All Episodes
Previous
Feb. 19, 2026 - Viva & Barnes
01:06:24
BUSTED! Former Prince Andrew ARRESTED! Judge Finds DOJ Attorney in CONTEMPT! Canadian Madness & MORE

SPONSOR! Download Rumble Wallet now and step away from the big banks — for good! https://rumblewallet.onelink.me/bJsX/vivafrei

|

Time Text
Gender Neutral Options Controversy 00:11:14
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, if you thought it couldn't get any more mad in Canada, I would beg to differ.
In another story of trans madness, gone even matter, I present to you the story of a hairdresser fined $500 by the Human Rights Tribunal for not offering a other when booking appointments online between male and female.
If you think this is a joke, it is.
It's Canada.
Behold!
In 2023, Alex Frédéric Mignon tried to schedule a haircut at Station Dis, a small hair salon that charges by the minute.
The concept seemed great because they charge based on the time that it takes to do the cut and not based on the gender of the person.
Alex identifies as non-binary and was disappointed to find that during the booking process, they were still asked to select between a men's or women's cut.
They sent an email asking for accommodation and say they were told to just select one or the other.
It is not fair and it's not legal to tell me no, since you don't fit into my worldview, I don't want to do anything with you and I don't want you as my customer.
Alexia.
I'm going to pause it just for one second and appreciate that the news outlet is systematically referring to this man as they, them.
And we're going to see it in the article as well.
I also want to pause it and say this.
What if the individual doesn't identify as human?
Do they then have to offer a non-human?
They are species amorphous, species fluid, and they don't identify as human.
We have to offer male, female, gender-neutral or species neutral.
I mean, species is a human construct after all.
This story is abject insanity and emblematic of what's going on in Canada and other virtue signaling, suicidally empathetic parts of the world.
Ilabrec is a co-owner of the salon.
He says the policy has nothing to do with ideology.
He says because the business model is low cost, high volume, they only take bookings online and ask for their customers' gender to help with scheduling.
How about we don't ask for gender then?
Just sex.
Your chromosomes, XX, X, Y.
Well, I'm chromosome fluid.
I don't care what my chromosomes designated me at birth.
I identify as XYZ chromosome.
Is that even a legit possibility of chromosomes?
I don't think so.
Chromosome fluid.
All right, forget it.
No gender.
Chromosomes, XX or XY.
And if you happen to be intersex, one of the medical conditions, you can put other.
Typically it takes longer for a woman's haircut than a man's haircut.
So we optimize our agendas accordingly.
We also get statistics for marketing.
But for Alex, the lack of accommodation had a major impact.
Stop right there.
The lack of accommodation had the major impact.
This is the problem.
I'm not saying this to be mean and I'm not saying this to be bombastic.
And we're going to come back to the video.
The lack of booking availabilities had a major impact.
This is where failure to treat is the actual inhumane punishment to the ill individual.
It was never the failure for them to offer a gender neutral option that caused this individual's distress.
What causes this individual distress is something beyond that.
They say like anxiety is a coat hook waiting for a jacket.
Whether it's this guy not getting his gender neutral, the anxiety, the distress, it's a symptom of the mental illness.
And right now, the coat hook is just this particular hairdresser not offering a they, them, Z-Z, usure option between male and female.
But listen to the distress that this man went through allegedly for what he's attributing to the lack of a third gender neutral option.
Listen to this.
Was already spiraling into a huge mental health crisis, and it precipitated my fall into complete disability.
I was unable to work for a year and a half.
So, to me, it also sounds like this individual, if they're claiming disability because they were unable to work for a year and a half, because they didn't have the they option on male, female to book a hair appointment, sounds like there might be some fraud going on in terms of workmen's comp, work person's comp, work they comp.
Alex filed a complaint with the Human Rights Commission, which recommended a $500 settlement.
The Human Rights Commission, the same one which will refresh everybody's memory, issued a $30,000 fine to a British Columbia restaurant that misgendered a gender-fluid transgender employee by calling him sweetheart.
I forget which way it went in that particular case.
We have administrative tribunals that are basically Soviet-style bodies that administer not law, not justice, but politics under penalty of fine.
Listen.
Le Brec refused to pay, so Alex sued for $12,000.
And we fought back because we didn't agree with the prejudice that we might have caused.
Le Brec says a few months after receiving the initial complaint, the salon updated its website to include a gender-neutral booking option.
Earlier this month, the courts agreed with the Human Rights Commission and ordered Stación Dist to pay $500.
That's Palais de Justice.
That's where I used to practice.
That's in old Montreal.
The Palais, the Palace of Justice, ratifying the administrative court's fine of $500 because this man only offered the only two biological choices when booking.
Damages.
It's clearly a precedent.
The amount we have to pay is relatively small compared to the precedent crease for legal debates in Quebec.
But also, they complied, and now they offer the third option.
He, male, she, female, other, other.
As if there's another.
For Alex, who also made headlines in 2023 for a hunger strike to try to force RamQ to provide a gender-neutral option on the health insurance card.
RamQ is, well, you can see Régie de la Cerence Maladie.
It's the healthcare Medicare card in Quebec.
Hunger strike.
There's nothing, nothing, nothing mentally ill about any of this.
It's about justice.
It's not about somebody who has undiagnosed, untreated gender dysphoria or other mental illness.
And I'm not even saying that to be judgmental.
They think that they're going to cater to this person by offering the they when booking a hair appointment.
That'll keep this person from going into a deep state of depression.
My arse.
The precedent alone is a win.
It was discrimination, and non-binary people should not be forced to pick between men and women if they don't want to identify as such.
They say it may seem like a small inconvenience to some, but to them, it's about being able to participate in society.
Can you believe the ratifying nature of this report?
I saw the video and I was like, no, this can't be real.
You got to go to the other propagandist outlets of Canadian media.
And the funny thing is, again, when I saw this, the image struck me as one of the robots in, I forget what the movie is, someone in the chat's going to know, which is what led me to think, like, how about if they don't identify as human?
And you say, well, I want a third option.
I'm not even, I don't identify as human.
It's my reality.
And you're causing me distress by not defying logic and catering to my obvious mental illness delusions.
And the amazing thing is, they cloak it as benevolence.
If you don't do it, it's because you're stubborn.
You're transphobic.
You're intolerant.
As opposed to them being the tyrants who say, you must cater to my own self-identification.
In what realm of the universe is that justice?
Your freedoms end at my nose.
My freedoms don't end at your self-identification, fears, and or mental delusions.
Non-binary client wins discrimination case against Montreal hair salon.
CBC News, listen to this.
Francis G. Magnasca, I wonder, I believe they're told that they have to, they being the journalists, I'm talking about more than one person.
I believe that they, the journalists, are told that they have to refer to Frédéric as a them throughout this article.
When Alex Frédéric Mignon suddenly began experiencing hair loss, they, this is why I've already thought, oh, are there more than one person?
They thought a haircut would be just the thing to help them feel comfortable again.
He thought a haircut would be just the thing to help him feel confident again.
How long until this type of rhetoric is outright illegal in Canada?
But they didn't realize trying to book an appointment at a Montreal hair salon would lead them to a years-long challenge.
We're taking crazy pills, people.
Nobody on earth thought it could lead to a years-long challenge, let alone one that he would win at the end of the day.
Chapter came to a close earlier this month when Quebec's Human Rights Tribunal ordered the Statiente Herret Longer to pay them 500 bucks in damages.
We heard the rest of it.
Salon says it feels extorted.
At some point, somebody looking for meaning in life just found it.
Now they'll be a hero in their own mind because they stood up for the rights of they themes to defy biology, impose their will on a patient and tolerant society, and they got ratification.
He got ratification by the Human Rights Tribunal and the courts.
And now everybody in Canada go make it a little bit more difficult to do business.
How many genders do you have to offer?
Is it going to be discriminatory if you don't offer all 29 genders?
I mean, you did he, her, and they.
Do you need to actively, proactively list all of them, Zais Zer, gendin?
Or is other not going to be enough anymore?
It's not going to be sufficiently inclusive.
You're reducing, you're reducing my gender identity to other.
This is actually the state of Canada going on right now before our very eyes.
Progress.
It's regressivism under the pretext of progressivism.
And it's going to become law.
It's going to become precedent.
It's going to be enshrined even more than it already is in the criminal code, in administrative tribunals.
And if you even accidentally slip up, even if you're one of the good ones, you're going to have to go through the public flogging, retribution, suicidal empathy.
And this person is now somehow going to think that this ratification is somehow going to resolve the self-harm, mental issues, crises going on in this person's head.
It never will.
What will, however, potentially would be treatment, not affirmation of delusions, affirmation of mental illness.
Tyrannizing others in the name of affirming someone's mental illness.
That is Candra.
You know what else is Canada, by the way?
Locking Off Bank Accounts 00:07:17
It's thanking the sponsor of today's show, Rumble Wallet.
Tell you what else is Canada?
Locking off your bank accounts, shutting down your money.
Hey, Viva, you didn't offer a third option for gender in your, I don't even have an email box.
You misgendered someone on the internet.
Well, you lose access to your bank account.
You may have seen the conversations happening online lately.
Censorship is back and it's happening everywhere.
Platforms are controlling narratives and pushing the stuff they want us to see.
We need to fight back.
Rumble is the only company that has stood the test of time and deserves our support.
It's why I'm with them.
We've both come from this country where we've seen what happens.
On one side, Rumble is challenging big tech censorship, but now on the other side, they've introduced something that will protect us from big banks and tyrannical governments from shutting us off.
Banks can cancel our accounts and freeze our cards.
That's why Rumble launched Rumble Wallet, a wallet that nobody can cancel.
Nobody can seize.
You can tip creators like myself and others without any middlemen taking their cuts.
Rumble Wallet, you control your money.
Not a bank, not a government, not a tech company, not even Rumble can touch it.
Just remember to not lose your 12-seed word password.
It's yours, only yours, yours to protect you and your family.
You can buy and save digital assets like Bitcoin, Tether Gold in one place.
Tether Gold is real digital gold backed to the actual gold on a blockchain.
Ownership of real physical bars.
It's amazing.
It's not only a wallet to buy and save, but it also allows you to support your favorite creators by easily tipping them with the click of a button.
I'll show you how to do that in a second.
No fees, no nothing.
Support my show and others.
Go to wallet.rumble.com.
You can download it on what's the places there.
You can download and check this out.
I'll show you how we do this right now.
All it, by the way, everybody who's watching Rumble on the landing page, click onto the channel, make sure you're subscribing and give it a thumbs up.
How can you do it?
It's super cool.
Go to tip.
You click on tip.
You can go tip with another crypto wallet.
They've added United USAT.
They have XAUT, which tethers crypto to the value of gold.
If you think it's going to go up, you can invest.
If you want to tip with it, this is how you do it.
Scan the QR code, Rumble Wallet, and support what they're doing because they're also up in Canada fighting a regime that is hell-bent on destroying societies.
We know it, if I may be hyperbolic.
Ladies and gentlemen, how goes the battle?
It's amazing.
Again, like, I don't even know what day it is anymore.
It's Thursday.
We've got some news.
It's very interesting.
Prince Andrew being sued.
More madness up in Canada.
More madness in South Korea for that matter.
And we're going to get into all of it because the Prince Andrew story is quite fascinating.
But before we do that, let me make sure that we are live on Viva Barnes Law.locals.com.
Check it out.
If you want to go over to Viva Barnes Law, support the work that we do.
That's the easiest way to do it.
We're in the chat.
It's Tuesday.
No, it's Thuesday.
I got four or five natural springs where water just bubbles up out of the ground on my land.
I would still be worried about that, Bill.
You never know what toxins it's bringing up.
Jane100 said, instead, the salon should offer no selection of gender and raise your prices by assuming all cuts are a pain in the ass.
Play the dumb bug.
You know, I don't even think that would work.
Yeah, well, I mean, also, that would just not work because it wouldn't work for them.
This is where you get into the competition of the virtue signaling.
Another salon out there is going to say, we are, they're not even appealing to the, you know, quote, trans community.
It represents allegedly, you know, 1% or less.
They are virtue signaling to the other dipshit liberals out there who want to trade in the currency of virtue.
It's so much easier than actually doing things just to say how you're doing it, pretend how you're doing it.
Now, but I did want to highlight one other thing on Canada.
Did I get the tweet out before we went live?
I was one minute late because I wanted to, you know, everyone's like, Trump is being so unfair.
Oh, I didn't get it.
Trump is being so unfair to Canada.
Nobody understands why.
I'll get to it in a second.
Bill Brown says his water is very clean.
All right.
Prince Andrew has been arrested and people are taking very curious victory laps.
There are some people attributing the arrest of Prince Andrew in the UK for improper dealings in office.
I'll get the exact charges in a second, although we don't know much more about it yet.
They're attributing it to Pamela S. Bonte.
I have no idea what her middle name is, and I know I have no idea if Pam, I presume, is short for Pam Bonte.
The breaking news of the day is that Prince Andrew has been arrested.
What was it called that?
He said it was.
Uh oh, it was.
Come on.
What was it?
Improper conduct in office, nothing to do with actual sex-related crimes.
And I had an interesting uh exchange with Michael Tracy if you don't know who he is, check him out.
Not a totally unreasonable person, just mildly insane, who's hell-bent on defending the narrative that Virginia Guffray was 17 years old when 41-year-old Prince Andrew allegedly had improper relations with her in the context of sex trafficking, and therefore because the age of consent in the UK was 16 at the time.
Well, then it's not pedophilia and it's not sex crimes because these were consenting adults and there's nothing weird about it and just set aside the whole accusation of sex trafficking.
And then I posited because in the UK, despite the fact that the age of consent is 16 and therefore in theory a 41 year old member of royalty, former prince, can have sexual relations with a 16 or 17 year old and it's not illegal, which is true.
There's still a separate protection under the law that, you know, even though the age of consent is 16, there is a separate exception under the law, which says that an adult, a major who's over 18 in a position of trust, and it's quasi-defined in the law, cannot engage in sex with someone who's 16 or 17.
So even though the age of consent is 16 in the UK and was, I think, at the time, there's still additional protections under the law because 16, old enough to consent, but not with a person in a position of trust, which typically includes teachers, therapists, etc.
Now, before we even get into the story, back to the fact that, you know, I love, by the way, also pay attention.
Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew.
He's the only guy.
He's like the former prince.
Andrew, formerly known as Prince.
Wasn't Prince the artist formerly known as?
No, he was formerly known as Prince as well.
Well, he got two formerly known as Princes.
The media, I believe, is going out of the way, and I suspect maybe they get letters to say, do not call him Prince Andrew.
He was stripped of that title in 2022.
And it would be not defamatory, but damaging to the brand of the royalty to continue to suggest that this pervert is royalty, which he isn't.
Misconduct in public office.
Now, before we even get into the accusations, I want to refresh everybody's memory on the accusations that were levied against the formerly prince known as Andrew Mountbutton.
Accused at Home? 00:05:36
What the hell was it?
Mountbatten, Winson, whatever the hell his name is.
Once upon a time, he was accused of sexual improprieties against Virginia Guffray.
He gave an interview that went down as the greatest debacle of an interview ever.
And I believe, let me just check the date on this.
Give or take, it's going to be, oh, this is he reposted new.
This is the interview that I believe led to him being stripped of any public function, where he says, I could not have had improper Sexual relations with her, though it would have been legal because she was 17 and I was 41, because I couldn't sweat at the time.
I've got to play it just to refresh all y'all's memories.
So you're absolutely sure that you're at home on the 10th of March.
She was very specific about that night.
She described dancing with you and you profusely sweating and that she went on to have bars.
There's a slight problem with the sweating because I have a peculiar medical condition, which is that I don't sweat or I didn't sweat at the time.
And that was.
Oh, is she?
Yes.
I didn't sweat at the time because I had suffered what I would describe as an overdose of adrenaline in the Falklands War when I was shot at.
And I simply, it was almost impossible for me to sweat.
Almost, almost impossible.
It's possible that I could have sweat if I were aroused quite enough.
But because I got, I looked up this alleged case of the inability to sweat subsequent to PTSD.
I'm not a doctor.
I'm just a hypochondriac.
I didn't find anything particularly credible to support this medical condition, but maybe I overlooked it.
Possibly, possibly couldn't sweat.
Yes, but let's go on.
And it's only because I have done a number of things in the recent past that I'm starting to be able to do that again.
So I'm afraid to say that there's a medical condition that says that I didn't do it.
So therefore.
There is, by the way, telltale sign of you're being lied to.
Not I have a medical condition.
There is a medical condition.
Always passive, always dissociative, because it's one way of being able to lie without it being a lie because you can detach yourself from the lie.
There was another one, even more classic.
When you're being accused of having sexual relations with arguably underage, but potentially not given age of consent, assuming the age was over, that which would have been the age of consent.
When you're being accused of participating in sex trafficking, what you want to use as an alibi is a restaurant, but not just any restaurant, a pizza restaurant.
You must always include the pizza when you're being accused of sex with potentially underage, or more likely than not, overage under British law.
You want to mention pizza, rub it in the face, make them know there's nothing you can do.
Oh, until the royalty says you are persona non grata and you are now a target, sir.
Do you remember dancing at Tramp?
No.
That couldn't have happened because the date that is being suggested, I was at home with the children.
Oh, yes.
You know that you were at home with the children?
Was it a memorable night?
On that particular day that we now understand is the date, which is the 10th of March.
I was at home.
I was with the children.
I'd taken Beatrice to a Pizza Express in working for a party at, I suppose, sort of four, five in the afternoon.
And then because the Duchess was away, we have a simple rule in the family that when one's away, the other one's there.
I was on terminal leave at the time from the Royal Navy, so therefore I was at home.
Why would you remember that?
But by the way, by the way, so therefore, I was at a, when you've dealt with liars enough, 13 years of practice of law, you'll deal with liars and just talking to people, you'll deal with.
So therefore, let me set up my premises.
And so therefore, it's not as there's no therefore with a statement of fact.
There's no therefore with a statement of fact.
Appreciate that.
Statements of facts, therefore, which are logical conclusions that follow from certain premises.
Make up a story to create the argument for that you were at home because you just got back from the pizza place.
So, therefore, I could not have been there because I wasn't therefore, and I could not have swept at the time.
And you thought this was going to go over well with the public.
Specifically, why would you remember a Pizza Express birthday and being at home?
Because we sat there trying to figure out how to divide one piece of pizza among seven adult males.
That's a joke.
Going to Pizza Express in Woking is an unusual thing for me to do.
A very unusual thing for me to do.
I've never been, I've only been to Woking a couple of times, and I remember it weirdly distinctly.
As soon as somebody reminded me of it, I went, Oh, yes, I remember that.
I have no recollection of ever meeting or being in the company or the presence.
Well, there were quite some pictures that proved otherwise.
Good, sir, that we'll get to.
Does everybody remember the Podesta email?
Podesta Email Revelations 00:15:07
The pizza-related map on a handkerchief.
Now, I'm just pulling one because I verified this at the time.
I just can't find my own tweet on it at the time.
These were from the WikiLeaks leaks.
Hey, John, the real, I'm just going to read this to you straight up, and you'll see if you can understand any realm of the universe in which this makes sense unless they're speaking in some related code.
Hey, John, the realtor found a handkerchief.
I think it has a map on that seems pizza-related.
Is it yours?
They can send it if you want.
I know you're busy, so feel free not to respond if it's not yours or you don't want it.
You left something at the house from Catherine Tate to Suzanne Handler, and it had to do with John Podesta.
The realtor found a handkerchief.
I think it has a map, minor attracted person, that seems pizza-related.
CP is child pornography.
So, this is the world that we're living in.
We've had the recent Epstein disclosures, and now we have an arrest in the UK.
I mean, you know, Sweden, people can resign.
They get some resignations, you know, everywhere.
They've got some charges.
I forget what other countries.
Well, now you got charges coming in the UK.
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly Prince of Andrew, arrested on suspicion of misconduct in office because he allegedly forwarded emails of confidential info to Epstein back in a time when he said he no longer had any relations with Epstein.
Authorities have full and wholehearted support, said King Charles.
No shit.
By the way, he gave that BBC interview in 2019.
Then he announced he was stepping away from public office or public life, representation of the royalty.
And then I believe it was 2022, he was formally stripped of any and all functions.
And I think that's when he was no longer allowed to use the Monica Prince.
BBC reported Thursday that the Thames Valley Police said a man in his 60s from Norfolk has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office.
Authorities are carrying out searches at two addresses with unmarked police cards.
Yada yada yada.
Former Duke of York turning 66 on Thursday, arrested on his birthday.
They've got the full cooperation, says Prince Charles.
You know that they've been waiting for a very long time.
And now the public pressure is just too much.
Here's your low-hanging fruit from the Epstein connections.
It won't be on anything sex related.
It'll be on misconduct in office.
We'll see where that goes.
We'll see if this is the investigation, is the cover-up, or the charges are going to be used to blow this open and find other stuff.
I'm curious that they have not been time barred.
I don't know what the time bar is on this type of misconduct, if it's relating to emails that were sent in 2010 compared to the accusations of sexual improprieties, which I would imagine have a longer statute limitations, but set that aside.
Former Duke 66 has been under public scrutiny over his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Press were made aware that the police were looking into allegations of misconduct in public office against Andrew, specifically regarding alleged sharing of confidential material with Epstein, as well as claims that a second woman was sent to the UK by Epstein for a sexual encounter with the royal.
Oh, but hold on one second.
Hold on one second.
I was told credibly by members of some DOJ that there were no clients of Epstein, that there was no international sex trafficking ring of Epstein, that it was just Epstein for his own period interests.
Interesting.
We'll see where that goes.
Andrew has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, asserting that he can't sweat and was eating pizza at the time, joking, including allegations of women.
We did that already.
The king, who was reportedly not informed in advance of the arrest, said in a statement after the news broke that the law must take its course.
I have learned with the deepest concern the news of Andrew Mountbutton Windsor.
The suspicion of misconduct in public office broke Charles.
What now follows is the full, fair, and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and the appropriate authorities.
In this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and cooperation.
Let me state clearly: the law must take its course, and this process continues.
It would not be right for me to comment further on this matter.
Police said in a statement, we will not be naming the arrested man.
Well, that's out.
Misconduct of public office applies where a public officer willfully neglects to perform their duty or willfully misconducts, willfully misconducts themselves to such a degree that it amounts to abuse in the public's interests.
In 2026, the arrest of a royal family member is unprecedented.
Okay, that's good.
Now, I want to just, you know, the documents that he was alleged to have sent, it was better detailed in the Atlantic article where it's like business opportunities, stuff like that.
Let me see here if we can just real quickly find it.
The allegations.
Okay, hold up.
Where was it?
At dawn today, the stupid and unethical decision, and many others like it finally come up with him.
Police arrested Andrew Mountbatten Windsor on his 66th birthday.
Prosecutors have not yet released the specific charges, which are thought to relate to Andrew passing on sensitive government information to Epstein.
The offense carries a maximum sentence of life in prison.
So we'll get the details as it comes out.
We've got an arrest, arguably, but not arguably, tangentially related to potential other women that Andrew, formerly the prince, may or may not have improper relations with.
We got an arrest.
I'm not picking on Razor Fist because I don't like him.
I do like Razor Fist.
Everyone's going to try to spin this.
Or I say everyone's going to not spin is a judgmental word.
Everyone's going to interpret this in light of their blinders.
We appreciate that.
I've got some blinders.
Everybody's got some blinders.
It's not bias when you can acknowledge it, specify it, and then reanalyze accordingly.
Some people are going to want to look at this and say, holy crap, they're arresting people in the UK based on the Epstein disclosures.
And what are we getting out of the states?
Nothing.
Others are going to say, holy crap, they're arresting people in the UK as a result of the disclosures in America.
Amazing.
Raise your fist.
Had him on the channel.
Like him very much.
Says you may not want to admit it.
Hell, I don't care to admit it.
Pam Bondi, but Pam Bondi did this.
Now you can't see the replies, but I respectfully said, hard disagree.
This is not Pam Bondi, at best, and then you will give credit, even though you don't want to, to Donald Trump for signing the bill that Thomas Massey and Rokana put out there.
You can not even plausibly, it would be disingenuous to say that this is not the result of Donald John Trump defying the messaging, defying the positioning of the DOJ.
This is because Trump said, I'm going to sign into law that bill that Thomas Massey and Rokana have been pushing forward, despite what Todd Blanche once upon a time said.
Epstein killed himself.
There is no client list, nothing to see here.
Move on.
Todd Blanche should be out of there.
This is going to be, despite the fact that Pam Bondi said, the file's on my desk.
Whoops, there's no file on my desk.
There's nothing to disclose.
It's all CP that relates to nothing but Epstein's puriant interests.
And now we're going to disclose it while we screw up the disclosure by failing to redact properly because you could remove the redactions, failing to redact victims' identification.
Pam Bondi should be fired.
My prediction is she will be.
My prediction is also she will be fired.
And you will hear, I suspect the only person who will be able to publicly comment on it who was in the administration, Bongino, will start talking about it.
He alluded to it already.
Do you remember that Bongino alluded to this when he posted something?
Link to tweet where Viva Fry asks Bongino to clarify post about Bondi with screenshot from Grok.
He once posted something.
It was very curious.
I was like, I sincerely wanted to know what was meant by it because it would confirm exactly what I've been saying from the beginning, which was that Bongino, everybody's going to have Bongino might have dug himself into a bit of a hole because had he come out and said, yeah, I couldn't do anything.
Pam Bondi was the decision maker and I was a federal employee who could not speak his mind.
That would have been different than coming out and declaring war on black pillars and whatever, although he'll argue and if you give him the benefit of the doubt, he's referring to leftist media and not legit, sincerely concerned, call them conservative peeps on the right.
And I don't think he was talking about myself.
I don't take it personally.
But the response could have been, messaging could have been better to clarify.
But this was January 16th.
Bongino puts out this tweet.
Grok versus the anti-Trump doomers trying to destroy his administration.
Friends don't let friends fall for doomer bullshit.
2026 will be one of the best in our country's storied history.
I think this could be true because if they fire Bondi and they fire Todd Blanche and they bring in two people who are change is always good.
Even, you know, you think Trey Gowdy would be worse.
Doesn't matter.
By the time you find out that he's worse, the change has already occurred.
There's that old study, you know, just the changing of the light bulb increases workmen performance, even if you're changing the light bulb to a dimmer light bulb.
Just the mere fact that people see change, it makes them feel, sometimes rightly, sometimes wrongly, that they're being looked after, cared for, thought of.
And so even if you change the light bulb, you can look up this study to a dimmer light bulb, the mere fact of changing a light bulb increases work productivity.
So maybe not Blanche, I don't know, you know, deputy director, replace Bondi, even if it's with Trey Gowdy and he'll be even worse, but give him time to be worse.
It'll be change.
You're going to hear some, hopefully, fingers crossed, my lips to God's ears.
Good news coming out of RFK Jr.'s department.
My lips to God's ears, hopefully some major developments as relates to implementing some of the recommendations that Stuart Rhodes, who I've had on the channel, Oathkeeper, recommended as it relates to how you can actually get Tina Peters out of that Colorado gulag.
Hopefully, hopefully.
So all that to say, long-winded way of parenthesizing, 2026 will be one of the best in our country's storied history.
Ecstatic to be back on the mic and enjoy.
Fine.
He tweets.
No, that's not what I meant.
This is Grok.
Bongino advocated for releasing the Epstein files multiple times before 2025.
As FBI deputy director, he pushed for transparency, but clashed with the DOJ over redactions.
You can't name people by name.
So when you say institutions, well, there's only one person who's head of the DOJ.
And then there's one person who's head of that person who's head of the DOJ.
So there was clashing over DOJ over redactions leading to his resignation.
This is interesting.
This isn't even the official narrative, which was it was always only supposed to be a nine-month tour.
And yet somehow Donald Trump was, understandably so, you know, disappointed that Bongino was out, but going back to podcasting is net positive.
These are Trump's words.
So if it was always the plan, this clash would not have led to the resignation, unless the resignation is in fact the truth that he got out because Pam Bondi was sinking that ship.
Sources indicate internal conflicts limited full disclosure, not a lack of effort on his part.
And I said, sincere question, Bongino, are you posting the screenshot of Grock's answer because it is an accurate summary or because it is an inaccurate summary?
I don't think I ever got an answer.
I listened to your entire bullshit podcast about why we don't need Greenland.
The guy was a complete liar.
What an obvious, okay.
Still haven't gotten an answer about that, but Bondi has to go.
I mean, it's been liability after liability.
And I'll respectfully disagree with Razorfist.
She does not get a lick of credit for an arrest occurring of a high member of the former member of the royal family.
She gets zero credit for that.
In fact, you give Trump the credit, give Thomas Massey the credit, or don't, if you want to be somebody who wants a name whose name need not be repeated anymore, take a dump all over Massey and pretend that somehow the inaction of the DOJ is the result of their having to focus on the Epstein files.
People are going to say this is all Massey.
That would be, I would say, intellectually insincere because Trump could have vetoed the bill.
It would have looked terrible, but he didn't.
So Massey got it passed.
Trump signed it in.
And I said to that, hard disagree, hard, Mr. Razorfist.
You can give it the credit to, where was Razorfist's post?
It was earlier today.
You can give credit to Donald Trump, obviously.
You can give credit to Thomas Massey.
Hard disagree.
The dirt on Andrew has been known for years, stripped of his title in 2022, well before Bondi.
We will see if this prosecution is merely the cover-up, a limited hangout of a prosecution charged for some mundane misconduct in office to do something while ignoring the more serious allegations.
But the reality is this has nothing to do with Bondi's bungling of the Epstein files or handling of the DOJ in general.
This has to do with public pushback.
An interesting tendency, but this was my deep thought of the morning, which I sort of I'm sort of proud of.
Interesting tendency in his life is that more often than not, the problem is never the problem.
A problem can last forever if no one knows that it's a problem or everyone shuts up about it.
The real problem is when people start noticing the problem.
Public sentiment and public pressure is now sufficiently ubiquitous and relentless that authorities need to do something, anything, to attempt to preserve their own legitimacy.
The same will soon be true of the DOJ in the United States.
And that's when I think Bondi gets the boot, but this is definitely progress, respectfully submitted.
And then I also said, yeah, you know, Trump gets credit here.
So that's it.
For the time being, it looks like the low-hanging fruit, the red meat to the masses to show that something is happening is Prince Andrew.
And I mean, you say dead to rights.
I don't know what the statute of limitations is on these things.
Okay, so misconduct in office relating to having forwarded emails from, I think, 2010.
It's a statute of limitations on that.
And that's what's going on with Prince Andrew.
He is down shit creek without a paddle, ladies and gentlemen.
Now, let's get over it.
Did I not put up?
Oh, hold on one second.
I didn't do this because I'm stupid.
Out up.
Oh, cripe.
Hold on one second.
I want to get the super chats, the Rumble rants over on Rumble.
I don't know if I'm going to get all of them, but let me start up from the top here before they go down.
Dominion after Dark says, Viva Fry is challenging all real men to put Anton's firm and meaty juice, firm and juicy meat into their mouths.
Is there a code they can use to check out this discount?
Prince Andrew's Contempt Crisis 00:15:51
Well, I think I do see King of Bill Tong there.
Saggy personality says he probably just forgot to get a TV license or posted a meme or something.
These people don't care about real crimes.
Well, we'll see.
We'll see.
Dominion After Dark says, DuckFet, if you do not put Anton, you are not a real man, get yours at Bill Tong.
We're going to get there in a second.
Dominion.
If you want additional discounts, consider.
Okay, Bill Tong USA.
We're going to get there in a second.
Over in our vivabarnslaw.locals.com community, where I think I can put it.
I think I can pull up the tip questions.
Tip questions over here.
We got Pasha Moyer, who sent in a meme.
I think his last name is now Mount Bitten.
Could be wrong, though.
Okay, that's fake.
That's fake.
I was going to say that.
That is that his hand is very far down that horse's mouth.
All right.
And then we got the two chats over here.
Viva lost Bill Tong.
King of Bill Tong says, We are the lowest priced, true, direct to customer Bill Tong brand in the U.S. Bill Tong USA doesn't overcharge for junk.
We make real Bill Tong.
Check out Bill Tongusa.com.
Use code Viva for 10% off.
Bill Tong is amazing.
Check it out.
Support him.
Made in Texas.
South African man moved to the land of the free for a better life that he has found.
Makes a beautiful product.
You got to support good people who support, who sell good products and offer good services.
Value added, and you will never regret having eaten Anton's meat.
There I said it, Dominant One.
All right, now let me see what else was going on before we get too far down here.
What was the other story that I wanted to talk about?
Talk a boot.
I had it on the backdrop here.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, no, there were just a couple of added things.
Tom Fitton is okay, back it up.
Speaking of legit issues with the DOJ, or at the very least, it was Kyle Serafin who was on the channel explaining that the person in charge of redactions or FOIA requests is an anti-Trump individual.
And Tom Fitton, I mean, who's made FOIA requests to the DOJ?
This is a video.
I won't play the whole thing.
It's from 2023.
Did FBI pay Twitter to censor Americans?
And I'll just refresh everybody's memory by playing a minute of this, and you can know where we're going.
We repeatedly have to sue the law enforcement agencies of the federal government because they're violating the law on transparency.
We have a new lawsuit against the Biden Biden, FBI, again, and Justice Department.
I just want you to just focus on that.
We repeatedly have to sue the law enforcement agencies of the federal government because they're violating the law on transparency.
Okay.
And he's not talking about transparenting.
He's talking about transparency.
There's a joke in there somewhere, but I'm not a stand-up comic, so forget about it.
All right.
So this is Tom Fitton, November, two and a half years ago, talking about how he had to sue the FBI, Biden's DOJ, to get information.
This is his tweet from today, quote, tweeting his tweet from a year and a half, two and a half years ago, in which he says, so Judicial Watch sued to find out how much the deep state Biden FBI was paying Twitter, now X, to censor and spy on Americans.
Kash Patel's FBI and Pan Bonte's Justice Department told a federal court we shouldn't get even summary quarterly totals of the payments because it might expose FBI law enforcement secrets.
Unfortunately, Chief Judge Bozberg agreed and told us we can't have the info.
So if you want to know why sometimes I look ready to explode with frustration, you have one more reason why.
Judge Bozberg.
Now, the funny thing is, ordinarily, you would get Judge Bozberg to do everything and anything in his power to damage the Trump administration.
This is the same Judge Bozberg who, is it the same one who held the Trump administration in contempt or threatened to because they wouldn't turn back the plane that was deporting illegals?
Did Boseberg threaten contempt for refusal for failure to return plane of illegals?
And I'm fairly certain the answer is going to be yes.
I just get mixed up between which judges these are.
One corrupt judge after another who have never faced any impeachment yet.
And you wonder why people get a little blackpilled, disappointed.
There's still so much time, by the way.
And it's amazing.
Like, you know, bankruptcy happens very slowly than all at once.
So does the massive comeback.
You start getting momentum and people sort of don't really pay attention to it.
And then lo and behold, it's a comeback.
It's been here for years.
Rocking the mic, putting suckers in fear.
Yes, U.S. District Judge James Boesberg threatened and proceeded with content proceedings against Trump administration officials for failing to comply with his order to turn around deportation flights carrying Venezuelan migrants, often referred to in the discussions as illegals or alleged gang members, to El Salvador.
So ordinarily, you have Judge Bozberg, who would do anything to stick it to the Trump administration, now granting, apparently, I don't know how Kash Patel from the FBI goes and requests this.
I don't know who the counsel is, but is now granting the redaction or the non-disclosure of, what did he say, how much they were paying X, how much the deep state Biden was paying X.
I made some jokes and you're like, oh, they don't want, everybody knows, you know, I had to spell boobies with a calculator.
What do they do?
They don't want to reveal that they've been paying them $8 million and $8,135.
But this is why people are getting pissed with this DOJ.
Now, again, steel man it.
The federal government is the biggest corporation on earth.
You got people who are in charge of things that are holdovers, partisan TDS holdovers from prior administrations who might actively be deliberately trying to sabotage Trump.
And one way to do that is to either make redactions that are terrible, send back a document like they did to James O'Keefe, the affidavit for probable cause, which is entirely redacted.
Why in the name of sweet holy hell would this current administration not want to reveal to the world the abject corruption of the prior Biden DOJ?
I don't know that there's a good reason for that, which is why I say, oh, no, it's a uni party.
I mean, that's what people are going to say.
It's the swamp is draining Trump and not vice versa.
Or, you know, the more plausible explanation is at some point, there's a great degree of incompetence with certain members of this administration who I've been vocal, you know, ought to be replaced for the betterment of the administration.
And they haven't gotten rid of the holdover partisan hacks who are deliberately sabotaging this administration by making redactions look abusive and by withholding information to piss off the most ardent supporters.
I mean, I would call Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch supporters of the Trump administration, which you can imagine why this is particularly offensive.
So there's that.
And then speaking of the judges doing everything they can to frustrate Trump's administration, did you hear that who's this active?
There's another activist judge in here.
This one I'm on the fence about in terms of the sanction, and I'm also on the fence of, you know, in terms of the egregiousness of the violation, but this is coming out of, I want to say Minnesota.
Fairly certain it's Minnesota.
I forget which state.
Federal judge holds DOJ attorney in contempt over ICE case, Matthew Isahara, found in civil contempt after ICE released Roberto Soto Jiminez without his identification documents.
It's quite amazing to hold an attorney, I mean, especially a state attorney, in civil contempt.
For allegedly, the idea here is that the judge issued an order to force the release of a suspected illegal and to release him without any hindrance, without any impediments.
And then allegedly they released him without giving him his identification papers.
Justice Department attorney has been ordered to pay $500 daily fine after a federal judge found him in contempt of court.
On Wednesday, Judge Laura Provincino, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, found special assistant, U.S. Attorney Matthew Isahara, in civil contempt, hitting him with a daily fine.
On the one hand, you can sort of understand the mistake, and on the other hand, you can sort of understand the contempt.
It starts today, and all it requires is them to provide the papers to the individual that they just released.
The broader context is what appears to be judges either frustrating Trump's ability to enforce immigration or, depending on your flip side, keeping in check what could arguably be tyrannical enforcement of immigration, depending on which side of the political aisle you're on.
Judge reportedly said that her goal was to ensure the government complies with her orders regarding Roberto Rigoberto, Soto Jimenez, a detained Mexican immigrant living in Big Lake, Minnesota.
Okay, good.
Sotoro has reportedly lived in the U.S. since 2018, has no criminal history or final orders of removal, according to KMSP.
Additionally, the outlets noted that Sotoro Jimenez, attorney, stated he is years into the process of obtaining lawful immigration status.
This is where you just say there's a divergence of facts that would be determined depending on which one's right and which one's wrong.
Can one be illegal while also being years into the process of getting legal status?
Soto was arrested by U.S. enforcement by ICE personnel January 14, and as of February 9, was not given a warrant that justifies his detention according to the judge's order.
Soto Jimenez was also allegedly denied a bond hearing, something the judge demanded be held.
Additionally, Provincino ordered that Soto Jimenez be released by custody by 5 o'clock, February 13.
That was about a week ago.
ICE met the deadlines, but Soto Jimenez, but let Soto Jimenez out of detention without his identification paperwork, which I could tell you could be exquisitely, especially if you're, you know, you have some form of legal status or legal process going on, disconcerting, to put it mildly.
This appeared to violate Provencino's Federal 9 order, which said the government was ordered to release him without imposing any conditions of release and return all property to him.
So I guess it's there.
Isahara reportedly admitted that Provencino's order had fallen through the cracks.
According to the outlet, the outlet noted the attorney blamed a massive caseload and lack of staff to handle the civil litigation related to Operation Metro Surge.
It might be another reason why, you know, Homan's decision to pull back, if only to simply avoid mistakes like this, which admittedly, the judge did give the lawyer, the attorney, a grace period, get the papers to him before end of day today, and you won't have to pay the fine.
But, you know, mistakes happen is not the best excuse for what sounds like, admittedly, not abiding by the court's order.
Flip side, you know, just think it out loud.
I don't know who the attorney is in this one, what his political history is.
Do you have another case of an attorney behaving in a way that's going to compromise the administration because it's some sort of sabotage?
This is what, you know, we're living in a world where you don't know how to interpret what you see before your eyes.
Is it an activist judge going out of her way to impede lawful enforcement of federal law?
Is it, in fact, the case that they're overwhelmed because they went in and arrested too many people in Minnesota, that the bureau is understaffed and they can't do their job properly?
And they admit it.
Is it a TDS-afflicted holdover?
Actually, I got to answer that question right now.
Let's just see who appointed the attorney here, Matthew Isahara.
Yeah, let's see who appointed.
Is it, as we saw in another case, I believe it was the Kilmar Brego Garcia, do you have an activist holdover acting in such a way to try and compromise the administration?
Who appointed Matthew Isahara?
Let's see if we can just get a quick answer to this.
Searching, searching.
He's a U.S. Judge Advocate General JAG, special assistant, United States General in the office to help the high volume.
In short, no single person appointed him.
His role stamps on the Department of Justice to justice detail.
Okay, so we won't get an answer.
He came to public attention recently, February 19.
Yada, yada, okay, fine, because of what happened there.
I'd like to know his history.
I'll go more with innocent mistake, but these types of mistakes can happen, certainly with unforgiving judges, because they will hold it against you.
But anything's possible.
The daily fines began, will begin accruing Thursday, will remain in place every day that Soto Jimenez does not have his identification.
Fox Digital's reached out to ICE for comments.
We'll see if I can get any comments.
I won't be able to get any comments.
Who am I kidding?
So there's that.
All right, Peeps, I'll give you the link to that one too.
There was one other story that we're going to talk about before we go anywhere.
Pasha Moyer says, oh, hold on.
I got to bring this one up in our locals community so you can see the image.
For those of you tired of winter weather, here's a photo of a rarely seen coral reef.
Oh, come on.
Want, want, want, dad joke.
No, it doesn't make sense because it would be a coral reef even without the choir.
But we get where you're going with that.
Okay, that's good.
And then we can go here and just see.
FYI, it's Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor.
Yeah, that's okay.
I don't know what's going on there.
For judges, don't conflate intentional criminality with incompetence.
Elected Congress critters are incompetent or under compromat, or likely both.
Now, the other problem is you know, this you practice law or you have a boss that doesn't like you.
If you have a judge that is politically partisan or doesn't like you, they will not forgive your mistake.
You know, you'll forgive allies and you'll never forgive enemies.
And so, this judge probably wouldn't say anything if it were a lefty judge doing something like this to a conservative Jan Sixer, for example.
But they sure as shit are going to do it to a Trump admin attorney.
And so you have to know that and you have to, you know, conduct yourself accordingly.
Now, by the way, let's just go back to Hrumble for one second.
And everybody, again, reminder, if you're watching on the landing page without having clicked through, click through to the channel, subscribe to the channel, give a thumbs up or a thumbs down for all I care.
Drop a comment and let me know what you think.
I wonder how GoodLogic's immigration judge application is going.
I'm going to find that.
Judge shopping is disparable.
Unfortunately, I don't know if that's true.
I don't think it is, but everybody does it regardless.
So, right, Viva, don't make dumb mistakes.
Absolutely.
And then also get rid of saboteurs in the administration who are going to make dumb mistakes, like admitting that they deported Kilmar Albreco-Garcia by accident.
Who was the judge that just ordered him released?
Yoon's Martial Law Precedent 00:05:56
Anyway, that's the world we're living right now.
So that's it.
What's the deal with Viva's words?
Oh, it all scene 03.
It all goes back to a certain Gretchen Whitmer when Huen back in the day was arguing that Trump supporters tried to kidnap her.
And I was arguing that it was entrapment, pretty much, not pretty much from day one, just it was suspicious from day one.
And then pretty much early on, it looked like entrapment.
And Gretchen Whitmer always became the in Huit.
So to Hit.
We now do it all the time, even when there's no H in a word.
Okay, that was funny.
All right.
And then let's do one more thing before we head on over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com for the afterparty.
We touched on this, and this is another situation where again, like, holy crap apples.
You guys remember the South Korean dictator who declared, I did not mean to say dictator, the South Korean president who was accused of being a dictator for having declared martial law received life sentence?
I mean, look, what the hell's going on?
It's like, it's like you thought government.
What doesn't make sense is life in prison for declaring martial law.
But, and I remember there was some politicking to it at the time, but the news of the day coming out of Canada, ACTV News, South Korea, former South Korean president Yoon-suk.
Oh, come on.
Yoon-suk-yeo was found guilty of leading an insurrection on Thursday and sentenced to life in prison for his brief imposition of martial law in 2024, a ruling that marks a dramatic culmination in the country's biggest political scandal.
Can you imagine this?
Like, again, I'll tell you what I'm thinking out loud.
I am not a specialist by any means in South Korean politics.
When I first started learning of and discussing the war in Ukraine, you know, that was one hell of a steep learning curve.
And I'm now more comfortable with the broader geopolitics of this.
When I read this, this strikes me as being something akin to the videos of locking people up out of China that are merged in early COVID to like sensitize Americans and Canadians to what's coming so that when it happens there, like, oh yeah, well, I've already seen it.
My outrage has been tempered because of what I saw occurring in China.
When I hear things like found guilty of leading an insurrection and sentenced to life in prison, I'm like, holy shit, they're setting the groundwork for sensitizing the world to presidents being sentenced to life in prison for leading an insurrection.
Where could that be used by way of precedent?
Better, you know, better start writing the ship so that Democrats don't get in power in 2026 and don't get in power in 2028 and start doing shit like this.
No matter what Pam Bondi thinks, no matter what others who are allegedly potentially bilking the administration to line their own pockets, you do not have enough FU money on this earth when you do not have your freedom.
Elon Musk figured that one out.
Donald Trump illustrated that one perfectly.
You do not have enough FU money if you don't have your life, and you don't have enough FU money if you don't have your freedom.
Conservative leader was ousted from the office after he declared martial law and sent troops to surround the National Assembly on December 3rd, 2024, in a baffling attempt to overcome a legislature controlled by his liberal opponents.
Judge G. I'm not trying to be funny, G. Kui Yoon of the Seoul Central District Court said he found Yoon 65 guilty of rebellion from mobilizing military and police forces in an illegal attempt to seize the assembly, arrest political opponents, and establish unchecked power for an unlimited period of time.
My goodness, the Democrats are sitting looking at Minnesota.
It's like, yeah, come on, come on, Trump.
Do it, invoke the Insurrection Act.
And when we take back power, well, now we've seen this precedent set elsewhere.
Yoon's martial law in position, the first of its kind for more than four decades, recalls South Korea's past military-backed governments when authorities occasionally proclaimed emergency degrees that allowed them to station soldiers, tanks, armored vehicles in public areas.
As lawmakers rushed to the National Assembly, Yun's martial law command issued a proclamation declaring sweeping powers, including suspending political activities, controlling the media and publications, and allowing arrests without warrants.
Now, you want to talk bias again?
Check your own bias.
As I read this, I'm like, yeah, I can see how the left would try to use this against Donald Trump.
And I'm sitting here saying, awesome, let's use this against Justin Trudeau.
Did we not just have the Emergencies Act invocation declared unlawful?
So he invoked the Emergencies Act, brought in exactly what we just read here.
Sweeping orders, suspended political activities, controlled media publications, allowed arrests without warrants.
Let's do Justin Trudeau.
Life in prison sounds pretty good.
And then we go on with this afterwards.
But protesters rally outside court.
As Yoon arrived in court, hundreds of police officers watched closely as Yun supporters rallied outside the judicial complex, their cries rising as the prison bus transporting him drove past.
Yoon's critics gathered nearby, demanding the death penalty.
Pretty savage.
How many people have been put to death in South Korea as punishment?
I was surprised when I saw this number.
South Korea is not executing anyone since December 23.
Oh, no, it was Was Japan.
It was the sarin attack that I was learning about with my kid, the homeschooling, learning about the sarin attack in Japan, and the leader of that cult was put to death in 2016, I think.
So, anyways, that's what's going on in Seoul.
I've got Seoul, but I'm not a soldier, and that's what's going on there.
Savage Executions Revealed 00:04:35
And as I read it, I say, Trump, Trump admin should be looking at that with a cautious eye, that precedent.
It seems that, you know, for whatever the reason, and it might have a little something to do with the Second Amendment, the shit that they get away with in terms of overturning elections in Romania, in terms of interfering with elections in the EU, in terms of locking up their past presidents for life, for insurrection.
They get away with that in Seoul, South Korea, they get away with that in Europe, the United European Soviet Union.
They try in America.
And but for the grace of God, they don't.
And it might have a little something to do with the Second Amendment that protects the first.
And now we're going to go.
Oh, no, before we raid the message, let me just do a couple of things here.
Come on over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Oh, tonight we've got Viva and Lord Buckley go to the movie.
Speaking of coups to overthrow the government, we are reviewing Seven Days in May, a political thriller from 1964 with Kirk Douglas and this other guy there who's very famous.
Forget what his name is, about the military planning a coup to overthrow the government, to overthrow the president.
We're going to be live at 7 o'clock.
And I want to just get the channel, so I'll give you all the link.
Go to it, Viva and Lord Buckley.
What's the word I'm looking for right now?
I'll give a bit of a preview.
I fell asleep during the movie.
It is the type of movie that I am incapable of watching.
But come and watch it.
Link Viva and Lord Buckley.
Our review.
It's going to be fantastic.
We're going to talk politics a little bit.
The movie review channel is supposed to be everything, not politics, but got to do it every now and again.
Let me make sure that we got this here.
And that is it.
Now we're going to go raid.
He's just been released, says Sandra Beasley.
Well, I wouldn't imagine they're going to keep, what's his name again?
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor locked up.
Burt Lancaster.
Thank you, Rustang.
Burt Lancaster, the.
I'm still a kid.
Watching that movie for doing my homework with Lord Buckley was like watching Citizen Kane as an eight-year-old.
Okay, now we're going to go raid redacted.
Let them know from whence he came.
If you want to support the channel, you guys know how to do it.
All the links are in the description.
Get Rumble Wallet and let's go raid and then read some chat while we do that.
Boom.
Confirm raid.
Let me go over there and just say Viva raid in the house.
And you can all go watch the comments turn to, oh, the Zayo Jew, because that's what some people.
Let's go see.
Viva Zerlien shit.
All right.
What I was going to do was go to the chat.
And there's nothing funny, though.
When we raid Jimmy Dore, oh, that's their chat.
Howdy, Viva.
Okay, good.
Thank you for the raid.
Booyah.
No, I want to go to our channel so that we can see a little bit of chat.
Here we go.
Okay, fine.
I saw some people talking about Rumble Wallet is incompatible with all of my devices, sadly.
Dan Hartman is familiar with that neurodivergent.
Oh, I don't know what we're talking about there.
I remember the movie The Villain with Kirk Douglas, Arnold Schwartzenpecker.
That's what I call him.
And The Whiskey and The Horse Whiskey is funny.
The only movie that I recall with Clef Chin Kirk Douglas was Spartacus.
Hey, all, don't forget to don't forget to hit the like the thumbs up button before you go.
There you go, that's better.
Okay, fine.
I didn't do it myself.
And that's it.
Okay, so what we're going to do right now, Viva, turn to.
Have you been following the chat here?
I have not.
I liked Blue Rodeo's Five Days in May.
Don't think that the same thing was.
Florida claims Viva as an honorable man.
Thank you, sir.
Vajich Vge.
Don Jr.'s channel is the same.
I'm friendly with one of the mods.
He said it's tough to get mods because of the background check.
I'd assume you three would be perfect.
Okay, well, if NeuroDivergent, I can certainly put in a word with Don Jr. for NeuroDivergence.
Okay, peeps, we're gonna do it.
Let me just make sure that I haven't forgotten anything that I specifically wanted to talk about on today's show.
I got my links here.
Okay, so I forgot one of the articles.
Waxing Another Trans Individual 00:00:46
Epstein files drop.
No, that's it.
There was a story about this, another trans individual who sued a foreign body wax woman, a woman who had her own body wax, you know, female hygiene.
I think she was Muslim because, you know, there was an issue about waxing another man's balls who said that she was a woman, this person named Jessica Yeniv, who took them through the ringers.
Ultimately, I think, because this person was an insane, litigious claimant, it got tossed, but not after coercing some settlements out of some of these women and harassing the others.
We're going to go to vivabornslaw.locals.com Thursday.
So Friday, we shall be live again.
And that's it.
Rumble, thank you for being here.
And we're going over to locals.
Export Selection