm a loser.
This is the guy.
This is the guy who tells veterans that they're services.
Yeah, because those are weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist.
I'm anti-war.
Yeah, I'm anti-war because I don't believe it.
Did you guys find any weapons of mass destruction?
As a matter of fact, we did.
Oh, where was?
Oh, we have weapons of mass destruction this year.
You're actually going to go down this route, Alex.
Yeah, because we don't have any weapons of mass destruction.
I'm looking like a fool right now.
You're telling me that.
You're the one that's giving more money to Ukraine.
You're telling plenty of people in America that they're serving.
I want to highlight something in the Maddis.
I want to bring it back to the beginning.
going to give you all the links so that you can go watch this share this because i don't want to appropriate all of alex stein's uh awesomeness in this particular clip the guy cranshaw tries to snatch the camera at the beginning then you're just a little loser right right there Right there.
That's actually, if it's not battery, that's attempted battery.
You can't snatch a camera, a phone out of somebody's hand.
That's a crime.
I was going to say that's assault, brother, but assault is creating the apprehension or fear of violence.
Battery is actually making physical contact.
Daniel, just such a little loser.
Damn.
That is battery.
Let's bring it to the end of this.
Oh, no, not where he gets detained by the police.
Where there's a hilarious moment here towards the end of this highlight.
Oh, what are we up to now, Dan?
And they even say none of those weapons even go to the front lines.
So why don't you start caring about America?
You don't care about America at all, Dan.
You're a globalist.
You're a traitor.
You're a dwarf.
Where's Dan Crenshaw?
Come on.
By the way, by the way, you know that meme with the dog, they're barking at each other when the fence, and then the fence opens up and they start, they all get, then the fence closes.
Dan Crenshaw got behind his fence.
Look at him now.
Now he gets bodacious.
Oh, I'm a piece of shit.
You're the one that's a globalist.
You're killing young children for no reason.
Sending them to war for no reason.
At Congressman and calling someone an effing piece of S. That's Alex Stein.
Pimp on a blimp.
The good news?
Who would have thunk that threatening to sue people like Sean Ryan, however you feel about Sean Ryan, wouldn't be winning?
Who would have thunk that complaining about the fact that you don't have money to invest in the stock market?
Who talks like that?
I appreciate I swear.
And it was my New Year's resolution to swear a little less.
Let's just flashback before we get to the news of the day.
Dan Crenshaw lost his primary run yesterday.
Let's get to this one.
A blast from the past.
How much fucking money I've ever had in the stock market?
You don't have any idea how much fucking this guy is giving an interview and is apparently complaining that he doesn't have enough money to invest in the stock market in a way that makes you say, me think he doth protesteth too much.
How much fucking money I've ever had in the stock market?
About $20,000.
And yet I've been dragged through the mud on this as if like there's some insider trading.
Why not?
Don't let us trade stock.
How about we'll just keep whipping ourselves?
How about we don't make any money either?
Because insider trading is the same thing as not making any money.
Prohibitions against insider trading, which he ultimately concedes here after some me thinks he doth protesteth a little too much.
Insider trading is, you know, whipping yourself.
Like, just cut our paychecks.
We haven't gotten a pay raise since 2008.
Yeah, no, actually, no, yeah, this is a great idea.
Let's make Congress a place where only the millionaires can actually afford to do the job.
This is a wonderful idea.
Because what do the people want?
Well, I mean, they want an easy button.
All my problems will be solved if there's if there's no stock trading.
All my problems will be solved if there's term limits.
No, not all your problems, but one problem of corruption would be solved if there was no insider trading.
Not stock trading, insider trading.
Nancy Pelosi-esque, although it's definitely a bit on both sides of the aisle.
Yeah, but if you think about any of these things for five whole minutes, you know, you might quickly come to a different conclusion.
Well, we thought about it for five whole minutes.
Election Losses & MAGA Talks00:02:43
I didn't get to vote in the Texas primary.
They thought about it.
And the news of the day is that Dan Crenshaw has lost his primary run yesterday.
Rep Dan Crenshaw loses to Republican primary challenger in Texas.
NBC News.
He lost by double digits.
This is coming out of the news from last night, I think.
Is it coming out last night?
What day is it?
No, it's March 4th.
This is today.
Texas state rep Steve Toth defeated rep Dan Crenshaw in a Republican primary in Texas.
NBC News projects unseating Crenshaw after a race that centered on which candidate more closely aligned with President Donald Trump.
Crenshaw becomes the first member of Congress to lose renomination in the 2026 midterm election cycle.
He becomes the first member of Congress.
Toth challenged Crenshaw, the lone GOP House member running for re-election in Tuesday's primaries, who didn't have Trump's endorsement.
Trump challenged Crenshaw, the lone GOP House member running for re-election in Tuesday's primaries, who didn't have Trump's endorsement.
Can we get somebody to like write properly here?
Arguing that his foreign policy and immigration views did not sufficiently align with those of MAGA movement.
Toth, an ordained pastor, also secured a late endorsement from Senator Ted Cruz.
Crenshaw, who is in his fourth term, has at times bucked his party by backing aid for Ukraine and criticizing Trump allies for their claim that the 2020 election was stolen.
It doesn't have to be a Trump ally.
The 2020 election was stolen.
And anybody who says otherwise is an idiot.
But he sought to tie himself closely to Donald Trump through the can't throw out the campaign.
Yada, yada, yada.
If you think I'm not MAGA enough, then you're not following me on social media.
That's the reality, Crenshaw said in February interview with the Houston Chronicles editorial board.
If you don't think I support Trump enough, then you're not following me.
You're not listening to a thing I say.
I'm out there defending his policies pretty hard, and I've defended them in extremely hard places in the past.
Yada, yada, yada.
Out.
Yeah, defending the corruption, money laundering through Ukraine, denying documented reality of the amount of military aid and financial aid reaching the end line.
And he's got the boot.
Crenshaw is not.
And by the way, sometimes being MAGA, and you might disagree with this, sometimes being MAGA is voicing your concerns when you think that certain decisions are being implemented that are not MAGA.
I said we're not talking Iran today.
We're not talking, but if you wanted everybody's talking about it, it's on the one hand, not just overwhelming and suffocating.
It's unproductive at this point in time.
Everyone has said what they have to say.
Crenshaw Wrong On Ukraine00:03:09
As things develop, we can reshape, reformulate, and discuss developments.
As of now, everybody has not made their bed, but everybody's fleshed out their concerns.
And now it is the cross your fingers and pray for the best.
So we're not talking Iran, but Crenshaw was wrong on Ukraine, ardently so.
He was belligerent.
He was disrespectful.
He was demeaning, degrading.
And sometimes being true MAGA actually means saying what you think is best for making America great again and for putting America first.
Now, with that said, people, another piece of good news of the day.
First of all, before we get started, are we live across all platforms?
We're live in vivabarnslaw.locals.com, where we say he's either lying or he sucks at managing his money, says Callie Fred.
Crenshaw is a crybaby phony, says Ali Michael.
Lizzer says, has Al Green conceded, or will there be a runoff?
I don't know.
We're going to be following it.
The results are in.
What were some of the bigger, I say, upsets?
Tallarico destroyed, what's her face, Jasmine Crockett.
So, again, I say faith, at least people have some level of discernment, although Tallarico is a liberal who will implement liberal policies if he gets elected in Texas.
Jasmine Crockett blamed her loss on Republicans, if you can believe it.
But, you know, the woman who proudly says, we're done picking cotton, she literally verbatim said that to justify modern-day slavery, which is exploitation of illegal aliens.
You know, don't expect more from her.
And just so that nobody thinks that that was a word that ever came out of my mouth, because I don't talk like that.
Go around the country and educate people about what immigrants do for this country or the fact that we are a country of immigrants.
The fact is, ain't none of y'all trying to go and farm right now.
Ain't none of y'all trying to go farm right now.
That's matter of fact wrong.
I'm sorry.
I won't belabor it.
We've played this clip a few times.
Look at her.
But put in the bounce bomb bounce bounce bounce.
Okay, so I'm live.
Raise your hands!
You're not!
You're not.
We're done picking cotton.
We are.
So we need a new demographic of that to pick the cotton is what she actually said out loud, people.
So not the smartest woman on earth.
And Tallarico, if nothing else, is somewhat more charismatic and weighs his words a little more.
Okay, now hold on.
I want to say we're live on vivabarneslaw.locals.com and we are live on Crumble.
And I'm just reading the comments, which I will not read.
Another element of good news.
Aaron Spencer's Dash Cam Confession00:12:46
Do you all know the story of Aaron Spencer?
Aaron Spencer is a man who is charged with murder.
I forget if it's second-degree murder or we'll get it here.
We'll bring it up and bring up the details.
He's charged with murder for murdering a 64, 65-year-old man who assaulted his daughter, kidnapped his daughter.
And he, as he was calling the police to track down the man who intercepted his daughter in the middle of the night and took her off in his pickup truck, he intercepted that vehicle and ended up killing the man to save his daughter.
The man who, after it became known, had assaulted his daughter, was arrested and released on $5,000 bond because I think it was $50,000 bail and they post 10% of it.
He was charged.
And the corruption of the Arkansas system saw to it that the judge in charge of his file was trying to have a trial where cameras would be excluded.
And this man was running for sheriff in the interim.
Refresh everybody's memory about the story.
More details out on father's killing of man accused of molesting 13-year-old daughter.
They should say killing his molesting his 13-year-old daughter.
After the Arkansas Supreme Court ordered the court's files to be made public, we have now a clear picture of what happened the night Aaron Spencer killed Michael Fossler, a Lanoke County man who had previously been arrested and charged with sexual offenses against Spencer's teenage daughter.
Now, just to fill in a blank here for one second, there is apparently an interaction with police where after the father found out this 64-year-old pedophile had molested his daughter, was asking for the man's address, which they then later argued was some form of premeditation of Aaron Spencer in killing the man who kidnapped his daughter in the dead of the night.
Now, I'm not sure if it was a physical kidnapping or if there was some element of grooming here and blackmail, where the man, Michael Fossler, pedophile, alleged, after he gets let out of jail, goes and contacts the daughter, either extorts her to come out of the house to join him in the middle of the night, threatens her or physically grabs her, or she, you know, was brainwashed by this guy to join him again.
He kidnapped the man's 13-year-old daughter in the dead of the night.
They tried to use that prior interaction with the police when the man found out about the pervert having molested his daughter to determine premeditation in the killing.
So listen to this.
The court's records had been sealed pursuant to a broad gag order by circuit judge Barbara Elmore.
But last month, the Arkansas Supreme Court struck down the gag order and criticized Elmore's actions.
Barbara Elmore, from what I understand now, is not the original judge who let the alleged pedophile, Michael Foster, out on $5,000 bond.
That was another judge.
Whether or not it's one judge covering for the corruption of another judge, whether or not there's some underlying relationship between the now deceased pedophile and this judge, this judge, Barbara Elmore, put a gag order on the file, tried to shut cameras out, tried to basically make sure that this persecution occurs in the dead of night and not with the big broad spotlights of the court of public opinion, which I will make sure to bring this into because it's not yet over.
According to records obtained by the Arkansas Times, Spencer initially called 911 just after 1 a.m. on October 8, 2024 to report his 13-year-old daughter missing.
Spencer told police he'd been awakened by his dog barking, went to his daughter's room to check on her and saw she was missing.
This is the stuff of nightmares.
He said he suspected she was with Fosler, 67, who had been arrested in July, charged with 43 counts, including sexual assault of a minor and internet stalking of a child related to Foster's pursuit of Spencer's then 13-year-old daughter.
Apparently, he had images of Spencer's daughter on his phone.
The arrest affidavit for Spencer says he went to look for his daughter and Fossler after calling 911 the first time.
The Lanoke County Sheriff's Office contacted Cabot Police, Jayeda.
Prior to hearing back from Cabot Police, however, 911 Dispatch got a second call from Spencer, who said he had located the quote man who kidnapped his daughter, end quote, and his daughter, but that Fossler was dead on the side of the road and that he had no choice.
The affidavit contains Spencer's recounting of how the deadly interaction unfolded.
Spencer saw Fosler's white Ford F-150 turn onto Highway 236 East towards Fossil's home.
He then turned around, chased after the vehicle, flashing his lights and honking his horn to get Fossler to pull over.
When the two vehicles arrived at the intersection, Spencer rammed his truck into the rear of Fossler's, sending the 150 into the ditch.
The affidavit continues.
This is wild.
By the way, let me open up another parentheses here.
Spencer, the man who we're going to get to the news of, this is all the preamble context, apparently had all of this recorded on dash cam and gave his dash cam to the police, the local police, who then allegedly lost the dash cam footage, which Spencer says absolutely would have exonerated him and proven that this was all necessary, defense of his daughter, and totally justified.
They lost it.
They lost it.
And from what I understand from the court ruling, no negative inference could be drawn from the local corrupt enforcement.
By the way, the pedophile, the now deceased alleged pedo, had a history in law enforcement as well in another village, another town, from what I understand.
He turned over the dash cam footage and the police lost it.
And no negative inferences were allowed to be drawn from the police having lost the dash cam footage.
This is from the affidavit.
Spencer then continued.
Spencer then stated that he exited his vehicle with his firearm in his hand.
Bear right, it's his daughter in the car with the man charged with 43 counts of sex crimes against his daughter, 67-year-old pedophile who kidnapped his daughter at one in the morning.
He ordered Fossil out of the vehicle and to lay down in the ditch.
Spencer stated that he observed his daughter trying to exit the passenger side of the vehicle, but it appeared that Fossler has grabbed her and stopped her from getting out.
Spencer then stated that Fossler exited his vehicle and had something in his hand, but Spencer did not know what it was.
Spencer stated that Fossler then lunged towards him, saying, Fuck you.
Spencer stated that he then opened fire on Fossler, emptying his weapon before jumping on top of Fossler and pistol whipping him.
Spencer then stated that he got his daughter out of the vehicle, returned to his truck, where he reloaded his weapon and called 911.
Do we want to, let's finish this just so we get all according to the police report, Spencer shot Fossler in the chest, armed, abdomen with a Glock 19 Gen 4 pistol.
The report does not say how many times each body part was hit, though a standard Glock holds 15 rounds regarding the pistol whipping of Fossler.
The report notes that blood was on the outside of the weapon.
Spencer bonded out of the Lanoke County Jail the following day.
The case quickly drew attention, both inside Arkansas and beyond.
Let's make sure it gets far beyond.
On November 27, prosecutors charged Spence with second-degree murder and commission of a felony with a firearm.
Can you imagine the insult to injury that this is?
Like, in an ideal world, people would be convicted and then they would be punished appropriately.
In an ideal world, pedophiles would not be allowed to abuse children.
This alleged pedophile will not be allowed to abuse any more children.
That's for damn sure.
They charge him for shooting the man who kidnapped his daughter at one in the morning.
Then they try to gag him.
Then they try to gag the file.
Then they try to make sure nobody hears about it because there's a whole hell of a lot of corruption going on here.
The same day, Spence's attorneys Eric Cassilini and Michael Kaiser issued a statement calling Spencer a decorated war hero who protected his country and a loving father whose heroic actions protected his family.
They said Foster repeatedly violated his child and kidnapped her in the dark of night to continue his assaults on her.
Statement criticized prosecutors for bringing charges against Spencer at all, accused prosecutors of, quote, perpetuating these horrors instead of protecting legitimate victims and punishing true criminal offenders.
How the hell was this guy let out?
They thanked those who had voiced their outrage over the treatment of Aaron, his child, and the rest of the family had suffered.
Following week, prosecutors asked Judge Elmore for an order preventing Spencer's attorney and anyone else from saying anything about the case to anyone.
Why?
This is the lessons that have been learned from the persecutions of Alex Jones, Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, Roger Stone.
I know everybody hears now Steve Bannon's voice and hears a bunch of other things, but doesn't matter.
Persecution of this type of nature.
Lawfare.
Deprive you of your defenses and deprive you of your ability to even voice your concerns of the abuse in public.
Spence's attorneys filed a 19-page response to the prosecutor's motion in December.
Less than 30 minutes later, Elmore granted the prosecutor's motion and entered a gag order.
She also sealed the entire case file despite neither side requesting it.
Huh, nothing weird about that.
Spencer appealed to court.
In March, the Arkansas Supreme Court stayed the case pending their decision.
On May 29th, the high court struck down the gag order and sent the case back to Lanoke for further proceedings.
A pretrial hearing for the case is now scheduled for August 8th.
Yeah, this is now the case is the judge got removed.
So the case has been stayed indefinitely.
The charges should be dismissed, period.
Now, that's at all a long-winded way of getting to the good news of the day.
This man, Aaron Spencer, was running for sheriff, and he got elected yesterday by a massive, massive margin.
This is where you know the public factored all this into their decision, and they say, Yeah, you know what?
It was the primaries.
He's going to have to go now in the generals in a heavily Republican area against a Democrat candidate for sheriff.
We know that this guy shot and killed a pedophile who kidnapped his daughter after sexually abusing her.
And not only are we not, do we not have a problem with that?
That's what that's what we want more of in terms of justice.
And we want an end to this persecution of people who get prosecuted, persecuted for defending their daughters from actual pedophiles.
This is the news from yesterday, Arkansas Times.
Aaron Spencer, dad who killed daughters' alleged molester, wins Republican primary for Lanoke County Sheriff by twofold.
Is it twofold?
It's actually more than twofold, by a small amount, more than twofold.
I say small miracles.
The people have spoken.
They say, you know, everybody gets a little dismayed about voting.
As the old saying goes, if voting did something, they wouldn't let you do it.
But sometimes at the lower levels of grassroots politics, it actually does something.
When Aaron Spencer announced he was running for Lanoke County Sheriff, it seemed like a joke.
He'd been arrested less than a year prior and charged with murder for allegedly shooting a 67-year-old Michael Foster after discovering with Spencer's missing daughter, then 13 years old.
The felony charge was still pending at the time of his campaign announcement.
And if convicted, Arkansas law would bar him from holding elected office.
Drop those freaking charges.
Period.
Should be ashamed of ever having brought them in the first place.
Now the people have spoken.
Spencer still faces that murder charge.
Incompetence from circuit court judge Barbara Elmore caused multiple delays as the state Supreme Court was forced to step in more than once, ultimately removing Elmore from the case entirely.
And a pretrial hearing is scheduled for later this month.
Dismiss the charges, period.
When he appears for that hearing, however, Spencer will do so as the Republican nominee for county sheriff, having defeated both incumbent Sheriff John Staley and fellow challenger in Tuesday's primary.
The race was not particularly close.
How much less close does it get?
54% of the 10,000 votes cast.
This is how they should do corrections in every article.
Spencer will face Democrat Brian Mitchell Sr., an independent and independent candidate, Larry Benke, in November.
If Spencer wins the general, whether he will be able to take office come January will depend solely on whether he's convicted of murder between now and then, which is just an objectively insane thing to have to write.
You know why it's objectively insane?
Because he killed the man that molested and then kidnapped his daughter after being arrested, released from prison, released from jail, sorry, on $5,000 bond.
And then the police lose the footage, bring these abusive charges, pursue these abusive charges under corrupt criminals with robes, Barbara Elmore, who gets removed from the file, reprimanded, and you still have these charges pending.
Schofield's Statements in the Lawsuit00:14:14
He's won.
It's a small miracle.
It's a silver lining.
And everyone should put this on blast and everyone should demand that these charges be dropped entirely.
And then he should win easily and handily.
Come time to appoint the next sheriff of Lanoke, a man who understands law and order, who understands abuse of the system, who understands systemic corruption and will fight it effectively.
And that is that.
Now, let's see what's going on here.
We got more.
Do we have any more good news?
Now, there's an interesting story, which we're going to get into, about a TikToker.
I said this one's going to be of particular interest to Candace Owens.
I still stand by my assessment of the defamation claim against her, but she might want to pay attention to this lawsuit.
Some TikToker who, a TikToker psychic who said that some professor at the Idaho University was actually responsible for the quadruple killing of those Idaho students ordered to pay a lot of money because of defamation.
But we'll get there in a second.
Right now, I want to go see what's going on at our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
Yeah, there we go.
We got that beautiful meme of, I didn't, I did not bowl well yesterday.
Viva vetoed posting last night's subpar bowling scores.
Excuse me.
It was 169.
I did not come.
It was didn't even come close to averaging 200.
TikTok psychic.
That's all you need to know.
Stephen Britton says, was his daughter in imminent danger at the time he shot and killed the Pedo?
I mean, I know you're asking that question not sarcastically, but what's the word I'm looking for?
What is it?
Rhetorically.
When anyone is kidnapped by a man who molested her, they are at any point in time, they're in the presence of that person, let alone in their vehicle, in imminent danger.
At any point during that interception, it would have been justified and no charges should have ever been brought.
Now, let me do one thing here, real quick, like, but hold up.
Let me just see what's going on in the chat over here.
Boom.
Okay.
Let's go down and take a few more here, and then we're going to get on to, let's go see what's going on on V on Rumble.
Now, for those of you who want to support the channel, all the links are in the pinned description underneath.
Oh, he just got raided by the quartering.
Right.
I didn't even know that that happened.
Jeremy, thank you very much.
I was actually listening to Jeremy before going live.
Come on, Gonzo Owens is psychic and she had dreams about Charlie Kirk.
Maybe we'll get into that story right now.
Thank you, the quartering for the raid, Jeremy.
Great stuff.
Let me see what we got here.
Where did these?
Okay, I'm not reading that one.
Somehow, see, I gotta be careful with the chat.
The guy should have made a copy of the dash camera before giving the original to the cops, says Tatanka Dave.
Absolutely.
Part of me hopes that I don't know if it uploads to a cloud.
You know, should have just recorded it at that moment off the back of the cam.
But yeah, so that's that.
All right, now, speaking of psychics, okay.
This is a story.
I mean, it's so insane.
There is a TikTok psychic, her name was Ashley Guillar, who claimed in her TikTok psychicness that she had discovered who the killers of the four Idaho's Moscow, Idaho students were.
She was just ordered to pay $10 million because of her psychic predictions.
I wonder if she saw that one coming.
Bada bing, bada boom.
The story itself is not all that funny.
And if you're that professor and you have someone who's spreading these, these, I don't even know what you call them rumors.
The reason why I say Candace might want to pay attention to this particular decision is because I would have raised the argument that nobody in their right mind takes the internet content of a self-proclaimed psychic seriously or as anything else other than their own personal stupid opinion because I do not believe in psychics.
That's the argument I would have raised.
I would have, you know, something along the Maddow backslash Tucker Carlson defense.
Nobody listens to them thinking that you're listening to matters of fact statements of actual fact, but rather news type commentary.
I would have said a TikToker who says that she figured out the killer, I would have said, yeah, most people are, I don't think anybody's going to take that seriously.
I would have been wrong.
$10 million.
This is out of New York Post.
University of Idaho professor awarded $10 million after TikTok Tarot influencer claimed she quote ordered end quote quadruple murders.
I got the lawsuit.
We're going to pull up a little bit of it afterwards.
A University of Idaho professor won a $10 million judgment against a TikTok Tarot Tarot or Tarot Tarot influencer pushed a crazy fake conspiracy that she was behind the savage quadruple murders of four students.
So two things of note here.
Being crazy is not a defense.
And I was a psychic and nobody was supposed to take it seriously.
Also, not a defense.
Other learning curve points of interest here, getting suckered into or say influenced into promoting crazy conspiracy theories because of the traffic that they garner can be liability incurring.
And this is not any attack on freedom of speech.
Freedom of speech never covered defamation.
It never covered intentional infliction of emotional distress.
And we now have, at the very least, a I won't say new precedent, but at least a contemporary precedent that you don't get to cloak it in.
It's just my opinion.
I'm just a crazy psychic.
If it harms, you might be on the hook for millions and millions of dollars.
A Boise jury in U.S. district court ordered fortune-telling Texas TikToker Ashley Guillar on Friday to pay $10 million after concluding she falsely accused Professor Rebecca Schofield of having a secret romance with one of the four victims and orchestrating their killings.
Following the verdict, Schofield thanked the jury and said she hopes the case sends a clear message that making, quote, false statements online have consequences in the real world.
Do we have a video here?
Ashley Guillar posted on TikTok.
Can you imagine it's wild?
Woman looks clearly crazy to me, but maybe I'm just projecting at this point, or at least projecting what I already know of her.
The caption says, at this point, it's obvious Rebecca Schofield silenced Kaylee through her ex.
She wanted to silence me, so she contacted my ex.
Batshit crazy, but it rhymes with other theories that we're seeing.
The murder of the four students was the darkest chapter in our university's history, Schofield wrote.
Today's decision shows that respect and care should always be granted to victims during these tragedies.
I am hopeful that this difficult chapter in my life is over and I can return to a normal life with family and the wonderful Moscow community.
I don't know how she's going to collect on this.
I don't know how much the TikTok influencer might have been worth, but Schofield, University's professor for the history chair, filed the lawsuit December 2022, just weeks after Kaylee, after the four were murdered.
Guillar began uploading videos to her more than 100,000 TikTok followers in late November, accusing Schofield of a secret relationship with one of the students and claiming she had, quote, ordered the killings, garnering millions of views across the social media platform.
The complaint states that Schofield never even met the victims.
We got the rest of that.
Let me show you a little bit of the lawsuit itself, because it is kind of interesting.
This is the lawsuit from back in the day, Schofield versus Guillar.
November 2022, four students were murdered.
We don't need it.
We did the preamble here.
The parties, factual allegations in the early mornings, well, we got the factual stuff.
Let's get to the statements of what she actually said.
First claim for relief, defamation, false statements regarding the murders.
In her TikTok post between November 24, 2022, and present, Guard made false and defamatory statements implicating Professor Schofield in the murders of the four students.
As Geal's false statements involve criminal accusations, they are per se defamatory in nature.
That means no further evidence required to determine the defamatory nature of them.
In fact, this went to a judge who said, as a matter of law, this is defamatory per se, and we don't need to have a trial on that.
We're going to get to that paragraph in a second.
She knew her statements were false.
She had no knowledge about anything happening in Moscow in or around November 12th.
She never even went there.
Giao's false TikTok defamed Professor Schofield because they were viewed by millions and millions, yada, yada, yada.
Now, where were some of the claims?
I got a video up in the backdrop so we can look at this.
By November 28, 2022, Geal had been directly informed that her TikTok videos alleging that Professor Schofield was involved in the murders were false.
Nevertheless, she continued pushing her TikTok videos, aware that they were false.
In one TikTok video, she wrote, I don't care what y'all say.
JD and Rebecca Schofield killed the women.
Rebecca was the one to initiate the plan and hired JD.
I mean, I'm surprised she didn't succeed on just the insanity defense because it's objectively insane.
But let's see if I can get the, is this the ruling right here?
This is the ruling.
So from page 18, let me come back to it in a second.
This is the court order itself that said, as a matter of law, these statements are defamatory.
This is a memorandum from the judge.
And what the judge basically says here is going down, no one disputes the words were spoken.
Nobody contends that they meant anything other than what they meant.
And this is a summary judgment.
Paragraph page 18.
This is powerful evidence at the summary judgment stage.
It not only substantiates plaintiff's argument that defendants' statements about her are false, it also highlights the complete lack of any corroborating support for defendants' statements.
In this way, plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated the absence of any genuine issue of material fact relating to the falsity of defendants' statements about her, meaning we don't have to have a jury decide this.
As the gatekeeper of evidence, the judge can say yes, defamation per se.
This shifts the burden to defendants to dispute that claim by setting forth facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial relating to whether her statements about plaintiff are actually true.
In that regard, defendant, quote, may not rely on denials in the pleadings, but must produce specific evidence through affidavits or admissible discovery material to show that the dispute exists.
By the way, just apply this mutatus mutandis to the Candace Owens defamation case, where Candace is going to have to, I mean, presumably, if the, if, if Macon, because remember in the Candace lawsuit as well, it's not just that Candace was saying Macron is a man or was a man, was born a man, became a woman, you know, made accusations of having participated in stolen identity.
I don't know, secret murders potentially.
And so the question is going to be, what evidence do you have to substantiate that above and beyond just mere denials?
So this could be applied mutatus mutandis to some degree, although I think the accusations here are far worse.
Except the only support for defendant statements about plaintiff is that defendant's spiritual investigation into the murders using quote intuitive tarot readings, end quote, led her to plaintiff.
Guillar used her clear cognizant abilities to gather all the pieces of the puzzle of what happened to the four students and why.
She became very passionate and touched by their stories, as told by the intuitive tarot readings and their social media footprint.
An intuitive tarot reading revealed that Schofield would get away with the murder if it wasn't for Guillar.
This is fucking crazy.
I mean, this is just batshit crazy.
At the time, Guillar did not know what would happen, but she decided to continue to seek the truth regarding the murders of the four students on their behalf.
Okay.
Let's scroll down a little bit.
Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend to complain and add punitive damages.
Yada, yada, yada.
And then we got the, we got it.
It is hereby ordered.
Plaintiff's amended motion for partial summary judgment granted on the issue of liability only.
Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint and add punitive damages is granted.
And now, well, I mean, see, after all of that, jury came out with $10 million.
I think it was $2.5 million.
What were the amounts here?
Hold on.
It was $10 million versus, I think there was $7.5, if I'm not mistaken.
Yeah, the jury awarded Schofield $7.5 million in punitive damages in addition to the $2.5 million in compensatory damages.
Well, that's funny in the sense that the psychic, if she were a good psychic, probably could have seen that coming.
And then just to pull up one of the videos where you can actually see the batshit crazy woman being batshit crazy.
University of Idaho professor Rebecca Schofield has filed lawsuit against Ashley Garrett, a TikTok tarot reader for inaccurately linking her.
Inaccurately is one way of saying it.
And then this is the video, which will probably tell you everything you need to know.
I think this is how y'all want me to feel about a measly ass $75,000 lawsuit that I'm going to win.
Oh my God.
Killer Rebecca is suing me.
I think this is how y'all want me to feel about a measly ass.
I think this is how y'all want me to feel about a measly ass $75,000 lawsuit because I guess at that time, the only amount claimed was $75,000, the threshold to get into a certain court system.
$75,000 lawsuits.
Then I'm going to win.
It's not $75,000 anymore.
Killer Rebecca Sues00:03:57
Oh, my God.
Killer Rebecca is suing me.
The killer Rebecca is suing me.
It's wild because I do wonder if we're living in a world where people think anything goes in the context of social media content.
I think this woman is probably clinically insane, which would have been a better defense.
I'm sorry.
It was a manic bipolar episode that extended over time, undiagnosed or unmedicated.
And I was not legally responsible for what I did.
And I apologize.
But you got to wonder, what the hell do people think you can get away with under the guise or pretext of social media content?
Well, I'm a psychic.
Nobody's going to take it seriously.
You're calling someone a killer, someone who's at the university, a professor, so that you can garner millions of views on your crazy conspiracy theories, fake crime investigation drama.
I'm just wondering what she's worth because this might be one of those situations where you have a judgment-proof creditor.
I don't know if that was her house.
Does look kind of nice.
Maybe she's renting.
Cabinetry looks okay.
You got an above microwave, above oven microwave.
No clear indications of water leaking on the ceiling.
Nice light fixture, air-conditioned unit.
Who knows?
Maybe she's not judgment-proof.
Maybe she'll garner the revenues from her TikTok account.
But that is the lesson of the story.
And some people might want to pay attention because I think a lot of this does apply, mutatus mutandis.
Now, let's go see what's going on because I see some color.
It's like when you get when you get baseball cards, like I see some color.
I got green, purple, and yellow.
Thank you very much.
Ginger Ninja in the house.
The molestation prosecution of Aaron Spencer's daughter.
It included penetration and Fossil.
He had picked up the daughter four times after he got on bail.
The dog saved her on the fourth time.
I'm going to snip and clip that portion.
We're going to put it on blast and we're going to try to put public pressure on the prosecution's office to outright dismiss these charges immediately.
It's unclear if it's back on the docket or when the trial is scheduled.
I'm not sure that there is a trial scheduled.
Let me just double check here.
Is there a trial date scheduled for Aaron Spencer?
Charges dismissed, and we can maybe feel like we've done something productive as a community.
Yes, there's a criminal case.
Okay.
However, January 23rd, the Arkansas Supreme Court removed the original judge.
Yada, yada, yada, citing concerns.
A new judge was appointed shortly thereafter.
Recent updates indicate the trial was delayed to allow the new judge to get up to speed for scheduling.
Case remains ongoing and unresolved as of the current date.
That's it.
So no trial that we know of yet.
No trial date that we know of yet.
Dismiss those charges.
We'll work on it.
King of Biltong says, get yourself some tasty, high-protein snacks.
Biltong is packed with B vitamins, creatine, iron, zinc, and more.
Perfect for carnivore keto diets.
Biltongusa.com.
Use code Viva for 10% off.
Do you know why I didn't have a stellar bully night last night?
First game was great.
And then it was downhill from there because I didn't have my Bill Tong before.
Because I was tired and hungry.
And the Diet Coke didn't do anything to invigorate.
You want to know why Bill Tong is as good as it is?
You guys got to see it.
And this is not an official sponsor.
This is just a man who's a member of our community, makes great meat, delicious, absolutely delicious.
And cookies, if you're into cookie caca.
I'm not into cookies.
I'm into savory and meat over carbs and sweet.
But check it out, Bill Tongusa.com.
Order it.
Reward him for the good work that he does and the good product that he produces.
Made in America.
He is from South Africa, came to the land of the free and is pursuing life, liberty, and happiness.
Civil Law Tort Defense00:02:56
Forced name change says it's true.
Anton is the king.
You can't beat his meat.
Thank you very much.
All right.
And let's see what's going on with vivabarnslaw.locals.com down to the bottom here.
Marion Nafal reports on X that the U.S. is quickly using up the 4 million a-piece interceptor missiles trying to combat the waves of incoming $20,000 drones.
Trouble is the enemy is sending in waves of decoy drones coupled with armed ones.
Impossible to discern which is which.
I don't want to talk about it because it pisses me off.
Stephen Britton says, Is that manic episode not legally responsible for my actions?
An actual defense against defamations?
I have to, I don't want to answer that right now.
I'm just going to, let me just double check.
I mean, basically, I think it is.
Is insanity?
Is insanity a defense to defamation, civil liability?
I think it is.
But let me just, we're going to, we're going to deal with an AI overview answer and take it for what it's worth.
Because if an insane person can't contract, they can't.
And then the question would be: well, who, who would be responsible?
Because you still have damage.
And in civil law, it's, you know, damage, fault, and the causal link.
But then you have defenses of, but that's in criminal defense.
Hmm.
It looks like the answer is going to be that, generally speaking, it's not a defense, but that might be under the American system.
We're going to come back to that.
We may have stumped AI.
I don't think that insanity is a defense in the defamation case in civil in civil law.
Let's see here.
We take it for what it's worth.
No, in general, it's not a defense to civil liability for defamation.
It's a tort under majority rule of law.
Individuals with mental illness or insanity are still held liable for their tortuous actions, including intentional torts.
But that's the whole issue.
It's not intentional if it's mental illness.
This is based on the policy that between an innocent victim and the mentally incompetent tort visa, the loss should fall on the tort visa or the estate or the guardian.
That's the other issue.
Well, that would be the bigger issue if they're under the tutelage of somebody.
Anyhow, I'm going to do a deeper, I'd say a deeper analysis.
I'm just going to refresh my memory on that.
But, Stephen, thank you.
And then, okay, so we're going down here.
Let's go down to the bottom.
You see, I don't think it's a defense because the damage is still being done.
That's what I thought.
As a tort, it's still damage.
I'd have to check under Quebec civil law, which would be my only basis.
Because in Quebec's civil law, it's the criteria.
It's the damage.
It's the damage.
It's the fault.
And then the causal link between the two.
I'll get to it.
I'll get to that in a vent.
Governing Minnesota's Fraud Crisis00:14:59
Okay, fine.
For now, however, speaking of damage and causal link, Tampon Tim Walz is getting his ass grilled, basically bipartisan.
But, you know, the Democrats during these hearings use their time to divert, distract, and basically just try to find a way to blame things on Trump.
Just redirect from Tampon Tim Walz, A.G. Ellison, and the $10 billion fraud in that state, and use the opportunity because they have no defense, just use it to divert, distract, and try to attack Trump.
Try to attack Trump for some of his pardons, which might have pardoned people who were found guilty of fraud.
Try to attack Trump because he, you know, cut federal aid because of the fraud.
They had their hearing today, and it's the most insanely idiotic thing you can possibly imagine.
Tim Walz is an abject, he's not just a buffoon because I don't actually believe he's as stupid as he portrays himself to be.
The easiest defense is to say, oh, he's he's dumb and therefore, you know, not really responsible for what he's doing.
But he's not as dumb as he looks.
He's actually sufficiently smart to make himself look dumber than he is so that you can't really get mad at that stupid, jowl-faced puppy dog moron who looks like he's staring into the headlights of an oncoming 18-wheeler every time he has to answer a very simple question.
Did you continue making remittances to these organizations after the fraud was discovered years earlier?
Can't answer the question.
He has his hearing today.
The overall summary is they got their asses grilled.
Governor Walls, A.G. Ellison grilled on Minnesota fraud during congressional hearing.
And it's the same players.
Jim Jordan is awesome with his talking.
He talks great.
What's his face?
Comer also talks great.
You know, they make their points.
Nancy Mace had her moment today.
And then those other awful scoundrels on the Democrat side.
Was it not Rashid?
Pressler.
These idiots.
They take the opportunity to divert from their own, I would say, corrupt criminal fraud to try to attack Trump for trying to combat their fraud.
Minnesota governor and attorney general on Wednesday defended their efforts to combat fraud.
There were no efforts.
They convicted a few people after it became so widespread, but even the convict, the prosecutions of the convictions were the cover-up again, because it allowed them to say we did something while absolutely concealing and sweeping under the rug the sheer scope of the fraud itself.
Republicans on the oversight committee accused Governor Wallace and Attorney General Keith Ellison of stalling to fight fraud in government, saying they put politics ahead of rooting out abuse instead of pausing payments.
Who was this one?
You have not been good stewards of taxpayer dollars, said James Comer.
And the Democrat position is to keep the money flowing.
The American taxpayers have had enough.
Comer and other Republicans accuse Walls of lying about when he first learned of the fraud tied to Feeding Our Future and other state programs.
They also focused on how many of the defendants are Somali Americans.
82 of the 92 charged so far in the feeding fraud are.
Walls said he wanted to work with the federal government to help the fraud investigators, but the immigration surge was making that more difficult.
Oh, we would have loved to have combat the fraud, but the immigration surge that we also facilitated and basically financed and promoted was causing problems.
So we couldn't fight the fraud because of the immigration surge that we also did.
And these jackasses want to come back into power.
And if enough screw-ups are made, they might come back into power.
This man, Tampon Tim Walz, could have been the next vice president.
He could be the current vice president of these United States of America.
Kaklin Kamala could have been the president.
Let me just open up a parentheses.
As much righteous criticism or constructive criticism there is against this administration, some of the failings or some of the policy issues, there would likely be no America as we knew it had Kamala Harris come into office.
Not only would you not have had, at the very least, a ceiling of the border and deportation, including voluntary deportation of millions of illegal immigrants, a crackdown on illegal immigration, which necessarily translates into crime.
You would have Kaklin Kamala, having continued that, continued the war in Ukraine.
And I know people are pissed off that it looks like we might be getting into broader conflict in the Middle East again, but what's his face put out a question?
Still better than Kamala?
It was Nick Fuentes.
Yes.
Yes.
Because there would be nothing left if it were Kamala and Tampon Tim Walz.
And this is exactly the reason why.
People of Minnesota have been singled out and targeted for political retribution at an unparalleled scale, Wallace said.
Can you imagine being a criminal and then trying to pass yourself off as the victim?
That's what a sociopath narcissist, Darvo, deny, attack, reverse victim and offender.
You are the offender, Tampon Tim, not the victim.
We're going to prosecute as we have every single person that's involved in fraud, but we can't do it alone.
Oh, we would have done it better.
But we didn't have enough.
Plus, we were too busy fighting all of the immigration.
Walls and Ellison defended their efforts on fraud while also trying to turn the focus of the hearing to the surge of 3,000 federal agents in Minnesota.
Oh, that's right.
That was the other thing that they did constantly throughout.
We're neighbors in Minnesota.
We look after each other's neighbors, even if it means stealing from the federal taxpayer to give stolen money to our illegal alien neighbors.
That's what love means.
That's what being a good, loving neighbor means.
And then they talk about the fear that children were feeling.
They take their five minutes, these are the Democrats, their five-minute questions to Tampon Tim and Ellison and that pastor, whatever her name was, to lecture about how children are afraid to go to school for fear of getting nabbed up, even to children that are American citizens and the children of American citizens.
Rubbish.
The Trump administration cited fraud as one justification for its enforcement action.
Homeland Security Secretary Christy Noam testified Tuesday about the 650 investigations.
Investigators remain in Minnesota as part of a broader fraud probe.
Operation Metro Surge did nothing to address fraud in our state.
Ellison said, hmm, probably not true.
We'll find out in a bit, but at the very least, it did something with respect to illegal immigration in the state.
It harmed our economy.
Oh, yeah.
Well, you get rid of those illegal aliens that you exploit for cheap labor, like we saw Jasmine Crockett say at the beginning of the show, and it's going to hurt your economy.
It scarred our people and it dealt a devastating blow to fraud enforcement in Minnesota.
Well, how could it have done that if the feds were doing the enforcement?
You still can't prosecute your state crimes.
Ellison noted that the series of resignations of lawyers in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Minnesota, leaving those who remain drowning in immigration-related petitions instead of prosecuting fraud.
Wow, we've made one problem so big that it's not allowing us to deal with the other problem that we've made massively big.
All right.
Ellison said his office has punched over our weight in winning 300 Medicaid fraud convictions.
Why do you have 300 fraud incidents in the first place?
We're punching over our weight by shooting the fish in the barrel that we've populated with fraud.
We want to go through the rest of this.
My goodness.
No, what we'll do right here, actually, is just go to the highlight of the day, Nancy Mace.
Let me bring this one out and bring Nancy Mace in.
And we'll walk through it.
You'll walk through a man who's too stupid to understand the trap that he's set himself up for and walked himself into.
And Nancy Mace does good.
It's performative, and that's what it is.
It's theatrics.
It's what it is, but it's good and it's effective.
My questions this morning.
My first go to Governor Walls, and I hope you learned some lessons from your last hearing with me on the oversight committee.
Have you learned anything?
I did that if I didn't speak up, two of my people would be dead, Congresswoman.
And I warned you.
Okay, Ms. Governor Wallace.
I warned you.
How about you warn them, Tampon Tim?
Warn them not to confront ICE agents when they're carrying out ICE operations.
How about that?
Sorry.
What is a woman?
Have you learned that lesson?
Do you know what a woman is?
I'm the governor of Minnesota, Congress.
I'm not here to be your prop for your obsession.
Count it.
That's one time.
I'm not here to be your prop.
If you can't define what a woman is, you certainly can't define what fraud is.
If you can't even define what a woman is, you can't define fraud.
How much money was spent on autism in Minnesota in 2017, Governor?
I don't have those numbers in front of me, Congressman.
I don't have those numbers in front of me.
You're called to testify on the fraud in your state.
How the hell are you going to know how much fraud there is if you don't know how much money was being spent as the baseline?
Did you prepare for this hearing today?
Did you do anything?
I take Congress seriously.
And you've seen the numbers.
I take Congress seriously.
I just don't even know my own basic numbers.
I wasn't governor back then.
Oh, okay.
Wait until you have your new excuse for why you don't know what the numbers are today.
About autism fraud in Minnesota.
So we're going to do some Minnesota math with you today, okay?
Are you ready?
How much money was spent on 2017 for autism in Minnesota?
How much?
I don't know.
I wasn't the governor.
Okay.
Did you not just say that you prepared for this hearing today?
$1 million, okay?
A quick Google search or using your AI could tell you $1 million was spent.
How much money was spent on autism in Minnesota in 2024?
I don't have a number in front of me.
Were you governor in 2024?
I was, but I'm not the.
Okay, so your excuse before that you didn't know what 2017 autism numbers were because you were not governor.
And today you can't answer the numbers about 2024 as governor.
But do you appreciate?
I mean, this is what I mean.
He might actually be that stupid.
Because if you're a smart criminal, you wouldn't have made two mutually incompatible excuses for not knowing the numbers.
Well, I didn't know it then because I wasn't governor, and I don't know it now because I'm not in charge of that department.
May I ask what exactly it is that you do here, Mr. Walls, other than turn a blind eye to $10 billion in fraud to your local Somali community?
And you still said you prepared for this hearing today.
It's unbelievable.
$343 million was spent in 2024.
What percent increase is that from $1 million to $343 million?
What percentage increase is that?
I'm not here to be your prop.
Go ahead and tell me.
Number two, I'm not here to.
So I would have gotten the answer wrong because I would have initially reflexively said 343%, but that would have been if it tripled in a half.
This is 343,000% increase from 1 million in 2017 to 343 million.
Are you governor of Minnesota or not?
Yes, I am.
I'm not.
Well, when I'm governor of South Carolina, you can sure as hell bet that I'm going to know the math.
The math is 34,200% increase, an increase of 343 times.
And by the way, even AI got this answer immediately.
1.1 million in 2017, between 240 and 343 million in 2024.
What it was in this time period.
Do you know the number of children in Minnesota?
Nope.
I know that Minnesota ranked as a top three state for children in Minnesota.
What does that mean?
Can you imagine?
Like, he's dumb.
I'm sorry.
I take it back.
He's not even too smart.
He's dumb.
This man is an absolute idiot.
Do you know how many children there are in your state?
No, not offhand.
No, no.
I know something else that's unrelated and totally stupid.
He sounds like he's got a smoker's voice.
He sounds like he's in Minnesota.
5.7 million.
Okay.
What is the total population of children in Minnesota?
I don't have the number in front of me right now.
Are you governor of Minnesota?
I know 400,000 were cut out of health care last week.
Diversion, 400,000 cut out of health care last week.
Why?
Because they did nothing on the fraud.
They were continuing to make the payments.
I'll get to that in a second.
Are you governor of Minnesota?
I am.
And you don't know the number of children.
Why did that take?
Hold on one second.
How long did that take him to answer?
Cut out of health care last week by the actions you made.
Hold up.
Are you governor of Minnesota?
Zero.
One.
Two.
I am.
That's the number one.
And you don't know the number of children residing in the family.
I don't have the specific number.
It's 5.7 million.
That's your total.
What is your age?
What is the age?
Zero to five?
Zero to 19?
We have approximately 1.2 million children in Minnesota.
I'm not even governor of South Carolina.
Our population in South County is 5.5 million.
We have approximately 1.1 million children under the age of 18 in my home state of South Carolina.
Okay.
As governor, I expect you to know this information.
Thank God you're not vice president of the United States.
Objection, ad hominem, berating the witness.
Do you know approximately how many children in Minnesota are autistic or on the spectrum?
So even if it follows the national statistics, for anybody who's responsible for money to not see the fraud that was going on there, the absolute in-your-face fraud, it's criminal negligence, if not outright criminality.
No, I don't have that number.
Okay.
Well, if you take the CD.
So he doesn't know how much money was given to autism in 2017.
Doesn't know how much it was in 2024.
Doesn't know what the population of children is in his state.
And doesn't know what the population of children with autism is in his state.
He sees roughly 1 in 36 kids are on the spectrum.
We're talking about approximately 33,000 kids.
In South Carolina, it's about 31,000 or so.
What is, do you know what this is per child spending wise in the fraud for autistic kids in Minnesota?
Again, I'm not here to be your prop.
Go ahead and tell me.
I'm not here, is doing Minnesota math a prop?
This is math.
We're talking about fraud.
Minnesota ranks at the top.
Where does South Carolina rank?
We're talking about money.
Where does South Carolina children rank on healthiness?
These are my questions for you.
It doesn't go the other way around, unless we're debating on the debate stage.
And we're not.
I'm asking you questions about being governor of Minnesota, which you can't answer.
This is basic math.
And you can't even answer.
Do you even care about kids in Minnesota?
They rank near the top in every category.
No, sure.
If you've got eight, $10 million per kid in there, oh, they'll rank towards the top on the ground.
Autistic children are getting the services they need.
My children have the best schools.
No, you don't.
Mr. Chairman, I you know.
Arrests and Redacted Videos00:10:49
Now, incidentally, what ended up being disclosed, it's known to everybody already during Comer's five minutes with, what's his face?
Tampon Tim.
He says, no, it was an elderly lady.
I forget her name now.
She's like, when did you guys become aware of the fraud in your state?
Did you know as of 2020?
And Tim is like, I don't know what I can't do.
There were charges.
The information was known.
There were complaints as of late 2020.
They continued to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to the very same organizations that had been flagged as frauds, fraudulent, potentially fraudulent.
They went out and they paid that money hundreds of millions of dollars in full awareness of fact and fraud.
And their excuse to it is that, well, we're not going to cut off the money to the children just because there's a couple of fraudsters here.
You've said, we're not going to stop paying to thousands of children, you know, the aid and whatever because of one fraudster.
And basically, what that is tantamount to is, at the very least, nothing shy of criminal negligence.
And it's the question from office space.
Like, excuse me, Mr. Walsh, what exactly do you do here?
What exactly do you, you don't know the numbers?
You don't know what the hell is going on.
Oh, you prosecuted 76 people, so you knew there was a problem While you continued to make hundreds of millions of dollars in payments to these fraudulent organizations, you refuse to stop any form of financing because, you know, won't someone think of the children.
Then you go and attack the feds and Trump for saying, we're going to cut off funding here until you fix your fraud.
Because you're stealing from taxpaying Americans and you're allowing illegal aliens, a foreign community that is siphoning hundreds of millions of these dollars out to their own country to the point where remittances account for 40% of the GDP of the country of Somalia.
And what's going to happen from all of this?
Probably nothing.
Maybe something.
Don't hold your breath.
I did a podcast earlier in the day.
It's going to come out soon.
I'll give everybody the link.
But, you know, the question I was asked is: how do you feel about what's been going on?
It's not, you don't want it to all be doom and gloom, and you want to give credit where credit is due.
But you're going to hold your breath to see who gets arrested, charged, and convicted for this rampant fraud?
I wouldn't.
What have we seen coming out of Minnesota?
We've seen a bunch of the people who stormed the church getting charged.
All right.
Whoop-de-doo.
Have I seen any RussiaGate hoax arrests, any deep state arrests?
No.
And when you initially voice your concern, say, hey, guys, when are we going to start making some progress here?
The memes start circulating: zero deep state arrests, zero Russia gate hoax arrests, zero Jan 6 persecution arrests.
And you're told, don't be a panicking, don't be a black pillar.
Things are going on.
You don't know what's going on.
Pam Bondi's doing a great job.
And then six months later, nothing's happening.
And then they say, well, you know, it's because there's a shortage of state attorneys because they can't get them through because of the blue slip procedure.
And then relatively recently, Mike Davis coming out and saying, you haven't seen any deep state accountability because the DOJ has been bogged down with the Epstein files.
And you have this moving goalpost from a department that is seemingly not succeeding, to put it politely, or failing at the transformation that needs to occur.
You're going to hold your breath for any meaningful prosecutions and convictions in Minnesota for the fraud.
We'll see.
And even if that were to occur, you know, the question is going to be at the expense of what?
That'll be administrative type enforcement of the law and not the transformative institutional transformation that we needed, that we wanted, that we had hoped for, and that we still hope we can achieve with this presidency of Donald John Trump.
But that is the summary of the hearing so that you don't have to watch it.
The Nancy Mace was the highlight.
You can always go back and watch Jim Jordan and James Comer.
They were good.
And if you want to have your brain melt and drip out of your nose at an excessive rate, go listen to the Democrats.
Presley in particular will make you want to scratch your eardrums, stab them with nails, clot your eyes, and have a frontal lobotomy.
With that said, people, let me go here and see what's going on in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
DZ Ball says the fraudsters are aided and abetted by the lack of attention of the government, of the government people running the program.
Heads should roll in the government federal level, politically speaking, not just the state level.
Whatever they find and convict.
Yeah, no, and then the other reality is they have zero incentive to attack the fraud because they would lose their voting demographic.
It was the podcast I'll give you the link for was with Stephen Gardner.
But he asked me the question, do you think it's outright kickbacks or whatever?
It's like, if it's not direct kickbacks to that type of corruption, it's political kickbacks, political corruption.
Let your demographic pillage from other taxpayers that are out of state.
You don't have to see the faces of the victims.
Let them pillage and they'll elect you back into power.
And that's the political quid pro quo.
Viva is still blocked by Harmeet Dylan.
Hold on, Rustane.
Now they mentioned it.
Let me see.
Maybe, maybe, hold up.
Hold up.
Wait a minute.
Do I go like this?
Harmeet.
Harmeet Dylan.
I didn't spell the name right.
Harmeet.
Oh, still blocked.
You cut me deep, Shrek.
Going down here, let's see what else we got here.
What a nuthead.
My children are, says Walls, of all children in Minnesota.
Those children belong to their parents, not you.
Not the guy.
No, no, commies.
Commies like to appropriate other people's children.
Old man Stevie B says zero arrests with the exception of Don Lamon and his cohorts storming the church.
Blondie Bondi needs to go.
There's zero question about that.
All right, people, we're going to take our party to Viva and Barnes.
Vivabarneslaw.locals.com after we go find a worthwhile party to raid.
I make this joke entirely too often, but you all know how it goes.
Like button.
Forced name change.
I think I'm not getting the joke.
I make this joke entirely too often, but you all know how it goes.
Someone's going to have to explain that to me in a few minutes.
But with that said, let me go over to the chat.
Let me go to the chat and explain it as we do this.
If you wouldn't, okay.
The molecular structure.
What am I reading here?
A lazy man should go hungry.
Unwed baby moments.
Okay.
That's why they chose.
Okay, I have no idea what's going on there.
Let's go see who we're going to raid, and then we're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Okay, redacted is on the cover on the front.
And thanks, Viva.
Blessings says to Tanka here.
This is the link to locals.
Come on over to locals.
It's 10 bucks a month, 100 bucks a year.
You can support the work that Robert Barnes and I do.
I listened to his burden with Barnes last night.
That was another question, actually.
I'll tell you what the question was, and then you're going to have to wait for the podcast to get the answer.
But Stephen asked me, Do you guys know who Stephen Gardner is?
He's got a great show.
He says, your partner-in-law, Barnes, is going rather hard against the administration.
Do you share the skepticism?
I don't even remember if that was the exact question, but something along those lines.
Go check it out.
Come to support the work that we do there.
If you want to support in other ways, you can go here, click on that tip button, download the Rumble wallet.
You can tip with crypto.
You can USAT, Bitcoin.
If you want to tip with Bitcoin, scan that QR code if you've got a wallet and tip me.
I appreciate all support, but the most freest and most appreciative I am of all the support is just like, share, subscribe.
If you're watching on the Rumble page, go in, click thumbs up on the video.
Oh, hold on.
I didn't hear.
Let's see what it's at.
There we go.
Not bad.
And snip, clip, and share and spread awareness of my channel.
The other thing that I was just going to do right now is going to go, we're going to go raid redacted.
So let me do this.
Massive escalation to Rand.
Pound.
Oh, they got a typo.
We got a typo.
They're being pounded by U.S. bombers.
Economy set for big trouble.
Who could have seen that coming?
Well, okay.
Raid and go raid.
And now we will take this party on over to viva barnslaw.locals.com.
Viva raid booyah.
Excuse me.
I just knocked all the stuff off my desk.
Rumble, if you're not coming over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com, thank you for being here.
I will see you all tomorrow.
It's Wednesday today.
No, it's not.
What day is it?
It's Wednesday.
So I'll see you tomorrow.
It's Thursday.
I don't know, you know, same old stuff.
And that's it.
Now, let's see here.
No, it still only allows us to go to locals.
Support is only, so I'm going to ask what's going on there.
Oh, Lord Buckley at the movies.
We changed our movie tomorrow.
It's no longer Runaway Train.
It's Bonnie and Clyde.
Let me give you all the link.
Viva and Lord Buckley go to the movie seven o'clock tomorrow, and we're doing Bonnie and Clyde.
We're watching Bonnie and Clyde.
I spoiled it and I watched the end scene, although I did know that Bonnie and Clyde both got killed.
I'm going to watch that movie and I'm going to watch it for historical accuracy because I am told that the end scene was not accurate.
Here, this is uh movies.
So, we're watching, we're gonna review Bonnie and Clyde tomorrow.
So, go check it out.
Make sure you subscribe.
Roosting, thank you for the reminder.
Viva and Lord Buckley Movies.
What's the film?
Hopefully, the chosen film will keep Viva from drifting off.
Otherwise, it could be called Viva Falls Asleep at the Movies.
How's Manny?
I'll save all of that discussion for our locals exclusive after party.
So, come if you're coming.
And if you're not coming, go watch Redacted.
And if you don't want to watch Redacted, I think Owen Schroyer might be alive.
There's a ton of other people on the Rumble platform to watch.