All Episodes
Previous Next
April 24, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:23:51
Judge Cano BANNED from the Bench! Is That the COVER-UP? Tariffs, Trans in Military & Fall of Canada!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Behold the image that you're looking at.
Five people of...
I don't know how to describe it.
Listen to the words, and I'm sorry to start off with more Canadian stuff again.
I have been feeling a little black-pilled myself, and this is not making me feel any better.
The year is 2021.
All five political parties in Canada have joined to support pharma and push experimental medical procedures on the Canadian population through coercion, extortion, We're all in this together.
We've come so far in the fight against COVID, it's time to finish this pandemic for good.
So get vaccinated.
If you know someone who hasn't, talk to them.
For our kids, for our communities, for our economy.
It's how we get forward together.
Vaccines are safe and effective for use.
Vaccines are the best way for you to protect yourself.
Your family and your community.
So get vaccinated.
This is a conservative.
This is a so-called conservative.
To protect yourselves.
To protect the vulnerable.
The best method is still vaccination.
Please be responsible.
Solidarity. Get vaccinated.
We all agree getting vaccinated is the way forward.
We're all in agreement.
This is not a partisan issue.
So please get vaccinated.
We're united.
And it's time to get the shot.
Vaccines save lives.
They're how we're going to beat COVID.
And it's time for everyone to do it.
Get the shot.
Get the shot.
Does this not make everyone else who watches that want to vomit?
Who watches this and says, that's awesome.
These are great people.
These are role models.
And I should really listen to what the government has to say.
Who watches this and thinks this was a good idea?
Hold on.
We're all in this together.
We're all in this together.
Get the shot.
Go F yourselves.
Get the shot.
Anybody telling me to get the shot?
I mean, the funny thing is, if I were to say, go shoot yourself, I might get in trouble for suggesting a threat.
That is the absolute state of Canada in 2021.
The first jackass, Justin Timberlake.
Justin Trudeau.
The liberal.
The second jackass, Erin O'Toole, so-called conservative.
The third guy, I wouldn't even call him a jackass because I kind of like him, Yves Blanchet from the Bloc Québécois.
The fourth jackass, Jagmeet Singh.
The fifth jackass, I don't remember her name.
The Green Party, I think.
Telling you to go get the shot.
We're all in this together.
Pushing an experiment.
By the way, just for what it's worth, they all knew at that time.
That it didn't do what they said it did, and it did a whole hell of a lot more that they weren't telling you that it did.
They all knew that at the time.
And this is 2021.
What has changed since then?
Very little, it would seem.
They swapped out one globalist whore, Justin Trudeau, for another globalist whore, Mark Carney.
They swapped out one useless tool, Erin O'Toole, and swapped in Pierre Poilievre, who I dare say...
Is any better?
He might be a little bit better than Aaron O'Toole.
He's a little younger, a little better looking, a little bit more looks like Superman.
Black Quebecois guy, he's still there.
Jagmeet Singh, he won't be there after this election.
And the woman, I forget her name, doesn't matter.
But this is the absolute state of Canada.
It's uniparty tyranny.
And I appreciate, I'm trying not to get blackpilled here, people.
You know, Pierre Poiliev is down to 15% in the Calci market in terms of likelihood to become the next Prime Minister of Canada.
I appreciate markets are not perfect.
Markets can be manipulated.
And for the amount of trading volume, it would be very cheap for China to manipulate those markets so that the media can then say, look at how bad the markets are, so that the polling agencies could then say, look at what the media is reporting.
And this is, you know, the sentiment that people think it's going to be a liberal majority.
Full disclosure, as always, I own, what is it called?
Futures. I own contracts in a no to a liberal majority.
If it's a liberal majority, do you understand what that means for Canada?
Hold on a second.
And while you think about that, I'm going to let my dog out of here.
you.
God, she smells bad.
Holy cows, does that dog smell bad.
Do you know what it means for Canada?
If it's a liberal majority, well, I can tell you one thing.
The carbon tax is coming back.
The tax cuts are going to come to an end.
No GST, QST, or no government sales tax on housing.
They might keep that.
Because they're going to sell you Mark Carney Brookfield Assets Management Modular Housing.
Oh, you're going to be eating squirrels, people.
Not even bugs anymore.
The bugs, that's going to be for the upper middle class.
You're going to get rodents that you can find on the street.
The government's already predicting that.
But it's not a prediction.
It's a forecast.
And they always have to forecast negativity.
No, no, no, they don't.
No, they don't.
And the fact that the government is forecasting that within 15 years, Canadians may be reduced to foraging parks and waterways with reckless disregard for regulations.
You got to have your freaking head examined to vote for the...
I'm going to rage.
I'm raging against the liberals now.
You feel like you're taking freaking crazy pills.
And I'm going to say this.
How stupid do you have to be to contemplate voting for the Liberals?
How stupid?
I'm going to ask you this.
People are going to say, very stupid.
Others are going to say, Viva, you're being mean.
They're not stupid.
They're just ignorant.
And maybe that's a fine distinction to make.
Some are stupid.
Some are just too busy in their daily lives to do what it is that I do on a daily basis and make sure that people understand what the hell is going on in Canada.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
I just went back, you know, because the flavor of the day from the Liberal Party is we're going to make affordable housing.
You know, even if it's modular government-sanctioned ghettos, we're going to make affordable housing.
I just went back because I know that I've seen this before.
I know that I've seen these freaking tweets.
I put together a little montage today so that for those of you who are too busy with your daily lives, who don't live on the internet like I do for a living, I'll help you.
I will awaken you.
I will educate you.
In 2015, Justin Trudeau writes on Twitter, our plan to invest in affordable housing will help the middle class and those working to join it.
I don't even know what ELXN 42 means.
2017, everyone deserves a place to call home.
Today we announced...
Real help for Canadians to reduce homelessness and help more families find a safe and affordable place to live and raise their family.
There wasn't an election in 2017.
2015, it was an election promise.
2017, they just repeated.
2019, another election.
For too many hardworking Canadians, buying a house right now seems impossible.
The first-time homebuyer incentive is going to change that.
It didn't.
They're giving you up to 10% of your new home's value and making the housing market more fair.
None of that happened.
2021. Like, this is Groundhog Day, and if you don't understand it, pay attention.
And don't get mad at me for telling it like it is.
You want to be coddled and told everything's going to be okay.
Go suck at your mama's tini.
That's not what I'm here for.
Everyone deserves a safe and affordable place to live.
Raise their family and build their future.
We've made good progress over the years.
And with more support for housing in Budget 2021, we're not going to slow down now.
2025? More of the same.
No, I'm sorry.
I didn't know that, Viva.
How am I supposed to know that?
I just read CBC.
What's CBC saying?
Oh, who the hell cares?
Holy crap!
Hold on!
Where was the other one here?
Jordan Peterson's in the news and taking a little bit of heat for his talking about four or five percent of psychopaths on all sides of the aisles, you know, co-opting elements of the conservative right, whatever.
Forget that.
There are psychopaths out in the world.
Bonafide. They're not serial killer psychopaths.
They are people who are built differently, who don't have the same ethics.
They have an IQ that might be high, but they have an EQ that might be very low.
Or they don't have an EQ at all, an emotional quotient.
They have no problem exploiting people.
They don't feel empathy.
And they don't have any qualms about lying, gaslighting, and deceiving their way into positions of power.
Who might be a person of that order right now?
Well, Justin Trudeau, I have no doubt, is a total narcissist.
Who's proving to be that as well now?
Carnage Carney, three passport carrying globalist WEF
That's who.
What did they say here?
They actually say this.
This is Carney Media.
I don't know.
Let me see.
Is it actually related to Carney?
This is like liberal stuff.
Rapid response and fax checks from Liberal Party HQ.
It is.
What do they say?
Look at this.
Pierre Poiliev says he'll end, quote, woke culture, end quote, in the military.
We're going to talk about this today as well.
We've seen this movie before.
You know what movie I've seen before?
Frickin' liberals lying and promising affordable housing.
You know what they did in the decade where they were promising affordable housing?
They didn't build the affordable housing, but they sure as hell let in a lot of immigrants who are going to make it a little bit more difficult for you to get that housing.
They let in 500,000 immigrants a year.
Who put a strain on the housing, strain on the infrastructure of healthcare, a strain on Canada, strain on culture.
That's what they did.
In the 10 years that they were promising housing, no housing, but here's about, I don't know, several million immigrants.
Good luck with it, Canada.
Four million, I think?
The population of Canada is now damn near 40 million.
They've been letting in 500,000 immigrants a year, some of whom, say, more or less properly vetted.
Pierre Pouliot says he'll end woke culture.
And then they show a picture of Trump.
That says Trump fired first woman to lead a U.S. military service.
I hope they're not talking about Rachel Levine.
I hope they're not talking about Rachel Levine.
That's a joke.
Ba-da-bing, ba-da-boom.
Rachel's a man.
Poilier promises to end war culture and military.
The one they used of Trump says Trump fires first woman to lead a U.S. military service.
Now, I know this because I've covered it from the beginning.
Justin Trudeau, after having taken the virtue...
What is it called?
Walk of grace.
For having hired, appointed the first female indigenous minister of justice and attorney general.
Fired her.
Justin Trudeau fired the first female minister of justice and attorney general.
I should say the first indigenous female because I don't know if it's the first female minister of justice, attorney general, Mojang, but she was certainly the first Native American Indian minister of justice female.
He celebrated it.
Because it's 2020.
Or whatever the hell year it was when he got re-elected there.
Because it's the year 2000.
We gotta have women here.
I fired her.
Trudeau did.
Because she refused to follow his corrupt orders not to prosecute SNC-Lavalin because of his big boy friends within that company.
The psychopathy of the Liberal Party is truly astonishing.
Pathological narcissist Darvo.
Deny, attack, reverse, victim, and offender.
It was literally Trudeau who fired the first woman Mojang, Minister of Justice.
It was literally the Liberals.
During Carney's race, who expelled a woman of color, Ruby Dalla, from the leadership.
And they accused Trump and Poilievre of being the misogynists.
Scum of the earth.
What else do we have?
We're going to put a bow in this, because we're going to put a bow in this before, if the liberals get elected, they put a bow in the future of Canada.
And now they promise housing.
And they promise Tolerance.
The Liberal Party criticizes America for not having elected Kamala Harris because, you know, it's time for a woman president.
They disqualify fire women in their own cabinet.
Is this it?
No, that's not.
Let me put this one away.
But that's what's going on in Canada, people.
You know what the biggest problem is?
I don't trust the markets, but they are indicative of something.
I don't trust the markets.
I trust that you can make a little money off of the markets being inaccurate.
But the problem is...
Has Pierre Poiliev gone on Gadsad?
Nope. Has Pierre Poiliev basically pulled an Erin O'Toole?
Kind of looks that way.
We've got basically a uni party in Canada where even the so-called conservatives vote unanimously for the conversion therapy ban, which basically prohibits the likes of Jordan Peterson, psychiatrists, psychologists, parents, from counseling their children out of transgender ideology.
Conservatives, so-called Canadian conservatives, voted unanimously for that.
So-called conservatives sitting there pushing that toxic jab back in 2021.
And I know what Aaron O'Toole is going to say and what people are going to say if they want to steal men.
Aaron O'Toole was talking about vaccines in general.
He specifically said vaccines and not the COVID jab because he doesn't want to endorse the experimental COVID horse crap.
We're dealing with a uni party in Canada.
And I get a little conspiratorial.
It almost looks like the conservative element of the Uni Party is deliberately trying to throw this election.
And even if they win, what's going to change?
But if you vote for the Liberals, you are a painful idiot.
And there is no way about it.
Good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
For those of you who are new to the channel, Viva Frye, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida Rumbler, this is part of the Rumble lineup, daily at 4 o'clock, every Sunday at 6 o'clock with Barnes, Viva and Barnes, Law for the People.
And everything goes on podcast unless I forget, and I sometimes forget.
I just put out the interview with Gadi Taub, which, it's an amazing thing.
You put out anything on YouTube that has Israel in the title.
Maybe I'm wrong.
I don't think I'm wrong.
I am 99% certain anything on YouTube that has Israel in the title gets immediately suppressed.
But if you haven't seen it, go watch it because it's a great interview.
But I want to highlight one element of this.
Gadi Taub is a historian, Israeli political analyst on the conservative side of things.
And I had asked him a question that was on my mind since the first moments of October 7 happened.
And I remember what I said at the time, and I remember my tweets at the time.
And I said, how the hell can this possibly have happened?
Period. And I asked Gaddy about two questions.
They're two theories, two prevailing, or two...
Call them conspiracy theories, but that almost is a term that undermines the potential legitimacy of theorizing.
I asked about two theories that have been floated that...
People can espouse and that, you know, I wouldn't blame them for espousing because in as much as you might say, how dare you espouse such a ridiculous conspiracy theory?
At the very least, as Gadi Taub conceded, but I think everybody on earth would concede it, October 7 was nothing less than the most catastrophic intelligence failure in Israeli history.
But I asked him about the theory that, you know, what about the theory that...
It was a leahop, let it happen on purpose, to justify a military incursion and or subsidiarily a leahop by elements who loathe Netanyahu, who wanted to allow something like this to happen, maybe not on the scale that it did, so that they can then use it to highlight the incompetence of Netanyahu and lost him from power.
Here, let me just play this a little bit and go check out the full interview.
It's on both Rumble and Commitube and on Twitter, actually.
We can all at least admit...
Absolutely. If
anyone in the world thinks that Netanyahu would have families tied together in barbed wire, then have gasoline spilled on their heads and then lit up in order to achieve whatever it was that he wanted to achieve in Gaza,
that person must be crazy and completely I'll pause it there and you can go watch this.
The second half of that was when I asked about, you know, potentially the left-ish.
The Netanyahu deranged syndrome in Israel.
Because what Gadi explained is that in Israel, you have as much...
You have the equivalent of...
Trump derangement syndrome vis-a-vis Netanyahu.
And I said, well, that's very interesting then.
So what about the theory that maybe it's intelligence allowing a lapse so they can use it against Netanyahu?
And his answer was, even they're not that crazy.
And I said, you know, I'm not sure if they are as Netanyahu deranged as some of the liberals and Democrats here are Trump deranged.
I'm not sure that I would, you know, I'm not sure that I wouldn't disagree with that.
I'm not sure.
I think I might disagree with that because I think there's a lot.
There's a lot of TDS people in America who, my goodness, to facilitate the destruction and slaughter of their political rivals, I think they would do it.
I think they might even do it with their own bare hands.
But it was an interesting interview.
The conclusion to that was, go watch the tweet and go share the video.
It was an interesting discussion.
Now, before we even get started on the show, everybody, I was going to say that intro, it almost makes me want to have a heart attack.
It doesn't make me want to have a heart attack.
Someone's going to say, Viva, chill out, you're going to have a heart attack.
To which I will say, I'm a damn healthy person.
I may have a few vices.
Everyone has vices.
But I'm a healthy person.
I exercise regularly.
I eat mildly healthy.
Maybe a little bit too much red meat.
But I have my vegetables.
And when I can't get my raw fruits and vegetables, I get my field of greens.
Peeps! We're human.
We don't always eat healthy.
And when you can't, there's always alternatives.
And one good alternative is Field of Greens.
A delicious glass of Field of Greens daily is like nutritional armor for your body.
Each fruit and vegetable was doctor selected for a specific health benefit.
There's the heart group, lungs, kidney group, metabolism, even healthy weight.
I love the energy that you get from it.
It tastes delicious and gives you the confidence.
That if you can't do the healthy thing, you have one easy, healthy alternative.
A spoonful of this a day.
I can enjoy guilt-free when I eat badly because it helps.
By the way, it gives you the better health promise where you go to your doctor and you'll notice better health at your next visit or they will give you your money back.
Let me get you started with a special discount.
It's 20% off for your first order.
Just use code VIVA at the checkout of fieldofgreens.com.
That's code VIVA.
For 20% off fieldofgreens.com.
It's delicious.
I say it looks like swamp water.
And the joke is that swamp water is high in nutrients and specifically the origins of life because of what it has in it.
One spoonful is one serving of raw fruits and vegetables daily.
It's delicious.
Boom. All right.
On the menu, people.
Before we even get there, we've got a new member.
True Agent has donated.
I think that means has become a member of our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
All right.
Today's show.
We're going to cover, in addition to Canada, get out there and vote on Monday, people.
Get out and vote early if you're able to.
I never tell anybody who to vote for, but if you vote for the Liberals, you're an absolute idiot.
And I'm having a discussion or an ongoing bet with Encryptus as to whether or not it's actually going to be a majority Liberal government after the next election.
I have predicted it, shan't.
And if I'm wrong in my prediction, well, I think I and the rest of Canada will have bigger problems than a lost investment.
Well, you're covered by copium, and I'm powered by math and stats.
No, no, no.
Well, first of all, you say you're powered by math and stats, and yet Barnes is powered by math, stats, and much more than that.
He disagrees with me, I know.
Well, we'll see where it goes, people.
We are on the menu today.
We've got trans stuff.
It's got a lot of looping trans stuff.
Trump's trans ban in the military.
is up before the courts.
Now I actually forget if it was upheld or not upheld.
Anyway, we're going to get to that.
The Judge Cano out of New Mexico who was found is harboring the word housing.
We'll say harboring implies something illicit.
Housing. Illegal aliens who were in possession or had access to firearms.
He resigned from the bench.
He has now been banned permanently.
But my theory on this case is that the ban Is the cover-up.
We're going to get to that.
And a bunch of other crap.
It's fun stuff.
Leticia James.
We're going to get to Leticia James also.
We are going to start with Judge Joelle Cano.
And now we know that Cano does not mean dog.
It means...
What did it mean?
White in Cryptis?
What? What did Cano mean?
We did that two shows.
White hair.
White hair.
Okay, good.
Judge Joelle Cano.
Here. This is the backdrop for those of you who don't know what's going on.
Democrat Judge Joel Cano banned by New Mexico Supreme Court after alleged Trena de Aragua gang member arrested in his home.
Not just an illegal people, a member of the TDA, the Trena de Aragua, that has now been designated something of a terrorist organization.
The news broke earlier this week.
He sends in his letter of resignation.
The story's a little bit older than this week, so the timing is a little interesting.
He announces his resignation, and then the news of the day is, all right, guys, we've done it justice.
He's been banned from sitting on the bench for life.
But is that just part of the cover-up?
A Democratic New Mexico judge who had an alleged Tren de Aragua.
That means the train of Aragua, because it's such a powerful force that it comes at you like a train, and there's nothing you can do about it.
Gang member living in his home has been permanently banned from the bench by his colleagues according to the state Supreme Court documents.
Jose Joel Cano resigned in March after agents from the United States Department of Homeland Security arrested suspected TDA gang member Cristian Ortega Lopez at Cano's home in February.
The discipline handed down by the Supreme Court of New Mexico makes it so Cano, quote, My goodness.
If he was cozying up with the TDA beforehand, my, he's going to be out of revenue for the rest of his life.
He might have to cozy up with them even more for other reasons, which I'm going to get to in a second.
All speculative people.
The ban even prohibits Cano from officiating weddings in the state.
Lopez, 23, was arrested during a Homeland Security raid at the former Donna Ana Magistrate Judge's home.
At the former Donna Ana County Magistrate Judge's home, I guess, on February 28th.
Feds also seized four firearms from Cano's daughter's home after getting search warrants related to social media evidence of Ortega Lopez's alleged ties to Tena de Dago.
He had also, apparently, images of decapitated bodies on his cell phone.
Investigators found pictures of social media.
On social media, the Venezuelan national eating dinner with Cano's family and posing for Christmas pictures in 2024.
Wearing a cowboy hat and a bolo tie, Ortega Lopez is wearing the classic yadda yadda yadda.
Cano resigned on March 3rd, made no mention of Ortega Lopez in his letter.
We'll cover that part.
Cano's link to Ortega Lopez, who illegally entered in 2023, but was released from the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol facility because of overcrowding, was first revealed in court documents seeking to keep the immigrant in detention.
He climbed over a barbed wire fence at Eagle's Pass and copped to illegally entering in the U.S., the court documents said.
Lopez first made contact with Cano's family a little over a year ago when he helped with the jurist's wife, Nancy Cano, install a glass door.
He did other odd jobs for her.
Is it amazing?
What I'm hypothesizing is whether or not they were involved in something more nefarious.
Drug trafficking, human trafficking.
People are going to call me crazy, and I'm not going to connect dots that don't exist.
When you hear stories of judges sentencing people...
To facilities so they can get kickbacks because they need to keep those facilities populated with children, which is an actual case.
One of the judges just got pardoned by Joe Biden on his way out.
You can not even assume the same thing is happening, but ask whether or not something similar might be happening.
Is this guy involved in drug trafficking, human trafficking, or other criminal activity?
Or did they just find an illegal immigrant that they could exploit for cheap labor in their homes?
Which is also what it sounds like.
You exploit an illegal immigrant for cheap labor because as Joe, what's her name, whatever the Osborne says, who's going to clean your toilets, Mr. Trump?
They get them, and then the guy falls in love with the daughter.
The daughter falls in love with the guy.
Daughter might be something of an activist who says it's not fair that they're deporting all these illegals.
They develop a relationship.
Who knows?
Maybe the daughter's an activist, like some sort of weather underground, building up an army, arming them, training them how to use guns to fight a deportation.
I mean, this is all not beyond the realm of possibility.
Nancy offered Ortega López a place to stay in the Castilla in their home, or maybe just thought they were doing something nice.
When he got booted from his apartment in El Paso.
While Sting at the Canos, he and the judge's daughter hung out.
And she let him hold on to some of her firearms.
Well, if they're holding on to each other's arms or guns, bada bing, bada boom, Ortega López is charged with being an illegal in possession of a firearm.
If convicted, he could face him to 15 years behind bars.
That's the story.
And then the only question is, is there more to the story?
Is the ban, the lifetime ban, are they going to say that is...
You know, when it came to Eric Adams and the indictment, and then people were saying, you know, the indictment is an indication of the corruption.
Or the indictment, hypothesizing, might have been part of a cover-up.
They indict him on some bogus, weak-ass charge, which is what they did, to cover up from potentially more nefarious stuff.
Or... The indictment was the corruption in that they were trying to, like they accused Trump of doing, use those charges as a sort of Democles to coerce activity or to coerce compliance from Eric Adams.
Pre-election and post-election had Kami Kamala won.
The ban of the judge in this case, if they say, well, we've washed our hands of it, there you go, there's justice, no need to look further, I would be inclined to think that the ban is the cover-up and not the justice.
But even as it stands, it's wildly suspect that this judge is harboring an illegal in their home.
It sounds like it might have just been mere human exploitation to take an illegal, pay him to do some odd jobs, feel bad for him, think you're doing a good thing by allowing him to stay in your home, daughter falls in love, trains him how to lead the resistance for TDA, or the daughter is into something that we'll find out about or not because they've banned the judge and that's where it all ends.
So that's that.
But in the theme of the theme of illegals, the other news of the day is that another activist judge, this one's name is William Orrick, has enjoined the Trump administration from withholding federal funds from sanctuary cities who are openly defying federal law by operating as sanctuary cities.
It is kind of mixed messaging.
Where the judge who's harboring an illegal, I mean, he's just offering his home as a sanctuary home.
So if a judge comes in and says, well, you can't fault someone, you can't punish a city for defying federal law, why go after the judge for this?
I'll get the article before I...
There's some interesting comments.
Let me ask you a question.
With him getting banned...
Does that take into account previous cases?
Do they get to get reviewed now?
Do people get to contest because he's done some bad things?
I doubt they get to review the cases, but whoever was dealing with his current cases, there's going to be some issues with.
Take it with a grain of salt because I've only learned through osmosis, but I don't think this is behavior that is impugned behavior in other cases in terms of This is off the bench, unrelated to his role as a judge,
but I don't know.
I would be curious as to what basis there would be to go back and try to review decisions.
But I don't know.
So take that with a grain of salt.
Now, that being said, Trump administration asks Supreme Court...
No, it's not.
Which one is it?
I need to get the flipping thing here.
We're just going to go read the court docket.
It's right here.
All right.
This is the news of the day.
City and County of San Francisco Plaintiffs vs.
Trump Administration District Court for the Northern District of California.
Trump has come out and said to Sanctuary Cities, you defy federal law.
You don't comply, cooperate with ICE agents.
We're going to strip you of federal funding.
Seems like a pretty standard thing to say to children if you don't do your chores or you defy my authority.
As your overarching father, I'm not going to give you your allowance until you do what it is that you need to do that are the rules of this house.
States are states, and there are still rules of the federal overarching government.
What was I about to say about this as well?
Oh yeah, kind of like in Maine, you know, if they say, we're not going to comply with your executive order on...
Excluding men from women's sports, boys from girls' sports, and men from women's locker rooms.
The feds are going to say, well, we're going to withhold federal funding.
Same thing for states.
Same things for publicly funded institutions.
Don't comply with our executive orders.
You're not going to get our federal dollars.
Seems like a pretty standard operational relationship.
Well, not according to the judge.
The judge is, according to Barnes, a corrupt hack of a judge.
William H. Orrick.
And we will not read through the whole thing.
Just to get a feel for this.
We don't need to read an article summarizing it when we can summarize it in real time.
This judge apparently has already heard prior cases or prior injunctions that sought to enjoin similar threats to withhold federal funding.
And this judge doesn't seem to be having any.
This judge almost seems miffed that they would dare try it again.
In 2017, I'm reading paragraph one, but it's not numbered.
In 2017, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13. Whatever.
Titled Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States, which was directed at so-called sanctuary jurisdictions.
They're not so-called.
They are sanctuary jurisdictions.
In fact, they're so-called sanctuary jurisdictions because they call themselves sanctuary cities.
The city and county of San Francisco, Santa whatever, argued that Section 9 of the executive order was unconstitutional.
I found they had pre-enforcement standing that they were likely to succeed on the merits because Section 9 of the executive order was unconstitutional and they faced irreparable harm absent an injunction.
I enjoined them back in the day.
Here we go again, says the judge.
Shortly after taking office in 2020-25, Trump issued executive order.
Orders 1459, protecting the American people against invasion, and a bunch of other ones, yada yada yada.
Directs the United States Attorney General and the United States Department of Homeland Security DHS Secretary to withhold federal funds from sanctuary jurisdictions, cities, counties, that limit the use of local resources to enforce federal immigration law.
EO directs every federal agency to ensure that federal payments to localities do not, quote, by design or effect...
Abet so-called sanctuary policies that seek to shield illegal aliens from deportation.
Do you understand?
It's the same analogy that I've used before, but you get a kid who the father says, you're spending your money, you can't spend my allowance money on drugs or alcohol.
And then the kid who's got a job says, I'm not spending your money on that.
You see, when I put your $100 a week into my bank account, the $100 I'm spending on drugs and alcohol, that's my $100.
To which the father's going to say, well, I'm not giving you money anymore.
You spend your own money and I'll charge you for things.
And then if you have money left, you can go buy your drugs and alcohol.
This is the state saying, we get federal funds.
We're not going to use it or use our own resources to aid and abet with ICE.
And you can't force us to, but you got to keep giving us the federal funds.
The judge came down and said, I'm issuing the same injunction I did the last time because, you know, the four criteria, balance of inconvenience, color of right, likelihood of success.
Irreparable harm weighs in favor of the plaintiffs.
And I'm going to enjoin the feds to continue financing sanctuary cities who then take that sweet federal dollars and do nothing to aid and assist in the application of federal law.
You've got to read the...
I've highlighted the two sections here from the tweet here.
Activist Judge Orwick issues injunction in joining the Trump admin from withholding funds to sanctuary cities.
The so-called sanctuary cities can defy federal law while an activist judge protects their federal dollars.
The best part, the judge concludes.
I'll read it.
Neither executive order provides a definition for sanctuary jurisdiction.
As if we need to know what it is?
They've defined themselves.
But a memo from Attorney General Pamela Bondi on February 5, 2025, the Bondi Directive, along with various memoranda and public comments about the orders and their force, provide a clear picture of what jurisdictions qualify.
and the 2025 executive order's intended purpose to end or severely curtail federal funding for cities, counties, and states that the Trump administration deems to be sanctuary jurisdictions.
I'm fairly certain they've defined themselves as this.
Plaintiffs in this case, San Francisco, Santa Clara, 14 other counties from around...
have moved for a preliminary injunction to block the order.
Cities and counties seek the preliminary...
The preliminary enjoined the defendant and their office's agency at the conclusion, which is to prevent them from withholding funds, and the judge grants it.
But this is the best part here.
Let me see here.
I'll go to the line here.
And as the court order will follow makes plain, the cities and counties have also shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their Administrative Procedures Act.
Claim the body directive order to freeze all DOJ funds is likely arbitrary and capricious.
Contrary to the Constitution and an ultra-virus final agency action under the APA.
Arbitrary and capricious.
And they issue the injunction enjoining the threat agents, whatever, from withholding or threatening to withhold federal funds.
Arbitrary and capricious to say, if you do not abide by and enforce federal law or facilitate the enforcement of federal law, you don't get federal funds.
What you've got right now...
And we're seeing it on all fronts of the judicial lawfare against the Trump administration.
How many millions of illegals did Obama deport without a problem, without so much as boo?
How many millions did Clinton deport?
How many injunctions did they get in joining the deportation of illegal aliens?
How many?
Zero injunctions and millions of illegals.
What we've got now is you've got judges saying you can't deport illegal criminal wife beating gang members without hearings on the merits of each and every one of them.
You can't deport them without so-called due process.
You can't defund the cities that are harboring them.
But we'll give one judge a slap on the wrist for housing them.
It's another form of a judicial coup.
And you'll recall the first judicial coup was the Russiagate hoax.
Then the second judicial coup was the first impeachment to try to remove the democratically elected president.
The third judicial coup was the second impeachment after the Fed's surrection of January 1st, 2021.
This is a judicial coup by activist judges who now want to play the role of commander-in-chief, dictate which enemy forces can be deported under the Alien Enemies Act, whether or not you can even Invoke the alien entity's act.
Whether or not the president is the commander-in-chief.
They're trying to usurp the role of commander-in-chief.
Now they're trying to usurp the role of basically controlling the purse strings or authorizing the president to do what he's entitled to do as the federal government.
There was another element in this that I forgot to mention.
Oh, cripe.
That doesn't matter.
So, the enjoin for the time being.
My question is why the prior decisions had not reached the merits of the decisions to adjudicate on what the, not likelihood of success on the merits would be, but what the outcome on the merits in fact was.
So you can't deport them.
You can't defund the cities.
You've got to offer each and every one of them Full constitutional due process.
In other words, we've imported 10, 20 million illegal immigrants.
There's nothing you can do about it.
They're going to stay here long enough to affect the census.
And hopefully, we'll tie your hands up for the next two to three to four years.
And hopefully, we'll win the presidency in 2028.
And what we'll do?
Amnesty. And we will have a one-party state for the rest of the American future, much like it seems that we have a one-party state in Canada.
But let's hear what Tim Nobles-Walls has to say about this.
Make sure it's not too loud.
And play this.
Now, in this land of the free and home of the brave, we have university students being swept up, shoved into unmarked vans, and fathers being tossed into Salvadorian gulags without a hint of due process.
How many lies can you have in 18 seconds?
I'm just going to go bing every time there's a lie.
Now, in this land of the free and home of the brave, we have university students being swept up, shoved into unmarked vans, and fathers being tossed into salvage.
I'm going to go bing on the unmarked vans, but I think that might have been mildly true.
So I'll take back the bing.
Dorian gulags without a hint of due process.
Bing! It's like a church.
It's a church.
It's a bad church.
It's a government church.
He might actually be in front of a church.
No, he's not.
Okay, sorry.
I want to be real clear about this.
If you say you love freedom, but you don't believe freedom is for everybody, then the thing you love isn't freedom, it's privilege.
So hold on a second.
I love freedom.
I don't love freedom for criminals.
So does a murderer get freedom or is it a privilege then?
*Applaus*
This is idiocracy in real time.
This was from Benny Johnson, who's quoting him and said, We have fathers being tossed into Salvadorian gulags.
First of all, in cryptos, can you find the conditions or the room into which Garcia was moved in El Salvador?
Oh yeah, in a one-bedroom apartment, you mean?
Yeah, see if you can pull up some pictures of that.
Talk about a frickin' gulag.
So, lie after lie, we don't need to go over this.
Terrorists? Designated MS-13 gang members.
Did he say not a whiff of due process or not a hint of due process?
He had been in front of 17 some odd judges, two of which at the very least designated MS-13 based on the evidence.
It's so over the top, it's absolutely insane.
Even the crowd had to hit him with some boos.
Get off stage, your career is over.
Let's see if we can find the gulag into which the man has been placed.
Got a Toronto Sun article here just pulling that up for you.
Yeah, put that in the private and we'll see.
And let me see.
I think this is the one here.
Yeah, then we got Charlie Kirk who gets it right as well.
Let me get this straight.
So-called Maryland dad Kilmar Abrego Garcia was pulled over in Tennessee in 2022 carrying eight passengers with no luggage, no valid driver's license, Coming from Houston, one of the hotbeds for human smuggling told police it was his boss's car, a man named Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes,
an illegal migrant who was sentenced to prison for human smuggling in 2020.
All eight passengers claimed Abrego Garcia's address as their own.
Tennessee Highway Patrol suspected Garcia of human trafficking but ultimately let him go at the request of the FBI.
What year was this?
2022? And simply gave him a warning for driving on an expired license.
He needs to, heads need to roll for this.
Tennessee Highway Patrol and the FBI failed.
Unbelievable. It links to the Daily Caller article.
Let me tell you something.
I have my Florida license.
This was a while back, but I got pulled over.
What did I get?
Oh, because in Florida, you're not allowed.
First of all, no idea.
You can't let a kid off for school.
On the side, you know, anywhere you have to follow through the line of the...
No, it was letting them off anywhere, like on the side of the street, so they crossed.
It was 8 in the morning, didn't have my license.
I was given, not a big fat ticket, but rather I was given 10 days to bring my license, show my license, or I would have gotten a big fat ticket.
This is flipping insanity.
It's absolute insanity.
I mean, what it is, is it was in Jack Posobiec's Unhuman.
It's weaponizing the law.
To punish the legals and then allowing the criminals to wreak havoc on society.
Because you create absolute chaos that you then rule over.
It's absolute insanity.
The lies about Abrego Garcia are now known and they're for everybody to see.
And yet they continue to repeat the lie because what you end up having is people say that there's no way people would continue to lie about this because anybody with half a conscience Half a sense of decency would not continue to repeat a lie that has been so debunked repeatedly,
so there must be some truth to it.
That's how that whole repeat a big enough lie enough times and people will believe it, because no one would think that Tim Nobles Walls would get up there and say, this man, not a hint of due process, big fat lie, designated MS-13 in a gulag?
Let me see what that gulag looked like.
They don't have pictures of it, but they do describe it.
And by the way, I'm completely disgusted.
The search engine shows man mistakenly, et cetera, et cetera, throughout every single one.
There's two articles out of the, I don't know, 50 on my page here that actually say what actually happened.
It's unbelievable.
A man deported to El Salvador, moved to a prison with bed, furniture.
He's out on the controversial SIGOT mega prison.
He's out of the controversial SIGOT mega prison where he'd been held without the gang.
Look at them.
Look at them.
I love you.
Thank you.
The dancing.
Oh, someone messaged me and asked me if I could flip them the link of them dancing.
You have to Google it.
You have to go for it on Twitter.
I don't know where it is.
The Trump administration told a federal judge that a Maryland man...
He's an El Salvadorian illegal.
It's just unbelievable.
Wrongly deported to his native El Salvador.
It's like, oh, he's a naturalized citizen and you're deporting him to his native land?
He's an El Salvadorian illegal.
He got out of the prison where he'd been held with other gang members.
He was transferred to a detention facility known as...
Central Industrial in Santa Ana, El Salvador.
The U.S. State Department said Sunday, filing that did not give a reason for the move.
Abrego Garcia personally reported his transfer to the U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen.
Did Van Hollen say that?
The location of that meeting wasn't disclosed.
Abrego Garcia told Senator Van Hollen that he'd been placed in the administrative building of Central Industrial, whatever, with bed and furniture, and that he was not in a cell.
Oh, I don't think Van Hollen said that at the time.
His wife, Jennifer, who is a U.S. citizen, issued a statement praising four additional Democrat congressmembers who arrived in El Salvador to see her husband.
Particularly concerned for herself.
Yada, yada, yada.
Eh, whatever.
It's nice.
He's got better condition than all of the Jan Sixers ever got throughout their four years of pretrial detention.
No one gave a sweet bugger all about due process for the Jan Sixers.
It's not about due process.
It's about lawlessness.
And you have to show the video I just dropped in private chat.
Well, let's see this.
The Recon Memes.
Which one is this?
Don't tell me.
Don't tell me.
I want to see it.
Hold on.
There it goes.
Let's go like this.
Coming right up.
Oh, we got another dancing one here.
Okay, I'll share this one in the chat.
AI, it's good for now because things are...
Let me get this down here.
Because it's easy to tell what's real and what's not.
When it gets impossible, we're done.
We're done.
I love the guy in the back dancing.
Yeah, that's very good.
It's not as good as the other one where they kissed, but that one's pretty damn good.
So that's what's going on in the world today, people.
Let me just make sure that there's nothing left on this subject.
Okay, we got this, this, this.
Oh yeah, one...
Now we're going to get to that, and we're going to get to that.
Okay, good.
How do we transition into the trans discussion?
I ran a poll.
We'll see how many votes this thing got on Twitter.
It's virtually unanimous.
Do you support Trump's executive order banning, quote, transgender troops in the military?
Do I get to see this?
Oh, I gotta see what it is.
Hold on, let me go see what it's at on Twitter.
I'm going to say if it's not 90%, I'm going to be a little bit surprised.
It's 97.9%.
Yes, we support it.
2.1%.
No, we don't support it.
And there's only been 3,000 votes on that.
So the other news of the day, peeps, is that the Trump urges Supreme Court to let trans-military ban proceed.
This is, when you think about it, the most insane, pun intended, issue ever.
When you're talking about military preparedness, and for those of you who don't know exactly what goes into being quote-unquote trans, depending on the level of transformation that you've gone through with your body, medical transformation, to suggest that this is somehow an unreasonable ban for mental psychological reasons,
for medical procedural reasons, To take it to court is abject insanity.
It's almost as though the goal is not to protect anybody's rights, but rather just to compromise the ability to run a functional military.
Policy has become the target of multiple legal challenges with one notable suit out of Washington, D.C. Go figure.
Nick Talbot.
Transgender soldier defends his military service opposition of Trump executive order.
Nick Talbot.
A transgender U.S. Army Reservist spoke with Fox News about the lawsuit challenging a Trump executive order barring transgender military personnel.
The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to review a lower court's ruling that temporarily blocked its ban on transgender troops in the military.
So they blocked the ban, meaning that you cannot prevent...
Transgender troops from serving in the military.
I tried to find the filing.
I couldn't get it quickly enough, but this was earlier this afternoon.
In a filing on Thursday, the Justice Department requested that the High Court stop the lower court's injunction and allow the military to disqualify from service individuals who have gender dysphoria or have undergone medical interventions for gender dysphoria.
Gender dysphoria is a DSM-5 diagnosed condition.
Now, I think they've changed the definition of the criteria in that they used to have as the criteria, in order for it to be gender dysphoria, perception issues that cause discomfort.
So I guess the issue is if you are a man who feels like a woman, but it doesn't cause you psychological discomfort, it's no longer a diagnosable condition.
So you can just be a man that thinks you're a woman and...
It's not a mental condition.
Just pay attention to where we're at,
people. Activist judges preventing deportation of immigrants.
Illegal aliens.
Activist judges preventing the feds from depriving funds to sanctuary cities that are violating federal law.
Activist judges now telling the military how it has to operate.
At issue, President Trump's January 27th executive order requiring the Defense Department to update its guidance regarding, quote, trans-identifying medical standards for military service and to, quote, rescind guidance inconsistent with military readiness.
U.S. District Court Judge Benjamin Settle And avoiding disproportionate costs,
end quote.
Ninth Circuit declined to grant an administrative stay which would have let the government enforce the ban while the legal challenge moved forward.
And let's listen to this.
On March 27th, a three-judge panel of D.C. Court of Appeals paused a lower court order blocking the ban.
The panel emphasized that the stay should not be construed in a way as a ruling on the merits.
U.S. District Court Judge Anna Rice on March 26th denied the administration's motion to dissolve her earlier injunction blocking the Pentagon's transgender troop ban.
Decision came two days before the ban was set to go into effect on March 28th.
I pulled up something from, like, 2020, which I thought was relevant on all of this, because you'll recall, everybody, the arguments for opposing men and women's sports, trans men and women's sports, let me know which way it goes, trans women and women's sports, the argument for opposing men and women's sports,
boys and girls sports, is that there's so few of them, you know, it's basically, you're chasing windmills, it's not an issue.
What are they?
Oh, there's only 17 athletes in all sports that identify as trans.
All right, so it's a non-issue then.
Move on.
In this case, they say simultaneously it's a non-issue, but it would also compromise military readiness.
And this was something that I found from...
Is it this one here?
Yeah, this is from 2020.
How do I get rid of this crap here?
Get rid of this.
Get rid of that.
There we go.
The Palm Center.
Blueprints for sound public policy.
What year is this?
Yeah, November 2020.
DOD's transgender ban has harmed military readiness.
Executive summary.
On June 30, 2016, the U.S. military began allowing transgender Americans to serve openly in uniform.
Although all five service chiefs subsequently testified that inclusive policy was a success, on April 12, 2019, Department of Defense implemented a ban prohibiting...
Transgender. I'm going to make this bigger just in case anybody needs it.
Transgender individuals, with some exceptions from serving in the military, citing the financial cost of inclusive service as well as a threat to readiness, cohesion, and lethality.
More than a year and a half has passed since the bans implementation, but scholars have not yet assessed its impact on readiness.
This scholarly study is the first to undertake such an assessment.
We use five research strategies, including surveys, interviews, demographic analysis, and scholarly literature review.
And content analysis of media articles to analyze the impact of the ban.
Our data indicate that the overall impact of the ban has been to harm readiness by compromising recruitment, reputation, retention, unit cohesion, morale, medical care, and good discipline.
The ban undermines recruitment by artificially shrinking a recruiting pool comprising of an estimated 205,000 transgender Americans of recruiting age.
There's so few of them it's not an issue, but there's so many of them that it compromises military readiness.
By discouraging transgender and gender non-conforming individuals from considering service.
Reputation. The ban harms the military reputation and its appeal to millions of qualified non-transgender Americans.
Retention. The ban harms retention, including in ways not captured in discharge figures, by stigmatizing and uniquely burdening transgender personnel, making them less likely to continue or extend their service.
Unit cohesion.
The ban harms unit cohesion by encouraging anti-transgender harassment and by undermining trust when troops conceal their identities.
Morale. Medical care.
The ban thwarts access to medical care for transgender personnel by denying care and making...
Candid communication with providers a risk for discharge.
The ban thwarts access to medical care for transgender personnel.
Can you imagine being in the military and saying, I need access to medical treatment?
And then arguing it doesn't compromise military readiness?
Do people appreciate what goes into the full-on surgically transformed men who've created neo-vaginas?
What goes into that?
Daily dilation?
Medical, other medications, other mental medications, which might be problematic if you're talking about people who are authorized to engage in lethal force.
This is what you call trying to destroy a nation.
Forcing the military to take on people who are costly.
It's not a question of, you're an adult, do what you want.
But if you're a blind adult, you can't demand to become a bus driver.
Do what you want as an adult.
If you require daily medical interventions as a result of your decision to transform your body, that's fine.
But don't demand that the military accommodate that, accommodate whatever other mental conditions might otherwise be disqualifying.
You don't stigmatize mental illness, but also you don't let paranoid schizophrenics...
Hold firearms in the military.
There are mental conditions that are grounds for disqualification.
Gender dysphoria is a mental condition.
And the idea of when you're talking about unit cohesion, like this is the other thing.
The military is about an absence of individualism.
I've never been in the military, people, but I've interviewed enough people now.
I always ask, why do they shave your head?
They shave your head so that you look the same.
They shave your head and they treat you, they train you.
To treat your unit as a unit absent individuals.
There's no individualism.
It's unit cohesion.
The transgender ideology is the antithesis to unit cohesion.
It is all about the me, how I feel, how I identify, which is fundamentally incompatible with unit cohesion.
And it is insanity.
But the bottom line is it's insanity.
And now you have lower courts enjoining executive orders as relates to the governance of the military.
And this is how nations fall.
Can you imagine?
Reputational? Do you know what is reputationally compromising for the military?
Is having Russia and China and Iran look at the American military and say, I wonder if that troop has to go dilate their neo-vagina.
On a daily basis.
Don't put them in battle.
Just put them in a clerical job.
Put them behind a desk.
Maybe that would be a compromise.
Even then, is the medical condition related to the ability to serve?
Not arguably.
Probably. Now on the subject of the transgender ideology, people.
Did I get all of it here?
Yeah, I think I did.
So, a number of interesting court cases to follow.
The judges in the courts can tell the president how to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, how to implement the Alien Enemies Act on predatory incursions, what qualifies as a predatory incursion.
And so, you know, during the bourbon with Barnes last night, one of the questions from the chat that he answered is, you know, Can you imagine, could the judges come in and prevent Trump from shutting down military bases in foreign countries?
In the ordinary run of things, no, because the commander-in-chief is the commander-in-chief in today's judicial activist America.
Unclear. I mean, that's assuming that Trump could even get the accurate information, assuming that there's no people in the military lying.
General Milley, I'm looking at you as to where troops are and how many there are still there.
But you get a judge come and say, you can't shut down that base.
You can't turn that ship around.
You can't patrol that water.
You must patrol that water.
You've got activist judges thinking they are the commander-in-chief right now.
And now you've got activist judges enjoining the president from running the military to its full potential of lethality.
Reputational harm.
Russia, China, Iran are looking at what's going on with the American military and they are probably laughing their heads off.
Probably laughing their heads off at what's going on in the Canadian military too because you know what actually?
It impacts cohesion and willingness to recruit or be recruited.
Woke ideology is what compromises it.
The amount of people not signing up for the Canadian military is exactly why the Canadian military, in all its readiness for 40 million people, is down to 15,000 active duty or ready-to-respond soldiers.
In cryptos, what was the...
The news with Pete Hegseth that was talking about a jump of recruitment in the military.
Did I bring that up?
No, you didn't.
I dropped a couple links in your Twitter DM.
8,700 people are being invited back to join the military after being booted for rejecting a COVID jab.
Yes. I have this one up.
It's a tweet, right?
From Liz Churchill.
The best one is actually lives of TikTok.
TikTok post.
Libs, there's Liz Churchill, and then there's Libs of TikTok.
Here we go.
Let's go with this one.
Yeah, you know what's amazing?
You know what increases recruitment?
Kash Patel joining the FBI is what jacks up recruitment.
Pete Hegseth coming on as, geez, what is it?
Secretary of Defense?
Not Secretary of Defense.
Is it Secretary of Defense?
Yes. Secretary of Defense.
That jacks up recruitment.
Let's hear what Pete Hegseth has to say.
We're also welcoming back former service members who were wrongly forced to leave the military.
More than 8,700 service members were involuntarily separated for not taking an experimental COVID-19 vaccine.
Others were more informally pushed out or decided to get out.
We are welcoming actively back those warriors of conscience.
We've sent letters out.
We're seeking them out.
We want them back.
They never should have been forced to come back quickly.
The personnel and readiness department is working in real time to make that process more and more efficient, more and more direct every single day.
Can you listen to that and then you compare that to those political pussies in Canada, the so-called Conservative Party that we saw at the beginning of this show?
Compare Pete Hegseth to Aaron O'Toole.
Compare the MAGA America to the so-called conservatives up in Canada.
And I'm supposed to believe that Canadians would rather see a Pierre Poiliev conservative or an Aaron O'Toole conservative to a Pete Hegseth conservative?
Horseshit. You get someone like Hegseth saying what Hegseth said up in Canada, you would have people joining the military again.
You would have morale being elevated.
you would have people who thought they were alone and who were too scared to come forward, come forward with pride.
Cowardice begets cowardice, cowardice begets cowardice, and strength begets strength.
I'm just making this stuff up.
Courage begets courage.
I will not believe for one second that what we just saw from Pete Hexeth would not be wildly more popular in Canada than what we're currently seeing from the so-called Conservative Party.
And anybody who says otherwise, I won't say you're a coward, but you are certainly succumbing to the Cultural and media propagandization of Canada as a whole.
My goodness, just get someone up in Canada that says, anyone who was fired for the jab, I will bring you back.
Pierre Polyev would win the election.
Come back and say, we should have never fired you.
We will look into compensation.
We will fully investigate every suspected COVID death out there, and we will compensate you.
My goodness, Pierre Polyev would win the election.
Can't even bring himself to do that.
No, but Viva, you don't understand.
It's not the same up in Canada.
Canadians are an especially cowardly people who are an especially propagandized country.
The populist movement that you've seen in every other country, including European countries, which Canada says it's closer to than America, just for some reason is different in Canada, right?
Bullcrap. Good one, Pete Hexeth.
Good for him.
Holy hell.
Let me bring these up because I see now King of Biltong is in the house.
Is in the house.
Cultivated Mind says...
Cultivated Mind!
Did I just get something from you in the mail?
I think I did.
Dog treats.
Cultivated Mind says the entirety of my JROTC and Civil Air Patrol training was mostly unit cohesion.
And while rivalries were encouraged, drama was squashed immediately by the sergeant.
An army should be effective, not political.
Agreed. And Cultivated Mind, am I crazy or did I just get a box of dog treats from you?
Fairly certain.
Yes. It is 5 o'clock and I'm still currently live on the internet.
And Kiga Biltong says, get back to eating healthy by adding some tasty high-protein Biltong to your diet, packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
Get some at BiltongUSA.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
Eat healthy, drink healthy.
Fieldofgreens.com.
Promo code Viva, 20% off.
And let me get this out of here and then see what else is going on.
I don't know what that is.
Looking over at our chat over in vivabarneslaw.locals.com, SB Farmer says he is an attorney.
He still has a bias of the system.
Not sure who that is in respect of.
We got more here.
I'm just going to go here and see what's going on in our wonderful, above average, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
SB Farmer says, I like warriors of conscience.
You know what the truth is?
Everybody likes warriors of conscience.
Even radical lefty activists love warriors of conscience.
It just depends on whether or not their conscience is clean or firebombing Teslas.
The activists love warriors of conscience as well when they are warriors of firebombing Tesla because they're solving government malfeasance.
B. Craig distracted me with this.
He says, Pete isn't running for office right now, Viva.
But is the argument there that you become more of a political pussy when you're running for office?
People are going to call it politics or good politics.
Well, if it's not working, it's not good politics.
But is the argument that when you're running for office, you compromise on your principles in order to get into office?
Okay. See how that works out.
And at that point, are you even winning?
Oh, Elon Musk tweeted this, so I think I had this one on before.
Yeah, another case of judicial corruption.
Okay, that was the first story.
There is something else that we're talking about here.
I have it in the backdrop.
Defense Secretary, I got that one.
Oh, yes!
New York Attorney General.
We'll get there in a second.
Let's bring up Pete Buttigieg.
Talking about...
Just talking about government and doge and cutting government waste.
I'm going to go watch this whole thing.
I've seen a bunch of clips from this interview with, I think it's Nick Schultz and a bunch of others.
First of all, far be it from me to call someone else dirty looking.
Pete Buttigieg looks dirty, like especially dirty in this.
It looks like he fell in the mud and it got more on the front of his face than on the side where I have the opposite problem.
But set that aside.
Who am I to judge?
I look like a long-haired, wild, crazy person.
What he says, It's so emblematic of career politicians and the government at large.
He says it, and it goes over his own head that he actually said it.
Listen to this talking about how to solve the homelessness crisis.
The folks who are saying government got this wrong, which might be true any number of times.
What they're really saying is the policies of this person in government got it wrong, but they don't have an answer.
Their answer is burn it all down.
Oh, I'm going to play this again.
Focus. Focus.
The folks who are saying, like, government got this wrong, which might be true any number of times.
What they're really saying is, like, the policies of this person in government got it wrong, but they don't have an answer.
Their answer is burn it all down, right?
If we haven't solved poverty, their answer is we're going to slash Medicaid, which is what the Republican budget moving through Congress right now will do, is slash Medicaid.
Medicaid may not be perfect.
In fact, I know for a fact, like, many issues come up in the way it's administered, the way people have access to it.
I also know for a fact that if your answer to that is just to cut out a bunch of poor people.
Or VA, like any veteran can tell you.
The horror stories of all the times things didn't go right in dealing with the VA.
But if you think the answer is to just cut it or privatize it, that's not an answer.
We can do better than that.
And I think my partner's job is to make clear what that looks like and how we would do it better.
The vocal fry is truly annoying.
We've thrown X amount of dollars at it and we still haven't solved the problem.
Their solution is to stop throwing dollars at it.
That's not a solution.
We need to throw more dollars at it.
We need to take more time to not do anything.
It's almost as though the more you spend on something...
Or the more money the government has to do something, the more corruption, the more inefficiency there is.
And Pete Buttigieg's solution, give us more money.
Give us more time.
We're not doing it with the time that we've had, and we're not doing it with the budget that we've had.
Give us more so that we can corruptly siphon off, so that we can have more problems that we acknowledge that we have.
The way he acknowledges, yeah, there's problems.
We're saying government got this wrong, which might be true any number of times.
What they're really saying is the policies of this person in government got it wrong, but they don't have an answer.
Their answer is burn it all down.
The straw manning is through the roof, but their answer is burn it all down.
My answer is give us more money.
The government is the only entity on earth that gives itself a raise every time it fails.
It's the only entity on earth that gives itself more money every time it screws up with what it already had.
And it's the only entity on earth that gives itself more power with each and every one of its catastrophic failings.
And that brings us to Big Tish McTish LaJames.
What does she have to say today?
I'm suing the Trump administration with a multi-state coalition for AGs for imposing worldwide illegal tariffs.
These tariffs are unlawful, and if not stopped, they will raise taxes on Americans and lead to more inflation, unemployment, and economic damage.
That is Big Tish McJames.
What did I say to that?
I said something funny, which I have to get in over here.
Hold on a second.
I had to double-check with Barnes.
Yeah, yeah.
Slip it in the private chat.
I'm going to bring it up in a second.
I want to just...
I had to double check my facts before I replied.
I did.
And I was right.
I was listening to Viva Barnes.
I was listening to Bourbon with Barnes as I was jogging.
And Barnes talked about this yesterday.
And we had talked about this previously.
I'm suing the Trump administration.
Yada, yada, yada.
It's within presidential authority, under the Constitution, and related statutes, ratified by the Supreme Court in J.W. Hampton Jr. and Company versus the United States.
You, however, belong in jail, you corrupt skank.
Now, for those of you who don't know, I'm looking up the word skank.
Not skink, that's a beautiful lizard.
Skank, a disreputable or sleazy person.
A woman who has many casual sexual encounters or relationships.
That's not the way I was going for it.
A dirty or unpleasant substance.
That's how I was going for it.
A steady-paced dance performance to reggae music characterized by rhythmically bending forward, raising the knees, and extending the hands, palms downward.
I have never heard such a definition of skank before I just looked this up in the dictionary.
Verb. To swindle or deceive.
They made a tidy sum, skanking the tourists.
What's-her-face is a skank by every definition, except I don't know about the...
I don't know about the...
I don't know about the reggae one, but in cryptos, is it the supply chain dive solar panel?
Oh, yeah.
This is the most fun tariff I've seen yet.
Oh, 35. I heard about that.
It's funny.
I saw it briefly in the chat.
$3,500.
3,500%.
This is from...
Supply chain dive.
Get this out of here.
Commerce finalizes tariff rates on solar imports from Southeast Asia.
The 3,403.96% rate set on four exporters in Cambodia is, quote, among the highest rates I've ever seen, said American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee attorney Tim Brightbill.
My goodness, these people have the names that fit what they're doing.
Before I get into it, I'm going to predict why.
It's so high on Cambodia.
And it's because China is using Cambodia to circumvent tariffs imposed on China.
Am I right in cryptos or no?
Ding, ding, ding.
You win the prize.
The U.S. Commerce Department on Monday announced its final determinations in an anti-dumping and countervailing duty.
Yeah, duty.
Investigation into solar cell imports from these four Southeast Asian countries setting individual trials 3,400%.
Story of strong results.
Yada, yada, yada.
Their rate for Cambodia solar exports is among the highest ever seen.
Okay, fine.
Let me just get to the punchline.
The Trump administration is focused on the use of tariffs not only against China but other countries and is focused on the support for domestic manufacturing in a variety of industries.
Okay, fine.
Get to the next China.
China! Hey, are we done?
Is it on the side?
We'll have to go read the article now.
This may not be the best article.
It's just the one that had the latest info at the 3,409.9.
They dropped it.
It was at 3,500 even.
But now the question is, who did I have on that we were talking about how China circumvents the tariffs on Chinese imports of solar panels, and then they use the four Asian countries, Cambodia, Vietnam, I'll forget the other two,
to circumvent it, and how all of the solar panel industry out of those four Asian nations are basically China-controlled, China-owned, and therefore they're effectively circumventing any tariffs.
And limitations on solar coming from China.
So it's a known thing.
And that's it.
Oh, sorry.
Hold on.
Getting back to this.
Yes. So Barnes talked about it during his bourbon with Barnes.
There was the 1927 decision, which basically was the Supreme Court.
It's the prevailing precedent.
Hold on, now I forgot what it was.
Gosh darn it.
Delete. What was the 1927 SCOTUS precedent on tariffs?
There we go.
They throw the word illegal around, and by the way, may she go to jail because she is a criminal, Big Tishla James.
The details of J.W. Hampton Jr. and Company versus the United States.
The case arose when J.W. Hampton Jr. and Company, an importer, challenged a tariff imposed by the Coolidge administration under the Tariff Act of 1922.
That would be the regulation.
The act allowed the president to adjust tariff rates after an investigation by the U.S. Tariff Commission based on differences in production costs rates between the U.S. and foreign countries.
Hampton argued that this delegation of authority to the president violated the Constitution by giving the executive branch legislative power.
Supreme Court ruling.
Unanimous decision written by Chief Justice William Howard Taft.
The court upheld the constitutionality of the Tariff Act.
The court ruled that Congress could delegate authority to the president to adjust tariffs as long as it...
The precedent has been critical in cases involving executive action on tariffs and other regulatory matters as it permits flexibility in trade policy while maintaining congressional oversight.
So I guess the only question is going to be whether or not there was the requisite congressional delegation in terms of what Trump is doing today as relates to the imposition of tariffs on countries that have been exploiting America for a long time.
That and the fact that I think he's basically paused all tariffs except on China and now maybe the four Asian countries that are basically Chinese satellites for the purposes of solar panels.
Have we done everything that we're going to do before we head over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com afterparty?
Liz Churchill, I got that.
Oh, we'll end on this, people.
First of all, what day is it today in Cryptos?
It's Monday.
It's Wednesday.
No, it's Thursday.
Sorry. What month is it?
It's April, and the season is not yet summer.
People, try living in Florida for three years.
You don't know what day it is when you work from home.
You don't know what month it is because every month, the weather's the same.
The only way I know that it's the dry season is that the local ponds are now like four feet lower.
The water is so low that some of the ponds, the connecting section is now exposed.
So the fish have gotten stuck in their respective ponds.
So it's Thursday, which means that America's Untold Stories is not on.
Hunley is not on.
Yeah, I've got one.
Cool Frog.
I'm actually going to be on their show probably tomorrow.
Kind of the same guy.
A little bit more laid back, a little bit of a stoner.
It talks about the same topics.
How does anyone get laid back when they smoke marijuana as opposed to having a million thoughts a minute and time never ending?
I don't understand it.
Everybody, thank you for being here.
But before we go, before we go, so there's going to be a good raid.
Before we go, everybody, go get Louis the Lobster Returns to the Sea, a book written by...
David Frye.
Put together by my wife, Marianne, and she did amazing work.
And it is illustrated by Abigail Martin, a member of our Locals community, who had the amazing illustrations in the book.
Link here.
If you get the book, take a picture, tag me on social media, although I don't have notifications turned on, and I will see it and I will retweet it.
Maybe I'll have someone turned on.
Maung.
Maungozzi says, Viva with practice.
No! No comment.
Not talking about that.
What else are we going to...
Oh, yeah.
So I want to end on this.
I don't know how this works.
We got the SEIU Healthcare.
This healthcare should be for you when you need it, not just when you can afford it.
The Jagmeet Singh fought hard for free dental care, yada, yada, yada.
The SEIU Healthcare endorses Jagmeet Singh.
This tweet was from two hours ago.
The SEIU endorses Mark Carney.
How the hell does anybody endorse two rival candidates at the time of their running for prime minister?
I don't know.
But I want to go see who funds, where they get their funding from, SEIU Healthcare, because I guarantee you they are corrupt to the core.
It's a union.
It's a healthcare union.
So people pushing the toxic jab and indebted to the government, beholden to the government, and therefore they should be disregarded.
Bloody nuts!
It says hyphen.
Wait, hold on one second.
Where'd that go?
Oi! Bloody notes.
Sativa versus Indisa, Viva.
Indica. You know that Indica?
That's the first letters of indication that Viva's gone crazy.
There's no difference.
It all messes with brain chemistry, people.
There's a lot of difference.
We could have a long conversation about that.
I'll get Bill Brown back on.
Second time watching the show, I am a fan now, says KCJ Gates.
Booyah! Make sure that you're subscribed also before you go, because some of you are either from the raid or from the landing page.
So make sure that you go down there, you hit the subscribe button or whatever it is, and turn on notifications.
Download the app, people.
And I almost forgot, actually, before we do this, we're going to do our second sponsor of the day.
Well, we've still got everybody here.
1775 Coffee.
Encryptus, you said you were going to remind me, and I forgot now.
Encryptus People is the equivalent of Jamie, Joe Rogan's Jamie.
He's an amazing guy.
AgentGuru underscore IO on Twitter.
Helps me out with everything.
Fact-checking, runs things through AI models so that I can be smarter than I actually am.
But he forgot to remind me to do our second sponsor, 1775 Coffee.
Do I have my...
Oh, no, I got my mug here.
I got my mug, but I don't have that bag of coffee because I think we were almost on the verge of it being out.
People, have you ever had a cup of coffee that makes you feel younger?
1775's Rejuvenate Roast is a dark roast infused with C-A-A-K-G, the same compound studied to reverse biological age by up to eight years.
It's like giving your cells a tune-up without needing a cold plunge, a biohacker's lab, or buying mystery powder off a late-night infomercial.
My goodness, you know how many things I bought off late-night infomercials with our first kid?
I was up.
Oh, my God.
I'll tell you that in a second.
Coffee hits hard, tastes great, and helps you recover.
Gives you clarity, long-term strength, all without drinking grass or chewing mushroom or bark.
No synthetic junk, no mystery blends, just one proven ingredient added to a small batch, single origin coffee, roasted fresh every week.
And every bag supports free speech, freedom of choice, and creators who actually call out the circus, not just dance in it.
You're not funding a mega brand corporation.
You are actually funding a company that is partnered with Rumble, that respects free speech and respects you as a customer.
So go to 1775coffee.com, grab, rejuvenate, use code VIVA for 15% off, feel stronger, younger, and sharper.
And know that you're fueling companies that support what we support.
1775coffee.com, promo code VIVA.
And what was I just about to say about...
I forget.
I forget what I was going to say.
But it doesn't matter.
Now you come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com if you are so inclined.
And if not, go raid the stoner that Encryptus has chosen.
Here is the link to our...
In our after party today, I'm talking about the interview with Gaditaou.
And not my dissatisfaction with the interview.
It was fantastic.
That whatever skepticism and cynicism I had before...
It not only persists, but I think it's actually, I think I've actually feel more justified in it than I did before.
TT Fulltimer over in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com says, Viva Fry, look at Mike Benz on YouTube today.
He says he now understands Pete for sec def.
I'm going to pull that up and we're going to look at that in the after party.
Tomorrow is Friday.
I'm interviewing Myron Gaines from Fresh and Fit.
And it's going to be fun because I know Myron for all the shit that he takes on the internet.
There's going to be no question that I can ask him that's going to be over the top.
And in as much as we disagree with each other, I think we know that we like each other.
So it's going to be a very, very good interview, pre-recorded, and I'll publish it afterwards.
Go check out my Gaddy Taub interview.
I'm going to talk about that now.
And if we can find that Mike Benz clip, we're going to do that as well.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
$10 a month if you get the whole year at one shot.
I think it's $100.
You get exclusive stuff, and there's a ton of stuff that's just for members if you want to come over and watch it.
So that is it.
And we shall end on crumble.
Oh yes, and you can find all of this on Podbean, podcast format, and I put clips on Commitube.
That is it.
We're out.
Peace, peeps.
▲
Export Selection