All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 16, 2026 - Viva & Barnes
01:11:07
Canada's Deal with the Devil! FBI Wrongdoer Promoted Again? AND MORE! Special Guest Kyle Seraphin

SPONSOR! Field of Greens! Go to http://fieldofgreens.com and use code VIVA for 20% off! ----- Support Viva: GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CTYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

|

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the episode, damn it, I screwed up.
Let me start that again.
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, in today's episode of You Do Not Hate Them Enough, despite you hating them more than anything, and hatred being a consuming force that one should avoid at all costs, I present to you three passport-carrying globalist who are Mark J. Carney, the newly anointed PM of Canada, making you understand that no matter how much you hate them, you cannot hate them enough.
Behold, mine is the first visit of a Canadian prime minister to China in nearly a decade.
The world has changed much since that last visit.
I believe the progress that we have made in the partnership sets us up well for the new world order.
Do you see the first let me pause this here?
Do you see the face of the man behind him?
I've forgotten his name right now.
This is three passport-carrying globalist who are Mark J. Carney, transgender ideology-promoting individual as well.
Set that aside.
Who thinks he's the white Obama, who gets the dramatic pauses in his speeches, who thinks that everything he says is wise beyond his years.
He thinks by speaking slowly with dramatic pauses for emphasis, it's going to make the garbage that he's spewing somehow more digestible.
I will pause it periodically to add my two cents because there are a few things that require clarification here.
Mine is the first visit of a Canadian prime minister to China in nearly a decade.
Dramatic pause.
You know who the last one that went was?
Justin Trudeau, the other globalist who, the other man who admired the basic dictatorship of China.
That was the last prime minister to go.
Yeah, Harper went, I think, in 2015 or something, 2014.
Maybe it was earlier than that.
Justin Trudeau, I believe, visited three times.
Fact check me on that.
That's the last prime minister of Canada to have visited China.
His commie predecessor, Justin Trudeau.
Okay, moving on.
The world has changed much since that last visit.
The world has changed much since that last visit.
The world has changed much.
Speaking in Shakespearean prose is not going to make you smarter.
Mark J. Carney, three passport-carrying globalist who are.
Oh, yes, the world has changed much.
Dramatic pause.
I believe the progress that we have made in the partnership that's us up well for the new world order.
Who else wants to vomit?
Who wants to vomit listening to that?
What were my incredible insights to this?
Mine is the first.
We don't need to hear it a third time.
Mine is the first visit of a Canadian prime minister, Chinadian prime minister.
Oh, don't worry.
You didn't have to go to China, Carney, because China's already come to Canada, Carney.
Oh, but you knew that damn well because Canadian MPs have been infiltrated by Chinese influence.
The Canadian government has been influenced, infiltrated by Indian government interests.
You got, enjoy that tweet.
Watch that video over and over again.
Canada has been taken over.
Property, mineral rights, sold out to China.
Government officials.
How many are we at?
A dozen MPs that have either wittingly or unwittingly become agents of the Chinese Communist Party?
Well, you don't need to go to China, Carney.
Just zoom over, but it's nice that you're flying over there anyhow.
Real good for the environment.
Canada's already been taken over.
The new world order.
Remember, people.
Agenda 2030, conspiracy theory.
WEF, you will own nothing and be happy.
Conspiracy theory.
Oh, yeah, what's that?
No, no, it's real and it's good.
The ever-moving goalposts of conspiracy theories.
The celebration parallax.
It's not happening, but it's a good thing that it is.
The new world order.
Not an 80s band that many of us who grew through that era loved.
A conspiracy theory about globalist interests usurping the power of individual nations.
What did Prime Minister Connie mean when he said new world order?
Oh, don't worry, because he was asked to clarify what he meant when he said new world order.
And this was his clarification.
Get ready for this.
I'll read you the tweet.
Listen to it very carefully.
Listen for the buzzwords in this.
They are buzzwords for tyranny.
They are buzzwords for communism.
But don't worry.
They already told you that.
Just none of us were listening back in 2015.
Listen to everything he says.
Payment regulations, environmental stuff.
He's going to use fancy words.
They're not so fancy.
Architecture, you dumb jackass, is not a fancy word.
What fancy words are are cloaking your verbal diarrhea in fancy words.
Listen to this.
What did you mean when you said new world order?
Your strategic partnership with the Chinese Communist Party that spies on foreign nations, that has human rights abuses in its own country, that has copyright and trademark infringement as their primary source of income.
What did you mean by that?
Yesterday when you met with Premier Li, one of the things you said in the public remarks was this partnership, Canada and China, this new partnership, sets us up well for the new world order.
What did you mean by that?
What is the new world order?
Well, good question.
But what he said was, new world order.
Oh, he's a superstar.
He thinks he's Noel Gallagher.
He thinks he's the lead singer of Oasis.
This scumbag thinks he's a celebrity rock star.
Sorry, I'm getting in the way of the beautiful answer.
What did you mean by the new world order?
Well, this is, it's a great question, Brian, because I think the world is still determining what that order is going to be.
And let's be clear.
Let me just pause.
So the world is still determining what you meant by new world order.
No, I didn't ask what the world means and understands by new world order.
What did you mean by new world order?
Well, it's a good question because I don't even know what it means.
So when I said it, thinking it sounded smart and powerful and charismatic and Obama-esque with my pauses, I didn't actually know what I meant when I said new world order because it doesn't actually exist yet in my mind.
Horse crap.
Partnership with the Chinese Communist Party after they've infiltrated your government, after Canadians' involvement in the COVID outbreak, two Chinese scientists disappearing to Wuhan, look it up.
Training Chinese soldiers on Canadian soil for wintertime combat.
Look it up.
Oh, don't worry.
They're not doing it anymore.
What we're talking about first and foremost, which is what are the trading, what is going to govern global trade?
What is the role of the WTO going to be?
How important are bilateral deals such as the one we're developing?
Plurilateral deals, if I can use that term, Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Just throw it plurilateral, plurilateral deals.
Trans-Pacific Partner.
Let me just throw it a bunch of buzzwords to make it sound like I know what the F I'm talking about.
Potential linkages between Transportation Pacific Partnership and the EU.
Where is financial regulation, payment system regulation going to fit into that?
Financial system regulation, payment system regulations.
Are we talking about central digital banking?
Is that what we're talking about right now?
Or are you just going to go full China and just freeze bank accounts again?
Like Christja Freeland, who now is an advisor to Vlodymir Zelensky after siphoning hundreds of millions of Canadian taxpayer dollars out to that proxy war.
These people are flipping criminals.
I don't know what he means by it, but it's fancy talk.
It's fancy words that the lowly plebs like myself don't understand.
All of these aspects, I mean, use fancy words like the architecture, the multilateral system.
Architecture is not a fancy word, you buffoon.
What you're trying to do is just baffle bullshit for your dumb followers.
Elbows up, people.
I think it's Erbers up now.
Yes, Mr. Xi Jinping, elbows up.
We are your subservience, bilateral infrastructure architectural partners.
I don't know why I have a Japanese accent there.
Suspend disbelief, people.
That has been developing these is being eroded, to use a polite term, undercut, use another term.
So the question is, what gets built in that place?
How much of a patchwork is it?
How much is it just on a bilateral basis?
Or where do like-minded countries in certain areas?
So like-minded countries, just to be clear, doesn't mean you agree on everything.
Oh, yeah.
Canada is a like-minded country with China right now.
I mean, it's been a like-minded country with China since Justin Trudeau came in venting as to how much he loved the basic dictatorship of China.
It's official, people.
You have a bilateral agreement with a country and a prime minister saying that these are like-minded countries.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, I guess from the Canadian perspective, human rights abuses, you know, who gives a crap?
Lock down a population, force them to take an experimental jab.
You know, I guess they have something in common with China after all.
They would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for those meddling kids.
So, aspects, for example, on digital trade or agricultural trade.
Digital trade.
Climate finance.
That's another area.
Climate finance.
Can you imagine?
First of all, I don't even know what he means by it, but I presume I sort of understand what he means by it.
He's talking about climate issues with the number one polluter on earth to which we have outsourced our pollution by crippling the Canadian economy and energy resources.
This mother effer is selling Canada to China at wholesale prices, arguably not even selling it, giving it away for his seat at the altar of the globalist agenda.
To move into areas of geostrategy, geosecurity, you will have different coalitions that are formed.
So what this partnership does is in areas, for example, of clean energy, conventional energy, agriculture, as we were just talking about, and financial services, which we've talked less about.
Oh, yeah.
Financial services.
I'm curious to know what that means, what that partnership with China is going to look like.
Environmental issues with China.
Holy crap.
If this guy couldn't go, I mean, he would speak for 50% less time.
But the evolution of the global financial system, the role of the Reminby over time, the evolution of cross-border payments.
I know it all sounds very dry, except for your organization, which I think takes an interest in it.
These are important elements of how the system is going to work.
And look, the expectation is that rather than these being developed necessarily through the IMF, WTO, and other multilateral organizations, it is going to be coalitions that develop them, not for the world, but for subsectors of the world.
What you just said is the most insanely idiotic thing I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent answer, did you come anywhere near anything that could be resembled a rational thought?
I award you no points, three passport-carrying Mark Jay globalist Hoo or Carney.
No points.
And may God have mercy on your soul.
It makes no sense.
It means nothing.
It's a barrage of verbal diarrhea punctuated with and what it basically is shorthand for is Canada is sleeping with the devil right now.
That's right.
I called the Chinese Communist Party the devil.
The devil of Western interests, the devil of Canadian interests.
And you have Mark J. Carney cozying up, dancing with the devil as if the devil doesn't dance back with you.
Bilateral agreements, because he's angry at Trump and, you know, thinks he's going to get a better deal with China through a bilateral agreement.
Now, for those of you who don't know, like the video's gone viral, and then some people don't really know what the substance is of what the hell he's talking about.
Canada has struck a deal with China to reduce tariffs on EVs, to reduce tariffs from China on canola oil, lobster, as if, I mean, I don't know what the respective purchase power is of these two countries into their respective markets, but I do know that it pales in comparison to the U.S. Canada to allow Chinese EV imports at 6.1% tariff, Carney says, says Canada expects China to lower canola tariff.
Canada welcomes further Chinese investment.
What could possibly go wrong?
This is the pith and substance of the deal.
Canada-China struck initial trade deal that was slash tariffs on electric vehicles in canola.
You're going to see a lot more Chinese EVs driving around Canada.
Just, you know, I guess when they burst into flames in winter, it'll be a cheap way to keep warm.
Prime Minister Marnie Kark said on Friday, both nations promised to tear down trade barriers while forging new strategic ties coming from Reuters, the first Canadian prime minister to visit China since 2017.
Oh, because the last one was another liberal commie scumbag, Justin Trudeau.
Don't say that, though.
Don't mention it.
Reuters.
Carney is seeking to rebuild ties with the country's second largest trading partner after the U.S. What are those respective differentials?
You can put it in the chat if you have the answer right now.
It's substantial.
Oh, it's its second largest.
Pales in comparison to America.
Don't try to make friends with the democracy.
Oh, no, Trump's America is not a democracy.
Xi Jinping's Communist Party is a trustworthy partner.
So they're basically they're reducing tariffs, 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles at a tariff of 6.1%.
Yada, yada, yada.
Carney said after talks with Chinese leaders, including President Xi Jinping, he did not specify a time period.
That compares with the 100% tariff on the Chinese electric vehicles imposed by the governor.
Yada, yada, yada.
Okay.
This is a return to levels prior to recent trade frictions, but under an agreement that promises much more for Canadians, Carney told reporters.
Trudeau justified his tariff on the grounds that there was an unfair global market edge for Chinese manufacturers betting from state subsidies, a scenario that threatened domestic producers.
Oh, yeah.
Also, just that minor thing called intellectual property theft and slave labor.
Set aside those two things.
You get 49,000 Chinese-made EVs.
Have fun driving those around.
To hell with Tesla.
Hey, I bought my Chinese EV after Elon went crazy, right?
Elbows up, morons.
And it gets even worse if you can possibly imagine it.
So you have the tariffs.
They've come to an agreement.
It's beautiful.
Did you also hear, you know, to add insult to injury, to just be stupider than you can possibly ever imagine?
What did they discuss in their meeting?
This is from MSN.
There is much alignment between Canada, China on Greenland sovereignty.
Carney.
Ooh, they talked about Greenland, did they?
Oh, what did they say about that?
What did Carney say to the Chinese Communist Party leader about Donald Trump's aspirations, discussions of acquiring Greenland for reasons of hemispheric national security?
Prime Minister Mark Carney said Friday he found much alignment between his views on Greenland's sovereignty and those of Chinese President Xi Jinping in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's threats against the territory.
Quote, I had discussions with President Xi, he identifies as Xi, about the situation in Greenland, about our sovereignty in the Arctic, about the sovereignty of the people of Greenland and people of Denmark.
And I found much alignment of views in that regard.
Carney said at a press conference in Beijing.
Carney said Canada's position is that Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, should determine its own future.
Noting that Denmark is a NATO ally, Kearney said, quote, our full partnership stands with our obligations under Article 5, Article 2 of NATO stand, and we stand full square behind those.
What are those, you might remember, from such international proxy wars as Ukraine versus Russia?
Oh, remember when the Polish soldiers, the Polish farmers got bombed, and then Zelensky was saying, this is an attack on a NATO member.
Article 5, Article 5, World War III, haha, hooray.
Article 5 is the alliance's collective defense agreement, which states that an attack on one member constitutes an attack on all.
It has only been invoked once in NATO's 75 history, 75-year history, by the U.S. after the 9-11 attacks.
Trump insists the U.S. needs control of Greenland for national security reasons and has said he would take it over whether they like it or not.
And so, what does totally not a threat to American national security do?
He goes and reassures China that Canada would invoke Article 5 of NATO to defend against American aggression on Greenland.
This is what you call sleeping with the enemy people.
This is what you call dancing with the devil, as if it doesn't dance right back with you.
And this is exactly why there are U.S. intelligence authorities who refuse to have discussions about matters of national security with Canadian authorities because they are untrustworthy.
And they have been infiltrated by China.
China, this man, Mark J. Carney, the longest unsecured border, I don't know if it's on Earth, but it's a freaking long non-militarized border with America, is sitting there talking with Xi Jinping about invoking Article 5 should America, in Carney's view, engage in unauthorized aggression on a NATO member, Denmark, via Greenland.
This is a national security threat to these United States of America.
Canada has already been infiltrated by China and right now is actively participating, collaborating, and facilitating Chinese influence in the Northern Hemisphere.
You know, the same reason that Trump, whether you like it or not, arguably went in and replaced Maduro, tried to, you know, not do regime change, but certainly keep out Chinese influence in the Western hemisphere.
You got Carney boasting about it on television.
By the way, it's a risky thing because after all, this is Tamara Ugolini from Rebel News pointing out, you know, China's known for a couple of things.
Human rights abuses, desecrating the globe through emissions, if that's what you believe are the ultimate cause of climate crisis, copyright infringement and copyright and intellectual property theft, and spying.
So much so that the journalists who went to China had to talk about getting burner phones because of the risk of Chinese spying through their electronic devices.
And look at Melanie Jolie.
I forget what her position is in the government right now.
I'll find it as we're going playing this clip.
Melanie Jolie.
By the way, the irony is that Jolie, her last name in French, means pretty.
And I don't say this because I find her pretty, but this is what happens when someone who's grossly incompetent gets into positions of power.
Once you get into the government, you fail upwards.
This is a person who is grotesquely incompetent to even have a position in a government, let alone the position of authorité that she has.
Listen to this.
We're using burner phones for the first time when we cover this because China spies on journalists and businessmen.
China intercepts communications.
Is China really the right kind of partner for a Canadian industry?
Listen, we've been clear-eyed.
Listen.
We're eyes wide open.
Eyes wide open.
What do you know that?
There's been investments by Canadian companies.
Pause, pause, pause.
What the hell does that mean?
We have been clear-eyed.
She's French, that's why she got a bit of a French accent.
We have been clear-eyed, eyes wide open.
First of all, your eyes look freaking glazed, Melanie.
Her position, by the way, Minister of Industry and Minister responsible for Canada economic development for Quebec regions.
Oh, this might have been the old one.
Serving as a member of parliament for a Hamsik Cartierville Liberal Party.
She previously held significant roles like Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister of Canadian Heritage before her current appointment.
Minister of Industry.
We are eyes wide open.
Eyes wide clear.
We understand everything.
Businessman.
China intercepts communications.
Is China really the right kind of partner for Canadian industry?
Listen, we've been clear-eyed.
We're eyes wide open.
We know this, but there's been.
We know that China spies.
But look, I know there's a likelihood that you might get beaten to death, but I think I'm going to go out at three in the morning, you know, fraternizing with gang members.
But.
Investments by Canadian companies for years here.
Tomorrow I'm meeting with Magna.
Magna, one of the biggest car auto parts companies in the world.
They have 30,000 people working here.
We're meeting with Manualife.
We're meeting with BMO.
These have been, these companies have been in China for years.
They have.
And they've been responsible for money laundering of Chinese money through Canada.
Holy shit, you're describing the problem, not the solution.
You're describing your corruption.
This is like that scene from the big short.
Why are they confessing?
They're not confessing.
They're bragging.
Best line of the movie, by the way.
Now, obviously, we're having these conversations with the Chinese government.
If they're going to invest in our country, they need to make sure that our companies are able to invest and have access to stability and have access to a form of certainty.
And so that's what we're working on.
When we engage with China and we engage with businesses like Tim and I have been doing, we put everything on the table to address these risks.
And that's why this visit is so important.
And it's been a focus of the Prime Minister.
By the way, you brain-dead idiot.
The question was: what are you going to do about the real risks of spying and surveillance from the Chinese Communist Party?
Oh, that's why this visit is important.
Let me speak for a minute and not answer any of your questions.
Thank you for the question.
Moving on.
That's what's going on in Canada.
It's a big flipping problem, whether you understand it, it is or not.
Serenity now.
Now, by the way, before we get into the second part of the show, because we've got Kyle Serifin coming on to talk about some latest breaking developments with arguably, but not arguably, problematic elements of the FBI that have not only not been purged, but have been getting promoted.
We'll get there in a second.
When the world makes you feel ill, when it makes you feel like you're going crazy, there's a solution to that.
Everyone's New Year's resolution is to get healthy, get healthier, stay healthy.
People, most people do not look forward to their annual physical because they're nervous about what the doctor might find.
That's what you do before the appointment that matters.
Before your next checkup, make the online change your doctor should notice, or you get your money back.
Make it Field of Greens.
Doctors today look beyond your calendar age.
They look at your biological age and how healthy your cells and vital organs are.
Field of Greens was designed with that in mind.
Each fruit and vegetable is doctor-selected to support your cells, heart, lungs, kidneys, healthy weight.
In fact, a university study found that participants who only added Field of Greens saw measurable improvements in key health markers.
Just one change might change everything.
That's why Field of Greens promises you your doctor will notice your improved health or your money back.
Get into go order some.
Get confident on your physical health.
One scoop, once a day.
It tastes delicious.
It will make a difference.
Make Field of Greens, your one smart change this year.
Check out the university study and get 20% off fieldofgreens.com, promo code Viva.
That is fieldofgreens.com.
Let me see what we want to do here.
Let's go with more energy.
I could use more energy.
Oh, I'm going to have to go like that.
Go check it out.
They've got a bunch of amazing products.
It's delicious.
It's healthy.
Sometimes you can't get your fruits and veggies in on any given day, especially if you're traveling.
You can do two spoons a day if you want.
That's what I do.
Where is mine?
No, it's in the kitchen somewhere.
The link is in the description.
Field of Greens.
Thank you very much.
And one more thing before we bring Kyle in because I saw some.
Oh, did I not bring up the oh, flip?
I didn't have it open on Rumble.
Let me see what's going on in here.
Xi Jinping.
Here we got King of Biltong, who's also got some deliciousness.
Let me bring this one up here real quick, like.
And I'm going to get to some tip questions.
Do we see it?
Oh, that's me right there.
Hey.
Let me go read what it says.
It says, get your kick off your 2026 health journey today, getting some tasty Bill Tong from Biltong USA, packed with B vitamins, iron, zinc, creatine, and more.
Get some at Biltongusa.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
And there were a couple of questions here from Mr. Mike.
Mr. Mike, regarding Greenland, please, could you have on former guest Chief Bear something or another to speak about the possible Inuit situation and existing Indigenous peoples concerning the Greenland situation?
I'll definitely have a look at that.
And let's see here.
Tequila Repasado.
When oh when, Viva, will you platform your fellow Canadian and historian Matthew Ehret so American citizens may truly begin to appreciate the existential threat residing in America's northern border?
Here's a fantastic corollary.
He's a fantastic corollary to your fantastic critique today.
Amazing.
I'll have a look at it.
There will be some good remand.
It says, several are of our lawsuits to BC's chief electoral office officer seeking judicial review 2024 now before the Supreme, the British Columbia Supreme Court, which is the lowest level updates when I have them.
Thank you for your support.
Oh, there was a little bit of a white pill coming out of Canada, and that was that a, I think it was a federal court of appeal ratified a lower court level that declared Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies Acts to be unlawful.
Expect nothing to be done with that.
Your news, breaking news at six o'clock.
All right.
Many of you know Kyle Seraphin.
We've become good friends, actually, oddly enough, despite how it started.
Precarious because of what I thought was the James O'Keefe dream.
You mean oddly enough?
What kind of nonsense is that shit?
What are you doing?
I remember, I remember the, this is, uh, let's see, Field of Greens is missing in the Rumble description.
Well, let me go ahead and fit.
Get it there.
No, I'm going to get it there right now.
Yeah, while you're getting it, let me just tell people that if you don't go to a doctor, though, they'll never notice your markers and you might live forever.
There's a possibility you're immortal.
Look, first of all, don't go to the doctor too often.
I never go to the doctor.
I honestly just, I just don't.
You need to get, you need to get blood work done.
Feel of good.
What are you doing about your blood work?
Well, they told me to eat less red meat and stop drinking alcohol, to which I said.
Absolutely not.
Absolutely not.
No, but there's certain things.
I was, when I was a part, somewhat anemic, because I had a, well, we talked about this one briefly, but, you know, some bleeding.
And it's good to know those things because it would explain fatigue.
And then when you take care of it, it's a good excuse to eat more red meat.
You should always eat more red meat.
If you eat nothing but red meat, you'll get to the point where your bowel movements just are like this.
They're like, there's nothing there.
You don't even have them.
You don't have to worry about anything.
Michaela Peterson was on a while back.
And she mentioned that I don't, it's not that I don't want to call people.
I don't say I don't believe people.
She said they were eating nothing but meat, salt, and water.
Yeah, that sounds like a bummer.
I don't, but I don't think that's humanly possible or even physiologically desired.
Like, you need to have your veggies.
You need to have your- No, no, no, no.
You- You can, I did nothing but meat.
I did actually added eggs and cheese too, but no, literally no vegetables.
What do you need for your audio end?
You always have like a, you can't monitor levels on your end.
So your audience is.
No, no, I can't.
Hold on a second.
Let me just see if it's good here.
Audio levels.
Good.
One.
Actually, StreamYard has enabled.
If I have to bring yours down a little bit, I can bring yours down specifically.
Let me see what they say.
I can do all kinds of.
I mean, I got the board in front of me if you need.
Okay.
They say Viva, it's all good.
No, but what I'm noticing, and I think it might be it.
I think it's a, I don't know if it's a studio issue because I think I noticed it through StreamYard.
It's depending on where people are watching the show, there's different audio levels.
So people watching it on TV sometimes say if the audio level is low, people on Rumble sometimes say, so there's never been a consistent thing.
Either way, this is why you mix not on a on a software program there, but you mix it locally on your own machine and then you broadcast it out.
That's the way.
WCC, everyone says good, good.
And then someone says, no, Viva is low.
Yeah, Viva's low.
I'm one and a half times louder than you.
I'm one and a half times more aggressive.
Well, I just lowered you down, but about 20%.
So that usually you ask me a simple question when I enter the screen.
And I actually had prepared something, which I never regularly think about what I'm going to say when people ask me questions, but I did prepare some.
The question should be for those who don't, how goes the battle?
That's normally the question.
Yes.
And the battle today is it's questionable because I've been reflecting on the troubles in Ireland a lot, just like every other 30-year-old black man might do as he wanders around building pipe bombs and thinking about how his kindred were willing to go after those imperialist British assholes.
Well, so people, I guess, well, I talked about it.
Who did I talk about?
I had Stuart Rhodes on yesterday and we were talking about a bit about the pipe bomber, a number of things.
The news that you posted earlier today, and I said, it's tough for me to keep up with everything and to know the details adequately to explain to myself.
And if I can't, that's when I say, well, then I need to get someone who can.
Kyle, so the news of the day yesterday or something is that we got to back it up to the story of Crowder, the woman who was put on, what is it, the quad S, was basically designated as a domestic terrorist.
Quiet skies.
Quiet skies.
Before we get into the promotion of an individual at the FBI who oversaw this injustice, you sent me a five-minute video.
It was her husband talking about the ordeal that they went through.
Flesh out for those who don't know the story of Madam Crowder and what happened to her under the Biden regime.
So she went to January 6th, like many people did.
Her husband is a federal air marshal, and she is a longtime disabled, paralyzed Catholic school teacher.
She's had the inability to use her left leg, her left leg properly and her right, her left arm rather, for something like 26 or almost 30 years now at this point.
And so she attended the rally on January the 6th, like many people did.
She was trying to link up with friends.
She was unable to link up with those friends.
She ended up listening to President Trump's speech.
Apparently, she was frustrated that it took an extra hour for Trump to take the stage and do what he did.
And then, unable to link up with her buddies who were supposedly on Independence Avenue walking around and she couldn't find them in the huge crowd, she was sort of overcome by the physical inability to get there.
So she got into a lift or an Uber.
I guess it was a Lyft specifically branded.
And she went back to her hotel and then she flew home.
And that was her January 6th story.
She flew in on the 4th and she flew out on the 7th.
And that's where the FBI picked up the baton.
And they did what the FBI did, which is that they had some person.
And I talked to Christine today for about 45 minutes.
She's a nice lady.
She's a second grade teacher.
And I still remember my Catholic second grade teacher whose name was Mrs. Dykes.
Nothing.
Her name was Karen Dykes.
Actually, is that not funny?
She was awesome.
She was this tiny little lady with this like really funny gray hair at the time.
She was, she was amazing.
Anyway, she was an amazing second grade teacher.
This lady is a very nice second grade Catholic teacher.
She teaches Latin to students and traditional kind of classics.
So all that's good.
She never went to the Capitol.
She went home.
And that's when the FBI was like, oh, we're going to take a phone call from some batshit crazy friend that you had a falling out with.
This friend has since committed suicide, neither here nor there, but just interesting sort of tidbit she gave me.
And that person said, that looks like my, I think my friend Christine was at the Capitol and I think that she's a bad person.
And so the FBI was like, oh, well, wonderful.
We're looking for bad people, just like your friend Christine.
Maybe we could find her for you and prosecute her.
So they opened up a case and the case was under two different FBI categories.
One was a criminal case, 176, which is the anti-riot statutes.
And so they had cases against that.
That was a lot of the trespassing and so on, generally speaking, the Capitol Siege case.
And the second piece of it was the 266 Oscar designation, which is for people who are members of an extremist group known as anti-government, anti-authority, violent extremists.
And we had some reporting during the Biden administration that that was essentially a stand-in for MAGA.
It was a government euphemism for MAGA people in general.
So they opened a counterterrorism investigation.
Then the FBI nominated her for the terrorist watch list, like they often do.
And then they took it away from there.
The FBI did a two-year investigation out of the Houston Field Office into this woman.
And the United States air marshals also decided to instigate their own quiet skies program and cover for her.
And so they would do what's called special mission coverage, where they would send at least three United States air marshals that should otherwise be looking for terrorists.
And they documented what she did.
They tracked her through the airport on foot surveillance.
They boarded the aircraft with her, sat in areas where they could see and react to her when she tried to do something terroristic, despite not having a functional left side of her body.
And she's in her 50s.
And they followed her for at least 13 missions, which is not cheap.
And of course, she never did anything.
And the only problem was that her husband was a supervisory federal air marshal who also was required to assign air marshals to watch his own wife as she flew places over the last several years because he knew that she was on the quiet skies list.
Now, he has a top secret clearance like everybody else in the marshal service.
And so he self-reported the possibility, just pointing out the absurdity of it, that he was living with a terrorist and nobody seemed to be worried about that.
The FBI also didn't know about that.
And so they found out about it, as far as I can tell, from a podcast that I did with a woman who runs the National Council for the Federal Air Marshals, which is like a lobbying group on their behalf or like kind of a mutual aid society.
And Sonia Labosco, who was on Bongino's podcast on Fox and a couple other places, and she's great.
I met her at the Premiere for Police State.
She was in the movie with Danesh D'Souza and I. Sonia came on my podcast two years ago, told me about this story, said how ridiculous it was, said it was ridiculous that her husband was a federal air marshal, assigning federal air marshals to watch his own wife who was taking trips.
And the next day, the FBI's Houston field office dispatched two agents to go do an interview.
And three weeks later, they closed the case when they realized: one, this wasn't the person.
She showed photographs of what she was wearing on the day and it didn't match the picture.
Two, she had a paralyzed left side.
And the entire predication of the case was based on the fact that there was a woman waving with her arm up in the air, which clearly could not have been Christine Crowder, was reaching for doors.
And then maybe the most important part of it is the FBI did what they called the geofense warrants, and those were negative.
Her phone was not in the area of the Capitol at the time.
They did facial recognition checks, of which were also negative, so they didn't have that predication.
And they did a basic criminal background check, which she had none because she's a teacher.
And so this woman had no indications that she was involved in anything.
They had the picture of the wrong person.
It was indicated by a complete rando.
And what I found out today on my podcast is I've reviewed the 66-page documents of this case.
After they closed it, they also cited something really wild.
They had an FBI confidential informant giving them information about Christine Crowder, but this person most likely was actually just one of the sedition hunters, like a paid overseas agitator that did what they call OSINT or open source research.
Because my guess is the way that a lot of these cases were predicated, they didn't actually have sources on it.
They just paid someone in Denmark or in Holland or in Switzerland to go out there and do research on the internet, find pictures of people on certain days, through all the pictures in the crowd on Facebook and so on, and then paid them as a source and then protected their identity.
And they used those to predicate cases.
And so this is the worst of what could happen.
And then, of course, the next piece of it is that they promoted the guy who was overseeing this case.
Well, let's back it up a little bit.
Sonia Labosco was actually on, I had her on as well.
We were talking about the Quad S abuse of the air marshal system.
And now people out there might say, well, Kyle, you're disgruntled.
You're angry.
And so, you know, you're making it an issue where it's not that big of an issue.
Not that this is the evidence that it is that big of an issue, but even the people who are on the side, you know, or less adversarial, some might say, or even Julie did not know what she was weighing in on this, which is why it's so funny.
Well, so, and Julie Kelly put out a thread that says, this is this is talking about it.
Senator Rand Paul published records showing FBI's two-year surveillance of an American citizen suspected of entering the Capitol Jan 6.
The spying includes surveillance of her home and movements.
Is this the one also where they went after her Facebook page?
Yeah, sure.
She was removed from Twitter as well.
Okay, so I just want to highlight this.
Then Christine Crowder is a Catholic school teacher.
Husband is a federal air marshal.
Paul released seven pages, 70 pages, documents related to their full-throated investigation into Innocent America.
Just imagine how many times this happened under Chris Ray.
Okay, fine.
Outrageously, DC U.S. attorney Matt Graves wanted to pursue a criminal prosecution of Crowder despite the FBI finally admitting it didn't have enough evidence to bring a case against Crowder.
Why Graves is still off the hook for his hand?
Where is Grays right now?
Is he still employed with no?
I think he, I think he, because he was the, he was a political appointee.
I think he works at a private law firm now.
Okay.
Let's see here.
The decision to prosecute Crowder was announced by senior counsel of the Capitol Siege unit.
This is believed to be Greg Rosen, who resigned from the DOJ after he was demoted by FBI.
Yeah, it wasn't Greg Rosen.
It was somebody else.
Actually, Breanna Morello answered it.
His name was like Kolsha or something.
Well, that's, and now let me bring up Brianna's tweet because I have that one in the backdrop as well.
This is Brianna, who also is not able to be described as someone who's a whack job, who's an actual damn good journalist, exclusive.
FBI is denying claims that the new deputy director, Christopher Raya, was involved in Christine Crowder's investigation.
FBI telling me Raya had no involvement.
Crowder was wrongfully targeted.
We got all that part.
She was added to the terror watch list.
Raya worked at the Houston field office as the assistant special agent in charge.
That is an ASAC.
But an FBI source says he focused on violent crimes, which didn't include the Crowder investigation.
FBI is refusing to provide a number of how many agents were terminated for investigating Crowder, even though she was never at the Capitol on Jan 6.
FBI Director Cash Ratell's spoken about it.
Yada Yada called it wrong.
Okay.
Do I come to yours now?
So that's the crowded situation.
Now, the issue is, has Christopher Reagan is Christopher Rea.
You can't make this up.
Has he been officially appointed to replace Bongino as deputy director?
Yes.
Yeah, no, he has.
It's been announced by the New York Times.
You can find a good headline for that.
So, yeah, but so then what happened to Andrew Bailey and all of that?
He's still there.
He's the co-deputy director.
Okay, so they did not remove the co-deputy director, which is odd.
So there's going to be.
Well, we know why.
You want to know why?
Let's just do speculation here.
So Kyle's educated guess on that.
I think what happened is for the first time in history, they had to have a co-deputy director, which was not common.
And they did that because Dan Bongino was unable to do that job and probably because he was on his way out and he was miserable.
So they brought in Andrew Bailey.
So that's all smart and good.
And so they brought him in.
And then Bongino leaves.
And then you have this scenario where now you don't have a co-deputy director anymore.
And you look like Bongino was the only person in history who needed a co-deputy director.
So they brought in another co-deputy director to kind of normalize it.
And since Bongino was the only co-deputy director in history and also the only deputy director in the history of the Bureau to be on social media, they went ahead and had Andrew Rea go get himself, I'm sorry, Chris Rea, rather, get him a social media account, which he did yesterday fortuitously, just in time for me to go and dunk on him, which is fun.
All right.
And now let's bring it up here.
So the Christopher Rea has been appointed deputy director.
He was, before we even get into this, definitively, he's been at the FBI since 2003, 20 years?
22?
22.
And so, and his, I guess it's going to be like damned one way or the other because either he was involved or he wasn't.
But then the question is, what was he doing at the FBI during Biden's reign of terror to either reveal it or to oppose it?
But we'll go.
By the way, let's just stick on that for one second.
That's the question for everybody who's in management.
There's no good answer.
There cannot be a good answer.
If you were not a whistleblower, then you were complicit, period.
There's only like a dozen or so whistleblowers that came forward.
Everybody paid pretty dearly, whether it be in reputational harm, whether it be in the inability to promote or whether you lost your career.
My buddy Steve Friend has now been fired by the FBI two times in the last five, four years.
So that's pretty impressive too.
The issue is you're promoting from a tainted management pool.
What did you think you were going to get?
Every one of these people has something wrong with them.
They're all broken goods if you think the FBI should be de-weaponized.
So it's for me, it's non-negotiable.
There's no other possibility.
What was it on a personal level?
Had you ever interacted with Chris Triffer Rhea prior to that?
Oh, personal animosity.
Okay.
And so.
Listen, the Bureau is really strong.
It's really a small place.
There's 14,000 agents, but not all of them are needed to be known.
You only need to know like a couple, like a dozen people inside the FBI well to know all the stories because everybody knows a couple of people.
There's a thing that we talk about in intelligence.
They abbreviate the different types of intelligences.
So there's a thing called SIGINT or signals intelligent.
And there's a thing called GeoInt, which is like geographical maps-based intelligence.
And there's a thing called HUMINT, which is human intelligence.
That's when you get information from people.
There's the most capable thing.
It's a version of HUMINT.
It's called Roomint, and it's rumor intelligence.
It's a joke that's made inside all these intelligence agencies.
But Rumint is rampant inside the FBI.
So if something happens, everybody knows about it very, very shortly.
Kyle just froze.
We're going to give this a second to catch up.
It might be my internet.
Are we lagging?
Yeah, I'm not sure if it's you or me, but say what you just said again.
There's a thing called Rumint, which is prevalent in the FBI, which is rumor intelligence.
And so it goes across the whole spectrum.
If somebody knows something, it quickly gets out to the whole bureau.
It moves very quickly, and the stories go.
And the example is this: Did you see the video of the guy stealing the rifle out of the FBI Durango?
Yeah, actually, only once what I've seen.
Yeah.
So somebody stole a rifle in Minneapolis, Minnesota, right?
And so they stole it and it was an FBI rifle and it ended up being a Latin Kings guy and he had like a tattoo on his face up here.
It said no love and then it had something else.
And he got arrested recently.
And he got arrested.
Right.
The person whose rifle was stolen is a friend of my friend.
That's how small the FBI is.
There's no particular reason why that would be the case.
It's absolutely absurd and silly that I would actually know somebody who knows the guy that physically is there, but I do.
And so like, that's how small the bureau is.
It's just, you don't need to know everybody.
You just need to know a couple.
And so I don't know Chris Raya.
I don't need to, but I know people that retired out of the Houston field office.
So you know the stories of that.
And the stories I'm already getting, which are much more damning than the fact that he was involved in this case, they're ubiquitous.
Apparently, he had some real serious problems.
We're going to find out about what those are.
I'm giving the FBI till Monday to answer it.
And we have some journalists working on it too.
But let me ask you, I don't want to definitively come to conclusions based on my own searches, but has Julie basically stopped talking about the Crowder story?
Because I went Billy Kelly.
Yeah.
I quoted her yesterday, and I don't think she liked when she realized that she was on the wrong side.
So, Raya, on the side to maybe irritating those who might be embarrassed by this story, it's going to be really embarrassing because my understanding is that, and this probably is pretty good.
This is a rumint as well, but there's more to it behind the vaccine.
I'm fairly confident that this guy, Chris Raya, was picked to be the deputy director because he became friends with Dan Bongino while doing CrossFit.
But that's how it happened.
I mean, that's how it happens.
No, but that's that would be fine if the if it would be fine if you have a dirtbag who had been doing all the things that he was not supposed to do.
So if you walk through his resume, you had it on the screen in there.
Yeah, well, no, I just want to bring this up because I don't know if this is how to definitively do it, but I put in the search engine Crowder from Julie's account and the last tweet.
Twitter searches are really weird too, of late.
Yeah, that's the thing.
I don't want to come to any conclusions because sometimes they don't even provide the proper results.
So I'm going to pull up your tweet thread on this.
Yeah, just the press release.
So look, this is from the FBI.
This is not from Kyle Seraphin, but the press release, I think.
Press release April 9, 2025, which is the key element right up there.
Director Cash Rotel's name, Christopher G. Raya, as a, hold on a second, April 9, 2025.
That's when he was.
So this is when he was promoted to be not, so he was the ASAC in Houston.
And then he had a couple of other promotions that moved around.
And then after the bombing that happened, or not the bombing, but the terror attack that took place in New Orleans on January 1st of last year, there was a woman named Aletha Duncan, who was a black lady with the nose ring.
And she came out and said, it's not terrorism.
Of course, then they found out, yeah, it was terrorism.
So they got rid of her.
So she embarrassed the FBI, which is fatal.
Her career's done.
They sent down this guy, Chris Raya, and he stepped in in front of the camera and the microphones and he did an okay job.
And so he immediately found himself in better places.
He was the deputy assistant director of their counterterrorism program at the time.
So eventually he was rewarded by jumping several rungs on the ladder and he became what's called the a dick.
I kid you not.
You go from being a sack.
A sack to a dick.
Okay.
Yeah.
He went from a sack to a dick.
And so he's the assistant director in charge of the New York field office at that time in April.
And this is the press release about it.
Okay.
So they say he joined the FBI in 2003.
Yada, yada, yada.
2012, Raya reported to the FBI headquarters as a supervisory special agent, international terrorism.
This next paragraph, Mr. Raya was promoted in 2014 to senior supervisory resident agent of Brian College.
I don't know what that is.
Just I'll give you a quick little thing.
He was a, he was the lead agent and supervisor in College Station, which is just outside of like where Texas AM is.
It's a sub, it's a resident agency as like a satellite office of the mains of the main field office.
So he was back in Houston.
Houston's the field office.
College Station is the satellite office.
And he was the top guy in that little office doing whatever they did.
All right.
And in 2020, he was named assistant special agent in charge in the Houston Field Office's Violent Crime Branch and then its National Security Branch 2021.
So let's understand real quickly that the field offices, generally speaking, outside of New York, outside of Washington, D.C., and outside of Los Angeles, they don't have one special agent in charge.
They have many.
But generally speaking, 52 of the 55 FBI field offices, or now I guess there's 56 again.
So 53 of the 56 field offices only have the top agent being the special agent in charge.
And it's known as a SAC in most places.
We call them SACs because they don't like being called SACs.
So the SAC is the top guy or girl.
And then underneath it, you have anywhere between two and three ASACs.
And the ASACs handle things that are called branches.
So for people just to understand the org chart, it's complicated.
But top guy, SAC, the number two in command, even if it's just like for a section, is going to be the ASAC.
He was the ASAC of the criminal branch for a while, the violent crime section.
And then he moved over and he took over the national security branch, which is going to be counterintelligence and counterterrorism.
And that happened in 2021.
We don't know when in 2021, but the fact of the matter is, it doesn't actually matter because, as we're going to show you, like the case went on long enough that he was in charge of it while the case was going on.
And that's what the circled stuff says.
Okay.
2023.
So the rest of it we don't really care about here.
No, he promoted on to some other thing.
The only thing that's kind of interesting is that he took his position there in Houston and then he was able to jump into a chief of staff position for a woman named Larissa Knapp.
This might actually be interesting background for your audience.
He started working as the special executive assistant of this woman who was named Larissa Knapp.
She was the top agent for all of the national security programs for the entire United States for the Bureau.
And she retired.
She was garbage, by the way.
She's the person that gave hugs to every one of the Neil Team Sixers that knelt for BLM in the summer of 2020 and apologized for them and told Chris Ray that they did the right thing, all this kind of stuff.
So Larissa Knapp actually left the FBI as the top counterterrorism and counterintelligence agent in the entire FBI.
And her next job was at the Motion Picture Association of America.
So don't read anything into the idea that people in the Intel space decide to move in and try to control what you're thinking or what kind of media you're getting or what kind of movies you're getting or ratings.
I have no idea what the crossover is between the MPAA, the rating board that does movies, and the FBI, but that's where she's at.
Okay.
And now I want to pull up the tweet of Bro or Ben.
Well, this is it.
You can make this stuff up.
Let's let's this is gonna poor Ben.
Ben's having a rough day today, you know.
Well, Ben, just so because this is what it's impossible.
This is his personal account.
Well, it's assistant director for public affairs.
He's functionally the FBI's spokesperson.
He's the AD of public affairs, but that is the FBI's spokesperson at this point.
And he's doing it on his personal account, which is in violation of FBI policy.
I don't know why he's doing that.
And he's trying to cover for what they did, which is that they didn't know who they promoted.
They didn't know.
No, what's amazing is Shipwreck.
First of all, she's 100% right.
No, I know, but Shipwreck, is this her?
This is Shipwreck?
The woman that's talking?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Oh, I didn't know.
I didn't know.
Well, you're thinking of Bill Shipley, who's someone else.
Okay.
I am.
So Bill Shipley, Bill Shipley is a middle-aged attorney.
Well, that's what I thought.
That's what.
Yeah, he's the one.
He's not sure.
He's like a retired boomer.
But so what's her?
She's a Badlands.
She's a Badlands podcaster.
Oh, so she doesn't hate me then.
Because it was Shipwreck Crew who hates me.
Yeah, yeah, he's mad.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, okay, let it be known.
They both go by the same moniker.
She's Shipwreck Show, and she does one on Badlands.
And so she's a Rumble podcaster.
And so she does stuff on here.
And then Bill Shipley is mad at you because Bill Shipley thinks that he's the smartest man in every single room.
And he has a voice that sounds like someone's been chewing on a dog's ass all time.
No, well, forget about Bill.
I couldn't even understand why Shipwreck crew was angry at me.
It was over the holidays.
It had to do.
I know you reached out to me.
He's really abrasive.
Like Bill Shipley is really abrasive.
I couldn't even understand.
All right.
So let's play this out here.
We're going to hear what Shipwreck Show says.
We have a brand new deputy director of the FBI following Dan Bongino's return to podcasting.
I'm going to get to old boy in a minute, but first, I want to tell you a story.
We heard about this.
So the Biden-era FBI tracked a Catholic school teacher who was paralyzed on one side of her body, okay, on unsubstantiated January 6th allegation, even though she wasn't even there.
All the evidence proved she wasn't there, the facial recognition, the geocache, all that shit.
They pursued her anyway, and then they put her on the Quiet Skies thing.
Name was Christine Crowder, and the investigation was opened by the Houston Field Office as a counterterrorism and domestic extremism probe.
It started around 2021 and went through about 2022, and it lasted about 23 months.
During that time, she was wrongly placed on the TSA Quiet Skies watch list for enhanced airport surveillance, despite clear explanatory evidence, no geofenses, no facial recognition, that she had even been to Jason.
She ended up ultimately by the end of all of it proving her case that the person that they were looking for could use both hands and she could not.
Shatel himself came out and stated that the case is an example of misplaced priorities and everything went wrong with fellow law enforcement in the aftermath of January 6th.
But then he made the guy who was responsible for the whole thing, the deputy director of the FBI.
Why would you do that?
He ruined that lady's life for like two years.
He was harassed and hounded constantly.
Like, why would you, why would you appoint this guy?
Now, okay, so this clarifies at least one confusion.
I couldn't figure out why shipwrecked crew hated me so much, and there was no apparently no animosity with shipwreck.
Okay, so shipwreck puts that up.
To which, uh, Ben Williamson, from his personal account, says, You can, in fact, quote, make this up and quote, because it's 100% false.
Raya was the violent crime ASAC, assistant special, what is that?
Uh, yeah, I forget now, I forgot what it is.
Assistant special agent in charge.
Okay.
Um, when this case was opened, a totally different position that had nothing to do with it, it's a lie.
Okay, fine.
Okay, but then he also supervised the branch that maintained it.
I can tell people why that's really, yeah, well, that's what we're going to get into.
So now you say, Hey, Ben, no one said he was an ASAC when it was opened.
Lying FBI slav propagandist.
He was the ASAC while it continued, and when it was closed, because it shouldn't have been opened.
You dim-witted clowns don't even know who you promoted.
That's true.
This is what, like, people who don't know the jargon might, if there is a sleight of hand, well, he was in another department and he had no idea what was going on because it's a need-to-know basis.
Flesh this out because this is where I could not possibly explain it on my own.
You're attributing fault.
You're saying this guy, whether or not he was in the violent crimes unit, he knew, ought to have known, or clearly did.
No, okay, so he was in the violent crimes section per his own bio that you threw up on the screen.
That the FBI press office, the same one that Ben Williams now supervised, placed.
And Ben Williams was in charge of the press office when they made that release.
They said that in 2021, he became the ASAC of the national security branch.
So he went from dealing with violent crime, which he may have been doing when they opened this case, and then he became the guy who was in charge of national security.
I don't think that's up for debate because that's their words, not mine.
I'm not taking it from like my own.
By the way, it's on his own resume too, if you go to LinkedIn.
So that's easy enough to find.
Well, there you go.
So that's the matter of fact.
So now you're going to say, once he gets put once he's there, once he's on the national security branch as of 2021, I guess the month doesn't really matter because, look, they opened this case up in June.
The case opened in June of 2021.
She was a little bit off on her dates as well.
Shipwreck was not quite right.
2021, June, they opened it.
2023, June, they closed it.
It was essentially three weeks shy of two years.
Okay.
Okay.
So that's really simple.
He was the ASAC of the National Security Branch for the majority of the time that this case was open, even if somebody else was the person who approved that opened it.
And I don't, I don't care if he opened it or not.
Here's how I know he knows.
You ready?
Well, yeah, let me bring this out because this is the key part.
I'm going to ask this.
And I have to steal man for those who are not there.
He'll say, I didn't open it.
I wasn't in charge of it.
It pre-existed me and it ended and I had nothing to do with it.
Correct.
False.
No, no possibility.
Okay.
None.
Evidence.
Okay.
It's real simple.
Every FBI agent that works cases is between the GS10 pay grade and the GS13.
That's what's known as the brick agent or what you guys would call rank and file FBI agents.
They're the ones who do cases.
All right.
All GS10 to 13s have a GS14 supervisor.
That's going to be the supervisory special agent.
And you're going to have like, I don't know, a handful of these supervisory special agents.
They all run squads.
So if I'm an agent, I'm working on a squad.
My boss is the squad supervisor.
The squad supervisor all answer to the ASAC.
That's the chain of command.
GS13, GS14, GS15.
Now, Raya's position at this point was GS15.
Okay.
He was in charge of violent crime.
Fine.
That's fine.
Then he became the guy in charge of CT.
That's fine.
They opened it up before he was there.
That's fine too.
Every 90 days, every single FBI case, unless you're a new agent, it has to be done every 60 days, but every single case has to be reviewed in what's called a file review.
Every single 90 days, you bring it in front of your supervisor and you sit down and say, my file review is up.
These are my cases.
This is what I'm working on.
This is what I've accomplished in the last 90 days.
This is the paperwork I've done.
This is the legal process that I've served.
These are the surveillances that I've done.
You know, this is what we've kind of caught up on.
This is my investigative plan for the next 90 days.
This is where I see it going.
This is what I think is going to happen.
This one's about to close.
This one's about to do.
We've got another case that might need to open.
I brief my boss on it.
Okay.
Everybody else in my squad briefed my boss on it.
They all brief their cases.
We all have anywhere from like six to 15 cases.
So he takes all those cases and then he goes to the branch meeting.
And the branch meeting is held on a rotating basis.
It could be once a month, but oftentimes more than once a month.
Sometimes it's every two weeks.
And every two weeks, all the supervisors, the 14s, do exactly what I just did as a 13 with their boss, the ASAC, in this case, Raya.
And they sit down, they say, boss, these are the cases that my squad is working on.
Here's all the January 6th cases that we're working because those were a whole subset of cases.
We got this one that's coming into fruition.
This one's still under surveillance.
This one is still waiting on sourcing.
This one has some legal process.
This one's ready for arrest.
And the reason they do that is because then the ASAC goes and sits down with the SAC and says, okay, sir, here's how it goes.
Right now, I've got about six cases that are going to move to arrest in the next 90 days.
So you can forecast this many things for your statistical accomplishments.
We have a couple of terror cells that we think we're going to be able to take down.
So you're going to get these disruptions.
And they're doing that because every single quarter, the main boss, the SAC, is rated on how he performs statistically so that he can get a bonus, which is like 40 grand at the end of the year.
And he's trying to track it each quarter.
So every single person briefs every single thing up the chain.
And you could not have a case open for two years that was getting file reviewed every 90 days or 60, depending on the case agent, going up and not being briefed to the ASAC who was involved in this stuff.
And then more importantly, he would have freaking known because Ron Rand Paul held a hearing on this in October of last year and it broke again on Fox News about nine days ago.
So when they were vetting him for this job and they were asking him to be the number two and Kash Patel on Fox News 10 days ago said this was a grievous error and shows the worst things that happened on January 6th.
I freaking know that Chris Raya knew that he was working at that office when that case was underneath him.
It was, at the end of the day, he was responsible for the people that work underneath him.
That's how this works.
The ASAC is the most senior real manager that anybody has when you're working as an FBI agent.
And they're on a first name basis oftentimes with the people that work for them.
So it's like, hey, Kyle, like, what's up, Ed?
What do you need from me?
And Ed would be like, oh, this and this.
And you're like, Roger, that yeah, I got it, sir.
So I've got Ed Brown as my boss.
He's my boss's boss.
I know him on a, on a walking basis.
I know 100% who that guy is.
This is like, and then the last thing is this.
It was also approved by the CDC, the Chief Division Counsel.
So that's like your in-house lawyer.
And everybody in that office sat together that would have been the top end supervisors.
So the special agent in charge sits next to all the ASACs, two or three of them, and the chief division counsel in what's called the executive suite.
And I've been to 20 different FBI field offices and they all have the same thing.
They all have an executive suite where those people hang out.
because the people that are at the top of the pay grade, they all cluster together.
And so it's regular back and forth shop talk.
There's no chance that this guy did not know this story before he got there.
But I'm guessing one of two things happened.
Either the FBI put it up because they knew they were going to embarrass Patel by promoting him.
That is a disturbing possibility that continues to exist.
The mechanism is trying to set him up to look ridiculous.
Okay.
And that makes a lot of sense because he doesn't know who the hell he's promoting.
And then the second piece of it is, is that, you know, Raya knew it and he just kept his mouth shut because he was like, yeah, of course I did all the things that I was told.
Like there's 6,000 people that worked on January 6th cases.
I heard we were all okay.
Like we didn't do anything wrong.
Even though this was considered the most egregious.
Just to follow the analogy that the way I would understand it is, you know, having worked in a law firm and you have your mentor who is handling a junior on a case.
And then your mentors have their, you know, they report to managing partners and then the managing partners have their monthly or whatever bi-annual meeting where the monthly partners say, okay, how much are we making here?
What are the big cases?
What are the big files, big clients, yada, yada.
And so it filters its way up to the top.
And it's necessary for accounting, for budgeting, for resource expenditures and whatnot.
So in that sense, okay, he's basically a managing partner.
The idea is if there's a, he would know of the, of the big files to avoid conflicts and whatever.
And more importantly, they know it because the way that you brief those things up, it's like, hey, what kind of resources might you need?
And so the ASAC is asking the supervisors about those cases.
How many of these things are going to need specialty surveillance squads?
Do they need a SWAT operation approved?
Do they need some sort of technical or, you know, a technical agent?
All these things that cost money.
The ASAC is the one who strokes the check that says, okay, got it.
We're going to pay for that.
We're going to allot this man hours to it.
So they're the ones that are also like marshaling the resources of the field office at the highest level.
So if you want anything done on your case, if you want to fly a drone over somebody, or if you want to go and try to do, you know, some sort of technical surveillance or you want to get one of the specialty teams involved, all of those things are going to be approved.
It's like they're going to be briefed to the ASAC because one, the ASAC gets credit for it because those are stats.
They get stats on it.
But in two, they also want to make sure that they're marshaling their resources properly and that it's getting to the most critical stuff.
So there's no chance he didn't know about it.
And anybody who's been in the bureau knows that the ASAC knew what that case was if it was underneath his squads.
There's not that many squads in Houston for whatever it's worth.
It's not a big office.
It's like a medium office.
This was the, you know, I don't know if every individual element of the Jan 6 persecution would have been known, but it was the biggest, most sprawling, and they were proud to say it, prosecution investigation in American history.
And it had visibility to headquarters.
It had visibility to another field office in Washington, D.C.
So WFO, the office I used to work out of, was the one that was quarterbacking those cases.
So if you look at Christine Crowder's file, which I've looked through the file, I've read the opening EC, I've read the closing EC, and I've read all the surveillance and all the bullshit in the middle.
And what's wild is, is that it's a dual case.
One case is a 176 anti-riot case out of Washington field office.
So she's actually looped into the main J6 case file.
So other people would have seen it as well.
And then secondarily, it's a counterterrorism case that is out of Houston specifically.
And so that's a 266 Oscar HO case.
So you can read the case file and know who owned the case.
It says the case number.
Then it tells you the field office.
WF is WFO or Washington field office and the HO is Houston office.
So you can see a lot of things by just looking at the numbers and what's going on there.
I know that this was a big enough case to be brief because they did it for two years.
And they actually, the air marshal, the crowders think that they were on the verge of being served a search warrant.
That's what they were told by people that were friendlies.
Because guess what?
I know air marshals.
When I was in Washington, D.C., I did training with the air marshals.
Like, you think you don't know that like if you're about to serve a search warrant on some dude's wife that's a friend of yours and you're like, oh, that's awkward.
We're going to have to go do this.
If they were briefing up and getting ready to do the search warrant, which is what the crowders believe, they think that our podcast, my podcast two years ago with Sonia, was enough to actually make the FBI come out, do the interview they should have done in the first place.
And it avoided them having a search warrant because we pointed out how ridiculous it would have been.
That's really bad.
At the risk, I wouldn't suggest anyone try to get any whistleblower documents because we've seen what the raid on journalists that might occur now.
What could be obtained by way of FOIA?
And what could be like just signature evidentiary confirmation that Raya was either involved in or had knowledge of?
Like what would be a black on white receipt that one could acquire either through a FOIA request?
We can't get it.
No, we can't.
So you'd have to get either minutes from the from the branch meetings, which are out there.
There are emails that would have come from the branch, but they're going to go ahead and redact that because they're going to say there's some operational need for you not to have the file numbers.
But members of Congress could get it if they were interested.
And I've recommended that Rand Paul's office go and request it.
They should be asking for emails from the FBI from all the branch meetings because what they do is they do those branch meetings where it's going to be all the supervisors in the ASAC.
There's going to be a request for it to come in and then they're going to have minutes like everybody else has minutes.
These are the major things that were discussed.
And if you see an email chain, and I'm sure there's probably like a dozen or more, it probably happened like, you know, for two straight years.
He got briefed on these are the cases we're working on.
And it would have been an update on the on the J6 cases would have been its own subsection.
There's no doubt in my mind that it was a section because as you said, it was the biggest, most sprawling and the most high-profile case for the Biden administration.
There's no chance this guy didn't know about this.
Like zero chance.
And so then the only question is, like you say, like one of my ongoing theories is that the activist element, the TDS element of the rank and file of the FBI are doing everything they can to discredit or even the deep state elements are trying to discredit Patel and embarrass him.
And this would be very embarrassing to, you know, to push a recommendation that absent insiders like yourself, Steve Friend, who I know less, they would never know about it and be susceptible of getting duped and tricked and embarrassed.
I think it's actually uglier than that.
I think that the people that work at the bureau that know that this guy is a clown, because look, Patel does to himself.
Like if he wanted to have somebody to be able to help insulate him, people like Steve Friend wanted to help him.
I recommended a handful of people that are current FBI agents that would have looked out for him.
They all went up there to work with him and they all left, by the way.
None of them want to stick around in Washington, D.C. and help him out because he gave himself over to doing things like that, like this, like dumb stuff.
This is the stuff that you do if you're listening to the exact wrong people.
That's his own choice.
And so he made a choice of who he wanted to align himself with.
It just turns out it was the wrong people.
So I think that the people inside the bureau that are that are nefarious, you know, it does two things.
One, it's really funny to be able to point out your boss is incompetent if you want to make your boss look bad.
And it's also, I am like a freaking pit bull on this stuff.
And so they must know that I'm going to do it.
So like, I think you could actually, you could credibly argue the people that want to set up Kash Patel don't need to do anything except put the wrong guy up there and then just wait for me to unpack it because that's what I'm going to do.
I am instinctively driven to go and show that these guys don't know what they're doing.
Or Kyle, and I'll float this one out.
You're the saboteur who is now recommending to the inside of what they can do that you can then later put on blast to embarrass Kash Patel.
I wish I would do it.
I would do it if there was an opportunity to do that.
I don't think the people that have Cash's ear actually listen to me anymore, but I do think they watch the fallout from it.
And this is not the first time.
I mean, apparently Judicial Watch released a finding the other day, 138 people were fired from the beginning of Trump's term until Dan Bongino left for the entire DOJ, which means there was about 40 or 50 FBI people total.
And it's been my supposition.
FBI is 30, I think Patel said they have 33 or 35,000 currently employed in the DOJ.
You're looking at what, total of 70 between the two of them?
I don't know the exact numbers at DOJ.
I actually probably should know, but I don't know.
I know it's 30.
They said it was 35.8 for the total bureau employment, but they got rid of maybe 40 people from the FBI, of which I will claim almost every one of those scalps with the exposés that I've been doing.
I pointed out the people on Neil Team 6 that were dropping a knee for BLM in 2020, and they've been a long project of mine, and I've been working on it for years.
I had friends that went up to help out Patel and Bongino to try to find out who these people were, and they ended up firing all of them.
I don't think they should have fired them.
Like, these are scalps that I'm like, okay, these are my scalps, but I would have just, I would have just moved them somewhere where they couldn't do anything and let them just wither and go to Puerto Rico or Guam.
That would have been my move.
Send them all to Guam, send them all to Puerto Rico where they can't do any damage and let them quit.
But they didn't.
They fired them.
So like, whatever.
Like the people that I've been highlighting, there were five that were that were in a single story that the New York Times ran.
Brian Driscoll, the former acting director of the FBI, and he seems like he was a decent dude.
He was collateral damage.
They got Steve Jensen, who I was rallying against.
They went after Spencer Evans, who personally terminated me based on COVID stuff and was like, you know, the person who wrote up the file that helped get rid of me and wrote me up on AWOL and some other nonsense.
They fired him for the reason that I'm suing the FBI, which by the way, I have an active lawsuit over COVID injustice, the same as anybody who was in the military.
We filed a lawsuit.
There's 33 of us.
None of us have been made whole from the stuff that was done.
And my case was the most egregious because not only was I not accommodated religiously, they violated the law when they did it.
It's not like they had to accommodate me.
They just didn't do the legal process required.
And then I lost my job over it and everything else.
So like, I have an ongoing lawsuit.
They fired the guy for the allegations I made against the FBI.
They fired him for the thing that I said the FBI did.
That's how he lost his job.
And then they haven't turned around and said, by the way, we also agree.
So we've actually submitted his termination letter as one of the findings in our lawsuit as we wait for a jury trial or a judge decides to try to help a settlement move along.
So it's very weird.
It looks like the numbers are about 110, 115,000 at the DOJ, including FBI.
So 70 to 80 at the DOJ, excluding the FBI, which means.
Well, you've also got Marshall Service, you've got ATF, and you've got DEA.
So it's not as easy to probably break down as we'd have to take it by segment.
I don't know how many personally work there.
Now, Kyle, I'm going to go over to viva barnslaw.locals.com for the after party.
I don't want to monopolize your time.
You want to come over or you want to sit with you for a minute.
OK, good.
What we're going to do right now, first, check my phone.
My wife sent me a message.
She said, there's a guy who's on drugs walking on the street outside.
And I was like, well, which street?
It's like 50% of the time.
What drugs?
Yeah.
I'm like, how do we know?
Locals, everybody.
We're going to go raid NerdRotic, which might be a different, a shift for some of you, but it'll be a non-political thing.
And I'm going to go get some of the tip questions before we do this.
Sunday night show is going to be awesome.
What else is happening?
It's Friday.
So that's it.
Next show is going to be Sunday, six o'clock, everybody.
Viva and Barnes Law for the people.
Raiding NerdRodic.
Let them know from whence you came.
That's going to piss somebody off.
Jeez, Louise.
Sorry.
Nobody heard that.
It was just you.
It was very light.
So I just played Nerd Rodic and it was loud music.
And I'll just go Viva Raid Booyah.
Okay.
What else was I going to say?
Oh, yeah.
I was going to get to some of the tip questions before we do that and see if there's anything for Kyle.
And then we've got some other stuff, fun stuff to talk about.
Over on here, NeuroDivergent says, no, this is not.
It's Dominant One says Realman want to be pounded by Anton's meat because half pound with eight inches is not enough.
This is for King of Built on.
Okay.
It won't get old, but I'm going to keep reading them.
We've got Ginger Ninja, who says, my hypothesis, Andrew Bailey won't carry the water for Patel.
So Patel doesn't want to use him.
How could that, I don't think Bailey would stay there if that were the, if that were the terms of employment that he's going to sit there.
They're not going to listen to what he has to say.
Then we got, oh, hold on.
Let me bring this one up here.
All right.
So anyways, everybody, we're going to, we're going to end this here and take it over to viva barnslaw.locals.com.
Oh, now I can do rumble premium.
So here I said, let me see.
Premium exclusive.
Can I do both?
By clicking the update stream, your stream will become available to premium subscribers only.
See, that's a problem.
It's got to be subscribed.
It's got to be premium and local supporters.
Okay, I'll finish.
I'm going to send this back to the team now.
▲
Export Selection