Viva & Barnes - Live with The Blaze's Steve Baker: Jan. 6 Fed-Surrection and Patel's Clarification Adds Confusion!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 29, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:12:42

Live with The Blaze's Steve Baker: Jan. 6 Fed-Surrection and Patel's Clarification Adds Confusion!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Yes, ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs.
	I have started three minutes early, but on purpose.
	I just want to play some clips.
	I'm gonna get out of the golfer's voice.
	I'm gonna play some clips uh from the ostrich farm that I want to put on blast before we get started with Steve Baker.
	So enjoy would be the wrong word, but watch this.
	I want to see what happens when all the police drones are flying so low.
	Go away.
	The police drones are flying so low.
	They're putting our birds through fences.
	You want to talk humane?
	Here's our here's our girl.
	She just went through a fence, got stuck.
	She's don't know if she can get up.
	They're causing these animals to kill themselves.
	They're going through fences, they're hitting fence posts because their drones are flying so low.
	Do you see this?
	This is life.
	This is this is humane.
	These are healthy animals that are suffering because of the negligence of learning or even knowing about these animals.
	They don't know these animals.
	They don't know these animals.
	They're not their animals.
	Our birds are dying due to the hands of their negligence.
	This is inhumane and we They want to kill them.
	It only makes sense.
	Okay.
	Well, I don't think anybody's gonna be shooting them today with drones.
	So this is gonna be true.
	This is the lawyer on the phone.
	Umar chic.
	Um I don't want to give you any calls over this is gone.
	Talking about whether or not they're gonna shoot the ostriches through uh drones.
	Here's Katie with a public appeal for Donald Trump, and I put this on truth and on uh Twitter.
	Mr. Trump, President Trump, this is a cry out, a plea from Canada.
	Please stop the slaughter of almost 400 healthy ostriches that are going to suffer today or tomorrow.
	Well, they're so they're suffering right now.
	The world has been calling on a miracle.
	This is of interest, as you know.
	I know you know.
	Yeah, you would say hello.
	They are this is this is universal ostraum.
	You all know this.
	This one is the one that really broke my heart.
	This is the farm owner's mother or the farm owner, sorry.
	Uh Katie is the farm owner's daughter.
	Another bird.
	Here's here's a bird that's you know fallen over.
	This is drones.
	This is police because the police are flying the drones.
	Okay, like too low and scaring the ostriches.
	And then they run around, they hit fences.
	Look at what the way your mother's gonna hug it right now.
	You tell me this is not heartbreaking.
	So this is what's going on in Canada.
	I I I said it earlier on Twitter, and it's it's not a bad original thought, I think.
	You know, in World War, I think it was World War I. Which one did they call the war of attrition?
	I think World War I and World War II were basically wars of attrition, but I think the term got coined in World War One, where they just sent rows upon rows of of of men to die.
	And you know, who whoever killed the most, you know, eventually you'd run out of soldiers.
	And then you'd win.
	War of attrition.
	We're we're at war right now, whether people like to admit it or not.
	It's not a kinetic war.
	Uh, you know, if I can borrow the Alex Jones um phrase, it's oh it's a war of information.
	And the attrition is our attention.
	And you you realize what the CFIA is doing, the Canadian food inspection agency.
	Although it's it's basically the same type of battle every time someone with unlimited resources, someone with unlimited resources can battle forever.
	The government is fighting the citizens with the citizens' own tax dollars.
	They can fight for as long as they have citizens to tax.
	This is a war of attrition for attention.
	And what happens is this has been a week and a half.
	People want to move on with their lives.
	Or are you still talking about the ostrich farm up in Canada?
	I didn't really care about it in the beginning.
	Now it's a week and a half later.
	Move on, Viva.
	Move on with the news cycle.
	Uh, and it's a battle for the attention of people out there so that you don't forget, and you sure as sugar don't forgive if they go through with what they're going through.
	I have uh I'm I'm hellbent on this.
	Uh I would love to get up there, but I'm not sure that I would feel comfortable being around the RCMP anymore.
	I they are modern-day Gestapo agents, period.
	Armed Gestapo agents, just following orders, flying their drones too low, or at least allowing the CFIA to fly the drones.
	I don't know who's flying the drones, scaring the birds, torturing the birds, the birds are injuring themselves.
	Now you got your Soviet propaganda branch of the government, the CBC and Global News saying the birds are sick.
	The birds aren't sick.
	The birds are being dehydrated, unfed, scared, and injuring themselves.
	And now they say, oh, they're six.
	I swear to you, I don't put it past the CFIA to deliberately infect those birds.
	They're in their custody right now.
	Oh yeah, they wouldn't do that.
	That would be crazy.
	So I'm not done yet.
	Uh howling at the light, whatever the hell the uh whatever the hell the poem is.
	Don't go gently into that light.
	People are gonna forget about this.
	People have already started moving on if they've ever cared in the first place.
	I got people who claim to be conservatives up in Canada saying, what's the big deal?
	They knew what they were getting into when they got into business with the government.
	You stupid jackasses.
	All right, you incorporate a business in Canada and it gives the government carte blanche in the absence of any scientific, legal, logical reason to come in and steal your stuff and kill your animals.
	That's called nationalizing corporations.
	People leave countries that do that.
	People were leaving Canada after they froze the bank accounts of the truckers because who the hell wants to do business in a tyrannical shithole that can freeze your bank accounts in the absence of any court order?
	Well, congratulations.
	If the price of doing business with the government incorporating in Canada means they can come in and shut your shit down overnight.
	Nobody's gonna do business in Canada.
	Enjoy your Venezuela 2.0 Canadians.
	Do not go gently into the night.
	Rage rage against the dying of the light.
	Yes, F. Chaton's right.
	Fuck these motherfuckers.
	Oh no, no, no, you you got into business with the with the it's a Faucian bargain to get into business with the Canadian government.
	Get the hell out!
	Hey, oh, and but oh, but farmers know that they sign up.
	They can they can order, you know, the government can come in and kill all your livestock.
	Well, then farmers will leave.
	And look what's gonna happen.
	What's happening in South Africa?
	You morons who learn nothing, not only from history, but from the present.
	All the farmers leave.
	You will starve to death.
	Leave the farming to people who don't know how to do it because they make it impossible for the people who know how to do it to do it.
	You will starve to death.
	What happened the last time the government got involved in farming at a global national scale in Soviet Russia?
	Tens of millions of people starved to death.
	So that's it.
	I just wanted to start the show with that before I bring in the guest.
	And also I do have to thank our sponsors for today's show.
	And I feel bad.
	Raging into sponsorships, but I guess actually, it might be the good thing because we're going to talk about you know, not getting unhealthy and staying healthy, people.
	Oh, we all have two ages, people our actual age and our body's internal biological age.
	What I didn't know, I've likely lowered my biological age without even knowing it.
	In fact, I think I do know that I've lowered my biological.
	I'm closer to 60 than I am to 30 people.
	And I ran a 5k in under 22 minutes.
	Here's the thing because Americans eat so many processed foods and not enough fruits and veggies.
	Sometimes people you don't even sometimes Americans don't even eat, not even Americans, Canadians also.
	They don't know their actual biological age.
	They are ticking at time bombs.
	A major university study suggests how to slow aging and diffuse the biological time bomb.
	Participants slowed their aging by drinking field of greens.
	That's all.
	They didn't change their eating, drinking, or exercise.
	Although you could do that too, and it'll make it even better.
	Just field of greens.
	You see it on the way on the on the page right now.
	Each fruit and vegetable in field of greens was doctor selected to specific health benefits, cell health, cellular health, heart, lungs, kidneys, metabolism, even healthy weight.
	Uh Field of Green, Field of Greens is amazing.
	Where's my bottle?
	It's somewhere here.
	It's not in the kitchen, actually, because I had it.
	They're amazing.
	Check out the university study that they published on their website.
	You can go to their website, you put in the my promo code, you get 20% off.
	Go to field of greens.com, field of greens.com/slash viva for 20% off.
	It tastes delicious.
	It's I say it looks like swamp water because swamp water is the nourishment of life.
	They're an amazing company.
	USDA, uh organic.
	And you also support companies that support the freedom of speech and the things that we do.
	Now, by the way, uh I'll play this one here.
	This is another one for health benefits, flavanol, and I can never hear the word without thinking of Professor Frink from this episode of uh the SimCh.
	Dark chocolate, like 73% cacao.
	Really dark chocolate.
	And you make it into a high flavanol hot chocolate drink for twice a day.
	This was the clinical study they found in people who wound up actually having drinking the hot chocolate twice a day over the course of a month.
	They doubled the number of stem cells compared to the people who didn't drink hot chocolate, right?
	So when you and I are growing up, right in grade school, we learned from our teachers that starfish can regenerate, salamanders can regenerate, but people can't regenerate.
	Yeah, right.
	It's true, you can't grow a new arm, but we do regenerate.
	We trained.
	Well, for you can't grow a new arm.
	I don't know why we can't regenerate bones, but you definitely regenerate uh skin cells.
	And by the way, let me let me bring you to the website of uh Black Forest Supplements so you can see what we're talking about as we do this.
	Um, stem cells are like tiny repair crews in your body, they go out and fix whatever needs to be repaired.
	If it's your skin liver, they'll fix it.
	Most stem cell therapies are illegal in the United States, not because they're unsafe, but because they work too well, which threatens big pharma, which is oddly enough, suspected to be behind the ostrich um need to kill those ostriches.
	Imagine if you could heal your knees, fix your back, recover from surgery without pills, without insurance, and without endless doctor's visits.
	That is bad for profits, and it's why the FDA has blocked these treatments.
	Now people go overseas, paying up to $50,000 for one stem cell injection.
	I listened to Rogan talk, but if they go to like Tijuana, if there's a stem cell place there, I'd never go to Tijuana, regardless.
	So hopefully I never need stem cells.
	But here's what most people don't know.
	High flavanol cocoa can naturally boost your own stem cell activity.
	Studies show it helps cells flow from your bone marrow into your bloodstream like bees from a hive.
	We saw the video.
	Here's the thing: flavanols are the good stuff found in cocoa beans, but they're usually destroyed during the chocolate making process.
	The good news is Black Forest Supplements has created the first ever high flavanol cocoa powder packed with everything your body actually needs.
	Only 20 calories.
	You mix it with your coffee, drink it in the morning twice a day.
	It's delicious, and it's stem cell power-ups that your body needs.
	If you're experiencing significant aging, slow recovery, weak immunity, or just feeling off, give it a try.
	Go to the link.
	It is Blackforest Supplements.com forward slash fry.
	You get 40% off for 48 hours.
	I think it's a 48-hour blowout.
	The link is in the description.
	Black Forest Field of Greens.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you for waiting in Steve Baker, who's been patiently waiting in the back.
	I went early because I um wanted to talk about the ostrich stuff, and I don't want to waste too much of the time that Steve has to talk about the bombshell coming out of coming out of DC.
	Steve, uh, how many times have you been on the channel now?
	It's been at least two or three, right?
	Oh, wait, you're you're muted.
	Steve is on the road, and we uh we made sure that I think this is my fourth time, but it's my first time to ever have an ostrich uh intro.
	Uh and and F-bomb intro.
	Steve, I've I've I've lost my I lost it a long time ago.
	I'm I'm fucking fed up with I'm I'm fed up with everything.
	Like I I'm not gonna turn into a cranky old man, but I might be cranky.
	Yeah, you were on um, so we talked about oh my goodness, he was in the news also.
	Corey Corey Mills was back in the news recently.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Um tell us who you are.
	For those who don't know, I mean, welcome back.
	I love having you um tell us who you are.
	Uh well, my name is Steve Baker.
	I'm with uh Blaze Media, uh, a writer, investigative journalist uh with uh Blaze.
	And um the last few days have been uh really something, you know.
	Uh look, we have been full on on this Corey Mills story for about um well since about April, I think, maybe, um, when we really got into it big time.
	And and of course, it's it's it's the gift that keeps on giving uh from our perspective.
	He was in uh his uh most recent hearing this past Friday.
	I don't know if you knew that, down there in Florida, uh Lake City, Florida, at the Columbia County Courthouse, he was there facing uh the judge and his accuser, the uh the young Miss uh beauty pageant winner, uh Miss United States, Lindsay Langston.
	And uh, of course, he was in a hearing to determine whether he he should have a restraining order uh put on him to uh keep him away from her.
	Um, this was his second hearing in that case.
	There's been no ruling yet.
	I guess the judge is gonna take a few days to consider it.
	But in that particular hearing, um, I mean, you know, it's it's salacious.
	They had uh they had made uh sex tapes of each other and you know, videos and taking bad pictures and sent things like that.
	And and uh he was he was even asked if he had uh you know sent his dick pics to her recently, and he said, you know, I well I can't recall uh whether you know that was his answer.
	I can't recall.
	But um the funny part was is that two, three weeks ago when the first hearing for this uh particular restraining order uh opening day, I was there.
	I was actually in the courtroom, and I was on I was actually on my phone sitting on the front row in the gallery, and all of a sudden the congressman is standing right in front of me.
	I didn't know it was at the time.
	And he says, Well, Mr. Baker, so good to see you here today.
	Because he knows I've been writing stories about him for months.
	He shook, you know, got a big smile on his hand face and shook my hand.
	And um, then when the uh sheriff came over and had the journalist move off the front row and said, That's you know, that's just for family and attorney.
	So we moved to the second row.
	And uh, right when the the sheriff told us to move, the congressman, Corey Mills turned around and looks at me, he goes, Oh, he goes, Steve, call me by my first name.
	He said, Steve, uh, just tell him, you know, as much work as you've been doing, you know, covering me.
	You're your family now.
	You can sit on the front row.
	I mean, this guy was like, do refresh everybody's memory.
	Corey Mills was married to a uh a Muslim woman.
	He was married in a mosque that had two.
	Still is still and was having an affair with another woman.
	Explain that portion of it.
	It's amazing.
	Chat GPT, uh, what it refuses to give answers to, but uh multiple fairs.
	Uh, the two the two prime primary affairs were in February 19th, it was revealed um actually because of a police call to the DC Metro Police by his young um so he's married to an Iraqi woman, his young uh Iranian girlfriend by the name of Sarah Rabbiani.
	Uh so she's 26, 27 years old.
	And on February 19th at 1.15 in the afternoon, she calls in a domestic violence charge against the congressman there in DC at his 21,000 a month uh penthouse uh in DC.
	Um stop right there.
	Yeah, 21,000 a month.
	Correct.
	Who pays for that?
	Well, he has a foreign uh international arms trading company.
	Have you ever been to his place?
	Have you seen pictures of it?
	What the hell can you get?
	What could 21,000 dollars?
	We've seen interior.
	It's it's a it's a it's a luxury DC penthouse complex.
	Um, but that's but but but but it's blown away.
	Okay.
	Because, all right, so his young Iranian side piece, all right, calls the cops at 115 on February 19th.
	And at that moment, his other living girlfriend at his beach, $12,000 a month beach property in Florida at Smyrna Beach there.
	She finds out that she's not his one and only.
	Now she's been with him for three years.
	The girl up in DC has been living with him for over a year in his DC penthouse.
	The the beauty queen, the reigning Miss United States, is living in his beachfront property.
	She finds out he's not his one and only, and that's what starts this whole process of them breaking up and the restraining order petition and and all of that.
	But while he's got those two going on, there are others, and of course he's still married, and he runs an international arms trade company, and he's a congressman.
	And his DC penthouse filed a suit of a conviction against him because at one point a couple of months ago, he owed them 85,000 in back rent.
	This is I I didn't think we were going to get so far into the Corey Mills.
	I just it's a fun start.
	Jeez Louise.
	So he's still married.
	The mosque at which he was uh at which he was wed, had the the cleric there was involved, had something to do with 9-11 or was was tangentially involved.
	No, he was he was a uh unindicted co-conspirator in the first World Trade Center bombing back in 1993.
	Uh and and this mosque in Falls Church is known as the Al-Qaeda Mosque.
	The shoe bomber came from there, the guy that made all of us have to take off our shoes for years, you know, when we go through the TSA line uh at the airport.
	Um he was from there, as well as several other uh prominent um uh terrorists that were have been arrested and disposed of uh since then, were members of that particular mosque.
	But he was the Mufti.
	He was the guy, and according to Islamic religion, he can't marry a man who is not a Muslim.
	Now he can marry a woman who is not Muslim but is marrying a Muslim man because that in their tradition, he's you know, the religion of the house.
	Yeah, the well, the religion passes through the father, so that's still a way of expanding conversion.
	Um Wilde, okay.
	But he married Corey Mills.
	Remember what I said?
	The Mufti can't marry a man who's not a Muslim.
	Yeah, the the inference is that he converted to Islam at some point.
	We have six different sources who have told Blaze Media that he can he's confessed to them or admitted to them or spoken to them about his conversion to Islam.
	And then the I was only getting into this because of the recent scandal that he voted against censuring Ilhan Omar, which some people said was a conflict of interest, but I just think is an exposure of intent.
	So he's he was in court defending against the the issuance of a restraining order against the woman who he's alleged to be attempting to release uh sex videos of for the purposes of harassing and distressing.
	Sex torsion as they call it.
	Actually, that's the the nomenclature for the Florida law is uh sex torsion.
	It's carries up to 15 years in prison, $15,000 fine.
	As we say in French, Tabarwet, this is this is wild.
	I mean, this it's just it's amazing.
	It's amazing.
	So he's actually running arms uh with his own um I guess I don't know if it's military industrial complex would be the right term, but with his own gun running company that is so lucrative, he's spending let me do the math real quick.
	That's a quarter of a million dollars.
	$350,000 a year between the two properties.
	$21,000 a month in DC, 12,000 a month in Florida.
	That um there's nothing suspicious about that.
	I'm not going to go follow up on this story right after we're done with this.
	I thought we were only going to talk about Jan 6.
	Holy crab apples.
	So there has been no issuance of a restraining order yet in that hearing.
	No, uh, the the hearing was Friday afternoon, and the judge said he would offer up uh ruling in a few days, so we don't have that yet, as of well, I guess I I've I've I've lost total track of time.
	I don't know where I am, I don't know what time it is, I don't know what day it is because of the news cycle the last several weeks, as you can imagine.
	Yep.
	We've been round the clock uh since especially since Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
	Uh and and then of course all the other things in the world don't stop.
	Here now, here's one for you.
	All right, you're not gonna believe this.
	So Saturday, I'm in Fort Worth, Texas.
	All right.
	I'm at a wedding reception of our blazed guy that does all of my video production.
	So the guy that crafts all these videos I've done about January 6th, the guy that does all the editing for that.
	I'm I I was just blessed and honored, he invited me to his wedding.
	I'm there at his wedding reception, downtown Fort Worth.
	It's a city club there, and all of a sudden my phone goes off, and my son, back in North Carolina in a town called Southport.
	Do you remember where the shooting was Saturday night?
	Yep.
	My son was there.
	My son is sending me real-time videos from the shooting, and immediately while I'm and I'm sitting at the same table with my editor-in-chief from the Blaze, I'm showing it to him.
	All of a sudden, we're running out in the hall and feeding the Blaze News guys and the social media guys, uh, the videos I'm getting from my son.
	And so we have this we beat as a result of my son being at the shooting, my 26-year-old son at the shooting.
	It was it was that was that a restaurant or a nightclub?
	Yeah, at a restaurant right on the water there.
	The guy pulled up in his boat and just started unloading uh into the uh the restaurant there.
	Your son was there at the very same restaurant, heard the shots, saw the saw it all.
	He sat right next to at uh one of the you know, uh restaurants or or dives there next to that particular restaurant.
	So he was he was right there and he began uh feeding us real-time information and interviewing the cops on the scene.
	They confirmed for him that three were dead.
	We were able to just because my son was there, and I'm at a wedding in Fort Worth, I'm able we're able to beat CNN and Fox News by about 45 minutes on the uh the the story.
	That is, I mean, it's it's it's wild A that he was there.
	Do we did I mean I heard about the incident, don't yet know if there was there a motivation?
	Was it um I don't know domestic terrorism disgruntled, somebody got kicked out of the bar.
	Do they have any motive yet?
	Yeah, no, I mean he he was obviously a uh mentally challenged.
	He had he had had several cases against uh the federal government, uh, against VA, he was a uh Marine veteran.
	Uh apparently uh a lot of awards.
	He had had quite a quite a few uh medals, ribbons, a couple of bronze stars, purple hearts, things of that nature.
	And he was just very disgruntled against the government in general, and he just snapped.
	Um he he even he he even won a prize back here.
	I don't know if you remember there was a an American idol star back in their heyday called Kelly Pickler, um, another North Carolina person.
	And anyway, he won some prize where he got you know to go out on a date with her, or she attended the marine ball with him or something to that effect.
	So he actually there's photos of this exact guy out with uh American Idol star Kelly Pick.
	I do remember, I do remember her roughly that was I think we used 2006.
	Holy cows that show's been on a long time.
	Yeah.
	Um holy crab apples.
	And then we had the other incident now in um at the uh the the Jesus Christ Church of Latter day Saints in Michigan where uh do we have I mean I I know people were hypothesizing on a motive earlier.
	There was some misinformation about this guy having donated to um a Democrat uh you know organization.
	Do we have what do was there any word on the on the motivation yet?
	Another Marine.
	Uh so the both shootings, uh uh Saturday night and Sunday uh were uh former Marines.
	And I have not, because of what I've been working on, not been able to drill down into that story uh yet.
	I I did hear that he had some he had some problem with the Mormon church itself, um, and that's why they were they were his target, but I don't know what the motivation or what the problem he had with them.
	Okay, well, that's um well follow up on that, but it it is um you know, and then in in all of this, who the hell cares about uh a bunch of birds up in Canada?
	Uh but it's um try to do we'll try to do everything.
	So North Carolina, uh I I we heard about that shooting.
	Uh uh disgruntled, uh injured, brain injured, potentially um uh veteran.
	This guy, I uh wasn't clear if he was anti Trump or pro-Trump based on the stop sign and the Trump sign on his property.
	Um, follow up on that.
	Steve, the so hold on.
	Corey Mills waiting on that.
	These two we'll come back to.
	Uh, but the big one, I mean, say the big one.
	They're they're all freaking huge and they're all uh equally uh some are more deadly than others.
	Jan 6.
	So who broke was it you that broke the story last week about the confirmation that there were almost 300 plain clothed FP?
	Okay, just I mean, I know you don't disclose sources.
	How does um how do you well what I want to ask who you're not who were your sources, but how do you get the intel and um what was it like breaking that story?
	Uh uh, you know, as with many of these things that we've gotten over the last four and a half years, many of these things are given to us by high placed or specially placed um uh congressional sources.
	Uh sometimes they're they're staffers, sometimes they're actual congressional investigators that work for the committees.
	You know, these committees, particularly when you're talking about uh a criminal event, uh, you know, a criminal event like this particular thing, they will um they'll have a team of investigators working for the committees, uh hired uh former law enforcement, former FBI, former military intelligence, that kind of thing is what they typically do when they hire uh investigators for these committees.
	And so um that's that's typically where these kinds of sourcing come uh comes from.
	Um and and then, you know, let's just be perfectly honest, just like with mainstream media, the same thing is true with whether it's the Blaze or John Solomon, uh just the news or uh or other you know uh sources, uh they uh will the committees and the Congress members will sometimes leak something to us in advance of a press release or a big thing that's about to come out.
	And that's basically what happened this time is we were leaked the advanced information that this was coming out.
	Uh I mean, I guess the one question is before we even get into Patel's clarification, why it took um how many years out are we now?
	Five years, four years.
	Yeah, it took 52 months, something like that.
	Um I get how how does it what was the question I was gonna ask?
	The the the information itself that was that was leaked and subsequently confirmed is that there were 274 plain clothed FBI agents, or uh I think we can call them agents right now on the scene the day of in the crowd.
	Uh what was the explanation given in what was ultimately leaked to you but published later for why they were there in plain clothes?
	Yeah, the the initial leak was only that there were 27.
	I was told 275, and you know you know how it is in the social media, people will drag you through the mud for getting that one, you know, it was 274, but I said 275, and you know.
	BF BFD is I would say, right, right.
	Okay.
	And and so um uh so we reported, as we were told, that there was 275 or 274 plain clothes agents that had been deployed or sent or embedded or put into the crowd.
	And what we what uh we then learned, because the report then came out actually Later that night, uh, this was Thursday, is that in this what they call an after action report that the number was 274?
	We learned from the report that these agents were deployed or sent by the Washington field office of the FBI to go to the Capitol and engage and assist in crowd control, quote unquote.
	Crowd control.
	Okay, let me stop you there for the time being.
	Uh am I getting too conspiratorial or too um paranoid, cynical, that they would leak the number so that people would then say, look, it was a Fed selection and then come out later and say, no, no, no, they weren't there as instigators, they were there only because we sent them.
	And now everybody who uh believed that that confirmed their theory of a Fed selection now looks stupid.
	Like, oh, they weren't there as agitators, they were there to um uh to to assist, but we didn't tell you that when we leaked the number, so that we would know that you would jump on that as an initial story.
	Do you do you get the feeling that that might have been the reason for the initial leak to make people look potentially stupid, although I don't think it changes anything if they say, oh, they they were there to assist in agent agitating the crowd, but then they come out two days later and say, No, no, no, they weren't there from the beginning, they were only there after being sent to deal with the riot control.
	Do you think that might be a motivation for the leak?
	I I I'm not gonna get into the the conspiratorial side.
	I'm gonna address the cash patel side, which is he tends to make this mistake over and over and over again.
	He will release a statement.
	Let's go back to the you know, to the Epstein file Axios memo leak on a Sunday back however many months ago that was.
	That was the biggest PR bungle in the history of the FBI, and it was made by the current administration's uh, you know, director of the of the bureau.
	And then they had to they had to, you know, backtrack and reword and address that and deal with the the aftermath of of the firestorm that happened there.
	And then jump forward to the uh Charlie Kirk assassination.
	You remember the night's next, you know, the next night he's at some expensive restaurant in New York, and he tweets out that uh we have the subject.
	He didn't say the suspect.
	He said we have the subset subject in custody.
	We've got him, you know.
	And then an hour and a half later, he goes, uh yep, oops, not so much.
	And uh and why does he make a mistake like that?
	It's it's because he's not a cop, Viva.
	He's he's a uh he's an attorney.
	Um, you know, he is uh bordering on a career bureaucrat of of sorts.
	And um he has been, he has been a you know, um a prosecutor.
	He has done that, but he um he's not a cop.
	And any cop, and especially the all of the cops that we talked to, including FBI agents and and local cops after that bump bungle in uh in uh the Charlie Kirk uh assassination, was that real cops don't announce that we have our man until after the interview.
	Because you may find out in the interview the guy's got a solid uh alibi or something, and sure enough, that was the case.
	The guy they walked the guy that uh Patel said was the man.
	And then you jump forward to this situation.
	And so I don't know if there was a deliberate conspiracy, or it's just as I've tried to put it out there, either either somebody on his uh PAO uh office staff, that's public affairs officers, somebody needs to uh take his phone away from him, or his general counsel needs to take his phone away from him, or at the very least, they need a rule and say, uh, sir, Mr. Director, before you tweet out anything, run this by us first.
	It is um uh I don't want to fault him for that.
	I I'm just I don't believe the explanations because I I don't believe that you send 274 plain clothes, and there's an argument in the chat, assets versus agents.
	They're being described as agents, not assets, not confidential human sources.
	There's a difference.
	Yeah, and so I I don't believe you send, I don't believe the subsequent clarification coming from cash.
	Like I I believe maybe he's saying it to try to not upset the rank and file of the FBI agents that are starting still working for him because he still has faith in them, even though I don't, but what do I know?
	And so he's like uh he doesn't want to embarrass them for having potentially participated in this.
	So he says, No, they were down there to assist in law enforcement in plain clothes, or were they carrying firearms?
	And and to get to your tweet afterwards, we said this is bullshit.
	I've seen all the video.
	No plain clothes anybody was assisting uh Capitol Police.
	And so even the subsequent clarification seems to be factually Incorrect, but doesn't make any sense on its face.
	Okay, so the so the first thing that you have to parse out here is what's the difference between plain clothes, undercover.
	Uh I mean, is there even such a thing as an FBI uniform?
	Well, the answer is no.
	I mean, this is not J. Edgar Hoover's FBI anymore, where they all show up in you know black suits every day uh and are all buttoned down.
	Uh there's no national dress code for the FBI anymore.
	And so they show up to work, or if they come to your your house to do a you know for a knock and talk on your door, they might be in flannel shirts, t-shirts, blue jeans, but they're always displaying their badge or they're flashing and identifying themselves.
	They might have a jacket on, or they might have a ball cap with FBI on or something like that.
	Now, when they are listen, let's just talk about January 6th in particular.
	If they were truly 100% plain clothes, in other words, no identifying markings whatsoever on their attire associating them with the FBI, they would have only been performing one of two functions counter surveillance in the crowd, which means basically at very large political rallies, events, protests, things of that nature.
	The FBI are on the ground doing surveillance.
	It's an actual job of theirs.
	And ostensibly, that's to serve and protect.
	They're doing the one moral function of government, which is to protect us from force and fraud, right?
	Now, assume assuming they're doing that, would they not have earpieces, walkie talkies, they'd have to.
	Maybe maybe not.
	But they, you know, because they can it depends on how how inconspicuous they want to be during the process of performing that duty.
	The second thing that they might be completely 100% unadia unidentifiably plain clothes is that they're undercover.
	Now, undercover is a completely different classification within the bureau.
	That's an actual operation that they're trained for, that they've been preparing for, and that's a whole different set of rules and guidelines.
	It plain clothes undercover are not the same thing in FBI speak.
	Now you have 274 agents that were either sitting in their offices or so many of them were sitting at home because it was COVID, you know, land at the time.
	And so all of a sudden, their email starts going off and they're being ordered to go to the Capitol and assist in crowd control.
	When that order happens, and we have interviewed multiple FBI agents since this came out on Thursday.
	Here's what happens.
	They go get their tactical uh ballistic vest, they gear up.
	Now they may not look like the SWAT team because the SWAT team or the tactical teams are HRT from uh the the uh hostage rescue team, though those guys are wearing full military, you know, battle regalia, right?
	Just to make a small joke, HRT is human rescue team.
	Right.
	It also stands for hormone replacement therapy.
	So that that could be confusing depending on the context.
	Okay, so we're not talking about transgender ideology right now.
	Okay, fine.
	So they they but if they come like that, they're identifiable.
	That's correct, because they've got they've got FBI on their battle gear, you know, uh, it's they've got it on their patches, they've got it on their their um uh their ballistic vests, they've got it on their back, um, and and and of course they're carrying big weapons, they've got all the you know the the protective face and headgear and all this other stuff.
	That's them.
	Now, those guys were on the campus at about 24245 that day on January 6th.
	They entered through the south um uh door on the lower level where they call what they call the hall of columns.
	And when they came in the door at about 248, something like that, Ashley Babbitt was being brought down the stairs already mortally wounded at the bottom of those stairs.
	She was laid out on the floor, and the FBI's a tactical team medics began immediately trying to save her life.
	And the reason why I know that so well is I witnessed that with my own eyes that day.
	So this is the thing.
	If if if that's the excuse for certain FBI agents that came like two and a half hours after this all started, are those included in the 274 that they were saying um were there to assist with the Capitol Police?
	Uh I I my my determination is no, it does not include those because there's there's some there's some dispute about whether the because I don't know if you've downloaded that after action report yet.
	It's really hard to read.
	It is super, super hard to parse out all the details in that after action report.
	Uh It's not very well put together, considering how organized the FBI is supposed to be.
	But nevertheless, so a lot of people are saying that that 274 includes all FBI personnel that were there that day.
	I don't think it does.
	Because, okay, first of all, it's you still cannot tell me that even though the FBI, and we know this from uh the previous select committee uh transcripts interviews, we know that the FBI did not deploy their counter-surveillance teams that day, according to their testimony.
	Now, I don't believe that, but we also know people that were on counter-surveillance.
	You've heard of Kyle Serafin, uh, FBI whistleblower.
	He worked for FBI Washington field office on January 6th.
	He was in Maryland at a gun range training with Maryland state troopers when their phones and radios went off saying, you know, we've been called to the Capitol.
	So the Maryland State guys are now running to the Capitol.
	He's off.
	He's he's on leave.
	And he never got called in because he was on the um uh counter-surveillance special operations group.
	And he didn't even get called into the Capitol.
	So we know that he wasn't deployed.
	I don't believe for a second that no FBI agents were there.
	We know that some were there.
	We know that we know that FBI agents were there that were Trump supporters.
	They were there at the rally.
	They just came to watch and you know, support the president.
	We know that FB FBI agents from other parts of the country showed up that were Trump supporters and they were in the crowd.
	What we don't know is what other assets they have.
	They've admitted to 26 assets, right?
	We know about that, confidential human sources, as they call them.
	Uh so they've admitted to 26 assets, four of which actually went into the Capitol building.
	But um, you know, it's the slow dribble of truth and information is quite not acceptable at this point.
	Because um, see, the people in the chat uh agree with me, and not that that makes me it makes me feel less crazy, but I I would add rather just understand and if possible, also be right.
	It's if they say 274 agents there, people go crazy on the internet.
	Holy crap, it was a Fed selection, we all knew it, and now we've got the confirmation.
	Oh, no, no, no, says Cash.
	I don't want to piss off the 30,000 FBI personnel who I still have faith in.
	They were there for crowd control to assist.
	I I don't know if anybody has watched more video than you, but I know you've seen a lot of video.
	I mean, you were one of the ones tied up in this, you know, throughout the throughout the years.
	Was there any video evidence of any anyone who was not clearly Capitol Police assisting the Capitol Police other than the National Guard later on?
	Like, was there any video evidence of plain clothes or seeming civilians assisting Capitol Police in law enforcement?
	Uh it'll be a necessarily long answer to that simple question.
	Uh, we'll start with saying there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever ever of plainclothes FBI assisting Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police, and the other law enforcement agencies that did arrive from Maryland, from Virginia, they were they were pouring into the Capitol at the chief of police request to assist.
	And so there's no evidence that any of those people called in to do crowd control ever did crowd control.
	And that's what I erupted about.
	And I'll just I'll explain this.
	So nobody has had more time in the Capitol CC TV viewing room than myself and my partner at the Blaze, Johaneman.
	All right.
	We have been granted more access than anybody else.
	In fact, two different occasions for an entire week, we had the entire room booked out with all the consoles, and I brought in a team of video analysts up there twice for a week at a time.
	We've got more man hours there than any other news organization, any other uh journalists on the planet.
	And that doesn't mean we've seen everything because there's no way to watch 41,000 hours worth of video.
	Most of that video is not uh important anyway.
	But what is important is noon to midnight, you know, on that day.
	And and so what we have what we immediately reacted to at this statement from director Cash Patel was both Joe and I went, we were DM DMing each other in real time and both of us at the same time.
	This is bullshit.
	Because of the amount of video we've seen, we would have noticed FBI assisting or other plain clothes individuals assisting uniformed law enforcement.
	And it just didn't happen.
	Now, I have hundreds of people that got pissed off at me over the weekend and saying you wouldn't know if they were plain clothes.
	Yes, you would.
	Because FBI has to do one little thing.
	In order for them to stand on the line, the battle line, or assist in clearing out if they're if they look like some schmuck off the street, they're gonna have to flash their badge.
	But Steve, I mean, even just to say all the footage, presumably they can go and identify, they've identified everybody in that crowd.
	They can say these were our 274, here's where they were, and this is what they were doing, which I presume they haven't yet done, or at least disclose to the public.
	Not disclose it.
	Okay.
	But but I would I would say I would tell you, Viva, that most of those 274 did not even arrive until after the building was cleared out.
	Okay, interesting.
	Then why uh first of all, I'm gonna bring this up.
	Where's Bill Brown?
	Bill's in the house.
	What about the mass people breaking shit on camera?
	We'll get there in a second.
	Um so you think that of what when they refer to 274 plain clothes, they arrive.
	Wait a minute, wait a minute.
	But somebody somebody's saying that Baker is a liberal hack.
	Don't pay attention to the chat, Steve.
	Come on, this is why I don't bring up the chat.
	Not everybody can deal with the amount of trolls.
	People are entitled to be stupid, Steve.
	Um that's liberal hack there.
	That's a really stupid one right there.
	Well, they think I'm a liberal hack because I come from Canada, but um, set that aside.
	So you think you're you're you're thinking now is they're saying 274 were there.
	Is this an incompetent FBI trying to feign competence now?
	Or an or an incompetent FBI trying to cover up for the cover corruption of the previous FBI because all of those people still work for the current FBI.
	Put your yeah.
	Uh the problem is that the FBI is an inherently corrupt cult blob, okay?
	And and the blob itself is not going to change.
	The cult is not going to uncult themselves just because you have Cash Patel and Dan Bongino running the bureau.
	It's not gonna happen.
	Well, uh my theory right now, sorry to cut you off.
	Bon Gino's not running anything.
	I think Bon Gino has been a uh what's the the the a peacock that's not allowed to fly.
	Uh and I think Patel's been doing it, Bondy's been doing it, and and Cash, uh sorry, Bangino would love to do it, but is taking orders from these two.
	That's that's my that's my assessment.
	But here's the problem with what happened this weekend.
	All right.
	So you have you have the agency releasing this truth that we haven't had for four and a half years, that there were 274 agents responding, okay, to the riot and assisting in riot control.
	Now that's what they told us.
	Then the president goes out there on Truth Social and drops the bombs and saying we finally got them.
	We the people that were agitating.
	Do you have that?
	Do you have that little bit?
	Yeah, let me see if I can find that.
	It's very inflammatory and it's very conspiratorial.
	Here, let's see if I can find this quickly.
	But yeah, he comes out and says, um, basically saying that this was this was a hell, let me see if I can get here.
	Yeah, I mean, here we go.
	He says he says, probably acting as agent provocateur.
	But by the way, and my under my theory about this always is Trump knows more than a lost you.
	Are you there?
	Hold up.
	Yeah, audio.
	I'm still here.
	Can you hear me?
	Uh refresh, refresh your uh let me let me see.
	I'll just text them.
	Uh I'll I'll read this while we do it.
	I can see you, but I can't hear you.
	Uh hit refresh.
	Let me text you here, Steve.
	Hold on a second.
	Uh this is Steve's fault, people.
	I blame Steve.
	Steve Baker.
	Uh refresh your computer.
	Oh, there's a private chat here.
	I can tell them in private chat.
	Uh, refresh your computer.
	And I think everyone just got that.
	Let me go.
	Let me go into private.
	Refresh.
	There we go.
	I'll read the article as to what Trump said.
	Took to Truth Social, said the agents were probably acting as agitators or insurrectionists, and certainly not as law enforcement officials.
	Now, while Steve uh refreshes and come back in.
	Can you hear me now?
	Nope, he's in these out.
	Uh okay, I'm uh there you go.
	Are we there?
	Okay, I got you now.
	Okay, good.
	So uh I always say that Trump knows more than he lets on, or he knows more than people think he knows when he truths things like this.
	I think he knows that what Patel said is probably not entirely accurate.
	He certainly knows Enough to know that if this is not true, what he's saying, sorry, I just scrolled all the way down, uh, that it would look bad now and or later.
	So I think he knows what he's saying here is true.
	I believe it.
	I think we've got ample evidence for it, but it contradicts Patel's clarification.
	Yeah, and and this is but this again, this muddies the water, it confuses it all, and it makes it very difficult to for people to believe what's true.
	Now, here's the reason why idiots like this one idiot would call me a liberal.
	The reason why he calls me a liberal is because I won't come right out and say that every single person wearing a mask and breaking windows and and attacking cops that day were either Antifa or Feds.
	And you know why I won't?
	Because every single person that got involved that day were separate individuals.
	We don't know who they were working for, if they were working for anybody.
	We don't know if they just lost their shit in the crowd mentality of a riot, which happens all the time.
	We don't know.
	And I can tell you this because I have followed the trials since day one.
	I have followed the cases.
	I have been I've done more work on this thing than virtually not everybody.
	There are people that have done more work than me on January 6th, but I'm up there at the top of the pile in terms of the number of man hours I put into this thing.
	There has not yet been a single person identified by investigators on the right or the left.
	Well, but but it would require as being a Fed doing bad things.
	Because it would require confirmation from the Fed.
	I will never not believe that Ray Epps was not uh a Fed.
	I'll never not do it.
	Well, he was an asset.
	He was an asset.
	Yes, I'm sorry.
	And the and the D and the DOJ gave the game away when they slapped him on the wrist.
	One misdemeanor, yeah, six months.
	They gave it away.
	But that and and that was only after the internet discovered who he was that he was on the FBI's water list taken off and then let you know no punishment for three years.
	Um, some people suggest Nick Fuentes, I won't go there.
	But um let me bring let me bring this one up just by way of example, Steve, because this is the one I know people want to look at.
	Uh is this it right here?
	This is it.
	This video, which I might be very loud.
	This guy is a cop, or we don't know who this guy is.
	Break the window in and then he shoves the guy.
	So we we've all seen this video.
	If you haven't, there's a better version of it on Twitter.
	This is a guy wearing a mask.
	I think he looks like well, but he is law enforcement, right?
	Or do you don't know?
	We he's never been identified.
	I mean, he has clearly got the build, the shape, he carries himself like that.
	Uh now, here's what the left media the dude in chat, this is what the left wing media says about this guy.
	The left wing media said that he was just removing what was a dangerous hanging piece of glass.
	I absolutely I see.
	I can think like a scoundrel, I was like, that's what they're gonna say.
	He's just he's just make sure nobody gets hurt.
	So throw the glass on the ground and then tell the guy not to go in and shove him as though he was the one that broke the glass and removed in the first place.
	Except the guy that got shoved was the one trying to tell people not to go through that.
	So we don't know who that guy is.
	We don't know who or where the 274 agents, not assets were.
	We still don't really know they I think they said 27 assets in the crowd.
	We don't know what they were or who they were.
	Uh why what what would be the reasonable uh steel man explanation for which the current administration would not identify who the CHSs were or the assets, not the agents yet.
	But why wouldn't they just identify all of them?
	Or at least at least show footage to say who they were and what they were doing to quell conspiracy theories.
	And in DC, there's a simple answer to all these types of questions.
	Revealing the truth in these types of scenarios implicates people from both parties.
	And that's why.
	It's not complicated.
	It's one of the reasons why.
	And I'll I'm gonna give you, I'm gonna give you a little inside base baseball here.
	All right.
	I have worked very, very closely with the uh previous uh investigative committee.
	Not January, not Nancy Pelosi's committee, but the one that uh Chairman Barry uh Loudermelk chaired.
	Uh it was an oversight committee under House administration uh when they took over Congress in January of 23.
	And for two years they worked on January 6th um uh issues, and I was uh very, very close to what they were working close with them.
	They were the ones that gave me all of that access to the to the can uh to the videos.
	All right.
	So during that time of working with them, I can tell you that there are more, there's more opposition from GOP congressmen to their work than there was Democrat Congressman.
	Let me pause you.
	Okay, if I know I won't pause you there.
	Keep going, Ash.
	I'm gonna maybe I'll answer this question.
	And then and then you have to ask why.
	And then with the formation of the new committee, and this is really, really inside baseball here.
	With the formation of the new committee, when it was first being discussed in January, February of this year, they told Loudermilk he could have his new select committee, which by the way, the president asked for and specifically asked for Louder Milk to be the chairman of the new select committee investigating January 6th.
	And they said, yes, you can have the committee, but you can't have one thing.
	What's that?
	You can't investigate the Capitol Police.
	What?
	How do you how do you investigate January 6th?
	Yeah, what's what's the purpose of the committee then?
	Well, there's a no the purpose of the committee is to investigate January 6, but you can't investigate January 6th without without the Capitol Police.
	But why why exclude the Cap Capitol Police out of the investigation?
	It it makes no sense.
	I mean, the the only sense it makes is that it it would implicate Rhinos.
	Because the Capitol Police know where all the bodies are buried, they know who sleeps with who, they are the Praetorian guard of Congress.
	They have their dignitary protection detail that goes with them on all of their foreign trips.
	They know what goes up their nose and they know who sleeps in their beds.
	And if you reveal what we don't want you to reveal, then we tell tales.
	And that's why the opposition to this new committee came from the highest level of current GOP leadership.
	Jeez, I thought the biggest scandal of the new committee is that they put uh Jasmine Crockett on the committee.
	Well, that's look that that's just that's just entertainment right there.
	I'm I can't.
	Holy shit, Steve.
	Okay, so the members of the bar protect the members of the bar, and uh we're we're not gonna ever know what truly is there any uh uh We're going to know.
	I I'm I'm gonna I I'm gonna be perfectly honest with you.
	All right.
	Uh there's there's many people that I trust on Capitol Hill.
	I was holding up like seven fingers right there.
	I only saw six.
	Yeah.
	Uh I I used to say when I was when I was there uh talking to uh other members of Congress, I would I would mention that there was only you know 12 or 15 of them I trust, and they'd go, it's a little high.
	And and uh, and so I'm down to six or seven now, and louder milk is one of them, and he's also got a burr under his saddle because if you recall, he he took like family and friends and some VIPs on a tour through the Capitol on January 5th, the evening of, and then the the left and the new committee accused him of doing a recon mission for the insurrectionists that were being arriving or we're gonna be arriving the next day.
	And they pissed off a really good man who is now gonna take it back to them.
	Um I have to ask just because of the quote, the it popped up in my head.
	Uh I won't ask all the names of the others.
	Thomas Massey, what's your what's your impression?
	Uh trustworthy of him.
	On January 6th, totally trustworthy.
	Okay.
	Is that to say on another issue you would not trust him?
	No, Massey's uh one of my two favorites.
	Okay.
	I'm a libertarian, so obviously I I lean, I lean more to the massey Rand Paul uh, you know style of building.
	So I mean uh who's on this new committee?
	What who are all of them?
	Do you know all the members offhand?
	Uh if I had to name them all right now, uh the the Democrats, you know you dame Crockett, uh Raskin is also uh sold over.
	How okay, he's a holdover.
	How he's not how he's on the committee and not again.
	I don't know if he's done anything that warrants jail time.
	Maybe his his you know threat to override the election.
	But okay, so Raskin, I'm gonna see if uh chat guet or something.
	Yeah, yeah, pull it pull it up real quick, and we can talk about uh on the uh on the other side, uh Troy Nils, uh Clay Higgins, uh obviously Louder Milk.
	Um oh gosh, trying to remember uh who the oh oh um uh what's her name from uh Wyoming.
	Um really like her a lot.
	Um anyway.
	There's it's amazing.
	Chat GPT is actually useless.
	It it's I don't know if it's just giving me these answers.
	There's no um there's no uh what am I referring to as a committee?
	Maybe that's the reason.
	No, it's amazing.
	So I'm I went back to Venice.ai.
	Let's see what let's see what not the sponsor for today's show, but they have better AI than uh chat good.
	It includes five Republicans appointed by Speaker Mike Johnson.
	Is this it?
	Yeah okay, good.
	We got uh Barry Louder Milk as the chair.
	Doesn't give me the other one.
	That's all we're getting so far.
	Well, let's see here.
	Okay, who how the house replies they want to rewrite history?
	Let's go see what political has to say.
	Yeah, okay.
	Well, I'll get back to that afterwards.
	That's more or less important, but got a better answer from Venice.
	Yeah, but but but the makeup, the makeup of the committee.
	Uh there's a couple, like I said, there's a couple of hilarious choices on the Democrat.
	They're just flame throw throwers, that's why they brought them in.
	And and um, you know you've got a couple of law enforcement people, uh Troy Nails and Clay Higgins are both former cops, you know, actual real cops are on the GOP side.
	Um so that bodes well in terms of you know an investigative style of of questioning and and process.
	But uh the the committee is not going to have any teeth if the DOJ does not follow up with them afterward when they reveal the the criminals in the process.
	And look, we've already revealed some of the criminals in the process.
	We we've revealed actual trial per uh trial perjuries, lock stock and barrel.
	I mean, I don't even say a I don't even use the weasel legal words anymore of alleged and apparently and that kind of thing when I'm talking about these because we've got them nailed.
	I mean, we have we have Nancy Pelosi's, head of her dignity protection detail, testifying in the Oathkeepers trial that he witnessed Harry Dunn have an antagonistic confrontation with four oathkeepers three or four times as he was passing by them uh uh rescuing people from Pelosi's office.
	Except for one problem, Viva.
	The video shows that he was in another building on the other side of the Capitol, a quarter of a mile away in a Senate building when that uh encounter with Harry Dunn and those four oakkeepers took place.
	He lied.
	He was brought in.
	He was sub that was pure rehearsed suborned perjury by the DOJ.
	And we're gonna find out who did that.
	We're I am I am confident that Louder Milk is gonna call in Harry Dunn, is gonna call in Agent Lazarus and have them testify again.
	Now Dunn got a preemptive pardon from Biden, but that doesn't that doesn't cover his trial testimonies nor a new a new a new potential act of perjury if it comes in person.
	Also, uh they say it it eliminates the ability to invoke the fifth or plead the fifth, which it doesn't entirely, but set that aside.
	Um I don't know if you saw Tim Poole's analysis that uh what's her face?
	AOC didn't just la didn't lie, actually, that she might have had advanced knowledge of what was coming because when she said uh you know the the rioters had had breached and were coming to get her, it the riot hadn't actually even started yet.
	Um what what do you think of AOC's testimony and the media trying to claim that forget now was the media claiming that she was wrong or that she was right, but it's factually impossible that she was correct.
	Well, you know, I I would imagine that most people that are listening to us right now have never seen those uh congressional office buildings.
	They are fortresses under themselves, they are massive complex, they're gigantic facilities.
	Those buildings were on lockdown, and nobody, none of the protesters ever were inside those buildings in her office.
	So when she was cowering in her office saying that she thought she was gonna die, that was during a period where the lockdown had already been um uh called and uh no protesters ever entered that building.
	Yeah, I I think she's just a liar.
	I don't think she had uh manufacturing uh valor the same way Hillary Clinton dodged bullet fire wherever she landed.
	Um okay, another question that I'm going to have is um Yogananda Pittman.
	Where is she at these days?
	Uh as far as we know, she's still the chief of police for UC Berkeley.
	Um she got her sweetheart uh transfer there, and they sent her you know all the way across the country so that um she can't tell tell tales.
	But I would imagine that she'll be called in again because there's a lot of questions hanging over her head that she would have had direct responsibility for.
	As a matter of fact, the chief among those would be turning the surveillance cameras away from the DNC pipe bomb scene.
	And she's she and uh assistant chief Sean Gallagher were the only two in the command center at the time with the authority to order those um camera operators to turn those cameras away from the investigation scene.
	Now, I and I'm I'm giving Dan I'll always give him the Ben for the belt because I know I'm gonna like him and trust him.
	Uh he's been heavy on the Jan 6 pipe bombs.
	We haven't yet heard anything about that, but maybe it's coming down the pike slowly because we've been making some progress with indictments of of big people.
	Do you have any knowledge as to whether or not we're going to hear anything about the pipe bomb investigation or if there is even a pipe bomb investigation going on?
	Well, since you have voked Dan's name back in May when he and the director Patel were on uh the Maria Bartolomo show, uh however you say her name.
	Anyway, when they were on her show, um they said more is coming.
	Of course, they said it's coming very quickly, and he specifically addressed the pipe bomb and said that we would learn information about that.
	I am I am personally in the camp that the FBI already knows who that is.
	And again, the reason why so many things of these answers are slow rolled in the manner that they are, is there's damage to both sides.
	It's mutually assured destruction for truths of this magnitude to come out, including the Epstein files.
	And it's a perfect uh, you know, circle back to the beginning where it's like the slow roll causes some people or a lot of people to lose interest in it.
	And then you either it's not about what people know, it's about when you let them know it and keep it going slowly.
	People lose interest in Jan 6 pipe bombs because other stuff happens, and then when they release the information, it doesn't necessarily have the impact that it would have had had it been done in a timely manner.
	Um yeah, they they probably and the the what's the operating theory on the pipe bombs that it was in fact an agent or they were it was a false flag.
	Well, uh look this is the pipe bomb is almost as obvious as Ray Epps, probably more obvious than Ray Epps, because you have a plain clothes, an actual plain clothes Capitol Police officer who suddenly recognizes the bomb, just or he sees it for the first time after 1 p.m.
	And he's just walking by and he sees the bomb over in the bushes behind the bench.
	He walks over to the car where the Secret Service agents are sitting in the big black you know limo out in front of the parking deck driveway.
	He walks over and tells them about a bomb he just saw.
	And what did the Secret Service guys do?
	They finish their sandwich for two minutes before they get out of the car.
	And they and they infamously let kids go by.
	They don't, you know, they don't issue an alarm that this thing might you know detonate if it's if it's live.
	We still don't know.
	Uh we were told that it was in fact a live, a live explosive, correct?
	It's not.
	In fact, you can go to Blaze TV on YouTube and you can pull up never before seen video of us.
	We actually found the camera.
	Uh this is on we found the camera of the bomb being detonated.
	Blaze.
	Well, I'm gonna see it.
	I'm gonna get well.
	I'm gonna give everyone the link to your article right now, Blaze TV, the bomb being detonated.
	Yep, we have that on our on the Blaze TV YouTube channel.
	You go to we have a we have uh go under playlists, and then in the playlist the playlist that says truth about January 6th.
	We have an entire playlist of the videos that we built of the things that we discovered in the Capitol CC TV viewing room, and a couple of those are directly about about three of them are about the uh the bomb itself.
	And I don't know if this is it, but this this looks like a whole this is beautiful.
	Yeah, scroll scroll back up to the top and then uh are so click on Blaze TV.
	I can't see Blaze TV.
	This, no, yeah, I this you shouldn't.
	I might I might have to sign it.
	Well, everyone can find it.
	But so hold on.
	So the the they detonated it and it was inert, it wasn't actually an accident.
	That's correct.
	It was an and we we knew that it was inert already because investigators that were doing the work of looking for the pipe bomber had already been assured By their commanders that and that was the word used.
	No, it is an inert device.
	It was an inert device.
	And people were saying it at the time because the timer itself had only an hour limit, apparently.
	20 minutes or something like that.
	Yeah.
	Amazing.
	And now by this, I brought it up, but I don't you, I won't, you don't give the punchline away, but this is your latest article.
	I lost you again.
	Refresh.
	Let me refresh one more time.
	I love it when there's a bigger boomer on the channel than me.
	Steve is on the road, by the way, so he doesn't have the best uh the best setup here.
	Viva has gas.
	Oh no, if you okay.
	All right, Steve is back.
	Um this is this is their your latest break-in article from today.
	I've given everyone the link.
	Correct.
	And you're asking the questions that you know most reasonable people are asking.
	Names of each of the roles of each of the agents, while Cash Patel says the agents only did crowd control.
	So where do we go from here?
	I I know you have uh you have an out, and uh, I want to thank you very much.
	We'll do this every time and any time, but where does it go from here?
	Uh right now we're excited about three different things, okay?
	The the new committee.
	The new committee is very, very committed.
	I trust them.
	I trust the staff.
	I trust the investigators that are working with this new committee.
	That's because you're it's because you're controlled opposition, Steve.
	Everybody knows that.
	Correct.
	Well, that and they're gonna say those in your uh your comments here.
	I I trust those guys.
	Tulsi Gabbard's group called uh at OD and I is called the Dig.
	It's called the Director's Initiative Group.
	They are also about to open up January 6th, and they have through it's the mandate of OD and I they have access to all of the data of every intelligence federal intelligence group.
	Uh oh, yeah, what is it?
	There's 17 or 19 different intelligence agencies in the in the federal system.
	But also that gives him access to Capitol Police because they have an intelligence division at Capitol Police, which means OD and I oversees them as well.
	So this is really exciting.
	And then DOJ, a sub-component of DOJ, is also uh working on this as well on the weaponization in the courts side of things and how that works.
	So there's three uh January 6th is not going away, and for good reason, is there was a lot of damage done to a lot of Americans and not only the uh to the 1600 defendants, but the psyche of the country at large, because we were lied to for so long about so many things related to January 6th.
	And let me ask you one, maybe not the last good last question to ask.
	Uh, do you believe that these six uh police officers who took their own lives in the wake of January 6th, in fact took their own lives?
	Or do you is that story something you're comfortable with on its face, or do you have questions about that?
	Um I don't I don't know that it's really six yet, but uh no, I'm I'm comfortable that they they did.
	And uh and to be honest with you, we're working on part two of our directed energy weapons series because we know that there were devices used at January 6th that nobody has yet revealed.
	Well, that's gonna be the best.
	I won't say tease.
	That would be too cynical or tawdry, but the best um enticement.
	Where can people find you, Steve?
	Uh I'm at the Blaze uh.com.
	Uh also on uh X at Steve Baker USA.
	That's probably the you know, that's where I do all of my shit posting and muck raking.
	So it's uh it's probably the best place to keep up with me on a daily basis.
	And then all of our uh all of our videos are on YouTube, Blaze TV, and also uh um uh at theBlaze.com.
	Amazing.
	Well, it's send it all to me, but I'll put it in the pinned comment uh after the show publishes.
	Steve, you'll come back on.
	Absolutely, any time, man.
	All right, but have a good one.
	Thank you very much for the intel.
	It's it's amazing.
	All right, appreciate it for good day.
	Now I gotta kick him.
	I feel so bad kicking people from the studio.
	I'm gonna read all the tipped questions, people, and then we're gonna go over to VivaBornes Law.locals.com for le après party, la prefight tabaret.
	Uh, here we go.
	Live here we go.
	Do I only see two uh not that I'm complaining?
	Here we go.
	What does Steve think about the burn bags that were supposedly found?
	Well, I didn't get to that one logjam, but I'll tweet it out to him.
	And uh Bill Tong in the house says everyone at the Blaze should be eating our bill tongue.
	It's packed with B12 creatine, iron at zinc, and more.
	Get some now at Bill Tong USA Code Viva for 10% off.
	They can set up a code Blaze.
	I'll give your info to um to Steve.
	Steve's amazing.
	Let me go to the chat here before we go to some of the tip questions.
	Um I'm gonna be taking shit here for any reasons.
	Saying tawdry is toddy.
	I say saying taudry is pedantic.
	It's shallow and pedantic.
	Lois, geez, I forgot his her name already.
	Um what about Obama calling upon his domestic army?
	Potty mouth curse words, guess you lacked good parents.
	Okay, I'm not getting involved in a fight on the internet.
	I'm not getting involved in that comment.
	All right, you know what?
	We're going back to we're gonna go to locals and see what the um comments are over there before we head on over here.
	Hold on.
	Everyone, come on over to locals before we go raid redacted.
	Here's a locals link.
	You can support the work that Robert Barnes and I do there.
	Uh, 10 bucks a month, 100 bucks a year if you get the entire year.
	Bourbon with Barnes, tons of fun stuff, amazing community.
	Louis the Lobster, you can get a book on Amazon.
	And um, let me just read the tip questions over there because we have an above-average community of awesome people who have awesome.
	No, you can't touch it.
	You already broke yourself.
	Okay.
	Uh, let's go over here to the questions.
	Tipped.
	Andrew Piscadlo, who's uh, oh my ostrich is in danger.
	Why the hell does Canada feel the pissing away of all this public money on this?
	Something escaped the government's gun, and therefore we must correct that mistake.
	It's stuff like this that makes me despise the government as a business owner and just a citizen a bit more each day.
	Absolutely.
	F. Charton says, Viva, redhead libertarian and the lectern leader doing a hair cast tonight.
	You should join.
	It wouldn't be uh if it's about hair.
	Mine smells like uh marshmallows today, because I have some oil that my wife uses that I put in there to make it okay.
	Uh Andrew Piscadlo, I turned in, I tuned in, I turned in for the first time in a while to confirm the time of our interview.
	Yes, now I can publicly announce it.
	Andrew is coming on on Thursday, three o'clock Eastern time, Andrew.
	So that's two hours earlier.
	Mountain.
	Thursday, what time in mountain?
	I think it's two hours earlier.
	You say the phone is the most direct way to talk, and then we continue an email and messaging you into follow-up and confirm.
	Pretty please get back to me.
	I'm just ribbing you, love.
	Uh, I'm gonna be out of cell range via email and we'll lose connectivity.
	I hope Andrew knows this is a public message.
	Andrew, three o'clock Eastern Thursday.
	Andrew, for those of you who don't know, was the man that was defamed by certain public figures as being involved in or the shooter at the Charlie Kirk uh assassination.
	So um yeah, what's gonna be a very, very interesting interview.
	He's a member of our community.
	Um lose connectivity.
	Get back to it with the time setup material, camera mic, stuff I gotta get.
	Okay.
	Exonerated says the post-January 6th FBI deployment deployment was to give 9-11 vibes and push the Reichstag fire.
	It was also to scare and enrage not just the public but Congress members to manipulate their votes on such things like the impeachment and political persecutions.
	Not an wholly untenable theory.
	How come we don't hear people talking about Captain Steve Sund?
	I think we do.
	This is Sammy.
	He says, that book seemed like it laid out where to start asking questions first.
	He said he had his hands tied because Stenger and Irving were running up the chain to get approval for Capitol Police.
	Is Sund credible?
	I'll ask Tarek Johnson about that.
	Uh I forget exactly Son's role right now.
	Okay, uh Redacted is live.
	So I'm gonna go, we're gonna go raid them.
	They've got an interesting show that has an interesting title that says um hold on, let me see what the title is.
	The FBI Charlie Kirkass Nation story has fully collapsed as new details emerge.
	That's some good.
	I'm I'm not calling it clickbait in the cynical way.
	That's a good title to a stream that would make even me want to watch it.
	But we're gonna go for our locals after party after we raid.
	Redacted.
	So come join us at viva barneslaw.locals.com.
	If you're not, enjoy redacted.
	Let her know who sent you.
	And um that's it.
	I'll see you tomorrow.
	Tomorrow's gonna be Tuesday.
	We're gonna have a good show, as always.
	All right, rumble, peace out.
	X, I say uh bid you farewell as well.
	Hold on.
	Okay, I'm confirming the raid before we go now.
	Uh only because I use commy tube to promote our Sunday shows and rumble and viva barnes law.
	I put out a story, which I don't know if you heard about it.
	The superintendent, Des Moines, Iowa Superintendent.
	Who was arrested after being found to have been an illegal with a deportation order under the Biden administration, arrested with a loaded handgun, three thousand dollars cash after having fleeed the authorities.
	So with that said, people go see redacted.
	Booya Viva Raid Booya.
	And uh someone tell me what um what the information is that leads for the breakdown.
	Did Viva go over the new Canadian gun laws?
	No, Sammy, we'll do that, we'll do that quickly actually.

▲