All Episodes
Previous Next
April 9, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:17:15
Canadian Government & Courts Denying Military Jab Injury Compensation? Trump Pronouns "No Thanks"?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
...again today.
His voice really makes me angry, but we have to.
Sorry....saying on my phone.
I know some of you know this on the iPhone.
They've got that little stock app.
I added Tesla to it to give me a little boost during the day.
$2.25 and dropping.
So... $2.25 and dropping.
So... Yeah.
$2.25.
Let me do this again here.
Hold on.
I'm going to do this.
I'm going to do the intro.
Base to Seinfeld.
They've got that little stock out.
I added Tesla to it to give me a little boost during the day.
$2.25 and dropping.
Idiots. Idiots.
Malicious idiots who revel in the misery of others.
I said it yesterday.
$2.25 and dropping.
$25 and dropping.
I'm fairly certain it was up $50 today.
Which was something like 20 some odd percent at the close of the market.
That was Matt, Matt Walls, Tim Walls.
Tampon Tim.
I have a guest in the backdrop, so I will watch my language and not call him Tim No Balls Walls, but it's Tim Walls.
You know who it is.
A man whose business acumen is right up on par with his vice presidential aspirations acumen.
Reveling in the misery of others, enjoying the fact that he and his citizens are losing money, Giving you the stupidest advice on earth but reveling in the moment because that's what they are about.
Weaponizing misery.
Who now looks like the biggest idiot on earth.
I wanted to start with a Mark Carney opening video which I'm going to get to right now because I'm going to take this opportunity of being on one end of that spectrum.
You guys know the meme?
Let me get the meme.
It's the genius meme or the bell curve meme.
Today I'm on one end of the spectrum of it.
I'm either on the left end or the right end because I put out a tweet on Monday which basically said, you know, if you have the intention of pausing the tariffs or putting a 90-day pause on the tariffs,
the first thing you're going to do is deny the rumor that you're contemplating putting a 90-day pause on the tariffs.
I said that Monday.
And today, lo and behold, Trump announces to the joy of the markets that there will be a 90-day pause on all tariffs for all countries who came to the table and did not retaliate.
You know which countries did retaliate?
China, Mexico, and Canada.
Let's go listen to the wonderful words of Mark J. Carney.
And then I'm going to tell you the revelation that I had in the intro before we got live.
Encryptus on the end heard me screaming to the mic.
I get it now.
I understand what Trump was doing.
He set up Mark Carney for a fail, and now it's going to be up to Pierre Poiliev to not slam that ball down that net when he's been given a layup to do so.
I'll tell you in a second what I mean by that.
This is exactly the type of innovation that we need to tackle the housing crisis and the economic crisis that has been brought on.
By President Trump's trade war.
Pause. Remember, he always says and.
And. Because when I say it a second time, it makes it even more impactful.
The housing crisis of the Liberals' creation.
But this intro is not a rant about Canada at this point.
Just pay attention to it.
They're going to solve all the problems they cause.
But right now, Trump's tariff war, which this nincompooped, feigning strength against an adversary that could kick his butt in every respect.
Despite his newfound pride in the post-national state of Canada, lest we forget what Justin Trudeau said in 2015, he picked a fight with the guy that he had no chance of winning against, and now he's understanding why he was stupid for having done what he did, which was retaliate, instead of saying, let us address your issues with our border,
with our fentanyl crisis, with our illegal people on terror watch lists crossing into the border.
Okay, fine.
See, President Trump If you had bought Tesla when Marjorie Taylor Greene told you not to be a-panicking,
you're up 30-some-odd percent?
40%?
People's livelihoods, from the auto industry in Ontario to the forestry workers here in British Columbia, those livelihoods being put in jeopardy.
The US is again targeting the Canadian forestry industry by more than doubling the duties charged on softwood lumber.
I'm sorry, I cannot hear the word duties and not laugh.
I apologize.
That decision, as well as with the other Trump...
Well, all right.
Well, no pause for you, Carney.
So when I said that Trump was laying it up for Pierre with the initial tariffs and Pierre fumbled that ball, here's your second chance.
Do we now understand what he was saying?
Yeah. It's easier to work with liberals because they're stupid.
It's easier to work with liberals because they're predictable in their responses because they think like second grade children, smooth brained animals.
It's easier to deal with liberals because you can predict what they're going to do and what they're going to do is going to be stupid.
So America comes in and says, fix up your border, fix up your drug problem, fix up your illegal immigration problems, or we impose a tariff.
And Carney, the newfound savior of Canada, comes in and says, oh, no, no, we're a proud nation.
Nobody's going to insult us and call Trudeau the governor and suggest we're going to be the 51st state.
No, we're going to come back with retaliatory tariffs to an economy that is over 10 times more powerful, more diverse.
We're going to go with retaliatory tariffs against Tesla, against everything, even though we already have tariffs on labor, sorry, on labor, on poultry, dairy, meats, even though they already have 200% tariffs.
No, they're a proud country.
We're going to retaliate.
Well, you retaliated, Carney.
Now you put Canada in the position where it's going to have its ass kicked by Trump, unless you just come back to the table.
But it's too late for you.
You've already retaliated.
You know who might come to the table now?
If Pierre Poilier is listening, looking, and learning, Pierre is coming to the table now.
Sorry. I'm really sorry about what Carney did.
It was stupid.
We should have listened to your legitimate grievances.
We shouldn't have retaliated.
And then there would be a 90-day pause on the tariffs so we can figure things out.
Renegotiate. That's all we wanted to do.
Renegotiate. Tighten up the borders.
No, no, no.
The neighbor, Steve Urkel, just took a shot at his other neighbor, Mike Tyson.
What did you learn?
So the news of the day, if you haven't heard, people, is that Trump has paused the tariffs.
And it's wild to live through this.
Hold on a second.
I want to bring it up.
Because I did say it.
Maybe it was lucky.
Maybe it was just stupid.
But I got it right this time.
I'm not in Trump's head.
This is on Monday, April 7th.
Nor do I have any info from his admin.
Just to say that if you're open to a 90-day pause on tariffs, you obviously deny a rumor that the admin is contemplating on the verge of a 90-day pause on tariffs.
And I haven't even read the art of the deal.
And so what happened today?
90-day pause on the tariffs for the countries that didn't retaliate.
Who retaliated?
China. Because they are big bullies with global...
You want to talk about aspirations of global dominance?
Communist domination nation.
They retaliated.
Because they think that America can't live without them.
And I put out a tweet earlier today like, does America need Chinese products more than China needs American dollars?
We'll find out.
If you can't get what you get from China from 70 other countries that weren't stupid enough to retaliate and are coming to the table now to renegotiate, you probably can't get it anywhere on Earth.
There's going to be the issue about getting stuff from countries that China has infiltrated like Vietnam and Cambodia, but set that aside.
We'll deal with that when time comes.
The news of the day is that Trump pauses reciprocal tariffs for 90 days, ups China's levy to 125%.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he was authorizing a 90-day pause in reciprocal tariffs to all countries except China.
I think it's more than except China, but...
Whatever the news is breaking and developing.
On which he was raising the levy to 125% in the latest twist of a saga that has roiled financial markets for a week.
The universal 10% tariffs still remain in place.
The US markets immediately responded with exuberant joy.
As all three major indexes were up by at least 6%, NASDAQ gaining nearly 10% by 2 p.m.
Earlier in the day, China and the European Union unveiled stiff retaliation fees aimed at countering the U.S. tariff splits, while an unfazed Trump urged global companies to set up shop in the U.S. That's one way that you make sure that you decouple from China.
Oh, but we don't have the infrastructure yet, everyone said last week.
You've got 70 other countries now.
Maybe you can find some infrastructure there.
Maybe you'll woo some business to come in and build the infrastructure here.
My goodness, if you can do Operation Warp Speed and develop a jibby jab in six months, the safest and most effective jibby jab in all of humanity, you can build up some infrastructure for manufacturing, textiles, minerals, pretty quick.
Medicines. Although from what I understand, the tariffs don't apply to medicines, so that, you know, we should not have a problem there.
Although we get a substantial portion from India.
Apparently, you know, on which there will not be any more reciprocal tariffs.
Or a 90-day pause.
All right, whatever.
At the session with reporters, Trump was asked why he paused the tariffs, and he said some folks were getting spooked without specifying who.
People were jumping a little bit out of line, Trump said.
They were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid.
The EU said earlier Wednesday it would impose 25% tariffs on a range of U.S. imports.
First try, yeah, whatever.
Still the brunt of...
Trump's wrath was aimed directly at China, which Treasury Secretary Scott Besant described as a, quote, bad actor, end quote, in addressing reporters in front of the White House shortly after the tasks were announced.
What we've ended up with here, as I've told everyone a week ago in this very spot, do not retaliate and you will be rewarded.
We don't need to go into the rest of it.
That is what you call the art of the deal, people.
You can bet on people's predictable actions and they bet on China's actions.
China thinks America can't live without China?
China's going to find out whether or not it can live without American dollars.
Or they'll come to the table.
Or we will decouple as respective nations and whatever China supplied, America will be able to find from other countries.
Canada retaliated?
Because Mark J. Carney is an idiot?
A corrupt, three-passport-carrying, WEF globalist whore stooge of an idiot?
And now Canadians are going to suffer as a result of that?
And now Pierre Poiliev, if he's got half an ounce of political savvy, which I know that he does, he will now be able to say, congrats, the retaliatory tariffs that Carney imposed on Trump, stupidly imposed on Trump, are now going to hurt Canadians.
Had we just sat at the table and negotiated, we'd all be better off.
Our best neighbor, biggest trading partner, which offers us defense.
Which we've been causing a bit of a headache because of the Chinese infiltration in our Canadian government.
They would have been talking to us had we not done what we did.
I will be the one to lead us out of this when I'm elected Prime Minister.
What a time to be alive, people.
Well, we had to address that because if we didn't talk about the news, I think a lot of people would be very, very angry.
We've got a show.
I've got a guest in the backdrop who is a lawyer working on A lawsuit, and I don't know if it's a class action exactly what the mechanism is, but we're going to delve into it.
It's sort of short notice.
My brother texts me and says, would you have this person on your channel who's talking about the fact that Canadian Armed Forces members up in Canada are getting absolutely screwed in their inability to get compensation for the jab injuries that some of them seem to have suffered because the Canadian government is giving them the dirtiest of the dirty runarounds.
Canadian Commando says, Thanks Viva for having Catherine on.
Our story will blow your mind.
Things done to Canadian soldiers that if done to an enemy combatant would be a war crime.
A-OK if it's your own, I guess.
Heart emoji, fire emoji.
Canada, heart emoji, fire emoji.
We're going to get to it in a second.
These idiots have never read The Art of the Deal by Donald J. Trump.
If they had, they would realize that his first offer is always his best offer.
It's just going to get worse from here.
They should come to the table, says Denise Antu.
Well, it's Pierre's moment to shine.
So, Pierre, take it away.
Before we get going, got to thank the sponsors of today's show because, look, we got to thank the companies that support free speech, that support everything that Rumble is doing here, that have been on board before it was cool to be on board.
1775 Coffee is one of the most delicious ones.
1775 and Rumble just launched their first anti-aging coffee.
And no, it's not brewed in Dr. Fauci's lab.
Dr. Fauci.
In Fauci the war criminal's lab.
They dropped a thousand longevity bundles, blew through them very quickly because everybody ordered them.
And watching freedom lovers panic harder than CNN on election night, they extended the sale and added a few more.
Once this is gone, though, it's gone.
There's about, I think, what did they add?
I don't know how many more they added.
$99 value.
$99, you're getting a $250 value, two bags of longevity coffee infused with C-A-A-K-G to support cellular health and reduce biological age, plus one ultra-rare pea berry roast that makes up less than 5% of global crops.
We're still going to get our coffee, peeps.
Don't worry about it.
Exclusive merch that screams, I do not shop at Target anymore.
Special degrade, single origin, small batch, it's not your sleepy...
Chain store disgusting burnt coffee.
It's for people who love the way good coffee tastes.
If you still believe in America, in freedom, and are not selling for weak corporate nonsense, this is your coffee.
Also, by the way, every dolly you spend gets you entered in the Tesla Cybertruck raffle plus $30,000 cash.
99 entries locked in.
If you get this, go to 1775coffee.com slash Viva.
Grab yours before the bundles are gone.
1775coffee.com forward slash Viva.
And also, Rumble Premium, people.
This is a way to compensate.
Help Rumble fight back.
Rumble is not here to fit the mold.
They're here to defend freedom of expression.
To strengthen that mission, we are offering Rumble Premium, completely ad-free experience with exclusive benefits from your favorite creators for your favorite viewers.
You'll find exclusive content from Russell Brand, Dr. Disrespect, Tim Kess, Mug Club with Crowder.
It's more than a subscription.
It is a stand against free speech.
Your voice matters.
Join Rumble Premium if you can.
Ten bucks a month.
You get $10 off if you use promo code VIVA10.
Go to rumble.com forward slash premium forward slash VIVA10 to get that exclusive offer and you can help support the company.
That supports free speech.
We will turn the tide and we will make free speech cool again, profitable again, and the companies that weren't on board when they had the opportunity will be punished in the exact same way Donald Trump is currently punishing China, maybe Canada, maybe Mexico, maybe the European Union.
Alright, that is it.
Rusteng says, Viva!
Don't forget to offer a way to help the brave Canadian soldiers who are struggling after returning from overseas service.
Veteran Transition Network, vtncanada.org.
I should also add, by the way, we're going to talk about maids and the maids being offered to veterans in Canada because Catherine, from what I understand, is also representing a plaintiff in a lawsuit that relates to that.
So without further ado, without further to do, without further introduction.
Everybody, share the link.
It's going to be awesome.
Catherine, when you are ready to come in, unmute, un-mic, un-camera, and let's get this on.
Catherine, so we've never met until five minutes ago, as far as I know.
We never met in Ottawa at any point over the trucker protest.
No, we didn't.
If you may be so kind, ordinarily I would have done more homework, but there was not even enough time in the day to do the homework that I would ordinarily do, but I think I have a sufficient understanding of this.
Explain who you are to those who are meeting you for the first time.
Sure. So I am a lawyer that has always represented military and veterans up here in Canada for 10 years now.
And I mainly did a lot of family law, but in October of 21, when the Canadian Armed Forces brought in their mandate for the COVID vaccine, I had thousands of members reach out to me.
To see if there was any legal way to get around it, what was happening.
And I said to him, well, you know what?
I'm willing to try if you're willing to trust me to try.
And away we went.
And we've ended up filing two mass torts for abuse of power related to the mandates.
There are judicial reviews of grievances that were filed over the mandates.
And we are now working on a class action for a vaccine injury.
Which is kind of where I was talking to your brother about it because it's quite a story about what's happened to our military members who were willing to take the jab and then were injured in it.
And the ones who died, it's even a worse story.
And we don't need to worry about censoring any words here.
I call it the jab because it's not a vaccine as far as I'm concerned.
Never was, never will be.
Although I did have the Attorney General lawyer accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist in court in September for calling it better than a vaccine.
At the risk of violating my one-day-old resolution to not swear anymore.
At the risk of telling them to go F themselves.
It never was a vaccine.
Even under what we might say the new definition, and I believe it was Dr. Kieran Moore who...
Accidentally said that at one point during one of his pressers.
What city do you operate out of?
I operate out of St. Albert, which is just bordering up against Edmonton.
So I'm right outside the gates of CFB Edmonton.
Okay, very cool.
And what type of law did you practice?
And how long you been a lawyer for?
I've been a lawyer for 10 years.
And I've always practiced with military and veterans.
And in October 2021, I became a constitutional and civil litigation lawyer.
I basically retaught myself everything that I'd learned in order to help out these thousands of members who came to me for help.
They were told by other lawyers who had been JAG officers and were in private practice, you were given an order, follow it.
And I have a nursing background before I was in law, and I'm thinking, where's the informed consent?
You can't force anybody to take medical treatment.
All this was going through my head.
They still have their rights, even though they wear a uniform.
And so, yeah, I was more than happy to take it on.
Incredible. So you had not done constitutional law until these cases came about.
How did you get the first of the, I would say, Canadian, how did you get, do I say soldier?
I can say soldier as a general term, right?
How did you get the first one?
Because I was well known in the military community for my legal work that I had already done, and I'd already done some work for some veterans, they knew my name, so they reached out to me and it was over.
I was prepared to tell them you can't sue the Crown, that there's nowhere to go, and then they started sending me their stories.
And each story, one was worse after the other.
And I was like, I got to find a way to do this.
And I knew I couldn't get into court with a COVID lawsuit.
That that was just going to be a no-go in Canada.
So we came up with a strategy to bring it in as an abuse of power.
The Chief of Defence staff overstepped his boundaries legally.
It was an unlawful order and we went after them that way.
We're now in an appeal.
Okay, and I might ask a bunch of stupid questions, so forgive me.
Is this in federal court or is this in military court?
It's in federal court.
That's where we have to bring a case.
By the way, my brother's going to pop in here.
My brother, Lion Advocacy, there he is, who's also a lawyer in Ontario.
Okay, so you're doing this in federal court.
Now, a mass tort, it's different than a class action?
Yes. So each plaintiff has their case has to stand on their own.
So instead of bringing 458 lawsuits...
We've grouped them into two lawsuits.
One's 330 and one's 128.
And we've condensed them so that we're bringing it as a package.
Different than a class action, which would be a representative plaintiff or plaintiffs and then people would sign on.
That's interesting.
So I'm not sure that I'm familiar with the mass tort mechanism and how it's different.
Everybody's got individualized claims.
Yes. But similar fact patterns?
Yes. And so you're able to categorize them based on the fact patterns, but the claims themselves are going to, or the claims for damages are going to be different.
The injuries are going to be different.
Right. Well, the vaccine injury lawsuit is going to be a class action, just because the numbers are going to be high.
But the abuse of power one, they wanted to do a mass tort.
Oh, hey.
Good to see everybody.
I'm Lion Advocacy on X, a lawyer up here in Toronto, but I've taken to X to advocate against some of the stuff I saw during COVID.
All right.
So, Catherine, they come to you, they say, I've got injuries from the jab, and you don't want to take a COVID injury claim against the government.
They've been tossed already, as relates to Dan Hartman and the claim for his son, Sean Hartman, at least against the government.
I don't think Kayla Pollux has been adjudicated as it relates to the government.
I don't want to do that.
Well, see, here's what makes it so unique.
You can't group the Canadian Armed Forces troops into any other lawsuit.
They have a completely unique system.
They have two sets of laws that apply to them.
They've got the laws that apply to every Canadian, but then they have all the laws that apply to them for being military.
And so for a soldier that's hurt, Say they've been told to take a hill and he loses his leg.
He has to go to Veterans Affairs, and Veterans Affairs then decides if they're going to compensate him if his injury is related to service, if they're going to compensate him.
And if they turn him down and say, no, it's not related to service, then he can appeal to the Bureau of Pension Advocates.
And if he loses that appeal, then he can go into the federal court to pursue a claim for injury.
So what's happened with the vaccine injury cases is they're getting to Veterans Affairs and they're saying well I was ordered to take this jab and now I've been injured by it and I want to be compensated for it because careers were ended people have died from it in the in the armed forces and what they're being told by Veterans Affairs is it's not service related even though it was an order to take it.
Let me ask you this.
I've never served, but I know a number of servicemen and women in America.
Is this different than with any other vaccine?
And I use the word that they're forced to take.
If they get injured by the anthrax vaccine in the course of their duties, I presume they get compensated for that because I believe I know people who...
There's the catch.
So we went looking.
I have a brilliant ATIP team.
We have a million pages of corruption.
Sorry, if I may,
in 2021 specifically, which means that they had hitherto covered vaccine injury.
For things like anthrax, malaria.
Could that be because they punted it over to the vaccine injury support program?
That's exactly what they decided they were going to do.
But they didn't tell anyone in the Canadian Armed Forces that that's what they were going to do.
And everyone only found out after the three-year limitation period was up to apply to the vaccine injury support program.
So what we've got are injured veterans who are being denied any type of coverage.
For any type of injury.
Hold on.
I actually don't understand why they would be punted to the VISP, which is the Vaccine Injury Support Program.
Hypothetically, if they had gotten an anthrax vaccine injury in the course of their duties, they wouldn't go to the VISP anyhow.
Is that wrong?
They shouldn't be going, no.
Any injury related to their service should be handled by Veterans Affairs.
And so in 2021, with the creation of the VISP, which was done very quietly, as my brother learned and pointed out, that's when they decide, Any vaccine injury from a serviceman or a woman would go to the VISP.
If it's anthrax, malaria, smallpox, whatever, Ebola, whatever.
Yeah. Okay.
It's very subtle language, and they didn't tell anybody that that's what it was.
It was only by us doing an A-tip and discovering this conversation, and then we looked at the dates, and by the time we got the A-tip back, the three-year window was closed.
What's an A-tip?
Sorry, access to information request.
Okay. And by the way, the reason they didn't, they probably, I'm just assuming, is for the same reason they didn't advertise the vaccine injury support program from day one, which is because as soon as you start advertising it or making it known, people start to ask more questions.
Like, why is there...
I went to the board of governors of the Western University in 2022, late 2022.
They didn't know about the vaccine injury support program.
This was the well-kept secret.
Why? Informed consent.
It was all about making sure people didn't have all the information because if they did, they'd poke around.
Well, and for military members, their claims for an injury related to service is for life.
There's no limitation period for them to make the initial claim and to appeal it.
So it wouldn't even enter their mind that there might be a three-year limit to claim an injury.
Keep in mind also that military doctors were told not to report vaccine injuries.
They were told to write it up as something else.
So you have an injury either.
Wow. Even as they're going for open heart surgeries and aneurysm surgeries and they're having strokes and they're getting cancer and yeah.
How many how many servicemen and women have been injured by the jab?
I would love to tell you but I can't get the exact stats but I just from People who have contacted my office, we're looking at about eight percent.
Eight percent of military members.
You would assume that that number would be a commensurate or correlative to the general population unless they were getting a different iteration of the jab.
Most of them, I would say 99% of them, their only option, the only authorized option was Moderna.
Okay. Even after it continued elsewhere, our military kept giving them Moderna.
All to save a few bucks.
Well, up until when was that?
I did not know that, Catherine.
Yeah, and our hardest hit, the most deaths and the worst injuries were special forces.
Pilots and search and rescue.
So our strongest, healthiest troops were the most severely injured.
I'm trying to connect two dots here because this, you know, Trudeau announced the Moderna mega facility outside in Laval, outside of Montreal.
As of when and until when were they being required to take the Moderna?
It continues today and from when Moderna was first brought out in December 2020 and then the mandate was in October of 21. Why Moderna over Pfizer?
That was the only option they were given.
And if they asked to do a different one, only rarely would a commanding officer authorize them to go and get Pfizer or Johnson& Johnson.
What percentage of servicemen and women got the jab?
All of those who remain, obviously.
Well, 98%.
Or sorry, 96%.
There were 4% that didn't take it.
And then they were dishonorably discharged or released.
Yeah, it was a real gong show.
Sorry, Catherine, does that mean 4%?
Is that including the religious or medical exemptions in that 4%?
Yeah, there were only 150, 150, somewhere in the 150s religious exemptions accepted.
Who got the religious exemptions, if I may ask?
Demographic, race, religion?
Demographically, they tended to be a colonel or higher.
Okay, no specific race, religion, or creed?
Yeah, no specific.
Well, the chaplain general came out with a list of religions that he considered acceptable, religions in the Canadian Armed Forces.
What were those, if we can ask?
Well, the Jewish one was the Orthodox, Catholic, Roman Catholic.
Some of the Christian denominations.
Pagan was accepted.
Yeah. But not carte blanche.
You would still have to apply within those sects or whatever.
So disproportionately higher ranked were given the exemptions.
Yes. As if they had the connections and they had the information.
Or they're just more religious generally.
Yeah. I've been saying a lot more prayers since my lawsuit started in Ottawa.
Holy hell.
How many individual clients do you have between these two mass torts?
The mass torts for Abuse of Power, there's one was, it started at 330.
51 decided not to go forward with appeal.
So we're looking at 279.
And then the other one is 152 people.
Alright, so they come to you.
Vaccine injured, we've got a couple hundred.
We're picking out the best ones to do the class action on that one.
And we're waiting for the appeals with Veterans Affairs to finish.
Okay, so someone asked how you got to the 8%.
How do you know that it's give or take 8%?
Just because of what CAV is willing to release, what we've picked up in ATIPS, and the pipeline that I have to just about every corner of the Canadian Armed Forces.
is pulling out people who's been injured, who's seeing people injured at work or released injured, people who have died.
We have quite a list of sudden deaths
By the way, something worth pointing out is that when it gets punted over to the VISP, their standards of causation and injury threshold is, I would expect, I think, it's significantly higher than had it been dealt with,
right? Procedurally,
how does this start?
They come to you and they say I'm injured.
And then you go to Veterans Affairs and ask for an assessment to determine what, if anything, VA is going to cover.
Right. Yeah.
So they submit a claim.
Okay. To submit the claim, how long does it take to submit it?
And then how long does VA have to adjudicate on the claim?
They don't have a limit.
In some cases, some people have been waiting a couple of years.
And then if that gets rejected, then they have to go to an appeal.
And the Bureau of Pension Advocates is so overwhelmed that they're looking at a year before their appeal is going to be heard.
And the appeal is an administrative appeal within Veterans Affairs.
It's not at the court level?
No. Okay.
Then hypothetically, because these are administrative bodies, the appeal gets denied.
You've got to ask for the court authorization to review the decision, which is administrative, and they're going to be very deferential and say, did they grossly abuse of their administrative power in coming to the decision?
That's what the court would do.
The federal court is very sympathetic to the Chief of Defense staff and the Canadian Armed Forces.
And in order for the Canadian court to do that, you've got to petition the courts, go through the process, and the federal courts, I presume they have six months to render their judgment, like provincial courts.
Maybe I'm wrong.
But there's that whole process, which can take...
A year or more.
I wish it was six months.
And by the way, you're up and up, at least at the federal court level.
You've got to get to the Court of Appeal.
Federal court broadcasted their vaccination status in September of 2021, right before the election.
So if you really want to...
The Court of Appeal refused to.
So I'm looking forward to doing...
I've got three or four appeals before them coming up, and I'm looking forward to seeing how they handle it.
So... And now, let me ask you this.
In order to even make the claim at the VISP, do armed force members have to go through this whole process, or do they now say, skip Veterans Affairs, skip that adjudicative administrative process, you go straight to VISP?
They're being told, well, you're being denied for Veterans Affairs because you should have gone to VISP.
That's what they're currently being told by...
That's what they're being told.
They're being told that by VISP.
Oh, by the way, it's been more than three years, so you can't...
Make that claim.
Sorry. And having gone through the process does not itself toll prescription in this case?
Like having gone through the administrative process typically would suspend prescription?
Or pause it?
Nope. It might not be the good time to bring this up.
I'm going to bring it up because it's on Canadian Commando says they killed my brother and broke my heart and I will never forgive them.
And then in addition to that they basically say you're SOL.
If you even are within, if you have a claim now, go to the VISP and good luck with the VISP, although they deny black and white cases like Sean Hartman, who has medical evidence to support the claim.
So you're representing hundreds of people now who went through this whole process, went to VA, went to appeal, went to the courts, and now they went to VISP and they're told for whatever they would get capped at, damn, what is it, capped at a quarter million?
I think it's around that.
250,000 Canadian.
They're then told, sorry, you are literally shit out of luck.
Yeah, you're out of time.
Now, Catherine, isn't there also if a new injury is discovered within that three years or at any point, really, you can always go back or if the thing gets worse?
Isn't there some opportunity there to reapply?
I think so.
I think so.
I'm not as familiar with VISP as I am with BAC.
So what stage are you at of the court system?
So now they get denied from VISP and they say, you're really out of luck.
And what do you do now?
So then we start preparing a class action and try to force FACT to take the claims back.
Because then there's no delimitation.
Yeah. I just have to understand this, Dan.
Veterans Affairs told you, sorry, we no longer have jurisdiction over this as of 2021.
Yep. I don't think people realize what this means in terms of compensation for injury.
I didn't realize this.
it means they basically pull the wool from under their feet.
Because when you're going in, and it's the same with true to an extent when people are applying for a new job, they're not covered by WSIB.
So if they take that vaccine for a job that they need, you're not getting insured from WSIB.
workers WSIB.
What's WSIB?
Worker Safety Insurance Board in Ontario.
So it's like you're not getting it because
But a vaccine for soldiers is different because there it's like part of the argument was that you needed it to serve in different jurisdictions or like certain countries, right?
Like you needed it.
Well, the interesting thing is that under the National Defense Act, Section 126, the chief of defense staff has the authority, the legal authority to order a vaccine for any member.
They didn't do that.
They went administratively because if the catch all with the 126 is that if you don't get it.
You're charged and then you have to go through a court-martial.
And if the judge decides that you had a reasonable excuse not to take it, you're acquitted.
And the JAG court couldn't handle 3,000.
I had 3,000 people objecting to this vaccine in October'21.
They couldn't handle 3,000 courts-martial.
And they didn't want to set the precedent that you could say no.
Because these people were being told,"You don't have any rights." When you signed up, you gave up all your rights.
You do what you're told.
You cannot ask any questions.
Line up and take the jab.
Unlimited liability, isn't that the principle?
You signed on, but they didn't because they didn't give up their rights as a Canadian citizen.
Let me ask you this.
When did Veterans Affairs tell the soldiers that they had to go to the VISP?
When people started making claims about a year ago.
Why didn't they tell them?
Since 2021.
Good question.
I look forward to finding out the answer to that.
I think I answered that earlier.
Has no one even offered an explanation?
Like, oh, we didn't know?
Have they been asked?
They've been asked, yeah, and they tried to deny it.
But when we did the ATIP and we pulled up all the emails where they're discussing it between Canadian Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs, that's where we discovered, oh, look, this was planned.
Because when my vaccine injured people, I said, okay, you've got to go through the Veterans Affairs process.
You have to do that first.
And then they would get back to me and they'd say, well, I'm completely incapacitated.
I've had open heart surgery twice.
I can't work anymore.
And they told me it's not service related and I've been denied.
And I'm like, what?
Like, what?
It's either an illegal order.
Someone got injured following that order, so that's service-related.
Or if it's not a legal order because it's not service-related, then they've got to answer that question in the other lawsuit.
They're trying to play it both ways.
I'm looking at this from a fraud angle because if the Veterans Affairs knew or ought to have known, they're jerking you along so that you let the prescription period lapse.
Entertaining a claim that they knew they didn't have jurisdiction for throughout the process, and then by the time they tell you, oh, we've denied it, but you should go to VISP, but it's too late because we've jerked you around for the last two plus years.
And this is the, what is it called?
Hanlon's Razor?
Haslon's Razor?
Was it incompetence?
Or was there, you know, you put on your conspiracy theory hat here, was there something so off the charts here?
And so...
Somebody put this on Twitter about how if there were bad batches that were sabotaged and there was an intentional infliction of injury on certain soldiers over others, and they commanded this on everybody, how would you have caught that sabotage,
that act of sabotage on certain members of the armed forces?
That's a good question because they're refusing to disclose medical records of members who have died since 2021, even to the families.
I'm representing families that want those medical records and that would have vaccine batches, et cetera.
I was just going to ask you that question.
You don't yet have the batch numbers of the vaccines for the injured soldiers that you're representing?
This is...
It's not even...
It would be comical if it were a movie and no one would believe it.
It would be believable if we thought we were talking about a corrupt Eastern Bloc country or a developing nation where you would expect this or at least wouldn't be shocked by it.
This is Canada and the Veterans Affairs are not...
or the military, Canadian Armed Forces.
They are not giving you the information as to what the batch numbers were on the very jabs that your clients who are veterans or who are...
Armed Forces soldiers got.
That information would be available by the pharmacist for the public, right?
If they were injected?
Yeah, you get it on injection.
Wow, okay.
And when you think about it, here's why they don't want me to have the medical records.
Because those medical records are your best database to show just how much damage was done by the mRNA vaccines.
Because... Those CAF members, from the time they signed up, usually about 18, till the time they leave, all their medical care is within the Canadian Armed Forces system.
You can't get a better data set for what their health was from when they signed up to when they were vaccinated and what happened afterwards.
Because they can't go to...
If they go to a civilian doctor or civilian medical service, they can...
They can be court-martialed for that, which is another reason why the whole Visip thing shocked me, because they're not allowed to seek out anything medical outside of the system.
So they wouldn't even think of doing that.
I'm not going to overplay this.
This could be the biggest scandal in Canadian history.
If they are not giving this information, denying the claims, giving the runaround, because they have clear documented evidence.
As to the percentage of the injury, the extent of the injury, the scope of the injuries, because like you mentioned, and I don't think many people appreciate this, these soldiers, men and women, go to medical doctors within the military, and they've had their charts from day one to present,
and if it showed that 10% were getting whatever adverse events, and depending on when they knew it, and they continued to push it and continue to push it to this day, it could be...
Exponential, limitless liability for the government.
Right. And I have military doctors who are very willing to testify that when they tried to report vaccine injuries, they were told not to.
They were told, we are not doing that, or we're not going to tell you how to report an injury.
So the whole VARS system that we should be using, they didn't do it for the Canadian Armed Forces.
Because the results were that bad.
Holy hell.
Are there any doctor whistleblowers that have come out or willing to come out?
I do have doctors that are military doctors that are willing.
Well, willing and at the risk of asking the absurd, do they have access to or have they secured documentation or evidence?
They did.
They did.
Yeah. That's part of a million pages, Viva.
We've got Encryptus in the back who works with AI in terms of analyzing, summarizing massive amounts of documentation.
This is absolutely flabbergasting and scandalous.
It's not just about denying the injuries.
On what basis are they denying the release of the medical records, though, Catherine?
Privacy. Privacy of the deceased.
So is the estate trustee making the application?
Yep. And they're not giving it to the estate trustee?
I'm sending them copies of the wills to say, this person is the executor.
And they're saying privacy?
You can have it in 20 years.
Are they saying that to surviving victims as well?
Surviving spouses or surviving parents.
Yes, they are.
For a claim...
If they wanted to move that over for a claim of loss of companionship with the Vaccinator Support Program, don't they have to disclose, they have to forward the medical records there?
Yeah, but they can't get them.
Oh, they're not even cooperating with the VISP?
Nope. Has any journalist reported on this?
They do not want those medical records.
That hurt, Dan.
Has any journalist...
I consider myself an analyst, not a journalist.
I don't think people would even understand.
That's crazy.
Absolute peer corruption and peer cover-up.
Oh, yeah.
The non-deceased victims, like people who've suffered myocarditis or whatever, are they also being denied this information at their request?
Some of them have managed to walk into their medical units and get a copy of their charts.
A copy of their charts, which indicate the injury.
Yeah, before it got sent off to the archives.
Because if you're released, it goes to the archives.
And some of them have managed to get...
If the military doctor writes it off as something else...
So one of our special forces troops was in Africa, deployed in Africa with his unit.
He had had one shot of Moderna.
He was due for a second shot.
They gave him the second shot in the field.
his heart felt like it was exploding out of his chest and they have fancy equipment.
They, they slapped the heart monitor on him and the reading they were getting out of it, the machine couldn't tell them what that heart pattern was.
abandoned the mission, picked him up and carried him to an American hospital base and the doctor there said, "Oh you just drank too many Red Bulls.
You'll be fine." So that's what his chart says.
Had too many Red Bulls.
We've heard of cases about that where they attribute the heart issues to other factors.
Yeah. But then presumably after they say too many Red Bulls, they're not doing the limited knowledge I know.
They're not doing troponin tests.
They're not doing D-dimer tests to determine if they're...
I called the coroner's office when all these deaths were happening.
I'm like, are these sudden deaths?
Unexpected. I'm like, is the coroner's office doing any inquiry whatsoever?
Nothing. I'm like, and they're right?
So, I didn't realize.
The Special Forces guys were telling me that they were having the injections and then guys were dropping in the parking lot 10 minutes later.
And they were saying to him, well, it's not the Moderna because if you're going to have a reaction, you would have had it inside.
You sign over all your rights in the military.
I see someone commented here, you sign over all your rights in the military?
No. No, you don't.
No, I mean, I think he's saying as a criticism to this treatment, where they think...
People were told that.
But I remind people that if you were charged with a criminal charge in the military, you get all your rights.
You get a right to a lawyer, you get a right to silence.
All those rights are still there.
Do we know if the Moderna was statistically more harmful than Pfizer?
Yes. And Denmark had already, and some other countries had already banned Moderna for young men by the time it was mandatory in the Canadian Armed Forces.
I'm just going to fact check in real time and see what that...
Some European countries halted Moderna COVID-19, and this is from October 2021.
So you have now several hundred clients, victims, who have been denied at the VAC.
Sent to the VISP, Veterans Affairs Committee, Commission.
I don't know what the C stands for.
Then they go to VISP, Vaccine Injury Support Program.
They're told no, either outright rejected for those who are still within the three years, or sorry, you're beyond your three years.
You're definitely out of luck.
And now you're going to sue at the federal level, or you have sued at the federal level for a mass tort.
I presume it got dismissed at the first level?
On what basis?
No basis to the claim.
They said that my statement of claim was nonsense and full of conspiracy theories.
If I may ask, do I want to ask?
I don't want to ask the name of the judge because I'm not looking to docs, but who is the judge?
She had brought many cases.
She had defended many cases against the Canadian Armed Forces before she was named to the bench.
And she was named to the bench by the Liberal government.
It's Justice Catherine Coughlin.
How old is she, give or take?
She's probably in early 50s.
She had been an attorney general lawyer before she was in line.
And was it on a, I presume it was on the Crown's motion to dismiss?
Yes. Okay.
And now you're appealing that?
Yes. Yeah.
What stage are we at for the appeal?
The appeal book is due the end of this month.
It's just unbelievable.
It's fraud.
It's basically like, yeah, I'll pay you, I'll pay you, I'll pay you.
Whoops, you waited too long.
I'm not paying you anymore.
When they knew it.
And then you go to, even if they could get a vaccine injury support program claim, it's capped at, what are the natures of the injuries that we're dealing with?
Some are catastrophic.
Like I said, some have had to have open heart surgery.
Some have had aneurysm repairs.
There's been strokes.
Life-changing strokes.
The myocarditis, which we all know.
We're coming up to five years.
Five to ten years.
You're going to have massive problems if you've had myocarditis of any kind.
We've got sarcoidosis.
What's sarcoidosis?
It's sort of degenerative.
We've got Lou Gehrig's disease.
You've got everything that you see in the general public.
My brother had pointed out the last time he was on that he managed to get the Mayo Clinic.
Which one was it?
Cleveland or Mayo?
Cleveland Clinic, yeah.
Cleveland Clinic to update their, what's the word when you give a prognosis on myocarditis?
Catherine, what is the prognosis now, the accepted prognosis on clinical myocarditis?
I'm not sure what the latest version of it is, but when I trained in cardiac ICU as a nurse, the outcome was poor.
Usually you were going to die within five to ten years after you've had myocarditis.
That's when I was trained.
It depends on severity.
Also, we're looking at a different type of myocarditis than the usual.
That's the other factor here.
That's where the research is lacking.
We're waiting for answers.
Could you explain what you mean by that?
The follow-up studies for the young kids were being done at some hospitals and there were some follow-up studies that are still in progress.
We're talking viral myocarditis versus jab myocarditis.
Vaccine-related.
You could predictively say that it was the exact opposite of what they were saying and that jab-induced myocarditis would actually be worse than infection-induced myocarditis because they were telling you the exact opposite.
No, no, no.
The myocarditis you get from the jab is less severe than what you get from the infection.
I forget which doctor now, but one doctor explained the whole thing to me.
He's like, that makes no sense.
When you have an infection, your entire body responds.
When you get Yes.
Could be.
They don't know.
That's what requires further study.
Yeah. And when you think about it, the military 18 to 60 would be an ideal test group to look at what happened.
Which is why they don't want to stab those medical workers.
I've got to pop off, but I'll let you guys finish.
Go for it, Dan.
Good to see you again.
Thanks for having me on.
Lion Advocacy on X. Lion Advocacy on X. He puts out good tweets.
And they're clean.
Swear wordless.
Yeah. Sometimes I even rebuke Viva.
Go for it, Dan.
See you soon.
Catherine, okay, so the status, at least for all the injured soldiers now, is...
You're going to submit everything for appeal.
There are no oral arguments for appeal.
It's all written submissions?
I think this one will end up being oral arguments.
Okay. And you don't have that date yet?
No. And in the meantime, all of these servicemen and women who have been rendered incapacitated or debilitated, do they get, not that it's any compensation whatsoever, do they get pension?
Are they left totally high and dry?
A lot of them have been left high and dry because they didn't serve long enough to have a pension.
You have to serve 25 years in Canada to get a pension.
So incapacitated, injured, denied.
Which is why they took it.
Because they couldn't afford to lose their job.
And now they are absolutely left without income, without the ability...
Abandoned, basically.
Is there any...
Crowdsourcing to support these soldiers?
Nobody started crowdsourcing as far as I know for them.
They've been crowdsourcing to do the legal battle.
Some of them have managed to get other claims approved by Veterans Affairs, like for PTSD from deployments, etc.
So they managed to get a little bit of money.
I'll talk to you after we're offline.
Let me bring this up and just get Canadian Commando says they knew and they did it anyways.
They were already at 90% when they mandated.
We will find a way.
And Mike Freedom says my business partner was essentially placed on house arrest for nine months after refusing the jab.
That's a soldier's story there.
So this is what's going on with your clients.
I haven't forgotten to ask any question about this particular case.
I'm going to see if in our locals community if anybody has any questions on this, but we're going to segue it.
Let me just double check here.
Over in locals.
There is one question that was in chat that didn't come up as a tip, but the name is Jarhead310 asked, is it possible to even win this lawsuit in Canada?
Good question.
We're going to keep trying until we come up with a win.
There's been a few small wins lately.
Well, as in recent court rulings in other cases, like with Randy Hillier?
Yeah, and another one in veteran one, Thomas versus Canada, where the court ruled that the grievance system is not appropriate for...
Dealing with charter issues and Payne versus Canada said the same thing.
So we're chipping away.
It's a big wall, but we keep going and we'll keep trying.
Jacob Castro says, people walking around today glad things are, quote, back to normal, ignoring that as long as no one's been arrested, we're begging for it to happen again.
Forget the arrested.
It's not back to normal for hundreds, thousands, and probably more people.
The question that I was just going to ask, oh, no, in response to that question, Encryptus, Yeah,
exactly. To a certain extent,
the Conservatives and to a certain extent, the NDP were complicit orchestrators of this, what I believe to be a crime against humanity.
Well, all the generals that got removed, I could easily lay the timeline out for you, Viva, and show that the generals who tried to stop it were pushed out under sexual misconduct allegations.
Are there any names that you can name publicly?
Yeah, absolutely.
So General Vance was chief of defense staff when they first tried to bring this in.
He said, no, you're not going to experiment on my people.
And if there's something wrong, you're going to destroy my military.
He, sexual misconduct.
They brought in Art McDonald.
Let me stop you on that one.
What's his first name?
Jonathan Vance was the first one.
Jonathan Vance, sexual misconduct.
Untarnished record up until that point?
Yeah, and what the sexual misconduct was for a woman he'd been having an affair with for decades.
That was no secret.
Okay. Yep.
And then you bring in Art McDonald, Admiral Art McDonald.
I've got his briefing note.
They said, you cannot do this.
It's illegal.
It's not a lawful order.
He said, pound salt, I'm not bringing in a mandate.
Sexual misconduct.
That he was...
Cleared for.
And then they brought in Acting Chief of Defence Staff Wayne Eyre, and I've got the briefing note to him from General Cadoux.
And General Cadoux says, you can't do this.
It's illegal.
Nope, you can't do it.
General Cadoux, sexual misconduct that never came to be.
Danny Fortand, who was a general that was in charge of the civilian rollout of the COVID vaccine in Canada, he said, no, we can't mandate that.
That's illegal sexual misconduct that he was cleared of.
And then General Stephen Whelan, he was in charge of HR for the military, and he said, you're destroying the military sexual misconduct allegations when it came time for General Ayer to get on the stand.
And the person accusing him to get on the stand in his court-martial, they withdrew the charges.
This is...
What would it take to actually just blow this open and to definitively prove what is patently obvious?
You would need internal correspondence, which you haven't been able to get through AATIP?
Oh no, that stuff I have.
How many pages do you have?
I have a million pages of corruption in the Canadian Armed Forces right now.
Have you been able to effectively or meaningfully go through it?
Oh, yeah.
I've got a great...
One thing veterans are really, really good at is knowing the system and knowing what to look for.
We've taken...
The Office of the Information Commissioner has taken D&D to the Department of National Defence to court many times because they've come back and said, we don't have any records.
And I've got the people saying, no, I wrote emails.
Where are my emails?
So there we go.
And you don't have any, like, I say not smoking gun, but what is the smokiest of the guns that you have?
And is it public yet?
The smokiest of the guns, I would have to say, is that the briefing notes that say you can't do this, and then we also have that the public, they said they based it on the advice of Public Health Canada, and we actually have the documents from Public Health Canada that show That was based on a draft from Public Health Canada.
And in that draft, we've got their notes on that draft where they say, you can't use safe and effective for this because no vaccine is safe.
And then they acknowledge myocarditis, Lou Gehrig's disease, etc.
are happening with these vaccines.
And you do not have the complete breakdown of the stats analysis of injuries within the military?
Not yet, no.
Because I don't have the medical records to back it up.
That to me would be probably the smoking gun least of the objective metrics.
You know, you've been a litigation lawyer.
Whatever they try to hide the hardest is usually what they don't want.
They're finding discovery like you would not believe.
I can absolutely imagine.
I'm sure they've signed all their NDAs and I'm sure they're shredding and bleach bidding whatever they can.
I'm going to get some questions in for those who might have them, but this is going to segue into when I spoke with you earlier.
How many of your clients who are suffering through illness now have been offered maids?
I sort of asked medical assistance in dying because I sort of asked as a sick, not even a joke, the sick state of Canadian politics where they've literally been offering not ill, physically ill soldiers, but those with PTSD, maids.
Have any of your clients?
Well, I brought the first lawsuit against Veterans Affairs for it.
It is for a 24-year-old veteran with no physical problems at all, but he's suffering quite severe PTSD.
He had had four suicide attempts on his own.
His uncle and his dad were veterans, said reach out to Veterans Affairs, get some help.
And on his very first phone call to Veterans Affairs, he was offered MAID as the first option.
Did he record the conversation?
Unfortunately, no.
And they're saying it didn't happen.
And I'm getting the response back from the Crown is that, no, we don't have a policy that doesn't happen.
So when I saw today that there's another one that's been offered.
Do they not record the conversations for quality control on the government's end?
Apparently they didn't that time, Viva.
Holy hell.
I've heard countless stories, maybe not countless, but dozens of stories of people who are ill.
Kayla Pollack, they offered it to her three times unsolicited.
I have a friend of mine that they were willing to give him made for PTSD.
These are the soldiers?
Soldiers, veterans, yep.
What's the nature of it?
I'm going to say it, Viva.
A dead veteran is cheaper than a live one.
I've mentioned it a number of times on the channel.
It's the principle of Canadian politics.
Maybe even internationally, legally speaking, it's cheaper to kill someone than it is to pay for their lifelong injuries.
Yes. Especially when you look at this one veteran, mental health issues for life, and he's 24 years old.
They're looking at paying him for 50 years.
Oh my goodness.
I think we might have some questions here.
I'm going to come back to this.
So what is the nature of the lawsuit?
What is the basis of the claim?
The basis of the claim is that they were negligent and that there was some misfeasance of public office by offering to commit murder.
Because under the criminal code, it's still illegal to counsel suicide.
Sort of like intentional infliction of emotional distress?
Intentional infliction, yeah.
The whole works.
And VAC just says it never happened.
Well, Trudeau has admitted that it's happened on certain occasions.
Yeah. I would like to hear from more veterans who've been offered.
Even if they don't want to pursue a lawsuit, I would like to have them swear an affidavit for me, because that would help out this guy who's leading the charge.
Full credit to him.
With all his issues, he was still willing to step up and say, no, this isn't right.
Somebody has to fight this.
You're doing this 24-7, seven days a week.
Yes. Are you a solo practitioner?
Is it crowdsourcing the assistance?
Yes, we're doing crowdsourcing.
I have a non-profit.
It's the valorlegalactioncenter.org and valor with a U for the Canadian spelling.
I don't charge for my services to these military members and veterans.
All my work for them is pro bono because I have my private practice that I...
I wish there was no need for me at all.
I wish the Canadian Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs treated their people the way they should.
Even if they would just follow their own policy, I'd be happy.
I'm going to go into our locals community and see if there's any specific questions that I might have missed.
Oh, Encryptus says from an account that is shoveling SH1T, Viva, is this woman protected?
Have you received any political...
IRS backlash?
IRS? Have you been audited?
Have you noticed any anomalies in your daily life, professional or personal, that you might think related?
No, surprisingly not.
And I thank Ezra Levant from Rebel News for that, because he taught the Law Society of Alberta a lesson that if you push somebody out of the profession, you lose control of them.
So right now, because I'm still licensed, they still have some control.
But if I'm not licensed anymore, I got a million pages of corruption I can expose.
So there's that.
But I also happen to have a fantastic team of specialized people with special skills to keep me protected.
I'm picturing Liam Neeson right now.
There's a question here that says, from Garvin.
Why have none of these generals gone public?
This is the first I'm hearing that anyone in authority stood up.
I don't think, well, at the risk of saying maybe it's not true, how many of them have gone overtly public?
And where do they go public?
Yeah, overtly public.
Stephen Whalen has been very vocal.
And Danny Fortan was quite vocal until they settled his lawsuit.
And I probably have an NDA.
But I would suspect that when their NDAs expire in two to three years, you're going to hear more.
Yeah, and they're not willing...
I don't know what the penalties would be for breaking an NDA, but I mean, there might be military...
Well, they can only bring them back...
So the Canadian military is a little bit different.
You can only be brought back for service-related charges a year after you're retired.
So there's also that factor.
Some of these generals have just retired, so they can't.
They can't say anything or they risk being charged for court-martial.
Anyone in the U.S., they can bring them back in and charge them, but Canada's a little bit different.
Encryptus wants to know if your phone gets hot when it's just sitting there unused.
Oh, yes!
On a regular basis, my staff and I joke around of like, has anybody said hello to CFNIS, which is the military investigation service or the Canadian investigation service.
Everybody say hi to them!
What is the status of the claim for the IIED for the veteran who was offered maids?
Interestingly enough, the Crown is playing a real delay, delay, delay game.
I'm still kind of waiting for documents.
They haven't brought a motion to dismiss.
I think they want to keep this quiet because it is election season.
That's my opinion.
At the risk of asking the obvious stupid question, has anyone from the Conservative Party reached out to you in order to put your story on blast?
They haven't offered to put the story on blast, although a couple of the Conservative MPs have been working with us for some of our disclosures.
I mean, they could take it to committee, that sort of thing, but as opposition, they weren't really in a position.
Although one of my clients has spoken and has a tape recording of the conversation with Pierre Poiev, who says that this is all going to get looked into when the Conservatives come to power.
It's an election promise.
We'll see.
Which Conservative MP was it?
Roman Baber?
Roman has made a few comments.
It was Jim James Bezan.
Okay. And Cathay Whitnall from Saskatchewan as well.
It's depressing and enraging because this is a massive, massive cover-up.
It is.
The Canadian Armed Forces is...
Well, we have about 15,000 people that we could actually use to defend Canada right now.
When they said defend the border, I'm like, with who?
I brought up the comment earlier.
It was from...
Oh crap, I'm going to forget the name.
He said it's 30,000 active service members.
Is it in fact as low as 15,000?
It's 15. It's 15. And that's all services.
That's Air Force, Army, and Navy.
Does that include the Chinese soldiers that we're training on?
No, there's extra of those.
Holy sweet merciful goodness.
There was in May a couple of years ago on a Friday afternoon, we had three jets with crew, with a pilot, with an air crew and a plane that worked to defend our entire country.
15,000.
What's that down from?
What was it at its peak?
Okay, I'm sorry.
So that's been a precipitous drop off in the last three years.
The whole COVID madness and the hardcore DEI agenda.
It's been rendered.
If we did a draft, we don't have enough experienced, non-commissioned people to train the new people.
That's where we're at.
Because they gutted all the guys with combat experience, the guys that train.
Amarals and generals don't train new soldiers.
That's up to...
Master corporals, sergeants, warrant officers, a few captains, and they're all gone.
They're gone.
And they're not coming back.
I'm just going to look up a word before I read a tweet.
I don't know what this word means.
At the risk of getting in trouble, I'm going to bring up a chat.
It was rumble rants here because there's some questions that people have.
Let me see.
Do we see this?
Okay. I don't know what that word means and I think it's probably are in Canada by now.
The internet seems to be doing payees and I don't think that's what you mean, ZionistCuck, based on the name.
I'll see what the chat, tell me what that word means.
I think it might mean foreigner if I'm not mistaken.
Schmickle says the veteran may not have it recorded but he has his own phone history to show the call at least happened.
The phone company is giving us grief on trying to get our access to that.
His own phone records.
Yeah. King of Biltong.
This is not a sponsor, but he is always here and he makes great stuff.
It says, Biltong is a non-MMR vaccine combating vegetarian and vegan viruses.
It's a peer-reviewed and has been tested extensively for centuries.
Biltong USA.
Code Viva for 10% off.
Unfortunately, it's not available in Canada, or I don't think you can send the meat cross-border.
Schmickle says, Viva, the Romandin has dropped another article on the polymarket and Canadian elections.
They deep dive if the whole polymarket is just manipulation or foreign interference for the public to consume.
And that's it.
Catherine, I don't know.
Is there anything that you wanted to mention that I should have asked that I didn't think to ask?
No, I think we covered a lot.
There's a lot of information.
I think we touched on it.
I'm flabbergasted that we went from 60 some odd thousand to 15 in four years and down from an all-time high, rounded up to 100,000.
Canada's a sitting duck.
Oh, and we have been since 2021.
We lost 10% of our military in a month.
In late 2021.
And any business that loses 10% of its trained workforce that fast is bankrupt.
Do we know why we lost them?
Was it injury health?
Well, in 2021, it was because of the vaccine.
The whole COVID thing.
Can you imagine the national security threat they've created through this mandate of this experimental jibby jab?
Yeah, and General Vance told them that that was going to happen.
He said, no, I won't do this because...
Happened. It's going to happen.
But Jody Thomas stood in his office and told him that he was going to have to do this.
That the Canadian Armed Forces were going to lead by example for the Canadian population.
And he's like, that's not what they're there for.
He stood up to her.
I've got this from someone who was in the office, so I know it's true.
Do you have another 15 minutes?
I'm getting tight on time.
I'm going to go to our locals community.
I'm going to call you afterwards because I want to give my number to a few of these people.
I've got a whole group of people that are happy to talk.
I'll speak with Jacob Wells at GiveSendGo and we'll see if we can't set up something of a crowdfunding for the aggregate health issues.
You know what I mean?
Monies to survive, not monies to pursue legal.
Not to put more work on whoever's plate would manage that, but we'll see what we can do with that.
So I'll call you afterwards and we'll figure this out.
Catherine, what's your Twitter handle?
It's Valor...
Valor Legal.
V-A-L-O-U-R and then legal.
Okay. You'll see me trolling the Chief of Defense staff regularly.
Okay, amazing.
Well, okay, I'm glad we met.
I'll call you later.
We'll talk more about this and we'll figure out what can be done.
And everybody now knows and everybody snip clips share away.
But Catherine, thank you very much.
I'm going to continue live.
Thank you.
And thank you for having me on to tell their stories.
Anytime. And we'll come back for updates.
All right.
Take care.
Have a good one.
That's flabbergasting, people.
Alright, we're going to go over to VivaBarnesLaw.
If I...
I think we're going to go raid Hunley, but I don't know how the raid works if the stream is not live yet.
Hunley is not live today.
I already checked.
Who's live now?
Let's go see here.
Redacted is still live.
Okay, go raid Redacted.
Here, I'm going to do this.
Put it on pause.
Everyone... On our stream here.
Let's do this now.
We're going to go slash raid and put it here.
Go tell them from where you came, people.
Enjoy it.
We're going to go for our locals after party.
It's not going to be too long because I'm going to be on with Dr. Drew at 545.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Oh, I forgot to tell everybody.
I'm probably going to miss tomorrow's four o'clock because I'm going to be in transit, but we'll see if I can't figure something out.
Maybe like a from the airport one hour stream with my kid.
We're going to Vegas for the Hunley event, but it's going to be a tough one.
I got all the tipped questions.
I got all the chat.
What does a pait mean?
Did anyone in the chat?
Yeah, it's a pait.
It's pajit.
It is a derogatory term for Indians.
Well, and I'm glad I thought it said pait because...
All right, well, thank you very much, ZionistCuck.
You got me in trouble.
I should have known from the name.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Thanks for the interview, says Laura Weekly.
If you are so inclined to get your butts on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com Okay, well I just read Corin McCobber's link.
Come over to Locals.
Ten bucks a month if you want to support us there or you can join.
I've got to figure out the Rumble exclusive stuff but I haven't been able to do that yet with the team at Rumble and Locals and figured out how to work it with Locals.
So if you want to come, come on over to Locals.
Thank you all for being here and enjoy the afternoon.
Locals? Here it comes.
▲
Export Selection