EARLY HOLIDAY STREAM! Kirk / TPUSA Internet Pile-On CONTINUES! Minnesota Fraud! Georgia Faud & MORE!
|
Time
Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the Interwebs, in today's episode of people lacking insight and advertising their competitors for them, I introduce you to a man named Tim Walz with a video that is entitled, Meet Donald Trump's Pick for Governor of Minnesota.
And I dare tell you one thing: if you weren't inclined to vote for Mike Lindell before watching this video, I suggest you will be inclined to vote for him after.
Behold!
Running for governor?
Mike Lindell, do we like Mike Clinton?
Do people know you as the Mike Pillow guy?
Blah, blah, blah.
Uniparty, the deep state globalists, and the media tried to completely bury the truth about the 2020 election.
You didn't do an audit to match them up.
They were audited against the machine.
No, they weren't.
No, they weren't.
In these counties.
No, they weren't.
No, they weren't.
Who told you that?
The county officials.
Oh, did they tell you that?
Well, they're going to have some answering to do it.
No matter who says there was no widespread fraud in the election, whether it's local election officials, secretaries of state, judges, or even Donald Trump's own attorney general.
Mike Lindell's conclusion is the same.
They are all wrong.
No, they're not lumpy pillows.
That's not what they call on.
Okay.
When you say lumpy pillows, now you're an a**hole.
You got that?
You're an a**hole.
That guy deserves to be governor of Minnesota.
You know who's running for governor?
Mike Lindledell.
Do we like Mike Clinton?
Can you imagine?
I'm going to leave that in the backdrop and I'm going to give it to everybody.
Can you imagine Mike Lindell posts, not Mike Lindell?
I'm sorry.
Tim Walz posts a video of Trump starting off a speech saying, do we like Mike Lindell?
And they didn't even edit out the cheering crowd roaring with affirmation that they like Mike Lindell.
He posted that video.
When did he post this video?
It's impossible that someone can be so stupid.
How do I get this escape?
He posted this yesterday, a video in which Mike Lindell is talking about widespread voter fraud.
A video in which Mike Lindell is talking about how corrupt officials are.
In a week in which we are now learning the fraud in Minnesota, the Somalian aid welfare fraud now exceeds the entire GDP, gross domestic product of the country of Somalia.
In the same week where we have now found out that there was, in fact, objective, illegal voter activity in Georgia.
Objective, illegal.
We're going to get into the distinctions where they're going to say, well, you know, it was the votes were unlawfully counted or unlawfully certified, but they weren't unlawful votes, but it was illegal in Georgia, in a state where they tried to lock up Trump and everyone in his orbit for alleged RICO criminality that never existed in the first place.
Tim Walz puts out this video, impugning the character of Mike Lindell, a man who has been more right than wrong, though, like all of us, has been wrong from time to time.
$18 billion of fraud in the state of Minnesota committed by not just the Somali community, because there were other people taking their percentage, taking their 10% for the big guy, but a fraud that is now confirmed to have exceeded the GDP of the country of Somalia itself and Mike Lindell in the same week that definitive voter fraud in Georgia occurred.
And I should say, election fraud.
These are splitting hairs.
Oh, no, the votes were legal, but the counting was illegal.
Fraud, criminal fraud.
And for those who don't know yet what is going on, and I had to, A, make sure I understood it because you need to understand the nuance.
You see people like, well, anybody with half a brain, Mike Benz, you know, people on the right going to Twitter and saying 315,000 votes illegally counted in the state of Georgia.
The margin of victory was under 15,000.
You know, find me 11,000 votes.
When people are posting that and then the rebuttal, the standard rebuttal is the votes were legal.
It's just that the certification of those votes was illegal.
Well, A, you need to make sure you understand it.
And B, you need to make sure that you know how to respond to it.
It was illegal.
Period.
This is the news of the week.
Fulton County admission on unsigned voting tabulations brings back spotlight on 2020 election.
Ratface Burger.
You've been around the channel for long enough.
Robert Barnes and I were talking about this from back in the day.
Am I showing you the right screen here?
I am showing you the right screen.
Where did it just go?
Son of a beasting.
Hold on one second.
Let me bring it back.
My fat fingers have messed this up.
Fulton County did not dispute the allegation in a complaint before the state election board this month that more than 130 tabulator tapes from 2020 were unsigned.
Understand this.
It was not lawfully conducted.
Their argument is going to be, well, there was no difference in the outcome.
We will never know.
But what we were told was that it was the most fortified election of all time.
It was the most unquestionably kosher election of all time.
And now after five years after activists unearthed this, they do not contest the fact that there is basically no chain of custody on some 350,000 early votes.
Atlanta, Fulton County admissions that more than 130 tabulator tapes, the receipt-like piece of paper that contained vote tabulation information for a particular machine.
Oh, by the way, they made a mistake on the machines too.
Just that little receipt.
You imagine having to audit or get audited and you say to the government, yeah, my receipts are all wrong, but trust me, that's how much money I made.
Jail.
So the receipt-like pieces of paper that contain vote tabulation information on a particular machine were unsigned in 2020 has brought back the spotlight on Georgia's election that year.
Records from the records account for virtually all of the county's early in-person votes in 2020, more than 315,000.
Fulton County addressed the issue of the unsigned tapes.
Listen to this.
They've addressed it.
Yeah, we broke the law, but it was without consequence.
Here we go.
In a moment that has gained international attention this week, including from such figures as Elon Musk and the Federalists.
Listen, the county contends, in essence, you know, because it's complicated.
I don't really want to get into what they're contending.
They're just contending, in essence, that poll workers five years ago made an administrative error that they've taken steps to resolve.
Attorney Ann Brumbaugh represented the county at the hearing, said those steps include enhanced training for election workers, as well as a review process on handling the paper ballots, known as tabulator tapes, the paper ballots, the paper records, known as tabulator tapes, and self-initiated investigation process if they're not signed.
The tapes are part of the record keeping and chain of custody procedure outlined in state regulations, whichever are the regulations here, Georgia state rule, whatever, requires a poll manager and two witnesses to print three such tapes and quote, sign each tape indicating that it is a true and correct copy of the tape produced by the ballot scanner.
The bottom line, what they're going to say is the votes themselves were not unlawful.
Just take our word for it, even though we've lied to you about this for the last five years.
Was just the tabulations or the unsigned certification of those votes that didn't follow protocol.
You've recounted, as was the argument back in the day, well, you know, signature verification.
We've recounted them.
The number of the recount is accurate.
The number of the recount was not what the issue was.
It was matching signatures, which was never done.
It was an audit of the signatures that was never done.
And in this case, all that they're basically saying is 315,000 early in-person votes.
There's no chain of custody.
There was no legally required verification, but trust us, the votes were good nonetheless.
It was not done in more than 130 in-person tapes, encompassing 350 plus thousand votes.
Yeah, I do not dispute that the tapes were not signed.
It was a violation of the rule, a violation of the law.
Just it was criminal.
But trust us, the rest of it was good.
We, since 2020, have new leadership and a new building and a new board, new standing operating procedures.
Since then, training has been enhanced.
The poll watches are traded specifically.
They've got to sign the tapes this morning in the morning, and they've got to sign the tapes when they return at the end of the day.
Bombaud said in the meeting.
This case is about tapes that are not signed, which is a violation of a statute, of a rule, not a statute.
Bull crap.
Another distinction without a difference.
But a rule they said should have been done.
Like I said, if they were signed, they weren't signed.
Procedures have been updated.
Oh, if we did it right, if we didn't know, Janelle King, one of the board members said, at best, it's sloppy and it's lazy.
At worst, it could be egregious.
Called it troubling, yada, yada, yada.
Georgia's Secretary of State Brad Ratfaceberger, the man who refused to provide a meaningful audit, an actual signature verification back in the day.
We talked about this at length.
What did he have to say?
Just making sure that we're still alive because I get sometimes so engrossed.
I'm nervous that I might be talking to an inactive camera.
Georgia's Secretary of State Brad Ratfaceberger said in a statement Saturday that all voters with verified, who were verified with photo ID and lawfully cast their barrets.
A clerical error at the end of the day does not erase valid legal votes.
You never did signature verification.
Never, Ratface Berger.
And sorry, by the way, do not expect me to believe that you didn't break the law in other respects when you acknowledge five years later that you broke the law in the chain of custody of the votes that you are now claiming were totally legit, but you have no way of verifying the chain of custody.
Ultimately, the SEB vote 3-0 to refer the case to the Georgia Attorney General's office for possible sanctions, as well as requesting a $5,000 fine for each missing $670,000.
We'll just take it from the taxpayers.
As a related but separate matter, there were 10 of 148 tapes missing entirely.
Oh, yeah, you know, just what was the margin of victory?
The subject of another earlier complaint.
Those encompassed more than 20,000 votes, which became the subject of a claim in 2023 that they didn't exist.
Remember when Trump said, find me the votes?
Oh, and they tried to prosecute him for that, Rico.
They were actually breaking the law.
They actually can't account for more votes than was the margin of error.
And they prosecuted Trump for saying, find me the missing votes, arguing that that was election interference, not what they've just admitted to having done here five years later.
Spokesperson for Georgia Secretary of State's office at the time, Mike Assinger, said the poll tapes are part of how votes are recorded multiple ways to provide redundancy and security.
A scanner that didn't produce a poll tape would have no effect on the number of validly validity of the votes casted.
Well, we're going to take your word for it.
Poll tapes are not supposed to go missing, but precincts are managed by human beings who sometimes make mistakes.
That's amazing.
And elections are not supposed to be fraudulent, but they're run by people who sometimes commit fraud.
But trust us, we broke the law here.
We failed to verify the chain of command.
We've now apparently have 20,000 missing votes because we can't actually find the tabulators or whatever.
But trust us, it was good.
And Trump was the one engaging in election interference.
Cross, who brought the complaint at issue this month, presented a competing version of the seriousness of poll tapes.
These are not clerical errors.
They are catastrophic breaks in chain of custody and certification.
You can hear both sides of the arguments, and I want to make sure I understand them.
And then you can decide which one makes sense and which one doesn't.
We broke the law, but trust us, it was a good election is not going to convince anybody except for the beneficiaries of that breaking of the law because they wanted the election to be stolen.
Adding that the lack of signatures on the tapes meant that Fulton County had no lawful authority to certify its advanced voting results to the Secretary of State yet did.
That spoke to a deeper, more ongoing debate about the mishandling.
Yada, yada, yada.
Some reports on the Fulton admission have referenced the county illegally certifying the votes with unsigned poll tapes.
A ruling by Fulton County Judge Bernie in another matter on certification held in 2024 said that they must certify their results, quote, under any circumstance.
The Georgia Court of Appeals upheld that ruling in July, emphasizing how state law uses the word shall in relation to certification and citing a, quote, mandatory duty to certify election results.
Doesn't matter how it was done, just certify something.
King at the December 9 meeting acknowledged that standing law, but disagreed with it.
I know according to the new law, now you have to certify even if there's missing tapes.
I get it.
Even if the data is wrong, even if we have elections, where there's clearly been some improprieties where the board members do not want to certify.
But according to the law, you got to do it anyway.
That's insanity.
The notion of nullifying votes or decertifying an election, this is they're asking them to decertify this based on the conduct.
Federal Judge Timothy Batten, yada, yada, yada.
Bush appointment, let's see what he says here.
They ask the court to order the Secretary of State to decertify the election result as if such a mechanism even exists.
And I find that it does not.
That's fine.
It's unclear following the board's vote to send the case to the Attorney General's office, whether there might be movement on the case.
Yada, yada, yada.
We have the end here.
I mean, it's amazing.
This is in an election where you will recall there were pipes breaking, counting into the late night hours, allegedly bags appearing out of nowhere, allegedly bags being pulled out of tables.
And now five years later, they're basically saying there was no chain of custody, not chain of command, but certification.
And we broke the law, but we've implemented some protocol.
So don't worry, it won't happen again.
In the same week, by the way, in the same, well, no, this is a, that was the Georgia fraud.
Mike Walls, going back to that video.
First of all, good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
How's the audio?
Because I'm using the native audio on the computer.
I'm told it's pretty good.
But I'm using, I'm on the road.
On the road again.
Bump, bump, bump.
So we're going to have today's show is not the Sunday show.
If you're watching this tonight at six o'clock, there will be no Barnes tonight because the Sunday show is going to be Monday.
Some of you astutely observing, well, if the Sunday show is on Monday, then that's the Monday show, to which I say semantics, good man.
Audio's fine.
Audio is good.
All right.
Yeah, we're going to have the Sunday show tomorrow.
I wanted to get a quick show out because I've got a Christmas party tonight that I can't and shan't miss, but there's too much to talk about.
Oh, yo, yo.
So that was what's going on there.
Superbuff shaft in the house says, let me open this up here and my eyes are bad.
Lindell and crew lied for a long time about PCAPs.
People need to see his court and Joe Altman's death positions.
Both lied and grifted millions from people.
Please interview John Pulitzer to get all info.
I've had the record.
I say, I don't know.
You say, I don't know what this particular accusation of lying is.
I said, Mike Lindell did get a number of things wrong on the election, which undermined both his and other legitimate contestation of that election.
But I'll screenshot that and look into it because I'm not entirely familiar with what it suggests offhand.
Mike Walls puts out a video of Tim Walz puts out a video of Mike Lindell raising his election issues, his election skepticism, which has now been, I don't care what you say about it, vindicated.
A lot of people's criticisms of Georgia have now been vindicated in the court of law in the same week that the scandal in his own effing state is now, you know, it started off as nobody knew about the scandal.
And had Tim Walz, Tim Noble's Walls, Tim Tampon Tim Walz, been elected vice president, we would never know about it.
It started off as, you know, some Somalian welfare fraud.
Then it's like, holy shit, it's a billion dollars worth of fraud.
That's more than what it costs to run the, what, the justice system of the entire state of Minnesota.
Now it's like $9 billion, and there are estimates that it's up to $16 or $18 billion of fraud.
And just so you appreciate this, by the way, I'm not sure that everybody does.
I had to double check myself, and I'm comfortable with my assessment that the GDP of the country of Somalia, the gross domestic product of the country of Somalia, is between $11 and $14 billion.
Somalia's GDP is around $11 to $14 billion, nominal for recent years, with projections reaching $13 showing consistent growth driven by remittances.
Do we know what remittances are?
Agriculture.
And so remittances are what Somali, what's the word?
Not in exile, but in diaspora from elsewhere, send back to family in Somalia.
The Somalian fraud now exceeds the entire GDP of Somalia.
How much of Somalia's GDP was financed with stolen American taxpayer dollars sent back to Somalia by way of remittances?
Inquiring minds want to know.
And before we get into it, let's just see what Minnesota reformer, eh?
Let's see what they're saying here.
U.S. attorney, fraud likely exceeds $9 billion in Minnesota-run Medicaid services.
Let's hear this.
This is amazing.
Tim Walz thinking he's owning Mike Lindell in his run for governor when Mike was highlighting election fraud.
And Tim Walz is indirectly, and thanks to the amplification of big mouths like myself, highlighting his own absolute egregious state fraud and all those who may have been benefiting from it.
Where the heck did it?
Oh, come on.
Here's my fat fingers again.
Do this and do this and bring back up the article.
$9 billion, peeps.
A Minnesota safety net program.
So easy to scam, it attracted tourists.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson said Thursday, two Philadelphia men.
Is this the right article here?
Yeah, this is it.
This is it.
Two Philadelphia men, Anthony Waddell Jefferson, Lester Brown, heard that Minnesota's housing stabilization services program was easy money.
So they traveled to Minnesota, enrolled their companies into the program, returned to Philly, and submitted fraudulent claims from there.
Thompson said in a news conference, charged against the two men, 3.5 million.
The extent of fraud in Minnesota human services program, which has become infamous across the country, is even higher than the public knew.
Providers in 14, quote, high-risk state-run Medicaid programs being audited by the state have billed $18 billion since 2018, and half more is possibly fraud.
Half or more is possibly fraudulent.
The fraudulent, the fraud is not small.
It isn't isolated.
The magnitude cannot be overstated.
What we see in Minnesota is not a handful of bad actors committing crimes.
It's staggering industrial-scale fraud.
It's swamping Minnesota and calling into question everything we know about our state.
It's unclear how much of the 18 billion in the 14 Medicaid services comes from state taxpayer dollars.
Around 36% of all Minnesotan Medicaid dollars comes from the state, while the rest is funded by the federal government.
Federal fraud, too.
Federal prosecutors also charged three other individuals who allegedly defrauded house stabilization.
Yet, yet again, Department of Human Services in August shut down the housing stabilization, citing credible allegations of fraud.
Do we keep going with this?
And DHS Inspector General called Thompson's speculation at least half shocking.
I've previously sent letters to U.S. Attorney's Office asking them to share evidence of fraud, and I'm requesting a meeting immediately to discuss how we can partner to stop crime.
Now, Clark said, messaging from temporary DHS Commissioner Shirley Gandhi didn't mention the gap in evidence between state and federal investigators.
I'm grateful for the U.S. Attorney's actions to prosecute criminals attacking and stealing from Minnesota's programs, said Gandhi.
We will continue to work to support their efforts, yada, yada, yada.
Um, this is uh, this is what Tim Walz wants to highlight by celebrating his competitor in a one-minute montage.
It's unreal, unbelievable, and it's just tremendous self-owning stupidity that can only be rivaled by Gavin Newsom tucking his legs behind his ears, uh, bearing his exposed bottom, uh, trying to own Donald Trump and inadvertently, indirectly, and perhaps unwittingly owning himself.
I have to show you this: Viva Fry Newsome.
Uh, it was in news, no, it was in Newsweek.
Yeah, let's see this.
Where was it?
Maybe it wasn't newsweek.
What was it?
Oh, it was New York Post.
New York Post.
If you, I just, we gotta, we gotta, we gotta remind ourselves of um oh, come on, Gavin Newsome Post X. Am I not gonna find the flipping picture?
This is no, no, no, hold on.
I'm gonna get stubborn.
Uh, New York Post is it this one?
Yeah, no, it wasn't.
Uh, oh, yeah, here it is.
Here it is right here.
Just because we have to, we have to, if anyone didn't, you know, vomit this morning, uh, there, there.
This is this is this is what you always want to see, people.
Gavin Newsom basically taking the position of the California taxpayer, while Tampon Tim does the exact same to his own Minnesota taxpayers while defrauding federal funds as well.
What is Viva doing here this afternoon?
I'm getting we're getting an early stream.
We're going to get the stream out because I want to talk about a few things, and then I got to go to a Christmas party, but not until I exercise, do my push-ups, try to strengthen my uh, my shoulder.
I was talking with uh Kyle Serafin after we had the show Friday.
I think it was after the show because I don't think it was during the show.
Something like my old man, I got bursitis of the shoulder.
And, you know, he says, Some things you're not going to stretch your way out of, you've got to strengthen your way out of.
So, I'm going back to, is that my shirt?
Yeah, I'm going back to push-ups, and I'm going to start trying to start trying to strengthen up my shoulder here.
Viva, lucky you, born and bred here.
Minnesota.
All right, that's what's going on there.
So, good times, fun stuff.
Did everybody watch the fight yesterday?
I don't give investment advice, gambling advice, anything.
All that I know is when I was looking at the odds for the Andrew Tate, Chase, what's his name?
Damore fight, and they were like 82% in favor of Andrew Tate.
I'm like, hold on.
I didn't realize Andrew Tate is, I'm not going to use the word top G ever.
In no realm of the universe did those odds make any sense.
In any given day, typically a fight is going to be 50-50 when there's a 10-year differential.
But they hosted this exclusively on Rumble Premium, and it was flipping amazing.
I mean, I don't like boxing as much as I like UFC or MMA.
I find boxing, you know, it's a little one-dimensional.
You can only punch.
UFC, MMA, you can kick, break arms, submit, choke, no fish hooking, no eye gouging.
But back in the early days, UFC won, two, and three.
Holy crap.
But then, meanwhile, it was a great event and it went to a decision.
It was majority 220 because one of the judges had it a tied match.
But now, you see, no, Andrew Tate losing that fight is people can make fun all they want.
I don't know why people are making fun of the other guy there, Jake Paul, for having lost that fight so badly.
He broke his jaw in two different places.
Oh my goodness.
At the end of the fight, Jake Paul, if you have your little Andrew's not 50.
Andrew is 40.
He's 39.
Unless I'm totally wrong.
There's no way I'm wrong.
How old is Andrew Tate?
No, he's 39 years old.
I'm not going crazy.
Jake Paul with a broken jaw.
Oh my gosh.
And people are mocking him.
You don't make fun of someone because they lost.
You can make fun of someone because they didn't try.
You can make fun of someone because they gave up.
And you sure as hell should make fun of someone if they throw a fight.
But it was a good fight.
And I mean, I think there's just something at some point, age, a 10-year differential.
There is beauty, there is strength, there is power, there is resilience in youth.
And you start to lose it as you get older.
And maybe I say this as a 47-year-old man who's complaining about shoulder brisitis that I can't quite bowl the 220s consistently that I used to bowl.
Pardon me, 39 going on 50.
Well, that was wrong.
Okay.
Let's talk about the Epstein continued debacle, the unforced error that is causing a rupture, causing a tear in the right.
Unnecessarily so, because you have folks on the right who believe that being loyal to the Trump administration means excusing every unforced gaffe by members of the Trump administration.
And you have, I'm not calling them sycophants.
Maybe I have already, and maybe some of them act like sycophants.
You have people defending the indefensible.
And the indefensible here is not Trump's not implicated.
The indefensible is not asserting Trump's innocence or non-implication in the Epstein files.
The indefensible is defending this debacle that is now going on six months of the bungled release of the Epstein documents or the failure to launch of the release, which led to Bindergate, which led to six months of some infighting.
People saying, no, no, no, Trump is telling us to not care about it anymore.
Move on.
Some of us didn't.
Some of us took flack for that, only so that six months later, Trump can come around and say, yes, okay, I agree.
It's important.
Release it all.
And you have that only after Thomas Massey and Roe Khanna join forces to some extent on this particular issue, only on their behalves to have their coalition co-opted by anti-Trump activists on the left.
And then people say, well, look what Thomas Massey is doing.
He's causing damage to Trump because his move to force the release of the documents is allowing the anti-Trump rabbit at TDS afflicted people who still think Trump is a pedo in the files to coalesce together and use it as a cudgel against Trump.
That's not Thomas Massey's fault.
People need to understand that.
That is Trump and Bondi's fault.
And I should say this: it's Trump's fault for putting Bondi in a position to cause this problem for no better reason.
Now, some of us have been on this from the beginning, and some of us have been saying, holy crap, when Trump is told to believe that this is a hoax that the Democrats are going to use against him, it's because people like Pan Bondi haven't actually really meaningfully looked into the files and they see Trump's name all over the files and they say, oh my goodness, it's going to implicate you.
So we've got to stall and cause a bunch of problems doing what we never needed to do in the first place because your name's in it and they're going to say you're implicated.
Dumb.
It was a bad decision, what Bondi did.
It discredited all of the so-called far-right MAGA influencers who came to the White House that day, who got caught up in Bindergate.
It discredited them through no fault of their own.
The Liz Wheelers of the world, the DC Drainos.
I don't say discredited them to anybody who knows the story, but it allows and facilitates an argument of discrediting them for those who want to.
Every anti-Trump TDS afflicted idiot, and I would even dare say some of the DeSantis holdouts, just posts that picture of binders and say, oh, look at these idiots.
Why would you trust anything they have to say?
So Bondi, I don't think actually knows what was in the files.
I'm convinced by that theory, or and that's if I want to impute incompetence to this bungled mess.
And if I want to impute malice, well, then you say, if someone were trying to sabotage Trump and cause a fracture, discredit the most vocal voices in the pro-MAGA camp, if someone wanted to do all of that, what else would they be doing different?
So Bondi, after the Bindergate, after six months of pushback from people who deeply want this administration to succeed, and I'm talking about myself, so you can't just forget about it.
You can't just move on from it.
This was a litmus test issue from the beginning.
And go back and look at my exit captain, put in Viva Fry litmus test, Epstein files.
You'll see it.
Don't have the tweet handy right now.
Maybe I'll find it.
I said, this is a litmus test issue.
If they don't deliver on this, people are going to lose faith and they may or may not ever come back.
Six months later, Trump finally says, okay, fine, we're going to abide by this piece of legislation that Massey and Khanna put forward.
And Trump signs it into law.
They had 30 days to release all of the documentations, save and except for that which would identify victims, protecting victims, fine.
Save and except for stuff which by law would need to be redacted or not disclosed.
I would presume they would have to just, you know, explain what it was that they were not disclosing and the basis of law for which they were not disclosing it.
And on Friday, on Friday, what happens?
Let me just show you this.
This is Thomas Massey, who retweeted a video from Caitlin Collins.
And I'll tell you this: when you are allowing, through your bungled delivery, Caitlin Collins to look like she's delivering news, to look like she's in the right, you're failing.
Let me see this here.
Put the volume up here.
Listen to this.
We're actually in this morning talking, and we said, look, we're willing to give them some benefit of the doubt as long as the quality of the release is substantive.
But what we found out is the most important documents are missing.
They've had excessive redactions.
And the central question that Americans want to know: who are the other rich and powerful men on the island raping these young girls or covering up has not been answered.
So those two documents that you were told by the survivor's attorneys that are the most important, the indictment that came out before Jeffrey Epstein got a sweetheart deal and an 82-page memo backing up why he should be charged.
Neither of those are in this release tonight.
Neither of them are in the release.
And to the extent the drafter's intent of a law matters, Thomas Massey and I explicitly drafted it to cover those two documents.
And you had three federal judges look at our law and say, release everything in terms of the grand jury.
You had judges saying release it, and then the Department of Justice is redacting it.
Now, I know what they're thinking.
They think, okay, it's going to be Christmas.
They're going to do this release and people are going to move on.
I would just remind them that's what they thought that the Trump administration thought when they shut down Congress early before the August recess.
Well, I could disagree with Rochana there.
If he believes that, that's a bad assessment.
The last nine months has shown that no one's going to forget about this.
But this is Caitlin Collins saying, Rep Rokana, this is her tweet, says there were two key documents the survivors wanted released, a 60-count indictment before Epstein got his sweetheart deal and an 82-page memo backing it up, but neither are in today's release.
Then you got Thomas Massey saying Attorney General Pam Bondi is withholding specific documents that the law required her to release today.
Now, I said in response to that, you can say whatever you want about Roquana and Thomas Massey.
Impug their intentions, call them traitors, whatever.
You could insult you.
They might be liars and they might be the worst people on earth.
Doesn't change a damn thing.
The Epstein failure to disclose has been the biggest and continued unforced error of Trump's second term.
From Bindergate to this debacle, if Bondi were deliberately trying to sabotage this administration, I don't know what she would be doing differently.
It's not for D Chess.
It's amateur hour.
And that's assuming you want to impute all of this to incompetence.
Then I have people telling me, and I'm not stupid.
I understand these arguments.
His bill he co-sponsored literally included redactions.
You're smarter than this, Viva.
It's so original.
A, and if I'm wrong, this is why I not test certain things with the internet.
If I'm wrong, I will gladly correct, revise, and if necessary, apologize.
This was the actual document.
Like I had to go and look at this and see what the hell was going on because I saw a video and I thought, oh, this has got to be a joke.
This is the document that was redacted.
And it's however many pages of pure black.
Now, note the number.
It says EFT.
It ends in 5590.
That's the document.
This entire document, even the number of lines per page was redacted.
The argument is going to be grand jury statements or grand jury testimony can't be disclosed.
Well, A, it can be if the law provides for it and the law does provide for it under certain circumstances.
If the reason for which this was redacted top to bottom, entirely in black, was because it was grand jury testimony that by law needs to be redacted, you specify the redactions.
Everybody knows there's codes for redactions.
What you don't get to do is just black out an entire document with no explanation and then expect people to swallow it and have them say at the same time, yeah, it's mainstream fake news that's true that we're going to need additional time.
So we can't deliver.
You had 30 days to do it by law.
Absolute unforced nonsense.
Now, someone did say to me, Viva, that document, they subsequently released it and it's this.
It's not this.
As far as I can tell, it's not this because I'm looking at the EFT, the number on the bottom.
The serial numbers don't match.
But what do you have here?
Oh, United States grand jury, Southern District of New York.
And you have the names of people that are redacted.
And you have the parties.
United States of America versus Ghelaine Maxwell.
What is this?
Oh, this is grand jury testimony that they can release.
I don't know if this document is the other document.
I don't think it is because the numbers on the bottom don't match up.
But don't give me bullshit and say, oh, you're so stupid because I just, I want to defend this administration no matter what happens, even if it's hurting them.
Well, that makes you an idiot.
You're complicit in hurting the administration.
You claim to want to help.
So I don't know if this document is the same thing.
I just know that this looks a whole hell of a lot like some grand jury testimony and it's redacted to protect people.
Now, it looks like it's here.
It's protecting the agents and the detectives, but I suspect it's protecting the witnesses as well.
So there's no need to defend the indefensible.
not helping anybody by facilitating their own self-destruction.
What Viva won't tell you is the effing CIA is in charge of it all.
I've said this multiple times.
Go look at how many tweets I've put.
First of all, I've on a number of occasions asked if the CIA has done a name check of Epstein and their files.
I've had Mike Benz on in the past and I'd love to have him on again.
By the way, if they know that the CIA is involved in all of this and this is what they're putting out as the distraction, here are your crumbs, they're complicit in the cover-up.
So what you're saying still doesn't make any sense.
Yeah, okay, fine.
Let me take all I'll operate on the basis.
The CIA has everything.
The DOJ knows it.
And they can't, well, they're participating right now in the cover-up then.
So your explanation is actually even more corrupt than the one I'm offering, which is this is either an unforced error of the highest order, or people are trying to fraction, faction, and divide the MAGA Trump or the conservative movement so that the midterms are awash, I should say, a bath.
And I won't use certain terms because the less those get taken out of context.
And 2028 goes to the Democrats.
And then all of these people are getting impeached, convicted, and removed from office.
Pam Bondi will get impeached, convicted, and removed from office if she's still in office at the time.
Because what's his face?
Rokana, from what I understand, has suggested he's looking to impeach potentially for the failure to do this in accordance with the law.
Is this it?
I think this is the same one before.
From what I understood, Rokana had suggested taking the appropriate action for impeachment.
And then there was a response to that from the administration, which I thought I had on the back burner here somewhere.
Yeah, right here.
From Eric Daughtry.
Breaking.
The Trump DOJ is telling reps Thomas Massey and Rokana, bring it on after they floated impeachment of A.G. Bondi on criminal referrals from the DOJ.
I won't mischaracterize it.
I'm just going to play it.
Let's hear what he has to say.
Congressman Thomas Massey and Rokana, the authors of the Epstein bill, say the partial release of files failed to comply with the law.
They say they are considering looking into the possibility of impeachment proceedings, content, even criminal referrals for obstruction of justice for DOJ officials.
Do you take these threats seriously?
Not even a little bit.
Bring it on.
We are doing everything we're supposed to be doing to comply with this statute.
And Congressman Massey and these other congressmen that are coming out speaking negatively about Director Patel and the Attorney General have no idea what they're talking about.
They know the work that we're going through.
They know what we're doing to protect victims.
Just so you, I'm not going to be any easier on people, an administration that I like versus one that I would be critical of.
They know, you know, you know.
The weakest arguments on earth are, you know that you're wrong.
You know that what you're saying is wrong.
No, tell me.
We know what you've been doing.
We know what the law says.
Can you imagine in any other realm of the universe?
I mean, yeah, I'm trying to comply with your subpoena, but it's hard.
So I won't be able to do it within the legal timeframe.
People go to jail for that.
Oh, and by the way, you might want to learn from it.
People have gone to jail for that.
Democrats have put people in jail for that, for defying congressional subpoenas.
You think if they get into power, they're not going to put people in jail for this?
I mean, just think about what we're doing.
You're talking about a million or so pages.
A million or so pages when Pam Bondi, what is it now, six months ago, said after saying it's on my desk, that there's nothing there to release in the first place.
I mean, these explanations themselves, you could put a montage together and say, oh, I thought there was nothing.
Now there's a million pages.
You've had a month under the law to do it.
You've got all the resources in the world.
You think we're going to say, well, we tried our best, so we didn't comply with the law.
So, you know, never mind, no harm, no foul.
You think that's going to fly if Democrats ever get back into the reins of power?
Impeachment, conviction, removal from office.
And then maybe they're going to continue on with their Rico-type bullshit that they did in Georgia.
And they'll have the power to do it.
Of documents.
Virtually all of them contain victim information.
So listen, the idea that Attorney General Bondi would ever let a single piece of paper go out of this department that contains victim information is something they know we won't do.
He did it again.
They know we won't do that.
Well, then redact it.
You've had a month after six months.
I know what people are saying in the chat.
Like, if you wanted to think about someone who might want to sabotage Trump, you know, what would they be doing differently right now?
And the fact that they're threatening to impeach her for protecting victims is a reflection of where their heads at.
But nobody's accusing them of wanting to impeach her for protecting victims, but for not complying with the law.
I mean, this is just, this is just bad logic.
This is, if this were remotely adversarial, that would be the, I'm sorry, they're threatening impeachment for failure to comply with what you've had a month to comply with after six months of saying you didn't have it in the first place.
It's not a reflection of this department.
We are complying with the statute.
We will continue to comply with the statute.
And if by complying with the statute, we don't produce everything on Friday, we produce things next week and the week after, that's still compliance with the statute.
There is well-settled law, as they should know, that in a case like this where we're required to produce within a certain amount of time, but also comply with other laws like redacting information, that very much trumps.
Redacting information very much trumps some deadline in the statute.
Congress Massey and Rokana, we're complying with the law, but there's exceptions that would explain us not complying with the law.
Some deadline in the law.
That looks like sabotage to me.
Yeah, no, no.
We're doing our best.
How dare anyone want to impeach Pam Bondi for protecting victims?
No, that's not what anyone is suggesting impeaching her for.
What they will, however, impeach her for is not complying with the law.
Oh, some deadline that's in some statute?
Yeah, it's called the law.
Oh, so you have a deadline, but because of the importance of something, you have more deadlines.
Like some deadlines are more equal than others.
Pam Walker says, Do you follow Mike Benz on X?
I posted a video yesterday by him following the money all the way back to the Iran-Contra affair.
Absolutely.
First of all, I follow Mike Benz.
I posted another segment that he posted where if we're talking the Epstein, he talked about that when he was on.
Was it him or who else would have talked about that on my channel?
Fairly certain it was Mike Benz.
Went all the way back to Iran-Contra.
Anyway, bottom line.
He sounds like a Democrat and he does.
This is from Dirk Gently, who says he sounds like a Democrat and so does Bondi.
Fire them all and put Ed Martin in charge with Alina Habba Hubba Hubba and his number two.
Absolutely.
And we know Todd Blanche's history.
This is not criticism for the sake of destruction.
This is criticism because it's objective.
It's black on white, pun intended, given the nature of those redactions.
And you can make all the excuses in the world.
The only people who are going to buy those bullshit excuses are people who are already so blindly convinced it doesn't matter.
There are plenty of people.
And even between Massey and Rokana, imagine you play this properly and you comply and you actually sway the voters or the supporters of both Rokana and Tom Massey.
Imagine what you have then for the midterms.
And the amazing thing is, maybe this all plays out absolutely perfectly.
Maybe this plays out that the information comes out on the eve of the 2026 midterms.
It is as damning as I believe it is to Democrats and it actually sways the midterms.
Maybe that works.
And if that's what you're playing for, you're taking one hell of a gambit.
Maybe that's the way it pans out.
But for the time being, it's caused unnecessary damage.
And even if it does pan out that way, you don't get to claim he was playing 50D chess because it didn't have to go that way and rely on that Hail Mary.
Because you know what I bet?
Do y'all remember this picture?
But this one's old.
This one's as old as Bethusela.
This one's as old as Bill Clinton.
Look at that face.
Oh, yeah.
And it's the underjaw.
It's like the underbite of a bulldog.
Oh, yeah.
Getting that deep tissue massage.
That's Virginia Guffray, one of Jeffrey Epstein's sex victims.
I was like, oh, my goodness.
Once you see Bill Clinton's O-face, you never unsee it.
I was like, oh, this is a picture that just came out, released, redacted.
And I do wonder who's behind that redaction.
Is it an unnecessary redaction to make Bill Clinton look a little bit more sus?
It's like, oh, I know that face.
I know that Bill Clinton O-face.
And it's the stuff of nightmares that you don't want to know about.
He's sitting in a hot tub somewhere in the Epstein place in a moment of what's the word I'm looking for?
Superficial body pleasure.
This is what's coming out of it.
Whether or not there are other people and they're actively trying to protect for other people in the administration or within the orbit, I don't know.
But the problem is this.
Whether or not the Hail Mary works out and this information comes out on the eve of the 2026 midterms and it's a which way does it go in America?
In Canada, it's the blue-red is totally inverted.
It's a red wave.
CBC, because you know they talk about Canadian news, at least 16 files have disappeared from the DOG webpage for Epstein documents since their release.
Missing documents include an image of a drawer containing a photograph of Donald Trump.
Oh yeah, I would really be more concerned about a drawer of a photograph of Donald Trump as opposed to Bill Clinton getting a back massage by a sex victim and in a jacuzzi.
At least 16 files disappeared from the webpage, yada, yada, yada, including a photograph showing U.S. President Donald Trump less than a day after they were posted with no explanation given.
Oh.
Missing files, which were available Friday, are no longer and no longer accessible Saturday, include images of paintings depicting nude women and one showing a series of photographs along a credenza in drawers.
In that image, inside a drawer, was a photograph of Trump alongside Epstein Melania and Epstein's longtime associate.
DOJ did not say why it removed the photos, why they're dead, or whether their disappearance was intentional.
Online, the unexplained missing files fueled speculation, but what was taken down and why the public was not notified, compounding long-standing intrigue.
So great, it's just great.
Transparency, just take it down, no explanation.
I don't even know if, like, maybe they uploaded them by accident.
Who the hell knows?
But what was revealed?
And the more that's revealed, the more the usual suspects in incriminating situations come up.
Photos from the latest batch of Epstein files.
Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and Richard Branson among the people who appeared in the thousands of documents released by the U.S. Justice Herman on Friday.
By the way, stuff we were told didn't exist, apparently.
Let's go down here.
I want to see who these are.
So we've got Sarah Ferguson in a partially redacted photo.
Bill Clinton in a partially redacted photo.
Well, at least he's got his, looks like he's got his shorts on.
Then we got this guy here, Richard Branson.
Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein.
Jeffrey Epstein, partially redacted, surrounded by what appear to be probably, well, that looks naked.
And I would imagine they're either young or whatever.
Glaine Maxwell, Chris Tucker, partially redacted photo.
Glaine Maxwell and David Copperfield.
Glene Maxwell, former Prince Andrew.
Oh, Prince Andrew.
Where do I know him from?
Oh, yeah, that's right.
Bill Clinton, partially redacted.
We can, I would presume that that one, they've redacted the photograph in the back as well.
Presume that that's Glaine Maxwell.
Bill Clinton, McJagger, Glaine Maxwell.
My goodness.
I tell you, sometimes it's good not to have that many friends, people.
Jeffrey Epstein, Michael Jackson.
Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey.
Jeffrey Epstein, redacted.
Chris Tucker.
McJagger.
Holy crab apples, people.
Yep, that's it.
Get married young.
Stay married.
Keep your schmeckle in your pants.
Don't go out after 10 o'clock at night.
Nothing good happens after 10 o'clock at night.
That's the Epstein stuff.
What else is going on here?
Let me see here.
Ginger Ninja.
Oh, let me see if I can bring these up over in Rumble itself.
Ooh, I don't know if I have an energy drink here to drink.
I'm now realizing I had two cups of coffee this morning.
Blanche says, bring it on.
Agreed.
Let the impeachments roll.
Put all of them behind bars.
Got the Republican Party for complicity in these massive human rights abuses.
May they go the way of the Whigs.
Ginger Ninja says, Paul paid Tyson to get beat in a fight.
I will mock him as much as possible when he gets what's coming to him.
Yeah, I forgot about that.
Okay, so never mind.
I know, Broken Jaws Banner are particularly terrible.
And then we got Super Buffshaft who said that over there.
Let's see what's going on in VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
Over here.
Never have children in the, never have children in the open-air prisons we are in.
Anita B. Nah.
Okay, so I don't get this one, Bill.
Wayman, Waymoint, who the I don't get it.
Someone's going to see what that means.
Susanna 8 says, my daughter has a degree in brainwashing.
My daughter has a degree of brainwashing, but she gives me free reign with my grandson.
He learns of Jesus and Christian values from me and how we have little boys.
Fantastic.
The icy one I get.
What am I looking at here?
Who did this come from?
This came from a special SOV.
He is not a prince anymore.
All right.
Well, that's what's going on with Epstein.
That's what's going on.
Let's see what we talked about here.
Hold on, crack my fingers.
Crack my back.
Oh, there we go.
What did I have on the back here?
First of all, what did I put in the title?
We should make sure we get everything.
TPUSA pylon continues.
Oh, yes.
Well, make sure not to forget about that.
When you're on what the expression is that when you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to take a moment to reflect.
I'm not saying that the people criticizing TPUSA Erica Kirk are anywhere near on the side of the majority, but both sides of the aisle here, the criticizing Candace and the criticizing Megan Kelly, and inversely their side criticizing TPUSA, criticizing Erica Kirk, they've reached a certain critical mass where everybody feels empowered basically to say and do anything,
no matter how egregiously unfair it is or no matter how wildly stupid it is.
The crowd going after Megan Kelly for not, I guess, you know, publicly disavowing Tucker, Candace, etc., the fight that's going on at Amfest now, very public.
I say you should not fight with friends or allies publicly, but sometimes it's unavoidable.
I'll take my, you know, I will criticize Candace when she deserves it.
And recently, she's really been, you know, going a bridge too far in a great many respects.
But I do genuinely and sincerely feel that what the heck is going on to Megan Kelly is wildly unfair.
That Megan, because people now feel morally justified, and I argue say rightly so in going after Candace for what she's been doing going after TPUSA, saying, unless Megan Kelly disavows Tucker Carlson, disavows Candace Owens publicly, like she has to do it publicly, like this is the new struggle session of the right, it's wildly unfair.
Candace has said some incredibly outrageous things in the latest response to Ben Shapiro's attack on her.
I mean, it's great.
I mean, this is a factioning off, and we'll see what happens when it comes time to vote during the 2026 midterms.
But the treatment of Megan Kelly, I think, is just wildly unfair.
That being said, it seems that the camps have achieved a certain critical mass that people feel empowered to be unfair, so long as they get the cheer and the support of their relatively sizable respective mobs.
I mean, both sides have their mobs now.
There's no question about it.
Joshua Hull, and I'm not trying to put him on blast just because Patriot, freed political prisoner.
I presume that means a Jan Sixer retweets a video from MS Now.
They've changed their name from MSNBC to MS Nowk.
It's the worst thing ever.
Like, it sounds like multiple sclerosis now.
I'm like, oh, hey, guys, did you hear about MS Now?
It's like, yeah, what are they doing?
They're raising money for multiple sclerosis.
No, it's a news organization.
It's the shithole that used to be MSNBC.
They put out a video, and this is how they frame, this is how they describe the prove-me-wrong tent, which was set up at Amfest, which is still going on as we speak.
You can see from behind me, this is a recreation of the tent where Charlie Kirk lost his life at Utah University in September, and people are taking selfies with it.
You can see from behind me, this is a recreation of the tent where Charlie Kirk lost his life.
Pause.
First of all, lost his life, like it just wandered away from him, where he was brutally murdered by a furry trans unhinged lunatic of the left.
Just say it properly first, is a recreation of the tent where Charlie Kirk lost his life?
Like, sometimes I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Maybe it's because I'm a lawyer or former lawyer, placing a little bit too much emphasis and value on the meaning and importance of words.
That's not a recreation of the tent where Charlie was killed.
That is the tent that they toured the country with, the prove-me-wrong tent that they had at every event.
So I disagree with the stupid bullshit MSNBC framing of this woman who's it's a recreation of the assassination.
No, it's not.
No, it's not.
I can give you 15 pictures of every other event that proved me wrong.
And so I would say that that's stupid bullshit propagandist fake news framing.
And then you get people who are on Team Candace, I guess, or let me not reduce it that much, who think that TPUSA, I don't know, deserves to be criticized for their handling of the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination, putting out stuff like this, breaking.
Charlie Kirk's widow, Erica Kirk, created a reenactment of the booth that Charlie Kirk was tragically shot and assassinated in for attendees of Turning Point USA Conference to take selfies with.
I'm sorry, but what is wrong with Erica Kirk?
She isn't acting like a widow.
It's like it's somehow glorifying and profiting off her husband's death.
She doesn't appear to be grieving.
She is grifting.
Absolutely disgraceful.
First things for, I know she's the CEO.
So she's responsible for everything that Turning Point does.
This is not a reenactment of the assassination booth.
What people are basically saying here, and it's driving me up a freaking wall, is that TPUSA has to shut down.
No more cardboard cutouts of Charlie Kirk.
No one can pose with a Charlie Kirk cutout ever again.
At any TPUSA event, they can't have an image of Charlie Kirk because people will take pictures with it in a tribute to Charlie Kirk.
I just said this is how rapidly stupid the anti-TPUSA Erica Kirk out of gotten.
Unironically repeating MSNBC propaganda because it fits their insatiable desire to harass to harassing a widow and promote insane theories.
A recreation of the tent where Charlie Kirk lost his life.
You idiot.
It's not the tent.
It's the same tent they put up at every TPUSA event.
Congrats on apparently believing and even worse, amplifying with approval MS Now propaganda.
You ask what is wrong with Erica.
I ask what is wrong with you.
Delete, apologize, and reflect.
Here's one.
Prove me wrong.
Same tent.
Here's another one.
I don't know if this is from the same event.
I tried to make sure that I was finding ones where his clothing was different.
At another event, prove me wrong tent.
Here's the one from the last event that they held.
So what do people expect?
What do the people expect them to do right now?
Do they expect TPUSA to fold up shop?
Well, we can't.
We can't raise any more money.
Or we can't raise any more money while mentioning what happened to the man who was the face of this organization.
Can't go on tour anymore.
Can't have any pictures of Charlie Kirk out there.
We have to retire the prove me wrong tent.
Certainly can't set it up at any events in the future.
God forbid people would want to have a photograph of them at the tent that toured the country.
They can't raise money.
Erica Kirk apparently has to be in a fetal position in a bathroom for the rest of her life.
Otherwise, she's not grieving enough.
And people think it's somehow justifiable to impugn the intentions of this organization endlessly and the intentions of a widow whose husband was brutally murdered?
I mean, it's insanity.
Congratulations.
Basically, want to fulfill the wish of the assassin, which was to turn TPUSA into something of the past.
And it's, it's, it's, what I find also amazing is when Megan Kelly came out and said, look, I don't think Israel was involved in the killing, but I support Candace asking questions, asking these questions.
And you might find that offensive.
And if you're going to say, I don't know that it was Candace who revealed the text messages, because I don't think it was, but when you had Harrison, it was Harrison Faulkner, right?
Who before Charlie was assassinated, put out a video that said, if something happens, you know, it was when you have that, you want to tell people they can no longer ask these questions?
No, you could keep asking questions, but the continuing of asking of questions or asserting of facts in the absence of any evidence proves a certain unhinged element.
But if it were not for certain scrutiny, one might not know what was going on behind closed doors, not as relates to the assassination or the plot, but as relates to what goes on at these organizations and the influence and power that donors exert on what people perceive to be independent organizations.
And so to that extent, there has been some political value to some of the questions that have been asked in terms of what influence do any donors exert on an organization to which they donate.
And I go back to Mike Cernovich's take on this.
If you think Israel was involved in the assassination, you're hallucinating or coming to conclusions based on evidence that doesn't exist or does not yet exist.
So congratulations.
If you were unaware of the insidious influence and pressure campaigns that are waged by donors on organizations for the price of their donation, now you know it's ugly.
That doesn't mean that Israel was involved in assassinating Charlie Kirk and all of these questions and at least some of the attacks on Erica, attacks on TPUSA and statements, not questions, but affirmations that Israel was involved without any proof to that effect other than these text messages, which don't prove any involvement in the act, but do prove certain influence behind the scenes.
You're actually doing the Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs and radical leftist deviants who killed Charlie Kirk because of what he believed and because of what he professed.
You're doing them a whole hell of a lot of favors.
So congratulations.
That's all I have to say about that.
What we're going to do is take this party to the after party at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Ginger ninja in the house says, it's like DeSimps that begrudgingly joined and then pretended they called the shots for MAGA.
These people say they quote care and quote about Charlie more than his freaking wife and kids and want to boss around TPUSA.
Now, some might say that some of them actually want TPUSA to break up, to dissolve, to die with Charlie, because they didn't want MAGA to succeed in the first place.
And this is one hell of a way of making sure that there is a political fractioning of the right that will make the next midterms a landslide and potentially 2028 a disaster for conservatives, for Republicans, for MAGA, and for America.
Because the motherfuckers who impeached, sorry, the motherfuckers who impeached Trump twice, who sent Bannon, who sent Navarro to jail for contempt of Congress, they will get back into power and they will rain down holy hell on everyone, even the ones who now say, oh, I'm with you.
I criticize TPUSA.
Don't line me up against the wall.
Showtime tomorrow, Dan Sundon, three o'clock is going to be the Sunday show with Robert Barnes.
Three o'clock Eastern Standard Time.
That's it.
Now we're going to go have a bit of an after-party at vivawrencelaw.locals.com.
Then I'm going to exercise.
I'm going to do my push-ups.
And then I'm going to go have a Christmas party.
I like Christmas.
I like the presents.
I like the food, but I don't feel good about eating the food unless I've gotten my exercise.
And it was funny.
I just, I found something that a relic from the past.
That is it.
3 Eastern, Roxy Ann.
Yes.
And everybody out there, we'll see you tomorrow.
I don't know.
When is Christmas actually?
It's December 25th.
I'm an idiot.
Sorry, hold on.
Christmas date.
It's December 25th.
I'm just making sure.
What day is it today?
So it's in four days.
Everybody, Merry Christmas.
We should say nothing.
Here, here, this is a man.
Christian in Christine in Texas.
Oh, so Viva believes the Fed slop.
I love it.
I'm going to channel Scott Adams and everyone should pray up for Scott Adams.
Christine in Texas, how does it feel having ridiculous arguments with yourself?
So I believe, hey, by the way, if the Feds tell you the earth is round, are you going to believe the earth is flat just because the Fed said it?
So do I believe the Fed slop that Tyler acted alone?
No.
Do I believe the Fed slop that Crooks acted alone?
No.
Do I believe that Crooks shot at Donald Trump and killed Cora Protein?
Yes.
Do I believe that despite, am I going to not believe that just because the Fed said it?
You want to think you're making a good point.
Oh, so you're going to believe the Fed slop?
But if you don't want to believe what you have evidence to believe, regardless of who says it, enjoy being perpetually ignorant.
I don't believe that Tyler Robinson acted alone.
But until demonstrable evidence to the contrary, above and beyond somebody saying that's how a 30-aught six behaves, I believe Robinson fired the round that killed Charlie Kirk.
When people say, oh, he didn't admit to it.
Well, unless you're saying that those text messages are outright manufactured fake evidence, and if you're saying that, how can I disprove that?
You're saying, oh, his parents didn't turn him in.
Well, unless you're saying that his parents are now in court with him and not announcing the fact that he's not the one that they turned in because they thought he did it, you're making up evidence and you're disregarding the best evidence that currently exists, irrespective of who said it.
So if you think you're smarter just to say, I don't believe anything the Fed says, even if I have good reason to believe it, you're not smarter.
you're not adding to the discussion, and you'll actually just successfully confuse yourself into believing the earth is flat.
Hold on.
LMAO, my fingerprint on a family gun, got that to stick.
FSC.
And the other thing is the irony is I've asked, Robinson is the Patsy and didn't do it, Daniel Bush.
Okay, who did do it?
I don't know.
What was it?
You're going with the lapel mic or the detonator or the snipers from planes?
What evidence are you relying on that you've manufactured or does not yet exist in order to come to that conclusion?
Viva, you should bring up that debate at the Christmas dinner.
Oh, the other amazing thing is I've offered not to have a debate because it's not a debate.
I want to explore the reasoning of, you know, I've invited Ian Carroll on and he has effectively now ghosted me for the last little while, which is fine.
I've asked Ian Carroll to come on.
I've asked Candice to come on.
I'm not big enough for Candace, I guess, and I don't care.
I've had Chris Martinson on to talk about it and we had a very meaningful discussion.
I got to understand where I think the weaknesses in his position are.
I understand the basis for it.
But, you know, it's the irony.
It's the people asking these, just asking questions who also refuse to have open discussions about it.
I don't know.
And then you say, well, go watch endless hours of pontificating, of their just asking questions, and you'll get all the answers.
No, sit down, have a discussion, and I'll ask these questions.
All right.
So Tyler Robinson didn't shoot him.
How did Charlie Kirk die?
Oh, you're one of the ones who doesn't believe that Charlie Kirk is dead.
It was CGI.
His body went on the ground and they just ushered him off because they want to pretend he's dead.
He's actually still alive.
And I appreciate there's people out there.
There's more of a basis to believe that Epstein is still alive.
And I understand how some people believe that.
But then you've got to have evidence that he somehow is alive above and beyond just, oh, yeah, look at the corner, the earlobes, the nose.
in this day and age to maintain someone totally anonymous undetected that's amazing these big points would never have been known if candace would have dug into it Facts, disagree, disagree.
I think some of it actually had come out right.
Who was it?
It was Harrison Faulkner, I think, who made the, who had put that video up that went viral afterwards.
But yeah, no, I thought, look, some of those text messages are very embarrassing.
And I imagine that there would be people who would want to cover up those text messages, not because it incriminates anyone in an act as of for no evidence yet, but because it's embarrassing.
And it certainly would allow some people to entertain those theories.
Let me see what's going on in the discussion section here.
I like this.
Viva reminds me of a gypsy.
Oh, and okay, well, I didn't realize what we're talking about.
Well, I dare say once you got a certain amount of bots, I guess it's a sign of success.
All right.
Everyone knows that human skin can't stop a 30-odd 60.
You're right.
Because when they said there's no way that it would always go through a body, everyone said that, not realizing that Martin Luther King was shot with a 30-odd 6 and it didn't go through his body.
Then they have to pivot.
Oh, well, it hit him in the jawbone.
And that's a strong bone.
So that stopped the bullet.
So the human body can stop a bullet under certain circumstances is the new argument after asserting that anybody who's hunted knows that a 30-odd 6 goes through a deer.
It'll go through bone.
It'll break through brick.
So this is how you have an endless moving target when people refuse to concede that their initial conclusion or their initial skepticism might not have been warranted.
A 30-odd 6 never always goes through a human body that level of force.
What about Martin Luther King?
Oh, that hit him in the jaw.
Okay, well, this one, the argument is that it hit Charlie Kirk in the spine.
Oh, well, a spine wouldn't stop a bullet like that, but a jawbone would, yeah.
You'll always, and the more that people, you know, criticize or respond to these theories, the more right that people know that they are.
That's the ultimate cultish cop-out that the more people call you crazy, the more right you are.
Sometimes it's true.
But that's it.
All right, people, let's go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party.
We're going to talk, have some fun.
And other than that, go and have a Merry Christmas.
Do not drink and drive, people.
And watch out for drunk drivers.
And watch out for people who shouldn't be driving commercial big rigs when they're in front of you and when they're behind you.
Constant 360, people.
You can see an accident happen in front of you.
Pay attention to the big rigs that might be taking a U-turn on the middle of a four-lane highway.
Pay attention to the ones that are texting on their phones that are going to rear-end you.