All Episodes
Sept. 28, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
02:22:14
Ep. 284: Ostrich Crisis Continues! Kirk Updates! Fed-Surrection Confirmed? Comey Indicted! AND MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs.
I am channeling my gad sad inner honey badger, ironically enough, over the ostrich.
If you think that I don't know that I am annoying on the interwebs, relentless, persistent, then you don't know that I know me better than most people know me.
We will begin with the ostriches.
Behold.
Good morning.
Katie with Universal Ostrich.
257 days.
Happy, healthy ostriches that are behind punishment fence.
So yesterday, let's be clear about something.
There's a hen in there that is suffering.
She's dehydrated.
They will not allow any any of us to treat her to tube her and give her her electrolytes.
Because science.
Their people will only do it.
And they're not doing it right.
Because they've never done it.
So this hen is suffering.
And it's a major problem.
The communication between we have an interim stay and to be able not be able to have any right and handle our animals is absolutely insane.
And uh let's talk about that these animals, it's not their fault.
It's not anybody's fault.
And we definitely shouldn't be being punished.
But these animals are being punished.
We're being punished.
And uh we have some hay coming in, getting police escorted in right now.
Again, your taxpayer dollars, hard at work.
I'm not gonna read my entire tweet verbatim because I'm gonna speak it out as we do this here.
This is Universal Ostrich Farm.
The crisis standoff, if you will, has lasted now the little over a week, week and a half, I think.
Not gonna go into the details.
I'm gonna highlight something that's going on right now, and and I'm gonna put it out there, and I would like everyone to memorialize it, bookmark it, and then put it on blast.
If these birds get infected with an influenza, and I'll put it in quotes, it should be presumed that the terrorist organization that is the Canadian government are the ones who infected those birds with something at this stage.
What I believe that they're doing is actually trying to stress the birds out to the degree that they will have weakened immune systems and be more susceptible of getting ill.
That's what I sincerely believe they're trying to do.
Oh, look at that, they got sick again.
Now we gotta slaughter them.
Now we've got our scientific excuse.
You do know what role uh scientists in Canada uh played in the COVID scandal, that there were two Chinese national spies who were apparently um involved in gain-of-function research or something along those lines, who absconded and disappeared into China.
I think it was the Winnipeg lab.
If anybody doesn't know this, Google it.
If those birds get sick, on the one hand, it is the direct result of the torture that is stressing those animals out, and that would be compromising their otherwise proper functioning immune systems.
And they can say, Oh, they're sick again.
If they get of influenza, they've been healthy for damn near a year.
It should be presumed that the uh principles of the Soviet-style state-sanctioned terrorist organization that is the CFIA, infected those birds on purpose, so they could then say, well, now we definitely need to kill them.
All that aside, set aside conspiracy theories, because you know a government would never do something like that.
A government would never unleash a virus on its people.
A government would ever test on its own citizens without telling them that they're testing on them.
No, my goodness.
It's not like they did that in the Tuskegee experiments and residential schooling.
No, no, no.
They would treat ostriches better than they have historically treated their own people.
What they're doing right now is state-sanctioned terrorism, and it's state-sanctioned animal abuse.
And I put out a tweet just before going live.
It's like, it's an amazing thing.
...tends for five minutes to tend to this ill bird that Global reported on last night that actually broke its leg because of the drones and the helicopter.
They're trying to make the birds sick so they can run with the media narrative that the birds are sick, and now they gotta do it.
The RCMP, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, which are supposed to be there to so-called keep the peace, are actually only facilitating animal abuse at this point in time.
Who's the who's the PM?
The per not the PM, the premier of uh British Columbia, David Eby?
How about he gets off his ass and does something?
Where are the animal rights groups of British Columbia to come in here and prevent the torture of these animals?
You got CFIA, the Canadian food inspection agency, government idiots who don't know shit about farming, who don't know shit about animals.
You wonder why tens of millions of people starved to death when the government took over farming?
It's because the government doesn't know how to do it, like private enterprise.
So they come in here, they don't know how to feed the birds.
They're probably scared shitless of these birds because these birds are massive.
Not feeding them properly.
They're getting injured from the drones flying overhead, and the RCMP, the Gestapo of modern day Canada, are sitting out there keeping the peace and allowing the CFIA under the tutelage of its president, Paul McKinnon, to torture these animals.
And I made the joke, you're like, they're there to kill them.
The reason why the CFIA has custody of these animals even during the interim stay, while the farm owners, Katie and her mom are not allowed going in there to feed them properly.
The reason why they have custody of them is to kill them.
You think they're gonna give a sweet bugger all if they die of neglect, natural causes?
They want to kill them.
And they want to torture the birds and they want to torture the farmers to teach them a lesson that this is what happens when you don't abide by government dictates.
This is what happens when you don't trust the science, because you know the science, the science is uh for the last, I don't know, first three or four days of the standoff, Katie was going in and out of the birds.
No issue.
People were coming in because the birds were coming, they're hitting the fence.
Nobody's wearing face masks, let alone hazmat suits.
I already knew I already knew the outcome.
Videos of people dropping dead on the streets, Zoom meetings and people dropping dead during COVID.
They died from COVID.
This is how they manufacture consent with this type of fear-mongering propaganda.
Get the government officials, get him in hazmat suits, people.
Get him in hazmat suits.
We got to kill those animals.
We won't be able to do it quietly if the public doesn't think it's necessary.
Let's make them sick.
So that the sons of bitches at the Globe and Mail, at Global News, say that they're sick birds.
And so that when we kill them, it was necessary.
Well, we did our best.
That's what's going on in Canada right now.
I'm not done screaming holy hell about this.
I couldn't get up there.
Tamara Leach, you know, the the trucker organizer who the Canadian terrorist government wants to lock up behind bars for seven years for nonviolent mischief.
And Pierre Mousfart Polyev can't find his voice to say anything during the election.
Do you all remember me saying, hey yeah, Pierre, now would be a good time to say something about the persecution of Tamara Leach and Chris Barber, wanting to lock them up for seven and eight years respectively for nonviolent.
Now would be a good time to say something.
Oh, what's that?
Don't want to sound too much like Trump.
Well, you lost the election, and then it's only you know in July, and then again in September that he starts saying something about the wicked persecution of Tamara Leach.
I no one's gonna tell me he doesn't know what's going on with the ostriches.
I know that he does, because uh I know.
There's no way to ignore the most popular replies to each and every one of his posts.
There is no way to pretend that he doesn't know what's going on in British Columbia.
He knows.
He's making a deliberate concerted effort to tweet about everything else under the sun other than this, because he's a flipping coward.
Part of me feels a little bit bad for being mean to Pierre.
It was a slow, it was a slow gradation.
I was being deferential, trying to give constructive criticism.
Then I was just being uh annoying to make sure that he knew what was going on.
He is deliberately choosing not to talk about this.
It is government tyranny of the highest order.
It's unscientific, it's torturous, it's malicious.
And um, if there's any Canadians who don't yet know about it, it means that I'm not doing a good enough job screaming about it.
We're gonna talk about it a little bit more when Barnes gets on after we thank our sponsor for tonight's show.
But before we do that, just to introduce everybody, how are you guys doing?
Viva.
You might notice I got new glasses.
Now, these are the same frames as the other ones.
The other ones kept breaking, so when I go to the shop, they just kept on swapping them out, but then they didn't have the same color.
And this is the same week I was giving uh Adam Kinzinger a hard time for having like woman granny glasses.
I hope these don't look like granny glasses, and I hope they don't look like pretentious artist glasses.
I kind of like them.
And the blue sort of like actually creates more light when light refracts in and it's not a dark halo that I have around my glasses, it's light, but whatever.
That's what they it is what it is.
And at least I got uh the frames replaced, and I don't have to get a new pair of glasses.
Okay.
Before we get into anything, everybody, I want to thank our sponsor.
And our sponsor for tonight's show is crypto.com.
Now, I always say, I look, I still don't understand cryptocurrency, so I can't tell anybody to go out and buy crypto.
All that I know is that, especially in our community for people who are investing in alternative, not incomes, but alternative methods of or depository of finances.
I know that in our community, and we have a massive one at Viva Barneslaw.locals.com.
A lot of people are into cryptocurrency.
I still don't understand it.
I'm dabbing my pinky toe.
Got a little doge coin just for uh poops and giggles, as we say.
But cryptocurrency is no longer emerging.
It's here.
And the latest move cements that in a really big way.
Trump media just linked a massive $6.4 billion deal with Yorkville Acquisition Corp and Crypto.com, the crypto platform trusted by millions of users worldwide.
They're teaming up to scoop up $6.4 billion in CRO, the powerhouse token that fuels fast low fee defy stake room staking rewards and real world perks like cashback on your spends to establish America's first CRO Treasury, Trump Media Group CRO strategy.
When it's done, this new company will be the biggest publicly traded CRO holder out there.
You want to join it on the action, head over to crypto.com today, and we can make crypto great again.
I know people do it.
And if you're gonna do it, use the proper platform to trade.
Crypto.com.
The link is in the description.
And uh it's big news.
I mean, Rumble partnering with Tether.
Rumble going to be using uh, I'm fairly certain crypto uh transactions on the website.
It's gonna be amazing.
Uh, you can check out uh more information on the proposed business combination at Yorkville Acquisition Corpse Public Filings.
The link is in the description.
And um you can only fight technology for so long before you have to understand it or not, become a part of it.
Uh we're gonna have a good show tonight.
You know, speaking speaking of uh small progress, baby steps.
What about Bob?
Baby steps, baby steps, baby steps.
What do we know?
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August.
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August.
We're September.
Eight months into Trump's presidency.
Uh, seven months into Pam Bondi's stewardship as uh AG of the DOJ.
We got our first indictments, people.
James Scumbag Comey.
We've got um a bunch of big news to talk about tonight.
Barnes is gonna come in and Viva is aging like fine wine.
I hope that's also I did a I did a 5K race this morning.
I woke up with my wife.
It's called the umdog fundraiser for veterans.
Our name, well, you know, one of our good friends is a is a veteran and they organize this every year.
And um, I ran a 5k in 21 minutes and 47 seconds.
I think it was my personal best, but but like only by like eight or nine seconds.
The only important thing is that I'm getting older and I'm not getting much worse.
I'm still getting a little bit better, but about the same.
But it's Florida, everything's flat as anything, so it's easy to run a 5k like that.
Robert, sir, how goes the battle?
Uh, good, good.
The uh uh it was uh eventful weekends.
Uh college football was good.
Uh we'll see how NFL turns out.
Uh UFC, bunch of like the lot of the fighters, one dropped out, another one changed.
So that was a little thing.
But uh it was a fun weekend.
Uh how did I like I was three for five on what was left of my picks?
Uh, was it net positive?
Uh, as per my recommendations.
Uh, you're I wasn't able to get uh some of the changes in.
Oh, crap.
Well, I changed with uh Tavaris, the guy who missed weight.
I was like, if he misses weight, this is based on some good advice that I got.
Something's wrong, and then you know the guy who makes weight is gonna be pissed and beat the living hell out of him, which is what happened.
But uhy.
Um Robert, what do we have?
Well, before we even get to what's on the menu, you're I mean, you're following what's going on with the ostriches.
I guess you can't avoid it because I'm screaming it like like at the top of my lungs.
Um it's amazing.
Like in the States, Chevron was overturned and sort of like deference to these administrative bodies was sort of cut back a little bit, and and people don't seem to understand how bad it can get.
We have this, it's a Soviet-style administrative body.
That's What it is.
The Canadian food inspection agency, they make their own rules, they interpret their own rules, they apply their own rules, and then they get the armed Gestapo arm of the government, the RCMP, to come in while they enforce their own rules.
And I don't know what I gotta do to frickin' get now.
We'll see.
But I don't know if you uh have to do that.
I didn't think up Robert, I mean Robert Kennedy uh gets involved, says, Hey, I'll take them off your hands.
Well, what why wouldn't they take that offer?
He this is my issue.
He asked not once but twice.
And I wanted to get it to the Trump administration, you know, just to play to Trump's ego a little bit.
It's an insult to Trump's dignity, it's an insult to Trump's presidency that they have the man who's in charge of the the biggest budget department of the government, RFK Junior say, we'll take them.
We'll we'll take them from you.
We'll we'll do research on them.
And they say not once but twice, a big fat middle finger to you and the Trump administration.
If I were Trump, I would say retaliatory tariffs for disrespecting my administration.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, uh why do you uh is it they're just determined to show off their authority?
No, it solves their problem.
It avoids them having negative consequences either way.
So I'm always fascinated by the bureaucratic incapacity for just common sense solutions.
It is um look, uh I have two theories about it.
One is it's just to show their authority, but the other is uh I don't know.
You need to get the Cartman thing out.
Somebody take the Cartman uh from South Park, put a little Canadian on him, you know, a little Canadian authority thing, uh going around beating people up, saying, you know, respect my authority.
Well, I think it's a bit of that.
I think it's also retribution for having uh effectively denied the government power for damn near 10 months.
And also, I don't know if you I don't know if you saw hold on a second.
That's going to um oh, that's Dexter Taylor, Robert.
Should we bring Dexter Taylor in for a second?
I don't uh remind me.
Oh wow.
Let me see.
Oh, crap.
I don't know if I can do it.
It takes forever to get this thing in.
Um, I said it now a lot.
Okay, okay, Robert.
Um, cover something.
Let me see if I can get him hooked up here.
Sure.
The uh our top topics tonight, uh, the number one uh voted on topic by the Viva Barnes Law dot locals.com board is all the deep state related cases, including the one and only James Comey finally indicted on something.
Uh hopefully it is the beginning, not the end.
John Bolton search warrant raid reveals that he's been up to all kinds of criminal activity, as a lot of confession through projection is revealed in the information that was uncovered in that search, as detailed by Robert Gouvet over watching the watchers in Robert Gouvet on YouTube and Rumble.
Then uh last but not least in that deep state category, we have Fed Surrection confirmed.
Of course, if you are at Viva Barnes Law, ThatLocals.com, and saw the January uh 2020 won uh hush hush on J J6.
We all that's happened is everything that's been speculated there has been confirmed.
And uh so we have the uh over 274 plain clothes federal officers.
Now, this doesn't include all the undercovers.
This doesn't include all the assets.
This only includes undercover agents, uh, actual agents, over 274 mixed in uh among J6, the Fed Sirection indeed.
Robert, and we're gonna get to Cash Patel's clarification, which makes even less sense.
But before we do that, uh, so we've got Dexter Taylor on the mic.
Dexter, uh, say hi to the world right now.
Hello to the world.
Now it's gonna be technically difficult because Dexter won't hear you, Robert, but I'll ask him if just a few questions.
So everybody who doesn't know Dexter Taylor up in New York State, serving 10 years for possession of an unregistered firearm uh because he ordered parts and assembled them in his apartment.
And Judge Darkay said there is no second amendment in this court, don't raise it.
Currently under appeal, Dexter.
Um tell us how you're doing, and and just you know, to tell us what uh we've been planning to do this for a while, and I'm I'm happy that it worked out, but just say what you want to say to the world now.
Well, uh thanks for uh letting me join the live stream on short notice.
Um godless liberal heathen who do not respect the second amendment.
Um yes, my case is overappeal, and we're gonna see what happens with that in the meantime.
We're trying to uh you know, kind of turn up the volume and as many people as possible knowing about this case.
Um, and hopefully could get it the ear of podcasts as possible.
I've been trying to do as many interviews as I can, um, to spread the word uh the more people know about the case um and how the case was conducted and why it became a case in the first place, uh, the worse uh the Democrats look.
Um that's uh that's the flip notes version.
Dexter, the one with Robert Barn, by the way.
Yeah, Barnes is on, but he you won't be able to hear him when he if if he says anything.
I can I could tell you what he says, but let me is it let him know I'm a huge fan.
Oh no, I've I've let him know that all many times.
Your your give send go is still active, and this is the one that's uh you're you the goal of 400,000 for your defense now, which is under appeal.
It's still the proper give send go.
Yes, sir.
That's still the one.
All right, and let me just ask you these questions because I I I know we've talked many times and I just want the world to know like what is it like?
What's life like um in a state penitentiary?
You're you're in the Coxacky uh correctional facility.
That's correct.
Yeah, it's a class A maximum security facility, because according to New York, uh possessing a firearm without having asked the state for permission is a literally violent felony.
That's how they classify that.
So yeah, there's a class A max.
Um well, it's not nice.
Um, you know, the surroundings are dismal.
Uh I'm lucky.
Um I have a job.
Uh I'm I'm a porter in the school building, which is a glorified janitor, but but the the perk is that I get to go to the library every day.
Um and I'm on a road to live low temperature cell block, so most of the guys on here are a little bit older.
Um they're good people, they're not trying to make trouble.
And so it'll give along fine and kind of you know, just talk and swap stories and and bust each other's chops and kind of get through each day as best they can.
So um that's the long and short of it.
Someone in Rumble uh on Commutude wants to know what your canteen number is.
Can you give your the ad where if people want to mail stuff to you how they can help you?
Well, my my um my number is uh that's that's what you know my New York State uh image identification number is two for Bravo.
Um two two seven five.
And um, I have any envelopes.
Uh I love getting mail.
Uh and my uh address of the facility is it's it's you said two two for Bravo, two two seven five is your is your identification number?
It's my in my number.
Okay.
Yes.
And the address of the Cuxaki Correctional Facility is post box nine nine nine, Coxacky, New York, one zero one, cash zero nine nine nine.
Say that one more time.
999 Coxacky.
Yeah, postbox 999, Coxaki, New York.
Zip code is 12051-0999.
0939s.
Okay.
And uh Dexter, you so you you were sent you you'd never had never convicted of anything.
Uh first time offense uh tax paying citizen.
That's right.
And someone has somebody here in the tech industry as a software developer, um, licensed amateur radio operator, shape stream mechanic.
I dwell my own apparent house, I make my own pressure, I call me a weld.
Um the the first prosecutor assigned to my case, by the way, uh, said to my lawyer in writing that, quote, if Mr. Taylor had applied for a permit, he wouldn't have passed the good moral character test.
So don't take my word that that I'm a claim citizen.
Take the prosecutor's word for it.
And you were sentenced to 10 years.
Have you been in touch with um or have you heard from um uh linahaba?
Robert, who's the name I'm thinking of?
Um Harming Harmete Dylan.
Have you heard from Harmie Dillon?
I have not heard from her.
Um she is in circles that are kind of adjacent to mine.
So I think I'm about uh a degree and a half of separation away from Harmie Dillon.
Many of my friends on Twitter side of my Twitter circle, many of my friends on Twitter have uh kind of tagged her on posts relating to my situation, and she's responded positively.
Um but uh but I I she hasn't been in touch personally.
Um apparently my my attorney is also familiar with with uh and and and the Dylan also know each other.
So all that is good.
Um I'm hoping that the speaker from Dylan, I'm hoping that the second attack towards what the president put together.
Um uh you know, find the time from that on the thing if you look like a ton of work.
Um it's cutting out a little bit.
I'll just repeat it.
That the second you're hoping that the second amendment task force that the president put together uh will do something in this.
We'll come down on New York like a ton of yes, sir.
Um and there is, of course, ample precedent for the federal government to get involved when when Democrats have uh systematically uh denied people civil rights in certain states of the union.
So there's precedent for that.
And uh I'm gonna say just because I won't don't want people thinking like the goal is 400,000, you're already at 280,000 and you should be happy with that.
What's uh without getting into strategy, what's the next step in your appeal and what is required financially in order to take this where it needs to go?
Well, I mean, the fact is we've you know, we the amount of money we've raised so far, we couldn't run through all of so the the latest kind of milestone that we hit was to enable me to pay my legal team to file the appeal.
Uh uh, I believe the appeal has been filed already, although I'll I'll I'll wait until I get positive confirmation from my lawyer.
Um really as far as the appeals process is concerned.
We have no control over that.
Um that's a government process.
Um the the uh the New York state courts have every uh incentive to drag their heels on this one.
So that'll take as long as it takes.
Um but yeah, each each stage in the appeals process is gonna require like additional filing fees and of course labor fees for my legal team.
We're going to have to, unless something else happens, we're going to have to lose in all the state appeals courts in order to get to the federal courts where we stand the chance of getting some second amendment relief.
So that's where we are now, which is why the political side of this struggle is very important.
So I'd ask your listeners um to do the one thing that involves any money, which is step the work.
Uh, people who know influencers, podcasters, people with microphones, conservatives who care about this issue.
I'm delighted to talk to anyone, anyone and everyone about this case and about what I think it means, uh, obviously, not just for me, but for you know, all my fellow New Yorkers.
Um and my fellow Americans.
You know, all of us deserve uh equal protection under the law, and it's being denied to us in a systematic way in New York State, and that's a problem.
Amazing, Dexter.
Okay, so um everyone's got the info.
We're gonna we're gonna put it on blast.
Um, I'm glad that the timing worked out perfectly.
Call me tomorrow.
We're gonna we'll talk offline and uh and we'll see who we can who we can get you on and spread the word as much as possible.
Sounds good, brother.
Take care, is it there?
Okay, have a go in, Dexter.
I'll talk to you soon.
Okay, well, that worked out uh it's it's the amount of times my phone is on silent when I go live and then I miss it.
Okay, good.
Yeah.
Well, I think Dexter Taylor's case, for those that don't know, that basically prosecuted for exercising his second amendment rights in the communist state of New York.
Uh his case, like Tina Peters in Colorado, like Kurt Benchouf in Seattle, Washington.
These are examples of left-wing jurisdictions politicizing and weaponizing their uh legal uh power to go after those they disagree with on political grounds in violation of their constitutional rights and liberties.
Whether in Dexter's case, it's his second amendment self-defense and self-empowerment and self-arm right, uh right to bear arms, uh, whether it's Tina Peters uh fighting for election integrity and blowing the whistle on corrupt elections in Colorado, uh, or Kurt Benchouf exposing a corrupt uh political and legal system in Washington that uh wants to radicalize his son against his own interest uh by making him trans uh but with these uh uh with their his uh uh literally uh
uh you know uh basically horse uh prostitutes uh parents uh that he that the uh lesbian couple that uh have custody of the kid and for him uh voicing objection To it.
He's serving more than 10 years in state prison.
That's the insanity.
And hopefully we're starting to see, we'll get to some of the cases.
We're starting to see more action by Ed Morton as part of the weaponization task force.
We're starting to see Pam Body takes more corrective action.
And as Dexter mentioned, a second amendment protection.
And in fact, there was a second amendment case we'll be talking about in that capacity.
We're starting to see Harmie Dillon take proactive action in voter roles cases.
But there's much more that needs to be done.
As Dexter Taylor's case is evidence and manifest.
Now the other cases we have tonight, we got uh the uh multiple attacks on ice by Antifa in Dallas, uh, and uh a copycat of the Charlie Kirk assassin assassination inspired.
This is how perverse this is, inspired by the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Uh, you have a a business in Maine on Bailey's Island.
I happen to have a client that lives on Bailey, lives on Bailey's Island, uh, a main rest uh main restaurant owner, uh, lesbian couple that uh says make assassinations great again.
I mean, that's the kind of nonsense of that that the insanity that's consuming and subsuming the left.
The ice currently insurrectionary activity in Portland, Oregon and Chicago, Illinois, as we speak, uh, such that President Trump has had to uh bring in the military and the National Guard.
We've got the Second Amendment case before the Seventh Circuit.
We've discussed this many times.
It's now back before the Seventh Circuit.
And now it finally looks like the federal courts will do what they're supposed to do.
Harmick Dillon intervened in the case, uh, which was a very good sign indication of the attention to Second Amendment concerns and her civil rights division of the as the assistant attorney general in charge of civil rights at the Justice Department.
Uh so we got that case.
Uh, we got a Title IX case, Supreme Court took up several.
Uh, it probably means the days of trans ideology being infiltrated into our school system and sport competition is probably coming to an end, thank God, as people are recognizing just how dangerous and damaging this trans ideology and idolatry has been.
Uh, the uh to our public uh to our collective consciousness and social society.
We've got the Supreme Court reinstating Trump's right to use the impoundment control act after the commie courts of the District of Corruption tried to prevent him from doing so, tried to force him to spend money on things he had specifically said he wasn't going to spend money on.
Uh, we've got a when can somebody claim to be a parent if they're part of a same-sex couple that had nothing to do with the physical aspects, biological aspects of the child's birth.
That went up before the Georgia courts.
We've got when can you make a claim after death?
This went up to the Tennessee Supreme Court in the invasion of privacy context.
Uh, the we have a Columbus statute being taken down in New Haven, Connecticut.
I know the exact neighborhood, old Italian neighborhood.
Uh, and they sued.
Could they can they do anything about it?
That went up before the second circuit.
We've got the when, you know, trademarks get uh diluted in a wide range of ways.
Uh, what happens then?
Uh, we've got a teacher who get got reinstated, a professor of art, University of South Dakota after celebrating the murder of Charlie Charlie Kirk.
Does free speech extend that far?
Uh, the so yeah, those are uh the the dozen or so cases and topics uh voted in the top vote getters, the deep state case set of cases.
But we can start anywhere, including uh what was a hot topic on social media this past week, uh, which is the various alternative conspiracy theories uh where people are trying to exonerate uh Trans Tifa and the left and instead attack Charlie Kirk's organization, attack Charlie Kirk's family.
Uh it's you know, people have gone full candice uh Owens in some of these cases, and they're saying things that are libelous in some cases, saying things that are ludicrous in other cases.
There are sincere legitimate questions being asked, but that's being mixed up with the people who have illegitimate clickbait motivations uh and want to make everything about a little tiny country in the center of the uh uh of the Middle East rather than look at what the facts actually show in the case.
Robert, I'm gonna do it.
We got a Nina of the Bell.
The bell has been wrong, people.
We got a new member of our Viva Barnes Law.locals.com community.
Um, Robert, look, first thing, actually, before we even get there, just for those who don't know, Dexter Taylor, he was arrested for possession of a firearm.
He was building them in his apartments from kits that he was ordering online, machining certain parts, uh, kits that were lawfully procured.
So I just want everyone to know it's only it wasn't smuggling them.
He never took them out, never sold them, never did anything.
He was exercising the uh the greatest right in our constitution, which is the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Why do I call it the greatest right?
Because without it, the rest of the rights disappear.
And now, speaking of the right to say stupid things, Robert.
So look, I I'm also, I don't want to even entertain some of these theories or even reply to these things on Twitter, although I've just been doing it very, very uh rarely to put people on blast for saying horrific, atrocious things, and you should unfollow them and you should never talk to them again.
Um I'll give we'll get to some of the less implausible conspiracy theories, but the things that have been said online that they go from as far as Charlie Kirk isn't dead, actually, to um Erica Kirk had something to do with it to TPUSA took him out to um I mean this is the violent event denialism that landed Alex Jones with it with a billion dollar lawsuit.
Now, I don't want to say that everybody doing this should be facing that because I think it was an injustice then.
I think they're idiots who should never be listened to again.
And some of them are just people who I followed, and I don't know what's going on in their heads.
Are they doing it for clicks and I don't like making that accusation?
Or are they so traumatized by conspiracy theories that they're seeing them everywhere even when they don't exist?
Or, like, like you said, your theory about Sandy Hook, something that's so inexplicable, so uh, you know, you want to make sense of it, and so you have to look for some alternative theory, like he's still alive.
Not to give Stu Peters credit, because I I have my issues with him, you know, he wants to blame Israel.
That's fine.
He's exploring the exploding lapel theory.
I can understand how someone can think that from looking at the video.
What I love is that people propose this highly scientific, um, you know, very technical exploding lapel theory, that there was a guy in the front row who had to detonate it because you know, like they're using 22nd century technology, they gotta have a detonator, like it's like 1950s, and the uh, you know, a lapel mic that's floating around, you don't know what direction it's gonna be pointing, and and they would, you know, go for that conspiracy over the easier way to do it, which is a shot that everybody heard ringing out from the area where everybody heard it ringing out from.
So I don't blame some people, I don't even blame some people's focus on Israel because I can understand how they get there based on statements that Charlie recently made, and other, you know, I don't blame them.
Some of them are just batshit crazy, Robert.
And when does it, even in the realm of a First Amendment freedom of speech uh society, when does it become libelous or uh when does it become liability exposing?
I think it people need to reapply the qui bono who benefits to these alternative theories, right?
A lot of times you'll people apply qui bono to to explore possibility of false flags, wrong culprits, so on and so forth.
Apply that to the people promoting and propounding these theories.
Because here's what the evidence shows.
There's evidence of Robinson showing up, walking in an unusual way toward the toward the building he would be in that is strong evidence that he had the gun on him at the time.
There is evidence found at the scene uh uh on the building where there was a sniper's nest where he left things with his forensic evidence, but that had a direct line of sight to Charlie Kirk.
There is evidence of him from videotapes of him running across right after the shooting across the building.
There is evidence of him getting off the building with uh a what appears to be a gun underneath uh that he's trying to hide underneath a towel.
Then the where there's where they there's him communicating to his lover that he had that's how he had hidden the gun, that he himself had done it, that he confessed to doing it, that he had placed the gun in a particular place where they found the gun.
Let me just apologize for one thing, just to add one very important thing.
Everybody heard where the shot came from.
The video of the day, everyone panned to that section, or there was a 90-minute video going around that panned right over to it after they heard it.
But Robert, people are gonna say, I don't believe the text messages, AI generated fake images.
I don't believe a word the FBI says.
All those videos are CGI, whatever.
Some people are saying the the blows of the thing.
That's what's happening.
What you have to do is you have to believe that the that he that Robinson is lying, that the lover is lying, that the government is lying, that everybody else's video tapes, they're all fake, they're all fake.
You're in Looney Land, folks.
You're in fantasy land.
This is in the you know a good description is the Alex Jones.
Because remember, you know, the we first met, Uh me defending Alex Jones, you covering his deposition.
Alex, I thought was really forthcoming and honest in that deposition.
He said, Look, I had got to the point where I'd seen so many crazy government conspiracies came true that I was almost, I had to delusion, I had a disorder almost mentally, and that I was just taking everything.
In fact, because he was very reflective at how did he lose his mind?
And people forget 90% of what he said about Sandy Hook didn't question Sandy Hook.
He's talking about for a brief period of time, two years after Sandy Hook happened, he bought into the idea that maybe some aspect of it didn't happen.
And the and he later said, No, he was wrong.
And he explained why and how he was wrong.
But he said part of it was he got into a mindset where all he could see is conspiracies, and he couldn't even see it was because he'd been just bombarded with so many crazy ones that prove it were proven true.
And what he had spent a lot of time on was figuring out, okay, I got to use my incredible intellectual skill to start filtering things through.
What's credible, what's not, what's reasonable, what's not, and not just have a reflexive position that no matter what happens, if it's a public trauma, assume the government is lying and an alternative narrative is true.
The but here, what the evidence we have.
There is physical evidence, demonstrative evidence, video evidence, text evidence, confession evidence that all points to one guy and one guy only, Robinson doing it.
Now, I think there was coordination and conspiracy in the lead up to it, potential coordination and conspiracy to try to cover it up, but that he was in more and more of the gun people, even people that started out with doubts because of the lack of an exit wound, uh, due to the nature of the uh ammunition use and the kind of gun use that they thought you normally you would have a big exit wound that even that they and so they had questions about direction and angle and bushes and other things.
Most of them, including like Chris Martinson at Peak Prosperity, have come to the conclusion that indeed the evidence all starts to point in the same direction, which is that he was shot by a single bullet from a high power rifle by a sniper from that direction.
And the only question is like Martinson thinks that maybe the angle would suggest a different location for maybe a different shooter or or and the rest, but that's the only question he has left.
There's no more the the credible people are not voicing all these lunatic explosions.
I mean, Stu Peters always been an idiot.
People have asked me to go on Stu Peters.
I'm like, I have no confidence in that guy.
That guy spins whatever nutty theory comes out of his head.
Yeah, it's like being even by associated with him.
He he had like people told Stu Peter's like Alex Jones.
He's nowhere on the same plane as Alex Jones.
I'm sorry, it's no comparison.
Alex himself talked to the TPUSA folks, and what they explain is due to the angle of the bullet, it went down, took out his spine, it exploded within within his body, and people tend to forget it's the energy, like those people looking at explosions and whatnot.
What kills you from a long-distance high-power gunshot isn't always the bullet.
It's often the energy displaced by that bullet.
What it's almost exploded, and you and as people have got more video footage, you can see.
I mean, to be uh Charlie, I think was dead on arrival, was dead uh at the moment of impact.
Because you see the way his hand is moving, his spine is gone.
Um it's consistent with what she saw, his wife saw, where the doctors didn't want him to look at it because saying his neck and his back have just been blown out.
Can you uh I didn't get that confirmation independently, but that was my that was my thought from the you know the first day because of the the hand did you so who I don't want to ask who told you that they said they found the bullet, they found the bullet under the skin.
Alex Jones talked directly to people with knowledge of everything at TPUSA, and so and Alex is one of the first people saying, hold on a second, this doesn't make sense if it was straight on with that kind of so on and so forth.
And but Alex said once the way they explained the angle, he was like, that probably makes sense.
And more and more of the evidence.
Uh we had somebody who was there who's been subject to all kinds of libels, uh, who might have the chance to uh depends on what he wants to do, but might appear with uh Viva later this week, uh who's done detailed proprietary sound analysis of what took place, and everything keeps pointing back to Robinson.
I I I want to just say, like I the chat went away and I couldn't bring it up, but someone said, Oh, like the cabal didn't infiltrate the group and and motivate him.
If you want to blame Israel, the most plausible way in defensible to say, yeah, someone was in infiltrated that group, MK ultra these guys, you know, convinced him to do it.
He's a patsy in the sense that he did it, but he was manipulated.
Not that you're gonna go with a tell Mike.
Like how all these ridiculous theories.
The Bush, remember the those people they're hiding to somebody, Barnes, or somebody hiding behind there.
Then somebody did the smart thing and started looking at Google maps of that of images, going back years back.
The Bush is still there, people.
So if you find yourself, the other thing is my question was, qui bono.
Who benefits from Robinson not being fingered?
Who benefits here?
The trans movement benefits.
The deep state benefits.
Those people out there saying, Oh, I'm exposing.
No, no, no.
You are doing the deep states bidding by pointing the finger at TPUSA, by pointing the finger at Erica Kirk or the family, by pointing the finger and pointing it away from their trans-Tifa violent group that they have helped curate uh for now for a decade plus.
You are doing their bidding and you're too dumb to even know it.
If you're out there voicing these idiotic theories that are not based in evidence that are contradicted by the evidence, where you sound like the people like, oh, Sandy Hook didn't happen.
I still get these emails, by the way.
I still get email.
Barnes, you understand?
Sandy Hook never happened.
It was totally fake.
You got taken in by a Barnes.
Robert here, free speech for license.
Come on, guy.
Sandy Hook was a false flag.
The government deleted so much proof.
This is what I say.
Like, it depends what you mean by false flag.
If you mean false flag that you shouldn't blame the gun and you should blame mental illness and you should blame uh SSRIs or that it was security at the school system.
Hey, I'm with you.
But if you're saying it didn't happen, you're insane.
You're nuts.
You've lost your mind.
You've taken the bait.
So I I ran out of patience.
And I was running, I was running out of patience more and more throughout the week because people were bombarding me with this stuff.
And then I saw some of the nastiest, vicious, meanest criticism of a widow who just saw her husband, 31 years old of uh of young children murdered on national TV.
And I see people attacking her, not calling her good.
You should be disgusted with yourself.
You should be ashamed of yourself if you're doing that.
That is outrageous.
There is no justification for that whatsoever.
So have some decency and some humanity and quit doing the deep state's bidding, thinking you're taking the deep state on when you're their little bitch.
So the uh so you know, that's my rant on that.
No, I hey Chris Martins and other people, they're asking legitimate questions.
I don't get a problem with that.
I have a problem with people demonizing TP USA, demonizing Charlie Kirk, demonizing Erica Kirk, thinking they're doing God's business when they're doing the devil's business.
No, no, there's no, oh, she she's smiling.
She who does a podcast.
I'm telling you this, like in a year, she will not remember this month.
Uh she is in shock and auto function mode, trying to stay strong for her family, strive for her kids.
She won't remember these this period of time in a year, in a two-year, because it's a haze as well.
First of all, nobody responds the same way to trauma.
This is there's all these myths out there that there's this universal response.
There is no universal response.
There's universal tendencies, universal commonalities, but there is no universal response.
I say this as someone who's been through it, seen other people through it multiple times.
So all that garbage is just garbage.
The evidence all points to this being part of the trans-TIFA.
I sometimes call it trans-Tifa.
People tell me it should be trans-Tifa.
I mean, we made this up, folks.
So, you know, pick which one you want.
Or combining trans with Antifa.
Uh, that that is who did it.
And that that was, and it was intended to create this to unearth to create a new wave of left-wing violence uh across.
I mean, look at the democratic politicians in Oregon right now, uh, trying to protect and safeguard.
Look at the ones in California.
You have Governor Newsom out there calling Stephen Miller a fascist, knowing that that label and that misrepresentation was part of what led to the murder of Charlie Kirk.
Governor Newsom's office is illegally inciting violence against a member of the federal government.
That's how insane these people got.
Even George Wallace didn't get this crazy in the middle of 1960s, uh hold standing in the schoolhouse door.
He didn't call for the murder of President John Kennedy.
He didn't suggest John Kennedy was assassinated or LBJ was a fascist.
The that's how nuts these people, and this is the governor of California and the would-be Democratic nominee for president of the United States, his office effectively inciting violence against a high-ranking member of the federal government right after that same violence just took place against the public citizen and Charlie Kirk.
In Oregon, they're trying to inoculate and immunize the violent Wing that they have used, basically they have done what the South did after the Civil War.
That the South used the Ku Klux Klan as their private enforcement army for their political objectives to strip other people of their civil rights.
The irony of this.
Like Oregon was like, well, Senator Wyden was out there saying, oh, we can't allow the federal government to violate people's civil rights by prosecuting Antifa.
Where are you, you nut job?
The uh Antifa is the one violating the federally protected civil rights.
Every single day, Andy Noah, the reporter who's been previously physically assaulted to the risk of death by Antifa for covering Antifa gets another death threat.
And these democratic politicians do nothing about it but green light it, but encourage it, but incentivize it.
We are reaching a stage that we did not even reach in the late 60s, early 70s.
We have the recently passed away, uh was Tupac's mama.
People forget she was a radical lunatic nut job who summarily executed a New Jersey police officer before fleeing the commie Cuba.
And you've got schools in Chicago and other places wanting to make a special honor recognition of her.
Say, here's our heroes, the violent terrorists are our heroes.
They've gone full Palestine.
That now their heroes are terrorists, and their government politicians encouraging it, incentivizing it, supporting it, subsidizing it, protecting it.
So I any politician who comes out for this should be put under investigation themselves because they are engaging in dangerous behavior that I believe is criminal behavior.
We have something even worse than late 1870s, deep south conspiracy with the Klan, because even back then the politicians tried to hide their role in it.
They didn't brag about it, like Governor Newsom is, like the Senator Wyden from Oregon is, like all these other corrupt politicians are.
So I mean, the fact that ICE is under daily attack, attack, they they tried to they actually end up killing detainees because that loony trans uh Tantifa nut job.
Uh the, you know, hit the wrong people uh by his own plan.
The uh you have attacks all throughout California, attacks right now in Portland, Oregon, where they've been Trantifa has been running Portland now for a decade, the at least half a decade.
Attacks in Chicago.
These people need to get the message.
We need mass arrest, mass arrest.
Drag him in, throw them in, let them stay there for a while.
Let them stew for a little while because they've been committing crime after crime after crime, and this crime wave is an imminent risk to the security, freedom, and liberty of ordinary Americans.
Uh and hopefully something happens about it.
But anybody pointing the finger in any direction other than Tyler Robinson is doing the bidding of the deep state.
Tyler Robinson is the product of this trans-Tifa motivated politicized violence that's trying to use violence to suppress our civil rights and civil liberties.
Don't be fooled, don't be deceived about that reality.
And if you're doing anybody else, and if you're challenging that, you're doing their bidding, so you better have a gosh darn good evidentiary foundation.
And I ain't seen it yet.
I want to bring up a couple here.
Uh at least I'll bring up the Hrance, and then we're going to bring up the tip questions afterwards.
But I so the bottom one, I don't think you can see it says squiggs.
Viva, if you can remote detonate a lapel, surely you can remote activate a rifle sound from the position you wish it to come from.
But think about it.
You're having to go to more esoteric crazy lunatic theories.
Well, maybe this could have happened, and then this crazy.
But not just that, not just 10,000 thing could have happened, this 100,000 thing could have happened.
When you find yourself there, folks, you are discrediting the legitimate inquiries.
When we, you know, I mean, I uh I challenge established narratives as much as anybody out there in the public informational space.
So does Alex Jones, so do other people.
Many of them are coming to the same conclusion as the government that Tyler Robinson is the man who committed this murder.
Now he likely committed it, motivated and incited by social authority figures who have who have labeled anybody who is conservative identical to the politics and policies of Adolf Hitler.
It is that insanity, that political permission slip that invited it, curated it, narrated.
Now, it would not surprise me if we find feds all over different parts of planting and building and promoting this movement, just like we found out with Fed Surrection this week.
Don't be deceived.
This is Tantifa who murdered Charlie Kirk.
I have no doubts about that.
I I appreciate the exploding pagers.
That was a multi-year operation to get into terrorist organizations' pockets.
Why would they have a remote detonated shot from a different angle where the guy was to complicate what could have otherwise just as easily been done by the guy who was there with the rifle?
Like, why would you complicate it?
You're gonna take a chance.
Oh, he might have missed his shot.
And the remote lapel that's a directional bullet might have been twerked at a different angle.
Okay, doesn't matter.
Uh Sandy, okay.
People are going down the wrong rabbit trails, they should be skeptical of those uh rabbit trails because those rabbit trails are designed to de to distract from deep state complicity and culpability in creating this weaponized, clan-like violent tool in Trantifa.
And it is a it we have to recognize it for the threat that it is.
Any other argument that takes away from that, I'm gonna be very skeptical of unless the evidence is compelling.
And so far, the evidence has been crap.
Not non-existence.
Read the room, Barnes, believe the shit.
Barnes, it's Barnes thinks his audience is stupid.
Okay, Squig says, Imagine being.
No, I think my audience is intelligent.
And that's why I say it bluntly, straightforwardly, and honestly, and don't hold back.
I don't think my audience I have to talk down to.
I don't think I have to explain things in real, you know, to simplify them to a third grade level.
That's what I have to do if I'm talking to some of these idiots who believe this lunatic nonsense, but they're not part of our core audience.
Imagine being a pawn pushing the exact defice the theory.
I'm gonna just say a lot of confession through projection here that fake narrative wants us to push thinking the rest of us.
If you're hypothesizing that the lapel thing blew up, and that's what it was because there was a remote detonated bullet to draw people's attention together.
You have zero evidence for that, other than an analysis of a video which shows a shockwave rippling through a human.
And you're doing the bidding of the deep state.
This is what they don't want to admit or acknowledge.
They don't want to admit or acknowledge that by saying Tyler Robinson and Trantiva had nothing to do with it, they are doing the bidding of the murderer.
They're doing the bidding of Tantifa.
They're doing the bidding of the deep state.
They don't want to admit that because they like to fancy themselves these brilliant, smart.
No, you're not.
You're idiots.
You're useful idiots, but idiots nonetheless.
I happen to think a lot of them are either bots or doing it for attention or doing it to troll, but set that aside.
Some are doing it for clickbait.
Some are doing it to, I mean, I've never, of course.
It's what I talked about.
We talked about Dominion.
They're good.
The Patsy isn't Tyler Robinson.
The Patsy is believing it's not Tyler Robinson.
Uh, let me do this here, not saying it didn't happen.
This is Sandy Hook, just that whatever happened, the government did it.
That's that's that's a less implausible false flag theory.
Keester says, going so far as to make fake tweets from Mrs. Kirk saying she's starting a dating app is disgusting.
King of Bill Tong, want more, want to add more protein to your diet, add some healthy zinc protein.
The hell's my problem.
You don't lose your mind.
You eat more built on.
It's delicious, people packed with B12 creatine iron zinc, a great addition to a healthy diet.
Bill Tong USA.com, code Barnes for 10% off.
If Tyler didn't confess and he didn't, Barnes is like it depends if you believe the text messages or not.
If you don't believe it, if you discard all evidence, then you can come up with any theory you want.
No, that's what this lunatic is doing, discarding all evidence and then pretending that they're evidence-based.
What a joke.
There is a video of a dispatch call claiming there was no autopsy done on Charlie Crown.
No, done that that the autopsy was not immediately done at the Utah hospital because it's a federal the feds have taken over large part, even though the state is leading the prosecution, the feds saw this as a federal case.
That usually means the feds have a role in the autopsy process.
Plus, and like you can go to Chris Martinson, who started out very skeptical.
Other people, again, he still thinks there might have been a second shooter.
He's still, I mean, all of that, but he's follows the evidence.
I mean, I I think ultimately he'll find that the angle could have been done by Tyler Robinson.
Yeah, I think that will clarify that aspect.
But the, but even he started realizing that all the evidence points to high-powered single shot that killed him on impact.
Uh, the and so the only question for him becomes the angle and the location and whether there could have been a second shooter involved.
Now, the only thing with the second shooter problem is as you point out, as the person who was there that we know from our board member, uh, there was only one shot that anybody heard.
I mean, so I mean, I mean, there's there's so many problems with these crazy loony theories out of the side window out the back.
These are done to discredit people.
And they've done this in the Kennedy other king assassinations, other assassinations, where there was a legitimate reason to question the official narrative.
And so they would inject loony ideas.
Exploding lapels, the secret explosion of the under.
I mean, oh, the secrets conspiracy of the hand signals of the security guy connected to Israel.
This is done to discredit legitimate inquiry.
Legitimate question.
So run away from anything that sounds as loony as a lot of this nuts uh sounds.
Yeah, we got uh eTaler67.
I was a combat medic in the army, civilian paramedic for many years, have seen numerous gunshot once Charlie's wound is consistent with the rifle use.
Yep.
Some of us out there, conspiracies sound like QAnon 2.0, just saying, how did this one go, my friends?
If the conspiracy is too good to be true, it is well, no, I I've heard people say it was CGI blood.
I'm like, the crowd responded to the blood, not the gunshot.
Um, and well, then it's it's like, okay, it doesn't matter, but uh terrible.
There are we've addressed the nut jobs.
Uh now we could get to some of the true criminals finally getting uh uh, and we've addressed ISIN and you know, I think the president's on the right path there.
Well, we're seeing the literal recreation of the late 1960s, except it somehow is managed to be worse.
For those of you don't remember the late 1960s, every little radical, the Crips for people that don't know, the gang, the famous gang of LA is actually like the committee for the revolution of whatever.
The they all came up with the idea from the Black Panthers, are like, oh, we we just got to rebrand.
It's okay to be a gang, just rebrand as a political rebellion.
Uh, and so that's what you know that part of that took place.
A lot of young lefties, like my niece, who's gone bat shit insane.
Uh, the uh the you know, up in New York, the the uh you know they joined the weather underground.
I mean, they convinced themselves that violence was the tool, that violence was the path, like Tupac Shaker's mother is being celebrated by the left this week after her death, uh, who summarily executed a cop while he was on the ground.
Bam, bam, twice in his head.
Uh, the that's who they consider their heroes.
Uh, anybody who does that should be put under immediate inquiry investigation uh for the for suspicion likely evidence of suspicious activity.
The uh, but we're seeing it at scale.
So credit to President Trump for getting proactive, getting the National Guard involved, getting the military involved at protecting federal law enforcement in these locations.
And this is insurrectionary activity.
And the Civil Rights Act under the Ku Klux Klan Act laws gives the president the authority to use the National Guard and use the U.S. military whenever there's systematic systemic deprivation of civil rights and civil liberties, as is occurring every day in California, Oregon, Washington, Illinois, and New York.
What I uh when I say like you could entertain some theories I could entertain, like with the ice shooting, where the guy wrote anti-ICE on his uh on the casing.
I mean, yeah, I can understand someone saying that is too stupid to be real, and that's like a bad FBI agent trying to frame a Patsy, but you still have to like find an alternative theory to explain it away regardless.
No one has yet come up with an explanation for Tyler Robinson's presence, right?
All these alternative theories that they just don't have it there.
The guy admitted to doing it again, unless you just blink everything's fake and everything's unreal and everything, nothing's violent.
Okay, well, then you're in loony world.
No, but then there's some there was some of the call on a stimulation, and you didn't even hear me talk today.
It's all in your head, my friend.
Uh go take another pill from the shrink.
Uh the I mean, that's where these people are at.
Yeah, someone in the chat said, Where's the evidence coming from?
Okay, we so we don't trust, we don't even trust the evidence.
Okay, set that aside.
So Charlie Kirk.
You don't trust videos of people who are there who are big Charlie Kirk fans.
You don't trust audio of people who are there, there, physically there, to support Charlie Kirk.
No, no, Bart.
All 7,000 people are part of it.
I mean, come on.
Get on, go back to Looneywill.
Go back to Looneywill, be the useful idiot for the deep state that they want you to be.
Now, what is finally good to see is some deep state accountability.
It's not at the scale we want yet.
Uh, you know, I don't still have the greatest confidence in Pam Bondi at the moment, but at least we're getting somewhere by seeing some arrest.
Uh, as they they saw the seashells this week and it said F-A-L, James Comey.
I want to find the tweet from uh clandestine.
What is that internet?
That internet, the the Twitter handle.
I'm gonna find it in a second because I I'm still this you can call me a kook because this is where I think maybe Pam Bondi um indict what's his face or you know, issuing the indictment for James Comey.
The the two of the you know, weaker charges against James Comey on the eve of the five-year uh statute of limitations after Trump takes to truth.
Some people say Viva he wasn't admonishing her, at the very least, he was uh edgy telling her to do something, like take some action.
Well, yeah, don't let this bum walk, who's been one of the biggest criminals for the last 30 years of the American deep state against the interest of the American people.
Well, when I when I hear By the way, there's a long history of that.
There's a great there's some good Twitter posts.
President Washington personally intervened to see who got prosecuted and who didn't In cases of political impact.
George Washington, President George Wall, President John Adams, President Thomas Jefferson, President Andrew Jackson, President Abraham Lincoln, many of our greatest presidents were directly involved in these kind of criminal charges and cases.
The difference between this and Biden is that Trump is being honest about it, where Biden was being dishonest about it.
And Trump is actually getting actual criminals because they're because they are criminals, not making up crimes to try to get his political opponent.
Let me bring this one up from Clandestine.
I'm suspicious about who is behind this account, but it doesn't matter.
Deal with the arguments.
This person is saying going after Laura because Laura Loomer was going hard after Pam Bondy.
He's he's finally saying, look, Pam is finally done it.
It took some time to do this.
You know, she's doing her job, and Laura's an idiot for come for criticizing her.
And I think Laura, you know, makes other mistakes.
This is not one of them.
Robin, if I want to get conspiratorial, I could say, well, you know, what a wonderful distraction from the Epstein debacle.
Now they throw a little red meat at us and say, shut up, we're doing our job.
Two measly charges against James Comey.
Um after being nudged by Trump, where he basically expressed his disconsent discontent at the rate of inaction.
And you read the indictment.
It's not weak.
It's unfleshed out.
I didn't at first even know if we were talking about uh Comey's leak to his law professor buddy there, Richmond at um at Columbia.
But this was uh him authorizing leaks from Ray in the context of the Russia Gate hoax.
Uh you know, it it's it's a pretty weak indictment, uh, as far as I'm as far as my limited Canadian civil attorney experience could possibly lead me to believe.
What do you think of the indictment?
Is it is it is it weakly fleshed out?
Is it just a bare minimum to go after Comey for?
And might some people think that this is uh Pam Bondy trying to distract the masses from ineptitude in an array of other uh aspects of her job.
Uh no, I think that there is a consistent effort uh by key people afoot in the Justice Department to get some deep state accountability, as evidenced by the prior raid on John Bolton.
The the issue here was this was simply to get the indictment down before the statute of limitations expire.
Comey thought he could dodge this indictment because he had insiders, including his including relatives, son-in-law at the Eastern District of Virginia.
This gives you an idea of how the deep state thinks they get away with everything.
One, because they always have outside of the late 1970s, where they briefly face the possibility of some consequence.
For the most part, the deep state never faces any consequence.
So that's part of his arrogance and his hubris and you know, putting out 8647, which is what uh Comey did, uh, and then later try to walk it back as a joke, or it did it just came across all the rest.
But it was his message that he thought he was beyond reach.
That he, and why did he think that?
He had key allies in the Eastern District of Virginia that was investigating this particular part of the Comey investigation that had promised him, I suspect, that he would never be prosecuted.
Oh, so actually, let me stop you there because that makes a lot more sense when all the legacy fake news is reporting.
They say they had already looked into it and determined they couldn't find probable cause.
That's when family members and his allies are in there saying, we can't find probable cause, that he lied under oath when he said he didn't authorize the leaks.
That's that explains that.
Okay.
And so the some smart people, uh, the oh, I won't name them, but some smart people got word to President Trump that this was happening in that district.
He found out and is like, I want everybody connected to that canned, and we need new people brought in to make sure this case goes forward in the proper way it should.
And the, and that's what happened.
And so, and then, and then what they so once they got in there on the clock, they had like a date, 24 hours before the statute of limitations expired to get the indictment down.
Once they get the indictment down, that does not preclude or prevent them from doing additional indictments in other cases in other jurisdictions.
It does not limit them at all in doing a superseding indictment, as Mike Davis is out there talking about.
The now, I wouldn't recommend the superseding in the so the problem is where they're at, they had to bring the indictment in the Eastern District of Virginia.
Now, now, if Bondy had done what some of us had recommended from the get-go, all of these cases would have been brought in the Southern District of Florida as a broader part of a conspiracy to deprive President Trump of his federally protected civil rights and had all the other charges the false statement charges, the obstruction charges, the aiding and abetting charges, the solicitation to commit perjury charges, all of those charges, all in that one case, say it's related because it is related to the cases against President Trump in the Southern District of Florida.
So you make sure you get an impartial judge.
Here, you're bringing a case in the Eastern District of Virginia, uh, which is filled with a bunch of liberal Democrats in the Alexandria division.
Second, you get a Biden judge that has deep, deep state ties if you research his family history.
So you've got a bad jury pool and a bad judge.
The I saw this as just getting it on record.
There's nothing that prevents this case from being joined to another case, say in another jurisdiction down the road.
Now, as to the key of the case, it's real simple.
James Comey told the Senate that he had not authorized anybody at the FBI or connected to the FBI to be an anonymous source to anyone concerning anything, including President Trump.
He lied.
It was a false statement.
It was a false statement within a federal proceeding.
It's obstruction of justice.
It is an open and shut case.
He is guilty, guilty, guilty.
The only thing he is praying for is that the biased judge and a biased jury pool will help him escape justice.
But that depends on the case staying there.
That depends on them mishandling aspects of the case going forward because he's as guilty as guilty gets.
Matt Taibi is right.
He this case is an open and shut case.
He said there was nothing there.
They have internal proof showing he knew, showing that he he put because folks, you know, these guys never learn, never in writing, always in cash.
Uh they don't operate under those rules.
The instead he wrote and communicated in communications to people saying, Here, you are hereby authorized as an FBI special employee to be an anonymous source to about Reddit saying negative things about President Trump.
Exactly the opposite of what he told them.
And then find all the quotes of Comey over the many years where he's like, You can't let people off the hook if they even give a wrong inference.
So I mean, he can't claim intentionality as a defense here at all.
All he is banking on is jury and judicial nullification because he's as guilty as guilty gets.
Now, who was it that said that um Comey authorized him?
Was it Christopher Ray?
I forget it was the so of in writing, he authorized a uh his old professor buddy and some others to be federal to be special federal agents for the purposes of getting classified information solely for the purpose for them to leak negative information about President Trump.
It's in writing he did it.
And he told the Senate just the opposite.
Okay.
It's guilty, guilty, guilty, period.
Um, is there any chance that a judge tosses it because of public statements made by Donald Trump?
Not on any constitutional grounds, no.
The and again, there is a long presidential history dating back to George Washington of presidents being more directly involved than Trump is here.
So the fact that he was victimized by this criminal, the fact that a bunch of other people were victimized by this criminal is not an immunity card.
So he doesn't have any claim.
And are the same liberal Democratic judges who said Trump had no First Amendment claims, and he really did, are gonna try and suddenly reinterpret the First Amendment to specially protect James Comey?
Not under the law.
So is there a risk of judicial nullification with this corrupt deep state hack judge?
Yes, there is.
With this corrupt uh deep state-oriented jury pool, yes, there is.
But let's be honest, it's simply nullification.
It's not the law.
There's a risk of jury and judicial nullification in the Comey case, but it's not quite as high as a lot of people are suggesting.
So this is just the beginning.
This is not the end of these cases.
Um, the district, it's uh Eastern District of Alexandria.
I I was told by someone at 77% uh Kamala Harris supporters.
Yes, yes, yes, not only that, it's all government bureaucrats and a whole bunch of deep state hacks.
So you've got a bad jury pool, and you've got, and then the judge assigned the case, a bad judge.
My view is I hope this motivates them uh to uh there's just because you brought this indictment doesn't mean you have to keep it there.
You could bring indictments on Comey in multiple jurisdictions.
I hope they do, and then you could move to transfer it to be and to consolidate it with the other cases.
The uh that's what, but here's the thing just the fact these indictments are coming down the pipeline, uh, the fact that bolt Bolton indictments almost a guarantee.
Yeah, I mean John Bowling was caught red-handed.
And just like Comey, this nitwit went around, he was attacking Trump, admitting evidence of his guilt.
It's the iron law of woke projection is that they sit there and accuse others of exactly what they're guilty of.
And he's sitting there saying Trump should know, understand the importance of classification and releasing classified info.
While this guy, but when he does it, I have no doubt he thought he had a benevolent reason to do it, and that it was for the greater good, and that it wasn't a crime when he did it.
Um what Bolton was doing with this old school criminality.
He was weaponizing his access to classified intel and information to line his pockets.
And the idiot kept it around his office, kept it around his home.
And he, and this is a guy who said Trump should have never had the president of the United States who has the right to declassify anything he wants.
The president was absolutely outrageous that he could have any such documents in his home.
And it turns out Bolton has tons of them in his home, his business, shared him.
He was using AOL.
AOL.
That Ned Witt was still using AOL.
And he was sharing classified information.
And the way this got uh uh on the government's desk wasn't just the book he wrote where he tried to cash in on illicitly disclosing classified information, a foreign government.
I wonder which foreign government might be.
But a foreign government hacked it all.
But of course, he was using AOL, and he was sharing with his wife classified information, sharing with random friends classified information.
So he's he's dead to rights too.
Uh the he's done for, and this is just the beginning.
And here's the key.
You keep hitting these, and some of these judges that might get real cocky otherwise, might wonder, hmm, might they look at what I've done as a judge?
Might they look at what I did before I got to be a judge?
Maybe I should play this by the book, unless I'm the next person in the rack.
It's amazing.
Uh, so you think it's definitely Bolton is is coming down the pipe.
Who else should we expect?
Uh Brennan, Ray.
Uh Clapper and Brennan, Brennan for sure.
Brennan, my prediction, 85.
You can actually get these on Couchi.
Uh, you can get odds someone will be arrested.
And the Comey check.
Bolton check.
Uh, but before 2027, uh, the so these free picks out there for people who want to uh cash in on all this.
The uh uh in an ad Brennan check.
Uh I think I'll put Clapper at 5050.
Brennan, 75% chance.
By the way, Tucker Carlson's first 9-11 video.
Guess who he implicates in 9-11?
John Brennan.
Uh, so the I mean, that's how far back Brennan's crimes goes.
James Comey has been a deep state criminal for 40 years.
And he's so getting Comey is huge, getting Bolton is huge, getting Brennan is huge.
That that unholy trilogy of deep state criminality might finally face some consequence.
Why did you do this to me?
I don't want to do this, but now I think I already have to.
You don't have a choice.
It's like a viva UFC pick.
You gotta get in early, you gotta cash in.
And I think Letitia James and Peter Schiff will also face indictments uh before 2026 is done.
Peter Schiff and not Adam Schiff.
Well, hold on.
Sorry, I mean Adam Schiff.
I don't mean Peter, you're okay, Peter.
Sorry, look the uh slight uh misnomer.
Adam Schiff, Adam Schiff.
Uh okay, Wilde.
Uh, while I think about how much to wager on these various people, because Adam Schiff is at a very good price right now.
Uh no, Schiff has to.
That's that is also.
So you know who else is next?
Christopher Ray.
Because of what just got this.
Christopher Ray lied to Congress about tons of things, but one of the big ones he lied about was January 6th.
Uh, okay, I'm gonna add another topic afterwards, but we'll get there.
Yeah, we got we gotta do January 6th right now.
The insurrection that was a Fed surrection.
I'm gonna have Steve Baker on tomorrow.
He's one of the journalists uh who wrote the the piece in the blaze, and I'll stop there because there might be more news by the time he comes on tomorrow.
So we're gonna talk about this tomorrow afternoon.
Robert, the news breaks.
I don't know how they uh where the intel came from that there were 247 or 274, I get numbers mixed up, uh, plain clothed FBI agents on the Capitol building the day of.
I tweet out.
This is a this confirms everything that we all knew already, that they were agent provocateur, instigators, bad actors, or at the very least, I don't know, enablers, facilitators, whatever.
Then they say that Christopher Ray lied because he said that there were uh what did he refer to?
There's a difference between agents and plainclothes.
Um essentially, there's assets and there's agents.
And there's undercover and there's uh in uniform.
But but Ray consistently represented that there were very few to know FBI agents, and he tried to dismiss or minimize FBI assets by playing language games with what's an asset.
You know, do you mean confidential human source?
Do you mean someone registered as a source?
You know, the because there's a lot of federal assets.
Uh, you know, Nick Fuentes, I consider a Fed asset, even if he doesn't know he's a Fed asset, because he does a great job discrediting criticisms of countries like Israel by affiliation and association with all of his lunatic beliefs and spouting every anti-Semitic conspiracy theory known to man for uh 300 you know 2,000 years.
Uh but then you have real Fed, so the you know, Fuentes would be one of those assets that's not a registered asset because he doesn't even know he's an asset.
Then you've got Fed assets that are off the books assets that they know they're an asset, but nobody's putting them on the books because nobody wants anybody to know about them.
Then you have the on the books assets.
They're listed as everything from confidential informant to confidential human source to a whole bunch of little lingo and language they use within the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Uh, the or should be called the Federal Bureau of Insurrection, as this case may be.
But here, you had over 274 federal FBI agents, and they were all undercover, plain clothes, as they called.
At and in fact, apparently they have been complaining bitterly.
As soon as Cash Patel and Bonino came in, they were like, this has been a nightmare for four years.
A lot of them, you know, some, of course, famously blew the whistle, many of them are getting reinstated, not all of them.
I'm hoping that Robin Gritz, there's a resolution reached.
Robin Gritz was one of the whistleblowers, wrongfully terminated by that corrupt actor, Andrew McCabe.
The but basically they were neck deep in weaponizing the FBI on January 6th.
And now we have no doubt about it because the report confirmed by Cash Patel, there were at least, this is not the cap.
This is the minimum.
This is the floor, not the ceiling.
They were at least 274 federal agents, not assets, agents undercover on January 6th.
Some of them are seen doing things like breaking the windows uh of the Capitol.
Some were seen opening the doors to get people in.
Well, but then this is why, look, I'm trying, I'm trying not to get too skeptical and conspiratorial because I've been disappointed by uh some of the conduct of you know, or the inaction of Patel and Bondi.
But you know, during the Charlie Kirk manhunt, Patel comes out and like unforced errors is an understatement, but he came out, Robert, after this news broke and says it clarifies the role of the hundreds of agents on Jan 6.
Says that the current FBI bottom line, he says they were there for crowd control after it had been declared a riot.
So suggesting that they were there to assist with the capital police officers in crowd control.
Steve Baker put out a tweet, said, dude, I've seen all the video.
None of them were liaising, none of them were assisting.
There were no plain clothes anybody.
They were complaining.
They were complaining, saying we've been weaponized for crazy purposes, that this was a crazy project, that we should have never been there.
What the hell?
That we never did this in the BLM riots just a few months before.
We didn't take any proactive action.
So the these were instigators and infiltrators at multiple levels to support a bogus insurrection to justify and rationalize a political crackdown on all Trump supporters in the nation, which the Biden administration used it to launch, and to distract and discredit from the legitimate election challenge that Congress should have and had a constitutional obligation to uh address in uh January of 20, January 6th on 2021.
But what is clear is Ray said there was no almost nobody there.
So Ray lied.
Now, this is just one of the many, many, many lies I suspect we're gonna find that Christopher Ray made.
But Christopher Ray, Federal Society guy, by the way, the uh put in there by Chris Christie, by the way, that Larda uh that I don't know, it's not fair to Lardasses to compare him to Christopher Christie to Larda.
But the uh the that was it by the way, Ray, long criminal history too, connected to Muller.
They these guys go back.
These guys are part of the the nest of deep state vipers that have been the individuals taking some of the worst actions for 40 years, by the way.
This goes only back 50 years actually.
Let's go back to the 70s.
The uh Ray could implicate Bill Barr, by the way.
The bar better, but you know, double check some things.
He's not quite on the safe standing.
I think he thinks he is.
Once they went after Bolton, once they went after Comey, it meant they did have the guts to do what some of us doubted they had the guts to do.
Because those are the two biggest next to Brennan.
So now I think the dominoes are gonna start to fall.
But Robert, I I gotta, I mean, I gotta explain someone has to explain this to me.
Patel comes out and clarifies afterwards.
Agents were sent into a crowd control mission after the riot was declared by Metro Police, something that goes against FBI standard.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So Ray Ray lied.
Why this, I mean, this defies uh what we've all witnessed ourselves.
Uh is he say is is Patel saying this a because it's true and none of us knew it, and we don't want to.
He's just saying somewhere there for that is the way I interpret it.
Because I've I've seen a lot of these different quotes.
So, like either it was a quote from the FBI, the media said there was no political motivation behind the NBC behind the Charlie Kirk thing.
And I was like, who the heck is saying that?
Then you read the FBI's statement, and that's not what the FBI agent told him.
Well, that's why we don't have them as part of a particular organized group, but we do, you know, but they were still saying it was clearly politically motivated because they'd already designated that within the FBI.
So it's kind of a fake headline.
I uh I won't dispute.
Uh I think Cash Patel's in way over his head.
I don't think he's particularly well equipped for this.
I have doubts about whether Bon Gino is well equipped for this.
I think that this requires a certain mindset that I don't think either one have shown the consistent capacity to deliver upon.
Now, I do think Harmik Dillon has that capacity.
I do think Ed Martin has that capacity.
I do think uh the you know uh Andrew Bailey, uh now deputy co-deputy director of the FBI and probably future attorney general, uh, uh it does have that capacity.
Is it a coincidence?
As soon as Bailey gets there, uh all of a sudden in Martin meets with Alex Jones two weeks ago, all of a sudden a bunch of things start rolling, right?
Uh, the so I think that's what's really happening.
God bless Cash, he'll he'll he'll probably make 10 more uh you know screw ups on this between between now and next week.
But it doesn't change the fact Ray lied, Ray should be under the gun.
Because my my only question is whether or not it's cash Patel either trying to not be not deceitful, but just not trying to let people know that they're gonna be onto those agents, or he's still got faith in the rank and file of the FBI.
He doesn't want to, he does.
He blames this on Ray making a mistake.
He doesn't blame it on the agents doing bad actions.
Here, Kimmy Hunt in our locals community says the FBI wouldn't send in 274 plainclothes agents for crowd control because Capitol Police wouldn't be able to identify them from rioters.
It makes no sense.
But why did Patel say it?
Well, but well, Patel said that he they that that was actually a violation of policy for that precise reason.
Okay, so but he did confirm that aspect.
But what he's trying to do is exculpate the agents.
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking and blame the hierarchy.
Uh I think a lot of the agents were were very culpable.
Not all of them, some of them are just trying to do their job and they're stuck in a bad situation.
But a good number of them, it was the other way around.
Well, they were inciting, they were uh encouraging because the FBI at the top levels had been politically weaponized for a decade plus.
Uh, and that's who and what they are.
Plus, it's what they do.
It's what Jay, it's what J. Edgar Hoover designed the agency to do.
It go back and research COINTELPR.
Uh, you know, this is who and what they are, and has been from their very inception.
You can watch a hush hush of Eva Barnes Lock That Logos.com, either on the history of J. Edgar Hoover or watch that one, or about the questionable charges against anarchists for that established the FBI as an independent agency in the first place with bombs that were probably put there by J. Edgar Hoover himself.
Uh, and but and by the way, think about it.
We always have problems, trans people, you know, whatever is going on with trans, really high level of violence of risk.
Uh, you know, well, maybe it applies to cross-dressers, true, too, uh, at least in the case of Jay Edgar.
So the uh uh, but you know, it's at least we're getting something going in the right direction.
It isn't as far as I would like, it isn't as far as I think we need, but it's much better than where it was six months ago.
Yeah, well, and I brought up that chat that said uh don't don't bad mouth uh Bon Gino.
Barnes has been much harsher.
I I I still trust fully Bon Gino, and my my assessment is that he must be frustrated as hell because I think he's been upstead of the record.
I hope you're right.
Yeah, the uh but if if if they if they if they get all these guys indicted in a uh in the in the way that they need to be, so that we can find it's two things.
We need accountability.
I said three things.
We need accountability to actually happen.
Two, we need the public to believe accountability is happening.
And three, we need deterrence.
The reason to have the guys like Comey and Clapper and Brennan and Bolton and Ray in the rack is it that's a message people get.
That's a message that the somebody who's thinking about doing the same thing.
Like whatever that UN employee was, one UN employee sabotages, stops the escalator while President Trump is going up against it, going up on it.
And then another UN employee cuts off the sound, so it's not working.
A third uh UN employee cuts off the teleprompter so he can't read from it.
Big mistake with Trump, by the way.
He's much better riffing than he is with that.
And then that's when he went on that great.
The only thing I ever get from the UN is teleprompters that don't work and escalators that don't work.
The uh and then somebody at the UN went after one of Robert Kennedy's assistants in the bathroom and attacked him there.
That the these lunatics need to get the message.
They get the message by a lot of people being shunned and shamed in the Charlie Kirk public assassination context.
We'll get to one of the first amendment cases in a second on that.
The uh, but you know, that that's a message.
Seeing a lot of these uh uh the real crackdown on and Trantifa, uh, seeing that them they're they're starting to see it and they're shocked by it, the those in the Trantifa movement and its political associates.
That sends a deterrent message, but we got it send a deterrent message to every rogue federal and state official.
And you do that by getting the shifts, Letitia James, the fat Fanny Willis, uh a big Fanny Willis, sorry.
Uh the uh the uh and the and the comies and the clappers and the Brennans uh in the rack.
Uh that's why it's gotta happen.
And we're seeing real evidence that it is happening, and and it's and it's just the beginning of other things we're seeing happening because we're also seeing Harmade Dillon really continue to step up, step up, step up, brought suits across the country on these rogue state election officials trying to uh keep dirty voter rules.
So we're starting to see it in more expanded, extended roles.
So my confidence is building uh that uh Bobby Kennedy survived the coup attempt against him over the last month, got the information out about Tylenol being connected to autism.
Talked about that last week that that was likely coming.
It did come.
There's been evidence.
Tylenol's own people have been admitting this for years internally.
And that credit to Daily Caller for getting that information out.
Uh, the I know about it because I've been researching this for over a decade when uh my brother's son was diagnosed autistic, and I was like, what the heck is happening?
And one of the research studies they came across was a doctor trying to figure out the difference between the Cuba and the US.
And his conclusion is there's probably a tie to Tylenol with pregnant women, late-stage pregnant women and and babies.
Uh and the uh the because our rate in the US was much, much, much, much way higher than it was in Cuba.
It was the biggest distinguished uh distinctive factor, along with the too many vaccines and toxins in our environment.
And I understand people are gonna say, well, Cuba, it's a communist government, they don't want to identify anybody with autism, so their numbers are wildly low.
But Robert, the internet is forever.
I don't I you probably saw this, so let me just bring the volume up a little bit.
Listen to this.
This was CBC News in October 24.
Yes, it's part of a study in the British scientific journal Nature.
And here's what it does: it cautions pregnant women about using acetamenophant.
And that is the active ingredient in Tylenol and many other medications that so many of us use to relieve pain or fever.
CBC Health and Science reporter Christine Birack has the details.
Oh, whatever.
But one, it says it causes uh prenatal neurological disorders or post it causes neurotrophics.
Autism is a neurological disorder.
And so the aside from the lunatics who now want to pretend that you should celebrate if you're it's a superpower, we need more of it.
I I'm waiting until they until they create a word like um uh uh uh an an autistophobe.
You're gonna they're gonna call people an autistophobe for wanting to minimize autism.
Oh no, that'll be even worse.
So yeah, you're not a phobe, you're a hater.
Uh you're you're the uh you're a discriminator.
Uh that's the kind of but name how many aut now.
Here's the thing.
There's a lot of people, I've I got a sister-in-law in this category.
They don't want to think they did anything wrong.
Yeah, so they're all for uh interpretations of autism that suggest it's natural, uh, it's genetic, it's uh it's environmental, but but environmental beyond their control.
Those are the answers they don't they want to hear.
They don't want to hear.
Maybe there's something I did in the number of vaccines, the timing of vaccines, the sequencing of vaccines, the use of Tylenol, other things that might have caused my child to be autistic.
Now, the other thing that got really the media didn't want to cover it all, is they have some potentially promising therapeutics that might be able to mitigate the worst consequences of autism.
That was also announced by Robert Kennedy because he's sincere and serious about getting to the bottom of this and trying to make our children as healthy as they can be.
So the credit, I mean, I don't know whether the story is true, but I mean, all these lunatics saying I'm I'm I'm late stage pregnant, I'm gonna take a bunch of Tylenol.
And you know, there was a story of somebody ODing on it.
Don't know if it's true or not, but it's the kind of thing you could see happening.
And what happens if their kid is born ends up autistic?
And they may have caused it because they are against Trump.
This is the level of insanity these people have.
Uh, so the credit to Robert Kennedy for continuing to move forward.
Credit to President Trump.
He kept his word on this.
There was a few of us a little nervous whether he was gonna follow through with all this pressure from the big pharmaceutical industry.
He kept his word.
He went out there and said, Yep, go forward, Bobby Kennedy, and then put used his own truth post to say, hey, we got to start staggering when we do vaccinations, which vaccinations we do, what whether we use Tylenol or not, or something else with that.
Trump is is with is honoring his commitment to Secretary Kennedy, and that is a very promising indicator in there.
Robert, but so like I don't know half of these stories I think are fake, but I came across this tweet over the weekend, which was Amanda Littman who says, I took my newly one-year-old baby to her checkup this morning, and she got her MMR chicken pox flu and COVID shots.
If she's feeling fussy tonight, I'll alternate pylonol and motion per my doctor's recommendations.
How fun that I get to ignore the president and be a good mom and good citizen instead.
And I said, First of all, it's real because I went to her profile.
She wrote a book called uh We're in Control Now or something.
That's like you gave your one-year-old a COVID shot.
You're an idiot.
And then if he gets fussy, not if he needs it because he's got a blaring fear.
If he's annoying me, I'm gonna drug my kid to sleep, is basically what this nutbag lunatic who's a real person.
And if he gets fussy, if he's annoying me, I'm gonna give him drugs and make him go to sleep.
After giving him a COVID shot at the age of one, uh, they need to have their heads examined.
Some people are saying this is what child protective services are for.
I don't agree with that at all.
No, but when you know they tell what child protective services knows or not.
But is this person uh making it clear to everyone she's being neglectful and irresponsible to her own child?
Yes, she is.
Uh, and the you know, the and and you know, now that I think the uh a potentially appropriate legal remedies for that child to take action when they're an adult against their own parents, neglect and abuse because the statute of limitations until they're the age of majority, posting it like she's a good citizen.
It's straight out of uh Starship trooper.
These are insane people that are proud of their insanity and like to brag about it because they don't recognize it as insanity.
That that's the great danger of it.
The now, uh speaking of which, one of these lunatics, this art professor at the University of South Dakota went on this rant against uh Charlie Kirk after his assassination.
Uh, then she took it down and corrected herself.
Uh, but the uh but the it caused such controversy.
The University of South Dakota felt it had to fire her.
Was she because you can't have someone in a position of social authority out there greenlining murder?
It was a it was a man, Robert.
I got I got I got I was confused for a second.
I'm fairly Philip Philip Michael Hook, Robert.
Okay, look here, hold on.
So I did a car vlog today.
I did three car vlogs, and they're in the process of being edited.
This one, I I'm not trying to be a fence sitter or holier than thou.
I'm on the fence about this one as to whether or not the statements should warrant termination.
But I I want people to read the statement because it's uh I'm ear muffs, it's fucking vile.
It's vile.
The the the the guy in late afternoon, September 10, while at home and off work, Hook posted the following message concerning the recent shooting and killing of Charlie Kirk to his private Facebook account.
I don't know how you have a private Facebook professor.
Uh yeah, I do look.
I mean, that's your typical liberal judge uh trying to say private private.
Uh how's that private?
No, that's a public Facebook account.
Almost my definition.
Yeah, if you have a Facebook account, how is it private?
If it's private, nobody can see it, and it's not a real Facebook.
No, it's only it's only because he only lets people in who he wants on the internet, and They can do whatever the hell they want by screen grabbing it.
His post was this.
Okay, I don't give a flying F about this Kirk person.
Apparently he was a hate spreading Nazi.
I wasn't paying close enough attention to the idiotic right fringe to even know who he was.
I'm sorry for his family.
That should be your first sign, right?
Should you really go out and libel and defame someone that you admit you don't even know who they are?
It's so stupid.
Everything about it is stupid.
He says, okay, so I didn't even know who he was.
Listen to this.
This is what a I'm sorry for his family that he was a hate spreading Nazi and got killed.
I'm sure they deserve better.
Maybe good people can now enter their lives.
This is how these filthy fucking commies actually think.
Like, I'm gonna the we'll take out the evil and then we will infiltrate and we'll bring in the good.
Sorry, I'll finish it.
But geez, where was all the concern when the politicians in Minnesota were shot?
It was everywhere, idiot.
And the school shootings and Capitolice.
I have no thoughts or prayers for this hate spreading Nazi, a shrug B. So Robert, he's a professor, he's at a uh university, so I presume it's a government.
State university, University of South Dakota.
State.
So it's a state action to fire him.
Correct.
Which which is presumptively, I guess, you know, the the the they went through the test.
He got a TRO.
The punchline of all of this is he got a TRO enjoining his reinstatement pending further proceedings.
Basically, he's not going to be legally fired because the federal judges said he can't be.
The question is this he's working for a government institute.
If it I didn't want to get ahead of my out of my lane or ahead of my own knowledge, if it were a private employer, I would say he deserves to get fired because he's compromising the brand of the employer.
I could say, like maybe if he works, I'm not trying to be demeaning to anybody who works at a McDonald's.
If he works fast food, no, I don't think he should get fired for it.
Because he's not in a position of public social authority, such that his statements are not likely to incite future violence.
A professor at a public university saying those things is likely to incite future violence and creating a political permission slip by these kind of statements.
Well, and the school had a protocol which said they even granted, okay, fine, it's presumptively violative of the First Amendment.
We have a policy that says even if you're it's off school property, not on your uh employment time, if it causes substantial disruption to the campus activities, then we can fire you for it.
This flipping judge came out and said it didn't cause substantial disruption on campus, that people calling in and you know flooding the lines with messages, well, that was off campus, and there was no evidence adduced that it interfered with campus activities.
I'm like, holy shit.
I mean, I mean, it's it's it's it's activist uh uh judging, but there's a lot of these liberal democratic judges appointed in these conservative Republican jurisdictions.
That's why you've seen some crazy rulings out of Montana, South Dakota, Idaho.
Uh that's why these are Biden federal judges almost without fail.
So the the the to me, the big key here is this is a person in a position of trust in public with social authority.
And the University of South Dakota's own rules say that because of that, you have to be more careful about what you say, because it will be perceived that what you are saying is in that position of public social trust and public social authority because we, the university, have given that to you by making you a tenured professor at a said public university.
So they cited that particular rule.
So I I think the judge didn't adequately address that issue precisely because that issue undermines the judge's decision.
Now there's other aspects I don't disagree with the judge on.
So are you so generally speaking?
The question is in a First Amendment case, are you speaking uh as a private citizen?
Or are you speaking on behalf of the institution or the government itself?
Because if it's the latter, they can say they can fire you tomorrow.
If it's the former, they can't fire you at all.
So the and the argument was it was on their Facebook account, and even though their Facebook account identified them as a tenured university professor, the judge pretended that was somehow insignificant, inconsequential, and it really isn't, right?
If this was someone's private account or private statement to somebody that was that had nothing to do with their role as a university professor, I would agree with the judge's decision.
The problem is that this person is using their platform and their stature of public social authority to incite future violence.
And Notice the judge didn't even talk about that.
Well, because it's a the judge is a political hack who probably privately agrees with the individual statements.
Who who appointed the judge?
I remembered.
I think it was a Bill Clinton appointee, but set that aside.
Now, what uh not to be mean to the guy, um, he took it down within a couple of hours and then issued an apology.
Uh I think he deserves I'm I'm I'm I am I think he deserves to get fired, but I don't know if that's because I I have I have seething rage for assholes like this who would say something like that.
Well, my concern is his public social authority.
So the fact he took it down, I thought to it was to his benefit.
Yeah.
We want more people to do it.
Like there are people who criticize Jimmy Kimmel's apologies, crime.
I'm all for that.
Uh I'm all for more people publicly confessing that their their prior acts to incite illicit violence is wrong.
Even if I think they're insincere.
It is a good thing to see that in terms of the social discourse because it moves it in the right direction.
The now I also agree with the judge that the you don't get a heckler's veto.
And that disruption is often used as a pretext for uh basically asserting a heckler's veto.
So I agree with that part of the judge's ruling.
The part of the judge's ruling, I I I because the judge didn't even address was does the fact this person was in a position of trust in public authority, inciting violence against another, which is a reasonable interpretation of that statement.
Does that change the First Amendment analysis from an institutional perspective?
The judge doesn't even address it.
So we don't even get to figure out whether the judge's analysis is right or wrong because the judge refused to even address that issue.
And I think that is a critical question going forward.
And I'm I'm I'm always gonna be biased on the First Amendment side.
So if this professor ends up winning when that analysis is finished, I probably won't have a problem with it.
But the key is at least that analysis has to be done.
And the and make a persuasive argument that the the what the what he needs to do, in my opinion, is that he that his public social authority had no impact whatsoever on how the statement would be perceived or what he intended.
And if he can show that, okay, not a problem.
Then I'm not for heckler's vetoes.
I'm for maximum First Amendment protection, no matter how much I hate the speech that's being done.
This is a classic example of that.
I mean, if this guy had said it right in front of me, I would have might have had a more direct reaction.
Let's put it that way.
Um, the but the uh, and I think they would have justifiable cause.
I defend the well, I won't go any further.
I'll get myself into trouble.
More trouble.
But so uh the aspects of the case I don't disagree with at all.
The problem is the judge did not address the big issue, the elephant in the room.
Does the fact that he's in a position of public social trust change the dynamic?
Does the fact that he used his page, which identifies his position of public social trust change the dynamic?
Yeah, but failure to do that is a fundamental failure of the judge.
This is where people, I'm I'm not a bleeding heart.
I I think he should get fired.
I just want to make sure it's legally sound.
Assuming he said it at a dinner table and it's a private account in that only.
Then I'm like, okay, no, no.
The i if he didn't have his position listed on his Facebook page.
I would also would like to know the fact the judge didn't mention it makes me skeptical.
Yeah, how many people follow him?
Who follows him on the Facebook page?
Do a bunch of his students follow him?
Does he promote it's a good that's private?
That's totally fake.
There's no such thing as a private Facebook account.
I think what she the judge meant to say was that it wasn't a governmental account.
Well, no, or that it or that's fine, but that's different than pretending it's private.
Well, I'm just trying to like against Steelmann, or that it was private, like you have to, he has to accept you in.
Like it's it's not like you know, kids have their what she means is it's not the University of South Dakota funded Facebook page.
Well, I'm trying to think of like if you're at a family dinner, you say the exact same thing, someone records it and then posts it online.
Uh, do you get fired for that?
Like if it's that level of a private Facebook account, uh, the bottom line is that many.
I would say no in that case, to be honest with you.
I would say no.
The the uh the to me, the biggest concern is the political permission slip aspect, and that to me is more disruptive.
The first amendment analysis is you as the government are allowed to fire somebody for their speech if that speech is sufficiently disruptive of a core governmental objective.
To me, preventing political permission slips for for politicized violence fits within that disruption analysis.
And him being in if he's the janitor, I don't think he uh I don't think he should be fired.
If but he's a professor with influence over students that the state Has given him.
The state has given him that influence.
The state has given him that authority.
And that to me changes the analysis substantially.
And the judge just ran and hid from it.
Probably because the judge knows if you do that analysis, the conclusion is not clear.
You know what?
I'm actually going to reach out to the prosecutor and see uh uh answer that question as to how private this was, how many people were on it, and whether or not it included any students.
Robert, before we get painfully behind over here, stop info tyranny, which is a new name that I'd seen on our Viva Barnes Law Dot Locals.com.
What's the name of the globalist group that Canadian politicians are trying to keep happy by slaughtering the ostriches?
That's who needs to be pressured, not the no, first of all, it's called the World Organization of Animal Health.
Whoa.
It's actually called woe.
Uh but putting pressure on globalist organizations is not.
Any organization that starts with the name world organization is basically a bond villain.
Yep.
Uh no, and as I put all the pressure on them.
They don't they you should put pressure on Pierre Mousfart Poilievre.
Don't relent.
Big bad bottom.
Went to the heart of the UN.
The media didn't want to cover this, and basically went like this to the World Health Organization.
So that was a beautiful speech to see as well by Bobby Kennedy.
If you put a hundred black ants and a hundred red ants in the jar, nothing will happen.
But if you shake the jar, the ants will start killing each other.
Red will believe black is their enemy, black will be resident.
When the real enemy is the person who shook the jar, yeah, but uh and I agree with that entirely.
But my point is that the I think the deep state is shaking the jar using uh Trantifa to do it.
And so we've got to identify that as the threat.
Any threat that says, oh, Trantifa had nothing to do with it, helps the people shaking the jar get off the hook.
Well, and not just that someone shook the jar.
And if I'm the red ants and the black ants, well, take it the other way.
If the if I'm the black ants and the red ants are coming to kill me, I'm going to, you know, do what is necessary to do that.
I'll worry about who shook the jar later and how to prevent them from shaking the jar later.
But right now you got a proximate threat that you're the first way you get to the people shaking the jar is the people who put those red ants in the f in the jar in the first place.
Big bad bob says was Charlie Kirk or White's supremacists, listen to what this very knowledgeable, very wise, dark skin, dark sh uh dark skinned man had to say.
I for I Oh, yeah, that was good.
A bunch of African American advocates, Charlie what a racist bone in his body.
That's a complete lie.
Uh, and all these people that keep lying and libeling, thinking that there's no potential consequence.
What they don't recognize is that while it is generally true that a defamation claim does not survive death, the exception is if the defamation claim is being brought upon by an organization that was represented by that individual.
Turning point is still here.
Turning point can still bring libel lawsuits and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims by Erica Klerk, uh, Erica Kirk against these people.
And so the uh, and so they they might want to keep that in mind because there's plenty of us that are happy to help Erica or Turning Point or any of them get accountability for the lies and libels being told by all these powerful, many cases powerful political public figures against them.
Uh Dexter should try to reach out to the Institute for Justice has said.
They're really good.
I like the uh Institute for Justice.
Yeah.
The uh, and uh we're gonna be adding Dexter's case to the 1776 Law Center uh portfolio of uh cases for the the world to pay attention to.
Dog's nose says take the conspiracy to a separate show.
Well, we're gonna move on, but Chaton, the messages are sus.
Howard the Duke been hearing some fairly disturbing military-related rumors, covert bombing of Sudan to clear out space for Gaza refugees, troops in the end.
That needless.
There's all kinds of wild stuff going out there.
I think they're gathering the military to dress them down and to clean up.
All this was, oh, we're about to go to war with Russia, about to go to war in Venezuela.
It's like, no, I don't think that's what this is.
This is Heggsith calling them all in in person to stop the insanity.
The politicization, all these generals have politicized their position disproportionately.
They're saying crazy things.
They're they're leaking things, they're not supposed to be leaking.
They politicize their departments using vaccine mandates and trans uh idolatry and ideology.
And Hagesith wants it all done with, all finished, all over, and he wants them all in the room so they can make it clear to them that there are certain consequences are coming to them if they don't stop the insanity.
Uh, we got too many generals anyway.
Uh you got all these fake generals, to be honest with you.
The generals that don't deserve, I mean, all they've done is lose things, and somehow they get more little stickers on their on their lapel.
Uh, but I think some of that is exaggerated.
There still is risk with Iran.
There still is risk with Ukraine, there still is risk with Venezuela.
Uh, the but I think those thinking there's imminent World War III uh misinterpreted what some of those things were, including Trump's own truth post, which you know, I I don't recommend sarcastic posts that could Lead you to war, but uh I think it was a sarcastic post meant to exit us from Ukraine, not enter further.
And everyone should have washed the bourbon with Barnes where you explain that out, but basically saying, uh, yeah, Ukraine is doing so well, they don't need us helping them anymore.
So we can pull out and Ukraine will take over Moscow in three months.
Um S. Ren says Charlie Kirk multiple ICE facilities in a church today's political terrorism.
And he has also.
And and it follows on ones that happened just a few months ago in Kentucky.
I mean, for those that don't know, uh a Mormon church in Michigan was attacked today.
These people have gone insane.
They keep getting political permission slips from people in authority, they keep getting political protection from both the NGOs and elected officials, and we got to unravel all of it.
The good news is there is increasing indicators in the Trump White House that they're aware of this necessity.
Uh the the one coming out of uh the the attack on the Mormon church, there's some debate as to whether or not um the guy was he was an Iraqi or an Iraq war veteran.
Uh apparently donated well, no, sorry.
So I I double checked in the I guess I guess uh with data republican.
There was a meme going around that said he donated to act blue.
It it might not be the same person, so you might want to hold off sharing.
Yeah, you always have to be careful with that.
I mean, like the it's not clear whether Robinson's uncle is the one that's tied to Ukraine or not, the same name, but there's their differences there.
So you'll you never know for sure with these kind of information.
But there is at least preliminary information that it's kid that these shooters are overwhelmingly.
In fact, there's an article in Axios, Senator John Fetterman was tweeting about it today.
That leftist violence is at the highest level it's been since the 1970s.
This is terrifying.
Um, and uh there's another image.
Well, apparently, I don't know without jumping on whether or not he was left or right, there's a picture of his property that they pulled from uh social media not from the Google maps.
That looks like a Trump sign.
So people said he's a Trump supporter, but there's a stop sign right underneath it, and people are saying, no, this is actually stop Trump because that stop sign is not at the corner of a street waiting and holding off.
It's the fog of war.
So don't make any mistakes that might cost you some credibility.
All right.
Um, I think uh this is Griffin says, I think the Barnes is correct.
Shooter was manipulated by uh for a while by crazy people into doing evil actions.
VR China.
He is a guy that had no criminal history of any kind.
And and they took a normie and they radicalized him to the point that he commit politicized violence against a man he'd never met and likely had never really read or received, and then thought he was a hero for doing so.
That's a serious cultural problem that judges like the University of South Dakota professor case failed to even address.
Harmie Dillon is the boss for civil rights for all of us.
Give her kudos for fighting for the constitution, says Mandeliche.
Absolutely.
Fenton law.
I agree entirely.
I think she's the future attorney general of the United States.
Uh, let me see what this is analysis.
There's a okay, that's a Kirk analysis.
Is Pence going to court?
Says hope for the better.
On what?
Um Pence, I don't see getting indicted, uh, Obama and Biden.
I don't see those people, but uh or the Clintons.
But I would be uh, but I think the the country would would as long as we get people like Comey and Clapper and Brennan and Bolton, uh, that will be sufficient to start putting us on the right corrective path.
If you were offered to join the federal government, would you?
I think the answer is.
Oh, sure, yeah, but I prefer to be in the background advising and helping people and continuing to be active in the court of public opinion and as a private counselor for people.
Crash says Crash 105.
I'm working and missed the start.
I went to Portland ICE yesterday to showcase what a liar Ron Wyden is.
He must be paid.
Uh he must have paid all those protesters to clean the street.
Here's a video.
I'll bring that up actually afterwards.
And last one for now, S. Ren, federal government knows how dangerous SSRI and hormone treatments are.
The FAA will suspend any pilot license while on any SCP-19.
That's the next uh the two big the Tulsi Gabbard is doing a big detailed i review of both the election and the COVID pandemic, working with Robert Kennedy on the latter.
And Kennedy is going in the next after he gets these issues involving vaccines and those issues and autism, his his uh and there's the the general food and medical health he continues to progress progress on.
The other next big one is school shootings and SSRIs because he this is I mean, Robert Kennedy came from a big gun control background.
And to his credit, when he reviewed the evidence, he concluded about a few years ago that he was mistaken.
Uh and that in fact the issue is SSRIs.
That the issue uh is or is likely SSRIs, as well as the political permission slip of the of the press celebrating and giving high profile coverage that incentivizes these copycats.
So the uh so credit to him on that.
Speaking of Second Amendment freedoms, and speaking of Harmine Dillon, she was battling for Second Amendment in Illinois and before the Seventh Circuit this week in a case that looks very promising after it used to look terrible.
This is the um I want to say high capacity magazine one is Oh, it's assault weapons, period.
Assault weapons banks in Illinois just banned them.
Which which they they how do they decide?
They decided based on whether or not they look militaristic and it's and it's it's it's reviving the debate.
I don't know how they revive a debate that was already determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.
I gotta get some rubbing alcohol, Robert.
I got bitten by a red ant on my ring finger, and it's the itchiest thing on the face of the planet.
So I'm gonna put some rubbing alcohol on it.
That is rough.
Um, so the how are they still adjudicating on this when the Supreme Court came down?
Now they're gonna go and offer the uh historical analysis as to whether or not the founding fathers intended to cover militaristic assault rifles, and then they were like talking about how to deal with crowd control and riots back in the 1700s.
How are they not?
I mean, am I going crazy?
Because I feel like they're readjudicating the same question over and over again.
It should have been, but the Illinois Supreme Court said it was just fine after Bruin.
And the Seventh Circuit previously said a different panel said it was just fine.
Credit to a smart federal district court judge who said, you know what?
I'm gonna hold a whole trial on this.
Oh a real trial.
Let's see what all the evidence is.
You know, tons of experts, 200 plus exhibits, four-day bench trial.
That's a long trial for just a judge, because usually what drags out of trial is the jury going in and out and this and that.
The I mean, four-day trial.
And he concluded the Illinois Supreme Court was wrong, the Seventh Circuit itself was wrong, that when you look at the actual facts that there is no uh constitutional basis for Illinois complete ban on assault weapons.
And now that, and so he said the so he changed the prior decisions and said, No, this is not good law.
Goes up to the Seventh Circuit, Harmete Dillon intervenes, and Harmie Dylan says this violates the second amendment.
And she's doing this in multiple Second Amendment cases.
She's got to get her in Dexter's and some other cases.
But did she does she do this at the request or behest of uh Pam Bondi, or does she do this on her own authority?
She uh on her own authority.
She is the she is directly appointed.
So that there's only a few uh Justice Department depositions that are directly confirmed by the Senate.
So that their position is direct, so they're not really subordinate.
Uh they're they're they're like they're almost like parallel, they have different accountabilities and responsibilities, but she's not really.
I mean, you could say she's subordinate, but not really in the way that's done.
Uh, the so uh the assistant attorney general for civil rights, like the assistant attorney general for tax, is directly appointed with confirmation by the Senate, just like the deputy uh uh is underneath uh uh Pam Bondy.
And Pam Bondi's chief of staff, I think, is leaving, or one of his keys, and let's just say the staff member, let's just say it's good, uh, decided to go uh elsewhere.
You know, the some of us might have been in incentivizing and motivating that to occur.
So we're we're uh I've seen a lot of promising stuff out of the Justice Department the last month.
Uh and and if anybody's been watching, I have not been the biggest fan of Pam Bondi.
Uh, I've been a big fan of Harmie Dylan, I've known her for many years, worked with her on multiple cases.
Great, great, very smart, very creative, uh, fearless, fearless lawyer.
Uh, the I was a little worried about whether she would how fearless you are when you get there, like we've seen, sadly, with to some degree, in my opinion, with Cash Patel.
But with but with her, she's been gung-ho, and she keeps expanding and expanding and expanding.
So she went in and said, no, the second amendment is clear.
This Illinois law is unconstitutional, and that's the official position of the United States government.
And it looks like the Seventh Circuit will affirm and uphold that and strike down that ridiculous Illinois decision and thus give us better Second Amendment protection across the country.
In the same vein, she wasn't done there.
She brought about a half dozen suits against rogue states who refused to clean up their dirty voter roles, including Camifornia.
Uh, so that's very promising on the election integrity front.
And she went in front of the said of the Supreme Court and said there's never been any basis for race to be barred of redistricting, period, consistent and consonant to the Constitution of the United States.
So uh very good work by Harmie Dillon, who keeps plugging away.
We just need the civil rights division to keep expanding uh that.
By the way, if you're a young or or uh whoever you are out there, if you're a lawyer and and uh you want to you want to work for the Justice Department, guess who's uh taking applications?
Armade Dillon at the Civil Rights Division.
Uh so yeah, that's a great place to be.
So the, so you know, the uh so if you're a young lawyer, other lawyer out there, apply.
Uh, you know, some of us know her.
So you know, let us know.
And if you're legit and a real actor, because we need to get rid of all these uh these these corrupt uh actors who are trying to undermine from within uh the ability to get things done.
So the that was a very good decision for those that don't understand the dirty voter roles.
The vote the way in which you can pad the ballot with bogus ballots.
You don't got to rely on computers and machines and all that, uh, like Dominion and the rest.
Never been a Dominion fan, never been a smartmatic fan.
Uh to be clear, I like old pay.
I like I like the way even Comida does its elections, the way the whole world does its elections.
Paper ballots, you know, you put it in a box, you take them out, you count them for everybody to see.
That's what I like.
Uh, not all this other stuff.
However, the key way they pad the ballot box is by padding the voter rolls.
Uh and credit to Harmick Dylan spotting it as a key issue, going after these rogue states.
They won't explain why it is that dead people are still on their voter rolls.
They won't explain why they've got duplicates.
They've got uh the same person registered in like eight different counties.
Why do they have all these illegals?
Credit to the Secretary Duffy of the Secretary of Transportation, pointing out that the state of Camifornia has been regularly violating federal law by issuing bogus driver's licenses under California to illegal immigrants.
Uh to and what does that do?
It allows them to get them on the voter rolls.
So the so the dead people, the people that are too young, people that have moved out of the state, people that are duplicate registered, all those issues that we identified in 2020.
The uh she's identified and she understands a key fulcrum to all of it is the voter rolls.
And what's unique is while there's no private cause of action for many of the election laws that go federal laws that govern voter registration roles.
The all of those laws specifically authorize the attorney general to bring legal action.
And so she brought action against, I think, six states just this past week.
Uh that to finally clean up our voter rolls and expose the fraud at the highest levels of these states because the people she's suing are the secretaries of state and those in charge of the elections.
So uh look that's looking very promising to finally get some clean voter rolls.
And you get clean voter rolls, a lot harder to pad those ballot boxes with bogus ballots.
I just noticed a uh a super chat on ComicTube.
I'm hoping Hexeth is going to cut how many generals and admirals we have.
We have around 900 generals and admirals, almost as many as we had at the height of World War II.
That's from Kevin Patrick.
Um and by the way, their claims.
First, it's constitutional dilution.
What's voter dilution?
My vote doesn't count like it should if there's a bunch of illegal and bogus ballots included.
Hence, my vote has been diluted, and that is a constitutional right.
She is civil rights division of the Justice Department gets to enforce.
Second, that federal law specifically requires maintenance of honest, accurate voter rolls that they're not doing, and the production of information upon request by the attorney general, which they're hiding.
Well, if there's nothing wrong, why are they hiding it?
Why aren't they producing the records and documents of these roles are so clean?
Guess what their excuses?
Voter privacy in the name of voter privacy.
The same people that want a digital ID, the same people that want to mass censor you, the people, the same people that want mass surveillance state, say in the name of privacy, we got to keep those fraudulent ballots secret.
Well, I don't think that's gonna fly.
My my uh reverse psychology as to how to get Democrats to vote for to support voter ID, same-day voting paper ballots, is say that the reason why Trump is rounding up all the illegal immigrants is to use them to pad the ballots so that they can then you know fortify the next election and find whatever votes they need to beat the Democrats who win on day one, and that the blue wave will fade and so on and so forth, and get them to vote, get them to support voter ID, citizenship, and same-day paper ballot voting and counting the same day.
Yes.
What I'm talking about can only be done by Harmita Dylan or the Justice Department.
A private citizen can file a habeas petition to release her as a material witness into a federal case.
No judge is gonna pay any attention to it.
So what we need is the Justice Department to file habeas petitions to release Tina Peters, release Kurt Benchuff to release Dexter in New York and these other politicized targets of politicized, weaponized violation of federal civil rights by local law enforcement authorities, because all of these people have information and evidence that can be used in a federal investigation against rogue state officials.
And that the grounds would be that they're a material witness in a pending federal civil rights case, and they can't have them in state custody and be able to secure their testimony for future cases.
And thus we need Harmeek Dylan uh or someone uh in the Justice Department to take proactive action in the Ben Chuv case in the Dexter case, in the Tina Peters case to get them released.
That's who we need to uh to do something.
And I believe they are now looking at that.
And so that's promising.
President Trump has been trying to light a little fire under Pam to get those things done.
Uh so hopefully they do get done.
Uh the but in that context, we had a couple of SCOTUS uh cases uh this week.
Uh one about taking a big trans case and the other one about Trump's ability to use the impoundment control act.
Uh you might have to do both of those.
First of all, how many cases, how many decisions do we have?
Uh, how many subject matters do we have left?
So we got two SCOTUS cases.
We have when does your action survive your death?
We have when does a same-sex parent get to claim parenthood rights?
Uh, and we've got a Columba and the Columbus statute.
So we've got uh in, I'm not sure if I fully went into the media AI issues.
So that we got about six topics left.
All right, so let's do uh let me let me uh get a few of these more over here, the tip questions, and then we'll um we'll do a couple more, and then we'll head over to viva barnslaw.locals.com for the after party.
Griffin says the back man, the black, the men in black neuralizer tool might be inspired by those small infrared pen games that made noise, says Griffin.
Buffalo Betsy.
Bondy AL saying bullshit about hate speech uh is disgraceful.
And they claim they clarified, but uh Bondy should, you know, weigh her words more.
What about the news about the record that Ukraine is requesting 90 billion in arms deal from the US?
Yes.
What if Trump agrees to that?
What would that mean?
Hopefully he gets us out.
But you know, the uh uh, you know, his uh he's having to go through all these shenanigans to get us out.
And then it concerns me.
I don't know why why why is Bess why are we back talking about Iran again?
I thought we got rid of their nuclear weapons, but why are we pretending that they they may be back and we gotta have snapback sanctions and we gotta have well are we gonna go back in the war again in Iran?
Now President Trump, he at least finally came out and said, no, BB, you don't get to have greater Israel and annex all the West Bank.
So at least that's a promising indicator.
But who knows what's going to happen in Gaza?
So the, but of course, you know, all the Hamas and the Palestinian side can't help themselves.
They go out and commit terrorist violence on a regular basis somewhere in the world.
And I and we're supposed to say anything in defense of that side.
Sorry, I can't.
But I'm not on the uh Israeli side of the equation either.
So the uh I think they've overreached uh in ways that is gonna cause political backlash around the world.
Uh that they don't have a propaganda problem, they have a policy problem.
And they just refuse to recognize that, unfortunately.
But hopefully, President Trump keeps us out of these wars.
Uh, we all get to sweat it in the interim because God bless the uh dear Donald.
Uh, but uh sometimes he he doesn't get us out as quickly and clearly and easily as I think he could because the deep states uh uh you know he lets Lady Lindsay dog walk him way too often.
So I'm hopeful.
Uh, but uh I you know, nothing is a done deal until it's a done deal uh in this situation.
Well, uh and um yeah, I was I was gonna go back to the tweet that I put out the weekend of the strike saying, you know, in due time they're gonna come and say we didn't do as much damage as we need.
Netanyahu's gonna be begging them to go back.
Stingray says, what are your thoughts on Netanyahu meeting with TikTok personalities?
Many people are complaining about his address claiming control in the U.S. Yeah, yeah.
I mean, his arrogance is off the charts.
He's running around the Middle East telling everybody he owns Trump and gets to dog walk Trump whenever he wants.
Uh that's come from a wide range of circles and sources.
Uh Trump knows it's a problem, and he's trying to figure out what to do with it.
And the uh we'll see how he handles it.
But I think BB's gone crazy, uh, gone loco uh with the Greater Israel project.
He was kind of forced to because he was cut off from center-left allies uh by the indictment.
And I get the indictment, but I mean it's it's more like technical violations.
I mean, it's not really a compelling indictment.
Uh, the uh, but what is what the his critics did is unleash the Greater Israel project on the world.
And that I think is a very dangerous project for peace around the world.
Uh, but we'll see.
Uh, but you know, the uh UN he had a wide range of presentations and speeches this past week, but Trump has ordered an investigation into.
I mean, imagine the arrogance that somebody at the UN thought they could sabotage the president of the United States.
What would have happened if Melania had fallen and and and hit her neck against those sharp escalator stairs?
Do these people think any of this through?
Well, but not to tell them.
Why don't we just get rid of the UN?
God bless Jesse Waters, please.
I know you're trust trying to tell a joke, but please let's have less jokes about bombing uh civilian places, just saying, God bless you, Jesse, but come on.
Uh let's get more Tucker version of Jesse, not Bill O'Reilly version of Jesse.
Uh the unlike Jesse, you know, uh Ben uh you know, talked to him in the past.
The uh but the well, why are we still in the United Nations?
why are we still in NATO?
I mean, why you know I'd like us to exit these organizations.
I mean, well, I I I you know, I think there's a you know, if he niss to what Trump is doing and bombing drug boats, but I hope it's actually a fight on drug cartels and not a disguise to invade Venezuela.
So uh, you know, if the president is the president's getting increasingly uh is in a position where he can survive the midterms as long as he keeps us out of a dumb war.
But that latter part is just remains an open gamble between now and uh November 2026.
No, you the joke about it.
Imagine they cut the elevator with the with the the crazy person that they led in through security, like or you get a crazy person stuck in an elevator with it.
There was a crazy person in there because somebody attacked one of Robert Kennedy's assistants right inside the UN.
A bunch of a bunch of charges.
No, like that's what they want.
I think it was the Bolivian or I forget.
Some government official came forward, said a bunch of things.
Rubio didn't like it, so he suspended his visa.
I disapprove of suspending visas if it relates to travel to the UN because the quid pro quo for the UN to be in New York was that we would not weaponize our visa access for that purpose.
If it's for something other than that, if it's saying you if it's any purpose other than the United Nations, I don't have a problem with the suspension of the visa.
If it includes trying to deny access to the UN, I disapprove of it.
Uh, because that was the quid pro quo we cut so that we would be able to spy on the UN whenever we wanted because it's right there in New York.
They could they could kick them all out, appropriate the buildings.
Trump can turn it into a Trump plaza 2.0 condos or a hotel.
It'd be a beautiful hotel.
Um, all right, Robert, what's the Supreme Court got?
We got two Supreme Court cases.
Uh the first one is on Trump, and the second one is on trans.
Uh, you pick which one we go in.
What order?
Go trans, because I'm going to have to refresh my memory as you talk.
So the so what is is remember all we've been covering all of the way that this this corrupted culture, this through their public educational system, has radicalized so many of young men in America by convincing them that they are not the gender God gave them.
And this trans ideology, which I call a trans idolatry, because that's what I think it is, is not only contrary to almost all of human history and contrary to the biology God gave us, uh, but is also contrary to common sense.
And title and title nine.
Exactly.
When you unleash and people, something happens in people's brains that when they stop knowing what gender they are, they start becoming very dangerous to themselves and others.
The rate of sexual assault violence, four to five times higher by trans, and physical violence, four to five times higher by trans.
The probability of engaging in sexual assault four to five times, all of it, just across the board.
Sexual assault, physical assault, intimate violence, public violence, all of it's much worse.
As soon as somebody doesn't know what gender they are.
Uh, that doesn't mean every trans person is gonna do this, but there's about an 80% chance that people it's also that you get people who are bona fide, evil, crazy, violent, who now can get some cheap social media uh public.
Cover they get covered.
They get crazy.
I'm just trans.
But Robert, this is what I never understood how people get so stupid.
Forget the trans.
You know, the trans movement is one thing that they got people to say, yeah, Title IX existed to create separate categories so that ensure that women were not dis um uh discriminating.
It was to give an excuse for women to be able to play sports and us to continue to fund it, even though nobody wants to see them play sports unless it's beach volleyball in USC.
Tennis, tennis is the only sport.
And I'm not bad either.
Not because of the women's tennis, women's tennis, women's volleyball, only sports that should be allowed.
Robert, not because of the way they look, just because the rallies go longer in women's tennis.
Um, but um I was focused on the look.
The uh uh the but yeah, the a cheerleading.
Uh I'm all for cheerleading too.
Um, I'm a big I think that's a very important uh space for for for women's athletics.
I'm like gymnastics, gymnastics uh gymnastics.
I'm I'm I'm for that too.
No, because men's gymnastics is pretty damn good, like the Pummel horse or whatever the heck that thing is, the uh the palm horse.
I'm trying to think of a sport that most people would like that is women okay.
It doesn't matter.
Uh it's it's the patriarchy.
You're gonna be struggling for a while.
There's none that make money financially.
But there's like the WNBA pay us what you owe us.
Well, then you owe us money because you just lose everybody money every year.
The uh basis of this has been through the school system.
Get it into the locker room, get it into the restroom, get it into the high the elementary school, junior high, high school sports team, legitimate in uh this trans idolatry.
And finally, we the public started fighting back.
Meghan Kelly, this has been a big issue for her, yeah, saying you're you are diluting and diminishing the value of women's sports by letting men compete in it.
It literally was an old South Park episode became reality.
Here, what happened is West Virginia said, no, no, no, no more.
Boys play in boys' sports, girls play in girls' sports, boys don't play in girl sports.
But the fourth circuit said that's outrageous.
Gender identity is part of Title IX.
No, it's not.
It's nowhere in Title IX.
And the Constitution, Equal Protection Clause.
These poor gender confused people get to uh use the constitution to dictate to us that the trans idolatry.
That's how insane this ideology got within our legal system.
No, but but they they get to use the equal protection clause to physically abuse and dominate women.
Like this is where it's like gadget.
It's it's not it's it's uh Gads had says like suicidal empathy.
We oh we're such bleeding hearts, we want to recognize gender identity, even if it means men get to beat women in women's sports and literally crack their skulls in UFC and whatnot.
I I was saying jokingly, homicidal empathy, like that we you know you do it or we'll kill you.
This is like retarded empathy, is what this is.
Is we're saying we are so tolerant that we're going to defy the very reason for which we created chapter nine, title nine in the first place, which was to protect women from getting dominated by men.
Like you've come full circle in the loop of idiocracy.
So the Supreme Court's taking it up, no ruling.
Yeah, they took up multiple cases, including the West Virginia case.
And what I think that highly likely means is the Supreme Court is gonna put an end to this insanity.
That Title IX does not recognize and never has gender identity.
Title IX is based on biology, uh, based on what God told you what gender you are.
That's what it's based on.
And in order to respect women's rights, in order to respect women's ability to compete on their own terms in women's sports, then men have to be biological men need to be excluded, regardless of what by the way.
And then what happened in the West Virginia case?
The person got an injunction, and the man went on to dominate all the competitions to deny all of those young girls the opportunity for the recognition for their achievement.
So that's what happened.
And the that's the insanity by those lunatic leftists on our uh federal uh court system.
A bunch of federal courts have said trans have special rights under Title IX.
They've said trans have special rights under equal protection clause.
That has always been insane.
And I believe the Supreme Court will come in and say gender identity is not recognized under the Equal Protection Clause as a suspect class, and gender identity is not recognized under Title IX because it was intended to protect biological gender and biological gender only.
West Virginia's law is completely consistent with this and cleanly and neatly uh uh crafted as such.
I think Supreme Court's gonna rule that, and we're finally gonna get some rollback on all the trans idolatry consuming our educational system and sports competition system in broader society.
Here's the major question.
How's Katanji Brown Jackson going to rule if they finally get a biologist in who says, yes, Katanji Brown Jackson?
Women have vaginas and men have penises.
Like it will she will she this is like something from the movie well with the Arnold Schwarz's name.
Yeah, boys have penises, girls have vaginas.
I mean, blast that would be blasphemy today.
Uh well the the insanity with which these people say things with a straight face, expecting people to believe them is is been incredible.
Uh the but I think the Supreme Court's gonna strike it all down, which will be good.
And in another Trump win, I think it's like win 18 in a row.
The but all they did is recognize the constitute.
The DC District Court, the DC Court of Appeals came in and said President Trump couldn't even use his rescission powers under the impoundment control act to not give money to people he doesn't want give to give money to, and the American people don't want the money to go to, including questionable foreign aid practices.
So the Supreme Court had to step in and say no, the federal courts don't get to override the president's empowerment control act.
Nobody gets to sue the president if he properly when he exercises authority under the Empowerment Control Act and restored the president's right to control federal funds, like the Constitution entitled him to.
So another another good ruling uh from the Supreme Court, which uh provides some hope as we go forward in the rest of the term, which uh started uh you know this past week.
Amazing.
Uh we got David DeHart over on Comedy Tube says 30 aught six is a 7.62 millimeter U.S. sniper rifle M14, it's a 7.62 millimeter, has a flash suppressor at the end of the barrel, also has a silencer for it, also AK-47.
All right.
What we're gonna do, let me read a few more of the tip questions while everyone gets their butts on over to the Yeah, we'll we'll cover over there when does a same-sex couple when they get divorced, when do they get to claim parenthood rights?
This would I did not give birth or cause the birth of the child.
I predict we'll get into when does it cause of action survived death and the removal of the Columbus statute, Statute of Columbus from an Italian section of New Haven.
Do they have any legal right or remedy?
We'll cover all of that, plus all the five dollar tips or more over at Viva, Barnes Law.
That locals dot com.
Uh, what I'm gonna do here, we're gonna go raid.
Um, who are we gonna go raid?
I just I I just had it.
We're going to raid.
I've lost the logo here.
Uh Matt wrote Matt Morse TV.
We're gonna go raid Matt Morse TV.
Uh uh, as I do that, come on over to Viva Barnes Law dot locals.com.
I'm gonna read the chats and raids while we do this.
If I have my fat fingers can type properly, I'll do this.
And uh let him know from once you came.
Matt Morse TV, he's talking Portland Antifa versus ICE.
It's gonna be interesting.
Raid confirmed.
Let me do let's do as many as I can real quick, real quick lack.
We got what can uh I'm gonna go all the way to the bottom of the met.
No, we're gonna have to like this.
Let's go back up here.
Uh confusion among our local workers about no tax on tips, actually, meaning same tax, but a moderated refund later.
Trump wasn't candid on this.
We talked about that.
It was I mean, that was Congress changing it in ways that undermined the efficacy of it.
Doctors are using prescription Lucorverin to kids with ASD.
Uh, I don't know what this is.
So I'll get my hands on some of it the way I got my hands on I have her mectin during COVID.
Doctors are refusing to help with kids with ASD.
Uh, that is uh Tylenol has killed what, 20 times more people than Ivermectin ever did.
Oh, Iromectin was prohibited for use and Tylenol incentivized.
500 a year, Robert, on average.
Buffalo Betsy, in the meantime, they'll help stand in the way for parents like me, us to getting answers because y'all say they work for the other side by mocking and criticizing those who've accepted.
We may have unwittingly played a role in our child harm, says Buffalo.
I say for all the my only, but for the grace of God, I you know, we our kids didn't get that, we didn't give our kids that jab, nor we were going to, but somebody in the locals chat put a photo in of Viva's hands.
It's just funny.
Uh, I want to look at that.
You're talking about the fat fingers.
And but by the way, it's like I've been bitten by ants.
This was just I was biking with my wife last night, and we're going through tall grass, and the ants just like start feeling the little bastards are biting me.
I just want to explain to all my uh uh relatives and family and friends that love camping out and doing things outdoors.
Florida.
I would not have invented indoors if you wanted us to stay outdoors.
Well, for Florida, it's I couldn't imagine actually camping.
Mosquitoes are bad, but not as bad as Quebec.
Uh, red ants, snakes, alligators.
We're biking.
We see a freaking snapping turtle on on our trail.
It was small though.
Uh cousin Eddie says the fr the professor in South Dakota should absolutely be fired.
We in South Dakota don't put up with morons.
We are clearly a small population.
Yeah, I'm I'm I think he shouldn't be fired, but I want to make sure I'm not saying that because I believe it, or because I just like seeing him get fired.
What can President Trump do against companies who have kept pandemic prices inflated post-pandemics, says grade 101.
Uh there's certain monopoly and antitrust.
That's that's where you know there's a great assistant attorney general for antitrust, Gail Slater.
She's trying to do really good work.
Times a certain Pam Bondi has interfered in the efficacy of that work.
If she could just stay out and encourage and incentivize uh what Slater is doing, then we could get at those kind of issues because often there's antitrust violations, monopolistic violations involved.
Buffalo Betsy says autism and denial of parents agree with Barnes wholeheartedly.
My daughter, nine years old, has autism spectrum disorder.
Some of these parents are so emotionally immature and stunted and selfish that they would rather shield themselves ignore from potential causes where they may feel implicated because they cannot wrestle with any internal guilt.
So they smear others as part of the psychological self-protective measure.
Absolutely.
It's gonna be the same thing with the COVID.
That's what they should be doing.
You imagine if like if if thalidomide children were not so obvious, if it weren't such an obvious correlation, they would say, oh, well, it's just it's genetic, like it's genetic.
It just it's just happened.
Um, let me do one.
Let's do a couple more over on Rumble just to get these, and I'll get to the rest afterwards.
Um, women field hockey is pretty good too, says Dan Vicious.
U.S. church shooting just now, two dead building on fire.
Yeah, so the the um the donations that allegedly made by the the guy to act blue or don't it's from it's another guy with the same name, so don't repeat that.
There's some screenshots that say he was an anti-Trumper.
I'm gonna just double check those in as much as I can.
Jay Techie says, Why is election day not a national holiday?
It should be, as far as I'm concerned.
Randy Edward, John Locke, two treaties of government was a main influence of James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, Tom Jefferson.
Per Locke, the right to bear arms is instrumental in policing rogue government.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
And it's self-defense.
People tend to forget that.
Like sometimes they get caught up in defending yourself against the government.
It's giving the power, uh, the means and the right of violence for your self-defense to you as an individual and not letting the state have a monopoly on it.
I believe that people are saying there's another uh another shooting.
Let me just see if I can find this.
Um it's clear they're just gonna unleash them unless we crack down.
We've got to massively crack down, and that's gotta be the shun and shame on the political permission culture aspect.
It's gotta be terminating people that are in positions of social authority aspect in terms of employment, uh, and keeping and not letting them stay in those positions of public social authority.
Uh, and it includes legal, civil, and criminal remedies, where appropriate for all of these groups, taking apart their funding mechanisms, taking apart their political protection network, taking apart their uh their their uh the way in which they organize.
Uh that you know, Tran Tifa is one of the most dangerous organizations since the Klan.
And I would say more dangerous than the Klan.
Uh, and also just to also be weary that the media will start reporting on any and every shooting, and then the they'll be this and they'll and they'll blow it up, knowing it causes copycats.
AOC la L O L say It Louder, Barnes.
AOL AOL, sorry, Donner.
Uh Bill Dozer says re-Kirk shooting.
I shot my buck last year at a similar distance and angle.
The 270 round I shot my deer with didn't exit.
It hit the shoulder blade, destroyed the heart, and broke apart inside.
Gunpowder residue test on Tyler.
We'll see evidence when they have their trial.
1973 stonewall riots is the mothership of controlling language use.
I would note he was arrested a day and a half later.
So that's gonna change what kind of physical evidence you're gonna get from that.
Yeah, well, if they find his clothing, maybe they'll find something there.
They found a fingerprint and on his on a screwdriver that he left up there when he screwed, I think the scope on the gun.
Yeah, uh, and apparently uh uh a for what do you call this part of the hand?
I'm blaming it.
Uh the palm.
Yeah, a palm print uh on the gun itself.
Yeah, but no, no one's gonna believe it because it's the FBI.
Uh Ginger Ninja says 1973 Stonewall riots is the mothership of controlling language.
That's Randy Edward.
Gay was an adjective, bright, happy, sunny.
Yep.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, I remember that.
Keeping so's gay and uh I mean a fag referenced a cigarette in London, not anymore.
Well, and it used to I well, I think that that goes back to was it a fag was a bundle of sticks that they used to burn.
I'm not sure.
Because they started a form, they're like, why don't we drop the T in the Q part?
Because these people are insane.
Keep in mind, Comey's daughter was in the Maxwell and Diddy trial.
Comey's son-in-law was in the Virginia Fed district.
Comey was in, yeah, absolutely.
This is ginger ninja.
Sherlin says, uh, much like with Luigi, what do you think law enforcement would be releasing crucial holdback evidence?
Photos, firearm, etc.
Well, I think one and I I understand the concern, and I'm all for more transparency.
The fact you're not seeing a lot of disclosures means this investigation is ongoing.
The case is not closed.
The the partner has disappeared from the apartment.
I suspect that's because they are in federal custody.
And my guess is that what they're doing, but not official federal custody.
So that they are a material witness and that they are putting the pressure on them to rat out everybody that was in this network that helped facilitate this.
My my theory is that the roommate was obviously in on it, had advanced knowledge, and is now and is now trying to save his butt.
Yes.
Uh fair point, gents not saying I know how it happened, just exploring theories.
This is squig going way back.
We don't see Tyler take the shot.
It's too early to claim this the single the single shooter on the roof.
And that's okay.
The it's the theories that are going a different.
I don't mind people saying, okay, what about this?
What about that?
I I mind when people start attacking Erica Kirk.
I mind when people start attacking TP USA.
I mind when people want to whitewash Trantifa.
Those are my problems.
All right, we got Duck Fat, which I always read that as F that, but uh I'm playing the undefeated at Good Logic this week with his FFL.
That's uh firearms license, right?
He has a slight thirty-three point lead going into tonight.
I have three players left.
Maybe that's not what it is.
Oh no, maybe football league.
Fantasy football league.
Um, good on that, Duck Fat.
Uh I can't say but uh uh Joe is great.
He was local counsel for me in uh in a recent case.
He got a little nervous, he goes, you know.
Joe is awesome.
Yeah, but yeah, yeah, Joe's great.
Good logic.
Uh good logic.
Uh they say in New York, uh, you can find him on YouTube and Rumble and locals.
Uh does great breakdown of a wide range of things.
Father's an old school orthodox Jews, got the big huge beard, uh, has all these kind of fascinating histories.
Uh, you know, you know, uh Joe grew up in that uh rabbi tradition, uh, or rabbi type tradition, I should say.
Orthodox tradition.
Uh, but always a fun, interesting uh listen to uh all the way through.
And Robert Govet, great breakdown of John Hill.
Great breakdown across the board.
Uh D O U V I E A, I believe.
Uh yeah, great follow online, uh, consistently YouTube Rumble locals as well.
Uh, he'll go through all the complaints, he'll go through the legal documents, he'll show you all the information.
Usually these really cool like presentation things.
He does amazing work here.
Let's see.
Uh my goodness.
So he's he's crushing it.
Let me uh let's let's just give one here.
Yeah, I just hung out with Robert.
He's also ripped like you've never seen this.
We have a stream ahead.
We've got liberals.
Married very well.
Married very about to marry very well.
Uh I was quite quite quite impressed.
I uh I am uh my eye I've got I've got the Mary Blinders on.
All right, everybody get your butts on over to locals.
We're gonna end it here.
Uh I'll be live tomorrow.
Robert, what do you have coming up this week?
Uh, not sure.
Definitely have Bourbons Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday at Viva Barnes Law dot locals dot com.
There's a Barnes brief posted.
Might have some hush hushes on you know, MK Ultra other projects uh this week that might be applicable and analogous to events and information in the news.
Uh so the I think that uh I I don't think I'm doing any other uh I have a bunch of client work.
Uh but uh the uh that that's it otherwise.
But so the Viva Barnes Law that locals dot com is where you can find all the interesting information and content uh that we provide and at our community, which is exceptional, extraordinary, and always above average, also provides.
And I'll be live tomorrow, three o'clock as usual, but Steve Baker's gonna come on, we're gonna talk about the uh FBI agents.
Okay, so we are ending it now on all platforms except for locals.
Here we go.
Export Selection