Viva & Barnes - Arctic Frost is Bigger Scandal than you Think!! Live with Former Green Beret Ivan Raiklin!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 5, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:44:23

Arctic Frost is Bigger Scandal than you Think!! Live with Former Green Beret Ivan Raiklin!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, you may be asking yourself why we are starting one minute early from the scheduled slot, which is itself close to three hours later than the regular slot.
	This is a spontaneous, impromptu interview with Ivan Rakelin.
	And if you don't remember who Ivan Rakelin is, I shall introduce you again.
	Behold.
	America, this is now my newest favorite, Nancy Pelosi.
	She's the president of the Nancy Pelosi fan club.
	Absolutely.
	And the reason why she exists here is because of your favorite guy that provides you pillows.
	Vindel TV.
	Woohoo!
	Isn't she awesome?
	Yes, both of you.
	I love you guys.
	America.
	All right.
	Hold on, put on pause.
	Take the video out.
	Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, you're hearing my regular voice.
	I want to take the screen out.
	It's short notice because I'm still in New Orleans.
	I haven't left the square kilometer of the hotel, and I'm probably not going to get to see the French quarter, although I'm told to walk around the Vomitas and Detritus that happens to be on the ground.
	So I said, I might not be rushing out there.
	The conference today was amazing.
	I gave my talk.
	I think it was good.
	I'm going to get the audio and the video and share it in as much as I can.
	And it's not copyrighted material.
	And then we had a panel with Matt Taibbi and Christina Ham, and that was fantastic as well.
	And there's a cocktail this evening, which I will be partaking in after I partake in my.
	I was going to go with regular coffee, but I'm going to splurge and get the 110 calories.
	They could make this half as sweet and it would be just as good.
	Crap, don't drink it.
	It's bad for you.
	I text Ivan.
	It's like, Ivan, short notice, random.
	Can you do it?
	He's like, let's do this.
	If you don't remember who Ivan Rakelin is, go check out my AI-generated two-line summary.
	I go in there and I say two-line bio on Ivan Rakelin, Green Beret, former Green Beret, political activist.
	And what you might not know is apparently he was named, what was it, multiple times in the subpoenas in Arctic Frost.
	He's being sued by the deep state because some woman claims that she got fired as a result of his putting her on blast.
	And there's been amendments in that lawsuit.
	Share the link around because you got about like eight minutes' notice for this impromptu live stream.
	Ivan's awesome.
	Eccentric might be an understatement.
	I was going to say eclectic, but that's definitely not the right word.
	He's awesome.
	He's going to introduce himself.
	And we're going to go over Arctic Frost today, the scandal that is, I think, bigger than most people fully appreciate.
	And how are the hotels getting away with a 20T?
	Well, I'll tell you one thing.
	I couldn't even turn the TV on yesterday.
	I couldn't figure out how to turn it on.
	So I just went to bed early, which was very depressing.
	Francis, all right, everybody.
	If you have not met Ivan Rakelin, you are new to the channel.
	Welcome.
	And we're going to bring in Ivan right now.
	Ivan, come on in and let's get this party started because it's going to be an intense one.
	And I'm just going to stare at the screen.
	There he is, Ivan.
	All right.
	Viva, the Viva Fray.
	Make sure you follow him.
	Ivan, it's amazing.
	First of all, we couldn't figure out how to cross stream or cross streams, but you'll take this and you'll blast it around ever afterwards because this deserves as much exposure as it can possibly get.
	For those who missed the, I don't know if we've done one or two prior interviews, but 30,000-foot overview for, we've done two, good.
	I'm not going totally crazy.
	Who are you for those who may not have seen either of those two first interviews?
	I'm probably the most unconventional thinker in our ecosystem politically, trying to solve things through maximum political courage and unconventional thought because of my background, which is 25 years in the national security ecosystem, Green Beret, Intel Officer, human intelligence, counterintelligence, analysis, lawyer alongside of that.
	And I just, that's probably about it, professionally.
	You were, I say infamously, but hilariously, famously, the guy sitting behind, what's his face?
	Everybody.
	Anthony Fauci.
	Well, during the congressional hearings, we'll see if I can pull up some of those.
	You got a reputation.
	You got known for activism.
	What type of activism have you been into?
	And when Chad GPT says you have unconventional, it didn't say unconventional.
	It said, I don't want to say radical, but it called you an activist for election issues.
	What has been your activism?
	I'd say the main three categories have been exposing the deep state writ large, right?
	Going back 11 years of treason, which the last several years have included the illegal 2020 election across 39 states, the January 6th Pelosi-led Fed surrection, and then the whole COVID op.
	And so that's kind of what I've been actively involved in and exposing.
	So everybody you see that I confront falls in some way, shape, or form and nests in with really the whole 11-year arc of escalatory treasonous cover-up after escalatory treasonous cover-up amongst categories.
	And that's why I created that deep state target list, which categorizes a lot of it.
	I need to update it because now we're seeing much more evidence.
	There should be a category called the Jack Smith category, which is now relevant based on the recent disclosures of Senator Chuck Grassley, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee.
	And I so happen to be in four of the 197 subpoenas.
	We can go into that.
	Oh, we're going into that right now.
	I think everybody needs the explanation as to why we've heard the overview news of Arctic Frost.
	And I think part of the reason why people are not quite as shocked as they should be is they're like, all right, well, we knew Jack Smith was spying on Republicans.
	We knew that they went overboard.
	And that's old news.
	So what's new about the fact that there's 176 subpoenas that were signed off by Boesberg in particular?
	Now they're moving to impeach him.
	What is it that people are not appreciating, in my view, about the depth and breadth of the scandal of Arctic Frost?
	I think what a lot of people miss is that it's an arc of the same players that have been conducting the undermining of our constitutional order going back to 2014.
	And the reason why I say 2014, people are going to ask, well, isn't that the same time that the Autopen started giving pardons?
	Voila, as they say in French.
	Exactly, right?
	The reason why is that it was when in 2014, the Biden criminal syndicate became the point person for Barry Hussein in Ukraine to run that 10% for the big guy pay-for-play scheme, placing Hunter in the system, right?
	To start working the whole barisma angle and the 10% for the big guy play.
	Since then, you've seen in 2016, they had to try to take out Trump, right?
	They started the crawl.
	And then once Trump got in office, they had to use their existing levers of influence and power to be able to go after him, whether it was through the Crossfire Hurricane illegal spying operation, then the Mueller probe, then Impeachment Hoax One led by Jamie Raskin, then Impeachment Hoax 2 led or the COVID op that resulted in 39 states running elections unlawfully, stamping their seal of due to COVID, right?
	So that it would legitimize it.
	Then it followed up with the J6 Fed surrection.
	And then the Fed surrection resulted in the Fed surrection cover-up known as the Nancy Pelosi J6 Select Committee, which created the body of evidence that was manipulated off of manipulated CCTV footage of U.S. Capitol Police, as well as the manipulated testimony of U.S. Capitol Police officers.
	That body of evidence was then handed over to the DOJ, aka Jackass Smith, to then run the next cover-up op.
	That's the link that many people miss.
	It was literally this.
	Imagine this is what the work was of the select committee of January 6th for Pelosi to cover up the Fed surrection to steal the 2020 election.
	And then it was handed right over to Jackass Smith because the Republicans took over the House.
	The Democrats didn't have control of it anymore.
	So they had to send it over to another institution that would then continue to escalate their bidding.
	I think that's the biggest takeaway at the strategic level.
	It is, it's the continuation of all of it.
	The question is this.
	The overlapping players from 2016 to 2024, or at least the Jack Smith stuff is now 2021.
	It involves Republicans as well.
	I mean, above and beyond Liz Cheney, so-called Republican, and Crying Kinzinger.
	Like, what other rhinos are involved in this?
	So you'll notice, I mean, I've said this numerous times.
	Mike Pence has a massively instrumental role in the entire 11-year arc because you got to remember that it was him that was foisted onto Donald Trump during the first term to essentially be that liaison controlling mechanism of Donald Trump during his first term.
	And it was Mike Pence's chief of staff, Joshua Pitcock, wife, Catherine Seaman, that was the senior Russia analyst for Peter Strzok.
	Hold on.
	His name is Pitcock and her name is Seaman?
	Yes. You listen closely.
	Okay, that's let me say that again.
	Mike Pence's chief of staff's wife was Pete Strzok's senior Russia analyst involved in the whole Russia-Russia play, involved in the 25th Amendment attempts at removing Trump.
	You see how incestuous and generational rot this is?
	And then furthermore, it was Mike Pence that squealed and yelled and said, oh, me, me, me, Mr. President, I want to be your COVID task force lead so that I can allocate to the different governors, my fellow Republican and Democrat governors, on who would get Remdesivir, the protocols, who would get the ventilators to start murdering people, who would get the face toilets and then double it up with the two-face toilets, who would get the PCR tests.
	That was Mike Pence.
	Okay.
	Then, was it Mike Pence that fired General before that was the one instrumental at advocating for the firing of General Flynn?
	By the way, I might say this for the first time here.
	I can't remember his name.
	Mike Pence's attorney, he'll know who I'm talking.
	He'll know that we talked.
	So there was a couple years later that Mike Pence's lawyer told me in the Trump International Hotel when it was Trump International Hotel in D.C., told me that the most adamant he saw his boss, Mike Pence, was when he was advocating to fire General Flynn.
	Okay.
	So Mike Pence's involvement in a lot of this kind of, it touches everywhere.
	And because of his close proximity with the Cheney family, by the way, yesterday, Dick Cheney, rest his soul, you'll be the judge or anybody else will be the judge of what that means.
	But Dick Cheney was Mike Pence's favorite vice president.
	And this is according to his Wikipedia profile.
	It linked to a quote that he did.
	So what I'm getting at is when you ask Republicans were also involved, I think that Mike Pence had a very instrumental role in the entire last 11 years and to include this Jackass Smith investigation.
	Okay, now the Jack Smith investigation, which was born out of the January 6th insurrection.
	They subpoenaed phone records, et cetera.
	ATT didn't comply with the subpoena, allegedly, although they were asked not to disclose the existence of the subpoena to Ted Cruz.
	What did they get out of these subpoenas?
	So I think you're looking at the same share screen that I am, aren't you, Viva?
	Oh, yes, we are now, sir.
	Now, just so you know, this is live for everybody.
	I can see what the document's called.
	I cannot control Ivan in terms of what he shares.
	I love this about Rumble Studios.
	Like, dude, I trust you.
	So let's see what you got.
	Well, thank you.
	This is fantastic.
	So what I'm pulling up right here as you're looking at it is the Arctic Frost released by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley last Wednesday included a list of 197 subpoenas issued by Jack Smith.
	Okay.
	Of those 197 subpoenas, they, being the Senate Judiciary Committee, you see staff, compiled it and kind of summarized it into a spreadsheet of, I don't know, it was a few pages that categorize all 197 and who were the targets.
	So on the left, it's what was the subpoena, what date it was issued, who it was targeting, and then who were the persons of interest that were ensnared in that organization, if it happened to be an organizational targeting that were part of trying to look into who was being looked at.
	So four of those 197 applied to me.
	And can you see my mouse cursor?
	Yeah, it says GJE119, Save America.
	So for example, this subpoena is titled This, and it was dated February 10th.
	All of them were dated February 10th.
	And the target of the subpoena was Save America Joint Fundraising Committee, Save America, Make America Great Again PAC, and Trump Make America Great Again Committee.
	Now, tell everybody who those four entities are.
	Right.
	So these are the four fundraising mechanisms for the Trump campaign and the associated and affiliated PACs, the political action committees.
	Essentially, it's the entire infrastructure that raises money to help candidate Trump become a president.
	Okay.
	Now, if you're wanting some insider details of this and you ask the question, well, who runs these PACs?
	The primary individual listed is going to be the treasurer.
	But then also the people that run it are the two names that come up most frequently are names Susie Wiles and Chris La Savita.
	Okay.
	Now, let's take a look here.
	The specific subpoena itself asks for any communications between these organizations and the following individuals.
	As you look through this list, you can see that my name is listed on all four of them.
	But more unique is that it focuses in on, let me go over here and switch my tab to this one.
	And it says the following.
	This is the actual original subpoena that it's referring to.
	So the first one is to Save America Joint Fundraising Committee, right?
	Jack Smith.
	And I scroll down and we look at, although you are not required to do so, you are requested not to disclose the existence of this subpoena.
	Now, I'm going to ask you, did you ever hear that the Save America Joint Fundraising Committee released any evidence that this subpoena existed to the public?
	I never did.
	Well, absolutely not.
	Now, they could have.
	Okay, so if they had courage to do so, kind of like what Mike Lindell did, but they didn't.
	Sorry.
	Wait, wait, before you get there, do we know who signed off, which judge signed off on this subpoena?
	Is this Bosberg, or do we know who the judges are?
	No.
	So for a subpoena, it is the special assistant special counsel is the one that signed off on the request.
	And the authority of the court that signs off on it is the clerk, not a judge.
	Okay, fine.
	I'm going to get to it.
	Maria K. Vento, who's now gone.
	She resigned along with Jack Smith.
	She was the assistant special counsel.
	Okay.
	Now here's the U.S. District Court, and here's the actual subpoena signed by the district court, signed off by Angela Caesar.
	And just so people appreciate this is a clerk, not a judge.
	And I'm not saying there's anything procedurally shocking about it other than the fact that that's how subpoenas are issued.
	It's an order of the court, but it doesn't require a judge's analysis.
	It's basically based on the good standing of the petitioning subpoena party.
	Right.
	And so the unlawful Jackass Smith that was never constitutionally authorized or approved by the Senate to be in existence as a special counsel had his surrogate, Maria Vento, who's also illegitimate, to go ahead and participate in the conspiracy to violate my Fourth Amendment.
	And another co-conspirator, the clerk of court, Angela D. Caesar, also participated in violating my Fourth Amendment.
	Okay.
	Now, what were they looking for?
	Here's some details.
	You can scroll down.
	Wait, before we get there, you mentioned it and you say the Save America PAC never disclosed the existence of this subpoena, despite the fact that they had the legal freedom to do so, but they were requested not to do so.
	Maybe that's getting ahead of it, actually.
	Why the hell?
	Why the hell did they not disclose this subpoena, which would have outed the cat from the bag a couple of years ago?
	Right, because then I would have been able to help in the process to expose a lot of these things because I've looked at the deep state in very granular detail because I had a first or second row seat to it that maybe Susie Wiles may not have been aware of or Chris La Cevita may not have been aware of.
	Okay.
	So you would have to ask them.
	And if you want their numbers, I can provide it to you after the show.
	Because they won't respond.
	I don't think they'll respond to me either, but we'll see.
	Maybe I'll ask.
	If anybody wants to direct message me that wants their numbers, I can also provide that.
	Okay.
	So what are they looking for?
	All communications electronics, right?
	We scroll through here.
	Communications refers to literally everything.
	It hits every category: text, email, instant message, WhatsApp, all production documents.
	Let's just say everything.
	Everything you can think of.
	Meetings, notes, whatever.
	Now, these are the requests.
	Requests for documents for the period August 1st of 2020 to the present, all documents to, from CC, BCC referring to, referencing, or relating to one of the following entities and or individuals.
	Okay?
	Let's go through this.
	Yeah, and I'm going to ask you who the lawyers are, if there are any on that list.
	And I think there are, because I think I might see one of their names.
	Okay, go through it.
	Remember, I consider this probably the most important four subpoenas that will prove that the purpose of this entire Jackass Smith endeavor is the transfer of weaponizing against anybody that would expose the Fed surrection and tie it to Trump as being an insurrection.
	So this is why.
	The first three are organizations, the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and First Amendment Praetorian.
	Okay.
	Now, First Amendment Praetorian, the founder of that is this gentleman right here, Robert Patrick Lewis.
	Let me zoom in so that it's a little bit more visible, maybe there.
	Now, let's take a look at some of these other ones.
	Now, I have listed here myself and actually created a document.
	If I have it here with me, yes, I do.
	Perfect.
	I already took notes and analyzed every single person that's listed here to determine who they're affiliated with, organizationally or individually, that's of relevance, which is pretty important.
	There it is.
	So, my notes.
	There we go.
	So, the first one, Brandon Ackerl, right here, worked for Alex Phillips of ALX Incorporated.
	He's been in the movement, and he's hosted a few events called Amfest, like America First Fest, not to be confused with the Turning Point USA event.
	And I actually contacted Alex Phillips and asked him about this gentleman to get some more details and insight.
	And he didn't have, I guess, kind words to say about him other than that he was talking in a manner that probably exceeded a little bit the First Amendment.
	Okay. That's it.
	But I don't think he was ever indicted.
	Next one is Joseph Biggs, Proud Boys.
	You heard of him, right?
	Absolutely.
	He was a Proud Boy and was one of the five that was convicted by the Biden Criminal Syndicate for seditious conspiracy, right?
	That was pardoned by Trump.
	Charles Bowman testified to the J6 committee, and he worked for Women's for America First.
	I reached out to Amy Kramer to find out any atmospherics and details.
	And apparently, she didn't want to talk to me about that.
	So there's that.
	Next, Thomas Caldwell, Oath Keeper.
	Donovan Crowell, Oath Keeper.
	Actually, I think it's spelled C-R-O-W-L is the proper spelling.
	Next one is another Oathkeeper, Joseph Hackett.
	Kenneth Harrelson, Oathkeeper.
	Joshua James, Oathkeeper.
	As I mentioned, number 12, the Robert Patrick Lewis was First Amendment Praetorian.
	I reach out to him on LinkedIn after I read through this and learned and searched for him.
	I have yet to receive a response from him.
	So if anybody can connect me with him, I'd appreciate it to kind of get his sense about it.
	Next one is Connie Meggs, Oathkeeper.
	Kelly Meggs, Oathkeeper.
	Robert Minuda, Oathkeeper.
	David Marshall, Oathkeeper.
	Ethan Nordine, Proud Boy.
	Dominic Pizzola, Proud Boy.
	Zachary Real.
	We'll skip over me for now.
	Zach Real, Proud Boy.
	Stuart Rhodes, Oathkeeper.
	Kelly Sorrell, Oath Keeper.
	Russell Taylor was a 3%er.
	Another organization that was targeted by Pelosi.
	He was indicted.
	Enrique Tario, Proud Boy.
	And then the last three, Brian Ulrich, Edward Vallejo, Jessica Watkins, all three Oath Keepers.
	Now, for me, I was never an oath keeper, and I was never a proud boy, and I was never a 3%er, and I was never a First Amendment Praetorian member in any way, shape, or form.
	Which begs the question, why am I on here, Viva?
	I couldn't even begin to venture a guess.
	I'm just lining up my follow-up questions about whether or not Susie Wiles is in on all of this.
	Why would you be on the list?
	So, here's what I speculate.
	It's probably more than speculation: is that I am, if we look at all of the 1,561 January 6ers that were pardoned, and then the third 12 to 14, depending on how you look at it, that still have yet to be pardoned, but they were commuted in some way, shape, or form, or still rotting in jail.
	I'm the only one that, well, one was in the system because I was a contractor at the Defense Intelligence Agency.
	I never shied away, and you know, I've never hit any of this stuff.
	I was a reservist.
	I held a top-secret clearance, and I also never bent the knee and was very vocal in my personal capacity about the illegal election 2020, the January 6th Fed surrection in particular, and all the COVID products of being completely illegitimate, right?
	And so, because I think I had a role, I had in some way, shape, or form, not bent a knee on any of what they were censoring and coming after all of us about, plus being an insider at the time, and match that with I actually was on the Trump Victory Finance Committee at the time, raising it, wasn't that much.
	I mean, it was maybe $25,000, I can't remember, $50,000 for the campaign.
	And I ended up later going up to Philadelphia to try to figure out what was going on in Pennsylvania with the whole stolen election up there when, remember, Corey Lewandowski, Rudy Giuliani, and Pam Bondi was up there.
	Matter of fact, I was just trying to figure out a way how to fix the illegal election.
	And then I only escalated my rhetoric on online, explaining how constitutionally we can fix it.
	And then I came out with the Pence card theory and memo, which are you familiar with that?
	I think we talked about that.
	Yeah, we did.
	I am, but refresh everybody's memory who might not recall what the Pence card was.
	Yeah, so if you look at the Electoral Count Act, three U.S. Code, Section 12, I believe, it basically states that if the states don't transmit a slate of electors to the president of the Senate by the fourth Wednesday of December, which was December 23rd in 2020, then the president of the Senate was obligated to send back to the states a demand letter for electoral slates.
	So my legal analysis was that the contested states, at a minimum, the contested states, but I think 39 in general, but the six that were contested, they transmitted electoral slates that relied on an illegitimate election because those states ran their elections under COVID rules and not under their state election law, triggering the violation of Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2, which is the electors clause that gives the authority for the state legislatures to allocate their electors.
	And because the state non-legislative actors took the authority away through their procedures, those electors were illegitimate, whether you considered the Democrat or the Republican ones that were transmitted.
	I considered all of them to be illegitimate.
	And so I wrote a memo with a tweet titled Operation Pence Card.
	It was directed to Mike Pence, CC'd real Donald Trump, and giving Mike Pence options to one, send it back to the states demanding that the state run an election legitimately that doesn't violate the federal Article 212, abstain from sending electors because the election was totally bogus, or three, have a joint session vote of that state legislature to go ahead and allocate their electors, right?
	And so I put forth that theory, presented it.
	President Trump retweets it.
	I posted on the 22nd.
	Trump retweets it on the 23rd.
	And that's when Mike Pence's problems begin.
	You're welcome.
	Again, well, which lawyer was it, though?
	I think it was Jeff Clark who basically experienced disciplinary hearings for proposing the Pence theory as a legal theory.
	No, no, no.
	I'm the only one to come up with this particular legal theory and strategy and publicly published it.
	John Eastman had a separate Jeffrey Clark.
	They all had separate.
	John Eastman.
	Not sorry, not Jeff.
	My theory only December 23rd, though, Viva.
	That's the distinction here.
	But the J6 committee, for some reason, thought it applied to January 6th.
	And then because it was a handoff to Jackass Smith during his indictment of Donald Trump, he included, like the J6 committee said that my tweet was the opening salvo for the whole sequence of events that resulted in the January 6th, what they call insurrection.
	And same thing that Jackass Smith took that for the word of the J6 committee and then regurgitated those words.
	It's all false.
	The Pence card theory only applies to the Electoral Count Act and the vice president's role on December 23rd of 2020.
	It was a separate and secondary theory that I presented on January 4 for January 6th to Kevin McCarthy and Mike Pence's chief of staff, totally separate from Pence card theory.
	And that theory was you vote on when it comes time to object to an electoral slate, instead of voting one person, one vote in the House of Representatives, where the Democrats had the majority, I recommended that we test the system and vote by state delegation on the objection vote because it's not designated how the House is supposed to vote on the objections.
	And that's where Republicans had the majority.
	So then had that been done, and then the chambers come back into session jointly before Mike Pence as the presiding officer, he would have had to make a decision on whether or not to accept the Pelosi Democrat vote or the Kevin McCarthy majority state delegation vote, which would have been divergent.
	And then my argument was due to federalism.
	And if you look at the Federalist papers, my analysis said that in this sort of instance, the vice president or the presiding officer would have had to agree with the majority state delegation option because the 12th Amendment envisions a contingent election.
	And two, you never want one state to have an outsized representation when determining the allocation of electors that could have an impact on an entire presidency.
	You want to give each state equal, essentially, representation through that majority state delegations.
	That was the argument.
	And it was heard by Mike Pence's chief of staff because I communicated with him.
	It was heard by Kevin McCarthy because I also communicated with him directly.
	And so I think when that theory came about and it was and Pelosi caught wind of it, that's when you queue in, stage left, the insurrection, meaning the insurrection by Nancy Pelosi, aka the Fed surrection outside the Capitol.
	The actual insurrection took place in the Capitol.
	The Fed surrection took place outside of the Capitol.
	And it was all led by Pelosi.
	And that's one of the reasons why they target me.
	Do you need the subpoena in the backdrop, or can we stop share screen and make ourselves big again?
	So we can make ourselves big, but before we do, I wanted to focus in on two other individuals that I want to focus in on.
	I've never heard these names before.
	If you have any questions about this subpoena, and it would have been really nice to know this, Susie Wiles and Chris La Savita, because I would have been able to launch these boogers so far off of their jobs way back when this, in February of 10th, I would have been able to fire these two scum.
	But you didn't afford me that opportunity, meaning Jeremy DeSor and special agent Walter Jardina.
	Because I know my truth.
	Well, hold on.
	Hold on.
	Let me just see what happens if I do this.
	I don't know if it's going to boot your screen from the screen.
	It does.
	Okay.
	These were, I think these agents just got fired.
	Yeah.
	So I wanted to start bringing that back up.
	I didn't talk about that.
	And Jardina, his name is Jardina.
	Okay.
	So the two of them just got fired.
	That was the article from Reuters, which means that they've been in Patel's FBI since Patel's been there, and they've been in the FBI since 2021.
	Oh, they've been at the FBI much longer than that.
	Let me just put this out for the first, I'm going to break some stuff for you because, you know, you're a lawyer.
	You kind of get some of this stuff.
	I like naming names, right?
	I'm one of the few people that just goes directly naming names.
	So based on my nice source, this guy, Jeremy, I'm almost certain was not only the guy investigating me for Jackass Smith during that component, he was also the one that almost certainly, because same first name that I was told.
	Let me pull up the other subpoenas.
	So January, excuse me, October 13th of 2021.
	Let's make myself bigger, I guess.
	Can we do that?
	Yeah.
	Can you make me huge?
	Let me see what happens if I take myself out.
	Do it.
	There you go.
	I think you can still hear me now, too.
	Okay, so stop moving it.
	It says, dear Google user, Google responded, received a response to legal process issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation compelling the release of information related to your Google account.
	A court order previously prohibited Google from notifying you.
	We are now permitted to disclose the receipt of the legal process to you, the agency reference case number, yada, yada.
	This is to you?
	Yes.
	I received this from Google.
	So, Jeremy.
	When did you receive it from Google?
	They sent it to me on January 5th of 2023.
	Notice, after the Republicans took over in 2022, the House, they were able to release this information.
	So apparently they weren't able to find anything on me.
	So they're like, okay, we're going to end this thing.
	Needless to say, this is from Google based on, if you look at the GJ2021-1013 and then 83092, that's 2021, October 13th, and then the number of the subpoena of the process.
	So that's one of them.
	Another one comes from Fake Joe.
	I got to stop you here.
	Yeah.
	I gotta, I gotta stop you here because you're getting out of the blue notification from Google that the FBI requested access to your Google, your Gmail.
	You might Google everything.
	Every Google holding that exists as it applies to Ivan Reagan.
	Okay.
	Are you certain this involves everything, right?
	My search, my emails, my whatever you can think of.
	This is what they're trying to remember the adage: find me the man, I'll find you the crime, dude.
	I mean, like, I think most people might be, especially these, a lot of these criminal perverts would be worried about their search histories and who fraternizing.
	So, okay.
	So, obviously, I'm pretty clean there on Google.
	Let's take a look at our Fake Book.
	Who looks at me on my Facebook?
	Okay, so it says here, for more information, the requesting agency maybe reached blank case number.
	We are unable to provide you with legal advice.
	Okay, fine.
	Who are we looking at?
	Oh, so this basically agency contact FBI.
	Yeah, FBI, grand jury.
	Again, October 13th, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, law enforcement response team from Facebook.
	Okay.
	That's the similar thing that you saw for Google, but they also requested my Facebook.
	What's the timeframe on those two documents?
	That one is August 2020, 22.
	Okay. That was sent to my hotman.
	August 2022.
	And the other one was January 2023.
	Correct.
	And then there's another one.
	Okay.
	November 8th of 2023 from Apple.
	Look at this.
	Another one.
	Here, hold up.
	There we go.
	These are just the ones that I know.
	They received legal requests.
	This is on you as a person.
	The FBI has been trying to get access to this.
	Was sent to Apple, Google, Facebook to get the user data on me.
	And then, but then they could not notify you at the time.
	They notified you after when they had authorization to do so or when they were able to do so.
	I'm guessing when the case was closed.
	Yeah.
	And so this is a couple years.
	A year or so.
	Okay.
	Now, let me ask you this.
	Some people, I don't know if in the chat they're accusing you of being a fed, are going to say, well, you've been investigated, but not prosecuted.
	So you must be a fed.
	Perfect question.
	Thank you for asking.
	And by the way, ask everything.
	So here's my, and I understand why people say that because I, here's my answer.
	I fought this pre-indictment.
	And people are like, well, how do you fight this pre-indictment if you don't even know that you're being investigated?
	Well, I do know that I'm being investigated.
	How?
	Folks, I spent 25 years in the system and I kind of pick up on things, right?
	And so when I have a question about whether or not someone's investigating me, I know people in the entire interagency.
	I know people that I've known and worked with for 10, 20 years.
	And I call them up and say, hey, let's have dinner and don't bring your phone.
	Tell me, if I were to ask the following question, such as which office would investigate something like this and who heads up that office?
	Okay. They're not telling me anything classified.
	They're not disclosing anything that they shouldn't.
	So, I asked the question in a way that doesn't put them in a precarious position, the person that I know, so that they're not getting fired.
	But also, they give me a little bit of insight on whether or not, let's just say through nonverbal cues that can be misinterpreted or interpreted however you want, that lead me in the right direction to decide: hey, my guess is that this individual is investigating me.
	Let's say Jeremy DeSor.
	Am I wrong or am I right?
	How would I find that out?
	And then, through hints and clues, it allows me to then investigate Jeremy DeSor.
	It allows me to answer Walter Jardina and others that are on my trail.
	So, when I learn that, I get to investigate them as much as they are investigating me.
	And so, when I find some dirt on them, which at every stage of the game I have, these aren't the only two, by the way, Viva.
	I then can easily learn their phone number, right?
	Just doing a little search.
	And then, if I have dirt, I can go ahead and drop, I don't know, an email or a text message and say, Hey, is this you with this person?
	That's very interesting.
	I'm not impeding anything, I'm not obstructing anything, I'm just sending a question or a statement directly to them.
	And so, if you're a Viva, if you're investigating me and you're seeing that, in addition to that, here's the most important part: So, let's just say I do know people at the FBI, and I have because of my background, right?
	Who do I trust in the FBI?
	Almost nobody, almost nobody, okay?
	But there are some that I do, at least on certain matters.
	And so, when the investigations I felt were happening on me, and I thought the dragnet was increasing, they're going to come after me.
	I pick up the phone and say, Hey, so-and-so, I feel like I'm going to get rolled up in one of these 6 a.m. raids, and it's totally unlawfully predicated.
	And here's why, because here's what I did in the run-up to January 6th, on January 6th, and after.
	Everything was lawful.
	I didn't trespass, I didn't commit any crimes, I didn't go after any, like I didn't break anything, I didn't assault anybody, nothing, right?
	This is where I was.
	And so, when I pick up the phone and call an active FBI agent, not in their role as an FBI agent, but because I have a pre-existing personal relationship with them for a decade plus, and I tell them, This is what happened to me.
	This is what January 6th was from my perspective and what I was doing.
	Once I do that, while I can't be held responsible for that interaction for what I'm saying to them, they are obligated to now inform whoever's investigating me of that interaction.
	Okay, so now I'm using that individual as a conduit to inform the Jeremy DeSource of the world of what I said to an active FBI agent that I had a pre-existing relationship with of my role in January 6th.
	And guess what?
	That same FBI agent tells Jeremy, or let's just say somebody with the name Jeremy that Ivan told me this.
	I've known him for whatever 10, 15 years.
	And if you show me one picture or piece of evidence or video of him in the Capitol, and I will personally arrest him in front of his kids and embarrass him.
	Because if you prove me, if you provide me something, then he lied to me on the phone.
	And then he would take it personal and come after me.
	But because I was telling the truth, this FBI agent, who's a senior to this Jeremy, basically says, You better produce something, otherwise, I'm going to keep an eye on you.
	And he couldn't produce anything.
	So that's how I fought this pre-indictment because not everybody has this ability.
	I leveraged my network knowledge of the system to basically use it to my advantage, if you will, to be able to defend myself before they can weaponize unlawfully against me because they had somebody looking over their shoulder.
	And thank God I had that ability to do that.
	And I get it.
	I apologize that no, others don't have that, but that's how I was able to defend myself.
	I'm bringing this up.
	I know the answer to it, but I don't want to look like I'm avoiding it.
	Ivan, some are saying you called for Trump to step down after indictment.
	Tell them it ain't true.
	I don't think they'll be able to hear the answer.
	I don't recall you ever asking unlawfully indicted.
	That was my recollection.
	You got me confused with someone else.
	I've never said that.
	Now, recently, I've said he's betrayed us based on him inviting Albert Burla into the White House and handing him tens of billions of dollars.
	The biggest DNA mutilation distribution platform in the world, Pfizer.
	Yeah, that's unacceptable.
	Actually, I want to we're going to come back to that because that's going to take more than he was criminally referred by two members of Congress, COVID Select and the Oversight Committee, and then he admitted that he basically killed off the nursing home patients and Donald Trump endorses this scumbag.
	That's a betrayal.
	If that's not a betrayal for you, then I guess we're not in the same camp here.
	We're going to come back to that because I got more follow-up questions.
	But just coming back to one other question, why Susie Wiles, and I don't want to throw her under the bus, I'm just going to ask the obvious question, and people have their suspicions about her.
	She was aware of these subpoenas.
	Was I, I mean, obviously, she was aware of these subpoenas, correct?
	I mean, I can't tell you with 100% surety, but if you do it, I mean, follow along with me.
	I'm going to pull up a chat, right?
	And I'm going to ask the question.
	What's that?
	Oh, no, you want to bring up our chat or are you going to bring up a chat?
	No, like a chat bot, like AI, right?
	So we'll bring it up and we'll ask the question of whether or not who was leading Save America Joint Fundraising Committee, right?
	Because I guess the issue is Susie Wiles or anybody else, why would they not have made this subpoena public?
	Whoever, someone got it at the committee, at the PAC.
	Why would they not have made it public?
	And why would they not have advised Trump of it?
	And I don't know that there's a treasure Bradley T. Crate was the treasurer.
	Save America Fundraising Committee.
	Let's see.
	Let's take a look at all of that.
	But I guess the bottom line is: why was this not brought to the public's attention and not brought to Trump specifically?
	Because I presume he didn't know about this.
	Oh, that's so cool.
	I could see myself as the reflection of your watch for a second.
	Oh, I presume he didn't know about this.
	I can't say that.
	I mean, that's an assumption that you can make.
	I can't agree with that assumption, although it may be right.
	It may be right to say that.
	I'm not convinced that that's true.
	That's something that he would have to respond to.
	Well, he doesn't have to, but like he would know the answer to that, right?
	And if Susie Wiles is running the entire fundraising platform, and this is just my words, this is what I did a search on.
	And you can, you know what?
	So that the haters can follow along with me.
	Let me just do that as well.
	Let me share my screen.
	Bring up.
	You want to use Grok or Chat GPT?
	What's your favorite?
	Neither, but I'll use Comet in the backdrop to double-check your findings.
	Here, why don't you, yeah, work on yours so that it's going to be a different sort.
	Please go ahead.
	And give me the same questions, and I'll ask it over on.
	Yeah, so basically, the question is: who were the employees of, and just put in there, Save America Joint Fundraising Committee, Save America.
	And while you're doing that, let me just screen share these subpoenas.
	I mean, that'll be easy enough.
	I'll trust this answer.
	It's pretty matter of fact.
	Employees of Save America PAC include a small number of key managers, staff, yada, yada, Bradley T. Crate.
	That's the treasurer.
	Yeah, so I'll trust yours.
	This is matter of fact and not subject to political interpretation.
	So suffice to say, the inside, if there are packs, right?
	If Chris LaSavita and Susie Wils are running these PACs and fundraising mechanisms, I mean, a subpoena from the DOJ, I would expect that them to be knowledgeable of it, right?
	I mean, I think most people would agree with that assumption, right?
	If they're not, I mean, there's no good answer to that.
	If they're not aware of subpoenas coming from the FBI, it's negligent.
	If they are and don't disclose it, it's something else.
	Well, they don't have to.
	Yeah.
	They can say, you know what?
	We just didn't want to risk it.
	We didn't disclose it.
	So, I mean, there are reasons that are good faith reasons for doing it, right?
	But we don't know.
	Yeah, and I guess you're right about that.
	We don't want to amplify what would be misinterpreted by the media as a political scandal.
	So we'll just keep quiet about it.
	Right.
	So there, I mean, they're obviously, yeah, exactly.
	And that's a good faith reason for it.
	But why does Mike Lindell, as soon as he got that subpoena from the FBI, what did he do?
	He went immediately live on Lindell TV and said, oh, it says that you can't talk about this, but guess what?
	I guess I can.
	I'm going to choose to do that and amplify the subpoena.
	It's funny.
	No, it's funny because, and I don't, I don't think anybody on the Republican side would have viewed that as exposure.
	They would have viewed it as a criminal witch hunt.
	The media was getting leaked of information anyhow.
	Okay, fine.
	It's interesting.
	So the PACs get subpoenaed at the time, but no, because it doesn't make sense.
	They can't now, I say feign outrage at the extent of the scope and breadth of the overreach in Arctic Frost if they weren't outraged at the time by these initial subpoenas.
	Thank you for saying that.
	That is exactly the same conclusion that I come to, Viva, is that if they're making this massive, oh my God, I was spied on and this and that.
	Now, you can argue that these four, I mean, these four subpoenas, they could publish and say publicly.
	There were other subpoenas that I don't have listed here because I only cropped out the ones that apply to me.
	Yes, there were some subpoenas that you would be obstructing.
	They said that you would be obstructing the investigation if you were to disclose it.
	So there's that aspect.
	So some of the senators may have get it, but not on these four.
	So then I think it's a legitimate question to ask Susie Wiles and Chris LaSavita.
	If you could just, it'd be nice to know.
	I mean, they don't have to say anything, but I personally would like to know what was the decision, calculus, on just keeping this under wraps.
	And it's probably, you know, it could be a good reason, but I'd like to know just to kind of shed a little bit more context to the totality of the investigation.
	I think it'd be insightful.
	And do you know what, um, do you know what information they got on you pursuant to what Facebook, uh, Microsoft, or um, what's the other one?
	Google provided Google Apple.
	Yeah, did they actually provide uh your info or did they refuse to do it?
	No, they provided everything, everything think of everything when you that you can obtain from somebody's account.
	Yeah, do you think most Gmail enough is giving so?
	Do you think most people would uh face some legal liability if an unlimited, resourced, weaponized DOJ and FBI were to come after them?
	I think so, not me, but not me and not a Fed.
	You, Ivan.
	I'm not joking.
	I guess you can say Ivan's either a Fed or I'm clean as a whistle.
	Okay, I go with clean as a whistle because, in order for you to have had total whisper clearance, yeah, this is what I'm getting at: if I'm clean as a whistle and I'm the only guy by the book as an insider exposing the entire corrupt regime of the Biden criminal syndicate.
	By the way, one thing that I did was when I was internal contractor at the DIA, one thing that I did, I reported to one of the counter intel officials at the Defense Intelligence Agency because at the time I had been, I saw early drafts that were done by Garrett Ziegler of the Biden, you know, the Biden laptop report that he put out.
	No, I've had him on a few times.
	Yeah, so you know exactly.
	So before that was all out, I was communicating with him and looking at the drafts.
	I was like, holy crap.
	I'm like, what do I do?
	I have to report this.
	Like, I'm in a, I have to report it some way, somehow, with somebody that I trust because I didn't trust enough people with any other entity.
	So I reported it and said, hey, can you at least capture that I'm not sure if I, as a reservist, have to file a foreign agent registration because I'm a sub-agent of China because Biden is a freaking Chinese agent.
	And so is his family.
	And at first, they laughed at it, but when you present the evidence, it's like, oh, crap.
	And he told me, if I were to file that, I'd get fired, even though it's true.
	Luckily, I did that because fast forward to post-January 20th.
	Some of the same people that I knew back in the day are now in positions in this administration doing exactly what everyone is clapping about because they stayed in the system and knew exactly and remembered the things that I did early on in 2021 when all this weaponization started.
	Like I had people on the inside that I could call as witnesses to testify and confirm everything that I was saying.
	And I think that's one of the other reasons why it was difficult for them to indict me because I had too much paper and digital trail in the system exposing that like I was already exposing them before they were coming after me on the Biden on the election on the January 6th Fed surrection, et cetera.
	Pull out and the screen share so we can get back to the big faces here.
	No, Dora, but this is from our locals community.
	At this point, I question if Besent and Wiles are working with Soros.
	Robert is correct about Besent never investigating Soros.
	Never happened.
	I mean, I guess that.
	Okay, so hold on.
	Did we cover the bulk of the Arctic Frost?
	It's amazing.
	Now, for everybody feigning outrage about the extent, scope, breadth, excessive nature of Arctic Frost, they had good indications this was going on at the time.
	And if they didn't disclose it then, I can see a lot of people saying that this is, you know, theater of people feigning outrage of what they were largely aware back in the time as a distraction from whatever.
	That I can appreciate that argument now that people have been making.
	Is there anything else about Arctic Frost that is relevant that we didn't touch on yet?
	I guess it's a question for you.
	So if you're, I just feel like, as I'm looking at this, I may be wrong here, but I think I may have been the most investigated across the entire interagency American of anybody that was ensnared across DOD.
	Because remember, I was a reservist, right?
	So there's no real big reason for the Department of Defense to investigate Donald Trump, right?
	Because there's no real affiliation there.
	But for me, I was.
	The Department of Defense Office of Secretary of Defense investigated me.
	My Army Reserve unit investigated for the Pence card tweet and others, right?
	Whether or not I was doing political stuff on duty, because there's the Hatch Act component.
	I didn't violate it.
	All my First Amendment activity was in my personal time, off duty, never represented myself in my military capacity.
	And I always kept my, well, at the time, now I do, I'm a little bit more free in my First Amendment, but I kept it as though I'm an, because I was a lieutenant colonel, I still kept it as a professional delivery of information, trying to defend the Constitution, right?
	Within my First Amendment.
	Next, I was investigated by the two contract companies over the years that I was affiliated with, whether it was supporting the Defense Intelligence Agency or supporting the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
	Okay. Investigated by them.
	This is all just DOD investigating me.
	On the DOJ side of things, I had Jack Smith investigate me.
	I had other elements, the National Security Branch of the FBI, the National Security Division of the Department of Justice, the Joint Terrorism Task Force of Northern Virginia.
	How do I know this?
	Because when I was a contractor at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, my security officer told me that they were being contacted by the Joint Terrorism Task Force and Army Criminal Investigation Division on Fort Belvoir.
	That's another line of investigation.
	That doesn't even mention the DHS component of this.
	I was placed on the Quiet Skies program in August of 2021 through about April of 2023, where it wasn't no-fly, but it was, you know, the quad S. You probably heard of it.
	So they would conduct Fourth Amendment gang rape on me.
	That also blocked me from entering onto military bases.
	So as a reserve lieutenant colonel, right, in good standing, with a top secret clearance at the time, right?
	In good status and standing with TSA pre-check and clear since the inception of those two programs that DHS handles.
	They nonetheless, based on political predicate, unlawful predicate, wanted to target me because they wanted to create some, they wanted to find a scheme that my First Amendment lawful rhetoric to stop their stealing of the election somehow resulted in an insurrection that could be tied to Donald Trump.
	That's the whole scheme.
	And so that's DOD, DOJ, DHS.
	And because I was at the Defense Intelligence Agency, not only was a DOD investigating me, the intelligence community was investigating me.
	And it was the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency that decided to go ahead and block me from performing on my contract because of my First Amendment activity in my off-duty.
	Because while they didn't pull my clearance, they told me that you can't come to work.
	You can't enter the building.
	Maybe for several reasons.
	One, because the FBI was unlawfully investigating me.
	Another one, because I didn't bend a knee on the COVID measures.
	Okay.
	I didn't comply with their illegal COVID product consumption.
	Okay.
	And then also, obviously, the rhetoric of I didn't accept the illegal 2020 election and I didn't buy into the insurrection narrative.
	I actually proved, I've been helping prove that it was a Fed surrender.
	So that's the long answer to, or I should say, discussion about, I don't think there's any single other human being that has been investigated more across the entire interagency than me by the Biden criminal syndicate.
	Yeah, I should maybe add the caveat without being arrested or indicted.
	I mean, I don't know if they've investigated.
	Well, no, I'm talking about even any name, name any of the J Sixers that were in the military at the time.
	There's only a handful.
	Name those that had a clearance, maybe two or three.
	Okay.
	And so, okay, the DOD investigated and the DOJ and then a little bit of DHS, but they didn't get the Jack Smith treatment.
	I got the Jack Smith treatment as well.
	Let me ask you this.
	It was the question from our locals community.
	I've previously, that was Don.
	Oh, yeah.
	You previously said people are going to be held accountable.
	Do you still think that?
	Well, the way I see it, this is my analysis.
	And people are going to get angry and be like, oh, Ivan's bad.
	So I thought that this administration would participate in accountability.
	I genuinely thought that.
	I came quickly to realize a couple of weeks after January 20th, when we didn't see all the nonviolent J Sixers being pardoned.
	I noticed that there was already capitulation on going the correct course.
	Next, we didn't see any indictments for a week, two weeks, a month.
	We didn't see any arrests.
	We didn't see any, we saw things such as, oh, I got my booster.
	You should too from the White House.
	Okay.
	We got Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates invited to dinners at the White House as they're being patted on the back.
	Meanwhile, it was the very Mark Zuckerberg that admitted and apologized to Chairman Jim Jordan that he bribed $400 million across the country to steal the 2020 election.
	He participated with the White House and the government, previous illegitimate government, to censor, to coerce people into induce people into believing that the jabs were safe and effective, that the 2020 election was legit, that January 6th was an insurrection.
	Meanwhile, these people are being lauded and invited into the White House.
	So I genuinely thought that we were going to have a government that at least sat and watched accountability take place.
	I haven't seen that.
	And in the absence of states and county, like DAs really doing anything to the level that Fannie Willis or Alvin Bragg did, I think we have to increase our pressure to expose the cowardice.
	Because right now, people are going to be mad at me, but name one arrest.
	Did I miss something?
	Has there been an arrest of any of the voters of the last 11 years, whether it was during the first four years of Donald Trump or the last 10 months?
	So four years and 10 months.
	It started with.
	Steelman in and then I'll steal man.
	Yeah.
	Well, that's I was gonna, I was gonna steal him and they're gonna say, okay, well, we got Comey now.
	We got another guy, you didn't arrest him.
	He's still out there freely treasoning, coordinating with his surrogates at the FBI.
	Remember, Jim Comey was the FBI director.
	They didn't take his devices.
	There's no gag order.
	He's still doing like me and you.
	He can communicate with all of his previous network at the FBI to undermine Kash Patel, to undermine Dan Bongino.
	John Bolton, is he arrested?
	No.
	He's still coordinating and communicating with, I'm sure, the Mike Pence's of the world, the Liz Cheneys, the Adam Kinzingers, and whoever else he wants to continue to treason and undermine President Trump.
	These are freebies for them.
	They fundraise off of it.
	It only strengthens their position.
	How am I wrong, Viva?
	No, you are.
	You know, I was going to argue that, first of all, the steel man would have been, okay, you got a few big names.
	The steel man retort is, you got Comey on two lies to Congress or whatever.
	We haven't gotten him on anything compared to what he's done.
	The government prosecutes these cases right now, right?
	And he's freely treasoning.
	While all these people are furloughed, not going to work, they're probably having meetings coordinating the coup that's going to start on January of 2026 because they just, guess what?
	John Brennan's little lackey employee, Abby Spamberger, is the governor-elect of Virginia.
	And the Attorney General of Virginia is also going to be sworn in in January.
	The guy that wrote text messages about how he's going to slaughter his political opponents' children and the former Speaker of the House.
	So if I were a Democrat, you think that they're going to do less than Letish.
	And people don't know Spanberger, early 2000s.
	He had a substitute teacher at the Islamic Saudi Academy in Northern Virginia.
	Did I get the right person?
	All right.
	Spamberger taught English literature as a substitute teacher at the Islamic Saudi Academic in Northern Virginia.
	She received a conditional job offer from the CIA in December 2002 while waiting for her background complete to be checked.
	She worked as a postal inspector.
	In 2006, after Spanberger's background check, she joined the CIA as a case officer, working to find and build relationships with foreign nationals.
	Holy shit.
	That's where I read that before and I didn't put a couple of things together.
	Viva, it's frustrating because I know all these people.
	I know all their backgrounds.
	I have dirt on everybody over here in DC.
	But people don't like to listen to me.
	And I'll just keep talking, I guess.
	I'll just keep doing my part.
	If they want to call me, I'm not trying to help, but I'm going to call balls and strikes.
	If you don't like that, then I guess you're going to have to deal with the pain from someone else.
	At best, they've indicted, you know, I say two of the lowest hanging fruits.
	Who else?
	Leticia James, Lisa Cook, low-hanging fruits, politically inconsequential, on the least of the possible charges.
	We're a year almost into the presidency.
	He's got three years left.
	I don't know what control they're going to lose as of the midterms 2026.
	He hasn't until January.
	Because starting in January, when they actually are sworn in in Virginia, this is what people fail to realize.
	Most of these federal government employees live or work in Virginia.
	So the jurisdictional nexus for the AG in Virginia is there to completely ransack your life.
	So if Trump wants to lose his properties in Charlottesville and Loudoun County, he just lost them because the Democrats are going to seize them in January.
	There's a trifecta right now in Virginia once they swear in in January.
	They're going to go ham, scorched earth.
	They're going to take what they were going to do with Jack Smith had they done a reelection and do that on steroids coupled with what Letitia James did in New York on steroids against every single political opponent that they already had a list for that is in this administration.
	So if you like Tulsi Gabbard, well, John Brennan doesn't like Tulsi Gabbard.
	So he's going to call Abby Spanberger to say, hey, let's have a meeting and figure out something similar to what we did to General Flynn.
	Let's take what we did to General Flynn, to a little sprinkling of Peter Navarro, Steve Bannon, Mike Lindell, the J Sixers, what we did to Charlie Kirk, and let's figure out what we're going to do.
	That's what happens in January, Viva.
	60 days.
	Let me ask you the observation.
	I like yell and scream about this months in advance when people are like, hey, you need to give them time.
	No, there is no time to give.
	But is there any because we don't know it's unclear what you're describing sounds like the inevitable.
	And I don't know what I can't even envision what a solution would be.
	What other options do they have, right?
	The Dems.
	Well, to the extent the solution you're going to propose is lawful, please go ahead.
	For now, I still continue to maintain my legal, moral, and ethical posture.
	So what can be done between now and then?
	So every single person that's at the Department of Justice, first order of business.
	Every single person in our government that is jabbed, you're not showing up to work.
	Okay.
	Everyone that's a whistleblower in the past regime is elevated to the senior levels of the organization, particularly DOJ and FBI.
	Number two, those that didn't take the jab are elevated to the senior executive service.
	So you fill out the top ranks so that you have two layers of protection for Cash and Dan for them to go scorched earth, which is what.
	Let me pause you there.
	Two things.
	I mean, set aside the legalities.
	It'll get challenged.
	They'll get reinstated.
	It'll get blocked.
	Okay, I mean, challenge.
	Bring it on.
	Go ahead.
	I've had a side challenge.
	Kash Patel.
	Kash Patel seems to still think the rank and file of the FBI are, you know, by and large, say not by and large, are good, hardworking cops who just need to be let to do their jobs.
	I'm very skeptical of that and probably skeptical of two-thirds of the rank and file of the FBI.
	So cash seems that game works.
	Okay, remove Cash and Dan.
	Elevate Andrew Bailey.
	Andrew Bailey.
	Have Andrew Bailey do this tomorrow.
	And as soon as he does that and wipes out all the jabbed CRT, DEI COVIDiots from the entire organization, you now no longer have 90 to 95% of the organization fighting you.
	Okay?
	People are like, oh, well, how are we going to do our work?
	Would you rather have a rowing crew where nine out of the 10 rowers are fighting against the captain?
	Or would you rather have just the captain rowing?
	I think a more effective and efficient strategy is to have the captain rowing because then you're going to move forward versus going backwards because the nine are rowing against the captain.
	That's what's going on in our institutions.
	Because the other nine that I'm talking about, they're loyal to Jim Comey.
	They're loyal to Chris Ray because they're still there.
	They have moved nowhere.
	Not only have they moved, apparently some have been getting raises, as far as I understand.
	Yeah, Cash has promoted them.
	Next, the Department of Justice.
	So what if I were to tell you that a guy that used to work for Rod Rosenstein for a year, still at the Department of Justice?
	So a lot of these guys at the, let's bring up a name.
	This is key.
	Jolene Ann Lauria.
	Jolene and L-A-U-R-I-A.
	You've never heard of her.
	Most of the audience have never heard of her.
	This is what I do in my spare time as I, you know, have a few minutes of spare time thinking, you know what?
	If I were to take out the deep state, who would be my top priority targets at the DOJ?
	And why?
	I would say it would be Jolene Ann Lauria.
	Why?
	Because she spent 18 years being the comtroller, literally running who gets hired and fired, who is allocated funding and resources for every single project at the DOJ.
	And then you look at her background, you're thinking to yourself, damn, she may have a little outsized deep state influence when you look at her background.
	And yet, Scam Blondie, excuse me, Pam Blondie, excuse me, Attorney General Pam Bondi loves this lady.
	Why?
	Because this lady does the same thing that those that Cash hires and says are great.
	They tell them all the things they want to hear.
	You're the best, Cash, Dan, and Pam.
	All you need to focus in on this, and we will love you for eternity.
	So now that we did that and duped you for up until the election, now you can face Abby Spanberger and our Democrat Virginia crew.
	Now that you never came after us, now we have you by the balls and by the neck.
	So they did it.
	Time's up.
	Some people might like being grabbed by the balls in the neck, but most people, if you're into okay, bada bing.
	So have I blackpilled you enough?
	Quite a bit.
	And I haven't even gotten to my question about Albert Burla and Zuckerberg and the Trump betrayal.
	And his endorsement of Andrew Cuomo with the two criminal referrals that was already.
	Yeah, well, that, I mean, the Cuomo I can understand only because it's like not even the lesser of two evils.
	I mean, it's not.
	It's decided.
	Last time I told him, that's Damadi, who's a Islamist socialist.
	I get it.
	I mean, he hasn't committed genocide last I checked.
	Not yet.
	My joke is: one's a mass murderer, the other one's an aspiring mass murderer.
	Yeah, you just see, okay.
	My eye is twitching now as a result of everything you've just said.
	Pan Bondi, what is her deal?
	Who controls her?
	To whom is she loyal, if not to Trump?
	Well, you know that she was one of her clients right before she became AG.
	She represented Pfizer.
	Right down in Florida.
	And when you look at her history, you look at the relationships, a lot of overlap with Susie Wiles at Ballard Partners and Mercury PR.
	You've done a deep dive on those two organizations.
	No, I know that she represented Pfizer, financial disclosures, multiple.
	I knew that part.
	I know Mercury Wiles history and Ballard Partners.
	So if you look at Ballard Partners, they're the most influential lobby in this White House.
	So when you look at all these foreign policy plays and then you take a look at their FARA registrations and their lobbyist registrations, the timing is exactly commensurate with a policy, a foreign policy decision, money in the bank for Ballard.
	FARA registration.
	Okay.
	So, I mean, how much has changed, right?
	Before you had a crack baby kid pay for play.
	Now you have elements, you have an entire so here's the question.
	I've so many people in certain names and facts about those certain names, but the reality of it is the only time I get any sort of movement anywhere is when I put these people on public blast.
	It brings me pain, but I think it creates a better circumstance for those that profess America first or America only values.
	The question is: is Trump oblivious to this, in your opinion, or has he been an accusation, it's just a hypothetical.
	Has he been bought out or threatened out?
	When BB gave him the golden, not the golden buzzer, the golden pager, do you view that as a gift or do you view that as a threat?
	Man, your questions are so perfect because that's literally where I wanted to go with this.
	When someone told me, someone told me, I noticed Trump's behavior all changed around February when BB gave him the golden pager.
	I'm like, I thought that was more recent.
	And it was February, like right after Trump is fresh into office.
	And I said, yeah, yeah.
	So as everybody observes what's going on, look at it from the following lens and tell me if I'm wrong.
	The only thing that Trump does not have that he wants for his legacy is to have what Barry Hussein Obama has and that Donald Trump does not, which is what Nobel Peace Prize.
	The Nobel Peace Prize.
	So he is now compromising and betraying every single thing that he promised and campaigned on in order to obtain what is not going to be attainable, the Nobel Peace Prize.
	And everybody knows this.
	B.B. Netanyahu knows this.
	Millay knows this in Argentina.
	They're basically saying, oh, Mr. President, we're going to nominate you for the thing that you want the most and we're going to get it for you.
	But they don't want to get it to him because once he gets it, they have no leverage.
	So their best case scenario is to say, is to dangle it and be like, hey, hey, little buddy, I got your Nobel Peace Prize right here.
	And then you can compare yourself to good old Barry Hussein.
	But you got to do something for me.
	Don't release the Epstein files because then we won't have leverage.
	So tell Pam, Dan, and Cash, don't worry about the Epstein files.
	So that's one, right?
	That's how I view this.
	This is my assessment, okay?
	But hold on.
	I'm just assessing.
	Yeah, but see, don't release the Epstein files because then we won't have leverage.
	Is that to say we won't have leverage that we're using the Epstein to coerce other parties or they won't have leverage over Trump administration?
	No, it's I think it's more of than BB I think it was a joint op.
	Mossad, MI6, CIA.
	I think Mossad was the lead, right?
	And so it's kind of a sharing agreement.
	We control certain officials that we want to globally based on the Epstein op to include American politicians and government senior officials.
	Don't release that.
	Because based on what I saw up until that point, to me, it doesn't look like Trump, his name may be in some documents, but not in a nefarious way, right?
	I don't think he would be inspired in that.
	But because he's seeking that Nobel Peace Prize, I think he's willing to protect some of the people and friends that he knows that are on the list in return for that coveted Nobel Peace Prize.
	Again, I don't have any perfect evidence or proof of it.
	This is just my assessment, okay?
	I want to make it clear.
	It's like what I know, what I don't know, and what I think.
	This is what I think.
	And I could be wrong.
	But it just makes sense when you look at it from that lens.
	And I've been pretty accurate in my assessments the last eight to 10 years.
	So I have that.
	Next thing is, what else did he compromise on?
	Has COVID?
	Has there been any COVID accountability or even discussion or thoughts of COVID accountability?
	You know, well, that's what we're getting now back to the Albert Burla being invited in and given the royal treatment when he should be locked up, you know, under the promise that Fize is going to invest in America.
	And then also, it's not for nothing.
	And I'm not, you know, I'm not finding the J card.
	Albert Burla is a prominent member of the Jewish community.
	He's a prominent member of the Jewish community.
	He just won the Centennial Award or was it awarded some prize for Jewish innovators in science where I think he should be in jail.
	And I can appreciate now following your theory, you know, grease up a little Pfizer and then maybe a Nobel Peace.
	If I'm following your logic, I'm not saying I totally agree with it, but I could follow the logic.
	If there's any evidence that somebody has that is inconsistent with my theory, I want to hear it because then I can say, you know what?
	I was off.
	So let's take a look at this tweet I put out earlier.
	Cuomo criminally referred twice to DOJ by Brad Wenstrup and James Comer.
	You don't believe me?
	Here are the actual screenshots of the criminal referrals, one from October 31st of 2024.
	Okay, I get it.
	It was before the election.
	So you can say, oh, Pam wasn't in office.
	She hasn't said anything.
	Okay, great.
	But then there's another one, April 21st of this year.
	Comer refers former New York governor Andrew Cuomo to Trump DOJ for criminal prosecution.
	And guess what?
	Pam Bonnie doesn't even acknowledge receipt.
	It's one thing to say, hey, we're investigating, but it's a lot less threshold to say, hey, received.
	You're not violating any policy.
	You're just acknowledging that it was received.
	So in light of two criminal referrals by Republicans in the House, Brad Wenstrup and the previous Congress, and then this one by James Comer, the guy that exposed the Biden criminal syndicate.
	And then you have this admission by Cuomo, Andrew Cuomo himself.
	Let's listen in.
	I don't know if you can hear it.
	Yeah, we can hear.
	We followed the federal guidance, and people died in a horrific way.
	There were no visitors allowed into nursing homes.
	And I apologize for any family that lost a loved one during that time.
	It was on my watch, and I understand how terrible it was.
	Holy followed the fellow.
	You he admits to it.
	Can you imagine that?
	And Donald Trump endorses this guy.
	When was this video from?
	I haven't actually seen it, and I know what my reaction would have been had I seen it at the time.
	How old is this video?
	This was the night before the election, so Monday.
	Is it a contemporaneous interview?
	Like he gave that interview right before the election.
	Yeah.
	This guy acknowledges that he killed people.
	They died alone because they couldn't be with family because of his policy.
	And he apologizes to their families.
	This is what accountability is like to a fucking narcissist, sociopath.
	Oh, yeah.
	I'm sorry I killed your family.
	Now elect me.
	Okay.
	And now I understand what you are, what you are getting at in terms of the.
	Now you see my frustration and betrayal, right?
	And so I will.
	Well, now you've really, you've really fleshed out the Pam Bondi Pfizer corruption in terms of her not even entertaining the referral for criminal prosecution.
	Because I presume, I don't know if I don't know how a criminal prosecution of Cuomo could potentially entail Pfizer, but I can imagine at somehow things overlap or.
	No, no, I didn't make that nexus in our discussion yet.
	And I don't think I've researched it at the time.
	No, you could make that nexus.
	No, you didn't.
	I'm just thinking out loud in terms of how those could intersect by way of investigations and prosecutions.
	But, okay.
	And what's the truth post?
	And this is Donald Trump endorsing Cuomo.
	So bring it back to the question buzz.
	Why and who put him up to it?
	Yeah.
	Was it Albert Burla?
	So he could get his Nobel Peace Prize.
	See, I would never, I would not have thought that Trump, this might be my own confession through projection in a way that I wouldn't impute that intention to Trump.
	I would never have thought that Trump would have even would have had that aspiration because the Nobel Peace Prize to me is such a disgusting, sullied entity that I wouldn't want to be with the likes of Obama and Arafat and some of the other questionable recipients.
	Let me bring up another tweet that supports my hypothesis, if you allow me.
	By the way, thank you, Kash Patel, for firing this guy.
	I wanted to share this.
	I mean, there are some good positives going on.
	So this was an article from the New York Sun.
	I think it was today or yesterday, where Jeremy, the guy that we spent a couple minutes on, was fired, and then Janine Perro wanted him back.
	And then Cash fired him again.
	So right now he's gone.
	And I might be grocery shopping with him here shortly in the next few days.
	Just accidentally.
	I just read the top comment.
	You're in Northern Virginia, because guess what?
	Most of these guys are my neighbors.
	Where do you live now?
	If you don't mind saying, are you in?
	Are you in that general jurisdiction?
	Yeah, I'm in Northern Virginia.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Northern Virginia.
	Dude, this is going to blackbill.
	Oh, cripe.
	I lost all of the chats.
	Hold on.
	I should have brought these up when I had a chance.
	Let me just share the screen and read some of these chats over on Rumble.
	Viva, some sidebar requests for Connor Tomlinson, Connor Tomlinson, Connor Tomlinson.
	Okay.
	Screenshotted T190.
	I'll definitely have a checkout on that.
	And then let me bring this out.
	And we've got Rustang says, Ivan, if you continue to provide a compelling case that you were severely wronged at many levels by the Biden crime syndicate, if it were possible, how do you think a fair course of justice would help make you personally whole?
	I guess the question is going to be, what prejudice did you suffer from their invasion of whatever privacy?
	Oh, absolutely.
	So I've lost 90% of my incoming revenue as a result of it.
	So I was canceled and blocked off of performing on my contracts with the Department of Defense to the tune of, I'd say, over the five-year period for the contracts that I had with them would result in a little over $2 million, right?
	So $2 million, which to me, that would be about 90% of my income, right?
	So I had to go from about mid-six figure to $40,000 or so.
	I had to pull out my entire 401k in order to be able to survive cleanly, legally, morally, and ethically on my own to push back and reject the tyranny.
	Okay.
	Now, I'm not complaining because guess what?
	I kept my freedom the entire time because we had J Sixers that were unlawfully persecuted, prosecuted.
	And so I have no leg to stand on to complain.
	They have a leg to stand on.
	And that's why I focus my efforts on advocating for the pardons for the J Sixers, first and foremost.
	This administration can't even do the simplest things like that.
	Okay.
	The nonviolent J Sixers.
	Eight oath keepers, four Proud Boys.
	Tina Peters still rots in prison.
	Shane Lamond, the head of DC Metro Intel, that could expose the mayor and DC's role in the Fed surrection supporting Nancy Pelosi.
	He's rotting in jail right now.
	Why?
	Because he was going to go against the prevailing Democrat narrative when the Proud Boys were going to call him to testify in their trial.
	He didn't even volunteer to testify.
	He was listed as a witness and then was prosecuted for obstruction of Democrat narrative.
	Rotting in jail right now.
	Okay.
	So going back to me, how I was harmed monetarily, massively.
	The health care I couldn't access because I had military health care.
	I couldn't go on a military basis to even have access to health care for myself and my family.
	Traveling, I was subjected to, I mean, it wasn't embarrassing to me.
	I embarrassed them in the process when they did the Fourth Amendment gang rape while I traveled.
	I recorded many instances of that.
	I was actually planning on testifying for Congressman Chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, Mark Green, but Mitch McConnell wouldn't allow for a Senate trial of the impeachment of Ellie Mayorkis.
	Remember, he was impeached, but Mitch McConnell wouldn't allow for a Senate trial.
	So that would have been a great moment to vindicate and show America how the Biden criminal syndic completely weaponized against me.
	Meanwhile, they're deploying a dozen TSA agents, three federal air marshals to surveil me, slow me down from traveling, and stopping me from traveling the country to explain to state legislatures how they must reclaim their electors because they were transmitted under fraudulent means.
	And all while essentially saying that this Biden criminal syndicate is doing nothing to those illegally trespassing into our country while deploying a dozen TSA and all these assets under fraud, waste, and abuse against someone with a top secret clearance, clear, pre-check, no criminal background, no criminal history, not a single, they couldn't find anything on me.
	That's how they use their resources.
	So that's just a portion of what I can recall right now of how what harms were committed to me.
	Ivan, I like you.
	I knew it.
	I've advised you for a while.
	No, I know, but what I like, it's you, what you've gone through, you have a rough edge to you.
	And I think people who are cynical and jaded by their experiences with other people online will jump to conclusions, will make accusations.
	But the extent of what you've A, gone through, B, detailed.
	You know, it's incredible.
	It's incredible, but it's absurd.
	And I don't, I can appreciate the loss of faith in what looks like a current administration that has been hijacked by deep state players and maybe either unbeknownst to Trump or I don't know what the alternative is to that that wouldn't be even more cynical.
	So, no, I'm laying out the problem that most people aren't accepting yet.
	And I always come with a solution, though, Viva.
	I'm always positive in my outlook.
	There's always a solution to everything.
	Nothing's impossible, in my opinion.
	So now that I think I've, well, let me end with this on like putting the stake in the heart before we go into solutions, if I may.
	This one, one video I want to share with you.
	So I wrote.
	Oh, yeah.
	You saw this?
	I did allow it.
	Okay, let's see.
	We, the people, are deeply concerned about the president is exercising that our president is exercising undue restraint at the moment of existential conflict for our nation, particularly when Speaker of the House has so starkly revealed his own fragility.
	President Trump is encircled by timid, foreign-influenced, and big pharma-aligned figures with the executive branch, while the legislative branch continues to advance policies to undermine American sovereignty and traditional values, including all right, we got all the mutilation, family mutilation, selling out the family mutilations currently with China, pro-Israel, pro-Ukraine, Qatar.
	We elected a president, House, and Senate to place America first and to restore a constitutional republic by obliterating the deep state, not to seek a Nobel Peace Prize by conciliating the deep state and becoming foreign asset agents.
	Ten months have been lost to hesitation and a profound absence of resolute leadership.
	It is now imperative to confront the entrenched traders directly and decisively.
	Our patience is exhausted.
	We've lost all confidence in the current leadership community, the leadership's commitment to dismantle the administrative state and deliver the retribution promised to the American people.
	This is not a moment to retreat or negotiate.
	It's a moment to eradicate the corruption, root and branch.
	American Patriots will be monitoring tomorrow's elections in New York City, New Jersey.
	When I wrote this, finalizing strategies to halt the nation's hemorrhage.
	The plan will be announced on Wednesday.
	So this is where I announced my plan.
	Ready?
	Is this retribution or not?
	No, it's the opposite.
	I think I've been very mild-mannered, but I brought, I mean, just a little list.
	Mild-mannered.
	So he's not all in.
	He promised obliterating the dip state.
	And this is Sunday's interview where he says, Is this retribution?
	No, I'm mild-mannered.
	Backwalking, right?
	What's his focus instead?
	Watch.
	Look at this.
	Wars.
	How many did I solve?
	Cambodia, this is Cambodia, Thailand, Kosovo, Serbia, Congo, the Congo, and Rwanda.
	Pakistan and India.
	That was going to be a beauty.
	They shut down seven planes.
	Israel and Iran.
	You've heard about that one.
	Egypt and Ethiopia.
	That's another beauty.
	Ethiopia built a big dam where there's no water going to the Nile.
	Armenia and Azerbaijan.
	And if you take a look, Israel and Hamas, which is a rough little situation, but it's going to be.
	I do want to talk about it.
	I mean, you have branded yourself the peace president.
	Well, I think I did pretty good.
	Is this.
	So where's his focus?
	Is he making sure that Ballard Partners makes payroll with all the steel man?
	Yeah, I mean, the steel man is going to be he promised to be the president of peace and he's trying to prove that he's the president of peace and not the president of starting new wars with Iran.
	Like, you know, many people were railing against.
	I mean, I definitely tainted by the last, you know, by this discussion, and I appreciate how this can be viewed as aspiring for there's only one thing that you would imagine.
	I mean, other than the recognition of being a peace president, the next obvious conclusion is trying to talk the media into supporting a Nobel Peace Prize.
	That much I definitely appreciate.
	Meanwhile, we're still in Ukraine, still supporting Ukraine.
	Meanwhile, the involvement in the Middle East is that which is causing a lot of MAGA supporters to question his loyalty to America first.
	So, which begs the question, why all of a sudden out of, oh my gosh, Mark Levin comes out and Ben Shapiro and all these other players come out.
	And what do they focus in on?
	Tucker can't talk to people.
	Meanwhile, the same Ben Shapiros and Mark Levins were shilling for big pharma as they were selling their products.
	So those individuals with a massive audience, much bigger than Andrew Cuomo, I get it.
	Andrew Cuomo was a government official that ended up slaughtering people under his own admission, right?
	How many people believe Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin as they were shilling for these big pharma products?
	How many were injured?
	But yet instead, they go after individuals like Tucker Carlson that never took the jab, that was putting forth content advising and warning people that these products could be harmful, platforming people that exposed it because he had the courage.
	While everybody like the Ben Shapiros and Mark Levins were trying to cancel that information, same thing with who they're trying to cancel now, right?
	I'm a free speech absolutist.
	I want people to attempt to offend me.
	They're not going to be able to because you cannot offend me.
	You can try to insult me.
	That's a different thing.
	Okay. If you're offended by anything, you are weak.
	I want nothing to do with you because you're mentally weak.
	And so if that's the case, I mean, instead of focusing in on, hey, Abby Spanberger is John Brennan's little lackey.
	And if Abby Spanberger wins in Virginia, this whole deep state is going to flourish starting in January.
	No, Ben Shapiro focuses in on, oh, I don't like Nick Fuentes.
	He's making First Amendment sounds that are unpalatable.
	What's his name?
	Levin.
	This young kid is too intelligent.
	He can articulate his thoughts and they're convincing many people.
	I don't like his First Amendment sounds.
	So it begs the question: I mean, who's the enemy here?
	Who's the problem?
	So my solution is every single person that was involved in the COVID op that will cover 95% of our problems.
	The problem is that 95% of our government was involved in it, both Democrat and Republican.
	So you helped me figure out a solution.
	I think the fastest way path forward is to, I mean, they didn't listen to us privately.
	They didn't listen to us when we were politely trying to tell them, hey, I love you.
	I worship you.
	Can you please do this and that?
	So now it's time, for me personally, it's now time to go frontal assault and call them out.
	Call a balls and strike and a spade, a spade.
	People are going to hate me for it.
	They're going to accuse me of whatever.
	Hey, I voted for the guy six times.
	Three in the primary, three in the general.
	He's a trillion times better than Kamala Harris, but I don't like what I see right now.
	And it needs to change because right now I see a betrayal.
	And I campaigned for him.
	I did what I could for this guy, right?
	And so now it's time to deliver on the mandate that we.
	I mean, I go around the country and I ask, what's the number one thing that you wanted when you voted for Trump?
	And the whole room voted for Trump.
	Accountability, retribution, justice.
	Punish the criminals.
	The list is there.
	Cash made the list.
	His list is this big.
	My list is massive because I spent a lot of time on it.
	We're just trying to save a republic, which also downstream saves him and his family.
	Because if he doesn't do it, good luck because he's going to be like, he's already been convicted in New York.
	So when he finishes office, what happens to him?
	He goes to jail, I guess.
	I don't know.
	What are your solutions, Viva?
	I don't have any.
	I like the discussion, and I'll let the bigger brains of it figure it out or at least propose their solutions.
	But I got one more.
	We need a speaker of the house that will take control of our government.
	Yeah, but yeah, sorry, go for it.
	A speaker of the house can create accountability at scale massively.
	One, he could implement the doge efforts that Elon did.
	Elon didn't want to take the speakership, right?
	And I get it.
	You have to skip him over in the line of succession because he's not a natural-born U.S. citizen, but he can be the Speaker of the House.
	He has dirt and blackmail on enough members of Congress currently to force and compel them into voting how he wants to, meaning totally doge every single aspect of our government that's weaponizing overnight.
	He could go after and impeach judges, publicly displays the dirty laundry so that they can't walk the streets at night or during the daytime as he exposes it.
	Because guess what?
	I don't care at this point, Viva.
	They looked at my entire life.
	I just showed you all the subpoenas.
	I want, like, I want all of my stuff disclosed.
	If Pam Bondi, Cash Dan, Janine Piro, you name it, I want everything of mine disclosed.
	All of my DMs that Jack Smith looked through, all of my Facebook, all of my LinkedIn, all of my Google.
	I could care less.
	But once I do that, I want to see yours too.
	And that's when we start to, with the transparency, we'll see who's good, who's bad, and whose intentions are pure and who's not.
	Expose it all.
	Ivan, take out your backdrop.
	We're going to have our full faces for the end of this.
	Sorry.
	No, Doria.
	Send me.
	No, it's fantastic.
	Send me every link that you want me to put in the pinned comment.
	I'm going to do it.
	Your socials, wherever you want people to find you.
	Get to the lawsuit.
	Now we might.
	We'll do we're going to do part two.
	We'll have to do part two later.
	There's a yeah, we'll do we'll do we'll do part two and I'll actually we're only part partway into the law fair against me.
	It's it's amazing.
	It's here.
	TT Fulltimer says Viva Muskrat told Rogan he was not ready to die, so he will not investigate the elected.
	Yes.
	He even made excuses for them grifting.
	He did.
	A lot of people say, like, what happened to the arrests and the retribution, Ivan?
	What happened to the mother of all Twitter files?
	I said from day one, the play was to motivate Elon Musk to release the mother of all Twitter files.
	But on that Joe Rogan interview, he basically said that I know too much.
	And if I put it out and explain how the corruption game works, then they're going to off him.
	And so it begs the question: why did Elon Musk say that Trump was on the Epstein list?
	Was he just messing with him?
	Is there something more to it?
	And then, why did Elon Musk never release the Fauci files?
	This is no matter how cynical you get, Ivan, it's tough to keep up.
	All right, well, we'll do part.
	We'll do part two on the lawsuit, but this was fantastic and already borderline too much for people to absorb.
	So he can tomorrow change all the dynamics and start going after everybody.
	It just happens.
	It's his, yeah, no, it's like the fear, the fear of self-preservation causes one to pucker, not pucker up, but be quiet to silence themselves.
	Whereas if they had a fear, if disclosure was what was compelled from the fear of self-preservation, that's how you flip.
	I mean, but again, we're actually talking a world where political assassinations have become the norm.
	The norm, yeah.
	So can we do a 10-second preview?
	Oh, yeah, please go for it.
	So next time, we're going to talk about how yours truly is a co-defendant with the CIA director, the CIA, Tulsi Gabbard, the director of the DNI, the Interagency Weaponization Working Group, a couple other folks, and yours truly as the only private citizen.
	Everyone else is a governmental actor.
	So all the conspiracy theorists are going to be like, he's got to be a Fed.
	I'll have to save a bunch of questions here.
	Ask Ivan about the Bitcoin, the Binance part.
	And we'll get questions for the round to him.
	Maybe I'll be back in the studio.
	Not maybe I'll be back in my studio by you got to go your drinks with Matt Taibbi.
	Tell him I said hi.
	I will.
	I haven't gotten the text yet.
	There is a cocktail somewhere in this building.
	I'm going to go find it.
	Ivan, stick around.
	We'll say our proper goodbyes.
	Locals, there won't be an after-party today, but I'll make it up to everybody afterwards.
	Thank you, Ivan.
	You are a younger version of me.
	I try to help those who want help.
	TT Fulltimer is in there.
	All right, man, this is amazing.
	And I guess everyone's going to have to digest this a little bit.
	It's a lot.
	No, it's almost too much.
	Send me every link you want me to put in the pinned comment.
	I'll do that right after the show processes.
	Stick around.
	Rumble, locals, X. See you tomorrow.
	Tomorrow will be a later show.
	I'm traveling back and then I'm back in the studio on Friday.
	So, Ivan, stick around.
	We'll say our proper goodbyes.
	Thank you very much.
	And everyone else out there, peace out.
	Don't end the stream.
	Hold on one second.
	No, I do want to end the stream.

▲