All Episodes
Previous Next
April 23, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:09:52
Cuomo for Prosecution! Fox News Goes Woke? And Whatever Else the News Brings! Viva Frei Live!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Has he seen this report?
His department wrote it.
And what they are anticipating on the current trajectory is a total meltdown, a societal breakdown in Canada if we stay on the current track.
Why this isn't blazing the front pages of every news outlet in the country right now is beyond me.
It's just unbelievable.
Unbelievable. It blows my mind.
What they're actually saying is that...
I'm just going to read some of these.
More people...
This is for the future.
It's not enough for Mr. Carney to say, oh, well, the last 10 years is in the past.
Forget about it.
Stop bothering me about the past, he will say.
This is the predicted future his department foresees for Canada.
More people may struggle to afford rent, bills, or groceries.
The resulting stress could worsen mental health challenges.
This would increase demand on social services.
In 2040, upward social mobility is almost unheard of in Canada.
Hardly anyone believes they can build a better life for themselves or their children through their own efforts.
Many worry about sliding down the social order.
In 2040, owning a home is not a realistic goal for many.
The fact that Pierre doesn't actually get to the most nauseating, revolting part of this report, which I'm going to explain in a second.
Also highlight that when they talk about increasing the stress on the system and mental anxiety and all of those issues, it's also going to increase people who are going to be offered the wonderful mercy killings that the Canadian government is going to be doling out like...
Halloween candy because it's going to alleviate the financial burden on the system.
And especially after they expand medical assistance in dying to,
It's almost like it's all part of the plan.
I'm going to go hard on this for a little bit.
Why isn't this blazing in the headlines?
We'll get to that in a second.
Let me finish up with Pierre here.
Inequality between those who rent and those who own has become a key driver of social, economic, and political conflict.
In 2040, pursuing a post-secondary education is no longer considered a reliable path to social mobility.
Fewer young people choose post-secondary education and those who do see it less as a path to a successful career than a way to reinforce their membership in the, quote, elite.
That's not my words.
That's the government's words.
The report paints a terrifying picture of a spiral of economic depression and cost inflation.
Brain drain.
Financial drain.
People who can leave.
Leaving. Because nobody wants to be on that ship when it sinks.
People may lose faith in the Canadian project, it says.
It forecasts that this may trigger people to, quote, emigrate to jurisdictions where they perceive upward social mobility or other higher standards of living are easier to obtain.
If young workers leave, it may become harder to pay for our social programs for the older people in the country.
You know what they're going to do then?
They're going to literally kill the older people of the country.
Offer them medical assistance in dying.
Yeah, we can't help you, old folks.
Very sorry.
We're kind of broke, kind of out of money, and so it might be time for you to just check out.
It'll save us some money, plus we get to harvest your organs afterwards.
Now, for those of you who don't know what Pierre is talking about, I had to...
Verify that this, in fact, was not a joke, was not misinformation, disinformation.
Let me just go to the government website.
Government of Canada put out this report.
It's at horizons.service.canada.ca.
Policy Horizons Canada.
Future Lives, Social Mobility in Question.
This is from, at least it's published on January 7th, 2025.
The section that Pierre didn't mention in that...
This is what's in the report,
and I'm reading it from the report.
Section 3.4, people might find alternative ways to meet their basic needs.
Bullet one, housing, food, childcare, and healthcare cooperatives may become more common.
This could ease burdens on social services, but also challenge market-based businesses.
Bullet two, forms of person-to-person exchange of goods and services could become even more popular, reducing tax revenues and consumer safety.
I really don't think they care about consumer safety when you're bartering goods.
They just care about what they can tax and what they can't tax to continue to fund that massive bloated government machine, but that's not the best of it.
This is absolutely the best of it.
God forbid!
People should no longer be reliant on the government, but go back to bullet three.
People may start to hunt, fish, forage on public lands and waterways without reference to regulate.
We're going to come back to the without reference to regulations, but I'm going to share this with you.
What does this mean?
In the dystopian hellscape that is being predicted by the Canadian government itself, Canadians, or maybe not Canadians, might be reduced to foraging for subsistence.
Literally. You might have to go out there and eat the bugs, eat the squirrels, go out and get fish out of Beaver Lake if you're up in Canada.
Goldfish, you know, they're kind of disgusting.
Mash them up into balls.
You got mutts, not malts balls, you got gefilte fish.
Canadians might, as a result of the lack of upward mobility, the economic drain, the brain drain, the lack of government financing where government's not going to have the resources to provide the infrastructure of whatever it's supposed to give you, Canadians might be reduced.
To literally foraging public waterways, public parks for food.
Now, just so nobody does this, I happen to know this because my mother, neurotic, and never fails to send me something that might traumatize anybody.
Man dies from extremely rare disease after eating squirrel brains.
It's from October 2018.
The short story is a man in New York developed an extremely rare and fatal brain disorder after he ate squirrel brains, according to a news report.
2015, a 61-year-old man was brought to a hospital in Rochester, New York, after experiencing a decline in his thinking abilities and losing touch with reality.
The man also lost his ability to walk on his own.
An MRI of the man's head revealed a striking finding.
The brain scan looked similar to those seen in people with...
Yeah, mad cow disease.
Makes you go crazy.
All that to make light of this.
This is actually what the liberal Canadian government is predicting by way of Canada's future.
Why isn't it blazing on the airwaves, the headlines, Pierre?
Maybe because the Canadian media...
Might be a little bit beholden to that liberal government that promised to double their funding.
Why isn't it blazing on the headlines?
Maybe. I haven't seen Pierre's latest interview, which was just released today, and I've been told by a member of our community it's a good interview.
Go watch it.
But maybe it's not blazing on the headlines because, I don't know, a prime minister candidate is not on every podcast on earth.
Putting on blast the fact that in Canada, they are forecasting that in the not-so-distant liberal dystopian future, Canadians might be reduced to forging for existence.
Maybe it's not in the headlines because you haven't put it there.
Maybe you should get out there and put it in the headlines.
Podcasts, interviews, put it on blaze.
Otherwise, we'll do the work for you, Pierre.
But looking at the markets today of the elections and the predictions, it's not determinants, but it's looking bad.
Worse and getting worse.
And at this point, I've done everything I can to help.
Earlier today, I put out a poll.
Should Pierre Poiliev go on Gadsad to do an interview with Gadsad?
What's the latest results on that poll?
I mean, it's virtually unanimous that Pierre Poiliev should go do a podcast, an interview with Gadsad.
I appreciate.
Maybe I'm a little bit too, I call it eccentric.
Maybe I've cussed a little too many times on Twitter for Pierre to be able to come on a podcast with me.
I mean, he who dares nothing need hope for nothing.
What is it?
Fortune favors the bold.
Whatever. He would have a good excuse not to come on with me.
There is no good excuse not to go on with Gad Saad.
He's literally a scholar.
I put out the poll earlier today.
Would you like to see Pierre do an interview with Gad Saad?
What are we at?
3,000 votes?
Not particularly great, but 87%.
Who would say no to that?
So Pierre has done a few interviews now.
He's done another one, which I have to go listen to.
But why isn't this news blazing in the headlines?
Because it hasn't gotten to the people with the biggest bullhorns yet.
Maybe it'll get there after this.
And not that I'm one of them, but maybe I can get it to someone with a bigger bullhorn.
Like Tim Pool might be interested in knowing that the government of Canada is forecasting a future in which Canadians are forging public lands, the king's land, the king's forest, looking for food.
So get out there and make it happen.
But by the way, what they probably mean by this, without reference to regulations, I mean, that's a very interesting caveat.
Without interest, without reference to regulations.
They're not even describing the future, people.
They're describing the present.
Because what happens when you open your borders to foreigners who don't necessarily assimilate, who don't necessarily acclimatize to Canadian regulation, who don't necessarily know that you can't just go into rivers and fish?
You can't just go into rivers and fish with nets.
We have a foraging problem in the present in Canada.
And it results from the fact that 97 plus percent of Canada's population growth has come from immigration.
Poorly vetted open border immigration.
These videos went viral last year, give or take.
And I remember these things.
This is from Pled the Reporter back in the day.
I do my best to make sure not to make a mistake and not to pull up a video that doesn't actually show what it purports to show.
This was going on last year when videos of new arrivals to Canada were out there poaching animals, fishing illegally, with no regard for Canadian regulations as relates to fishing in particular.
Here's one.
Here's one.
We'll do a couple.
But I'm not sure.
Let's see if there's any commentary on this one.
Remember, people, in the future, Canadians might be resorting to foraging.
For now, it's only the foreigners that have been graciously admitted into Canadian society.
97 plus percent of population growth in Canada comes from immigration.
500,000 a year under the Liberal government.
To be reduced to 250,000 under a future Conservative government, which is looking less and less likely.
Do you understand, by the way, how bad it is?
Because what I believe is happening here is that these are spawning salmon.
Yeah, that's definitely a spawning salmon.
The spawning salmon, the life cycle of the spawning salmon is magnificent.
They hook their mouths, the male's mouths get hooked so they can grab the tail of the female and shake them about.
So that's one.
You mean the spawning salmon that the left is going crazy about having to protect?
Say that again?
You mean the spawning salmon that the left is going crazy about wanting to protect?
The natives in Canada are sometimes allowed net fishing because they're grandfathered into cultural practices, historical practices as it relates to salmon and living off the land.
But yeah, there's regulation that exists to protect the spawning salmon because it's the most vulnerable.
When it spawns, it's at its most vulnerable.
But it's not just one video.
Look at this one.
This is last year.
You guys know that's very illegal, eh?
Netting fish.
You guys know this is very illegal, what you guys are doing?
What's your guys' names?
Yeah, they're going to tell you their names.
You're netting fish, yeah.
You're netting fish, which is extremely illegal.
Maybe they think, as a result of them being from India, that's where they're from.
They fit under the Indian exceptions.
They're videotaping you guys for a while.
What's your guys' names?
They're not going to give you their names.
Where was this one?
This is from Sean Rickard, Bowmanville Creek in Ontario, Canada, yesterday just down the highway from me, and this is from September 2024.
I don't know where the one with Pleb, I think it was, I forgot to look where the one from Pleb was from.
This is from Ontario, Canada, 2024.
As we're getting reports that in the future, Canadians might have to.
For now, it's only the newly arrived immigrants after we've opened our border who are, without reference to regulations, pillaging Mother Nature.
Why isn't it all over the news?
It's a good question.
Toronto Sun is reporting on it.
Joe Warmington, by the way, is one of the few legacy media reporters who's seen the light.
I've watched his evolution in real time.
It's fantastic.
Why aren't anybody else reporting on this?
Did they report on it at the time?
Nope. Are they reporting on it now?
Nope. Why?
Well, because Carney's going to double their salaries.
Why? Because they need Carney to get into power in order to keep their jobs.
That's how the Liberal government is ensuring that they win this election.
Says Warmington, Pierre Poiliev addresses dystopia predicted for Canada in government report.
The Conservative leader said Canada must make a change if it wants to avoid a dark future of a hellscape where people will have nothing.
Sorry, it's kind of the present, actually.
These Hunger Games will not be fiction or a movie.
This will be the kind of real starvation and quest for survival, a dystopia that Prime Minister Mark Carney's own Privy Council office warns could be possible just 15 years from now as the country slides into the abyss.
Canadians will not be able to say they were not warned about a possible economic apocalypse.
That may have them hunting for rabbits and squirrels in parks to feed their families.
Conservative leader Pierre Poiliev has warned them.
It might.
If the goal were to put it on blast, Pierre, you go on Gadsad, you put it on blast.
You go on Gadsad to do it.
Gadsad's quite good friends with Joe Rogan, been on his show 11 times.
It probably gets to Joe Rogan's ear, and it probably gets on national blast.
But take your time.
Take your time.
The election's Monday.
Conservative leader Pierre Poliev has warned them.
It's something from the post-apocalyptic TV show like The Fallout or The Last of Us, Poliev said Tuesday, while delivering his costed election platform in Woodbridge.
But this is the forecast from Prime Minister Carney's own government department, the Privy Council Office.
Now Mr. Carney plans to continue the very policies that got us into this mess in the first place.
It's terrifying stuff.
Why isn't it in the headlines?
Why isn't Pierre Poiliev doing a podcast every day and not just ones with softball questions?
God bless him.
I don't know.
I'm doing my best, people.
Let me just see.
There was another thing about this.
My brother was tweeting this out.
I mean, I thought it was a joke.
My brother tweeted this, Lion Advocacy, and I had to fact check my own brother just to make sure.
My brother, Lion Advocacy, writes, as Carney puts, Vote wisely, folks.
Yep. But if you're dependent on the government already, cripe.
They got you by the balls.
They got you by the financial balls.
Let me just put that tweet up there for everybody to go check out.
It's getting very, very...
I'm not saying I'm getting scared from the States because I'm still Canadian.
I'm getting scared from the States because I've still got family in Canada.
I'm getting scared from the States because of the amount of people who are getting mad at me instead of getting mad at Pierre for potentially not running the best campaign and instead of getting mad at Canadians for seemingly looking like they're going to turn to the Liberals for a fourth time in a decade.
And by the way, the fact that they might go for the Liberals for a fourth time...
Since 2015 means that the Conservatives will have lost a fourth time since 2015.
You want to try and blame that on me and my constructive criticism of Pierre Poilier?
Your criticism is misguided.
Although I understand the anger.
Look at this.
Go watch the movie Don't Look Now with Donald Sutherland.
And this is the murderous troll at the end of the movie.
This is Christopher Freeland.
This is the same person who was the Minister of Finance under the Trudeau regime.
This is the same person who was instrumental in siphoning billions of Canadian taxpayer dollars off to her ancestral homeland or that of her parents, Ukraine, to fight that useless, endless proxy war that has cost more Ukrainians their lives than anybody knows.
But it's not their children.
It's not their children.
And the blood of the war machine needs to be provided with the...
Youth of Ukraine.
A generation of Ukrainians sent to the slaughter to fight Khrushchev Freeland and the globalists' proxy war against Russia.
Let's hear what she has to say in her campaign video.
We all know that a strong Canada starts with a strong middle class.
And that's why a liberal government led by Mark Carney will put more money back into the pockets of hard-working Canadians.
I know that I talk with my hands.
What the hell is she trying to?
Is she trying to fly?
And she's wearing red gloves.
Red for the liberals.
Maybe she's wearing red gloves because she's got literal blood on her hands.
We'll cut taxes on the middle class and we'll cut taxes on first-time homebuyers.
Because we know that life can be tough.
And we know that it's important to help middle-class players.
So please, vote for me.
Christia Ford here in University Rosedale on April 28th.
God, turn that off.
Get your audio level straight, Christia.
Yeah, life can be tough under liberals.
Life can get tougher under liberals.
They're going to fight for the middle class right now after literally stealing billions of their hard-earned taxpayer dollars and siphoning them off to a corrupt foreign government to fund their foreign proxy wars.
It's amazing.
And you want to know, I mean, I say if you vote for the liberals, you're either...
An idiot, corrupt, or unfortunately reliant on the government for your existence.
It really seems that the consensus is going to be just dumb.
I had to double check that this wasn't a parody account.
The account came from one O'Leary.
Talk to O'Leary.
And it says, Pierre Poiliev claims he's cutting your income tax by 15%.
In reality, he's lowering it from 15% to 12.75%.
He'll say anything to get your vote.
Details be damned.
I swear to you, I had to go through the feed to make sure that it wasn't parody because I can't tell anymore.
Can't tell if satire...
If he's lowering your taxes from 15% to 12.75%, he's lowering your tax by 2.25%.
What's 2.25% of...
15. Let me rephrase.
What is 2.25 divided by 50?
The bottom line is it's 2.25%, 15% of your income tax.
He is lowering your income tax by 15% by bringing it from 15% to 12.75%.
But these are the idiots who think that Pierre is lying and that he's actually not proposing to cut your taxes while simultaneously accusing him of cutting your taxes.
Because he's giving his gifts.
The government's not going to have the money it needs to continue going.
And they can't do basic math, but they can go certainly predict, vote on the future of Canada and drive it into a hellscape where you're going to be forced to forge in order to subsist.
Didn't Freeland just lie?
Or not lie.
She stole Pierre's platform of...
Removing the tax for first-time homebuyers.
That was his platform before they ever mentioned it.
They've been stealing from Pierre left, right, and center.
Why he hasn't been putting that aspect on blast?
I mean, the axe of the tax was his until they made it theirs.
The no tax for the no GST on homeowners, I believe, was his until they made it theirs.
It's great.
There's so many analogies or comparisons that can be drawn between Trump versus Kamala and...
Pierre versus Carney in terms of the anointment of Carney as Prime Minister and the anointment of Kamala as the candidate.
In terms of Kamala stealing every good idea from Trump, in terms of Carney stealing every good idea from Pierre.
You know what the only non-comparable is in all of this?
Pierre is quite clearly not a Trump.
And not for lack of comparison.
He's not a Trump because if he were, he would be putting their idea theft on blast.
He would be calling Mark Carney the globalist whore that he is.
But he's not.
But they accuse him of being Trump nonetheless.
This was the most glorious one, by the way.
This is from the Liberals' website, the Liberal Twitter account.
It's from April 23rd.
Oh, it was from today.
I didn't realize that.
Pierre Poilievre is following Trump's playbook.
The Wall Street Journal reports he supported truckers who blockaded Ottawa in 2022 to protest COVID-19 lockdowns.
You know what the problem is?
He didn't support them enough.
And he hasn't supported them in a while.
He hasn't supported the vaccine injured in a while.
He hasn't come out and said anything about categoric on a bullhorn to be antagonistic to everyone who defies science, that there shall be no men in women's sports and boys in girls sports and men in women's spaces.
He hasn't said that in a while.
Certainly hasn't said it vocally.
He promised to slash taxes, shrink the government, end liberals' climate change policies, and end welcomeism in the Canadian military.
His election slogans, such as Canada First, echoes Trump's.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Did not we just hear Chrystia Freeland talk about lowering taxes?
Oh, but when he does it, it's Trumpish.
When they do it, it's a theft of his idea.
But he's the one who's pro-Trump.
Or taking...
What do we call it here?
Plays out of Trump's playbook.
You know what's amazing?
Because I've got a memory.
Remember when Carney signed that bullshit executive order piece of paper?
Eliminating the liberals' own carbon tax on the consumer portion of it?
Yeah. You know what?
People are arguing as to the lawful legitimacy of that piece of paper.
But one thing's for certain.
It looks like an executive order.
It's very Trump-ish in terms of, you know, sitting down, opposing his big signature to a paper that may or may not be legally binding.
Yeah. But it's Poilier who's taken a play from Trump.
Oh, what was the other one here?
Remember when Trump was serving fries?
You know what Carney did today?
Serve fries.
I mean, it's almost a joke.
It's almost a joke, and it's like, it's me and others on the social medias running a harder campaign for Pierre Poilier than Pierre himself.
I mean, you look at it, and it almost looks like it's a joke of a joke.
Like, oh, these have to be AI.
They didn't actually do this.
It's not just Carney.
Stealing Poilier's ideas and Carney mimicking Donald Trump.
Then Carney comes out and accuses Pierre of doing what he's doing.
True narcissism.
Is that all we got for Canada?
No, it isn't.
There was one other thing in here.
You wanted to talk about the market.
Hold on a second.
We'll get there in a second.
There was another one that I forgot to bring.
A Toronto woman goes off on family illegally fishing in Credit River in Mississauga.
You know, it's embarrassing that you're their mother, probably, and you're letting this type of behavior happen.
It's embarrassing.
It's embarrassing that you conduct yourself this way.
The salmon run happening, you're not supposed to be fishing.
There's signs everywhere.
There are signs everywhere.
The irony is that the salmon, A, I don't believe they taste good when they're running.
They don't eat when they're running.
And so what you're basically hoping, from what I understand, is to either foul snag them as they spawn.
Or, I don't know, you get some nasty-tasting fish.
Yeah, the markets, the markets.
I have to bring that up on a separate window here.
I don't trust the polls.
The markets are somewhat more reflective.
And they have taken a spike for whatever the reason today.
Now, I still think there's good opportunity there because I do not believe that the chances of a liberal majority are what the markets are saying they are.
But let's just go for posterity.
Let's go have a look at this.
Got to open this up here.
No. Cancel.
Hold on a second.
Let me bring this down.
Got to bring this up on a separate window here.
Here? There is the Kelsey.
I see the Kelsey here.
This is this one?
Is it this one?
Oh yeah, we got it right here.
So let's just go to Canada.
Who will be the next Prime Minister of Canada?
85% the next Prime Minister is going to be Carney of the Liberals.
I mean, First of all, even if it's a...
I don't believe it's 85-15.
But there's nobody on earth that is looking at this and saying this is not concerning if you actually want Pierre Poiliev to win.
Maybe if you want to...
What do they call them?
Accelerationists? Maybe if you want to bring about the separation of Alberta, you want this to happen?
Who will be the next Prime Minister?
Hold on.
Say a Liberal...
I want to see the Liberal Majority.
I got such fat fingers here.
Next, Government of Canada.
Let me see here.
Liberal Majority.
Look at this.
There's opportunities to be had here, people.
I think.
Not investment advice.
There's nobody who can look at this and not be absolutely terrified for the future of Canada.
You can choose not to believe them.
And that's fine.
Some might call that what they call cope.
You can choose not to believe them.
But you can't look at those things and not be wildly concerned for the future of Canada.
And why might it be happening?
Well, the MVP seemingly are going to go vote Liberal.
So that'll add to the seats that the Liberals get.
The Bloc Québécois?
Might not get as many seats as they are anticipating.
But no one, and I mean no one, is going to say Pierre is running the strongest campaign that he could have.
And every flipping excuse out there that I hear, he can't do that, it'll be too Trumpy.
Bull crap.
Fortune favors the bold.
And if you want to play defensive chess, you will always lose.
You want to play defensive squash, you will always lose.
You want to play defensive hockey, you will always lose because you're not taking the shots.
Serenity now.
Good afternoon, everybody.
Haitians' illegals will gladly be welcomed in Canada, says Chienvisage.
Not to be politically incorrect, Haitian immigrants are welcomed in Quebec because they speak French.
Quebec, just as a matter of policy, prefers immigrants that speak French.
So you get Moroccans.
You get people from the Middle East who speak French.
This is just a matter of fact.
There's no judgment here.
You get people from the Middle East who speak French and Haitians who speak French.
So, I mean, that might have intended to be a joke, but it's actually based in fact.
Forced Name Change says, I already fish sans license and I'm not First Nations.
If it gets bad enough here, I will take up poaching as well.
I buy my weed and my cigarettes on the black market.
I also have a garden and chicken.
I'm going to remove that and just, I don't know who that person is.
I can tell you one thing.
You don't want to get caught fishing without a license because if you're a citizen, the government will literally take your shit.
I mean, they will take not just your rod, not just your tackle.
They'll take your boat if you have one, and they'll take your car.
Fishing without a license is a very serious thing.
And fishing for salmon without a specific salmon license, because you get your freshwater license that's different than a salmon license.
They will take your stuff.
Canadian geese to go the way of the passenger pigeon.
Okay, stop it.
And then we got Boopsie.
Can you give us all a link to Pierre P so we can flood him with comments, suggestions to go on Rogan?
Yeah, here, let me give you the link to the poll that I put out earlier today.
I said, tag Pierre.
Tag Gad said.
It would be amazing.
Gad is an amazing person.
He's more diplomatic than me, but I think, you know, I say anybody who's too scared to come on a podcast with me is a sissy.
So that's that.
Oh, lordy, lordy, lordy.
What else is going on, people?
Let me double-check something here.
Let me just get this up here, and let me bring this up.
It's not going to be only Canada today.
We're going to get to the States.
As you transition, there's a good comment here in Rumble.
And she says, if Viva makes you feel better, the polls said Hillary Rodham Clinton is beating Trump by 95%.
Well, I know.
I posted that link.
And they also said Kamala Harris was leading Trump.
At some point, they said it.
I appreciate that.
And first of all, the polls are different than the markets.
So I don't trust the polls, period.
But we're not dealing with the same person.
And we're not dealing with the same politician.
And we're not dealing with the same style.
You know, I did a podcast with, was it Megan Murphy?
I said, Canadians, maybe I'm wrong.
And maybe I'm wrong.
Canadians want populism.
Everybody wants populism.
The people want populism.
And they don't have, in Pierre, a vocal, unapologetic populist candidate.
What they have, and the shit that I'm taking on the internet, is Viva.
He's got to go left of center in order to get the full crap.
Bullcrap. And I think all that's happening is what you're going to notice is a lot of people might just get too discouraged to vote.
I would encourage everyone to get out there and vote.
I will not tell you who to vote for.
I will just tell you that if you vote for the Liberals, you're an idiot, you're corrupt, or you are financially hogtied so that you have to vote for those corrupt scums of the earth who have literally destroyed Canada, then literally accused their adversaries of being the ones who destroyed Canada.
That's it.
All right.
Now, what else do we get to?
We didn't talk about it yesterday because we got caught up with a bunch of other stuff yesterday, and it was a great show yesterday.
We briefly talked about it on Sunday with Barnes, Viva Barnes, Law for the People Sunday night, law extravaganza, Harvard suing Trump to block him from slashing billions in research funding.
You want to compare Hillary to Trump and you want Kamala to Trump?
Then you have to compare...
Poiliev to Trump in order to make sure that those analogies work.
They didn't fight their political campaigns the same way, which is why I'm not so optimistic that the outcomes are going to be the same.
Trump is thus far proving to be a wildly transformational president.
Remember, we talked about this.
You can be transitional or transformational.
This is Barnes's big brain insight.
And the question was, Is a second Trump presidency going to prove to be transformational or purely transitional?
And had he been elected in 2020, had they not chicaned their way into a victory in 2020, he might have just been a transitional president in 2020.
Right now, thus far, he's proving to be absolutely transformational.
The corruption that has been exposed worldwide is amazing.
The corruption and waste within the American government that has been proven is amazing.
Venerable institutions like Harvard.
The summary keynotes, in case you don't have time to read a five-minute article, Harvard says Trump's $2.3 billion funding freeze is illegal.
The White House says it is seeking to combat anti-Semitism on college campuses.
Funds for some other top universities also paused over responses to pro-Palestinian protests.
By the way, on the subject, just did the interview with Gadi Taub today.
And in cryptos, you think it was good?
I... Again, I love all the interviews.
We've done a lot of good ones.
This is absolutely one of the best, one of the most insightful on the Middle East.
And I know there's going to be a lot of haters about it.
Stop it, dude.
It'll be very interesting and eye-opening, even if you disagree.
The news.
Harvard University sued on Monday to block U.S. President Donald Trump from freezing billions of dollars in federal funding after the elite research institution rejected a list of White House demands that it said would undermine its independence.
You know what that means, by the way?
It's independence has already been undermined.
It's just a question of to whose interests?
It's an amazing thing.
You know, the states and these institutions think that they're entitled to federal funding, but that they don't have to abide by any, I don't know, guidelines of behavior.
Maine just gets federal funding.
Sanctuary cities just get federal funding, even if they operate in open defiance of federal law.
Lawsuit filed in federal court in Boston said Trump has launched a broad attack.
On funding for cutting-edge research at major universities.
Did we go over the...
While I'm talking about this, can we get the CEOs and the executives of Harvard and what they make?
I think it's like...
We went over, I think, on Monday?
Millions. The case involves the government's efforts to use withholding a federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decision-making at Harvard, the lawsuit says.
Harvard alleges the Trump administration's actions were arbitrary and unlawful.
It's what they always say.
And violated the university's First Amendment rights to free speech.
Like that time, the university couldn't categorically assert that wishing genocide on any students, I don't care that they happen to be Jewish in this circumstance, wishing genocide was not violative of campus policy.
Because unless you act on the wish of genocide, it's free speech.
White House spokesperson Harrison Fields, he's the one I interviewed when I went to D.C., said in a statement that the gravy train of federal assistance to institutions like Harvard was coming to an end.
Taxpayer funds are a privilege and Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege.
My concern, having seen the way the courts are going, used to be like, you know, being a reporter and getting access to the scrum was a privilege.
Then it becomes a right.
It's an amazing thing.
And it highlights sort of the welfare state, the problem of the welfare state.
What at first is you're thankful for, the privilege of, then becomes an expectation, and then it becomes a demand.
And then if they take it away, it becomes the source of a grievance.
Since his January inauguration, Trump has cracked down on U.S. universities saying they mishandled last year's pro-Palestinian protests and allowed anti-Semitism to fester on campuses.
But protesters, including some Jewish groups, say their criticism of Israel's military action in Gaza is wrongly conflated with anti-Semitism.
I don't think anybody would disagree that legitimate criticism, if it is called anti-Semitism, is wrongly conflated with anti-Semitism.
What we witnessed during those protests, you want to talk about actual occupations.
And I know that people call the Ottawa protest an occupation, was depriving students of their ability to get the education that they paid for.
It was actual occupations that resulted in actual vandalism, actual destruction of property, and actual harassment of students.
We've seen the videos.
Now, did they...
What's the word I'm looking for?
Did they define those protests?
No. Might they have not been representative of the broader peaceful nature?
Possibly. Did it happen?
Yes, it did.
There's ample video evidence of it.
You know what there's not ample video evidence of from the Ottawa protest?
Harassment of anybody.
Period. Harvard's the first university.
The Trump administration began a review of $9 billion in federal funding for Harvard in March and subsequently gave the university a sweeping list of demands, including a mask ban.
And an end to all diversity, equity, and inclusion.
I'm curious.
It's a very interesting thing.
Who disagrees with this?
And I'm not sure if it means a ban on masks like COVID masks or face masks so that people can protest, harass, and vandalize with impunity.
And an end to DEI.
Yeah, it's about time there.
Since then, Trump administration has frozen $2.3 billion in funding, threatened to strip the university of its tax-exempt status, and take away its ability to enroll foreign students.
It has also demanded information on the university's foreign ties funding.
We'll skip it from there.
You know what the interesting thing is, by the way?
Go for it.
I have those values you look for, which we have base salaries plus other compensation.
Lawrence Bacow, the president, base salary, $1.3 million.
Other compensation, $423,000.
Alan Garber, provost, base salary, $884,000.
Other compensation, $238,000.
Dean George Daly, $931,000.
Brian Lee, vice president, $866,000.
Another dean, $837,000.
We get the idea.
Millions. They have a tax-exempt status, and they're making millions.
The interesting thing is, in my interview with Gadi Taub today, where we were talking about, I believe he mentioned in Cryptos, correct me if I'm wrong, that some of the terrorists had received American educations.
Yeah, I mean, it's a wild thing when these tax-exempt institutions, where people are getting rich like the fattest of Wagyu cows, who are training...
And educating foreigners who go on to use that education potentially for nefarious purposes, not necessarily even for something as nefarious as terrorism, but I don't know, IP theft or information that they take to adverse nations like China.
No, no.
They don't want to abide by federal obligations, and yet they still think that they're entitled to taxpayer dollars to operate institutions that undermine the very democracy of the country in which they operate.
I am just concerned that it's not going to go the way of Trump, because as we've seen, Trump can't remove credentials for journalists without that being deemed to have been an acquired right.
In Quebec, we say droit acquis.
And it's like, it's the defining element of trying to do business in Quebec.
Droit acquis, acquired rights.
Once you've given someone a privilege, they have acquired rights and you can never take them away.
Unless, of course, you know it's the government during a time of crisis, then your God-given charter rights are mere privileges that the government can take away and that you have to then comply with various demands in order to get your God-given rights back.
Can't take away press credentials?
Can't take away clearance for corrupt, borderline criminal law firms?
Will he be able to deprive or deny federal funding to the venerable institutions of Harvard?
I will go out on a limb and say at least at the Initial level, it's going to come with a ruling that is going to be unfavorable to Trump.
Rien ne va plus.
That is the prediction.
And that's that.
What else do we want to move on to now?
Oh, hold on a second.
Let me bring up...
Share. King of Biltong is in the house and he says need to add more protein to your diet.
Add some healthy protein Biltong packed with B12 creatine, iron, zinc, a great addition to a healthy diet.
Go to BiltongUSA.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
And then forced name change says it's on private land and we're not catching anything but slew sharks.
Oh, Pike.
Pike are disgusting, man.
Babe, we might end up at one point in time.
In Florida, we're good.
In Florida, if we have to forage the land.
I got iguanas.
We got fish up the wazoo.
You got turtles.
There's a lot of squirrels, but the iguanas really are like...
Apparently they're the chicken of the trees.
I have yet to eat one, but we'll be able to forage here very well.
But imagine having to eat pike.
I mean, pike is disgusting, but you can cook it in a way that's nice.
We caught this morning a bowfin, and it was a big-ass bowfin.
Let me just show this one here.
I don't know that I'd want to eat.
You kill a good crock and you can eat for a month.
Oh yeah.
Check this out.
Here, the kid held it.
Look at that thing.
That was a big one.
Off of frozen shrimp because they had no minnows left at the gas station.
But I know we would have good eating here.
We've got both of them, but nobody wants to eat garfish.
Garfish are like the Floridian pike.
They're slimy, scaly, fishy.
Anyhow, that's it.
Forced name change.
Charter rights are not God-given rights.
It says in the opening paragraph that they can be taken away at the stroke of a pen.
True, but it also says...
Hold on, hold on.
Forced name change.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom.
I'll have to go to the text.
Text. Yeah, let's just go here.
Continue to publication.
Here we go.
Let's just look for the word God.
God is in the first paragraph, and it does say they can take away your rights at the stroke of a pen, but it does say, whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it, subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by laws as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
And when we lock you in your house during COVID, that's demonstrably justified.
When we force you to go to designated quarantine facilities, that's demonstrably justified.
When we force you to take a jab or lose your job, demonstrably justified.
When we come down and beat the ever-loving piss out of peaceful protesters, demonstrably justified.
But point well taken, forced name change.
All right.
Okay, okay, okay.
We're going to go back to some illegals.
Now, here.
Yeah, let's go.
This is a story that's going to actually make you very angry, both because of the nature of the story and because of the degree to which Fox News, this is why I hate using Fox News.
They're, I would say, arguably no better than the left.
They're mildly better than the left.
Fox News to legacy media, CNN, MSNBC, is kind of like Pierre Poilievre to the liberals.
A little bit better, but still problematic.
Bada bing, bada boom.
And yet I still use Fox News from time to time.
That's just to show you.
Tom Homan vows action as California is set to release illegal immigrants who killed two teens.
If you don't know the story to this, it's horrendous.
It's an illegal immigrant who was drunk high, got into a fiery car crash, and killed two young Americans.
It doesn't matter if they could have been foreigners.
Killed two young people.
Was sentenced to 10 years.
And apparently now is set to be released after having served barely two.
I don't want to play the video.
You watch their broken fathers sobbing as they talk about the incident, how they were notified that their children are dead, that they get the call and they say, are you this person's father?
And these, who themselves were immigrants, they were Eastern European, find out that their children are dead.
Killed by an illegal immigrant, which is not the crux of this, except to say that illegal immigrant, on drugs and alcohol, and they die in a horrendous manner, and the man gets sentenced to 10 years in jail and after two years is looking like he's going to walk.
Outrage is growing after the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation announced it will release an undocumented immigrant convicted of killing two American teenagers more than six years before his original sentence was set to end.
Anyone else get pissed off by two particular words right here?
Undocumented immigrant?
What the hell does that mean?
Like, first of all, why does the headline go illegal immigrant and then the body go undocumented immigrant?
And an undocumented immigrant is an illegal alien.
And why an immigrant?
The thing about immigrant...
It sort of, to some extent, presupposes some lawful migration.
This is an illegal alien.
Or, at the very least, an undocumented migrant in that they're just migrating wherever willy-nilly with no permission from the country.
That irritated me.
The story is just tragedy.
I will work with Homeland Security, Secretary Noem in this case, and I guarantee you if they don't honor the detainer, we'll have ICE agents outside that facility to take custody of this individual and deport him.
You know what the only problem was?
The guy's already been deported twice.
Oscar Eduardo Ortega Anguiano was driving drunk at high speed in 2021 when he crashed into a car carrying 19-year-olds Anya Varfo-Maliv and Nikolai Osokin.
Both teens were killed in the fiery wreck.
Ortega Anguiano was later convicted of two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and sentenced to 10 years.
Now California officials say he will be released early, sparking outrage from the victim's families.
He's been deported several times, which means he's a felon, Homan said.
Re-entry to the country, deported.
Deportation is a felony.
We will prosecute him and we will deport him.
According to the ICE, Ortego Anguiano has a long criminal history, including prior convictions for burglary, vehicle theft, battery with kidnapping, In 2014, Homan says those prior offenses and his repeated illegal entry into the country make this case especially egregious.
ICE issued a detainer requesting a custody of Ortego upon his release.
However, California's sanctuary state policies raise questions about whether they'll comply, defund, and deprive California of all federal funding.
You're just going to punish innocent civilians for the harboring of illegal criminals by the government.
I'm sorry, you thought you had to abide by federal law?
It's an amazing thing.
Sanctuary City is announcing, I will defy federal law.
Any citizen does that, you go to jail.
We don't need to go into the rest of the story.
It's just pure tragedy, but it's pure outrage tragedy.
And Fox News is using the language of the enemy, but not in an ironic manner.
They're using it in a...
Lending credibility to the terminology.
An undocumented immigrant.
He's not an illegal.
He's not a criminal.
He's not a multiple criminal entering with felony, criminal charges, convictions, whatever.
No, no, no.
He's an undocumented immigrant.
We should feel bad for him.
And don't use politically incorrect terminology or verbiage, Fox News.
Heaven forbid.
Now, but on the subject of illegal aliens, by the way.
This is when you...
First of all, I called out Fox News, but maybe this is why I never get a call to go on any shows on them.
Undocumented immigrants.
What did I say here?
What is an undocumented immigrant?
It was at that point that Fox News never got back to Viva.
No, but this is where you...
Realize just how backwards things are.
And it's not about due process.
It's not about anything.
This dovetails into the whole, we just want due process for Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
Even though he got due process, they're releasing the illegal alien killers.
They are protecting them.
And then they try to convince themselves it's under the pretext of due process.
You know what the amazing thing is?
These are the same people who literally...
Chanted for the deportation of Elon Musk, a naturalized American citizen who broke no laws, but they disagreed with him ideologically.
So set aside due process, which Kilmer Obrego Garcia got, and due process varies depending on your status of illegal being in the country.
They don't care about due process.
They just care about wielding the baton of power and beating everyone they disagree with into submission.
Chanting for the deportation of Elon Musk.
And then you get people.
I see this guy's account.
I don't want to spoil the punchline.
Devin Duke.
Sir Devin Duke.
I know I see this guy's account.
Social media strategy.
PhD in cognitive neuroscience.
Military brat.
Drummer. Metalhead.
He puts out this tweet.
And, you know, when you're new to an account, like there was a tweet out earlier, I have to make sure the person was actually the parody that I thought it was.
But then with the one with the math, that wasn't parody.
So then, you know, you can go a little harder on them.
An answer to this question would be nice, says David Duke.
Oh, sorry, Devin Duke, not David Duke.
That's terrible.
An answer to this question would be nice.
If gang affiliation is illegal, why isn't every Proud Boy and Klan member sent to El Salvador?
Hmm. Good question, Guado.
Let me think about this one for a little bit.
First of all, I don't know that the Proud Boys in America have been designated a terrorist entity.
In fact, I know that they haven't.
They have in Canada, because Canada's special like that.
So they're not a gang.
They're not a criminal organization in America.
The Klan, I think the Klan is.
But why aren't they being sent to El Salvador?
It's such a great question.
You're clearly neuroscientifically, cognitively impaired, David Duke.
I'm sorry, I swore.
You are so fucking stupid, it's actually beyond words, Dot Duke.
Even assuming the idiotic premise of this retarded meme, which is...
Premised on the idea that the Proud Boys are a terrorist slash gang organization.
What is the citizenship of the Proud Boys and Klan members?
Are they El Salvadorian or American citizens?
To what country would you deport American citizens?
You painful fucking beater.
But these are the people who pretend to care about due process.
These are the people who pretend to care about law.
Openly calling for the deportation of naturalized American citizens who have not broken any law, only because they are ideologically different than them, and promoting seemingly the deportation of criminal citizens.
You know what you can do to a criminal citizen?
You can put them in jail.
You know what you can do to a criminal illegal alien?
You can deport them to their country of origin.
Ah. Ah.
Thank you.
And that's that.
And now, speaking of criminals who deserve to be in jail, this is another one I didn't get to get to earlier.
When I say transitional versus transformational president, the other day we talked about it, Trump comes out and puts out on the White House website that the true origins of COVID were from a lab in Wuhan, China.
That Fauci, Dr. Fauci, the recently auto-panned, pardoned Dr. Fauci.
Hit it, concealed this, and tried to make sure that Americans didn't know the truth.
Dr. Drazak actively participated in the cover-up, and that these people potentially should go to jail.
You know what the amazing thing is, by the way, regardless of the legitimacy of Fauci's auto-Pen-Biden presidential pardon, you could still be charged at the state level for the very same crimes.
For the state-level crimes of the crimes against humanity that Fauci has committed.
I said it at the time.
Cuomo, Whitmer, crimes against humanity, at the very least, crimes against their citizens.
They single-handedly, I say between the two of them, I think they killed upwards of 30,000 Americans by forcing COVID-positive patients back into old persons' homes.
After they protected their own, you know, Rachel Levine, I don't know what his first real name, I don't know, what was Rachel's Levine name when he was, you know, still a man, but when he pulled his mother out of the system, put his mother in private care,
saved his mother's life, Whitmer was responsible for, I would say, you know, from what I recall, 10 to 15,000 deaths.
Cuomo, 10 to 15,000 deaths.
Remember, they had that ship that Trump brought in that they didn't use.
And instead, Cuomo forced old person facilities to take in COVID positive patients when they knew that it would kill them, would just wreak havoc on the old person's facilities.
And it did.
But it wasn't until, he didn't do that until after he immunized the CEOs, the executives of these old person's homes.
GOP leader asks Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute Andrew Cuomo.
Republican House Chairman renewed a request to the Justice Department to prosecute.
What were those false statements, you might recall?
Republican House Committee Chairman on Monday renewed a call for the Justice Department to prosecute former Governor Andrew M. Cuomo of New York, asserting that Cuomo, a Democrat, lied to Congress about his actions during the COVID pandemic.
Republicans initially referred Mr. Cuomo to the Department for Prosecution last October when Democrats were in power, but apparently no action was taken.
You know why?
I'm not sure if they were thoroughly convinced that they were going to be done with him as their political lackey.
Transformational president, people.
Pam Bondi has got to start doing things.
People are asking, is she in over her head?
Is she feckless?
Is she useless?
Is she corrupt?
For now, we'll just all go with the one that I think is the most likely explanation, just in over her head, had no idea what she was getting into.
She better start doing something meaningful.
The Epstein debacle.
People haven't forgot about nor should they.
But the RFK and JFK files doesn't make up for the Epstein debacle.
Prosecute Fauci?
Could probably do something there.
Bottom line.
By resubmitting the case to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Representative James Comer of Kentucky appears to be hoping for a different outcome now that Republicans have taken charge of the federal government and Mr. Cuomo is a leading candidate for the mayor of New York City.
Can you imagine?
He literally killed 15,000 people, or was responsible for the deaths of 15,000 people, if you want to give him the benefit of the doubt.
And not only is he not rotting away behind bars, he might get re-elected after he was ousted for reasons.
In a brief letter, Mr. Comer, the chairman of the House Oversight and Governor, urged Ms. Bondi to revisit the matter.
He called Mr. Comer a man with a history of corruption and deceit, now caught red-handed lying to Congress.
My goodness, it's it's it's fun to have been right on these issues in real time.
I can go back and pull up my tweets and pull up the coverage that I was doing of Cuomo at the time.
The fresh broadside from Washington may cause Mr. Cuomo political head.
And you know what they might be trying to do here because Trump's DOJ paused or gave a temporary reprieve by withdrawing without prejudice.
The charges against Eric Adams because they said it would interfere with his ability to campaign, run for office again.
So you know what they're doing with this.
At least the goal is to, if it's not interfere with Cuomo's ability to run for office again, it's at the very least to remind people that he's arguably, but not so arguably, a mass murderer.
I don't know how many people you have to kill in order to be a mass murderer.
10, 15,000?
Puts you up there.
Justice Department has no obligation to take up the case.
Referrals like the ones sent by Mr. Comer do not bear any legal weight and have historically amounted to little more than news releases.
Or as some like to say, angry letters.
Republicans are great at writing angry letters.
They're less great at actually locking up mass murders.
Chad Gilmartin, Justice Department, declined to comment on the matter.
House Republicans contend that the former government engaged in a conscious, calculated effort to dodge accountability for COVID-related deaths in New York nursing homes.
In closed-door testimony, remember, Cuomo said that he had not reviewed a 2020 government report that significantly undercounted the people who died in the state's nursing homes in the early days of the pandemic.
The New York Times subsequently reported that Cuomo had not only seen the report, but had personally written portions of early drafts.
He blamed the discrepancy on his memory, insisting he had not intended to lie to Congress, which is a federal crime.
Do you understand also, by the way, what they did is they then took the numbers of people that died as a result of their grotesque criminal negligence and then used that number to blame it against Trump, that his response to the COVID pandemic was lackluster.
They literally killed people or were responsible for the deaths of people and then tried to hold Trump responsible for their killing of tens of thousands of American citizens.
That's evil.
That's evil.
And then you got, what's his face?
Cuomo's brother.
Protecting him.
Oh, yoy, yoy.
Anyways, whatever.
I think that's about it here.
And then the letter, which is, you know, just not even a strongly worded letter.
From the Honorable...
Who's this from?
James Comer.
Dear Attorney General Bondi, October 30th, 2024, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Select Subcommittee referred former governor of the state of New York, Andrew Cuomo, for making criminal false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C.
1001. To our knowledge, the Biden administration ignored this referral despite clear facts and evidence.
Accordingly, we request you review this referral and take appropriate action.
For your reference, the referral is attached to this letter.
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the principal oversight committee, yada, yada, yada.
Not even a strongly worded letter.
Just a reminder.
Will they do it?
Time will tell.
Ah. Ah.
Thank you.
That's that.
Now, let's get to the chat and see what's going on here.
Electric chair for mass murderers says last line.
They have to stand trial first.
The show goes on.
We just watched in comments says Elvish Cajun Mustard.
Okay, fine.
Well, let's get here.
Now, let's go over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com and see what's going on here.
Everybody, if you're not familiar, VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com, the best above average law community out there with Barnes's Bourbon with Barnes every night, hour after party, which we're going to get started earlier today.
Early today because I got to go do a track meet with my daughter.
I gotta go see where they go.
Hey, I gotta exercise, and I gotta go watch my daughters track me, because apparently she's doing very good.
And... Can't miss it again.
I missed the first two or three now.
Let's see what's going on in Local.
We've got Pam Bondi, the inactive figure.
See, this is why our Local's community is above average.
Encryptus, has there been any breaking news since we've been live?
Nope, it's kind of boring.
That's Pan Bondi, the inactive acting figure, because she's done nothing thus far, but she gives good press conferences.
Pover on Locals says Gad has a tiny channel on YouTube for views.
And Gad's audience already vote conservative.
First of all, his presence on Twitter is far bigger, especially since Elon tends to retweet his content.
But the bottom line is...
It's inexcusable to not have done multiple podcasts, and certainly the big Canadian podcasts.
We're getting back to the Canadian stuff, but if everyone wants to say, you know, Pierre doesn't need to go on Rogan, I think it's stupid.
Period. But you go on the big Canadian podcasts, which are going to be smaller, but big nonetheless.
Peterson was one, but that was four months ago, and that was not so much...
You've got to have a challenging podcast.
Jake Jacobs says, Call New York State has a similar rule that pertains to government employees.
Once a benefit has been bestowed upon these employees, it can never be taken away.
The single largest item on the Buffalo school system budget is boob jobs for retired teachers living in Florida because in the 1940s, elective surgeries were given as benefit to the teachers union.
And then we got from Free Rider, something that's been making the rounds today.
Let's see about this.
Yeah, we're going to look at this one right now.
This is good here.
Let's bring this up.
Scoop Magoo.
Let me just double check this.
Scoops Magoo.
Follows me.
That's always a good sign.
The Information Commissioner sides with Health Canada over disclosure of DNA in Pfizer COVID vaccines.
Health Canada explained that it did not find that further disclosure would be in the public interest for public health and public safety reasons.
This is coming out of Canada.
They're never going to disclose any of this because it would reveal government malfeasance.
This is on the disclosure.
April 23rd, complainant alleged that Health Canada had improperly withheld information under subsection 19.1 personal information, yada, yada, yada, of the Access to Information Act in response to an access request.
The request was for a submission from Pfizer to Health Canada with respect to the SV.
40, DNA contamination in COVID vaccines.
The allegation falls within paragraph yada yada.
Investigation. Okay, fine.
Let's see what the...
Does the information withheld relate to public health, government safety?
Or the protection of the environment.
The withheld information COVID relates to COVID vaccines.
Therefore, the withheld information relates to public health.
Would the public interest in disclosure clearly outweigh in importance the specified harms?
Health Canada stated it had weighed public safety against material impact on the third party.
And to disclose information in the public interest when it originally responded.
For the withheld information, Health Canada asserted that the circumstances described in the subsection 26 do not exist.
Health Canada asserted that disclosing any additional information would reveal third parties' confidential chemistry and manufacturing data, which would negatively harm the third party.
Health Canada stated that if data were released, it could be used by the third party's competitors to gain insight into its manufacturing capabilities and impact its contract negotiations.
They're withholding this information for the benefit of Pfizer.
Oh, wow.
The OIC concludes that the information Health Canada withheld, the circumstances set on yada yada, there is no need to examine the issue of discretion.
The complaint is not well found.
It's impossible not to get blackpilled.
Night Privilege has subscribed.
Night Privilege, welcome to the vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
And while we're on the subject, let me just see what's going on over on Twitter because I've got a lot of notifications and see if there's been anything new that has come up.
And no.
All right, peeps, that's it.
Good. We're going to do this.
We're going to have our Locals afterparty at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
In Cryptis, you'll pick a worthwhile person to raid on the Twitterverse?
On the Twitterverse.
I'm looking for that, right?
Over on Locals?
I don't want to see Locals on Rumble, for goodness sake.
I'm reading the chat as we see this.
In other words, we don't want to tell you, so there it says, Laura Weekly.
Yeah, no, it's not just that.
We've got to protect Pfizer.
Who are the competitors right now for a jab that nobody's taking in Canada?
It's criminal.
Congrats to your daughter.
What does she compete in?
I ran sprints.
The running long jump.
The hurdles.
And that's it.
We're going to go see.
Alright, people.
Let's do this.
Oh, so tomorrow.
I'm still getting a rate, guys.
Give me one moment.
Yep, let's do that.
And I'm going to continue reading.
Hold on.
Well, while we do that, I just got something exclusive from Alexa Lavoie.
Alexa, the voice at Rebel News.
Let me go open this in...
It's on the discussion of immigration, people.
Hold on.
Let's bring this one up.
Last minute as we raid and head over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Here, here, and here.
Alexa Lavoie.
Exclusive Conservative candidate and CBSA officer speaks out on the border chaos and gun crime.
Conservative candidate David de Repentigny, a CBSA custom border something something.
Officer running for Chateauguay Le Jardin de Napierville unveils the truth about Canada's border chaos in an exclusive interview.
At the infamous Roxham Road border crossing, that's in Quebec.
Conservative candidate at Repentigny 2 running for Chateauguay sat down for an exclusive interview.
A Canadian Border Service Agency, CBSA officer and volunteer firefighter de Repentany faces Nathalie Pravot, a Polytechnique shooting survivor and vocal anti-gun activist with Polytechnique.
Polytechnique is our, I think it's the biggest mass shooting in Canada.
It took place also in Montreal.
Not far on Côte d'Anege at Ecole Polytechnique, which is a few kilometers from where I used to live.
On gun control, De Repentigny respects Provo's intentions but critiques her approach.
When we want to ensure public safety, it's based on risk management, he said.
We're putting restrictions on people who follow the laws instead of focusing on criminals.
Citing Toronto's police chief, he noted 96% of illegal firearms come from the United States.
Well, the other problem is, in as much as you believe that tougher gun laws reduce crime, 10 years of liberal policy proves otherwise.
Laws have gotten tougher and tougher, and gun crime in particular has gone up and up.
The Quebec border where Durant-Pantony has worked through the 2017 border crisis and beyond shapes his perspective on immigration.
We had tools to manage this crisis efficiently, he said, pointing to the Immigration Act's purpose of protecting Canada's economy and culture.
He argues that political interference, including tweets, welcoming all fueled illegal crossings.
No shit, so another problem created by the Liberals.
I found a small channel for you.
Awesome. Go for it.
The guy on this channel, he's wearing a shirt that says, I'm claiming Zelensky on my taxes.
Not bad.
He will be worthy of it.
The purpose of the law is to prevent the repetition of an infraction.
So when we put laws forward in order to prevent someone that already follows the law not to violate the law, it's kind of counterproductive.
What Pierre Poilievre puts in is that when we have too much regulation, It prevents the people that are actually trying to abide by the law to actually properly follow it, and it penalizes them.
The purpose of putting a law into place is to make sure to protect the people and to answer a need.
So these laws were not effective.
They've been deemed not effective by many chiefs of police.
And at the end, we're paying for this program where that money could be invested to some more urgent matter.
We're talking about the border today.
There are many urgent matters, but the border is one of them.
Or you can just not tax people quite as much and reduce the size of the government.
I'll give everybody the link to that.
Go check it out.
And if you're Canadian, get out and vote, people.
Get out and vote like the future of Canada depends on it.
All right, peeps.
Thank you all for being here.
If you're not coming from Rumble, go and...
Watch the show.
Share it.
If you're going to come over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, that's where we're going to be having our after party for about 20 minutes.
Tomorrow, I'm trying to get Myron Gaines on.
I'm trying to hammer down the time.
I will publish my GAD Tau B interview.
It's going to be fantastic.
We will be live at 4 o'clock tomorrow as well.
So, all that to say, have I missed anything?
I didn't miss any of the Rumble rants.
Get your butts on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
And we're going to have the after party there.
Let me give everybody the link one last time.
Thank you all for being here.
See you tomorrow if you're not coming.
And go raid the channel.
And say hi and let them know who sent you.
▲
Export Selection