Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 5, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:39:37

Jailed for a Tweet! The U.K.'s Descent Into TYRANNY! Covid Talk With Jessica Rose & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	What you are looking at might be very unclear to the untrained eye.
	Above are a group of people, spectators who look very shocked or excited.
	You will understand why in about one second.
	one.
	No!
	For those listening on podcast, there is a cat dangling from the rafters.
	The crowd desperately trying to save the cat.
	A man who is quite clearly inebriated or on drugs.
	Oh my goodness.
	The cat is dangling by one finger claw.
	Oh my goodness.
	And they crack the cat in the American flag.
	Oh my goodness, people.
	The man who's on drugs or alcohol or both.
	Because it could be both.
	Very excited people.
	First of all, the symbology of saving a cat's life by catching it with the American flag is a thing of beauty.
	And yes, symbology, because ironically enough, this morning I was at another thrift shop and I got Boondock Saints on DVD.
	Now we just need to get a DVD player because the DVD player we have is broken.
	But that is flipping wild, flipping beautiful.
	They caught the cat with the American flag.
	See, we don't always have to start off with something that's going to make you want to puke in your mouth like Justin Trudeau's face, who we haven't seen him in a while.
	I wonder where Justin Trudeau is.
	Mark Carney.
	We don't have to start off with Mark Carney, but we're going to get into Mark Carney today.
	Politically speaking, gross.
	And we're going to get into Keir Starmer today.
	Also gross.
	But before we get into the grossness, we're going to start with a madam, a woman, who has been on this channel multiple times, who you may not know if you have been new to the channel, or you're definitely familiar with if you've been around for a while, Jessica Rose.
	And that also explains why I started with the cat video.
	Because ordinarily, I judge cat people thoroughly.
	In fact, I start off with one strike against cat people.
	But Jessica has proven herself, despite being a cat woman, being the best of the cat women, Jessica Rose, I want to say a statistical, analytical, biologist, PhD, neuroscientist.
	I always forget how to describe what she does, but Jessica will describe it for herself when she gets in here, when she activates her camera and activates her microphone.
	That is the...
	The discreet cue to enter.
	Are you still muted or are you?
	No, no, I'm here.
	Jess, okay, first of all, welcome back to the channel.
	It's been, I'd say, a long time.
	I feel like I just saw you because I was watching a documentary over the weekend called Follow the Silenced.
	And I'm like, oh, I know that voice.
	I know that woman.
	Jess, for those who don't know who you are, tell them who you are because I always forget how to describe your area of hyper, super specialized expertise.
	All right, so I suppose I'm a computational biologist because that's what I have a PhD in, but I'm more of an immunologist because even though that was my master's, it was the hardest degree of all the degrees I did, and I liked it the most.
	It was really cool.
	I'm an applied mathematician, a biochemist, and a molecular biologist too.
	But I suppose why you know me and everybody else knows me is because of the...
	So yeah, that's me, cat lover, surfer.
	You did get me into surfing, which is I also partially blame you.
	Yeah, well, I told you what happened.
	Yeah, I partially tore my MCL.
	Jess, so before we get into follow the silence, you've been working on some stuff, or at least there's some stuff that you've been looking into recently.
	I mean, I guess let's start from the beginning.
	Where are you at now in terms of your overall aggregate assessment of COVID, VAERS data, the adverse events that are now reported both in VAERS but being documented everywhere?
	or where are you at in terms of what you're looking into with COVID and the toxicity of the safe and effective jab that doesn't prevent transmission and causes myocarditis in one in 5,000 per dose for aged men, 18 to 40?
	Well, the bottom line is it's going to be akin to the summary I'm going to give in front of an audience of people soon who don't know anything about this, which is that the It's designed to detect safety signals and causality assessments are supposed to follow if a signal is detected.
	And there are so many signals in VAERS in the context of these COVID shots.
	Death is one of them.
	Neurological problems, cardiovascular problems, immunological dysfunctions, autoimmune diseases.
	I mean, everything under the sun.
	The problem is that the owners of the data, because it's owned by HHS, CDC, and FDA, are not doing what they've always done with VAERS, or at least sometimes done with VAERS, which are the causality assessments that follow.
	So they're not looking at the data.
	And it's not only that.
	I mean, I reminded myself in preparing for this talk I'm going to give.
	Back in 2022, when Molenski and Fauci were doing that Senate hearing, I don't know if you watched that, and both of them were asked a direct question by a senator.
	I don't remember which senator it was.
	Is there a way, do you know, the number of deaths in VAERS right now?
	And at that time, it was something like 11,000.
	Reported, not confirmed, because they say, okay, fine.
	They've been reported as adverse events, but they haven't been investigated and confirmed by whichever, the CDC or the HHS.
	I don't know who confirms the causality, but reported, just so nobody wants to take it out of context.
	Yeah, but neither of them had any clue what the number was.
	This is the point.
	Walensky was the director of the CDC.
	She owns this data set.
	If that was me, man, if I was the director of the CDC at that time in 2022, you're damn straight.
	I'd know the exact number of deaths in VAERS.
	You know, causality assessments done or not, I would know that number.
	And neither of them knew the number because they weren't looking.
	Either they weren't looking or they just didn't know or they were denying because they didn't want it going on record that there were that many deaths in association with these shots.
	So, yeah, it's like, I mean, the number of publications that are coming out now confirming Cardiac-related problems is astounding.
	A friend of mine is doing some work on amyloids now.
	He's a neuroscientist and he's confirming what I've been talking about for ages about the problem with amyloid proteins forming as a byproduct of both the shots and SARS because
	Flesha, well, amyloids in the context of COVID means, because I don't think a lot of us are going to understand or fully appreciate it.
	All right, so everybody go to ACS Nano.
	It's a journal.
	There are at least two, at least the last time I checked papers.
	Going way back, that document the presence of amyloidogenic peptides in the SARS sequence.
	So yeah, that's the journal.
	So if you type in amyloidogenic, you'll find one of the most relevant papers.
	So there's evidence that there are amyloidogenic peptides in the spike protein coating material.
	So this is exactly the coating material.
	That was nucleoside modified that was used in the context of the Moderna and Pfizer products.
	So what that means is that when that coating material gets to your ribosomes and they translate that into proteins, what's going to happen is you're probably going to end up with a bunch of amyloidogenic-like proteins being manufactured because that's the modus operandi.
	And those kinds of proteins, if you look it up, are...
	We don't have enzymes that are specifically designed to enable the breakdown of these kinds of proteins.
	And they cause a lot of buggery in your system, especially if they're being produced in excess by your own cells.
	So this is what some of us are thinking are causing problems So yeah, exactly.
	Interesting.
	Okay, now I'm actually just putting something together where going back to the died suddenly or the embalmers who are noticing these fibrous things, were they referring to those as amyloidotype proteins?
	No.
	They're probably not referring to them at that time, but that's indeed a component of what they are.
	In my opinion, the white rubbery stuff is more about excessive production of wound healing factors like collagen and fibrin.
	And this is in tandem with the clotting pathway getting buggered as well.
	I don't know if you know this, but there's another paper that's published that actually demonstrated that the clots in the context of flu virus are much less dense than the clots that are formed with SARS.
	And it's possible that it's this twofold process where the clotting pathway itself is out of control or dysregulated.
	And also it could be.
	Or the presence of amyloids when you're talking about SARS.
	Just about everything you can think about potentially physiologically going awry is associated with this spike protein in particular.
	This is something everyone's going to be hearing about a lot now.
	I've been literally giving talks about Amyloids and misfolded proteins for years because I knew that this was a problem.
	You say everybody's talking about it.
	What I'm finding is that not enough people or virtually nobody's talking about it anymore.
	It's like everybody wants to just forgive and forget and move on.
	I don't know if you had any opinion about Joe Biden's alleged aggressive prostate cancer, but when the internet says, we don't know if they're saline solutions, but someone who's up to their no less than their sixth booster.
	I mean, or sorry, I should say six shot, two shots, fourth booster.
	I don't know what percentage, I think it's like 2% who are doing that anyhow, but what sort of problems would one expect to see in the long run for multiple habitual abusers of the booster?
	It's Russian roulette, man.
	Like, you can't...
	Let me just put it this way.
	If you're listening to this and you've gotten multiple shots...
	Because even if you feel fine now, I'm happy for you, but you don't know what you're going to get in that next needle.
	We don't know.
	There's so much debauchery in terms of the manufacturing, and we don't even have to talk about the contaminants, the DNA contaminant.
	We can just talk about, you know, what these things were designed to do, which was, you know, get injected into you.
	Basically, they biodistribute.
	They go everywhere in your body.
	The lipid nanoparticles are highly toxic.
	They're cationically charged.
	We dump this payload, the nucleoside-modified RNA, and whatever else, potentially DNA, into whatever cells.
	You know, they're not picky.
	They're not what we call specific.
	They're nonspecific LNPs.
	So they go everywhere and they dump it wherever they land.
	And, you know, those cells, wherever it lands, are doomed.
	Because they're going to start mass-producing spike protein and potentially off-target proteins because frame-shifting is also an issue.
	Frame-shifting, explain that.
	So there's another paper that's published in Nature that came out a little while ago that demonstrates that because they substituted out one of the bases of the coating material for RNA with a So a ribosome is this protein factory that's inside your cells,
	and it's kind of shaped like a burger in schematics and textbooks.
	I suppose X-ray crystallography demonstrates that it looks like a burger.
	So it's like running a shoestring, which is the mRNA, through The lettuce layer of the burger.
	And that has to go at a certain speed.
	And the shoestring has to be unkinked.
	And in one end, it goes in as mRNA.
	And on the other end, it comes out as an amino acid.
	So each three bases called a codon translates into a specific amino acid.
	And then that string of amino acids that comes out, This end.
	It's like a pearl necklace and it folds a certain way, in a specific way to become this protein.
	But these modified bases cause the shoestring to become, let's just go with the analogy, a little oily.
	So it pulls through the burger faster than it should.
	and it's called slippage.
	So what ends up happening is instead of those and then you have a different protein.
	And we don't know what those proteins are.
	They're called off-target proteins, and they could be Maybe they get degraded by enzymes, or maybe they could be very bad, because misfolding of proteins would probably become a huge problem.
	And one of the things about that in biology is that misfolded proteins, AKA prions can teach other proteins to misfold and that can become a disaster.
	So we're just, you know, It was a huge deal.
	Misfolded proteins in the long term, I mean, that leads to things like what?
	Cancers, heart attacks, heart conditions?
	No, prion diseases.
	That leads to death, like inevitable death.
	It's one of the worst things you can possibly face.
	It's like I'm not scared of any virus, not even Ebola.
	But prion diseases scare the shit out of me.
	Because basically...
	And if that's in the brain, you're dead.
	That's what Kreuzfeld-Jakob is all about.
	Jeez Louise.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	We don't want to inflate because it's not exactly the same thing, but it's the same concept of misfolded proteins.
	And you know what?
	We don't know very much about our own human biology, do we?
	It's like what you're explaining typically would have been the standard five to seven year studies that you would study before you mass administer this to two and a half billion people, whereas we're just doing it in real time with real data just to lighten the mood.
	I can never hear the word ribosome and not think, this did not make the ribosomes happy.
	Okay, we don't need to go to the chlorophyll.
	More like, well, he says ribosomes when you said it.
	It's like, oh, I remember.
	I heard that word somewhere.
	Oh, did you not hear it?
	No, I just don't know what it is.
	You don't know what Billy...
	Now it's going after the cap.
	Chlorophyll?
	More like borophyll.
	Am I right?
	Am I right?
	Right?
	Okay, well, the audio's off.
	I don't know why that is such a terrible...
	As much as I'm disappointed, I'm actually, I'm very encouraged because it's not often in life that you get to say, you must go watch Billy Madison.
	For someone who's different.
	Okay.
	Holy cows.
	Have you seen Happy Gilmore?
	Have you seen?
	Okay.
	So, okay.
	We'll talk after.
	We'll talk after.
	I'll text you.
	I'll text you privately.
	Oh, I'm having a...
	It's either...
	All right.
	Well, in light of all of this and the studies that are being published contemporaneously with the approval of the updated Moderna jab, which if you have a better understanding of it, let me know.
	My understanding is it's like a fifth of the concentration of the prior one.
	This one's called like NMX spike or something.
	And it has an adverse, a serious adverse event.
	Ratio percentage of 2.7%, which is just slightly higher than the last one, which had 2.6%, which is insane.
	But I don't know if you have an opinion on how this gets approved while all of this data, studies, and research is coming out showing the abject, inexcusable, but intolerable, unacceptable adverse event reactions from these jabs.
	Yeah, so this just doesn't surprise me.
	You know, I said this at, where was that?
	Oh, that was in Brussels, when I spoke to the parliamentarians in, like, the big EU parliament building in Brussels.
	I did an interview with, I think it was CHD, and I said this.
	It's like, the pathway that we're on is going to involve little to no Trials or tests for any subsequent products that use that platform.
	And that's exactly what we're seeing.
	It's absolute lunacy.
	It's like these things that we already injected into...
	It's like the segue.
	They have to say that they're still safe and effective and ignore all the adverse events.
	because if they don't, if they admit harm, then they can't go ahead and keep using the platform.
	And I don't mean to be...
	But I would like to point something out that I've seen a couple times on Twitter now.
	Nexspike.
	It's called Nexspike, right?
	Is that the name of it?
	I think so.
	I'm going to pull it up and just double check.
	So nex, this prefix in Latin, means death or murder.
	This is not a joke.
	That's actually what it means in Latin.
	And I don't know, you know, I'm a biologist, so we often, So, I don't know.
	The front door, Jessica.
	Okay.
	Introducing Mnexspike.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	So Mnexspike is what it translates to if you use the Latin prefix, you know, meaning of next.
	So I got fact-checked after I thought I was so smart fact-checking the fact-checkers where...
	And then I thought I understood a fact check saying, no, it's when you splice together different foreign languages that you get that.
	But then, no, it was actually Google Translate was translating it in there, but the fact check said, no, Google Translate's translation is not accurate, and you wouldn't break down in that order anyhow.
	But ultimately, the translation's not accurate.
	Let's go see what next means in Latin.
	Not that I doubt you.
	Necks in Latin.
	It's not funny.
	It's not funny, but it's...
	We have to laugh, though.
	Come on.
	It translates to death or...
	Like, can you tell me that the PR person for this goddamn product doesn't know that?
	And if they don't...
	No, but I'm not one of those people either.
	I sincerely believe they are brazenly rubbing in your face, that they are doing it in real time, and there's nothing that you're going to do about it.
	M, Death Spike.
	Moderna's Death Spike.
	It's literally like, it's like this thing where...
	I don't know if I said that right, but I think you know what I mean.
	It's like the crazier something sounds, the less...
	The less likely it is that people will think that it's crazy.
	You know what I mean?
	It's like, no, it can't be.
	But what was, there was another example just recently where I said, they're telling you brazenly as they do it.
	I have to, now, it's going to come back to me in a second, but that is absolutely wild.
	I'm taking a note to clip this section because, yeah, we're going to make that known.
	But just, look, I have to make the joke now because in our locals community, they want to know what's up with the hat and it's the perfect add-on to the, I'm not one of those people.
	We're going to reveal my secrets!
	Do tell us what's up with the hat.
	Okay, shout out to Maria!
	My dear friend Maria Hubner-Mogg gave me this hat at a conference.
	I think it was in Bath at a World Council for Health meeting.
	Some people, they're very sweet.
	They give me presents and I end up having no room to put things in my suitcase.
	I haven't worn this yet until today.
	And it's lined with silver.
	So it's literally like a tinfoil hat because it's a company that produces clothes made with EMF blocking fabrics.
	I don't know if it works, but I thought, ah, I'm going to wear that today because, you know, I...
	And maybe I should protect my brain.
	I'm convinced that, like we were joking before we went live, everybody, I knew it was in that hat, but I was putting my kid to bed and I could just hear vibrations, electricity.
	I could feel the murmur of not energy in a good sense, like cables, refrigerators, electrical stuff turning.
	I was like this, this, whether or not it's good or bad, it can't be an, And I was going fishing under these power lines and I could hear the power lines zapping, you know, murmuring and crickling.
	I hear mine like right now.
	When the power usage goes up, it's like, wow.
	So I get to blame every one of my quirks and idiosyncrasies and obsessive compulsive disorder on electricity.
	It's nothing to do with my genetics or makeup.
	M. Neck's death.
	It's Moderna's death spike.
	I feel a little black-pilled, actually.
	Sorry.
	Before you move on, can you take a look?
	I just dropped you a tip.
	Take a look at the tip.
	A tip question.
	Hold on.
	Let's go here.
	Did you see this?
	Check this out.
	Hold on, I got to bring it up over on...
	Let me bring it up.
	A tip question here.
	It says, what is the meaning of death spike?
	Question.
	It says, October 2024.
	Definition of death spike at Cadenza.
	Let's see what this is.
	I can share screen here.
	Death spike is synonym with increase of deaths.
	Example, sentences.
	There has been a recent death spike due to the coronavirus.
	The recent death spike among the other.
	Yeah, it's rubbing in your...
	It wasn't that one, but it was something similar.
	Chat's going to get it to me when I remember.
	Like, seriously, were they always this weird and we just didn't know about it?
	I think they were and we didn't know about it.
	And now we just can't believe it.
	Ever since John Podesta's, you left a handkerchief with a pizza-related map on it, do you want it back?
	And they want us to believe that that's totally normal.
	It's wild.
	So they're using the platform, the platform itself, like when they say, hey, we've got another approval for an mRNA-based device.
	I was like, the last one, not only, I mean, set aside the death that it caused, the necks that it forced onto people.
	It didn't work!
	And so they're using the same platform to do more stuff that didn't work the first time around.
	And it's like, you know, the Rwandan genocide thing.
	Like you kill one person and you got to just keep killing more and more people so that it feels less meaningful at the amount of people that you've killed.
	I mean, I'm a little, are you pissed off with the.
	I don't know what to think, but I did see something and I don't know the logistics.
	I'm just kind of reading what this is, but I'll do that after.
	I heard that there's some stuff.
	A coming to fruition as a residual from the Biden era.
	Like, I don't know how it works logistically or legally, but it makes sense to me that maybe there are some things indoctrinated or ingrained from before.
	And that's the reason a lot of stuff might be happening.
	However, I mean, I'm an idealist and I think that the people who are in the positions of power that are able to shift or change policy or rewrite it altogether, do have that ability.
	I will actually say that, because he's the FDA guy right now, right?
	Like, what's he doing?
	Like, because this article that I just started reading, it puts it on FDA, right?
	It's an FDA approved product right now.
	So it's like, We don't need another product that is in this context, and we certainly don't need one that uses this platform, because it's demonstrably harmful.
	Well, demonstrably harmful for a coronavirus that they've never, ever been able to manufacture any successful vaccine, too, even if it was supposed to work.
	Yeah, Marty, what's his last name?
	Marty Macari, or Macari.
	I don't know what the hell's going on.
	I don't know who approves these things.
	I don't know if Marty Macri does not have the authority to not allow this authorization.
	So I would love to be able to sit down with...
	Because a number of the branches of the Trump administration were wondering, who has the power here?
	Who has power, if anybody?
	Or is it the bureaucracy?
	And that's exactly it.
	That's exactly it.
	That's what I've been talking about a lot lately.
	Like, who the hell knows?
	Like, I'm not even sure that our guys know.
	Like, Jay's an amazing human being, and so is Robert.
	And they're benevolent.
	And, you know, I think that their intentions are exactly what they've always laid out.
	I don't know Marty yet.
	But, you know, he visibly shifted, like, during the whole COVID era towards so-called our side.
	But it's like, man, imagine you're the head of HHS right now.
	Like, can you imagine the den of snakery he's facing?
	I mean, does he logistically have any...
	I don't mean to make this sound like emasculating, but does he logistically or bureaucratically have...
	Do you know what I mean?
	Absolutely.
	What is their function?
	There's a process, and it went through the process, and maybe the argument is going to be, okay, they have to approve it because they approved the first one, and this one's five times less toxic, but at least it's not mandatory.
	And then if and when something new comes up, like falsified clinical studies, then we'll reinvestigate, and then we're going to go hog and put people in jail.
	Thus far, it's like it's been just more of the same, just less of it, which is really pissing some people off as relates to COVID stuff and other issues, which we don't need to get into here.
	And by the way, it was in our locals community.
	It was a rocket boy who said it was when, uh, the woman there, Dr. Caitlin Jettelina was still recommending the COVID jab for pregnant and breastfeeding women.
	I was like, how did, And now they're still saying, go ahead and do it some more so that the more adverse events we have, the more difficult it is to blame it specifically on this one thing because they've muddied the water so much.
	And speaking of which, you were in the documentary Follow the Silence and it was amazing.
	What was that, just on a personal level?
	You were amazing in it as well and fantastic.
	What's it like being in a documentary and then seeing yourself in a documentary afterwards?
	Fantastic.
	And I mean, this isn't just like any documentary.
	You have to see it because this, this, the vision that Matthew, Matthew Guthrie is like.
	You know, beloved, I love this guy.
	He actually traveled to me to film all of that footage special.
	Like he actually flew to the Middle East to film me.
	And I took him out for the most amazing grilled food afterwards.
	He's a really benevolent human being.
	And his vision for this film was for the injured people.
	To be front and center.
	And that's exactly what it turned out to be.
	You have to watch this documentary.
	You'll cry.
	I mean, I cry every time I see it.
	I love how it turned out because during one of my And I talked to Matthew about this episode of The Golden Girls, which I absolutely adore, The Golden Girls.
	A beautiful message in each episode.
	And there's this episode that's just the COVID era and how doctors have been dismissing people and telling them that they have mental problems when they come in with, you know, multiple sclerosis or something.
	And so the movie's actually bookended with this episode and it's so poignant and on par.
	You know, I have a few speaking parts about VAERS, which is, it's important, but, like, the main thing about this movie is the voice of the stories, the real stories of the people who got injured, who had the brilliant opportunity to speak in this movie.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, I reached back out to Stephanie Daguerre to just see how Maddie was doing.
	How is she doing?
	Well, I'll...
	I mean, she's, you know, some progress, but still not good.
	And so, in that episode of The Golden Girls, what was Blanche, Rose, and Dorothy?
	What did she have?
	Was it menopause in that episode?
	No, no.
	It was this chronic fatigue syndrome.
	And back then, like, the storyline was that it was one of these things.
	That was being reported across the board to doctors, but they didn't have a name for it yet, and they didn't know what caused it.
	So, because Dorothy was older, you know, she was basically dismissed by a number of doctors, especially one named Dr. Budd, who said that she should just, you know, go get her hair done because she's getting old and that it's in her head.
	And Dorothy's mother, of course, It's like if her daughter says she's sick, she's sick.
	And so she finally saw this other specialist who told her that this new condition that was being described by many different people And so slowly, slowly, they're learning more about it.
	And it made her feel much, much better because now she, you know, she knew she had a confirmation that how she was feeling completely fatigued wasn't in her mind.
	She wasn't being gaslit by these doctors.
	And that in itself, I mean, everyone who's injured by these shots knows that feeling.
	It's like just to have another person believe you is a huge stress relief.
	I'm going to have the director on tomorrow of the documentary.
	What absolutely enraged me is that they call it functional gastro disorder for Maddie DeGarry, which is like a bellyache.
	Then they call it functional, what was it, neurological?
	Functional neuropathy or functional neurological, which just means you're crazy.
	And they were blaming, like, paralysis, transverse myelitis on this.
	When Kayla Pollack was rendered a quadriplegic, they said it's in your head.
	I mean, it's not enraging.
	It's not gaslighting.
	It's, it's inhumane to say like someone who's paralyzed losing.
	Actually, because you're those doctors who are supposed to, to treat, do no harm, Right?
	Like, if those guys all got IVIG immediately, a lot of them probably wouldn't be paralyzed right now.
	There are solutions.
	Like, Brie knows this better than anyone.
	Like, there are solutions, but you have to get to them quickly.
	Which means you have to diagnose the problem, which means you have to not ignore people when they come to you saying, look, this started right after I got these shots.
	I can't walk.
	It's not in my freaking head.
	Right?
	Jess, it's amazing.
	I know it's late for you, and the tinfoil hat was keeping you awake, but I won't keep you for much longer.
	Where can people find you, as always, for what you're working on?
	I did the substack, jessicar.substack.com.
	And I guess Twitter every now and then, if you want to hear me curse a little bit more.
	I'm going to be at the Bitcoin Prague conference coming up soon.
	So if you want to hear me speak about stuff there, I'm hoping to make a little bit of an impression.
	And yeah, I guess.
	I want a tinfoil hat.
	I want that particular.
	I'm going to order that hat and see how I'll have to figure out.
	I meant to tell you, it's called...
	Look at that.
	Let's have a competition here.
	No, I beat you, buddy.
	Look at that.
	Look at that.
	There's like no dark hair yet left.
	You beat me.
	It's called Viversis.
	G-M-B-H.
	Info at Viversis.
	Like V-I-V-E-R-S-I-S dot com.
	Info at Viversis.com.
	It's 100% silver fiber fabric, so I'm hoping that that means it's actually silver.
	Real carbon phone for iPhones, Viversis.
	V-I-V-E-R-S-I.
	I'll find it.
	I'll find it afterwards.
	That's where you can get the EMF hat, people.
	Before you let her go, I would like you to bring up the tip questions, and there's some visuals that you need to bring up as well.
	Let's see here.
	Hold on just one second.
	I'm not in a hurry.
	I'm already awake.
	The hard part is like staying awake.
	Thank you, Jessica, for real information.
	that is from TT Fulltimer.
	Let me bring this one up.
	There's this.
	This was from one of our streams.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Jessica was drinking water.
	I don't know who found this and remembered that it was there.
	Let me see what else there is.
	That's brilliant.
	We got Death Spike.
	Okay, we got that one.
	Then we got the Shan Visage.
	What happened to the cat with nine lives and betting to go with it?
	And then we got TT Fulltimer.
	Wayne Fleet, Ontario.
	Homeowners are at risk of having their homes seized for renting their properties.
	YouTube video.
	Definitely have a look at that.
	I saw that just before we went online.
	It's crazy what...
	I mean, I think it's getting as bad in Canada as it is in some parts of the States.
	It's out of control in Canada.
	I think it's even worse.
	Oh, you know what?
	We'll segue because there's one story about Canada and then I'm going to go into the British story, which I've been going down a rabbit hole.
	I'll do that without you here, but this one might be right.
	Did you hear about the story of the woman whose baby died because it wasn't vaccinated from measles?
	I'm sorry, I didn't.
	Look at this.
	Well, I say look at this like it's a sick thing.
	CTV News puts out this article, or they put out the tweet, which says Ontario infant dies after measles infection.
	And the incredible thing is I say, like I read this, I was like, okay, back when, not Dina Hinshaw, the other one there, it was Dina Hinshaw, that psychopath from Alberta, said, you know, a 14-year-old boy died from COVID or died after a COVID infection.
	And then it turns out he had...
	Prediction, the kid had something else.
	And so, first of all, I don't know that they've identified where the mother is from.
	Not that it matters, but it might matter as a question of policy, not as a question of vaccination.
	Ontario confirms death of an infant infected with the measles.
	Look at this.
	Infant in southwestern Ontario who contracted measles from their mother before birth and was born prematurely has died.
	Ontario's chief medical officer says the child's mother had not been vaccinated against the viral illness.
	Dr. Kean Moore, he's the one who finally admitted the COVID jab was a therapeutic at best in his statement.
	While measles can be fatal, especially for young children, Moore noted that the child also faced other quote serious medical complications.
	While measles may have been a contributing factor in both the premature birth and death may have, the infant also faced other virus.
	No further details being released.
	So, it's like...
	Blame it.
	Tangentially related.
	Run the headline.
	Dies from, you know, after infection.
	And it's only very nuanced or you appreciate the wordsmithing in the headline afterwards.
	They didn't say he died from after infection because technically, I guess he tested positive, I guess.
	I'm curious to know where the mother was from because I don't know what percentage of people in Canada born and or raised in Canada have not.
	Or got injected with COVID shit.
	Questions that we probably will not get the answer to.
	Somebody said their undeveloped lungs and that makes sense to me because that happens.
	This is the other thing that bugs me.
	I hate to sound morbid, but sometimes babies Young infants do die due to complications that are unrelated to, say, viruses.
	Sometimes it's related to vaccines, as a matter of fact.
	And yeah, it's really gross how, like you said, they're running headlines that You know, we're trying to scare people into saying, well, you have to get injected with measles vaccines because then this blah, blah, blah.
	But it's like, hey, if there's one thing that I've learned over the last five years, it's that even if you get vaccinated or injected with something, it doesn't mean that you're going to be, you know, broad spectrum immunized.
	The best way to immunize yourself against pathogens is to get exposed to them at low doses.
	Period.
	It was on a Rogan episode and the doctor who wrote Disillusioned.
	What was her name?
	Disillusioned.
	She said something interesting.
	Like we all have the vaccine that we trust.
	And whenever anyone accuses me of being an anti-vaxxer, other than the fact that I took Thus far, touch wood.
	I always forget that.
	I've gone for ECGs and tests and whatever.
	Whatever I have would have been there regardless.
	One will never know.
	The tetanus shot is one that I would not question.
	When I cut my finger metal detecting, I made a video about going to get this well before COVID.
	But then she didn't get into it with Rogan.
	And said, you know, you'll be blown away when you appreciate that you should question the tetanus vaccine as much as you question everything else.
	like, I don't know, am I ready to have that level of, other than the fact that nobody dies from And even back in the day when they were in the times of war, you have to have many other factors contributing to it.
	And the picture that they use, and when you Google it, the guy rigid was World War I, and they're living in trenches.
	But I'm such a flipping neurotic idiot.
	I cut my finger on anything.
	I have qualities too.
	I'm like you too.
	But the thing is, I learned this recently as well.
	There is a shit ton of propaganda in association with tetanus.
	Like I learned recently that if you, if you, you know, fall on something and you get dirt deep in a wound, like a very large laceration, you.
	For those who don't know, you deep gashed your palm when you were jogging.
	I ripped open my hand on a rock.
	You can see the scar here.
	See, it's like brown.
	No, you can't see it.
	It's not coming through clear, but I remember it at the time and the way you described...
	horses and dogs roam around.
	You're probably not going to get tetanus, even if there is tetanus bacteria there, because the oxygenation from the blood is going to kill that bacteria.
	So it's really, really, really, really, really unlikely that you're going to get tetanus, especially considering the fact that up until that point, I think I'd gotten three tetanus shots.
	Because I also had a bad surfing injury.
	I ripped open my butt cheek.
	And the doctor didn't even ask me.
	He's like, I'm giving you a tetanus shot.
	And because it happened...
	I was like, yeah, shoot me up, man.
	Because who knows, right?
	That's a different situation.
	although it's salt water.
	I don't know what other...
	I wasn't as wise back then.
	And then if they sew it shut when it's infected, then that's the problem if you leave it open and then it can heal.
	Yeah.
	No, no.
	Oh, God.
	Nowhere near on par, but just the other day, I got spiked by a peacock bass, and the spine went literally through and back out.
	And it hurt, and I cussed.
	And then I was squeezing the blood out for a good 20 minutes, and my kid's like, what are you doing?
	I was like, flush out the nastiness with the blood.
	That's what my mother always told me.
	I'm like, you don't want to stop.
	Just squeeze it out, keep dripping it out.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And saline will help that flow as well and sterilize the location.
	I cut my finger pretty deep on a can, a tomato can.
	You see that?
	It's like, that's almost stitch-worthy.
	One of those stupid tomato cans, you know, with the lid, and then you put, like, I'm so dumb.
	I always put the lid back.
	Well, it's not dumb, it's consideration.
	I feel bad for garbage men, because I feel like garbage men are always getting caught by people doing stupid things.
	So I push the lid back in, and then when my finger comes back out, it always gets sliced.
	I had the same concern when we broke a big-ass table.
	I broke the pieces into glass and waited by it when the garbage man came so that he would understand.
	But they've got shred-proof glasses on.
	Yeah, no, no.
	Tin cans.
	Kids are idiots.
	They're like, don't stick your finger down the top of a Sprite container.
	Don't tear the container.
	My kid wanted to make like a pulley system.
	So he cuts aluminum.
	Sheet metal cuts like a razor blade.
	And it makes...
	Jess, here's a question.
	I don't even know the premises of this question or the premise of this question.
	What's with all the infighting with Malone, McCullough, Naomi Wolf?
	I hate infighting.
	I love Dr. McCullough and feel he's sacrificed so much, as have many, for the good of all of us.
	Do you even know what the drama is?
	Why don't you go to my sub stack and there's a little magnifying glass and type in infighting and read my article about that.
	I wrote it a long time ago.
	You'll probably figure out how I feel.
	I wrote a whole article about this.
	Jessica Rose in fighting.
	Let me see if Jessica Rose Williams.
	That's not you.
	No, I mean the sub stack.
	Go to unacceptable Jessica and then with the little magnifying glass search thing, type in in fighting.
	Unacceptable Jessica in fighting.
	I gotta enter if you dare.
	Okay, here I'm in.
	What?
	Enter if you dare?
	FOIA obtained by Judicial Watch.
	Wait, what's going on here?
	Where's my substand?
	Flip me the link and I'll share it around and then we'll know what's going on.
	I didn't even know that there was infighting.
	I don't like getting into infighting.
	I know that some people criticize everything for the sake of criticism.
	Let me summarize, okay?
	There's no such thing as infighting.
	There are good guys and bad guys.
	So I'm going to leave it at that.
	It's called Taking the Sea Out of Confusion on Fusion Disarming the Confusion Creators.
	So there's no infighting in the name, sorry.
	It's actually in the article.
	Flip it to me right after and I'll post it so that everybody can read it.
	All right.
	I agree.
	I'm not even going to get into it.
	It's always...
	They want us to waste our time.
	There's been some so-called infighting on the right, but I don't think it's infighting.
	I think it's sabotage.
	Yes!
	That's exactly it.
	That's enough said.
	Okay, good.
	And I'm not talking about McCullough, people.
	Just, thank you very much.
	Come on whenever.
	Come on always.
	And when there's updates, we'll know.
	If you come stateside, we will hang.
	You will take me surfing.
	And you will come over for a beautiful barbecue because I like barbecuing meat.
	And I love steaks.
	This is it.
	It will be fantastic.
	Well, I'll share all your links with everybody afterwards.
	I'll put them in the pinned comment.
	And now I'm going to go and get into the law stuff.
	All right.
	Jess, it's awesome.
	Thank you very much.
	And everyone's going to go watch Fall of the Silence.
	We're going to talk about it more tomorrow.
	Part two.
	Part one of two of two.
	It's coming tomorrow.
	And watch tomorrow's episode with Matthew because that's going to be fire!
	It's going to be awesome.
	Thank you very much, Jess.
	I'll see you soon.
	Bye-bye.
	I feel so bad kicking people.
	It says kick.
	It should just be close.
	Close window.
	I got to go check out the tetanus one.
	Tetanus.
	Measles.
	At the very least, there is decades worth of data.
	So that you would know if they had anywhere near the adverse events that they had.
	You go watch Fall of the Silence, and they talk about the virus, like Jess talked about the, I don't know, five or six, maybe more now.
	What do they call them?
	Indicators.
	They are called signals.
	And virus was intended to be a signal.
	That's what it was designed for.
	That's what it is.
	And the signals that were abnormal after the rollout of COVID, And that's that.
	Yeah, Jessica is awesome.
	I want to put up all the links afterwards so everybody can find it.
	But now, let me see something because I see it.
	We're going to get into commie, not California, commie UK.
	The United Kingdom is going to put the...
	What I wanted to bring up was King of Biltong in the house, who says, craving a snack that's bold, authentic, and packed with protein.
	Biltong boasts nearly 50% protein, packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and more.
	www.biltongusa.com.
	Use code VIVA for 10% off.
	Okay, people.
	Let's take a trip across the pond to the United Soviet Union.
	The Soviet Union Empire.
	Kids coming in to grab a phone and then just go close the door.
	We are taking a trip across the pond to get to the UK hellhole that it is.
	I forget where it even came across my table that I was on Twitter doomscrolling and it was either in response to a video or it was a video that popped up on my feed from Rebel News.
	Geez, I wish I could remember my own life.
	I mean, it only happened this morning and it sent me down the rabbit hole.
	The rabbit hole I'm familiar with right now.
	But I want to see if I can find the original tweet.
	It was Rebel News.
	Rebel News UK Arrest.
	Let me see if I can find the Facebook post.
	Give me one second to find it, just so if I can get the timeline.
	Here, scroll down.
	Breaking news.
	This is when I was sent down the rabbit hole.
	This was it.
	No, I'm not going to find it.
	Well, it's a shame.
	I won't find the original tweet, but if someone does find it, it was an Irish or British man talking about the arrest of a woman in the UK, the arrest and conviction of the wife of a city councilman for alleged inciting violence.
	The story is mind-blowingly horrendous and I don't think enough people know about it because I live and breathe the internet and I didn't know about it so I presume a lot of other people also did not know about it.
	The details are outrageous and you have difficulty believing that it's reality but it's reality.
	Here, let's just break up the tweet here.
	Here we go.
	It's an article from the BBC.
	Woman jailed for race hate post on X loses her appeal.
	And you go to the article and you read the article.
	Connolly posted the swear word written message on a 29 July, 2024, the day three girls were murdered at a dance class in Southport.
	This was at the same time when the government was banning who could say what as relates to that stabbing, because they didn't want to create racial disharmony in the UK.
	But what's amazing is how they described it.
	While calling for, quote, mass deportations now, the 41-year-old childminder, I guess that means mother, In the UK, her being a mother, and by the way, she had one of her own children that died tragically.
	I don't know the circumstances of it.
	Some 12 years ago, which explained why she was so emotionally distraught after three girls were stabbed to death by someone who turned out to be not what the media said he wasn't.
	It says she urged readers to, quote, set fire to, quote, all the hotels that were, quote, full, end quote, of those she wished to deport.
	Read that again.
	She urged readers to, quote, Why wouldn't they just include the tweet in its entirety?
	We're going to get there in a second.
	Why wouldn't they just quote the tweet in its entirety, as opposed to spending three lines quoting from it, but then editorializing, quoting from it, then editorializing?
	I'll tell you why they wouldn't do that.
	Because they're a bunch of dirty, bastard, scoundrel liars.
	Here's the article.
	Are we seeing the article?
	Let me see if we're reading the same thing here.
	We're reading the same thing.
	Good.
	Here's the article from the BBC News, and this is from May 20th, 2025.
	Women jail for race hate post on X loses appeal.
	Counsel, a conservative, oh, conservative counselor.
	Even more interesting.
	A conservative counselor's wife who was jailed for inciting racial hatred after an online rant against migrants on the day of the Southport attacks had her appeal against her sentence dismissed.
	Lucy Connolly from Northampton was jailed for 31 months in October after calling for mass deportations now and urging her followers on X to set fire to hotel Hotels, housing, asylum seekers.
	Just remember the word urging.
	Words are the tools of the trade when you're a lawyer, and they're the tools of the trade when you're a journalist.
	And they're the tools of the trade when you're a filthy, gosh-forsaken, demonic, propagandist, wordsmith of the devil.
	She urged her followers to do these things.
	Tweet was viewed 300,000 times before it was deleted.
	Her husband says he's heartbroken.
	Connelly posted the swear word written...
	We can skip here.
	Let's just see.
	Does the written judgment come up?
	Yeah.
	By the way, you don't get the tweet in the article.
	And I'll skip to the portion of it, which has the tweet.
	This is from the actual judgment itself.
	They're not criminalizing speech in the UK.
	It's not gone full tyrannical.
	But this is on their own publication.
	This is on the website, whatever government website this is.
	Listen to the warning in red.
	Read it and understand the onus and the burden that it purports to impose on anyone who even wants to report on what the court has made public.
	Read this out loud.
	Warning, reporting restrictions may apply to the contents transcribed in this document, particularly if the case concerned a sexual offense or involved a child.
	Reporting restrictions prohibit the publications of the applicable information to the public or any section of the public in writing, in a broadcast, or by means of the internet, including social media.
	Anyone who receives a copy of this transcript is responsible in law for making sure that applicable restrictions are not breached.
	A person who breaches a reporting restriction is liable to a fine and or imprisonment for guidance on whether reporting restrictions apply and to what information.
	Ask the court office or take legal advice.
	If you can get access to these and they're unredacted, or if they publish them to the public and they don't redact the alleged private information, and if you share what they published online to a broader community, you can face a fine or imprisonment.
	I have no doubt.
	Onus is on you.
	I've got two big fat middle fingers for the authorities in the UK who think this is somehow proper or appropriate.
	I don't know if there's any publication restrictions on this.
	This is from them.
	This is from the BBC.
	This is already on the internet.
	Kiss my hairy tushy if you think I'm not going to get to refer to the document that you've made public yourselves under penalty of law.
	I got to go hire a lawyer to find out what I can report in this document that you've made public?
	But, serenity now, go to paragraph four.
	The applicant then aged 41 and employed as a childminder.
	Someone's going to have to tell me what that means.
	Had an account on the X platform with some 9,000 followers.
	At 8.30 that evening, she published the following message.
	Quote, Mass deportations now.
	Set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care.
	While you're at it, take the treacherous government and politicians with them.
	I feel physically sick knowing what these families will now have to endure.
	If that makes me racist, so be it.
	Remember in the BBC article?
	It said she urged her followers to do something.
	Again, maybe someone's going to accuse me of being the wordsmith of the devil.
	But urging to me means go out and do it.
	When the qualifier in the statement is for all I care, that to me does not sound like urging anyone to do anything at all, full stop.
	That almost sounds like the indifference that it is.
	Maybe she doesn't care if it happens.
	And maybe it could have been phrased better.
	I don't know.
	Maybe under UK law, this would still be illegal, as apparently it is from this order.
	To me, urging someone is not for all I care.
	It's like when your kid comes up to you and they're eating candy.
	Eat the entire bag for all I care.
	Make yourself sick.
	You're not urging them to do it at all.
	What you are doing is resigning yourself to what children are going to do regardless, saying, I don't really care.
	Go make yourself sick.
	Did I just break something?
	I didn't.
	But do tell me, am I being the wordsmith of the devil, sneaky deaky lawyer saying, burn the place down for all I care.
	That's not urging anybody to do anything in my mind.
	That is indifference to what others might be doing.
	Confirmed on appeal.
	Sentence of 31 months.
	Upheld.
	I want to try to find one of the paragraphs down here that's just going to blow your mind.
	Analysis.
	There was a part where she was talking about the fact that her kid, her child had died.
	Child.
	Let me see here.
	just to see if I can find it quickly.
	When interviewed under caution following her arrest, the applicant admitted that she had posted the tweet She said she had taken the post down because she realized it was wrong.
	Later in the interview, she said her tweets were not racial and she had no intention to cause hate or racial.
	By the way, this is one part of it that's amazing here.
	The law.
	This is the law in the UK.
	A person who publishes or distributes written material which is threatening, abusive, or insulting is guilty of an offense if he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred or, B, having regard to all the circumstances, racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby.
	Do you understand the massive distinction there?
	And it's one that's going to blow your freaking mind?
	One is intent, mens rea, and the other one is you don't even have to intend for it to do it if it's likely to happen under the circumstances.
	Like if you say, yeah, the kid who stabbed the three white girls at a Taylor Swift dance show was, I want to say Nigerian, but now I forget, Rewan.
	It was Nigerian.
	Was a recent convert to Islam?
	Allegedly had a book, the Quran, or had Al-Qaeda training materials by his side.
	If you say that, and that's likely to stir up racial hatred, you could still be guilty even if it's true and even if you didn't even have the intent.
	But if you had any doubts, this is to my legal interpretation.
	Read paragraph 16. As is clear from section 1901, the offense may be committed either by publishing the offending material with the intent to stir up racial hatred or by publishing it In the present case, the prosecution made it entirely clear from the outset of proceedings that the allegation against the applicant was that she had acted with intent to stir up racial hatred.
	So in this case she had the intent.
	You don't even have to have the intent in the UK to be found guilty of this.
	And then they get into, yeah, we feel bad that her child died.
	The judge was assisted in the pre-sentencing report.
	This referred to the very sad fact that in 2011, the applicant's son, then aged 19 months, had died in circumstances which had given rise to complaints of negligence against the medical practitioners who had treated the child.
	The death of the child had affected the applicant's mental health.
	With a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder, the author of the PSR, that is the pre-sentence report, The PSR also noted that the applicant,
	when questioned by the author, There's a part that gets even worse.
	In his submission, this is paragraph 26. Ms. Muir made it clear that notwithstanding what she had said to the author of the PSR, the applicant stood by her guilty plea that she had put forward, yada yada.
	He submitted that the applicant had been devastated by what happened in Southport, especially given her own child loss, and that her tweet had been an expression of her true feelings rather than an attempt to exploit the Southport tragedy.
	He pointed to private messages which the applicant had sent in which she said that she could not stop crying and thinking it could so easily be our kids and said that she had become, quote, Incandescent with rage.
	Mr. Muir also referred to her tweet on the 30th of June.
	He emphasized that the offending tweet had been posted before the outbreak of any violence.
	Mr. Muir then referred to tweets which the offending tweet had been reposted to.
	There's a part where they say she didn't wish them well.
	We feel bad for her.
	Was this the part here?
	Yeah, this is it.
	Paragraph 31. Wait until you read this.
	She may have gone through her own devastating loss of a child arguing at the hands of medical malpractice at a hospital staff.
	She may have had post-traumatic stress disorder.
	She may have been in a rage and out of her mind when she did this.
	But she didn't express her rage properly.
	The judge accepted that there were mitigating factors which he listed.
	He took into account the absence of any previous convictions, the character references, the effect on the applicant's daughter, she's a mother, and the fact that the applicant would be serving a first custodial sentence in the present prison conditions.
	He accepted that although the tweet had been widely read, the applicant had not repeated any such statement, had in due course taken it down, and had sent some of the messages to the effect that violence was never the answer.
	I have read the psychiatric report from some 12 years ago as to the psychiatric difficulties you then suffered.
	I accept that you still very keenly feel that loss.
	Thank you, Your Honor.
	I still feel the loss some 12 years later of my child.
	There is no recent psychiatric evidence, and whilst you may well have understood the grief of those who suffered their own tragic losses and so forth, you did not send messages of understanding and comfort, but rather an incitement to hatred.
	There is no evidence of any mental disorder having any material effect on you committing this offense.
	Similarly, while I accept you regret your actions and their effect upon you, And I have been referred to messages in which you say you disagreed with racism and violence.
	It is clear from the evidence, from your own words in the days following your actions, what you said to the police, don't talk to the police people, and what you said to the probation officer that you have little insight into or acceptance of your own actions.
	We'll stop it right there.
	How disgusting is that?
	Some disgusting sack of crap.
	Sitting on a bench saying, yeah, I appreciate you lost your own child some 12 years ago.
	Oh, I'm sure you must still be upset about it.
	But you didn't use it to wish well or well.
	No, no, no.
	You didn't act properly.
	You didn't respond properly.
	31 months in jail.
	And that was after they reduced it some because, you know, she cooperated with the state.
	Don't go to the UK, people.
	And if you're in the UK, get the hell out.
	Let's see what this was about here.
	Those were the highlights of the decision.
	Absolutely atrocious.
	I wanted to highlight something that, you know, reporting on facts, if it's likely to stir up racial hatred, you don't even have to have the intent to do it.
	If it does it, then you might still be problematic.
	Well, and I guess you can't talk about the Pakistani rape gangs in England anymore because just talking about it, Notice that might stir up racial hatred.
	Well, the BBC's in big fucking trouble then.
	I mean, look at the screen grab just in case they decide to take it down out of fear of being prosecuted.
	But something tells me the BBC, the state-funded propaganda, they don't get prosecuted.
	Separately, Zahra also alleged that she was abused by another man from a British-Pakistani background.
	Oh, that's interesting.
	British-Pakistani background.
	Okay.
	Who is due to go on trial?
	Zahra said that the alleged abuse, to me, in my head, he was my boyfriend.
	He didn't abuse me straight away, so I was convinced it was a normal relationship.
	Zahra, who is a mixed English and Asian background, said it was easy for me to accept the flattery and compliments.
	Let's keep going here.
	What was this one?
	What data on grooming gangs shows?
	Better not speak too much truth there, BBC.
	It might incite racial hatred.
	The BBC has obtained new police data on the ethnicity of suspected arrests.
	The BBC has obtained new police data on the ethnicity of suspects arrested on suspicion of gang grooming offenses in England and Wales in 2024.
	The National Police Chiefs Council, NPPC figures, indicated that British Pakistanis were substantially overrepresented among the suspects.
	What in the name of sweet holy hell is a British Pakistani?
	What the F does that even mean?
	But don't comment on the fact that Pakistani Muslim men are statistically overrepresented in the suspects of rape gangs.
	If you report that, how is that not inciting hatred?
	BBC, who are the authors in this journal?
	This article?
	Sean Seddon and Yang Tian?
	Jail!
	It doesn't matter that you didn't intend to do anything.
	It doesn't matter that what you were speaking was the truth.
	You've just violated the law.
	In 2024, grooming gang suspects, where an ethnicity was recorded, just over half were white British, and around one in eight were British Pakistani, even though one in 40 people in England and Wales were of Pakistani heritage, according to the 2021 census.
	Better watch what you say there, peeps.
	It's a little bit too much truth.
	It might stimulate a little bit too much anger.
	That might cause people to publicly complain about immigration policies that have resulted in this disastrous rapist devastation that you have going on in the UK.
	The fact that the woman is a conservative councilman's wife, you think they're not trying to make an example out of her?
	For the other conservatives out there who might criticize British policy that has allowed for an all-out invasion of the country and the ensuing consequences, the ensuing devastation?
	And then the ensuing cover-up because they didn't even want to report on the stats of the grooming gang ethnicity because it might stoke racial hatred.
	31 months in jail.
	I couldn't believe it.
	And as I went down that rabble hood and found the decision itself, it was true.
	Stay the hell out of England, people.
	That's that.
	All right, let's go see what's going on in the chat.
	Ooh.
	I see a purple one over in Hrumble, and I'm intrigued by the first three letters.
	Four words.
	B said and says, Longtime Bongino listener.
	Been searching for a good replacement.
	I like information and opinions.
	Started with Viva Barnes Sundays.
	I am now a full-time Viva fan.
	I swear to you, I don't know this.
	First of all, thank you.
	That is probably the most flattering thing on earth.
	Bongino was my go-to, and the selfish part of me can't wait.
	The selfish part of me can't wait.
	The selfish part of me cannot wait.
	That's right.
	Until Bongino comes back to podcasting.
	It's not even podcasting.
	He had insight.
	He had insider information.
	He was amazing.
	Is amazing.
	Will always be amazing.
	Which is why we will give him the benefit of the doubt.
	However frustrated we might be at the way the big bureaucracy moves slowly or the way that big-ass ship takes some time to turn.
	But thank you, B-Said.
	I don't think I could have much more.
	Of a flattering compliment.
	So I'm going to screen grab that.
	And I'm going to take it to heart.
	But I will not let it make me change.
	Thank you.
	Seriously.
	Our Sergeant 31 says, You know, I wish the Queen was still alive because I'm pretty sure she would be saying something to Parliament about this crap.
	And now they might lock her up.
	You never know.
	Lock up everybody.
	They can't lock us all up.
	Well, England says, hold my pint of beer, sir.
	TT Fulltimer over in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
	Let me see if I can bring these up.
	I can bring them up, but I'll bring them up like this.
	Writes, England was trying to get extradition from other countries for whatever they call a post they do not like.
	TT full-time.
	I remember when they made that threat specifically in relation to...
	The funny thing is, and I say it's funny and it's not funny.
	I wholeheartedly acknowledge I probably can't or should not go to China.
	And I won't.
	I don't think I can go to England.
	From what I've said, once you're on British soil, and once you've seen what they've done to Tommy Robinson, it's not a safe place to travel.
	It's no longer a country that represents so-called Western values.
	It's a tyrannical, And the irony is, go pull up any one of Keir Starmer's recent tweets.
	Let me pull these up.
	The irony is any, any number of, of Keir Starmer's recent tweets themselves could be violent of, of the law.
	Before we get there, let me just finish with the, Abso-freaking-lutely.
	It's an amazing thing.
	People ask me if I would like to be or become American.
	On the one hand, I think I'm American at heart.
	And I'm thinking I'm understanding what that means over time.
	But absolutely, it drives me nuts.
	There are flaws and foibles in the American system.
	But as far as a government goes, it's hands down the best government system on earth to the extent it can be maintained.
	And the Constitution, it's based on God, so in some sense it's quasi-religious.
	It is an ingenious document that you cannot understand how genius it was for those young men at the time, young men and women, the young men at the time to have come up with.
	But they knew what they were fleeing, and they knew what they didn't want to see repeat in these United States of America, and they had foresight.
	They had an appreciation of history in order to contextualize it into the present and then project it into the future to know what they needed to do to avoid exactly what they just fought their freedom from.
	And a lot of people in America, a lot of people in the world don't understand it, and they will trade the semblance of security for the sacrifice of rights.
	And all that ends up happening then is the government will literally shit on you and tell you it's raining.
	And then you can say, this isn't even water.
	This isn't even liquid.
	It's like, shut up.
	It's rain.
	And then chlorophen says, thanks for covering this, Viva.
	My country is changing beyond recognition.
	I couldn't believe it.
	I'm going to see if I can find the tweet.
	Again, there's too much injustice to even keep up with.
	And I saw the tweet.
	This guy's talking about a woman who's jailed for 31 months for a tweet.
	I'm like, not possible.
	It had to have been bad.
	Then I go to the BBC article and it says she urged people to bring violence on immigrants.
	No, she didn't.
	And then you go read that effing judgment.
	You understand her personal tragedy.
	These are goddamned tyrants.
	And I apologize for using the Lord's name in vain.
	It's one word, so it's not.
	They are gosh-forsaken, filthy tyrants.
	And let me see.
	One thing.
	Hold on.
	I want to see who that judge was.
	The judge in the case.
	Am I going to have the judge?
	I have the BBC article.
	I got the link to the decision.
	No, not there.
	I do want to see who the judge was.
	Mr. Justice Sheldon.
	Mr. Justice Gross.
	This doesn't tell me if we're dealing with three white men who, in all of their wisdom, Oh, yes, madam, I know you've lost a child.
	This is weird 12 years ago.
	Get over it.
	You should not have responded the way you did.
	Shame on you.
	DarkRaven8 has donated.
	I think this means you might be a member of the channel for a little bit.
	Welcome to the channel, sir.
	That is in vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	If you want to support the work that I do, that Robert Barnes and I do, vivabarneslaw.locals.com is the absolute best place to do it.
	There's exclusive stuff for supporters.
	Nightly Bourbon with Barnes is.
	I watched the Bourbon with Barnes yesterday.
	And who was it that people said I should have on the channel, who's now living in Mississippi, who could talk about what's happening in the UK, because I think they're from the UK.
	It's going to happen.
	I just have to go remember the name, but someone in the community is going to remind me.
	All right, now hold on.
	This is a meme, and it's coming from a good cartoonist.
	Quick, throw the government waste into the volcano.
	It's funny, they better...
	That was from Sammy.
	Thank you very much.
	All right.
	What else do I have on the backdrop here, peeps?
	First of all, all of you that are here, thank you for being here.
	If you're new to the channel, make sure that you subscribe.
	Let me see how many subscribers we are at.
	In Hrumble, we're at...
	And let's see.
	463,000.
	Followers.
	Amazing!
	Holy crap.
	Go make sure that you follow.
	Hit the follow button.
	I don't know what the notifications are like on Rumble, but I do know that if you download the app, download the Rumble app, you get notifications instantaneously.
	You can follow the people you like.
	Rumble Premium, this is not a sponsored video today, but if you can support Rumble, go get Rumble Premium.
	I think there's like a forward slash Viva, you get $10 off of the annual subscription.
	But subscribe.
	Snip, clip, share away.
	And if you want to support the work we do, vivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	What other stories do I have in the backdrop here?
	I have a slight breaking one for you.
	I just dropped it into a tip for you.
	You just missed it while you were reading the previous tips.
	Hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Elon Musk, time to drop the really big bomb.
	What is this?
	Shut up.
	Encrypted.
	I need a link to this.
	Is that a tweet?
	I actually dropped that link in your tweet DMs.
	Hold on.
	Is that a tweet that he put up?
	Yes.
	And the thread is active and it is in your tweets right now.
	So you're actually in your DMs so you can pull it up yourself.
	DM?
	DM is on the Twitterverse.
	Man, okay.
	The lingo.
	DM is Twitter.
	Text message.
	I don't even know what message it is.
	And then text.
	Okay.
	Shared.
	Shut the front door.
	Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay.
	Time to drop the really big bomb.
	Okay, so speechless.
	For obvious reasons, life flashing, but I'm not, I can't tell.
	So let's, we're going to go slowly here.
	Let me just cut this.
	This is the actual Elon Musk account.
	Okay.
	He has not been hacked that we know of.
	There is no forward slash sarcasm.
	And there is no statement.
	This is a prediction, but there's a follow-up that says, mark this post for the future.
	The truth will come out.
	Time to drop the really big bomb.
	At real Donald Trump is in the Epstein files.
	That is the real reason they have not been made public.
	Have a nice day.
	Holy shitballs.
	That was from Spaceballs, right?
	Holy shitballs.
	This is so wild for a number of reasons.
	You can call me bias and I'll just flesh out my bias in real time and then you'll understand that this doesn't mean that I'm biased.
	It's actually exactly the antithesis of bias.
	Let's assume that we like Donald Trump and we want to rationalize that.
	And let's assume it's true.
	Holy crap.
	Let's back it all the way up to the beginning.
	If it's not true, it's defamatory.
	I don't care that in the follow-up he says, mark this post for the future to suggest it's a conjecture or prediction.
	It's a statement of fact, as formulated in the original tweet, one that is not just defamatory, defamatory per se, or at the very least, defamatory per quad.
	Because what it might mean is that Donald Trump is tangentially or in the Epstein files, whatever that means, because he flew on a plane with Epstein from, let's say, New New York to Miami or New York to Florida, whatever the hell.
	So let's say it's, as a matter of fact, true, but in a manner that once revealed is innocuous.
	It would be defamatory per quad, I think, because in the context, it is suggesting something nefarious where, although true, It might not be nefarious.
	If it's true and nefarious, how would Elon Musk know, A, and he might want to make a joke about this afterwards, like, I'm not feeling self-harmished?
	Holy shitballs!
	Okay, hold on, hold on.
	I'm just going to scroll down.
	Do we know he was involved?
	says Luke Rudkowski.
	Drew Hernandez says, Hey, Elon, I'm curious if what you were saying about Trump being in the Epstein files is true.
	How long have you known this?
	Why did you wait until now?
	Were you planning or just sitting on this forever?
	Genuine question.
	What have you noticed?
	Elon's going to get deported back to South Africa now.
	You blithering idiot.
	We reported this months ago.
	Also, it's been known for a long time.
	And by in the files, you mean his phone number was in the Epstein's book.
	That's it.
	This would be the right one.
	But that's where you're going to get into defamatory.
	I think it's per quad, like to say that they're suggesting something defamatory, even though there's not.
	If this is the move to finally get the files released, I'd like to buy you a drink.
	Then some people can say, oh, he's playing like double super fakie reversal.
	Knowing that he's not in the files.
	Trump knows that he knows that he's not in the files.
	Trump knows that Elon knows that Trump knows that he's not in the files.
	But this is the catalyst to compel the production of those files.
	This is some serious-ass drama.
	Hold on.
	Okay.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	I don't want to get too excited here.
	I want to see what's going on in the chat.
	Did you see Alex Jones's response?
	No.
	It was just below what you were reading.
	I can't read that.
	I'm still mildly freaking out.
	Okay, hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Let me bring this back up.
	Man, it's a good thing I didn't have the energy drink before.
	And this is like, this is natural energy.
	I can't even find my thing.
	Here, it's right here.
	Okay.
	Tim Young says, okay, fine.
	Steve Baker, who I just had on the channel a week and a half ago.
	And just like that, Democrats started buying Teslas again.
	Alex Jones says, God help us all.
	Come on, Elon.
	Who is Epstein working with?
	Say it, says Mel.
	Mel, we know.
	I've had Mel on the channel a couple times.
	I like her.
	She's wild.
	I won't say vitriol.
	She's unapologetically anti-Israel.
	And no problem there.
	Adrian Dittman, who many people suspect is Elon Musk, says, damn!
	Constantine Kissin, who I've had on the channel, says, please double your security immediately.
	Tim Young, who I've been on his channel, says, I'm calling it.
	This is all a false flag to cover up the terrible release of the Nintendo Switch 2. Mr. Guns Gear, I don't know who that is.
	Tim Young says, okay, the Epstein files need to be released immediately.
	Harry Sisson, the beef, this beef is the greatest thing ever.
	Nina Turner, who I have taken, I've destroyed her on Twitter so many times.
	Question, how long have you known this information and why did you continue to work with him if this is true?
	He's saying it because as a matter of fact, it's going to be accurate, but it's going to be innocuous.
	And that's going to be his defense.
	Truth is an absolute defense.
	Is the word defamatory per quad?
	I think it is.
	In the context, the statement is defamatory.
	Let me see.
	Just refresh my memory.
	Defamation.
	I'm not a U.S. attorney, people.
	In fact, I'm still a lawyer, but I'm not licensed because I relinquished voluntarily in good standing my Quebec license because all the motherfuckers were doing was using it to file ethics complaints because they didn't like my tweets.
	And I don't have any aspirations of ever practicing in Quebec ever again.
	Ever.
	Period.
	Defamation per quad refers to a false statement that is not inherently defamatory on its face, but becomes defamatory when understood in the context of specific facts or circumstances.
	So that's interesting.
	So it's a false statement that becomes defamatory in the circumstances.
	Oh, then I guess it would actually, it would probably be more like false light, which is a true statement, but is defamatory.
	That is damaging a false light definition.
	False light is a type of privacy tort that occurs when somebody is portrayed in a way that creates a false impression about them causing emotional distress.
	Unlike defamation, which focuses on harm and reputation, false light protects the individual's right to be free from emotional distress caused by misleading portrayals.
	Holy shit.
	Do we go back to reading the replies?
	But we must!
	We must!
	Okay, I don't know who this is.
	Elon Musk's atomic strike on Trump's umpire, Donald Trump, will either resign in disgrace or...
	If you knew he was, why would you be willing to work with a pedophile?
	This is all unnecessary.
	you already had the more principled position, then why didn't Democrats say, This smells like a massive lawsuit, my man.
	And then Simon Gadek, who I've had on the channel, says, can you confirm that he's getting blackmailed by those who ran this operation?
	This is the wildest thing ever.
	Who could find the tweets where Democrats were saying, I predict this is going to end?
	How does one digest this and process this and rationalize it?
	It's true in the sense that he's in the files, he's in the black book.
	Let me just double check that to cover my own ass.
	Is Donald Trump in Epstein's Black book.
	I know that he is.
	Just make sure.
	Yeah, he is.
	I have a full listing of it.
	Donald Trump's kids are in there.
	Yeah, so his name appeared in Jeffrey Epstein's address book, also referred to as the Black Book.
	Fine.
	So as a matter of fact, what Elon Musk says is true.
	Let me ask a question here.
	Go for it.
	If this was true and the DOJ was weaponized against Trump, And they've had the files for so long.
	Why would they not?
	Wouldn't this have come out?
	Yes.
	But a thousand percent.
	That's why I'm inclined to say they're doing this together as part of some play.
	If there were anything...
	It would have been leaked already.
	And then someone's going to say, well, no, not if it would have taken down the rhino establishment.
	I won't even mention names just for the sake of it, but if it would have taken down too many conservative rhinos of high repute, then they would protect Trump only to protect their own because by taking down Trump, it would take down all of the rhinos.
	I don't believe it for a bloody second.
	If they had anything that Trump was materially involved with Epstein in any nefarious capacity, it would have been leaked, period, full stop.
	So I would disregard that.
	I think it's a bad joke.
	Let me think of my response.
	And then I'm going to put it in there.
	We do have a comment in our local chat that says, Viva, you need to zoom out and look at all of the other Trump-Elon tweets today.
	Zoom out.
	I'm assuming that there's additional context in relation to...
	Well, let's go here.
	This is it.
	Okay, so this is two hours ago.
	Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?
	Let's say yes.
	Okay.
	Time to drop the really big bomb.
	Okay, we got that.
	Mark this list.
	Okay, this is Elon Musk an hour ago.
	This just gets better and better.
	go ahead and make my date.
	This would both end the International Space Station in simultaneously...
	Oh, that's...
	Okay, so we got this.
	As the blow-up escalates, Trump suggests terminating Musk's federal contracts.
	The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to eliminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts.
	I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it.
	Elon was, quote, wearing thin, end quote.
	I asked him to leave.
	I took away his EV mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted, that he knew for months I was going to do, and he just went crazy!
	Now we have to make sure, not that I don't trust Caitlin Collins, but I don't trust Caitlin Collins.
	Let me go to my truth and make sure that these are actually Donald John Trump's tweets.
	I'm scrolling through.
	Yeah, there would have been a community note if they were not accurate or they were not real.
	One day ago?
	One day.
	I don't actually...
	Where are these truth posts?
	I just concluded a very good call with President Xi.
	President who identifies as Xi him.
	Shockingly, the Democrats controlled CBO.
	That's four hours ago.
	Donald Trump, Donald Trump.
	I'm not seeing these on his...
	Okay, fine.
	Okay, so this is fine.
	They're legit.
	Let me show these out here.
	In Caitlin Collins' case, it's not trust, but verify.
	It's just don't trust.
	The easiest way to save money on our budget.
	Okay, so these are his, and Field of Greens, hashtag not an ad for today, but they are a wonderful sponsor of this show in general.
	Holy shitballs.
	Okay, I'm going to go digest this and mull this over.
	Everybody, I think we're going to raid Redacted again.
	Is Redacted live?
	I can't believe what we are living through, people!
	Have it loaded up?
	Tell me when to go.
	Go do it now, and I'll just rant for another minute.
	At the very least, it's just a dumb joke, and Elon, who's been known to read humans not necessarily accurately, tongue-in-cheek, ha-ha, I'll make a laugh.
	How would he have known?
	I mean, okay, look, let's say it's true.
	It's nefarious.
	How would Elon know?
	He's got access to people's DMs in Twitter, everything.
	What do we think?
	Okay, so hold on.
	As you go and go raid the redacted, let them know Viva sent you.
	Oh, and by the way, thank you, the quartering.
	Who else?
	Did we get raided by Raketa today?
	Thank you, the quartering, for the raid.
	As we go and raid the redacted, buy a book.
	Louis the Lobster Returns to the Sea on Amazon.
	What do we think here?
	Is this actual sabotage?
	The thing is this.
	I don't know.
	I don't know what to make of this.
	Even if it's true, Elon's going to do that, expose himself to a lawsuit, expose himself to serious potential, whether or not I agree with it, serious potential lawfare, political lawfare, corporate lawfare.
	of lawfare.
	But then it couldn't be a setup, and it couldn't be a shtick, and it couldn't be them saying, let's do this and let everyone know it was a joke afterwards, because it's not the type of thing you can do as a joke.
	No, I'm flabbergasted, speechless, and now I'm going to have to go fishing to clear my mind.
	I'm joking.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party.
	Let me see here.
	I have never heard you speechless before.
	I even put that in the chat.
	Your response is going to be holy shit when you see it.
	How do you digest this?
	Because it's either true or it's not.
	It's either part of a scheme or it's not.
	There's no good alternative here.
	If they came out after and said, ha, we were just joking, that's not funny.
	Like, there's no way the president does that.
	If it turns out Elon is just playing a gag, like, oh yeah, he's in there technically, it's true.
	Still not.
	You can't.
	Holy shit.
	I think it actually could be a little bit of both, right?
	So Elon being one of the richest people in the world.
	He can afford whatever the lawsuit happens to be.
	No, because this is Trump real.
	Like, fuck you, money is no good if they put you in jail.
	Like, not Bonkel, what's his name?
	Telegram guy.
	Pavlov.
	Pavel Durov.
	Sorry, not Pavlov.
	Pavel Durov.
	You can have all the money in the world.
	When you're in jail, that's worth zero.
	Like, Epstein had a lot of money.
	Died in jail.
	So, there's no FU money on earth that can serve as the defense of the shield to this.
	And, like, this is stuff that people would get killed for.
	Like, jokes aside, there's no fear hiding a wish.
	It's just a straight-up fear.
	This is the stuff that gets people killed.
	Accidented.
	So, holy, sweet, merciful goodness.
	Dred Roberts said, Elon publicly endorsed ending EV subsidies.
	What is Trump going on about?
	There's that.
	Is Trump finally too old for the job?
	This is out of control even for him, says Doc.
	No.
	T.T. Full-timer says Donald John Trump was willing to testify against Epstein in Florida before the CIA, FBI said, hands off, he is our asset.
	I do not believe, call it bias or whatever, I acknowledge it.
	I do not believe that Trump is involved in any nefarious way in pedophilia with Epstein.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	So that's the reason why they wouldn't have disclosed the files.
	I don't believe.
	That it might embarrass Israel?
	That I believe.
	Not only do I believe that, I mean, I think that's not just Israel, but Israel in particular.
	Not only do I believe that, I think it's probably the case.
	What the hell was I just saying?
	Oh yeah, that's right, Donald Trump.
	So I don't believe that Trump is in...
	Trump is not compromised like that, period.
	I might be wrong, but I don't think I am.
	Holy...
	This is Elon taking a dig at Trump over the big, beautiful bill.
	Yeah, I get that, Joe Bascu, but there are digs and there are digs.
	That's like saying, ha, he slashed his tires and killed his dog.
	It was just a dig at the one big, beautiful bill.
	Holy hell.
	Great excuse to dump the entirety of the files to show he was only tangentially corrected.
	It says HPGKMC.
	HPGKMC.
	I like doing the acronym game.
	Holy price gouging.
	I can't go on.
	I always go to like terrible things.
	Okay.
	That is from HPGKMC.
	And then we get R Sargent says, this is fucking genius because in order to prove that Trump isn't in the files, those files all have to be released in a disclosure, in a defamation suit.
	R Sargent 31. This is fucking genius.
	Okay, we got, hmm.
	I can't believe that.
	Really strange.
	Says chlorophyll.
	Donald Trump.
	Okay.
	All right.
	All right.
	We're going to the after party on local.
	Let them know I sent you.
	Let me see here.
	I love seeing people coming in from the Viva raid.
	Yeah.
	Viva raided you.
	I think this Elon Twitter thing is fantastic because if Trump does a defamation suit, all the files have to become released, says our sergeant.
	And the raid has taken over.
	All right, we're going to go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com immediately to carry on with this discussion.
	Thank you for being here.
	Make sure you subscribe on your way out.
	And I will see you tomorrow.
	Tomorrow's going to be a good one.
	And that is all.
	I'm going to be on with Elijah Schaefer tonight, 7 to 9 o 'clock.
	So tune in for that.
	Godspeed, peeps.

▲