Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 19, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:31:04

Lock Liz Cheney Up! Spending Bill MADNESS! Not Just Pork, but GAIN OF FUNCTION! & MORE! Viva Frei

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	No, I'm supposed to share the screen, not take myself out.
	Share the screen again.
	There you go, Viva.
	You'll get this one day.
	There you go.
	Now enjoy the soothing voice of my voice while we play the intro song.
	If I can find it, right here.
	Maximize screen and play.
	and play.
	You want us sick, you think we're dumb.
	You want us blind, then you want us drug.
	You want us poor while you get more of everything.
	But you don't get to tell me what to think and what to do.
	You don't get to tell me what is true.
	Cause you're just liars, jeans and crooks.
	Change the rules and you burn the books and so I don't believe a single word you say.
	You're all liars, fakes and cons.
	Watch out and we want you gone.
	So don't believe this time you'll get away.
	You want us tricked, you want us numb.
	You want us scared and you want us stung.
	You want us shot and you want us fought in every way.
	You want our minds, you want our time, you want us friend up in your crime.
	I hope you know that it's time to go when we're taking names.
	Cause you don't get to tell us what to think and what to do.
	No, you don't get to tell us what is true.
	Strongest lies, cheats and crooks.
	Change the rules and you burn the books and so we don't believe a single word you say.
	You're all liars, fakes and cons.
	Watch out and we want you gone.
	So don't believe this time you'll get away.
	Cause we see la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, all your lies.
	La, la, la, la, la, la, all your lies.
	You don't get to tell us what to think.
	Liars, Cheats and Crooks.
	Five times August.
	We're going to cut it early because I started late this morning.
	One more thing.
	We're going to...
	Why? People!
	Every time I get going in the morning and I say, are we going to have that witch to talk about?
	Why is the camera tracking my face?
	I don't like this.
	This makes me feel very uncomfortable.
	Why do this?
	Why can I not...
	Where the heck...
	That doesn't matter.
	We're going to have to let it track me this time.
	Every time we wake up in the morning and I say, oh my goodness, is there going to be that about witch to talk that's not going to be like mere...
	Gossip and fighting on the internet, which is what we do on Twitter.
	The world happens.
	And then such wonderful news as above and beyond locking up Liz Cheney.
	Potentially! We're going to get into it.
	I do not think the threat is without merit or legal basis.
	Someone says no sound and someone says I can hear him.
	I made sure that the sound was good.
	Let me just...
	Nobody's trolling.
	In our local community.
	I hear me.
	Who dares troll in our local community?
	Liz Cheney threats to, you know, lock her up.
	And I believe there's a good legal basis for it.
	Fannie Willis just got the big, fat, judicial spanking today.
	Oh. Fannie Willis just got disqualified by the Georgia Court of Appeals.
	I will.
	Pat myself on the back.
	I will take a victory lap.
	I said full vindication.
	It's full freaking vindication.
	We'll get there.
	Okay. But before we even get there, I want to just say one thing.
	I went yesterday.
	The American healthcare system, it's got its problems.
	It's also got its benefits.
	I go to my doctor, and just like that, I'm told that for whatever the reason, my primary care practitioner, PCP, It's an unfortunate acronym.
	Just like that, I'm told, oh, my primary care practitioner has been swapped.
	I was like, no, he hasn't.
	My PCP, my primary care is on my insurance plan.
	It doesn't really matter.
	You pay $30 more for the visit out of pocket if they're not covered.
	But all that to say is I go to my primary care practitioner to have my blood tests because I'm a 45-year-old man.
	It's time to start doing those things routinely.
	I've done my colonoscopies routinely.
	Anyways, my blood work is good.
	I'm going to send it to the fellow doctor in our locals community who I all send my questions to just to make sure.
	I trust my doctor, but I trust our locals community even more.
	My blood work is good, but...
	And there's no but to that, actually.
	It's just a segue into our sponsor of today's show, people.
	Blood work is important.
	Digestive issues are even more important.
	Those I don't...
	I suffer from IBS, people, and I don't do what the doctors say that I should do in order to resolve that, but whatever.
	Speaking of my digestive issues, which no one asked about, it's caused by potential toxins that's in all of our healthy foods that scientists have been telling us to eat with a fraudulent food pyramid for the longest time.
	This potential toxin causes digestive issues, according to Dr.
	Gundry, a world-renowned cardiologist that is affecting millions of people nationwide.
	Warning signs include weight gain, fatigue, digestive discomfort, staphs, and stress.
	I think I maybe only have two of those.
	Stiff joints.
	And digestive issues.
	Well, Dr. Gundry explains these side effects are often mistaken for normal signs of aging because digestive issues develop usually over a matter of years and sometimes even decades.
	I can assure you that the damage is probably caused by these so-called healthy foods and it's far from normal.
	The good news, you can easily fix this by going to watch the video.
	I think you should be watching some of the video right now, right?
	Yeah, I'm playing the video with no audio.
	You just have to know which foods actually have the toxin in them, which ones are actually healthy.
	Go to gutcleanseprotocol.com forward slash Viva.
	The link is in the description.
	Watch it.
	It's a great video.
	After years of research, Dr. Gundy has decided to release this informative video to the public for free, uninterrupted, showcasing exactly which foods you need to avoid.
	Go to that video.
	That's gutcleanseprotocol.com forward slash Viva.
	The link is in the description.
	I'll give you one spoiler from the video.
	Avocados are good.
	So, there's that.
	People! People, people.
	What were the three subject matters that we were going to discuss today?
	Oh, by the way, the food pyramid?
	Bullshit. I remember being young and dumb.
	I might still be dumb, but I'm older and less dumb.
	And I remember thinking, if you eat foods with fat in them, you get fat.
	And if you don't eat foods with fat in them, you don't get fat.
	And so we'd go to the restaurants, and I'd say, oh, no dessert for me.
	I'm just going to load up on bread right before the meal.
	Oh, all right.
	Well, if I'm not eating fat, I'll have bread without butter, and it'll be good for me.
	Idiots. Ich bin ein Idioten.
	So I know better now.
	We have got...
	Why can't I remember the third subject matter that we were going to talk about?
	Oh, the spending bill.
	That's right.
	But the breaking news of the day, people.
	Oh, first of all, share the link around.
	Let it be known that we are live.
	We're going to deal with the breaking news of the day first so that I can pat myself on the back with my short little arms, but my short little back is just as close.
	You know, you make predictions, and I will highlight some of my own predictions of the last year that did not come to fruition.
	You make predictions, and depending on what stage of the story you're at, the prediction might not come true.
	I did predict that Fannie Willis was going to get booted from that case, along with Nathan Wade, by Judge McAfee, who didn't have the judicial cojones to do it.
	We don't need to go too far into the Fanny Willis rehash the saga.
	It made memes that were meme gold.
	I'm not going to play the meme gold because when I play it, it gets copy claimed on Commitube.
	But the beautiful, beautiful video of Nathan Wade.
	Have you ever gone to a cabin with Fanny Willis?
	A cabin.
	And he pauses for, I believe it was a full 24 seconds, and the meme is a bubble comes up and he's like picturing AI images of Fanny Willis and like revealing lingerie, and then the song is playing Marvin Gaye's Let's Get It On.
	I'm going to get copy claimed for that.
	The memes that came out of that trial, Nathan Wade, her lover extraordinaire, getting pinged from his cell thing, you know, going to stoop Fanny Willis from midnight to four in the morning.
	Terrence Bradley.
	A man who was clearly not coerced into testimony or the absence of testimony.
	And we all watched that saga together.
	It was amazing.
	It was revelatory.
	It highlighted, what do they call her?
	Cash Money Fanny?
	There's a guy on the internet, Spez?
	Spez or Fez?
	Who was doing great coverage as well, called her Cash Money Fanny.
	You know, Fanny Willis just keeps, her dad always told her, keep tens of thousands of dollars cash in your house and pay for things like vacations and cash.
	Whatever. We don't need to go through all of the outrageous bullshit of that trial.
	Judge McAfee, because he was running for re-election at the time, lacked the judicial testicular fortitude that was required to disqualify Fannie Willis from that case along with Nathan Wade.
	But it's an amazing thing.
	You go back and life can only be understood forwards.
	Life can only be understood backwards, but must be lived forwards.
	I predicted that she was going to get disqualified.
	And I was wrong because the judge didn't have the cojones to do it.
	You go back and you look at the reasoning.
	Now, some people will say some predictions don't come to fruition and you can't just celebrate the ones where you got them right.
	True. But the improbability of a prediction...
	Has to factor into, you know, what happens if you get it wrong.
	Not all predictions are 50-50.
	So when you predict that Joe Biden is going to tank in the debate and going to be replaced by Kamala Harris, and I'm pretty sure I was vocal about that because I did bet on Joe Biden, against Joe Biden, when he was trading at 87 cents on predicted, that he was going to bomb in the debate, as would his predicted chances of becoming president.
	When something like that happens, that's not a coin flip.
	And so extra credit is warranted where the prediction was less likely.
	I am still thus far wrong on my prediction that Joe Biden's going to resign or be resigned from the presidency, but we still have 30 days for that to happen, for Kamala Harris to become the 47th president of these United States of America.
	But you could be wrong or right on a prediction so long as you're not wrong on the rationale and the underlying logic.
	On which that prediction is based.
	And you will recall, Judge McAfee, he was a good judge.
	He did a good job during that trial.
	Right up until the time he decided that he no longer had testicles, but he had a mangina and couldn't issue the proper ruling because that mangina interfered with the testicular fortitude that was required to render the legally justified verdict.
	I feel like I'm going to get in trouble for this, but Brennan has a mangina.
	Everybody knows that.
	Now we're going to have to say Scott McAfee has a mangina.
	In his ruling, and this is, I just went back to my tweet from the time, where in the ruling of McAfee, he said, simply put, the defendants have not presented sufficient evidence indicating that the expenses were not, quote, roughly divided evenly, or that the district was, or that the district attorney was, or currently remains, quote, greatly and pecuniarily interested in this prosecution.
	Another highlight from that very same judgment.
	Without sufficient, wait a minute, did I get page one before the...
	No, that's page 7. And now we're at page 9. Without sufficient evidence that the district attorney acquired a personal stake in the prosecution or that her financial arrangement had any impact on the case, the defendant's claims of an actual conflict must be denied.
	Later on in that paragraph.
	Rather, it is the undersigned opinion.
	That's fancy talk for my opinion.
	It is the undersigned...
	Why can't you just say it's my opinion?
	It's my opinion that Georgia law does not permit the finding of an actual conflict for simply making bad choices, even repeatedly.
	And that the trial court, and it is the trial court's duty, eh, duty, to confine itself to the relevant issues and applicable law properly brought before it.
	All of this was problematic because the judge recognized that even an appearance of conflict was a problem.
	Set aside the fact that this conclusion, as a matter of observations, was contradicted by his own evidence.
	With these principles in mind, the court finds at the record that the evidentiary hearing established that the district attorney's prosecution is encumbered by an appearance of impropriety.
	This appearance is not created by mere status alone, but comes because specific conduct and impacts more than a mere, quote, nebulous, end quote, public interest because it concerns a public prosecutor.
	This is in the guy's same decision.
	There's not an actual conflict of interest, only an appearance of one, but there's an appearance of impropriety, not just conflict.
	And it results from more than a mere superficial...
	This is in McAfee's own decision where he exonerates or does not disqualify Fannie Willis, but thinks that he's resolved the conflict by disqualifying Nathan Wade or suggesting that he can be disqualified.
	While the testimony of Robin Yerdy raised doubts about the state's assertions and ultimately lacked context and detail.
	Bull. She.
	At. Even after considering the preferred cell phone testimony from defendant Trump, along with the entirety of the other evidence, neither side was able to conclusively establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the relationship evolved into a romantic one.
	Oh, when the relationship evolved into a romantic one.
	Yeah, of course not, because Yertie wasn't clear enough when she said that it predated certain events and that Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade lied about when they're romantic.
	Professional relationship became professional booty calls at midnight.
	Alright, and then I just highlighted the absurdities of the judgment itself, which did not allow my prediction at the time to come to fruition, but over time, everything bends towards the truth, people.
	No evidence of any reimbursement, but Willis'testimony was not inherently unbelievable.
	No conflict, even when Willis repeatedly made bad choices and despite an appearance of conflict of interest.
	Terrence's testimony disregarded.
	Yurdy's testimony lacked context and detail.
	Oh yeah, and Fannie Willis' church speech was legally improper.
	That's what McAfee wrote in that decision.
	But she doesn't get booted from the file.
	I'm not attempting to split it.
	In attempting to split baby justice, the judge has killed it.
	And the Georgia Court of Appeal has sewed that baby back together, people.
	And they have ruled that she's disqualified.
	The judgment is not particularly interesting.
	You can read through it.
	It's actually 18 pages of the majority.
	There's one dissenting opinion, which I haven't really read thoroughly, and I don't really care to.
	Not because it doesn't confirm what I already believe and predict, just because I'm not interested in seeing idiotic stupidity carried out at the higher level.
	This is from The Ruling Today.
	After carefully considering the trial court's finding in its order, we conclude that it erred by failing to disqualify District Attorney Willis and her office.
	The remedy, by the way, just, you know, get the prediction wrong at a certain point in time.
	Losers now will later be win.
	The losers now shall later win because of the times they are changing people, and we actually are living maybe through a time now of some form of judicial justice, political justice.
	The remedy crafted by the trial court to prevent an ongoing appearance of impropriety did nothing to address the appearance of impropriety that existed at times when District Attorney Willis was exercising her broad I should have
	highlighted that part.
	Maybe by not highlighting it, I've highlighted it even more.
	Understand what they're saying there, people.
	I want to read it one more time.
	It's the rare case where there is no other remedy to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings.
	Do you know what that means?
	Let me translate that for you.
	They are effing embarrassed at what the world saw in those broadcasted hearings.
	They are embarrassed.
	The upper ups, the higher ups, judges, are embarrassed.
	The entire judicial system is out of order.
	And now they have to restore some of the faith that people have in the system because they've seen how people have lost the faith because the people have seen what goes on in these judicially corrupt, urine-soaked hellholes, pee-pee-soaked heckholes, people.
	So, that's that.
	Hold on, that's not that.
	I'm not yet done patting myself on the back.
	I said full vindication.
	Where was the other one?
	Yeah, this was Phil Holloway, by the way, is going live this afternoon.
	I might pop in, but even if I don't, go check him out at 3 o'clock.
	Georgia Court of Appeals is disqualified Fannie Willis.
	Obviously. Where was the tweet that I said initially at the time?
	Let me bring this one up.
	Allow me to take a bit of a victory lap, people.
	I won't be able to take the victory lap if I can't even find my own tweet, which I can't.
	Damn it.
	Hold on a second.
	Home. Tweet.
	Where was it?
	I brought it up earlier.
	Ah, yes, that's right.
	It's over here.
	Hold on.
	Let me make sure I'm not showing my DMs.
	Full friggin' vindication.
	Why? Because back in the day when the Georgia Court of Appeal took the appeal.
	Remember this?
	You got the little Court of Appeals.
	They say they're gonna take the appeal and hear it.
	Georgia Court of Appeal will hear the appeal.
	On the refusal to disqualify Fannie Willis.
	Am I wrong in thinking that they would not take the appeal unless it was to reverse McAfee and disqualify?
	Why else take the case and delay the prosecution if only to affirm?
	Also, if, when, the court of appeal disqualifies, I claim, in caps, biatches, full vindication for my initial prediction.
	Booyah. Well, that's where we are today, peeps.
	Let's get that down here.
	I don't know why I can't bring up the app to stop this stupid thing from tracking my face.
	Instalink controller.
	Yeah, the app is not coming up.
	Who cares?
	Okay. Let me see what's going on in the chat here.
	This is the meat of the issue.
	The old adage, if it walks like a duck.
	This is from Kfish63 in Rumble.
	Not in Rumble, in Locals.
	The common man standard saw this prosecution as fraught with impropriety from the get-go.
	Justice wins today.
	And you could be certain of one thing.
	Had Trump lost the election...
	They might not have felt the political pressure to come down with the obviously right decision.
	It's an amazing thing.
	It's only with full transparency, full eyes on the corruption, then the unlikeliest of political victories, that they then decide they have to do the right thing.
	If it weren't broadcast, if it were not live-streamed, outcome different.
	If Trump loses the election, outcome is different.
	20-minute commercials on Rumble?
	iRealMedia on YouTube?
	Saboteur. I'm joking.
	You're not a saboteur.
	There is no 20-minute commercial on Rumble or on YouTube that you can't skip after the first 10 or 15 seconds.
	So, yeah.
	Anyway, so that's it.
	It's fantastic.
	Do I want to bring up the...
	I'll bring up the meme of Nathan Wade over on YouTube.
	Actually, you know what we're going to do?
	We're going to go over to Rumble now, anyhow, because I don't want to interrupt the next segment.
	And quite frankly, I'm convinced that the existence of platforms like Rumble, convinced X, now under the new administration of Elon Musk, is allowing all of this to occur, is facilitating the redirection towards the righteous and the lawful and the just.
	Fannie Willis, get packing.
	Oh, by the way, just to finish on the Fannie Willis, and then I'll do a short car vlog on this later.
	That's not the decision.
	Where is the decision?
	They did not dismiss the indictment.
	And I can understand that.
	Is this it right here?
	Yeah, this is it right here.
	They didn't dismiss the indictment.
	But, you know, it's effectively dismissed.
	So you go down, I think it was at page 18. After 17, 18, sorry.
	Oh, here we go.
	You can see this, right?
	The appellants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motions to dismiss the indictment.
	The state responds that the appellants have failed to show that the trial court erred in finding that the appellants had not shown, quote, that their due process rights have been violated or that the issues involved prejudiced them in any way.
	Dismissal of an indictment is an extreme sanction used only sparingly for unlawful government conduct.
	This I can understand.
	It's a de facto dismissal of the indictment because no prosecutorial office is going to pick it up.
	But you can understand that.
	The appearance of impropriety doesn't mean the existence of unlawful government conduct.
	In the absence of express statutory authorization, dismissal of an indictment, quote, generally cannot be imposed absent a violation of constitutional right, end quote.
	I think there was here, but whatever.
	While this is the rare case in which DA Willis and her office must be disqualified due to a significant appearance of impropriety.
	I love how they're adding words now.
	It's not just an appearance, a significant appearance.
	We cannot conclude that the record also supports the imposition of the extreme sanction of dismissal of the indictment under the appropriate standard.
	We therefore affirm the trial court's denial of the appellant's motion to dismiss.
	And here, I mean, look, I believe that there's a little bit of politicking here.
	Even though I believe that they have judicially spanked Scott McAfee.
	Is his name Scott McAfee?
	No, it's Judge McAfee.
	I forget what his first name is.
	I believe that they've judicially spanked Judge McAfee.
	But even when they do it, they want to give him a little slap on the wrist, not a full pants-down public humiliation smack on the butt.
	And so they save him a little bit of face.
	And so they say, yeah, okay, it's bad.
	You should have disqualified Willis.
	But you were right not to disqualify the indictment.
	There you go.
	A little spank and a little bit of a rub to make the pain go away.
	So... And that's not a big deal.
	Anyhow, it's a de facto dismissal because no one is picking up that prosecution, especially given that Trump just won the election and is now going to be the president.
	Well, he's basically the president now, anyhow.
	No one's picking that back up.
	Can Fannie Willis be charged with anything?
	This is from TZ76Patriot, which I think, that looks like 1776Patriot.
	No, not yet.
	It's premature yet.
	You know, she'd need to be found to have violated her code of ethics, which I think the ethics complaint is still pending.
	Ethics complaint.
	Fannie. I'm saying Fannie Willis because it's funnier than what they want us to believe her name is.
	Fannie. Fulton Board says it doesn't have jurisdiction over the Fannie Willis ethics complaint.
	That's from March, so I don't know if there's been anything new in that.
	And then there was the issue Fannie Willis...
	Contempt documents where she was refusing to turn over documents.
	Fannie Willis rebuffs GOP lawmakers' request.
	Dude, shit's gonna hit the fan for Fannie, pun intended.
	This is it.
	I mean, she just got re-elected, which is hilarious in all of this.
	Fannie Willis rebuffs GOP lawmakers' request for documents, says Trump election case is ongoing.
	Not anymore, baby!
	Well, it still is technically ongoing.
	Just not with you, Fannie.
	Oh, I feel so bad for Fannie.
	You feel bad for people who don't even feel bad for themselves.
	And that's all we have to say about that.
	But speaking about feeling bad for people who don't even know to feel bad for themselves, we talked about, it's not on the menu for today, but we'll bring it up anyhow just because it's freaking hilarious, Rachel Gilmore, Canada's Taylor Lorenz, who was testifying before Canadian Parliament about the Russia disinformation campaign.
	Rachel Gilmour testified before Canadian Parliament about Russia disinformation and how the trucker protest, the Ottawa trucker protest, was somehow linked or adjacent to or the players involved adjacent to Russian disinformation.
	By the way, check this out.
	See, even Twitter hates Rachel Gilmour in incognito mode.
	That's odd.
	I see.
	It won't let me share the tweets of Rachel Gilmore.
	We'll just have to go to my Twitter feed to bring it up.
	So Rachel Gilmore testified before Canadian Parliament.
	I showed the highlights of and the entirety of her five-minute opening statement, which was laughably, laughably stupid.
	Laughably ridiculous.
	And not just her either.
	The guy there, Pecky Koliomene, Finnish expert in Russian disinformation.
	And the other guy there who worked at the Canadian military university or something.
	A bunch of idiots, a bunch of barking, sealed, smooth-brained idiots who are running with this Russian disinformation campaign.
	I highlighted a bit of the absurdity from her opening statement.
	She made that opening statement when she was a journalist employed, a so-called journalist employed, I forget where, and she has since become unemployed.
	And she put out a video the other day saying, you know, she's now unemployed, they laid her off, and at some point when you get laid off from employer after employer...
	You might want to start looking inwards and not financially outwards at the corporation, but set that aside.
	And she literally said, now I have to beg for support because I'm going to go independent and it's tough and I want to start a podcast.
	I'm like, I felt bad for her.
	She then puts out a video yesterday doubling down on...
	What she calls the right-wing griftersphere.
	Look at this.
	Jordan Peterson says he's leaving Canada for the U.S. Kind of redundant when we're about to become a 51st state, no?
	But seriously, the thing I found more surprising about this is the fact that he still lived in Canada.
	See, Canada has a number of exports to the U.S. We've got softwood lumber, crude oil, steel, and apparently right-wing culture war grifters.
	Right-wing culture war grifters.
	This is a woman who has now gone independent and is now going to realize very quickly, you're not going to survive off what she thinks is, I mean, obviously what is her grift, which is accusing everyone else of a grift.
	You're not going to survive off that for very long.
	You're going to survive off accuracy and fairness, even with your ideological adversaries.
	And I'm going to be as fair as I possibly can with Rachel Gilmore.
	But when you show a display of what she's calling right-wing grifter...
	What does she call it again?
	Hold on, let me get back here.
	What does she call this?
	Right-wing culture war grifters.
	Right-wing culture war grifters.
	Let's go through the list behind, shall we?
	I don't know who the gentleman on the upper right corner is.
	I think that's Laura...
	I want to say that's Laura Southern.
	I don't know who this is.
	I don't know who this is.
	I can't see.
	That is Kevin McInnes, or McInnes for sure.
	That's Stephen Crowder.
	That is Paul Joseph Watson.
	I know him for sure.
	That's Alex Jones, and I didn't think he was Canadian.
	I don't know who that is.
	That's Milo Yiannopoulos, I think.
	I don't know who's behind that.
	This is Stéphane Molineux.
	And this is Stéphane Molineux.
	Two of them.
	Don't know who that is.
	Don't know who that is.
	Don't know who this is.
	Philip DeFranco?
	You're trying to now survive off your own as an independent journalist by not just being radically unfair to the people who you consider your ideological adversaries, but to the people who might be ideologically aligned with you?
	You're going to find out that there's going to be layoffs, Rachel Gilmore, in independent journalism if you keep not just burning bridges, but keep being intellectually dishonest with people who might even be on the same side as your ideological bias.
	Okay, that was a random tangent, and I don't know why we went there.
	But here, hold on.
	Check this out.
	David, I wanted the Georgia case to go to trial because I wanted discovery.
	We need to address the 2020 election and get answers, says Denise Antu.
	I do know there are a lot of people who were predicting that this was never going to go to trial because of what it would reveal.
	That theory is becoming less and less likely now as a plausible explanation because with a Trump presidency, they can go and investigate pretty much whatever they deem necessary for investigation, and they will.
	So I don't think it doesn't need to go to trial for that.
	It just needs to be properly investigated, which as of now, Has not been.
	Okay, let me go up into the commie tube and see if I'm missing anything.
	Hey, Viva, come to Phoenix Freedom Fest, says Barb Ariane.
	I can't.
	There's no question I can't.
	I gotta go to...
	Hey, Freedom Fest in Phoenix or communism in Canada to see family?
	Hmm. Gotta go to commie Canada to see some family.
	Christmas came early, Viva.
	Remember you saying this in February when Fanny barged into the courtroom, says Megan.
	Yeah, it's fantastic.
	But it was also obvious.
	Viva, are you sad that you are not on her wall?
	Well, the other thing is the export to Canada.
	Justin, I don't think that Peterson lives in Canada.
	He might still be a Canadian citizen.
	I'm not sure where he's a resident for tax purposes or for resident purposes.
	Either way, these idiots in Canadian media and politics who celebrate talent, intellect, And let's just be more superficial.
	Money. Who celebrate money leaving Canada.
	You are godforsaken idiots who are so stupid to even know what's good for you.
	You are stupid.
	Stubborn, stupid, ideologically driven.
	You would rather starve to death and feel righteous than actually create a full functioning civil society.
	The brain drain leaves.
	The economic drain leaves.
	And guess what you're left with?
	Venezuela. Okay.
	Let's get the number on Commitube down under 1,000, and let's go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Let's go.
	No, I'm sorry.
	We're going to go to Rumble.
	Here's the link to Rumble, and we're under 1,000.
	Good. Let's do this.
	We're going to end on Commitube.
	It's going to end on Twitter as well.
	Let me see if there's anything before we go, actually, while everyone goes out there.
	Freespring1 over in Locals says, then why to his punishment thing, Peterson?
	Then why, to his punishment thing, Peterson, I presume the question means, then why would Peterson have to go through the re-education with his order of psychologists?
	He didn't, he's not, okay, for those of you who don't know, Peterson got in trouble for some tweets that he made involving Ellen Page, the doctors who apparently cut off her boobies.
	And calling fat people unattractive or saying that it's not attractive, it shouldn't be celebrated, that fat people, you know, there's no reason logically why a severely overweight person would be on the cover of the swimsuit magazine.
	I forget what that's called.
	What's it called?
	The swimsuit magazine.
	Whatever, you know what I'm saying.
	He put out some tweets.
	There was one tweet where someone said...
	Something about climate change, humans being the cause of climate change.
	And he said, you're free to leave.
	And the person took that as encouragement to self-harm.
	And so a number of people, none of them had ever been actual clients of Peterson, filed complaints.
	He makes mean tweets.
	He needs literal social re-education.
	I mean, literally.
	They said Peterson needs to go through a training with the order of psychologists for online etiquette.
	I'm not joking.
	Actually, let me just see this here.
	I want to get the online etiquette.
	Jordan, that was the word that they used, but I don't want you trusting me for that.
	Because it's...
	I seem to have just gotten good news.
	Hold on a second.
	I'll get to that in a sec.
	Jordan Peterson broke his rule.
	Etiquette. Let's see.
	Re-education.
	The terms were so Kafkaesque.
	It has to contain the word etiquette.
	Yeah, it was to...
	Okay, here we go.
	Here we go.
	Ground news.
	I don't know if it's the best outlet, but I know that I read it, so you can go check it out later.
	Jordan Peterson ordered into six-month re-education program over social media comments, Rogan podcast appearance, and then the word I'm looking for is etiquette.
	Sure. The word I'm looking for is etiquette here.
	Coaching to refine his social media etiquette, according to a document from the whatever.
	So he was doing that and doing it as a matter of principle.
	He doesn't rely on his practice of psychology to make money anymore.
	So he's lucky.
	He's attained the requisite...
	What's the word that he used?
	To escape the gravitational pull.
	He's escaped velocity.
	Of the system, where he can stick two middle fingers up to the system and then stick around nonetheless just as a matter of principle.
	And so that's it.
	But no, so he'll leave.
	Congratulations, you chased out another intelligent, tax-paying citizen.
	To the victor go the spoils.
	Choosy heretics.
	I'm just asking.
	You'd think the guy who's missing one testicle would want to put the other one to good use.
	What the hell are we talking about?
	This is not about me.
	I've got both my testicles, despite my testicular torsion and the surgery that went along with that.
	Yeah, it's called Fuck You Money, says Mahart Martza over in our locals community.
	But what we've learned is that there is no such thing as fuck you money when they can literally get a ruling for $500 million or just lock you up.
	All the fuck you money in the world is great.
	Not so great if you're in jail.
	And Scott McAfee, the other McAfee...
	Who had the F.U. money.
	That was good for nothing.
	Elon Musk has got the F.U. money, but when you get regulatory sanctions, wild court rulings, weaponized prosecution, there is no amount of F.U. money on earth, but he certainly has escape velocity means of subsistence.
	And so he doesn't need to stick around that commie hellhole where people try to actually strip him of his license and worse for saying tweets that he doesn't like.
	And this is also, by the way, how they ideologically curate professional practices.
	At some point in time, it's going to be great.
	You're going to have chased out all of the Jordan Petersons or Jordan Peterson adjacent from the practice of psychology.
	It's going to be great.
	At some point, you'll have chased out all of the Viva Fries from the practice of law.
	That's not exactly why I left.
	I was done for anyhow.
	But it's great.
	So you'll get an ideological adherence to the remaining members of professional orders.
	Where does that get you?
	Stalinism? Lysenkoism?
	And Venezuela-ism.
	Okay, that's all I have to say about that.
	Get your butts on over to Free Speech Rumble and VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com right now.
	Okay, now what I'm going to do here...
	Oh, frickin' Liz Cheney.
	If I'm Liz Cheney, by the way, I'm actually legit scared.
	I mean, she must have been...
	She was like, lock her up.
	Nobody's really scared because nobody believes it's going to happen.
	And... If Trump doesn't come into power, it's never going to happen.
	Trump is now in power.
	Loudermilk, the guy in government, is not just shouting into the void.
	He's doing a lot of great, great work.
	And he came out with an interim report from the sub-select committee on investigating the January 6th committee investigation.
	It's unfreaking believable what is being laid bare for the world to see now.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Viva Independent Media is under attack from the CBC.
	No shit.
	It's been under attack for a long time.
	Bankrupt them.
	And when maybe when a little peepee...
	Pierre Poiliev.
	I should have said it like that because I don't use that stupid name.
	When Pierre Poiliev comes into power, I realize now why people say PP because nobody can pronounce his last name.
	Maybe when he comes into power, they'll defund the CBC, defund Radio Canada.
	He'd been under attack for a long time.
	But maybe when Pierre Poiliev comes into power, because he will, it's the inevitable trajectory of Canadian politics.
	To what degree of a majority, we'll see.
	Maybe he'll defund the CBC and Canada and Canadians will have access to independent quality media.
	And they'll have their choice.
	You can go listen to the Rachel Gilmores of the world.
	Or you can watch the Viva and Barnes Law for the Peoples of the world.
	And you can actually get things right and understand them.
	Or at least understand them when they don't go the way they should.
	Or you can get whamboozled into propaganda thinking that, you know, January 6th was an insurrection and everybody involved should go to jail.
	Which brings us back to the segue of the day.
	So, Loudermilk, segue of the day, what the hell are you talking about?
	Considering the...
	Hold on.
	They came out with an interim report.
	It's an interim report on the...
	They're investigating the January 6th investigation.
	It's freaking phenomenal.
	And by phenomenal, I mean it's revealing freaking criminality.
	Period. Full stop.
	We'll start with...
	We'll start with the executive summary, so to speak, of this report.
	For those with short attention spans like myself, they put out a top-line overview.
	And then for those who want to actually flesh out the actual findings, they give you access to the full report.
	Here we go.
	So how do I share this like such?
	What's my problem, man?
	Okay, it's right there.
	So I'm going to go to my Twitter feed and share.
	Get ready for jail, Liz!
	Alright, so Chairman Loudermilk, this report came out two days ago.
	It's a report.
	They're investigating the investigation.
	And they're finding objective, abject criminality in my humble view.
	And I'll get to what that criminality is for those who...
	May or may not be convinced of said criminality, allegations of.
	Washington Today Committee on House Administration Subcommittee.
	I don't understand what these words mean.
	The Committee on the Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman Barry Loudermilk released an interim report on his findings on the events surrounding the January 6th, 2021, as well as his investigation into the politicization of the January 6th Select Committee.
	This report outlines criminal recommendations against former Representative Liz Cheney.
	Top findings.
	I've highlighted a couple of them.
	Former Representative Liz Cheney colluded with star witness Cassidy Hutchinson without Hutchinson's attorney's knowledge.
	Former Representative Liz Cheney should be investigated for potential criminal witness tampering based on the new information about her communications with...
	What's her face?
	I'm going to forget the first names.
	Cassidy Hutchison.
	Jack Posobiec.
	These tweets were in the report themselves, or these DMs.
	I don't exactly know.
	I have to figure out how they got them.
	I wasn't able to surmise that from perusing the report.
	Alyssa Farah is...
	Reaching out to Hutchison.
	I believe the blue is Hutchison.
	I know you're busy, but is there a chance you've touched base with anyone re what we talked about Tuesday night?
	That's not suspicious wording at all.
	Hey, yes, this is Alyssa.
	I'll tell you who she is in a second.
	So I reached out to Liz.
	She agreed to keep our convo totally confidential.
	Why? She said she admires you and could tell that you wanted to do the right thing.
	Do the right thing from your testimony.
	Her one concern was so long as, I presume that's as you have counsel, she can't really ethically talk to you without him.
	But what she suggested is a follow-up with you, with your lawyer, that she and Dan George can lead.
	Probably can do without other members and Tim.
	Does that help at all?
	I can tell she really wants to work with you and is just trying to figure out the right way to do it.
	I mean, do you think this is actually of interest to her at this point, or is it moot?
	Like, have they moved beyond it?
	Oh, very much of interest.
	She basically just wants to structure it in a way you are comfortable and wants to make sure it's clear if you can speak to them again if it's not asking you so you don't get in trouble and then it gets truncated.
	Okay. Many of you might not know.
	Let me bring this out here.
	Let me see something here.
	Liz Cheney is a lawyer.
	Liz Cheney lawyer.
	Liz Cheney, an American attorney.
	Holy motherfucker.
	Sorry. Okay, look, guys, let me bring this down.
	I was an attorney for 13 years.
	You know this.
	Depending on whether or not you want to think I was a good one or a bad one, I don't care.
	The one thing I know is that my weakest grade in law school was criminal law, and my strongest grade in law school was ethics.
	Because you don't need to study in order to know what's ethical.
	Lawyers, I mean, it's the most fundamental rule of the practice of law.
	And it's one that I was so, I mean, neurotically, obsessively, compulsively obsessed with.
	You do not communicate with someone whom you know to be represented by counsel.
	Period. Full stop.
	You dumbass.
	Corrupt son of a biatch.
	You don't.
	Once upon a time, and this was where I had a bit of a run-in with a colleague in the practice, the mother effer of a lawyer, this is my own anecdote.
	You know, you write back and forth to lawyers all the time.
	That's what you do.
	You write emails, and you're mean, and you're nasty.
	It's sort of like a Twitter war, but more polite.
	And you call them all sorts of names, but legally so, because you know that one day this might end up in front of a judge, and you don't want to be caught calling a lawyer a lying asshole.
	You have to call them a potentially dishonest individual.
	And so I get into it back and forth with a lawyer, and the lawyer then replies to me and berates me.
	Like, just to be expected.
	And I hit reply all with the most kick-ass of comebacks ever.
	Not realizing that the stupid jackass scoundrel of a lawyer had put his own clients in CC to that email.
	So that when I replied all, I replied to him and everyone else in CC.
	Unwittingly, unbeknownst.
	I wouldn't have done it any differently had I known.
	I just hit reply all.
	The guy then didn't file an ethics complaint, threatened it.
	And then I didn't have to go, but I was like, I'm interested in the ethics of this dilemma right here.
	He puts his own clients in CC and then expects me in reply to remove his clients or not reply all.
	But bottom line, I'll let's say it's funny.
	That guy's an asshole.
	If you're watching, go screw yourself.
	I still remember your name.
	All right.
	And people, let me just get this over here.
	People want to ask, you know, Viva, why didn't you stay in the practice of law?
	Because the practice of law consists of 95% of assholes like that.
	They put their clients in CC and then threaten to file ethics complaints when you respond to their bullshit emails copying everyone who they copied in that email.
	Okay, bottom line.
	Takeaway from all of that.
	You don't communicate with a client who you know to be represented.
	And in this case, what we now know is that Liz Cheney knew that Cassidy Hutchison was represented by counsel and that she couldn't go and talk to Cassidy about her testimony.
	In the absence of her counsel, and why would she want to do that in the absence of her counsel, it's a very, very, very confusing thing.
	I mean, who the hell knows why she would want to talk with a witness in the absence of their counsel, presumably about their testimony.
	By the way, Cassidy also lied under oath during her testimony.
	And it's actually, it's so much even worse than that.
	Liz Cheney knows the rule.
	They get her to being ceased, they get her to cease having that attorney as counsel so that Liz Cheney can have discussions with this witness in the absence of counsel, whether or not they overtly coerce her, not coerce, but induce her into providing false testimony because she said a load of things that were just abjectly dishonest and incorrect.
	Here, let me get, let me get, no, that's Stephanie Willis.
	Here, this is the summary.
	You know who did, though? Yogananda Pittman!
	Cassidy Hutchinson falsely claimed to have drafted a handwritten note for President Trump on January 6th.
	Representative Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson baselessly attempted to disbar Hutchinson's former attorney.
	These people, these people being Liz Cheney, is the biggest piece of shit on the planet, tied for first with all the other pieces of shit.
	After she gets Hutchison, you know, she tries to, she's having, through the back channel of Alyssa Farah, we'll get to her in a second, to a...
	Discussions in the absence of her counsel because she knows that she's represented.
	They tried to have her attorney disbarred afterwards.
	Maliciously, wrongly disbarred.
	There's a place for people like that.
	It's called hell.
	Of course, she's living in hell right now on Earth.
	When they say, like, hell is right here, hell is of your making.
	Because Liz Cheney has turned her life into hell, and rightly so, and deservedly so.
	These are evil, evil, awful people.
	In addition to what I believe to be framing.
	All of the Jan Sixers, even the ones who responded to police violence with violence, framing those people, stealing lives, literally, trying to disqualify Trump from the ballot on the basis of insurrection.
	They have no qualms ruining people's lives through procedural, judicial means.
	Hell is what they deserve, and hell is what they're going to get because they're getting it right here on Earth.
	Yes? The kid wants to know if he can play Minecraft in here.
	If you don't mind listening to me yell for the next hour.
	Okay. Don't look at me because it makes me nervous.
	All right.
	I'm homeschooling, by the way, guys.
	Not only homeschooling, but it's Christmas.
	So the kids are writing exams and then coming home.
	And I'm single parenting for the rest of the week because my wife is back up in Commie Canada.
	And it's just...
	It's endless chauffeuring.
	It's endless cooking.
	It's endless cleaning.
	Tangent. By about 10 o'clock in the morning, I have picked up poop.
	Touched raw meat.
	I've washed my hands seven times.
	Volume down.
	I can't tell you how many times I've washed my hands because I pick up dog poo, clean up dog pee, feed the dogs, then I've got to feed the kids, touch raw eggs, clean my hands, drive kids, drive kids.
	I told one kid, I was like, okay, dad is no longer chauffeuring between 11.30 and 2.30.
	And then she says, without even blinking an eye, yep, and at 2.30 you're chauffeuring me to Target.
	Okay, so where were we?
	We were on Chaney.
	Please stop making noise.
	All right.
	Now, where were we on the Cheney report?
	Hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Jack Posobiec.
	We'll get there in a second.
	So, objective wrongdoing.
	And then you have people say, well, what laws did she break?
	What laws did you...
	Viva, be specific.
	You're a lawyer, right, David?
	I love when people on the internet use your first name as though it's some sort of, like, attack.
	Although it's actually a pathological narcissistic tactic, which I try not to do.
	Like, I call Billy Baldwin Billy Boy, and I do it to irritate, but it's a distinct personality disorder type tactic.
	You should tell us what law is being broken.
	Use equivalent Canadian law if your knowledge of American...
	Precedent is patchy, which it would be.
	Some of you might read this and not realize this person was systematically a troll.
	So there was a benefit of the doubt was given for a long time.
	And to which I replied, considering the evidence demonstrates Liz was communicating with a witness she knew to be represented in the absence of counsel for that witness, and then she tried to have that counsel disbarred, and was allegedly suborning perjury from that witness, which in fact lied under oaths that we just saw.
	Which ones?
	Here are the two.
	Subornation of perjury.
	And tampering with a witness, victim, or informant.
	And it's as clear as day what they've done.
	And by the way, destroying evidence after this committee hearing?
	The committee was not lawfully formed.
	Let me get back to the findings, the executive summary findings, before we get into who Elissa Farah is.
	I've got to bring this up.
	It's just laid bare for everyone to see here.
	Former Representative Liz Cheney used the January 6th Select Committee as a tool to attack President Trump at the cost of investigative integrity and capital security.
	The January 6th Committee was improperly constituted and lacked authority.
	Thanks for finding this out now, Loudermilk.
	I don't want to pull the whole, you know, you got there too late.
	Bannon already went to jail for defying, for contempt of subpoena from this unlawfully formed committee.
	So it's great that we're now, you know, Republicans are looking into it and they've had a committee to investigate.
	The committee was always unlawfully formed.
	It didn't meet the quorum.
	It didn't have a bipartisan element to it.
	The bipartisan element is law-breaking Liz Cheney.
	And now they're finally coming to the conclusion that it was improperly constituted and lacked authority to do things like issue subpoenas, which means that you can't be in contempt of an unlawfully issued subpoena from an unlawfully formed committee that didn't have the authority to issue the subpoena in the first place.
	The January 6 select committee neglected or withheld evidence from its final report and deleted voluminous records it should have preserved.
	The Department of Defense scapegoated the Washington, D.C. National Guard to distract blame from senior leadership.
	We all knew that.
	The FBI and Capitol Police both failed to investigate individuals responsible for the fake gallows.
	Why would you investigate people for fake gallows?
	How about the bomb?
	How about the pipe bomb?
	No? Subcommittee published more than 44,000 hours from the end.
	The subcommittee conducted extensive review of investigation into the two type pipe bombs on January 5 and 6, and the report is set to be released within the next few days.
	Holy shit, people.
	Click on the full report.
	Here, check this out.
	Let's just go over here for one second.
	I think it was on page.
	It's so much fun.
	It's all at the tips of our finger.
	Scroll down and look for the blue text message from Alyssa.
	Here we go.
	Look at this.
	Alyssa Farah Griffin back-channeled with Vice Chair Liz Cheney to help Hutchison change her story.
	For nearly a month, Farah Griffin acted as an intermediary between Vice Chair Cheney and the select committee's star witness, Hutchison.
	As an intermediary, Farah Griffin helped coordinate Hutchison's third transcribed interview.
	Without the knowledge of Hutchison's attorney, Stefan Passantino.
	In a television panel with a member of the Select Subcommittee, Representative Raskin.
	Ratskin is what he is.
	He's a human enveloped in ratskin.
	A year following the end of the Select Committee, Hutchison freely stated that she had, quote, back-channeled for a third interview without my former attorney's knowledge at the time with one of my good friends, Alyssa Farah Griffin.
	76 footnote.
	Okay. At this time, Farah Griffin and Hutchison Hutchinson discussed the optics of Hutchinson leaking, quote, new information, end quote, to the press instead of testifying directly to the subcommittee.
	Hutchinson's messages indicated that she and Farah Griffin colluded to create a false story about why Hutchinson needed to do a third transcribed interview for the select subcommittee to convince her attorney, Pasantino.
	And then we got the text here.
	In her May 17, 2021 transcribed interview, Hutchinson testified to a series of uncorroborated and unverified stories that conveniently fit the select committee's anti-Trump narrative.
	Despite already testifying to the subcommittee twice, Hutchinson never previously mentioned this, quote, new information.
	The subcommittee was only able to obtain a limited number of text messages from Hutchinson and Farah, but Representative Cheney's influence on...
	Hutchison is apparent from that point forward by her dramatic change in testimony and eventual claims against Donald Trump using second and third-hand accounts.
	For example, Hutchison claimed that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Attorney Ornato told her that Trump lunged towards his car to request to go to the Capitol when his request to go to the Capitol was denied.
	This story has never been corroborated and was directly refuted by both the United States Secret Service agents in the vehicle with President Trump that day and Ornato himself.
	It goes on.
	But what I wanted to show you was this.
	Passentino. Let's go to the part where they tried to disbar Passentino.
	Is this it?
	No? Yeah, here.
	Finding Seven.
	They tried to disbar the lawyer.
	After the Hutchinson switched attorneys at Cheney's direction, the select committee needed to shore up Hutchinson's credibility as a witness and explain away her ever-changing testimony.
	To do this, the select subcommittee created a narrative.
	That would make Passentino the scapegoat.
	They manufactured the story that Passentino gave Hutchison faulty advice, such as instructing Hutchison to withhold information, to misrepresent her testimony, and even that Passentino implied he would help Hutchison with future employment in return for favorable testimony.
	Contrary to the select committee and Hutchison's narrative, however, the subcommittee obtained messages between Alyssa Farah Griffin and Hutchison where Hutchison admits that Passentino was.
	Acting in her best interest and that she agreed with his counsel.
	And then we can look at this.
	Hmm. I can't read that.
	That was Liz's direction.
	How do you feel about just doing it with Stefan but answering more questions?
	You can handle yourself and he's just there as a figurehead.
	And basically, give the ultimatum A. We'll come back when we need the assurance.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, hold on.
	He's not acting against...
	He's not acting against me.
	He's actually sort of willing to do it because he thinks it builds my credibility as a witness.
	But he wants just enough from the committee to balance out the public backlash from the lawsuit and to frame me as a super compliant, respectful of congressional subpoenas.
	He's going to call George this afternoon.
	Can you tip off Liz or Dan?
	Who's Dan?
	Goldman? And see their thoughts.
	Elissa Farah.
	Hmm, okay.
	That was definitely Liz's direction.
	How do you feel about just doing it with Steph?
	I'm personally fine with Liz, with just Liz and Dan, but I have a feeling he'll want it structurally.
	Oh, Dan is her new lawyer, I guess.
	Same as my other depots, but I haven't gotten that far with him yet.
	Where was the part where it confirms it?
	The subcommittee has no reason to believe the select committee coordinated with Washington, D.C. Bar Association.
	The subcommittee has reason to believe that the select committee...
	Coordinated with the Washington, D.C. Bar Association to file an ethics complaint against Passantino.
	The select committee did this by using the content of its not-yet-public report to accuse Passantino of instructing Hutchinson to lie to congressional investigators, sharing information about her testimony with the press over her objections, sharing information about her testimony with other attorneys, and not disclosing who was paying the bill for her representation.
	This complaint reviewed by the subcommittee was finalized by the DC bar and sent to Passantino of the same day the select sub, the select committee's nearly 900 paperboard was filed.
	All Barthas complaint against Passantino was ultimately dismissed and he was cleared of all the allegations lodged against them.
	This episode further demonstrates Hutchinson's willingness to create a false public record that contradicts the truth.
	Can you believe that?
	There is nothing more evil than gleefully, remorselessly trying to ruin somebody's life.
	Now, I've been saying that we're going to get to Farah.
	Alyssa Farah Griffin.
	And who she is.
	Let me bring this one up.
	Can we see this one?
	I think we can, people.
	Ah, Alyssa Faragriff, look at this.
	In the same week, it was revealed that CNN journalists, I should have put journalists in quotes there, Clarissa Ward and Alyssa Faragriff respectively produced propaganda for terrorist entities and conspired to violate civil rights, subvert democracy.
	When do these propagandists face professional legal sanctions for such egregious, unethical, and probably illegal conduct?
	Faragriff, by the way.
	The View, co-host, CNN political commentator, prior White House, Pentagon, Cap Hill, was a career spokesperson, I guess.
	These are my words.
	Oh, very nice.
	And you all remember Clarissa Ward.
	We're going to have to do that in a second.
	CNN chief international correspondent.
	All views are my own.
	Yep. Because your views are propaganda and lies.
	So within the same week, now this happened a long time ago, but within the same week, we got two...
	CNN commentators, whatever the hell they want to call themselves, participating in the most egregious, unethical conduct imaginable.
	And those were the receipts that I brought.
	So Alyssa Farah Griffin, CNN propagandist.
	On The View.
	I mean, I didn't know that she was on The View.
	I don't know.
	I know Sonny, Whoopi, Joy Behar.
	Who's another one on that show?
	I don't watch The View.
	And that's that.
	Do we have any questions about Liz Cheney, people?
	Okay. Let's go over to...
	Oh, that's why I'm not seeing them, because I didn't put the...
	Oh, there we go.
	Bill Tong's in the house, peeps.
	Bill Tong sent me some steak, a big-ass tomahawk, and some...
	I believe it's tailbone.
	Meat. And it's beautiful.
	I'm going to make a nice soup out of that.
	King of Biltong in the house is get yourself some tasty high-protein snacks.
	Biltong is packed with B12, iron, zinc, creatine, and more.
	Perfect for Carnival keto diets.
	Available at BiltongUSA.com.
	Code VIVATEN for 10% off.
	We stream every Friday and Sunday, 4 p.m.
	Eastern, 3 p.m.
	Central. Shit-talking.
	Whilst cooking real food.
	We cook interesting things and talk up a storm.
	Follow our channel.
	Eat at Anton's.
	And I see best show ever right there from Alabama.
	Thank you very much.
	Clarissa Ward has been putting out bullshit for years.
	I'm surprised she has any credibility anymore.
	Yeah, she put out that video from Gaza when she's lying on the ground.
	You guys should watch the Unusual Suspects episode from yesterday.
	We talked about that there.
	Oh, Bill Tong says, let me know if you need recipes.
	Dude, I'm a very simple man.
	On a barbecue, that's it.
	It's very annoying, this thing.
	I have to reboot my computer.
	Okay, take the pin off here.
	What I wanted to do is make sure that I haven't forgotten anything as relates to this particular story.
	Spending bill, spending bill, spending bill, spending bill.
	Oh, this was, was this, what was this one?
	Oh yeah, that was the, okay, fine, we got that.
	That's the text messages.
	And I think we did it.
	Let me see something here.
	I'm going to go send an invite to somebody.
	Okay.
	on.
	Okay. Boom.
	Okay. I think that is it for the interim report.
	Jack Posobiec.
	Here's Liz Cheney.
	Oh, yeah.
	No, Jack.
	Oh, gosh.
	Look at this.
	This is Jack.
	Here are Liz Cheney's text messages with Kat G. Hutchinson.
	They show multiple calls between Cheney and Hutchinson without lawyers present.
	In fact, Hutchinson was sharing her lawyer's private texts with Cheney.
	Well, and I'm not going to disagree.
	I'm not going to quibble with Posobiec just for the sake of it.
	Hutchinson can do whatever the hell she wants.
	Cheney is violating the most fundamental rule of ethics for attorneys.
	At the very least, ethics complaint and disbar the biatch.
	Can I make that a hashtag trend?
	Disbar the biatch.
	Look at this.
	Hi, this is Cassidy Hudsonson.
	I'm sorry for reaching out this way, but I was hoping to have a private conversation with you soon, if you are willing.
	I would be happy to.
	Let me know what time works for you.
	I'm free all day.
	For a call or in person, whichever you prefer.
	I really, really appreciate this.
	Miss call.
	Give me a call when good for you.
	Is now okay?
	Can we aim for one?
	That works for me.
	Sorry I missed you.
	Please call in your mode.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Oh, that's nice.
	Let's lose change.
	Will call shortly.
	Sorry, got stuck in another call.
	Call again.
	And then we see here.
	Can we see this?
	This is from...
	Oh my gosh.
	This is her lawyer.
	With DOJ refusing to hold Mark and Scavino in contempt and with the committee talking about you to the press again, I don't see why we do anything more with them.
	There is a small element of risk to refusing to coordinate, but I think it's the best move for you.
	Do you agree?
	Do they reach out live about the hearing?
	They have not.
	Okay. Can I call you tomorrow?
	Of course, everything okay.
	Okay, that's nice.
	What happened there?
	Okay. So, yeah.
	That's it.
	That's it.
	It's outrageous.
	Okay, fine.
	Okay, okay, okay, okay.
	Let's go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and see what's going on here.
	Spuds says, Viva, remember when you questioned my proposal for annexing parts of Canada?
	Looks like Donald J. Trump watches your chat.
	Look, the joke about the 51st state is hilarious.
	And anybody who's feigning outrage needs to check their funny bone.
	Stephen Britton says, nothing yet, Viva Frye.
	Did you send the invite to the right address, Stephen?
	Don't be miffed, Stephen.
	Not alone, no.
	You have to wait for me.
	Are you almost done?
	Yes, I'm almost done.
	Go watch another episode of Kikiwaka and get out.
	The kid can't go fishing alone because there's gators out here.
	And where's my stabby knife?
	Yes, when I say I'm going to go medieval on those gators, I mean medieval.
	This is not a real arrowhead.
	We bought it, but it's good.
	It's nice and sharp.
	Okay. We'll see here.
	I was joking.
	I know, Stephen, I'm joking.
	I sent the invite to Pisco, the guy that I had on a while back, the lefty, because I said I'm not interested in having a discussion with Destiny.
	Period. Full stop.
	We can go back and forth on Twitter, and it's probably better to do things in writing because it allows for less wiggle room, but I'm simply not having discussions with people who I think are fundamentally immoral, scoundrel, disgusting people.
	Period. I don't have to.
	He's not that smart.
	If he were smarter...
	You know, you might forego moral qualms to have what could be a productive intellectual discussion.
	He's not that smart.
	He's just an asshole.
	And he wants to spread propaganda on Twitter, all replied point by point.
	What's the need for a discussion after that?
	All right.
	Hold on.
	Oh, that's great.
	Thank you.
	No, you've seen...
	Oh, gosh.
	Oh, you piece of junk!
	This flipping camera.
	I... Sorry, guys.
	Give me a second.
	That's very, very, very annoying.
	Yeah, that's right.
	I forgot the thing's tracking my stupid face now.
	Good. I won't hit play to listen to Destiny, says triple exits.
	No, it's...
	The funny thing is...
	When everybody gets their ass handed to them in a point-by-point rebuttal to a tweet, they demand a debate.
	First of all, I don't use the word debate.
	I'll have a discussion.
	I'll have a discussion with pretty much anybody unless I deem them to be an absolute POS who has transgressed the lines of human decency, which destiny has as far as I'm concerned.
	Will Bannon get recompense?
	The answer to that is going to be a big fat no.
	Will he get any compensation?
	Will he get any justice?
	I don't think so.
	Pink shorts.
	I'll have you know they're not pink.
	They're salmon.
	Salmon is a very popular color in Florida.
	That's it.
	Let me see what we've got going on here, because I didn't have the...
	Canada would have to be two states.
	You know what's going to...
	I've got a funny joke here.
	Crash Bandit says, Canada would have to be two states.
	We need to balance out Canada's capital with the rest of the country.
	It'll be straight up carving up Canada.
	A portion of it goes back to England.
	Quebec goes to France.
	And the West goes to America.
	Because it's true.
	There was that funny video of the AI of Trump.
	What sense does it make?
	You have to drive through Canada to get to parts of America?
	Although there is a part in America where you have to drive through America to get to parts of Canada.
	There's a little peninsula that is a landlocked piece of Canada in America.
	Is it landlocked?
	The only way to get there is by driving through America or taking a boat over.
	It's Sam and I tells you if they look pink, it's only because they've gotten washed out.
	In the wash.
	Viva, just a quick question.
	Where do you get your eyeglasses from, and what is the name of the frames?
	I get them.
	I'm a very fancy person.
	See, I go to Stanton Optical, and I get the BOGO, which is the buy one, get one.
	I'm living large, people.
	So these are from Stanton Optical.
	I do actually love them.
	They are brown, multicolor, designed in Palm Springs, probably made in China.
	And they are the RESW-20-02.
	Respect. R-E-S-P-E-C.
	Those are the glasses.
	The dog is going to have to wait out there.
	Okay, so I think that's good.
	I think we got everything.
	We're going to get into the budget now.
	Let's do the budget.
	Unless I've missed anything over in Locals.
	Going down to the bottom.
	It's the Florida Pink Salmon Equals Like King Candy from Wreck-It Ralph.
	Spud says, Viva, we will take the Maritimes.
	They have natural gas and lobsters.
	The joke is funny.
	Okay, now.
	Now the last thing of the day.
	It's an amazing thing what sunlight brings to the world.
	The budget.
	What do they call it now?
	The continuing resolution, the spending bill.
	Here, let me see this here.
	Where was it where I said it's amazing what happens when you shine the light on things?
	The spending bill, now that it's got the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs on the platform, which is actual true journalism, covering it.
	It's amazing what the internet is picking out of this bill, which is 1,547 pages long, and specifically so because they want to make it impossible for anybody to read.
	I actually should start with Vivek Ramaswamy's assessment of this bill.
	Is it this one?
	This is very irritating because I'm getting a little distracted.
	Flipping dog.
	Let's start here.
	Lauren Lee.
	Who is busy dismantling the propaganda media at SheIsLaurenLee website.
	SheIsLaurenLee.com.
	I don't know who she is.
	This is not a paper.
	It's doing good work.
	The spending bill would have blocked RFK Jr. from updating his HHS, that is Health and Human Services Protocol on Vaccine Injuries, on page 757.
	Because what's happening right now is you've got everybody on the internet looking through this bill with their own eyes and their own perspectives.
	She's looking for things related to COVID vaccines.
	Page 757.
	The bill amends the previously passed, quote, prevent pandemic act.
	Quote, the secretary may not revise the vaccine injury table to include a vaccine for which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a recommendation for routine use in children or pregnant women until at least one application for such vaccine has been approved.
	Upon such revision of the vaccine injury table, all vaccines in a vaccine category on the vaccine injury table, including vaccines authorized under emergency use, shall be considered included in the vaccine injury table.
	They also added, quote, an injury or death related to the administration at a time when the vaccine was covered, was a covered countermeasure subject to a declaration under the bill, shall not be eligible for compensation under the program.
	I Really, really, that dog is annoying.
	I don't know how to get the camera not to track me the way it did the last time.
	Is it gonna stop?
	Okay, we're taking a chance, people.
	Yes. Get in.
	Let's go.
	in.
	The dog decided she wanted to come back in.
	Okay. So that's one element to it.
	Vivek Ramaswamy put out a short video, and it's amazing.
	I mean, you've got the smartest people on the internet dissecting these things in real time, whereas they would have passed in the dead of night, and you would have had to pass them to know what's in them, to quote What's-Her-Face.
	They would have passed in the dead of night, and no one would have known.
	And by the time anybody decides to look into it, good luck understanding it, and good luck getting it to the masses, because back in the day when media was captured, it would never have happened, period.
	Now, they slap a 1,547-page bill.
	They've got Vivek and his team going through it.
	They've got Elon Musk and his team going through it.
	They've got every independent, I'm not putting independent in quotes, independent journalist.
	They've got people who just want to understand the world, looking through it in real time.
	They're not getting away with this shit anymore.
	And they know it.
	Let's hear what Vivek has to say.
	Congress is about to pass a bill that blows away your taxpayer money.
	But they made it over 1500 pages long so you wouldn't read it.
	I did you a favor.
	I read it for you.
	It's supposed to be about keeping government operations open and providing disaster relief aid to hurricane victims, which I'm sympathetic to.
	If you read the bill carefully, it contains Pay raises for members of Congress, and I'm not making this up, an expansion of their federal health benefits.
	It contains all kinds of special interests and pork funding, including opening up a new stadium in Washington, D.C. It renews the Global Engagement Center, which is a keynote of the censorship industrial complex.
	And the worst part is...
	They didn't want you to know about any of it, and that's why they made this a last-minute jam job.
	The reason I'm co-heading Doge is I think we need outsiders to bring actual accountability to Washington, D.C. So feel free to call your congressman and let them know how you feel about it.
	Congress is about to pass a bill that blows away your taxpayer money, but they made it over 1,500 pages long so you wouldn't read it.
	I did you a favor.
	I read it for you.
	It's supposed to be about- Vivek is looking through DOGE perspective, Department of Governmental Efficiency perspective.
	That's fine.
	You can't pass a bill without giving them their raises.
	Everybody knows that, you freaking morons.
	Just like during COVID pandemic, when everybody's shut down, businesses are shut down, and we're locked in our homes under house arrest.
	Jagmeet Singhs of The World and the MPs in Canada got three pay raises.
	We are all looking at this now, scrutinizing it and disseminating it freely on Rumble through the Bonginos of the world who are reaching more people weekly than basically all legacy media combined.
	And you've got the biggest, brightest brains looking at this.
	And more importantly, you've got the critical eyes of others making sure that people get it right.
	But just imagine this.
	Before the age of the internet, you would never have had access to the report itself.
	1,500 pages.
	You would never have had access to the report itself.
	Period. You'd have to go to a library, go get a physical copy in person.
	If they had control over the internet, you might be able to access the bill if you wanted to, but your reach might be severely stifled if what you were saying was not flattering of the bill that they want to pass.
	So this is the bill.
	No, that's not the bill.
	I'm on the wrong tab now.
	This is the bill.
	That's not the bill.
	That's it.
	Where the hell's the bill?
	I just opened up the window.
	It's this one?
	No. This is the bill.
	Okay, scrolling up and down.
	1,547 pages.
	So nobody's going to be able to read that.
	Period. Full stop.
	It's certainly not within the time frame within which they want to get this thing passed.
	So you have people break it down into sections.
	You have teams break it down and look for what you're looking for.
	What is of interest to you?
	You know what was of interest to me in this?
	I'll tell you what I did first.
	Here. Control-F.
	Ukraine. Didn't come up.
	Okay. Interesting.
	I was just checking.
	Are they offering another...
	$10 billion to Ukraine in the, what do they call this?
	The continued spending bill?
	Whatever the hell this thing's called.
	Okay, so Ukraine's not in there.
	What I did learn, I went to see, oh, Russia.
	Oh, Russia's in there once.
	It's very interesting.
	Because it's either going to be not in there.
	Okay, fine.
	Not covering it.
	In there 50 times.
	Okay, yeah, we got to spend more money for Ukraine.
	More funding for Ukraine.
	Ukraine democracy, yada, yada.
	But it's in there once.
	And so I find Russia in there once.
	And then I just go and look at what we're talking about here.
	Look at this, people.
	This is in the section of limitation related to countries of concern conducting certain research.
	Well, if you come across that header, that doesn't mean anything.
	Okay.
	Done. Pandemics.
	Here, listen to this.
	Section 2315 of the Prevent Pandemics Act.
	42 United States Code 6627 is amended to read as follows.
	This is the only section in the entire 1,547 pages where the word Russia appears.
	Limitation on countries of concern conducting certain research.
	What kind of research is that?
	In general, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, referred to in this section as the Secretary, shall not fund research that may reasonably be anticipated to involve the creation, transfer, and use of enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential or biological agents or toxins listed pursuant to Section 351A of the Public Health Service Act.
	If such research is conducted by a foreign entity at a facility located...
	Can we go back and read this?
	Just like everyone's probably a little bit overwhelmed if you haven't seen my tweet from earlier today.
	Try to make sense of the double negatives, triple negatives, quadruple negatives that are going on in this statement here.
	Okay. The Secretary of HHS shall not fund, so he will not fund research that may reasonably be anticipated to involve the creation, transfer, and or use of enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential.
	That's gain of function, as far as I understand it.
	They're not going to fund gain of function research, but it's not just that, period.
	It's they're not going to fund gain of function research if The research is conducted by a foreign entity at a facility located in a country of concern.
	So we're not going to fund gain-of-function if it's conducted by the foreign entity at a facility in their country.
	So first of all, just like the first most obvious thing, why the fuck are we funding in any realm, anywhere, what is effectively gain-of-function research?
	Why are we funding it, period?
	But this doesn't even say that they're not going to fund it.
	It doesn't even say that they're not going to fund it if it's done in a country of concern.
	They say we're not going to fund it if it's done by the foreign entity at a facility located in a country that is of concern.
	Understand what that leaves open by way of loophole.
	It leaves open the same loophole that led to the gain-of-function research at the lab in Wuhan, China.
	Well, it wasn't being conducted by...
	I don't know who it was being conducted by, but the argument might be there.
	It wasn't being funded by the government, so the funding is okay, because it's conducted at a lab controlled by the foreign entity in the foreign country, that being China, but it wasn't being funded by HSS.
	It was being funded by EcoAlliance, whatever the hell that NGO intermediary was.
	This is outrageous.
	Like, period, full stop, it's outrageous.
	It is nothing shy of the ratification of funding.
	Gain-of-function research if it's at a facility that's not in a country of concern.
	You know what country that would include?
	Ukraine. And you know what's been going on in Ukraine?
	Bioweapons research.
	It's an oldie, but it's a good one.
	Bioweapons research.
	Newland. Tweet.
	Viva Frye.
	I wish I could get it faster, but whatever.
	I wasn't thinking we were going to get here.
	Why nobody believes that?
	Bioweapons Newland tweet.
	Oh, come on.
	This is when Victoria Newland basically confirmed.
	There we go.
	It's unbelievable.
	Can we get up here?
	Oh, well, this isn't it anyhow.
	There are bioweapons research facilities.
	Let's see if I can just get to that.
	Oh, here we go.
	I just need the video.
	Why is everybody quoting it?
	There we go.
	Here we go.
	We got it.
	What's his face?
	Marco Rubio.
	Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?
	Ukraine has...
	Biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of.
	So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of I'm sure you're aware of that.
	Don't you love their soft, nasally, well-curated, polite, clear...
	There are bio-research facilities and we're very...
	It all makes sense now.
	And you understand it now.
	And it's always been under our noses for all of us to see in real time.
	So good.
	This spending bill...
	Allows HHS to fund gain-of-function research if it's done in a facility that is not run by a country of interest, in a country that is not a country of concern, Ukraine.
	And now we know it.
	All right.
	That's not it, though.
	There's more.
	I don't know.
	Benny Johnson.
	We got Benny Johnson on it.
	I love Benny.
	Benny Johnson has his own.
	Political perspective to look through this bill.
	And he came across an element of wokeism in this, where they want to change the definition of offender to something less offensive to the offenders.
	This was at page 950.
	Justice involved individual.
	This is...
	338 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act is amended by striking offender and inserting justice-involved individual, and in the manner of proceedings of paragraph A, by striking offender and inserting justice-involved individual.
	I can understand the context under which this amendment is being proposed or this change is being proposed.
	If it's in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, they're trying to give people second chances in life.
	You don't want to call them offenders because that carries stigma.
	So let's call them justice-involved.
	You don't want to call them homeless because that carries stigma, so let's call them unhoused.
	You don't want to call them illegal aliens because that involves stigma, so let's call them undocumented migrants.
	Let's just change the meaning of words, and then lo and behold, you raging dumbasses, in 10 years' time, justice-involved individual is going to be just as pejorative as offender isn't today.
	Let's replace the word that we argue wrongly is offensive.
	There's nothing offensive about illegal aliens.
	It's what they are under the law.
	There's nothing offensive about offender.
	It's what they are under the law.
	What was the other one that I used earlier?
	I forget.
	They changed the terms for politically correct terms without realizing that if they thought the original term that they just replaced was politically incorrect offensive, the replacement becomes equally politically incorrect offensive over time also, you morons.
	So you got your element of wokeism.
	You got your element of inhumane crimes against humanity research on...
	Gain-of-function research that we can now continue to fund and carry out in Ukraine.
	And was there any other element to that that I wanted to highlight?
	Yeah, that was my tweet on it.
	Ukrainians. Hornet18 says the war crimes are coming and Biden and his pals are going down.
	You understand why they needed to take down or at least try to take down Telegram.
	Why the FBI comes in and basically threatens Zuckerberg.
	Why they are going after Elon almost like it's coordinated.
	You'll notice here, I noticed a couple.
	The talking point of the day is it's an oligarchy and Elon is the oligarch.
	Chris put out earlier today.
	Here, check this out.
	And I had noticed it yesterday.
	Here, check this here.
	Chris says, I gotta say, Elon Musk is really exposing how unhinged and rattled the power structure really is.
	Seeing posts from representatives of the House that I never thought I'd see.
	And then you go down.
	This guy, Michael Trippi, is not a member of the...
	But just go look.
	Everybody is saying the same thing.
	The amount of influence that Elon Musk has on our government is the ultimate example of corporate capture of the entire system.
	Just because it benefits you today doesn't mean it always will.
	What happens when he supports something you don't agree with?
	Thanks for your deep thought, you dumb jackass.
	And here's Bernie Sanders.
	Democrats and Republicans spent months negotiating a bipartisan agreement to fund our government.
	The richest man on earth, President Elon Musk, doesn't like it.
	Is this a parody account?
	No, it isn't.
	Will Republicans kiss the ring?
	Billionaires must not be allowed to run our government.
	You stupid idiot, Bernie.
	Speaking of kissing the ring, I think you got a Hillary Clinton butthole to go kiss.
	It's not the richest man on earth who doesn't like it.
	It's nobody who's paying attention to it likes it.
	Oh, it's bipartisan?
	You mean like what they said about the bipartisan border bill?
	That was a Ukrainian and Israel aid package?
	partisan, all that it means is that you got crooks on both the left and the right in government, Bernie, and you're one of them.
	You're one of them.
	Okay. That is all, people.
	What I'm going to do right now is there's some stuff left over here.
	I'm going to do it over at vivabornslaw.locals.com.
	My kid might get a little frustrated if I don't go do something goofy.
	It's an amazing thing.
	I... I nag that kid to go fishing with me.
	I beg him to go fishing with me.
	It's always a no, no, no, no, no.
	Then I'm live.
	Let's go fishing, Dad.
	Holy crap.
	He knows what he's doing.
	And then I'm going to get up.
	We're going to say, let's go fishing.
	I don't want it.
	I'm joking.
	He's not going to say it.
	It's amazing.
	I think it's knowing that you can't have something makes you want it more, even when in ordinary times when I beg that kid to go fishing and he says no.
	Let's go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	For our after party.
	Make sure that I haven't forgotten anything.
	I'm going to go to the tip questions just to make sure.
	Devil Dog Mom says, can we talk about the CR?
	Devil Dog Mom, what do you mean by that?
	FreeSC01 says, Viva, you like gin.
	You should try Hat Trick.
	It's made here in Charlestown, North Carolina.
	Hat Trick gin.
	I'm fairly certain I've had this.
	I like the bottle.
	Okay, I haven't had that.
	And let me make sure that I haven't forgotten anything over on the Rumble Rants.
	Everybody, get your butts on over there.
	I'll put out a short video this afternoon on both of these issues.
	Just, you know, I'll do them from the car when I'm waiting in the parking lot of a Target for my kid who's getting Christmas presents.
	Okay, link to locals.
	Come on over.
	And if you're not so inclined, I will see you tomorrow.
	Let's get some of the chat in the bottom here.
	Kosher mafia, Bolshevik mafia, Stalinist, communist.
	Okay, I don't know what that's about.
	Colonel Sanders and his boys make it finger-licking good.
	Okay, what am I getting involved in here?
	Bernie has been selected for years per Vermont citizens.
	Psychological warfare says neurodivergent one.
	Have fun with the kids.
	Billionaires are hard to buy off, says Decimal Threat.
	That's a good statement there.
	I might have to steal that and pretend it was mine.
	And we'll just end on the main channel by saying, I called it.
	Booyah. Fanny Willis.
	Spanked. Alright, get your butts on over to Locals Only supporters if you are so inclined.
	And if not, I will see you tomorrow is Friday.
	Saturday, transit.
	And then Sunday, live from Commie Canada.
	People, I will see you tomorrow this afternoon.
	And Locals, I'm coming right now.
	Peace out, Rumble.

▲