All Episodes
Previous Next
April 8, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:33:20
SCOTUS Rules for Trump? Kind Of... Market Bloodbath That Wasn't... Canadian Tyranny Updates & MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
...that are anywhere between 20 to 50 percent faster to build, more than 20, 25 percent cheaper than existing homes to build, and that cost less to live in because they're better insulated, better for the environment, they're warmer, safer places to be.
We're going to build homes that are anywhere between 20-50% faster to build, more than 20-25% cheaper than existing homes to build, and that cost less to live in because they're better insulated, better for the environment, they're warmer, safer places to be.
Warmer, safer places to be.
It's a shame that I don't have...
Every video clip that has ever existed to highlight the absolute...
It's not just insanity.
It's inanity.
I mean, it's inanity, insanity.
It's Groundhog Day of a political campaign.
They're going to build houses faster, people.
You know who else said that?
Justin Trudeau.
You know when else he said that?
2015, 2017, 2019, 2021, and now it's 2025.
And listen to the man who has been behind the scenes.
What's his name?
Mark J. Carney.
We're going to build houses faster.
They're going to be warmer.
I'm sorry.
Have people been complaining that their houses are not warm enough in Canada?
I didn't hear that on the checklist of items that are the biggest concerns for Canadians.
Safer? Oh, you mean like when that York police officer was telling York residents, York is in Ontario, to leave the fob for your cars at the front door because the armed criminals who are there to steal your stuff don't want you.
They just want your car.
So leave the fob at the front door?
Encryptus, if you can find that video clip and bring it up when you can, if you can.
Literally the police officer, who somebody I think later on, I won't even repeat the fake news story, someone else had repeated a fake news story that would have suggested some very sinister Rico-esque type motives for which this police officer was saying, yeah, make it easier to steal your cars.
That was bullcrap, so don't spread bad news.
But he said, leave the fob at your front door because these criminals, and they're armed.
And their guns are real guns.
They're not toy guns.
So after 10 years of stricter gun laws that have impacted everybody except the criminals, they want you to feel safer in the houses that they're gonna build for you this time around that they haven't done for the last 10 years in a country with increasing crime, but they're gonna make them safer.
They're gonna make them cheaper.
They're gonna make them eco-friendly.
Holy hell!
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
I'm taking crazy pills, people.
That's Mark J. Carney.
Mark J. Carney, who is the object of...
It would seem some potentially inorganic promotion on the WeChat communist Chinese app.
But before we even get there, it looks like Encryptus is going to come back with another one.
We're going to roll that video when we get it.
Let's go to the, what the news of, okay, we're going to do that.
Is it going to refresh and play?
There's also updated advice for all vehicle owners.
This is real life.
Speaking at an Etobicoke safety meeting last month, Constable Marco Ricciardi had a new message for vehicle owners who keep their fobs in Faraday pouches.
To prevent the possibility of being attacked in your home, leave your fobs at your front door.
Because they're breaking into your home, steal your car.
They don't want anything else.
A lot of them that they're arresting have guns on them.
And they're not toy guns, they're real guns.
They're loaded.
That's why Galinsky says they will be installed.
Take it out now.
Yeah, they're real guns.
They're loaded.
Unlike yours, because you don't have any.
Because we made it so exceedingly difficult for you to procure a double-barrel duck-hunting shotgun, you don't get to have a small-arm revolver for self-defense.
What do you think this is, like, America?
You think you get to defend your body against armed criminals?
But don't worry.
They don't want to do things to your body, although that's been going up in Canada as well.
They don't want to assault you.
Although that's been going up in Canada as well.
So just leave your fobs at the front door.
Like I said the first time I heard of that story, leave it there with a little milk and cookies.
Make sure the milk is warm because the criminals, they're carrying real guns and real bullets.
They don't like cold milk.
And give them your stuff.
Let them take your stuff and you do not dare to defend yourself.
There was a story.
The video went around, I think it was in Ontario, of a dude ramming his car into someone's garage and then going through their house.
Assaulting their family with a chain.
I'm like, hmm.
You know what the great equalizer would be to a chain?
A gun.
Oh, but you're not allowed owning a firearm for the purposes of self-defense in Canada.
You can use one if you have it for self-defense and then you'll defend yourself in the courts for the rest of your life.
You're not allowed procuring a firearm for the purposes of self-defense.
Why do I know this?
Because I have my firearm license.
I had a shotgun up in Canada.
If you even leave an inkling, To the fact that why you're getting a firearm is for the purposes of self-defense and not hunting?
They won't let you have a gun.
You gotta go take a two-day course, which I took.
You gotta pass the exam, which I passed.
You gotta go get a background check, which I got.
You gotta get the authorization of your wife, which I got.
And ultimately, I never even got to go duck hunting because we came to the States before that.
Leave your stuff at the front door for the criminals, people.
Now, Mark J. Carney.
Has been the subject of the news lately.
I don't know if any of you heard about this, but there was something of an inorganic promoted campaign on a Chinese website called WeChat.
And now you guys just, you know, we all got out of four years of Beijing Biden.
And if Canada doesn't get their, how many minutes into the show are we?
If they don't get their stuff together.
You're going to end up with four more years in addition to the last ten years.
This time, it's going to be Commie Carney.
Or Comrade Carney.
Or China Carney.
Or CCP Carney.
I like that one.
CCP Carney.
In fact, you can't spell CCP without the C for Carney.
The way the media reports on it is actually quite stunning because they leave it ambiguous as to whether or not the This article that is being promoted on this WeChat app is favorable or not to Mark Carney.
Now, I have it in an...
Let's get this out here.
Hold on a second.
I have it in an archived link because I wanted to make sure to keep it just in case things disappear on the interwebs.
Well, forget it.
I'll get the other one afterwards.
Here. This is National Post reporting on the story.
This is...
I know Sam Cooper's been talking about it.
This is everything that we've been talking about.
And you get your bootlicking, sycophant, propaganda hack.
So-called journalists out there trying to fact-check other people.
I wanted to make sure about this before I took a position.
Because I had seen people saying China is supporting their preferred candidate, Commie Carney.
Comrade Carney.
CCP Carney.
And then I heard some other fact checkers saying, no, how do you spread this information?
Here's the article from the National Post, the way they're reporting it.
Chinese government boosted carny posts on popular social media platforms.
So far, there's no qualification of the nature or messaging of the posts.
Both posts caught fire at a suspiciously fast pace, garnering an estimated 1 to 3 million views.
Now, this was from the other day.
I think I talked about this particular article where I said, okay, fine.
No, it was the...
Video of the government officials in Canada talking about it.
And, you know, there's an element of if you don't know how social media works, you say like, why is this post getting so much traction and none other?
It's got to be inorganic.
Look, things catch fire, things don't on the internet.
The video of me catching a smallmouth bass with a drone should have caught internet fire.
It should have been a 100 million view video.
As it is, it's barely scraping to a million now.
And it's 10 years old.
Best moment of my life.
Go look it up.
Drone bass fishing.
It's mine.
Sometimes videos for no reason go super viral.
Dave after the dentist.
There were other people who were high off that laughing gas that didn't go viral.
So sometimes it happens and it's not necessarily inorganic.
It's not necessarily bought farming.
It's not necessarily paid for.
They could have boosted it.
I don't know how boosting works on WeChat.
So I was a little skeptical.
Okay. Ottawa.
Canada's electoral interference watchdog says Chinese government is behind recent campaigns on China's largest social media network to influence views of liberal leader Mark Carney.
Notice it's neutral.
I want to know these two posts, good or bad, about Mark Carney.
Positive or negative, I should say, to be more accurate.
On March 10, March 25, Yuli Yumian, the most popular news account on Chinese social media platform WeChat, shared posts about liberal leader Mark Carney that cast him in a generally positive light.
My reaction when I see the national posts, they tend to be better by Canadian standards.
If they say generally positive light, that sounds like back massage, we lovey lovey Mr. Marky Carney love.
So I say, okay, if they say generally positive, it's damn positive, but we won't get there yet.
Both posts.
By the same account, caught fire at a suspiciously fast rate, garnering between 85,000 and 135,000 interactions, 1 to 3 million views.
The Post got so much attention so quickly on the Chinese platform that they caught the eye of security and intelligence threats to election.
Sight. That was the woman that we watched yesterday in the video.
Task Force, which realized that the publications were part of an information campaign by the People's Republic of China.
Quote, this content has been amplified in a coordinated and inauthentic way.
This information operation had contrasting positive and negative narratives, first amplifying Mr. Carney's stance with the United States and then targeting his experience and credentials, said PCO Assistant Secretary Laurie-Anne Kempton, who we watched yesterday.
The site task force assesses for the state-backed information operation was intended to influence Canadian Chinese communities and look to mold perceptions.
And then we get to the posts.
March 10 post entitled, The U.S. Encounters a Tough Guy Prime Minister and describes Carney's position vis-a-vis President Donald Trump's terrorist threats.
The March 25 article, Canada's Road to Seeking Survival Election, describes Carney's political road to the liberal leader, but also notes his career to date has not been smooth and he's been criticized by conservatives for refusing to disclose his assets.
Okay, we can stop here because I don't think we need to get any more into that.
So I went and I found the original articles.
I don't know if they're in Mandarin or Cantonese.
I suspect it's Mandarin.
I don't speak Mandarin.
So using Encryptus in the backdrop to summarize, translate, and give the essence of these articles, what did we come up with?
We'll show you the multi-page report of this.
The conclusion.
Of these articles, as the Toronto Star put it, Carney's victory reflects Canadians' dissatisfaction with the status quo.
But whether he can turn this crisis dividend into meaningful reform is the true test.
Can you imagine anyone on earth suggesting that Carney is the answer to the status quo?
Sorry, is the fighting back against the status quo?
It's so inconceivable and laughably stupid that the only thing that that could be is Chinese propaganda to influence the very, very prominent and numerically dispersed Chinese population in Canada that Carney is the solution to the status quo, the status quo being Carney's Liberal Party.
He's the disruptor.
Holy hell do you have to be mentally challenged to actually believe that.
Or... Susceptible of Chinese-influenced propaganda.
Oh yeah, he's the disruptor to the status quo of 10 years of liberal rule, five years of which Carney has been the advisor to Justin Trudeau.
If you buy that, you're an idiot.
If you vote for the liberals, you're an idiot.
If anyone is going to look at that and say that is anything but delusional support for Mark Carney, they probably work for the S-I-T-E.
The site.
I forget what it was now.
The secure...
Oh, geez, what was it?
Integrity? Something about elections.
Whatever the site stands for.
So now you know it.
This is what's going on in Canada.
It's election interference targeting Canada's Chinese population, which is robust, encrypted.
What's the Chinese population in Canada?
I mean, it's massively concentrated in two areas that tend to, at least one of which tends to dictate the results of elections, Ontario.
And then you got Vancouver, British Columbia.
Two provinces which are more liberal than Portland, Oregon.
I should be accurate.
Sorry, I'm a little unfair to Ontario.
Vancouver, British Columbia, specifically Victoria Island, Vancouver Island, makes Portland, Oregon look like Texas.
Go for it.
We have 1.71 million people identified as Chinese in Canada, which represents 4.7% of Canada's total population.
And it's called Canada, China.
Well, give it a few years, Encryptus.
So that is the...
We don't know if it's mixed.
It's mixed reviews.
Carney is the disruptor to the status quo on a Chinese app targeting Chinese Canadians for the purposes of Chinese propaganda to prop up, yet again, not just the Liberal Party, but specifically Mark J. Carney.
Two weeks after, one of his MPs had to resign because he suggested that the general population deliver.
A Conservative MP to the Hong Kong consulate for the $1 million bounty that the Chinese party has placed on that Conservative member's head.
That's what's going on in Canada, people.
Holy sweet, merciful crabapples.
Good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
For those coming from the quartering, thank you for being here.
Mr. Jeremy, thank you for the raid.
This whole Rumble lineup has been something that's absolutely phenomenal, and everybody should be paying attention to it, partaking in it, and the easiest way...
Do it if you can.
If you can't, just keep watching on Rumble and spread the word at Rumble.
We understand that free speech is under attack and Rumble refuses to back down.
We've always believed in empowering voices no matter how unpopular.
To give you the choice and not curate for political censorship.
Now we're taking that fight to the next level when major advertisers conspire to pull their dollars, even brands like the so-called American company Dunkin' Donuts, turn their back, claiming that Rumble was too right-wing of a culture for them to spend their dollars trying to get you as customers.
We're not here to fit a mold.
We are here to defend free expression, to strengthen that mission.
We're excited to offer Rumble Premium, a completely ad-free with exclusive benefits for viewers and creators.
You'll find exclusive content from creators like Russell Brand, who is living through the wrath of lawfare yet again.
Dr. Disrespect, Tim Cast, Mug Club with Crowder.
It's more than a subscription.
It's a stand for free speech.
Your voice matters.
Join Rumble Premium for a limited time.
Go to Rumble Premium.
That's just rumble.com.
Forward slash premium.
Forward slash Viva 10. You'll get 10 bucks off the annual plan.
You can claim your discount today.
Together we can and will.
Turn the tide.
Make free speech amazing again.
Make it profitable again.
And if you can't support Rumble Premium, just keep supporting the channel.
Watch, snip, clip, and share away.
Alright, awesome.
We're not yet done with Canada.
We're gonna get done with Canada and the absolute tyranny there.
When you get like, you get the slightest I dare say.
not even the slightest remedy of the injustice.
And it's going to bleed into the judicial tyranny that we're witnessing in America.
And it's very interesting.
I dare say that my analysis of what we were being led to believe was a Trump victory, SCOTUS victory in his favor, 5-4, is in fact not.
But I'm going to tease you for that.
And you're going to have to wait.
Because right now we're just going to cover one quick story coming out of Canada.
I think we mentioned it briefly yesterday, but I want to get into the details today.
CTV News.
Propaganda. Garbage.
Of the highest order.
Reporting on...
A story that we covered.
I met Randy Hillier in person.
Geez, I want to say I had him on the channel.
I did.
I have to go back and see when that was.
I don't know if I'm going totally crazy if I didn't.
Randy Hillier is a true patriot, a true Canadian.
I don't use the word patriot very often.
He is a man that stood up to his principles, stood up for his principles, was lambasted by the media, defamed by the media, persecuted by the government.
And several years later, at least on one of the elements of his persecution, he's got some vindication, as if there can possibly be vindication after four years of hell.
But what I wanted to highlight first was CTV News choosing the most flattering, the most honorable photograph they can get of Randy Hillier, him smoking a cigarette.
Now part of me says, A, I kind of like the picture.
He looks like a badass, kind of like, um, who is the guy in all the Western movies?
What are you looking at, punk?
What was his name?
Hugh... Not Hugh Hefner.
Oh, come on!
You feeling lucky, punk?
Well, while the chat gets it, that's sort of what this makes me think of.
But that's not why they picked the picture.
They take an unflattering picture to headline their article when they are forced to admit that their government that funds them, that subsidizes them, and that bails their incompetent, corrupt, partisan asses out, they gotta make this guy look bad.
In the cover photo.
Just because.
It's driving me crazy.
What's the guy's name?
Clint Eastwood.
Thank you.
It's kind of a Clint Eastwood look there.
The bottom line, however, is that they have to come out and say yes, that the courts ruled that some of the 2021 orders barring public protest To the COVID measures were unconstitutional.
So they impose unconstitutional restrictions on gathering so that you can't gather to protest the unconstitutionality of the restrictions on public gathering.
Ontario MPP Randy Hillier smokes a cigarette as he speaks with the media before turning himself in at the Ottawa Police Services headquarters on Monday, March 28, 2022 in Ottawa.
They could even take the pictures three effing years old.
CTV News, you scumbag scoundrels.
Hey, here's breaking news.
Randy Hillier was right.
Let's take a three-year-old picture of him smoking a cigarette.
That'll do.
Booyah. No ill motivation there.
It's just they couldn't find a better picture of him.
You know, like maybe his MP picture.
He was a provincial MPP.
Sorry. Maybe you take his official photo.
Nah, screw that.
Let's take a picture of him picking his nose.
Do we have one?
No picking his nose?
Okay, well, let's just go with the next best one.
Smoking a cigarette.
Ontario's top court has ruled that the provincial restrictions on gatherings that prohibited peaceful protests for several weeks during the COVID-19 pandemic were unconstitutional.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario made the finding today.
This was yesterday.
At the time of shooting this vlog.
And now I've lost my part here because it's right here.
The heck is my problem?
Where was I?
Yeah, they made their...
Ontario's top court ruled we're unconstitutional.
The Court of Appeal made the finding today, yesterday, in a case brought by former Ontario legislator Randy Hillier, who faced several charges for organizing or hosting protests against pandemic measures while the rules were in effect last spring, the spring of 2021.
Hillier appealed after the judge who heard his application found that while the limits on gatherings did infringe on his right to peaceful assembly, they were justified and therefore constitutional.
How the hell did any judge in their right mind come to that conclusion?
While they were limiting gatherings that did infringe on his right to peaceful assembly, yay, that little thing called the God-given right in the charter, that can be limited in as much as it's justified in a free and democratic society, the one catch-all of the charter that makes it all worth used toilet paper.
It was a restriction on his God-given right to peaceful assembly, but they were justified.
Because of my science.
And it was never justified.
Ever. Anywhere.
Anyone who says it was is an idiot and a liar.
There was, I believe, what?
One case of outdoor transmission?
And I think they were probably having sex?
No, maybe they weren't having sex because, you know, Theresa Tam said, when you're having sex, consider wearing face masks.
Consider doing it through glory hole in a wall.
No. They were kissing.
There was close contact.
That was one case.
You can go look it up.
I covered it so many times at the time.
The three-judge panel unanimously found that the application judge incorrectly applied the necessary legal test in coming to that conclusion.
The appeal court says the application judge looked at the impact of the restrictions broadly rather than on the right to peaceful assembly specifically.
And what were the compelling reasons?
What was the science behind it?
There was none.
You had a partisan hack of a judge who was probably...
I don't know how old this judge was or wasn't.
Political, politicized, political coward.
Probably had his mob of Ottawa idiots.
You can't have them gather outside.
You can only do that for Black Lives Matter.
It notes that while the province had made exceptions for other types of gatherings, such as weddings and funerals, the rules amounted to an outright ban on protests.
There was also no evidence that the province even considered an exemption for outdoor political protests, the court wrote.
Quote, can the court in assessing the state's justification countenance An outcome in which the state eliminates the free exercise of a fundamental freedom without giving that elimination any actual thought the court agrees.
Well, only if you're an idiot.
And there's enough idiot judges that did it.
They did it in Nova Scotia, had to rely on the Court of Appeal to overturn that one.
They did it in Ontario, had to rely on the Court of Appeal to overturn that one.
They justified forced detention in government designated courting facilities.
They justified forced detention for anybody coming over across the border two weeks in a government-designated quarantine facility, also known as a frickin' federal prison.
But they made them out of hotels.
They were nice.
There were only a couple of sexual assaults at these government-designated quarantine facilities.
Such an outcome would be entirely contrary to the purpose of the Charter in protecting the free exercise of fundamental freedoms against the limiting actions of government.
The court has asked for submissions on possible remedies over the next few weeks.
Here's the remedy.
Don't do it again.
Oh, well, next time it happens.
Well, now it's a really serious virus.
COVID really was.
We were wrong on COVID.
Okay, sorry.
Mea culpa.
But this time we really got it.
This time it's really necessary.
This one's worse than COVID.
So come back in four years after we've violated your rights, your God-given charter rights.
But the violation was justified in a free and democratic society.
Where's my phone?
Where's my serenity now phone?
The kid took the...
He took my serenity now prayer off the back of my phone.
God, give me the strength.
I can never remember it.
It's an actual brain fart.
God, give me the strength to change the things I can.
Give me the courage.
Can someone put the serenity prayer in the chat?
Oh, okay.
Well, let's just bring this one up here.
We've got Schmickle and House Viva.
did you see the bomb report at the remanded dropped on the BC election?
Take a look.
It was released this morning.
Cheers. I'll have, I mean, if, if I know briefly, I think what you're talking about is in BC, there was discussion about the duration it took to count the votes.
And they, I believe we're using the, I dropped the entire prayer into your text.
Text! Let's do it right now.
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.
I have not seen the second part of this.
Living one day at a time, enjoying one moment at a time, that's not something I'm able to do.
Accepting hardships as a pathway to peace, I can do that.
Taking as he did, capital H, this sinful world as it is, not as I would have it, trusting that he will make all things right if I surrender to his will.
That I may be reasonably happy in this life and supremely happy with him forever in the next.
Amen. Well, holy crabapples.
I've never heard the rest of it, and now I feel kind of stupid because the rest of it is almost better than the first part of it.
I wanted to make sure you had the full version because I know you were just reading the phone case version for ever so long.
I wanted to make sure you had it.
Well, thank you.
If I ever get a tattoo, that tattoo just got a lot longer, but we'll see about that.
All right, peeps, that's what's going on in Canada.
Before we move on, does anyone have any questions?
Let me go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Boopsy says, the key is asking God to grant it to you.
TT Fulltimer says, my only prayer, God's will be done.
And then we got Sting17 says, now I lay me down to sleep.
I pray the Lord my soul to...
That I only know from the Metallica song.
So that's what's going on in Canada.
Let's head back over to the US because what is being largely hailed as a massive victory for Trump, there's two of them.
I love...
No matter how cynical you get, it's hard to keep up.
Lily Tomlin.
And everyone's like, Viva!
Why do you have a Democrat quote in the banner of your Twitter feed?
Because Democrats can say smart things too.
You know, every now and again.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Plus, who knows, by the time she, you know, is Lily Tomlin alive, she might have turned Republican.
They do say, if you're not a liberal when you're young, you have no heart, and if you're not a conservative when you're old, you have no brain.
The news of the day was that the Supreme Court ruling in one of the cases involving the detention and deportation of Trena de Aragua gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.
That the Supreme Court came down 5-4, Amy Coney Barrett, dirty traitor, was on the side of the three libs, came down 5-4 in support of Trump, saying he gets to do it.
I actually go read these decisions, not that I rely on the summary by propagandists.
I like to go in as much as I humanly can find the actual decisions and read them.
I will tell you I read quickly and...
I read the first few lines of a paragraph.
If it doesn't get to where I think it needs to go, scroll down and read the end.
And you can get what you need to know of this order, because I'm reading the per curiam majority decision, and I'm reading it like, ugh.
The first thing I say is like, is this the right decision?
Like, everyone's saying this is amazing.
This strikes me as being not just not amazing, it strikes me as like almost being the wink, wink, nudge, nudge, or at least the blueprint for how the activists are now going to respond going forward.
And I don't think I'm wrong about that.
Percurian means there was not one judge who put their name to it.
5-4.
This matter concerns the detention and removal of Venezuelan nationals believed to be members of the Trena de Aragua.
An entity that the State Department has designated as a foreign terrorist organization.
The president...
Okay, then we get to the proclamation.
Yeah, see, now I skip.
Okay, fine.
Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act regarding the invasion of the United States by Trinidad and Agua.
Five detainees and a putative class sought injunctive and declaratory relief against the implementation of and the removal under the proclamation.
So you understand the measure was...
The way it played out, actually, it's kind of fascinating, is Trump...
Issue this proclamation designating Trena de Aragua a terrorist organization.
And so could then apply the Alien Enemies Act to Trena de Aragua, which he argues is a predatory incursion force, which means it's coming at the direction of a foreign government.
We're not at a time of war.
And the way the media was spinning this was, okay, he designates them as a terrorist organization so that he can invoke the Enemies Act, but we're not at war with Venezuela.
Are we at war with Venezuela?
No, so you can't invoke the enemy's act.
Idiots. Smooth-brained or ill-informed or propagandist idiots.
There is something called a predatory incursion, which itself is not necessarily predicated on there being a formal declaration of war.
It's rather a predatory incursion done at the behest or the request of a foreign government.
And the argument here, and I don't think anyone disputes it, is that these gang members were sent at the specific request at the behest of the Venezuelan government.
A punitive...
Class action.
I mean, they're trying to get a class action to have a massive TRO, temporary restraining order, to prohibit their detainment and deportation.
And so, okay, fine.
That's the procedural mechanism, not the substantive issue at law here as to whether or not Trump can invoke the Alien Enemies Act to deport people that they've designated and doing it as a matter of...
Basically, sort of quasi-military policy and not as a matter of legislative policy.
In as much as the courts, as the analogy goes, Stephen Miller gave it to Casey Hunt on CNN, the courts are not going to come in and say what terrorist base the president can order the bombing of in Yemen.
Same thing should apply here.
They're coming in and saying, no, these people have due process and you can't just deport them because you've designated them as a terrorist organization under this proclamation so that you can apply the Alien Enemies Act.
Okay. That's the broader context.
Initially, the detainees sought relief in habeas, habeas corpus, show me the body, bring me the body, among other causes of action, but they dismissed their habeas claims.
March 15, 2025, the District Court for the District of Columbia issued two temporary restraining orders, TROs, preventing any removal of the named plaintiffs and preventing the removal under the Alien Enemies Act of the provisionally certified class consisting of, and then they define the class.
So basically, the D.C. Court comes in and says, you can't Deport them.
We're issuing a TRO.
Turn those planes around.
Tough noogies.
They're already in international waters.
Go F yourself.
But you can't deport them as members of a class.
And here's the temporary restraining order issued in the context of that putative class, the determinate class in a class action.
And what do they come in and they say?
We grant the application to vacate the TROs.
The detainees seek equitable relief against the implementation of the proclamation and against the removal under the AEA, Alien Enemies Act.
They challenge the government's interpretation of the act and assert that they did not fall within the category of removable alien enemies.
But we do not reach those arguments.
They don't even address them because that's not the substance of it.
Challenges to removal under the AEAS statute, which largely precludes judicial review, and then they cite that precedent, must be brought in habeas.
So they're not saying that Trump can invoke the Alien Enemies Act and that it's not subject for judicial review.
They're saying you want to challenge it.
You go do it by way of habeas corpus.
Show me the body.
Challenge through habeas, not through a class action temporary restraining order.
So I'm reading this like, crap, is this the right decision?
Because this is not looking good.
Because all they're going to go do right now on a going forward basis, and we'll get to it, is go by way of habeas.
Challenge each and every detention and deportation via habeas.
Give me my habeas corpus hearing before you deport me.
Good luck deporting.
I don't know how many violent TVA terrorist organization members there are.
There's like...
Say there's 10 million illegals.
They're not all subject to potential deportation under the AEA as applied.
But I don't know how many there are.
100,000?
So let's just assume that everyone files a habeas motion if they get deported.
So before they get deported, you have a habeas hearing on each and every one of...
Just say it's 50,000.
And it's a one-day hearing.
That's a lot.
But 50,000 court days.
How long is that going to take?
Say it's three hours.
It's 150,000 hours.
How many court days is that going to take?
Where was I?
Okay, so behaviors.
Here we go.
Okay, scroll down.
Now we're going to see here.
Get the next line.
Let's go to the next paragraph.
The detainees also sought equitable relief against summary removal.
Although judicial review under the AEA is limited, we have held that an individual subject to detention and removal under the statute is entitled to judicial review.
As to, quote, questions of interpretation of constitutionality of the act, as well as whether or not she or he is, in fact, an alien enemy, 14 years.
Of age or older.
So reading this, basically what they're saying is everybody who contests it, I'm 13, you don't get to deport me, so I get a hearing.
I'm not a member of the TDA, so you don't get to deport me.
I want my hearing.
For all the rhetoric of the dissents, today's order and per curiam confirm that the detainees subject to removal orders under the AEA are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal.
The only question is which court will resolve that challenge.
For the reasons set forth, we hold that venue lies in the district of confinement.
The dissents would have the court delay resolving that issue, requiring, given our decision today, that the process begin anew down the road.
We see no benefit.
Application to vacate the orders of the United States District Court, yadda yadda yadda, is granted.
March 15, 2025, minute or...
So, scroll up, because this is the key.
For all the rhetoric of the dissents, today's order and per curiam confirm that the detainees subject to removal orders under the AEA...
Are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal.
The only question is, which court will resolve that?
And so they say, you got to do it in the area, in the district of confinement, under a habeas, and not through a TRO in the context of a class action.
That's not a victory.
I'm sorry.
And I don't want to get too pessimistic.
And I'm talking with Encryptus before the show.
And like, do you understand it the same way?
And Encryptus...
Via his AI wonder.
Because I trust my judgment, but I want to vet it.
And I put out a tweet just to feel the water.
Someone says, Viva, you idiot.
Didn't you understand this part of it?
What you're saying is totally wrong.
Nobody said that.
And I don't think I'm wrong.
And I tweeted out, as far as I understand the Supreme Court 5-4 ruling, quote, in favor of Trump.
It actually does not adjudicate anything on the merits, and even on its face seems to lay out the very complex and impractical framework for future deportations.
Is my reading accurate?
And here's the graph created by Agent Guru.
This is the process under this particular decision.
For those listening in podcast, required process for deportation under the Alien Enemies Act.
Trump versus JGG 2025.
Step one.
You can have lots of fun.
Step two.
Sorry. Step one.
Government decision to remove under the Alien Enemies Act Proclamation.
Step two, detainee is given official notice of an AEA, Alien Enemies Act, removal designation.
Step three, notice must be timely and allow for real opportunity to file habeas petition.
Step four, detainee files habeas petition in district of confinement, whatever that district is.
Step five, district court reviews.
Is it constitutional?
And are they legit under the AEA for...
Deportation. They're 13?
Nope, you don't get to go.
Oh, you're not a member of the TDA?
It was allegedly just a soccer ball with a crown on it?
A crown to your parents?
Oh, you're not a member of the gang?
So you don't get to go.
I mean, due process is not just a wonderful thing.
It's an essential thing.
Some people are going to say, they're illegal to begin with.
Fine. But then the argument's going to be, you don't deport them to an El Salvadorian gang prison if they're not members of TDA.
And you just deport them to a country that won't take them back because they're already here.
That's your problem, tough noogies.
This is the process.
And I feel bad we put this graph out.
It's not like the immigration activists who want to flood the country with illegals so they can basically turn America into a uniparty blue state.
It's not like they're not going to know this.
But this is it.
So the question is going to be, can you detain and deport before they have a chance to file habeas?
I mean, some people are going to say that's totally unfair.
But every one of them who wants to avoid deportation, they know the blueprint.
I'm the 13-year-old with the biggest mustache you've ever seen in your life.
These tattoos?
Yeah, we can get tattoos at 12 years old in Venezuela.
It's totally normal.
So that's it.
I don't think it's a victory.
I actually think it's the majority basically telling the dissent, shut your traps, you bunch of hysterical idiots.
We're basically on your side here.
They just don't go through a...
Class action?
Just go through a habeas, individual habeas.
Oh, but they don't have the, you know, they might not all have the means to do it.
Maybe not.
It's a tough life.
That's it.
This will take years to remove, even at 10,000 illegals, says bcancella0608.
I tend to, I mean, just do some math hours.
Hey Siri, how many hours are there in a year?
2,400?
8,000 hours.
One year is 8,000 hours.
How many judges?
I mean, maybe it'll be good.
Create an entire court system.
If it doesn't already exist, I suspect it already exists.
But then what's going to happen is you're going to get your activists, district judges, whomever, who are going to systematically say, the evidence that they're TDA, not so strong.
Sure, they got tattoos on their faces and their shoulders, and they got TDA on their back with their names, but they since left the gang.
In fact, they left the gang since the time they left Venezuela.
It's an impractical procedure that even the majority has set up, and I don't want to sound too blackpilled.
It is what it is.
And that's my understanding, and I don't think I'm wrong about that.
The other good news of the day, we're going to lump it in here, which was Judge Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts, suspending activist, corrupt, SOB Judge Boasberg's order to bring back Somebody who's an alleged TDA member who was already deported to El Salvador to go back and either kidnap, as Barnes is saying, or order a foreign country to re-deliver someone who you've deported, who even if they weren't a member of the TDA were illegal aliens to begin with.
So this is yesterday as well.
As of the time of shooting, this was Chief Justice saying, Order entered by the Chief Justice.
Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants, it is hereby ordered that the April 4, 2025 order of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.
I'm getting mixed up now between judges here.
Case number is hereby stayed pending further order of the Chief Justice or of the court.
It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before April 8th, 2025.
That was another smashing victory that people thought, oh, finally, Judge Roberts finally understands that the court has been sitting on its judicial hands for a little bit too long.
And the breaking news of the day in response to that was apparently Judge Boasberg cancelled a hearing that he was supposed to have in response to the Supreme Court ruling and is going to regroup and reassess.
Maybe he's going to have a clerk go out and find that memo that we put together here.
Well, I would love to!
I would love to order and enjoy all of them as a class, but I can't do that anymore.
So what they're going to have to do is adhere to the Supreme Court ruling.
And here's the step one.
Here's step two.
Here's step three, step four, step five.
Go inundate the court system so that it's bogged down for years.
And in Trump's three and a half years left in office, a little more than that, 3.8 years.
He'll be lucky if he can get out any more than what he's already gotten out because they'll be tied up for due process means the wheels of justice turn very, very slowly, even for illegal aliens, here illegally, who are suspected members of a designated terrorist organization.
Judge Boasberg cancels hearing on Trump deportations after Supreme Court ruling.
Supreme Court ruled on Monday that deportations under the AEA can continue.
They can continue!
Put an asterisk on that!
District Judge James Boasberg cancelled his Tuesday afternoon hearing on the Trump administration's use of the Aliens Enemies Act to deport alleged migrant gang members without due process after the Supreme Court ruled Monday evening that the administration could resume carrying out such deportations.
With an asterisk, Boesberg had scheduled the hearing to consider whether to convert the temporary restraining order he issued blocking those deportations last month into a longer-lasting preliminary injunction as he mulled whether to hold the administration in contempt for failing to provide information about the deportation of over 200 alleged Venezuelan gang members last month.
This is a judge.
Who thinks he's commander-in-chief?
An activist corrupt judge.
Corrupt judge.
What was the deal with his daughter that was recently disclosed?
She's working for an activist organization.
I mean, this is Judge Juan Marchand 2.0.
Except he predated Judge Juan Marchand.
So I guess he's Judge Juan Marchand 1.0 and Judge Marchand is Boesberg 2.0.
He canceled the hearing, did not address where the contempt issue stands.
Supreme Court ruled 5-4 and we just covered that.
The unsigned opinion lifted Boesberg's temporary restraining order, ruling that he lacked jurisdiction to address the matter.
So they're going to go regroup, send them all to whatever activist organizations are helping.
Literal gang members stay in a country illegally where they are, at least some of them, literally committing the most violent, heinous crimes imaginable.
Encryptus, can you pull up the most recent article of the most recent gang member who was scheduled to be deported?
And I think it was Caroline Levitt who was talking about it, committed a murder and necrophilia on the victim.
If you can pull that up, I just want to finish it with the actual consequences of what was intended to be an invasion.
By the country itself and by the Democrat and I'll say the uniparty machine, these activist organizations that wanted to facilitate an outright invasion of America so that it would change all of the congressional seats, the proportions, because now we know that when they do the census it includes illegals.
It was clearly politically motivated invasion, arguably facilitated or orchestrated by Mayorkas, who deserves to be in jail.
With all of these activist organizations who deserve to be in jail, with these foreign governments who are looking for any good excuse to get rid of their gang members.
Last month, Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act, a wartime authority used to deport non-citizens with little to no due process, arguing that the Venezuelan gangs are a hybrid criminal state that is invading the United States.
Boesberg temporarily blocked the president's use of the law on March 15, ordering the government to turn around two flights carrying more than 200 alleged TDA members to El Salvador.
Authorities failed to return the flight.
Leading to the judge to threaten the administration with contempt.
What on earth, people?
Let's see what we got here.
King of Biltong is in the house.
Try our Biltong.
Almost 50% protein.
Packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
A perfect snack addition to your weekly meal prep.
BiltongUSA.com.
Code VIVA for 10% off.
I wanted to get some questions on this.
Get some questions in the chat.
I'm going to go to locals and see who's got any questions on this before we change topics.
And let me see what we got here.
One of the things that occurred to me when I did the research was that I had to...
This is unrelated.
Let me go to Rumble and see what's going on here.
Who thinks this is a victory?
Me thinks not.
Zenscapes says, Viva, I need to drop off to create more content.
Almost 100 followers now, so hopefully soon I can join the creator program.
Thanks for the follows.
Everyone, I don't know what content Zenscapes makes.
Check it out.
Hans1pack says, This is why Trump has announced enforcement of $1,000 a day.
I think it was $996 a day.
And I wonder if there's a reason why it's $996 to keep it under a threshold.
A fine for people with final removal orders and to enforce back to removal order.
Been in USA and own a house but final removal order.
Yeah, he issued something, basically a fine of $998 a day for every day that you remain in violation of an order to self-deport.
And the idea being that for any...
Illegals who have assets to seize in America?
That will be that against which they execute should they refuse to self-deport.
Americans have got to make phone calls and emails and stay engaged.
The people are the lesser magistrates, says Warrior Gal.
Now let me go over to locals.
Sting17 says you need money to get...
Tattoos. They are crying that they are poor and hungry.
BS. Well, some of those are gang tattoos.
One thing I've understood is that the blue tattoos are the prison tattoos because they do them cheap when you're in prison.
Aunt Lee says, how do you stop the imperial judiciary when Democrats love power and have corrupted the three branches of the federal government?
That's the question.
And we've talked about it with Barnes in terms of how do you actually When you get Justice Roberts coming out and saying, casting doubt on impeachment, what are you supposed to do?
You can't impeach.
They don't play by the rules.
They don't play honestly.
They will literally picket and protest on the front lawn of judges who are on the verge of issuing rulings that they don't like.
They will literally issue statements and make inflammatory rhetoric to drive people to literally Drive themselves to judges' houses to do them egregious bodily harm.
They don't play by the rules.
They play for power and they play for keeps.
And then they prevent you from righting their wrongs and remedying their mistakes.
One way to do just keep going about making as much noise as possible and trying to wake people up.
The one thing you don't want to do is resort to violence because while they tolerate violence on their side, they don't tolerate violence on other sides.
They don't even tolerate the potential for violence and they manufacture the violence even if they don't get it so that they can go after the Jan Sixers but not the BLM Summer of Love.
The Molotov cocktail lawyers, because they're on the right side of the political alley, they get the good treatment.
But anyway, that's it.
That's what's going on with those two decisions.
They're not what I think we thought they were, and I have no doubt in as much as Judge Boasberg is regrouping, I wonder, like, okay, is it going to be detention and deportation instantaneously?
You want your habeas?
Apply for habeas from El Salvador or Venezuela.
I'm not sure I like that idea.
Go for it.
So there's actually part of that ruling that says no quick and secret deportations.
Scratch that.
Say it again.
I couldn't find the specific article you were looking for.
I did find an interesting one that I haven't heard you talk about that I put into our private chat.
And then also, there's been some comments about Andrew Branca, Law of Self-Defense, giving a completely different take on this.
It might be an interesting perspective.
I'll have Andrew Branca on.
I would almost defer to his opinion over mine, but I'm curious to hear it.
This is the article.
Whoa! Senator Schmidt floats Judge Boesberg may have been tipped off to Venezuelan gang member deportation case.
I don't think...
What's the whoa about that?
We didn't talk about this article, but we definitely talked about that.
Encryptus, if you can pull this up.
He wasn't the emergency judge the weekend that this became an issue.
He wasn't the judge that would have gotten the request for a TRO.
Somehow it landed on him, despite the fact that he wasn't the presiding or the sitting judge or the emergency judge that weekend.
See if you can find that while I read through this.
But they knew that they had gotten wind that he signed, Trump being him, signed the proclamation.
And they knew what was coming into effect.
And they started preparing their pleadings at like 10 in the morning.
And they asked for a hearing that day.
Knowing that these deportations were going to occur, and then the only, I say saving grace if you think it's a good thing, and by all accounts, these were gang members, the only saving grace was that the plane was over international waters by the time this got to Judge Boasberg, who had no business hearing this because he wasn't the emergency judge on that weekend.
Judge Boasberg, this is from Gateway Pundit.
So if you think Gateway Pundit is propaganda, right-wing propaganda, more power to you.
I like them.
They've been very, very good.
And I check everybody meticulously.
James Boesberg, U.S. District Judge, D.C., appointed by Barack Obama, insists he was randomly assigned to the Alien Enemies Act case related to the deportation of Venezuelan gang members.
However, it appears Boesberg purposely inserted himself in the case.
Okay, last month he granted the order.
Far left, America-hating leftist groups such as the ACLU and Democracy Forward rushed to a D.C. court in a desperate bid to shield dangerous illegal aliens from deportation.
The only word I might add was alleged.
The lawsuit was filed just after midnight.
And in the early hours of Saturday.
This much we knew and this much we talked about.
And surprise, surprise, Bozberg grabbed a case a few hours later that morning, even though he was on vacation.
Senator Eric Schmidt, Republican from Missouri, said Bozberg wasn't even the emergency assignment judge on March 15th.
Okay, this is it.
Fine. We talked about this, but not this particular article.
So he likely used his position as chief judge to insert himself into the case.
Quote, how did Judge Bozberg get the Trena de Aragua case when he wasn't the emergency assignment?
Judge, on March 15, did he use his position as Chief Justice to force himself onto the case?
The American people are demanding answers.
I'll be filing legislation to require random case assignments, Senator Schmidt said.
You know what I love about this?
If they're going to file legislation or the prospect of legislation, hold a congressional hearing on this and inquire.
Call Judge Boasberg up.
Don't need to ask any details about the case.
For the purposes of future legislation, how is it that he came to be the judge on this case?
Judge Boasberg, over the weekend it came out, he's not the emergency judge in D.C. He inserted himself in that role.
He was on vacation.
The case was filed at 2.30 in the morning.
Somehow he ended up with that case.
He wasn't the emergency judge on duty, so I think this requires further investigation of legislation, Schmidt said.
Schmidt continued he is the chief judge and he inserted himself.
That's a gross way of putting it, but that doesn't happen.
The emergency judges 100% of the time get those cases, so he could have been tipped off that this was going to be filed while on vacation he took the case.
It makes absolutely zero sense how he got the case.
It being on the weekend, regardless of vacation, it being on the weekend, he wasn't the emergency judge.
When you file injunctions, and if you guys are new to the channel, I've practiced law for 13 plus years, and I did a lot of injunctions.
You go get the judge in chambers.
They're not in a courtroom.
They're in chambers.
They're for emergencies.
And then they will hear you.
And depending on the emergency, they will order a hearing, order the opposing party to come, unless it's an ex parte Mariva injunction.
Was it a Mariva injunction?
Anyhow, bottom line, vacation or not, on the weekend, he's not the emergency judge.
He doesn't see it.
Unless the emergency judge says, I'm overloaded.
I got too many stuff I'm dealing with right now.
I'll call the chief judge and he'll deal with it.
And if that's the case, tell us.
Let's see.
Okay, good.
That's interesting.
Now I'm actually kind of dying to see what Branka has to say.
Let me see if we were potentially having a guest who might not be making it today, but we'll get him later on.
Should I see if I can get Branka?
Let me see if I can get Branka in real time.
I was just about to say, why don't you text Branka?
Let me see if I've got him here.
Guys, give me one second.
I'm going to go like this.
It's Law of Self-Defense.
Law of Self-Defense.
And I'm going to DM him.
Let's see how fast we can do this.
Want to pop on and talk about the ruling, the SCOTUS ruling.
See if we can do this.
It probably will not happen, but he who dares nothing need hope for nothing.
All right, the other thing that we're going to talk about, David Mamet, every fear hides a wish.
There are things like, oh, I sure hope that doesn't happen.
Wouldn't it be terrible if that happened?
Oh my goodness, Trump is going to cause a bloodbath on the markets.
It's going to be terrible.
Hope, hope, so that we can use it against Trump.
We don't care how many people suffer as a result of it.
Oh my goodness, Trump is going to get people killed.
Hopefully someone does something stupid.
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
Go do something stupid so we can blame it on Trump.
The tariffs, the bloodbath that never was.
And by the way, it's not that I have a risk aversion.
Nobody likes losing money, especially money that's...
Hard earned.
Nobody likes losing.
I wouldn't call a 5% drop in the stock market a bloodbath to begin with.
Okay, the fact that it's across the board, across...
What do they call those things?
Across markets?
Across the globe?
Fine. It's a uniform dip.
5% to 7%.
Yeah, that's bad.
It's bad.
If you look at it over what time frame.
So I wouldn't have even called what happened yesterday a bloodbath.
The Democrats and anyone suffering from TDS wanted it to be a bloodbath so they could use it against Donald Trump.
And for clarity, scumbag propagandist, a marketplace bloodbath, an economic bloodbath.
They wanted it to be the Great Depression bloodbath so they could then use it against Donald Trump.
Nobody cares about the victims of it.
When you have Tim Noble's walls that...
Slithering scumbag son of a bitch.
Getting up there saying, to get my rocks off in the morning, I go look at how much Tesla's down.
Oh, look at that, down another 7%.
You stupid jackass.
You have citizens in your state who have investments, who have retirement funds, who have pension funds.
You yourself have it, you sniveling dweeb.
I love seeing it.
It gets me hard in the morning.
Oh, God, yeah.
Idiots. They love it.
Political disaster doesn't matter so long as they get to weaponize.
In fact, the more people that suffer, the more people that die, the better.
So they wanted a bloodbath yesterday.
It was the bloodbath that never was.
And all of their tweets age like frickin' cheese over the course of literally one day.
Because whatever bloodbath was yesterday, the markets bounced back today.
Whether it's countries running and asking to renegotiate trade deals with America, whether it was just a panic sell-off because people were listening to the people who have been wronged for the last five years.
Holy hell, how stupid do you have to be to continue listening to these pundits, these politicians, these experts, when they tell you it's going to be a bloodbath.
You're an idiot.
And no one forced you to sell.
And had you not sold yesterday, you would have 0% difference today.
And had you bought yesterday, you'd be up 7%.
We'll get to that, Marjorie Taylor Greene.
So this is Kristen Gillibrand.
Wait, is this the same Gillibrand who I was making fun of during the congressional hearings?
Yep. She doesn't look like that.
No, she looks about 50 years older.
Okay. That's getting closer to what I thought.
Okay, that's her.
And not to make fun of anybody's looks, but there's no but.
Just update your picture.
This was from yesterday.
No, sorry, this was...
Let me rephrase.
Hers had a few more days to age because hers was Friday.
And then over the weekend, I was like, oh my God, the market's down, the futures, everything's down.
I can't sell.
I can't sell.
It's Sunday.
I'm in a panic then.
Do something stupid.
Kristen Gillibrand, April 4th, I believe, was Friday.
The front page of Trump's tariff.
Trump's tariff's tax.
Give it a name, people.
This is going to make the cost of everything you buy higher.
You got the New York Times.
You got your New York Times who said 800,000 children were hospitalized with COVID.
They had to retract.
You got your New York Times that said it's racist to suggest that COVID emanated from a lab in Wuhan, China.
They're saying, holy crap, look at this.
New York Times.
The source of propagandist idiots.
Newsday. Stocks plunge.
Daily News!
I mean, these are like the National Enquirer of news outlets.
The patient lived.
Dow drops 1,600.
Falls 6%.
Pros see the biggest slam in the economy in years.
This was on Friday.
Okay. Today, things are back to normal.
Well, that was the quickest bloodbath of the markets you've ever seen.
Let me see this one.
No, that's the wrong one.
What was the other one?
I had another.
I had to bring up the chart.
It all depends on when you look at it.
So they show you the...
I couldn't get the one from yesterday when it showed the 5% drop.
But one of the major charts they're showing, last five days, it's down 9%.
It is!
It's down 9% over the last five days.
Over the last six months, it's down 9%.
And now, I will wholeheartedly steal madness.
You don't measure over the...
Five years is kind of a big measurement.
Nobody wants to say, well, it's up 60% over the last five years.
You're not expecting, typically, to only make 60% over five years.
And had you stopped right here, you would have been up like, what, 70-some-odd percent?
I brought this one up to highlight one thing.
I know that people were making hay of it, but it wasn't the same people making hay of this drop here.
Look at these two big, fat, precipitous drops right here.
Boom. Who was in power?
In 2022 to 2023.
Beijing Biden.
Who was in power from 2000 to 2021 when it went up substantially?
Trump. Who was in power when it was up?
What do we got in here?
Let's see.
I don't know when it became 2025.
The market overall did better.
It increasingly gained under Biden.
But you remember when even people on the right were blowing their lids at bad days on the market.
Here. Boom.
Here. Boom.
Calamity. No, not really.
Not so much.
But here, yeah, calamity.
So when they show you graphs and charts that highlight the disaster, they want it to exist.
They want to exacerbate it.
They want more people to suffer the better because they get to weaponize that even more against Donald Trump.
And it was a bloodbath that never was.
It was hysteria that never was.
But that will not cause these stupid people.
To take a step back and stop being stupid.
The one whose brain is broken.
The chat's going to know who I'm going to get to right now.
There's a number of people whose brains have just turned to diarrhea and just dripping out of their ears, dripping out of their nose.
That's the most awful graphic visual I've ever thought of.
Secular talk with Kyle Kalinsky.
Oh, God, the blue sky.
Kyle Kalinsky.
Has gone full political retard.
And you never go full political retard because you never come back from it.
Kyle Kalinsky has been posting shit like this.
This was 17 hours ago.
Aged like cheese.
Republicans dream.
Republicans reality.
Then there was this one.
Very creative.
I mean, it's just like it's political retardation.
This is the stuff you'd expect from a 12-year-old girl.
Who hates the boy that sits next to her in class because he picks his nose and she draws stuff like this and makes little voodoo dolls.
This is the stuff you expect from unhinged children.
And especially young girls.
So congratulations.
Secular talk.
What was the other one?
There was a third one.
This one right here.
And when it doesn't happen, when the markets bounce back the next day, They don't take a step back and say, okay, maybe we overreacted.
Maybe we panicked.
Maybe people shouldn't trust me.
No! Double down.
You're never wrong.
Never apologize.
Never correct.
What is it that Roger Stone says?
Attack, attack, attack.
Deny, deflect, attack, attack.
Something along those lines.
And in politics, it's what you have to do, I guess.
As it is in propaganda journalism.
So, it bounces back.
Encryptus, can you pull up this chart or a link to this chart in its full timeline?
Because again, look at this.
The timeline here, we're going by years.
1928, 28, 29, 29, 1930, 1930, 31, 31, 32, 32. So he's now making a prediction that's no longer like a week, a month.
He's saying in two years.
The market's going to fully tank.
This is the stock market crash.
Oh, yeah, the market bounced back after the crash.
So he's analogizing, comparing yesterday's 5% drop bounce back today to the Great Depression drop, which I can't see the metrics on the...
Is it the x-axis on the left?
I can't see the values on the left.
Let me see.
Let me see.
Encryptus, let me know when you got it.
I'm going to see if I can bring this up.
But this is him.
We've got it.
I'm pulling it up right now.
Give me two seconds.
We weren't wrong.
Just wait.
We were wrong.
I said yesterday was D-Day.
Okay, I was wrong that it was yesterday.
Just give it time, people.
Give it time.
Keep saying the same things over and over again.
Eventually, when something close enough happens, you get to say, see, I called it.
Propagandist morons of the highest order.
And while they do that, they demonize the people who were telling people, don't panic.
Don't be a panicking.
Trump is good with names every now and again.
Maybe it wasn't his.
There are some cringier names that he's come up with.
Panikins was one of them.
So what are the values of the drop?
Here's that chart.
If you see that little red dot there on the far, far left, that would be that drop that you see in 1929 and everything that's happened since.
Okay, now, is the baseline zero, though?
Yes. Okay, so where we see the drip and it nearly hit the bottom, that nearly hit what we effectively call zero.
Okay, I think you got it.
Yeah, so the number's zero.
It's not like...
Okay, fine.
Okay, so that illustrates even more the absolute idiocy of comparing a 5% drop in a five-year 60% gain to hitting nearly, I don't know what happens when you hit zero on the market and then the gains ever since.
Yeah, Kalinsky, you're an idiot.
He's married to Crystal Ball, right?
How many Ks do they have between the two names?
I'm always a little not suspicious.
It would be three.
It would be three, right?
I'm always a little bit not suspicious.
I just say, like, judgment-wise, if your last name starts with K, don't pick a first name that starts with K. And certainly don't pick a middle name that starts with K. Like the whole Kardashians and everyone's K. Maybe there was a reason.
Maybe K means something different in different cultures and heritages.
And I'm not trying to be funny there.
Your last name starts with K?
Don't have a first name that starts with K. There's plenty of good names out there.
Spell Kyle with a C-H.
I'm joking.
No. So they're panicking.
They're a bunch of panikins.
And they did?
I don't know if they sold.
They lost.
Good for you.
You're losers.
You panicked on a Monday and now you lost money on a Tuesday.
Same thing with crypto.
Maybe I could have sold whatever modest holding I had in crypto when it was at $100,000 and I didn't.
I'm not going to sell it now that it's at $75,000 and I'm down.
I mean, who does that?
But if you panic and you're paper hands, you lose money.
You get burnt.
If you're diamond hands, and not to the end of time, but whatever.
So those who panicked yesterday lost money, and those who didn't made money.
Now, there was a time when a website handle, Twitter handle, known as The Unusual Whales, was actually good.
Encryptus, are you familiar with The Unusual Whales?
Absolutely. One of my best followers.
I thought once upon a time they were holding spaces that were good and that they were espousing positions that were good.
And now it really seems like, I don't know if they've been bought out, if they sold their Twitter feed, or if they've just suffered from TDS.
I mean, this alone is enough to cause one to question the legitimacy of any positions they've ever espoused in the past or will in the future.
This is one now where I say, all right, I've got to treat everything that comes out of unusual underscore whales with...
Skepticism. Just want to make sure it's the right account.
Excuse me.
It is.
Oh, son of a beast, dude.
Excuse me.
I can't say that I'm not disappointed in them.
I've been following them for many years.
They have some great takes and they absolutely have TDS.
This is not the first TDS.
I've known that they've done good work.
I thought for a second it was Unusual Wills and I got to go and say, oh, parody.
It's not.
It's Unusual Wills.
Unusual. They write, this is unusual.
Their name is Unusual Wales.
Yesterday, politician Marjorie Taylor Greene said that people panicking over tariffs are, quote, losers and failures.
Today, she disclosed over a dozen stock purchases, purchasing hundreds of thousands of numerous stocks.
She bought when the market was deeply red.
Unusual. I don't know how much stupider a purported economic Bitcoin, whatever the hell this is, any financial advisor or financially based website handle could possibly get.
First of all, I don't know the exact amounts.
Does it tell you the amounts here?
It doesn't.
So whether it's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, whether it's $19,000 or $250,000 if she bought up to 15,000 of the stock, we don't know.
Let's say she bought 10,000 of each.
That would be $190,000.
What the hell is unusual about telling people don't panic if you panic and sell your losers and failures and then buying on the dip because you think people are panicking and selling at a loss?
What the hell is unusual about that?
That's actually technically buy low, sell high, you bunch of morons.
And I just say, oh, hold on.
So she said people were panicking, which means that people were wrong for selling.
She was buying when the market was deeply red, and all the pundits were saying it was a recession, the Great Depression on steroids.
And as she was telling people they were wrong for selling, she was buying?
And you're suggesting this is unethical for what reason exactly?
Let me show her a picture for you.
Look at her.
Look at this scar.
Insider trading.
She's telling you what she's doing as she's doing it.
She does it.
She was right, at least today.
And you say unusual?
Unusual. You're idiots.
I mean, that's enough that I will never take anything you say seriously.
And if I do want to rely on it, I'm gonna have to go check it myself because you're unreliable.
I am.
Unusual. Unusual my ass.
It's actually exactly what you're supposed to do.
Don't panic sell.
Buy the dips.
Then I, you know, put out my tweet.
And then you have people coming in and saying, how does she have the money to do that?
Okay, fine.
So now it's no longer a question of whether or not it was unethical or insider trading, which it wasn't.
She was literally telling you what she's doing.
There's nothing more transparent than that.
How did she have that much money handy?
Well, some people, if they invest their money properly, keep a certain amount of cash handy so that when there are dips like this, you can buy.
Now, admittedly, why does she have cash?
Hold on a second.
Let me do what I typically do.
And let us go see.
Marjorie Taylor Greene net worth.
I love how muscles is the first thing that comes up.
Seems that she has a very serious net worth.
20 million.
How did she make her money?
Let's see this.
Marjorie Taylor Greene net worth.
Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene ripped to shreds after asking followers to Venmo her money for her son's beer.
Sorry, I didn't know this was the article, but I just want to see what her net worth is.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, feeling the heat, a tribute to her son, in a sense deleted but screenshotted tweet.
The congresswoman shared a photo with her son, Derek.
It's my baby's birthday, 22. He'd love to buy him a beer.
I think that just sounds like, you know, celebration, not we're short on cash.
Greene, who also shares kids Lauren and Taylor with ex-Perry Greene, has an estimated net worth of nearly $22 million.
She deleted her post.
I don't think she was asking to buy a beer because he's short on cash, you stupid jerks.
How did she make her money?
That's what I want to know.
I believe it was a family construction company she took over, and I believe she also has a couple other businesses.
She's an entrepreneur and promotes that quite actively.
Okay, well, there's your answer, peeps.
She did not make her money in politics.
She probably lost money as a result of politics.
Can you believe that?
Buy him a beer?
Nobody was saying...
Oh, for goodness sake.
It wasn't like, what's her face?
Alyssa Milano raising money for her kids' baseball team.
That sounded like kind of a joke that got misinterpreted either accidentally or deliberately by the propagandists at Yahoo Propaganda News.
So yeah, some people try to have a little bit of cash at the handy, and I absolutely appreciate most people don't have that type of cash or any cash whatsoever.
Many people don't have cash and are deeply in debt, especially when you have kids.
Camp. Freaking dogs.
My freaking dogs eat...
Encryptus, do you know how much we spend on dog food for those two special needs dogs that we have?
I don't even want to say it.
I'm going to guess probably a hundred a week.
That's about right.
It's a little more.
I think it's about a hundred a week.
Not that they eat like pigs, but one of the...
They are on the raw beef diet, and once you find the raw beef diet that doesn't give them diarrhea, they're hooked for life.
If either of those dogs eat anything other than this particular brand of raw beef diet, and I think it's $80 a bag for 24 pucks, and my, I will not swear, Pudge, who was never my dog!
I took that paralyzed dog nine years ago.
Thought she'd walk.
I'd be able to give her back to my sister-in-law.
I fell in love with her.
I love that dog.
She's got the softest, sweetest lips.
And her nose is always like the perfect cold, wet temperature.
She's a rapacious eater.
So bottom line, they're hooked.
And I can't switch.
I can't go back to kibble.
And when you feed your dogs raw beef diet, their poop is very hard, very dry, easy to clean up.
The paralyzed one, when she does her business in her bed, whatever we spend more on beef, Diet, we save on washing.
But yeah, bottom line, total, what was that word?
Look, a detour.
Yeah, she has cash.
She told you what she was doing.
Had you done it, at least for today, you'd be happy.
Whether or not we're heading into the Great Recession like so many of these idiot lefty, panicking, TDS afflicted morons want to make you believe, every fear hides a wish.
They want it to happen so they can weaponize it politically because they love I can have a little bit of another take on that.
Go for it and let's hear this.
Wait, hold on, hold on.
For everybody who doesn't know who Encryptus is, agentguru underscore IO on Twitter.
We call him Vivas Jamie, and he's an amazing smart guy, wicked with AI, and is helping with the production of the show.
Go for it.
And I made this call a year ago.
I think I've got an article here on Locals about it.
I said this was going to happen before Trump got elected.
And this was going to happen when Trump got elected.
And I believe it's due to the illegal immigration.
And once the illegal immigration had stopped, it was an entire industry, many industries, estimated to be about $1.4 trillion of money added to the economy due to the illegal immigration.
Which is essentially a false stimulus.
That stimulus doesn't lead to more production.
So generally speaking, when government adds stimulus, it goes to industry and it goes around the economy.
The problem is it doesn't add more money into the economy except for the period of time that it's being spent.
Which means that the economies in the areas where illegal immigration is big, those businesses are no longer going to be getting that money because the government isn't directly funding immigration anymore.
Those people are going to leave.
So it was a house of cards ready to fall down.
The illegal immigration consistently being pushed by Biden was a way to stop this recession from happening.
So there's going to be a downfall in my guess is another six months, eight months or so before a true upturn.
And it had to happen.
This is a correction.
Yep. And who did we have on the channel that actually said the same thing?
They said that Trump was inheriting a bag of a steaming bag of crap and there was going to be something of a financial crash after he took office.
Very little he could do about it.
And they've got to make the gains they can make before the midterms in 2026.
The chat's going to know who I'm talking about.
But yeah, it's a legit theory.
And it wasn't George Gammon.
Oh, geez, I'm gonna have to go back and see.
It was not a sidebar.
I had the person on.
I'll find it.
But this was one of the warnings as well, is that things were set up for there to be a massive crash.
And especially when you cut government jobs the way Trump's cutting government jobs and the inflated real estate that goes along with inflated salaries for government employees in the D.C. area, markets are going to slump.
People are going to be out of work.
There has to be some financial repercussions for correcting the...
Dier situation that we're in.
But one thing is for certain, by the way, when people are saying, what's going to happen to tariffs?
We can't tariff everything because where are we going to get our coffee?
Bada bing, bada boom, people!
Get your coffee from 1775 Coffee.
I almost forgot to do the second sponsor of the show.
We're not going to.
The 1775 coffee, it is delicious.
And by the way, 1775 and Rumble just launched the first anti-aging coffee.
And no, it's not brewed in Fauci's lab, though it will make you feel younger without the side effects of bad government advice.
They dropped a thousand longevity bundles, blew through most of them, and after watching freedom lovers panic harder than CNN on election night, they extended the sale and added a few more.
Once the deal is done, it's done, gone, and you're not going to get it again.
So go over to I'll give you the link in a second.
For $99, you're getting over $250 in value.
Two bags of longevity coffee infused with C-A-A-K-G to support cellular health and reduce biological age.
And yes, they'll be selling biological age tests soon to prove it.
Plus an ultra-rare pea berry roast that makes up to less than 5% of the global crops.
Kind of like Honest Politicians.
The other 95% give the 5% a bad name.
And exclusive merch that screams I don't shop at Target anymore.
All of it, specialty grade, single origin, small batch.
This isn't your sleepy chain store Dunkin' Donuts crap coffee.
It's for people who read food labels and voted before mail-in ballots were cool.
If you believe in America and in freedom and in not selling for a week, crappy coffee, this is your coffee.
Every dollar you spend, by the way, gets you entered into the raffle to win the Cybertruck and $30,000 cash.
That is 99 entries locked in if you get this kit.
Go to 1775coffee.com slash Viva.
Grab yours before the last bundle is gone.
Fuel up.
Live long.
Start your morning with coffee that stands for something.
And support the companies that support Rumble, support free speech, and respect you as a customer.
What else do we talk about?
Are we an hour and 18 minutes into this?
We've got a good show today.
My goodness.
So I am...
Looks like I'm going to be...
All things working the way it should.
I will be at Eric Hundley, Mark Robert's gathering on Saturday in Vegas where they're going to be celebrating Robert Barnes' birthday as well.
And what else?
Going to be on the Back to the Unusuals because I think they're going to be doing pre-recorded.
I should have a good interview, which I will not.
Well, you know who it is.
It's Gaddy Taub.
I'm going to see if we can have it.
And maybe a couple of other pre-recorded interviews because I might be in transit Thursday.
And so I might have to have a pre-recorded show for 4 o'clock.
Let's go to the chat and see what's going on in here.
Let me just make sure I didn't forget anything in the back here.
The chat said that the guest was Ed Dowd.
Ed Dowd!
It was Ed Dowd.
Thank you.
Smart chat.
Yeah, he said it.
He called it.
Go back and watch that interview.
And I specifically remember him saying it's going to happen.
They've got to get their work done before 2026 because they're going to blame the crash on him and it might...
Cause for a bit of a tumultuous 2026.
And thus far, Ed Dowd is right, but it's not a question of trusting the plan.
I appreciate what Trump is doing.
It's kind of amazing.
One last thing here, people.
What was this that I know that I wanted to bring it up for a reason?
Ah, yes.
Okay. We're going to have a little fun with, it's sort of like a fact check Friday or a fake news Friday on a...
Tuesday? We're going to just humorously fact check the fact checkers because I saw that I had not read this article yet.
So we're going to be doing this in real time together.
As I was looking for the news on Judge Boasberg's order, I came across something from PBS News, which was fact checking misleading claims by Trump and his allies about James Boasberg.
And I'm like, this is going to be fun.
Let's do this in real time.
And Encryptus, if you can help me along as we go.
We'll do it.
I think I've got it all memory banked.
When I detect the bullshit, I'm going to know it.
This fact check originally appeared in PolitiFact, the fakest of fact checkers the world has ever seen.
Two plus months into office, President Donald Trump has signed more than 100 executive orders.
This is from a couple of days ago that inspired over 150 legal challenges against his administration.
It's Trump that's at the root of the unprecedented lawfare against his administration.
It's not the lawfare.
Fact check.
You're idiots.
As Trump exercises and seeks to expand executive power, bullshit, people affected by his actions on everything from immigration to civil service employment have taken their complaints to the judiciary in the hopes of relief.
Displeased with the check on Trump's power, the president and his allies have lashed out at federal court judges and against one in particular, Judge James Boasberg, Chief Justice of the U.S. District Court of Corruption in Washington, D.C. After Trump invoked the rarely used 1798, they always add the year.
Why don't they do this with every law?
Only the ones that are old, as if to delegitimize the basis of the law.
You know, murder is a really old law.
Maybe we shouldn't have that on the book.
Oh, just qualify it.
The 1648 law against murder.
Let's hear it.
They're talking about Boesburg.
Temporarily ordered that we got to this.
When Boesburg-Weasel was assigned a case related to the Trump administration's use of the commercial messaging signal app to discuss their plans to bomb Yemen, the judge ordered the executive branch to preserve those communications.
Trump responded by attacking Boesburg in Truth Post, describing him as highly conflicted, massive Trump derangement syndrome.
Here. Okay.
Oh, this is going to be so good.
This is wrong.
Judges don't self-select their cases.
Cases are assigned to judges randomly through an automated process.
How did he end up with the TDA case on an emergency basis on the weekend?
The fact-checking is not repeating what the judge says!
Court rules...
We know what the court rules are.
We're not saying that they're following the court rules.
ABC News and Politico reported that in March...
That's awesome.
So they're asking the guy to fact-check the statements made about him.
This is how it works, Boesberg says.
That's how it works.
All the cases have continued to be assigned to this court, Boesberg said, according to the news outlet.
Michael Weinstein, a criminal defense attorney, former federal prosecutor with the U.S. Justice Department, told PolitiFact that cases are assigned on a rotating basis.
Everybody knows that's how it should be.
How the hell did he get the case on the Saturday?
Judges, don't just go to the court.
Actually, on that point, I've actually done some research and looked at how many judges, specifically in the J6 case, how the specific judges got those cases, and the probability of the same judge getting four cases was.00004%.
Encryptus, and everybody knows, it's astronomical, it's implausible, and their fact check consists of taking at face value the response from the impugned individual.
Everybody knows how it's supposed to work.
Everybody knows that it's supposed to be randomly assigned.
It's not.
And the question is why?
Alright, so that's good.
Let's go to the next one.
The law professor.
March 8th, Fox News, the Ingram angle.
Boesberg is radical left.
He was Obama appointed.
This is misleading.
He was appointed by Obama, but he's not radical left.
Oh, so they're fact-checking an opinion?
Oh, George Bush nominated Boesberg, previously a federal homicide prosecutor, as an associate judge.
All right.
President Barack Obama nominated Boesberg in 2000 to the court.
It's not misleading!
He sometimes ruled in ways that align with Trump.
In 2016, he ordered the release of thousands of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emails.
This is bullshit!
This is bullshit!
Even the way that he released those documents was favorable to Hillary Clinton.
I believe it was either redacted or timing.
Bullshit! Okay, good.
So I got this one.
Bill Shipley!
Oh, I've had my problems with Bill Shipley.
Oh my goodness.
He gave lenient sentences in comparison with other judges providing over the cases as relates to Jan 6. Oh, so because they're lenient compared to bullshit, that that's somehow less bullshit?
He's a radical leftist whose daughter is financially incentivized by his radical leftism as a Barack-appointed federal D.C. judge.
So, so far, you're zero for two, you fact-checking losers.
March 22nd.
Truth Social.
A photo shows Bloomberg has a conflict of interest because he appeared in an event with Vice President Kamala Harris.
This is a stretch.
The event Trump posted was neither related...
To a factual case or politics and it has traditionally involved high-level judges.
Oh, okay.
So what did the fact check in here?
That he doesn't have a conflict of interest because he didn't appear.
Oh, other people did too.
How about the fact that his daughter is an activist who's reaping the benefits of her father's political persecutions?
Fact check false.
Three for three.
March 19. Rogue district court judges are trying to invalidate the results of the 2024 election by issuing lawless rulings against the president.
This one I'm going to be less familiar with.
Okay, fine.
All right, that was since overturned.
We don't know how Boesberg will rule on the merits.
Well, he's not going to rule on the merits because it was overruled.
In a speech, openly admitted that he didn't think harsh enough laws existed on the books to punish Jan 6 defendants.
The statement from an anonymous source, conservative source, referred to Boesberg's remarks at University of Chicago law students in 2023 guest lecture.
Available information about his comments do not support this characterization.
Available information about his comments do not support this characterization.
Did he say it?
The school and the judge's chambers told PolitiFact they had no recording or transcript of the speech.
Oh, nice.
Okay, well, better trust him.
But a student-authored article posted to the law school's website includes some of his quotes, none revealed but saying nothing harsh enough for the Jan 6th.
Okay. Well, actually, I want to read this.
This is amazing.
The article said Boesberg spoke with the value of being apolitical and described the Jan 6th 2021 related cases as challenging because they involved an area with a lot of law still to be made.
There were no statutes that were written that said it is a criminal offense to storm the Capitol and interfere with accounting certification.
No one could fathom something like this, the article quoted Boesberg as saying.
That sounds pretty, uh, pretty biased if you ask me.
So fact check false on all four, you scumbag losers, PolitiFact and PBS for republishing PolitiFact rubbish.
Go back and put in my name on Twitter and all of the debunking I've done of PolitiFact being a bunch of wordsmiths of the devil, because that is exactly what they are.
That's our show, people.
Who are we going to raid right now?
Let me go see who's...
Let me see.
Is Redacted live?
I think it's...
Well, we're going to go raid Kim Iverson.
I think she's live right now and I don't see any other people that are live.
If you're going to go raid Kim Iverson, I would say mention that I've sent you, but that typically leads to...
Interesting chat.
If you are not so inclined, you can come over to watch us at vivabarneslaw.locals.com and say hi.
But it's important to listen even to people that you disagree with who say things you don't like.
So I would...
Oh, say it again.
Is America Untold Stories?
Is that someone you can rate?
Are they live right now?
I believe they start in one minute.
Oh, crap.
I actually...
Well... Hold on one second.
Where? Send the link if you can.
I actually just went into her chat and put rate.
I'm an idiot, so that's great.
Let's encrypt this if you can get that for me.
Are you guys familiar with America's Untold Stories?
I think we'll wait until they go live, so we'll just wait a minute.
Is it a minute and a half?
Are they live on Rumble?
It says upcoming right now.
I'm grabbing you the link.
Okay, let's see if we can do this.
Dropping in our private chat.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Private chat.
Before you go, I'll do this.
Before we go, by the way, everyone, make sure that you're subscribed and you have notifications turned on.
If you want to go get Louis the Lobster, the book, I think I sent the link out.
It's on Amazon.
Written by me.
My wife put it together and a daughter of a member of our Locals community did the illustrations.
Live stream?
Let me see if I can.
I'm going to our stream.
Can we do this?
Okay, this is me.
Go raid Eric Hundley's America's Untold Stories.
Is it going to forward slash raid?
Is that going to work?
Confirm raid.
Encrypt this.
You're sure that they're live at 530?
I'm watching it right now.
Well then.
Raid them, people.
America's Untold Stories.
And they're going to be talking about...
What are they talking about today?
Trade war?
Trump's tariffs ignite global trade war.
China vows to fight to the end.
Oh, yes.
Go raid.
Are they live, Encryptus?
Oh, yeah.
Started on time.
No, hold on a second.
I don't see anything yet.
I only see the globe and the pulsating globe.
I'm in the chat.
I'm looking at the Viva raid.
Oh, this is awesome.
I'm texting Eric now.
Hey, better make sure they go live.
Come on.
I'm not ending until they go live.
Hey Siri, text Eric Hundley.
You'd better go live right now, exclamation point.
The raid is coming over, smiley face.
Okay, bam.
The dial is running up.
They've got a ton of people in there.
What should you drop?
Obviously, I'll drop the Viva raid.
What else?
Drop something in the chat that's funny.
And I'll give everybody the link to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party if you're going to come over there.
And link to Locals if you want to come.
$10 a month, $100 a year if you get the full year.
Bourbon with Barnes, you get the after party, you get some exclusive stuff, the caterpillars eating the plants that we have in the backyard, though we bought them for that reason.
And I'm just going to keep going until I'm sure that they're alive.
They just got off.
I'm going to text Grobert.
Hey Siri, text Mark Grobert.
What would you like to see?
Get your butts live!
I have sent over the raid, smiley face.
Done. This is a super cool function that Rumble offers.
Okay, so they haven't gone live yet?
No, no, no.
And if we're going to pull the arcade, a late and...
Words that I don't use on the channel.
So, we're going to get a couple...
Okay, well, they better fix that quickly.
Alright, what else?
I don't want to end it until it happens, because I don't want to screw up the function of the raid.
Okay, the raid is live, so now I'm going to go and we're going to all join.
Okay, do I see them?
There we go.
Okay, good.
They're live now.
People, go.
Send some love, but don't just go and raid.
Make sure that you subscribe.
Make sure you drop a comment.
Feed that algorithm.
And actually, just watch the show.
Eric Hundley, Mark Robert are, I won't say underrated because that qualifies.
They are amazing.
And that is it.
Are they playing it now?
I'm looking at Steve Bannon.
Okay, good.
It's Steve Bannon.
All right, now we're going to go to our locals after party.
And that is it.
Thank you all for being here.
Tomorrow is Wednesday.
We'll be live.
And I gotta make sure I got the interview lined up.
Unusual suspects in the morning.
Thursday's gonna be one hell of a pain in the ass of a day, but it's gonna be a day nonetheless.
And Friday should be live.
Saturday, event.
Sunday, there probably won't be the Sunday night show because of holidays, so we'll have to put that to a Monday.
And that is it.
Go, people!
Forth and prosper, and enjoy the day.
Godspeed. God bless.
▲
Export Selection