All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 24, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:36:02
Live with Ivan Raiklin! Jan. 6 Pipe Bomber~! Comey & Letitia James Charges Dropped! AND MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, as I stare at my wife, child, and friend and tell them to leave the house so that Viva can go live this afternoon, I shall present you as an interesting opening video.
Zohran Mamdani, the globalist, lawless bastard that he is, telling us who he is.
Listen carefully.
You said you would arrest Benjamin Netanyahu based on the 2024 International Court Arrest Warrant.
Next UN General Assembly, as mayor, would you do that?
So I've said time and again that I believe this is a city of international law.
And being a city of international law means looking to uphold international law.
And that means upholding the warrants from the International Criminal Court, whether they're for Benjamin Netanyahu or Vladimir Putin.
I think that that's critically important to showcase our values.
And unlike Donald Trump, I'm someone who looks to exist within the confines of the laws that we have.
So I will look to exhaust every legal possibility, not to create my own laws to do so.
On the other hand, this is also a world event.
Does that not count a little bit?
Well, I think we are a global city, but I also think what New Yorkers are looking for is consistency in the way in which we talk about our values and follow through on them.
And that's why I think these warrants from the International Criminal Court, they are worth fully exploring every legal possibility to actually follow through on.
You said you would arrest him.
Can you imagine?
I don't know when this clip is from, if it's from before or after Zohan Mamdani met with Donald Trump.
And Trump, let me just get some better lighting.
I don't know if this is from before or after Zohran met with Donald Trump.
I think it's brand new.
He's talking about New York City being a global city.
And it's a city of international law, as if now it's going to be up to the cities to ratify international treaties and apply international law.
Applying international law in a city in which they have vowed to defy federal law.
So prioritizing international law over federal law of a mayor of a city.
New York City, by the way, which is home of the United Nations.
So the next time Bibi comes to New York City for the United Nations, Zohran Mamdani is threatening to arrest Benjamin Netanyahu.
This is lawlessness.
It's insanity.
Let me just get this out of here.
It's insane lawlessness.
But the man is quite literally telling you he is a globalist puppet, turning New York City into a globalist city, defying federal immigration law, but prioritizing international law.
And he's not like Trump.
He doesn't just make and break the laws.
He applies the rule of law to his city.
And I appreciate some people out there going to say, yeah, go ahead.
That was not a fart.
That was the chair underneath me.
I appreciate that some people out there are going to say, yeah, arrest BB.
We hate Netanyahu.
Arrest Putin because you guys are idiots.
Like, you think this is how international law is applied?
Oh, the international criminal court issued a warrant for the arrest of whomever.
Therefore, now it's going to be up to independent countries to go and arrest the officials of another.
Yeah, arrest Putin when he shows up to America.
That's a good way to resolve an international conflict.
Who were the idiots?
The Klippens, not the, ooh, sorry, not the Klippensteins.
The Krapensteins, the Krassensteins, making jokes about terminating Putin when he came to America.
These people are idiots who understand nothing from nothing.
They don't know shit from Shinola, to put it according to that awesome line from the jerk.
Yeah, go ahead and assassinate the leader of a nuclear-armed country.
Go ahead and arrest the leader of a country as he shows up to the only place on earth where the UN is located specifically for the purposes of facilitating international relations and what I mean.
I think the UN is totally useless.
Disband it, get the hell out of America and have nothing to do with it.
Not so that you can apply international law in the city of New York so that you can get this globalist institution, which has done nothing good, in my humble view, out of New York City.
But that's what's going on in this morning, afternoon, depending on where you're watching with Zohan Mamdani, telling you that he's a globalist who are and he's going to turn New York City into, I don't want to say a 15-minute city.
It's already basically a 15-minute city.
He's going to turn it into a cesspool of criminality, poverty, impoverishment, and degradation.
Just give it time, people.
Give it time.
Socialism looks good on paper.
It just doesn't work well in reality.
Something's driving me crazy here.
The symmetry.
There we go.
Good afternoon.
How goes the battle?
I wanted to start with another video.
First of all, let me just make sure that we're good across all platforms.
We are live on Rumble.
Someone says, what time did this start, Lisa?
Started at three o'clock.
And now I'm nervous that I started at the wrong time.
No, we started at three o'clock.
Ivan Rakelin is coming off to talk about some of the news of the day.
We're live on Rumble.
We are live on Twitter, I think, but I don't really ever check it there.
And let me make sure that we are live on viva barnslaw.locals.com for the bestest above-average community out there.
And we are live there.
The audio is bad just because I'm on the road and I don't have my good mic, but I wanted to start with something.
Tell me if you can see, if you can see this video here, and if you can hear it.
The thing is, I'm not sure that you can hear the audio.
Do you hear any audio?
Tell me if you hear any audio right now because I hear it, but I don't think you guys do.
No, you can't.
You can't.
If you can't, let me see here in locals.
No audio?
No audio.
All right, well, I'll tell you what you're listening to.
We went snorkeling this morning.
But to the extent that there's no audio, let me just skip ahead.
We went snorkeling.
It was this lighthouse on, actually, I'll just turn the volume all the way down so I don't.
It was a lighthouse four miles, four and a quarter miles off of Robbie's Marina.
And you're not missing much, but this.
Okay, so I just wanted to show you this.
It was the most amazing.
So I go under the lighthouse.
We took a boat out.
There were, I don't know, 40 people on the boat.
Went under, and I saw a barracuda that was, it was, it was longer than I am tall, which is not saying much, but it was a damn big barracuda.
Check this out.
So you go under here.
All the fish are schooling in the shade of the tree.
Look at that.
Look at that barracuda.
It was over five.
I think it was over five feet long.
Easy.
And I was worried that it was going to go and bite me.
But here, check this out.
Hold on, hold on.
We're going to go here.
This is getting a little panicking because it was.
Okay, here, check this out.
Look at this.
Look at this.
I mean, that was a big, fat barracuda with big, sharp teeth.
And yeah, that's what we're doing.
The Florida Keys are amazing place.
So good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
It's the thing is, it was like, it was 55 bucks to go snorkeling.
It took me, it was, we only had, we had a couple hours.
It was glorious.
We saw conch shells.
I swam with a little sea turtle, about this big a baby.
And I got, I got the footage on GoPro.
All right, before we get into the, uh, before we get into the actual thick of the show today, um, I want to thank our sponsor of today's show, which is Black Forest Supplement.
So I'm going to bring this up here.
I'm going to just show you what's going on with this.
I think they're uh oh, yeah, they're they're they're getting some some holiday season uh stuff going out.
And by the way, did you know this about um something wild about coffee?
Studies have shown that within just an hour, regular coffee made people's arteries go rock hard like copper pipes.
When your arteries harden, you can't do the things that you used to do-mountain biking, running, pickleball.
You got to soften them up.
You want pliable, rubbery, youthful arteries.
Scientists gave some old mice NMN for 12 weeks, and their rock hard arteries became elastic again.
It was 60% reversal, not better, reversed.
It's like 60-year-old arteries becoming 25 again.
This was published in Cell Journal.
It activates Enos, which makes nitric oxide, your blood cells literally get younger.
I'll play a video of a professor talking about this so you can hear this.
You should, oh, you're not gonna be able to hear the audio.
No, you will be able to hear the audio here.
Hold on one second.
Let me play this and you can listen to a word from our sponsor.
Of the people that I know that look freakishly and unusually young for their age that I have met in, say, the last 36 months, I cannot get over how many of them have told me that I'm on NAD and I'm on metformin.
And I'm talking about everywhere from a gym to a golf course to a business meeting.
And I'm talking about visually, shockingly looking young people, mainly people in their 50s that look like they could be in their 30s or early 40s to me.
So, when you say NAD, do you believe in the IV therapy?
Do you believe in the stuff you can inject with subcutaneously?
Or are you speaking specifically about this precursor that you were referencing?
Well, what I believe doesn't so much matter, but the scientific evidence points to taking a supplement every day, a gram of NMN, which is this precursor, stands for nicotinamide mononucleotide for the aficionados.
Just swallowing one of those thousand milligrams is enough to double your NATO.
We're going to pause it here.
So, by the way, you get up, put your pants on, drive to pay five plus dollars for that crappy coffee that hardens your arteries.
Let me show you how you can do it in a way that makes things better.
Introducing the world's first longevity coffee, the only coffee that doesn't wreck your arteries.
Instead, it helps them relax, boost nitric oxide, and keeps you feeling young from the very first sip.
It starts with NMN, the same molecule shown to restore arterial elasticity and reverse age-related stiffness, but it doesn't stop there.
Bluthion, the major antioxidant in your body, it helps detoxify your toxins in the air from your food environment, stuff that makes you age faster, vitamin D3, K2.
By the way, you go over to Black Forest Supplements, launch day, Black Friday, get one, buy one, buy one, get one completely free for 48 hours.
It's only available for the next 48 hours.
Hold on, let me bring it back up so you can go see the website of our sponsor, Black Forest Supplements.
And you can get all of this there.
Amazing stuff.
Links in the description.
48 hours.
Newest Cocoa or Kakao.
Turkestosterone and Tonka Ali.
NMN right there.
Check it out.
Thank you for the sponsor.
And let's get on the show.
Hold on.
Do I want to bring it back this way?
I want to bring it back.
It's going to be a little dark.
Not I drink black coffee with nothing in it.
My arteries are fine.
Your arteries could be better.
I'm no doctor, but your arteries could.
And by the way, they do say to drink it black, no cream, no sugar.
But then what's the point of drinking coffee?
All right.
Let me take this out by the way.
You guys hear the news of the day?
Do I say that I called it?
Because I did call it.
James Comey charges Leticia James cart charges have been dropped.
Now, by the way, I want to show you.
I said, once upon a time, I said the only way that these charges are going to get dismissed is going to be judicial activism or jury nullification.
Jury or judicial nullification.
We're going to get into a bit when much deeper when Ivan Rakelin gets here.
This was, when was this?
November 6th?
But we said it even before that.
The Comey fix is in an absolute pretzel logogic.
The judge says it feels like indict first, investigate later, while simultaneously faulting prosecutors for the amount of documents in the file that they've had for close to five years.
While lamenting the possibility that prosecutors may have violated an attorney-client privilege, the only way Comey walks is through judicial or jury nullification.
We are witnessing step one in real time, and we witnessed step two today when they actually dismissed the charges against both James Comey and Leticia James.
Gonna talk about that.
Jan 6, Epstein, the lawsuit that Ivan Rakelin is a defendant in, and much, much more.
I think I see Ivan in the backdrop.
So, whenever Ivan is ready to pop in, I hear him.
Something's wrong here.
Oh, it might be taken.
No, that it might be going through the camera on your computer and not the plug-in camera.
Just make sure you're wearing pants.
All right, one second.
I'm coming.
Yeah, it's, I think there's something with Rumble.
It doesn't allow Rumble Studio doesn't always recognize.
I just switched it before coming in.
Well, I blame you.
This is Boomer Ivan, everybody, not Boomer Viva.
And we'll get to this in a second.
Let me see what else we got going on here.
There we go.
Hold on a second.
There we go.
Ivan, sir.
How goes the battle?
Excellent.
All right, man.
So, hold on.
Something's going to drive me crazy.
I got to move my chair over here because the sunlight is going to be just a little bit off.
Okay, there we go.
Ivan, that's better.
Oh, lordy, lordy.
Sir, so what's going on?
Ivan, I mean, I know everybody has met you.
Well, let me give me back up.
Ivan, the joke's on me.
I think you're still a half-inch taller than I am.
No, you, because how tall are you?
I'm five, five and a half, five, six with shoes on.
Yeah, I got an inch, inch and a half on you.
I think I might have 10 pounds on you, but I'll Ivan, tell everybody who you are in case they don't know.
Uh, I'm probably the most aggressive uh shit poster on the internet.
That's kind of my resume.
You won't go through the whole thing, but you did you ever practice law?
You are an attorney, right?
I'm an attorney.
Uh, I do advisory work, I've not done any courtroom work, but I've done transactions and I do legal advisory consulting strategy.
Well, let's start with the item one of the day.
We're going to get into the good stuff without disclosing my uh, I won't, I won't ask, i'll.
Let's just say they're they're, they're known by the whole world like some of my clients.
Ivan, starting with item one of the day, James Comey, Leticia.
James, charges are dropped, uh dismissed without prejudice by, um you know, on the basis that Haligan was not properly appointed as a?
U.s attorney.
There's there's, two ironies to all this.
It's confirming what they did with Jack Smith, because that was the entire argument.
Argument raised against Jack Smith is that he wasn't properly appointed, but that was good for the goose back in the Day.
They dismissed the charges without prejudice, which means they can re-file.
I'm not confident enough in my understanding yet, or the consequences of American law.
The charges against Comey lapsed.
They are time barred as of, I thought it was the end of September.
Assuming that they're time barred, the charges are dismissed without prejudice.
Can they re-file, or are they now barred by the statute of limitations because of the five-year statute?
Yeah, a couple of things there you talk about.
The first thing is, let's ask the question.
So if she wasn't properly appointed, that means no one can be charged with anything in the Eastern District of Virginia.
So I can actually hang out right now and I can commit a bunch of murders and just do whatever I want.
Total anarchy because no one's appointed properly.
That's the analysis of this ruling.
I mean, it's just totally ridiculous, right?
I think it's not an accurate decision.
The second part is what happens to the statute of limitations.
I always say this: that I could care less if he's lying to Congress, but I do care about him conducting treason.
And while he was slapped with effectively a jaywalking charge in the form of lying to Congress, which he had does have a five-year statute of limitations under 18 USC Section 1001, I think the argument is going to be from the government, from the DOJ, is that they filed it timely initially.
And so it has toll, pause the statute of limitations at the time that initial filing because of what you said, because it was dismissed without prejudice.
Normally, you continue as long as the amended complaint is filed within the period of time of what the local rules are for this district.
And if it's anything as it applies to civil litigation, that would be a 21-day, I don't know exactly, but there's some period of time where you can amend your actual complaints.
And that, I guess, would be the answer: that they're amending the existing complaint, not filing a new one entirely.
So, in theory, it's not time barred for James.
But like you said, this is- they're going to argue what you present is that they're going to say that, oh, statute limitations done.
Let's go.
And they're going to get it granted.
There's no question about that.
But even backing it up, because people were happy finally Comey's arrested.
And I'm trying to.
He's not arrested, though.
That's the problem, Viva.
A lot of people say, oh, we got something.
We got a scalp.
We didn't get anything.
And as it shows here, he can continue to freely treason.
Like I said, I don't know if I talked about it on the last time I was on, but James Comey still lives in his home in Northern Virginia.
He still has a cell phone.
He still has the devices.
He still has connectivity with all of the seditious co-conspirators going back 11 years.
He's still meeting with them.
He's still calling them.
He's still communicating, planning.
He's probably sitting down with John Brennan, probably with Abby Spanberger and Jay Jones, the incoming AG and governor in Virginia, to figure out how to conduct further lawfare against Donald Trump starting on January 17th of next of 2026 in eight weeks.
He's still able to communicate, coordinate, synchronize, and effectuate the law for with the Normiacins of the world, with the, I mean, you name it.
Nothing has stopped.
It's because we have a cowardly, cuck, incompetent, buffoon, toxic, feckless, just simps in the DOJ, in the FBI, and those that aren't of that category, the rest of them are loyal to James Comey and Christopher Ray at the FBI.
And if you're at the DOJ, you're still loyal to Eric Holder, Bill Barr, Sal Yates, and Rod Rosenstein.
So how do you think they're going to get anything done?
They're not until they like, I provide an answer sheet, Viva.
I know that sounds very humble, but here's my answer, she.
Why don't you throw out every single person that was vaxed with the COVID jab across the entire DOJ and FBI?
Bing.
And those that are left are already proven up that they're willing to go to bat for America, for the Constitution, and start laying waste to the deep state.
Until that happens, nothing will change.
I want to respond, just clarify something I saw in the chat.
They just said a clickbait title.
No, the charges are actually.
First of all, I don't do clickbait titles.
I'm actually very bad at it.
I need to resort to Grok just for titles.
They dismiss the charges.
And then to go back to what he said, like you said, a Jaywalk and slap on the wrist ticket.
People were saying, we got our charges against Comey.
It's, you know, baby steps.
And I'm like, those were two of the weakest charges, two of the most, you know, almost innocuous charges.
Yeah, sure, they carry potential jail time.
He'd never get it.
It was too little, too late.
And now it sounds like it was, I don't want to say improperly done because I think it is judicial activism, but it's nothing.
It's absolutely nothing.
Nothing for the 8647, which I believe was a threat.
Nothing for the continued conspiracy to undermine the 2016 election.
And I don't, you know, who to blame, Ivan, because people are saying Cucky McCuckstreakstein, whatever her face is, Pam Bondi.
Others are going to say Kash Patel, but they are operating under the umbrella of the DOJ.
And then others are going to say the buck stops with the president.
The bucket.
The buck stops with the president.
How about you stop being distracted by the little carrot known as the Nobel Peace Prize, Mr. President, and actually get your own house in order?
I'm here to help with that.
Viva's here to help with it.
I'm sure every single person in the chat that is watching in, we want you to succeed, but we can't help you if you're completely oblivious to what we're trying to help you with.
And instead, you have incompetent buffoons that are doing other things.
So when the house collapses and you're left with no clothes and you're thinking, oh, wait, I was lied to by Bibian, Miriam Adelson, and my son-in-law, Jared Kushner, they all promised me this Nobel Peace Prize.
And in January, you're going to feel lawfare like you've never felt before, Mr. President.
Just like I explained, because they're coming for you.
The only way you stop it is if you start to focus on accountability.
Otherwise, I mean, I hate to say it.
Good luck.
I'm going to continue to try to stop these people, but like, I only have so much influence.
You only have so much influence, Viva.
The president has full stop authority.
If he were to use the same authorities that John Brennan and Barry Hussein did, guess what?
John Brennan, without due process, was like, hey, let's go ahead.
Hey, Barry, you want to sign this off on me?
Let's go ahead and drone strike an American citizen.
Boom, done, gone.
Ivan, to play devil's advocate, not even devil's advocate, just to try to steel man the other side.
It seems like the little baby steps that Trump tries to accomplish still get shut down by a system that protects its own brethren.
And so if you were to go after them the way they went after him and all of his brethren, well, the court system wouldn't allow it, as we're seeing right now with Comey.
So how do you even play it out?
We need to go maximum, Viva.
So he can't go maximum because who does he have for a staff?
Who got weaponized to the maximum that's on his staff?
Name someone.
Who faced weaponized to the maximum over the during the Biden criminal syndicate that is currently on his staff, ready, willing, and able to go just as scorched earth as they received by the Biden criminal syndicate?
Was Pam Bondi?
No, she got destroyed.
No, nothing happened to her.
Did Susie Wiles get any angst or hate from the Jack Smiths of the world or anybody else during that Biden criminal syndicate reign of terror?
No.
They could care less because they're unscathed.
Now, you could argue that Kash Patel did, but where is he?
Now that you mentioned it, how about you bring in the whistleblowers?
I mean, I can name some.
You've had them on your show.
Garrett O'Boyle should be at the senior levels of the FBI.
Kyle Serafin should be at the senior levels of the FBI.
Who else?
Well, Steve.
I mean, Steve Fred.
They should be running, if not the second tier, providing that inner perimeter security for the Kash Patels and the Dan Bonginos.
And then from there, you elevate every single person in the FBI and the DOJ that refused to comply with the unlawful vaccine order.
Then you have your second rung of protection.
And now you have a cadre that are willing to go completely 100% against the institution that is still controlled by James Comey and Christopher Rayeps.
Pun intended.
You can laugh now.
Well, no, but this is the question.
Why do you think he's not doing it?
I mean, people are making, I say, the joke, the observation.
He's chasing titles.
He's chasing the Nobel Peace Prize.
He's chasing, I say, pursuits of ego and not pursuits of nation.
This is his last term.
He is not up for re-election, and people say that's when you go scorched earth.
And what we've seen is seemingly dancing with the devil and expecting the devil not to dance back.
So I'm going to present it this way: what option does he have?
Right now, he has, I mean, who got him elected from the donor and political establishment class?
I mean, arguably, when you look at the financials, it was Elon Musk and Miriam Adelson, the top two fundraising capabilities, right?
Well, Miriam Adelson was able to leverage the White House to push out Elon Musk, right?
Right?
Joe Bohr, Susie Wiles, et cetera.
So when you look at the ecosystem of who has affiliations and relationships, and you start to see the connectivity between Susie, Miriam Adelson, Baby Netanyahu, Jared Kushner, Chris LaSavita, who's on the outside still doing the fundraising PACs on behalf of which a lot of it's funded by Miriam Adelson.
And she's essentially saying, hey, Donald, do everything in your power to stop the release of the Epstein files because that's our mechanism to control people.
I mean, that's kind of how we operate here globally.
So if you do that for me, we'll work on your Nobel Peace Prize.
And if you do release it, we're just going to destroy you, right?
Politically.
We'll go after everything.
So that's why he's going after Marjorie, Taylor Greene, and Thomas Massey because they're the ones that are trying to stop, or I should say, release the very thing that is keeping Donald Trump in check by the bigger donors.
This is my analysis.
If I'm wrong, I want anybody and everybody to say I'm wrong, but with receipts, not just like, oh, you've turned on Trump.
Oh, you this.
No, the way I see it, he's betrayed us.
Bringing in Pharma Schills, Birla, right?
Bringing in Mamdani, endorsing, I mean, endorsing Lindsey Graham, you could argue, oh, well, he's a Republican.
Okay, let's set that one aside, even though Lindsey Graham was behind providing cover for Jim Comey when he was the director of the FBI, as Lindsey Graham was the chair of the Judiciary Committee, as he allowed Russia, Russia, Russia to continue, right?
During the first term.
But even there, let's go into what part of people did not understand that Andrew Cuomo is a Democrat that led the effort nationally during the COVID op to slaughter thousands of grandmas and grandpas into the nursing homes.
So Democrat COVID criminal, Donald Trump endorses.
It is the trail.
I'm struggling to try to make sense of it.
I mean, some people are going to say it.
That's why you're seeing a civil war because you got the sycophants basically carrying the water without anything to back up.
Why we should agree with them?
Trump endorsed what's his face, Cuomo on the eve of that election.
Why some people say the lesser of the evils between him and Mandani?
He's got Burla in the White House, Zuckerberg in the White House.
Who's the other, you know, the big tech bro?
Bill Gates.
It's tough to understand.
I mean, what you're describing, you know, he wants the Nobel Peace Prize.
He wants these awards that'll solidify his greatness.
Does he not think, does he not appreciate, like, as you say, they're going to come after him and everyone in his orbit once they regain the levers of power, unless he thinks that he plays ball now and then they'll spare him when they come into power?
Possibly that's the calculus.
But the other thing to consider is I did a timeline on a previous podcast a little earlier today, and we kind of stepped through the wins and the losses that have taken place since January.
And it's essentially it's a big donor class, the globalists, that have funded his campaign, right?
Which got him in office.
Don't get me wrong.
So they have a say in what happens.
And then you have us on the other side.
And we're most of us, if you will, don't really know the names and the individuals that are on this other side.
We're just kind of guessing, but they know exactly who we are.
And they try to like this whole civil war amongst us is created by the very globalist fundraising scheme them so that they can continue to increase their levers of power and influence over this administration.
But at some point, I don't know, maybe with what happened today with Tish and Homi Kaumi and all the angst from a lot of key leaders that are independents that are not probably paid or shills of the comms team at the White House that are part of this movement that got him elected.
We're not buying it.
We don't want any of that.
Focus on America.
Like, where's your priority to take out to get Tina Peters out, Mr. President?
I don't know.
I'm just going to say it bluntly.
Where the fuck are you, Donald?
You got Tina Peters fucking rotting in jail.
Where the fuck are you?
How about you order the DOJ to order the U.S. Marshals director, Seralta, to go ahead and extract her?
He's got 4,000 federal marshals that can easily surround and raid that dissident, whatever you want to call it, the insurrectionist Colorado that's holding her in prison.
Her blood will be on your hands, Donald, because of your failure to act.
And you're distracted with the Nobel Peace Prize and all this other stuff globally.
You can get prisoners out in other countries.
How about you fucking get an American citizen out of prison?
That's how I feel.
And not, I say, I'm telling everyone to clip that and share it because they can use whistleblower protection to get Tina Peters out.
They can't do quite as much with Dexter Taylor in New York State for the firearm charges.
Tina Peters allegedly, arguably, but not arguably, blew the whistle on election chicanery.
And her health is at issue.
She's been in there.
I think Harmee Dylan might have talked about looking into it a little while ago, but nothing.
So I get it.
Like I got passionate.
People are going to get me pissed about, oh, you can't say that.
I can say whatever I want, okay?
Number one.
Number two, if she is released and she's given her, and she given her dues and the other J Sixers that haven't been pardoned yet get their pardons, guess what?
You can get your Nobel Peace Prize.
Do both.
Okay.
Stop being distracted with one thing as it destroys families, destroys Tina.
You got another guy that hasn't been pardoned, Shane Lamont.
He can't testify before Barry Lautermook's committee because he's not available.
He's in prison.
And maybe you're being advised to not pardon him until January 7th so that the statute of limitations completely tolls on the January 6th component.
Unacceptable.
And I'm here to say it.
And I'm going to get a lot of heat for it, but I'm sick of it.
Like somebody has to step up and confront the massive problem.
I mean, this is not an elephant.
This is a fucking stampede of problems that can so easily be fixed.
And once they are, then I'm going to be like, okay, you can claim 5D or trillion D chess, but it's done now.
I judge based on actions, not on anything else.
I want to bring it up at all.
You got me fired up.
No, no, Ivan, I appreciate it.
I appreciate it, not in the sense of I agree.
And it's watching.
I get nothing out of getting these people released.
Like, it's just the right thing to do.
It's not for nothing, and I'll get in trouble for bringing this up.
But you got Susie Wiles, who worked on getting Netanyahu elected.
You got Pam Bonte, who was literally attorney, counsel, or whatever you want to call it, advisor for Pfizer in 2021.
These are people who not only can't have diverse or adverse interests or even opposing positions to certain entities that carry a lot of influence, they are their spokespeople in the White House.
And you say Tina Peters is rotting away.
The last I checked, she was having health issues.
She's been sitting there praying to God that Trump does something, and he's done nothing.
And I say, everyone plays FTSE and NICE.
I'm beyond it.
I'm just going to blow a gasket from here on out until this issue is resolved.
Tina Peters.
That's it.
How about we start with that?
I mean, this is simple.
Oh, the argument is like, oh, it's a state case.
Like you said, I put out a tweet.
I listed the federal statutes that Jenna Griswold violated and Tina Peters is the number one witness, federal witness for the 2020 election.
Pull her out.
Okay, you filed your request.
They said no.
Okay, great.
We tried the procedural route.
Now we go into testing the constitutional limits of a state and violating federal statutes to completely obliterate a federal election.
But we have cowards.
We have fucking cowards in our government right now.
And I said January 20th.
I'm happy.
I'm happy we went from a tyrannical, belligerent, illegitimate regime to a coward regime.
Because guess what?
This coward regime doesn't have their foot on my neck.
I have the ability to speak.
I have the ability to call them out.
I can move around freely without being concerned that I'm going to get a knock on the door in the six in the morning and one of us comes out alive.
Okay.
We're in a different position now.
Now we have to get this cowardly cuck administration to go scorched earth against those remnants, meaning 99% of it.
They need to be extracted.
99% of our government is cancer, is cancer to the people.
And okay, maybe in some instances you can say, great, cash fired a few people.
Okay, 98%.
There needs to be a complete cleansing of the system, and that can happen immediately, but it requires courage.
You say, like, we're going to be a year of this administration, and other than, and I'm not trying to be too cynical or too harsh on the administration, other than the border, and despite the hurdles there, other than the border, I mean, what is the other big W?
I mean, I'm having trouble at this point.
Yeah, so truth and transparency, we're getting W's, okay?
Let me kind of calm down and bring it down a couple decibels.
Who's doing great?
Tom Holman.
I give him an A, A, right?
The border stuff.
Stephen Miller, many of the policies, his ability to communicate from his position.
Remember, he's a deputy chief of staff in his portfolio.
What he's able to do within his role, I would give him an A. Tulsi Gabbard has been doing what?
She's fired a lot of folks and her staff that were the deep staters.
She has pulled clearances of not only staff, but other folks that are on the not only government gangster list, but the deep state target list.
And everyone knows who they are, some of the key individuals that lost their clearances.
The secure security details have been stripped, right?
So in some instances, we're moving the ball down the field significantly.
Don't get me wrong.
This is way better than Kamala Harris.
Way better than Kamala Harris.
No, but someone said it's like, I mean, that's like, you know, saying it's, I won't be crass, but that's like saying it's comparing poop with P. Like, okay, fine.
P is better than poop, but I'd rather not have to be bait than either of them.
So exactly.
It's better for the A.
Well, but it's also, it's also so ephemeral.
It will be over if they win the midterms.
And depending on the degree to which they win the midterms, there can be impeachments, there could be convictions.
And then come 2028, if or when they ever get back into power, I'm not worried about myself.
I mean, I sort of, you know, am in a way, but they're going to come down with an iron fist of 10x of what they did in 2020, 2024, sorry, up until 2024 against everyone in that administration who was an enemy of them.
It'll be the Bondis to some extent.
It'll be the Patels.
It'll be the Bondinos.
Well, that's why they don't want to move because they're afraid that that's going to happen.
My answer in response to that is twofold.
One, it's not going to be the midterms.
This is all going to start in January from the Democrats.
They're meeting right now, communicating, talking, planning how they're going to go scorched earth on January 17th of next year.
Number two, if you don't stop them now over the next two months, they're going to come after you regardless, no matter how polite and nice you are.
That's just how they operate.
So I don't know.
Maybe the advice should be: hey, Donald, maybe you should hire some Democrats because they actually conduct business.
They actually go after their perceived enemies, right?
Why don't you hire them and say, hey, here's the actual evidence.
It doesn't have to be political.
Here's the crime.
I mean, he hired RFK and Tulsi.
They seem to be actually doing something.
Well, the rest of them.
They're doing something.
The Republicans.
Yeah, but they're doing something right up until, you know, RFK Jr. is trying to do what he's trying to do.
And then you get Pfizer, a Boer Light in the White House.
Yeah, and then you get that.
Tulsi Gabbard.
Tulsi Gabbard's trying to do what she's trying to do.
And you've got no real movement on.
Let's talk about the timeline.
From January to May is when we had tech support, right?
Known as Elon Musk.
After May 31st, you started to see, and you look at the poll numbers from Rasmussen.
I mean, it starts to tank right after May 31st.
And then what happens?
The only guy in president's ear in the White House that is actually doing the bidding of America and the base and the grassroots and the MAGA base, Charlie Kirk.
So what happened?
September 10th, that ended with the murder.
And so what happened since then?
We've just been spiraling completely out of control.
September 10th, October, November, two months later, what has happened?
Don't release the Epstein files.
Endorse COVID criminals so that Burla can make more money with Andrew Cuomo.
Bring in Burla into the White House.
Give him $70 billion so that I can talk about Operation Warp Speed being the best thing ever.
And I can basically say, hey, Jared, good job on Operation Warp Speed and the COVID Task Force, little buddy.
Go get me a Nobel Peace Prize with Miriam and BB.
And while you're in the Middle East doing that, why don't we just go ahead and put out truth posts about how I got a booster?
Wee!
We all see it.
It's like we're not retards here, Donald.
We all see it for what it is.
What is, it's interesting when you lay it out like that.
Let me bring up one of the chats in Rumble.
I mean, defend it.
Counter it.
Rebund it.
Here, ask him about the golden pager that BB gave to Trump says 808 Scotty.
No, because you talk about when it all starts going down.
808 Scotty put the idea in my head, at least the timeline, that the golden buzzer, the golden pager was gifted to Trump in February.
And since then, yeah, shit has gone downhill fast.
Doge now officially shut down, allegedly, as of whatever this weekend.
So whatever Elon Musk was doing in terms of rooting out corruption via USAID and other government waste, it's done.
And they never even implemented some of the recommendations that Elon wanted to put in and why, according to it.
Nothing happened.
No implementation.
Zero.
Republican House, Republican Senate.
I should put it this way.
Epstein blackmailed Republicans in the House.
Control it.
Epstein blackmailed Republicans in the Senate.
Control the Senate.
And the White House.
Let me ask you this.
I don't know what your insider knowledge is and don't really want to pry if you're going to.
Yeah, quite a bit.
What is your, you know, we're calling it the Epstein files, the Epstein list.
Everybody understands what we're talking about.
It's the Epstein debacle.
You got Speaker Johnson coming out and saying, well, we can't, you know, it risks disclosing methods and sources, whatever it is, which means that Epstein was connected with intelligence.
There was a 180.
I took shit for not compromising my principles and integrity on shifting that 180.
There was a 180, and it seems like it was at the snap of the fingers.
What happened?
And who was advising Trump and why to pull the 180 on the Epstein files that he has now done, let's just say a 90 degree on the 180?
Who was advising him and why did that happen?
I'm going to speculate a little bit on this one.
So I'm going to say this.
My read of the situation is that because they brought in Lauren Boebert into the situation room to try to convince her to not, because remember, there were four, there were actually four Republicans in support of the discharge petition.
Massey and Marjorie are the two that everybody talks about.
But you also had Nancy Mace and Lauren Boebert, okay?
Which effectively gave enough, if all the Democrats voted, effectively, it was a done deal if all the four of them stood.
So since they couldn't convince Massey, obviously, and then Marjorie, they were trying to get Lauren Bobert.
And she gave the indications that she's not going to bend, but it wasn't vocal in public.
And so when that occurred, when the White House saw that there was not going to be sufficient votes, they had to completely 180 it and make it look like, oh, 25,000 trillion D chess.
Woo!
We're the smartest people ever to walk the God-level chess, right?
And so we're going to go ahead and backwalk it and say, we want Republicans to vote to release the Epstein files.
Okay.
So politically, Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene just drug Donald Trump's face through the concrete mud.
Okay.
And I, you know, people are like, oh, you're laughing about it.
I'm just telling you politically what happened.
Okay.
Next, you got to save face, right?
And then you message saying that, oh, I had it all along.
I want them to vote.
But that's not the case.
Based on how he's treating Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massey, they're pissed.
Well, if I can interrupt you there.
The next thing, they're probably now planning and coordinating to make sure that the DOJ, SDNY, and any other place that has Epstein stuff, do anything in your power to slow walk it, slow roll it.
So I don't expect them to release it on December 19th.
If they do, it's just going to be like more pages with no information.
And maybe they'll do it in a way that's, oh, this is the first tranche.
We're trying.
Here's the first five pages.
And notice how none of it's redacted, but we gave you five pages.
And then the next month, just like with the Pfizer requested release in court, where they did, they requested 50-year delay or something like that, or 100-year delay on the jabs.
Remember that?
I think the same thing is going to occur.
And that's why Marjorie said during the press conference last Monday that the fight only begins.
So this is all it's just moving further the court of public opinion to realize that there's something there there.
And again, I don't think that Trump's in it in a nefarious way, but his cabinet members may be.
And that donors may be.
And they're begging him to stop this from happening because let's face it, what's his name?
Larry Summers in Harvard was one of the ones that he had to make a statement about it.
He was like, oh, it's an embarrassing thing.
And there's going to be a range of embarrassment.
There's going to be, okay, I went there and did consensual, whatever, right?
That may be embarrassing.
But then there may be elements of it's more than consensual.
And then it gets into illegal activity.
And then it gets into further the pedophilia that everybody's been talking about.
And then it goes into what Thomas Massey calls rape island.
I've monitored Massey for quite some time.
And so far, he's batting a thousand on the most important issues for we the people, meaning he's the only one that called on everyone to vote in person during the COVID heist package, right?
COVID relief package.
Everyone went against him on that.
He was the only one right.
Number two, he and Marjorie are purebloods, meaning they didn't take the jab.
And then Thomas Massey is still the one that's the most zealous about going after the January 6th pipe bomb, which may be a good transition point.
Well, let's did you see the I didn't see the tweets.
They got Julie deleted them.
I don't know if you saw Julie on the channel last week.
Julie Kelly seems to be a little bit more.
I did.
I watched that.
I mean, look, first thing, I didn't think that I was unfair.
I didn't think I was particularly ill-informed either.
Nobody is perfect.
Did she say that?
Yeah, she said I was grossly uninformed and didn't know anything about the Jan C.
I don't even care.
First of all, you don't need to know things to ask questions.
I think I'm still above average.
Okay, so after the name calling, what's next?
Well, so that was my question.
Say to Julie, like she's she's describing how to explain away the FBI or the DOJ's response to Steve Baker's expose.
That person of interest, too, the man who took a picture of the dumpster where the pipe bomb was found the next day, was exonerated or cleared by the FBI.
The FBI at the time, the corrupt Christopher Ray FBI, he was exonerated because he was taking pictures of things bearing numerals for a book he was writing.
And the FBI at the time said, Totally passes a smell test.
Totally, good enough for me.
Let him go.
Stop talking, sir.
I mean, you've told me enough.
You were taking pictures of numerals.
Totally makes sense.
Everybody does it.
That's like a household thing.
Go about your business.
So she's explaining.
It's like, do you hear what you're saying?
Like, this sounds like a stupid explanation a kid would give when he gets caught doing something dumb.
And like a parent, nobody on earth would believe it.
So fine.
But my observation was that the woman that Steve Baker identified as being the suspected Jansex pipe bomber based on gate analysis, whatever, has yet to sue, has yet to issue a formal demand for retraction.
And I find that to be curious.
I noted there's 18 states that either have a formal retraction requirement or a mitigation retraction requirement.
And this person has done nothing over two weeks after the publication of the article.
What is your take on it?
What do you think is reality versus fiction versus a couple things?
I want to talk about the Julie Kelly component, and then we'll talk about the Steve Baker component.
So on the Julie, Julie, Julie Kelly, Julie Baker, Steve Kelly, right?
On the Julie Kelly, the former food blogger component, okay?
Just judging based on her interview of you, I'm not going to go into all the other hoopla yet.
I actually will take her side in some regards, which I normally don't do because we had this conversation after the interview, after I saw it, and we were going back and forth, phone call and text, but she makes the point that you can't come, and I say the same thing.
I'm not saying Steve Baker's wrong, okay?
But I can't come to his same conclusion without seeing the gate analysis, what he used to come to that conclusion.
Okay.
So on one side, I'm not saying he's wrong, but on the other side, I can't agree with him on the conclusion because I don't have the luxury of seeing everything he saw.
Okay.
So then it comes down to you believe Steve based on the trust me, bro, litmus test, right?
Now, some people have already gotten past that and trust him and say, you know what?
His body of work lends me to believe that everything he's putting out is trustworthy.
And so I'm going to come to the same conclusion.
So you have that camp.
I'm not there because I need to also see the evidence.
And I think Julie Kelly is of the same opinion if you're treating her as a good faith actor, meaning she also hasn't seen the evidence to come to the same conclusion.
Okay.
That's one aspect.
Does that make sense so far?
True.
Yes, but I would only respond by saying, Have I seen the expert report?
No, but the description: five foot seven, same height, a slight limp on the right leg, and other elements that allow that I haven't seen the breakdown in the formulas, but those are the broad brush jokes that say, okay, that makes sense.
And the same woman who's agitating the crowd by firing rubber bullets at their faces.
Like, okay, that fits a pattern.
I'm inclined to say, of all the explanations I've heard up until now, that one sounds the best.
I'm not saying yes or no because nobody can say, like, I believe his no, it's a good data point to continue the con everything that Steve has been doing is a net positive.
Let me start.
Like, I should have started with that.
That's net positive, okay?
To try to get to the truth, the other part is on Julie Kelly, when she talks about the persons of interest.
She is not, and I think I agree with her on this point if I understood it correctly, is that it's a logical leap for Kyle Serafin to say that he was surveilling a house next door neighbor.
Okay, and this is maybe where I just didn't look at it as detailed as you did, but she talks about how there were two individuals, person of interest two, person of interest three, and she talked to person of interest three, I believe, et cetera, et cetera, and the age and whatnot.
How do you make the leap that person of interest two?
First, you have to rely on the FBI or whoever did the investigation on this particular side.
Because remember, it's U.S. Capitol Police as well as Metropolitan Police Department and Transit Police because they started to incorporate the actual key cards, the Metro, what is it called, smart trip cards here in DC.
So supposedly, number two borrowed the smart trip from number three, went into DC to take the pictures of numerals, and then he went about his day, and they're great because they're Trump supporters, kind of like Ray Epps is a Trump supporter, yada yada.
Okay, pun intended.
So from her side, she's asking the question.
I think you didn't allow her to really convey this, and that's where I think you maybe jumped a little bit because you were working on another train of thought.
But I think what she was trying to convey, and I mean, she can correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't really know because she blocks me, just like Dan Bongino blocks me after I offered evidence of January 6th and January 5th stuff.
But whatever, that's another side note.
I'd be more than happy to talk at any time with anybody.
So she's of the opinion that she doesn't quite understand how Kyle Seraphin was able to jump and say, well, person of interest two is the boyfriend.
Is that my idea?
Well, first, I think Kyle might have made a mistake about that.
I'm not a thousand percent certain, but the bottom line to that was astronomically minimal odds that the house they were surveilling based on the user, the Metro card linking it to that house is actually the neighbor of the person that they suspect is the bomb, the planter of the bombs.
That was the bottom line.
He was looking for a way to explain.
That's if assuming that the gate analysis is accurate.
Now, keep in mind, the last component I want to talk about is the Steve Baker component of it.
Initially, it was almost as though he was going to release a more detailed allegation of the individual.
And remember, the first time he's like, oh, tomorrow we're going to have something breaking, blah, blah, blah, about an individual.
It's going to be earth-shattering.
It goes up to the highest levels of government.
That language, when the lawyers at the Blaze saw it, probably were of the opinion, Steve, hold off on that, because if you're wrong, we don't want a subsequent lawsuit.
And so when it actually came out the way it came out, when I read through it, I read it as though it's sufficiently caveated enough that even if he is wrong, I don't see a method or mechanism for this individual to sue the Blaze, okay?
Because it was based on analysis of gate analysis.
There is a probability of so-and-so.
All you're doing is analytic work based on some evidence that you have.
You're not alleging anybody that violated any crime, right?
Now, I guess you got to work it out in court if she sues, but I think they toned it down sufficiently to at least they mitigated some legal risk.
And that may be the conversations going on between her and her attorneys and whoever else.
Now, here's the other funny thing.
I don't know if it's funny.
You said I'm kind of an insider.
I don't know.
You take it for what it's worth.
Little Bertie or Little Birdies told me immediately after that, and Steve can probably confirm, or Glenn Beck can confirm this probably better than Steve can.
Glenn, did you get a phone call from Kash Patel asking you to fire Steve Baker?
Did you?
I'd like to know from you.
Because right now, since Cash is a government employee, he's guilty until he proves his innocence is my take on things.
When you're a governmental actor, you are guilty until you prove your innocence to me.
And so since now he's a government actor, he's under that standard burden.
But Glenn Beck, you're a private citizen, so I consider you innocent until proven guilty.
So I trust you more than the institution that Kash Patel leads, just like Viva Frey, I'm sure.
So why would Kash Patel, if that's the case, ask Glenn Beck to fire Steve Baker?
I don't know where I had.
No, I'm not sure where I had heard that rumoring as well.
And I'm careful not to spread rumors.
Rumor.
I'm glad you mentioned it, Ivan, because I think I don't recall where I heard the same thing.
There were strong warnings not to publish the article and to fire Steve Baker.
And I presume that it was discussed publicly because I said, like, you know, if that's the case, then Glenn Beck is going to have to either confirm or deny that that actually happened because that's next level brutish behavior in terms of transparency and freedom of speech of an administration to fire the journalist who comes out with an article that might mean at the same time they're trying to get rid of Massey.
Massey's the only and oh, by the way, wait, today's Monday.
Steve Baker just did a sit-down with Tom Massey and that long interview is coming out today.
It may have already actually, let's take a look.
But while you pull that up, Ivan, who does this embarrass?
Like, why would anyone fight this hard to protect that particular person?
What I found curious also, you know, having the discussion with Julie was she acknowledged and admitted that this person, even if it's not the January, even if she is not the one who planted the Jan 6 pipe bombs, violated people's civil rights, fired on a crowd in a manner that was potentially using lethal force, instigated and tried to irritate the crowd.
But it's defamatory to say that she might have been the Jan 6 pipe bomb placer based on the gate analysis in Baker's report.
Like, why would this FBI even go out of their way to protect this woman if it's not only because of the fact that she somehow got bumped up to the CIA and is now working at a Ratcliffe institution?
And it might be embarrassing that they continue to employ this woman who fired in a potential lethal manner on the Jan 6 crowd.
Like, that's the only angle I can see about it.
But why would they go out of their way to defend this woman to this degree if not because they have something to hide?
Great question.
And I think I have a pretty good analytic response.
So if you, did you have a chance to see my long interview that I sit down I did with Tarek Johnson, QK Johnson?
No, but I know I think I'll know where it goes because I had Tarek on.
I implore you to watch that because we went into the very depths of the U.S. Capitol Police down to almost every single individual that would have likely been involved in the January 6th op and its cover-up.
Okay.
So, to answer your question, when you see and know what we discussed in that, and there's a lot of like references and map and pictures and names, etc. I would suspect that the entire Republican and Democrat establishment at the highest levels cannot have the January 6th pipe bomb and the January 6th truth to come out,
similar to the Epstein stuff, because then it exposes exactly, let's just say, very high-ranking people in the government are getting closer and closer and more convinced of my theory of the case of the Fed surrection, meaning the Pelosi from her office, the seniors, and the U.S. Capitol Police ran it.
So, if this I'm not, I'm not making allegations, I'm just saying hypothetically, if a U.S. Capitol Police officer was the one that placed a pipe bomb at the DNC and the RNC, and they are identified and they are put in the box to ask questions under oath through a proper competent authority, they're probably going to tell the truth unless there's something else that,
especially if they're given a plea deal or a, I should say, a bargain.
As long as they tell the truth and tell us who else was involved, then they're not going to face prosecution, they're going to start throwing senior U.S. Capitol Police leadership under the bus.
And what does that mean?
If you're a head of dignitary protection or a senior official in the U.S. Capitol Police, you have dirt on probably everyone to have dirt on of a sitting member of Congress.
So, Speaker Pelosi, I don't know, Kevin McCarthy, et cetera, et cetera.
If you throw me, U.S. Capitol Police Officer, on the bus, I throw you under the bus.
So you better protect me.
I think that's probably what's going on more likely than not.
Does that make sense?
Well, it makes total sense.
And again, you're not the first person to say that the Capitol Police are basically, you know, they have dirt on everybody in Washington.
And this is the system.
Yeah, well, not everybody in Washington, but they can.
Anybody that comes in and out of the U.S. Capitol, I mean, think about it.
There's a specific section called the Dignitary Protection Division.
They're the ones that protect the leadership of both House and Senate, meaning the five leaders in the House, Speaker, Majority Leader, Minority Leader, Majority Whip, and Minority Whip.
And on the Senate side, the President of the Senate, the Senate Majority Leader, the Senate Minority Leader, and then the President Pro Tem.
Okay?
Nine people.
So if you have the Dignitary Protection Division captain, Sean Gallagher, for quite a few years before he rose in the ranks, and his officers, like David Lazarus, who is protecting Nancy Pelosi, the guy that perjured himself against the oath keepers on behalf of Pelosi, if you have these officers that are in there that are living, traveling, observing 24-7 with the leadership of the House and Senate, and they observe a transgression,
you name the transgression.
Deviancy, you name a crime, drugs, sex, and everything.
Yeah.
Everything, all of the above or some of the above.
Now they have dirt on that member of Congress, a leadership member of Congress.
So now they become themselves untouchable because who's going to prosecute them for, I don't know, some sort of transgression or violation?
That officer.
Well, it's going to be the Capitol Police Board who appoints the Capitol Police Chief.
And who appoints the Capitol Police Board?
The speaker of the house and the senate majority leader, the same people that they protect.
So it's this dual blackmail.
Well, and that's why we're in this position of how they were able to run the Fed Surrection Op.
I suspect, Ivan, you'll know this.
This is not irrelevant, but the woman who, even by Julie Kelly's own admission, you know, fired indiscriminately with potential lethal force on the crowd, was the one that seated.
She was one of the witnesses during Guy Reffitt's trial.
Yeah, as soon as I found that out, as soon as this story came out and the discussion about Guy Reffitt came out, and I was looking her up as well, I talked to Guy, right?
He wasn't able to really provide anything new or like anything in addition, but I just wanted to make sure that I ran that to ground if anything else that he knows or would like to add to the conversation is potentially things that haven't been released yet.
He sent me all the transcripts.
I haven't had a chance to look through the transcripts.
I might be able to glean something from his trial.
But yeah, I'm pursuing that lead as well.
So, well, we'll see thus far.
I mean, I still think now I'm not so certain that the person will in fact sue, but we'll see where that goes.
And I think the explanation for why the current admin would go out of their way to basically protect the institution.
This is it's sort of it's the exact same rationale for Epstein that if people found out, they would lose faith in the entire government potential international governments.
We already have, we are, we've already lost faith.
Well, some of us, but we're not the use, we're not the useful ones that have lost faith.
When it's you know, if people were to find out uh how things actually work, it might get left and right uh up in arms together, metaphorically speaking, and not just and then we'll have the power to remove all of them.
Um, Ivan, we're gonna raid, but we still got more to talk about.
Well, okay, so hold on a second.
We've got you have to talk about your lawsuit where you're being we're gonna stay on rubble to do it, but I gotta go raid.
Um, because I've they've been very nice.
Raid is where we're gonna we link to the next stream, which is redacted.
And uh, it basically let me put this on pause.
It basically, unless you opt out, it automatically pushes everybody who's watching now to go watch redacted, but we're gonna carry on and people can opt out.
You could just say no, and you'll stay here, and then we're gonna go over to local.
Do you have a few minutes to go to locals for some exclusive after questions?
Yeah, absolutely.
I'm gay.
Great.
I've got a few more minutes until the entire family comes back.
We're still on the road.
The kids have been very nice to be very.
Well, I just love the high IQ interactions and dialogue.
Well, no, it's amazing.
You know, I talk with everybody.
I don't mind talking with Julie.
I was, I was a little not, I was just surprised that she took things personally.
I have no problem talking with Kyle.
I mean, she just seems very delicate.
I can throw shade and I can take it.
Just as, you know, yeah, but it's like Kyle, we, you know, I still, I'm just.
Kyle doesn't talk to me.
I mean, he can dish it out.
What I can't dish it back out.
I mean, well, hold on.
Now, now that you opened that door, and I'm glad I walked you to that door.
What's going on between you and Kyle?
I would have thought.
You got to ask Kyle.
I honestly can't put a finger on it.
It's weird because, you know, I can understand why people within the Jan 6 community don't agree and don't get along with Jake.
I can understand it.
And when I had Jake on way back in the day, and other people like, watch out for him.
He's a fed, yada, yada.
I can understand why people, you know, within that community, butt heads with Jake.
And then I can understand why Kyle butts heads with Jake, with others.
I don't know with whom.
But that I was surprised.
I'll ask Kyle and I'm sure he'll be happy to answer.
But I've had multiple people ask him.
And the common theme that I'm hearing is that he talked to some guys that I served with in the military that didn't like me.
And so based on that, he doesn't want to talk to me.
And so, okay.
I mean, I have my haters out there.
Okay.
Let me bring up all the tipped questions in locals and see if there's anything specific to you here.
It says, Now that James Comey is exonerated, what comes next?
Yeah, well, we'll see if they refile, amend and refile.
Gray 101 says the Trump administration may soon face impeachments for A.G. Bondi's widely known pay-to-play schemes, says Gray.
Whose side are you on, MAGA or Marjorie Trader Green?
And I think he means that fastetiously, Gray 101.
No, we got to answer that question.
I'm on the side of truth.
So that's the answer.
This is like, I don't care if I'm wrong.
I'm not trying to be right.
I'm trying to get it right.
And between Trump and Marjorie and Marjorie Taylor Greene on that exchange, I think Trump was wrong.
And I would hope that he apologized, make amends.
With Massey, I can understand in some areas where they have they two buttheads, you know, on the continuing resolution of the spending bill, I'm sort of with Massey, but I'm not, I wouldn't die on that hill one way or the other.
On the Epstein stuff, Massey is right.
On Epstein, on COVID, on J6.
I'm all in on Massey.
And Massey and Israel.
I mean, I appreciate it.
People are, you know, it's not anti-Semitic or anti-Israel to say we should not be involved in a forever war with Russia via Ukraine any more than we should be involved in forever Middle Eastern conflicts with Israel.
I can appreciate it.
Don't have to agree with it.
Here's one that people are going to go nuts about.
It's anti-American to call somebody anti-Semitic because now you're getting into First Amendment problem areas.
Dan Sundon says, no, person of interest two was the guest of the Air Force officer person of interest three in the house in the photo.
U.S. Capitol police officer was living in the house to the right in the picture.
Yeah, her boy.
So we're not sure about the boyfriend.
I think Kyle might have acknowledged he made a mistake on the boyfriend.
It might have not been her boyfriend that they think, whatever.
Her boyfriend lived with her, was also a police officer.
Thus far, neither have I identified.
Right.
He's saying that her boyfriend, actually, yeah, went to the neighbor that maybe borrowed his Metro card.
Request to borrow the Metro card.
I don't know about you, but I mean, I lived in this area for about 20 years.
Unless you can show that there's a long-standing relationship with someone, with the neighbor, to request to borrow somebody's Metro card, it's just a trivial thing.
It's just as easy just to get one yourself.
It's not a heavy lift to get a metro card.
No, but you know what?
You put five bucks in the kiosk in the metro station and you use it.
I don't know.
It's more of a problem to borrow it from a neighbor and then give it back.
No, but you know, I'm old enough to remember when we used to actually, my mother said, go to the neighbor's house and ask for some sugar.
We ran out of sugar.
We needed two eggs.
Go ask the neighbor for two eggs.
I could appreciate also on that day, you know, exceptionally exceptional circumstances because they've got some Fed surrection to Fed Surrek.
So we gotta get there.
I'm giving the counter to say, you know, but that is obviously like that is a hypothesis as to how they connect the two houses, but coincidences.
They're very stunning coincidences.
We got to always hear.
I will say the address that Kyle surveilled, when you look at this individual's background check, which I have, there's another address that this individual moved to in, I believe, October or November of 2020.
Let's just say I may or may not have observed that location, and I continue to maybe or maybe not observe that location.
Okay.
Not me, but we, the collective we.
So I'm putting my computer on mute just so nobody hears the background.
But yes, Ivan, okay.
Why aren't Canadian?
Like to bounce off of Kyle and Steve, but both of them, just like the former food blogger, they're afraid to speak with me.
I will bridge that divide.
We'll have a nice threesome on the internet, a threesome of discussion.
That's that's it.
Now that's clipped.
Uh, why are Canadian media businesses using USA VPNs for ex?
They're hypocrites.
Oh, no shit, Griffin.
And Dan Sunnin says, No, the neighbor boyfriend didn't borrow the metro card.
Again, that's we're good.
Okay.
Let me get my phone.
Oh, gosh, my phone because I want to check something.
What's going on with what's going on with your lawsuit?
Well, let's take a look.
Now, remind everybody, you are being sued on the basis that the go to my ex account, share the screen, go to my ex and the pin tweet.
Uh, Ivan Rakeland.
Hold on, hold on, wait a minute.
Come on, get up here.
Oh, that's because I got Ivan Rakeland here.
Okay, and just make sure that my DMs are not open.
And let's bring it up, Ivan.
Pin tweet: while the White House focuses on being a big pharma brand ambassador that endorses Democrats and COVID criminals, I'll just focus on working with those in the admin that are on Team America and willing to help we the people guarantee COVID accountability.
Looking forward to loop in Pete Hegseth and Bobby Kennedy next.
What do we got here?
Terry Adiram.
Oh, she's the woman that alleges you got her fired by putting her on blast.
Who's she suing here?
CIA, Ratcliffe.
They're going to pay her $8 million like they did with what's his face, Lisa Page and Peter Stroke.
They're going to and Ivan Esquire.
Okay, so what's going on with it?
Look, no, list all the defendants.
Oh, yeah, hold on a second.
This is an amended complaint number two.
Okay, CIA Ratcliffe, Adoe, Adoe, Adeer, a female dealer.
Okay, Office of the Director.
So DNI, Tulsi Gabbard, Carolyn Rocco, DNI, okay, and Intern Agency Weaponization Working Group, and Ivan Rakelin Esquire.
Well, at least she gave you the Esquire, Ivan.
Before I answer your question, if you're just looking at that, what do you make of that?
Like, what do you, what conclusion do you come to?
Well, I mean, I say batshit crazy, but most importantly, I say suing a number of people, but suing the right people in the hopes of getting some form of settlement out of this.
But let me see something here.
Hold on.
Notice everyone is in their official capacity except for me.
Yeah, because you're not a member of the administration.
Correct.
Or is your name below?
No, so hold on.
Let me just bring up your name.
There you go.
Now you can see it.
Yeah.
So, but you're the one who did her dirty by outing her as.
Well, you got to refresh everybody's memory as to what the basis of her claim against you is.
I didn't do anybody dirty.
All I do is exercise my First Amendment to the maximum.
Okay.
My legal, moral, and ethical First Amendment obligations are definitely adhered to every day.
Okay.
And you help facilitate that.
So thank you, Mr. Yeah.
For Ivan, I love having people on.
I also love the fact that some of the people, many of the people I have on, don't even talk to each other, but we'll fix that.
But no, you are particularly insightful, and I love having you on.
Thank you.
Thank you.
No, so let's go back.
In May of 2025, a lady by the name of this lady that's the plaintiff sued initially me, the CIA Radcliffe, and another organization.
That organization was dismissed with prejudice because it had no relationship to me on this lawsuit, but she kept me.
The first one alleged that the here's a sequence of events.
No, Ivan, hold on one second.
Someone has gotten to you.
There you go.
Your camera went dark for a second.
Is it still dark?
No, now I can see.
Oh, now you're out.
Here, let me turn it off and turn it back on.
Oh, I shouldn't have done that.
We can still hear you.
That's interesting.
No, no, Ivan.
This is intelligence.
Can I refresh?
Yeah, go ahead and refresh and I'll bring up the Hrumble prance while you do that.
We got.
Oh, my goodness.
We got a lot here.
Ivan, look into John Bowman, the RF engineer overseeing Huay equipments in our cellular network.
Quicker communications between XSF guy.
Griffin says, why are they God?
Well, hold on.
You're back in.
Okay, you're back in.
I'm going to read this in here.
Ask Ivan about Obama's FCC allowing Yahweh or Hawaii, whatever.
Oh, is it Yahweh?
It's not pronounced Yahweh.
That would be fun.
Huawei.
Hawei.
Cellular equipment into cellular communications.
Chinese phones, cellular sites, network.
Don Mannon, Dominate One.
They will release some Epstein files eventually in 70 years.
MAGA just needs to vote harder since only voting has never in history changed a bad government into a good one.
Paul Rose says, I'm surprised you don't think the following are positives.
Drill, drill, drill, permitting rare mineral.
I mean, it hasn't happened yet, but these are good things, but these are not the national changing policies that are needed to make sure America doesn't go the way of Canada.
Our container with imported goods dropped.
Check out Bill Tong USA for a great selection of imported candies, cookies, groceries, and of course, Bill Tong.
BilltongUSA.com code Viva 10% off.
Dominate one, put Anton's meat in your mouth for his pleasure and yours.
Ask him about the golden pager.
I did that.
Didn't Trump just decry the use of an improperly appointed special counsel, Jack Smith?
How could they then go make the same mistake?
I don't think they made the mistake.
I don't want to venture.
I don't think they made the same mistake.
So it's not that she Jack Smith was just never appointed, was never properly appointed to the position of special prosecutor.
Halligan was appointed to a U.S. attorney.
So I don't think they made the same mistake at all.
And Green Thumb Nursing says, Viva, please have John Porter to chat about his new web app, Barter.
Real quick, I was on Real America's Voice a little bit earlier with Steve Gruber.
That's why I was a couple minutes late.
And one of the senior legal fellow over at Heritage, I was on with him.
We're discussing that particular component of the appointment.
So Jack Smith is a different style appointment than Lindsey Halligan.
There's a statute that allows for 120-day interim appointment.
The argument that was made is that she was the only one in the arraignment when they presented the grand jury.
Yeah, when they presented the grand jury.
And so essentially what I think, I agree with this individual's analysis.
I can't remember his last name, John somebody, that if there was a U.S. attorney with her that's been in the position that comes in, then it should be okay.
So I think this is just a delay tactic.
Again, and it may be that they did this in order to potentially get into the realm of discussing the statute of limitations next.
All he has to do is just delay, delay, delay until the next administration when they steal the next election, right?
Or when they win the house.
Okay.
That's kind of, I think, the strategy.
By the way, Ivan, and they're going to be able to influence things quite a bit.
Oh, that's beautiful.
So earlier on the channel.
Can you screenshot that?
I want that.
I'll send it to you after.
So earlier on, Viva, I should give you some of my hair, but then voice lick.
Yeah, I saw in the chat somebody said, like, get some of your hair.
And while it is Fabio-esque, glorious, and I'm envious of it, I just need to grow it.
No, but you wear the Bruce Willis shaved head perfectly.
Like, who knows?
I might with a shaved head as well, but I'll deal with that when it comes.
So, okay, so Adirim is arguing that you got her fired from her newly appointed position by bringing up her.
I think it was COVID.
Yeah, I made some First Amendment noises that she claims are false and defamatory.
And because of that, somehow I communicated to Laurel Loomer this false and defamatory information that she then took to the White House meeting that she had with Donald Trump, President Trump, to then suggest, in addition to the National Security Council people that she recommended for firing, she included Terry Adiram's name into it.
This is what she alleges.
Adirum, that is.
And then Donald Trump took that, contacted the CIA director, John Radcliffe, for him to then go ahead and fire Miss Adirim.
Yeah.
By the way, Miss Adiram was what?
You got to pull this one up.
Yeah, I'm doing it right now.
Scroll down in my actually, let me see if I can share.
You can share freely on your end.
All right, let me pull this up.
This is important.
Yeah, and I'll just pull up an article from the just to refresh everybody.
Judge let's CIA fire doctor who pushed mandatory COVID vaccines for military.
I remember you had some choice words for Adirim in terms of the tyranny that she inflicted.
But when was this from?
This is from May 9th, it looks like.
So early in the doctor had argued her looming termination was a result of public attacks by some of Trump's most vocal social media defenders.
And if we look through the iron, here it is, Ivan.
Ivan Rayklin, who publicly characterized her as the architect of the Pentagon's quote, jab genocide mandate.
I love it because it's hyperbolic, but it gets hyperbolic, but accurate.
But it's true.
Well, it's not genocide.
It's supposed to make you healthy.
And, you know, at the very least, it might give myocarditis to a few teenagers.
What's the big?
No, so as I'm talking, if you can pull these up, I don't know.
You got to do a search, but it's because I don't have it handy.
Actually, you know what?
I can send it from here.
A couple photos.
Yeah, you can hit that little up arrow in the computer screen in the middle of the five icons on the bottom, and you can share the screen with whatever you want.
Just be careful that it shares sometimes the whole screen.
Okay.
So, no, I think I found it.
I'm going to send us.
I'm going to tweet it out again, and it's going to be a couple documents that are pretty important.
Unlawful.
Here we go.
I'll refresh your Twitter feed and bring them up right away.
I think if you go to my replies, go to my Twitter and then click replies here.
Replies.
Scroll down.
And there's two pictures that should come up.
Keep going.
Maybe.
Yeah, underneath that one, I think.
Yeah.
Okay, so delegate Danner.
Brennan, underneath the Brennan one.
Okay, so let's go like this here.
Where is Rayklin?
I don't know if it comes up.
No, I'm not seeing it.
Rayklin?
It's definitely not coming up.
Flip it to me.
I'm posting it again on Twitter.
Go ahead.
Okay.
I'm going to go back here, go back, Dad, Republican, and home.
And let's go to Rayland.
Why?
Fingers.
Raylan, Ivan, and here.
COVID.
Okay, let's see.
This is related to the case.
So take a look at that.
That is dated September 14th of 2021.
Please read the highlight.
Subject mandatory vaccination of service members using the Pfizer Biontech COVID-19 and mandatory vaccines.
Let me just hear.
Okay, and it's by Terry Adirim right there on the cursor.
August 23.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Consistent with FDA guidance, DOD healthcare providers will use both Pfizer Biontech vaccine and the Comar Nati COVID-19 interchangeably for the purpose of vaccinating service members in accordance with the Secretary of Defense Memorandum: Mandatory COVID Disease 2019 vaccination of Department of Defense service members, August 24th, 2021.
Terry Adiram.
Next one.
Okay, let's pause there.
Yep.
That is an order by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs.
And what that effectively does is order folks that they must consume either the FDA approved one, which didn't exist, wasn't created.
It was just approved, the licensing, right?
Or the one that was actually physically produced, the BioNTech one, which was emergency use authorized.
By law, you cannot mandate the emergency use authorized product.
So this memo orders people to consume the emergency use authorized product.
That is an unlawful order, exactly what the six seditionists that did the video a couple days earlier were referring to.
Do not follow unlawful orders.
This hearing, folks, is an unlawful order.
How do I know this?
It's because even though this was written by an assistant secretary of defense, the next memo was written by the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, which is a higher-ranking official than an assistant secretary of defense.
And what date is that?
Well, May 7th, my friends.
True, but May 7th, not to play devil's advocate, Ivan, I'll just argue what they're going to argue.
May 7th, 2025, it's only, you can't, you know, it's like ex post facto criminal law.
It wasn't unlawful when she issued that order in 2021, and it doesn't become unlawful in 2021 when someone in 2025 says it was unlawful.
It was unlawful.
And this memorandum just agrees to its unlawfulness through policy now.
And I don't, incidentally, I agree with you.
I'm just, I want to all steal man.
No, if you're just relying on the memo and nothing else, then yes, potentially.
But the problem with that argument is that you're still not incorporating the actual statutes that list, and I can't remember right now, section 1007 alpha, I believe it was, 18 USC, if I'm not mistaken, where it says you cannot mandate an emergency use authorized product, which she did.
So then it begs the question: unlawful order that resulted in death.
If you can show that, how many deaths are required for that to constitute the term genocide?
What say you?
Well, I'll not even go there.
I'll say it's obviously intended to be hyperbolic rhetoric, indicating what we all understand it to mean that she's responsible for harm, injury, and probably death, even if it's one and it's more than one.
But look, so you put her on blast.
She ends up getting fired before she even takes office.
She then sues.
I think she tried to get an injunction.
I think she got an injunction for a bit to two days until the following Monday.
And then there was a hearing.
The government was ready for the hearing.
They knocked it out of the park.
And then the defense wasn't ready, or excuse me, the plaintiff wasn't ready to argue.
They're like, oh, I need time.
So then we came back on a Wednesday.
They argued.
It moved forward.
The case was dismissed without prejudice against me on four counts.
One, defamation, two, intentional infliction of emotional distress, three, conversion, and four, tortious interference.
They're literally trying to like do the Alex Jones on you.
It's two days later, they filed an amendment, and in that amendment, like 11th hour, they amended the complaint to only include two counts.
So, the two counts that remain: defamation and conversion for Twitter DMs.
So, now I can now read because it was just filed minutes ago as we're sitting here by my legal team.
This is straight up breaking news, Ivan.
Yes, yes, yes.
Wait, let me share the screen.
Continue with screen sharing.
Hopefully, I don't let me see if I can get the right.
Yeah, there, Danny Sundon says 10 deaths is journey.
Previous vaccine.
I mean, I remember what they, what they pulled other vaccines for in terms of injury.
Breaking defendant, hold on, Rakeland's opposition to plaintiff's motion for leave to file a Second Amendment complaint.
This is what so she filed a First Amendment complaint, and the judge was going to rule on it.
And just before he's going to rule on it, they filed a second amended complaint to include more defendants.
And this is our response.
So, you're what this is: you're asking the court to not allow her to file a second, a subsequent amendment.
She's going to have to argue why it's necessary.
You're probably going to have to argue why it's prejudicial in a manner that's going to destabilize the administration of justice.
They're going to make you say, What are you unable to defend against if we allow this amended complaint?
I would typically they don't allow you to add defendants at a later time because you have to start the whole procedure from scratch.
I don't know that this is even this is at the preliminary stage.
So, if I had to bet, I'd say that they're going to allow her amended complaints because you're not going to be able to show any irreparable prejudice or interference with the administration of justice by allowing her to file a second amendment complaint, amended complaint.
Well, the argument is actually pretty solid on our side because it says defendant Rakeland further opposes the proposed amendment because the new claims do not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as the claims against him.
You got to remember: the claims against the government are that they fired her unlawfully because they in the First Amendment complaint, she did not include that the count against me for conversion.
Our argument is that she can no longer include us in the same pleading, if you will, on the complaint towards the government.
Does that make sense?
Well, yeah, actually, flesh out the conversion.
I forget if I'm if I'm not conversion, um, tortious interference, tortious interference is getting in the way of her.
Basically, my rhetoric created a sequence of events that caused her to get fired.
Yeah, you bet you basically you interfered with a third-party contract, her and a third party to because she dropped that in the first amendment complaint.
Like, I'm no longer on the hook for this second amendment complaint.
Yeah, okay, so maybe, okay, it's interesting.
I, I, I'd have to, yeah, okay, I can see that.
So, we'll see.
I mean, the judge will have to make a decision.
What district are you in again?
Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, Virginia.
Who's your judge?
No comment.
I really should.
I love trying to not try to get people in trouble.
I love it when people realize you're better off not.
I gotta say, I came into it very skeptical so far.
Well, so far, the judge, the court has been very good, very respectful, very attentive.
Uh, I can't ask for better so far, honestly.
I'm not just saying that.
No, no, I appreciate it.
And nor should you say anything different during a live, uh, you know, a live uh litigation.
I'm not able to close your window from my end.
Hit um, whatever, maybe I don't want to close it.
I'm just no, no, I was actually trying to see the opportunity.
I see your window on the bottom.
I'm gonna have to, I'm gonna ask Rumble to Rumble Studio to add a couple of features here so that God forbid someone takes up something, puts up on the screen that I don't want to see.
I'll be able to, I'm not able to take in this thing, yeah.
You could, you could, uh, it's you could you could search, it's on your um no, I don't think it's not searchable.
The document that I have, all right.
I'll close it.
Uh, say in that filing, you can read it through it nice and neat.
You know, flip it over to me.
I'll do uh, maybe I'll do a summary of it.
Okay, I'll give you there that's gonna catch some folks' attention.
That uh, oh, the government won't like it, but whatever.
Oh, can you bring, can you bring it up right now?
You can't leave the audience teasing on that.
Wait, let me find it here.
Yeah, I'll just read it.
Paragraph nine: while the amended complaint suggests defendant Rakeland may be a fact witness as it relates to plaintiffs' claims against the government defendants, he should not be a party, particularly in light of the dismissal of plaintiffs' tortuous interference with contract claim against defendant Rakeland.
So, the first part: the claims against let's see.
While the amended complaint suggests defendant Rakeland may be a fact witness, so there could be well, I'll just stop it there.
I'll just stop there.
I'm not going to add this, it's all public, and that's what we're going to keep it.
Yeah, you know, things that might be relevant for the trial if it even happens, which honestly, it's a win either way because this just goes to trial discovery.
Boom, bam!
Thank you, bada bing.
We get to see her communications with all the DOD folks and all the CIA folks related to COVID.
You, um, I presume you don't have insurance that's taking up your defense in this case.
I do not.
That's why everybody needs liability insurance.
No, no, I have insurance and it would get covered, but I'm uh, I have some supporters that are helping Ivan.
We're gonna take this to locals for a bit of an after-party before, just before we go.
We got it.
If people want to support you, by all means, throw in a couple bucks here and there.
How do they do that?
Do they go knock this out in like 10K?
So, I'm about halfway there on my fundraise.
It's uh, it's give send go forward slash Terry Adirim.
Give and send it in honor of her name forward slash dot com.
Hold on a second.
Come on, get my face.
Give sendgo.com forward slash T-E-R-R-Y A-D-I-R-I-M.
She's gonna she's gonna demand, she's gonna sue you for unlawful use of her name for fundraising.
I'm joking, she might.
Um, I'll give everybody that link right now so they can go.
That's really funny.
CI Fart is top doctor after she appeared on Deep State Target, Ivan Rakeland, Deep State Target List lawsuit.
All right, that's offense fund.
Okay, so now I'll give it to locals as well.
We're gonna, if you can, come over there for a few seconds and uh, we'll take some questions before we go there.
Just going to remind everybody if you want to.
I want, I think I'm noticing stuff come in on the app.
If you go to TIFF, people, and you go to Tip with another, if you have Bitcoin, you can officially tip on Rumble via Bitcoin.
I've given the link to what's that other phone?
Android.
They have the Rumble Wallet app on Android.
Download it, see if you can start your own wallet.
It's like in the beta stage right now.
We're trying to see if there's any hiccups or glitches to work them out.
But if you want to support, you know, to do, come over to locals right now if you want to support.
And we're going to have a bit of an after-party with Ivan over there.
Here's the link.
Ivan, the chat, not the chat.
The crowd loves you.
And even over, I say, especially, can you have Ivan on for a weekly update going forward?
I would not burden anybody with that level of commitment, but Ivan is an open invitation every time.
I appreciate that because I genuinely enjoy our conversations because, I mean, you get it, right?
There's very few really substantive podcasters in the area specifically that I'm really engaged on, particularly on the legal front.
So you can dissect it and you can push back if I'm saying something.
Well, neither of us, neither of us take anything personally when it's, I mean, even when it's personal, it doesn't matter when it's on the substance of it.
Right, right.
And you are quite an eccentric character.
I mean, there's nobody who's going to, you know, listen to you and say, I remember back in the day, it's like, man, he's he goes a little hard in the paint, as does Kyle Seraphin.
Steve Baker is so polite about things.
He just comes out with the goods in his journalism.
No, I can be diplomatic.
And you can be massively undiplomatic.
My person range is pretty broad.
We're going to end this on Rumble.
So come on over to Locals.
We'll take some questions over there.
And oh, I didn't hit the set.
There it is.
Okay.
And now go watch it.
Ivan is not a terrible name.
It's a horrible name.
Ivan the Terrible.
The horrible.
All right.
We're going to pun intended peeps.
Okay, we're ending it on Rumble.
Come over to Locals.
I'll be live.
Hopefully, I'll be back home by tomorrow afternoon from my home studio with my good Mike.
But that's it.
Updating the studio.
Rumble.
▲
Export Selection