Ghislaine Quiety Moved to Texas Facility? Tish Sues Trump Over Trans E.O. Canada Madness & MORE!
|
Time
Text
Interwebs.
Who you're looking at on the left, I don't know, but I don't like the way he's looking at me.
Major breaking, Ghislaine Maxwell has been quietly moved from the Florida prison she was serving time in to a prison in Southeast Texas.
Her attorney even refused to comment on the reason for the move.
The timing is suspicious as hell, and every American should be shouting, no pardon ever for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Major breaking, Ghislaine Maxwell has been quietly moved from the quietly moved.
If that man is not from New York, I don't know who is.
I don't like hearing the inner workings of a person's mouth when they're talking.
And if my microphone is ever that sensitive that you hear the, I want you to tell me, people.
A Florida prison she was serving time in to a prison in Southeast Texas.
Her attorney even refused to comment on the reason for the move.
The timing is suspicious as hell.
And every American should be shouting, no pardon ever for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ghelane.
Ghelane, dude.
Some people say Ghislaine, and it's sort of an internet joke.
This is called to activism.
If you don't know of the account, they are, how do we say in the industry?
Tarted.
Oh my goodness.
It's the most idiotic account you could possibly imagine.
Let me just bring up one example where they have illustrated their tardedness.
Yeah, here, here, guy, hold on.
This is one of their best posts ever, October 29, 2024.
What's the first word you think of when you see Kamala Harris?
I remembered I had interacted with this account in the past.
Photoshop, then cackle.
Look at that.
I mean, maybe it's makeup, and I'm not trying to make fun of the way people look.
I think today I have bags under my eyes because I'm a little tired of the bull crap in the world.
That is so photoshopped.
Maybe this one's photoshopped.
That you look at this picture, it triggers auditory hallucinations.
I hear her.
All right, but the news behind the story is that apparently, for whatever the reason, Ghelaine Maxwell has been moved, allegedly, purportedly, it's been confirmed from her Florida federal prison cell to Texas.
Now, what's particularly interesting about this is I've been following the story.
There's not much of a story to it, but I've been following it throughout the day.
And I pulled up an article.
Let me see if this is the right one because what I noticed is that the article changed throughout the day.
That was not the right one.
Let me bring up the other one.
I had to.
Luckily, I archived them and I want to bring it up here.
Hold up.
Let me just get the right archived article so that I can find it because it went through a little bit of a change, eh?
In the time that it was originally posted to the time that I re-archived it for whatever the reason.
How do I see the article that I want to bring up right here?
This is it right now.
Okay, let's have a look at this one.
This one was posted at 11:52 a.m.
And look at the nice picture.
This one has a picture of Ghelane and her partner in sex trafficking to nobody, Jeffrey Epstein.
You can't really see it here.
And the reason why I archived it the first time is because I didn't like the picture that automatically came up when you shared the hyperlink on the interwebs by one Josh Meyer.
And it says Epstein accomplice Ghelaine Maxwell quietly moved out of Florida federal prison.
The move not announced by the Justice Department or Bureau of Prisons comes as Maxwell seeks a pardon from President Donald Trump.
Ghelaine Maxwell, the convicted sex trafficker, who was sex trafficking to nobody.
Get back to the article.
Longtime Associate of Epstein quietly moved from federal prison in Florida to one in Texas.
Federal Bureau of Prisons confirmed August 1st.
The transfer comes as Maxwell's attorneys are pressuring the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn her conviction while also seeking a pardon or commutation from for her from President Donald Trump in exchange for her cooperation in the Epstein investigation and broader sex trafficking issues.
She spent two days talking to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last week, Trump's former personal defense lawyer at a courthouse, yada yada yada.
We can confirm Ghelaine Maxwell is in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons at the facility in Texas.
BOP inmate locator official Benjamin O'Cone said the news was first reported by the New York Sun.
That was the original article.
Now, after the article broke, and I shared a link, and then I asked the USA today, you know, just out of curiosity, why would you have used this particular picture when the hyperlink comes up?
Epstein accomplice Ghelaine Maxwell quietly moved out of the Florida federal prison.
And they have a picture of, I feel like an idiot for not being certain who this person in the middle is, of Ghelane, Epstein, and Trump many, many years ago.
I just said, hey, why'd you pick this photo for the cover hyperlink?
Just out of curiosity.
I know damn well why they picked it.
It's how they get their indirect smear on Donald John Trump.
And then in the time that I had posted that, I think, if I'm getting the time properly, they then went and updated the article to make it much more lengthy than it was the first time around.
Check this out.
Updated 1225, same author, and it's substantially longer.
We can confirm there.
Look at this.
Maxwell attorney David Oscar Marcus also confirmed USA Today that Ghelain was moved from Bryan, Texas.
No comment.
The move sparked concern from the family of one of Maxwell's most vocal accusers, the late Virginia Guffray, who, in the midst of all of this Epstein debacle, allegedly took her own life.
The transfer is part of an undisclosed, the fear is that it's part of an undisclosed deal between the Justice Department and Trump's administration.
In recent days, they have expressed worry that Trump and presidential appointed leaders inside DOJ are trying to silence Maxwell without receiving any input from potentially hundreds of accusers who say she and Epstein sexually abused them and forced them to have sex with prominent men.
Men, many men, not just Epstein, in which case there were clients, in which case there were unindicted co-conspirators that are known to Maxwell, presumably were known to Maureen Comey when she prosecuted Maxwell, but for reasons unknown have never been disclosed to the general public, the existence of which have been, in fact, denied to the general public.
Family's scrambling right now to figure out what's going on.
They don't understand why this is happening.
Prison swap is the latest development in the growing controversy over Trump's relationship with Maxwell and Epstein.
No, it's not.
The controversy is not Trump's relationship with Epstein.
We've known that for decades.
The controversy, unfortunately, is the botched rollout, which I think now is actually paying dividends in terms of the heightened awareness.
And you've got the left now clamoring for the release of the documents, you know, half half-acidly and clamoring for no pardon for Maxwell.
We can keep going.
Look how much was added to this article.
At what point does it become a new article where you don't update it?
You publish a new article.
Guffray's family especially demanded answers about why Trump said in recent remarks that Epstein, quote, stole Juffre from Mar-a-Lago more than 20 years ago.
You heard the audio, people?
It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been, quote, stolen from Mar-a-Lago, the family said.
It makes us sick.
It makes us ask if he was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghelaine Maxwell's criminal actions, especially given his statements two years later that his good friend Jeffrey likes women on the younger son.
Nobody understands the words that Trump spoke when he says, Good friend, the privilege of going to the island.
You don't understand what he's getting at, or you do, and you want to paint it in a way that is inaccurate for your own political purposes.
Trump made the comment on July 30th, telling reporters Epstein, quote, stole her while Juffrey was working as a spa attendant, that he subsequently banned Epstein from his Palm Beach residence and the club after he tried to poach additional employees.
I think we heard this audio.
He stole her.
And by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever.
Guffrey had long insisted that Maxwell, Epstein's longtime associate and former girlfriend, was the one who met her, recruited her to serve as a masseuse for Epstein.
Well, we also know from this particular article and to be sexually abused by other men.
The arrangement ultimately led to Epstein sexually abusing her and Maxwell trafficking Juffey to have sex with other men, she said.
In a lengthy statement, the Jews faith, Juffre's family rejected Trump's characterization, saying she was stolen by Maxwell, not Epstein.
We would like to clarify that it was convicted sex trafficker Ghelaine Maxwell who targeted and preyed upon our then 16-year-old sister, Virginia, from Mar-a-Lago, where she was working in 2000, several years before Epstein and President Trump had their falling out.
In a statement USA Today, the White House said no leniency is being given or discussed, and Trump himself said he's not thinking about clemency at this time.
So it is interesting.
You recall when they were floating the idea for a pardon of what's his name?
George Floyd and well, I'm totally blanking on the guy's name now.
Oh my goodness, George Floyd.
Hold, this is crazy.
George Floyd.
Oh, Derek Chauvin.
When they were talking about floating the idea of a pardon for Chauvin, and some people were saying, why would you want a pardon for Chauvin?
You're going to take him out of federal custody and he's going to go serve his state conviction in a state that will shank him yet again in prison.
So the question here is, and you're going to get it from both sides, is the move of Ghelaine Maxwell from Florida to Texas to protect her, to expose her as part of some deal?
Lord knows this is the latest breaking news.
Suffice to say that USA Today is propagandist rubbish using a photo that was totally unrelated to the original story.
And then I don't know if they're stealth editing the original article so that the, I would say, defamatory by implication photograph that they decided to use for that headline somehow had some relation to the story.
That is the first borderline non-story of the day.
It's not a non-story.
It's curious as to what's going on.
Is it for protection?
Is it for exposure?
Depending on which way you want to view this, what deal would there be that would warrant bringing her to Texas?
Might it be a question of getting additional information about the men to whom the victims of Epstein and Maxwell's trafficking were trafficked.
You know, there was another video that I came across looking into this before going live, and it was another video of another Epstein survivor talking about what they went through and the ordeal.
And it wasn't just trafficking to Epstein.
And I'm going to stand by this unless I'm proven wrong, in which case I'll admit that I was wrong.
Maureen Comey's prosecution of Ghelaine Maxwell was the cover-up.
The fact that no one ever sat down to talk with Ghelaine, allegedly, the fact that the Epstein trafficking involved hundreds of men and thousands of victims, the prosecution was the cover-up.
Here's what Sarah Ransom is her name actually Ransom Ransom.
Listen to this.
She participated.
She tortured me and others.
And she's worse than Jeffrey.
She broke the sisterhood.
She broke that bond.
She was supposed to be a protector and nurturer.
And she failed us.
And she'll have to live with that for the rest of her life.
Yeah, she's a socialist.
Something tells me that in the realm of sex trafficking, Jelaine is not going to really have difficulty living with her guilt to the extent that she would even have any, to the extent that she's not something of a sociopath that had no problem trafficking young girls for sexual exploitation.
But we've got, you know, Marco Foster, Epstein survivor Sarah Ransom on Glene Maxwell.
She participated.
She tortured me and others.
She's worse than Jeffrey.
On the issue of a discussion of a commutation, I say it's presumptively wrong, but from a consequentialist perspective, if there's net benefit to be drawn from ensuring that you get active collaboration with Glene Maxwell for the purposes of going after, investigating, prosecuting, and jailing the actual clients who partook in the sex trafficking, presumptively wrong, consequentially, or I say consequentialism perspective-based, net positive.
I can understand the argument.
There are people who are going to say, of course, Ghelain's going to say anything to get out of jail.
It's totally untrustworthy.
Presumably, this would not be a commutation based on empty words that leads to nothing, but rather evidence-based, links-based, connections-based that leads to convictions.
We'll see.
That's the latest.
And with that said, everybody, Friday afternoon.
Tomorrow night, Tatsurio Taira is fighting Young Song Park.
It's going to be one hell of an awesome fight night.
I'll see if I can stay up past 10.30 to actually catch a main event.
And for those of you who are new to the channel, Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
And we are, yeah, Epstein, Epstein Epstein.
Hold on a second.
Let me bring this up here.
I'm going to have to refresh my screen.
Give me one second.
Give me one second.
Well, now I can no longer bring up the comment in the chat, but I had auto-logged out of Rumble, apparently.
Epstein Epstein Epstein was the comment to which I was going to comment.
You're damn right.
But don't worry, it's not all going to be Epstein Epsomepscene.
Today we're going to talk about some stuff going on in Canada.
Some stuff going on in where is it?
Colorado.
Get the hell out of these states, people.
Colorado is a, we know it's a batshit crazy state.
We've known it from Jenna Griswold's persecution of Tina Peters, the Donald Trump removal of the ballot.
Colorado was cutting edge in terms of TDS violation of civil rights.
Nonsense coming out of Colorado.
And New York Times, true to form, wants to expand the definition of death to facilitate harvesting the organs of people who are only mostly dead.
Oh, I need to pull up that meme.
All right.
Here we go.
I am.
Oh, let's see if I can bring this one up.
I am a grifter.
Irrelevant bookworm.
Hopefully, you're not talking about me, good sir.
Because if you did, you spelt grafter wrong.
Grafter is someone who works damn hard to make sure he knows what the hell's going on.
All right.
Starting in commie state of New York.
And Tish James, who deserves to be behind bars.
And I say, if there's any cosmic justice on this earth, she will be behind bars one day.
Takes to Twitter and tweets out with pride that she's suing Donald John Trump or the campaign.
I'm discovering that I don't believe AI is, you know, Chat GPT, Grok, they think like a very linear thinking human, and they can't get past nuances for the purposes of understanding broader questions.
Just asking, you know, what is New York Attorney General Letitsia James suing Donald John Trump for?
And they say, she's not suing Trump.
I was like, I'm sorry.
Here's a link to the lawsuit.
Oh, she's not suing Trump personally.
Okay.
Do not rely on AI for anything.
And anybody asking Grok on Twitter in anything other than a sarcastic, sort of stylistic, hey, Grok, tell me something, you're going to not understand things and get misled.
So you can tune in every day and watch Viva, who does the deeper research and actually, you know, reads through the proceedings with the perspective of a former Montreal litigator, turned political legal commentator.
New York A.G. James, who belongs behind bars, writes, We're suing the Trump administration for attacking access to gender-affirming health care.
They're threatening providers with baseless criminal charges and targeting youth already facing barriers.
We won't stop fighting for the safety and rights of the transgender community.
Such a, she's the hero in her own story, as is every villain.
Now, I wanted to go see what was going on with this story.
And I started with a good article coming out of the post-millennial talking about the nature of the lawsuit.
Let me bring it up right now.
Post-millennial's avatar looks a lot like Twitter in general, in smaller forms.
So it gets confusing.
Tish James sues Trump to allow child sex changes in New York.
You see, you're getting two ends of the spectrum here.
One is from a confirmed liar, and I'm talking about Tish James, who you might recall from such malicious prosecution persecutions as the one that she instigated against Donald John Trump for crimes that she herself probably more likely than not committed.
You get her saying, I'm doing it for the children, and you get the post-millennial saying she's suing to allow sex changes for children in New York.
And then you're going to say, well, which one's more accurate?
Spoiler, post-millennial is more accurate.
New York State Attorney General Letitsa James is suing the Trump administration over the federal ban on medical sex changes for minors.
We're suing the Trump administration for attacking access to gender-affirming healthcare, James said.
They're threatening providers, yada, yada, yada.
We saw the tweet.
Her post said that, quote, the Trump administration is running a shadow campaign attacking access to gender-affirming care.
The notion that medical sex changes like administration of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones or even invasive surgery are gender-affirming is prevalent among leftist politicians and activists and Dr. Mengele and Nazi experimenting doctors who would do things to the human body just to see if it could be done.
Performing vivisections on pregnant women, taking twin sisters and experimenting them to see which ones suffer what from what medications.
I think this might have actually been the Japanese to the Chinese in unit 193, whatever it was.
You know, putting people's limbs in cryogenically freezing them while they're still alive to see what impact that would have by way of frostbite.
Dr. Mengele is looking up from hell and saying, oh my goodness, even I would never have thought of doing that.
Take a piece of skin off the leg so you can create what doesn't even look like a wanker and cut off the breasts of mentally unwell teenagers, adolescents, autistic young adults, and call it affirming care.
Holy hell.
That is what you call Nazi-level euphemisms, mercy killings.
James in New York are joined by 15 other states who claim that the prohibition on medical sex changes for those under the age of 19 is quote unlawful and that the services, which often include double mastectomies and orchicomies, are quote medically necessary.
We can skip this because, well, let's read this.
The attorney generals are asking the court to halt this unconstitutional pressure campaign and ensure transgender youth can continue to access legally protected health care without fear, the suit says.
Federal government is running cruel and targeted harassment campaigns against providers who offer lawful, life-saving care.
What would you rather have?
A mutilated girl with a double mastectomy or a mutilated boy used to be a girl, a girl mutilated, or a girl who's going to take her own Life because we will not give her this life-saving treatment.
The administration is ruthlessly targeting young people who already face immense barriers just to be seen and heard.
This is in a lawsuit that this is alleged and are putting countless lives at risk in New York Nation.
Why we will never stop fighting for the dignity, safety, and basic rights of the transgender community.
Let me scroll to the, let's see, here we're going to just finish this up here.
She laments that, quote, some providers are even scaling back or eliminating services entirely.
In New York, several major health systems reportedly canceled youth patients' gender-affirming care appointments abruptly in the wake of the president's executive orders, leading families without care guidance.
Denying access to that care, the Attorney General war ones will cost lives.
Supreme Court, however, has already disagreed.
And the evidence presented before the court shows that the advocacy undertaken by those medical associations is not evidence-based.
In their recent term, the court ruled that the state of Tennessee can ban sex changes for minors.
All right, so you've heard both perspectives now.
Who do you think is going to be more accurate?
Post-millennial is more accurate.
But I want to bring up just a couple of the actual allegations from this lawsuit because it's flipping wild.
It's Nazi-esque in its insanity.
And it actually requires people to go through the article, the Dafti article, the lawsuit, and read it for themselves.
I say jail for Tish because I genuinely believe this woman belongs behind bars.
Look at this.
Look at this allegation, paragraph 42.
Medical intervention to address gender dysphoria may include puberty delaying medication, hormone treatment, and surgery.
Healthcare that has been referred to collectively as, quote, gender-affirming care.
Do you know what's amazing?
Murdering mentally retarded people back in Nazi Germany was referred to as mercy killings.
Murdering people who were physically mentally impaired, they called it mercy killings because you never call it murder.
This is nothing shy of child genital mutilation, but these idiot lefty, progressive genital mutilators have figured out a nice euphemism for it.
If we call genital mutilation gender-affirming care, who can call us the baddies for administering it?
It goes on.
Puberty-delaying medications, sometimes called quote-puberty blockers, are used to delay the changes of puberty in transgender and some intersex adolescents who have already started puberty in order to prevent changes to those individuals' bodies that are inconsistent with their gender identity and that, if they were to proceed, could exacerbate the individual's gender dysphoria.
Listen to this.
This is the argument you always hear the Nazis of the modern era use.
Puberty blockers are administered through injection several times a year, subcutaneously, yada, yada, yada.
Puberty blockers are also medically accepted treatment that is prescribed for precocious puberty.
I'm going to take this out and come back to the second part in a second.
Do you know why you administer puberty blockers to precocious puberty?
Because puberty is occurring before the body is ready for it.
Precocious puberty, I think it's girls is eight, boys is nine.
If a child, a young child at that age starts going through puberty too early before the general window for which it is healthy for the body, they'll delay it so that the window fits within the natural timeframe that a body is to go through it.
Fundamentally different than pausing the only open window for which the body can go through it, thinking that you're going to go through puberty when you're 18 if you delay it when you're 14.
I mean, these people are taking one medical condition for which there is a recognized temporary solution to actually delay the precocious puberty to the timeframe within which it's supposed to happen naturally and healthfully for the body.
Because I would imagine an eight-year-old, nine-year-old girl boy going through certain body changes, their bones might not be ready for the change.
There might be other reasons for which it's medically too early that it would be unhealthy.
Pause it.
And then you have your window from 11 to 16 to go through it.
Taking a 12, 13, 14 year old kid and then saying, we're going to pause your puberty because you're not mentally ready to deal with it, not physically in the body, other than empowering the mental illness, is closing the only window because it doesn't happen when you're 18.
And so these idiot scoundrel criminals take the only, you know, medically necessary argument and then confound delaying it for the proper window for delaying the proper window to when it doesn't happen.
And what you end up happening is you have a kid with a micropenis that can't have a proper orgasm for the rest of their lives, improper bone density, mutilated for the rest of their lives.
And then they think, oh, we saved that kid.
My goodness, thank us.
So thank goodness that we had the precocious puberty argument because now we went to blocking precocious puberty to blocking puberty.
Oh, it delays it.
It delays it.
Yeah, of course.
When you delay something for which you only have a finite timeframe, you don't delay it.
You interrupt it.
But wait, there's more.
What was the second part of this post?
Let's go back here.
It's amazing what happens.
Yeah, you actually go read the lawsuit.
Oh, yeah, section 106.
Listen to this.
Listen to what the executive order issues.
Section 2 of the denial of care order sets out the following definition.
A, the term, quote, child children means an individual under the age of 19.
Yep, that's kind of typically what it means, depending on the jurisdiction, maybe 16 in some jurisdictions.
Sorry.
They want to allow minors who can't smoke, can't vape, can't get tattoos, can't drive, can't own a gun, to be able to lop off their boobs and tear off flesh, pieces of flesh to make what does not even out of a horror movie, a la the human centipede, look like a penis.
The term pediatric means relating to the child care.
The phrase, quote, chemical and surgical mutilation, end quote, means, quote, the use of puberty blockers, including GNRH agonists and other interventions to delay the onset or progression of normally timed puberty in an individual who does not identify as his or her sex.
The use of sex hormones such as androgen blockers, estrogen, progesterone, or testosterone to align an individual's physical appearance with an identity that differs from his or her sex, and surgical procedures that attempt to transform an individual's physical appearance to align with an identity that differs from his or her sex or that attempts that or that attempt to alter or remove an individual's sexual organs to minimize or destroy their natural biological functions.
That is, by the way, as far as I'm concerned, the definition of genital mutilation.
I get into this argument with people who are hell-bent on trying to convince me that circumcision, male circumcision, like, you know, the is genital mutilation and that it's somehow analogous to FGM, female genital mutilation.
I say it's not.
Here you go.
You got one right here.
I mean, I don't mean to judge you.
I'm just going to tell you why you're wrong.
Nothing in ordinary, properly administered male circumcision impedes the proper functioning of the organ, period.
Oh, but you get callous on it and it's never as sensitive as it would.
All right, callus on my hands is not mutilating my hands.
Oh, but you can't undo it.
All right.
That's called a scar.
What's the other one?
What's the other argument?
Typically, oh, but when it goes wrong, when it goes wrong, shit goes wrong.
There's very, very bad horror stories.
And I'm not, not even not defending the other way that some ultra-religious do it.
They say, oh, but what about the TCP when they, when the rabbi sucks out the blood and gives herpes to babies?
Nobody's talking about that either, by the way.
Just spoiler alert, I have yet to meet any Jew in the Jewish community that actually approves of that method of circumcision.
But standard circumcision, other than the argument for potential health benefits, you don't get the risk of strangulation around an erection with the skin.
There's arguments.
I know that people debate them as to whether or not it actually reduces the likelihood of sexually transmitted diseases.
The bottom line, snipping that piece of foreskin off does not impede or alter the proper functioning of the penis, period.
But I appreciate that some people don't like it.
Don't do it to your kids.
I can just tell you one thing.
It was done to me.
It was so painful I couldn't walk for a year.
Bada bing, bada boom.
So that is Tish James, always looking out for the young children who are mentally unwell by definition, easily exploitable, and the industry behind what has been created of that industry.
Appreciate, by the way, when they talk about it, look, doctors are doctors are reluctant to give the procedure.
No shit, as they should be.
But if you read through the lines, what you understand is that this has been created.
This has created an industry.
And once that industry gets created, there is the corruption, there is the corporate corruption.
And what you have right now is the medical industry using their useful idiots, a la Tish James, to try and protect their medical gravy train of creating patients for life.
You give puberty blockers to a kid and cause that kid to have micropenis.
They're patients for life.
You give a double mastectomy to a healthy girl.
You have created a patient for life.
They should be understanding that if there's justice on this earth, they will be creating lawsuits for life.
So the executive order about flipping time states that defy it, cut off federal funding, and go after these criminals who are mutilating the genitals of vulnerable and mentally unwell children.
Period.
Ow.
What else is going on?
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the show?
Let's see what we got in Viva.
Old Man Toby says, if they can use Maxwell to break down the whole system, then maybe she's a tool worth using.
I'm happy I don't have to make those decisions.
The question is, though, what does she have?
What does Maxwell have by way of untapped evidence or evidence that has not yet been disclosed or obtained?
I'm curious because it's an amazing thing that in the broad scheme of the prosecution conducted by Maureen Comey, now terminated Maureen Comey, that they never found any of the hundreds of men to whom these victims were trafficked by the accounts of the victims and by basic logic.
Unless you believe that the prosecution was the cover-up, which I do.
And I believe the same thing with P. Diddy.
And I called it, predicted it, and it happened.
And I get to say, I told me so.
At one o'clock, by the way, we might be having some, yeah, we're going to have the Romandadon from Canada who's going to talk to us about the corrupt British Columbia elections and the latest updates on that.
I guess what's the best segue here?
Let me go see what's going on in viva barnslaw.locals.com.
Medical corruption often becomes medical coercion, i.e., 70-some vaccines required for college, says Fiddlewitch.
Most circumcisors perform the surgery for free, but they accept tips.
Oh, come on, who did that, Dashman?
Hold on, I do have to bring up something in our locals community because it's horrifying, hilarious.
I like to say hilorifying or hilarious.
Hold on, let me get the meme.
Let me get the meme.
The chat's moving fast today.
Vivabarnslaw.locals.com for the best above-average community out there and the greatest memes out there.
If you're sensitive or if there are children watching, ear muffs, eye muffs, behold, Nancy Pelosi.
Gene's ad.
Huh?
Funny is funny, and that's funny.
Who did that in our community?
I always like the who did this.
And now I can actually go see who did this.
We got Bill Gates.
Yeah, that's no, that's Anthony Fauci, not Bill Gates, gene therapy.
That's funny.
So it's Daryl Escola.
Considering she's over 80 and you're lucky to be alive at 80, I mean, that's that would be, those would be good genes for an 80-year-old to be able to live that long, drunk as a skunk and worth $412 million.
You know, good for her.
Okay, vivabarneslaw.locals.com for anybody who wants to come on over to the after party and join the community, support the work that we do.
Before we get to Canada, this is going to be the segue into Canada.
There was an article that was going around earlier today.
You may have seen it, and it says we need to expand the definition of death out of the New York Times.
I don't have a lot of the, I won't call them rage baiting because that's judgmental.
There were a lot of people responding to this, retweeting the headline, saying, how disgusting.
And I want to pull up the headline here.
Let's just pull up the headline so you can see what it looked like.
And people were sharing the headline, just the caption: donor organs are too rare.
We need a new definition of death.
And it was like, oh, here we go.
They're eating the people.
Food is too scarce.
We need a new definition of death.
And people were raging against the headline.
And I wasn't sure how many of those people raging against the headline, sharing the links, had actually read the article.
The article is written by one Sandeep Jahar, who tweeted the following.
His own article.
I think he is since, yep, he has since restricted responses as to who can reply.
Sanjeep, Sandeep, sorry, who is a cardiologist?
I mean, I guess Dr. Mengele was also a doctor.
Was Dr. Mengele an actual doctor?
Hold on.
Let me just, let me just check myself.
Was Dr. Oh, come on, get out of here.
Was Dr. Mengele a real doctor?
Yes, Dr. Joseph Mengele was a real doctor, both a medical doctor and a PhD holder, but his actions during the Holocaust represent some of the most horrific abuses of medical ethics in history.
So Dr. Mengele was a real doc.
I'm not saying Dr. Sanjeep Jahar is Dr. Mengele.
I'm just saying he seems to be promoting the idea of harvesting the organs of mentally challenged people if they fit his definition of death.
We'll get there.
But Dr. Sandeep is a doctor.
Death is not simply a biological fact, but it's also a complex social choice.
Sorry, what was that, Dr. Mengele?
I couldn't hear you through the calls to harvest the organs of people who are not yet dead.
We should expand the definition of death.
It will actually save lives.
No shit.
That is pretty much the excuse for genocide in general.
Got to get rid of this group of people.
It'll save more lives.
Just, I know it's a hard thing to do, but let's just go ahead and do it.
Read the op-ed I wrote with one of my two of my Northwell Health colleagues in the New York Opiniente.
Well, Sandeep, I took your advice.
I went to read the article.
And oh, cripe, did I put the article down?
Oh, I've turned the article away.
Now I got to see the section.
I'll go to my tweet.
I read the article.
The article is nothing shy of promoting or at least being exactly one step away from rationalizing, justifying harvesting the organs of people who are so mentally challenged, they fit Dr. Sanjeep.
I forget his name now.
His version of death.
This is from the article.
You have to actually get through the long-winded opening middle towards the end.
Listen to this.
Apart from increased organ availability, there is also a philosophical reason for wanting to broaden the definition of death.
The brain functions that matter the most to life are those such as consciousness, memory, intention, and desire.
Once those higher brain functions are irreversibly gone, is it not fair to say that a person, as opposed to a body, has ceased to exist?
Now do mentally challenged people, doctor, do mentally challenge people who are so mentally challenged.
And I'm not trying to be funny or glib here.
You know, people who are basically what used to be referred to as vegetables or in a vegetative state, people who can't think, can't function, drool.
Now do them.
Do they have those higher brain functions of consciousness, memory, intention, and desire?
Why, no, they don't.
They can barely walk and chew their own food.
We can basically say that they're dead and harvest their organs, can't we?
It'll actually save lives.
From this one mentally challenged individual, we can gain enough organs to save 10 people.
Should we not kill this person who is already dead, according to my definition, doctor?
Holy hell.
Understandably, some will worry that doctors will prematurely pronounce a patient irreversibly comatose when, in fact, the patient is not or there is genuine hope for recovery.
This is rare, but it can happen.
And when it does, it is a catastrophe.
That sort of a concern, however, is a oh, is about practicalities, such as whether doctors are following protocol properly.
No, it's about whether or not you're killing a living person to harvest their organs.
I used to proudly consider myself to be an organ donor.
I mean, I'm not sure that I am at this point anymore.
And I would always be able to rely on a very active, active fist support from family so that Dr. Mengele over here is not harvesting my organs because he says there's no chance for me to recover, though it could happen.
Yes, once you are no longer, what was it?
Once your brain functions, once you no longer have consciousness, memory, intention, or desire, let's start killing, start harvesting the organs of Alzheimer patients.
Don't they lack consciousness, memory, intention, and desire?
Bruce Willis, suffering from that degenerative mental, holy crab apples, dude, we are one step away from killing mentally challenged people, mentally unwell people, and homeless people.
Why not?
We could save more lives.
So I mean, I know it's bad.
Hear me out.
I know it's bad, but it might actually save more people in the long run.
That's what's coming out of the New York Times.
Let's not kid ourselves either.
Those with power stay in power and those that don't become slaves to the system or insignificant.
Yeah, look, Coffee Crew Mocha.
You're not wrong.
I always say that everybody loves freedom of speech until they're in power and people use that freedom of speech to go after their power.
Then all of a sudden, they start worrying about the children.
They start worrying about hate speech.
They start going after the platforms that allow the speech that goes after the power, like what we're witnessing in the UK right now with Ofcom threatening to surveil the actions of Rumble to see what's going on on their platform.
Are they hosting any content that's going to make the migrants in London uncomfortable?
So that's what's going on in America in terms of being one step closer to literally harvesting the organs of people who are alive.
But not the higher order of what it means to be alive.
Why even live if you're so mentally challenged?
So it's not just Canada.
So when people say De Viva, you harp on Canada.
Unfortunately, it's not just Canada that's fallen off the deep end.
It's basically states that resemble Canada.
New York, California, Michigan, where else?
Maine, Colorado.
What happened In Colorado.
Oh, yeah, Color.
Okay.
We're going to save the Colorado one.
No, we're going to go to the Colorado one right now.
This is the news out of Colorado, and you hear it, and you read it, and you say, I don't even understand what it is that I'm reading.
This is coming from Libs of TikTok, and it doesn't.
Well, tonight we have the latest.
It's coming from her.
It matters what is coming from her.
I love it when people don't want to, they say, holy schlit, or that's holy shut.
No, that's holy.
That's the polite way of saying holy shit.
In which case, I just say, like, that's just as rude as saying, holy shit, but it's done so that the algorithmic suppressor doesn't suppress the bad words.
Libs of TikTok, holy schlit.
More Colorado officers facing disciplinary action for sharing information about illegals with ICE.
I'll play this.
We don't have to play the whole thing, but I want to play it in all.
I'm going to pause it and commentate as we go through it because there's important elements to focus on.
The bottom line in this is that you have police officers in Colorado who have, in fact, been put on unpaid administrative leave very short periods of time for having shared information with ICE agents.
Now, I thought upon reading it and hearing initial reports that they actually violated some like privacy protocol by setting up, I think it's Telegram in this case, but it's or signal chats.
No, no, it's because they provided information to ICE agents to facilitate federal enforcement of immigration laws.
Listen to this.
Well, tonight we have the latest updates regarding the Utah student who was detained by ICE in Mesa County last month.
Reporter Robbie Fatland joins us live in studio tonight with the latest details.
Robbie.
Yeah, thank you, Hannah.
So 19-year-old Caroline Goncalves was pulled over by a sheriff's deputy on June 5th.
Her information was shared with immigration officials in a group chat.
Now, over the last few months, an internal investigation was conducted into the deputy who performed the traffic stop and other officers in said chat.
The details of that investigation were released today.
Pause.
Never say in said chat.
I mean, that is the most pretentious way of trying to sound formal.
In the chat.
Okay, in the chat, in said chat.
All right.
So they set up a chat.
They share information.
Listen to what happens.
Your actions have discredited the Mexican Sheriff's Office by acting outside of our standard operating practices and culture.
Standard operating practices and culture.
That's from the disciplinary hearing.
Because Colorado apparently recently passed a law that says state police officers will no longer or cannot collaborate, provide information, share information with federal ICE, immigration customs enforcement.
They can't do it.
It's a recent law.
The culture.
We don't cooperate with the feds to enforce federal law within the states.
That was a recording from Deputy Alexander Zwink's disciplinary determination from July 25th.
Deputy Zwink pulled over Caroline Goncalves after she drove too close to a semi on June 5th.
During the stop, he collected her documentation and sent information to other law enforcement officials.
Imagine that there is a law that was passed in the states that says we are actively not going to collaborate, cooperate with the feds in terms of enforcing federal law.
That sounds insurrectionist to me, if I had to say.
I took a photo of her driver's license.
I heard what I thought was her driver's license.
Sent that out in a signal chat group.
The group chat was formed on an app called Signal, which allows people to send encrypted messages.
Now, investigators found that members of Colorado State Patrol, Homeland Security, and other officers from drug interdiction teams were all part of this same group.
This doesn't sound like a bug.
This sounds like it should be not just a feature of this.
It should be that all, I mean, I'm trying to think of a reason for which there would not be interconnectedness among all law enforcement across the country.
I mean, it wouldn't just be for arresting people.
It would be for helping people.
This is like, it's like the problem with the healthcare system is that doctors can't access files from other doctors for the purposes of better serving their patients.
There should be automatic, central database and sharing of all law enforcement information.
I mean, on the one hand, it would prevent the wrong people getting arrested.
It would prevent the wrong houses from getting raided.
Okay, I'm sorry.
It's like they're describing this as though it's the end of the world when it should be how things work.
However, Zwink said that no ICE agents were involved.
Your knowledge is ICE.
Part of that chat group.
This is from his administrative hearing.
I mean, this is it's it's it's Orwellian, Kafka-esque.
Was there any members of federal law enforcement in that group?
I thought the issue was just using a group chat to share information.
It isn't.
Okay.
The investigation is now over.
Deputy Zwink and three other sheriff staff are on leave.
Mesa County Sheriff Todd Rowell said in a statement released today, the sheriff's office should not have been involved in Goncalves' detention.
Prior to this disciplinary action, Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser filed a lawsuit against Deputy Zwink.
County law expressly prohibits both state agencies and political subdivision employees.
That includes local agencies like the Mesa County Sheriff's Office from disclosing personally identifiable information that is shared for the purpose of investigating for, participating in, cooperating with, or assisting federal immigration enforcement.
Pause this right now.
This man should be in jail as well.
He didn't just say it was a law prohibiting the sharing of personal identification information.
He said it's a law, the purpose of which was to prevent the sharing of personal identification information for the purposes of facilitating enforcement of immigration law.
This is an attorney general of the state of Colorado.
I don't know what federal charges could be laid against him, but it sounds like some should.
This is not just unlawful and seditious or insurrectionist in that it's literally insurrecting against the authority of the federal government.
And as much as there is one and should be one.
It wasn't just sharing personal information.
It was sharing it for the purposes of facilitating enforcement of immigration law.
So what they are basically is right now harboring and sheltering illegal aliens from immigration enforcement.
Oh, we're not, we're not doing anything active in terms of aiding and abetting and sheltering.
We're just not actively participating in cooperating with.
Sheriff Raoul writes, the lawsuit filed by the Attorney General's office sends a demoralizing message to law enforcement that the law may be wielded selectively for political effect.
The attorney general's office sent our newsroom a statement saying he was presented with facts that showed blatant violations of state law.
Goncalves was detained in an ICE facility in Aurora for nearly two weeks before her release.
I don't understand what it is with the next generation of women sticking their tongues out in photographs.
I don't understand it, and it drives me crazy.
Here are things that I don't want to be seeing when looking at pictures.
Down people's throats.
I don't understand it.
I'm sorry to digress.
She is now safely back home.
Now, Colorado State Patrol also released a statement regarding this investigation.
Chief Matthew Picard said that the patrol reevaluated its use of the signal app and that they no longer share information on it.
He also writes that we respect Mesa County Sheriff Raoul's correctivist actions, but believe his judgments regarding the patrol are misinformed and premature.
End of story, people.
It's actually the case right now that states are actively not only not cooperating with, but punishing people who do cooperate with federal authorities as it relates to enforcing immigration.
Like, why immigration?
Like, why not also not collaborate, cooperate with any other enforcement of any other federal law?
Colorado deputies violated new state law when sharing information with federal immigration agents.
Anyway, we basically heard it, but this is the article.
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser sued Mesa County Sheriff's Deputy Alexander Zwink last week after his cooperation with federal immigration agents on Drug Task Force was exposed during a Brazilian college's student's arrest for an expired visa.
It's lawlessness by design.
All right, peeps.
Let me see what's going on in the chat over here.
We have got some humble rants to have a look at and see if there's any tips, questions over on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Viva, are you surprised?
What happened with Texas pushing back on the federal government to protect its citizens?
Biden-Fed government caused a domino effect of states to push back.
Okay, I appreciate, I appreciate the point you're bringing up.
Maungozi says, Are you now or have you ever been affiliated with any federal law enforcement?
Why does that sound familiar?
If the question is directed at me, the answer is no.
Are you now or have you ever been affiliated with any federal law officers?
Why does that sound familiar?
Okay, I don't even, I don't think I got that.
The only reason I know that, are you now?
Oh, have you ever been?
It was a line from a clockwork orange.
Let's see what's going on in viva barnslaw.locals.com.
All the way down at the bottom, we've got, we've got to get to Canada.
We've got to get to Canada because Canada would be a sick joke if it were funny.
As it is, it's not funny.
It's actually disgusting.
I get sent an article yesterday and I do not believe what I'm writing, reading.
And I tweet: Canada has become a sick joke.
Holy hell, this is beyond ridiculous.
Before we get to the tweet, because I want to read through the article without spoiling the punchline, which is insanity, but it's going to be insanity based on the headline.
This is actual reality in Canada.
From the National Post, killer who raped, decapitated a 12-year-old girl in Ontario has been paroled.
Police.
Halifax police say Douglas Worth was convicted of murdering Trina Campbell in 1987.
If you thought it was bad enough that the man raped, killed, and then decapitated while trying to dispose of the body of a girl 12 years old in 87, if you thought that was bad enough in this story, it actually gets worse.
A Nova Scotia man who raped murdered a 12-year-old girl, later decapitating her dead body in an attempt to hide evidence, has been released on parole and is living in the Halifax area.
According to Halifax Regional Police, 73-year-old high-risk offender Douglas Worth is living in Dartmouth.
Worth, originally from Pictou County area of Nova Scotia, was released after serving 35 years of a federal life sentence for the December 1987 second-degree murder of Trina Campbell in Brampton, Ontario.
By the way, 35 years of a life sentence.
Guess it wasn't really a life sentence, you jackasses.
National Post has contacted the parole board to obtain a copy of the decision to release Worth, who police say can have no contact with children or his victims, no drugs or alcohol, and must report all relationships.
We're not yet at the worst part of this.
They're asking a man who raped, murdered, decapitated.
I mean, that's, you know, I appreciate some people think you can always pray for forgiveness on your deathbed and find salvation.
Nope, not nope.
Burn in hell for the rest of your life.
Unless there were attenuating circumstances that he took some drugs and was on some sort of psychotic episode.
No, because listen to this part.
He has a criminal history dating back to 1968 that includes break-ins, motor vehicle theft, and the 1978 rape of an Indigenous girl in Ontario, for which he was sentenced to serve eight years, earning his release in June 1987, about seven months before he killed Campbell.
The circumstances surrounding that murder are detailed in multiple news outlets.
In the show, it notes that shortly before his release, Worth said he had planned to kill people and go on a rampage as retribution for his incarceration.
Despite those concerns, he had served his limited sentence and nothing in Canadian law at the time established safeguards around release.
After Worth got out in spring, however, police tracked him to Edmonton, where he reconnected with a woman named Mary Kelly and her teenage son from a different relationship, Sean.
Police said they lost track of Worth soon after, but believe he returned to Ontario.
Police said Campbell, a Metis girl who'd had a troubled life, was living in a group home in the fall of 1987 after having run away from foster parents on several occasions.
When she failed to return to the facility on December 11th, they thought at first she might have run away again.
After a month-long investigation into her disappearance, police didn't have any credible leads, despite no evidence of foul play.
Meanwhile, Peel Office were completely unaware of Worth was living in a downtown boarding house close to where Campbell was last seen by her school bus driver.
We had no idea this sadistic predator had moved into our area.
Authorities later learned Worth was soon rejoined by the Kellys.
Okay, he left the car with a hockey bag and went to the ravine area.
He was then seen by Mary to come carrying a hockey bag that was now laden with something.
The two drove about an hour with Mary Worth, took the bag into the woods and came back with it empty.
Back in Brampton, he then ordered the 14-year-old Sean to clean up the stains left in the car's trunk.
We don't need to get into this.
The man announced that he was going to kill people if released, but nothing under Canadian law could prohibit his release because he was sentenced to eight years for the rape of an Indigenous girl.
He gets out, murders a girl after raping her, decapitates, and is serving a life sentence and now has been paroled, but he's not allowed to have contact with kids.
We don't need to get into the whole murder.
This is Canada.
And by the way, what did he serve for rape?
Seven years, eight years.
You know what they're asking for for Tamara Leach and Chris Barber, the organizers of the Ottawa Trucker protest, for nonviolent mischief?
Seven and eight years, respectively.
We are living through abject insanity.
Life sentence for life sentence gets out after 35 years after having gotten out announcing he was going to murder people as retribution, does it, goes back to jail.
And now they say, well, he's old, 73.
He signed an undertaking under penalty of perjury that he won't have contact with children or drink alcohol and that he'll report any relationships to the police.
Hashtag meanwhile in Canada.
Roflo 1804 says, I remember circa 2007 seeing my first dumb girl showing her tongue in a pic.
One of the comments said it all.
You look like you're trying to.
I reviewed those pics.
What is what is it?
What do 304 pick?
What does that mean?
Hold on a second.
Let me just see what does 304 mean.
Multiple meetings to make all the context.
Most likely referring to HTTP status code.
Yeah, I don't think that's what it means.
Let's go to oh, NPC referring to people as 304 and NPCs.
Okay, fine.
So I guess that's what it is.
You learn something new every day.
All right.
King of Biltong in the house says, need more protein in your diet.
Okay, that was one hell of a segue.
Try some healthy, high-protein Bill Tong packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
Get some now at Bill Tong USA.
Use code Viva for 10% off.
Bill Tong is delicious.
Get it.
It's flipping delicious.
Now, let me see what's going on over on Viva Barnes Law.
I'm not reading that one either.
Look at what they wanted for the Jan Sixers, says Bill Brown, but go easy on rapist and murderers.
This is in Canada.
Come on, man.
This is in Canada.
In the states, they just don't want states cooperating with the feds in terms of locking people up for or deporting them for being here on illegally.
We've got a new member of our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community, Anita Deep.
Is that Anita B. Deep?
Anita B. Deep is now a member of vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Anita, welcome to the above-average community.
It's fantastic.
I was listening to Bourbon with Barnes yesterday, and it's more phenomenal insight.
But if you want to support and you don't really want to go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, don't know why you wouldn't want to, but go get some merch at Viva Fry.
You can some good merch, hats, cups.
Everyone needs to drink coffee in the morning.
Everyone can use a cup.
Be a force multiplier.
And if you want to get a kid's book, Louis the Lobster, returns to the sea on Amazon.
Self-published with my wife, Abigail Martin, illustrations.
She's the daughter of one of our amazing above-average community members out there.
And 304 means a certain three-letter garden.
304.
I know it means ho, but how does 304 get to ho?
304.
Oh, I get it because let me see something.
Hold on a second.
If you go to calculator, calculator, I guess the four upside down.
Let me just see this here.
304.
Yes, I guess it would be, but no.
Oh, the four would have to be spelt like that.
So yeah, I get it now.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Sorry.
All right, we got one more story here.
I mean, it ties them all together perfectly.
And we'll do it quickly because we have a guest in the back who's going to talk to us about the fraudulent elections in British Columbia in Canada.
This is Fox News.
ICE arrests illegal immigrants who was released despite charges of sex crimes against children.
ICE official criticizes sanctuary policies recently enacted by the Montgomery County Commissioners in Pennsylvania.
Add Pennsylvania to the list.
U.S. Immigration Customs ICE.
Idiota arrested an illegal immigrant who was recently released from a county jail despite facing multiple charges of sex crimes against children.
Oscar Adalberto Penate, 56-year-old from El Salvador, was taken back into custody on July 27 in Potts Town.
Send him to El Salvador.
I mean, we don't need to read the whole story.
We understand what the hell's going on here.
It's abject insanity.
Any sanctuary city that is responsible for the subsequent act of violence of someone that they did not report to ICE should go to jail for the crime that that person subsequently committed.
Period.
I like that.
Let's make it happen.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
All right, people, we're going to move back to Canada with another story that is phenomenally fascinating, but not many people are picking up on it.
I had the remanded and remanded on a while back.
This is relating to the British Columbia election that involved, I believe it involved Dominion voting machines.
I don't want to get mixed up about things, but we'll get some details on it.
And the remanded is an individual of British Columbia.
You're going to see an avatar because I think he still wants to protect his identity for reasons that I think are obvious.
British Columbia is basically as progressive as Washington State, Portland, Oregon.
You know, batshit crazy places.
But we'd need to hear the latest update in terms of what's going on there.
The remanded, whenever you're ready, activate your mic and activate your camera if you want to.
Let me see.
I'll get the there we go.
I know that he's watching because, well, I'm going to wait for the remanded to come in here, but while I do that, oh, there we go.
The remanded, sir, how goes the battle?
Not too bad.
End up having to fast-track putting the kids to bed, and it's half working.
Like for a daytime nap, yeah, just a nap.
I'm just like, yeah, I've got something that just came up, kids.
I need to take a nap.
Leave me alone for a moment.
Remanded, in as much as you don't have an avatar or something.
I want to bring something up to show your show yourself.
I did, but I had to.
I couldn't quickly do it because then they had to sign in and then update it through there.
Yeah, you know what?
I'll scroll through your feed while you do this.
Remanded, tell us what's going on in British Columbia, why America should care.
Even if they don't, they're going to hear it now.
But what the heck is going on?
Give us the update.
Well, give us the recap because I think many people will have forgotten about the provincial elections in Alberta, which saw a very narrow margin of victory for the, I want to say, the liberals.
And I was questioning why the conservatives would not be challenging the certain questionable or at least too close to call results that would have resulted in them potentially having a majority.
I didn't understand how British Columbia even swung that much in terms of the conservative direction, questioning whether or not it's legit conservatism.
Tell us what's going on in British Columbia.
Yeah.
I mean, this probably, this wouldn't even been on my radar if votes weren't missing off of the official website.
You know, that was the main thing.
We were on a stream at like 11:45 p.m. and the numbers just weren't really changing much.
And there was, you know, some cyber issue.
There was a DDoS tax someone mentioned.
I was like, okay, I'm going to count these.
I'm going to count these categories and just see if all the parties add up to the table that shows the total valid votes.
And there was 5,488 votes missing.
And that basically launched everything that we've been doing over the last nine months.
If I may stop you there, how did you determine that the votes were missing?
They literally just didn't add up on the webpage.
Okay.
So they, so on the official website, they show the nine categories.
So you have the BC Conservatives, BCNDP, Independents, Green Party, and basically it breaks down as the votes.
I'll bring this up.
I'll turn the volume down.
Is this, should I play this?
Yeah, I just put, I just went back through the 15 hours of media coverage and I found this gem.
You can play with me.
As you say, Gloria, we have, CBC has put a request into Elections BC to get clarification on the situation.
But as I say, the latest information we have, the final poll in many of these writings not being released just yet, citing safety issues, wanting to recount to make sure they have those numbers correctly.
And have a look.
This is why it matters.
Too close to call Wanda Fuel.
So I'm sorry, I meant NDP before, not liberal, but NDP are basically more liberal than liberal or more progressive than liberals.
Actually, if you keep that, if you make that big again.
Yeah, let me do that.
Hold on.
The reason why that's interesting, if people look at, it's in gray where it says Coquitlam, Millardville, or Revistoke on the bottom right, you'll see 17 out of 19.
So there's a little number in the bottom right.
Bottom right.
Yeah, right there.
17, 20 out of 22.
It's playing.
Okay, yes, I see.
Yeah, yeah.
So basically, what the media did, like just with this issue, is they kept two ballot boxes uncounted during the election.
And Elections BC didn't even acknowledge those ballot boxes.
And so that's where this weird thing with the media, like, why did they add 275 ballot boxes?
So that's the whole media thing.
So we don't really know why they did that.
But with this, the guy's citing safety concerns and that we need to do recounts.
So, well, I mean, what is what's hazardous about counting votes if they're done by tabulator?
So the voting for this provincial election, was it in fact using Dominion voting machines and digital voting?
I'll just Dominion voting tabulators.
Okay.
So they're not like the image-based ones you see in the States.
We have just the tabulator of versions.
And then they just tweak them where they apparently don't use the capable Wi-Fi within the tabulator.
And they came up with their own tape and ballot account that they print out to come up with the results.
But then they deleted all of the digital data from the tabulator.
So you notice that the actual numbers are not adding up the night of the election.
This sends you on a deep dive, rabbit hole discovery.
What did you discover and what's the latest in terms of what's going on with the British Columbia election results?
I guess like one of the biggest things is just kind of like counting the violations.
So when we go through the elections at 109.3, 149, 230, you know, blah, blah, blah, kind of go through, you can see about eight, probably eight to 12 violations by Elections BC or union or news news outlets.
And so that, I mean, that's kind of glaring where you can say, you know, there is lack of procedure, malfeasance probably.
And one of the key things is May 27th, they came out with their first report by the CEO of Elections BC.
Now, at this time, there's a court case under the Supreme Court of BC through one of the BC Conservative candidates to invalidate those results.
And so When we look at that report, there's 41 orders that the CEO put out.
So, what is an order?
An order basically something that he has to review where there is an error, a mistake, or a lack of procedure by an election official or voter or someone involved within the election.
Now, what's not included in those 41 orders is the evidence that came out through the Supreme Court of BC, to which Elections BC admitted to violating the Elections Act.
So, basically, you had, in this case, you had this facility, this senior's home or care home, that administered 21 ballots by someone who wasn't an official elections officer.
And so, that goes under violation 1093 and 258, 258 is subversion of an election by an official.
Now, what should have happened within the couple weeks of the election?
They should have caught that.
They should have erectified that.
And they technically should have gone to a by-election because that writing was decided by 21 or 22 votes.
Well, I mean, what's amazing is as I'm looking, like just looking through the news, there's nothing on this.
There's been nothing since early 2025 when some of the so-called conservatives were allegedly clamoring for election review.
So, since discovering this, like who's done what?
And is the answer nobody and nothing?
Pretty much.
I mean, even with that, the Elections BC admitting a violation, which they didn't even bring up until this case was before the Supreme Court of BC, the BC Conservatives haven't even said anything.
Not even the leader of the BC Conservatives, John John Rustad.
Like, nothing.
And so, it's basically been myself and one of my other teammates, ShareWare CDN, Canadian, who have been working on this through the four of us.
And that's pretty much it.
That's pretty much it.
So, when we had, so when that report came out, and in that report, the May 27th report, it basically states, which is why this makes the CVR data, the cast vote records, which a lot of Americans will probably know about through Mike Lindell and whatnot.
The reason why that's important is because, you know, eight months later, Elections BC came out in that report and said, oh, well, you know, we didn't make sure all the votes were counted and that they matched the registered voters and the ballot accounts all matched.
Next time, what we're going to do is we're going to fully automate the election.
So, 2028, you will see for the first time in Canada a province take on fully automated results.
And so, that's a problem.
Because if there's issues with this version and the admitted violations, why would you be comfortable with them fully automating the election?
And I mean, I can't make enough posts to bring awareness to it.
Are you currently involved in any litigation with this to, or is your activism strictly, I say, social media, not to undermine it?
Is there any pending litigation?
Not yet.
I did retain James Kitchen out of Alberta.
We haven't done any work on it yet because it does cost money, and I don't have the money to do the litigation.
So, we set up a crowdfund.
And in about a month, we ended up hitting that 10,000 mark to just do the filing.
But we have, I mean, we've got so much stuff to go through.
Just my report is 300 pages.
All of the additional information through independence, correspondence.
I mean, you're looking at hundreds more pages just to go over.
We'll probably have to make it concise, but then you're looking at how much time is that lawyer going to spend.
You know, you spend 20 to 25 hours just on understanding the case and doing up a filing.
There's a 10 grand rate there.
You know, and so what's the source for the what is the platform?
Is it Gibson Go?
Yeah, Gibson Go is the main one.
And then I was what's the forward slash or what's the name of the campaign?
BC election lawsuit.
BC election lawsuit?
BC election lawsuit, yeah.
Okay, there we go.
So I said it, I said I originally said it to ADK because that's kind of the end court costs, what was kind of estimated to be.
And you never know how long it'll go, whether or not they file something counter-file before you even get to, you know, pleading discovery or however, which way it works.
It's just, I can't, I just, I just can't cover the cost.
Like, it's just like it's impossible.
I've got three kids.
Yeah, but is there, are there not administrative remedies?
Like you file, file, I mean, file inquiries and then a designated administrative body that's intended to look into election integrity takes it over at taxpayer expense?
No, not in BC.
The federal you have that, they have their annual audits that they do on the election.
But the provincial ones, I mean, that's something that we're actually attempting to bring forth via a petition.
But then when we sent out our initial write-up, they said you can't request anything because you can't request something that will have taxpayers pay for something.
Well, it's just like, well, how the hell do you get an investigation, an independent review?
You know, what if you can't, if there can't be any funding towards whoever puts that together?
And so we're trying to figure out how to write that up.
But petitions typically don't go far.
They don't really have any legal standard of precedence.
Have the conservatives, the so-called conservatives, have they given up?
Are they making any active attempts to investigate or I don't know if it's so nobody's doing anything.
No, we just have the court case with that one writing that goes, that will be in court in September.
And that's really important because what's the name of that case?
It should be run, I can't remember what it's, it's run Rondawa VS.
Send me the link, either I bring it up now or share it afterwards.
You might have to share it after because I can't, I don't know if I can find the like that one, I don't actually have the link to the filing of when that is.
A lot of this stuff has actually been private.
I can only find the stuff that has been transcribed and put on to the government's website.
What's the nature of that lawsuit again?
That's the one writing where they basically had the admitted violations by Elections BC to overturn that.
And why that's important is because all the bills that had been passed in BC have been passed through the tiebreaker speaker of the house.
So if one writing changes, the government votes change.
Basically, the BC NDP won't be able to get anything passed.
And so it's pretty, it's fairly important.
And we're not letting it.
I mean, I don't want to let it go because we just spent so much time with it.
And there's just a whole lot of things that just don't make a whole lot of sense.
And this is all based off of their information to public.
Well, it's very interesting.
I remember the scandal at the time.
And I've been following it through you.
So, Remanded, your Twitter account is at the Remanded.
Yes.
And it's not spelt any funny way.
I'll bring it back up again in a second.
Yeah, it's all one word.
One thing before you close this off, what people don't know that's what's happening right now, and this is really important, is the BCNDP brought a committee.
It's a special committee called the Democratic and Electoral Forum Committee.
And what they've decided to do is phase one, which is happening right now, they're doing the democratic process electoral reform, but they're doing this before they investigate or review the BC election.
So I sent emails off and our stuff to the two of the BC Conservatives that are on that committee.
And they basically said, you know, thanks for doing what you're doing.
We'll look forward to looking at your stuff in 2026.
It's like 2026, that's another year from now.
So when you listen to these public presentations going on right now, the recommendations by Elections BC and the tone of the majority left-leaning committee member or MLAs that are on this committee, they're pushing for proportional representation.
And I bet you by next year, before they review the BC election in the spring of 2026, you will see either a vote, which is what they're pushing for, a vote to change the electoral model out of first past the post and change it to a proportional representation.
And the people will not have a referendum to vote on it.
That is what's happening.
And that's a segue that's just as important as this election.
Okay, very interesting.
Remanded.
Thank you very much for the updates.
No problem.
Have a good one.
I'm going to keep following you, everyone.
The remanded, it's right there.
If anyone's interested in what's going on in British Columbia, I know some British Columbians are and some Canadians are as well.
Remanded, man, thank you very much.
Take care.
Thank you.
Have a good one.
And now we shall go raid.
Jimmy Dore.
I want to go see the raid here.
Let's just see if it comes in.
It's in.
And then I say Viva Raid Booyah.
Excuse me.
And now we're going to go and have our after party at vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
I hear the kids coming in.
So we might have some noise in a few minutes.
It's a little hot in here.
Everybody, Sunday night show.
What day is it?
It's Friday.
Sunday night show is coming up.
Tomorrow night, I don't know if I'm going to try to do a locals community fight night.
I know Barnes does the Saturday night movie night, but we'll see what we do.
Let me just make sure I haven't missed anything over on Rumble in the chat.
Please chat.
Okay, no, I don't know what's going on with the chat here.
Okay, good.
We got everything.
Thank you, NeuroDivergent, for the help, as always in the chat.
All right, we're going to end it.
We're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the afterparty.