Viva & Barnes - Epstein Document Drop is a WILD! Blackmail, Infidelity & Collusion! And Other News...

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 13, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:11:33

Epstein Document Drop is a WILD! Blackmail, Infidelity & Collusion! And Other News...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, Steve Martin once said in an interview, I forget when, that eventually we all become caricatures of ourselves.
	I think about this every day when I look in the mirror, especially now when I see my bald, naked, ugly face.
	But for this moment, I present you with Pierre Poilievre, the so-called leader of the so-called Conservative Party of Canada, who has become a mere caricature of himself.
	Smooth, smiley face, phony smile is all I see.
	Listen to this.
	Behold.
	Damn it.
	Hi there.
	Sidney Fizzard with Rebel News.
	Last year it was reported our CMP published a secret report suggesting Canadians may revolt once we realize how broke we are.
	This year, under Prime Minister Kearney, we're approaching a $100 billion deficit.
	How close are Canadians to a breaking point?
	Well, many are already broken.
	That's not the only report.
	The Liberal government had, there was a leaked report that came out through Blacklocks.
	It got very little media coverage, but it said basically liberal policies had us on track so that Canadians will have to forage and hunt for food because they can't afford to afford groceries.
	Like this is in Canada.
	This is the talk that you would expect in an impoverished, overpriced third world economy.
	Impoverished, overpriced third world economy.
	I'll take three things that don't go together.
	I'll just throw this in right now and I'll pause it this.
	That document, that paper that was leaked or whatever, suggesting that Canadians might have to forage for food in the future, it might very well have been a description of what's going on in Canada right now, which is where Canadians, and I'll put them in quotes, foreigners, legal or otherwise illegal, are in fact foraging right now, violating a slew of laws as it relates to poaching, snagging fish out of river with nets.
	It might be happening already because of the people that have been led into the country en masse.
	Set that aside.
	Let's let Pierre Poiliev, smooth talker extraordinaire.
	I've never heard someone talk so much and do nothing.
	Pierre, carry on, sir.
	But that is the trajectory that the Liberals have us on.
	And this costly credit card budget of Mark Hardy will make that even worse.
	Oh, credit card, credit card budget, meaning that they're just buying things on credit.
	Now they have to pay for it later.
	Debt.
	He's got a great, he had axed the tax.
	Then he had to drop that when the liberals actually axed the tax.
	Now he's got credit card budget.
	He's good giving labels to things.
	He's just not good at getting anything done like elected.
	Canadians can't afford life.
	They are absolutely desperate.
	Go into our streets and talk to people.
	Ask them about their lives.
	Their lives are falling apart because they cannot afford this costly government.
	And it is leading to major breakdown.
	Go onto the street not far from here.
	There's an encampment where people who've lost hope and have been broken are now addicted to fentanyl and are dying face first on the pavement on our streets.
	These are the real issues.
	This is why I'm in politics, to fight for, to give back the promise of our country that every single Canadian, whether they're a waitress, a welder, or a businessman, can have a good plate of food every single night, live in a nice house on a safe street.
	That's why we're in this business.
	That's why he's in politics.
	Can you imagine this is coming from the same guy who quite literally didn't take a position against rampant immigration during the election, rampant immigration, which is contributing to the social problems in Canada, the economic problems in Canada.
	The people face down, you know, drugged up in Ottawa is nothing new, by the way.
	They've had open air safe injection sites for a very long time.
	Ottawa has been a dirty hellhole for a very long time.
	What has he done about it?
	Nothing.
	And now he's sitting there talking about how people are at a breaking point in Canada.
	No shit, Sherlock, or no poop, Pierre.
	Well, that's not bad, actually.
	They've been there for a while, and you've done nothing about it.
	You know who else is at a breaking point?
	Universal ostrich farms, farmers across Canada who are now living through these arbitrary abusive culls, as they call them.
	That's Pierre Polyev, the most useless, feckless, phony leader ever.
	I gave him a fair bit of grace during the election.
	He has now confirmed that he is not just not opposition.
	He's part of the problem.
	And part of the problem, going back to Universal Ostrich Farms, I was doing the rounds on social media.
	I was on Alex Jones.
	I was on with Dr. Drew.
	I'm going to be on with Megan Murphy because I want the world to know about this.
	Why do you care so much about the ostriches?
	It's emblematic of the tyranny and the passivity of the Canadian government and the Canadian population, respectively.
	And the news of the day is that apparently there's a screenshot going around that the universal ostrich farms are going to have to pay the bill for the slaughter.
	I mean, it's the most pathological sociopathic psychotic abuse imaginable.
	This screenshot is running around.
	Now, I've tried to double check with people I know contacts as to the accuracy of it, the authenticity of it.
	Never trust a screenshot unless there's a link.
	I haven't been able to get this confirmed independently with people I know on the ground very close to the situation.
	I've been following it for damn near a year.
	But it's something to the effect that the farm, if you can read here paragraph three, as of early November 2025, the costs are estimated to exceed $500,000, covering nine weeks of on-site care.
	Care for ostriches that they slaughtered in the most brutal manner possible.
	CFIA has indicated it will pursue full recovery of the claims if not paid voluntarily.
	Now, I do know for a fact from the legal proceedings that the farm, after having lost its contestation and appeal, they get stuck with court costs, they get stuck with some fees, and they're going to add up.
	I don't know, and it has not been confirmed to me for a fact yet, that they're going to be billed for the torture, though I have no doubt that the CFIA will do that.
	Can you imagine these motherfuckers who are actually doing everything that they're doing on taxpayer dollars are now going to go and say we need to get reimbursed by the taxpayer who we've just brutalized, vandalized, and demoralized.
	So I'm going to follow up on that.
	Don't trust the screen grab.
	From what I understand, it's true in essence, but the details, you'll want to be careful before you repeat it.
	Just a few more things on the Canadian stuff before we get to the wild news of the day, which is the Epstein documents.
	And holy, holy shit.
	This is just, this is just the level of pathological gaslighting out of Canada coming from our, you know, the people who took an oath to serve and protect the people, to serve and protect the Constitution, our Charter of Rights, our Bill of Rights.
	The RCMP, or as I call them and forever will, the RCMG, the Royal Canadian Mountain Gestapo, put out our deepest gratitude to those who have and continue to serve Canadians across the country and abroad.
	We gather on Remembrance Day to honor their achievements and sacrifice, lest we forget.
	Don't you just love it?
	When the RCMG come out to thank our forefathers who fought, bled, and died for the very freedoms that these SOBs have been violating left, right, and center.
	They come out of it.
	We'd like to thank all of our forefathers.
	Oh, we haven't done it.
	Some of them have done it themselves, and I thank all veterans.
	I would be shocked, or at least I'd be surprised to know how many veterans would have voluntarily participated in the slaughter that we just saw the other day.
	They put this tweet out.
	You know what the best part about it is?
	Oh, looky, looky, who can reply?
	Accounts RCMP follows or mentioned can reply.
	We'd like to thank our forefathers for fighting, bleeding, and dying for our freedoms, including the freedom of speech.
	But fuck you, Canadians.
	We don't want to hear what you have to say about us.
	Restricting replies on a post commemorating those who died for our freedoms that we have today.
	You got freedoms, Canadians.
	One of those freedoms is not to let the RCMP know what you think of them.
	While simultaneously restricting, oh, sorry, commemorating those who sacrificed their lives for our freedom while simultaneously restricting comments and people's freedom to express their disgust at the evil the terrorist organization that is the RCMP police just inflicted on the citizens they are supposed to protect and serve.
	No one will ever forget RCMP.
	Thank you for proving that your abuse at the Ottawa Trucker protest was not a one-off.
	It's a pattern.
	And so I'm on a mission.
	Never forgive, never forget, hold the line.
	I used to be a much nicer person.
	Forgive and forget.
	Hell no.
	Or forgive and forget, but never forget their names.
	I will try to adopt the Jesus type philosophy of turning the other cheek.
	And it's not from what I now appreciate is the best interpretation.
	It's not a question of turning the other cheek to be a sissy.
	It's a question of turning the other cheek so that you don't get consumed and destroyed by anger and seething rage because it is a consuming force.
	And I've said that for a while.
	So I will do my best.
	One of my coping mechanisms is putting it on blast.
	Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
	How goes the battle?
	Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
	Many of you know me.
	I think all of you know me.
	Who is here for the first time ever?
	In the chat, don't troll and say it if it's not true.
	Are you here for the first time ever?
	If so, drop a one or a yes while I read the chat and I should have made sure that we are live across three platforms, Twitter just because.
	Rumble exclusively, three o'clock daily, Monday through Friday, unless I'm traveling and the schedule gets missed up.
	NeuroDivergent is in the house.
	I have not, oh, there's a yes, jester, jesper jester, and jawass, jawass, and quiltebeast.
	Well, welcome to the channel.
	My real name is David Freihait.
	Some people feel violated when they find out that this, this is not my real name.
	David Freihait, former Montreal litigator, current Florida Rumbler.
	And we do this daily.
	Sunday night, we have the awesome Viva and Barnes Law for the People.
	Sunday night extravaganza across all platforms.
	We've got an amazing community at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	If you want to support the work that we do, and we always have an after party, virtually always, an after party after the daily show, which is exclusively for the supporters at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	You want to support the channel?
	All of the links are in the pinned comment.
	And the one thing I always forget to show everybody, for those who have crypto wallets, let me do this here.
	I got it.
	It's the most amazing innovation.
	And I always forget to actively celebrate it.
	It's not yet available to everybody.
	I was the first person in Rumble history to receive a tip.
	You go to the tip button right here and you can tip with crypto.
	If you have a crypto wallet, you can tip in crypto to support the work that I do to say thank you.
	Or even, I don't know if you can put a comment in when you do it, but or troll.
	I'm joking, don't troll.
	But anyways, so you scan the QR code and you can actually tip with crypto.
	Amazing innovation when it's, what is the word, rolled out for all creators.
	It's going to revolutionize the way creators can fund their own work, how people can support the work of their favorite creators.
	And it's going to revolutionize Rumble as a, I don't want to call it a social media platform, as a video hosting platform that facilitates economic freedom, freedom of speech, and freedom of conscience and freedom of thought.
	Skell Woodrum says, been watching for a few years, although I live in the U.S.
	Well, now I live in Florida.
	And God willing, I will live in Florida for the rest of my life because it's a beautiful place.
	And I was having some discussions with people, you know, for all its foibles.
	Canada is a beautiful country.
	The government is horseshit.
	I would say like RCMP horseshit, and they're destroying the country.
	And, you know, all countries are beautiful.
	All peoples are beautiful.
	But when it comes to countries, the United States of America is singularly unique in its role in the world.
	And it's a great place to live.
	Now, I've also got to get better.
	I'm going to try to segment this for a specific YouTube Commitube segment.
	One thing I've always noticed, you mentioned certain words on CommieTube, and there is an algorithmic suppression that is undeniable and inexplicable.
	Jeffrey Epstein, those are the words, people.
	There was a document dump in the Jeffrey Epstein disclosure files yesterday.
	The files that have dropped are revelatory.
	I say they are, in fact, groundbreaking, shocking, outrageous, not because they incriminate Trump at all, full stop, because they, in fact, basically fully exonerate Trump as an individual, despite all of the scheming of the dirty, rotten scoundrels, pathological liars, scum of the earth, capital D Democrat politicians.
	There was a whole, 20,000 documents dumped yesterday.
	I'm trying to keep up with it.
	I'm trying to go through with it, go through it.
	And I, you know, we're going to go through the highlights, or at least the highlights that have been brought to my attention since the dump.
	But I'm going to show you, and starting with the biggest POS out there.
	He's tied for first with a bunch of others.
	I'll give you names.
	The biggest tied for first scumbag SOB POSs out there are Adam Shifty Next Shift for Brains McShiff, Adam Kinzinger.
	What's the other guy's name there?
	Kinzinger Schiff.
	We'll go with Leticia James, obviously.
	New York Nipple Judge Angeron.
	Adam Kinzinger.
	Did I already say that one?
	Who's the other one I'm thinking?
	Oh, Eric Swalwell is the one I'm thinking about.
	I could name a whole Nadler.
	That other one there, Chuck Schumer, the scum of the earth.
	This guy's tied for first with all of them.
	Rep Dan Goldman.
	Now, I am going to play the whole thing.
	It's a little long, and you've got to appreciate.
	I'm not going to give you the punchline, although many of you already know the punchline.
	If you know the punchline, it's going to be infuriating to watch this.
	And if you don't know the punchline and you're watching today, I'm curious as to how you got here.
	Listen to this.
	This is the tweet.
	And, you know, the people who argued that Trump should not have presidential immunity, sure as sugar, appreciate and enjoy exploiting of their own fall.
	What is it called?
	Westfall Act immunity as federal employees.
	They sure as hell love to push the limits for what would otherwise, I would say, objectively be defamation, but they've got immunity while they sought to deny Trump his presidential immunity.
	Rep Dan Goldman, who's I think he's worth like, I don't know, $500 million.
	I'll double check in a second.
	We now have reliable, direct evidence connecting Donald Trump to Epstein's underage sex trafficking ring.
	These might be the words that trigger the algorithm on Commitube.
	And appreciate the words here.
	Because this man, if he's not intelligence, he's working with intelligence despite being thoroughly lacking in intelligence.
	We now have reliable, direct evidence connecting Donald Trump to Epstein's underage sex.
	What's the connection?
	I won't spoil the surprise.
	Trump's DOJ cover-up of the Epstein crimes must not continue.
	This right here is what some might refer to as a hoax, a cover-up.
	There's been a botched delivery.
	That for sure is sugar.
	The Justice Department wants to release every piece of the Epstein files.
	Only time I'll ever agree with Dan.
	No more secrets.
	The American people, the survivors, and the victims deserve the truth.
	He's this man.
	Watch this.
	I'll pause it periodically.
	Hey there, everybody.
	Big day in Washington, D.C., and I want to focus on the Epstein files because there was some significant news.
	By the way, this is like Better Call Saul dollar store version.
	It wasn't just that finally, after 50 days, Congresswoman Adelita Grahalva was sworn in and became the 218th signature and final signature on the discharge petition to force the Department of Justice to turn over all of the Epstein files.
	The bigger news, in my view, is the release of emails that relate directly to Donald Trump's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's underage sex trafficking ring.
	The big one to me is an email in 2011 from Jeffrey Epstein to Ghylaine Maxwell saying that Donald Trump has surprisingly been quiet, but that he was with one of the victims for hours.
	Now, the reason why this one is so important.
	It's so important they, and as far as I understand, the Democrats redacted the name of the victim.
	It's so important.
	And it was especially important that they redact the name so that nobody could know who it was until unmasked.
	Is Donald Trump was not running for president.
	Jeffrey Epstein wasn't getting asked about Donald Trump in any way, shape, or form.
	And he was communicating in private with his co-conspirator.
	These type of co- He was communicating in private with his co-conspirator.
	Let those lies sink in for a second.
	Oh, conspirator statements are admissible in court.
	And the reason is that they are generally reliable.
	When you make incriminating statements to your co-conspirator.
	I'm sorry.
	He's talking about Jeffrey Epstein making admissions to his co-conspirator about Donald Trump.
	And that admission, that statement being that Trump spent hours with victim one who was redacted.
	That is against your own interest, and therefore it's deemed to be reliable.
	So the fact that they are discussing Donald Trump's knowledge and involvement in the Epstein's underage sex trafficking ring.
	That's not what they were doing, but set that aside.
	Just confirms what we knew from Donald Trump's 50th birthday card to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003, alluding to these secrets, and then the statement he made about how Epstein is known for liking girls on the younger side.
	Yeah, which was the reason for which he banned him from his club earlier than that, I believe.
	The House Oversight Committee that received these emails did not get them from the Department of Justice.
	They got these emails from Epstein's estate, which they had subpoenaed.
	The Department of Justice has not given them anything.
	And in fact, just today, the heads of the Department of Justice were meeting with Donald Trump and Lauren Boeberg, trying to convince her to pull her name off of the discharge petition so that this cover-up can continue.
	But the cover-up is real, folks.
	It is real.
	It is significant.
	We now have confirmation that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files.
	And it is long past time that the Department of Justice turn over all of the files.
	So stay tuned.
	There's going to be a lot more to come.
	Appreciate the pathological dishonesty of that.
	Now, the punchline, which Dan Goldman doesn't get to in that video, which I've asked why Community Notes hasn't gotten to in that post.
	We all know who the victim was.
	The victim one that was redacted by the Democrats was Virginia Guffray.
	Now, a lot of people are saying that she had already tested.
	I mean, a lot of people are making the point that Virginia Guffray had already testified that Trump was nothing but cordial with her and that he wasn't involved at all.
	And that the reason why they redacted the name was so that no one would know who victim one was, to know that it was Virginia Guffray, to put two and two together that Virginia confirmed that Trump had nothing to do with anything.
	He never did anything to her and was only a gentleman.
	That is one of the reasons for which they redacted the name so that people wouldn't know that it was Virginia Guffray.
	The other reason is plausible deniability.
	Do you remember like the statement that Dan Goldman just made?
	Connection to in the book.
	First of all, everyone already knew Trump was in the Epstein files in that he was in the black book as a contact like Alec Baldwin, like thousands of other people.
	In the Epstein files, just as a pure matter of fact, is irrelevant, many of people were in the files without any criminality, without any guilt or suspicion.
	They pulled the same trick that those CIA agents pulled with the letter of the 51 intelligence officer saying this Hunter Biden laptop bears the earmarks of a Russian information campaign.
	They're suggesting the talking point that the media run with, repeat, to make truth out of that it was a Russian operation and not true and accurate.
	A connection to what's the connection?
	Victim one that we've redacted and didn't identify was Virginia Guffray, who had subsequently exonerated Donald Trump, said that she spent hours with him.
	Trump spent hours with a victim of his sex trafficking.
	What's his name, Epstein?
	Do you know what else is particularly dishonest about this?
	Virginia Guffray was an employee at Mar-a-Lago.
	Some of you might say why she was an employee there.
	Look, people work places, and to the extent it was in conformity with Florida law, which by all accounts it was, she was an employee.
	Now, I don't know what the purpose of the meeting was, but you could literally say and run an equally misleading headline, although it'll be easier to discover because if you say Trump employed, Trump had an employment contract with one of victims, sex victims, you'd know who they were talking about.
	They did this and they tried to conceal the fact that it was Virginia Guffray and they tried to manufacture the fact that there was something suspicious or incriminating about it.
	Dan Goldman is the biggest SOB on earth.
	And it only goes downhill from there.
	Let me bring up a video from Xavier DeRusso.
	Let me just see something here.
	You see, I'm not even going to read his bio, but I've met him.
	He's a good, cool guy.
	This is his take on it.
	And it'll be clarifying as well.
	The House Democrats just exposed Trump for being with an underage Epstein victim for hours, except they lied to you.
	They redacted the girl's name because it would blow up their entire story.
	The alleged victim, Virginia Duffrey, was crystal clear in her deposition as well in her own self-written memoir that President Trump did nothing wrong, was actually very friendly to her.
	Did you see Trump and Epstein together?
	No.
	Did he flirt with you?
	No.
	And so on.
	These Democrats have no integrity.
	They are evil.
	And they have learned nothing from what the rhetoric did to Charlie Kirk.
	The House Democrats.
	He's not wrong.
	I'll give everybody the link to that tweet so you can all have the receipts.
	I think I've been sending some of these tweets to private chat.
	So that's part one.
	There is yet again the exact same operation that they played with the intelligence letter.
	And I'm going to post my talk that I gave at the New Orleans Investment Conference on my channel sooner than later.
	And the theme of it was, this is how disinformation propaganda manufacturing consent 2.0 works.
	You take a crisis, you get your so-called experts or you get your evidence, you get the media to report, the media to repeat, and then you have fake truth.
	So that's part one.
	What is absolutely mind-blowing from these documents, and if you haven't read through them, set aside the attempt to manufacture evidence and make it look like Trump was guilty of something that he wasn't?
	Greg Price posting Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the victim in the Epstein emails they released.
	The unredacted version shows that it was Virginia Guffray.
	She had already tested multiple times that.
	And who posts this lie?
	And look at the way the oversight Dems post this.
	Is it an official account or not?
	It's not.
	It might actually be an official account.
	It is.
	It's got a gray check mark.
	Breaking.
	Oversight Dems have received new emails from Jeffrey Epstein's estate that raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein's horrific crimes.
	No, it doesn't raise any questions.
	It actually provides answers.
	Trump knew.
	He knew he got, he barred Epstein.
	He cooperated with authorities.
	Mike Johnson, I'm not going to play the clip, but the clip is out there.
	Mike Johnson saying that, you know, he was an FBI informant.
	I think he used the word informant, and I think he immediately realized he shouldn't have said it.
	But Trump knew, kicked him out, cooperated with counsel, and cooperated with the FBI.
	Raises serious questions.
	No, he was suspicious of Epstein, probably knew, and did in fact know and cooperate with authorities pretty much in the same way everybody else knew, you know, like when Ricky Geray gets up there and makes his jokes.
	It's not because people don't know.
	But it gets even worse.
	And this is going to go back to Greg Price again.
	This is absolutely amazing.
	Michael Wolf, we're going to get to him in a second.
	The only scandal Democrats revealed by their latest attempt to revive the Epstein hoax is that Michael Wolf, who we've been reliably informed is the greatest journalist of all time, was apparently giving Epstein rapid response advice.
	I've been needling Michael Wolf all morning.
	Hey, Mike, is this you giving PR advice to a known child sex trafficker or child sex exploiter?
	Because everything is dates.
	Michael Wolf, his email address, which they've redacted, to Jeffrey E.
	Now, we're going to get back to this as well, everybody.
	J-E-Evacation at gmail.com.
	Just remember that email address and we're going to come back to it.
	Re, heads up.
	This is in response to Michael Wolf writing, I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you, either on air or in Scrum afterwards.
	Importance level, high.
	I think you should let him hang himself.
	If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency.
	That's either, this is sort of the opposite of blackmail.
	This might be blackmail in and of itself, but people purporting to claim that there's no evidence Jeffrey Epstein engaged in blackmail, political blackmail or extortion via his sex trafficking ring.
	Apparently he trafficked children to nobody.
	Evidence right here.
	Evidence with him blackmailing Bill Gates with his extramarital failure.
	Set that aside.
	It'll give you valuable PR and political currency.
	You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you.
	Or if it really looks like he could win the election 2016, you could save him generating a debt.
	Why in the name of sweet holy hell is Michael Wolfe, who then goes on to write a memoir that tries to mock, humiliate, embarrass the Trump administration, why is he giving advice to a convicted sex offender?
	I mean, I've got my theories, pure personal theories, maybe because this man, as per his advice, confession through projection, is indebted to or beholden to Jeffrey Epstein for reasons.
	We won't know those reasons now because Jeffrey Epstein's dead.
	Dead men tell no tales.
	Why in the name of sweet holy hell would Michael Wolf be giving political advice to a convicted sex offender?
	Pond over that one for a second.
	Opine, I should say.
	Of course, it is possible that when asked, he'll say Jeffrey is a great guy and has gotten a raw deal and is a victim of political correctness, which is to be outlawed in a Trump regime.
	That is shocking.
	And we're not done with Michael Wolf just yet.
	There's more.
	But wait, there's more.
	Do I want to pull over some of some of my here?
	Let me see what there was one that Michael Wolfe also had to say.
	It's it's it's it's egregious.
	Michael Wolfe to Jeffrey Epstein at jevocation at gmail.com.
	Hi.
	Priority.
	Now could be the time.
	There's an opportunity to come forward this week and talk about Trump in such a way that could garner you great sympathy and help finish him.
	Interested.
	This is September, October, November 29th, 2016.
	Is that what it is?
	December, January.
	Help finish him.
	Who does?
	Let me just see something here.
	Who does Michael Wolf write for?
	I think it's the New York Times.
	I just want to make sure.
	Journalist email.
	I think he wrote.
	Let me see here.
	I'm fairly certain he wrote for the New York Times.
	Let's just go Times.
	It's not finding because I got a fat finger here.
	Times.
	Okay, so no, New York Times bestseller.
	He worked for the New York Times as a copyboy.
	That's not really good enough.
	He published his first magazine article in the New York Times in the 70s.
	Shortly afterwards, he left the Times, became a contributing writer to the New Times, a bi-weekly magazine.
	All right, whatever.
	This man is a journalist, purportedly reputable, great author, actively colluding with a convicted sex offender to take down the potential president.
	Although I think at that point, Trump had already gotten elected.
	When would the fairly certain the election would have already occurred at that time?
	Take him down.
	And I say, but wait this morning.
	I say, is that is that you, Michael Wolfe?
	Like, are you giving advice to this man?
	And if so, what do you have to say for yourself?
	So, thus far, the confirmation that we've gotten is that Trump was with Virginia Guffray for hours, capacity unknown, but totally exonerated by her own admissions, under oath and in the book, and that Democrat operatives are working with a convicted sex offender to try to take down Donald Trump.
	What do we have here?
	We're going to get to even more.
	This one comes from C3C3.
	There's just you have to like rely on the aggregate knowledge of the internet or some form of AI to search through the documents.
	This one now involves Kathy Ruhmler.
	And keep that name in mind as well, because these names are important.
	Scrolling down, it says you need to talk to Boss, and that is from JEE.
	Looks like I thought that was a different email address.
	J-E-E, Jeffrey Epstein, his middle name is Edward.
	Jeffrey Edward Epstein saying you need to talk to Boss.
	Then you got Kathy Ruhmer saying agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him.
	Then we go up here.
	Then we see understood.
	This is Jeffrey Epstein.
	It comes down to high-risk reward, low-risk reward, professional, emotional, and financial.
	To which Kathy Rumler says, most girls do not have to worry about this crap.
	Excuse me.
	To which Jeff Edwards, Jeffrey Epstein, says, Girls, careful.
	I will renew an old habit.
	This week, Teal, Summers, Bill Burns, Gordon Brown, Jaglin, Council of Europe, and Noble Chairman, Mongolia, President.
	What are we in now?
	We're in 2014.
	Hardeep Puree, India, Boris, Gates, Jabor, Qatar, Sultan, Leon Blackwoody.
	You are a welcome guest at any.
	Also, if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for Climate Summit Clinton Security Council, holy shit, I'm on whatever for the next 30 minutes.
	To which Kathy says, doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.
	How are you going to manage all of that?
	This is UNGA week.
	So the boss will be in town too.
	I'll be here all week.
	You may get sick of me.
	Just sat down on the train so you can talk freely.
	Kathy Rumler, people.
	Who's she?
	Let me bring this up here.
	It's absolutely astonishing.
	Kathy Rumler.
	She's now at Goldman Sachs.
	Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel at Goldman Sachs.
	In addition to serving, let me just make sure that we're looking at the same thing because I changed my window.
	We are.
	Chief Logan, in addition to serving as the firm's management committee, Ms. Rumler is the chair of the Firmwide Conduct Committee, co-vice chair of the Firmwide Reputational Risk Committee, irony, and a member of the Firmwide Enterprise Risk Committee.
	Prior to joining Goldman Sachs, Ms. Rumler was global chair at the White Collar Defense and Investigations Practice at Latham and Watkins LLP, Limited Liability Partnership.
	She rejoined Latham's practice after serving in the White House as counsel to President Barack H. Obama.
	As President Obama's longest-serving White House counsel, Ms. Rumler advised the president on all legal matters related to domestic and foreign policy, national security.
	Ms. Rumler also served as a federal prosecutor for seven years, including as principal associate, deputy attorney general, to deputy director of the Enron Task Force and Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.
	When was, oh, no, she's engaging.
	Let me just go back here so I can give everybody the link to the tweet.
	In 2014, she's actively engaging with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
	Does anybody not appreciate the depth of this?
	It's astonishing.
	Here, hold on.
	Let me bring this one up.
	This is from CanCon.
	Just getting back to who is colluding with, conversing with a known sex offender at the time.
	Longest serving in-house counsel to Barack Hussein Obama.
	Cancon, CanCon actual.
	Did Epstein collude with well-known author to blackmail President Trump?
	And did Dems just expose this like the derps they are?
	The ranking member of the House Overside Committee rep Robert Garcia said, quote, the more Donald Trump tries to cover up the Epstein files, the more we uncover.
	And these latest emails are correspond, emails and correspondence raise glaring questions about what else the White House is hiding and the nature of the relationship between Epstein and the president.
	Glaring questions.
	Like, why is author, an author colluding with a known pedophile to try and blackmail the GOP frontrunner for president?
	Or, quote, generating a debt, and quote, if it looked like Trump could win.
	This sounds like Michael Wolf MLC should be under investigation.
	It sounds to me like Kathy Ruhmler should be under investigation as well.
	This is at the high, this is above and beyond the pre-conviction or the Bill Clinton visits to the White House.
	This is criminality of the highest order.
	You know, let's bring one up from the AF Post here.
	They posted something else.
	This is.
	Hey, remember, everybody, like, you know, remember who is telling you this?
	Because it's an amazing thing.
	I was on with Benny Johnson earlier today, and I posit my theory.
	Jeffrey Epstein was running a blackmail operation, working with intelligence.
	And people are like, what's the evidence of that?
	Other than the fact that he is known to have blackmailed Bill Gates, he is known to have been very close and invested in a company Ehud Barak was investing in, involved in a cybersecurity company that would geolocate calls and video.
	Millions of dollars.
	Met with Ehud Barak post-pedophile conviction so many times, they probably, you know, Ehud Barak probably knew where the bathroom was in his place.
	You know, he was meeting with people who subsequently went on to be directors of the CIA.
	And now we see the knowledge and information that he had about other players in the White House.
	This is from the AF Post.
	News and alerts from around the world, from an America-first perspective, not affiliated with any organization.
	Jeffrey Epstein claimed that Hillary Clinton had a sexual relationship with former attorney and White House counsel Vince Foster.
	Foster committed suicide in 1983.
	Understand this.
	I mean, I really understand this, the timeframe that we're talking about.
	Epstein with knowledge.
	Maybe it was common knowledge.
	How the hell do I know?
	Keep your schmekel in your pants, people, and you'll live a long, healthy, happy life.
	At least you'll maximize the odds.
	Vince Foster committed suicide.
	We'll get to that in a second.
	The email reads, and it's from JEE Vacation to Michael Wolf, in response to a request from Michael Wolf saying, What's the thumbnail on Nusbaum Foster?
	Nusbaum, he says, is right, is White House counsel.
	Hillary doing naughties with Vince.
	Vince Foster, a man who would since go on to commit suicide, allegedly.
	Check this out.
	How did he do it?
	Here.
	Foster had been a partner at Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, where, as the Washington Post later wrote, he rose to the pinnacle of Arkansas legal establishment.
	In July 1993, he was found dead of a gunshot wound in Fort Marcy Park.
	Five official government investigations ruled his death a suicide, but several conspiracy theories emerged.
	Here, hold on, let's just see the conspiracy theory.
	I want to say it was because the, I think it was because the shot was to the back of the head.
	I will find it later.
	So, Vince Foster, according to the knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein, is having relations with Hillary Clinton in 1990.
	Well, it was pre-1993, obviously, for very obvious reasons.
	And Jeffrey Epstein knew this or claimed to have known this.
	And then, coincidentally or not, Vince Foster ends up allegedly taking his own life.
	I'm fairly certain the conspiracy theory was that he shot himself in the back of the head.
	Let's see here.
	How did Vince Foster?
	I'll just put the words in here.
	I think the conspiracy, I think it was because it was a magnum to the back of the head, if I'm not mistaken.
	Family revolver did it in the park.
	Gunshot wound.
	And let me see, was it to the back?
	Was it to the back of the head?
	I'm fairly certain that's where the conspiracy theory comes from.
	That it would have been a very bizarre way to do it if it were legit.
	You know, like the other guy who was found hanging from a tree with two shotgun blasts to the chest and a shotgun 20 some odd feet away that got there because it projected out of the hand after he shot himself after hanging himself.
	Yeah.
	Jeffrey Epstein had this info.
	This is what's been revealed today.
	And for the life of me, I'm going to get to this after we address the email address.
	I don't know why the Trump administration has been reversing course on the release of this.
	Some of you are saying it's all 3D, 4D chess, but Trump has said some things, which even if you're playing the 4D chess, you don't say because it will push a certain base away at a time when you need it.
	Anybody else pick up on the fact that Jeffrey Epstein's email address was jeevacation at gmail.com?
	Which email was this one?
	This is from Michael Wolf.
	Again, is Clinton willing to say he was not there?
	By the way, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershwitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers and then translated back here as reported fact.
	Interesting, he's describing something of a disinformation laundering.
	Problem with blank story is that tabs are too invested in present storyline and unlikely that the Times or Wall Street Journal will want to touch it, though.
	Depending on who is willing to go on record, they might.
	There is another political reporter I know who might do it again if the on-the-record sources are public people, or I will use it for the New York magazine, but that won't be until February.
	Can you still talk tomorrow?
	When works, Woody and Sun Ye coming for dinner tonight, 2015.
	It's amazing.
	JEE vacation.
	So I thought for a moment that this had to do with providing vacations, the types of vacations which you think some people travel abroad for because it's illegal here.
	And according to AI, for whatever it's worth, the theory is that, haven't been able to independently verify this yet, that he actually, Jeffrey Epstein, acquired or created those email addresses in 2008, 2009, give or take, to highlight the fact that the sentence that he was given subsequent to Alex Acosta's inexplicable sweetheart deal was basically a vacation.
	And so he created that email address either as, you know, sociopathic mockery of the treatment that he was getting, or it had to do with something, my theory, which was vacations of sorts.
	That, as far as I can tell, are the biggest bombshells of the day.
	We're going to get to something in a second in terms of why I don't understand why the Trump administration has bungled this because this could have been released when everyone was complaining that Pam Bondi hasn't released anything despite promising the release and then phase two after a phase one, which was no phase at all.
	This would have been great to have published when people were freaking out about the apparent 180 and the alleged lack of transparency.
	Just another one here, by the way.
	Email from New York Times journalist Landon Thomas tipping Epstein off about follow-up investigations by journalist and former NYPD detective John Conley.
	So we've got New York Times popping their head up here again.
	You know, Michael Wolfe's connection was maybe a little antiquated.
	So it's old enough that you can say no connection at all.
	New York Times journalist Landon Thomas, apparently notifying Jeffrey Epstein, and this is after Trump's election, 2017, that he is digging around again, not clear if it's another book or expanded paperback version, was asking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr.
	This is to Jeffrey Epstein.
	I told him I had no idea.
	I think he's doing some Trump-related digging too, anyhow, for what it's worth.
	Hey, heads up there, convicted sex trafficker pedophile man.
	Another journalist from the New York Times is giving you a bit of a heads up that you might want to start thinking of how to get your story straight before anyone comes on and asks you for some details.
	And two years later, he will no longer be capable of giving any details, conveniently enough.
	Why the hell did the Trump administration not even release these documents back when everybody was rightly flipping out?
	I have no flipping idea.
	And to those of you saying it's 4D chess, he got the media to demand it and yada yada.
	That's fine.
	If that were the plan, he could have avoided truth posts like the ones where he said, if you're still asking for this, you're no longer my supporters or you're no longer my constituents.
	I forget exactly how he said it.
	He did not have to put out the post even today.
	Look, you can call it a hoax.
	You can call it a distraction and that would be fine.
	But not to denigrate, undermine, and ostracize people who have been loyal to the administration to their own detriment, you know, professional, personal, financial, whatever, to put them in a spot where you're calling them traitors, for lack of a better word, for continuing to push a story that was important to Trump in 2016, important to Trump in 2020, important to the Trump administration in 2024, important to key members of the Trump administration throughout.
	There were other ways to play it if that were the play.
	So that doesn't save this play, but this stuff right here is flipping damning.
	It's flipping shocking, and it confirms what a lot of us already suspected, already knew, and just adds more evidence to it.
	Now, let me see what's going on in the chat because I haven't been there for a while at all, in fact.
	And we'll see if I haven't forgotten anything.
	Ginger Ninja, 1776 says, first time, new phone, who diss?
	Oh, Ginger, give it a Ginger Ninja is a wonderful member like all the others of our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
	He made me this bell, which I ring whenever we get a new member of our Viva Barnes Law.locals.com community.
	It is made from a round of ammunition.
	It is empty, obviously.
	The bell is the projectile, and it's fantastic.
	Ginger Ninja also took me to the gun range up a little north of Tennessee, a little north of Chattanooga, and we had a good day where I made it to the 1,000-yard club because I will never be a member of the Mile High Club, but I'm a member of the Mile Long Club.
	No, that's not 1,000 yards is about 1.6 miles, give or take.
	Wait, is that right?
	A thousand yards is 3,000.
	Yeah, it's about 1.6 miles.
	And then I also noticed that who do we have in the house?
	We had Bill Tong.
	King of Bill Tong says, we also specialize in imported foods.
	Check out Bill Tong USA for a great selection of imported candies, cookies, groceries, and, of course, Bill Tong.
	Everybody, check it out.
	Support people who support the causes that we love, the creators that keep things real and keep things accurate and keep things up to speed and don't let go of stories like the Epstein stories.
	Bill Tong has an amazing story.
	He's got amazing products.
	Check him out, BilltongUSA.com.
	Use code Viva for 10% off.
	Oh, look, who's this picture right here?
	Oh, that's just, that's Bill Clinton with his oh face.
	Oh, yeah.
	Getting a deep tissue massage by one Virginia Goufre.
	You never see a picture of Trump with anybody like that.
	That's it.
	What does everyone think of this?
	Because I think it's absolutely 1760 yards is a mile, says hyphen.
	Darn it.
	It's 0.6 of a mile.
	I converted the wrong way.
	This is why I say our above average viva barnslaw.locals.com community will correct you in real time.
	Yeah, I was converting the wrong way.
	My math wasn't off.
	I was just going the wrong way.
	I was doing one mile to 1.6, one mile to 1.6 kilometers.
	It's whatever.
	I screwed up.
	Thank you, locals, for half a mile.
	Still pretty damn good.
	All right.
	What does everyone think?
	Why would the administration withhold this or fight tooth and nail?
	Why demonize Thomas Massey, who is pushing for the release of these documents?
	To the irritation of the administration.
	And there was some back and forth with Dan Bongino and Douglas Massey, Thomas Massey.
	Let me bring that up.
	And again, I don't know where I stand on this because I appreciate what Thomas Massey is doing.
	Oh, I thought the post was unavailable.
	So check this out.
	This is a post from Thomas Massey from yesterday, November 12th, 7.17 p.m.
	That's in the evening, before midnight.
	Thomas Massey writes, I received this troubling letter today from the attorney representing the most recent FBI whistleblower regarding the Jan 6 pipe bomb investigation.
	Just a reminder to FBI Director Cash, in case this letter is warranted, federal law prevents retaliation against whistleblowers.
	Okay, so check this out.
	This is from Kurt Suzdak.
	Now, I'm not a, I'm not, this is a, I don't know what type of paper this is written on, but let's go ahead and read this here.
	Attorney Kusedick, the Honorable Thomas Massey, the Honorable Barry Lautermilk, protected disclosures by an FBI employee to the United States Congress related to a serious misconduct and gross misconduct by the FBI.
	Sent via email.
	That makes more sense.
	Dear Honorable Massey and Lautermilk, pursuant to section 28 CFR, that's a federal rules.
	I forget what CFR stands for.
	Please accept the following as a protected disclosure from an FBI employee related to a serious misconduct by the leadership of the FBI Washington Field Office.
	On November 11, 2025, the U.S. Congress received a protected disclosure related to the January 6th pipe bomber investigation.
	The J6 pipe bomb investigation was conducted by the FBI's Washington office.
	Today, the leadership of the FBI's Washington field office notified its management that there will be a management meeting tomorrow at 10 a.m.
	It was obvious from the information provided by senior leadership in the Washington field office that this meeting is an attempt to identify the FBI whistleblower who made the protected disclosure to the U.S. Congress.
	And this is in respect of the, I presume, the most recent bombshell coming from Steve Baker, which the FBI has yet to make any meaningful statement on.
	We're going to get to Diane Bongino's reply.
	The attempt by the assistant director and other senior leadership in the Washington field office to identify the whistleblower is a reprisal and violation of 28 CFR.
	What is it?
	The code, the criminal federal rules?
	At part 27, the Department of Justice's Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management, FBI Whistleblower Court, has upheld the right of FBI employees to anonymously make protected disclosures without being subject to retaliation by the FBI.
	All right.
	Identifying the whistleblower serves only one purpose, which is to allow FBI management to retaliate.
	Sincerely.
	Okay.
	That's a serious, that's a serious allegation.
	It's a serious accusation.
	And Bongino replied to it.
	And you'll make what you will of the response.
	It's a substantive response to the whistleblower accusation, but I'm trying to figure out what it means.
	And I'm kind of waiting for Massey to respond to this to see what, you know, to come to the conclusion, the best guess as to what the truth is under the circumstances.
	Bongino writes, Congressman Massey, when Director Patel and I entered our duty and our leadership positions in the FBI, we had our hands full, but we were happy to be part of the president's team and we still are.
	Despite the multitude of challenges we face, one of our first initiatives was to aggressively pursue a new strategy to investigate the January 6th pipe bomb terror attack.
	We brought in new personnel to take a look at this case, at the case, flew in police officers and detectives working as TFO's task force officers to review FBI work.
	We conducted multiple internal reviews, held countless in-person and SVTC special virtual telecommunications, I don't know, I'm just guessing, meetings with investigative team members.
	We dramatically increase investigative resources and we increase the public award for information in the case to utilize crowdsourcing leads.
	There's only a small work of the FBI personnel and leadership team and put into this critical investigation.
	When I spoke with you yesterday, a little after 8 a.m. Eastern in the morning, screenshots attached, I offered you an in-person brief on our work.
	We spoke for 10 minutes.
	I called you back a bit after 7:30 p.m., which if we're looking at the timeline here, would have been shortly after this letter.
	So 7:17 p.m. He posts this.
	Bongino is saying he called them back a bit after 7:30, so 13 minutes later, to again make that offer.
	You didn't answer and have yet to call me back.
	Despite this, you continue to imply that the director and I are targeting investigators in the case.
	This is disgusting, even by the low standards many have for politicians.
	You know my number, and you're free to call me anytime, but it's easier to tweet and throw BS bombs.
	Yes, our leadership team will be meeting with FBI team and members today, and we will avail them of all the whistleblower resources they need to disclose any evidence of malfeasance in the prior administration.
	And we will ask about the threads that may have gone unpulled under prior leadership because we are passionate about solving this case.
	But a week of near 24-hour work on recent open source leads in the case has yet to produce a breakthrough.
	And some of the media, this is where I presume they're talking about Baker reporting regarding prior persons of interest.
	I presume they're talking about the woman identified in Baker's report, is grossly inaccurate and serves only to mislead the public.
	So this is the substantive statement.
	It's not directly saying, but pretty as direct as you can without naming names by name, that allegedly Steve Baker's report on a prior person of interest, which means she's no longer a person of interest, it's grossly inaccurate and serves only to mislead the public.
	I'm proud to serve in this administration, and I proudly work with Director Patel to reform and advance the crime, fighting, and national security missions of the FBI.
	We would love to have you as a partner in this mission rather than a dog barking behind a fence.
	To which I believe I said I'm waiting for Massey to respond, and I don't know that we're going to get a response from Massey.
	So, I mean, basically, what you understand is they spoke.
	Massey relays the fact that there's an allegation of potential whistleblower reprisals.
	Bongino says, come and look at the file and you can have access to the information to substantiate or contradict that statement.
	From what Bongino says, Massey didn't call him back, hasn't consulted whatever file was offered for their review.
	There is a meeting today.
	They're going to offer whistleblower protections and that the reporting by presumably Steve Baker about the presumably person of interest who was prior investigated and released, absolved, presumably, is inaccurate.
	That's what we can make of that.
	My question is that if this person was investigated and was determined exonerated, they decided that she is not the person who the pipe bomber was, despite what Steve Baker is reporting, which is with 94 to 98% gate analysis accuracy, they think it's her.
	It's the woman, as you saw from my interview with Kyle Serafin, who was living literally next door to the address that Kyle Serafin was put on the beat.
	I don't know if that's the word of the FBI.
	He was investigating someone based on a Metro pass that was tied to that address.
	And it was literally the next door neighbor of this woman who was allegedly investigated and allegedly determined to be not incriminated and let go like two weeks into this investigation, three weeks into this investigation.
	So that is the question.
	And we're going to see where this goes.
	I mean, it would be better if the FBI had a direct statement on this article by Baker.
	Shocking still is that, let me just see, has Fox News reported on the Steve Baker Jan 6 expose?
	AI, I don't trust AI at all.
	I don't trust chat or Grok.
	One thing it's good for is just like basic searches of scouring of the internet on objective questions like this.
	Has Fox News reported on Steve Baker Jan 6 expose?
	No, Fox News has not reported on Steve Baker's January 6 expose.
	Steve Baker, an investigative journalist with Blaze Media, recently published a report around November 5, identifying the U.S. Capitol.
	I'm not mentioning her name, not for any reasons irrelevant, as the alleged pipe bomber.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Searches on Fox News site and broader web queries for coverage linking Fox News to Baker's expose, including terms like Steve Baker, pipe bomber, her last name, Jan 6, returned no results.
	Fox News has covered generally January 6 topics and Baker's 2024 arrest.
	The fact that, I mean, as far as I'm concerned, the Fox News is the mouthpiece of the current administration.
	To some extent, it's weird.
	They were anti-Trump, or at least not favorable to Trump prior to the election or elections, I should say.
	They got rid of Tucker Carlson, the most populous voice at Fox News.
	They, as far as I'm concerned, did something real fishy-like with Dominion, paying them $787 million as a settlement to a claim that was only $1.2 billion.
	I don't trust Fox News as far as I can throw them, but it seems to be the only outlet, conservative outlet, at least one of the few that gets a lot of the interviews with members of the Trump administration.
	It's beyond suspicious to me that Fox News hasn't even talked about this pipe bomb story.
	Oh, cripe, what did I just say?
	I hate doing that.
	Is it going to come back?
	Even talked.
	Come on.
	Hopefully, does it come back?
	There it comes back.
	Thank you.
	Cancon in the house.
	Cancon, I was reading one of your tweets from earlier today.
	Don't sleep on Bongino and Patel.
	They just rolled up Newsom's former chief of staff and tied it to Xavier Becara and Biden's cabinet.
	Huge, don't sleep on Bon.
	I don't know what that, hold on.
	What does that expression mean?
	No, I see.
	But Patel, Patel, I'm getting a little, you know, you can get a little irritated with, but no, I think the thing is, Bongino, as a law enforcement at the FBI, is doing amazing work.
	And I'm telling you, you all know, and you're going to, you give me, you give me grief for it.
	I don't have a soft spot for Bongino.
	I know Bongino.
	I do trust Bongino.
	I like him.
	I have my own theories that he's a peacock that's not being allowed to fly.
	When it comes to certain things, the Epstein files, the Jan 6 pipe bomb, Butler assassination attempt.
	He's made it clear.
	It's not in the FBI's purview there.
	That's a secret service issue.
	Same thing with, what's his face, Ruth, who got convicted and then tried to stab himself in the neck with a pen.
	So Bongino deserves an immense amount of credit for the work that they've done.
	To the extent that the terror plot in Michigan is not what we're used to coming from the FBI, they foiled a terror plot.
	They've been locking up drug dealers, sex offenders, child traffickers, and they do deserve credit for that.
	But like I've always said as well, you can't let people off the hook.
	And there's no holding people the hook.
	I still don't believe what's going on with Epstein.
	I can't believe what's going on with Epstein.
	And the response, the administration's response or lack thereof to the January 6th pipe bomb story from Steve Baker leaves room for improvement.
	Read the paragraph that says, according to the indictment.
	CanCon, how's it going, man?
	We got to hang out one of these days sooner than later.
	Okay, so here we go.
	Look, look, check this out.
	This is from Red.
	Thank you very much for this, by the way.
	And maybe I'll run to the car after this and do a car vlog because this is news to close open close.
	Newsom's former chief of staff arrested and charged with 23 felonies and federal conspiracy.
	It's political persecution.
	It's vindictive prosecution, CanCon.
	Holy shit.
	Okay.
	Dana Williamson, former chief of staff to Governor Newsom, arrested Wednesday morning, charged with 23 count federal endemic conspiracy to commit bank fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to defraud, yada, yada, yada, subscribing to false tax returns, making false statements.
	These charges are related to an alleged scheme between Williamson and at least three other prominent California Democrat political operatives, quote, to divert approximately $225,000 in funds from a dormant political campaign to an associate personal use.
	Yeah, because you know, like you got all that leftover money and you can't use it if the campaign is over.
	So you got to find a way to get it over there.
	Okay, so I'm supposed to go to, what did he say here?
	Go to paragraph, go to read the paragraph that starts with according to the indictment.
	Okay, hold on one second.
	We're still on the article.
	According to the indictment, in February 2022, Susan McCluskey, who was then Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, exactly your okay.
	Susan McCluskey, she was then Department of Health, Human Service Secretary Baccara's chief of staff, wanted a way to bring in additional income without having to report it on his federal financial and ethical disclosures.
	As part of his employment, McCluskey was also responsible for arranging a for the $1.5 million in Baquera's dormant state campaign accounts to be monitored and overseen by a third party while serving as a member of Joe Biden's cabinet.
	So he and Williamson devised a plan by which Williamson would bill Baquera's campaign for account management.
	And after the funds worked their way through various entities and a payroll provider, they would end up in McCluskey's bank account ostensibly as his wife's salary.
	McCluskey's wife, who had previously, who had previous professional experience with media companies such as Washington Post, did not work for Williamson and was a stay-at-home mom.
	In total, so I mean, that's that's that sounds like just, I mean, I thought that was more related to like Chinese stuff or spy stuff.
	That's, I mean, that's good.
	They're, they're, there are criminals abound.
	And they, you know, who was it?
	It was on the Rogan podcast.
	Someone says, like, I'm not saying it was, it was Elon Musk.
	I'm not saying all Democrats are criminals or the vast majority of Democrats are criminals, but the vast majority of the criminals appear to be Democrats.
	This definitely goes both ways, but that's good.
	I mean, that is fraud, alleged fraud.
	You know, why see that money go to waste?
	Pocket that money.
	Do a little fake payroll stuff.
	So good stuff.
	I mean, Bongino's doing great work in law enforcement, and people should not ignore that, overlook it, or write it off because you're frustrated with decisions and tactics that I think are largely not of Bongino's decision making.
	And he's got to do what he can for the administration and the country that he loves.
	Call me whatever, bias, whatever you want.
	Go ahead.
	Patel, I started off with the same attitude with Patel, but Patel is making active, overt mistakes and acting in a way that is sufficiently serious to undermine his competence and credibility.
	One of which are making factually incorrect statements while apparently gallivanting around, as relates to the Charlie Kirk alleged assassin, suspect in custody an hour and a half later, a person of interest released.
	The lawsuits by his girlfriend against various podcasters, I think, are terrible, legally questionable, if not totally untenable, and strategically ill-advised.
	And we're seeing it by the Streisand effect that it's having now.
	Meme go, I got, I gotta actually got to play this one for you.
	Hold on, let me see if I find this.
	It becomes a meme.
	They've made it a meme themselves by bringing more attention to it.
	I say, cash, there's no evidence Kash Patel's behind it.
	His girlfriend.
	If I were cash, I would have said, don't file these suits.
	Hold on a second.
	It was called Honeypot Song.
	I didn't know that it was an actual song from Winnie the Pooh.
	Somebody did something really funny.
	And again, I don't believe the conspiracy.
	Period.
	I think it's stupid, but I do believe everybody should be allowed to posit it as a theory.
	The music.
	Oh, here.
	So how do I find it?
	It was this, this one.
	There we go.
	This is it right here.
	I'm not playing the whole thing because it's crude humor, but it's good.
	It's interesting.
	Honey, honey, honey, honey.
	Honey, honey, honey, honey.
	This is a winny thing.
	Okay, let's get to the good part where it actually goes on this one.
	Alexis is my honey.
	She's been assigned to me.
	All right, we'll stop it there.
	They successfully make people make it into a meme, make it into now a Streisand effect, source of comedy, and above all else, what is it called?
	Protest.
	Some people who never even believed in the honeypot theory are now going to repeat it and promote it out of protest at the idea of being told what they can and cannot say for fear of a lawsuit of $5 million.
	Someone else said, this tweet will get me sued for $5 million.
	I'll give, if anyone's interested in the leak, it's just from a technical perspective, the song is well done, well performed.
	And when you appreciate that it's a parody of a Winnie the Pooh song that I had no idea, it gets even better.
	All right, peeps.
	Let's, before we go raid, who are we going to raid?
	So to tie things up, people, this has been fun.
	Don't forget, if you want a tip, I want to see it one organically come in via the crypto wallet on Rumble's new wallet feature.
	It's amazing.
	Rumble wallet.
	It's going to be rolled out November.
	Well, it's going to be December more or less looks like now, but one day I'll get an actual bona fide, like organic financial tip support from this, but it's flipping cool.
	You want to buy a book?
	You can go get Louis the Lobster Returns to the Sea.
	It's a children's book that I wrote, illustrated by Abigail Martin, the daughter of one of the members of our locals community.
	It's on Amazon and viva barnslaw.locals.com, where we go for the after party, as we're going to do right now.
	That's the link.
	And now we're going to go see who is live that we're going to go raid.
	It's redacted and it's bombshell stuff.
	What I love is I don't like, I was just listening to their podcast.
	I don't like watching the news that comes before me because the good thing about coming at three in the afternoon, my time slot is I get to cover whatever occurs in the morning, whereas those who go first don't.
	Flip side is by the time if I'm covering the same story that other people are covering, well, you'll have heard the various takes on this multiple times by the time it's three o'clock in the afternoon.
	The redacted, redacted is on now.
	They're talking about it.
	Go check them out and see what their interpretation is.
	And if they think I'm out in left field, CanCon, thank you very much for that.
	Let's go raid them and come on over to viva barnslaw.locals.com if you are interested.
	You're going to get pushed over unless you opt out.
	I'm going to read the chat for a few seconds while we raid and confirm the raid.
	Thank you all for being here, Rumble.
	If you're not coming over to locals and enjoy Redacted or whoever else you continue to watch, booyah.
	Confirm raid.
	And I'm going to just go in there and say, Viva Raid.
	What the?
	Okay.
	There we go.
	And now let's just go read some of the chat over on Rumble before we make our way to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Homeless Vlogucation says, I'm trying to get my story about being homeless and learning how the system works.
	I'm trying to get my story about being homeless and learning how the system work therein works.
	If I can't get it out there soon, I'll be tipping my way to get noticed.
	Well, here you go.
	It just happened.
	Homeless vlogucation.
	Now it makes sense.
	I have, let me just open it up here and see what.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	That means I'm trying to.
	I don't know what I'm doing.
	That means I'm replying to you.
	Go check out Homeless Vlogucation, people.
	Who was I listening to talking about the homeless crisis in California?
	We're saying, like, people who are mentally ill on drugs on the street and you have to, you know, being benevolent.
	This is Elon Musk again with Joe Rogan.
	You know, benevolence is not tolerating that.
	And it's also not calling it homelessness.
	Homelessness is having financial crises and figuring out a way to get back on your feet.
	You will not be able to get a drug addict back on their feet until you get them off the drugs.
	But homeless vlogucation, it was organic.
	It happened.
	So go check it out, people.
	New York City Healthscape coming.
	It's been so long, Viva.
	I didn't have any content yet, but I got a mic today.
	Do what Casey Neistat says, just keep uploading.
	Keep uploading, put it out there so that when people go after they see your first, the first video that they see of you, when they go to land on your page, there's going to be other videos there.
	I would even suggest, recommend pre-loading three videos so that if somebody sees one video and goes to your landing page, they see more than one video.
	But good luck.
	Godspeed, man, and share whatever message it is that got you back on your feet and back operational.
	What do I want to do?
	I want to go back up here.
	Viva warms me because I think of Percival from Little House.
	Little House on the Prairie.
	She is claiming to be a Christian.
	Yeah, I've heard this argument too.
	Oh, that was Elijah that raised that argument yesterday.
	I think people can be Christian and have Christian values, even though they are living with someone with whom they're not married.
	Maybe I say that as a man who lived in sin.
	Well, did I live in sin with my wife?
	Not really, because we kind of lived at my parents' place before we hold on a second.
	Did we live together at all before we got engaged?
	I don't think we lived together before we got engaged, but she used to sleep over at my parents' place all the time.
	My parents would make us sleep in separate bedrooms, by the way.
	At the age of how old was I when I got married?
	Hold on, how old was I when I got when I got married with Marion?
	My wife, my by the time we got married, we've been married for 18 years now, so uh 28.
	My parents made us sleep in separate rooms when she would sleep over at my parents' place.
	I can't say we always did that.
	Okay, let's go see what's going on at Viva Barnes Law while we come over there.
	This is not really being a Christian, then, says Jarhead.
	I try not to be too judgmental.
	I try not to be judgmental at all of people who, unless they're behaving in a manner that is immoral, that has an impact on other people.
	If they're breaking the rules or not living true to the rules and it only impacts themselves, I'm prepared to give much more leeway in terms of someone's spirituality than if they live by if they do not live by rules that hurt other people.
	This is Lefson.
	Look at this flipping thing.
	Now, I'm told that, you know, aside from looking majestic and being the national bird, that they eat garbage and they actually smell bad.
	But that's a beautiful bird.
	That's a beautiful picture.
	Lefson is our resident, is our resident nature photographer.
	Yeah, I need to grow.
	I'm growing.
	I'm growing the beard back, people.
	I feel naked and ugly.
	All right, that is it.
	And now what we're going to do is end it on Rumble, end it on Twitter, viva barnslaw.locals.com.
	Locals, we're coming for the after party.

▲