Viva & Barnes - Fined $28,000 for Going in the Forest! Live with Jeff Evely! AND MORE!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 11, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:16:26

Fined $28,000 for Going in the Forest! Live with Jeff Evely! AND MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you very much, Mr. President, and thank you, Madam Attorney General, and to all my partners here.
	We all want the same thing.
	We all want a safe city.
	We want a safe capital.
	We want to be able to bring our families here.
	We want to be able to come and enjoy the history that makes this place great.
	And unfortunately, we are not in that position right now.
	And Mr. President, I want to thank you for taking the step that we need right now to make criminals understand that they are not going to get away with it anymore.
	And I'm not going to stand here and go over and over the cases, but what I can.
	tell you is this.
	I see too much violent crime being committed by young punks who think that they can get together in gangs and crews and beat the hell out of you or anyone else.
	They don't care where they are.
	They can be in DuPont Circle, but they know that we can't touch them.
	Why?
	Because the laws are weak.
	I can't touch you if you're 14, 15, 16, 17 years old and you have a gun.
	I convict someone of shooting another person with an illegal gun on a public bus in the chest, intent to kill.
	I convict him and you know what the judge gives him?
	Probation.
	He says you should go to college.
	We need to go after the DC council and their absurd laws.
	We need to get rid of this concept of, you know, no cash pail.
	We need to recognize that the people who matter are the law abiding citizens.
	And it starts today, but it's not going to end today because the president is going to do everything we need to do to make sure that these emboldened criminals understand we see you, we're watching you, and we're going to change the law to catch you.
	And my final note is that.
	Just laughing at the oh no please.
	This is what always happens with Fox News.
	We see you when a Democrat says it versus a Republican says it means the exact opposite thing.
	We see you.
	We hear you.
	We'll do better.
	No, Janine Pirro says we see you.
	We're going to arrest you and put you in jail.
	Okay.
	Oh did I?
	Okay.
	These kids understand that the jurisdiction is through the state attorney general, Brian Schwab.
	I did a poster of the young man from Doge who was beaten bloody with a severe concussion, a broken nose.
	And then I did a poster of what happens to those kids because I can't arrest them.
	I can't prosecute them.
	They go to family court and they get to do yoga and arts and crafts enough.
	You gotta like that.
	By the way, this is the news of the day that I could not, could not avoid talking about before we get into the madness in Canada.
	Wait on a second.
	Come on.
	It's the Trump is federalizing DC here.
	Trump seizes control of DC.
	And I'm gonna just share some mild insights.
	There's so many ads.
	Janine Pirro, U.S. Attorney for Washington, DC vowed to change the laws in DC to crack down on what she described as a surge in young people committing violence.
	We don't need to get into this story in any meaningful detail, except to highlight the fact that when I won't say when Republicans are in power, it's more law and order.
	It tends to be more law and order, but there's no one in their health of mind that can disagree with what Trump is doing to try to tackle violent crime in DC.
	It's a veritable cesspool of violence.
	I went down there and I stayed in my hotel at night.
	Not that that makes any big difference.
	I got a little lost and ended up a couple of blocks from where I thought I was supposed to be.
	And you can you can feel the difference wherever you go there.
	You crime is rampant.
	It's it's a known fact.
	And I don't know who could have a problem with wanting to tackle crime except for those who sympathize with the criminals or the lunatics on CNN.
	You you you won't believe this because it's an actual I didn't get the entire segment in context.
	Western Lenzman video producer Politics Media puts out a tweet that says Dana Bash response to Trump federalizing DC police to fight violent crime.
	I won't spoil the surprise by reading it, listen to this insanity or just another day ending in Y at the propaganda network of CNN.
	I should note that the most violent moment in recent history in DC was January 6.
	And it was an attack on the United States Capitol by a lot of people who were doing it in the name of Donald Trump.
	And it included the people who were hurt, included members of law enforcement.
	I should note that the Did it include Ashley Babbitt, who was summarily executed by Michael Byrd, the lawyer?
	Did it include Roseanne Boyland, who was beaten by the police and then trampled and died?
	They attributed her death to drug overdose medical emergency.
	Well, there was a little bit of violence.
	There was what I consider to be a summary execution carried out that day.
	It wasn't the Jan Sixers against the police.
	It was the police against an unarmed woman, Ashley Babbitt, lunatics, like batshit crazy lunatics living in another dimension of reality.
	Malone put out a tweet highlighting the fact that DC ranks number five in terms of violent crime among big cities.
	This is the 2024 murder rates by city.
	You have number one is Saint Louis.
	Number two per 100,000 is so obscene, by the way.
	This is like South American gang town level crime, murder rate per 100,000, 54.4, Saint Louis, Baltimore, 51.1, New Orleans, 40.6, Detroit, 32.1 per 100,000, Washington, DC, 27.3, Philadelphia, 20.1, Chicago, 18.
	Chicago looks good by comparison.
	Atlanta, Houston, LA.
	Canada, Houston, LA, New York City.
	Now, what a lot of pundits love to do, by the way, is say, oh, look at these, how many Republican states are in there?
	Carl Malone, Carl Malone, Robert Malone says DC rangs fifth for murder rates in all large cities in the USA.
	I did something for fun because you feel free to bookmark this tweet.
	I'll give it to you so you can invoke it during your next argument with someone who says, oh, seven of the top ten states for murder rate or violent crime are red states.
	Yeah.
	You know what I did just for fun?
	I asked ChatGPT for this one, but I knew half of the answer.
	Here's another fun fact about the mayors.
	of those crime-ridden cities, all democrat.
	I hope I didn't make a mistake here.
	I'm pretty sure I didn't.
	If I did, please correct me.
	All democrat, each and every one of those crime-ridden cities, democrat.
	Now, I'm not saying there's any correlation between democrat-run cities and democrat-run states and crime and other issues, social issues.
	I'm not saying there's a causality because I don't know, but there's sure as sugar is a correlation.
	Every single one of them.
	Saint Louis, Missouri, Teshara Jones, Baltimore, Maryland, Brandon Scott, New Orleans, Latoya Contrell, Mike Dugan for Detroit, Muriel Bowser for DC.
	And then we go on, Eric Adams, I guess, might be an independent.
	Now, I think he still counts as a Democrat.
	Each and every one of them.
	You know who are the people objecting to all this?
	The Democrats, because the law and order or crime and disorder is a feature, not a bug.
	And here I'm going to give this tweet here.
	Oh, I had a little more on this before we bring in our guest of the day and go to the madness in Canada.
	It was Kevin Cork puts out a tweet earlier today as the victim of an armed carjacking in DC, not to mention numerous other property crimes.
	I can tell you firsthand, this is no way to live.
	And then they're talking about the stats.
	It's phenomenal.
	It's a bold move.
	You can hate Trump all you want, but it's the right move.
	Anyways, that's the latest breaking news of the day.
	Maybe one day DC is going to be a place where you can go walk freely.
	You can go walk freely now.
	And so long as you stay within like the perimeter of the White House, the perimeter of the Washington Monument, you're good.
	You venture off anywhere.
	I mean, I I had Uber drivers.
	I had hotel employees tell me, watch where you're going during the day, especially at night.
	Holy crab apples.
	Everybody.
	Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler, getting ready to get off the road to go to Chattanooga, Tennessee for the Viva Barnes Law.
	It's not really, it's a 1776 fundraiser, but it's the Viva Barnes Law dot locals dot com weekend conference.
	I don't know how you call it kind of lofty conference, but we're going to have speakers panels, the behavior panel is going to be there, a number of amazing guests.
	There's an auction going on online right now, which I'll give you to raise funds for 1776 Law Center.
	So Barnes can continue doing the Lord's work that he's been doing.
	But before we get into our guest of the day, Jeff Eavely, about the madness going on in Canada, which some of you won't believe.
	We'll do a little thanking our sponsors for today's show to make this all possible.
	And well, let's hold on a second.
	Here we go.
	I got to get the QR code, people.
	We got two sponsors for today's show, both fantastic.
	The coffee I drink in the morning and the kimchi one I take.
	I actually eat kimchi and love it as well, but most people don't love kimchi because it tastes like cabbage, but the pills.
	the capsules are the way to go for those who need good gut biome.
	There is a war happening right now and it's probably not where you think it's in your gut, a battle between good and bad bacteria can determine your health.
	Kimchi one from Brightcore Nutrition is the fermented superfood your body needs to arm the good guys with the right weapons to defeat the bad actors.
	Containing over 900 strains of beneficial bacteria in each capsule, Kimchi one supports healthy digestion, fortifies your immune system and helps detoxify your body.
	Kimchi has also been shown to reduce the risk of obesity, promotes smaller waistlines by curbing your appetite naturally and boosting your metabolism.
	Kimchi one is an all natural made in the USA non GMO capsule that gives you all the beautiful strains that come with raw kimchi but in your belly.
	I highly recommend it because all health starts in your gut.
	So putting the right fermented superfood in your gut improves every aspect of your health, skin, hair, mental performance, and you can do it the natural way.
	Today you can get an exclusive offer by clicking on the QR code that you're looking at right now.
	Use code VIVA.
	You'll get 25% off your entire order or even better, call them up.
	You've seen from the two interviews I've had with Kim, uh, Kim Bright, who's the founder of the company, and Ellie Hirsch last week.
	We talked about gut health.
	We talked about a bunch of other fun stuff.
	If you call, you'll get 50% off your order.
	Call 888 501 2209 888 501 2209 and third time's always the char charm.
	888 501 2209.
	Link is in the description.
	It's fantastic stuff.
	And after that, before we get into the madness in Canada, people, 1775 Coffee, our second and last sponsor of today's show.
	They have my coffee right behind me, right there.
	People, you're already drinking coffee.
	Everybody drinks it.
	You might as well support a company that supports free speech and makes delicious coffee.
	And you're probably drinking coffee that doesn't do anything really good for you other than giving you the coffee.
	1775 Coffee makes rejuvenate coffee.
	It's different science backed clean Arabica Arabica coffee infused with CaAKG, a powerful compound study for its ability to support longevity, cellular energy and metabolism at the deepest level.
	That means sharper mornings, no crash, more focus, long term benefits that you will thank yourself in the future for having done in the past.
	I drink it every day right here, booyah.
	And it is fantastic.
	You can actually judge how I look for 46 years old.
	46 years old.
	Oh boy, if you're going to drink coffee, drink the good coffee.
	1775 Rumble partner, delicious coffee.
	If you don't get to rejuvenate, they've got bold, medium, delicious Peabody.
	It's amazing.
	Amazing head over to 1775 coffee dot com, use code VIVA and try Rejuvenate Coffee right now.
	All right, now we step into the insanity people.
	We're going through the looking glass to Canada.
	Before I bring in our guest, and you'll forgive the cuss words, people, I didn't really cuss, I just said POS, which stands for piece of shit.
	For those of you who don't know, the premier of Newfoundland who has a striking resemblance to Beta O'Rourke.
	Someone said he's got low T, so he's got to be the big T tyrant.
	I'm going to play a longer portion of this.
	that I didn't play last night during the Viva and Barnes Sunday Night Law Extravaganza.
	Listen to this jackass tyrant tell you that you can't go in the forest.
	They will bankrupt you with fines and they will lock you up if you don't pay those fines.
	So as we said, we have taken decisive action to help address the situation.
	Yesterday, we announced we would increase fines for violating the forest fire regulations.
	And as I said today, we'll share the details.
	So effective today, new fines will range from $50,000 to $150,000.
	How did you get that number?
	For a first offense, when a ticket is issued, fines will increase from $75 to $50,000.
	And imprisonment in default of payment will increase from three days to up to six months.
	How'd you do that?
	For a subsequent offense, fines will increase from $150,000 to $75,000.
	Imprisonment for not paying will increase from six days to up to six months.
	How'd you get those numbers?
	For summons issued, A first offense fines will increase from $500 to $50,000 to $100,000 range.
	How'd you do that?
	And imprisonment will increase from up to three months to up to one year.
	How'd you get those numbers?
	Consequent offense, fines increase from a minimum of $1,000 to $75,000 to $150,000.
	And imprisonment in default will be increased from up to three months from up to one year.
	I'm going to say it again.
	Lock this POS up.
	That is what he deserves.
	That is where he belongs.
	But I just want to get to the end here where I think they had reporters asking, how did you come up with these numbers?
	So we...
	Numbers and why didn't you decide?
	So between $50,000 and $150,000.
	How did we arrive at those numbers?
	And why did you decide to go that high?
	Inflation, you know, for prison time.
	So we looked at other fines, I guess, across the country.
	We certainly looked at where ours were, and they were incredibly low.
	And that's not surprising given the fact that, you know, a wildfire season like this certainly wasn't contemplated when that legislation was drafted.
	I mean, times change.
	Oh, fire season like this wasn't contemplated.
	When that legislation was drafted is probably the biggest load of shit you can possibly imagine any human on earth saying.
	And here we are now.
	I think it was definitely appropriate to increase the fines by by um a serious significant amount um not only to send a message that it mean that we mean business but to punish individuals in the event that they do break the regulation so um you know those those laws and those penalties um always have several factors into why they're why we arrive where they are and it's for deterrence and for punishment.
	Inflation.
	It's like the inflation of tyranny.
	That is the backdrop of what's going on in Canada, people.
	Now we're going to bring on Jeff Eavely, who is a veteran.
	He's going to tell us his life story and how he got fined 28,372,50 dollars for taking a not even a gander into the woods.
	Jeff, I'm bringing you in.
	Let's see how I do this here like this.
	I can't see too good.
	Jeff, sir, how goes the battle?
	Oh, it is going and it is a battle.
	I can tell you that much.
	I've been doing the media blitz all weekend.
	And man, I thought this story was on fire when I first started doing interviews, but my whole day today has been in front of cameras.
	So, well, I mean, thank you very much for coming on.
	I mean, first of all, have we never met in person, right?
	We met at the convoy briefly.
	Okay.
	I will forgive myself for not remembering the specifics of who I met during the convoy.
	That was one hell of a Jeff, tell everybody who you are.
	I do want to dive into your life because I think it's absolutely relevant to where you are now and fascinating and people can learn and, you know, what's the word I'm looking for?
	Take inspiration from it, but tell people who you are.
	Well, I mean, first of all, I would say that I'm nobody.
	I mean, it doesn't really matter who I am.
	The truth stands or falls on its own and the law stands or falls on its own.
	So don't shoot the messenger.
	I'll say that to some of the people out there who would.
	But yeah, if you'd like to know a little bit more about me, I mean, I'm kind of a downhome East Coast boy and I grew up here in Cape Breton Island, the home of my heart in Nova Scotia.
	I joined the military when I was 22 as an electronics specialist.
	And when I was 22 in 2001, I'll say, and I did a 20-year career.
	I did a tour in Afghanistan in 2009.
	I was posted to Florida, Tyndall Air Force Base to work with NORAD for a four-year stent from 2010 to 2014.
	I went to Iraq in 2019.
	And, you know, I mean, I tried to stay active in the community my entire career.
	I started coaching boxing when I was 24.
	I moved into mixed martial arts when I was about 26.
	I ran the mixed martial arts club in Kandahar while I was there.
	I did some more teaching when I got down south there on base.
	I would volunteer to run some classes during the lunch break.
	And after hours, I coached junior girls cheerleading and junior girls softball.
	And I did some more softball coaching when I got to Ottawa in 2014.
	And I spent the last three years of my career helping homeless veterans off the streets of our nation's capital in Ottawa.
	before I was medically released in 2021, September in in fact so I missed the vaccine mandate announcement for the Canadian Armed Forces by about three weeks and the day I took possession of my retirement home in Cape Breton was November 1, 2021.
	That was the same date that vaccine passports came into effect.
	I bought my house crawling distance from the local legion.
	I was refused service there.
	When you met me, I would have been wearing a red hat at the time.
	I said, less we forget.
	And I took a permanent marker and crossed out the less.
	because that's how I feel.
	I feel like we forget that these rights and freedoms that are clearly being taken for granted and being used for toilet paper by our elected officials and our senior bureaucrats, these are the legacy of the fallen and less we forget that we all have a sacred civic duty to safeguard that inheritance for generations to come.
	So I feel like my simple act of civil disobedience was a matter of civic duty.
	I've been standing on guard for thee my entire life and I don't really know how to do anything else.
	So yeah, that's what I was trying to do.
	I think we have a matter, an issue of principle here.
	It really comes down to principles over politics at this point because I just find, like I said, the way that these rights and these freedoms have been trounced given that so many people have given their lives for them.
	I find that to be an egregious affront to veteran dignity and to human dignity more broadly.
	You were you were born and raised on Cape Breton Island.
	Yes, sir.
	I want to I think I need to show some pictures for people to appreciate just it was I did a road trip there with my wife like twenty years ago, one of the most beautiful places on Earth.
	What did your parents do, if I may ask?
	My mother was a physiotherapist.
	My father had a few different jobs around town, you know, kind of office work, that sort of thing.
	The road across Cape Breton, it's it's it's it's it's glorious.
	It's a little island.
	It is in fact an island off of, we could see it right here.
	Unlike Newfoundland, which is an archipelago.
	Okay, interesting.
	I always we call Newfoundland the Rock because if you, what's the difference between an island and an archipelago?
	An archipelago is a series of islands, like the Fogo Island in Newfoundland.
	And when you get off the ferry, it's as welcome to Newfoundland, where as it is the island of Cape Breton.
	It is a beautiful place.
	It's small.
	What was the population of the town that you were from?
	It's about 35,000.
	I'm from Sydney.
	Okay.
	So okay, that's big enough.
	And now you went into the army in 2001, you said.
	Air Force.
	Air Force, and you served from 2009 active duty to 2019, give or take?
	2001 until 2021.
	I did a full 20 year career.
	What is that?
	I mean, I don't know how you summarize a 20 year experience in service, if you can.
	I mean, what is that like?
	What did you see?
	What was the what type of engagement?
	What did you see in the 20 years that you do this?
	I guess I saw a lot.
	I mean, I didn't really think of it that way at the time, but looking back now and just kind of comparing notes with my civilian peers, it seems like I saw quite a lot.
	And that is, I think, kind of the idea.
	I went into it as a young man, expecting an experience of character development.
	And I read Orwell when I was in high school and I was quite taken with it.
	And F. Scott's Fitzgerald was quite good too.
	And Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, well, not Aldous Huxley, but Ernest Hemingway, I would definitely put in this bin.
	They're all World War 1 veterans.
	So it seems like some of the greatest insights into the human condition have been coming from those who serve our civilization in war.
	So I kind of wanted to better understand what it was that they were getting at, because it all seemed so strange to me at the time.
	I understood that there was kind of something there, but I couldn't quite understand it.
	So I feel like I really understand it now.
	And that is kind of one of the things that wasn't so bright about my experience with the military.
	I mean, it has had problems with corruption, you know, at the highest levels for as long as I was in uniform.
	I mean, they had the Somali affair in'93.
	I joined in 2001.
	So it was there when I got there.
	And I got to know it quite well.
	I filed ten grievances in my twenty year military career.
	I don't know anyone else who did that because, you know, I was told when I went to basic training that if I see something I should say something.
	We all have a responsibility within the institution and we all have a duty to defy illegal orders.
	That's what I was taught.
	You know, and of course the question that always comes up within the group is, well, how am I going to know if the order is illegal?
	And the answer is that you use your own judgment.
	And am I going to be protected when they come after me for defying that order?
	No, you're going to go in front of a judge and a judge is going to rule on the legality of that order and if you turn out to be wrong then you're going to be charged under the National Defense Act.
	Now, why would we impose such a burden on our young people?
	Because that is what separates us from Nazis.
	So I'm just keeping, I'm just in keeping with the principles that I've tried to embody my entire life when it comes down to defiring a lot of these illegal mandates.
	I see it as a civic duty at this stage.
	And, you know, I think that I hoped that with the video that I put up of me receiving the fine last Friday, that I was able to provide an example for civil disobedience that others can follow.
	Without getting into the nature of those grievances, for those who may not know what grievances are, you see corruption and you report corruption.
	Well, a grievance like you would have to be impacted by the corruption.
	So it's your grievance.
	You've been aggrieved by the chain of command and you submit your complaint to the chain of command.
	And what was it?
	You're just being whiny baby.
	What was the, I guess you can remember the one biggest or the one that sticks out the most in terms of a grievance you filed?
	Sure.
	So while I was posted to the United States.
	states, the higher headquarters, which is in Colorado, they, when it came time for the personnel evaluation reports, these are annual evaluations that form the basis for promotion.
	What we, what the way it's supposed to be done is your supervisor writes your evaluation and there will be some vetting on the part of the chain of command and then it goes to a unit board where we kind of rack and stack them and we just say this guy got the best score and that guy got the next best score and we give them a number for the unit like one to ten and then it goes you know the the highest ranking PERs will go to the formation board in Colorado.ado Springs was the old way of doing things.
	Now we call it the bun toss.
	Like all the supervisors kind of write the name of their favorite guy on a bun and they all throw their bun at the wall and whichever one bounces off and lands closest is the number one guy and gets the best score.
	It's not quite that extreme, but it's basically like the supervisor will stand up there and say, this is my favorite guy and this is why I think you should vote for him as the favorite guy and he should get the number one score and then everybody votes and then they have a scoring matrix where they say number one gets this score, number two gets that score and then they dictate those scores to the supervisors.
	So I saw it happen a couple of times with my subordinates' evaluations and when I saw it happen with mine, I mean, after I spent three years telling them that you're not allowed to do this, this, it's actually something that came out of the commission into Somalia.
	They revamped the evaluation and promotion system, gave them a turnkey solution complete with a set of instructions fully available to anybody using the program by clicking the help button.
	And the people in charge, they never read those instructions.
	They just kept doing what they were always, what they always did, which was the favorite guy contest.
	And so when it impacted me, I had grounds to submit a grievance, and that has teeth.
	Because it will go outside the unit and be on the formation if I take it all the way.
	So when I submitted that, before I knew it, my medical file was under review and ended up medically repatriated to Canada of all places to get health care based on a year and a half old injury for which I had already been cleared by the local doctors.
	Like they were trying to run me out of the military.
	They were trying to release me, trying to release me medically.
	And when I got to Ottawa, which is where I was posted, not only did I have to wait five weeks just to see a general practitioner, but when I saw him., he said, You're gonna need a nerve conduction studies.
	So that's in order to be cleared.
	And that's gonna take another five months.
	So it was so urgent to get me back to Canada on eight weeks notice with my two kids in tow as a single father that, you know, that they only gave me eight weeks to do it.
	And then when I got there, they said, You're gonna have to wait six months before we can, you know, and the thing is at that time, you couldn't be promoted while you were on the medical category.
	So I lost a promotion.
	They put me on shift work with my two kids at home.
	And it was an absolute nightmare.
	So that's kind of the way that they roll.
	They will get you somehow.
	And eventually I was clear, like when I talked to my general practitioner, he told me about the nerve conduction studies and I was like, well, I already did that.
	And he said, when did you do that?
	I was like, over a year ago.
	And he says, well, it's not on your file.
	Well, I will get you a copy.
	So I contacted my neurologist in Florida and got them to fax it up.
	And when I gave it to the doctors, they cleared me.
	And so then I got the promotion and a new position in off-shift work.
	But that is the kind of greaseball tactics, like the lowest of the lowest that you will see coming from the highest levels of the Canadian Armed Forces.
	And that same corruption that I've been battling for the first twenty years of my adult life is what I see everywhere in Canada now.
	So, and, you know, I think we need to have teeth like I did with my grievance.
	I can talk to them until I'm blue in the face and I can cite the policy chapter and verse and it just doesn't matter.
	There's the same kind of double think that we see everywhere.
	I saw that in the military as well.
	I mean, I could show them in black and white, this is what it says right here that you're not allowed to do this.
	And they'll say, no, that's not what that says.
	You're crazy.
	There's something wrong with you, right?
	So I see the same thing happening right now with our charter rights, especially when it comes to these woods bands.
	And I found the proclamation, the order in my own judgment to be illegal.
	And I'm adhering to my duty to defy it.
	So now when I took this to court in 2023 with a judicial review on my charter rights alone, the judge said I could not stand on my rights alone, that there had to be money involved.
	And had I gotten a fine, then I would have had standing.
	So they dismissed it in 2023.
	And they brought it back in now.
	I was like, I know what I have to do to make sure this gets to a courtroom.
	I got to go out and get fined.
	The 2023 was in respect of the COVID measures.
	No, that was the first Woods Band that Nova Scotia put in place.
	Oh, geez.
	After the, after the, the, the.
	the arson biggest forest fires in Nova Scotia's history in 2023.
	There were no active fires on Cape Breton Island when they banned me from the woods in my local area.
	Yeah, the woods.
	Okay, sorry.
	I thought the first one where you hadn't actually gotten a monetary fine was COVID related, but it was the first ban, which many of us didn't fully appreciate or weren't aware it already was done in 2023.
	Before we even get there, just a quick one.
	So you get out of the army, you say medically discharged.
	Air Force, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
	These are the citizens how a lowly citizen doesn't fully understand the divisions within there.
	You get out.
	How do you reintegrate into, I say reintegrate or integrate into.
	into civilian society?
	What did you do?
	How did you get involved with the People's Party of Canada.
	And then we're getting to the tickets, I promise.
	Well, I didn't reintegrate very well.
	I can tell you that because I was barred from society.
	So integration was a bit of a barrier to my reintegration.
	And when I was refused service of the Legion, like I said, I put on that red hat and crossed out the last from Last We Forget.
	And I just started defying the mandates.
	I mean, I was going, I would shop.
	I would just go about my daily business and refuse to put on a mask.
	I was arrested a couple of times.
	The first time I was charged with obstructing.
	I submitted a charter defense, I guess, you know, because I'm used to doing military grievances, but really, I should have held those cards closer to my chest because I submitted the charter defense.
	And then the day I showed up in court, I was the only one.
	So the police, the witnesses, the complainants, nobody showed up.
	And the judge said, well, none of the witnesses showed up, so case dismissed.
	And then, you know, then my charter defense never gets heard on the merits.
	And the same thing happened the second time I got arrested.
	They gave me the $2,700 fine for not wearing my mask in Walmart.
	And so I. I submitted another charter defense for the fine, and then two days before we were due to show up in court, the crown rejected the charges.
	And I have stood in open court in one of these other cases, for example.
	I think it was the last time I did the 2023 Woods ban, and I said to the judge, I told him that story, and I said, so it was all a shakedown.
	They all knew that this was never going to pass the Oaks test, okay?
	And they went ahead and they did it anyway, and then they skirted the law by keeping it out of court.
	So, you know, they're slippery buggers.
	Well, and they got it, they got a ton of people to pay for them in fear of this.
	Some of them, some of the judges upheld the fines in different provinces.
	So you you have your run-ins with COVID measures.
	Ultimately, you didn't get convicted.
	Do you have no criminal record as a result of anything of this?
	I have a mischief and obstruct charge from the convoy and I was also charged with breach of an undertaking because I signed an undertaking to get released after the convoy.
	And then Neil Sheard called Rolling Thunder, which was a bike rally and a reflecting ceremony to give dignity back to the monument and to the veterans who were beaten and drugged off it.
	So like I just said, well, I know what I'm doing.
	I'm going to that.
	And you guys can come out and arrest me again, which they did.
	And I think they're still holding $5,000 worth of bail over over that one.
	So yeah, I got charged with the breach on that one.
	And I pled guilty to it.
	I was like, yeah, I knew what I was doing.
	I even called my lawyer and told her to expect a call.
	So, you know, guilty.
	Ultimately, like they bundled it all together and gave me one full sentence at the end of it, which was a year's probation and 50 hours community service, which we appealed.
	And the appeal was denied.
	So now it looks like we're heading for the Supreme Court.
	It is, it's, it's absolutely sanity.
	This was the Rolling Thunder was to return to the Cenotaph, which was the War Memorial in Ottawa, where they claimed that protesters were defecating on it, urinating on it, defacing it, when in reality I went there and everyone saw it.
	The veterans were protecting it, shoveling snow.
	And then the Rolling Thunder was, was that a year later or two years?
	How much longer?
	Oh, that was April.
	That was April of 2022.
	It was only a few months.
	Okay.
	You could have given me a couple more weeks, by the way, Neil.
	I got snowed off the road in New Brunswick, because you have to go just as far north in New Brunswick as you do west.
	So me and the Atlantic crew, we got snowed off the road and got a hotel and rented a car because we were going to make it on our bikes.
	So it's unbelievable.
	I've shown the video.
	I won't show it again now, but then we get to, let's say it's 2023 is going to loop into 2025.
	2023 was the biggest forest fire in Nova Scotia history.
	As far as I understand and recollect, it was the result of arson.
	It was a dry season as well.
	I don't know what the forest management is like, but I think it's not particularly good from what I've seen.
	I actually read an article that said they can't really remove debris because it involves going too far into the forests.
	So therefore they don't remove any debris and you have the conditions you have.
	But 2023 was arson period.
	The largest I think the guy got convicted but it was of a lesser charge.
	Yeah.
	So during 2023, who's the premier?
	Was it Tim Houston as well?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Tim Houston, Progressive Conservative, issues a ban.
	What did you do with that ban in 2023?
	I mean, what I did was I submitted the charter application.
	I submitted the judicial review on charter grounds and I said that the bans violated the charter, but like I said, because there was no money involved, the judge dismissed it on standing.
	So that was the end of that.
	Like they tried, the Crown tried to argue mootness because by the time it got to court, the ban had been lifted.
	I argued that no, it is not moot because they're going to do it again.
	So clearly I was right and they were wrong.
	And I think I was probably right on the standing too.
	It's it's aberrant to me that I can't stand on my rights in a Canadian court.
	Jeff, it's something we talk about all the time on my channel on Sunday nights with Barnes.
	Like they say, it's latches, ripeness or standing.
	So you either waited too long, you're too early or you don't have standing and it's the way they get out of it.
	They did the same thing with the constitutional charges for the COVID measures, federal court came around and said moot now because they've rescinded them or suspended them.
	Insanity.
	So you try to challenge it in 2023 and they say you have no standing because you suffered no injury.
	This time around, they go for another ban because it worked so well in 2023.
	Nobody said boo about it to the point where I don't think many people knew about it.
	And this time you say, well, I've got to go get me a fine.
	You go to the police.
	It's not a police station.
	It's a D. What was it?
	DWS?
	DNR.
	Department of Rescue or do not resuscitate is typically the way I know it.
	So you go there, you let them know what you're going to do.
	I might have to pull up the video.
	You literally just crawl through the forest for 30 yards come out tell people what happened well um i i called ahead and i let the supervisor know what i was doing and what you know that i intended to go into the woods and it was for the purpose of uh receiving the fine and he told me that his guys didn't come on shift until 4 p.m and i said okay i'll come by at 4 p.m and uh and so i went down there and um as you can tell from the video like i went in and
	i explained where i was coming from um i i told them everything that i just told you that i had challenged it in 2023 but they said that i had to get a fine in order to be heard in court um so i'm not trying to make any trouble for you guys, okay?
	I'm trying to make trouble for Tim Houston, that's it.
	And unfortunately, the court has told me that I have to go through this process of getting fined in order for my case to be heard on the merits.
	So I will be going into the woods today.
	And, you know, there was a little bit of pushback, which I think is very much in line with what they're expected to do initially.
	The guy even threatened to double my fine.
	And I was like, no, you're not going to do that.
	But he threatened to double my fine to $50,000.
	And I was like, yeah, that sounds good.
	Well, I want to what part of this I want to highlight?
	My entire audience has seen it, as has yours, I presume, but it was just about what your excursion into the woods was.
	This was the extent.
	You let them know you go into the woods.
	I don't know how they how they knew it was off limits.
	Oh, they said out there is off limits, so you go into it.
	I don't know that there's a good spot to do it.
	Or iPhone.
	It's Samsung.
	I think it is.
	But I'm just going to make this as painless as I can for those guys.
	Break some bushwhacking here.
	Make it an even bigger fine for bushwhacking.
	Then you go in and they say, come and we'll write you the ticket.
	Okay.
	Uh, is there any part that I should highlight for the purposes of this?
	I mean, that's that's basically the gist of it.
	Everybody's seen it on my channel.
	I'll leave it in the backdrop because we want to come back to it.
	Um, okay.
	Okay.
	It's a max of 25,000 dollars for the fine, right?
	It's it's not it's not it's not No, it's it's 28,872 dollars and 50 cents.
	Well, that's after.
	Hold on, but no, what I'm going to say is they didn't they could have given you they could have arbitrarily decided to give you a $5,000 fine on because it's $25,000 max, not a fixed $25,000, unless I'm mistaken.
	You know, I I couldn't say for sure.
	I know you mentioned it.
	So, uh, either way, they give you the full $25,000.0 in change, which is for the victim compensation fund that every ticket speeding ticket contributes to, plus taxes.
	Yeah.
	So flesh this out now.
	I mean, okay, just tell us how you feel when they're actually, when they are solidifying the insanity.
	What's going through your mind?
	You know, I think I just tried to find the humor in the situation more so than anything.
	That was actually my first lesson in Afghanistan was that humor is a coping strategy for humans.
	And you want to hear the things that fly out of soldiers'mouths in a war zone.
	it gets pretty dark.
	i And I even knew a few guys that had some issues when they came back to Canada and they're reflecting on their experience and wondering, you know, who that monster was speaking through their mouths.
	And I was like, you're not a monster.
	You're just a human.
	Like you did what you had to do to get through it with your psyche intact.
	And, you know, jokes don't do any harm.
	So it's a net benefit to you.
	It's a net good.
	So that's the way that I try to approach.
	what I'm doing now.
	I mean, I do think that we're in a war.
	It's not a shooting war, but it's kind of like the new face of war.
	And so I always advise everybody that you should stay frosty, keep a level head in these situations.
	It's a line that I take from the movie Generation Kill.
	And it's very true.
	Like it's not the hotheads that win wars, okay?
	It's the cool and collected types, the pros, you know, and that's how I tried to approach this was like a professional.
	And in my experience, what I try to tell people, this is like there's two things you got to remember when you're going to war.
	Number one, you can't take it personally.
	If you take it personally, you're not going to last.
	You're going to burn out, right?
	You're going to crash and burn.
	And number two, you're not going to save all the children.
	We are going to take casualties along the way.
	That's just part of it.
	So, you know, whatever you have to do to keep your sanity intact, you know, tell some jokes and try to have a little bit of fun, no matter what.
	Like we, we have to have a little bit of fun while we're at work.
	And, and so that's how I tried to approach the situation while they were writing the ticket for me.
	I think I even said, Oh, victim search charge, hey, wow.
	Like I'm kind of laughing at it, really.
	And then when I got outside, I was still kind of laughing.
	Like, look at this ridiculous fine of almost thirty thousand dollars for spending ninety secondss in the bush here.
	You say not take it personally.
	And then flip side, you know, you talk about questioning things and what makes the West different than the Nazis is that you're not going to get the willing executioners to carry out Hitler's orders just because they're following orders.
	I'm having, admittedly, the orders are not the same.
	And so to that extent the comparison fails.
	But I don't, I don't see the distinction any more in terms of authorities in Canada defying these unlawful orders that they are carrying out.
	The police there not only carried them out, threatened to, you know, do it twice., it penalizes you to the fullest extent of the law.
	And their excuse is, well, we're just doing our job.
	They're not hauling people off in carts yet.
	And I say that sort of tongue in cheek, but they're just following orders, much like everyone else of other eras, Soviet, Nazi, whatever.
	How do you relate to these people who, on the one hand, don't have probably the same life experience that you have to have learnt the lesson that you've had, now basically tyrannizing you and just following orders?
	How do you internalize that?
	Well, it's like I said, I try not to take it personally.
	And as disappointing and gut wrenching as it is to see everybody failing in their civic duty to stand on guard for thee, I try to remind myself that, say, the guys at DNR, for example, they're just regular guys and they're doing the best they can.
	I have a much different life experience than they do.
	And perhaps I'm blessed in some ways that they are not, that maybe my understanding is a little bit more advanced.
	And so it shouldn't.
	want to come into it, you know, thinking that I'm going to penalize these people or take vengeance out on them.
	I think they're lost and they need to be shown the way.
	So I try to approach it with a little bit of leadership and professionalism, and I'm happy with the results that I got from DNR.
	Well, and I say you don't want to penalize them and you live in it's still pretty small.
	35,000 is big but small.
	I presume you're easily identifiable.
	Have you felt any reprisals outside of the scope of your overt acts of defiance?
	Do you get pulled over more often?
	Do you get, have you got audited yet?
	Like, have you felt any other reprisals?
	I haven't left the house in three days.
	I've been doing media appearances basically since the minute I got home from doing my from from getting my fine.
	But people have been reaching out to me over messenger and I mean I can count maybe a handful of messages that were negative like literally less than five but overwhelmingly the support is in my favor.
	People have had enough and you're messing with K-Prattners and their ATVs now and just like fishing, hunting, hiking.
	uh like in and their precious un has a universal declaration on human rights by the way and you know the full participation in the cultural aspects of your community is, I think, Article 26.
	So, you know, if there's anything that's culturally Nova Scotiaan, it's going into the woods to hike and fish and hunt and ATV.
	Now, when it comes to ATVs, I'm open to an argument that there's an increased risk of fire there, of course, but, you know, when it comes to my sneakers, I am not.
	So that's where the really unreasonableness comes in.
	Well, I say, I want to bring up one message because it seems that the vocal haters are very loud and very proud on Twitter or X. And they might give you the impression, my impression is that there are far too many Canadians who are not just putting up with it, but supporting this tyranny.
	One, you don't take it personally.
	And I mean, I would have laughed it off also.
	But POSs are POSs who need to be called out.
	And there was this doctor, son of a bitch, piece of shiser, who actually had the balls.
	I had to look it up just to make sure he's, you know, he's a doctor.
	I think he's born, he's born in Halifax apparently.
	I who has the balls to write, I apologize to every single firefighter in Canada who left their family and put their life on the line as our nation burns from coast to coast that there are selfish people like this in our great nation.
	The rest of us respect your sacrifice.
	This is the arrogance and pomposity of a maybe he served and maybe he didn't know you served.
	The pomposity I just I replied to him.
	Did you see my reply?
	No, I'm going to go look it up now.
	What I wanted to say, if you can paraphrase.
	I think you're better off maybe reading it because I'll get it here easily.
	Let me see this.
	I don't take anything personally either, but there's a level of arrogance in these bootlickers.
	Let me see here in response to, let me, oh.
	You know what?
	I think I might have, that crossed my feet and I didn't read the, okay, here we go.
	It's this one right here.
	I apologize to every single veteran in Canada who left their family and put their life on the line for our nation and the rights and freedoms now troused for which it once stood, that there are selfish people like this in our once great nation.
	For them, all that stuff about human rights, fundamental freedoms, rule of law, et cetera, are just fairy tales.
	that they tell young people to get them into flag-draped coffins.
	The rest of us respect your sacrifice.
	Marty up north is in the house.
	I've had him on the, it's, it's, it's.
	what I have noticed is that the people who are the most vocal supporters of the tyranny are, I say big, I'm not saying like big city versus small city, Ottawa, Toronto, people who A, don't have access to the nature that's being denied of the maritimes, B, government workers and therefore government bootlickers or propagandists for the CTV or CBC.
	Those are the ones who are the most vocal.
	Now you are in Nova Scotia, but I'm now in Florida looking up at Canada.
	My impression is that far too many Canadians support this.
	What is it like on the ground where you are?
	Well, I'll say first of all that that was.
	my impression while I was down in Florida as well.
	Seeing my own country through the looking glass, I was like, you know, we got a lot of work to do just during my time there.
	And I'm sorry, I think I may have trailed off a bit there, Viva.
	Could you repeat that question?
	Oh, no.
	It's just, what is the sentiment in Canada?
	Like, are more people than I think are as many people as I think actually supporting this or are more people than I think opposing it but just don't have the means to make it vocal?
	You know, it's pretty tough to take that temperature at this stage.
	Just anecdotally from where I'm sitting, I'm receiving a lot more support than I am hate.
	There seems to be an awful lot of interest in this.
	I did do an interview with CTV National earlier today, so that should be on later.
	And I've spoken to other mainstream, like CBC has reached out, Global has reached out.
	I'm doing interviews with all of them, not because I respect them, but you know, they're need we need to heal the divide at some point.
	And we got to break into that blue pill echo chamber as well.
	You know, that's the only way our voices are going to be heard.
	So, you know, I think I've tried to stand on principle.
	Now I spoke to some radio host in Toronto first thing this morning.
	And yeah, he really kind of piqued my ire.
	And when I started, like I started making it a matter of human dignity and veteran dignity in particular.
	And he was like, Oh, I don't think all those people died.
	So you could go for a walk in the woods.
	And I was like, Who the hell are you to tell me what I signed up to serve?
	But just that same smug arrogance that we see, you know, so typically in the people who support these things.
	So it's a bit of a mixed bag, but that was really the only negative interaction, and it wasn't even that negative.
	that that I had in dealing with any of the media and I have engaged so far, I'm losing track, but with several mainstream outlets like Chronicle Herald in Halifax, CTV in national, global in Halifax, and so they are reaching out, they are taking interest, and if I play my cards right, then we might see some progress on this front.
	Well, I mean, have you seen, not to be too cynical, but I'm not yet there, but I'll probably need to be.
	Have you seen the final product of what CTV in particular put out by way of the interview or?
	And let me ask you another question.
	Are you recording it on your end just in case it's a total bastardization of what you said?
	No.
	Okay.
	So I should.
	Well, for that, I mean, there's only there's only so much you can do to protect against the scoundrelness, but mainstream or I say legacy media in Canada is paying attention, but we have yet to see how they ultimately put the report together.
	Are you just a rogue People's Party of Canada far right?
	Are you a member of Diaglon, Jeff?
	Negative.
	Those guys hate my guts.
	Whoa.
	Those guys trouble me more than anybody.
	May I ask why?
	As a ring bearing member of I'm not a ring bearing member of Diagallon.
	Someone sent me this in the mail, but I'm friends with Jeremy and I'm friends with, I mean, I don't think I have my enemies around the government, not in the military, but I have nothing, I mean, set it aside, but why would they have issues with you?
	Well, because I don't subscribe to their narrative around the Jews.
	And the it really kind of came to a head with me and the PPC.
	Like I had kind of distanced myself from Diagallon quite a while prior to really ramping up my involvement with the PPC, but I saw a lot of the same anti Jewish propaganda is what it is.
	Like I recognize it for what it is.
	It's like the protocols of the Elders of Zion was cooked up by Russian secret police, for crying out loud.
	And I tried to do some education behind the scenes, but I just get attacked because they're woke and they form a rage mob and then go for the torches and pitchforks and come after me online.
	And so there was all this drama around that.
	And I've taken a position on the woke right, which, which by the way, there's no such thing as the woke right.
	It's just a bunch of snowflake millennials who sell their lives.
	And now you're going to get, now you're going to get, what's his name?
	Lindsay.
	What's his first name?
	Oh, what's Lindsay?
	James?
	James, now you're going to get James Lindsay on your case, Hate News.
	There's a woke right.
	Everybody who's coming around.
	I've shared my ideas with him and I have seen there's a there's probably about a three month lag, but he seems to be coming around.
	And I think that a lot of people are politically homeless.
	And so, you know, we have a lot of leftists who are against the mandates, who are finding the PPC, but they're bringing a lot of their Marxist baggage with them.
	So that was really what I was calling out.
	And I did like a couple of tweet threads on it where I was really, really demonstrating like the June narrative is fundamentally just repackaged third wave feminism for wannabe based chats.
	So it's the same kind of Marxist narrative where they will identify people in positions of power who are disproportionately represented by one group, whether it's Jews or it's men, whether it's the global Zionist shapeshifting reptilian overlords or the patriarchy.
	They just replace patriarchy with Zionist and women with the white man.
	And you have the same narrative.
	It's based on this oppression narrative where they point to disparities of outcomes between groups for which we have well understood social phenomena that explain why we observe the disparity, but they will always attribute that disparity to some form of oppression that's kind of invisible and ethereal and not really clearly identified.
	And it's resentment based.
	I think that it appeals to the human proclivity for envy, which is the most deadly of all sins.
	And you see a lot of the same kind of thinking that goes into it.
	Like they're totalitarian and collectivist.
	I did a six hour struggle session with them in a space.
	And that was that was I came out of it going, yeah, I was absolutely right.
	Like, you guys are trying to struggle me.
	And the ideas that they were putting forth, they were like, you need to be like this and you need to be like that.
	And I was like, no, I'm not a collectivist.
	I'm against all of that stuff.
	I'm a right winger.
	I'm an individualist.
	And I don't agree.
	I'm not on board with this, like, group think and these demands for ideological homogeneity.
	Like, this is just as dangerous as this stuff that we see all over the left.
	So, yeah, I mean, I took a lot of heat for saying those kinds of things.
	And it's been quiet on that front for a while.
	I kind of have more important things to do right now.
	Um, but, uh, but I'm sure, you know, the, uh, the animosity has not subsided.
	Well, it, I mean, it's interesting because I've had, I've taken heat for not, uh, railing against Jeremy McKenzie in particular because, you know, everyone's like, how do you feel about this and that that he says?
	Like, first of all, A, he can, he can believe certain things that I disagree with and that I might think are fundamentally flawed.
	And the, my ultimate bottom line is, I don't think if you're trying to win them over, and I say them, if you're trying to convince someone that they're wrong, the way you, you don't do it is by telling them they can't say it.
	Uh, and so I, I take flack for entertaining the discussion or at least, you know, not telling people to shut up.
	You can't say these anti Semitic things.
	And then I am also, say, maybe to a flaw, not sympathetic, but I understand where people come to erroneous conclusions based on statistical overrepresentation that you can't blame people for coming to.
	And then the question is, how do you get past that?
	And I found that, you know, debanking is not the best way to do it, but set that aside.
	I don't want to get into the fight between you and Diagon.
	And I made a joke that some of my friends said it's not really a direct fight, a fight like that.
	You know, and I didn't say Diagon in particular.
	I was just talking about the walk right, but a lot of the guys that seem to be giving me a hard time about that come from that camp um but also the pc the pc uh pbcers who are woke um are absolutely ravenous so i probably had a lot more trouble with them when when did you run for the pc 2021 no uh 2025 2025 how'd you do i think i got like 600 votes or something like that that's not obviously that's not bad um
	So you've now, so now getting back to the ticket, because you got this $28,000 ticket.
	I hate to impute my own neuroses or my concerns.
	What does that feel like having that?
	It's not even a sword of Democles, having that, you know, literal, I won't say potentially bankrupting, but that's that could be cataclysmic For, you know, pretty much anyone.
	How does it feel to have that dangle over your head?
	What's the next step in terms of actually getting to court to challenge that and what's the time frame?
	Well, you know, worrying never did a lick a lick a good for anyone.
	So I do my best not to engage in it.
	I'm not going to burn myself out, imagining things that might be.
	Was it Seneca who said that I have suffered more in imagination than in reality?
	So I I just try to keep that stuff under control so I can stay frosty and keep cool head about stuff.
	And the JCCF reached out right away and offered to provide my representation.
	So that was very reassuring.
	I feel much better having those guys in my corner.
	Everyone is telling me that I got a fundraising because they want to pay my fine for me.
	And I've been saying, no, I'm not going to do that.
	We can cross that bridge when we come to it.
	Right now, if you want to help me fight this fine, then donate to the JCCF and it keeps everything nice and clean.
	And if I get fined guilty and the fine sticks, I mean, then we can talk about whether or not people want to do any kind of group funding for that or something.
	But I'll figure something out.
	I always do.
	What choice do I have?
	So JCCF is formally they've they've they've they've been mandated.
	They're your counsel in this now.
	Yes.
	Okay, excellent because I got John.
	I have to sign the retainer, I should say that's the stage that it's at.
	It's in my gift box.
	I have to sign it and send it back.
	Excellent.
	And I'm going to, I think I'm doing an interview with John Carpey this afternoon, which is going to be prere recorded, and then I'm going to publish it afterwards.
	Okay, so you got that.
	You got counsel that I now had a question that I totally forgot in there.
	Darn it.
	Crowdfunding to pay off the tickets, if it gets there for the time being, JCCF is going to represent you, and it's going to be a long time in the future.
	Damn it.
	I forgot the question, Jeff.
	It'll come back in a second.
	What are you doing in the interim?
	This right now, I'm doing my media blitz.
	And I, like I said, I have the convoy case that could go to the Supreme Court.
	I also have another case that I'm bringing before the Nova Scotia Court of Appeals.
	I just submitted the latest trove of documents to them.
	I'm self-representing in that one because I submitted Nova Scotia Human Rights complaints every time I was refused service while not wearing a mask and also for my arrests.
	The CEO of the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission bundled all of my complaints into one letter and just said go away.
	He even said in the letter, because I said I made reference to prohibition on discrimination on the basis of a political belief, affiliation, or activity.
	And I said I'm engaged in a political activity.
	It's an act of protest.
	And in terms of my political position, like I'm a classical liberal.
	um you know uh i don't believe that uh human i think that humans are rational beings to be reasoned with not livestock to be coerced and these kinds of things and he said in his letter that my political affiliation had to be in association with an official party of Canada under the act.
	And I was like, well, I got you now because it does not say that under the act at all.
	It doesn't say anything about whether or not you necessarily need to be part of a political party.
	But that was how they dismissed some.
	And I had some other grounds there.
	Like I opposed them on religious grounds, calling, you know, this COVID-ism a cult and things like this.
	So they bundled them up and kind of threw them away.
	I submitted the judicial review.
	And then the judge, we're getting some really crappy decisions from the lower courts.
	I already understood that before I got.
	I understood that before I got started.
	And he dismissed it.
	But I think that he made several palpable and overriding errors.
	The first one being, you know, he said that it was not a palpable and overriding error that they basically rewrote the law in order to render their decision letter.
	They were like, no, he said, it didn't really matter that you weren't part of a political party.
	Like they still could have dismissed it.
	And I was like, no, how?
	Like they actually explicitly state that that is a requirement in the law and that that is the basis on which they are dismissing my complaint.
	Anyway, that's all part of an appeals book now that I just submitted at the end of July.
	And my next deadline is for the factum at the end of August.
	I have some election paperwork that I have to do to wrap things up there as well.
	So I'm always incredibly busy with all of this stuff going on.
	And it just keeps coming at us.
	Now we have this Woods ban and this Massive Fine that I have to deal with.
	It just kind of keeps coming at me.
	But I am elated to have the GCCF in my corner and not having to self-represent, I think, is going to be a huge weight off.
	Jeff, by the way, if I'm looking to my left, it's only because.
	my dog has for a small dog I don't know how he just peed so much on the floor and and and number two oh my goodness no Jeff I did remember I remember the question I was going to ask and I don't know how I forgot it but um uh the question a lot of people ask is how crazy does it have to get in Canada before you contemplate thinking of moving have you ever thought of getting out of there all the time uh as in fact The tyranny was kind of the only reason I stayed.
	Like when I was being released in 2021, I kind of had my eyes set on Florida.
	Like I wanted to go back down there, maybe go chase after my old girlfriend or something.
	And anyway, just when I saw the way that things were going, especially in the lead up to the 2021 election, I was like, we're in a lot of trouble.
	So I decided to, you know, come back to the home of my heart, dig my boots into the grand that I love and make my final stand.
	And maybe, hopefully, at some point soon, Canada will be free once again and maybe I can be on my way.
	It's amazing.
	Jeff, let me bring up a couple of questions over here in Rumble.
	We got God bless Canadian heroes like Jeff Avery from Liberty Patriot Canada.
	The remanded sent me some DMs which said, have you sent you images of annual wildfire stats in Nova Scotia?
	I had no idea arson was so prominent as the number one cause of wildfires there.
	1144th since 2007.
	No, no, I knew that back from 2023 when they were trying to blame it on the climate crisis.
	And then they were saying, well, it might be arson, but the climate crisis exacerbates the arson because it's such dry conditions.
	King of Biltong, looking for some healthy meat snacks to add to your diet.
	Try Biltong, 50% protein packed with B12, creatin, iron, zinc, and more.
	Go to Biltong USA.com code VIVA for 10% off.
	MK Telephone Man, VIVA, you need to.
	check out Jasmine Lane on Rumble.
	She is a Canuck who is sick of this crap also.
	And I don't know if you can see RoFlo says about the only thing that Trump's admin is missing is someone like Mr. Garrison from South Park talking about effing the criminals.
	Okay, that was the earlier show.
	Let me see over in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community if there's any questions for you, Jeff.
	Oh, hold on.
	Someone had a question and I have to get to it.
	founders in the U.S. declared our rights inalienable, rights that come from a creator, not from a human.
	Let me see this.
	I can't.
	Not from a man.
	If from man, they can be taken away.
	The founders enshrined these rights in the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
	If there's any rule of law that protects the rights of Canadians, is there any that protects us?
	Cliff Norman asks.
	I mean, you're there.
	I've been there for 43 years before I went to Florida.
	We have a charter of rights.
	What's your impression of the charter of rights, Jeff?
	I think we're going going to have to um i'm not sure if i want to say overhaul but definitely uh impose it'd be great if uh you know we could actually get people in jail for these uh these rights violations like some of the people in power for example so i think that there should be um maybe a section written on punishments for such abuses.
	And the standard should be higher for people in higher positions of power.
	Overall, I think it's a pretty good charter.
	I mean, the framers of the Constitution in the United States were Renaissance men.
	I think it's probably the most brilliant piece of political mastercraft that we've seen in the world so far.
	But like if we were going to overhaul ours, we could probably look to the United States and start there and say, you know, we can build something better than that.
	But overall, it's a pretty good.
	charter, a charter of rights and freedoms.
	A lot of people will point to like, let's get rid of the not withstanding clause, first of all, that shouldn't be there.
	But also, there's the section one that says that they may intervene with our rights.
	And a lot of people are kind of saying like that, null and void's the rest of them.
	I think that what we've seen is an abuse over the last several years.
	So people might have that strong impression.
	But we have freedom of movement in Canada.
	So you can move around the country in your car, but you may not break the speed limit.
	Like we put the speed limit in place because the risk to public safety over a certain speed on a certain highway.
	outweighs the absolute freedom of movement, the benefit of that freedom of movement to the individual.
	So there is a need to kind of reign some activities in that regard.
	But those limits, those interventions into our liberties, as it says in the Constitution or as provided by the Oaks Test, you know, they need to be minimally impairing.
	They need to be logically connected.
	Logically connected, proportionate.
	And for the Oaks Test is the Supreme Court ruling on when you get to infringe on constitutional rights.
	It's some there's no correlation.
	between the restriction that they're imposing.
	Like even ATVs, I can understand they have, uh, what are they called?
	Gar, not carburators, the things that get hot, not a muffler.
	They have things that combust on them.
	So I can understand that.
	Uh, but there's, there's simply no correlation and there's no proportionate correlation, like $25,000, a year and a half in jail.
	It's, it's, it's absolutely capricious and absolute tyranny.
	There was a question from our local community, which was from Bart Cop, who asks, ask Jeff for me.
	In watching the video, it didn't look like the leaves were stressed on the trees.
	Not saying it's not dry, but are they?
	overblowing the risk of forest fires?
	I got a friend up in Nova Scotia.
	He says, you know, the rivers are low and whatever, but like I say, like the leaves are green.
	The, the, the, the, the, it's lush.
	Is it as bad as they say or are they really just playing it hard?
	The leaves are green, the open grassland is not, and that is another one of the ironies in this is that, you know, if my sneakers really represented some kind of a fire hazard, then the first place you would ban me from would be an open grassland because the grass is all yellow and burnt, but the leaves on the trees are nice and green, like you said.
	And I was going to say too, like, you know.
	You mentioned the Oakes test and the case that led to that.
	That was a case where a guy, you know, he got caught with a small amount of marijuana on him and he was charged with trafficking.
	I think it was like less than a couple of grams, but they charged him with trafficking and we ended up with the test because of that because they said like, you know, we need to set a threshold here somewhere as to what constitutes simple possession and trafficking.
	It can't be arbitrary.
	It can't be left to the judgment of an officer on the scene, this kind of thing.
	So vastly, you know, the charge that he got was vastly disproportionate to the crime that he committed, which was simple possession.
	And in my case, like they've already charged people in Nova Scotia for burning, for actually breaching the burn ban, which makes total sense.
	I mean, that obviously makes sense.
	I should have a burn ban.
	I should have a burn ban.
	Yeah.
	But they're getting the fine.
	I'm getting the same fine that they are, any fires.
	That makes no sense.
	It's like the episode of The Simpsons.
	That's good.
	That's bad.
	It's kind of like I'm being charged with trafficking when I only engaged in simple possession, right?
	And not even that.
	I mean, like I'm just walking in the damn woods for crying out loud.
	It's, you know, the burn ban, and no one was would say it doesn't make sense.
	The ATVs, some people might be pissed, but they'll say at least it's causally related.
	Walking in rubber shoes and fishing doesn't make sense to fine people who have violated that with the same fine as the burn ban.
	It is like charging, it's like, well, sentencing someone to murder when it's simple assault.
	There was no incentive to not commit the murder then if you're going to do that.
	Not that you, you, you, you follow the law for the sake of being a good person, but, um, yeah, it's wild.
	I mean, we'll see.
	Now you're not, you don't need to raise money yet.
	If you get the fine, if you get found guilty, we'll cross that bridge.
	It'll be in a couple of years at least, Jeff said.
	Probably.
	You got, you got plenty of time to do do more damage in the meantime.
	Uh, before we raid Kimberly Guilfoyle, Where can people find you?
	I've shared your X account.
	Is there any place in particular you would like to send people?
	I mean, X is good.
	That's where I do most of my fighting these days.
	I'm on Facebook too, if you like that.
	I tend to focus on the X stuff more nowadays, but it's just my name on X or on Facebook.
	It's just Jeff Evely.
	And I have a Jeff Evely YouTube channel that I haven't touched in forever.
	But yeah, I mean, X, Facebook, that seems to be enough to kind of satisfy everybody.
	Jeff, I'm going to go to my local community after this, so I will not expect you to come with me.
	You've been more than generous with your time.
	I say God speed, keep fighting the good fight.
	But at some point, you need people who are willing not to fight with you, but even to support.
	And you have a lot of support.
	I'm just saying from here, it looks like there's a lot more approval of the government tyranny and a lot more people saying, Govern me hard or daddy up in Canada.
	Maybe I'm wrong and maybe Canada's going to turn the corner.
	The Conservatives are growing a bit of a spine now that the election is over, ironically enough.
	But Jeff, thank you very, very much.
	I say God speed.
	Thank you, sir.
	Ivan, have a good one kick from i feel bad it says kick from studio that seems very aggressive though and i just want to thank jeff for coming here guys we're going to go raid kimberly guilfoyle right now forward slash raid i have got such a mess in my office to clean up the dog weighs 15 pounds soaking wet it's a it's a leader of i mean i i it's not like i didn't walk him twice already before we went live i can't get mad at him because he's blind so you know the blind dog doesn't know where he's peeing That's
	amazing, everybody.
	Go follow Jeff Eavely on X. I'm going to do a prerecorded with JCCF John Carpe this afternoon.
	I'll publish that this evening.
	And for now, I'd say everyone, come on over to viva barneslaw.locals.com because there's no paywall today because I use StreamYard.
	So if you want to think about supporting the work that I do with Robert Barnes over on Locals, come on over.
	I did see a couple of more crumble rants that I'll get to before we leave, and they are here.
	Advice for other Canadian Air Force vets disenfranchised and lost since medical release asking for me in New Brunswick alone off-grid.
	RCAF SAR 42.
	Dude, am I reading like an SOS here?
	What does this mean?
	Advice for other CAF vets disenfranchised and lost since medical release asking for me in New Brunswick alone off-grid.
	RCAF SAR 413 413 SQN rescue.
	Jane Escarf, a formal paralegal, says that the charter protects government, not citizens.
	She says the Bill of Rights is what we should be using.
	Your thoughts, the charter was crafted on the Bill of Rights.
	The Bill of Rights is still law in, it's still law in Canada.
	The problem is, that's what I meant to say with Jeff here, is that the constitution., the American constitution is a is a work of intellectual art, but it still got trounced during COVID.
	It took a couple of judges to protect it, but it still got trounced and it still required the Supreme Court to get involved.
	And even then, you know, even then they find ways to get around it and they find a way to reaffirm Jacobson.
	The court back in the day found a way to just basically circumvent the constitution.
	It's not I don't think it's a question of the weakness of the document.
	It's a question of the weakness of the politicians and the judges and the judiciary and the enforcement.
	It's a question of the weakness of society.
	And we are now at a point where people would trade the risks that come with God given freedoms for the security that comes with man made prisons.
	Ooh, write that down.
	All right, people, we're going to go on over to viva bornslaw dot locals dot com.
	Ginger Ninja says, It's awful when the best of a nation are the ones forced to leave.
	I think it's safe to say that that's a sign of eminent self-destruction of a nation, unacceptable.
	And the people of Canada should be ashamed of themselves, says Ginger Ninja.
	Just so everybody knows, I'm not making that up.
	So people are going to say, Viva, how could you say that about Canada?
	This is a member of our local community of Canada.
	A great man as well, who's not necessarily wrong about this.
	Okay, what we're going to do, we're going to end it.
	We have raided Kimberly Guilfoyle.
	Let me see if we're good there.
	We have raided the stream.
	I'm going to say Viva Raid Booyah and go raid Kim, let her know from whence he came, drop a good word for me.
	And right now I'm going to end this on Rumble.

▲