Viva & Barnes - Kash interview - 27 Minutes of No Answers! Another Soft-on-Crime Catastrophe! Pedo Coach? & MORE

Nov. 25, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:13:52

Kash interview - 27 Minutes of No Answers! Another Soft-on-Crime Catastrophe! Pedo Coach? & MORE

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, for those of you who may not know, Viva Fry has another channel on Rumble known as Viva Random.
	You might be asking yourself, what in the name of sweet holy hell is Viva holding in his hands?
	I present to you the Cassiopeian upside-down jellyfish.
	Behold!
	No audio.
	The Florida Keys in the shallow, warm coastal waters near Key Lago, where you find something known as the upside-down, upside-down jellyfish, also known as the Cassiopeia jellyfish.
	Why is it called the upside-down jellyfish?
	Because they reside upside down in the water.
	Look at this.
	They reside upside down with their venomous tentacles pointing to the sky.
	And if you don't know what you're looking for, you won't see them, but they're everywhere.
	There's a small one right there.
	So check this out.
	They have their venomous tentacle pointing up.
	They also are mildly venomous, but they do something called envenomate the water.
	So you don't even need to touch them to get stung because they release their stinger things into the water and it can envenomate you just by contact with the neighboring water.
	And you would step on these things if you didn't know what you were looking for.
	They're everywhere.
	Let's pick this small one up and show you what it looks like.
	Don't worry, we're not going to play the whole thing.
	I think many of you have seen this all the time.
	I'm going to get it like this.
	Okay.
	So it won't touch me with its venomous tentacles.
	Look at that.
	Look at that.
	This is so cool.
	And I'm going to put it in the water and it's going to settle at the bottom and then plant itself like right there.
	That one right there.
	Yep.
	Get ready for this.
	Watch this.
	Three, two, one.
	Okay, well, we'll stop it after this.
	Just appreciate.
	Like, it didn't need to be this complicated, but life somehow decided to be this complicated.
	It looks like cauliflower.
	It looks like an alien.
	If you landed on Mars and you went into a lake on Mars, you would expect it to look like that.
	Oh, yeah, no, it's just, it's just some tentacle-ridden thing that amazing.
	That's Viva Random on Rumble, people.
	Check it out.
	Now, what's also amazing is we went snorkeling yesterday, and at one point in time, there were some scuba divers that were under us in the water, and their bubbles were coming up, and their bubbles, I was watching them like the bubbles rise and coalesce, and they reach a certain size and they break up, but there's a certain size, and the bubble rises, I think, at about like three feet per second is the rate that they say.
	The bubble looked exactly like the dome, the cone of a jellyfish.
	And you understand why they have that shape?
	Because it makes them sort of more aqua, what's it called?
	Aqua dynamic.
	And then we saw a sea turtle, a baby sea turtle, that I swam with for a brief moment in time.
	It's like, I mean, you look at this universe that we live on, and it's an absolute miracle work of art of intelligent design.
	However you want to take that.
	The jellyfish, I mean, it's just, it's just amazing.
	The Florida keys were amazing.
	We went down with five kids, three of mine and two extra kids.
	It's Thanksgiving week.
	They're all off school and that makes for wonderful stress and the wonderful love of family and life and everything.
	Everybody, good afternoon.
	Happy Thanksgiving.
	I'll be saying it all week.
	Thanks everything that we have on this earth.
	Now it's getting a little, I don't mean to get preachers, start with a prayer.
	Anyway, we live in an amazing place.
	We live in an amazing era.
	We live in an amazing time where information is disseminated rapidly in real time, where we have access to more information than we've ever had access to before.
	We live in a world that is now navigable.
	And we live in a world where Nate Brody, Nate the lawyer, can be determined to have a flipping tumor, a massive tumor on his brain.
	He goes under, they saw open his skull.
	They remove the tumor.
	And he was doing a live stream earlier today that I was lucky enough to get home in time to pop on for.
	So that's it.
	We shall say thanks.
	Happy Thanksgiving week.
	And we'll say it every day.
	Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
	We are going to talk about a few things today.
	One of which is Kash Patel's interview with Catherine Herridge, which I listened to as I drove.
	And I was taking periodic notes as to the time stamps that I was going to clip the portions of the interview to go over it today, in case any of you don't have the 27 minutes that it takes to listen to that, or 19 minutes at one and a half, or 13 and a half minutes at 2x.
	That's a little too fast to actually understand.
	We're going to talk about that.
	We're going to talk about a number of things, but we're going to start with something.
	I say, we'll always start with light topics, just interesting ones.
	When you read the news and you say, we had better wait 24 to 48, maybe even 72 hours before assessing what the hell is going on here.
	I read this article the other day.
	I just did a follow-up.
	So I don't know what was my initial prediction.
	Like, you hear a news about a coach, a Virginia high school football coach had gone missing.
	And I'm like, there's only so many ways an adult goes missing that it's qualified as, you know, a bona fide missing person.
	Like they either get killed somewhere, God forbid, or they're demented or on drugs and it's a known thing and they abscond or they have, you know, manic bipolar schizophrenia and they sort of, you know, have an episode and disappear or other things.
	And I read a story about this individual who mysteriously disappeared.
	Like, that's weird.
	Bookmark, revisit.
	And the news, when was this published?
	Today is that the Virginia football school coach is considered a fugitive following his mysterious disappearance.
	So, you know, I say luckily, you know, he didn't go and drink and drive and get into an accident.
	But the reasons for his fugitiveness are now perking some interest.
	The Union high school coach Travis Turner faces 10 charges, including possession of child pornography.
	I don't know what it is.
	Innocent until proven guilty, and these are just charges, but the man goes missing, disappears when he is apparently under investigation or facing these charges.
	The Virginia State Police have launched a manhunt for Union high school football coach Travis L. Turner, 46, who has been declared a fugitive following his disappearance from his home.
	Authorities announced Tuesday that they've obtained 10 warrants issued Monday to charge Turner with five counts of possession of child pornography, five counts of using the computer to solicit a minor.
	This is where you realize you cannot trust anyone on earth, period.
	That even means me.
	Full stop.
	Don't trust anyone.
	And like my father always says, don't trust anyone with anything more than you can allow them to steal from you.
	For whatever the reason, I'm not going to say there's proclivities in Innocent Until Proven Guilty, and maybe it's just one big gross misunderstanding.
	Back in Canada, where two of my brothers used to go to school, there was a similar scandal and a similar incident that made the headlines of the local news.
	And you realize the proximity of all of these incidents and how they're in your backyard in your local school, and you don't know who to trust.
	But I can tell you, don't trust anybody.
	This man is allegedly a coach and allegedly soliciting minors and possession of CP, allegedly child pornography.
	Authorities said the investigation remains ongoing.
	Additional charges are pending.
	Turner, who disappeared last week, is now considered a fugitive, the VSP said.
	According to the state police, Turner was first reported missing Friday, November 21, one day after troopers went to his home in Appalachia, Virginia.
	Special agents with the VSP Bureau of Criminal Investigations were en route to the residents on Thursday as part of their early stages of an investigation, not to make an arrest when they learned that Turner was no longer at the location.
	Since his disappearance, police have deployed search and rescue teams, drones.
	I mean, the thing is, you never know where he's going to turn up and in what condition.
	A main priority is locating Turner safely.
	The VSP said in a statement, noting that the search is ongoing across multiple jurisdictions.
	Authorities are asking anyone with information on Turner's whereabouts to contact Virginia State Police.
	276-484-9483.
	Questions at vsp.virginia.gov.
	They can be made anonymously.
	The interview, a recently serviced video from the Sports Network's Instagram feed is believed to show Turner's final public interview before his disappearance.
	The interview is conducted on a field.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	I thought our kids adjusted, played hard, and overcame adversity, Turner said, noting that the team pushed through questionable penalties.
	There was no, yeah, okay, whatever.
	Turner's disappearance has left the rural Virginia community reeling.
	Wise County Public Schools previously confirmed that an unnamed employee had been placed on administrative leave with pay, pending review of an external allegation, but did not identify the employee or confirm whether the matter involves Turner.
	Staff member has been placed on administrative leave with pay while external agency reviews an allegation that was reported to the division.
	This is standard procedure, not a determination of wrongdoing.
	A since-deleted Facebook post obtained by News Channel 11, Turner's wife said Friday that the coach was missing.
	That's all we know.
	We love him.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Turner comes from a long-established football family.
	His late father, Tom Turner, coached Appalachia High School.
	Yada, yada, yeah.
	It's wait 72 hours and don't trust anybody.
	At least trust but verify.
	Ask questions.
	If he's innocent, why did he vanish?
	Who knows?
	We'll find out.
	But I just, it was funny just because I saw that story.
	I was like, I wonder, did he go missing?
	Was it drugs?
	Was it alcohol?
	Whatever.
	No, 72 hours later, that's what was reported.
	All right, people.
	Before we get any further into today's show, I want to take a moment to thank our sponsor of today's show.
	I'll play you this.
	Of the people that I know that look freakishly and unusually young for their age that I have met in, say, the last 36 months, I cannot get over how many of them have told me that I'm on NAD and I'm on Metformin.
	And I'm talking about everywhere from a gym to a golf course to a business meeting.
	And I'm talking about visually, shockingly looking young people, mainly people in their 50s that look like they could be in their 30s or early 40s to me.
	So when you say NAD, do you believe in the IV therapy?
	Do you believe in the stuff you can inject subcutaneously?
	NMN, people, we can put it on pause while we thank our sponsor, Black Forest Supplement, because you can get this now in your coffee in the morning to make it actually make you healthier, make you younger.
	There have been studies, according to Black Forest, that show that coffee can have beneficial effects, but doesn't always have beneficial effects in terms of hardening versus softening your arteries.
	And you can get a coffee with something in it that will actually, according to studies, soften your arteries.
	Introducing the world's first longevity coffee, the only coffee that doesn't wreck your arteries.
	Instead, it helps you relax, boosts nitric oxide, keeps you feeling young from the very first step.
	It starts with that thing known as NMN, the same molecules shown to restore arterial elasticity and reverse age-related stiffness.
	It doesn't stop there.
	Glution, the major antioxidant in your body, it helps detoxify you from toxins in the air, in your food, in your environment, the stuff that makes you age faster.
	It's got vitamin D3 with K2.
	You never take this one without the other.
	D3 moves calcium into your blood, but K2 tells it where to go, into your bones, not your arteries.
	TMG, the only legal compound that specifically targets fat metabolism, magnesium glycinate, the most absorbable form of magnesium.
	This isn't one supplement.
	It's a 10 in one.
	Your body can use all of this in a cup of coffee just by drinking it.
	Longevity coffee, delicious mocha roast packed with MM, NMM, gluten, TMG, magnesium, D3, K2, real coffee, real science.
	One cup makes your body younger inside it out.
	There's a Black Friday special.
	You get one, buy one, get one free for the next 48 hours only.
	Head over to Black Forest Supplements.
	The link is in the description.
	The website is blackforestsupplements.com forward slash fry to make use of the two for one for the next 48 hours.
	Go check it out.
	And we're going to get on with the show, people.
	Kash Patel did an interview with Catherine Herridge.
	I will not be as hard on Catherine Herridge as I will be on Kash Patel.
	And there's the old expression: you know, you always hurt the ones you love.
	Or, you know, you're only critical of people that you expect more from or that you want to see more from.
	And it's not a question of being critical for the sake of being critical.
	And it's not a question of being unfairly critical.
	We're talking about Kash Patel, the man who wrote the book American Gangster, the man who basically vowed to take down the deep state.
	The man who, once upon a time, said he was going to take the FBI headquarters and turn it into a museum for the deep state.
	I made a glib tongue-in-cheek post that, you know, I didn't realize when Kash Patel said he was going to turn the FBI headquarters into the Museum of the Deep State, it was because they were going to move into bigger and better and fancier offices.
	I listened to the entirety of the Catherine Herridge interview.
	The amount of times and the amount of time of that interview that Cash was talking about, one of the biggest accomplishments being their moving into the Reagan building across the street and investing hundreds of whatever millions of millions of dollars into new offices for the FBI,
	the very same FBI that has been at the source of corruption for the last, I mean, since its inception, really, but at the very least, materially for the last decade as relates to Donald Trump.
	It was the weirdest thing in the world to watch the interview kick off.
	I'm reluctant to use the, I'm going to have to use the CommieTube.
	I was shocking to see the interview kick off with a statement that I think underlies or belies the problem and the disbelief that so many of us out there who have lived through the last decade of thorough, confirmed, demonstrable FBI corruption to hear two men, I say one in particular, you know, Kash Patel comes in.
	And when Dan, when those two, when Dan Bongino and Kash Patel came in, we're like, it's going to clean house.
	These are the, you know, the American gangster is going to come in and he's going to cut the trash out of the FBI.
	He's going to cut the corruption out of the FBI.
	They have been talking about the corruption of the previous FBI, burn bags that have been left in the FBI headquarters that were apparently intended to be destroyed, but somehow survived.
	The FBI lawyer back in 2016 falsifying evidence, submitting it to a FISA court.
	The FBI spying on people.
	A decade of corruption targeting Trump.
	Patel comes in, and this was the question that we had from the beginning: is the institution itself irremediably corrupt or can it be reshaped?
	I'll let Patel answer that question.
	Speaking with straight to the point, when you arrived here at FBI headquarters nine months ago, what did you find?
	Catherine, it's great to be with you.
	Thanks for coming here to FBI headquarters and sitting down with us.
	When I first got to the bureau, I knew I would find one thing for sure, and that is a dedicated workforce to the mission.
	I also knew I would find things that need to be fixed and changed and addressed in terms of how we prosecute and investigate cases, in terms of how we treat the workforce and how we care for them.
	This building, for instance, our infrastructure systems, all these things that a place like the FBI needs to be functional have to be serviced.
	And I knew I would find a lot of those matters in disarray, unfortunately, because of years of neglect.
	I'm going to stop it right there.
	That's like, I mean, you'll tell me if you share my sentiment.
	That's like getting punched in the stomach by an answer.
	Like when I came to the FBI, I was expecting to find a dedicated workforce from the man who basically called the FBI a deep state apparatus that needed to be memory, say, placed in the bins of memories and turned into a museum.
	And it's crazy to see Kash Patel basically say, I'm coming into an organization.
	What was the corruption in the FBI if you're coming to a dedicated workforce that only wants to do good?
	And I'm, again, not the FBI does good work on, you know, apolitical criminal stuff.
	They do good work on political criminal stuff.
	You know, they got to the guy who was threatening Benny Johnson.
	He will be forever grateful to and indebted to the FBI for their swift, effective work on that.
	They do good crime work.
	Some people are going to say, what the hell do you need the FBI for?
	State authorities are constitutionally created or exist under the Constitution for those reasons.
	The FBI is not a constitutional entity.
	It has no business doing it.
	The man who called it basically an apparatus of the deep state, who vowed to take it on, dismantle it, comes in and now says that everyone who works for this force who has been participating to some extent or another in the corruption, I came and found a great workforce.
	And, you know, the biggest things to do were to redo the building.
	So it starts off with a gut punch for anybody who wanted to say, yeah, we've got a massively partisan, weaponized element of the FBI.
	And here's what we're doing to attack it, to address it, to purge it.
	Now, I'm not giving Catherine Herridge a hard time here.
	You know, she asked questions like half of the answers were, you know, I'm reiterating public statements.
	I'm reiterating what was already publicly said.
	I can't answer that.
	There's an ongoing investigation.
	Can't answer Charlie Kirk.
	We'll get to all these clips because I was quickly putting them together before the show.
	I'm not faulting Catherine Herridge, but I would have asked the question, do you feel, or in your experience now, is there an element of the FBI, what percentage of the rank and file, the just let good cops be good cops, what percentage of the 33,000 FBI employees have participated in weaponized prosecutions over the last 10 years?
	I mean, I guess I'm not being harsh on her.
	It's always easier.
	You know, those who don't do correct and those who can't do teach.
	And I'm not trying to teach anybody.
	But my father also always says those who don't draft the legal proceedings always find the typos.
	And I live by that.
	Like people pick on me for typos.
	Pits off.
	When you draft the proceedings and you do the research and you put it all together, for the person who did none of that work, the easiest thing is sitting there reading it and you've got to type over there.
	So I'm not doing that.
	Had I had this interview or had I been able to submit follow-up questions, I would have had a few.
	But one question I would have had is what percentage of the FBI's 33,000 employees do you believe are politically partisan?
	None?
	I mean, none?
	Then who the hell weaponized the FBI to the point that it's been weaponized for the last decade?
	When they go and they arm raid, you know, pre-dawn raids of pro-life activists, when they go and basically, you know, raid and kill a 70-some-odd-year-old person who's incapable of following through on whatever threats he was posting on Facebook,
	when they go do pre-dawn raids on, I don't want to make a mistake on his name, I think it was Alpha Warrior, and with their concussive grenades and trying to basically invite people to respond to what they think might be an intruder with a gun so they can basically kill the person, which is what they did, the FBI, the corrupt one under the previous administration, to at least one person.
	What percentage of them are still there?
	How do you plan on purging the FBI of this activist element?
	It sounded like, and I'm maybe not projecting, but maybe I'm just imagining, it almost sounded like Patel felt the need to kiss the ass of the rank and file of the FBI, the same rank and file that has been demonstrably corrupted over the last decade.
	I mean, the Peter Strokes, the Lisa Pages, the, the, the, the, what's this?
	The Kevin Kleinsmiths, everyone involved in that.
	Oh, it was only Kevin Kleinsmith who falsified evidence and submitted to a FISA court.
	Everyone else on the Carter Page investigation, you know, clean as the, clean as the snow is white.
	And there were none of these questions.
	There was, it was 27 minutes of the most vapid, wishy-washy answers you could possibly imagine.
	I'll start with the one highlight here, which was these are in reverse chronological order.
	So the ones on the bottom were earlier on in the interview, and then the ones later on are from later on in the interview.
	Let's play this one and hear what Catherine asked and what Kash Patel had to answer.
	Okay, I want to talk about the Russia collusion cases.
	Former FBI Director Comey is pushing hard to get his case dismissed.
	Are you confident the interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan can secure a conviction?
	I can't comment on the finality of the case since it's pending and the allegations are before a court for Mr. Comey.
	But what I can tell you is this, this Department of Justice under the Attorney General and U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan have been following the facts and the law and making a presentment based solely on that.
	And the presentation of evidence that was divulged just recently in the pleadings shows the world the substantive information that we have collected when bringing this case and acting on the facts and the law.
	Am I being unduly harsh, unduly arrogant, unduly judgmental to say that answer is a non-answer?
	You don't need to tell people to follow the law.
	It goes without saying.
	You don't need to say we're following the facts and following the law.
	A, it should go without saying, and B, it's kind of something that we've heard over and over and over again.
	Now, C, this also predates the dismissal of James Comey's indictment.
	And now, I'm not going to rail against Halligan.
	I am going to say that, you know, A, that indictment was weak sauce.
	That was my initial opinion.
	Everyone's like, they finally came down.
	They finally got one deep state actor.
	Good.
	You got one deep state actor, James Comey, on two of the most wishy-washy, flaccid indictment charges you could have gotten under the circumstances.
	Okay, fine.
	Better that than nothing.
	Those charges have since been dismissed.
	And I'm not faulting Halligan, and there's no but to that.
	I believe it is judicial activism, also known as corruption, depending on how you phrase it, that they were going to do this anyhow.
	I called it a while back.
	It was going to be jury nullification or judicial nullification.
	And we've now gotten to the judicial nullification.
	That indictment could have been more kosher than a flipping Lester's pickle.
	Lester smoke me.
	That's actually not kosher smoke me, so it doesn't matter.
	It could have been every dotted I and every cross T, it could have been an example of perfection.
	And the activist judge would have still found a way to toss that indictment as he did.
	The fact that it was two piddley charges was disappointing given what there was going on there.
	And then they try to revamp it and add some allegations about the other lies of statements that Comey made in his collusion with the Columbia law professor there.
	I forget his name now, Dan Richman, I think.
	It was a weak indictment, in my view.
	Better than nothing, fine.
	Now it's been tossed.
	And now what?
	One question I would have had, a follow-up question.
	It would have been the initial question I asked a while back of Cash: why has Comey not been charged with anything else?
	Is he under investigation for anything else?
	The answer might have been, I can't comment on any current pending investigation.
	Why wasn't James Comey charged for the 8647 post?
	Some of you out there are going to say, Viva, you're importing your Canadian anti-freedom of speech, whatever.
	First of all, you're entitled to your opinion, and I am being very careful to not import the communism from Canada, but rather the God-given rights and reaffirm the God-given rights that these United States of America fought for from the very same parliamentary system that now resides up in Canada.
	But when a FBI director comes out with what is objectively mob talk, 86 means what it means, and everybody knows what it means.
	It was on the Sopranos multiple times.
	And funny enough, James Comey talked about how he used to watch the Sopranos.
	When the director of the FBI puts out that message, it's not free speech, and it's not like anybody on Twitter saying 8647.
	A, disagree with me all you want.
	That's fine.
	We can have a disagreement on that.
	B, when the FBI comes out and says, now we've got to go investigate copycat threats from people who are replicating this 8647 statement.
	Well, now they're acknowledging that they're investigating others for copycat threats, but not investigating or charging the originator of the copycat, James Comey.
	So it's what have we seen as relates to the deep state actors facing justice for the Russia?
	Other than James Comey, who do we have?
	Mustache Man?
	What's his face?
	James Bolton?
	John Bolton?
	So a weak sauce answer that is we're following the law and following the facts.
	And now the facts are that that has been dismissed.
	Whether or not it's going to be time barred, as relates to James Comey, to be determined.
	All right, let's go to highlight number two.
	On the Epstein files, the Epstein Files Transparency Act has a very tight deadline: 30 days to produce unclassified records.
	Will the FBI meet the 30-day deadline?
	Well, we are working with our partners at the Department of Justice to produce, as we've always committed to producing, what we can lawfully, legally produce.
	And we will continue to meet those metrics, reminding the public that there are court orders in place, protective orders, and orders to seal in place that legally prohibit the disclosure of information related to any investigation when there's a court order of that fashion.
	So we're working with DOJ to say if we can produce anything more.
	As FBI director, will you commit?
	I know he sniffs, and I'm not making a drug joke.
	My impression, and again, this is not to be unduly harsh on Kash Patel, this is a DOJ failure.
	I mean, the FBI itself is sort of under the umbrella of the DOJ.
	Another non-answer.
	All right, so we're going to, you know, the FBI.
	I mean, I don't even know what the FBI's authority would be to, you know, to comply with that.
	There's court sealed.
	You know, some of these files are sealed.
	Well, DOJ can certainly make some motions to unseal.
	It's like he's governed by a higher order that is the DOJ that is absolutely derelict in their duties as relates to their duties and promises as relates to Epstein.
	Let's keep going.
	As few blacked out sections or redactions as possible.
	We always do.
	We have in our productions to Congress, which have been historic to this year, and we'll treat every matter in the same fashion while also upholding always victims' rights, victims' rights in any case, whether it's President Trump's case, this case, or any case, the victims' rights statutes are preeminent and we will protect those victims at all costs.
	Now, put it on pause here.
	Dershowitz, when he put out that video that I don't think he's commented on much since, said, I've seen the list, there is a list.
	And when they say they're trying to protect the victims, what they might be saying also is that they're trying to protect some people who made false accusations, who jumped on the call it a Me Too bandwagon, for lack of a better word, an Epstein Me Too bandwagon and made false accusations about other people.
	What are we getting here other than basically non-answers, non-committal, every caveat under the sun for it might be redacted, you might not get information, and it's up to the DOJ and the DOJ under Bondi is the one that bungled this like nothing else from day one for no better reason and for no possible excuse.
	President Trump told your boss, Attorney General Pam Bondi, to look into the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Democrats, including former President Bill Clinton.
	Is the probe limited to Democrats?
	Or will you follow the facts wherever they lead?
	We'll just follow the facts.
	It's pretty simple.
	Oh, you know what?
	That's actually the most soft.
	Will you follow the facts where they lead?
	I mean, he's already said it.
	Sorry, I love it.
	Limited to Democrats, or will you follow the facts wherever they lead?
	We'll just follow the facts.
	It's pretty simple for this FBI.
	And now the problem is this.
	This is what we're being told now in an interview where for the last, again, unforced, bungled errors, Trump, for whatever the reason, based on whoever's advice, and I think Pam Bondi ought to have been replaced even before the Epstein debacle.
	Six months ago, Epstein files, Epstein files, and then the 180 turn, where it was, anybody who's still pushing this is not a Trump supporter, doesn't need the support.
	There's nothing to see here.
	It's a hoax, which is a bad shortcut name that Trump used because it's not to say it didn't happen.
	It was to describe the fact that the Democrats were going to weaponize it to try to incriminate, inculpate Donald John Trump.
	My understanding is that apparently, this is not from any insider information.
	This is just what's publicly accessible.
	The argument was to the effect that Trump's name appears in those files because in the emails that were just released, you have Michael Wolf, journalists who wrote the book after having access to the White House, colluding with Epstein to try to get blackmail material on Trump.
	You have people basically using Epstein to try to implicate Trump.
	And so his name comes up.
	And apparently, according to some people's interpretations, that might have been the advice that Trump was given to say, your name comes up a lot in this.
	So brush it under the rug, even if it means burning a lot of support from some of your most ardent, loyal supporters.
	And I'm not talking about myself right now.
	I'm talking about Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massey.
	That's bad advice if that advice came from Bondi.
	That's bad, stupid advice that has led to disastrous consequences.
	Now in this interview, we're being told that Trump is saying, you know, investigate and disclose.
	And Cash Pricella is saying, okay, fine, we're going to do it.
	While basically saying, you might not get anything because it might be redacted.
	It might be victim protection and it might be stuff that we can't release because it's sealed under the law.
	Or as Pam Bondi has now suggested, new information.
	So no comment, no disclosure of new information.
	I don't want to say gaslit is a term that gets used a little too often, a little too flippantly.
	This is pretty close.
	What was the third one that I had here?
	Let me put it on pause here.
	Oh, yeah.
	So the Epstein files, a lackluster response, non-committal, and almost committing to not total transparency, not full disclosure, not full compliance, short timeframe, but there might be a whole hell of a lot of redactions.
	And, you know, because it's about protecting the victims, despite the fact that I think all of the victims, you know, to their credit, although the way that that victim press conference was weaponized is a problem in and of itself.
	But are there any victims who are saying don't disclose this?
	Unless the argument is going to be we're protecting the victims of false accusations, and that would be people who fraternized with Epstein, but who didn't engage in criminality allegedly.
	And so we're not disclosing some of this information to protect those who might have been falsely accused and settlements reached, whatever.
	After having been told that there's nothing to see here, move on and we don't need your support on this.
	And then a total reversal 180, sign the bill.
	All Republicans go sign the bill, the Epstein Disclosure Act and whatever.
	And now we're just don't have any high expectations.
	All right.
	Epstein.
	So we got the other scandal.
	On the Epstein files.
	Not you.
	The other scandal is the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	We'll get to the pipe bomber as well.
	The four biggies.
	They were supposed to clean house at the FBI.
	First thing Kash Patel does is thank the dedicated workforce.
	How many of them overlap with the last 10 years of corruption?
	Epstein.
	Oh, the bond.
	Oh, yeah.
	Hold on one second.
	That was mine.
	That would have been my follow-up question.
	I forgot about that follow-up question.
	Cash, has the CIA run any cross names?
	And he'd say, well, you have to ask the CIA.
	Okay, well, has the FBI been working with the CIA to cross-reference any information as it relates to Epstein?
	Does the CIA have the information that we need on Epstein?
	That has not yet been disclosed because everybody's sort of harping on Kash Patel and the FBI.
	Okay.
	Then we get to Charlie Kirk.
	And this is another one, which is going to do nothing except exacerbate conspiracy theories.
	And I won't name any names, but you know exactly who I'm talking about, are going to say this is the evidence that they're not looking in to the potential of foreign interests.
	The rumors on the street on Joe Kent and Telsey Gabbard when they were trying to look into this or apparently looking into the Kirk assassination for a potential terrorist element angle to it.
	Listen to this.
	I'll play it uninterrupted, 90 seconds of me shutting my face.
	On the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation, you testified recently that more than 20 people were on the Discord chat related to the suspect, Tyler Robinson.
	Have you spoken to those people?
	Is it now a larger universe of 20 people?
	Well, so with the Charlie case, it's a matter that is being led by the state authorities in Utah because it is a homicide investigation that is being prosecuted by the state.
	So us as the FBI are partners and part of that prosecution team.
	We're not the lead.
	And it's very much ongoing.
	So there is a lot of legal process being doled out.
	And we are committed to issuing every piece of legal process and search warrant that we can to talk to absolutely everyone and anyone who had anything to do with the assassination of my friend.
	And we're going to continue to do that and also honor the prosecutor's wishes and how we do that and what we release publicly.
	Respecting that it is an ongoing investigation.
	Is there any evidence of foreign involvement?
	Is there any evidence that Tyler Robinson had help?
	Again, that will be spoken through by the prosecutors.
	If I, as the FBI director, commented on that right now in any way, shape or form, that would hurt their case.
	And the worst thing that can happen is the individual who's charged and has his day in court down the road is if we, the FBI or another law enforcement agency, improperly commented on evidence and gave the defense an unfair advantage during the trial.
	I'll pause it here and I'll say one thing that I've said before, and I've taken a little bit of flack.
	I can understand why this, there are two elements to this: it's a state prosecution.
	And so I understand why the state isn't coming out with, you know, maybe not total transparency, is not disclosing all and any and all of the evidence, taking questions as it relates to the state prosecution of Tyler Robinson.
	That much I understand.
	Some people say, well, you know, disclose it anyhow.
	Others are going to say they have good reason not to.
	You don't want to taint a jury pool.
	You don't want to compromise the prosecution.
	You don't want to give, I don't know, strategic heads up to the defense.
	And you don't want to be accused of trying to poison the jury pool or influence a prospective jury pool through disclosures pre-trial.
	Similar thing to Kohlberger, where the dateline ran that expose.
	And I was not on the fence.
	I just hadn't really taken a hard position on Kohlberger one way or the other.
	But when I saw that expose, I'm like, holy shit, I think he's guilty.
	Like, if I'm a prospective jury member and I see that, I think he's guilty.
	And if that, you know, prejudices the prosecution, as I imagine it could have they, you know, Kohlberg ended up pleading guilty.
	So that eliminated any doubt.
	I can understand that.
	There's a question I would have had as a follow-up to this.
	Are the feds going to prosecute any federal crimes against the accused, Robinson?
	Any others?
	If this is an incident of terrorism, there should be federal charges.
	Are you pursuing those?
	There were 20 other people on that Discord chat?
	Are any of them under investigation?
	What is the idea that we're going to have to wait for the trial, the state trial of Tyler Robinson, in order to determine whether or not the feds are going to bring any federal charges against Tyler Robinson or anyone else who partook in what I believe firmly was an act of domestic terrorism?
	I believe, my humble belief, and I take shit for this as well, I don't believe the official narrative.
	I just, you know, based on all the evidence that's out there right now, I think Tyler Robinson took the shot.
	Even with my interview with Chris Martinson, where we went over his hypothesis that the round could not have been a 30-odd six, I still believe, and it's been sort of affirmed or positively asserted by people who know more than me that unless you know the charge of that round, you can't determine anything that it wasn't the 30-odd six.
	Even after my interview with Chris Martinson, I think he opened the possibility that, yeah, there's an explanation pursuant to which it could be the 30-odd six fired from that rifle and Tyler Robinson.
	Do I believe that nobody else was involved?
	Hells to the bells, no.
	Do I believe that Israel was involved?
	No.
	I mean, there might be some evidence later on.
	What I believe is my personal humble belief, based on what we know, based on that Discord chat, based on the fact that now Patel is coming out and saying there were upwards of 20 other people who had, you know, some form of knowledge of this, I believe that other people participated in it, knowingly egging on this individual, radicalizing him, had advanced knowledge of the incident, posting on it, because we've seen those posts, unless they were fake and they've since been disproven, something big is going to happen at Utah.
	People knew in advance.
	They said nothing.
	I believe there was a conspiracy to murder Charlie Kirk.
	I believe it is terrorism and there should be some federal charges there as well.
	But what answer do we get out of this?
	Nothing.
	Don't want to say anything.
	Don't want to prejudice the state prosecution.
	Can't confirm if there's any federal prosecution.
	Can't confirm if there's investigating any other people here.
	And foreign involvement, other than the rumors that Kash Patel was getting angry at Joe Kent and Telsey Gebert for looking into that, you guys wait.
	And when the trial comes around, we'll see what evidence comes out that might confirm that this was some sort of incident of terrorism.
	We'll see who else was involved when the trial comes around.
	I don't know how much time Catherine Herridge had with him, but that would have been my follow-up question.
	Is anyone else under investigation right now?
	Don't tell me who.
	Where the hell is the boyfriend, Triggs?
	Is he under investigation?
	But that's at the state level.
	At the federal level, is anyone else under investigation?
	Is there any indication that this was a coordinated terrorist plot involving recently designated terrorist organizations in the United States?
	None of it.
	And then one last one.
	And then we're going to be done with this interview.
	And I hope I'm not being unfair.
	I hope I'm not being unfair.
	And I hope I'm not getting ahead of my skis or over my britches.
	This is just, I listened to this interview so that you don't have to.
	Oddly enough, my analysis is longer than the interview itself, but at least you get my thoughts and my insights.
	The January 6th pipe bomber.
	This is just the other elephant in the room.
	Just the other pipe bomb in the room.
	In a recent cable news interview with Fox, you said to stay tuned about the January 6th pipe bomber case.
	Are there new developments we can discuss?
	There are new developments.
	Can we discuss them?
	Not at this time, but I think you'll be hearing from us soon on it.
	There are new developments.
	I can't discuss them, but I think you'll be hearing from me.
	When was the interview when they last discussed the January?
	It was like six months ago that Patel.
	All right.
	So there are developments.
	I think you'll be hearing something.
	Not committing to it.
	Are you closer to making an arrest?
	Catherine, could you just have, I don't want to say bite the bullet pun intended.
	Could you not have just asked, what is your assessment of Steve Baker's expose?
	Do you formally refute it?
	Do you have no comment?
	What is your analysis?
	What is your opinion on Steve Baker's expose that purports to have identified the January 6th pipe bomber?
	Do you have anything to say about it?
	No.
	When we took over the FBI, we knew there was a renewed interest in a lot of cases of great public importance.
	Renewed interest?
	It wasn't renewed.
	This was a promise.
	We're going to find out what happened on January 6th.
	It's not a renewed interest.
	There has never been a lull in the interest of this case.
	These were some of the biggest issues that Kash Patel and Bongino had been talking about for the last five years.
	This is the true insurrection.
	January 6th was not an insurrection by Trump's supporters.
	It was a seditious insurrection by the authorities in Washington.
	Sorry.
	And of course, this one, where it was alleged that someone went to the United States Capitol grounds and planted a bomb to possibly blow up then Vice President Kamala Harris or other Republicans and other Democrats on Capitol Hill was one we felt important enough to redouble our investigative tactics.
	And that's what we've done.
	And like we did in the Comey case when we made presentations in court, when the American, unfortunately, like you did in the Comey case, is not going to be the best metric for comparison for success going forward.
	Public finds out the presentations we will be making if we get to a judicial decision.
	We're going to find out the representations we will be making if it ever gets to a judicial.
	That sentence doesn't say anything.
	And like maybe I'm just a cynic.
	Maybe I spent too much time practicing law.
	For those of you who don't know, I did practice for over 13 years.
	This is an answer.
	Like if I get this answer in a deposition, I was like, can you just say that again?
	In fact, say that five times and tell me what sense that makes.
	So if we, whatever information, let me play it again.
	When the American public finds out the presentations we will be making, if we get to a judicial decision?
	The presentations we will be making, if we get to it.
	So you may not be making them.
	So we may not ever find out.
	Then they will see how much was missed in this case and what we have done.
	And I hope the American public will realize our commitment to putting out as much information as we can when we can on cases of great public importance.
	Okay.
	They're going to you're going to show us how much was missed by whom?
	By the very by the very same FBI employees that you started this interview off by congratulating and celebrating?
	Missed by whom?
	And it wasn't information that was missed.
	If this was a false flag federal operation, nothing was missed.
	It was a conspiracy.
	It was a conspiracy to exacerbate a political crisis so that you could weaponize the entire DOJ FBI against your political adversaries.
	And the people that did that are now the same people working currently at the FBI under cash and Dan.
	What has been done to purge those very people who partook in that Fed surrection?
	What has been done to purge them?
	We're working with them right now.
	Five years later, we've doubled down our efforts.
	And you'll see what we're going to reveal if we ever get to a process where we reveal what we say we've got.
	There's been a lot of media reporting about the pipe bomb case recently.
	Have there been any significant breakthroughs for the FBI in recent days?
	I got to pause this.
	Now that I rewatch it a third time, it's almost like Catherine is afraid to just say, what about the recent breakthrough?
	Is it true that Steve Baker successfully identified the suspect?
	Is that like, it's like she's, it's like we're playing not scategories.
	What's the other one?
	What's the one where you have to try to describe something without using the word?
	Have there been any breakthroughs?
	You know, like a certain bombshell expose that broke two weeks ago that was never formally denied by the FBI with other than some opaque statement, the reward is still outstanding.
	Have there been any significant breakthroughs for the FBI in recent days?
	Yes.
	Such as?
	Of course, I'd like to have a little bit more, but can you share any more?
	Do you expect that there will be a charge before the end of the year?
	My job is to protect the integrity of the investigation, and I know that causes a lot of backlash from some sectors of the online community.
	Well, this will be one of them.
	My job is to protect the integrity of the investigation.
	I would argue the job is to pursue the investigation and transparency and disclose updates or at least get some concrete.
	We are now, we're bordering on the statute of limitations.
	This is as judicial of an emergency as anything gets.
	This is a judicial emergency.
	We're going to, this is going to be time barred by January 7th, 2026.
	That gives us November to December, January.
	A month and a week, a month and a half.
	I'd rather speak through our casework in public and be able to assure the American public that we are delivering actual accountability than just sit here and tell you, I think we're going to get them.
	I don't know how much, I mean, like Sue said, I don't know how much more of a non-answer you can get on something that should be just.
	Hey, is Steve Baker wrong?
	Don't talk with the events.
	Is Steve Baker wrong?
	Period.
	Yes or no?
	Can't comment on that.
	Okay.
	Are you looking into the details of Steve?
	Have you consulted with his gate expert to determine the methods that he used?
	Have you revisited the person of interest too that was cleared by the then corrupt FBI that you are now prosecuting through Comey and others?
	Well, Comey was gone before that, so scratch that.
	It was, it's very frustrating because There's constructive criticism and there's destructive criticism.
	I've mentioned this before.
	You know, like when it came to Justin Trudeau, Mark J. Carney, you're not criticizing them to make them better as politicians.
	You're criticizing them so they get voted out of office.
	When it comes to Trump and in responding to the Trump sycophants who give us shit and call us pannikins and whatever, you're not criticizing.
	I am not criticizing Trump when I do to destroy or try to encourage people not to vote for Trump.
	Trump, as far as I'm concerned, might be the last hope for these United States of America.
	And I'm not being hyperbolic.
	This is, I sincerely believe this.
	And if that's the case, you're not going to ensure the survival of this great nation, its constitution, by giving them a pass when it comes to prosecuting the people who took a hot steaming dump on that constitution.
	And so I never criticize Trump or Patel for the sake of criticizing Trump or Patel.
	I criticize Bondi.
	She needs to be replaced.
	And I don't know how much of this is attributable to Bondi versus Patel, but Bondi is not inspiring confidence, and neither is Patel with these answers.
	And I don't know that there's anybody who's going to watch that interview other than the most butt-kissing sycophant who's, yeah, yeah, yeah, great interview, Cash.
	We all trust you.
	We all feel better now having watched that.
	Six weeks out of the statute of limitations lapsing on Jan 6, not a boo peep about some of the most recent breaking developments and a non-answer.
	Well, if and when, we'll talk about it.
	And, you know, just, you know, get those charges in on January 5th and then have some activist judge dismiss the charges.
	And then, whoa, whoopsie doodle, we're time barred.
	Everyone involved in the January 6th Fed surrection can walk, live free.
	Oh, and by the way, come back to bite each and every one of these people in the ass if they get power in 2026 and even harder if they get it in 2028.
	So this is also, on the one hand, not destructive criticism.
	In fact, it's a little bit more than constructive criticism.
	This administration needs to succeed.
	It needs to succeed by getting back to its original course.
	But for all of us out there, it needs to succeed because if these Democrats ever get back in power, they will do what they are claiming Trump is doing now on steroids.
	If you thought it was bad in 2016, you thought it was bad in 2020 and you thought it was bad in 2024, steroids.
	Like Mark Maguire, Jose Conseco-level steroids.
	They'll be hitting them out of the park every single time, locking people up, impeaching people, raiding people's houses, surveilling people's social media.
	And so it's not constructive criticism.
	It's beyond that.
	It's self-preservation criticism.
	This administration needs to succeed, and they need to go hard on the people who took that hot steaming dump on the Constitution.
	Capital C Constitution.
	Serenity now.
	Oh, and by the way, I almost forgot to thank the second sponsor of the show, Rumble Premium.
	People, this one, you know, everyone should do it.
	If you can't get Rumble Premium, just download the Rumble app.
	But you already know my show's on Rumble.
	And if you want the best experience, the pure uninterrupted version, you need Rumble Premium.
	It's ad-free, distraction-free.
	I mean, maybe not distraction-free because I'm always here.
	And built entirely around creators who actually stand for something.
	You'll get exclusive access to Crowder's Mug Club, Tim Pool's TimCast, and the whole lineup of voices that aren't afraid to think differently.
	Rumble Premium is how you support a platform that genuinely supports free speech.
	It is built on free speech.
	Chris Pavlovsky has been the greatest advocate.
	And I even want to say engineer for facilitating and preserving free speech, even greater than Elon Musk.
	Elon's been good.
	Chris Pavlovsky has been the best.
	Rumble has been the best.
	Go to rumble.com forward slash premium forward slash viva 10.
	That's rumble.com forward slash premium forward slash viva 10.
	You'll get 10% off annually for Rumble Premium and join the movement.
	Download the app as well, people, because you get immediate notifications when people go live.
	It's a great app.
	I have the Rumble Studio app on my phone so I can set up streams wherever I am.
	I can go live whenever I am, and you get Rumble Premium or the Rumble app.
	Do it.
	Do it.
	Oh, and by the way, just not for nothing.
	We're going to go here.
	We're going to go here.
	We're going to click on my stream.
	There you go.
	Do it.
	Do it.
	Okay, good.
	I don't look too shiny or red-faced today.
	If you go to the tip, by the way, Android now has the Rumble Wallet app.
	So go to Android.
	No, sorry, go to Google Play.
	What is it called?
	The Google App Store.
	I don't know what it is because I've never used an Android.
	40% of the market, the smartphone market in America is Android.
	If you're amenable, go download the app from Google Play, the Rumble Wallet app, and you can connect to your Rumble.
	It'll access your wallet.
	If you have an account, it'll automatically connect to the wallet or create the wallet.
	And if you don't have a Rumble account, you're not watching this right now.
	Go do it.
	And if you want to tip with cryptocurrency, that's how you can do it.
	And if you go here, you go to that little icon that says tip.
	We're trying to troubleshoot.
	And also, this is a great way to support the work that I do if you like it.
	You go tip with a crypto wallet, go to Bitcoin, and then you go Bitcoin here.
	You scan that QR code, and you can tip your favorite creators with Bitcoin, XAUT, which is the gold tethered crypto, and then USDT, which is United States dollar tethered crypto, all from the fine folks at Tether who have now a very important stake in Rumble.
	So check it out.
	Do that if you're so inclined.
	I would appreciate it, obviously, because it keeps me independent and not beholden to anybody, let alone, and I say least of which being audience capture.
	What I did want to do, and we're going to get to all of the Humble hints because there have been quite a lot.
	And I'll see if everybody appreciates my analysis, disagrees, or thinks I'm an idiot.
	Why trust any Canadian to talk about how the U.S. government should or should not be operating?
	Hmm, Barry McGowan.
	Well, that's a good question.
	Hold on.
	Let me just bring this out.
	I'm going to have a little fun with this.
	I can't show the, it doesn't scroll up fast.
	When you resort to discrediting someone based on their identity, ethnicity, country of origin, age, sex, whatever, you're no longer addressing ideas.
	What I would like you to do, Barry McGowan, why trust any?
	Maybe you meant it as a joke anyhow.
	If there's anything that you disagree with, I would like to know what it is.
	If you think the reason for which I'm wrong has anything to do with my Canadianism, that's fine.
	Let's first establish that I'm wrong in any of my analysis.
	By the way, I've been on a very, very good roll with my predictions, starting from the Canadian elections to some of the U.S. stuff, and most recently, the James Comey indictment getting tossed.
	Let's see what we got here.
	McLoyd says, tree passas, cow intestines, lingua, cow tongue.
	What language are we speaking right here?
	Jay Teachy says Barnes was on fire today on the Alex Joe show.
	Check it out.
	Yeah, before I went live, I was like, Viva, why are you going live?
	Barnes, you should be watching Alex Jones.
	Three o'clock is my daily time slot.
	I can't not say no.
	FYI, Julian Pulitzer, Jovan Pulitzer on his show, Rumble, went into detail how the adjudication rig of ballots that was 12 times the norm would invalidate the election and why he's still going on.
	If anybody cares, I do still care, Superbuff Shaft.
	I also love your name.
	Superbuff Shaft.
	King of Bill Tong says our container filled with imports dropped.
	Check out Bill Tong USA.
	Great selection of imported candies, cookies, groceries, and of course, Bill Tong.
	Built on USA.com.
	Code Viva for 10% off Bill Tong.
	We got HPGKMC.
	So what does that stand for?
	His package gave.
	Okay, never fine.
	Trump needs to go full skirt earth bukele or this republic is doomed.
	I agree.
	And my concern is that we're running out of time.
	Eric 4x4.
	Viva, it always annoys me at the ever so slight hypocrisy of you lauding the benefits of Rumble Premium, yet you refuse to support those of us that have rumble premium.
	I'm curious as to what you mean by that.
	I have rumble premium.
	And what I'm curious, I don't know if it's hypocrisy.
	I'm curious to know what you mean.
	Last I checked, I have rumble premium.
	I know that I have rumble premium, and I don't know what you mean by support and refuse.
	I think I do as much as I possibly can to support a lot of people.
	All right.
	Anyways, I'm not going to take that personally because I'm not sure what it means.
	Now, over in Viva BarnesLaw.locals.com, right here.
	Let's see what our tip questions have to say.
	We got Jameson 2012.
	Viva, one of these days we have to talk about the CFIA.
	That's the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
	I got some interesting stuff for you.
	I'm going to screenshot that and I'm going to email you after this.
	Jameson, yes.
	And now, because of these idiots, there is one less Republican in the House.
	Now they're attacking Marjorie Taylor Greene for leaving, but celebrating the fact that she was getting primarily.
	Trump is a lame duck president and he earned it.
	Well, no, you see, lame duck president is one way to look at it.
	Free bird president is another way to look at it.
	Write that down, people.
	He's not a lame duck president because it's his last term.
	I'm just trying to be smart, Jameson.
	He's a free bird.
	He could go ballistic and he should.
	You got Pam Bondi out there protecting Pfizer, protecting the Biden-era prosecutions, protecting persecution of Second Amendment rights, protecting persecution of free speech, doing nothing.
	And I was getting a little critical of Bondi before the Epstein debacle.
	He's not a lame duck.
	He's a free bird.
	And he's got to spread those wings and fly and rain down holy retribution on everyone who tried to put him in jail, bankrupt him, steal his elections, and then kill him.
	Viva, says Rustang, now that you got your snout underwater and snorkeled in the keys, are you considering starting 2026 by taking a Florida PAD that is a driving course so that you can do some scuba diving?
	No, I'm never scuba diving.
	I shouldn't say never.
	I am not scuba diving.
	It's dangerous.
	My grandmother would say, What are you doing that for, David?
	Oh, and by the way, here, hold on a second.
	I almost forgot.
	MSP has joined our Viva Barnes Law.locals.com community.
	You get the bell.
	Welcome to the community, MSP.
	We're running a discount over at viva barneslaw.locals.com through the end of the year.
	I think it's a 40% discount.
	I don't want to say what it is because I don't know offhand.
	It's a discount.
	So go check it out if you want to get the bell of glory, MSP.
	Maple syrup person, one, two, three.
	Welcome to the channel.
	And Bondi.
	Let me just bring up the thing on Bond.
	Hold on a second.
	I got to get this out of here.
	Get this out of here.
	The Bondi.
	This was who put up the poll.
	American as F.
	Now, by the way, this is where you also have to not read the room.
	Read your base.
	I'm listening to Bourbon with Barnes from last night.
	My kids in the car.
	They've absorbed some information, whether they like it or not.
	They've absorbed through osmosis.
	But, you know, this is where the Trump administration needs to listen to the base and not the donor class.
	And I'm not trying to pull any higher, you know, like shit on the donors.
	I mean, America, American politics is big money politics.
	So is Canadian to some extent.
	But America, I think that the political system is tainted by the money in it.
	And then when the donor class gets their, you know, their selection elected, they expect things in return for that support.
	You got to listen to the people who put you there.
	But so you go look at this here.
	American AF, American First, breaking news, Tesla Zcash, just a dude with an iPhone, says on a scale of one to 10, how would you rate Pan Bondi's performance this far?
	Eight out of 10, there's always room for improvement.
	Gets ratioed.
	What the F has she done?
	Zero, zero.
	Number of arrests.
	This is from Ivan Reiklin.
	And look at the look at this support.
	Zero Russian collusion hooks.
	Zero Jan 6.
	Zero Mar-a-Lago rates.
	Zero Autopen Biden.
	Zero 2020 elections.
	Zero.
	I've seen pedophile arrests.
	Zero COVID.
	Zero Benghazi.
	Zero Doge.
	Oh, and then they just recently cut Doge.
	Zero out of 10.
	She has a lot on her plate.
	We may not be able to see things as they are right now.
	She was a 10 when Trump chose her for the job, and I gave her a 10.
	Trump will let us know when she falls short of a 10.
	He always does.
	Ratioed.
	Zero.
	Zero.
	She's terrible.
	I'm not quite that harsh, but I did have this to say.
	She has been as close to an abject failure as you can possibly get.
	Bad on COVID.
	And now we know why.
	Basically protecting Pfizer, but she can't possibly go against them because she was their attorneys in 2021.
	Bad on Biden-era crypto prosecution.
	Roger Veer, by the grace of God, finally got a not a deferred prosecution, non-prosecution agreement.
	He got an NPA.
	Didn't get a pardon yet.
	Maybe Trump will get around to that.
	Bondi pursued a Biden era persecution of Bitcoin Jesus, Roger Veer.
	By the grace of God, he got a deal and now hopefully can have some freedom.
	Bad on free speech, Douglas Mackey.
	They didn't even get involved in that case.
	It was the Federal Court of Appeal that overturned it by the grace of God.
	Bad on Second Amendment.
	How many cases did Bondi not even know were going up before the Supreme Court?
	The only deep state prosecution was a Piddley two-count charge against Comey that just got tossed.
	Trump should get rid of her and replace her with Andrew Bailey.
	Edit typo.
	And I forgot to include the Epstein debacle.
	The biggest unforced error of either of Trump's two terms.
	My humble opinion.
	Take it for what it's worth.
	Okay, so here we go.
	Chop Saki, Eric Tufoy.
	The hypocrisy I am refusing to is refusing to keep the after show on Rumble Premium like Tim Poole.
	That's not, see, you're saying refusing as though I'm doing it deliberately.
	I have asked Rumble to try to figure out a way to do it because there's no way that I can do it while going to locals yet.
	And they're trying to work that in.
	So that's not a refusal at all.
	I just, I'm asking the team how they can fix that because when I use Rumble Studio and I'm going to locals afterwards for the locals after party, it doesn't also simultaneously do it yet through integration from the Rumble Studio for Rumble Premium.
	So that's not a refusal at all.
	I'm trying to figure that out because I do appreciate that I've got some Rumble Premium accounts that have been gifted and that I'm not yet able to fully integrate the after party so that it's available on Rumble Premium.
	So I'm trying to work on that.
	Let me screenshot that so I can increase the pressure on the developers to fix that.
	It's not difficult to keep the show going for premium only instead of forcing us into locals interface, which is awful.
	No, it's not, it's not difficult.
	It's impossible using Rumble Studio because the only button that exists right now, when you click it, it says update the stream and it says, and it only goes to local supporters only and not Rumble Premium.
	So I'm going to use that, Chopsaki.
	Thank you very much.
	And I didn't take it personally.
	And now I know that it's a misunderstanding and not an attack.
	And that I'm, above all else, not guilty of something because I would have corrected it if I were, but I'm trying to fix that.
	So I'll have to just remind the team to see what we can do by way of integrating that.
	And thank you very much for the tip over on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And for the plug, because we're going to go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com right now.
	Here, link to locals.
	Let's go see.
	I got an exercise.
	I got bowling league tonight.
	And what else?
	Let me see.
	Did I have something else on the backdrop here?
	Yeah, we got a couple of good things.
	You know what?
	We're going to do one more story here before we go to Rumble.
	Before we go to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
	Let me see who's on the who's on the front page right now.
	It's still me.
	So when they put someone else on the front page, that's when we're going to go raid them.
	Okay.
	Let me play you a video from Benny Johnson that might show you yet another iteration of a consistent problem in the American judicial system.
	There's a number of problems.
	American politics, too much money involved.
	American judicial system, too much activism involved.
	This is the judge that was involved in a recent case where an individual who had been released by this judge, what, 72 times, went on to set someone on fire in a subway station.
	And we're going to read the details of the story.
	I don't understand.
	It seems very much premeditated because it's not everybody who goes and buys gasoline and puts it in a bottle and then goes on to a subway, I don't know, ostensibly looking for a fight to set someone on fire.
	Meet Judge Teresa Molina Gonzalez.
	She freed Lawrence Reed despite 72 prior arrests, letting him set 26-year-old Bethany McGee on fire on a Chicago train.
	Here she is on video admitting that skin color and ethnicity influence her ruling.
	Listen to this.
	I serve as vice president for the Office of Inclusion, Diversity, and Equal Opportunity.
	The first time I came out on the bench and the deputy announced, you know, all rise, the Honorable Judge Teresa Molina, the whole courtroom stood up and I was all excited.
	He's walking out there.
	And I saw an Illinois state trooper.
	He was African-American.
	He had a sleeve covering his tattoos and he was standing there.
	And I saw, he looked at me and he nodded.
	And I knew what that meant.
	And so I looked at him and I nodded back like, that's right, we're doing this.
	And it felt so good.
	It felt so, so good.
	But by the way, I am getting a lot of father anecdotes.
	And he's still alive, people.
	I'm not saying what my father used to.
	In the practice of law, we used to call it, well, he used to call it, and I since appropriated the term, the clendeurie, the clender.
	It's the wink of an eye.
	You know, when you get in front of judges, and if you're a connected lawyer at a big firm, as opposed to a solo practitioner, I didn't look like this when I was, you know, but there's a wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
	You guys know you're on the same team.
	You're sort of looking up for the same interests, or you have something in common.
	You worked at the same firm back in the day.
	You're of the same ilk.
	And as a result, you get different types of treatment.
	That's exactly what this judge basically just said here.
	It's a wink of an eye.
	We're a part of a club and we're going to give each other special treatment as a result of it.
	But in the name of criminal justice reform, in the name of equity, in the name of diversity, in the name of inclusion.
	Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
	And literally said it out loud.
	To me, a fine of $354, which is our normal no insurance fine, that's a lot of money.
	And some of the judges that I work with came from money, so $354 is no big deal.
	Pause it.
	A fine is supposed to be, say, a lot of money.
	It's supposed to be something that is a financial deterrent to breaking the law.
	If it isn't a financial deterrent and you lower the fine based on people's means, well, that's as much as allowing rich people to buy their way out of criminal injustice.
	That's a way of letting the Pfizers and the Googles buy their way out of their criminality.
	It's just as bad.
	Fines are intended to be financial deterrence.
	If you act in such a way that they are not for the rich or for the poor, you are invalidating the justice system.
	But to most of the people that come to my courtroom, it is a big deal.
	And so I always offer them the opportunity to do community service.
	I don't mind that to the extent that it's meaningful community service.
	Making someone work for 100 hours, that might be more value added to everyone than a $374 fine.
	But the idea, like, you know, it's the fine is expensive.
	It's supposed to be.
	It's supposed to be a deterrent.
	If it's not a deterrent, you don't have the deterrence or the penalty or the justice.
	In the office, people would tell me, like, don't you feel like you're prosecuting your own people?
	But it's true.
	There are a lot of, you know, defendants that look like me.
	However, I had a chance as a prosecutor to make a difference as to what cases come in.
	I had a chance as a prosecutor to decide what offers were appropriate.
	And so I always offer them the opportunity to do community service.
	That's astonishing.
	And then what ended up happening, people?
	This is what ends up happening.
	A man set someone on fire in a subway after apparently an altercation.
	Now I got to find the article here.
	Man accused of setting women on fire.
	I mean, it's funny.
	Like the story didn't reach my radar in a timely manner.
	I was surprised that the story is almost a week old.
	Man, this is from patch.com, Illinois, Chicago.
	Man accused of setting woman on fire had 70 prior arrests, told victim to, quote, burn alive, end quote, reports.
	The 50-year-old man accused of leaving a 26-year-old woman in critical condition has a long rap sheet, according to multiple reports.
	Who the hell goes around with a gasoline in a bottle, in a cup?
	A 50-year-old man accused of setting a woman on fire on a CTA train in a barbaric assault has more than 70 prior arrests, according to multiple media outlets.
	Lawrence Reed faced detention hearing Friday as Cook County prosecutors sought to have him detained until trial under the Safety Act.
	This horrific attack was not just a barbaric assault on an innocent woman riding a train, but an act of terrorism that strikes at the core of our American way of life.
	U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros said in a news release after his arrest, Reed is charged with committing a terrorist attack against a mass transportation system, an offense punishable by up to life in prison.
	On Monday night, police said a 26-year-old woman was involved in a verbal altercation with Reed.
	This is not any sort of victim blaming whatsoever.
	This is just a reminder, don't argue with anybody.
	As crazy as you think people are, they're even crazier.
	Don't argue.
	And you minimize the risks of barbaric assaults like this.
	Then they say he approached her as she was seated on the train with her back toward him, poured gasoline all over her head and body before he ignited a bottle and used it to light her on fire as she ran.
	The woman was engulfed in flames, was able to get off the train according to authorities.
	They used an extinguisher, put her out, etc.
	Police said Reed had purchased gasoline, putting it in a handheld container at a sit go 20 minutes before the attack.
	That's not someone getting into a fight and punching someone.
	That's premeditated.
	I mean, unless he's, I mean, I'm not trying to be funny, unless he's sniffing the gas and he's brain damaged.
	Unless he bought the gas to Huff, which is what a lot of unfortunate people up in Canada do.
	Reed was captured on surveillance, was arrested several hours after the attack.
	He was seen wearing the, okay.
	He also had a CTA transit card, which had been used to board the CTA minutes before the attack.
	According to Chicago police, reports and body-worn camera, once in custody, made repeated, spontaneous, and unprompted assurances yelling, burn, bitch, burn alive.
	Reed, after, according to Chicago police reports and body-worn camera footage, once in custody, he, quote, made repeated, spontaneous, and unprompted utterances, yelling, quote, burn, bitch, burn alive, bitch.
	I mean, this man sounds absolutely schizophrenic.
	He had more than 70 prior arrests to his name.
	He was at the time, he was on an electronic monitoring system stemming from accusations.
	He attacked a hospital social worker, knocking them unconscious.
	In August, an outlet said, Fox, 30-year criminal record, arson, several arson charges, 72 arrests, and about 15 convictions.
	Yep, yep.
	But, you know, community service don't want to be unfair.
	Don't want to not give someone their 73rd chance.
	And meanwhile, this woman who has critical injuries burns across her body, scarred for life, physically, psychologically, because you have an activist judge who, much like in the other case, there, let's send them to rehab clinics that we might have some interest in.
	Let's send them to community service, whatever, you know, anything except for actual meaningful justice, meaningful criminal punishment.
	All right, peeps.
	Now we're going to take this party on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Let's see.
	Chat is, let's see, Owen Schroyer.
	Owen Schroyer, is he live?
	Owen Schroyer is live.
	Missy.
	Oh, I love Owen Schroyer.
	We're going to go raid Owen Schroyer.
	Don't know what he's talking about.
	It says, Owen Schroyer.
	Hold on.
	Rumors start to swirl major shake-ups coming in Trump administration.
	Well, this might be the perfect segue.
	Before you go, come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Before you go, reminder: if you want to support the channel, the cool digital way to do it.
	Tucka, tuck, tucker.
	Crypto, you can do it on any way there possible.
	Download the Rumble Wallet app if you're on Android.
	Report any issues to the Rumble team because they want to troubleshoot this.
	And any issues, you can go to rumble.com and submit there.
	And just tag me on Twitter also.
	And I can do what I can to facilitate that.
	And now we're going to go raid Owen Schroyer.
	Let him know from whence you came.
	Say hi to him for me.
	And let's do it.
	Oh, Louis the Lobster returns to the sea.
	If you want to get a book, it's on locals.
	Forward slash raid.
	Owen Schroyer, confirming raid locals.
	Here we come.
	Raid is confirmed.
	Let's see here.
	Owen Schroyer.
	Viva has raided the stream.
	Viva Raid Booyah.
	What's up, Owen?
	Let's see if we can do this.
	Hold on.
	I want to.
	Arresting deep state criminals.
	So, okay.
	We got Pam Blondie out there.
	We got Ice Barbie, Chris Denome out there.
	We got the hot prosecutor Lindsey Halligan, the former model.
	It's like, all right.
	All right.
	I like hot chicks too, Mr. President.
	We get it.
	Hey, hey, someone.
	Maybe there's not many things up there.
	Not too many things as great as hot chicks.
	Viva Fry.
	There you go.
	Whoever said, why would we listen to a Canadian?
	Congrats.
	That's the same crowd that you're in.
	It's always easy.
	I don't have to address the ideas.
	Let's just go and attack him.
	Viva Fry's short.
	Why would I have to listen to what he has to say?
	Okay, let's go to locals.
	Everyone, Godspeed.
	Over on Rumble.
	And I will be live tomorrow, obviously, at the same time.
	Same bad time, same bad channel.
	We'll be on with Benny Johnson at some point next week.
	Got some other good stuff coming up.
	So stay tuned.
	We're going to go to locals for our after party.
	Vivabarneslaw.locals.com.

▲