All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 6, 2026 - Viva & Barnes
01:03:04
Jan, 6 Fed-Surrection 5 years Later! In-Flghting to Victory? Maduro Indictment & MORE!

Support Viva: GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CTYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

|

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, on this fifth year anniversary of the Fed surrection of January 6, 2021, everyone out there trying to get their hot takes.
This one coming from Patriot Takes, which is the least patriotic take on anything you will ever see.
They think they've got the gotcha by quoting Charlie Kirk or reposting a video of him on January 6th, saying something which they think shows hypocrisy.
And I say shows their stupidity.
Behold.
So Mitch McConnell said that we are not going to tolerate criminal behavior.
I completely and totally agree.
I think that all the people that came into Congress today that broke the law, they should be held to the highest level of criminal prosecution.
So Mitch McConnell said that we are not going to tolerate criminal behavior.
I completely and totally agree.
I think that all the people that came into Congress today that broke the law, they should be held to the highest level of criminal prosecution.
Now, bear in mind, everybody, in today's day and age, you have to make sure that everything is a real video.
I made the joke that you have things that are AI and you've got your CIA and you might have your CIA putting out AI, so it might be the CIA, C-A-I, I-A-C-I-I.
There's a joke in there somewhere.
It's a real video.
And what people don't seem to understand, and it was my revelation the longer I looked into or followed the events of January 6th.
Let me just, I don't want to do that.
I want to bring it out here.
And I say, first of all, there's no gotcha in this video.
Even on its face, highest level of criminal prosecution does not allow for hiding of exculpatory evidence, abusive pretrial detention, and excessive sentences.
Fail number one.
Second, when Charlie said this on the day itself, no one in their wildest nightmares could have known of the level of Fed involvement, agitation, and instigation.
So yeah, when new facts arise, like the fact that Jan 6 was a total inside job and they set up to impeach Trump, ban him from social media and persecute political adversaries, you change your opinion.
Thank you for reminding us of the depravity of government involvement and corruption in that Fed surrection.
You fail twice.
Mic drop.
And then I go into the chat.
Nothing is more shocking.
Do we do it right here?
Yeah, we're going to have to do it here.
I'll drop the link in there for this.
Nothing is more shocking than going into someone else's silo.
And I should say shocking.
It's hilarious in a way.
You go back here.
Hold on.
Yeah, you know what?
I got to open this up in my account so that we can see this because you can't see replies otherwise.
You get people coming over from their side of the aisle, ignorant as the day is long.
And they're asking this whole, hey, Grok, make me look less stupid.
Hey, Grok, I'm too dumb to actually have followed something in real time and then done any meaningful research.
So just give me an answer.
Where was I?
I thought I saw one here.
Well, is it not here?
So not here.
Let's go down into this one.
You go into their silo, people, and look at the.
Oh, that's right.
That's where I put it here.
I like to dabble in other people's pools.
I don't pee in them.
I drop truth bombs, not deuce bombs.
Same post.
Look at this.
Did the FBI set up January 6th or is this person a fucking idiot?
Answer set up or fucking idiot.
Based on official reports and investigation, there is no credible evidence that the FBI orchestrated or set up January 6th Capitol Riot.
Claims to the contrary are widely debunked conspiracy theory.
Oh, PBS?
PBS.org, check that one.
Oh, please.
First of all, your so-called gotcha on prosecutorial overreach is a total straw man.
No one claimed that holding people accountable means railroading them without due process.
Well, that's what happened in January 6th.
It's successful because you got triggered.
I don't block people on Twitter.
But if I did, I would block any idiot who replies, cry more.
I would block any idiot who replies, you got triggered.
I would block any idiot who says, you're Canadian.
I would block any idiot who says, you're a Jew.
Nobody cares what you think.
I would block.
That's what I would block if I were, on the one hand, prone to blocking, amenable to blocking, or thin-skinned.
I don't care.
But I can't imagine what it's like to actually not just feel useless, but be useless when it comes to public discourse.
There is nothing more useless than it looks like someone's triggered.
I'm so funny and smart.
It's good it got you triggered.
Sorry, getting me to clarify and elucidate your dishonesty and educate your stupidity is not being triggered.
Consider it a donation.
I should charge you for that, or at least get to deduct it from my taxes for the amount of time it took me to do that.
Morons.
Ask Grok, morons.
And by the way, nobody's saying it's, they were pardoned, not because they didn't, let me rephrase this.
They were pardoned despite the fact that they broke the law, but because they were abused in the judicial process through prosecutorial overreach, hiding of exculpatory evidence, Jocelyn Ballantyne, who still works at the DOJ, I'm looking at you, excessive penalties, excessive where there were not two like crimes treated similarly.
And so like, I had Jake Lang on back in the day.
We're going to talk about him for a bit here.
I actually wanted to give a little precursor or prelude before getting into that.
When I had Jake Lang on, and people like Jake Lang's a piece of shit, he took a bat and he hit police officers with a bat.
Okay, that ordinarily set aside legit self-defense or provocation.
You know, it's not because you hit a police officer that it's necessarily a crime on its face.
I mean, if you're being beaten, if you're being a pepper bald or pepper sprayed or, you know, you don't do it.
You play stupid games.
You're really going to win stupid prizes.
And even though Jake Lang, who a bat, what did he say, manifested itself, I think is what he described it as when I interviewed him like four and a half years ago, there were people who committed, performed acts of violence.
And if they hadn't been railroaded, they should have gotten whatever just punishment would have otherwise been fair under the circumstances, subject to the argument of provocation by the police officers.
Let me just see if I can bring one up.
Yeah, hold on.
Yeah, there was concrete evidence of abuse by the police, specifically to provoke a violent response from the crowd.
So raise your arguments and get the punishment that is fitting of the crime.
None of that happened in January 6th.
It was a Fed surrection in that there were agitators, instigators, provocateurs in the crowd.
The infrastructure was set up such that it would occur.
Having a third of your Capitol Police staff there because COVID, when you knew damn well in advance, people had planned lawful protests, had pulled permits for protests, and Capitol Police said, we couldn't have seen this coming.
FBI was notified in advance.
It was a facilitated so-called insurrection specifically set up for the purposes of persecuting and surveilling half of the country, your ideological adversaries, setting a damn good example.
Don't ever protest again, you Republican conservative SOBs, or we're going to lock you up in jail.
That's exactly what the message was.
That's what it was designed for.
That's what it was exploited for.
And it was exploited so they could go and try to impeach Trump again.
And like we learned, Mike Benz reported on this in their election integrity partnership program, whatever the hell they were doing to try to fortify the elections.
Even if Trump were to lose, he would still have the biggest bullhorn on earth on Twitter.
So they had to set up circumstances to justify the argument to deplatform him and cut his tongue out, metaphorically speaking.
And so they did it.
And they used Jan 6 to arrest 1,500 people, put them through the ringer to the point where a half dozen, if not more, took their own lives.
They used it to impeach Donald Trump a second time.
They used it as the pretext to yeet Donald Trump from Twitter and Facebook.
Even after he lost the election, they cut out his metaphoric electronic tongue so that he could not reach his army of supporters.
And there are some idiots in their silos listening to Charlie Kirk in a 17-second clip from five years ago saying, oh my God, even Chile understood that they needed to meet the full extent of the law.
Idiots.
And there's no cure for stupid.
Am I glitchy?
I can't even, I can't, I'm so not edgy, but I can't even keep still to make it look like I froze.
Good.
It is three o'clock.
Afternoon, people.
It's even afternoon in California.
How goes the battle?
Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
There's infighting.
There's controversy.
There's drama afoot on the internet.
And there's also a touch of law.
And we're going to get to it because Brian Cole Jr. of the Patsy, I'm calling the Patsy because I believe he's a Patsy.
And that doesn't mean I believe he was totally the wrong guy.
If he was involved, you know my theory.
And it is just my theory based on the evidence that I have believed to be credible or the dearth of evidence that I believe to be credible.
I believe Brian Cole Jr. is a pure Patsy and has been now detained pre-trial.
You know, I didn't just object to the pre-trial detention of the Jan 6ers so that I could say, well, those were for the people who I considered my allies.
So now I'm going to throw it aside when it comes to Brian Cole Jr., who, under the circumstances, should be my ideological adversary.
He should not be detained pre-trial indefinitely, period.
Oh, but Viva, he's accused of a really serious crime.
Oh, okay.
So then you just do away with, I forget if it's the 8th of the 14th.
It's the 8th Amendment.
Just do away with the Eighth Amendment.
Oh, this guy's really serious.
You know, because planting the pipe bombs is really serious, but seditious conspiracy was not serious.
So we're going to talk about that for a bit.
I want to make sure that we're good everywhere.
If I'm bleeding on my arm, it's because I scratched something and I keep picking the scab.
What was I just about to do?
Make sure that we're live everywhere.
We are live on Rumble, my daily stream.
Three o'clock.
Sunday nights, Viva and Barnes, law for the people.
Barnes taking a lot of flack for applying the law, as he understands it, to the arrest of Maduro.
We're going to talk about that as well because apparently they've discreetly dropped a certain element of the claim of narco-trafficking in his indictment.
We'll get there in a second.
So we're live on Rumble.
Hold on, let me bring this one up.
Where did I just disappeared my face?
Where we have a Rumble prant, which says, poor garble 42 says, hazard pay for Viva.
Thank you very much.
42 is the meaning of life, according to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, a book which I've never read.
And I only knew the joke from the family guy.
And we should be live on viva barnslaw.locals.com.
Itchy, glitchy.
I am not itchy, but I am not glitchy.
Let me see what we got here.
Oh, we got that one yesterday.
So we're live across Rumble, Viva Barnes Law.
We have our locals after party.
It might be a short one today because I'm doing the true crime with Megan Kelly Phil Holloway.
And I think we're talking about Maduro.
So it'll be a short after party.
I wanted to To give this one a little preface because I don't want anyone getting shocked at the language.
Not that anybody's sufficiently juvenile to get shocked at language, even if you find the language intolerable and unbecoming.
You know that I have known Jake Lang, one of the Jan Sixers, for I it's gonna be five years.
I don't remember the first interview that we did when he was in pretrial detention.
And I remember at the time being surprised at the controversy that my interviewing Jake Lang from behind bars had, because I don't remember the order of any of this now, but I had met Adam Johnson Lecter and Guy.
We became, we have since become good friends.
I met Jake Lang.
I've since met Steve Baker, who was also one of the Jan 6 victims.
I met, I'm not going to remember everybody's name now.
Oh, it's going to drive me crazy.
And I just had on Will Pope yesterday.
So, you know, I've been interviewing and covering this for the last five years.
And when I had Jake on, it caught, it ruffled some feathers.
I didn't understand that there was some infighting involving shipwrecked crew, Jake Lang, and others in jail, alleging some sort of confusing fundraising, yada, yada, yada.
And I was not interested in getting involved in the infighting among Jang Sixers because it would distract from the underlying injustice and the ultimate objective of getting them all out and getting them all pardoned.
Steve Baker is another good person to follow, Polish dog.
Yep, he's back at home after his health issue and continue to pray and continue to hope for a full recovery.
And I hopefully can get Steve Baker on one of these days.
So I was surprised by that.
And I didn't care to get into it.
Jake spent four years locked up in various facilities.
And some people are saying, Wolf Reaver, that's what you get.
And he's doing his time now because pretrial detention counts for one and a half or whatever, two times the amount.
And he's sure going to get convicted because he admits to having hit officers with a baseball bat when his defense was it was either before, during, or after or in contemporaneously with Roseanne Boylan getting beaten and stomped to death.
And he was there when she died.
And I said, look, dude, you know, understood.
People didn't like him.
He was quite vocal, quite active, doing live streams from jail.
Fine.
He spent four years in there.
He got out and he came over for a barbecue a couple weeks after he got out.
And there, I don't, this is not to be holier than thou or a sissy Canadian.
And maybe it's a bit of projection, but I don't think so.
And everyone I've spoken to who spent any meaningful time in jail or even not meaningful time in jail, locked up, incarcerated, it will break you to greater or lesser degrees.
And I don't think you do four years plus in various hell holes.
I think he said like 1500 days in solitary.
That might be a bit over the number.
Spent a substantial amount of time in solitary.
Whether or not he asked for it, whether or not he agitated his way into it, that will break a person.
It will cause irreparable scars.
And no matter how well you try to pass off, you're dealing with them.
Irreparable scars.
Post-traumatic stress disorder.
And it doesn't make you a weak person or a sissy.
And it doesn't make me weak or a sissy to assume that everyone who is locked up for any extended period of time will suffer from a greater or lesser degree of PTSD.
They'll wake up in the middle of the night, have no idea where they are, think they're back in the prison.
You know, Andrew, not Andrew.
Oh, my goodness.
I'm getting confused as to who spent 70 days in there.
Lectern guy, I think, spent 70 some odd days.
It will traumatize you, period.
And so when Jake came out and he comes over and we're having a barbecue and he's been locked up in a hellhole, he gets out for the first time in four years and can smell the fresh air.
I say, the man is the man, whether or not he knows it, I believe that he's broken.
I believe that he needs to heal.
If he finds that healing in religion and faith, more power to him.
He's since gone on a crusade, pun intended, because that's what they're calling it, in Minnesota to protest immigration in the country.
I had him on since to talk about it.
And, you know, when it gets to the substance of the debate on geopolitics immigration, he raises legitimate points.
I say that, and then I say, when you go burn a Quran or slap a Quran with bacon in front of a bunch of Muslims in Michigan, some people will say, congratulations on moving the Overton window.
And others are going to say, this is the type of conduct that makes it more difficult for others to air their legitimate political grievances on these issues.
In the exact same way that, and I still defend her right to say all of it, in the exact same way that Candace Owens has gone so over the top with critique of Israel and Israel is responsible for everything and Zionists and all this other crap.
It makes it impossible for other people to then legitimately air their legitimate grievances against Netanyahu, the Israeli government, without people saying, oh, another Candace Kook.
Don't listen to them.
I thoroughly believe, do you remember back in the day, like the whole flat earth conspiracy started getting promoted on YouTube?
And it was weird because at the time, YouTube was like censoring conspiracy theories and yet somehow promoting the flat earth conspiracy theory.
And I now thoroughly believe that the reason for them doing that in the day was so that they can then easily say anybody promoting any conspiracy theory is as dumb and whacked out as the people who float the flat earth conspiracy.
So you talk about January 6th being a Fed surrection.
Oh, that's a conspiracy theory.
They're as whacked out as the flat earthers.
Oh, you think there might have been more than one person involved in the Butler, Pennsylvania assassination attempt?
Flat earthers, write them off.
Oh, you think, what's that guy's name, Ryan Ruth, the pro-Ukrainian, apparently trying to draft Iranian terrorists to join the militia to fight Russia?
You think that there might have been something more deep statey to that?
Flat earther, write them off.
And so you have people who engage in behavior, which is actually counterproductive and undermines the very objective that they are either legitimately trying to pursue or sincerely trying to sabotage.
That's a very long-winded intro to this video, which I said, that's it.
I mean, I know Jake.
I think this is something of, I say something of a joke, something of a LARPing.
And I had to express my thoughts on it yesterday.
Now I can't find my tweet, which is going to drive me crazy.
I have to go back to my Twitter feed.
And I put it out yesterday.
I said it, first of all, again, you know, like, I don't know what's a real video anymore.
I see this being quote tweeted by other people.
I'm like, is this AI?
It's like, you know, I know he's out there being provocative.
I know he's out there burning the Quran and slapping it with bacon, which I mean, if your issue is Islamic immigration and you want to legitimately raise those political concerns, you may think it's unfair.
You may think, oh, it's just words and it's just freedom of speech.
You make it more difficult for everybody to advance those political causes through that type of conduct.
And so there's going to be the hard N-word in here.
It's just a fair warning.
Not everybody here is a little snowflake here, but this is the video that I saw.
And when I look at, he might not want this level of sympathy or empathy.
I still genuinely and sincerely see someone who's been broken by his life experience.
And I don't know if this is a coping mechanism or if this is like a Bullworth type episode.
By the way, everybody should go watch Bullworth.
It's one of the better political commentaries of all time.
Listen to this.
Go back, APAC, go back.
That's the APAC building right there.
White christian men are not gonna sit around while you turn our children into a bunch of nigger lovers Guys, we'll see you in Minnesota January 17th.
Be there.
If you guys are watching this and you're inspired, show up.
Like, I'll stop it there.
It sort of feels like Borat level shtick.
And so I had to say that, you know, I told to privately ensure that the video was authentic before commenting.
I thought it might have been AI.
Disappointed it's not.
I've known Jake for over four years, followed him through his Jan 6 persecution, advocated for his pardon despite the violent nature of the charges against him, regret nothing, and apologized for nothing.
A great injustice was inflicted upon Jake, and I think he bears the scars of that injustice.
That said, this is not behavior that I'll have anything to do with directly or indirectly, actively or passively.
If one were trying to sabotage Trump and the conservative movement, this is what they would do.
If one were trying to sabotage the Christian revitalist movement, this is what they would do.
I do not know what Jake's motivations are.
I give him the benefit of the doubt.
I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt and operate on the basis that he's a broken man as a result of what was done to him, but nothing can excuse this, in my view.
It might be fun to watch.
It might give people some cathartic release.
Yeah, someone's doing something's doing what I've always wanted to do in my wildest dreams, if that's what you dream of.
Whatever legitimate political grievance exists, this type of behavior specifically diverts and distracts from such a legitimate criticism.
The ultimate irony is that the very same people Jake thinks he's courting with this behavior will never accept him as one of their own and will turn on him on a dime when the opportunity arises.
I wish Jake the healing that he clearly needs, but will have nothing to do with this type of activity going forward.
Godspeed, God bless.
And may he wake up.
And the ultimate irony is: you go through the Twitter feed.
You know, you could do as many Zeke Heils as you want.
And Jake is half Jewish, and there's a picture of him at the wailing wall as though that's the most sinful thing of all time from 20 years ago.
You go through those Twitter feeds.
People aren't going to let him forget that he's Jewish in their eyes.
You can do as many Zeke Heils as you want.
You can quote scripture as much as you want, although quoting the scripture and doing the Zeke Heil, it might be a little bit of a historical incongruity there.
That's just, it's just dumb.
It's just dumb.
It's counterproductive.
It's low level.
That actually impedes progress.
And so, to the extent, if one were an agit prop agent and they wanted to embarrass Trump and make him look like a fool for having pardoned the people that he pardoned, this is not a question of having a disagreement with Trump afterwards, like QAnon shaman.
And I'm using that term loosely.
It's, I know it's Jake Angeli.
This is not like Jake Angeli having a political grievance or even accusing Trump of being involved in conspiracies.
This is like an outright embarrassment.
Remember when one of the Jan 6 individuals who got pardoned ended up getting shot dead by police?
Jan 6 shot dead by police.
I forget his name.
There was a pardoned, oh, I should say pardoned Jan 6ers.
The chat will probably get it before I get it.
Yeah, pardoned.
It was Matthew Huddle.
Sorry, is it Huddle?
Yes, Matthew Huddle.
Matthew Huddle was one of the pardoned Jan Sixers who got shot dead in a traffic stop.
And everyone who was an anti-Trumper, anti-conservative, who believes the January 6th was an insurrection.
Look at your boys now.
These criminals were always criminals.
They should never have gotten pardoned.
Matthew Huddle, an Indian, oh, Indiana man, pardoned by Trump for misdemeanor.
He's pardoned for a misdemeanor.
Fatally shot by Jasper County Sheriff's deputy during a January 2025 traffic stop after Huddle resisted arrest, ran to his vehicle, and appeared to reach for a firearm, leading to a struggle where the deputy fired his weapon, as confirmed by body cam footage and subsequent investigations, finding Huddle with a loaded gun in his car.
Prosecutors found the deputy's use of force justified.
No charges were filed.
Look, I don't know any conspiracy about it.
I don't know if anyone falsified evidence.
I could imagine that someone who had just been in jail for however long he had, who had just been abused by the system and saw how corrupt the system was, now sees, I'm going to go back.
Hell to the bell.
No, another broken man acting like a broken man might.
But when that happened, you know damn well what happened.
I lived through to the Santa Claus.
Everyone's like tagging, not everyone, I should say, shithead trolls on Twitter.
Hey, Viva, this is one of your boys fatally shot because he was resisting arrest.
A, that doesn't mean he should not have gotten the pardon, but B, you know that your adversaries are going to take those types of examples to try to shame and retroactively rebuke the decision that they disagreed with at the time.
So you have Jake Lang, a man who professes to be Christian, and I'm not going to lecture anybody on what it means to be Christian for obvious reasons.
I would just imagine that the teachings of Jesus Christ do not involve doing the Ziegheil, burning other religious scriptures and slapping them with bacon, and using the N-word lover to describe what I'm not even sure yet.
The future of America.
I mean, last night, yet, Jesus flipped over some tables at the Last Supper.
And I'm fairly certain the other Jesus teaching is turned the other cheek, but not in the sense of be a total pushover.
But you have a man who has some Jewish blood in him, and even his own audience will never let him forget it, who converted to Christianity.
And now, in the eyes of many, is making a mockery of that, turning it into an offensive joke, and acting in a way that is going to make Trump, or at least give people the argument to say, hey, Trump, you're really pardoned a sweet one here.
And the bottom line is it makes it more difficult for everyone to now have this discussion.
It doesn't move the Overton window.
It actually just allows those who might be the victimizers to claim to be the victim.
I'm not talking about anybody other than politicians right now.
And now they're going to get to say, look at this.
These savages, like throwing these wars around, doing the Ziegheil, burning books and slash.
We now, they're trying to provoke.
They're trying to victimize us.
And so now we don't even have to discuss the policy that resulted in basically a full invasion of a country.
Now we actually can make the stronger argument for more censorship, more police control, and less freedom of speech.
Everybody loves bacon, Rabbi Schwartzmeckle.
Everybody loves bacon.
There's a reason why Jews who are kosher make things that taste like bacon that are kosher because bacon is the most delicious food on earth, period.
Not ham, bacon, and good, crispy, maple-smoked bacon.
Not the thick one, the thin strips.
And I live near a Brazilian meat shop.
They have, oh my goodness, the bacon is delicious.
Bacon is almost more delicious than lobster or squid, calamari, all of the good stuff, shrimp.
So yeah, that's that.
And I feel bad.
I still, you know, he's, he's a, it's weird to say he's still a good person despite doing what he's doing.
Misguided and broken.
And so with that, you know, we move on.
Have I missed anything here?
Hazard pay for Viva.
Oh, we got something here.
Before we get into the other potentially misguided rodiodo says, I believe the real reason for Maduro's arrest is mostly about the fact that he is in cahoots with China, Russia, Cuba, et cetera, perpetrating unconventional warfare against the USA.
Yeah.
This is another one where, like, Barnes has taken shit for just arguing legitimate counterpoints.
And people think, you know, like, go back to Canada if you're defending Maduro.
First of all, this is one of those situations where there's no defending Maduro and there's no, but it's one of those situations where I don't actually care about what happened.
If it was, it's like, I don't actually care if it was technically illegal.
You know, okay, Maduro is behind bars and he, like many other politicians, corrupt, running cartels.
I had a funny exchange with someone who's like, well, you know, he was leading a drug trafficking organization.
Of course, the country is within their rights to go in and extract him, not extradite him.
And I'm like, dude, you might want to look into the history of the CIA.
If that's your rationale for justifying it, you might want to look into the history of the CIA and then say, well, what other countries on earth would be now justified based on that explanation to come in and snatch up whomever they want out of America?
The bottom line is, I'm not sitting on a fence.
I'm more inclined to believe that it's potentially going to have political consequences, ramifications against Trump.
But I could very, very much easily make the argument for Maduro's arrest specifically because of that.
Okay, look, remember when Trump imposed the tariffs?
And everyone's like, this is just pretextual.
You know, sorry, he imposed the tariffs, Trump.
It's the exact analogy.
And I'm actually glad I just made this connection right now.
Trump said, Canada, you got a drug problem there, and it's coming over the border.
And you got a terrorist problem there, and it's coming over the border.
And then all of the TDS libby idiots are like, that's not true.
Only 1% of the fentanyl comes from the northern border.
99% of it comes from Mexico.
A, that's only what's nabbed.
And B, the Canadian border is not a militarized border like the Mexican border.
The shit gets through on trains by the ton.
The precursors get brought down to Mexico by the ton.
So Trump comes out.
You'll remember this during the Canadian election and says, you got a drug problem, fix it up.
And you got a terrorist problem, fix it up, or I'm going to impose tariffs.
And then all everyone's other, he'll never do that.
Oh, and then he does it.
He's like, oh, it was just pretextual.
Yeah, it was pretextual.
And congrats, you played into it.
You played yourselves.
So everyone's out there.
Like, yeah, the drug trafficking, the machine gun possession, totally pretextual.
This is about keeping, India, I was going to say, this is about keeping Iran, China, and Russia out of the northern hemisphere or the Western hemisphere.
All right, good.
And Maduro gave him the pretext.
He played into it.
Come and get me, Mother Effer.
Well, now we come and got you, Mother Effer.
We gave you the pretext.
You played into it.
Our underlying goal might be energy independence or oil resources, oil reserves.
And it might just be to make this hemisphere safer.
I needed a pretext.
You gave me a pretext.
Have fun.
That's fine.
Then that's a real politique, legitimate explanation, legitimate justification for what they did.
And the arrest has legal precedence to the extent it does with the Noriega Panama arrest and the legal precedent, which I might talk about later with Megan Kelly True Crime with Phil Holloway.
Even if it was an unlawful snatch and grab, that doesn't affect the jurisdiction now that America has, now that he's in America.
Laura, 850.
I'm not going to give you a hard time on this.
I turned it off Sunday for the first time.
Barnes got to me.
Sorry, Villa.
If you have the snowflake ears that you cannot stand what someone's saying to the point of turning it off, you might want to force yourself to listen to it.
It's not like listening to Hunter Biden for five and a half hours with Sean Ryan.
You're not listening to a drug-fueled lunatic, or at least a brain-damaged former druggie lunatic, blabber for five and a half hours.
You're listening to someone who is objectively smart, objectively educated, and objectively experienced in the field.
If it hurts you, you might want to force yourself to listen to it.
It's the only way, incidentally, even if you still walk away and say, My goodness, everything I just listened to pissed me off.
It's the only way you're going to know the arguments.
And now, before we get into, well, I guess we'll get into the Maduro in a second here.
Hold on one second.
I saw Rustang view tip question.
Viva calls it tribalism.
What is more akin to jingoism, re-nationalism in a form of aggressive and proactive foreign policy with the warlike threats and actual force?
I have to look up jingoism, I thought, was just rampant nationalism.
Tribalism is that's interesting.
I'll think about that distinction.
Joe Masky says, I say, let Jake be informed by the courage of his convictions.
I say meekness has its downsides.
It has always been at least partially a mistake by the right to let the left own the streets.
Well, I say he's doing, he's being very counterproductive.
Rustang says, Viva, a lot of the guests, Steve Baker, Carl Serifin, Alex Jones, you had on your show, are upset with Bro Bongino's threats.
Ivan Reiklin retweeted, oh no, I know.
Bongino, I'm not reading this.
This is the most gaslighting I've seen from a supposed conservative.
I'll get to that in a second.
But just on the Maduro.
Where was it?
Maduro case drops cartel theory.
I don't know what clash report is.
January 2026, the U.S. Department revised its indictment of Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro, dropping claims that Cartel de la Soles is an actual cartel.
The shift undercuts 2025 terror designations and reshapes the Maduro drug case.
I've seen the memes or the ideas that this was all also pretextual to get Maduro into custody so he can rat out Venezuela election interference.
I neither believe nor disbelieve it.
I will wait for additional evidence one way or the other.
But if that were the case, I don't think Biden would have upped the bounty on Maduro to 25 million from Trump's original 10 million if it were in fact going to reveal election interference.
And I appreciate people say, well, that was just a blowhard, meaningless bounty action gesture.
They never had any intention of doing anything.
Well, you offer 25 million bucks.
I mean, you're dealing with that scene from, I forget what the movie was, but people might do crazy things to get 25 million bucks.
Justice Department has quietly narrowed down one of the most consequential allegations used by the Trump administration against Nicola Maduro, retreating from its earlier claim that he led a drug cartel known as Cartel de los Soles.
In a revised indictment unsealed on January 4th, 2026, prosecutors reframed the term not as a discrete criminal organization, but as a shorthand for a patronage system and culture of corruption inside Venezuela, civilian military intelligence.
The change marks a significant legal recalibration.
The original 2020 indictment referenced the cartel 32 times and cast it as a structured drug trafficking organization under Maduro's command.
The rewritten version mentions the term only twice.
It no longer describes Maduro as a cartel leader, instead alleging that he participated in the protected systems, which draw.
Well, I think it's look, it's fine.
You can go make hay out of it.
He's being alleged, he's being charged with cocaine distribution.
So whether or not it's a cartel, I don't think it's going to change the nature of that claim.
The other two, machine gun possession, and conspiracy, it won't change that either.
And what was the maybe, maybe the RICO part of it might make it more difficult.
Patronage system, according to the new indictment, profits from cocaine trafficking move through a hierarchy of officials referred to as the Cartel de la Solos.
A phrase linked to the insignia.
Justice Department's repeated retreat places new pressure on U.S. policy decisions taken in 2025.
In July of that year, the Treasury Department designated the terrorist organization, a step echoed by the State Department, designations without proof.
Unlike criminal charges, terrorism designations do not require courtroom proof.
That distinction now looms large.
The Drug Enforcement Agency, the DEA annual national drug threat assessment, has never identified Cortel de la Soles as a trafficking organization, nor has the United Nations office, who gives a crap on drugs.
The Justice Department's revised filing implicitly acknowledges those gaps.
I think it's no big deal for what they're going after.
Maybe take that with a grain of salt.
I know the limitations of my own understanding, and I certainly wouldn't claim to have expertise here.
I've read the indictment for the charges that they're going after him for.
I don't think it's going to make much of a difference.
Politically, they might make some arguments, and they'll use any inconsistency, any incongruity, any change to undermine the legitimacy of the conduct, which has historical, political, and legal precedent.
The only question is going to be whether or not the Democrats, if and ever they get power again in 2026, moving into our next topic, are going to apply those historical precedents equally and lawfully.
Spoiler, they won't.
Now, Hans 1 Pack is in the house over here.
The problem I've been having with the show is the lack of legal analysis and the lack of meaningful reviews.
It's just talk without substance.
Let's start reviewing law documents.
Well, I think we do both.
But also, things are going to evolve.
And some people are going to say, enough about if I wanted to read the document, I could read it myself.
The amount of times I've heard that comment.
And I hope you didn't mean to give that tip to us twice, but if you did, thank you.
So I do that.
But bear in mind also, you're reaching, at the end of the day, hundreds of thousands of people, or at least hundreds of thousands of views.
Everybody's going to complain about something.
You can't please everybody, and everybody wants something different or more of something.
King of Bill Tong in the house.
Kick off your 2026 health journey today by getting some tasty Bill Tong from Bill Tong USA, packed with B vitamins, iron, zinc, creatine, and more.
Get some at Billtongusa.com.
Use code Viva for 10% off.
Is Bongino going to kick you out of the Rumble lineup and replace you with the cat?
Quinn 1971.
Well, first of all, no, he still follows me.
The funny thing is, there is some like, first of all, no, I don't know what, I don't even know what his involvement is with any of it, other than being a Rumble shareholder.
But no.
And go put the Dilly meme team and have them speak for an extended period of time.
It's just so amazing.
It's just the level of rational thought is that of high school teenagers who think they're on the cool team and get to like bully everybody else.
And it is bullying.
I mean, I'm not using that word as a deep offense.
Let me see here.
I'll go here.
I'm going to go back to my Twitter.
The Dilly Meme team, I got into it with them this morning.
Oh, yeah, that one.
So Dilly Meme team.
They're going after, like, this is where the infighting is stupid.
This is Brandon Dilley going after General Flynn.
And again, you can take issue with some of the positions General Flynn has taken.
At the end of the day, however, it's not just show some respect to your elders, show some respect or at least some deference to people who have actually dedicated their lives to serving their country.
Like, no humility, no humbleness of any, just arrogance and pomposity of the highest order.
Hey, General Flynn, do you share your son's disdain for President Trump's supporters?
Or is this the first opinion that Junior has ever come up with on his own?
I see you amplifying anti-Trump accounts quite frequently.
Oh, you got your henchmen in here.
No more spy bullshit playing both sides.
What's the deal?
To which I respond, you do realize you're trying to lecture and shame a man who was the victim of deep state abuse and for which none has been held accountable.
That one of his abusers, prosecutor Jocelyn Ballantyne, who was involved in extorting a false guilty plea by threatening to go after General Flynn's son, Michael Flynn Jr., is not only not in jail, she's actually still employed at Bondi's DOJ and is currently working the Brian Cole prosecution.
And why are you trying to publicly sow discord between a father and a son?
A father who has a long and distinguished military career, this mean girl's bullying garbage might work on X.
It might make you feel good and give you that dopamine rush.
You need to start your day.
But my goodness, is it as juvenile as it is counterproductive?
Not to mention the audacity it takes for you to lecture Michael Flynn on anything in life.
Attacking Flynn only highlights the absolute dearth of retribution against the deep state the people were promised.
Take a step back and reflect.
Then, because you can do this, I go to check out the hit, because I posted on Dilly's thing.
I was like, oh, let me go see how it's doing.
Oh, not many people seem to even be engaging with it, even to shit on me because it's Dilly's feed.
The freaking guy hides, he hides my response.
And then goes on to say he's hiding my response so that his chat, so that I won't infect his chat, his group with his stupidity.
Because you're a colossal retard and I don't want your stupidity infecting my followers.
Stay mad, pussy.
This is amazing.
This is how you win elections.
Admitting you think your followers are so stupid, they would easily be infected by the stupidity of others.
Congratulations on the self-burn.
So that's sort of the infighting that's going on right now.
But the better part of it is Bongino came out swinging yesterday, and it was a three-part tweet.
And I've got it up here somewhere, and I'll go bring it up so that I don't mischaracterize anything.
And I don't like this because this is not legal analysis.
This is sort of gossip-ish to some extent.
But it's political relevance because the idea here is midterms are coming up in 2026.
And the question is, if you think things are going hunky-dory and it's going to be a walk in the park and a red wave, okay, I have a certain check that I'd like to write you, and it's called a reality one.
So people, you got to focus and you got to try to win the midterms.
And if Republicans lose the midterms, and depending on how badly, if they lose, things can get real ugly real fast.
Bongino comes out and says, good to see you all.
I missed you.
Thanks for everything while we worked on cleaning up.
Working in the administration was the experience of a lifetime.
I'll have some announcements coming up, taking a couple days off to spend with his family, and may he reconnect with his family.
The last year has have to have been pure shit for Bongino.
A couple of things.
Thank you for your interest in the show and return date.
We'll have something for you soon.
Trump team is not kidding around.
It's an otherworldly experience on the other side.
He's determined and focused.
I have no doubt about that.
Been quite around quite a few presidents.
This one broke the mold.
If we blocked you, it's because we care so little about your bullshit that we deem it not worthy of even seeing.
If you're bitching and whining about it, it means you can't exist without seeing and commenting on ours.
You'll need to get over that.
We do it because there's nothing black pillars and anti-Trumpers want more than to create division and drama.
We're about results and we'll talk about some of it soon.
And then there was a follow-up.
How do I see the follow-up?
Should I go like this?
And I go view quotes and I should see his follow-up.
Let me add this, okay?
From the jump, so there's no confusion.
I started this movement as a political candidate during the Tea Party, became political commentary shortly thereafter.
I helped build this movement.
Sure as hell, I'm not going to get it.
See it get hijacked by a group of black pillars, life losers, grifters, and bumps.
Don't know who he's talking about, but I know he's not talking about me because I think he still follows me.
We are a movement guided by truth.
The essence of conservative ideology is the preservation of eternal truths.
We are not the latest thing group.
We are not political cannibals.
I've watched quietly from the inside while doing the job I was hired to do, but I'm back off now and it's time to get back to balance.
Yada yada.
That one was for Gee.
As we get ready to make some announcements about the future, I also want to warn the haters and the zeros.
We've been at this for a long time.
We live for this stuff.
This isn't our first, second, or 10th rodeo.
We've seen a lot of dipshits come and go.
We revel in making you angry enough to show your asses.
It's glorious.
We've got midterms coming up, and there's no time for bullshit.
The administration is cooking, and real changes change simmers.
If you're spending your entire day bitching and whining with three-fourths of the term still to go, then please find the exits.
There's no time for it.
It's not infighting when you excise a cancer killing the host.
It's outfighting because you're not part of a movement I'm familiar with.
Looking forward to big things ahead.
I'll keep it at that.
I don't think we need to see any more of the actual infighting that ensued.
And then the only question is: how does everyone feel about that?
I've said this, and I've been accused of being too charitable to Dan.
I don't know him personally.
I mean, I've never had dinner with him.
I know him.
I think he's principled, immensely dedicated to the country, to the constitutional republic.
And despite what everyone thinks, I still believe he's one of the good guys who got in there and saw what a steaming pile of corrupt shit it was and said, I'm out.
Flip side, and this is not mutually exclusive.
This is the Ivan Rakelin interpretation of it.
From the inside, the administration saw what was happening on the outside, said, We're going to lose 2026 if sentiment continues the way it does.
So get Bongino back on the most popular podcast on earth and have him rally the troops for 2026 because he would be more useful there.
You could bring in an Andrew Bailey, who replaced him as deputy director, and let Bongino do his thing on his podcast, rally the troops for 2026, and Andrew Bailey will be as good as anybody enforcing the law as deputy director of the FBI.
So it could be a bit of both.
Back in the day, when everyone saying, you know, when they came out and said Epstein killed himself, trust me, I've seen the file, and everyone was like, nobody believes that.
And then people are like, if he's being, if his wings are being clipped and his hands are being tied, he has to get out.
That's what people said back in the day.
And he got out now.
Now, some people are going to say he got out only after having, you know, told us things that are unbelievable, you know, pissed off half of his audience.
He got out.
He did what people said he should have done six months ago.
Would he have been better off doing it six months ago?
Maybe the off-ramp wasn't there, and now the off-ramp was there to do it in a politically discreet manner.
People saying he should come out now and rat out everybody.
Talk about how incompetent Pam Bondi is.
Talk about all the skeletons in the closet in the FBI.
If your goal is to win the 2026 midterms and not torpedo the very administration you joined to see it succeed, someone might want him to do that.
If his objective is to see a win in 2026, that's not necessarily the most politically expedient move.
That being said, and this is where I take issue with some of this, and I tweeted it out earlier and I mentioned it on the quartering.
2024 was won because of a unity ticket, at least in part.
Some of you might say Trump would have won anyhow, even without RFK Jr. and without Tulsi Gabbard.
I'm not convinced, incidentally.
I'm thoroughly not convinced that he would have won without the libertarian vote, without Tulsi Gabbard's faction of centrist lefties, and without RFK Jr.'s Maha.
I don't think he would have won.
And I don't think that would have happened but for the failed assassination attempt, but I don't think the failed assassination attempt on its own would have done it without RFK Jr.'s delegation and without Tulsi Gabbards, with all the libertarians.
So you can disagree with that premise or not, but it's mine.
2024 was won because of a unity ticket.
You're not going to win 2026 by declaring war on dissident speech, even if it's coming from the Tuckers, the Candace's, the Nick Fuentes.
Who's another one?
Tucker?
When he says the black pillars of the Doom Pillars, maybe even Alex Jones at this point.
You are not going to win 2026 by declaring war on the dissenting speech who are largely comprised of disenfranchised and disillusioned supporters or former supporters.
It's not how it's going to work.
What I would love to see, it won't happen.
What I would love to see is open discourse between some of these black pillars and Bongino, either on his show or on theirs.
I'm not asking this as an invitation to me because I don't think he was talking about me.
Maybe he's talking about Barnes because Barnes has been a little...
Barnes has been hard on Bongino.
Hard in a way that I wouldn't do myself.
I'm not sure.
I don't believe in myself because I don't believe, you know, not things I would have said.
They're funny things and, you know, there's an element of humor in there.
And you're in certain positions in life.
You got to be able to deal with it and brush it off like water off a duck's back.
But maybe he's talking about Barnes.
And maybe he's talking about Viva and Barnes by extension.
But let's assume that he's talking about Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, and people who are saying, we're going to burn the shit down because we're not getting what we want out of this election.
And then some of you out there can say, well, Tucker, maybe Tucker is a bad example.
Nick Fuentes was never a conservative.
Candace Owens was never a real conservative.
Okay, fine.
Is your goal to be morally politically correct?
Yeah, they were never conservatives, so fuck them, but we're going to lose in 2026.
So I say, like, you don't go from winning election because of a unity ticket in 2024 to winning the midterms through declaring war on the politically disfavored speech, even if it is coming from bona fide black pillars and grifters.
I still don't know what that word means.
And it's always abused in a contextually inappropriate context.
Bring them on.
The reality is the sentiment might be that there's some things that you're not going to be able to debate your way into convincing others that things are going hunky-dory.
The debate to convince people that this attack, the attack on Iran back earlier on was not initiated or at least forced by the hand of Netanyahu, you're not going to easily convince people that that wasn't a backtrack on the promise of no regime change, no new wars.
Yeah, it lasted 12 days by the grace of God.
Nobody could sit there and say it wasn't a long, it's not going to be a long war.
You never know how long it is until it's long.
But it would be a tougher argument to say, yeah, bombing Iran was America first.
Arresting Maduro was America first.
I can make a very, very compelling argument for why it was America first.
You had the pretext.
You exploited the pretext.
You've now taken out a corrupt, drug-dealing, you know, South American leader, and you've sent an example to other dictators out there, and you've sent a message to Russia, China, Iran.
We're going to control our hemisphere.
I can make a very strong argument for that, but you have to make that argument.
You're not going to convince people they're right by telling them that they're wrong.
And you're not going to convince the followers of these people because whether you hate them or love them, they've got a lot of followers.
They might have a lot of bots and they might not have a determinate element on political outcomes, but you're not going to convince their followers or people who are on the fence by calling them names and saying, now I'm going to declare war on you.
How about you declare dialogue?
And then we can actually argue what's going right, what's going wrong, and what can be changed between now and November 2026.
But what's truly astonishing is like, you know, Brendan, the Dilly guys, they make funny memes.
They're technically very well done.
It's such a juvenile level of discourse that I mean, other than making yourself feel funny, like calling someone, okay, hey, hey, calling someone a pussy is funny when you're 12.
Like, it's okay.
Oh, yeah, and you're for your own crowd, everyone piles out of, oh, great.
I got more, I got more retweets on my pussy comment that you got on your.
Oh, all right, dude.
Nobody's going to be convinced by that.
The only thing you're going to be appealing to is this basic desire to be on the team that you think is winning so as to ensure your own survival, political, ideological, or physical.
But if the concern is losing 2026, I don't think you win it by further dividing a fractured base that is fractured from the unity that won the election in 2024.
That and Bongino, whether he likes it or not, is going to have to legitimately address certain people's grievances.
When someone's theory was, I think it was Jeremy from the quartering that, you know, maybe he was talking to half of his audience who turned on him.
There are people out there, and if they are the Michael Flynns of the world, you don't get to disregard their opinions just because they might have gotten certain things wrong on the election.
You don't get to disregard their opinions if it's legitimate, where people might be blackpilled because of what we believe, what we were told, what we were expecting to happen, and what we saw did not happen.
Now, I have no insider knowledge.
I thoroughly and sincerely believe that Bongino was in there, couldn't get anything done.
There might have been bumping heads between people in positions of power involving Bondi, involving Todd Blanche.
That unsigned memo was an embarrassment to Bongino.
And so he got the hell out, maybe a little bit too late, but he got out.
And then people either are going to say, well, he should have stayed.
Or other people are going to say, look, he didn't try hard enough.
He should have sacrificed more.
Nobody is entitled to demand someone else sacrifice their one and only life and their one and only wife and their one and only family.
But Bongino is going to have to legitimately and substantively address the fact that much of his audience who listened to him talk about Epstein, Jan 6 pipe bomber, Butler, say, man, we were hopeful.
If anybody was going to affect the change that we all believe and know is needed in that corrupt organization of the FBI, it was you and to a lesser degree, Patel, because I think more people had more faith in Bongino.
And now we're left a year later.
Yes, crime is down.
Yes, there have been some objective successes in law enforcement.
But on Butler, nothing.
On Ruth, Mar-a-Lago, nothing.
On January 6th, a freaking Patsy, a Patsy that nobody believes did what he's accused of doing.
And on Epstein, nobody believes it.
And even if he did it technically by his own hand, take his own life.
Well, it was certainly with linens facilitated by somebody with a blind, a window of opportunity provided by somebody.
And so he's going to have, he'll have to substantively address that.
The only problem is, I'm not sure legally or, I mean, I guess Barnes thinks the NDAs don't apply to FBI agents and First Amendment speech.
I'm not, I'm take his opinion with more than a grain of salt.
I think politically he wouldn't come out and spill the beans even if he could, because it would be counterproductive to his underlying goal.
But that's that.
But he's going to have to, he's going to have to substantively address it.
They're not unreasonable, they're not unreasonable sentiments.
And if the idea is, well, you know, I'm not going to address that, maybe I can't because of an NDA or I'm not going to, and I'm just going to declare war on Candice, Tucker, et cetera, that's not, take it for what it's worth for me.
That's not going to win an election.
They have legit successes.
Let me just bring this up here because I brought it up in the earlier part.
It was Vince.
Oh, it might have been.
Hold on a second.
It might have been on Bongino's page.
Let me see.
I want to bring this up.
It was Vince Cagliones, who's been on the show, has a great, great show himself.
Hold on.
Hold up.
Wait a minute.
Here.
Let me bring this one up.
We can celebrate the successes, but you cannot delegitimize people's honest, sincere grievances with what they think didn't happen the way they were expecting it to happen and feeling dismayed, disenfranchised, and disillusioned.
You're not going to win them back as voters by declaring war on the free speech of the people they have now turned to on the interwebs.
This is Vince.
I'm very excited to hear that Dan Bongino has officially got the FBI.
That I'm confident that comes as a great relief to Dan.
And to summarize how Dan's year went, the FBI director Kash Patel sent him off.
He said, Dan heads back to the private sector after helping orchestrate a record year for the FBI.
And here's how Cash ran the numbers down.
He said there was a historic 20% drop in the nationwide murder rate, a 100% increase in arrests from year to year.
That would be arrests being done by the FBI.
1,800 gangs and criminal enterprises disrupted.
2,000 plus kilos of fentanyl that were seized.
Over 6,000 child victims have been located.
Espionage arrests.
That would be spies in the United States.
And multiple successful surges, including summer heat.
That was violent crime.
Over 9,000 arrests in just three months.
None of it possible without Dan's leadership and support.
Thank you, Dan Bongino.
Yeah.
Thank you, Dan.
Thank you for your service to your country.
You know what wasn't even on the list?
They caught the pipe bomber.
Dan caught the pipe bomber, too.
Honestly, as I said before, when we got the news that Dan was leaving, a lot of points on the scoreboard.
And he can leave with his head held high.
A lot to be proud of.
Everything that is going to happen next in terms of Dan's schedule is up to him.
And I can't wait to see it.
I'm as eager as you are to see him back behind a microphone, talking to an audience and giving us his perspective on what exactly went down inside of that government and what the rest of us should make of it.
Want to see more?
Make sure to check out Vince.
You can see it every day, 10easternrumble.com/slash Vince or wherever you get a podcast.
I'm not sure what we're going to learn from went on within the FBI.
Jocelyn Ballantyne is still at the DOJ.
So you can take that with a bigger or less degree grain of salt, depending on your leanings.
There were definite successes in crime reduction.
I know that the haters would say, well, the crime reduction is either state or not FBI related and taking credit for whatever.
Child trafficking, they found some of the children that were lost under the Biden administration.
And I could imagine the level of frustration that comes with not getting recognition for the successes because people were too disenfranchised with other expectations.
And then the flip side argument to that is it's the job.
You did the job in certain respects.
And Owen Schroyer said it at one point in time.
Maybe he's talking about Owen Schroyer as well.
At some point, you don't really get to take continued victory laps for doing your job.
But there were definite W's.
I just would not have thrown the arresting of the pipe bomber in there because you know what I think about that.
And I say Dan might have gotten out in time before that entire case blows up, falls apart, and turns into a grotesque embarrassment for the DOJ.
But we'll see.
That would be where my prediction is.
I don't know if there's a market for it, but if there is, I might think about putting some money on my predictions as to what's going to happen in the future.
Now, with that said, because I got to do something at 4:30, I'm going to see who is up on the Hrumble lineup.
Okay, good.
Redacted is on in a couple of minutes.
So we'll go raid redacted.
Before we do that, and before we do that, I want to show you this.
If you want to support the channel, I am getting a better camera, people.
That was my New Year's resolution.
Because now I see what my camera looks like.
The camera still looks good.
If you want to support the channel, all of the links are here.
You can get some merch.
We're going to try to up our merch again.
I'm going to try to make publicly available a Viva Fry hot sauce.
Where is it?
I have one somewhere around here.
Anyway, we're going to try to make a Viva Fry hot sauce.
If you want to tip with crypto, you go click on that thing, tip with a wallet, go to Bitcoin, and you can tip by scanning this, even if you have one right now.
Redacted sucks.
Boo, redact.
Oh, come on, people.
I don't, first of all, I don't agree with you.
I think they're good.
And I love the filter they have on.
I love their mic quality.
And if you want to tip with, what was the other one here?
Oh, yeah, USDT.
You can go here and boom, scan that.
Join vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
And there were a couple of okay, let me go.
Oh, there you go.
Okay, good.
That's a little better.
What I was going to say was, oh, yeah, I was going to get the viva barneslaw.locals.com.
Here, Roostang says, Viva, some of the ex-comments by the nasty boys, Brandon Dilly, for example, are not impressed by Viva's fence-sitting poses in Holy Earth than that cons.
I don't give a sweet bugger all with those foul-mouthed, juvenile.
You want to know who's sowing divide who's sewing divide?
They are.
One thing you can, first of all, I don't think I sit on the fence at all.
I think I do try to be more empathetic than most.
Sitting on the fence, at the very least, doesn't cause division or internal strife.
These guys, Brendan Dilly, going out there, between Brendan Dilly and Cat Turtle, I mean, it's like when you can't convince people they're right, when you can't convince people that you're right, you convince them that they're a loser.
I mean, that's their mentality.
So, you want to talk?
I don't think it has worked very well to sway anybody over to team Trump.
It's actually probably done the exact opposite.
And I would argue that it's, I'm not trying to sway anybody to team Trump.
I know what I believe.
I know what I believe needs to happen for the future of America to be successful and not go the way of Canada.
And that is for a successful Trump presidency, which I think, you know, there might be those who are questioning whether or not that's happening right now.
Now, with that said, we are going to go raid Redacted, whether you like it or not, people.
And say hello for me.
We're going to have a short Viva Barneslaw.locals.com after party because I got to get probably another shirt on for today's show.
Raid, bada, bing, bada, boom.
Go let them know from whence you came.
We just got raided.
First of all, Jeremy, the quartering, thank you for the raid.
We just got raided by OG Dark Spider Gaming.
So that's going to be a short-lived raid.
And I see that we are live here.
Viva Raid Booyah.
No, don't do that.
Don't do that.
Thank you for the raid.
All right, that's good.
And with that said, tomorrow's Wednesday.
I got bowling tonight.
So I've been doing push-ups.
I didn't do my push-ups this morning.
And oddly enough, it is making the pain in my shoulder a little bit better, as in less painful.
Let's take this party over.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com if you want to come.
And if you don't, who needs you?
I'm joking.
Come on over.
And it'll be the best hundred bucks you spend.
You get the whole year, 100 bucks.
After parties, Barnes, what are they called?
Barnes, Burden with Barnes.
My deep thoughts of the day.
My deep thought today was a good one, which was the unity ticket.
I fleshed it out a lot longer here.
So that's it.
We're going to end it.
Rumble.
Godspeed.
▲
Export Selection