Viva & Barnes - White Guilt, or White Supremacy? FBI Ping of Brian Cole Explained! Trans Madness & MORE!

Dec. 11, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:12:49

White Guilt, or White Supremacy? FBI Ping of Brian Cole Explained! Trans Madness & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, it's at moments like this that I'm reminded of what Malcolm X once wisely said.
	I won't repeat it for fear of getting canceled, but you can all Google Malcolm X on white liberal women.
	I will also focus your attention on the eyes.
	When someone is trying to feign sincerity, they lift the eyebrows.
	They make their eyes look nice and friendly while they spew the most vitriolic horseshit you have ever heard.
	Behold, Sarah Stalker, representative from the state of Kentucky.
	I'm going to be honest, I don't feel good about being white every day for a lot of reasons because it's a point of privilege that I get to move through the world in a way that so many of my other colleagues and friends and family members of the community don't get the privilege to do.
	And I'm just a female, but just a woman, just a white woman.
	If I was a white man, I would be functioning from a point of even greater privilege.
	I think we're missing an opportunity when kids have a moment to reflect.
	Do you know what it feels like when you're literally choking on your own bullshit?
	That's what we're seeing right there.
	I sorry, I've interrupted.
	I should let this moment of intellectual wisdom carry on for its full 60 seconds of torture.
	About how the color of their skin does and does not allow them to move through the world.
	It's running to them and trying to stifle that.
	Pause it.
	By the way, everyone, just focus on her nice diamond earrings.
	Focus on her nice diamond ring.
	Trying to all the consequences and results of white privilege.
	The way she just floats through the universe.
	People are just, they throw money at white people.
	They throw diamond rings at white people.
	She just moves through with such white, white privilege.
	Such white, what's the word?
	Oh, like fluidity.
	White fluidity.
	And then for everyone else, how bad it must be to not be white.
	Say, you shouldn't feel bad.
	So we don't want to ever expose you to something that is going to make you have to pause and have maybe some internal feelings.
	It's a missed opportunity for some really good dialogue.
	She looks so sincere in her eyes.
	We're going to get back to this in a second.
	Ordinarily, when someone says, I feel ashamed of being white, I would tell them to kindly go fuck themselves.
	I would say, are you out of your mind?
	Do you, or if you're serious, you're an idiot to say, I'm not, I feel ashamed of an immutable characteristic into which I was born.
	I would say, if you are apologizing for being white, get bent and go to hell.
	The reality is she's not saying, I feel bad for being white.
	She is literally saying, I feel bad for you to be not white.
	I feel bad for all those poor brown, black people who, when I walk through the grocery store, people open the door for me.
	This is not white guilt.
	This is white supremacy in its purest form.
	A white woman looking down at everyone else who's not white, thinking they look up to her because of the color of her skin.
	And what's amazing is they say it so proudly, as if there's some virtue in A, if they were in fact sincere in their beliefs, being ashamed of the color of their skin, which they're not.
	What they're saying is they're ashamed of other people's colors of their skin.
	And then thinking the way she says, like, as I navigate through the world, like as a white person, it's all candy canes and cotton candy.
	People just like, they love me for being white.
	What must it feel like to not be loved for being white?
	That's what's going on in her demented head.
	But I got to bring this up, and I hate to bring this up.
	This is a state rep from Kentucky.
	I can tell you one thing: the last thing on my mind, the last thing that came to my mind was this comment right here.
	She's not white, she's Jewish.
	And I'm like, what the hell?
	First of all, it's going to be taboo and politically incorrect, but one cannot ignore certain phenomena, certain trends.
	And I was like, oh, that's weird.
	How many, how many?
	I mean, not to be stereotype the state of Kentucky.
	I'm like, how many, how many Jewish people live in the state of Kentucky to begin with?
	Let alone what?
	The bottom line is it does so happen that Sarah Stalker is also Jewish.
	Now, why is this relevant?
	I'm going to get called a self-hating Jew.
	One of the, oh, Viva, you're going to be on the trains with the rest of them when they come for us.
	I don't care.
	At least I'm going to be intellectually honest.
	When a white person gets up there and says, you should all be ashamed of being white and you should agree to be treated differently because you're white.
	You should agree to give up some of your rights and your privileges because you have the privilege of being white.
	You should be ashamed of your privilege and the good fortune that goes along with the color of your skin.
	And we should enact laws, racist laws, to compensate for equity to the detriment of people who are white for the color of their skin, to the benefit of people who are not white.
	You'll have someone say that simultaneously while saying, well, as a Jew, you know, we got to have laws that protect us and we've got to have laws that prevent the boycott of the state of Israel.
	We've got to have laws that prevent hate speech against Jews.
	But you whites, now I'm white, everyone.
	So I'll support laws that discriminate against whites.
	But as when it's convenient to be Jewish, I'll say this to protect the identity of Judaism.
	You can't deny that there are very prominent people who adhere to that double standard.
	And to those who are A, white and don't want to be told to feel bad for being white and who are not Jewish and don't want to be told that there are more protections for some whites than for others, you can't deny what that looks like to them.
	Get the one Jewish Kentuckian who ends up in state government trying to tell people to be ashamed for the color of their skin when all that she's saying is, my goodness, I look down on anybody whose skin is brown or black.
	They have it so rough.
	They need me, their white savior, to protect them, to take care of them, to guide them through life and this universe, which is so bad for them because of people like me.
	The soft bigotry of low expectations is still bigotry.
	And anybody thinking that they are privileged because they're white, privileged, which is the definition, is a benefit attributed to a specific group of people.
	There is no privilege in immutable characteristics.
	There's good fortune in some.
	It's good to be healthy.
	It's good to be born with 10 fingers and 10 toes.
	It's not a privilege to be born with 10 fingers and 10 toes.
	It is not a privilege to be black, white, or anything.
	It's a biological fact.
	The privilege that goes along with it is in thinking that you're superior and in implicitly stating that others are inferior because of the color of their skin.
	Serenity now, people.
	How goes the battle?
	Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler, and soon to be in the bad books of people who say, Viva, what are you doing?
	Okay, that's terrible.
	We've got one hell of a show today.
	I had to start with that because it's just, it's too frustrating to live with and to not comment on.
	White people should be ashamed of themselves.
	Black people should be proud to be black.
	You know, you got black pride, you got Asian pride, you got brown pride.
	White pride, racist.
	Jewish pride, absolutely fine.
	Catholic pride, Christian pride, racist.
	Muslim pride, fantastic.
	Hindu pride, amazing.
	Buddha pride, amazing.
	But white Christian working class, feel ashamed, be ashamed, and give up your shit because you didn't earn it.
	You don't deserve it.
	And sorry, those white folk living in trailer parks who have it extremely difficult, despite the color of their skin, for the indentured Irish servants, forget them.
	You have it good compared to the other people who really have it bad.
	Let me see here.
	Viva, Kentucky, primarily the city of Louisville, has been run by people of Jewish descent for decades.
	Jerry Abram, Greg Fisher, and now Craig Greenberg.
	Well, look, what I'll say is this: one cannot deny the statistical overrepresentation when they want to take pride in it.
	You know, scientists, laureates, artists, whatever.
	And one cannot claim that observing the statistical overrepresentation is anti-Semitic when you don't like it.
	That being said, in as much as there is statistical overrepresentation in, take the impeachments, for example, in progressive, what some people might call degenerate social movements, there is as much statistical overrepresentation on the other side.
	And you'll get some of that statistical overrepresentation tomorrow when you watch the Rubin report with me, Gad Sad, and Dave Rubin.
	And it was one heck of a spicy episode.
	So check that out.
	And how goes the battle, everybody?
	We are live across Rumble, vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
	And for whatever the reason, I set it up on Twitter.
	I don't know how many people watch on Twitter, but it doesn't matter.
	Today, we're going to talk about something very, very important.
	I was talking with Kyle Serafin, FBI whistleblower persona non-grata, among certain ranks of the government.
	I was talking with him before the show, and he was explaining something to me.
	And I was like, you got to come on and explain this to everybody because I don't think people understand certain A weaknesses of this case.
	I mean, I think we all do, but the details of it.
	So Kyle's going to come on in two seconds, and I'm going to start the segment without this broken introduction.
	Kyle Serafin, come on in and say hi to everyone and make them smarter.
	Tell them how this works.
	And we're going to go over the pinging of this case.
	First of all, Kyle, beginning and we will end with it.
	Who are you and where can people find you?
	I am Kyle Serafin.
	I'm a former FBI agent.
	I like to say a recovering FBI agent.
	I'm a husband.
	I'm a father.
	I am a white man, a white man with blue eyes wearing a black shirt.
	I'll do the Kamala Harris intro.
	I exist in a state of incredible privilege as I move through the world.
	And for all who are not as I am, please look upon me and despair.
	That's what I have to say about that.
	But I used to work for the government.
	I was a paramedic.
	I worked in the Air Force.
	I was in the Air Force for four years as well.
	And before that, I did regular people jobs.
	So I've weighted tables and I've worked in finance and I've sold computers and I've banged on doors and sold.
	In fact, even the chair that I'm sitting in.
	Viva, I used to sell this exact model of chair in 2005 in San Francisco.
	I wheeled it around on the BART trains and took it into people's offices and tried to sell them chairs, which is a U.S.-made product.
	And so I've done a bunch of like regular dude things.
	I'm being told that your audio might be a little hot.
	Hot.
	Let me see if that and how about now?
	I could just turn it down a little bit.
	Okay, just a touch.
	I think it'll be good enough.
	He's a Fed PSYOP.
	I've psyoped you so hard as you and I talk randomly about all kinds of stuff.
	Hey, look, bottom line, you might be a psyop.
	Can I actually say the FBI, having worked there, they're not actually capable of running a psyop as good as Kyle Serafin.
	Well, first of all, I don't, you might turn out to be one.
	It doesn't mean you don't have useful things to teach me and that I can learn from.
	So I just won't, you know, I won't trust you with too much.
	Kyle, so you're an FX FBI whistleblower.
	Some people say once FBI, always FBI.
	People can watch you and they can just, they can come to their own conclusions.
	I'm going to destroy this FBI in the next couple of weeks.
	It's going to be done.
	I actually just reached out to Brian Cole's attorney and he finally got back to me, which I'm pretty excited about.
	I've been leaving messages with him, but I finally got through on text.
	And yeah, and I'm also being sued by the FBI director's girlfriend for an inordinately ridiculous amount of money, as you covered yesterday.
	I heard you live say it, your prediction.
	So I'm holding you to it.
	And I'm hoping to, you know, I've been on a good, I've been on a good run these days.
	So we'll see if that one comes true.
	Okay, so look, we need to go over this because the pings, this entire case against Brian Kohler, at least what evidence we have to date says that they know it was him because a year and a half to two years before the pipe bombs were planted, he bought some materials.
	We don't know what else he bought with it.
	If anything, he bought the materials about a year and a half to two years earlier, and that's how he had it.
	Still no comments on the black powder, how he had that and the ingredients, but whatever.
	And he was in the area as pinged by cell towers.
	That's right.
	Now, it's confusing in the affidavit.
	I mean, it's confusing if you don't know the technology.
	Armitas put out a tweet.
	This is the other day in response to, it's an incognito, but it says, the problem is the first cell phone ping from tower or whatever is in the wrong section compared to where the pipe armor actually was.
	But without getting into that, I think we need to explain to people how this works.
	And I feel like I had a more backed out version because I think we need the more backed out version of the cell towers, right?
	I sent you one, and so you'll have that in your text message thread between us.
	Oh, great.
	Now that now the feds are going to be looking through my text messages.
	Well, they might as well.
	I know, first of all, I took for granted they would be in any let me see here.
	Okay, so let me bring this up and we're going to see if I can't have to ride this.
	Let's see what sort of things you accidentally reveal.
	Oh, no, no.
	I am so bloody neurotic about all of this stuff.
	But why can't I find, I want to see a window, entire screen.
	Oh, for goodness sake.
	Share the window only.
	Yeah, but this is just because I'm an idiot.
	No.
	Kyle, do you have it?
	Did you tweet it out at any point?
	No, I don't know if I did, but I could probably share it if it's helpful.
	Yeah, share it on your end.
	Yeah, let me take over here and help you.
	What the heck?
	No, because usually I see to the backdrop.
	I know it.
	I think I can actually present and share this.
	I'm getting better at using Rumble Studio because of you.
	Oh, thank you.
	You'll teach me one of these days.
	Not that I chose to do it.
	Let's see.
	Share this.
	How do you feel about that?
	That's what we like.
	Okay.
	So we were talking about this earlier in order to understand how they've identified where the pinging is versus where the cell towers are or the towers that ping them.
	So everybody needs to understand this.
	Once you understand this, you will understand either what is to come or at the very least, the potential weaknesses of the evidence thus far in the affidavit based on what has been disclosed thus far.
	So everybody's looking at this.
	You see two number ones, you see two number twos, you see two number threes, and you see two number fours.
	That's right.
	So the one that we're seeing here, forget the little let me do a circle so people can see it.
	I'm going to direct your eyes to the center of the screen.
	You're going to see a number one and my cursor is on it.
	Okay.
	So right there, that is a ping.
	That is a ping.
	Well, that is where they identified the ping.
	That's correct.
	But what people need to understand is the legs, we're going to call them the legs of the colors that are spread and they're spread open.
	So in the sense of this way.
	They're an acute angle.
	Acute.
	What's the other one?
	I'm sorry.
	No, they're actually they're an obtuse angle, aren't they?
	I'm saying acute, but no, no, they're a greater than 90 degree angle.
	They're 120 degrees, but it's not going to be the broader 270.
	It's the 120.
	Yeah, so we're going to say, like, imagine not to say like the spreading of legs, but these are like a spread of legs.
	So in between the V of the legs, what we're looking at is three example.
	Yeah.
	Is the tower, and the spread is what that tower covers by way of its reach in terms of identifying pings within its coverage, its spectrum.
	Right.
	So, Armitas, the guy that you were just showing on Twitter, Armitas has been responsible for the Blaze video analysis, or at least some of it.
	And he's a, I've been referring to him kind of as like a weaponized autistic guy, although I don't know that he's autistic per se, but he has that sort of a singular focus.
	He's a man that does video engineering for trade.
	And then he also like really, really narrowly, he's found this to be problematic.
	The story of the pipe bomber.
	Hold on.
	Don't do it.
	I'm running.
	One second.
	One second.
	Yeah.
	The video is bad that they put out.
	They've been putting out this like degraded video stuff and it's all been changed aspect ratio and they've dropped the frame rate.
	And you guys have seen they look like claymations.
	So all that's problematic.
	Armatas is the guy that has created this map.
	This is not the way the FBI map looks for whatever it's worth.
	If you guys have ever seen a cast analysis or if you've ever seen what happens when you put when you do law enforcement work and you try to map pings, this is not the way that it comes out.
	It's actually a different sort of graphic.
	But this is actually a little bit easier, I think, to understand.
	So the one we're going to look at right here is number one.
	And my cursor is on it.
	It's directly above my head on the screen.
	If you guys are watching, it should be pretty easy to see.
	It's the number one, and it has red legs for this angle.
	So the legs that Vivo is talking about, they're red and they spread outward and they basically go down and to the right, which is to say they go essentially southeast is the quadrant that they cover.
	And they include things like this Whole Foods over here and they include things like this little museum and they include stuff that's all in this area, Garfield Park, and so on.
	Okay.
	The interesting thing that Armitas pointed out is that part number one, segment number one, the first ping that they're identifying as saying Brian Cole's phone identifies with the route of the pipe bomber is that ping number one would place the pipe bomber in this area and this area is not where the pipe bomber was when ping number one was registered.
	So over here, this one two, three and four is the route of the bomber on foot from video.
	So one two three, four this is one and two and three are all part of the DNC loop and then up here is the RNC loop and, as you can see, sector one.
	You would have to basically make the argument that sector one is bigger or has a margin of error.
	That includes just the edges, the northern edge, and so that you don't have a ping inside of the actual sector that they're claiming.
	And the same thing is true of three.
	If you'll look at the orange little legs here, they're also outside.
	I don't know if you explained this part of it yet and sorry, I had to.
	Not nothing of a bad emergency, I just had to run to the door.
	Um, if they didn't know the route of the bomber, all the things, I didn't do that yet.
	So let's talk about okay.
	So if they did not know the route of the bomber because or the pipe bomber, the person in the hoodie, if they didn't know that the only thing that they would be able to determine by way of ping from tower three would be anything in the area between the legs correct, correct?
	So let's do that in a different way.
	Um Armatos explained it in his mind and I think it may it'll resonate with certain people that pings are actually more helpful for saying where somebody was not than saying where they are, because it actually eliminates, Let's say, 60% of the circle where you are not.
	And so, for example, if we were going to say that you, if I believe that you were a potential pipe bomb subject and I got a ping over here at the Library of Congress, you were in the building at the Library of Congress, but at the same time, I know that somebody was supposed to be in this cell phone area, or maybe there was a robbery at the Library of Congress and your cell phone pings over here in sector three.
	That's going to be the orange legs that we're seeing.
	And so you're south of the number three.
	Well, if you're south of the number three, because you're pinging, and that means you're anywhere here from 7th Street, Southwest, all the way over here to like 4th Street, I think it is Northeast.
	If you're somewhere in there or you were on 695, you could have been anywhere in this sector, but I sure as hell know that you weren't over here in the Library of Congress because your cell phone is pinging in a place that says you're in this sector.
	And that's essentially what it does.
	And you could be anywhere in there.
	You could be at the M Street Metro Station.
	You could be over here at the arena stage for the Mead Center.
	You could be over in this little park.
	It doesn't matter.
	If I get you pinging in this sector, it's not saying, oh, you pinged on East Street and 3rd Street.
	What it says is you pinged in Sector 3, and it's a very, very large 120 degree angle area.
	And so all I know is that you didn't ping outside of that area.
	Because what people need to appreciate, and this is what I misunderstood.
	And by the way, if this is wrong, well, you know, I'll eat crow and apologize afterwards or correct.
	When it looks like, oh, they pinged the number three at this location, what it would mean is that if you did not know where the pipe bomber was and you had none of these other colors, you didn't have red, pink, red, purple, yellow, or blue, you said you would only know that the three ping was anywhere in that triangle.
	You'd have to shade the entire thing.
	It's like that ping could have been anywhere in there.
	Yes.
	And let me give it, let me actually add a little bit more context to this because this is also worth people understanding.
	There are two types of pings that can be used.
	One of them is called active pings or something to that effect.
	And that means that we are gathering it in real time.
	As an FBI agent, as a law enforcement officer, you may have an app on your phone where you go get a judicial process to have a ping.
	And I can't remember if it's a subpoena or a warrant.
	And I can't remember if I've ever done these, but we use them on drug dealers all the time.
	It's like a tracker, but for your phone.
	It drains the battery.
	So we don't ping you nonstop because that would be too much.
	So we ping you intermittently and we try to see, hey, are you here?
	Are you in this sector or that sector?
	And we've associated certain areas where you might ping that will be associated with your home or maybe associated with your work.
	And so we've got some ideas.
	We've got some parts of the map that are mapped off.
	So if I ping your phone and I actively ping it, you know, query location of phone, it'll give me something.
	And then depending on the number of towers that it hits, you know, there's an overlap of all these different little legs.
	Yeah, that's like the Venn diagrams, which you could have described your location.
	I may get a much better read on you, but a lot of times in urban areas, it's complete crap.
	Like we'll get a ping and I'll reach out to a case agent when I was doing the job and I'd say, hey, you know, you got pings on the phone?
	They say, yeah.
	And I go, any good?
	And they go, you know, accuracy within 10,000 meters.
	It's like, that's useless.
	Fuck that.
	Like, we don't care.
	It's not helpful.
	But then they might be moving somewhere and suddenly they're out in a rural area and we got a better idea.
	They're within a thousand or 500 or 100.
	And then I can start narrowing down.
	If you're within 100 yards of the daughter's school, you're likely picking up daughter at school.
	And so then we can vector in our physical surveillance and put eyes on.
	That's active pings only.
	That's not what these are.
	These are historical.
	So I'm just looking at 120 degrees.
	So the idea here is that all of these angles of these triangles are 120 degrees, give or take.
	There's a margin of error of what the highlighted in section that it covers would be.
	And that's based on geography and it's based on topography and it's based on buildings.
	So human structures.
	So it can be limited.
	It's usually more limited than not.
	It doesn't usually expand more, but there's a possibility that you have a change in the tower orientation just a little bit because of wind or because of the way the building is oriented or somewhere.
	So there's a possibility that these shift a little ways, one or two degrees, and they certainly could shift less.
	But generally speaking, because we're talking about a city, they're mostly limited by scope because you got buildings and stuff.
	Okay.
	No, that's one place where I wanted to go that it's 120.
	There's a bit of a margin of error.
	Why does five not have a ping?
	Not clear.
	I can't remember where five was supposed to be pinging, but it's not mapped on this one.
	All right.
	And now all that's to say is just to highlight the fact that all of the pings on this overlapping section of one, two, three, four are all of them with, you know, they're very close.
	Not that I've been on or over, but certainly very close to the limits, the margins.
	With the exception of two.
	Two is the only one that fits perfectly inside.
	It's well within the dark blue.
	And you'll see two is right next to three as far as the towers go.
	So it's going to be in the center left side of the picture.
	Yeah, the two is right under the one, which is the one that's going to be a little bit more.
	Yeah, I probably can actually zoom in on stuff like this, can't I?
	I bet I can.
	Like, I don't know.
	Oh, look at that.
	So there we go.
	So, yeah, so two is up here.
	And you'll see that two fits directly inside sort of the narrower part of this, these legs, but one is certainly outside of it.
	Here's, here's the, oh, you can't see it.
	It's underneath me, but this is the outer rim for one.
	And the number one is well outside.
	Two falls within.
	Three is on the margin on the air, and four is also on the margin.
	So the way that the FBI is basically articulating, I might even be able to make this a little bit smaller and it might be better.
	The way the FBI is trying to articulate this thing is that they essentially want you to believe that the margins and the margin call is what they're actually made.
	They're arguing.
	So this is a, when I said that this, this complaint was thin to you, I meant that it's thin because it's, it's got pings.
	And these pings are not what you would predicate on, which is probably why they didn't lead with it.
	One, it's kind of archaic.
	Two, it's kind of difficult to understand.
	And we're sitting here talking it through.
	And then three, they led with what they think is better.
	And what they led with was historical purchases.
	And they were a little bit deceptive about some of those purchases, I think, for two years because this guy is both a prophet and then potentially he's got like telekinesis because he can actually use the bomb that he planted the night before on the day of January 6th, if you believe the argument that was being made.
	So all that's pretty weird too.
	Okay.
	But these pings suck.
	These pings are not good.
	And pings almost always are not that good.
	They're just, they're just one tool in many.
	Because I think most people would were under the impression that when it's ping number three, that's where he was.
	They got like a and a circle on the map, number one as well, number two as well.
	Yeah, that's an argument that they are making.
	And so that's, that's the big part of it.
	This is a leap of faith that ping number three, which should be in that orange sector, that narrower sector of the arm.
	That's that limit of the arm.
	Yeah, that it actually goes beyond the limit.
	And it could be this person that's walking around here, dropping off the pipe on.
	This is about 8 p.m., this three o'clock.
	And at 8 p.m., the pipe bomber basically is just about to go off video camera here, but is on foot over in this area, but over in this area that is outside of the sector of tower number three that we're showing.
	And so, and basically what they've, what they've done is pinpointed along the trail where they, where he would have to have fit based on the perimeter or the area covered by the towers and say, this is what he walked.
	And because of what we captured within the triangle, the triangulated areas, this is where he would have had to have been at that particular point in time.
	Yeah, they are arguing.
	They are arguing.
	Would you believe us that this tower number one and this ping?
	So here he was on the route.
	We're arguing that he actually pinged this tower while over here because that's where he would have had to have been.
	If we want to make the argument that Brian Cole was carrying Brian Cole's cell phone on the night when they believed that Brian Cole was delivering pipe bombs as the brony, autistic black guy with 60% torso and 40% legs.
	If he's the guy and he was carrying his own phone, which is what they want to say, then he's got to be outside of sector one, but still pinging off the tower that covers sector one.
	You can take up the leap of faith.
	Cal, stop sharing on your end because I don't have the power to kick it for you.
	You can't kick me off.
	No, I can't.
	Well, I can't, I can't even.
	If you started to share something highly embarrassing, I would be able to take it out.
	Okay, now, why on Armistas's on his tweet, there was that little thing right here.
	So that's the same diagram zoomed in with a little bit of a tighter line.
	And so what we'll see right there is, yeah, you've got better control of it.
	So the tower on the bottom left, like right behind where your head is, is the tower location for the first sector.
	That's the tower.
	And what's this drop here?
	What was that?
	Unknown.
	I have no idea.
	Maybe he might have just put it there to be able to like zoom in on that map and take a picture for all I know.
	This is obviously a screenshot map that then he went and doctored.
	But if you were to pull back out of that, you'll notice that if you put that back up on there, that the ping for number one is what he's honing in on.
	It is the furthest one out.
	And so.
	Oh, I guess that's what you're saying.
	So the problem is that the first cell phone ping is not in the wrong section.
	So it's being starting off bad.
	How many feet are we looking at giver here?
	This is like one city.
	That's half a half a city block.
	Yeah, that's probably a couple hundred feet minimum.
	Okay.
	So then the argument would be, well, what is that?
	That's a tenth of a mile.
	A city block is about a tenth of a mile.
	So now I understand.
	Okay, well, that's good.
	Now I understand exactly what Armistas was getting at with that.
	Right.
	And again, three is outside, four is outside as well.
	They're narrower.
	Like it's much closer.
	So you could maybe try to make the argument error.
	But here's the here's the more likely probability.
	The more likely probability is that cell phone is right in the middle or somewhere inside of the sector and not on the margins of air of that sector.
	And so an enterprising defense attorney would be hoping to find better evidence that maybe Brian Cole was in fact in the sector that he would be in in the center, of which he could not have been delivering the pipe bombs at the time, because especially ones like sector three, that is mid-route.
	That is the ping at sector three is about eight o'clock at night.
	And the relevant timeframe that everyone has to understand is the pipe bomber came onto camera at 734, roughly where the number three is, walked up that street, which I believe is New Jersey, makes a left turn and goes down what I believe is D Street, heading west, and then goes south and drops off the bomb and then does an egress route that's kind of illogical, kind of wanders around back and forth, and then ends up right then at point three.
	So from 7.34 to 8 p.m. is on camera in what we'll call the DNC loop, that little circle there, and begins and ends roughly where the number three is and then goes off camera altogether and then pops up on the north side of this particular map.
	And if you go up roughly where the four is, the four is supposedly where the bomb was actually being placed.
	That's really close to where the Capitol Hill Club is in the RNC.
	And so that happens.
	And then the video evidence of the pipe bomber ends at 8.18.
	Okay.
	I want to make sure.
	I hope everybody understands that.
	Now, what circumstances would it require that FBI comes back or whoever's, you know, the prosecutor says, no, these were not broad, you know, 120 degree pings.
	These were specific pings because at that point he texted somebody or made a call or whatever.
	So those are actually specifically geographically pinpointable pings.
	Well, they're not.
	That's not a possibility.
	So what they would have to have is additional cell phone tower hits from other cell phone towers.
	So you'd have to have overlap.
	You can see in certain areas where one and two might overlap on the on the graph.
	And if cell phone tower one and two overlap, then you could say that he's in not 120 degree, but the overlap of those two angles and it might be as little as like 50 degrees.
	But every single time that we would get pings, particularly like you'd get them for somebody who would go to their house, let's say, and a drug dealer is a great example.
	So drug den falls in the intersection of two tower pings that basically stretch out.
	And so you could find out if they were in that corridor, which might only be 12 degrees wide, but they would be within 1,000 meters from the beginning point all the way out to the farthest point of wherever the towers no longer operate.
	But it would be a narrower than 120 degrees.
	It's the overlap.
	It's that Venn diagram that we're talking about.
	So unless they're going to be able to say that, okay, well, Cole's phone was actively pinging on more than one tower at a time, which means it has to be in the overlapping section, you can't get more specific with pings.
	The things that people get more specific with are trackers and GPS warrants.
	And this is historical.
	So they can't do that.
	Unless they had a Google map, if the guy was like using some sort of a mapping program, and then, for example, if that particular mapping program actually held historical data going back that far, then maybe you get that.
	But you'd actually have to have something else going on.
	So either an app or you'd have to have overlapping pings or you'd have to have a live tracking on a vehicle or on a person.
	And as we understand it, that's probably not the case.
	Well, and this is a pure matter of fact, which my understanding, I've asked a few people, and this is the answer that seems to be the reality.
	If someone says, no, those pings were actually specifically located based on whatever, then I guess we'll see if that's the explanation.
	Yeah, they're not.
	And here's how I'll just tell you.
	I worked with the guys that like there was a guy who worked for CAST.
	There's only probably 16 people in the entire FBI that do what's called cellular analysis survey team.
	It's a collateral duty for most people.
	And I want to say they have a handful of full-time people, maybe as few as 10.
	It's a very, very specialized, incredibly small field of people.
	And one of them worked one desk away from me when I was in Las Cruces, New Mexico.
	And he also lived like down the street from me.
	And his wife worked with me and she was one of the kind of the mentors in my office in Las Cruces.
	And he's a super cool guy.
	So I would look over his shoulder on a regular basis and I'd say, hey, what are you doing?
	And he's like, oh, we're mapping historical pings of this phone.
	Well, what is it on?
	Oh, it's on a homicide case.
	You're trying to find if a guy dropped the body out in this area.
	And this is the only cell tower out there.
	And so likely.
	And then you'd look at another one and they would go, oh, well, what about this?
	It's like, that's a kidnapping case.
	We're trying to find a lost girl that some dad may have taken out to Colorado.
	So he worked on cases all over the country.
	It's not a big group of people that do this.
	And I had access to one of them, which is pretty uncommon.
	I would say there's 14,000 FBI agents and maybe 10 of them do this job.
	And I happen to work next to one, one of the 10.
	So I've seen what the software does and what it doesn't do.
	And, you know, he would get called in for expert analysis on a regular basis.
	In fact, Sean may be one of the people that they have to call in to explain what the FBI is alleging in this, because there's not very many who would do it.
	Kyle, Ginger Ninja over in our community asks, Kyle, would a cell phone outside the angle of coverage of a tower be able to ping off a tower by signal by reflecting off something like a building that's in the angle of coverage?
	It's possible.
	And that's what that's what the FBI is trying to argue with their map and saying that this person actually fits inside there.
	So there are urban anomalies, as you can imagine, just like radio.
	Radio can skip and it can skip off buildings and it can skip off structure and glass and different types of things.
	But what they're trying to argue, just so everybody understands, the argument the FBI is making in that complaint, and they're not saying it explicitly because it would really, really cut away from the probable cause.
	They're saying that the FBI is arguing that the error factor is what they're banking on putting Brian Cole's cell phone on the map where the pipe opera was walking and not the most common sense or most logical thing.
	These are not slam dunk pings.
	These are margin of error arguments.
	And so they're going to have to argue that that exactly what Ginger just said.
	That's the only way that they make the case based on cell phone pings.
	And again, look, if they were to actually be able to show that this guy parked his car in a very specific place, got out of it wearing the stuff the pipe bomber did, the cell phone pinged while you expected him moving, which they're not going to be able to do, and that he went on the route and delivered all the pipe bombs, whatever, you know, got back into his car and the vehicle drove off.
	Now you're going to start collaborating video and pings.
	And then those pings went down to Woodbridge, Virginia, where he lived.
	Then we're talking about something totally different.
	But if they had even something closer to this, because after reading that complaint, and I've showed it to other cops who are, you know, locals, I've showed it to state police officers, other FBI agents are telling me desperately, this is not good.
	This is not a good complaint.
	And it's not like Kyle Seraphin's beef against the FBI that's coming out here.
	When I read it, I went like, oh man, what do they got?
	Oh, really?
	You wrote a complaint that badly, that thin, and you think this is going to stand?
	Essentially, they're trying to snow you with sort of technical garbage because you're a smart guy and it didn't make sense to you when you read it.
	Well, I couldn't put together the pings, which is why I need to rely on the weaponized autism of the likes of Armitas.
	And I'm saying that almost joke.
	Like, I need someone to lay that out on a map and then explain to me because I was under the impression, I suspect many people were, that the pings were, you know, within within a meter.
	How can you get a ping within a meter?
	You can't.
	You'd have to have a precision.
	You have to either ghost an app onto somebody's phone, which is a thing that can be done.
	You'd have to actually hijack their GPS, which you can do with certain types of warrants.
	You can do it with FISA, but you need a tracking warrant to be able to do that where you can precision track the person.
	There are certainly programs.
	The Israelis have programs.
	NSO spyware is capable of doing these things, either Phantom or Pegasus.
	So there are tools that will allow you to do such things.
	But I'll just tell you straight up: like pings are not it.
	They are a very loose and sort of weak association with general.
	Armitage said it best.
	It says better that you are not somewhere than it does that you are definitively in someplace because I could rule you out based on pings, but it would be hard to rule you in.
	Does that make kind of sense?
	For sure.
	Bring on Darren Beatty.
	Darren Beatty's in the government now.
	He's not doing interviews, guys.
	No.
	But Revolver was covering it.
	Julie, they posted an article, which I covered yesterday as well, about Julie not even believing that the bombs were placed when they were.
	And even.
	Yeah.
	And if they weren't placed when they were, the argument on the FBI's case is contingent on the video hoodied person is Brian Cole.
	So if they weren't placed at the same time, and Julie Kelly's right, let's just say that she was hypothetically, then Brian Cole's also a bad suspect.
	And Revolver has covered that for a very long time, that they have this instinct.
	I don't think they really.
	Look, I don't know how many white, urban, liberal, affluent women that we've met, but you showed one of them who happens to be Jewish in Kentucky a moment ago.
	And so we're supposed to believe that this woman, Carlin Younger, who works for FirstNet, which is just like, it's like working for Verizon.
	It's like working for ATT, really, because that's but specific to law enforcement.
	Yeah, well, it's a division of ATT that gives priority service for their cell phone network.
	The network is the same.
	It's on the ATT network.
	Yeah, but that, but that, that subdivision is a relevant one.
	It's a suspension.
	It's relevant in so much as like, but like, that's just like saying, you know, imagine that you are a provider of uniforms to law enforcement, like you sell law enforcement belts.
	Does that mean that you know all the cops or that you have something to do with the cops?
	Like it just doesn't, it doesn't actually follow that somebody who works on a technology contract has anything to do at all with the agencies.
	Like I know nobody from FirstNet and I was in the FBI in the Washington field office where this went on.
	And I bet you, if you went out there to Capitol Police and you went out, like nobody knows who the hell's negotiating these contracts that come out of headquarters.
	As far as Carlin Younger goes in that, the evidence is that she didn't see the pipe bomb when she started her laundry with anybody.
	She's doing a freaking laundry.
	No, it's like, I don't, I don't believe that either.
	But what was the second thing that we were supposed to talk about?
	I don't know.
	Was it the body movement?
	There was a holy cows.
	We said there was another element that I wanted to flesh out today.
	Well, one of them is obviously the pings piece of it.
	What was the second thing we were talking about?
	Oh, yeah, the data dump.
	This is worth knowing.
	So, this is discovery.
	And this is what people have to understand, too.
	So we had a motion.
	Do you have the motion?
	No, I'm going to bring it up right now.
	Okay.
	So Brian Cole.
	The Department of Justice drafted a motion filed yesterday and said, let's go ahead and delay.
	And with agreement from defense, we are going to request a variance from the speedy trial requirements, which would basically say that we got to take this to trial in 90 days.
	And this is not uncommon, as I understand it.
	We'll need to pull up the documentary.
	It's by consent of both.
	Both agreed, DOJ drafted the motion.
	Per New Court Falling, Justice Department Defense asked to postpone Monday's detention hearing of Brian Cole.
	Fed suggests December 30th instead that Justice says, you know, they're dealing with a significant amount of discovery, which, you know, anybody who's, I always refer to it as like the Friday afternoon document dump where they do it in commercial litigation.
	They do whatever just to A, ruin your weekend and B, get you like on the eve of something so that they know you do not have enough time realistically to go through it all.
	They did it with Trump.
	So they seem to have done it now.
	They say they've dumped so much documentation information on the defense that they can't usefully go through it before the initial hearing date.
	So they want to postpone it, keep the kid locked up in that time.
	He hasn't entered a plea yet.
	Correct.
	So that's what's that's what's relevant to people to understand.
	By the way, neither has Tyler Robinson, who may be doing it actually at this very moment, but he has not had an in-person appearance yet, as I understand.
	They were still waiting to do the probable cause hearing in his case out.
	And they're not related cases other than people are aware of them.
	But Tyler Robinson out in Utah in a state case, also, because of the volume of data and discovery, has not actually had anybody pop up and make an argument whether or not he wants to plead one way or another.
	He hasn't pleaded yet.
	And that's presumably because they, I don't even know if he's innocent, what they're waiting for, but or not guilty, I should say.
	But they've dumped a sufficient amount of documentation on him.
	And we were talking about it.
	Explain what it is for those who are not in the industry, what they likely dumped on this kid and his lawyer.
	Yeah, they likely just gave terabytes of visual garbage that is absolutely unusable.
	So we showed you a graph and a map and we showed you some numbers and they're not perfect.
	And that's not what the FBI generates.
	They're not going to give you the exhibits they're going to argue in court.
	They're going to give you the data behind the exhibits, which is thousands and tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of lines out of a spreadsheet with GPS coordinates and so on that you don't have the software to interpret to anything.
	And so the goal is, and this is really unfair, and this makes me sick because this is not justice.
	And I'll make that argument very clearly.
	I don't think that our federal government should take the tens of billions of dollars of software and capabilities and specialized training and years and years of people cultivating the skill set and then turn around and dump a bunch of garbage on you that means nothing to you as defense and say, go mount your own defense, go hire your own attorney, your attorneys, then hire your own experts that handle cell phone, you know and and do this kind of stuff.
	None of that makes any sense to me.
	So they're going to get a bunch of spreadsheets which mean nothing to them until they hire someone to take the spreadsheet, interpret it, bring it in and make it into the same graph that you're looking at over there.
	That's awful.
	And they won't tell you what they're looking at.
	They'll say, the information that we relied on to bring these charges is this horrible stack of five terabytes of paper and pictures and video.
	And, by the way, you can only access the video if you come to our terminals.
	So you got to come to us Capitol police stuff, you got to make an appointment, you've got to get cleared through security and then you can bring one Person with you, and you can only bring a notepad, and you can't bring your phone or whatever.
	And then you'll ask for requests, and then we'll give you the video that you think is helpful.
	It's just a dirtbag way about going about it, and that's what they're facing right now.
	Yeah, and I forget which case it was with Trump, but they'll give you information that is simply not readable on your end.
	And like you say, you need to have software that is not just too advanced that you don't have so antiquated that only the FBI or law enforcement has stuff that you need.
	So, probably what they did to him said, Here's all here's all the data of the cell towers, figure it out and uh try to try to rebut our allegations.
	They'll give you non-standard videos, you know, video formats, and you and I might know how to do it because you know, I don't know if you use like something like handbrake, but you can manipulate certain styles of video and turn it into different things, and you can turn it into something you can watch somewhere else.
	But yeah, they'll give you whatever the proprietary software that came off the surveillance cameras is, and it'll have some unknowable, unrecognizable video format that'll just show up as a word file or a text document, and you don't know what to do with it.
	So, um, and we used to get this in the FBI too, like that goes the other way.
	You go and get evidence, and it'll come in, it'll be garbage, and you're like, oh, God, what do I do with this?
	And then we got to go find, can somebody download some sort of emulator to be able to use their software to be able to view this garbage, you know, C C D B footage camera stuff that comes in.
	So, there's a lot of like, they're really dirty tricks.
	If we're being totally fair about it, it's a dirty trick.
	It's not in the interest of justice.
	It's no, it's how they've railroaded many defendants that were not prominent, were not known, and did not have the means or the bullhorn to protect and defend themselves.
	And so, this is how the criminal justice system has historically worked.
	Everyone's like, what they did to Donald Trump was so egregious.
	They've been doing that to people for decades.
	Yeah, let me answer this too.
	Hold on, there's a thing in your chat because I'm eyeballing the chat because I'm used to doing this too.
	Uh, Rowdy Dowdy said something about how many times did you use that for an arrest or a warrant?
	Zero times.
	I feel perfectly confident.
	One, uh, I only wrote a couple of arrest warrants when I was in the FBI because mostly I was in a support role or I worked in counterintelligence.
	And when we were in counterintelligence, we didn't do arrests and we didn't do anything else except spy on people, which is what I did my first whistleblower activity on.
	So, I actually went and said, Hey, what we're doing is unconstitutional.
	How do I not do this anymore?
	Like, I don't think you guys should do this.
	And I definitely am not going to do it.
	So, I actually left my old, my first job in the bureau was doing something involving FISA 702, which incidentally, Tom Massey has been calling out and saying we should defund.
	So, my the reason why I didn't fit into the bureau is because I don't say yes to stuff like this.
	I've always felt the same way.
	Anybody who knew me in the FBI would have been like, Man, you should probably shut up if you want to keep this job.
	It's like, well, I don't really care if I keep this job because I didn't realize that you guys were doing this stuff.
	And now that I know, I'm just yelling it from the top of the hills.
	So, too bad for them.
	And we're going to, we're going to finish with this because I don't want to take in your entire afternoon.
	This was the other thing that I didn't want to forget.
	This is audio-free.
	No, this is a scene from Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer.
	And some of you will recognize that's Hermes the elf, right?
	Who is what video did I put up here?
	Do I put up?
	Yeah, this is Hermes the Elf.
	He's trying to visit the Island of Misfit Toys with Rudolph, who is trying to figure out who he is and whether he fits into Santa's.
	Look at it.
	I mean, it's like stop motion.
	It's like claymation.
	Well, so we have not yet gotten the non-altered version, which is like, you know, reduced to one frame per second.
	People are saying in this video, the person is adjusting his or her bra.
	You know, I don't know about that.
	You know, what I do see, though, is a look over the shoulder is not common for people who are autistic.
	That is a that's a level of self-awareness or circumstantial awareness that you don't often find.
	Well, no, I have some experience with you know, adult autistic people.
	And yeah, there's a there's a word for it, stimming, or they have a very, you know, sort of awkward, unnatural movement, not this natural, and like you say, like guilty sort of looking over the shoulder, if that's what it is.
	But, you know, I, we have not yet seen any video footage of the suspect in any natural setting walking or whatever.
	No video that he's ever posted online, nothing, correct?
	No.
	And you know what I don't see is I don't see a lot of autistic people that were super comfortable wearing the duck build, high, high, what is it?
	M95.
	Yeah, the N95, like that duck build thing that was like high draw and required you to, it was restrictive on your airflow.
	You don't see people voluntarily go put that stuff on.
	And I don't, I don't know.
	I mean.
	To walk around alone at night outdoors.
	Wearing a baseball hat with a hoodie on, restrictive stuff.
	We've never seen a picture of this guy with a hat.
	I mean, I went through his mom's Instagram and his mom's Facebook and I went through the grandma's as well.
	And he's not ever wearing those things.
	Sometimes he's wearing the headphones.
	And there's no headphones in the picture of the pipe bomber walking around in that hood.
	I looked everywhere.
	You don't see any, you don't see any obvious sort of deflections outward on that hoodie.
	It fits really smoothly.
	So anyway, I mean, there's so many holes in the story just from the like the layperson's end of it, but this technical end of it with the pings, when I read it, I just went like, you got to be kidding me.
	Like this is, this is not it.
	People need to understand it.
	They'll come to their own conclusions.
	But when we were discussing this, I'm like, if I understood it improperly, I suspect others did as well.
	So I hope everybody got clarification on that.
	Yeah.
	And I'll tell you one last little thing.
	My buddy lives in the neighborhood six doors down or so from this guy.
	And I showed him that video that you just put on the screen a second ago.
	And his first comment to me was, I've never seen Cole move that way.
	And I've seen him move a thousand times through the neighborhood.
	They've been there for a decade.
	They've been neighbors for 10 years.
	So put that into your pipe, smoke it.
	That's one guy's anecdotal answer to it.
	But I'm working against the FBI on this one because I think they got the wrong guy and I think it's really bad.
	Kyle, where can people find you?
	I'm on Rumble.
	It's Kyle Seraphin.
	Find me on YouTube at Kyle Seraphin on X. If you want to say something nasty, at Kyle Seraphin, my DMs are always open.
	I'll read whatever you send me.
	I may not respond.
	And let me just show it for the sake of it before I bid you fair afternoon, sir.
	Kyle Seraphin.
	And when is your show live on Rumble?
	It's at 0,930 Eastern Time.
	So that's 0, 8.30 in Texas America.
	It's kind of a mid mid-hour thing.
	Amazing stuff.
	Kyle?
	Thanks, bud.
	Thank you.
	And you and I will talk offline after.
	Yes, we will.
	All right, man.
	Godspeed.
	See ya.
	Peace.
	So that's it.
	I hope everybody understands that a little bit better now.
	And I think I needed that clarification because once you understand, like they could have been anywhere within that Angular thing, but they pinpointed it based on the route that they knew to fit with the Angular thing that they had because that ping could have been anywhere in it.
	But they say, well, this was the route, and we're going to stretch that route and make it fit on the outer perimeters of the 123 degree angles of the cell towers, either to make it fit or because it fits, because they got the right guy.
	Your choice.
	I know where I lean on this.
	I shouldn't have said 0% chance it's him.
	I should have said it's a 3.7% chance that it's him because like Scott Adams said, if you pick a random specific number, people tend to place more weight in it than if you just, you know, go all or nothing or round numbers like 50.
	Well, Jewish AF, I guess I won't read this live.
	Thank you.
	And then we got King of Bill Tong in the house, premium Bill Tong from Biltong USA, high protein, no additives, U.S. source beef, authentic South African flavor, mate.
	That's Australian.
	Get some now, Bill Tongusa.com, code Viva for 10% off.
	Ooh, I'll see if I can get Kyle's address.
	I'm sure he would like it.
	Everyone's in on the carnivore diet.
	Did I miss anything on?
	We're still going on, people.
	We're not going anywhere.
	I just want to see if I missed anything.
	Are you still a Bongino fanboy?
	I think it's unfortunate.
	I think this is going to blow up and it's going to be.
	Look, Bongino's an employee.
	I will not impugn ill intent or negative intentions.
	What I love is in one of the same day, I get called a Zionist and a Nazi.
	I get called a Candace Owens criticizer and a Candace Owens fanboy.
	And I get called a bongino.
	What did you call me in here?
	Who said it?
	A bongino fanboy and someone who goes too hard on the FBI.
	So, hey, man, I'm not walking in the middle of the street and getting hit by traffic on both sides, but I am more nuanced, which means those who want to take things as black and white on either side can do so to vilify me.
	Yes, sir, who just knocked on the door?
	Still alive.
	Okay.
	So that's going on there.
	What do we got here?
	We got one more over on Crumble.
	Prant just came in.
	Jarbot says, I view the delay different.
	DOJ is granting defense only the time so no one can claim the case was railroaded.
	Both sides will pursue mental health eval on autism claim against confessions and fitness.
	Yeah, well, no, the DOJ would not have, would not have insisted on refusing a request to delay speedy justice that was made by the defendant.
	They would never do that.
	It would look bizarre.
	So I don't think there's anything even 3D level chest to this.
	I think they probably did dump a shit ton of documentation on the defendant.
	And they're just no skin off their back to wait an extra two weeks.
	We'll see what that alleged confession was.
	I presume they're going to get the transcript of that four-hour counsel-free interrogation.
	And we'll see the level of autism of this kid.
	I mean, it's thus far, I think it's only the grandmother that said it.
	And we'll see if the grandmother's assessment is right or she's protecting her grandkid.
	But more stuff coming without a doubt.
	People, we're going to move on to something else.
	By the way, it was a package that I had to get.
	And I'm going to open it up at vivabarneslaw.locals.com in the after party.
	You might want to get over there now and just become a member.
	Oh, yeah, by the way, shameless plugs while we do this.
	I've noticed a few tips come in via the Rumble app.
	If you go to Amazon, not Amazon, what's the place there?
	If you have Android and you go to Google Play, you can download the app on Android and you can get the Rumble wallet.
	Do it.
	Check it out.
	If you want to invest in Bitcoin and crypto and whatever, this is not investment advice.
	You can do that.
	And then you can also tip your favorite creators by clicking on that tip thing.
	I think I might be the only one that has this right now.
	It's going to be more publicly available when they worked out, you know, all how it works and make the app available to iPhones.
	You can go try another crypto wall.
	Look at this.
	You can go here.
	You can click on Bitcoin and then you can go click on this thing.
	And right now, if you scan this avatar, if you have a wallet, you can tip me in crypto.
	And one day, we will see if I can actually get one Bitcoin.
	If the price dips enough, I might be able to acquire a portion of a Bitcoin or a bigger portion.
	I got like a fraction of a fraction of a Bitcoin.
	So you can tip that way.
	VivaFry.com if you want to get some merch and vivabarnslaw.locals.com for the best above-average law community out there.
	And I think you still got, I don't know if it's for the rest of the month, I'll double check.
	Christmas all caps for 40% off an annual subscription.
	Now, sorry, let me discream.
	What were we talking about right now?
	Canada.
	Hold on.
	Let me back it up.
	We've got to go across the Maple Gulag.
	We've got to go behind the Iron Rainbow up to a land of Canada that is objectively batshit insane.
	Not much more batshit insane than America.
	As you'll see, we have some clips of both, but pretty damn batshit insane.
	I'm going to play you a clip because Alberta is making the news for having invoked a provision of the Constitution, Article 33, the notwithstanding clause, which under Canadian law means a province can enact a piece of legislation, a law, that violates certain charter rights if it specifically sets out that it is violating the charter rights.
	And it can't violate every charter right or any charter, right?
	A section of rights, if it can be said this way, that can be violated under the notwithstanding clause.
	That is to say, you can enact a piece of legislation, notwithstanding the fact that it violates certain rights.
	Certain rights are inalienable, allegedly in Canada.
	You can enact legislation that specifically violates certain rights if you specifically invoke the notwithstanding clause, saying, We enact this legislation, notwithstanding the fact that it violates certain rights that we're allowed to violate, and it can't be for longer than five years, at which point, you know, you'll have a new government, you'll have new legislation, and then the society and the new government will make a decision as to whether or not it wants to do it.
	Alberta has done it.
	We'll get to the provision of law or we'll get to the pieces of legislation about which they've done it, but I'm going to play you some videos and then I'll give you some commentary.
	These are the people up in Canada who are freaking out about what Danielle Smith in Alberta is doing, the legislation in virtue of which she has invoked the notwithstanding clause to pass, suggesting that it will be law, despite the fact that it violates some rights.
	Late last night, Premier Danielle Smith and the United Conservative Party forced through legislation that invokes the notwithstanding clause and overrides the charter rights of transgender and gender-diverse Albertans.
	This is an extraordinary and deeply alarming use of power.
	It's a targeted infringement on the rights of some of the most vulnerable individuals in Canada.
	This legislation puts lives at risk.
	I'm going to pause there.
	I'm going to pause it there because I don't think we need to watch another two minutes of this absolute madness.
	That is obviously, who was that person?
	Who is that person?
	Because they have since blocked me.
	I said, what is it with you trans freaks that are obsessed with other people's children?
	Oh my goodness.
	Anna Murphy.
	Proud Calgarian community-minded leader, advocate for 2SLGBTQIA and women.
	This is a man advocating for women.
	It's fine.
	More power to adults, you know, so long as they stick with adults and stop trying to groom and trans children.
	Champion for equity, diversity, and inclusion.
	My views of my own, she, her.
	So I said, What is up with you, pervs, that you are obsessed with other people's children?
	And I was swiftly blocked.
	Actually, I'm surprised it took that long because I remember tweeting at that account a little while back.
	People rightly observe: well, when you can't have children of your own because of your proclivities, sexual desires, or whatever, or because you've sterilized yourself, when you can't have your own children, you can't procreate, you can only recruit.
	And it's not just, you know, non-politicians in Canada who are taking to Twitter to cry over the alleged rights that are allegedly being denied of purportedly trans kids.
	There are no such thing as trans kids, and that's not in terms of a denial of existence.
	There are kids, and there are kids who might be confused.
	There are kids who might have sexual proclivities that vary.
	There are gay kids, straight kids, black kids, white kids, Jewish kids, Buddhist kids, white Buddhist kids.
	There's no such thing as trans kids in a sense that what you are protecting is the right of a child who cannot consent to certain contracts to mutilate their bodies for the rest of their lives because of the era and stage of confusion in which they find themselves and in which they find themselves surrounded by transgenderism proxy, transgender Munchhausen syndrome by proxy.
	Well, here's the, what is she, Heather McPherson of the New Democrat Party, wondering why they have faded into utter irrelevance.
	This is what she had to say.
	Last night, in an all-night sitting, Daniel Smith and the UCP once again used the notwithstanding clause to ram through legislation that targets some of the most vulnerable people in our society.
	Trans youth.
	Trans youth.
	Is it not stunning that they all have the same talking points?
	Some of the most vulnerable.
	No, I'm sorry.
	A, I don't believe there are trans youth.
	And B, there is no one demographic of youth that is more vulnerable than another.
	You protect all youth, and that means you protect them from themselves.
	And that means you protect them from grooming perverts like yourself, Heather McPherson.
	This is not just one bad law.
	It is an attack on human rights.
	It is an attack on the idea that everyone, everyone deserves dignity, safety, and protection under the law.
	They invoked the notwithstanding clause because they know that this law would not survive a charter challenge.
	They did not want a court to say what is obvious to everyone, that this legislation violates fundamental human rights.
	Fundamental.
	And to make it worse, they did it on the eve of International Human Rights Day.
	Ottawa cannot keep pretending that this is business as usual.
	Every time the federal government stays silent, the line is pushed further and more rights, more human rights are put at risk.
	I'm ready to fight.
	I'm ready to fight for these human rights.
	Ottawa must be ready to, because if we fail to act now, the harm will be deep and it will be lasting.
	If you're with me, add your name to the link in my bio.
	Yeah, no, thank you.
	The harm will be deep and the harm will be lasting.
	She says, unironically, while suggesting that children should have the rights to literally cause deep and lasting harm to them by being subjected to surgeries, puberty blockers, hormone therapy, all in the name of inclusivity.
	You want to know what the pieces of legislation are that are at issue here?
	Let me see.
	I just got to, I have two articles.
	I've got to make sure I got the latest one.
	December 10th, it's this one.
	You got to go to the Communist Broadcasting Corporation to really see how the government propagandists are trying to spin it.
	Alberta uses notwithstanding clause again on three laws affecting transgender youth.
	You would think that they were actually imposing some form of intervention, medical intervention on children, something that would actually interfere with their inalienable rights to bodily autonomy and bodily integrity.
	You would think that's what they were doing.
	Listen to this.
	Latest use of the notwithstanding clause shields laws affecting transgender youth.
	Do you know what they're using it for?
	They're banning boys from girls' sports at the amateur level.
	Alberta's governing United Conservatives stayed up early into the pre-dawn yada yada to pass a bill that marks the second, third, and fourth time in under two months they have used the charter's notwithstanding clause.
	This is Canadian politics for anybody who's interested in it, but understand what's going on in Canada.
	It'll be trickle-down communism if you're not paying attention.
	Members of Premier Daniel Smith caucus used the majority to pass a third and final reading of a bill, a reading a bill affecting transgender people.
	UCP pounded their desk, shouted here at 2.20 a.m.
	Smith was not in the chamber.
	The bill moved quickly through the evening as the United Conservatives used their majority to limit discussion.
	The bill confirms the government's intention to use the notwithstanding clause to shield from legal challenge each of the three current laws affecting transgender people.
	The set, let's highlight this.
	The set of three laws will police names and pronouns in school.
	You love the way these commie bastards describe it.
	Police names and pronouns.
	Yeah, as in it will not allow or require people to actually misgender someone, as in call a girl a boy, a he if she identifies as he, they, not use names that were not the names the parents gave to their own children.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, it's going to police names.
	No, it's going to police the proper use of it and the non-molestation by teachers and transgenderism by proxy through monster adults who love having this control over impressionable youth.
	So it's going to police names and pronouns in school, ban transgender girls from participating in amateur female sports.
	Do you know what that is, you communist pieces of shit at the CBC?
	That is banning boys from participating in amateur female sports.
	Why don't you say it the way it is?
	You're going to use the word, even if we want to play this Orwellian news speak bullshit.
	Don't say transgender girls, say biological males and see what people have to think about that.
	The Canadian people are the most propagandized people on earth, and many of them don't even know it.
	Let's play the Orwellian word game.
	Instead of transgender girls, use biological males and see who has a problem with Danielle Smith invoking the notwithstanding clause.
	And restrict gender-affirming care for youth under 16.
	God forbid.
	You can't drink.
	You can't smoke.
	You can't get a tattoo.
	You're not emancipated.
	But by golly, if you think that you want to be a boy and you think a biology experimentation can be done, you get to do that because that is liberating.
	Allowing a kid to get a tattoo.
	Well, their brains aren't fully developed yet.
	But if they think they're a girl and they're a boy, fuck man.
	You're violating their rights by not letting them do that.
	You're violating the rights of a mentally ill person by not letting them get medical assistance and dying or state-sanctioned murder.
	Those are the three laws.
	So you don't get to fuck with a kid's mind.
	You don't get to hide from the parents that you're calling a kid not by the name the parents gave him because you're not the parents.
	You don't let biological boys or boys compete with girls, even at the amateur level, because it just ain't fair.
	And you don't let them mutilate their bodies for the rest of their lives.
	And these dipshit monsters are sitting out there sobbing because they lose control over the children that they want to have control over and the control to mutilate.
	So that's what's going on in Canada, people.
	And I'm the crazy one for putting it on blast and for, I say, reacting the way I'm reacting, for putting them on blast.
	What did I say here?
	No, this is this.
	This is what this will get you blogged.
	Dude, why is it old tranny perverts like yourself who are so obsessively interested in the children of others?
	How about you mind your own business when it comes to other people's children?
	Hashtag it wasn't an Insta block, but it's a block.
	So that's that.
	Let me see what's going on in the chat over on both Crumble and VivaBarnsLaw.locals.com.
	Jinja Ninja.
	The dude looks like if Vector from Despicable Me fathered a child with Ed the Mode from the Incredibles.
	Jinger Ninja says, Canuck MPs looking at the charter like cat call, look at the size of that, notwithstanding all that.
	And when is Tyler's first appearance?
	When is Tyler's first appearance?
	Today he has to be present via stream.
	Would you live stream it if it's happening?
	If it's happening right now, let me know.
	I didn't know that it was even happening today if it is.
	Let me just see if I can get that.
	Tyler Robinson appearance.
	Excuse me.
	He makes first court appearances.
	Well, this is interesting.
	I didn't know that this was happening today.
	Let me just make sure I get through all of the tipped questions.
	I'm just going here.
	I'm just going there, King of Bill Tong.
	Thanks.
	Okay, so bring this out.
	Bring this and let's see what is the news on that.
	Alleged Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson makes first in-person court appearance.
	appeared in utah thursday for the first do bring it up and we can go over to our viva barnes law datlocals.com community Oh, why isn't it refreshed?
	Yeah, I saw, I'll get to that.
	Okay, I'll get to that in a second.
	I saw Marjorie Taylor Greene is with Code Pink.
	That's it.
	I mean, that's MTG has gone past.
	She's gone full, Lisa Lampinelli.
	Viva, please explain the 2S LGBTQIA plus after his, her name.
	So you got two spirit.
	That's the native Indian iteration of gender fluidity.
	2S.
	So 2 Spirit, lesbian, gay, bi, trans, queer, intersex, and asexual.
	Because if you are not sexual, you also get a letter on the board of 2SLGBT2A.
	And the plus, other people hypothesize as to what the plus is.
	So that is what the 2SLGBTQIA plus stands for up in the batshit crazy commie hellhole of Canada.
	Yeah, MTG meeting with Code Pink.
	Now, I recall that I've had my falling out or falling ins with CodePink on Twitter, Viva Fry Code Pink.
	I know that I've referred to them a number of times.
	But I'd have to go through my Twitter feed to find that out.
	All right, people, I think we did good.
	Does everybody feel smarter as a result of today's show?
	I hope you do.
	Did I get to ring the bell today?
	No, I didn't get to ring the bell.
	You want to tune into Dave Rubin and the show tomorrow because it's going to be fantastic.
	So who do we go raid?
	Let me go see.
	White Guild.
	Who is own?
	Yeah, we're going to go raid.
	We're going to go raid redacted.
	And you can all decide whether or not you want to come over to...
	Sorry, I've got to turn this off.
	You want to decide if you want to come on over to VivabarnesLaw.locals.com.
	We'll raid, and then I'm going to send some links and you can support if you want or not.
	Go raid Redacted.
	Let them know from whence you came.
	Say much love from Viva Fry.
	And I'll get to the chat a little bit while everyone migrates over to VivabarnesLaw.locals.com for our daily after show.
	And some news.
	Confirm raid.
	Raid is confirmed.
	Viva's in the raid.
	Viva Raid Booya F TW.
	Okay.
	And now let's go over to the chat on Rumble.
	Viva, hold on.
	Hold on.
	Viva, bring on Darren Beatty.
	Oh, sorry, that's way earlier.
	Why not just call them?
	Why not just call the 2SLGBTQIA plus people what Elijah Schaefer does?
	I don't know what that is.
	Just call them plus.
	I mean, what do you need any of this for?
	Only two spirits, a rum, bourbon, whiskey.
	Okay, that's funny.
	I saw something that said, blaming boomers for everything will be minor accusation compared to other generations that fucked up their own children.
	That's from Imarquis.
	Take care, everyone.
	Fun hanging with you.
	Says Sefradin Squib.
	Viva wrote a book.
	I did.
	It's the kid's book.
	It's behind me.
	I sold the first one.
	I sold the first custom message on eBay.
	And you want to know what an idiot I am?
	Because I am an idiot?
	Let me just see.
	I did see something that I wanted to see it.
	I thought I saw something.
	Viva did something on the side.
	Viva left Canada right after it was saved, and that had me really questioning things.
	Let me see if I can get my eBay.
	I'm selling.
	It's sort of like what's it called?
	Cameo for books where I sold the first one, custom message.
	They wanted a kid's book for their daughter and for their grandkids, I guess.
	And I did my first one, but I'll tell you the funny story in a second because I've listed a couple of things and I'm an idiot.
	I listed a Randy Johnson.
	If you want to get a custom thingy thing for Christmas, cameo, custom message in a book.
	Boom.
	I listed a Randy Johnson for the 1991 Donris, and I think it was the error because it sort of had like an off-center cut.
	And I thought I listed it as an auction starting at 99 cents and I listed it at 99 cents.
	So someone got a great deal because I'm not that petty that I'm going to try to undo that mistake.
	So someone got the Randy Johnson error card.
	Do I have a picture of it?
	The Randy Johnson error for 99 cents.
	So I hope they enjoy it.
	And it's sold.
	I was like, wow, it's sold.
	How did it sell?
	Because I thought I was doing.
	Yeah, here, I'll show you this.
	I thought I did an auction.
	How did it sell?
	99 cents.
	Luckily, they paid for shipping.
	Otherwise, it would have been a net loss of $3.
	This was it.
	The Randy Johnson.
	Apparently, this is the error right here.
	The miscut, and it's like more lower down on the right than the left.
	Anyhow, whoever got it, enjoy it.
	Enjoy the fruits of my stupidity.
	Okay, with that said, Ginger Ninja.
	Gad sad, David Rubin, Dave Rubin, and Viva Friday.
	Now, that's a lot of overrepresentation.
	Yeah, there was a little saucy.
	You know, I brought the saucier side of things in terms of being mindful of that statistical overrepresentation.
	But it was funny.
	We talk about Candace.
	We talk about what else are we talking about?
	We talked about Tank Candy.
	It's good.
	I don't want to get ahead of it.
	All right.
	And that's that.
	Okay.
	So what we're going to do now, we're going to head on over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com and we'll have our after party.
	Wait, in fairness, let's just show a little bit of that while I update.
	And we'll see the chat.
	Oh, sad, Gad.
	MLB Randy Johnson card, that could be worth a little more than 99 cents.
	Don't make me.
	How can anyone support an acronym when they don't even know what it stands for?
	The big unit.
	Yeah, the Randy Johnson.
	Remember when he blew up that bird?
	The entire acronym is 50 Shades of Gray.
	Okay, well, that's it.
	Now we're going to go over to our VivabarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Oh, that's what I was going to say before we leave.
	Tomorrow, Larry Sharp, who's running for governor of New York, he's going to be on, but we're doing the interview exclusively on locals for the after party.
	And it'll be, it should be a good hour.
	And I'll publish it afterwards, but it's going to be live exclusively to our locals community.
	So we can take questions real time.
	And then I'll publish it across all platforms afterwards.
	Larry Sharp is running against the demonic bitch, Kathy Hochul.
	And he's running against Elise Stefanik, who I don't dislike.
	I like Elise.
	But Kathy Hochle has reserved her special seat in hell for pushing that toxic Pfizer jab on kids as young as six months.
	And I don't feel at all slightly bad about calling her a bitch.
	She's beyond that.
	So that's what's coming up tomorrow.
	If you want to make a decision as to joining our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community, that is it.
	And right now, we're going to merge over.
	And everyone else, go check out Redacted.
	And if you're not, check out someone else on Rumble.

▲