Viva & Barnes - MTG Goes on CNN & Goes OFF on Trump! Kyle Serraqphin's Motion to Dismiss Patel GF's Lawsuit & MORE!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 10, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:15:54

MTG Goes on CNN & Goes OFF on Trump! Kyle Serraqphin's Motion to Dismiss Patel GF's Lawsuit & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You are staring at the globalist three passport carrying Hoor, the member of the WEF, Bilderberg NGO, New World Government, Mark J. Carney.
	I thought long and hard before starting the show.
	Do I do it in my intro golf voice to make fun?
	Or do I do it in a serious voice because I am actually seething with rage?
	I have opted for the latter.
	No, sorry, the former.
	We will begin with humor because at some point in time, if you do not laugh, all there is to do is cry or scream at the clouds in seeding hype rage.
	Behold.
	There have been a few surprises during my first months as prime minister.
	For example, I hadn't expected to spend so much time dealing with wildlife.
	Belugas.
	Ostriches.
	Premiers.
	Present company accepted, obviously.
	Actually, there is no need for a mass cull because the premiers and I are uniting around projects that will diversify our trade, unlock billions and new investment, create hundreds of thousands of high-paying careers.
	Or as the National Post headline put it, Mark Carney fast-tracks the road to serfdom.
	I mean, you can't buy that kind of support, even if we do fund it.
	It's true, Conrad.
	It's true.
	It's true.
	This is quite literally the exact same joke that Justin Trudeau made.
	I'll see if I can pull that one up in a second.
	We're going to let this play out.
	Then we're going to play it again only for the first 30 seconds.
	Just the facts.
	Helen's here.
	It's got to be right.
	I've got to.
	Now, speaking of taxpayer-funded purveyors of post-apocalyptic dystopia, he Francois Blanchet and the block are in the house.
	Like, I try to laugh, and I try to laugh at everything, especially that which I cannot change.
	Rage.
	These people are the worst people on earth.
	They literally laugh at your misery.
	I'm going to play the first part of this again because I listen to this and I'm like, did I misunderstand something?
	Like, everybody sort of hung up on the, he's making a joke about the slaughter of the ostriches.
	He's laughing at other people's misery, literally.
	And I heard something a little bit not even different in addition to laughing at the tyrannical misery inflicted by that authoritarian terrorist government, the liberal government of Canada.
	There have been a few surprises during my first months as prime minister.
	For example, I hadn't expected to spend so much time dealing with wildlife.
	Belugas.
	Ostriches.
	Premiers.
	Premiers.
	Except for.
	Present company accepted.
	Premiers.
	Actually, there is no need for a mass cull.
	Do you understand what he's talking about here?
	Because the premiers and I are uniting around projects that will diversify our trade, unlock billions and new investment.
	I'm going to pause it right there.
	So I'm going to leave this open.
	You got to share this and put this on blast.
	Laughing at the slaughter of the ostriches.
	Ah, isn't that funny?
	And then he says, premiers.
	But there will be no need for a cull in respect of the premiers.
	I'm thinking, like, I must be going crazy.
	Like, there's no way that that would be part of the joke.
	Oh, there's no need to mass kill the premiers, present company excluded, of course, because we kill ours the last.
	It's not a question of when they're up against the wall.
	It's just a question of our allies being the last up against the wall when we decide that they're now adversaries.
	He literally said premiers as part of the wildlife, but there's no need for a cull because we're in ideological alignment on whatever the hell issue he was talking about.
	Translation will kill parliamentarians, premiers, if they're not in alignment with our political plans.
	Someone put out, I remember seeing it back in the moments after the slaughter.
	I don't know if it was this particular account, but many people were echoing a very similar sentiment.
	What they did to the ostriches, they wanted to do to the unvaxed five years ago.
	They are salivating at another chance.
	And that is from the architect at the M-A-R-C-I-T-E-C-T.
	I'm not putting this account on blast.
	Let me see here.
	Hitting the midlife crisis just as the world is going to shit is confusing.
	I don't know what, I don't know if I should get pregnant or buy a new Corvette.
	That's funny.
	I remember tweets like this at the time.
	They wanted to do to the unvaxxed what they did to the ostriches.
	And if they get another chance, they will do it.
	And I remember people saying, people, that's crazy hyperbole.
	This is why they're all crazy.
	The far-right extremists, the anti-vaxxers, the anti-Saris.
	Oh, how dare they say such shit?
	You literally just had Mark J. Carney, three passport carrying globalist WEF whore, joking about the slaughter because it's funny after all.
	Killing innocent, healthy animals is funny after all.
	And then making the joke that he's been dealing with wildlife, belugas, ostriches, premiers.
	But there's no need for a cull because right now we're in alignment.
	Maybe I'm thinking too much into it, or maybe I'm not.
	Maybe they're actually joking about the seriousness of what they would do if they had unchecked power.
	Oh, yeah, no, but then the media, the media is being so hard on Mark J. Carney.
	Do you remember that?
	Do you remember that time?
	What's his face?
	Scumbag McGee, the other globalist who are communist pig, Justin Trudeau at the time, made the exact same joke.
	And then they used it and said, oh, no, he was just making fun of the fact that despite funding the media, they still criticize the government.
	Listen to this.
	You sometimes hear about liberal bias in the media these days, how they're constantly letting off our government, letting our government off the hook for no good reason.
	Frankly, I think that's insulting.
	It's clear that they let us off the hook for a very good reason, because we paid them $600 million.
	You don't get stellar headlines like these without greasing the wheels a bit.
	Now, pause it right here because the fact checkers, the fake news wordsmiths of the devil at the time, were fact-checking this and saying, oh, no, because what Marty from up north, and I know him, he's a good guy, didn't do himself any favors by putting Justin Trudeau's face over the headlines that Justin Trudeau was referring to in the original unedited clip, which I can't find immediately.
	The headlines in the back were National Post.
	I forget exactly from what outlets.
	And they were criticizing Trudeau.
	So Trudeau's point was, oh, despite the fact that we paid them $600 million, they still criticize us.
	The criticism in those headlines of that state-funded, state-bought media were pussyfooting around actual criticism.
	It was whitewashing of actual criticism.
	It was whitewashing of actual corruption.
	That is what you would call the controlled opposition.
	Yeah, you pay them $600 million.
	It can't all be hand jobs and back massages.
	They've got to criticize the government a little bit to make it look legitimate.
	The criticisms in those headlines were bullshit criticisms.
	What is literally controlled opposition?
	Well, we pay them.
	You better put a little bit of opposition, but not too much.
	And they tell you what they're doing as they do it.
	Mark Carney making the exact same freaking joke with the exact same fake criticism from state-funded media that knows you can push back a little bit.
	You got to look like you're fighting, but not hard enough to win.
	You know, it's like in a fixed fight.
	You got to punch back, otherwise, everybody knows the fight's fixed.
	Punch back too hard.
	You might throw the fight, or you might interfere with fixing the fight.
	And then whoever it is, the gangsters that bet on the fight being fixed, might go after you if you screw things up.
	So that's what's going on in Canada.
	Never forget, and I am a little bit blackpilled.
	I've been in touch with Katie since.
	And I've been, I'm always honest.
	I'm just, you know, blunt.
	They won.
	There will never be justice in that injustice.
	There will never be political or judicial retribution.
	They got away with it.
	They got away with it because they had the cover of the courts.
	They had the cover of the armed Gestapo agents known as the RCMP, or as I like to call them, the RCMG.
	They had the cover of the media and they had the cover of the most brainwashed population on earth, liberal Canadians, and even some conservatives.
	What did the conservatives say about it?
	Jack shit.
	They got away with it.
	There will never be justice.
	There will never be punishment.
	There will never be retribution because they had the blessing of the Supreme Court when the Supreme Court played literal Pontius Pilot and said, I don't want to get involved here.
	So I'll just defer to the authority of the administrative tribunals.
	Kill away.
	And so I'm blackpilled about it.
	I speak with Katie.
	She's going to continue with a righteous pursuit of justice.
	And I don't believe there ever will be any justice in this situation.
	Not only will there not be justice, you have a bunch of Canadians who are all too happy to usher in their own demise, like lemmings to the cliff.
	Be careful what you wish for.
	And you get what you vote for.
	The only problem is, so do other good people who didn't vote for that shit and don't deserve that shit.
	And you will say, what the hell did we usher in when they come to your front door and say, yeah, we need to kill your dog, or we need to kill your cat, or we need to quarantine your eight-year-old kid because he played with a dead bird in the backyard.
	Oh, you don't like it?
	You saw what we did to the ostriches, motherfucker.
	You think we're going to stop there?
	Serenity now.
	Is Viva trying to pull an ish?
	Rustang, you need to tell me what that means.
	What does that mean?
	And Viva's running hot today.
	What does that mean?
	Does that mean in terms of microphone?
	Okay, no, but Rustang, you got to tell me what ish means.
	Is that like an internal something hemorrhage?
	Or is that Mark Carney is a globalist who.
	Pierre Polyev is a useless twat waffle, I think is the proper word for him.
	And they're all sitting there playing the fiddle, having their press gallery dinner, drinking their fine champagne, eating their beautiful dinners while Canada burns to the ground.
	All right, that's all.
	Now, but serenity now.
	But now, speaking of drinking their fine champagne, which is not good for your health, people, we're going to thank our sponsor of today that is making something that is good for your health.
	The power of NMN.
	By the way, it's in coffee.
	We'll get to it in a second here.
	Listen.
	And say the last 36 months.
	I cannot get over how many of them have told me that I'm on NAD and I'm on Metformin.
	And I'm talking about everywhere from a gym to a golf course to a business meeting.
	And I'm talking about visually, shockingly looking young people, mainly people in their 50s that look like they could be in their 30s or early 40s to me.
	So when you say NAD, do you believe in the IV therapy?
	Do you believe in the stuff you can inject subcutaneously?
	Or are you speaking specifically about this precursor that you were referencing?
	Well, here, I'm going to pause it right here and just thank our sponsor, which is Black Forest Supplements.
	They're making a coffee, by the way.
	Let me just show you what it all looks like, and you can go to their website and check it out.
	They're making a coffee that actually makes you healthier.
	You get up, you put your pants on, you drive, and you pay $5 for that shitty ass coffee at Starbucks.
	I apologize for swearing today.
	Starbucks coffee is shitty.
	What you could actually be doing is drinking the world's first longevity coffee, the only coffee that doesn't wreck your arteries.
	Instead, it helps you relax, boost nitric oxide, and keeps you feeling young from the very first sip.
	It starts with NMN, the same molecule shown to restore arterial elasticity and reverse age-related stiffness.
	It doesn't stop there.
	You've got gluth.
	I was going to say, gluteathin, glutathione, the major antioxidant in your body.
	It helps detoxify your toxin from toxins from the air that are in your food, your environment, the stuff that makes you age faster.
	It's got vitamin D3 with K2.
	You never take one without the other.
	D3 moves calcium into your blood, but K2 tells it where to go into your bones, not your arteries.
	TMG, the only legal compound that specifically targets fat metabolism.
	Magnesium glycinate, the most absorbable form of magnesium.
	This is not your ordinary cup of coffee.
	It's a 10 in one formula.
	You can buy them all separately, or you can do this.
	Go over to Black Friday, Black Friday.
	Go up to Black Forest Supplements.
	You got a Black Friday deal.
	It was a 48-hour special, by the way.
	If you click on the link, it's in the description.
	Blackforestsupplements.com forward slash fry.
	They don't just have coffee.
	By the way, that's me on the thing.
	I'm joking.
	They don't just have coffee.
	They have all sorts of supplements that are great for the body, great for longevity, great for health.
	The cocoa or cocoa, however you pronounce it, head over to the link in the description.
	Try the world's longest longevity coffee, anti-aging, clean crash.
	You buy one, get one free for 48 hours only.
	Blackforestsupplements.com forward slash fry.
	Link is in the description.
	Now, what do we talk about today?
	I'm not having a heart attack.
	I exercised today.
	I'm going to crack my back.
	Oi.
	I think that what happens is like you end up turtling under not the pressure of the world, the shit of the world that we all have to deal with and live under.
	These filthy, filthy tyrants, propaganda media outlets, and the people finance it all one way or the other.
	And the people suffer from it all one way or the other.
	Bill Brown posting pictures of his THC in our locals community.
	Yeah, well, okay, we're going to get into the subjects of today.
	So there's been some breaking news in the pipe bomber story.
	I got to cover it because I'm sticking to this story and all of the latest developments.
	And Julie Kelly and I, I say made up.
	I don't think we ever really had a fight.
	I get along.
	I can get along with everybody who is not inherently evil.
	I don't think Julie Kelly's a bad person.
	I like Julie Kelly.
	I like Kyle Seraphin.
	I like a number of people who don't get along for whatever the reason among themselves.
	And I understand it.
	But Julie Kelly has her alternative theory, which she's further exploring now, which I highlighted to her, sort of undermined her faith in the discrediting of Steve Baker's story, which relies on a narrative from the FBI that even Julie Kelly doesn't believe.
	We're going to get into that in a second.
	We're going to start with something right after I read this.
	Old man Toby says, Viva, did you see what Judge Jackson said about Trump's power to fire people and that he shouldn't be able to?
	Yes, we covered that yesterday.
	Today we're going to talk, we're going to cover some other fun stuff, you know, low IQ idiots, left, right, and center.
	But we're going to start today's show with fake news.
	Struggle sessions.
	You can judge people by who they have as friends, but you can also judge people, I think more accurately, by who they have as enemies.
	I call it like it is all the time, and sometimes that will evolve over time.
	Because when Donald Trump was out there calling Marjorie Taylor Green a traitor, I say on the one hand, true or not, it's politically net negative, I think.
	And although I think it's wrong, when you have Marjorie Taylor Greene going out and fraternizing with the devil, I think now Marjorie Taylor Green, in as much as Trump was wrong and I believe that Trump was wrong, is certainly validating some of Trump's criticism.
	We talked about it yesterday or the day before that Marjorie Taylor Greene did that 60 minutes interview with Leslie Stall.
	And I said in that interview, when she went on, oh, who was it with Dana Bash?
	And I won't play the clip again, but when she was on CNN with Dana Bash and she says, I want to apologize for having contributed to the toxic state of politics.
	I'm like, first of all, why are you apologizing?
	Who are you apologizing to?
	And what do you think they're going to do with that apology?
	Now, it's an amazing thing.
	When you apologize, I tell this to my kids as well: an apology, A, there has to be someone who was wronged.
	If nobody was wronged, you have no reason to apologize.
	B, or two, if you're going to apologize because someone was wronged, you've got to apologize to the person who was wronged.
	Apologizing to somebody else does no good if you're not apologizing to the person that you wronged.
	And if you're not apologizing to the person that you're wrong, but apologizing to someone else, what the hell are you doing?
	Three, C, depending on which we were counting, you do not apologize for something when you did nothing wrong.
	And something that you did on purpose that you did not feel was wrong at the time, you've got to have compelling reasons to say, oh shit, I now realize why that was wrong at the time.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene going on a struggle session is the way to phrase it.
	A struggle session tour.
	I don't know what the plan is here.
	Is she trying to cozy up to the CNNs of the world?
	Is she trying to issue constructive criticism to Donald Trump?
	Is she apologizing to anybody who she actually wronged with her own behavior for the last little while?
	I don't know the answers to any of these questions.
	To me, whether or not this is constructive criticism, going on CNN and assisting your enemies and arming your enemies to take down Donald John Trump, this is no longer constructive criticism.
	This is what I refer to as destructive criticism.
	And then some people are going to say, well, the only remaining question is, why?
	You saw Marjorie Taylor Green apologizing to Dana Bash for her contribution to toxic politics.
	Oh boy.
	Well, listen to what she said.
	This was yesterday.
	To be precise, in addition to what we just heard there, President Trump posted yesterday that you are quote, and I'm quoting him now, not America first or MAGA, and your quote, new views are those of a very dumb person.
	That's the president of the United States speaking about your, speaking about you.
	What's your response to these latest attacks?
	Well, actually, Wolf, I feel very sorry for President Trump.
	I genuinely do.
	It has to be a hard place for someone that is constantly so hateful and puts so much vitriol, name-calling, and really tells lies about people in order to try to get his way or win some kind of fight.
	And I think that's exactly what's wrong in America today.
	And that's what's wrong in this toxic political environment that has ripped our country apart.
	And I personally think that that's poor leadership from a president.
	It's a very bad demeanor.
	And Americans are very tired of it.
	Can we all fully appreciate what we just heard?
	In addition to a struggle section, a struggle session, what we just heard is the most paradigmic example of confession through projection.
	And I say this not as a criticism to Marjorie Taylor Greene, because politics is, was, and will always be toxic.
	The only question is what is deemed to be the level of toxicity or what is deemed to be toxic at the time?
	Politics is toxic by its nature.
	It's the struggle for power.
	It's not going to ever be civil.
	The only thing you can hope is that it remains nonviolent.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene accusing Trump of being the source of toxic politics is the manifestation of the pot calling the kettle black.
	And I say this not as a criticism to Marjorie Taylor Greene, because I don't really find Trump's politics to be that toxic.
	I mean, they'll call toxic whatever their adversary is doing.
	Your adversary could be as dumb and puppy dog as George Bush.
	They'll call it toxic, racist, Nazi-level stuff.
	Your adversary can be Ronald Reagan, who they now look back on as the quintessential example of what a Republican was.
	He was called all the names that they're calling Trump today.
	So what toxic is, is what is in the time.
	But Marjorie Taylor Greene going on CNN and accusing Trump and this apology.
	Hold on.
	It must be very hard for Trump to be in such a place of hatred.
	It reminds me of one of the classic scenes from Family Guy where Mel Gibson's apology.
	And it's the only, I'm going to play it.
	What Marjorie Taylor Greene is doing is sort of like, is like Mel Gibson's apology, apologizing for Trump being in a place of hate, apologizing for Trump of being in a place of being responsible for toxic politics.
	Trump is not the cause of toxic politics.
	Trump is the result of toxic politics.
	And people didn't elect Trump, notwithstanding or in ignorance of his mean tweets and his toxic politics.
	They elected him twice.
	I say three times because of it and or in spite of it, but in full awareness of fact.
	So his toxic politics is nothing new.
	It's nothing that people haven't baked into the fact that he was elected now three times.
	And you're apologizing for him being in a place of hate.
	My goodness, you've ratified a lot of what Trump has said.
	And I don't know why.
	But let's not forget about Mel Gibson's apology.
	Glad to have you back on my side.
	I only wish I could convince Megan and classmates, too.
	Well, show him somehow, Lois.
	I'll be more convincing than Mel Gibson when he apologized to the Jews.
	I'm really, really sorry about your big noses.
	I'm really sorry about how greedy you are.
	But most of all, I'm really sorry about your dirty, underhanded, backstabbing ways.
	Your number one dirty Jew fan, Mel Gibson.
	This was back when Family Guy used to be funny.
	Am I going to hell for laughing at that?
	That's what Marjorie Taylor Green did, effectively.
	And for what?
	I mean, is she trying to rebrand?
	Is she trying to actually atone for what she now might believe to have been her contribution to what she now seems to claim is the destruction or devastation of the world of politics, society?
	I've referenced it a few times.
	Do you remember?
	I mean, it's like a Lisa Lampinelli rebrand.
	Do you remember who Lisa Lampinelli was?
	This was who Lisa Lampinelli was on the left.
	And she lost weight, and that's very good.
	This is Lisa Lampinelli today.
	And I'm not making fun of having aged.
	I'm not even making fun of the blue hair.
	Who am I to make fun of somebody's hair?
	I might be thinking it, but I'm not going to make fun of her.
	I think Lisa Lampinelli had a midlife crisis where she looked back at her life and she said, Look at all of the awful, racist, anti-Semitic, anti-fat, mean jokes that I've made.
	I've been, she, for those of you who don't know, Lisa Lampinelli was like the queen of the queen of mean.
	Who is it that you got the queen of mean?
	Did I just make that up?
	You got the dean of mean, Keith Jardine, back in the day of UFC.
	She was basically the one to do roasts, and she was nasty.
	I would say she was funny.
	It's crude, crass roast humor.
	And then one day, she's like, I feel bad for everything I've done in my entire life.
	And now I'm going to rebrand myself as the new and possibly improved Lisa Lampinelli.
	Rebrand a life of shock humor, retired insult comic, creativity coach, inspiration to millions.
	With a career that spanned more than 30 years, I'm not trying to rag on Lisa Lampinelli.
	Maybe she had a come to Jesus moment and she's like, shit, I do genuinely regret everything I've ever done in my life.
	I don't know what that would feel like.
	She has now rebranded herself as a positivity coach.
	And when I look at what Marjorie Taylor Greene is doing, I'm like, holy shit, she's having a Lisa Lampinelli political midlife crisis.
	Either that or she is so scorned by Trump calling her a traitor that she's now going to basically confirm Trump's accusations and criticisms of her.
	People say she's going to run for the, you know, run for president or I don't know what in the future.
	People saying she's she's looking to seal a contract with CNN.
	The same people who are simultaneously saying she's rich for life now because of insider trading, which is just factually false.
	It's because she inherited the shares of her father's construction company.
	I don't know what the hell she's doing, but it's terrible because in as much as Trump was wrong for what he said, and as much as it was net negative, politically speaking, for him to have said what he said, it seems that she has now gone and is hell-bent on proving Trump right.
	And then maybe, who knows?
	Maybe even her own following says, what the fuck is she doing on CNN, throwing Trump and not just the MAGA movement, but effectively the future of America under the bus to try to kiss ass and beg for an apology from people who will never forgive her.
	You will never be welcome among the left, Marjorie Taylor Greene, except in as much as they can use you for their own political destruction of Donald Trump.
	And then you, like the rest, will be thrown under the bus if you are lucky.
	Hell hath no fury, like a woman's scorn.
	That is the second half of what Seth Randin's squibb just posted there.
	So that's that.
	I think Trump was wrong.
	I think it was net negative.
	And I sure as hell think that what Marjorie Taylor Greene is doing right now is not just wrong, destructive.
	And in as much as I thought maybe and hoped maybe there would be some sort of Christmas reconciliation, what we have right now is not just a further digging into the heels, but a further digging of the hole.
	And at the risk of not being able to find the clip from The Simpsons right now, no, no, stupid dig up is not something that people can physically do.
	Not to be rude, but I'm going to be rude.
	She's acting like, okay, I'm going to read it because I disagree with it.
	Mr. Vende, Venende, he says, not to be rude, but she's acting like a typical bra that's offended.
	I can name you a number of men who behave that way.
	And not, and I know people are going to say, well, what kind of man?
	People, when they get hurt, they act out of vengeance.
	They act out of pride, and they act out of their own hurt pride.
	And generally speaking, it does not make for good decision making.
	And that's what I think we're seeing right now out of MTG.
	All right.
	So I hope everybody appreciates that and maybe.
	Did everybody know the history of Lisa Lampinelli?
	Because I saw a video.
	I saw a video.
	Hold on.
	Bada bing.
	I saw a video of Lisa Lampinelli.
	I was like, who is this person?
	And what sort of thing?
	Like, you know, going on an apology tour or trying to rebrand yourself so radically from what you've been.
	I mean, I guess in a way.
	It's like, what's that porn woman's name?
	The woman who slept with a thousand men in a day.
	It doesn't even matter what her name is.
	Don't put it in there.
	You know, it would be like, I mean, it's like that porn actress.
	I don't remember her name either.
	The one who was a porn star got married.
	And people never let you forget.
	I mean, how can the internet ever let a porn star who retires and wants to live a Christian life and have a husband and kids?
	They'll never let you forget.
	I guess this is something like a very promiscuous person now trying to go to a life of celibacy or someone who has been an alcoholic, gambler, whatever, going to a life of God.
	And when you've been so public in your sleeping with a thousand men or public in your racist, I put racist in quotes because humor necessarily has to be somewhat offensive.
	Otherwise, it's just not funny.
	I mean, your rebranding has to be as public as the persona that you are trying to dissociate from.
	And that feels a little bit like what Marjorie Taylor Greene is doing.
	And I would love to ask her, Viva Voce, because everything is better when you actually have the discussion, even when you disagree with each other.
	All right.
	There's that.
	what was i gonna say she damn she No, no, no, Lynx is not what I wanted to bring up.
	Yeah, there was the woman.
	I forget her name.
	It's, for someone with a germaphobe, hypochondriac, and a fear of STDs, the idea of having, don't look it up,
	because there was a picture that the person posted of the, and what I read physically of what that person, after having a thousand people enter her body within a 24-hour period, it's physical trauma.
	It's psychological trauma.
	And it makes like licking the handbar on a New York subway station look like a file mignon by comparison.
	And that's all I'm going to say about that because I might actually vomit if we continue thinking about this.
	Now, with that said, in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community, bring it.
	We've got a new member, Jaram Wall, subscribed.
	Welcome to the club, sir.
	I can't seem to see this over on Rumble, but Doug Leaf fan69.
	69.
	Many Christian conservative Canadians are looking into asylum in the U.S. You better hope that MAGA conservatism continues to reign in America, because if it doesn't, like Enrique said, Enrique Tario, we're all going to be in something of the same prison cell.
	I know what the Democrats and the progressives would do on visas if they ever get into power.
	Or at least I suspect I think I know what they might do.
	Griffin says liberals have been permissive of paying for Chinese students' educations since the treaty 101079 in 1983, right?
	Also recently, China paid Canadian professors and students to visit China.
	And for Afghanistan, make help make a can-do power plant in China.
	What the hell, says Griffin.
	And then we've got Andrea 6270 in our Viva Barnes law.
	Hey, Viva, email us back to set up the interview with Larry.
	We sent an email last night.
	Know you're busy.
	I replied to your email last night.
	Gave you my cell number.
	So, I but I'll email you afterwards.
	I replied and I gave you my cell number, and uh, text is obviously much better, but we'll do it.
	And we got old man Toby Viva.
	Did you see what Judge Jackson said?
	Yeah, we got that.
	Okay, all right.
	Now, speaking of whatever happens if they get back into power, is that the proper segue to the next one?
	Let me let me let me check my notes over here.
	Uh oh, wait a minute, what was I gonna talk about?
	That revolver news, yeah.
	We're gonna, we're gonna do, I guess, one full segment out of uh no, we're not.
	We're gonna do Kyle Serafin's motion to dismiss of his lawsuit filed by Kash Patel's girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, and we're gonna do the latest breaking news coming out of Revolver by way of Julie Kelly.
	Before we get there, people in speaking of vomiting because of you know, cringe there's an old expression: you know, you got you gotta, you gotta make use of your assets.
	And I'm I'm not judging people for being attractive or not to the point of detriment.
	But one thing that is abundantly clear is: Jasmine Crockett is clearly playing her one strong asset, and it is not her big brain.
	Listen to this, people, and just appreciate this.
	Jasmine Crockett in this video is doing nothing but what she thinks is looking cute.
	She's doing nothing but what she thinks is looking cute because that's basically all that's going to get her elected.
	That and, you know, a catchy hip-hop tune to boot.
	She ain't never scared if she ain't never bent.
	Who else willing to go toe-to-toe against the president?
	Look at her.
	I can't wrap my head around.
	She's on the bottom.
	She advocates feeding kids.
	They protect the ones touching them.
	Trump invaded his own.
	Hold on, hold on.
	She advocates, she advocates for feeding kids.
	They protect the ones touching them.
	I presume that's an Epstein reference and, you know, not a Scott Wiener trans-enabling, genital, mutilating, progressive left.
	But they are talking about themselves, literally protecting the ones touching them.
	Joe Biden and all of those grooming perverts that get their hands on kids and trans them.
	I'm playing it out.
	I'm going to stop interrupting it.
	Try to read the words and try to listen to the words and appreciate that this when Trump calls her low IQ and everyone says, yeah, Viva, that ad of Trump calling her low IQ was not intended for high Q recipients, high IQ recipients, Because those are not the people who are going to vote for Jasmine.
	Jasmine is doing nothing but playing on her phone and thinking what she's looking is cute.
	Now look who name on the docket.
	Got two words for every racist wicket whipping Jasmine Crockett.
	Everyone in MACA isn't racist.
	Yeah, that might be true, but in all the history, I never seen a Nazi flag be blue.
	The dude doesn't understand what the word Nazi means, which means National Socialist, which is far left.
	Oh, National Socialist.
	Never seen a Nazi flag be blue, also.
	Oh.
	So which side you want to choose?
	Me, I hope my money goes to the side that isn't trying to say affordability's a hoe.
	She stands on business salty toast.
	Texas tough don't need no more.
	Bad built, bleached, blonde, butch bodies moving forward.
	Oh, oh, by the way, who are they talking about?
	Oh, it's who are they talking about there?
	Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	They will never forgive you.
	They will always use you and dump you or just continue to abuse you.
	So that is Jasmine Crockett's run for Senate.
	We are living through idiocracy in real time, quite literally.
	All right.
	You all know that Kash Patel's girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, is suing Kyle Serafin, former FBI, FBI whistleblower, for $5 million for statements that Kyle Serafin made, as relates to Alexis Wilkins,
	suggesting either humorously or hyperbolically as being a honeypot, honey trap, and otherwise, you know, having no legitimate interest in Kash Patel other than getting close to the administration for the purposes of influencing it.
	All right.
	You know also that Alexis Wilkins has sued Sam Parker for the same reason and Elijah Schaefer.
	And we are going in descending order of strength of these respective lawsuits because as far as I'm concerned, the lawsuit against Elijah Schaefer is absolute horseshit because it's based on Alexis.
	It's based on Elijah Schaefer retweeting a flattering picture of Cash and Alexis in response to an article about how Israel has used honeypots to invade or have an impact on foreign countries, Iran in particular.
	And from that retweet of that article with that picture, the lawsuit against Elijah Schaefer says they are suggesting that it's spying, treason, all sorts of things other than maybe either a meme or a tongue-in-cheek joke or someone's opinion.
	Well, she's suing Kyle Serafin.
	And I said from the beginning, Kyle Serifin's lawsuit was a little different because Kyle went a little harder in the paint, as we say in curling.
	Hurry hard.
	And I still think it's bullshit.
	And I think, you know, everybody listening to Kyle Serafin understands that Kyle Serafin is a commentator and he's offering his own commentary.
	And we can call it the Rachel Maddow defense or the Tucker Carlson defense.
	I think it doesn't apply as equally to Rachel Maddow, who purports to be MSNBC News.
	I think it applies a little bit more to Tucker Carlson, but arguably so, because he was still clearly giving opinion and commentary for and on behalf of Fox News at the time.
	I think it quite clearly applies to commentators who are clearly commentating and clearly offering their opinion that they think, hyperbolically or not, that Alexis might be a honeypot for some reason, willing or unwilling, whitting or unwhitting.
	Kyle has filed a motion to dismiss, incorporating, I think, some of my astute legal observations.
	And we'll go through it relatively quickly because at the end of the day, it's a pretty simple motion to dismiss.
	They're in the division of Austin, by the way, in Texas.
	From what I understand, they may have a judge that's mildly anti-Trump.
	My joke in this is you're in Austin, which is a very progressive district.
	I'm fairly certain it's the same district that railroaded Alex Jones.
	Who knows if they get the same judge?
	So you're in Austin, a very progressive, I call it an anti-Trump division.
	And so maybe that's going to work well in Kyle's favor.
	That being said, anyone who's anti-Trump is probably going to be just as much anti-Kyle, presumably.
	I know they might not like either people here.
	It might be a wash.
	But bottom line, they're in Austin, and this is the motion to dismiss.
	You get the intro paragraph breaking national and international news coverage about Ms. Wilkins and her controversial relationship with Director Patel has only intensified in recent weeks.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	We talk about the relationship.
	Then we allege that Ms. Wilkins filed suit against Mr. Serafin to stifle his free speech as someone who is critical of her and her boyfriend.
	I feel terrible.
	Like you're reducing Alexis Wilkins to her relationship with Kash Patel.
	She's a relatively, you know, smart, insightful commentator, did some political work for Prager U, which is sort of serves as the basis of the accusation that she's an Israeli honeypot, whatever.
	I think it's a stupid, idiotic, and untenable accusation.
	And I think some people are only making it either A as a joke or B as some sort of internet meme.
	But she's a smart person, and she's, as we'll see later, in my view, obviously, clearly, undoubtedly a public figure for the purposes of defamation lawsuits.
	Okay.
	But Seraphin is arguing that he's being sued to stifle his free speech because he criticizes Kash Patel.
	Ms. Wilkins' politically motivated litigation tactics have not stopped there.
	Since the inception of this lawsuit, Ms. Wilkins has filed two other suits against other individuals for the similar reasons, suing $5 million.
	Okay.
	We say here courts may take judicial notice of things that are out in the public domain.
	The exhibits attached to Mr. Serafin's motion to dismiss statements made on social media and in podcasts accurately reflect.
	Basically, Kyle is admitting that he said what he said.
	It wasn't very nice.
	Said basically, like, you know, why would this young girl, half the age of cash, be into a guy like Cash?
	Therefore, you know, it might be a honeypot.
	But we're talking about the legal standard for what is defamation when it comes to public figures, when it comes to commentary, satire, hyperbole.
	Serafin's statement was not defamatory because the average reasonable viewer or listener of Mr. Seraphin's statement would not understand the statement as conveying facts.
	This is what I absolutely agree with when it comes to Seraphin's lawsuit, when it comes to the lawsuit against Candace Owens.
	When anyone listens to Candace talk about Macon, his wife, allegedly being a man, what I think everybody understands is you're listening to one person's theory and the evidence upon which that theory is based.
	When you listen to Kyle Seraphin, I think it goes without saying you're listening to his opinion, his commentary.
	When someone calls someone a Mossad agent, a honeypot, it's pretty much by definition their opinion.
	These are not things that are even easy to be proven in terms of statements of fact.
	So Texas law long held that allegedly defamatory publications should be construed as a whole in light of the understandings.
	Yada yada yada.
	Falsity for constitutional purposes depends on the meaning of a reasonable person would attribute to a publication and not to a technical analysis of each statement.
	This inquiry is objective, asks how a hypothetical, reasonable reader or average listener would understand the statement, not how any particular reader or listener would.
	Ms. Wilkins sit case, we get into an argument about the legislation.
	But the bottom line is Seraphin is going to argue that it's quite clearly his own hyperbole.
	Ms. Wilkins is incorrect that Mr. Seraphin's statements should not be taken as satire or hyperbole.
	And I think that's where they have to emphasize it.
	Satire is not what it wasn't.
	It wasn't the onion.
	It was hyperbole and his quite clearly his opinion.
	She says people are going to take it as a statement of fact because he's a real whistleblower who presents the uncomfortable truth on his podcast.
	And then we talk about the distinction of the lawsuits here.
	Mr. Seraphin's statements contain similar clues, including Mr. Serafin's sarcastic tone and controversy surrounding Director Patel's relationship with Ms. Wilkins.
	Mr. Seraphin noted that the director has, quote, got a girlfriend that's half his age and that quote, she's really looking for like a cross-eyed, you know, kind of thickish-built, super cool bro.
	Like it has nothing to do with the fact that we're really close to the Trump administration.
	Anyway, I'm sure that's just totally just like love.
	That's what real love looks like.
	Those were the statements.
	And they're making the argument: any reasonable listener knows that that's commentary, that that's his opinion, that that's hyperbole, and that was not intended to be a statement of demonstrable, verifiable fact.
	Any more than calling someone a Nazi is a demonstrable statement of fact.
	Whether or not it's mean, whether or not it's insulting, it's obviously hyperbole and statement of opinion, which has hitherto never served as the basis for successful defamation lawsuits.
	And we don't need to go into it.
	And then we get into public figure.
	Although Wilkins argues that the motion to dismiss stage, it cannot be determined whether Ms. Wilkins is a general or limited person public figure.
	The question of public figure status is one of constitutional law for courts to decide.
	So general purpose public figure are those individuals who have achieved such pervasive fame or notoriety that they become public figures for all purposes and in all contexts.
	And then you got a limited purpose.
	We don't need, well, we'll get into it.
	Limited purpose public figures, on the other hand, are only public figures for a limited range of issues surrounding a particular public controversy.
	As far as I'm concerned, in the context of this lawsuit, it's a distinction without a difference because she is certainly at the very least a limited purpose public figure.
	But as far as I'm concerned, obviously, clearly, and demonstrably an all-purpose, general-purpose public figure.
	By virtue of her giving political commentary to Prager Yu, she's a general purpose public figure.
	She's a country singer.
	She does tours.
	She's in a public relationship with the director of the FBI.
	There is zero question that she's a public figure and sparsing or parsing, splitting hairs over whether or not she's a limited purpose versus a general.
	The outcome is going to be the same.
	They're going to have to show that what Seraphin made by way of statement was a factual statement that was demonstrably false and that was made with actual malice.
	And again, where it comes in, actual malice means he has to have known it was demonstrably false, as if you could ever disprove that someone is an unwitting honeypot or agent.
	It's impossible to disprove.
	That's basically how you know you're not dealing with a fact.
	You're dealing with someone's opinion.
	So we'll see where that goes.
	I think the lawsuit should get dismissed at the preliminary stage.
	I think politically speaking, it's a wash.
	We can't make any predictions as to whether or not a biased anti-Trump judge is going to dismiss it because the criticism targets Kash Patel's girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins.
	I do think you might be erring on the side of it getting dismissed if that is the political leaning, because what a judge would want to do is preserve other people's ability to criticize the administration without the risk of facing $5 million lawsuits for stating matters of opinion and what might be otherwise critical analysis, however baseless it might be.
	So do I do it?
	I'm going to make a prediction.
	Kyle, if you're watching, the lawsuit gets dismissed.
	As I think it should.
	We'll see now.
	Prediction is in.
	Rien nevapleu, as we say in French, if you go to the casinos, no more bets, and we'll see where it goes.
	Now, with that said, we've got King of Biltong in the house says, we specialize in imported foods.
	Check out Biltong USA for a great selection of imported candies, cookies, groceries, and of course, Biltong, BiltongUSA.com, Code VIVA for 10% off.
	Biltong, the ones I love are the ones that look like Carnutzel.
	I forget what it's called.
	Dire Words, Dire War.
	Let me bring up the website.
	They make something, if people don't know what Carnutzel is, it's a delicious meatstick.
	And they've got a version that I don't know what it is, but it's good.
	It's a little drier.
	It's a little leaner than what I've grown up with in terms of Carnutzel.
	Let's see if I can do die.
	Is it going to fill in the blank?
	A shop.
	Let's see if I can find it here.
	Dried sausage.
	Hold on one second.
	There we go.
	Dried sausage.
	Let's see it.
	This right there.
	Droe words.
	And the Kabanosi is amazing as well.
	In my grew up, we had Carnutzel.
	Sort of like, you know, the traditional Jewish stuff that you get at the bagel shop.
	But I never liked it because it was always too greasy and it made me burp garlic because I'm sensitive to that.
	These two are flipping delicious.
	And what they actually have in it is clove, which is flipping delicious.
	Built on thank you.
	That's not a sponsor of the show.
	It's an it's a what's the word?
	It's a discreet sponsor because he gives super chats and it's a very genius thing to do.
	And he's a good man.
	He's got a good company.
	Check it out.
	Okay.
	Now, breaking updates in the pipe bomb story, which even according to Revolver News, people is falling apart.
	The narrative that we are told to believe is falling apart.
	Revolver news.
	The Jan 6 pipe bombing story, pipe bomb story is unraveling.
	Newly released FBI records show the woman who discovered the device told agents it appeared between noon and noon 40 p.m. on January 6th.
	That directly is this new that directly contradicts the long-pushed claim it was planted the night before.
	Julie Kelly brings the receipts.
	We're going to get into this.
	And I'm not getting into other stories and other people where, you know, not believing the narrative in one case does not mean never believing the narrative in any case.
	Not believing the narrative is also different than saying, I don't believe anything.
	When it comes to, let's just take Uvalde.
	And do I believe the official narrative?
	To the extent, you know, I don't believe the official narrative in that I don't understand how cops waited for what was it, an hour and 14 minutes.
	How long did you cops wait in Uvalde before entering?
	I think it was an hour and seven minutes.
	Police officers waited over an hour, approximately 72 to 74 minutes inside Robb Elementary in Uvalde before breaching the classroom door.
	Can you?
	I don't want to get upset, but this is enough to make you upset.
	Can you imagine that the cops, and I'm not, I'm not, there may be, there may be judgment in here.
	I'm not saying it for the purposes of judging cowardice or inaction.
	Police officers waited over an hour, 72 to 74 minutes.
	That's an hour and 12 minutes to an hour and 14 minutes while an armed man was slaughtering students in a school.
	So when I say I don't believe the narrative, because how the effing hell could that have happened?
	It doesn't mean I don't believe kids were not killed at that school.
	It doesn't mean I don't believe the shooter shot all those kids at that school.
	I just say how the hell did cops wait around for an hour and a quarter of slaughter before breaching the school.
	The same old true, you can question or not believe certain elements of the narrative, and it doesn't mean you have to disregard basic facts of that narrative.
	And I'm not talking about any other particular case, but I'm talking about the Charlie Kirk case.
	Oh, if people believe the official narrative, first of all, I don't believe the official narrative because I don't believe Tyler Robinson acted alone.
	I don't believe the official narrative because I have questions as to how he was radicalized, who was involved in that group, who had advanced knowledge.
	But until there's evidence to prove the contrary or to offer an alternative theory as to who fired the shot, I'm not going to say I don't believe that Tyler Robinson fired the shot because a 30-odd six doesn't behave like that.
	When I've, you know, I had my interview, I had Chris Martinson on again.
	And even during that discussion where Chris Martinson does not believe that it was a 30-odd six that did it, even in that interview, he conceded it's conceptually possible that there was tumbling that would have caused the damage that we saw, not caused an exit wound if the gun were not properly maintained over the course of its life, which might make sense for a 100-year-old rifle.
	And there might be some conceptual tumbling that can explain the phenomenon.
	But until there's compelling evidence of an alternative shooter, an alternative theory, to say I don't believe the entire narrative does not say I'm going to disregard basic facts that I see before my eyes simply because the FBI says it.
	Hey, the FBI says children died in Uvalde.
	Well, do you believe the official narrative?
	You moron?
	Oh, if the FBI says it, then it must necessarily be false.
	Doesn't mean you can't independently verify to the best of your ability what you are being told by the FBI.
	So now, Julie Kelly is arguing that nothing makes sense in this because, and I told, I put this question to her when she was on.
	How do you believe the FII discrediting Steve Baker's expose when they say, well, it couldn't have been the person that Steve Baker identified because she was playing with her puppies because we saw a video from five years ago of her playing with her puppies when the bombs were planted.
	I said, how can you accept that as debunking Baker's story when you don't believe the bomb was placed at the time she was allegedly petting her puppies in a video that we haven't seen yet?
	And I don't believe that for a hole in the wall.
	Okay.
	So let's hear what this is going on.
	This is from Revolver, and they did amazing work.
	They do amazing work.
	And I'm going to listen to what they have to say, not necessarily to take it as sacrosanct and not to disregard it because of what I already believe.
	We're going to look through it.
	J6 bomb just took another shady turn.
	At this point, the Jan 6 biPalmer smells like a dog, smells like a, when is this?
	So let's make sure that this is from December 9th, 2025.
	Okay.
	Let me bring this up here.
	I want to get to the meat and potatoes.
	For years under the Biden regime, the FBI said the pipe bomb investigation was selective, but over the idea.
	We want to get, let's face it, an unsolved mystery is way more useful than an inconvenient truth.
	Okay, but before Congress showed renewed interest in the Jan 6 saga, investigative journalist Julie Kelly had been flagging some glaring inconsistencies in the FBI's pipe bomb timeline.
	Julie focused on what didn't add up, conflicts between public claims and internal records, unexplained omissions, and witnesses whose accounts didn't fit the overnight planting narrative the FBI media spent years promoting.
	So this is, was this when she was on with here, let's say this.
	We pulled on those loose ends and the entire pop-up hoax started to unravel.
	Now Julie Kelly, who's been digging into this shady story as well, has uncovered another damning glitch.
	And this one could be the final straw that breaks the pipe bomb's back.
	Julie took to X to post her receipts.
	She uncovered yet another massive problem with the FBI's official pipe bomb story.
	According to newly released records, Carlin Younger, she's the woman who supposedly found the pipe bomb.
	She was doing her laundry, right?
	12, 1240.
	She saw the device appear between 12 o'clock and 1240.
	What does that mean?
	Well, for starters, it means that it was not there the night before.
	It doesn't necessarily mean that.
	Okay, but we'll get to that in a second.
	Here, this is from FBI receipt.
	Threat to life.
	This is from drafted by we don't get to see it.
	This is a memo.
	Looks like it's dated January 15.
	Threat to life.
	I am the person who discovered and alerted the guards to the pipe bomb found next to the RNC.
	So now we know this is Carlin Younger's statement.
	I wanted to identify myself in case there are additional details I can provide that might be useful.
	I did not see nor do I recognize the person of interest socialize in the media.
	However, I can confirm that the device must have been placed between 12 and 12:40 because it was not present when I went down to the area to start laundry at give or take noon, but it was present when I returned to continue the laundry.
	Okay.
	I don't think we need to go into much more of that.
	The question is going to be fascinating.
	Newly released FBI records, Jan 6 pipe bomb document, a tip by Carlin Younger, the woman who allegedly found the device outside the RNC.
	Okay, so she told them that they didn't find it at the time.
	Now, there have been people who were saying if they were planted, let me just get out of here.
	If the bomb was planted the night before, how the hell did A, dogs not pick it up if it was an active bomb that was capable of killing many people, as DOJ AG Pambondi said?
	How did the dogs miss it?
	How did it magically get discovered the next day?
	When it comes to this is my, you know, there's two things here.
	A, it could have been planted the night before, could have been picked up and replanted again.
	So the fact that someone says I didn't see it at noon when I'm going to do my laundry, but I saw it when I came back at 12:40, doesn't mean it wasn't there the night before.
	It might mean that it, you know, might not have been there when they had dogs coming around to sniff it because the dogs would have sniffed it out.
	So it was picked up and then put back a little later.
	Or, and which is what I personally believe, based on as much as I've, you know, paid attention to this and talked to people, the woman didn't see it when she went to go do her laundry and she saw it on the way back and she thought it appeared because she didn't see it the first time around.
	I mean, for goodness sake, I appreciate it's a pipe bomb.
	It's got a distinctive look to it.
	And you'd think, my goodness, I would have seen that the first time.
	But thing this big, when you're walking through an alley to go do your laundry distracted, for goodness sake, sometimes I don't see my own dogs in the house and I trip over them.
	It's like, what the hell?
	That dog just appeared out of nowhere.
	So I'm not sure that, you know, that it couldn't have been there the night before because Carlin Younger says, I didn't see it when I started my laundry.
	That's only as strong as human memory is.
	And human memory and eyewitness testimony are the most notoriously inaccurate, the most notoriously unreliable forms of testimony.
	If that's the big crack, you know, I'm not, we all knew that the woman who was doing her laundry, I always forget her name and I don't care about names, but you know, concepts, said I went to do my laundry, didn't see it when I came, came back, found it there.
	Therefore, it must have, someone must have placed it at that time.
	It's not possible that I just didn't see it.
	Between just not having seen it and caught it the second time, or and it not being there versus caught it the second time and it was always there.
	I would probably err on the side of the latter than the former.
	But all that to say, Revolver is not buying the FBI narrative with our My Little Patsy, Brian Cole Jr.
	Julie Kelly's not buying the FBI story.
	So she might be on the outs for other reasons.
	Kyle Serafin and Steve Baker sure as hell aren't buying the My Little Patsy FBI story.
	I'm not buying the Brian Cole Patsy story.
	The only way, as I've said, that I think Brian Cole could be involved, which is why the FBI, Biden's DOJ FBI, would have known about it and not investigated it and known about it and tried to cover it up for as long as they could until they needed it as a plan B, is because Brian Cole, much like has been done in the past, was groomed and used by the FBI to carry this out, to stage the events of January 6th.
	And by the time the breach of the Capitol occurred, they no longer needed this, sweep it up, and never look into it again.
	But that's the latest, which is that nobody, nobody is buying the story that we are being told to buy right now.
	That an autistic, semi-verbal 25-year-old kid at the time, Allegedly, with some obsession with my little pony, which is not an abnormal thing for autistic kids to have obsessions with animation or anime, acted alone, unprompted.
	Nobody told him how to build the bomb.
	Nobody told him what items to get.
	We still don't know how he purchased the black powder materials or how he made the black powder.
	We know how he, allegedly, how he made the pipe bombs.
	And his cell phone was pinging in the area.
	And from what I understand, there might be some holes in the cell phone pinging as well.
	As was identified by, I want to say, oh, I don't want to miss a tribute who did the who it starts with ARM Armitas.
	Armitas, and again, take it with a grain of salt because you never know what to believe anymore.
	Armitas had put out that according to his analysis, the one of the pings at a relevant point in time falls outside the path and therefore conflicts with the theory that the pinging of Brian Cole's cell phone fits perfectly with the walking path of the hooded pipe bomber.
	And that's where we're at today.
	Now, let me see what's going on on vivabarnslaw.locals.com in our chat.
	I got the tipped questions.
	Okay.
	And let's go to all and just see what people have to say.
	Serafin said this morning that there is an alibi for the current Patsy.
	Is it, but was he joking about him petting puppies?
	Like people are people, people, when I say there's a double standard, I try not to have double standards and I'm very self-conscious and I'm open to criticism if I do.
	When people say, Vivi, you don't trust the FBI narrative in the pipe bombing, but you believe it in the Charlie Kirk.
	Well, A, I don't in either, but I don't disbelieve it to the same degree because the evidence is different in both cases.
	But flip side, the people who would be holding the FBI's feet to the fire if this were Biden's FBI, excuse me, why don't you allege what else he bought with those items?
	Why don't you allege a motive?
	Why don't you allege his weight at the time?
	Why don't you allege how he got the ingredients to build the materials?
	And the people on the right now who want to defend this story say, Viva, obviously they're not going to tell you everything.
	They don't want to open their hands to the case.
	All right.
	This is the most politically relevant case of all time.
	It needs to be overwhelming evidence to explain this 180-degree U-turn from the facts as we knew them.
	You don't come out with a thin affidavit and you should be not critical, but you should say a little more.
	Hey, Cash, didn't you say we were going to have news in 48 hours?
	Or what did he say?
	Didn't Cash say there's going to be some big developments?
	Kash Patel, 24 Hours Pipe Bomb.
	Let me see if I can find that clip real quick.
	Here, here.
	I'm fairly certain Cash said we're going to have new news within very short order because I think they acknowledged that that affidavit was inadequate to answer some serious questions.
	But people who would otherwise be holding an FBI's feet to the fire saying this is unacceptable now because it's their FBI and they want to be on the cool kids team and they think that being supportive means letting inadequate work pass.
	Trace, you're going to learn a lot more about him coming up in the next 24 hours because what's going to happen is he's going to make his first court appearance.
	He's going to have to be arraigned and he's going to have to be subjected to the formal charging process.
	And once that happens, we'll be able to speak more clearly to the public about what we found.
	But what I'll remind the audience is this suspect was just 25 years old at the time of the alleged pipe bomb incident.
	Not an old person at all.
	Not someone with extensive history necessarily in the criminal justice system.
	But I think what we'll find in the coming days, maybe even just by tomorrow, is the amount of resources that you have to put into this.
	Generally speaking, and not stylizing the evidence in this case, you got to go out and buy pipes.
	You got to go out and buy end caps.
	You got to go out and buy sulfur.
	You got to go out and buy wires.
	Then you got to figure out how to put that all together successfully.
	And remember, thankfully, these devices didn't go off, but they could have gone off.
	They were ready to go off.
	And so that was a disaster that was averted, thankfully, saving the lives of hundreds of people around the United States Capitol.
	And so that's what we were able to hone in on as investigators and FBI agents in the field let out on that and said, let's go figure out who's buying this stuff and how they're using it and how they're learning how to do it.
	And I think you're going to get a lot more information as to the how, the why, the when, and the where and the planning in the coming days.
	24 hours.
	That was December 4th.
	Now, am I to understand that the additional information was the my little pony element?
	Did they not want to add in the affidavit that the dude was a brony?
	What the hell is a brony?
	So, no, we haven't even gotten any meaningful additional evidence to shore up what some people feel was a relatively thin affidavit, despite Kash Patel's assurances.
	So, 24 hours has long come and passed.
	It's six days ago.
	So, let's hear it.
	I see Rustang, who's a sour, sometimes a little sour.
	Ask Bro Bongino your questions, Viva.
	He was beaming telling Hannity how they cracked the case.
	Roostang, you, I don't, I appreciate the question.
	You say this as though I haven't literally put these questions and tagged the FBI on Twitter.
	So, like, you know, the thing is, this, I, people want to accuse me of being supportive or, you know, patting Bongino on the back.
	I'm just not attributing ill intent to Bongino right now, but I've put these very same questions to the FBI and more.
	Just go on Twitter and look.
	I have not gotten an answer yet.
	I had questions about the Thomas Crookes expose that Tucker Carlson put out.
	It's nice that they respond and try to fact-check Tucker Carlson.
	It's nice that they respond and try to, you know, put Massey in his place.
	I was like, just answer these questions.
	Oh, but Viva, they can't answer these questions.
	It's an ongoing investigation, which I kind of understand as well because I've raised that argument in the Charlie Kirk case as relates to the prosecution of Tyler Robinson.
	But when it comes to other people involved in the Charlie Kirk assassination, they should tell us whether or not there are other people that are under investigation.
	So I've asked them this very question.
	I had a whole list of questions.
	See if I can't find this real quick.
	Viva Fry questions FBI.
	Let's see here.
	I got big fat typos.
	I won't be able to find it quickly enough.
	I'll find him.
	I'll tag it, Rooster.
	I'll post them in locals.
	So that's where we're all with that.
	Wild Things Fervises, you know, thinking outside the box, maybe Presidents Trump and MTG are sending in a Trojan horse to send Marjorie Taylor Greene into the left to woo some of their populist voters.
	No, but you see, like, okay, even still there.
	Now, it goes back to like, you know, what's her face?
	There are certain things that can't be unsaid, even after, unless they come out.
	No, like when Kamala Harris called Joe Biden racist and said he was responsible for the busing, the busing the minorities and yet you can't then go and team up with the person you called racist.
	Here, you know, you can't say these things and now she's no longer a traitor.
	I mean, you can't really walk that back, which is why you have to, you know, in as much as humanly possible, weigh your words when you're even when you're in a fight.
	All right, now before we head on over to viva barnslaw.locals.com, there was one other story that I think I wanted to play.
	Um, no, you know what?
	Okay, we're gonna do one quick story just because it's kind of funny and also kind of reaffirms every fear that I have in life.
	Did you guys hear about this?
	This is a DoorDash driver accused of pepper spraying customers' Arby's order, resulting in wife falling ill.
	Okay, so first of all, who the hell orders Arby's for delivery?
	Okay, sorry, maybe the person, maybe they got, maybe they broke an ankle or something they can't drive and they really, really wanted Arby's.
	Of all the food you're gonna order for home delivery, you're going with Arby's?
	Okay, caught red-handed, caught red pepper-handed.
	A DoorDash driver has been banned from the app.
	Well, this bitch should be in jail after this.
	If we see what we see and what we see is what we see.
	After being accused of dousing an order with pepper spray and causing an unsuspecting customer to fall ill after eating the tainted food.
	The sick act was caught on camera.
	I'm going to show you that in a second.
	The driver who hasn't been charged with any crime.
	Why?
	I guess this, I guess, you got to investigate before you can charge.
	Was dropping off an Arby's order delivery at Mark Carden and his wife Mandy when they snapped a confirmation photo before suddenly producing an object from her pocket and spraying it on the order.
	The blue-haired worker.
	Oh shit, we see where Lisa Lampinelli is now.
	Oh my God, I'm joking.
	That's not nice.
	I'm not accusing you, Lisa Lampinelli, of being a DoorDash driver who pepper sprayed an Arby's order.
	That was just a joke because you happen to have blue hair and we saw you at the beginning of this episode.
	The blue-haired worker placed the spray back in her pocket before walking away all in front of the camera.
	The couple brought the order inside, unaware that something was wrong with it, and began chatting down.
	I do wonder how the pepper spray got on the food if it was only sprayed on the outside.
	Like the food is not exposed, so I won't, it's probably on the outside of it and they're touching it unless they also sprayed the inside and just, you know, for good measure, sprayed the outside.
	I noticed the wife started having trouble breathing, gasping after a few bites of the food.
	And then she, I think she started vomiting.
	Horrified customer began investigating the cause of his wife's sudden illness when he examined the order.
	I had to look at the bag and see where there's some kind of spray or something, Cardin said.
	The bag had been tampered with.
	So I pulled up my doorbell camera and saw the lady who dropped it off had actually tampered with it on purpose.
	Oh my goodness.
	So that's probably what Cardin shared the video.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	He attended.
	He attempted to contact her, but found she had already blocked him on the app.
	This Mofo is guilty.
	Cardin reported the food runner's stunt to DoorDash and Vanderbilt, Vandenberg County Sheriff's Office to get the driver fired and charged.
	I definitely want to see her prosecuted.
	Absolute freaking lootly.
	She's been banned from the app.
	We have zero tolerance for this type of behavior.
	Yada yada yada.
	Okay.
	If the foreign spray resulted in the harmon charge could be increased to a level five felony.
	Let's see here.
	It's horrific.
	Cardin said we assume it's pepper spray.
	That's more than likely what it was, but now it could have been anything.
	It could have been fentanyl.
	My wife could be dead.
	Vandenberg Sheriff has opened an investigation into the driver and could charge her with consumer product tampering, a level six felony.
	How about there's got to be assault.
	Bring it bump it up to a level.
	I don't know what a level one felony would look like.
	We live in a strange and terrible world right now.
	Horrific people, mean people, yada, yada, yada.
	So let me let me let me bring the actual video up, which was posted by Chrissy Mayer yesterday on Twitter.
	Make sure the audio is not going to blow anybody's ears out.
	Here we go.
	Look at this.
	There is no audio.
	Oh no, there is audio.
	So she's literally a blue-haired, a blue-haired person.
	Takes a picture.
	Oh my goodness.
	My wife had started eating and she started choking and gasping.
	And after she had had a couple bites of her food, she actually threw up.
	It's pepper spray.
	It's more than likely what it is.
	But now in this day and age, it could have been anything.
	It could have been rat poison.
	It could have been fentanyl.
	You know, I mean, my wife could have been dead.
	Definitely want to see her prosecuted.
	Just want to play one time.
	It's psychotic.
	She's got the pepper spray in her hand already.
	She takes a picture before she sprays it.
	My wife.
	And then the question I have is: if the individuals listening, like, were there any pro-Trump billboards purely, purely thinking out loud right now?
	Maybe it was a pro-Trumper who saw a Kamala Harris sign on the front lawn and said, I'm going to, you know what?
	This is how I'm going to fight communists.
	Or maybe it's a blue-haired person who thinks everybody who disagrees with transgender ideology is a Nazi and thinks that she's morally and politically justified in pepper spraying their food.
	What's the worst that can happen?
	I'd love to know if there were any indications of political ideology on the lawn, vehicle, windows, bumpers of the victim, and if that might have played a role in triggering this person to pepper spray their food.
	The moral of the story, people, is not to not eat at Arby's, but cook your own food.
	It's going to be healthier.
	Eat at home.
	You're going to avoid trouble.
	And get a ring cam because those things are effing amazing.
	Do you guys remember the video, Viva Fry opossum?
	That was really funny.
	Let me see here.
	Viva Fry, maybe it's a possum, not an opossum.
	I walked out of our front door and there was a possum standing one foot from the door.
	And I, here we go.
	This is it.
	Is this it?
	Well, yeah, this, this is, check this out.
	This was a funny day.
	As we go, first of all, everybody, you want to support the channel?
	You know what to do.
	You can do the tip, the crypto tipping on Rumble.
	It's an amazing thing.
	You go down here, you can see the tip button.
	When you can see when it's not covered with the super chats, you can go and you can click on other.
	You can tip with Bitcoin, XAUT, like this.
	Oh, look at that.
	That's if you want to tip with gold-backed crypto from Tether, which is now has a stakeholder in Rumble, or you can do this one, Bitcoin, and then you can go down here.
	That's it.
	Screen that.
	By the way, Android users, go to Google Play, download the Rumble wallet, give it a test.
	You want to support the channel?
	That's one way to do it.
	You can come follow us at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	But the easiest way is just to share the channel.
	And as we go and raid, who are we going to raid today?
	We're going to raid Redacted.
	And they've got Thomas Massey on.
	Is he on right now?
	Yeah, Thomas Massey's on right now.
	So you might want to go watch that, even if you don't like Redacted.
	Go do it.
	No pressure.
	And we're going to end with a good laugh.
	And then we're going to go over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com for the after party.
	So peeps, Godspeed.
	Go raid.
	Let him know from whence you came.
	Viva Raid Booyah.
	Okay, now we're going to end with the laugh because this is what I walk out of the house and this is what I see.
	I scream like a girl, by the way, everybody.
	Hold on.
	I just, I just, I'm just trying to go to the car.
	I nearly stepped on it, right?
	Right there.
	Look at it's how cute is that?
	It's eating the strawberry pins, eating the strawberry.
	It's huge, Dave.
	Holy shiot.
	Oh my, it's dripping at the mouth.
	It's like it's like John C. You're gonna go away.
	I should have booped it on the nose.
	You think it's gonna attack?
	It's gonna go in the house.
	It looks like it's ready.
	Oh, I think it's maybe it's paralyzed frozen.
	That's oh my goodness.
	Okay, you're right.
	I'm just gonna go around the side of it.
	It's so cute.
	I can't.
	It's paralyzed frozen.
	I want to rodent of unusual size from Princess Bride.
	Everyone's thinking it's limping.
	Oh, my goodness.
	I think it was healthy enough.
	Okay, man.
	Yeah, just get out of here.
	Oh, so that was funny.
	Oh, that was a good day.
	Truly an ugly creature.
	I guess you were frozen with fear before.
	Okay, go, go.
	Get out of here.
	Go.
	Chase it to my neighbor's house.
	All right, so that's it.
	Let's go over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com for the after party.
	Oh, that was a funny.
	I'm going to keep that open and send that back to my wife.
	Everybody on Rumble, rock on.
	See you tomorrow.
	Tomorrow's Thursday.
	Yeah, we're live tomorrow.
	And for anyone who's interested, I know you were full.
	I bowled, I averaged 187 over my three games yesterday.
	So I'm back.
	I just have to find a way to loosen up that slight pain of my shoulder bursitis.
	But I'm back, and I bowled a 207 in the first game, which was nice.
	So go enjoy the day.

▲